British journalist and political activist for the Socialist Workers Party.
Harmann was involved with activism against the Viet Nam war but became controversial for denouncing Ho Chi Minh for murdering the leader of the Vietnamese Trotskists.
Harman's work on May 1968 in France and other student and workers uprisings of the late 1960s, The Fire Last Time, was recommended by rock band Rage Against the Machine in their album sleeve notes for Evil Empire.
I didn't like the chapter on feminism so much. But the rest of the book is pretty good as an introduction to Marxism-Leninism, though you should know it is Marxism of the Trotskyist-Cliffite variety, and therefore has its own particular slant. It's not too partisan, however. A better introduction to Marxism than any other I've read. It was good to go right back and clarify things for me as I'm working my way through Capital and wanted to ground myself in the basic ideas of Marx and Engels again. Highly recommended for beginner Reds.
A very readable introduction to Marxist politics marred somewhat by a lack of explanation on a few key issues brought up, which makes the work as a whole feel slightly patronising - a bunch of examples are listed to back up easy to understand and accept points and then more confusing or contentious points are presented as facts. Also gives a pretty shitty accounting of feminism and toes the Trot (specifically the UK SWP) line slavishly.
the book is simplified without losing any concepts, I enjoyed it all except the part on feminism because it focuses on class while disregarding matters that are as old aa humanity itself like sexism and racism, it should've included something about intersectionality and show how feminists like Angela Davis augmented to the Marxist theory
How Marxism Works is a readable outline of many of the key themes of Marxist thought and practise. Topics covered include Class Struggle, The Labour Theory of Value, Economic Crises, Revolutionary Parties, Imperialism, a Marxist critique of Feminism, etc. In other words, the greatest hits.鈥ㄢ€�
The perspective is very much that of the Socialist Worker鈥檚 Party which Chris Harman belonged to, with its broadly Trotskyite interpretation of Marxism and requisite swipes at the British Labour Party (the further reading section is mostly a list of various SWP books and pamphlets). Nevertheless, it is nice to read an introductory Marxist work that doesn鈥檛 shy away from the inevitable violence of revolutionary struggle. Rather than presenting a more palatable 鈥榮ocial democratic鈥� version of Marxism so as to avoid unsettling the newcomer, Harman bluntly rejects the notion that 鈥榮ocialism can be introduced gradually and without violence鈥� through reform. He also insists on the need for any revolutionary socialist party to be centrally controlled鈥斺€榝or it is an active party, not a debating society鈥欌€攕o that decisions can taken, acted on, and only afterwards debated and subjected to democratic judgement (such as a change of leadership if necessary). Needless to say, this strikes a different tone from the leaderless, decentralized political movements that have sprung up in recent years (and which have conspicuously failed to gain concessions for their causes).
I am less convinced of Harman鈥檚 critique of feminism which resembles a caricature of what is now referred to as class reductionism. For example: 鈥楩eminism starts with the assumption that oppression overrides class division. This leads to conclusions which leave class society intact鈥�; and 鈥榃omen鈥檚 liberation can be achieved only through the collective power of the working class. This means rejecting the feminist idea of women鈥檚 separate organisations鈥�. It is worth remembering, however, that Harman was writing in the late 1970s when many of the important debates on this topic were yet to occur.
Overall, despite its age, this remains a solid primer on Marxism, and one that will certainly appeal to anyone allergic to the weasel words employed by many recent writers.
A very basic intro to Marxism and socialism. Solid stuff, of course, but reading the fourth, 1993 edition, I wondered if the latest one takes into account the structural changes in the working class--away from classic steel factories (used as examples here) to semi-white collar service and office work. At the same time, when Harman in 1993 (originally 1979) talks about stripping down the welfare state, he couldn't probably have imagined how much worse off we're now. So, always topical.
A quick easy read, leaving you baffled as to why there are so many apologists of the measly Capitalist system despite its ruin and obvious inequality, screaming poverty or you could find yourself loving all the power belonging to one section of ruled Society, the almighty, powerful white man. Good book, crap system.
As a beginner to reading about Marxist concepts/ideas, I really appreciated how Harman discussed very important themes in clear and concise ways. Although he is simply scratching the surface, his book provides helpful language and explanations that will help facilitate one's initial learning and understanding of marxism.
I really appreciated how accessible this book was to the average person, and how it didnt have any complicated jargon. I appreciated the inclusion of imperialism and feminism in it also. My one critic is that I wish it included works from non Europeans.
Se lee r谩pido y esta muy claro, me ayudo a tener una perspectiva mas clara de los problemas que pasan en el neoliberalismo y ayudarme a construir una soluci贸n.
So I was suggested this pamphlet by a communist friend (who I think very highly of) who I've had the privilege of having quite a few conversations where I've definitely gotten the sensation that I should really engage with communism more than 'communism bad cause it leads to corruption which leads to totalarianism'.
This pamphlet was pretty much exactly what I needed. A plain English explanation of Marxism. I do get the impression that it was slightly oversimplified and I was quite consciously aware that it wasn't very comparative. It gave a very positive view of Marxism that may be truthful but given my (likely poorly construed) understanding of how Marxism is understood culturally, I'm left a little wary about reading this pamphlet and immediately leaping into self identifying as a Marxism. It does however provide one with sufficient context so as to think about the terminology and engage with other texts. After reading this, I was able to immediately engage and understand better 'The communist manifesto'. This pamphlet excellently contextualise and gave me the vocabulary to engage with that and has definitely given me tremendous food for thought around marxism and workers rights and relations. I would recommend to all but particularly those who would appreciate the ability to engage and follow Marxist stuff more clearly. It also provides further references to texts at the end for those interested in particular topics but with a British focus.
The oversimplifications, overgeneralizations, and often simple factual inaccuracies make this a less than helpful read. As others have mentioned, these issues are especially prevalent and obvious in the section on Feminism, but they are present in every section. Paul D'Amato's The Meaning of Marxism has fewer issues and is a more thorough introduction to Marxism without sacrificing readability, even for new readers.
The "Understanding History" section is full of mistakes which signaled to me pretty early that this wasn't going to be a useful read. Ironically, Harman's method for discussing most topics he broaches is decidedly undialectical. His descriptions of pre-modern societies are extremely simplistic. The model of capitalism (and especially capitalist government) he advances is static and all-encompassing, making it seem as if capitalism exists in some pure form - never changing, never evolving - and can explain every aspect of any capitalist society.