What do you think?
Rate this book
韦慰 蠁维谓蟿伪蟽渭伪 蟿畏蟼 蠈蟺蔚蟻伪蟼
螠喂伪 蟽蟿慰喂蠂蔚喂蠅渭苇谓畏 喂蟽蟿慰蟻委伪 伪纬维蟺畏蟼, 苇谓伪蟼 苇蟻蠅蟿伪蟼 蠂蠅蟻委蟼 伪谓蟿伪蟺蠈魏蟻喂蟽畏, 畏 喂蟽蟿慰蟻委伪 蟿慰蠀 蠁伪谓蟿维蟽渭伪蟿慰蟼 蟺慰蠀 渭蔚纬伪位慰蠉蟻纬畏蟽蔚 蟽蟿畏谓 螌蟺蔚蟻伪 蟿慰蠀 螤伪蟻喂蟽喂慰蠉, 蟺慰蠀 伪纬维蟺畏蟽蔚 蟿畏 渭喂魏蟻萎 魏伪喂 维蟽畏渭畏 蟺蟻慰蟽蟿伪蟿蔚蠀蠈渭蔚谓畏 渭伪胃萎蟿蟻喂维 蟿慰蠀, 蟿畏 尾慰萎胃畏蟽蔚 谓伪 伪蟺慰纬蔚喂蠅胃蔚委 魏伪位位喂蟿蔚蠂谓喂魏维, 伪位位维 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 蠀蟺慰蠂蟻苇蠅蟽蔚 谓伪 蟺谓委尉蔚喂 蟿伪 伪喂蟽胃萎渭伪蟿维 蟿畏蟼 魏伪喂 谓伪 蟿慰谓 伪魏慰位慰蠀胃萎蟽蔚喂 蟽蔚 苇谓伪 蟿伪尉委未喂 蠂蠅蟻委蟼 纬蠀蟻喂蟽渭蠈.
螣 螕魏伪蟽蟿蠈谓 螞蔚蟻慰蠉 未畏位蠋谓蔚喂 伪蟺蔚蟻委蠁蟻伪蟽蟿伪 蠈蟿喂 蟿慰 蠁维谓蟿伪蟽渭伪 蟿畏蟼 螌蟺蔚蟻伪蟼 蔚委谓伪喂 蠀蟺伪蟻魏蟿蠈 蟺蟻蠈蟽蠅蟺慰 魏伪喂 渭伪蟼 蟺伪蟻伪蟽蠉蟻蔚喂 蟽蟿伪 未伪喂未伪位蠋未畏 蟺伪蟻伪蟽魏萎谓喂伪 渭喂伪蟼 蟺伪蟽委纬谓蠅蟽蟿畏蟼 胃蔚伪蟿蟻喂魏萎蟼 蟽魏畏谓萎蟼, 蟽蔚 渭喂伪 纬位蠀魏喂维 渭蔚位伪纬蠂慰位委伪 蟿蠅谓 伪纬纬苇位蠅谓 蟿畏蟼 渭慰蠀蟽喂魏萎蟼.
螣 螕魏伪蟽蟿蠈谓 螞蔚蟻慰蠉 未畏位蠋谓蔚喂 伪蟺蔚蟻委蠁蟻伪蟽蟿伪 蠈蟿喂 蟿慰 蠁维谓蟿伪蟽渭伪 蟿畏蟼 螌蟺蔚蟻伪蟼 蔚委谓伪喂 蠀蟺伪蟻魏蟿蠈 蟺蟻蠈蟽蠅蟺慰 魏伪喂 渭伪蟼 蟺伪蟻伪蟽蠉蟻蔚喂 蟽蟿伪 未伪喂未伪位蠋未畏 蟺伪蟻伪蟽魏萎谓喂伪 渭喂伪蟼 蟺伪蟽委纬谓蠅蟽蟿畏蟼 胃蔚伪蟿蟻喂魏萎蟼 蟽魏畏谓萎蟼, 蟽蔚 渭喂伪 纬位蠀魏喂维 渭蔚位伪纬蠂慰位委伪 蟿蠅谓 伪纬纬苇位蠅谓 蟿畏蟼 渭慰蠀蟽喂魏萎蟼.
457 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1910
12.7k people are currently reading
295k people want to read
About the author
Gaston Leroux
950听books1,040听followersGaston Louis Alfred Leroux was a French journalist and author of detective fiction.
In the English-speaking world, he is best known for writing the novel The Phantom of the Opera (Le Fant么me de l'Op茅ra, 1910), which has been made into several film and stage productions of the same name, such as the 1925 film starring Lon Chaney, and Andrew Lloyd Webber's 1986 musical. It was also the basis of the 1990 novel Phantom by Susan Kay.
Leroux went to school in Normandy and studied law in Paris, graduating in 1889. He inherited millions of francs and lived wildly until he nearly reached bankruptcy. Then in 1890, he began working as a court reporter and theater critic for L'脡cho de Paris. His most important journalism came when he began working as an international correspondent for the Paris newspaper Le Matin. In 1905 he was present at and covered the Russian Revolution. Another case he was present at involved the investigation and deep coverage of an opera house in Paris, later to become a ballet house. The basement consisted of a cell that held prisoners in the Paris Commune, which were the rulers of Paris through much of the Franco-Prussian war.
He suddenly left journalism in 1907, and began writing fiction. In 1909, he and Arthur Bern猫de formed their own film company, Soci茅t茅 des Cin茅romans to simultaneously publish novels and turn them into films. He first wrote a mystery novel entitled Le myst猫re de la chambre jaune (1908; The Mystery of the Yellow Room), starring the amateur detective Joseph Rouletabille. Leroux's contribution to French detective fiction is considered a parallel to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's in the United Kingdom and Edgar Allan Poe's in America. Leroux died in Nice on April 15, 1927, of a urinary tract infection.
In the English-speaking world, he is best known for writing the novel The Phantom of the Opera (Le Fant么me de l'Op茅ra, 1910), which has been made into several film and stage productions of the same name, such as the 1925 film starring Lon Chaney, and Andrew Lloyd Webber's 1986 musical. It was also the basis of the 1990 novel Phantom by Susan Kay.
Leroux went to school in Normandy and studied law in Paris, graduating in 1889. He inherited millions of francs and lived wildly until he nearly reached bankruptcy. Then in 1890, he began working as a court reporter and theater critic for L'脡cho de Paris. His most important journalism came when he began working as an international correspondent for the Paris newspaper Le Matin. In 1905 he was present at and covered the Russian Revolution. Another case he was present at involved the investigation and deep coverage of an opera house in Paris, later to become a ballet house. The basement consisted of a cell that held prisoners in the Paris Commune, which were the rulers of Paris through much of the Franco-Prussian war.
He suddenly left journalism in 1907, and began writing fiction. In 1909, he and Arthur Bern猫de formed their own film company, Soci茅t茅 des Cin茅romans to simultaneously publish novels and turn them into films. He first wrote a mystery novel entitled Le myst猫re de la chambre jaune (1908; The Mystery of the Yellow Room), starring the amateur detective Joseph Rouletabille. Leroux's contribution to French detective fiction is considered a parallel to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's in the United Kingdom and Edgar Allan Poe's in America. Leroux died in Nice on April 15, 1927, of a urinary tract infection.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 13,456 reviews
September 25, 2024
Persons who are visited by the Angel quiver with a thrill unknown to the rest of mankind. And they cannot touch an instrument or open their mouths to sing, without producing sounds that put all other human sounds to shame.
Erik, AKA The Phantom of the Opera, is Paris's Heathcliff. This book is a dark tale of a man's descent into violence and madness, and the woman who forms the obsession at the centre of his life.
I should probably confess: I am a shameless lover of The Phantom of the Opera musical, which I have seen many and not enough times, as well as the 2004 movie version starring Gerard Butler and Emmy Rossum. I think the story, the setting, and the music make up one of the most beautiful displays of love and loneliness that I have ever seen. It can also be incredibly sexy, but that might have a little something to do with Mr Butler.
The musical version is truly wonderful. If you're curious, watch this wonderful scene from the movie: There's just so much love and sadness wrapped up in just a two and a half minute reprise. Honestly, this story is one of the few things that thaws my cold, unromantic heart.
铀� Christine: In the night there was music in my mind
And through music my soul began to soar
And I heard like I've never heard before
Raoul: What you heard was a dream and nothing more.
Christine: Yet in his eyes, all the sadness in the world 铀�
I couldn't help but compare this book to my favourite book of all time - . I felt myself drawing so many parallels between the two stories, even though one is a rough and wild story set on the Yorkshire moors and the other is set amid all the finest luxury of nineteenth-century Parisian high society. Both stories create complex villains that earn our pity as well as our disgust. Neither Erik nor Heathcliff is meant to be excused, or even forgiven, for their violent and cruel behaviour; they are not romantic heroes despite the love and passion that fuels both stories.
As with , this book is about a man who has lived his whole life with nothing but cruelty and hatred from others (in this case, due to his facial disfigurement). His own mother presented him with a mask so she didn't have to look upon his face. Erik becomes obsessed with Christine Daae - the object of his love and desire - and makes her the centre of his universe. But no man or phantom or angel of music can suffer through a loveless childhood and years of being a freakshow attraction without developing some serious issues. And the phantom, quite frankly, is as messed up as he is a musical genius.
Erik manipulates, terrorizes and even kills to fulfill his mission of furthering Christine Daae's career in the Opera House. He really is the best kind of character - twisted, complex, angry and evil, but I don't think we ever really hate him. I like how this book doesn't turn into something akin to a modern day YA romance where the heroine falls for the bad dude anyway because it's TRU WUV; that isn't the story being told here. Erik is not a hero, but a monster. And this is the monster's story.
It is the monster's deep, unrequited love that makes him human to the reader. I don't want Christine to be with him, that would weaken the true power of the story... but nevertheless, I had to fight back tears when he says:
"And yet I am not really wicked. Love me and you shall see! All I wanted was to be loved for myself. If you loved me, I should be as gentle as a lamb; and you could do anything with me that you pleased."
The *almost* ending scene is my favourite in the musical, in the movie, and now in the book too. The movie's sad reprise of the song Masquerade sung by the phantom just hits me in the heart every time:
Masquerade...
Paper faces on parade
Masquerade...
Hide your face so the world will never find you.
A beautiful book.
| | | | |
April 8, 2025
The emo kid to Incel pipeline.
April 16, 2020
The Phantom鈥檚 greatest tragedy in life is the fact that he came so close to gaining the heart of the girl he loved, a sense of acceptance he has wanted for an entire lifetime, but because of his scarred and damaged soul he did nothing but terrify her; ultimately, shattering the initial allure and glamour she felt in his presence.
In the vein of Frankenstein and Heathcliff, Erik鈥檚 shattered visage, his ruined face, permeates his soul. Society, humanity, perceives his appearance as evil and twisted; thus, he takes on these traits in a cruel mockery of what is expected of him: he becomes the very thing he is branded as. And it becomes his most powerful weapon and it also becomes his downfall. He is beyond bitter. He is beyond twisted. His heart oozes with venom for a world that has always shunned him and left him an outcast in the darkness.
The Phantom of the Opera is a tragedy in every sense of the word. All the Phantom ever wanted was love and when he finally finds it, it practically destroys him. It pushes him out of the shadows and makes him bold; it makes him yearn for what he thought impossible. And he acts. He sees his chance, the very essence of what has brought his voice and his soul back to life is before him, and he seizes it albeit too forcefully. He becomes vicious, demanding and overwhelming. The loneliness of his soul dominates his faculties. He loses the cold, practical, cunning that has kept him alive for so long and follows the unthinking possessive whims of his heart.
"And yet I am not really wicked. Love me and you shall see! All I wanted was to be loved for myself. If you loved me, I should be as gentle as a lamb; and you could do anything with me that you pleased."
Such words are uttered with the utmost truth and geniality. Erik comes forth into the light. In this moment he casts aside the guise of The Phantom and reveals his vulnerability and his ability to rejuvenate to Christine. He puts his heart out there, but like everything is his life love is illusory. In his misguided state he drastically misunderstands the situation and his erratic behaviour destroys any chance he ever could have had. His love has power, but he fails to understand that not everybody is as painfully desperate as he.
Leroux clearly loved opera houses and his phantom is beautifully dark concept. His descriptions of the theatre are vivid and verging on the enchanting. His prose is smooth and faultless, though his pacing is poor and the plot is weighed down with many non-essential characters that over complicate the situation. I love the story here, though the execution falls short of the faultlessness you would expect when you consider the sheer strength that surrounds the central plot and characters.
For me, the Phantom will always be better on the stage. The true pain of Erik鈥檚 soul pours out of the music and wrenches the hearts of the audience. The final scenes, the reality of the ending, place the story on the fringes of the modernist movement and show that romance is not always storybook despite how our hearts may yearn otherwise.
| | |
In the vein of Frankenstein and Heathcliff, Erik鈥檚 shattered visage, his ruined face, permeates his soul. Society, humanity, perceives his appearance as evil and twisted; thus, he takes on these traits in a cruel mockery of what is expected of him: he becomes the very thing he is branded as. And it becomes his most powerful weapon and it also becomes his downfall. He is beyond bitter. He is beyond twisted. His heart oozes with venom for a world that has always shunned him and left him an outcast in the darkness.
The Phantom of the Opera is a tragedy in every sense of the word. All the Phantom ever wanted was love and when he finally finds it, it practically destroys him. It pushes him out of the shadows and makes him bold; it makes him yearn for what he thought impossible. And he acts. He sees his chance, the very essence of what has brought his voice and his soul back to life is before him, and he seizes it albeit too forcefully. He becomes vicious, demanding and overwhelming. The loneliness of his soul dominates his faculties. He loses the cold, practical, cunning that has kept him alive for so long and follows the unthinking possessive whims of his heart.
"And yet I am not really wicked. Love me and you shall see! All I wanted was to be loved for myself. If you loved me, I should be as gentle as a lamb; and you could do anything with me that you pleased."
Such words are uttered with the utmost truth and geniality. Erik comes forth into the light. In this moment he casts aside the guise of The Phantom and reveals his vulnerability and his ability to rejuvenate to Christine. He puts his heart out there, but like everything is his life love is illusory. In his misguided state he drastically misunderstands the situation and his erratic behaviour destroys any chance he ever could have had. His love has power, but he fails to understand that not everybody is as painfully desperate as he.
Leroux clearly loved opera houses and his phantom is beautifully dark concept. His descriptions of the theatre are vivid and verging on the enchanting. His prose is smooth and faultless, though his pacing is poor and the plot is weighed down with many non-essential characters that over complicate the situation. I love the story here, though the execution falls short of the faultlessness you would expect when you consider the sheer strength that surrounds the central plot and characters.
For me, the Phantom will always be better on the stage. The true pain of Erik鈥檚 soul pours out of the music and wrenches the hearts of the audience. The final scenes, the reality of the ending, place the story on the fringes of the modernist movement and show that romance is not always storybook despite how our hearts may yearn otherwise.
| | |
June 25, 2011
Before we start off, let me clarify something: because I can't be bothered to create a "the Broadway stage adaptation is better" shelf, my "the movie is better" shelf will have to suffice here. The Phantom of the Opera, the show, is a giant, absurd, bombastic display of every bad misconception of theater, and is the main reason Andrew Lloyd Weber is able to fall asleep on a bed made of money every night. It's not my favorite show, is what I'm saying - in fact, I don't even really like the show, come to think of it (which begs the question of why I read this book in the first place, but whatever). So, with all that in mind, Madeline Reviews Inc now presents:
Why The Phantom of the Opera the Book Is, Somehow, Worse Than The Stage Show And Every Movie Version Released So Far
-Everyone in the book is a moron. Like, even more than they are in the show. I got about halfway through the book when I realized, "Wait a minute, was I supposed to be surprised by the revelation that the Phantom and Christine's tutor are the same guy? Haven't we known that from, like, page twenty?" Even if I hadn't seen any other versions, I feel sure I would have figured it out - come on, the story is about people trying to learn the identity of a mysterious, invisible guy and the title of the book is The Phantom of the Opera. Were Gaston Leroux's readers really that stupid?
-Annoying characters from the show are even more annoying here. Christine is still a useless twit, and in this version comes upgraded with zero observation skills and a seriously misguided sense of priorities. When she admits to Raoul (after like two months of bullshit) that the Phantom scares the hell out of her and she wants to escape him, Raoul makes the very sensible point that maybe she should stop wearing the ring the Phantom gave her. Christine's response: "That would be deceitful." GAAAAAAHHHHH.
Raoul is even worse. In the show, he's simply a well-meaning schmuck who fails spectacularly at saving Christine every opportunity he gets. In the book, he's a selfish dick. This is a paraphrased account of an interaction between him and Christine:
Raoul: "Christine, I know there's something super weird going on with this guy you're running off to see, and I want you to tell me what's up because I love you and want to protect you."
Christine: "It's too dangerous, I can't tell you."
Raoul: "OMG YOU'RE IN LOVE WITH HIM AREN'T YOU? WELL FINE, I DON'T CARE. I HOPE YOU DIE, YOU LYING WHORE."
-We never get to see anything from Christine's perspective. This is important, because in the book she spends at least two months as the Phantom's prisoner, and all we get is her description, later, of what it was like. Instead of seeing the Phantom through Christine's eyes, where he might have been a more compelling character, we just get to watch Raoul follow her around like a creeper and then listen to Christine give lengthy expositional speeches after events happen.
-The Phantom isn't actually that cool. He's always bursting into tears and begging Christine to love him, and the rest of the time he's so incredibly misguided about his relationship with Christine that it's almost funny. He comes off sounding like one of those perverts on cop shows who insists that he and the ten-year-old locked in his basement actually have a very special and loving relationship, while the cops are just looking at him like, that's nice, man, but your ass is still going to jail.
-There are way more characters than we need, and a lot of them are different (read: worse) than they are in the show. Madame Giry, last seen as a cool, commanding ballet mistress, is merely a crazy old woman who works for the Phantom because he deceived her with the most idiotic lie ever. The book also features The Persian, a guy who literally hangs around the Opera and shows up whenever it's thematically necessary. He might as well have been named Deus Ex Machina.
-Leroux's pacing sucks. Any drama is instantly ruined by his digressions or abrupt scene-changing, and all momentum is lost. When the Phantom kidnaps Christine after her final performance, the story is going along well, everyone's freaking out and trying to find her, and then Leroux pops up. "Hey!" he says, "You guys remember how on page 20 I told you that the new managers have to pay the Phantom 20,000 francs once a month? I bet you guys are wondering how that's going, huh? Let's check in with them quick." And before you can say, no, Gaston, I actually wasn't wondering that at all, he makes you slog through two goddamn chapters about the new managers trying to figure out how the Phantom collects their money.
Similarly, once Raoul and the Persian have gone after the Phantom and are almost at his lair (a journey that takes way, way too long) they get locked in his torture chamber (which involves torture so stupid I won't even describe it) and the plot comes to a damn standstill as Raoul and the Persian spends hours trapped there. It made me actually long for the show, where everything skips along at a fast clip and the worst digressions are five-minute love songs.
-The ending is stupid. Christine gets the Phantom to release her and Raoul (after a lengthy imprisonment that, again, we only get to hear about rather than see), not by having a sexy quick makeout session with him, but by crying with him. That's it. The Phantom kisses her (on the forehead), bursts into tears, and Christine cries with him. This somehow convinces the Phantom that she loves Raoul and that he should let them go, and that's how the Phantom is defeated. I am in no way joking.
In the interest of fairness, the book has two good things going for it:
One, Leroux's portrayal of the opera house as a sprawling, complex maze that's a contained city is pretty incredible, and he's at his best when he's describing all the intricacies and hidden secrets of the opera house.
And two, at least in the book, we are never subjected to a performance of Don Juan Triumphant. Thank you, Jesus.
Why The Phantom of the Opera the Book Is, Somehow, Worse Than The Stage Show And Every Movie Version Released So Far
-Everyone in the book is a moron. Like, even more than they are in the show. I got about halfway through the book when I realized, "Wait a minute, was I supposed to be surprised by the revelation that the Phantom and Christine's tutor are the same guy? Haven't we known that from, like, page twenty?" Even if I hadn't seen any other versions, I feel sure I would have figured it out - come on, the story is about people trying to learn the identity of a mysterious, invisible guy and the title of the book is The Phantom of the Opera. Were Gaston Leroux's readers really that stupid?
-Annoying characters from the show are even more annoying here. Christine is still a useless twit, and in this version comes upgraded with zero observation skills and a seriously misguided sense of priorities. When she admits to Raoul (after like two months of bullshit) that the Phantom scares the hell out of her and she wants to escape him, Raoul makes the very sensible point that maybe she should stop wearing the ring the Phantom gave her. Christine's response: "That would be deceitful." GAAAAAAHHHHH.
Raoul is even worse. In the show, he's simply a well-meaning schmuck who fails spectacularly at saving Christine every opportunity he gets. In the book, he's a selfish dick. This is a paraphrased account of an interaction between him and Christine:
Raoul: "Christine, I know there's something super weird going on with this guy you're running off to see, and I want you to tell me what's up because I love you and want to protect you."
Christine: "It's too dangerous, I can't tell you."
Raoul: "OMG YOU'RE IN LOVE WITH HIM AREN'T YOU? WELL FINE, I DON'T CARE. I HOPE YOU DIE, YOU LYING WHORE."
-We never get to see anything from Christine's perspective. This is important, because in the book she spends at least two months as the Phantom's prisoner, and all we get is her description, later, of what it was like. Instead of seeing the Phantom through Christine's eyes, where he might have been a more compelling character, we just get to watch Raoul follow her around like a creeper and then listen to Christine give lengthy expositional speeches after events happen.
-The Phantom isn't actually that cool. He's always bursting into tears and begging Christine to love him, and the rest of the time he's so incredibly misguided about his relationship with Christine that it's almost funny. He comes off sounding like one of those perverts on cop shows who insists that he and the ten-year-old locked in his basement actually have a very special and loving relationship, while the cops are just looking at him like, that's nice, man, but your ass is still going to jail.
-There are way more characters than we need, and a lot of them are different (read: worse) than they are in the show. Madame Giry, last seen as a cool, commanding ballet mistress, is merely a crazy old woman who works for the Phantom because he deceived her with the most idiotic lie ever. The book also features The Persian, a guy who literally hangs around the Opera and shows up whenever it's thematically necessary. He might as well have been named Deus Ex Machina.
-Leroux's pacing sucks. Any drama is instantly ruined by his digressions or abrupt scene-changing, and all momentum is lost. When the Phantom kidnaps Christine after her final performance, the story is going along well, everyone's freaking out and trying to find her, and then Leroux pops up. "Hey!" he says, "You guys remember how on page 20 I told you that the new managers have to pay the Phantom 20,000 francs once a month? I bet you guys are wondering how that's going, huh? Let's check in with them quick." And before you can say, no, Gaston, I actually wasn't wondering that at all, he makes you slog through two goddamn chapters about the new managers trying to figure out how the Phantom collects their money.
Similarly, once Raoul and the Persian have gone after the Phantom and are almost at his lair (a journey that takes way, way too long) they get locked in his torture chamber (which involves torture so stupid I won't even describe it) and the plot comes to a damn standstill as Raoul and the Persian spends hours trapped there. It made me actually long for the show, where everything skips along at a fast clip and the worst digressions are five-minute love songs.
-The ending is stupid. Christine gets the Phantom to release her and Raoul (after a lengthy imprisonment that, again, we only get to hear about rather than see), not by having a sexy quick makeout session with him, but by crying with him. That's it. The Phantom kisses her (on the forehead), bursts into tears, and Christine cries with him. This somehow convinces the Phantom that she loves Raoul and that he should let them go, and that's how the Phantom is defeated. I am in no way joking.
In the interest of fairness, the book has two good things going for it:
One, Leroux's portrayal of the opera house as a sprawling, complex maze that's a contained city is pretty incredible, and he's at his best when he's describing all the intricacies and hidden secrets of the opera house.
And two, at least in the book, we are never subjected to a performance of Don Juan Triumphant. Thank you, Jesus.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
August 11, 2022
Pierwsze 50 stron mi si臋 bardzo podoba艂o. Potem zacz膮艂 to by膰 nudny romans, potem wr臋cz sensacja. Poza histori膮 Erika, kt贸ra to rzeczywi艣cie jest bardzo smutna i przejmuj膮ca, nie znalaz艂am w tej ksi膮偶ce ani u艂amka czego艣, co dzia艂a艂oby na moj膮 wra偶liwo艣膰. A z kolei sama historia Erika gubi si臋 kompletnie w nat艂oku tych absurdalnych wydarze艅 po drodze. Ostatnie 100 stron zm臋czy艂am tak okrutnie, 偶e nie b臋d臋 wspomina膰 tej ksi膮偶ki mi艂o. A szkoda :(
September 1, 2020
Excellent, marvelous. A phantasmagorical (ha ha!) PERFECTION. NO JOKE. This is one true House of Horrors, perhaps the best one ever orchestrated (maybe discounting Poe). Yes, EVER. The prose is so simple, so readable, that the barest of essentials are there, in all their power & glory: the haunted house, the victim-lover, the victimizer/lover, the clandestine meetings, the haunted past, the switch-over of protagonists, the uncertainty caused by one elegant overflow of optical illusions, the Victorian conventions all intended to spook the hell out of a reader that's totally in awe of the way a classic story can be so expertly conveyed. Both this & "Dracula" are revolutionary in that uberentertaining way in which the plot is given to us: through letters & witness accounts. Yes, the only way to be frightened is to have the monster in the backdrop, a perpetual threat that's under the velvet curtain. It is truly, TRULY (I want to scream out my window!) delicious-- how nobody from the Paris Opera knows exactly what the phantom looks like, how they all put up their own fears projected unto the myth (who, I must admit, is a true turn-of-the-century bad-ass-- a Micheal Myers combined with Hannibal Lecter... you must meet this version-- he's a more maniacal and romantic phantom than the musicals!). I could not ask for more in a book, its brevity is bittersweet (you wish there were more details, more certainties... this effect, of course, is genius); its use of freak show conventions are all aligned beautifully. This is a masterpiece to be savored! (Read it to your cool kid or niece/nephew!)
UPDATE: just caught the show this last Wednesday night (9/7/16) at the Buell. No musical is as technically rich as this one (which is SO like the Phantom himself). It IS the decade of the 80s-its very opulent (quint)essence! And this is the decade of my birth...
UPDATE: Second time, with the first black Phantom on tour at the Buell! (11/6/19)
UPDATE: just caught the show this last Wednesday night (9/7/16) at the Buell. No musical is as technically rich as this one (which is SO like the Phantom himself). It IS the decade of the 80s-its very opulent (quint)essence! And this is the decade of my birth...
UPDATE: Second time, with the first black Phantom on tour at the Buell! (11/6/19)
August 13, 2021
Le Fant么me de l'Op茅ra = The Phantom of the Opera, Gaston Leroux
The Phantom of the Opera is a novel by French writer Gaston Leroux. It was first published in volume form in late March 1910 by Pierre Lafitte.
In Paris in the 1880's, the Palais Garnier opera house is believed to be haunted by an entity known as the Phantom of the Opera, or simply the Opera Ghost.
A stagehand named Joseph Buquet is found hanged and the rope around his neck goes missing.
At a gala performance for the retirement of the opera house's two managers, a young little-known Swedish soprano, Christine Daa茅, is called upon to sing in the place of the Opera's leading soprano, Carlotta, who is ill, and her performance is an astonishing success.
The Vicomte Raoul de Chagny, who was present at the performance, recognizes her as his childhood playmate and recalls his love for her.
He attempts to visit her backstage, where he hears a man complimenting her from inside her dressing room. He investigates the room once Christine leaves, only to find it empty.
At Perros-Guirec, Christine meets with Raoul, who confronts her about the voice he heard in her room.
Christine tells him she has been tutored by the Angel of Music, whom her father used to tell them about.
When Raoul suggests that she might be the victim of a prank, she storms off. Christine visits her father's grave one night, where a mysterious figure appears and plays the violin for her.
Raoul attempts to confront it but is attacked and knocked out in the process. Back at the Palais Garnier, the new managers receive a letter from the Phantom demanding that they allow Christine to perform the lead role of Marguerite in Faust, and that box 5 be left empty for his use, lest they perform in a house with a curse on it.
The managers ignore his demands as a prank, resulting in disastrous consequences: Carlotta ends up croaking like a toad, and the chandelier suddenly drops into the audience, killing a spectator. The Phantom, having abducted Christine from her dressing room, reveals himself as a deformed man called Erik.
Erik intends to keep her in his lair with him for a few days, but she causes him to change his plans when she unmasks him and, to the horror of both, beholds his noseless, lipless, sunken-eyed face, which resembles a skull dried up by the centuries, covered in yellowed dead flesh.
Fearing that she will leave him, he decides to keep her with him forever, but when Christine requests release after two weeks, he agrees on the condition that she wear his ring and be faithful to him.
On the roof of the opera house, Christine tells Raoul about her abduction and makes Raoul promise to take her away to a place where Erik can never find her, even if she resists.
Raoul tells Christine he will act on his promise the next day, to which she agrees. However, Christine sympathizes with Erik and decides to sing for him one last time as a means of saying goodbye. Unbeknownst to Christine and Raoul, Erik has been watching them and overheard their whole conversation.
The following night, the enraged and jealous Erik abducts Christine during a production of Faust and tries to force her to marry him.
Raoul is led by a mysterious opera regular known as "The Persian" into Erik's secret lair deep in the bowels of the opera house, but they end up trapped in a mirrored room by Erik, who threatens that unless Christine agrees to marry him, he will kill them and everyone in the Opera House by using explosives.
Christine agrees to marry Erik. Erik initially tries to drown Raoul and the Persian, using the water which would have been used to douse the explosives, but Christine begs and offers to be his "living bride", promising him not to kill herself after becoming his bride, as she had both contemplated and attempted earlier in the book.
Erik eventually releases Raoul and the Persian from his torture chamber.
When Erik is alone with Christine, he lifts his mask to kiss her on her forehead and is given a kiss back. Erik reveals that he has never received a kiss, not even from his own mother, nor has been allowed to give one and is overcome with emotion.
He and Christine then cry together and their tears "mingle". Erik later says that he has never felt so close to another human being. He allows the Persian and Raoul to escape, though not before making Christine promise that she will visit him on his death day, and return the gold ring he gave her.
He also makes the Persian promise that afterward he will go to the newspaper and report his death, as he will die soon and will die "of love". Indeed, sometime later Christine returns to Erik's lair, buries him somewhere he will never be found (by Erik's request) and returns the gold ring.
Afterward, a local newspaper runs the simple note: "Erik is dead".
Christine and Raoul (who finds out that Erik has killed his older brother) elope together, never to return. Passages narrated directly by the Persian and the final chapter piece together Erik's life: the son of a construction business owner deformed from birth, he ran away from his native Normandy to work in fairs and in caravans, schooling himself in the arts of the circus across Europe and Asia, and eventually building trick palaces in Persia and Turkey.
Eventually, he returned to France and, wearing a mask, started his own construction business. After being subcontracted to work on the foundations of the Palais Garnier, Erik had discreetly built himself a lair to disappear in, complete with hidden passages and other tricks that allowed him to spy on the managers.
鬲丕乇蹖禺 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 禺賵丕賳卮 賲丕賴 噩賵賱丕蹖 爻丕賱 2003賲蹖賱丕丿蹖
毓賳賵丕賳: 卮亘丨 丕倬乇丕貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 诏丕爻鬲賵賳 賱賵乇賵貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 賲乇鬲囟蹖 丌噩賵丿丕賳蹖貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 讴鬲丕亘賴丕蹖 噩蹖亘蹖貙 1343貙 丿乇 368氐貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 毓賱賲蹖 賮乇賴賳诏蹖貨 爻丕賱1394貨 丿乇 賴賮丿賴 賵 491氐貨 卮丕亘讴: 9786001215285貨 賲賵囟賵毓: 丿丕爻鬲丕賳賴丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 賮乇丕賳爻賴 - 爻丿賴 20賲
毓賳賵丕賳: 卮亘丨 丕倬乇丕貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 诏丕爻鬲賵賳 賱賵乇賵貨 亘乇诏乇丿丕賳: 丌乇卮 丨噩丕夭蹖貨 賲賴丿蹖 丨乇蹖乇蹖貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 讴丕乇賵丕賳貙 1381貨 丿乇 443氐貨 卮丕亘讴: 9647033389貨 趩丕倬 丿賵賲 1382貨 趩丕倬 倬賳噩賲 1385貨
賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 亘丕乇 賮蹖賱賲 乇丕 趩賳丿 亘丕乇 丿蹖丿賲貨 爻倬爻 诏卮鬲賲 賵 鬲乇噩賲賴 蹖 噩賳丕亘 丌賯丕蹖 芦丌噩賵丿丕賳蹖禄 乇丕 蹖丕賮鬲賲貨 乇賲丕賳 芦卮亘丨 丕倬乇丕禄貨 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丿賱 丕賳诏蹖夭蹖 丿乇 丿賱 禺賵蹖卮 賳賴丕賳 丿丕乇丿貨 禺賵丕賳卮诏乇貙 賵 亘蹖賳卮诏乇貙 賴乇诏夭蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 賵 氐丨賳賴 賴丕蹖 賮蹖賱賲貙 賵 蹖丕 賵丕跇賴 賴丕蹖 讴鬲丕亘貙 丕夭 蹖丕丿卮丕賳 亘賴 噩丕蹖 丿蹖诏乇 讴賵趩 賳賲蹖讴賳賳丿貙 賵 賳賲蹖乇賵賳丿貨 蹖丕丿賲 賲丕賳丿賴 讴賴 丌賳 丿禺鬲乇讴 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄貙 趩诏賵賳賴 亘賴 丌賳 賮乇卮鬲賴 蹖 賲賵爻蹖賯蹖 丿賱 亘丕禺鬲貨 賴賲丕賳 賮乇卮鬲賴貙 蹖丕 卮亘丨 禺賵賮賳丕讴貙 讴賴 丿乇 爻乇丿丕亘賴 賴丕蹖 爻丕禺鬲賲丕賳 丕倬乇丕貙 賲爻讴賳 诏夭蹖丿賴 亘賵丿貙 賵 鬲賳賴丕 亘乇丕蹖 卮賳蹖丿賳 賲賵爻蹖賯蹖 亘賴 讴賳丕乇 氐丨賳賴 賲蹖丌賲丿貨 賳蹖夭 賳丕賲 賮蹖賱賲蹖 賲賵夭蹖讴丕賱 賴賲 賴爻鬲 讴賴 亘爻蹖丕乇 丿蹖丿賳蹖 爻鬲貙 丿乇 賳賵卮鬲賴 賴丕蹖 丿蹖诏乇蹖 丿乇 亘丕乇賴 蹖 卮亘丨 賵 丕蹖賳讴賴 丕賵 讴蹖 亘賵丿賴貙 亘爻蹖丕乇 賳賵卮鬲賴貙 賵 丕夭 丕蹖乇丕賳 賵 丿賵乇丕賳 賳丕氐乇蹖 賴賲 蹖丕丿 讴乇丿賴 丕賳丿貨
賴卮丿丕乇 亘乇丕蹖 讴爻丕賳蹖讴賴 賲蹖禺賵丕賴賳丿 禺賵丿 丕蹖賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 乇丕 亘禺賵丕賳賳丿貨 趩讴蹖丿賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 乇丕 丕賮卮丕 賲蹖讴賳丿
趩讴蹖丿賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳: 賮蹖賱賲 丿乇 爻丕賱 1919賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 賵 亘賴 氐賵乇鬲 爻蹖丕賴 賵 爻賮蹖丿 丌睾丕夭 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 亘禺卮蹖 丕夭 丕賲賵丕賱 丕倬乇丕蹖 倬丕乇蹖爻 亘賴 丨乇丕噩 诏匕丕乇丿賴 卮丿賴 賵 丕夭 噩賲賱賴 卮乇讴鬲 鈥屭┵嗁嗀з� 丿乇 丨乇丕噩貙 賲乇丿 爻丕賱禺賵乇丿賴 丕蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 亘丕 毓賳賵丕賳 芦賵蹖讴賵賳鬲 乇丕卅賵賱 丿賵 卮丕賳蹖禄 賲毓乇賮蹖 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 賲賵乇丿 丨乇丕噩蹖 毓乇賵爻讴 賲蹖賲賵賳蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 爻賳噩 賲蹖鈥屫操嗀� 賵 芦賵蹖讴賵賳鬲禄 丌賳 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫必� 倬爻 丕夭 丌賳 賳賵亘鬲 亘賴 丨乇丕噩 趩賱趩乇丕睾 毓馗蹖賲 丕倬乇丕蹖 倬丕乇蹖爻 賲蹖鈥屫必池� 讴賴 亘丕 倬乇丿賴鈥� 丕蹖 倬賵卮丕賳丿賴 卮丿賴 鈥屫ж池� 亘乇丕蹖 賳賲丕蹖卮 丌賳 倬乇丿賴 乇丕 讴賳丕乇 讴卮蹖丿賴貙 賵 趩賱趩乇丕睾 乇丕 亘賴 亘丕賱丕 賲蹖鈥屭┴促嗀� 亘丕 亘丕賱丕乇賮鬲賳 趩賱趩乇丕睾 夭賲丕賳 亘賴 毓賯亘 賵 爻丕賱 1870賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 蹖毓賳蹖 丿賵乇丕賳 乇賵賳賯 爻丕賱賳 丕倬乇丕蹖 倬丕乇蹖爻 亘乇賲蹖鈥屭必� 賵 賮蹖賱賲 乇賳诏蹖 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賳賲丕蹖卮蹖 毓馗蹖賲 賯乇丕乇 丕爻鬲 丕噩乇丕 卮賵丿貙 賵 亘丕夭蹖诏乇丕賳 賲卮睾賵賱 鬲賲乇蹖賳 賴爻鬲賳丿貨 賳丕诏賴丕賳 倬乇丿賴 蹖 倬卮鬲 氐丨賳賴貙 亘賴 卮丿鬲 丿乇 賳夭丿蹖讴蹖 芦亘丕賳賵 讴丕乇賱賵鬲丕禄貙 亘丕夭蹖诏乇 賳賯卮 丕氐賱蹖 賮乇賵 賲蹖鈥屫з佖� 亘丕夭蹖诏乇丕賳 賲蹖鈥屭堐屬嗀� 讴賴 丕蹖賳 讴丕乇 卮亘丨 丕倬乇丕 丕爻鬲貙 賵 芦讴丕乇賱賵鬲丕禄 亘賴 丨丕賱鬲 賯賴乇 丌賳噩丕 乇丕 鬲乇讴 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 诏乇丿丕賳賳丿诏丕賳 丕倬乇丕 讴賴 亘丕夭蹖诏乇 丕氐賱蹖 禺賵丿 乇丕 丕夭 丿爻鬲 丿丕丿賴鈥� 丕賳丿貙 亘賴 鬲毓胤蹖賱 讴乇丿賳 賳賲丕蹖卮 賲蹖鈥屫з嗀屫促嗀� 丕賲丕 芦賲丕丿丕賲 跇蹖乇蹖禄貙 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 乇丕 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 噩丕蹖诏夭蹖賳 芦讴丕乇賱賵鬲丕禄 賲毓乇賮蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 丕夭 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 禺賵丕爻鬲賴 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 鬲丕 丌賵丕夭蹖 乇丕 亘禺賵丕賳丿貙 賵 丕賵 亘賴 夭蹖亘丕蹖蹖 丌賳 乇丕 丕噩乇丕 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 丕賲丕 丕夭 诏賮鬲賳 賳丕賲 讴爻蹖 讴賴 丌賵丕夭禺賵丕賳丿賳 乇丕 亘賴 丕賵 丌賲賵禺鬲賴 禺賵丿丿丕乇蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賳賯卮 亘賴 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 丿丕丿賴 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賵 丿乇 卮亘 丕賮鬲鬲丕丨蹖賴貙 芦乇丕卅賵賱 - 賵蹖讴賵賳鬲 卮丕賳蹖禄 讴賴 丿乇 噩賲毓 賲賴賲丕賳丕賳 丕爻鬲貙 丿乇賲蹖蹖丕亘丿 讴賴 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 賴賲丕賳 丿賵爻鬲 丿賵乇丕賳 讴賵丿讴蹖 丕賵爻鬲貙 賵 倬爻 丕夭 丕噩乇丕蹖 賳賲丕蹖卮 亘賴 倬蹖卮 丕賵 賲蹖鈥屫③屫� 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 讴賴 丕夭 丿蹖丿賳 芦乇丕卅賵賱禄 夭蹖亘丕乇賵蹖貙 亘爻蹖丕乇 卮丕丿賲丕賳 卮丿賴 賲丿鬲蹖 乇丕 亘賴 诏賮鬲诏賵 亘丕 丕賵 爻倬乇蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�
丿乇 倬卮鬲 氐丨賳賴 诏賱鈥屬囏й� 賮乇丕賵丕賳蹖 亘乇丕蹖 讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳 賮乇爻鬲丕丿賴 卮丿賴 丕賲丕 丿乇 賲蹖丕賳 丌賳賴丕 蹖讴 乇夭 爻乇禺 賯乇丕乇 丿丕乇丿 讴賴 乇賵亘丕賳蹖 爻蹖丕賴 亘賴 丌賳 亘爻鬲賴 卮丿賴鈥� 丕爻鬲貨 賮乇爻鬲賳丿賴贁 丌賳 诏賱 讴爻蹖 賳蹖爻鬲 亘賴 噩夭 芦卮亘丨 丕倬乇丕禄貙 蹖讴 賳丕亘睾賴 蹖 賲賵爻蹖賯蹖 讴賴 亘賴 丿賱蹖賱 賳賯氐 賲丕丿乇夭丕丿蹖 鈥屫й� 讴賴 丿乇 趩賴乇賴 鈥屫ж� 丿丕乇丿貙 禺賵丿 乇丕 丿乇 夭蹖乇夭賲蹖賳 丕倬乇丕蹖 倬丕乇蹖爻 倬賳賴丕賳 讴乇丿賴貙 賵 賳賯丕亘蹖 亘乇 趩賴乇賴 诏匕丕卮鬲賴 鈥屫ж池� 卮亘丨 毓丕卮賯 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 丕爻鬲貙 賵 丕賵爻鬲 讴賴 丌賵丕夭禺賵丕賳丿賳 乇丕 亘賴 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 丌賲賵禺鬲賴貙 賵 丿乇 丕夭丕蹖 丌賳 賲蹖鈥屫堌з囏� 讴賴 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 亘乇丕蹖 賴賲蹖卮賴 亘丕 丕賵 亘賲丕賳丿貨 丕賵 賴賲趩賳蹖賳 鬲賲丕賲 鬲賱丕卮 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘讴丕乇 賲蹖鈥屫ㄙ嗀� 鬲丕 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 爻鬲丕乇賴贁 丕氐賱蹖 賳賲丕蹖卮鈥屬囏й� 丕倬乇丕蹖 倬丕乇蹖爻 亘丕卮丿貙 賵 亘丕 丕乇爻丕賱 賳丕賲賴鈥� 丕蹖 亘賴 诏乇丿丕賳賳丿诏丕賳 爻丕賱賳 丕倬乇丕貙 丌賳賴丕 乇丕 鬲賴丿蹖丿 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 丿乇 氐賵乇鬲蹖 讴賴 賳賯卮 丕氐賱蹖 賳賲丕蹖卮 亘毓丿蹖 亘賴 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 爻倬乇丿賴 賳卮賵丿貙 亘丕蹖丿 賲賳鬲馗乇 毓賵丕賯亘 亘丿蹖 亘丕卮賳丿貨 丕賲丕 丌賳丕賳 亘賴 丕蹖賳 鬲賴丿蹖丿 鬲賵噩賴蹖 賳讴乇丿賴貙 賵 亘乇丕蹖 丿賱噩賵锟斤拷蹖 丕夭 芦亘丕賳賵 讴丕乇賱賵鬲丕禄貙 賳賯卮 丕氐賱蹖 乇丕 亘賴 丕賵 賲蹖鈥屫迟矩ж辟嗀� 卮亘丨 讴賴 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賲賵囟賵毓 賳丕乇丕丨鬲 卮丿賴貙 亘丕 毓賵囟 讴乇丿賳 丕賮卮乇賴贁 氐丕賮 鈥屭┵嗁嗀囐� 爻 氐丿丕蹖 丕賵貙 亘丕毓孬 诏乇賮鬲诏蹖 氐丿丕蹖 芦讴丕乇賱賵鬲丕禄 卮丿賴貙 賵 亘賴 鈥屬嗀и嗀ж� 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 噩丕蹖诏夭蹖賳 丕賵 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 丕賲丕 卮亘丨 鬲賳賴丕 亘賴 賴賲蹖賳 讴丕乇 丕讴鬲賮丕 賳讴乇丿賴 賵 賲爻卅賵賱 鬲睾蹖蹖乇 倬乇丿賴鈥� 賴丕蹖 賳賲丕蹖卮 乇丕 亘丕 胤賳丕亘蹖 丿丕乇 夭丿賴 賵 丿乇 亘乇丕亘乇 趩卮賲丕賳 鬲賲丕卮丕诏乇丕賳 丌賵蹖夭丕賳 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�
讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳 讴賴 毓丕卮賯 芦乇丕卅賵賱禄 卮丿賴 亘賴 丕賵 賲蹖鈥屭堐屫� 讴賴 丕夭 卮亘丨 賲蹖鈥屫必池� 賵 乇丕卅賵賱 亘丕 禺賵丕賳丿賳 丌賵丕夭蹖 亘賴 丕賵 賲蹖鈥屭堐屫� 讴賴 賴賲賵丕乇賴 丿乇 讴賳丕乇卮 禺賵丕賴丿 亘賵丿貙 賵 丕夭 丕賵 賲乇丕賯亘鬲 禺賵丕賴丿 讴乇丿貙 賵 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 亘丕 亘乇 夭賲蹖賳 丕賳丿丕禺鬲賳 诏賱 爻乇禺蹖 讴賴 卮亘丨 丕倬乇丕 亘乇丕蹖卮 賮乇爻鬲丕丿賴貙 亘賴 芦乇丕卅賵賱禄 賲蹖鈥屬聚屬堎嗀� 丌賳賴丕 賳賲蹖鈥屫з嗁嗀� 讴賴 卮亘丨 丕倬乇丕 卮丕賴丿 丿蹖丿丕乇 丌賳賴丕爻鬲 賵 丕賵 讴賴 賯賱亘卮 卮讴爻鬲賴貙 亘賴 賮讴乇 讴卮鬲賳 芦乇丕卅賵賱禄 賵 賳诏丕賴 丿丕卮鬲賳 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 亘乇丕蹖 禺賵丿 賲蹖鈥屫з佖� 丿賵 賲乇丿 賴賳诏丕賲蹖 讴賴 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 亘乇 爻乇 賲夭丕乇 倬丿乇 禺賵丿 乇賮鬲賴 鈥屫ж池� 亘丕 蹖讴丿蹖诏乇 锟斤拷賵丿乇賵 卮丿賴貙 賵 亘乇 乇賵蹖 賴賲 卮賲卮蹖乇 賲蹖鈥屭┴促嗀� 丕賲丕 倬蹖乇賵夭蹖 丕夭 丌賳 芦乇丕卅賵賱禄 丕爻鬲 賵 鬲賳賴丕 賳賮乇鬲 亘乇丕蹖 卮亘丨 亘丕賯蹖 賲蹖鈥屬呚з嗀�
賳賲丕蹖卮 芦丿賵賳 禺賵丕賳禄 丿乇 丨丕賱 丕噩乇丕爻鬲貙 賵 芦乇丕卅賵賱禄 賳诏賴亘丕賳丕賳蹖 賲爻賱丨 乇丕 丿乇 爻丕賱賳 丕倬乇丕 賲爻鬲賯乇 讴乇丿賴 鈥屫ж池� 亘丕 丕蹖賳 賵噩賵丿 卮亘丨 亘丕 讴卮鬲賳 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 亘丕夭蹖诏乇丕賳 賲乇丿貙 禺賵丿 亘賴 鈥屫й� 丕賵 賵丕乇丿 氐丨賳賴 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 丕賵 丿乇 讴賳丕乇 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 卮乇賵毓 亘賴 禺賵丕賳丿賳 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賵賱蹖 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 賳丕诏賴丕賳 賳賯丕亘 丕夭 趩賴乇賴 蹖 丕賵 亘乇賲蹖鈥屭┴簇� 賵 氐賵乇鬲 亘丿卮讴賱 卮亘丨 賳賲丕蹖丕賳 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 卮亘丨 讴賴 睾丕賮賱诏蹖乇 卮丿賴貙 胤賳丕亘蹖 讴賴 趩賱趩乇丕睾 毓馗蹖賲 爻丕賱賳 丕倬乇丕 乇丕 賳诏賴丿丕卮鬲賴貙 倬丕乇賴 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 趩賱趩乇丕睾 亘乇 乇賵蹖 噩賲毓蹖鬲 讴賴 丿乇 丨丕賱 賮乇丕乇 賴爻鬲賳丿 賲蹖鈥屫з佖� 賵 卮亘丨 丿乇 丨丕賱蹖讴賴 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 乇丕 丿乇 丌睾賵卮 诏乇賮鬲賴貙 賳丕倬丿蹖丿 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 芦乇丕卅賵賱禄 丕夭 芦賲丕丿丕賲 跇蹖乇蹖禄 讴賴 鬲賳賴丕 讴爻蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 乇丕賴 賲禺賮蹖诏丕賴 卮亘丨 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫з嗀� 賲蹖鈥屫堌з囏� 讴賴 亘賴 丕賵 蹖丕乇蹖 讴賳丿貨 芦賲丕丿丕賲 跇蹖乇蹖禄 乇丕賴 乇丕 亘賴 丕賵 賳卮丕賳 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 賵 芦乇丕卅賵賱禄 亘乇丕蹖 賳噩丕鬲 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌� 丕賲丕 卮亘丨 丕賵 乇丕 诏蹖乇 丕賳丿丕禺鬲賴貙 賵 亘賴 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 賲蹖鈥屭堐屫� 讴賴 賳噩丕鬲 噩丕賳 芦乇丕卅賵賱禄 亘賴 诏夭蹖賳卮 丕賵 亘爻鬲诏蹖 丿丕乇丿貨 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 讴賴 丿乇賲丕賳丿賴 卮丿賴 鈥屫ж池� 卮亘丨 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫ㄙ堌池� 卮亘丨 讴賴 丕丨爻丕爻丕鬲卮 鬲丨乇蹖讴 卮丿賴貙 亘賴 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 賵 芦乇丕卅賵賱禄 賲蹖鈥屭堐屫� 讴賴 丕夭 丌賳噩丕 亘乇賵賳丿貙 賵 禺賵丿 卮乇賵毓 亘賴 卮讴爻鬲賳 鬲賲丕賲蹖 丌蹖賳賴鈥� 賴丕蹖 賲賵噩賵丿 丿乇 賲禺賮蹖诏丕賴卮 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賳诏賴亘丕賳丕賳 賵 讴丕乇讴賳丕賳貙 亘賴 賲禺賮蹖诏丕賴 卮亘丨 賲蹖鈥屫必迟嗀� 丕賲丕 亘賴 噩夭 賳賯丕亘 丕賵貙 賵 丕爻亘丕亘 鈥屫ㄘж槽� 賲蹖賲賵賳蹖 讴賴 爻賳噩 賲蹖鈥屫操嗀� 趩蹖夭蹖 賳賲蹖鈥屰屫жㄙ嗀�
賵蹖讴賵賳鬲 卮丕賳蹖貙 讴賴 蹖丕丿賲丕賳賴丕蹖 诏匕卮鬲賴 乇丕 亘賴 鈥屰屫ж� 賲蹖鈥屫①堌必� 爻賵丕乇 亘乇 賲丕卮蹖賳貙 亘賴 爻賵蹖 诏賵乇爻鬲丕賳蹖 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌� 丿乇 丌賳噩丕 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 丌乇賲蹖丿賴 鈥屫ж池� 賵 丕賵 毓乇賵爻讴 賲蹖賲賵賳 爻賳噩鈥屫操� 乇丕貙 讴賴 丕夭 丨乇丕噩蹖 丕倬乇丕蹖 倬丕乇蹖爻 禺乇蹖丿丕乇蹖 讴乇丿賴 鈥屫ж池� 亘乇 爻乇 賲夭丕乇 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 賲蹖鈥屭柏ж必� 丕賲丕 亘賴 賴賳诏丕賲 亘丕夭诏卮鬲 賲鬲賵噩賴贁 卮丕禺賴 诏賱 爻乇禺鈥屫辟嗂� 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 讴賴 乇賵亘丕賳蹖 爻蹖丕賴 亘賴 丌賳 亘爻鬲賴 卮丿賴貙 賵 丿乇 讴賳丕乇 爻賳诏 賲夭丕乇 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 诏匕丕乇丿賴 卮丿賴 鈥屫ж池�
鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴賳诏丕賲 乇爻丕賳蹖 30/06/1399賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 21/05/1400賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
The Phantom of the Opera is a novel by French writer Gaston Leroux. It was first published in volume form in late March 1910 by Pierre Lafitte.
In Paris in the 1880's, the Palais Garnier opera house is believed to be haunted by an entity known as the Phantom of the Opera, or simply the Opera Ghost.
A stagehand named Joseph Buquet is found hanged and the rope around his neck goes missing.
At a gala performance for the retirement of the opera house's two managers, a young little-known Swedish soprano, Christine Daa茅, is called upon to sing in the place of the Opera's leading soprano, Carlotta, who is ill, and her performance is an astonishing success.
The Vicomte Raoul de Chagny, who was present at the performance, recognizes her as his childhood playmate and recalls his love for her.
He attempts to visit her backstage, where he hears a man complimenting her from inside her dressing room. He investigates the room once Christine leaves, only to find it empty.
At Perros-Guirec, Christine meets with Raoul, who confronts her about the voice he heard in her room.
Christine tells him she has been tutored by the Angel of Music, whom her father used to tell them about.
When Raoul suggests that she might be the victim of a prank, she storms off. Christine visits her father's grave one night, where a mysterious figure appears and plays the violin for her.
Raoul attempts to confront it but is attacked and knocked out in the process. Back at the Palais Garnier, the new managers receive a letter from the Phantom demanding that they allow Christine to perform the lead role of Marguerite in Faust, and that box 5 be left empty for his use, lest they perform in a house with a curse on it.
The managers ignore his demands as a prank, resulting in disastrous consequences: Carlotta ends up croaking like a toad, and the chandelier suddenly drops into the audience, killing a spectator. The Phantom, having abducted Christine from her dressing room, reveals himself as a deformed man called Erik.
Erik intends to keep her in his lair with him for a few days, but she causes him to change his plans when she unmasks him and, to the horror of both, beholds his noseless, lipless, sunken-eyed face, which resembles a skull dried up by the centuries, covered in yellowed dead flesh.
Fearing that she will leave him, he decides to keep her with him forever, but when Christine requests release after two weeks, he agrees on the condition that she wear his ring and be faithful to him.
On the roof of the opera house, Christine tells Raoul about her abduction and makes Raoul promise to take her away to a place where Erik can never find her, even if she resists.
Raoul tells Christine he will act on his promise the next day, to which she agrees. However, Christine sympathizes with Erik and decides to sing for him one last time as a means of saying goodbye. Unbeknownst to Christine and Raoul, Erik has been watching them and overheard their whole conversation.
The following night, the enraged and jealous Erik abducts Christine during a production of Faust and tries to force her to marry him.
Raoul is led by a mysterious opera regular known as "The Persian" into Erik's secret lair deep in the bowels of the opera house, but they end up trapped in a mirrored room by Erik, who threatens that unless Christine agrees to marry him, he will kill them and everyone in the Opera House by using explosives.
Christine agrees to marry Erik. Erik initially tries to drown Raoul and the Persian, using the water which would have been used to douse the explosives, but Christine begs and offers to be his "living bride", promising him not to kill herself after becoming his bride, as she had both contemplated and attempted earlier in the book.
Erik eventually releases Raoul and the Persian from his torture chamber.
When Erik is alone with Christine, he lifts his mask to kiss her on her forehead and is given a kiss back. Erik reveals that he has never received a kiss, not even from his own mother, nor has been allowed to give one and is overcome with emotion.
He and Christine then cry together and their tears "mingle". Erik later says that he has never felt so close to another human being. He allows the Persian and Raoul to escape, though not before making Christine promise that she will visit him on his death day, and return the gold ring he gave her.
He also makes the Persian promise that afterward he will go to the newspaper and report his death, as he will die soon and will die "of love". Indeed, sometime later Christine returns to Erik's lair, buries him somewhere he will never be found (by Erik's request) and returns the gold ring.
Afterward, a local newspaper runs the simple note: "Erik is dead".
Christine and Raoul (who finds out that Erik has killed his older brother) elope together, never to return. Passages narrated directly by the Persian and the final chapter piece together Erik's life: the son of a construction business owner deformed from birth, he ran away from his native Normandy to work in fairs and in caravans, schooling himself in the arts of the circus across Europe and Asia, and eventually building trick palaces in Persia and Turkey.
Eventually, he returned to France and, wearing a mask, started his own construction business. After being subcontracted to work on the foundations of the Palais Garnier, Erik had discreetly built himself a lair to disappear in, complete with hidden passages and other tricks that allowed him to spy on the managers.
鬲丕乇蹖禺 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 禺賵丕賳卮 賲丕賴 噩賵賱丕蹖 爻丕賱 2003賲蹖賱丕丿蹖
毓賳賵丕賳: 卮亘丨 丕倬乇丕貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 诏丕爻鬲賵賳 賱賵乇賵貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 賲乇鬲囟蹖 丌噩賵丿丕賳蹖貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 讴鬲丕亘賴丕蹖 噩蹖亘蹖貙 1343貙 丿乇 368氐貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 毓賱賲蹖 賮乇賴賳诏蹖貨 爻丕賱1394貨 丿乇 賴賮丿賴 賵 491氐貨 卮丕亘讴: 9786001215285貨 賲賵囟賵毓: 丿丕爻鬲丕賳賴丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 賮乇丕賳爻賴 - 爻丿賴 20賲
毓賳賵丕賳: 卮亘丨 丕倬乇丕貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 诏丕爻鬲賵賳 賱賵乇賵貨 亘乇诏乇丿丕賳: 丌乇卮 丨噩丕夭蹖貨 賲賴丿蹖 丨乇蹖乇蹖貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 讴丕乇賵丕賳貙 1381貨 丿乇 443氐貨 卮丕亘讴: 9647033389貨 趩丕倬 丿賵賲 1382貨 趩丕倬 倬賳噩賲 1385貨
賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 亘丕乇 賮蹖賱賲 乇丕 趩賳丿 亘丕乇 丿蹖丿賲貨 爻倬爻 诏卮鬲賲 賵 鬲乇噩賲賴 蹖 噩賳丕亘 丌賯丕蹖 芦丌噩賵丿丕賳蹖禄 乇丕 蹖丕賮鬲賲貨 乇賲丕賳 芦卮亘丨 丕倬乇丕禄貨 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丿賱 丕賳诏蹖夭蹖 丿乇 丿賱 禺賵蹖卮 賳賴丕賳 丿丕乇丿貨 禺賵丕賳卮诏乇貙 賵 亘蹖賳卮诏乇貙 賴乇诏夭蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 賵 氐丨賳賴 賴丕蹖 賮蹖賱賲貙 賵 蹖丕 賵丕跇賴 賴丕蹖 讴鬲丕亘貙 丕夭 蹖丕丿卮丕賳 亘賴 噩丕蹖 丿蹖诏乇 讴賵趩 賳賲蹖讴賳賳丿貙 賵 賳賲蹖乇賵賳丿貨 蹖丕丿賲 賲丕賳丿賴 讴賴 丌賳 丿禺鬲乇讴 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄貙 趩诏賵賳賴 亘賴 丌賳 賮乇卮鬲賴 蹖 賲賵爻蹖賯蹖 丿賱 亘丕禺鬲貨 賴賲丕賳 賮乇卮鬲賴貙 蹖丕 卮亘丨 禺賵賮賳丕讴貙 讴賴 丿乇 爻乇丿丕亘賴 賴丕蹖 爻丕禺鬲賲丕賳 丕倬乇丕貙 賲爻讴賳 诏夭蹖丿賴 亘賵丿貙 賵 鬲賳賴丕 亘乇丕蹖 卮賳蹖丿賳 賲賵爻蹖賯蹖 亘賴 讴賳丕乇 氐丨賳賴 賲蹖丌賲丿貨 賳蹖夭 賳丕賲 賮蹖賱賲蹖 賲賵夭蹖讴丕賱 賴賲 賴爻鬲 讴賴 亘爻蹖丕乇 丿蹖丿賳蹖 爻鬲貙 丿乇 賳賵卮鬲賴 賴丕蹖 丿蹖诏乇蹖 丿乇 亘丕乇賴 蹖 卮亘丨 賵 丕蹖賳讴賴 丕賵 讴蹖 亘賵丿賴貙 亘爻蹖丕乇 賳賵卮鬲賴貙 賵 丕夭 丕蹖乇丕賳 賵 丿賵乇丕賳 賳丕氐乇蹖 賴賲 蹖丕丿 讴乇丿賴 丕賳丿貨
賴卮丿丕乇 亘乇丕蹖 讴爻丕賳蹖讴賴 賲蹖禺賵丕賴賳丿 禺賵丿 丕蹖賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 乇丕 亘禺賵丕賳賳丿貨 趩讴蹖丿賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 乇丕 丕賮卮丕 賲蹖讴賳丿
趩讴蹖丿賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳: 賮蹖賱賲 丿乇 爻丕賱 1919賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 賵 亘賴 氐賵乇鬲 爻蹖丕賴 賵 爻賮蹖丿 丌睾丕夭 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 亘禺卮蹖 丕夭 丕賲賵丕賱 丕倬乇丕蹖 倬丕乇蹖爻 亘賴 丨乇丕噩 诏匕丕乇丿賴 卮丿賴 賵 丕夭 噩賲賱賴 卮乇讴鬲 鈥屭┵嗁嗀з� 丿乇 丨乇丕噩貙 賲乇丿 爻丕賱禺賵乇丿賴 丕蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 亘丕 毓賳賵丕賳 芦賵蹖讴賵賳鬲 乇丕卅賵賱 丿賵 卮丕賳蹖禄 賲毓乇賮蹖 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 賲賵乇丿 丨乇丕噩蹖 毓乇賵爻讴 賲蹖賲賵賳蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 爻賳噩 賲蹖鈥屫操嗀� 賵 芦賵蹖讴賵賳鬲禄 丌賳 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫必� 倬爻 丕夭 丌賳 賳賵亘鬲 亘賴 丨乇丕噩 趩賱趩乇丕睾 毓馗蹖賲 丕倬乇丕蹖 倬丕乇蹖爻 賲蹖鈥屫必池� 讴賴 亘丕 倬乇丿賴鈥� 丕蹖 倬賵卮丕賳丿賴 卮丿賴 鈥屫ж池� 亘乇丕蹖 賳賲丕蹖卮 丌賳 倬乇丿賴 乇丕 讴賳丕乇 讴卮蹖丿賴貙 賵 趩賱趩乇丕睾 乇丕 亘賴 亘丕賱丕 賲蹖鈥屭┴促嗀� 亘丕 亘丕賱丕乇賮鬲賳 趩賱趩乇丕睾 夭賲丕賳 亘賴 毓賯亘 賵 爻丕賱 1870賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 蹖毓賳蹖 丿賵乇丕賳 乇賵賳賯 爻丕賱賳 丕倬乇丕蹖 倬丕乇蹖爻 亘乇賲蹖鈥屭必� 賵 賮蹖賱賲 乇賳诏蹖 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賳賲丕蹖卮蹖 毓馗蹖賲 賯乇丕乇 丕爻鬲 丕噩乇丕 卮賵丿貙 賵 亘丕夭蹖诏乇丕賳 賲卮睾賵賱 鬲賲乇蹖賳 賴爻鬲賳丿貨 賳丕诏賴丕賳 倬乇丿賴 蹖 倬卮鬲 氐丨賳賴貙 亘賴 卮丿鬲 丿乇 賳夭丿蹖讴蹖 芦亘丕賳賵 讴丕乇賱賵鬲丕禄貙 亘丕夭蹖诏乇 賳賯卮 丕氐賱蹖 賮乇賵 賲蹖鈥屫з佖� 亘丕夭蹖诏乇丕賳 賲蹖鈥屭堐屬嗀� 讴賴 丕蹖賳 讴丕乇 卮亘丨 丕倬乇丕 丕爻鬲貙 賵 芦讴丕乇賱賵鬲丕禄 亘賴 丨丕賱鬲 賯賴乇 丌賳噩丕 乇丕 鬲乇讴 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 诏乇丿丕賳賳丿诏丕賳 丕倬乇丕 讴賴 亘丕夭蹖诏乇 丕氐賱蹖 禺賵丿 乇丕 丕夭 丿爻鬲 丿丕丿賴鈥� 丕賳丿貙 亘賴 鬲毓胤蹖賱 讴乇丿賳 賳賲丕蹖卮 賲蹖鈥屫з嗀屫促嗀� 丕賲丕 芦賲丕丿丕賲 跇蹖乇蹖禄貙 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 乇丕 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 噩丕蹖诏夭蹖賳 芦讴丕乇賱賵鬲丕禄 賲毓乇賮蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 丕夭 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 禺賵丕爻鬲賴 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 鬲丕 丌賵丕夭蹖 乇丕 亘禺賵丕賳丿貙 賵 丕賵 亘賴 夭蹖亘丕蹖蹖 丌賳 乇丕 丕噩乇丕 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 丕賲丕 丕夭 诏賮鬲賳 賳丕賲 讴爻蹖 讴賴 丌賵丕夭禺賵丕賳丿賳 乇丕 亘賴 丕賵 丌賲賵禺鬲賴 禺賵丿丿丕乇蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賳賯卮 亘賴 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 丿丕丿賴 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賵 丿乇 卮亘 丕賮鬲鬲丕丨蹖賴貙 芦乇丕卅賵賱 - 賵蹖讴賵賳鬲 卮丕賳蹖禄 讴賴 丿乇 噩賲毓 賲賴賲丕賳丕賳 丕爻鬲貙 丿乇賲蹖蹖丕亘丿 讴賴 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 賴賲丕賳 丿賵爻鬲 丿賵乇丕賳 讴賵丿讴蹖 丕賵爻鬲貙 賵 倬爻 丕夭 丕噩乇丕蹖 賳賲丕蹖卮 亘賴 倬蹖卮 丕賵 賲蹖鈥屫③屫� 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 讴賴 丕夭 丿蹖丿賳 芦乇丕卅賵賱禄 夭蹖亘丕乇賵蹖貙 亘爻蹖丕乇 卮丕丿賲丕賳 卮丿賴 賲丿鬲蹖 乇丕 亘賴 诏賮鬲诏賵 亘丕 丕賵 爻倬乇蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�
丿乇 倬卮鬲 氐丨賳賴 诏賱鈥屬囏й� 賮乇丕賵丕賳蹖 亘乇丕蹖 讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳 賮乇爻鬲丕丿賴 卮丿賴 丕賲丕 丿乇 賲蹖丕賳 丌賳賴丕 蹖讴 乇夭 爻乇禺 賯乇丕乇 丿丕乇丿 讴賴 乇賵亘丕賳蹖 爻蹖丕賴 亘賴 丌賳 亘爻鬲賴 卮丿賴鈥� 丕爻鬲貨 賮乇爻鬲賳丿賴贁 丌賳 诏賱 讴爻蹖 賳蹖爻鬲 亘賴 噩夭 芦卮亘丨 丕倬乇丕禄貙 蹖讴 賳丕亘睾賴 蹖 賲賵爻蹖賯蹖 讴賴 亘賴 丿賱蹖賱 賳賯氐 賲丕丿乇夭丕丿蹖 鈥屫й� 讴賴 丿乇 趩賴乇賴 鈥屫ж� 丿丕乇丿貙 禺賵丿 乇丕 丿乇 夭蹖乇夭賲蹖賳 丕倬乇丕蹖 倬丕乇蹖爻 倬賳賴丕賳 讴乇丿賴貙 賵 賳賯丕亘蹖 亘乇 趩賴乇賴 诏匕丕卮鬲賴 鈥屫ж池� 卮亘丨 毓丕卮賯 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 丕爻鬲貙 賵 丕賵爻鬲 讴賴 丌賵丕夭禺賵丕賳丿賳 乇丕 亘賴 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 丌賲賵禺鬲賴貙 賵 丿乇 丕夭丕蹖 丌賳 賲蹖鈥屫堌з囏� 讴賴 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 亘乇丕蹖 賴賲蹖卮賴 亘丕 丕賵 亘賲丕賳丿貨 丕賵 賴賲趩賳蹖賳 鬲賲丕賲 鬲賱丕卮 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘讴丕乇 賲蹖鈥屫ㄙ嗀� 鬲丕 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 爻鬲丕乇賴贁 丕氐賱蹖 賳賲丕蹖卮鈥屬囏й� 丕倬乇丕蹖 倬丕乇蹖爻 亘丕卮丿貙 賵 亘丕 丕乇爻丕賱 賳丕賲賴鈥� 丕蹖 亘賴 诏乇丿丕賳賳丿诏丕賳 爻丕賱賳 丕倬乇丕貙 丌賳賴丕 乇丕 鬲賴丿蹖丿 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 丿乇 氐賵乇鬲蹖 讴賴 賳賯卮 丕氐賱蹖 賳賲丕蹖卮 亘毓丿蹖 亘賴 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 爻倬乇丿賴 賳卮賵丿貙 亘丕蹖丿 賲賳鬲馗乇 毓賵丕賯亘 亘丿蹖 亘丕卮賳丿貨 丕賲丕 丌賳丕賳 亘賴 丕蹖賳 鬲賴丿蹖丿 鬲賵噩賴蹖 賳讴乇丿賴貙 賵 亘乇丕蹖 丿賱噩賵锟斤拷蹖 丕夭 芦亘丕賳賵 讴丕乇賱賵鬲丕禄貙 賳賯卮 丕氐賱蹖 乇丕 亘賴 丕賵 賲蹖鈥屫迟矩ж辟嗀� 卮亘丨 讴賴 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賲賵囟賵毓 賳丕乇丕丨鬲 卮丿賴貙 亘丕 毓賵囟 讴乇丿賳 丕賮卮乇賴贁 氐丕賮 鈥屭┵嗁嗀囐� 爻 氐丿丕蹖 丕賵貙 亘丕毓孬 诏乇賮鬲诏蹖 氐丿丕蹖 芦讴丕乇賱賵鬲丕禄 卮丿賴貙 賵 亘賴 鈥屬嗀и嗀ж� 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 噩丕蹖诏夭蹖賳 丕賵 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 丕賲丕 卮亘丨 鬲賳賴丕 亘賴 賴賲蹖賳 讴丕乇 丕讴鬲賮丕 賳讴乇丿賴 賵 賲爻卅賵賱 鬲睾蹖蹖乇 倬乇丿賴鈥� 賴丕蹖 賳賲丕蹖卮 乇丕 亘丕 胤賳丕亘蹖 丿丕乇 夭丿賴 賵 丿乇 亘乇丕亘乇 趩卮賲丕賳 鬲賲丕卮丕诏乇丕賳 丌賵蹖夭丕賳 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�
讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳 讴賴 毓丕卮賯 芦乇丕卅賵賱禄 卮丿賴 亘賴 丕賵 賲蹖鈥屭堐屫� 讴賴 丕夭 卮亘丨 賲蹖鈥屫必池� 賵 乇丕卅賵賱 亘丕 禺賵丕賳丿賳 丌賵丕夭蹖 亘賴 丕賵 賲蹖鈥屭堐屫� 讴賴 賴賲賵丕乇賴 丿乇 讴賳丕乇卮 禺賵丕賴丿 亘賵丿貙 賵 丕夭 丕賵 賲乇丕賯亘鬲 禺賵丕賴丿 讴乇丿貙 賵 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 亘丕 亘乇 夭賲蹖賳 丕賳丿丕禺鬲賳 诏賱 爻乇禺蹖 讴賴 卮亘丨 丕倬乇丕 亘乇丕蹖卮 賮乇爻鬲丕丿賴貙 亘賴 芦乇丕卅賵賱禄 賲蹖鈥屬聚屬堎嗀� 丌賳賴丕 賳賲蹖鈥屫з嗁嗀� 讴賴 卮亘丨 丕倬乇丕 卮丕賴丿 丿蹖丿丕乇 丌賳賴丕爻鬲 賵 丕賵 讴賴 賯賱亘卮 卮讴爻鬲賴貙 亘賴 賮讴乇 讴卮鬲賳 芦乇丕卅賵賱禄 賵 賳诏丕賴 丿丕卮鬲賳 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 亘乇丕蹖 禺賵丿 賲蹖鈥屫з佖� 丿賵 賲乇丿 賴賳诏丕賲蹖 讴賴 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 亘乇 爻乇 賲夭丕乇 倬丿乇 禺賵丿 乇賮鬲賴 鈥屫ж池� 亘丕 蹖讴丿蹖诏乇 锟斤拷賵丿乇賵 卮丿賴貙 賵 亘乇 乇賵蹖 賴賲 卮賲卮蹖乇 賲蹖鈥屭┴促嗀� 丕賲丕 倬蹖乇賵夭蹖 丕夭 丌賳 芦乇丕卅賵賱禄 丕爻鬲 賵 鬲賳賴丕 賳賮乇鬲 亘乇丕蹖 卮亘丨 亘丕賯蹖 賲蹖鈥屬呚з嗀�
賳賲丕蹖卮 芦丿賵賳 禺賵丕賳禄 丿乇 丨丕賱 丕噩乇丕爻鬲貙 賵 芦乇丕卅賵賱禄 賳诏賴亘丕賳丕賳蹖 賲爻賱丨 乇丕 丿乇 爻丕賱賳 丕倬乇丕 賲爻鬲賯乇 讴乇丿賴 鈥屫ж池� 亘丕 丕蹖賳 賵噩賵丿 卮亘丨 亘丕 讴卮鬲賳 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 亘丕夭蹖诏乇丕賳 賲乇丿貙 禺賵丿 亘賴 鈥屫й� 丕賵 賵丕乇丿 氐丨賳賴 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 丕賵 丿乇 讴賳丕乇 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 卮乇賵毓 亘賴 禺賵丕賳丿賳 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賵賱蹖 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 賳丕诏賴丕賳 賳賯丕亘 丕夭 趩賴乇賴 蹖 丕賵 亘乇賲蹖鈥屭┴簇� 賵 氐賵乇鬲 亘丿卮讴賱 卮亘丨 賳賲丕蹖丕賳 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 卮亘丨 讴賴 睾丕賮賱诏蹖乇 卮丿賴貙 胤賳丕亘蹖 讴賴 趩賱趩乇丕睾 毓馗蹖賲 爻丕賱賳 丕倬乇丕 乇丕 賳诏賴丿丕卮鬲賴貙 倬丕乇賴 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 趩賱趩乇丕睾 亘乇 乇賵蹖 噩賲毓蹖鬲 讴賴 丿乇 丨丕賱 賮乇丕乇 賴爻鬲賳丿 賲蹖鈥屫з佖� 賵 卮亘丨 丿乇 丨丕賱蹖讴賴 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 乇丕 丿乇 丌睾賵卮 诏乇賮鬲賴貙 賳丕倬丿蹖丿 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 芦乇丕卅賵賱禄 丕夭 芦賲丕丿丕賲 跇蹖乇蹖禄 讴賴 鬲賳賴丕 讴爻蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 乇丕賴 賲禺賮蹖诏丕賴 卮亘丨 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫з嗀� 賲蹖鈥屫堌з囏� 讴賴 亘賴 丕賵 蹖丕乇蹖 讴賳丿貨 芦賲丕丿丕賲 跇蹖乇蹖禄 乇丕賴 乇丕 亘賴 丕賵 賳卮丕賳 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 賵 芦乇丕卅賵賱禄 亘乇丕蹖 賳噩丕鬲 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌� 丕賲丕 卮亘丨 丕賵 乇丕 诏蹖乇 丕賳丿丕禺鬲賴貙 賵 亘賴 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 賲蹖鈥屭堐屫� 讴賴 賳噩丕鬲 噩丕賳 芦乇丕卅賵賱禄 亘賴 诏夭蹖賳卮 丕賵 亘爻鬲诏蹖 丿丕乇丿貨 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 讴賴 丿乇賲丕賳丿賴 卮丿賴 鈥屫ж池� 卮亘丨 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫ㄙ堌池� 卮亘丨 讴賴 丕丨爻丕爻丕鬲卮 鬲丨乇蹖讴 卮丿賴貙 亘賴 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 賵 芦乇丕卅賵賱禄 賲蹖鈥屭堐屫� 讴賴 丕夭 丌賳噩丕 亘乇賵賳丿貙 賵 禺賵丿 卮乇賵毓 亘賴 卮讴爻鬲賳 鬲賲丕賲蹖 丌蹖賳賴鈥� 賴丕蹖 賲賵噩賵丿 丿乇 賲禺賮蹖诏丕賴卮 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賳诏賴亘丕賳丕賳 賵 讴丕乇讴賳丕賳貙 亘賴 賲禺賮蹖诏丕賴 卮亘丨 賲蹖鈥屫必迟嗀� 丕賲丕 亘賴 噩夭 賳賯丕亘 丕賵貙 賵 丕爻亘丕亘 鈥屫ㄘж槽� 賲蹖賲賵賳蹖 讴賴 爻賳噩 賲蹖鈥屫操嗀� 趩蹖夭蹖 賳賲蹖鈥屰屫жㄙ嗀�
賵蹖讴賵賳鬲 卮丕賳蹖貙 讴賴 蹖丕丿賲丕賳賴丕蹖 诏匕卮鬲賴 乇丕 亘賴 鈥屰屫ж� 賲蹖鈥屫①堌必� 爻賵丕乇 亘乇 賲丕卮蹖賳貙 亘賴 爻賵蹖 诏賵乇爻鬲丕賳蹖 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌� 丿乇 丌賳噩丕 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 丌乇賲蹖丿賴 鈥屫ж池� 賵 丕賵 毓乇賵爻讴 賲蹖賲賵賳 爻賳噩鈥屫操� 乇丕貙 讴賴 丕夭 丨乇丕噩蹖 丕倬乇丕蹖 倬丕乇蹖爻 禺乇蹖丿丕乇蹖 讴乇丿賴 鈥屫ж池� 亘乇 爻乇 賲夭丕乇 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 賲蹖鈥屭柏ж必� 丕賲丕 亘賴 賴賳诏丕賲 亘丕夭诏卮鬲 賲鬲賵噩賴贁 卮丕禺賴 诏賱 爻乇禺鈥屫辟嗂� 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 讴賴 乇賵亘丕賳蹖 爻蹖丕賴 亘賴 丌賳 亘爻鬲賴 卮丿賴貙 賵 丿乇 讴賳丕乇 爻賳诏 賲夭丕乇 芦讴乇蹖爻鬲蹖賳禄 诏匕丕乇丿賴 卮丿賴 鈥屫ж池�
鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴賳诏丕賲 乇爻丕賳蹖 30/06/1399賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 21/05/1400賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
July 3, 2022
This was better as a musical!!!! Which I didn't even know existed until about a week ago!!
Oh Erik you simp.
Raoul you suck.
Christine you deserve better than both of these idiots.
Watch our full liveshow here:
2.5 STARS
| | |
Oh Erik you simp.
Raoul you suck.
Christine you deserve better than both of these idiots.
Watch our full liveshow here:
2.5 STARS
| | |
July 18, 2023
I fell in love with The Phantom of the Opera after watching the 2004 movie adaptation. Since then, I have wanted to read the book. I didn't know what a surprise there was in store for me. The movie was simply a love triangle between Raoul, Christine, and Erik - the "opera ghost" and nothing more. But the book is much more than that. It is a gothic horror story, quite different from the movie, and is very dark. Reading the book reversed my whole perspective of the story and its characters.
The "Poor Erik" of the movie was not so "poor" after all. He is not so much the wronged, unlucky man I thought him to be. He is a monster who kills, injures, blackmails, and kidnaps to achieve his desires in life. Just when I thought I have read the darkest classical character in Heathcliff, Leroux presents me with a more sinister Erik! He terrorizes the whole of the opera house with his brutality, especially the young and innocent Christine Dae. Erik is nothing but a villain who deserves no sympathy. And Raoul is no hero. He is more of a fool, with his doubting heart, his childish actions, his short sight, and impatience. Leroux's heroine is Christine. For one so young, she has a surprising strength to undergo the brutality of Erik and is of a mature mind to do what is best for others even at her own peril.
The story is a dark tale of a man with an unnatural, disturbing mind. The horrifying drama his actions bring about and the fright they cause leave you quite frantic. However, Leroux injects a little humor to assuage the grim atmosphere. Thus, despite the gravity and shocking wickedness so nakedly portrayed, I had quite a laugh too.
Although the book was not what I expected, it was nevertheless an interesting read in itself. Irrespective of the darker subject matter, I did enjoy the story pretty much. On reflection, I'm glad that it was a complex horror story, coupled with a bit of romance, and not a simple love story.
The "Poor Erik" of the movie was not so "poor" after all. He is not so much the wronged, unlucky man I thought him to be. He is a monster who kills, injures, blackmails, and kidnaps to achieve his desires in life. Just when I thought I have read the darkest classical character in Heathcliff, Leroux presents me with a more sinister Erik! He terrorizes the whole of the opera house with his brutality, especially the young and innocent Christine Dae. Erik is nothing but a villain who deserves no sympathy. And Raoul is no hero. He is more of a fool, with his doubting heart, his childish actions, his short sight, and impatience. Leroux's heroine is Christine. For one so young, she has a surprising strength to undergo the brutality of Erik and is of a mature mind to do what is best for others even at her own peril.
The story is a dark tale of a man with an unnatural, disturbing mind. The horrifying drama his actions bring about and the fright they cause leave you quite frantic. However, Leroux injects a little humor to assuage the grim atmosphere. Thus, despite the gravity and shocking wickedness so nakedly portrayed, I had quite a laugh too.
Although the book was not what I expected, it was nevertheless an interesting read in itself. Irrespective of the darker subject matter, I did enjoy the story pretty much. On reflection, I'm glad that it was a complex horror story, coupled with a bit of romance, and not a simple love story.
January 14, 2024
鈥淭he Angel was never seen but could be heard by those who were meant to hear.鈥�
A beautifully dark exploration of obsession, unrequited love and moral questioning.
The Phantom of the Opera narrates the purity and triumph of love, the captivating connection of Christine and Raoul- unbroken by any otherworldly hurdle. Both characters embody heroism, dedication. You long for their happiness, their pursuit of each other unravelling with each page.
Lurking below, gracing the dimly lit halls of the opera house, is the sinister enigma of The Phantom. His own forbidding pursuit of love. His pursuit of humanity, 鈥淗e simply longed to be someone', someone normal.鈥� His character captivates, wrapped in a sense of sinister romanticism, his actions shrouded by questions. You fear him, yet you pity him.
A read that spoke to me in a sense I didn鈥檛 expect, a compelling classic.
A beautifully dark exploration of obsession, unrequited love and moral questioning.
The Phantom of the Opera narrates the purity and triumph of love, the captivating connection of Christine and Raoul- unbroken by any otherworldly hurdle. Both characters embody heroism, dedication. You long for their happiness, their pursuit of each other unravelling with each page.
Lurking below, gracing the dimly lit halls of the opera house, is the sinister enigma of The Phantom. His own forbidding pursuit of love. His pursuit of humanity, 鈥淗e simply longed to be someone', someone normal.鈥� His character captivates, wrapped in a sense of sinister romanticism, his actions shrouded by questions. You fear him, yet you pity him.
A read that spoke to me in a sense I didn鈥檛 expect, a compelling classic.
January 6, 2025
I'll admit that I first saw the broadway show, then the 2004 film, and read the book afterwards. The book was a fairly different animal then its other incarnations, but I enjoyed it a great deal, especially the ending, which was much different. I felt that Erik was a tragic character, but you understood his pain enough to dislike him at times, but not hate him. I also very much loved when the phantom appears at the farewell ceremony to the opera managers, towards the beginning of the book. That stuck out to me a great deal, and set the tone for the remainder of the story. Highly recommend!
September 20, 2024
Sorelli, a principal dancer in the beautiful, new, and fabulous Paris Opera House ( circa 1880) is angry, her dressing - room has been invaded, by half a dozen hysterical young ladies, ballet dancers. The frightened performers have seen the legendary Phantom (Ghost), claiming to have noticed a very ugly man, but well dressed in the passageway. The superstitious but brave woman, opens the door quiet slowly and takes a careful peek. The shadowy in gaslight, reddish walls give a strange ambiance, but there is nothing around, the door is quickly shut ...The new managers don't take seriously the old ones, MM. Debienne and Poligny, warnings of the Phantom, receiving them as a joke to amuse Armand Moncharmin, and Firmin Richard, such distinguished gentlemen, playing silly childish games. The duo will be sorry they did not take their advise . Christine Daae, a young Swedish singer, gives an awe inspiring performance when La Carlotta, the spoiled prima donna, lead soprano singer, at the Opera House, through illness, missed her engagement . And the "man" in box five, falls madly in love with Christine, he is the Phantom ( call him Erik) and can help her achieve stardom, maybe not with a gentle touch. Many sightings of this phantom, but he is never caught after all, how can you stop a ghost? Trapped doors, secret passageways, magic mirrors, voices inside walls from empty rooms, a lake under the opera house the intelligent Phantom, knows everything about the gigantic building. A stagehand is found hanging , lifeless below in the cellars, he had seen a flaming head no body though, flying by people , thought he was drunk; a heavy chandelier crushes a woman in the audience during a performance, and at the farewell dinner for the old managers, this man with a death mask sits down at the table. No one talks to the weird, would you ... unnerving stranger, he tells the gentlemen that Joseph Bouqet, the dead man didn't commit suicide. And vanishes as fast as he had arrived ... Raoul Vicomte de Chagny, 20, a person who knew Christine, when both were children loves her too, not surprisingly the jealous Phantom, is not happy indeed. Neither is Phillippe , the Comte de Chagny, and snobbish older brother of Raoul, isn't pleased at all either. Erik kidnaps Christine, descends deep down, under the dungeon like cellars, the monster has a house on the eerie lake. He plays on a organ, his opera that he is writing for Christine, a beautiful voice comes out of his grotesque head. Christine is curious, when the fiend is playing with his back to her, she lifts the death mask ... a hideous, unbelievable repellent, repugnant, revolting face, she faints away. Meanwhile the frantic Raoul , meets the Persian, a person everyone knows but nobody can say who he is. But immediately, Raoul trust him, trust him he must, he knows where Christine is. The Persian gives him a revolver, takes another and they walk down, into the vast, darkness of the opera house basement, to rescue Christine, first seeing a shadow moving near them, but the Phantom it is not. Then a flying face all a blazed, thundering noises rising coming closer and closer, they reach the wall and can't go any further , the strange face approaches, the sound deafening ... thousands of rats, from the blackness, the pair, await their doom... A good old-fashioned tale for people that don't take it seriously and like the atmosphere of an amusing adventure too enjoyable to be real.
July 16, 2024
Well, that was melodramatic.
Because I quit a book last week, I forced myself to finish this one. I can finish anything on audio, thought I. I am not a quitter, thought I. But after struggling to focus on this and backtracking 2 hours because I realized I had been daydreaming the entire time, I have come to the realization that the DNF review is not so bad a thing.
This read was torture. Pure torture. I finished it but did not have a good time.
鈥淵ou don鈥檛 love me. But you will.鈥�
Sorry Erik but no. No I won鈥檛. Feel free to keep trying.
鈥淵ou must know that I am made of death, from head to foot, and it is a corpse who loves you and adores you and will never, never leave you!鈥�
Hmmm, slightly tempting. But no. And here鈥檚 why:
This story has the lovely gothic trappings that one would expect; an opera 鈥済host鈥� who hides in the shadows, a helpless damsel and loads of secret passageways and hidden rooms where ominous things happen. But . . .
It was boring .There, I said it. It鈥檚 rather a dry read, goes off on tedious tangents about missing money for hours (felt like hours anyway) and the narration was a wee bit on the stuffy side, making it easy for me to doze off. It also features a love triangle between Christine the beauty, Erik the mentally unstable phantom and Raoul a weepy, boy-man who dissolved into a fit of tears whenever he thought Christine might not share in his insta-love. Note to Raoul: toughen up, man! Your tears are a perfectly good waste of suffering (thank you Clive Barker) and they are not attractive. Poor Christine. She would鈥檝e been better off getting a dog than marrying either of these two.
This did not go down well for me. It was a struggle from beginning to end. I was very much expecting to become immersed in the world but instead I couldn鈥檛 wait to flee from it.
鈥淚 am dying of love. 鈥� Erik
Because I quit a book last week, I forced myself to finish this one. I can finish anything on audio, thought I. I am not a quitter, thought I. But after struggling to focus on this and backtracking 2 hours because I realized I had been daydreaming the entire time, I have come to the realization that the DNF review is not so bad a thing.
This read was torture. Pure torture. I finished it but did not have a good time.
鈥淵ou don鈥檛 love me. But you will.鈥�
Sorry Erik but no. No I won鈥檛. Feel free to keep trying.
鈥淵ou must know that I am made of death, from head to foot, and it is a corpse who loves you and adores you and will never, never leave you!鈥�
Hmmm, slightly tempting. But no. And here鈥檚 why:
This story has the lovely gothic trappings that one would expect; an opera 鈥済host鈥� who hides in the shadows, a helpless damsel and loads of secret passageways and hidden rooms where ominous things happen. But . . .
It was boring .There, I said it. It鈥檚 rather a dry read, goes off on tedious tangents about missing money for hours (felt like hours anyway) and the narration was a wee bit on the stuffy side, making it easy for me to doze off. It also features a love triangle between Christine the beauty, Erik the mentally unstable phantom and Raoul a weepy, boy-man who dissolved into a fit of tears whenever he thought Christine might not share in his insta-love. Note to Raoul: toughen up, man! Your tears are a perfectly good waste of suffering (thank you Clive Barker) and they are not attractive. Poor Christine. She would鈥檝e been better off getting a dog than marrying either of these two.
This did not go down well for me. It was a struggle from beginning to end. I was very much expecting to become immersed in the world but instead I couldn鈥檛 wait to flee from it.
鈥淚 am dying of love. 鈥� Erik
March 7, 2022
鈥淓rik is not truly dead. He lives on within the souls of those who choose to listen to the music of the night鈥�.
No s茅 por qu茅 en mi mente siempre pens茅 que este era un libro s煤per rom谩ntico, pero no lo es en absoluto. Tampoco he visto nunca el musical ni las pel铆culas, as铆 que de verdad no s茅 de d贸nde saqu茅 esa idea. Sin embargo, la historia de El Fantasma de la 脫pera y lo que hace Gaston Leroux al momento de narrarla me pareci贸 muy entretenido.
La historia de Christine, Erik, el vizconde de Chagny y el persa me entretuvo desde la primera p谩gina y, a decir verdad, me gust贸 mucho c贸mo todo lo que pensaba de este libro se iba cayendo al piso con cada acontecimiento, accidente, amenaza y aventura en la que se met铆an los personajes. Ah, adem谩s, disfrut茅 mucho con las estupideces que hac铆an los nuevos directores de la 脫pera con respecto al fantasma. Madre m铆a.
Si bien hay un par de momentos en los que sent铆 que todo se alargaba innecesariamente, luego llegaban otros con bastante ritmo que los compensaban. Adem谩s, creo que todo lo vale porque el libro tiene un gran final, lleno de angustia, tensi贸n y sentimientos muy intensos.
November 2, 2015
鈥淎nd, despite the care which she took to look behind her at every moment, she failed to see a shadow which followed her like her own shadow, which stopped when she stopped, which started again when she did and which made no more noise than a well-conducted shadow should.鈥�
Gaston Leroux - who popularized an entire sub-genre of detective fiction called 鈥�locked room mystery鈥� through his works like 'The Mystery of the Yellow Room' and his fictional amateur sleuth, Joseph Rouletabille - is most renowned for his suspense/ romance/ drama novel 'The Phantom of the Opera'; easily one among the most adapted novels in literary history. Originally published as a series in French daily newspaper 鈥�Le Gaulois鈥� between 1909 and 1910, this terrific tale of suspense and maniacal passion was published as a novel in 1910.
This romantic drama with a dark angle narrates the love triangle between the key characters of Christine, an opera singer; Erik, a man with a horrible facial deformity and who is living unknown to others in the Opera house, introduces himself just as a 鈥榲oice鈥� to her initially and trains her in fine tuning her singing; and Raoul, her childhood friend who is in love with her. The passion and possessiveness arising from the love and a string of violent and terrifying events that happen in an Opera house in which the legend of an 鈥�Opera Ghost鈥� is thriving drives this story forward.
Erik, who had been never loved 鈥� even by his mother due to his physical deformities 鈥� finds love in Christine and this lonely man becomes so mad and jealous with his obsessive love for Christine that through his character Leroux portrays the infinite capacity of human mind in generating evil and his tale is an inspection at the depths of darkness that a soul can possess. This is a Gothic tale of mad passions and the setting of the underground rooms of the Opera house matches the chilling atmosphere that the tale exudes.
I will not go much into the story-line in this review, as it will spoil the experience of reading this book but I can assure the prospective reader one thing, the anti-hero characterization of Erik is one of among the best; the terror, the evil, the fear and the malice that he generates all is brilliantly balanced with the pity and sadness that the reader feel towards him further into the book.
The illustrator
It was a decade and half ago that I read 鈥�The Phantom of Opera鈥� for the first time, but recently I came across a 1911 first US edition copy of this title published by Bobbs-Merrill. When the book was originally published in 1910 titled Le Fant么me de l'Op茅ra in French, it was accompanied by five oil paintings by French illustrator and artist Andr茅 Castaigne. The US edition of 1911 had three of these original five oil paintings reproduced on art paper plates and these paintings capture the eerie atmosphere of the story brilliantly.
The French artist and engraver Jean Andr茅 Castaigne, who was the original illustrator for the first edition of The Phantom of the Opera. This is an anonymous Portrait of Castaigne from 鈥楾he Charcoal Club鈥� in Baltimore, USA, 1893
Andr茅 Castaigne was a master illustrator and painter who drew humans, animals, architecture and landscapes with equal flair and illustrated extensively for both French and American publications.
One of the oil paintings that Castaigne did for the original 1910 first edition, depicting the below scene from novel
The Phantom of Opera - A clever blend of fact and fiction
Gaston Leroux in a clever manner infused real locations and actual events from history to make his novel more credible and more mysterious, and fact and fiction overlaps in this novel to form an atmosphere of misty unknown. Let鈥檚 inspect a few such elements that Leroux took from actuality to fuel his imagination.
Gaston Leroux used the 鈥�Palais Garnier鈥� opera house as the setting for his novel and some of the rumors and architectural elements associated with this real life monument allowed Leroux to infuse a sense of authority or reality to his fictional work.
Uncovered facade of the Palais Garnier on 15 August 1867
An Engraving of the main auditorium chandelier of the Paris Opera's Palais Garnier; The design was by Charles Garnier and the engraving is believed to be by J. B茅nard and C. Lapiaute
On 20 May 1896, one of the counterweights that keep this 7-ton bronze and crystal chandelier stable broke free and burst through the ceiling into the auditorium, killing a member of the audience. Gaston Leroux was inspired by this tragic accident to create one of the most famous scenes in the novel.
The concept of the subterranean lake under the Opera House is also based on some truth as when the site was excavated in 1862, the groundwater level was found unexpectedly high and despite some heavy duty attempts in draining this water from the swampy work site, the site was not dried up completely and a special double foundation had to be designed to take care of this groundwater seepage.
The subterranean water body underneath Palais Garnier, taken from Google Street view. You can Inspect this in detail here:
An enormous concrete cistern, which was built to take control of this situation, formed a reservoir of water and Gaston Leroux was inspired by the rumor, which soon spread around Paris stating that there is an enormous underground lake beneath the Palais Garnier. And the large cellars that act as the technical rooms of the building along with its alcoves and arches could have inspired him into creating the plot element that the phantom lived underneath the Opera house.
The Numerous Adaptations
There have been a multitude of adaptations for 鈥�The Phantom of the Opera鈥� 鈥� into both adult and children鈥檚 literature, dramas, musicals, movies, television shows and comic books 鈥� and I would wish to inspect two specific adaptations here; the 1925 movie adaptation and the famous Andrew Lloyd Webber musical based on the novel.
In 1925, Rupert Julian, the New Zealand cinema actor, director, writer and producer directed a movie adaptation starring Lon Chaney, Sr as Phantom and Mary Philbin as Christine.
Lon Chaney Sr. and Mary Philbin in "The Phantom of the Opera", 1925 Film
This was a faithful adaptation of the book with some plot differences only and was a box office success. I chose this adaptation for mention because of the famous 鈥�unmasking鈥� scene - the scene in which while Erik is playing the organ, Christine creeps up behind him to snatch his mask off 鈥� a movie scene, which can be easily stated as one of the most memorable moments in the history of films.
The famous unmasking the phantom scene
Since the movie is on the public domain you can watch this scene from YouTube - .
When it came out in 1925, this scene was the apex of horror and the make up that was used on Lon Chaney was much acclaimed and frightening. It is also one of the closest characterizations of Phantom, based on the book. From today鈥檚 standard this scene may not have even the slightest iota of horror in it as we have outgrown fear for such visuals with over exposure but at that time this scene when watched in a dark movie house could have been quiet startling and one of the promotional tricks that the movie used was that the theaters were asked to keep smelling salts ready in case someone from the audience watching the scene actually fainted.
A publicity photo of Steve Barton and Sarah Brightman in the final scene of 鈥楾he Phantom of the Opera鈥� musical.
Andrew Lloyd Webber鈥檚 musical adaptation opened in London's West End in 1986, and on Broadway in 1988 and is the longest running show in Broadway history with over 10,000 Broadway performances and a worldwide total gross collection of over $5.6 billion.
鈥�The Phantom of the Opera鈥� may feel overemotional from a modern perspective, but this is a classic mystery and suspense story from a whole different time period, and if as a reader you can have a bit of patience and can take account of this difference in the time-frames, then this work from Leroux can be a satisfying experience.
Written - October 31, 2015
Gaston Leroux - who popularized an entire sub-genre of detective fiction called 鈥�locked room mystery鈥� through his works like 'The Mystery of the Yellow Room' and his fictional amateur sleuth, Joseph Rouletabille - is most renowned for his suspense/ romance/ drama novel 'The Phantom of the Opera'; easily one among the most adapted novels in literary history. Originally published as a series in French daily newspaper 鈥�Le Gaulois鈥� between 1909 and 1910, this terrific tale of suspense and maniacal passion was published as a novel in 1910.
This romantic drama with a dark angle narrates the love triangle between the key characters of Christine, an opera singer; Erik, a man with a horrible facial deformity and who is living unknown to others in the Opera house, introduces himself just as a 鈥榲oice鈥� to her initially and trains her in fine tuning her singing; and Raoul, her childhood friend who is in love with her. The passion and possessiveness arising from the love and a string of violent and terrifying events that happen in an Opera house in which the legend of an 鈥�Opera Ghost鈥� is thriving drives this story forward.
Erik, who had been never loved 鈥� even by his mother due to his physical deformities 鈥� finds love in Christine and this lonely man becomes so mad and jealous with his obsessive love for Christine that through his character Leroux portrays the infinite capacity of human mind in generating evil and his tale is an inspection at the depths of darkness that a soul can possess. This is a Gothic tale of mad passions and the setting of the underground rooms of the Opera house matches the chilling atmosphere that the tale exudes.
I will not go much into the story-line in this review, as it will spoil the experience of reading this book but I can assure the prospective reader one thing, the anti-hero characterization of Erik is one of among the best; the terror, the evil, the fear and the malice that he generates all is brilliantly balanced with the pity and sadness that the reader feel towards him further into the book.
The illustrator
It was a decade and half ago that I read 鈥�The Phantom of Opera鈥� for the first time, but recently I came across a 1911 first US edition copy of this title published by Bobbs-Merrill. When the book was originally published in 1910 titled Le Fant么me de l'Op茅ra in French, it was accompanied by five oil paintings by French illustrator and artist Andr茅 Castaigne. The US edition of 1911 had three of these original five oil paintings reproduced on art paper plates and these paintings capture the eerie atmosphere of the story brilliantly.
The French artist and engraver Jean Andr茅 Castaigne, who was the original illustrator for the first edition of The Phantom of the Opera. This is an anonymous Portrait of Castaigne from 鈥楾he Charcoal Club鈥� in Baltimore, USA, 1893
Andr茅 Castaigne was a master illustrator and painter who drew humans, animals, architecture and landscapes with equal flair and illustrated extensively for both French and American publications.
One of the oil paintings that Castaigne did for the original 1910 first edition, depicting the below scene from novel
"He said to you, 'Christine, you must love me!'"
At these words, a deathly pallor spread over Christine's face, dark rings formed round her eyes, she staggered and seemed on the point of swooning. Raoul darted forward, with arms outstretched, but Christine had overcome her passing faintness and said, in a low voice: "Go on! Go on! Tell me all you heard! "
At an utter loss to understand, Raoul answered: "I heard him reply, when you said you had given him your soul, 'Your soul is a beautiful thing, child, and I thank you. No emperor ever received so fair a gift. The angels wept tonight.'"
The Phantom of Opera - A clever blend of fact and fiction
Gaston Leroux in a clever manner infused real locations and actual events from history to make his novel more credible and more mysterious, and fact and fiction overlaps in this novel to form an atmosphere of misty unknown. Let鈥檚 inspect a few such elements that Leroux took from actuality to fuel his imagination.
Gaston Leroux used the 鈥�Palais Garnier鈥� opera house as the setting for his novel and some of the rumors and architectural elements associated with this real life monument allowed Leroux to infuse a sense of authority or reality to his fictional work.
Uncovered facade of the Palais Garnier on 15 August 1867
"The house broke into a wild tumult. The two managers collapsed in their chairs and dared not even turn round; they had not the strength; the ghost was chuckling behind their backs! And, at last, they distinctly heard his voice in their right ears, the impossible voice, the mouthless voice, saying:
'SHE IS SINGING TO-NIGHT TO BRING THE CHANDELIER DOWN! '
With one accord, they raised their eyes to the ceiling and uttered a terrible cry. The chandelier, the immense mass of the chandelier was slipping down, coming toward them, at the call of that fiendish voice. Released from its hook, it plunged from the ceiling and came smashing into the middle of the stalls, amid a thousand shouts of terror. A wild rush for the doors followed.
The papers of the day state that there were numbers wounded and one killed. "
An Engraving of the main auditorium chandelier of the Paris Opera's Palais Garnier; The design was by Charles Garnier and the engraving is believed to be by J. B茅nard and C. Lapiaute
On 20 May 1896, one of the counterweights that keep this 7-ton bronze and crystal chandelier stable broke free and burst through the ceiling into the auditorium, killing a member of the audience. Gaston Leroux was inspired by this tragic accident to create one of the most famous scenes in the novel.
The concept of the subterranean lake under the Opera House is also based on some truth as when the site was excavated in 1862, the groundwater level was found unexpectedly high and despite some heavy duty attempts in draining this water from the swampy work site, the site was not dried up completely and a special double foundation had to be designed to take care of this groundwater seepage.
The subterranean water body underneath Palais Garnier, taken from Google Street view. You can Inspect this in detail here:
An enormous concrete cistern, which was built to take control of this situation, formed a reservoir of water and Gaston Leroux was inspired by the rumor, which soon spread around Paris stating that there is an enormous underground lake beneath the Palais Garnier. And the large cellars that act as the technical rooms of the building along with its alcoves and arches could have inspired him into creating the plot element that the phantom lived underneath the Opera house.
The Numerous Adaptations
Christine: "You. You are the Phantom!"
The Phantom: "If I am the Phantom, it is because man's hatred has made me so. If I shall be saved, it will be because your love redeems me."
There have been a multitude of adaptations for 鈥�The Phantom of the Opera鈥� 鈥� into both adult and children鈥檚 literature, dramas, musicals, movies, television shows and comic books 鈥� and I would wish to inspect two specific adaptations here; the 1925 movie adaptation and the famous Andrew Lloyd Webber musical based on the novel.
In 1925, Rupert Julian, the New Zealand cinema actor, director, writer and producer directed a movie adaptation starring Lon Chaney, Sr as Phantom and Mary Philbin as Christine.
Lon Chaney Sr. and Mary Philbin in "The Phantom of the Opera", 1925 Film
This was a faithful adaptation of the book with some plot differences only and was a box office success. I chose this adaptation for mention because of the famous 鈥�unmasking鈥� scene - the scene in which while Erik is playing the organ, Christine creeps up behind him to snatch his mask off 鈥� a movie scene, which can be easily stated as one of the most memorable moments in the history of films.
The famous unmasking the phantom scene
Since the movie is on the public domain you can watch this scene from YouTube - .
When it came out in 1925, this scene was the apex of horror and the make up that was used on Lon Chaney was much acclaimed and frightening. It is also one of the closest characterizations of Phantom, based on the book. From today鈥檚 standard this scene may not have even the slightest iota of horror in it as we have outgrown fear for such visuals with over exposure but at that time this scene when watched in a dark movie house could have been quiet startling and one of the promotional tricks that the movie used was that the theaters were asked to keep smelling salts ready in case someone from the audience watching the scene actually fainted.
A publicity photo of Steve Barton and Sarah Brightman in the final scene of 鈥楾he Phantom of the Opera鈥� musical.
Andrew Lloyd Webber鈥檚 musical adaptation opened in London's West End in 1986, and on Broadway in 1988 and is the longest running show in Broadway history with over 10,000 Broadway performances and a worldwide total gross collection of over $5.6 billion.
鈥�The Phantom of the Opera鈥� may feel overemotional from a modern perspective, but this is a classic mystery and suspense story from a whole different time period, and if as a reader you can have a bit of patience and can take account of this difference in the time-frames, then this work from Leroux can be a satisfying experience.
Written - October 31, 2015
February 5, 2023
Probably the most melodramatic book I've ever read. It was fantastic. 馃槀
to hear my thoughts on this book and the episode of Wishbone it inspired over on my Booktube channel, abookolive!
to hear my thoughts on this book and the episode of Wishbone it inspired over on my Booktube channel, abookolive!
August 8, 2019
4.5 en realidad.
Este libro es una maldita obra de arte. Lo he amado por completo. Cuando me adentr茅 en sus p谩ginas no sab铆a lo que me iba a encontrar y sin duda me ha sorprendido para bien. Creo que ha ayudado a no haber visto nunca ni musicales ni pel铆culas antes de leerlo, y aunque ten铆a algunas nociones sobre la historia, lo que me he encontrado ha sido todo muy sorprendente.
Es una novela combina much铆simos g茅neros y eso hace que te atrape desde el primero momento. Hay comedia, much铆sima m谩s de lo que podr铆a haber imaginado. Lo que me re铆 el primer tercio de la novela no lo sabe nadie. De verdad, algunas situaciones y personajes me hac铆an mucha gracia. Luego ya la cosa se pone mucho m谩s seria y empieza el drama, tragedia, mucho misterio y con toques de terror.
La historia se sit煤a en la 脫pera de Par铆s, la cual se dice que est谩 encantada y donde vive un fantasma, m谩s conocido como el Fantasma de la 脫pera y quien ha causado much铆simos accidentes en ella. Este fantasma est谩 muy enamorado de una de las artistas de la 贸pera, Christine, y por qui茅n har谩 todas las locuras del mundo con tal de conseguir su amor. Pero claro, Christine de quien verdaderamente est谩 enamorada es de Raoul, vizconde y amigo de la infancia de Christine. Esto crea un tri谩ngulo amoroso maravilloso lleno de tensi贸n.
Creo que este libro trata muy bien los problemas que acarrean que hayas sido un marginado social por el aspecto f铆sico y como acaba afectando psicol贸gicamente a la persona que lo sufre. Y sin duda esto le ocurre a Erik, nuestro protagonista (amo su nombre y a su personaje). Me parece un personaje con doble personalidad. De repente es tierno, adorable, cari帽oso y a la vez es cruel y despiadado, llegando incluso a matar a personas, pero eso no evita que estas dos facetas te hagan caer rendida ante tan complejo personaje. Luego tenemos a Christine. Ella es inocente y cae rendida al 谩ngel de la m煤sica en un principio, y si no llega a intervenir Raoul de nuevo en su vida, tal vez hubiera acabado prendad铆sima del fantasma de la 贸pera a pesar de su deformidad. Y veremos ese conflicto interior de Christine y ser谩 una parte importante de la novela. Ella quiere a Erik de una manera y a Raoul de otra... pero ciertos actos har谩n que acabe decant谩ndose por uno m谩s que otro.
Sin duda creo que ha sido uno de los cl谩sicos que m谩s me ha enganchado y disfrutado. Erik se ha quedado en mi coraz贸n y sin duda Gaston Leroux ha cre贸 una joya digna de recordar y ser le铆da por todo el mundo.
Este libro es una maldita obra de arte. Lo he amado por completo. Cuando me adentr茅 en sus p谩ginas no sab铆a lo que me iba a encontrar y sin duda me ha sorprendido para bien. Creo que ha ayudado a no haber visto nunca ni musicales ni pel铆culas antes de leerlo, y aunque ten铆a algunas nociones sobre la historia, lo que me he encontrado ha sido todo muy sorprendente.
Es una novela combina much铆simos g茅neros y eso hace que te atrape desde el primero momento. Hay comedia, much铆sima m谩s de lo que podr铆a haber imaginado. Lo que me re铆 el primer tercio de la novela no lo sabe nadie. De verdad, algunas situaciones y personajes me hac铆an mucha gracia. Luego ya la cosa se pone mucho m谩s seria y empieza el drama, tragedia, mucho misterio y con toques de terror.
La historia se sit煤a en la 脫pera de Par铆s, la cual se dice que est谩 encantada y donde vive un fantasma, m谩s conocido como el Fantasma de la 脫pera y quien ha causado much铆simos accidentes en ella. Este fantasma est谩 muy enamorado de una de las artistas de la 贸pera, Christine, y por qui茅n har谩 todas las locuras del mundo con tal de conseguir su amor. Pero claro, Christine de quien verdaderamente est谩 enamorada es de Raoul, vizconde y amigo de la infancia de Christine. Esto crea un tri谩ngulo amoroso maravilloso lleno de tensi贸n.
Creo que este libro trata muy bien los problemas que acarrean que hayas sido un marginado social por el aspecto f铆sico y como acaba afectando psicol贸gicamente a la persona que lo sufre. Y sin duda esto le ocurre a Erik, nuestro protagonista (amo su nombre y a su personaje). Me parece un personaje con doble personalidad. De repente es tierno, adorable, cari帽oso y a la vez es cruel y despiadado, llegando incluso a matar a personas, pero eso no evita que estas dos facetas te hagan caer rendida ante tan complejo personaje. Luego tenemos a Christine. Ella es inocente y cae rendida al 谩ngel de la m煤sica en un principio, y si no llega a intervenir Raoul de nuevo en su vida, tal vez hubiera acabado prendad铆sima del fantasma de la 贸pera a pesar de su deformidad. Y veremos ese conflicto interior de Christine y ser谩 una parte importante de la novela. Ella quiere a Erik de una manera y a Raoul de otra... pero ciertos actos har谩n que acabe decant谩ndose por uno m谩s que otro.
Sin duda creo que ha sido uno de los cl谩sicos que m谩s me ha enganchado y disfrutado. Erik se ha quedado en mi coraz贸n y sin duda Gaston Leroux ha cre贸 una joya digna de recordar y ser le铆da por todo el mundo.
October 29, 2024
鈥淭he Phantom of the Opera 鈥� is there, inside your mind.鈥� These lyrics from Andrew Lloyd Webber鈥檚 musical-theatre adaptation of The Phantom of the Opera echo the opening sentence of Gaston Leroux鈥檚 original 1910 novel: 鈥淭he Phantom of the Opera did exist鈥� (p. 5). And both sentences ring true 鈥� for in one form or another, as a novel or a film or a musical play, this Gothic-opera story of a mad, disfigured genius who lives in a network of caves and underground passages beneath the Paris Opera House has been very much with us ever since Leroux鈥檚 novel first saw print. The Phantom of the Opera does exist; he is here, inside our minds, and he shows no inclination to leave our thoughts anytime soon.
Born in 1868, Gaston Leroux studied law but found that journalism better suited his talents. He was a hard-working and successful reporter, and his experience as a journalist gave him a thoroughgoing knowledge of the cityscape, society, and folklore of Paris. As Jann Matlock of University College London explains in a foreword, part of that folklore included stories of how, when the Palais Garnier was being built between 1863 and 1875, it was discovered that an underground lake 鈥� a natural collection point for water from a tributary of the Seine 鈥� existed beneath the site where the opera building would take shape. Opera houses around the world already possessed a rich folklore of hauntings and weird happenings; and from that story of an underground lake, Leroux began to weave his tale of a mysterious, ghost-like figure who made the sunless grounds around that underground lake his home.
As Leroux鈥檚 novel begins, two new directors of the Paris Opera are learning, to their consternation, that the Opera House is haunted by an 鈥渙pera ghost鈥� who insists that Box Five be reserved for him at all times, and who has an odd physicality for a ghost; he sometimes asks for a footstool, and he always tips two francs and sometimes leaves a fan behind. And he shows a decided interest in the musical career of one Christine Daa茅, a talented singer who is also the daughter of a noted Scandinavian violinist.
Christine鈥檚 display of talent is threatening to the opera鈥檚 reigning diva, Carlotta, who seeks to make sure that upstart Christine will not steal her hard-won operatic thunder. But Christine, who is being trained in secret by a mysterious 鈥淎ngel of Music,鈥� also seems to have the protection of the 鈥渙pera ghost,鈥� who sends a threatening letter to Carlotta, warning her not to sing that night, and adding that 鈥渟hould you sing tonight, a great misfortune may befall you during your performance鈥 misfortune worse than death鈥� (p. 81).
The letter, 鈥渨ritten in red ink, in a clumsy, disjointed hand鈥� (p. 81), is no idle threat. Carlotta is mortified on stage when her hitherto beautiful singing voice becomes a toad-like croak. The mocking, 鈥渋mpossible disembodied voice鈥� of the Phantom calls out, 鈥淗er singing tonight is enough to bring down the chandelier鈥� (p. 92). What then follows is one of the most famous scenes in the history of literary Gothicism:
[The audience] looked up as one to the ceiling and let out a terrible cry. The chandelier, the enormous mass of the chandelier, was moving, slipping downwards in response to that fiendish voice. Unhooked, it plummeted down from the very top of the house, crashing into the middle of the stalls, amidst a thousand screams. Terror struck, followed by a general stampede. (p. 92)
Raoul, the Count de Chagny, was Christine鈥檚 childhood sweetheart; and his status as a patron of the arts brings him and Christine together once again. But Christine is also loved by the 鈥渙pera ghost鈥�, the Phantom; and when Christine and Raoul attend a masked ball together at the opera house, the masked ball is invaded by the Phantom, in a nice nod by author Leroux to Gothic forerunner Edgar Allan Poe:
This figure was dressed entirely in scarlet. A huge hat adorned with a plume of feathers crowned his skull-like head 鈥� and ah, what a splendid imitation of a skull it was! The art students applauded and congratulated him, enquiring which master craftsman, which workshop patronized by Pluto, had designed, made, and painted so perfect a head! The Grim Reaper himself must have posed for it. A huge velvet cloak dragged on the floor like a trail of fire as the man in scarlet with the plumed hat and the skeletal head stalked. His cloak bore, embroidered in gold, the words: 鈥淪tand aside! I am the Red Death.鈥� (p. 105)
It is a love triangle with a difference, with two compelling men vying for the affection of the beautiful and talented Christine. On the one hand, there is the thoroughly Apollonian Raoul 鈥� a fine match, a good catch. He鈥檒l be a good provider, a reliable and honourable husband, a doting father. He鈥檒l never miss any of his children鈥檚 soccer matches or dance recitals. He won鈥檛 run around with other women, or gamble away the house payment, or get drunk and say tacky things at neighbourhood parties. He鈥檚 everything a girl is supposed to want.
But then there鈥檚 the Phantom 鈥� dark, Dionysiac, transgressive, with the lure of the forbidden around him. He lives underground, does what he bloody well wants, and doesn鈥檛 care a fig what anyone thinks about it. He's creative and talented. The Phantom is a badass; and the thoroughly respectable Raoul sees that he鈥檚 at a bit of a disadvantage, bitterly asking Christine, 鈥淲hy waste your time here with me? You clearly love him! Your fears, your terror, all of that is still born of love, and love of the most exquisite kind, the kind that one does not admit even to oneself鈥�.The kind that gives you a thrill when you think of it. No wonder: a mysterious man living in an underground palace!鈥� (p. 140)
But what Raoul does not yet know, at that point, is the story of how Christine learned the Phantom鈥檚 dark secret while she was being held by him. The Phantom, whose real name is Erik, always wears a mask; and while she and Erik are singing together, Christine finds herself feeling compelled to remove the mask and see the face beneath.
When Christine unmasks the Phantom, there鈥檚 a dreamlike quality to it, the terrifying logic of a nightmare. The two are singing the duet from Otello 鈥� appropriately, a story of love and murder 鈥� and Christine recollects how 鈥淚 wanted to gaze upon the hidden face that must have been transfigured by eternal art, so as to take this sublime image with me to my grave. I wanted to see the face of the Voice and instinctively, for I was no longer mistress of myself, my fingers tore away the mask. Oh! Horror! Horror! Horror!鈥� (p. 145)
It is the passage that the reader has been waiting for, as Christine tries to describe to Raoul what the man looked like behind the mask:
鈥淵ou must have seen skulls, dried and withered by the centuries鈥�.You also saw the Red Death among the revellers at the masked ball鈥�.But imagine, if you can, the mask of the Red Death suddenly coming to life in order to express 鈥� through the holes that were his eyes, his nose, and his mouth 鈥� the unfettered anger and sovereign fury of a demon; and yet not the slightest gleam from those eye sockets, for, as I was to learn later, his burning eyes only shone in the darkest night.鈥� (p. 146)
Like the vampire, or the zombie, or Frankenstein鈥檚 monster, the Phantom occupies a sort of liminal space, a middle ground, between life and death.
Enraged at being thus exposed as 鈥渉ideousness incarnate鈥�, the Phantom, with 鈥済rinding teeth and no lips鈥�, draws close to Christine, and curses what he sees as her womanly curiosity: 鈥淵ou wanted to see! Then look! Feast your eyes, sate your soul, on my accursed ugliness!鈥� (p. 146) The story of how Christine engineers her escape from a Phantom who has sworn that, now that she has seen his ugly face, she can never leave him, is one of the most fascinating aspects of The Phantom of the Opera. As Christine puts it to Raoul, 鈥淢y lies were as hideous as the monster that had inspired them; but they were the price I had to pay to regain my freedom鈥� (p. 150).
Yet Christine鈥檚 freedom is short-lived, as the Phantom kidnaps her in the middle of a performance and takes her down into his underground lair. The actual architecture of the Paris Opera House, with differing levels of basements and sub-basements incorporated into its design in order to accommodate the elaborate sets of the time, lends itself to this aspect of Leroux鈥檚 novel. At the same time, the opera鈥檚 underground becomes a sort of map of the subconscious and unconscious reaches of Erik鈥檚 twisted mind.
Raoul鈥檚 initial feelings of despair at Christine鈥檚 disappearance are relieved somewhat when a mysterious Persian, who knows Erik from years past, offers to help Raoul find Christine. Warning Raoul that 鈥淵ou need to be ready for anything. I must warn you that we shall face the most formidable adversary imaginable鈥� (p. 200), the Persian leads Raoul down into the grim world beneath the opera house.
What follows is a descent through a variety of traps, devised by the Phantom to protect his lair from unwanted intruders. The traps impose different kinds of physical and psychological torture in a way that evokes Dante鈥檚 Inferno. The Persian, who takes over the narration at this point in the novel, sees how Raoul is being affected by the Phantom鈥檚 traps, and wonders whether Raoul will be strong enough to endure the ordeal: 鈥淗e shouted Christine鈥檚 name, brandished his pistol, called out to the Phantom, challenged the Angel of Music to fight to the death, and swore profanities鈥�.In short, the torture was beginning to affect his unprepared mind鈥� (p. 250). And amidst these hellish torments devised by a devilish but very human genius, The Phantom of the Opera moves inexorably toward its conclusion.
While thinking about the array of actors who have played the Phantom on film 鈥� Lon Chaney, Claude Rains, Herbert Lom, Maximilian Schell, Robert Englund, Charles Dance, Julian Sands, Gerard Butler 鈥� I found myself reflecting on how often film directors have felt the need to invent a backstory for the Phantom. Those backstories, some of which are quite fantastical (in one, the Phantom is raised by rats!), perhaps reflect the fact that Erik鈥檚 backstory, as set forth in Leroux鈥檚 novel, is fantastical in its own right 鈥� downright operatic 鈥� though it does provide an explanation for how Erik could design all that interesting and weird stuff in his underground home.
Today, as commentator Matlock wryly notes, the docents at the real-life Paris Opera House 鈥渄on鈥檛 tell you about the Phantom unless someone asks. And even then, the guides鈥ork very hard to keep that aspect of the building鈥檚 lore to a minimum鈥� (p. xiii); the gift shop doesn鈥檛 even stock Leroux鈥檚 book! And meanwhile, the Andrew Lloyd Webber musical, which debuted in 1986, is still running, both in the West End and on Broadway, with total worldwide receipts of more than $6 billion 鈥� a monster in its own right. (I saw it once, in New York 鈥� had good seats, right under the chandelier. It gives one pause.) The ongoing popularity of The Phantom of the Opera, in such a variety of media, speaks to how skillfully Leroux crafted and wove a story calculated to fascinate the reader. Truly, the Phantom of the Opera is still there 鈥� inside our minds.
Born in 1868, Gaston Leroux studied law but found that journalism better suited his talents. He was a hard-working and successful reporter, and his experience as a journalist gave him a thoroughgoing knowledge of the cityscape, society, and folklore of Paris. As Jann Matlock of University College London explains in a foreword, part of that folklore included stories of how, when the Palais Garnier was being built between 1863 and 1875, it was discovered that an underground lake 鈥� a natural collection point for water from a tributary of the Seine 鈥� existed beneath the site where the opera building would take shape. Opera houses around the world already possessed a rich folklore of hauntings and weird happenings; and from that story of an underground lake, Leroux began to weave his tale of a mysterious, ghost-like figure who made the sunless grounds around that underground lake his home.
As Leroux鈥檚 novel begins, two new directors of the Paris Opera are learning, to their consternation, that the Opera House is haunted by an 鈥渙pera ghost鈥� who insists that Box Five be reserved for him at all times, and who has an odd physicality for a ghost; he sometimes asks for a footstool, and he always tips two francs and sometimes leaves a fan behind. And he shows a decided interest in the musical career of one Christine Daa茅, a talented singer who is also the daughter of a noted Scandinavian violinist.
Christine鈥檚 display of talent is threatening to the opera鈥檚 reigning diva, Carlotta, who seeks to make sure that upstart Christine will not steal her hard-won operatic thunder. But Christine, who is being trained in secret by a mysterious 鈥淎ngel of Music,鈥� also seems to have the protection of the 鈥渙pera ghost,鈥� who sends a threatening letter to Carlotta, warning her not to sing that night, and adding that 鈥渟hould you sing tonight, a great misfortune may befall you during your performance鈥 misfortune worse than death鈥� (p. 81).
The letter, 鈥渨ritten in red ink, in a clumsy, disjointed hand鈥� (p. 81), is no idle threat. Carlotta is mortified on stage when her hitherto beautiful singing voice becomes a toad-like croak. The mocking, 鈥渋mpossible disembodied voice鈥� of the Phantom calls out, 鈥淗er singing tonight is enough to bring down the chandelier鈥� (p. 92). What then follows is one of the most famous scenes in the history of literary Gothicism:
[The audience] looked up as one to the ceiling and let out a terrible cry. The chandelier, the enormous mass of the chandelier, was moving, slipping downwards in response to that fiendish voice. Unhooked, it plummeted down from the very top of the house, crashing into the middle of the stalls, amidst a thousand screams. Terror struck, followed by a general stampede. (p. 92)
Raoul, the Count de Chagny, was Christine鈥檚 childhood sweetheart; and his status as a patron of the arts brings him and Christine together once again. But Christine is also loved by the 鈥渙pera ghost鈥�, the Phantom; and when Christine and Raoul attend a masked ball together at the opera house, the masked ball is invaded by the Phantom, in a nice nod by author Leroux to Gothic forerunner Edgar Allan Poe:
This figure was dressed entirely in scarlet. A huge hat adorned with a plume of feathers crowned his skull-like head 鈥� and ah, what a splendid imitation of a skull it was! The art students applauded and congratulated him, enquiring which master craftsman, which workshop patronized by Pluto, had designed, made, and painted so perfect a head! The Grim Reaper himself must have posed for it. A huge velvet cloak dragged on the floor like a trail of fire as the man in scarlet with the plumed hat and the skeletal head stalked. His cloak bore, embroidered in gold, the words: 鈥淪tand aside! I am the Red Death.鈥� (p. 105)
It is a love triangle with a difference, with two compelling men vying for the affection of the beautiful and talented Christine. On the one hand, there is the thoroughly Apollonian Raoul 鈥� a fine match, a good catch. He鈥檒l be a good provider, a reliable and honourable husband, a doting father. He鈥檒l never miss any of his children鈥檚 soccer matches or dance recitals. He won鈥檛 run around with other women, or gamble away the house payment, or get drunk and say tacky things at neighbourhood parties. He鈥檚 everything a girl is supposed to want.
But then there鈥檚 the Phantom 鈥� dark, Dionysiac, transgressive, with the lure of the forbidden around him. He lives underground, does what he bloody well wants, and doesn鈥檛 care a fig what anyone thinks about it. He's creative and talented. The Phantom is a badass; and the thoroughly respectable Raoul sees that he鈥檚 at a bit of a disadvantage, bitterly asking Christine, 鈥淲hy waste your time here with me? You clearly love him! Your fears, your terror, all of that is still born of love, and love of the most exquisite kind, the kind that one does not admit even to oneself鈥�.The kind that gives you a thrill when you think of it. No wonder: a mysterious man living in an underground palace!鈥� (p. 140)
But what Raoul does not yet know, at that point, is the story of how Christine learned the Phantom鈥檚 dark secret while she was being held by him. The Phantom, whose real name is Erik, always wears a mask; and while she and Erik are singing together, Christine finds herself feeling compelled to remove the mask and see the face beneath.
When Christine unmasks the Phantom, there鈥檚 a dreamlike quality to it, the terrifying logic of a nightmare. The two are singing the duet from Otello 鈥� appropriately, a story of love and murder 鈥� and Christine recollects how 鈥淚 wanted to gaze upon the hidden face that must have been transfigured by eternal art, so as to take this sublime image with me to my grave. I wanted to see the face of the Voice and instinctively, for I was no longer mistress of myself, my fingers tore away the mask. Oh! Horror! Horror! Horror!鈥� (p. 145)
It is the passage that the reader has been waiting for, as Christine tries to describe to Raoul what the man looked like behind the mask:
鈥淵ou must have seen skulls, dried and withered by the centuries鈥�.You also saw the Red Death among the revellers at the masked ball鈥�.But imagine, if you can, the mask of the Red Death suddenly coming to life in order to express 鈥� through the holes that were his eyes, his nose, and his mouth 鈥� the unfettered anger and sovereign fury of a demon; and yet not the slightest gleam from those eye sockets, for, as I was to learn later, his burning eyes only shone in the darkest night.鈥� (p. 146)
Like the vampire, or the zombie, or Frankenstein鈥檚 monster, the Phantom occupies a sort of liminal space, a middle ground, between life and death.
Enraged at being thus exposed as 鈥渉ideousness incarnate鈥�, the Phantom, with 鈥済rinding teeth and no lips鈥�, draws close to Christine, and curses what he sees as her womanly curiosity: 鈥淵ou wanted to see! Then look! Feast your eyes, sate your soul, on my accursed ugliness!鈥� (p. 146) The story of how Christine engineers her escape from a Phantom who has sworn that, now that she has seen his ugly face, she can never leave him, is one of the most fascinating aspects of The Phantom of the Opera. As Christine puts it to Raoul, 鈥淢y lies were as hideous as the monster that had inspired them; but they were the price I had to pay to regain my freedom鈥� (p. 150).
Yet Christine鈥檚 freedom is short-lived, as the Phantom kidnaps her in the middle of a performance and takes her down into his underground lair. The actual architecture of the Paris Opera House, with differing levels of basements and sub-basements incorporated into its design in order to accommodate the elaborate sets of the time, lends itself to this aspect of Leroux鈥檚 novel. At the same time, the opera鈥檚 underground becomes a sort of map of the subconscious and unconscious reaches of Erik鈥檚 twisted mind.
Raoul鈥檚 initial feelings of despair at Christine鈥檚 disappearance are relieved somewhat when a mysterious Persian, who knows Erik from years past, offers to help Raoul find Christine. Warning Raoul that 鈥淵ou need to be ready for anything. I must warn you that we shall face the most formidable adversary imaginable鈥� (p. 200), the Persian leads Raoul down into the grim world beneath the opera house.
What follows is a descent through a variety of traps, devised by the Phantom to protect his lair from unwanted intruders. The traps impose different kinds of physical and psychological torture in a way that evokes Dante鈥檚 Inferno. The Persian, who takes over the narration at this point in the novel, sees how Raoul is being affected by the Phantom鈥檚 traps, and wonders whether Raoul will be strong enough to endure the ordeal: 鈥淗e shouted Christine鈥檚 name, brandished his pistol, called out to the Phantom, challenged the Angel of Music to fight to the death, and swore profanities鈥�.In short, the torture was beginning to affect his unprepared mind鈥� (p. 250). And amidst these hellish torments devised by a devilish but very human genius, The Phantom of the Opera moves inexorably toward its conclusion.
While thinking about the array of actors who have played the Phantom on film 鈥� Lon Chaney, Claude Rains, Herbert Lom, Maximilian Schell, Robert Englund, Charles Dance, Julian Sands, Gerard Butler 鈥� I found myself reflecting on how often film directors have felt the need to invent a backstory for the Phantom. Those backstories, some of which are quite fantastical (in one, the Phantom is raised by rats!), perhaps reflect the fact that Erik鈥檚 backstory, as set forth in Leroux鈥檚 novel, is fantastical in its own right 鈥� downright operatic 鈥� though it does provide an explanation for how Erik could design all that interesting and weird stuff in his underground home.
Today, as commentator Matlock wryly notes, the docents at the real-life Paris Opera House 鈥渄on鈥檛 tell you about the Phantom unless someone asks. And even then, the guides鈥ork very hard to keep that aspect of the building鈥檚 lore to a minimum鈥� (p. xiii); the gift shop doesn鈥檛 even stock Leroux鈥檚 book! And meanwhile, the Andrew Lloyd Webber musical, which debuted in 1986, is still running, both in the West End and on Broadway, with total worldwide receipts of more than $6 billion 鈥� a monster in its own right. (I saw it once, in New York 鈥� had good seats, right under the chandelier. It gives one pause.) The ongoing popularity of The Phantom of the Opera, in such a variety of media, speaks to how skillfully Leroux crafted and wove a story calculated to fascinate the reader. Truly, the Phantom of the Opera is still there 鈥� inside our minds.
October 20, 2019
THE PHANTOM OF THE OPERA is a fantastic ghostly tale of love with so much more depth (and evil) to the storyline than I remember from either the play or "old" movie.
Be prepared for murder by hanging, frequent cries of terror from malicious "accidents", and suicide for just a smidgeon of what will "materialize". But, it's the mysterious Opera Ghost who lurks in the shadows using tricks and illusions to work his many evils behind a mask of horror and smell of death that will grab your attention throughout these pages.
This great classic (first published in 1909) is a wonderful haunting read with a dual love story and satisfying ending......oh that first kiss.
Note: "The Opera Ghost really existed. He was not, as was long believed, a creature of the imagination of the artists, the superstition of the managers, or a product of the absurd and impressionable brains of the young ladies of the ballet, their mothers, the box-keepers, the cloak-room attendants or the concierge. Yes, he existed in flesh and blood, although he assumed the complete appearance of a real phantom: that is to say, of a spectral shade." ...........From the author's Prologue.
October 12, 2020
...*stares into the abyss*
This book is...
Haunting
Dark
Gloomy
Atmospheric
Gripping
Mysterious
...and simply brilliant!!!
This book is...
Haunting
Dark
Gloomy
Atmospheric
Gripping
Mysterious
...and simply brilliant!!!
July 23, 2021
I didn鈥檛 love it. I don鈥檛 even know what I feel. So I鈥檒l leave it at 3 stars!
Mel 馃枻馃惗馃惡馃惥
Mel 馃枻馃惗馃惡馃惥
February 28, 2017
"He is extraordinarily thin and his dress-coat hangs on a skeleton frame. His eyes are so deep that you can hardly see the fixed pupils. You just see two big black holes, as in a dead man鈥檚 skull. His skin, which is stretched across his bones like a drumhead, is not white, but a nasty yellow. His nose is so little worth talking about that you can鈥檛 see it side-face; and the absence of that nose is a horrible thing to look at. All the hair he has is three or four long dark locks on his forehead and behind his ears."
Sounds deliciously creepy, right? Well, no doubt the Opera ghost would have scared the hell out of me if I had ever crossed paths with him! And he was scary; in fact he was downright evil. More evil than I recall from attending a live performance of the musical by the same name many, many years ago. All the elements of a gothic mystery were there; I was intrigued by the corpse-like apparition that was said to haunt the Paris Opera House. Unfortunately, I was more amused than I was terrified while reading this book. I didn鈥檛 experience the allure of the gothic atmosphere.
The plot was interesting enough and kept me turning the pages. Christine, trained by the Angel of Music, becomes a sensation at the opera house and falls in love with a young man from her past. Raoul has been smitten with Christine since he was a child. One day, a little boy, who was out with his governess, made her take a longer walk than he intended, for he could not tear himself from the little girl whose pure, sweet voice seemed to bind him to her." But the Opera ghost is infatuated with her as well, and will stop at almost nothing to make her his bride. I wasn鈥檛 sure how I felt about the phantom. At times I abhorred him; he seemed to have no conscience. The next moment I felt pity towards this unloved and lonely outcast of society. It鈥檚 a bit of an adventure in the underbelly of the Opera House and I did enjoy all the literal twists and turns there. The melodrama and the unpolished dialogue disappointed me, however. The characters felt flat, with the exception of the phantom himself. The Persian was a bit intriguing as well. Essentially, it鈥檚 a tragic story with an engaging plot, and it鈥檚 quite readable. Just not the remarkable story I was looking for, but I鈥檓 getting a bit particular about my gothic mysteries.
"He asked only to be 鈥榮omeone,鈥� like everybody else."
Sounds deliciously creepy, right? Well, no doubt the Opera ghost would have scared the hell out of me if I had ever crossed paths with him! And he was scary; in fact he was downright evil. More evil than I recall from attending a live performance of the musical by the same name many, many years ago. All the elements of a gothic mystery were there; I was intrigued by the corpse-like apparition that was said to haunt the Paris Opera House. Unfortunately, I was more amused than I was terrified while reading this book. I didn鈥檛 experience the allure of the gothic atmosphere.
The plot was interesting enough and kept me turning the pages. Christine, trained by the Angel of Music, becomes a sensation at the opera house and falls in love with a young man from her past. Raoul has been smitten with Christine since he was a child. One day, a little boy, who was out with his governess, made her take a longer walk than he intended, for he could not tear himself from the little girl whose pure, sweet voice seemed to bind him to her." But the Opera ghost is infatuated with her as well, and will stop at almost nothing to make her his bride. I wasn鈥檛 sure how I felt about the phantom. At times I abhorred him; he seemed to have no conscience. The next moment I felt pity towards this unloved and lonely outcast of society. It鈥檚 a bit of an adventure in the underbelly of the Opera House and I did enjoy all the literal twists and turns there. The melodrama and the unpolished dialogue disappointed me, however. The characters felt flat, with the exception of the phantom himself. The Persian was a bit intriguing as well. Essentially, it鈥檚 a tragic story with an engaging plot, and it鈥檚 quite readable. Just not the remarkable story I was looking for, but I鈥檓 getting a bit particular about my gothic mysteries.
"He asked only to be 鈥榮omeone,鈥� like everybody else."
March 2, 2020
I blame this book for my obsession in stories with misunderstood monsters who only need love.
"I have not come here ... to talk about Count Philippe ... but to tell you that ... I am going ... to die..."
"Where are Raoul de Chagny and Christine Daae?"
"I am going to die."
"Raoul de Chagny and Christine Daae?"
"Of love ... daroga ... I am dying ... of love ... That is how it is ... loved her so! ... And I love her still ... daroga ... and I am dying of love for her, I ... I tell you! ... If you knew how beautiful she was ... when she let me kiss her ... alive ... It was the first ... time, daroga, the first ... time I ever kissed a woman ... Yes, alive ... I kissed her alive ... and she looked as beautiful as if she had been dead!"
"I have not come here ... to talk about Count Philippe ... but to tell you that ... I am going ... to die..."
"Where are Raoul de Chagny and Christine Daae?"
"I am going to die."
"Raoul de Chagny and Christine Daae?"
"Of love ... daroga ... I am dying ... of love ... That is how it is ... loved her so! ... And I love her still ... daroga ... and I am dying of love for her, I ... I tell you! ... If you knew how beautiful she was ... when she let me kiss her ... alive ... It was the first ... time, daroga, the first ... time I ever kissed a woman ... Yes, alive ... I kissed her alive ... and she looked as beautiful as if she had been dead!"
February 14, 2022
2.5 stars
"Are people so unhappy when they love?"
"Yes, Christine, when they love and are not sure of being loved."
I would like to start my review by saying that The Phantom of the Opera was not the story I was expecting to read. I had an idea in advance, a really wrong idea, about this novel: I thought I would find a love story with a 'happy ever after' through its pages. While the last fact (a happy ever after) might be true or false and it's completely up to you whether or not this is a happy ending, my first assumption turned out to be wrong: we don't have a love story here; instead, we have the story of an obsession and a dangerous man who has lost his mind.
Needless to say, this novel was really disappointing for me. It was not so bad though, since I really enjoyed Leroux's narrative quite a bit, and in fact, I might be interested in reading another novel written by him, if for instance, I come across one of his other books in the future; however, my problem with The Phantom of the Opera was basically the plot and the characters; and so you can imagine that my experience overall was not successful.
If for a moment we ignore the fact that I was expecting to find something different inside this book, and even though I enjoyed the prose and some elements used by the author, such as different narrators throughout the novel, and therefore, different points of view which together complete the story at the end, good descriptions (not so impressive as Victor Hugo's descriptions of Notre Dame of Paris in his homonymous novel) of the Paris Opera House, and so on, the characters (mainly after the middle of the book) were not enjoyable at all, many of their decisions were not right, and the story itself felt sometimes ridiculous, other times annoying.
For instance, two of the main characters, the Opera Ghost and Raoul, were so 'insane' and their behaviors made me feel really uncomfortable, each of them in their own way.
The Opera Ghost has a completely wrong idea about what love means, and although his background is in the way it is, this fact cannot be used as an excuse; furthermore, there is something called politeness and respect, which are traits that this character doesn't know at all. As for Raoul, oh gosh! I am not pretty sure, and I can't put my finger on it because I can't remember all characters I have come across in my life, but I think Raoul is the most childish, selfish, and annoying character I have met thus far. I would prefer not to say anything else.
As for our heroine Christine, she is not a bad character but she might have been better, she could have had a better development for instance. I felt as though she was kind of flat, that it was impossible for me to know her deeply at the end of the book.
Sitting on the fence is not something that happens to me so often when I have to review a novel. Eventually, everything comes down to how much I have enjoyed the novel that I have read. However, in this case is certainly hard for me to say if I really liked this book or not, since there are some things I enjoyed reading and other elements that I really hated.
In short, is The Phantom of the Opera a good book? It is, but maybe it was not for me.
Did I enjoy reading The Phantom of the Opera overall? I would say 'yes', but not as much as I had wanted to do so.
So, if you were interested in reading this novel, I would say 'do it, you will probably have a good reading experience'; you know, in the end the last decision is up to us.
"Are people so unhappy when they love?"
"Yes, Christine, when they love and are not sure of being loved."
I would like to start my review by saying that The Phantom of the Opera was not the story I was expecting to read. I had an idea in advance, a really wrong idea, about this novel: I thought I would find a love story with a 'happy ever after' through its pages. While the last fact (a happy ever after) might be true or false and it's completely up to you whether or not this is a happy ending, my first assumption turned out to be wrong: we don't have a love story here; instead, we have the story of an obsession and a dangerous man who has lost his mind.
Needless to say, this novel was really disappointing for me. It was not so bad though, since I really enjoyed Leroux's narrative quite a bit, and in fact, I might be interested in reading another novel written by him, if for instance, I come across one of his other books in the future; however, my problem with The Phantom of the Opera was basically the plot and the characters; and so you can imagine that my experience overall was not successful.
If for a moment we ignore the fact that I was expecting to find something different inside this book, and even though I enjoyed the prose and some elements used by the author, such as different narrators throughout the novel, and therefore, different points of view which together complete the story at the end, good descriptions (not so impressive as Victor Hugo's descriptions of Notre Dame of Paris in his homonymous novel) of the Paris Opera House, and so on, the characters (mainly after the middle of the book) were not enjoyable at all, many of their decisions were not right, and the story itself felt sometimes ridiculous, other times annoying.
For instance, two of the main characters, the Opera Ghost and Raoul, were so 'insane' and their behaviors made me feel really uncomfortable, each of them in their own way.
The Opera Ghost has a completely wrong idea about what love means, and although his background is in the way it is, this fact cannot be used as an excuse; furthermore, there is something called politeness and respect, which are traits that this character doesn't know at all. As for Raoul, oh gosh! I am not pretty sure, and I can't put my finger on it because I can't remember all characters I have come across in my life, but I think Raoul is the most childish, selfish, and annoying character I have met thus far. I would prefer not to say anything else.
As for our heroine Christine, she is not a bad character but she might have been better, she could have had a better development for instance. I felt as though she was kind of flat, that it was impossible for me to know her deeply at the end of the book.
Sitting on the fence is not something that happens to me so often when I have to review a novel. Eventually, everything comes down to how much I have enjoyed the novel that I have read. However, in this case is certainly hard for me to say if I really liked this book or not, since there are some things I enjoyed reading and other elements that I really hated.
In short, is The Phantom of the Opera a good book? It is, but maybe it was not for me.
Did I enjoy reading The Phantom of the Opera overall? I would say 'yes', but not as much as I had wanted to do so.
So, if you were interested in reading this novel, I would say 'do it, you will probably have a good reading experience'; you know, in the end the last decision is up to us.
June 5, 2020
Honestly, I tried, time and again. It gave it time, let myself grow older, cleaned the slate to have a fresh start, etc ... it just did not work. EVEN THINKING ABOUT GERALD BUTLER DID NOT HELP. SO IT'S OFFICIALLY HOPELESS.
This book is the winner of my MOST-BORING-AND-POINTLESS-BOOK-EVER award.
The MCs, Whatshername & Whatshisname are the soppiest individuals and the soppiest couple ever.
The book's only saving grace is that sends it up all the way in his .
This book is the winner of my MOST-BORING-AND-POINTLESS-BOOK-EVER award.
The MCs, Whatshername & Whatshisname are the soppiest individuals and the soppiest couple ever.
The book's only saving grace is that sends it up all the way in his .
May 31, 2018
Part I: The Book
After the melancholy of 鈥攚here even the grand romance is tempered by children starving and teenagers dying from cotton-clogged lungs鈥攕ome escapism was desperately needed. And The Phantom of the Opera provided the most sweeping, colorful, splendid escapism one could ask for.
Yet there is a deeper undercurrent here. It was the hatred of the world that drove Erik mad.
The plot of this story is likely familiar to all: a mysterious being known only as the Opera Ghost takes up residence below the Paris Opera House. Meanwhile, an orphaned chorus girl named Christine Daa毛 has to fill in for the prima donna Carlotta one night, and brings down the house with the beautiful voice that no one knew she had.
Christine鈥檚 childhood friend Raoul is in the audience and falls in love with her, despite the disapproval of his elder brother鈥攙iscounts can鈥檛 marry untitled chorus girls! The idea!鈥攂ut Raoul soon discovers he has a bigger obstacle. There鈥檚 another man. His name is Erik, he is a magician, and Christine is both terrified of and protective of him. He鈥檚 already kidnapped her once, and he intends to do it again.
There appear to be a few sizable divergences between the plot of the novel and that of the musical, but I鈥檒l wait till I watch the 2004 film to evaluate those and decide which I enjoyed more.
One big difference already evident is the appearance and characterization of the Phantom. In the book, he鈥檚 not sympathetic, just pathetic. He vacillates between threatening to blow up everyone and groveling tearfully at Christine鈥檚 feet. Not only is he bipolar, he also has roughly six hairs on his head, looks like death, lives in the middle of an underground lake, strangles people, is irrationally convinced that one person/object holds the key to his happiness, his eyes glow in the dark, and he frequently refers to himself in the third person. Does this remind you of anyone?
Somehow Andrew Lloyd-Webber turned this hideous nut-job into a heartthrob. I can鈥檛 wait to see how he managed that.
The other characters are fairly standard for the Gothic genre. Christine is all innocence and gentleness, while Raoul is rash and brave and spoiled and wholesome. The Persian is intriguing, and I wish Leroux had given us more backstory about how he knew Erik. The supporting cast are quite funny, always yelling and blaming each other for things they know they couldn鈥檛 have done鈥攁nything so long as they can pretend the Opera Ghost doesn鈥檛 exist.
Leroux鈥� prose seems lacking, but that might be more the translator鈥檚 fault than his. This is very much a horror novel in the vein of rather than a character-driven novel like . That said, just because Frankenstein and Phantom are a bit melodramatic and short on psychological details doesn't make either any less poignant or profound.
Part II: The Musical & The Movie/Comparisons with the Book
Just finished watching Joel Schumacher鈥檚 film version of Sir Andrew Lloyd Webber鈥檚 musical (2003), which supposedly sticks to the script of the play quite faithfully. Lots of fans seem to think that the movie is a poor representation of the play, and I鈥檓 sure that nothing can compare to the kinetic energy of a live stage performance. However, I heartily enjoyed the movie (edit: since originally writing this review I've watched the film three times and loved it more with every viewing).
A lot of theater geeks complain that neither Gerard Butler (Erik) nor Emmy Rossum (Christine) has an operatic or Broadway voice. While this is true - he sounds like a grunge rocker and she sounds like a singer-songwriter - I believe that they capture their characters better than the (equally talented) duo of Ramin Karimloo and Sierra Boggess in the 2005 live performance at the Royal Albert Hall. Butler is charismatic, menacing, and broken underneath in this role; Rossum is gentle and sincere and a bit otherwordly; their chemistry is electric and their connection seems deep. Also, Patrick Wilson is Raoul, and he's so good he makes the character likeable.
The characterization of the Phantom has changed significantly from page to stage/screen. He has been transformed from an unholy hybrid of Gollum and Frankenstein鈥檚 monster to a weirdly-attractive chimera of Heathcliff and Batman.
I鈥檓 not sure how I feel about this. On the one hand, giving him a normal body and a face that is not just 75% normal, but 75% very handsome indeed, could actually make him more frightening, because you have to steel yourself against him鈥攚hereas one has no trouble rejecting a being that looks like a zombie. They say the Devil can disguise himself as an angel of light, and that鈥檚 just what he did here. (Leroux hints sometimes in the book that there might be something diabolical about Erik, similar to insinuations Emily Bront毛 makes about Heathcliff in Wuthering Heights).
But on the other hand (to quote Tevye from Fiddler on the Roof, probably the greatest character to ever grace a Broadway stage), many viewers won鈥檛鈥攁nd haven鈥檛鈥攑erceived it that way. Instead they make excuses for him: 鈥淚t鈥檚 his horrible childhood!鈥� 鈥淗e only kills because no one loved him!鈥� 鈥淐hristine could have changed him!鈥�
And they have a point. We are, after all, talking about a man whose earliest memory is of his mother handing him a mask so she wouldn鈥檛 have to look at his face. Leroux says nothing more than that; the freak show is a Lloyd-Webber invention, and a good one (it also offers a far more satisfactory reason for Erik鈥檚 alliance with Madam Giry than that given by the novel). That Erik鈥攁gain, like Heathcliff鈥攚as abused and damaged, is doubtless. But the same could be said of Quasimodo (another book I have to read sometime) and he turned out the opposite. It鈥檚 an explanation but not an excuse.
As for Christine, she did change him, in both the book and the play/movie, by showing him compassion when he needed it most. In the book, the horror of his proposal goes unmixed, while the musical has her heart torn in two different directions, between a good man who would die for her and a bad, broken, sympathetic man who would kill for her. In another timeline, where different choices were made, I hope that Erik and Christine were able to make a life together. As is, she made the only reasonable choice his actions allowed her to make.
WHERE IS THE PERSIAN?!? Well, Lord Andrew? Why did you write out one of the book鈥檚 most interesting characters?
The book has some disturbing violence in the Phantom鈥檚 torture chamber (yes, he has one), where Raoul and the Persian might die of heat exhaustion if they don鈥檛 despair of finding the hidden door and hang themselves first. Also, the Phantom鈥檚 got enough explosives down there to blow the Opera House to kingdom come, which he threatens to do many, many times. He also strangles quite a few people with his Punjab lasso. A lot of his illusions are terrifying, though none so horrid as his own poor face. Teens and up.
The movie contains one scene of highly disturbing violence. Erik finds out that a stage hand was spreading rumors about his disfigurement, stalks the guy in the rafters of the stage, throttles him, and hangs the corpse so it falls on the stage. He also drops a giant chandelier on a packed house. The stage musical supposedly has almost no sexual content. The movie doesn鈥檛 have anything terribly racy either, but apparently the screen Phantom pets Christine more than his stage equivalent does, and her outfits show a wee bit more skin than the stage costumes tend to. Should be fine for teens, but judge for yourselves if it鈥檚 okay for younger kids.
After the melancholy of 鈥攚here even the grand romance is tempered by children starving and teenagers dying from cotton-clogged lungs鈥攕ome escapism was desperately needed. And The Phantom of the Opera provided the most sweeping, colorful, splendid escapism one could ask for.
Yet there is a deeper undercurrent here. It was the hatred of the world that drove Erik mad.
The plot of this story is likely familiar to all: a mysterious being known only as the Opera Ghost takes up residence below the Paris Opera House. Meanwhile, an orphaned chorus girl named Christine Daa毛 has to fill in for the prima donna Carlotta one night, and brings down the house with the beautiful voice that no one knew she had.
Christine鈥檚 childhood friend Raoul is in the audience and falls in love with her, despite the disapproval of his elder brother鈥攙iscounts can鈥檛 marry untitled chorus girls! The idea!鈥攂ut Raoul soon discovers he has a bigger obstacle. There鈥檚 another man. His name is Erik, he is a magician, and Christine is both terrified of and protective of him. He鈥檚 already kidnapped her once, and he intends to do it again.
There appear to be a few sizable divergences between the plot of the novel and that of the musical, but I鈥檒l wait till I watch the 2004 film to evaluate those and decide which I enjoyed more.
One big difference already evident is the appearance and characterization of the Phantom. In the book, he鈥檚 not sympathetic, just pathetic. He vacillates between threatening to blow up everyone and groveling tearfully at Christine鈥檚 feet. Not only is he bipolar, he also has roughly six hairs on his head, looks like death, lives in the middle of an underground lake, strangles people, is irrationally convinced that one person/object holds the key to his happiness, his eyes glow in the dark, and he frequently refers to himself in the third person. Does this remind you of anyone?
Somehow Andrew Lloyd-Webber turned this hideous nut-job into a heartthrob. I can鈥檛 wait to see how he managed that.
The other characters are fairly standard for the Gothic genre. Christine is all innocence and gentleness, while Raoul is rash and brave and spoiled and wholesome. The Persian is intriguing, and I wish Leroux had given us more backstory about how he knew Erik. The supporting cast are quite funny, always yelling and blaming each other for things they know they couldn鈥檛 have done鈥攁nything so long as they can pretend the Opera Ghost doesn鈥檛 exist.
Leroux鈥� prose seems lacking, but that might be more the translator鈥檚 fault than his. This is very much a horror novel in the vein of rather than a character-driven novel like . That said, just because Frankenstein and Phantom are a bit melodramatic and short on psychological details doesn't make either any less poignant or profound.
Part II: The Musical & The Movie/Comparisons with the Book
Just finished watching Joel Schumacher鈥檚 film version of Sir Andrew Lloyd Webber鈥檚 musical (2003), which supposedly sticks to the script of the play quite faithfully. Lots of fans seem to think that the movie is a poor representation of the play, and I鈥檓 sure that nothing can compare to the kinetic energy of a live stage performance. However, I heartily enjoyed the movie (edit: since originally writing this review I've watched the film three times and loved it more with every viewing).
A lot of theater geeks complain that neither Gerard Butler (Erik) nor Emmy Rossum (Christine) has an operatic or Broadway voice. While this is true - he sounds like a grunge rocker and she sounds like a singer-songwriter - I believe that they capture their characters better than the (equally talented) duo of Ramin Karimloo and Sierra Boggess in the 2005 live performance at the Royal Albert Hall. Butler is charismatic, menacing, and broken underneath in this role; Rossum is gentle and sincere and a bit otherwordly; their chemistry is electric and their connection seems deep. Also, Patrick Wilson is Raoul, and he's so good he makes the character likeable.
The characterization of the Phantom has changed significantly from page to stage/screen. He has been transformed from an unholy hybrid of Gollum and Frankenstein鈥檚 monster to a weirdly-attractive chimera of Heathcliff and Batman.
I鈥檓 not sure how I feel about this. On the one hand, giving him a normal body and a face that is not just 75% normal, but 75% very handsome indeed, could actually make him more frightening, because you have to steel yourself against him鈥攚hereas one has no trouble rejecting a being that looks like a zombie. They say the Devil can disguise himself as an angel of light, and that鈥檚 just what he did here. (Leroux hints sometimes in the book that there might be something diabolical about Erik, similar to insinuations Emily Bront毛 makes about Heathcliff in Wuthering Heights).
But on the other hand (to quote Tevye from Fiddler on the Roof, probably the greatest character to ever grace a Broadway stage), many viewers won鈥檛鈥攁nd haven鈥檛鈥攑erceived it that way. Instead they make excuses for him: 鈥淚t鈥檚 his horrible childhood!鈥� 鈥淗e only kills because no one loved him!鈥� 鈥淐hristine could have changed him!鈥�
And they have a point. We are, after all, talking about a man whose earliest memory is of his mother handing him a mask so she wouldn鈥檛 have to look at his face. Leroux says nothing more than that; the freak show is a Lloyd-Webber invention, and a good one (it also offers a far more satisfactory reason for Erik鈥檚 alliance with Madam Giry than that given by the novel). That Erik鈥攁gain, like Heathcliff鈥攚as abused and damaged, is doubtless. But the same could be said of Quasimodo (another book I have to read sometime) and he turned out the opposite. It鈥檚 an explanation but not an excuse.
As for Christine, she did change him, in both the book and the play/movie, by showing him compassion when he needed it most. In the book, the horror of his proposal goes unmixed, while the musical has her heart torn in two different directions, between a good man who would die for her and a bad, broken, sympathetic man who would kill for her. In another timeline, where different choices were made, I hope that Erik and Christine were able to make a life together. As is, she made the only reasonable choice his actions allowed her to make.
WHERE IS THE PERSIAN?!? Well, Lord Andrew? Why did you write out one of the book鈥檚 most interesting characters?
The book has some disturbing violence in the Phantom鈥檚 torture chamber (yes, he has one), where Raoul and the Persian might die of heat exhaustion if they don鈥檛 despair of finding the hidden door and hang themselves first. Also, the Phantom鈥檚 got enough explosives down there to blow the Opera House to kingdom come, which he threatens to do many, many times. He also strangles quite a few people with his Punjab lasso. A lot of his illusions are terrifying, though none so horrid as his own poor face. Teens and up.
The movie contains one scene of highly disturbing violence. Erik finds out that a stage hand was spreading rumors about his disfigurement, stalks the guy in the rafters of the stage, throttles him, and hangs the corpse so it falls on the stage. He also drops a giant chandelier on a packed house. The stage musical supposedly has almost no sexual content. The movie doesn鈥檛 have anything terribly racy either, but apparently the screen Phantom pets Christine more than his stage equivalent does, and her outfits show a wee bit more skin than the stage costumes tend to. Should be fine for teens, but judge for yourselves if it鈥檚 okay for younger kids.
October 22, 2019
I'm really not sure what to say about this book. Was it suppose to be a scary story about a ghost because if it was, I didn't get it. Maybe it was suppose to be a romantic love story but if it was, I didn't get it. Overall, it was pretty tedious and in the end, for me, if wasn't a scary or romantic story.
June 29, 2020
guys be like 鈥渋 know a spot鈥� then take you to their lair on the lake underneath the paris opera house and won鈥檛 let you leave
September 6, 2021
For a tale with such a gloomy and sinister background and such a cruel villain at its center, The Phantom of the Opera sure was humorous. How has Tim Burton not already adapted this into a classic gothic comedy film? (Please make him make it, I would watch it endlessly)...
"He had a heart that could have held the entire empire of the world; and, in the end, he had to content himself with a cellar."
When a gala performance is held to celebrate the retirement of the two managers of the Paris Opera House, the young and talented Swedish soprano Christine Daa茅 fills in for Carlotta, a Spanish woman who has suddenly fallen ill. Her performance is an instant success. Backstage, Vicomte Raoul de Chagny visits Christine after the show. The two were childhood friends, and Raoul recalls his love for Christine.
A man is found hanged underneath the Opera building, the two new managers are spooked by letters with texts written in red ink, the little ballerinas are on edge because of creepy rumors, and the chandelier falls down as the Phantom lives on in the cellars beneath the premises.
"She's singing to-night to bring the chandelier down!"
That synopsis is just as dramatic as the book itself; I promise. Especially everything that the Ghost says about Christine is written in that classic I-would-die-for-you-in-a-heartbeat, everybody-hates-me-and-I-am-doomed-to-eternal-misery, you-are-the-most-divine-being-I-have-ever-laid-eyes-on way. Either you hate it, or you love it.
The beginning of this book had me hooked, the tension eased in the middle section, and then towards the end the storyline spiraled into a huge tornado of happenings. I loved how it becomes apparent that Erik's trapdoors are the only real power he has over 'real society' up there at ground level and imagining the secret passages and booby-trapped nooks of the Opera House.
"They played at hearts as other children might play at ball; only, as it was really their two hearts that they flung to and fro, they had to be very, very handy to catch them, each time, without hurting them."
The Gothic elements were incredible too. Raoul's fever dream-like moment at the cemetery was... A moment.
Though I was not convinced by the Ghost's 'villain story' and motives (nobody can convince me that ) I found that the overall setting and tone of the book was enough to drive me to rate it four stars instead of three. It's enchanting, and you don't have to be a fan of the gothic to be able to appreciate it.
Some have compared Christine and the O.G.'s relationship to that of Catherine and Heathcliff, but I can't agree there. The level of toxicity corresponds, yes, but Christine and the Ghost had no mutual tension while Catherine and Heathcliff certainly did. Moreover, Christine is the most innocent being I've ever read about 鈥� we can't say the same for Catherine, to say the least.
"If I am the phantom, it is because man's hatred has made me so. If I am to be saved it is because your love redeems me."
The Phantom of the Opera is, while flawed, an incredible story. Would 9/10 recommend!
---------------
Additional Notes:
- I now need to visit Palais Garnier. Apparently, that's where Leroux got his setting inspiration
- Forever screaming at that masked ball scene ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
- The musical adaptation is now on my to-watch list
"He had a heart that could have held the entire empire of the world; and, in the end, he had to content himself with a cellar."
When a gala performance is held to celebrate the retirement of the two managers of the Paris Opera House, the young and talented Swedish soprano Christine Daa茅 fills in for Carlotta, a Spanish woman who has suddenly fallen ill. Her performance is an instant success. Backstage, Vicomte Raoul de Chagny visits Christine after the show. The two were childhood friends, and Raoul recalls his love for Christine.
A man is found hanged underneath the Opera building, the two new managers are spooked by letters with texts written in red ink, the little ballerinas are on edge because of creepy rumors, and the chandelier falls down as the Phantom lives on in the cellars beneath the premises.
"She's singing to-night to bring the chandelier down!"
That synopsis is just as dramatic as the book itself; I promise. Especially everything that the Ghost says about Christine is written in that classic I-would-die-for-you-in-a-heartbeat, everybody-hates-me-and-I-am-doomed-to-eternal-misery, you-are-the-most-divine-being-I-have-ever-laid-eyes-on way. Either you hate it, or you love it.
The beginning of this book had me hooked, the tension eased in the middle section, and then towards the end the storyline spiraled into a huge tornado of happenings. I loved how it becomes apparent that Erik's trapdoors are the only real power he has over 'real society' up there at ground level and imagining the secret passages and booby-trapped nooks of the Opera House.
"They played at hearts as other children might play at ball; only, as it was really their two hearts that they flung to and fro, they had to be very, very handy to catch them, each time, without hurting them."
The Gothic elements were incredible too. Raoul's fever dream-like moment at the cemetery was... A moment.
Though I was not convinced by the Ghost's 'villain story' and motives (nobody can convince me that ) I found that the overall setting and tone of the book was enough to drive me to rate it four stars instead of three. It's enchanting, and you don't have to be a fan of the gothic to be able to appreciate it.
Some have compared Christine and the O.G.'s relationship to that of Catherine and Heathcliff, but I can't agree there. The level of toxicity corresponds, yes, but Christine and the Ghost had no mutual tension while Catherine and Heathcliff certainly did. Moreover, Christine is the most innocent being I've ever read about 鈥� we can't say the same for Catherine, to say the least.
"If I am the phantom, it is because man's hatred has made me so. If I am to be saved it is because your love redeems me."
The Phantom of the Opera is, while flawed, an incredible story. Would 9/10 recommend!
---------------
Additional Notes:
- I now need to visit Palais Garnier. Apparently, that's where Leroux got his setting inspiration
- Forever screaming at that masked ball scene ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
- The musical adaptation is now on my to-watch list
December 31, 2008
This book changed my life...I'm so not kidding. I saw the play years before I decided to read this book. I'm so sorry that I waited so long because it was fantastic! I plan to re-read it again! It has everything in it! It's scary, creepy, romantic, sweet, sexy, dark, sad, depressing, etc. This is the third book on my list that I would recommend to anyone that i meet! (having harry potter and the twilight series at number one and two spots. haha)
W A R N I N G *MAY be a spoiler in this next paragraph*
I love the phantom! He was dark and mysterious. He was that bad guy that you always wanted to love. I do not agree with Christine Daae's choice in the end. I hate who she chose, but yes, i know...it was the better choice.
This story remains so dear to my heart. I can relate to almost every character and I truly love the phantom. His intentions were good and he had a good heart...just a bad temper and a bad reason for murder. All he wanted was Christine's love...
W A R N I N G *MAY be a spoiler in this next paragraph*
I love the phantom! He was dark and mysterious. He was that bad guy that you always wanted to love. I do not agree with Christine Daae's choice in the end. I hate who she chose, but yes, i know...it was the better choice.
This story remains so dear to my heart. I can relate to almost every character and I truly love the phantom. His intentions were good and he had a good heart...just a bad temper and a bad reason for murder. All he wanted was Christine's love...
Displaying 1 - 30 of 13,456 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.