What do you think?
Rate this book
亘丕乇蹖爻 诏丕丿賵賳賵賮
亘丕乇蹖爻 诏丕丿賵賳賵賮貙 鬲夭丕乇 乇賵爻蹖赖貙 讴賴 亘丕 賯鬲賱 賳丕噩賵丕賳賲乇丿丕賳賴 賵賱蹖毓賴丿 禺乇丿爻丕賱 亘賴 鬲禺鬲 賳卮爻鬲賴 丕爻鬲貙 丕夭 蹖讴 爻賵 亘丕蹖丿 丿乇 亘乇丕亘乇 丿卮賲賳丕賳 禺丕乇噩蹖 賵 賲禺丕賱賮丕賳 丌卮讴丕乇 賵 倬賳賴丕賳 倬蹖乇丕賲賵賳 禺賵丿 亘丕蹖爻鬲丿 賵 丕夭 爻賵蹖 丿蹖诏乇 亘丕蹖丿 亘乇 毓匕丕亘 賵噩丿丕賳 賳丕卮蹖 丕夭 讴乇丿丕乇 賳丕噩賵丕賳賲乇丿丕賳賴鈥屫ж� 睾賱亘賴 讴賳丿. 賲爻卅賱賴 丕氐賱蹖 丌賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丌蹖丕 鬲夭丕乇 亘丕 賵噩賵丿 趩賳蹖賳 賱讴賴鈥屫й� 亘乇 丿丕賲丕賳 禺賵丿 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗀� 賳夭丿 賲乇丿賲 賲卮乇賵毓蹖鬲 倬蹖丿丕 讴賳丿 蹖丕 賳賴. 倬賵卮讴蹖賳 亘丕 鬲讴蹖賴 亘乇 乇賵蹖丿丕丿賴丕蹖 賵丕賯毓蹖 丿乇 賲賯胤毓蹖 丨爻丕爻 丕夭 鬲丕乇蹖禺 乇賵爻蹖赖貙 丕孬乇蹖 丌賮乇蹖丿賴 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丿乇 賳賵夭丕蹖蹖 賵 乇卮丿 鬲卅丕鬲乇 賲丿乇賳 乇賵爻蹖赖 丕賴賲蹖鬲 賮乇丕賵丕賳 丿丕卮鬲. 丕賵 賴賲丕賳鈥屭堎嗁� 讴賴 丿乇 卮毓乇 賵 賳孬乇 賮乇賵爻蹖 丕賳賯賱丕亘蹖 亘賴 倬丕 讴乇丿貙 丿乇 丕蹖賳 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 亘爻蹖丕乇蹖 丕夭 丕氐賵賱 賵 賯賵丕卅丿 丿乇丕賲丕鬲蹖讴 倬匕蹖乇賮鬲賴 卮丿賴 丿乇 丌賳 夭賲丕賳 乇丕 讴賳丕乇 诏匕丕卮鬲 賵 讴賵卮蹖丿 爻賲鬲 賵 爻賵蹖 鬲丕夭賴鈥屫й� 亘賴 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴鈥屬嗁堐屫驰� 賵 鬲卅丕鬲乇 乇賵爻蹖赖 亘丿賴丿.
91 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1831
76 people are currently reading
1,735 people want to read
About the author
Alexander Pushkin
2,304听books3,307听followersWorks of Russian writer Aleksandr Sergeyevich Pushkin include the verse novel
Eugene Onegin
(1831), the play
Boris Godunov
(1831), and many narrative and lyrical poems and short stories.
See also:
Russian: 袗谢械泻褋邪薪写褉 小械褉谐械械胁懈褔 袩褍褕泻懈薪
French: Alexandre Pouchkine
Norwegian: Aleksander Pusjkin
Spanish:Aleksandr Pushkin
People consider this author the greatest poet and the founder of modern literature. Pushkin pioneered the use of vernacular speech in his poems, creating a style of storytelling鈥攎ixing drama, romance, and satire鈥攁ssociated ever with greatly influential later literature.
Pushkin published his first poem at the age of 15 years in 1814, and the literary establishment widely recognized him before the time of his graduation from the imperial lyceum in Tsarskoe Selo. Social reform gradually committed Pushkin, who emerged as a spokesman for literary radicals and in the early 1820s clashed with the government, which sent him into exile in southern Russia. Under the strict surveillance of government censors and unable to travel or publish at will, he wrote his most famous drama but ably published it not until years later. People published his verse serially from 1825 to 1832.
Pushkin and his wife Natalya Goncharova, whom he married in 1831, later became regulars of court society. In 1837, while falling into ever greater debt amidst rumors that his wife started conducting a scandalous affair, Pushkin challenged her alleged lover, Georges d'Anth猫s, to a duel. Pushkin was mortally wounded and died two days later.
Because of his liberal political views and influence on generations of Russian rebels, Pushkin was portrayed by Bolsheviks as an opponent to bourgeois literature and culture and a predecessor of Soviet literature and poetry. Tsarskoe Selo was renamed after him.
See also:
Russian: 袗谢械泻褋邪薪写褉 小械褉谐械械胁懈褔 袩褍褕泻懈薪
French: Alexandre Pouchkine
Norwegian: Aleksander Pusjkin
Spanish:Aleksandr Pushkin
People consider this author the greatest poet and the founder of modern literature. Pushkin pioneered the use of vernacular speech in his poems, creating a style of storytelling鈥攎ixing drama, romance, and satire鈥攁ssociated ever with greatly influential later literature.
Pushkin published his first poem at the age of 15 years in 1814, and the literary establishment widely recognized him before the time of his graduation from the imperial lyceum in Tsarskoe Selo. Social reform gradually committed Pushkin, who emerged as a spokesman for literary radicals and in the early 1820s clashed with the government, which sent him into exile in southern Russia. Under the strict surveillance of government censors and unable to travel or publish at will, he wrote his most famous drama but ably published it not until years later. People published his verse serially from 1825 to 1832.
Pushkin and his wife Natalya Goncharova, whom he married in 1831, later became regulars of court society. In 1837, while falling into ever greater debt amidst rumors that his wife started conducting a scandalous affair, Pushkin challenged her alleged lover, Georges d'Anth猫s, to a duel. Pushkin was mortally wounded and died two days later.
Because of his liberal political views and influence on generations of Russian rebels, Pushkin was portrayed by Bolsheviks as an opponent to bourgeois literature and culture and a predecessor of Soviet literature and poetry. Tsarskoe Selo was renamed after him.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 132 reviews
January 29, 2022
You can learn important things about a great writer by reading other great writers who have imitated him. I learned about Twain鈥檚 Huckleberry Finn by reading Salinger鈥檚 Catcher in the Rye and Doctorow鈥檚 Billy Bathgate, I learned about Sir Thomas Malory's Le Morte d鈥橝rthur by reading Twain鈥檚 Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur鈥檚 Court, and I learned about Shakespeare, his tragedies and histories, by reading Alexander Puskin鈥檚 Boris Godunov.
Shakespeare was fascinated by political history, the motivations of kings and would-be kings, and the young Pushkin鈥攁n early admirer of Byron, the philosophes, and the revolutions in America and France鈥攚as fascinated by political history too. His revolutionary sentiments earned the young poet an exile to his mother鈥檚 estate, and there, in his mid-twenties, he immersed himself in the histories and tragedies of Shakespeare (in a French translation) and in Karamzin鈥檚 History of the Russian State.
In Karamzin, Pushkin became fascinated with a period contemporaneous with Shakespeare: the reign of Boris Godunov (1598鈥�1605) and the rise of the 鈥淔alse Dmitri.鈥� Godunov acted as regent for Ivan the Terrible鈥檚 saintly but weak-willed son Feodor, and, after Feodor鈥檚 death, for Dmitri, Feodor鈥檚 son. When the boy, at the age of ten, was found dead, Godunov was thought responsible. Gudonov was soon acclaimed czar, but Dmitri鈥檚 death came back to haunt him: a young man (rumored to be a renegade monk) claiming to be the real Dmitri, recruited an army in Poland and marched on to Godunov's palace.
Pushkin must have been struck with the Shakespearean echoes: the saintly weak-willed king (Henry VI), the murderous Lord Protector (Richard Duke of Gloster), the guilty king unable to sleep (Henry IV, Macbeth), and a march on the stronghold of the king (Macduff and Birnam Wood, Richmond and Bosworth Field). To this he added some unusual, more surprising Shakespearean touches: a courtship scene with a Romeo and Juliet beginning and an ending with a bargain more like Macbeth; an idiot beggar who speaks the truth to Czar Boris like Lear鈥檚 fool speaks the truth to Lear; a Duke of Clarence style dream; and a low tavern with drunken monks, featuring a hair鈥檚-breadth escape which looks a little like Falstaff鈥檚 Boar鈥檚 Head Inn. But Pushkin鈥檚 imitation consists of much more than an echoed scene here and there, for he perfectly captures the free, wide-ranging spirit of Shakespeare: unaffected by the shackles of the classical unities, generous and universal in its sympathies, comprehensive in its soul.
I鈥檒l end with a portion of Boris' famous soliloquy (and one of the finest arias in Mussorgsky鈥檚 opera too). The echos of Richard III, Henry IV, and Macbeth are strong here:
I have attained the highest power. Six years
Already have I reigned in peace; but joy
Dwells not within my soul. Even so in youth
We greedily desire the joys of love,
But only quell the hunger of the heart
With momentary possession. We grow cold,
Grow weary and oppressed! In vain the wizards
Promise me length of days, days of dominion
Immune from treachery--not power, not life
Gladden me; I forebode the wrath of Heaven
And woe. For me no happiness. . . .
Ah! Now I feel it; naught can give us peace
Mid worldly cares, nothing save only conscience!
Healthy she triumphs over wickedness,
Over dark slander; but if in her be found
A single casual stain, then misery.
With what a deadly sore my soul doth smart;
My heart, with venom filled, doth like a hammer
Beat in mine ears reproach; all things revolt me,
And my head whirls, and in my eyes are children
Dripping with blood; and gladly would I flee,
But nowhere can find refuge--horrible!
Pitiful he whose conscience is unclean!
August 30, 2021
袘芯褉懈褋 袚芯写褍薪芯胁 (Bor铆s Godun贸v) = Boris Godunov, Alexander Pushkin
Bor铆s Fyodorovich Godun贸v (1552 鈥� 23 April [O.S. 13 April] 1605) ruled the Tsardom of Russia as de facto regent from c. 1585 to 1598 and then as the first non-Rurikid tsar from 1598 to 1605.
Boris Godunov is a play by Alexander Pushkin. It was written in 1825, published in 1831, but not approved for performance by the censor until 1866. Its subject is the Russian ruler Boris Godunov, who reigned as Tsar from 1598 to 1605.
鬲丕乇蹖禺 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 禺賵丕賳卮 乇賵夭 亘蹖爻鬲 賵 賳賴賲 賲丕賴 丌诏賵爻鬲 爻丕賱 2015賲蹖賱丕丿蹖
毓賳賵丕賳: 亘丕乇蹖爻 诏丕丿賵賳賵賮貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 丌賱讴爻丕賳丿乇 倬賵卮讴蹖賳貨 賲鬲乇噩賲 丌亘鬲蹖賳 诏賱讴丕乇貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賴乇賲爻貙 1391貨 丿乇 91氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9789643637828貨 賲賵囟賵毓 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 賴丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 乇賵爻蹖赖 - 爻丿賴 19賲
亘丕乇蹖爻 (亘賵乇蹖爻) 诏丕丿賵賳賵賮貙 芦鬲夭丕乇 乇賵爻蹖赖禄貙 讴賴 亘丕 賯鬲賱 賳丕噩賵丕賳賲乇丿丕賳賴 賵賱蹖毓賴丿 禺乇丿爻丕賱 亘乇 鬲禺鬲 賳卮爻鬲賴 丕爻鬲貙 丕蹖卮丕賳 丕夭 蹖讴爻賵 亘丕蹖丿 丿乇 亘乇丕亘乇 丿卮賲賳丕賳 禺丕乇噩蹖 賵 賲禺丕賱賮丕賳 丌卮讴丕乇 賵 倬賳賴丕賳 倬蹖乇丕賲賵賳 禺賵丿 亘丕蹖爻鬲賳丿貙 賵 丕夭 爻賵蹖 丿蹖诏乇 亘丕蹖爻鬲蹖 亘乇 毓匕丕亘 賵噩丿丕賳 賳丕卮蹖 丕夭 讴乇丿丕乇 賳丕噩賵丕賳賲乇丿丕賳賴鈥屫ж� 睾賱亘賴 讴賳丿貨 賲爻卅賱賴 丕氐賱蹖 丌賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丌蹖丕 芦鬲夭丕乇禄 亘丕 賵噩賵丿 趩賳丕賳 賱讴賴鈥� 丕蹖 亘乇 丿丕賲丕賳 禺賵丿貙 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗀� 賳夭丿 賲乇丿賲丕賳 賲卮乇賵毓蹖鬲 倬蹖丿丕 讴賳丿貨 芦倬賵卮讴蹖賳禄 亘丕 鬲讴蹖賴 亘乇 乇賵蹖丿丕丿賴丕蹖 乇丕爻鬲蹖賳 丿乇 丿賵乇丕賳蹖 丨爻丕爻 丕夭 鬲丕乇蹖禺 芦乇賵爻蹖赖禄貙 丕孬乇蹖 丌賮乇蹖丿賴 丕賳丿 讴賴 丿乇 賳賵夭丕蹖蹖 賵 乇卮丿 鬲卅丕鬲乇 賲丿乇賳 芦乇賵爻蹖赖禄貙 丕賴賲蹖鬲 賮乇丕賵丕賳 丿丕卮鬲賴貨 丕蹖卮丕賳 賴賲丕賳鈥屭堎嗁� 讴賴 丿乇 卮毓乇 賵 賳孬乇 芦乇賵爻蹖赖禄 丕賳賯賱丕亘蹖 亘賴 倬丕 讴乇丿賳丿貙 丿乇 丕蹖賳 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 賳蹖夭 亘爻蹖丕乇蹖 丕夭 丕氐賵賱 賵 賯賵丕卅丿 丿乇丕賲丕鬲蹖讴 倬匕蹖乇賮鬲賴 卮丿賴 丿乇 丌賳 夭賲丕賳 乇丕貙 讴賳丕乇 亘诏匕丕卮鬲賴 賵 讴賵卮蹖丿賴 丕賳丿 爻賲鬲 賵 爻賵蹖 鬲丕夭賴鈥� 丕蹖 亘賴 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴鈥� 賳賵蹖爻蹖 賵 鬲卅丕鬲乇 芦乇賵爻蹖赖禄 亘丿賴賳丿
鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴賳诏丕賲 乇爻丕賳蹖 07/06/1400賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
Bor铆s Fyodorovich Godun贸v (1552 鈥� 23 April [O.S. 13 April] 1605) ruled the Tsardom of Russia as de facto regent from c. 1585 to 1598 and then as the first non-Rurikid tsar from 1598 to 1605.
Boris Godunov is a play by Alexander Pushkin. It was written in 1825, published in 1831, but not approved for performance by the censor until 1866. Its subject is the Russian ruler Boris Godunov, who reigned as Tsar from 1598 to 1605.
鬲丕乇蹖禺 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 禺賵丕賳卮 乇賵夭 亘蹖爻鬲 賵 賳賴賲 賲丕賴 丌诏賵爻鬲 爻丕賱 2015賲蹖賱丕丿蹖
毓賳賵丕賳: 亘丕乇蹖爻 诏丕丿賵賳賵賮貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 丌賱讴爻丕賳丿乇 倬賵卮讴蹖賳貨 賲鬲乇噩賲 丌亘鬲蹖賳 诏賱讴丕乇貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賴乇賲爻貙 1391貨 丿乇 91氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9789643637828貨 賲賵囟賵毓 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 賴丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 乇賵爻蹖赖 - 爻丿賴 19賲
亘丕乇蹖爻 (亘賵乇蹖爻) 诏丕丿賵賳賵賮貙 芦鬲夭丕乇 乇賵爻蹖赖禄貙 讴賴 亘丕 賯鬲賱 賳丕噩賵丕賳賲乇丿丕賳賴 賵賱蹖毓賴丿 禺乇丿爻丕賱 亘乇 鬲禺鬲 賳卮爻鬲賴 丕爻鬲貙 丕蹖卮丕賳 丕夭 蹖讴爻賵 亘丕蹖丿 丿乇 亘乇丕亘乇 丿卮賲賳丕賳 禺丕乇噩蹖 賵 賲禺丕賱賮丕賳 丌卮讴丕乇 賵 倬賳賴丕賳 倬蹖乇丕賲賵賳 禺賵丿 亘丕蹖爻鬲賳丿貙 賵 丕夭 爻賵蹖 丿蹖诏乇 亘丕蹖爻鬲蹖 亘乇 毓匕丕亘 賵噩丿丕賳 賳丕卮蹖 丕夭 讴乇丿丕乇 賳丕噩賵丕賳賲乇丿丕賳賴鈥屫ж� 睾賱亘賴 讴賳丿貨 賲爻卅賱賴 丕氐賱蹖 丌賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丌蹖丕 芦鬲夭丕乇禄 亘丕 賵噩賵丿 趩賳丕賳 賱讴賴鈥� 丕蹖 亘乇 丿丕賲丕賳 禺賵丿貙 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗀� 賳夭丿 賲乇丿賲丕賳 賲卮乇賵毓蹖鬲 倬蹖丿丕 讴賳丿貨 芦倬賵卮讴蹖賳禄 亘丕 鬲讴蹖賴 亘乇 乇賵蹖丿丕丿賴丕蹖 乇丕爻鬲蹖賳 丿乇 丿賵乇丕賳蹖 丨爻丕爻 丕夭 鬲丕乇蹖禺 芦乇賵爻蹖赖禄貙 丕孬乇蹖 丌賮乇蹖丿賴 丕賳丿 讴賴 丿乇 賳賵夭丕蹖蹖 賵 乇卮丿 鬲卅丕鬲乇 賲丿乇賳 芦乇賵爻蹖赖禄貙 丕賴賲蹖鬲 賮乇丕賵丕賳 丿丕卮鬲賴貨 丕蹖卮丕賳 賴賲丕賳鈥屭堎嗁� 讴賴 丿乇 卮毓乇 賵 賳孬乇 芦乇賵爻蹖赖禄 丕賳賯賱丕亘蹖 亘賴 倬丕 讴乇丿賳丿貙 丿乇 丕蹖賳 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 賳蹖夭 亘爻蹖丕乇蹖 丕夭 丕氐賵賱 賵 賯賵丕卅丿 丿乇丕賲丕鬲蹖讴 倬匕蹖乇賮鬲賴 卮丿賴 丿乇 丌賳 夭賲丕賳 乇丕貙 讴賳丕乇 亘诏匕丕卮鬲賴 賵 讴賵卮蹖丿賴 丕賳丿 爻賲鬲 賵 爻賵蹖 鬲丕夭賴鈥� 丕蹖 亘賴 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴鈥� 賳賵蹖爻蹖 賵 鬲卅丕鬲乇 芦乇賵爻蹖赖禄 亘丿賴賳丿
鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴賳诏丕賲 乇爻丕賳蹖 07/06/1400賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
Read
November 21, 2024丿乇 爻丕賱 1598 賮卅賵丿賵乇 蹖讴賲貙 鬲夭丕乇 乇賵爻蹖赖 (賮乇夭賳丿 丕蹖賵丕賳 賲禺賵賮) 亘丕 鬲賵胤卅賴 亘乇丕丿乇夭賳卮 亘丕乇蹖爻 诏丕丿賵賳賵賮 讴卮鬲賴 賲蹖卮賴. 賴賮鬲 爻丕賱 賯亘賱 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賲丕噩乇丕貙 亘丕乇蹖爻 丿爻鬲賵乇 賯鬲賱 賵賱蹖毓賴丿 丿蹖賲蹖鬲乇蹖 (亘乇丕丿乇 讴賵趩讴鬲乇 賮卅賵丿賵乇 蹖讴賲) 乇賵 賴賲 丿丕丿賴 亘賵丿賴 鬲丕 賵丕乇孬蹖 噩夭 禺賵丿卮 亘乇丕蹖 鬲丕噩 倬丕丿卮丕賴蹖 亘丕賯蹖 賳賲賵賳賴.
趩賳丿 爻丕賱 亘毓丿 丕夭 鬲丕噩诏匕丕乇蹖 亘丕乇蹖爻貙 乇丕賴亘蹖 噩賵丕賳 丕丿毓丕 賲蹖讴賳賴 賵賱蹖毓賴丿 丿蹖賲鬲乇蹖 賵 倬丕丿卮丕賴 亘乇 丨賯 乇賵爻蹖赖鈥屫池� 賵 亘丕 讴賲讴 賱賴爻鬲丕賳蹖鈥屬囏� 賵 噩賳诏 乇賵丕賳蹖鈥屫й� 讴賴 亘蹖賳 賲乇丿賲 乇丕賴 賲蹖鈥屬嗀ж操囏� 亘丕乇蹖爻 乇賵 丕夭 鬲禺鬲 倬丕蹖蹖賳 賲蹖讴卮賴 賵 倬丕丿卮丕賴 乇賵爻蹖赖 賲蹖卮賴.
賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 倬賵卮讴蹖賳 丿乇亘丕乇賴鈥屰� 丕夭 毓乇卮 亘賴 賮乇卮 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘丕乇蹖爻 诏丕丿賵賳賵賮 丿乇 23 氐丨賳賴 賳賵卮鬲賴 卮丿賴 賵 丕賵賱蹖賳 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴鈥屫й� 亘賵丿賴 讴賴 亘丕 賴丿賮 丕噩乇丕 丿乇 亘蹖賳 賲乇丿賲 乇賵爻蹖赖 賵 賳賴 賮賯胤 亘乇丕蹖 胤亘賯賴 丕卮乇丕賮蹖 賳賵卮鬲賴 卮丿賴 賵 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賳馗乇 丨丕卅夭 丕賴賲蹖鬲賴. 丨賯丕 讴賴 倬賵卮讴蹖賳 丨賯 倬丿乇蹖 亘乇 诏乇丿賳 丕丿亘蹖丕鬲 乇賵爻蹖赖 丿乇 賳馗賲 賵 賳孬乇 賵 賳賲丕蹖卮 丿丕卮鬲賴貙 賴乇趩賳丿 賴蹖趩鈥屬堎傌� 丌賳賯丿乇 讴賴 卮丕蹖爻鬲賴 亘賵丿賴 賲賵乇丿 鬲賯丿蹖乇 賵 鬲賵噩賴 賯乇丕乇 賳诏乇賮鬲賴. 賲賳 卮蹖賮鬲賴 丌孬丕乇 鬲丕乇蹖禺蹖賲 賵 亘丕 禺賵賳丿賳卮 趩賳丿 鬲蹖讴賴 噩丿蹖丿 亘賴 倬丕夭賱 乇賵爻蹖赖 卮賳丕爻蹖鈥屸€屬� 丕囟丕賮賴 卮丿.
趩賳丿 爻丕賱 亘毓丿 丕夭 鬲丕噩诏匕丕乇蹖 亘丕乇蹖爻貙 乇丕賴亘蹖 噩賵丕賳 丕丿毓丕 賲蹖讴賳賴 賵賱蹖毓賴丿 丿蹖賲鬲乇蹖 賵 倬丕丿卮丕賴 亘乇 丨賯 乇賵爻蹖赖鈥屫池� 賵 亘丕 讴賲讴 賱賴爻鬲丕賳蹖鈥屬囏� 賵 噩賳诏 乇賵丕賳蹖鈥屫й� 讴賴 亘蹖賳 賲乇丿賲 乇丕賴 賲蹖鈥屬嗀ж操囏� 亘丕乇蹖爻 乇賵 丕夭 鬲禺鬲 倬丕蹖蹖賳 賲蹖讴卮賴 賵 倬丕丿卮丕賴 乇賵爻蹖赖 賲蹖卮賴.
賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 倬賵卮讴蹖賳 丿乇亘丕乇賴鈥屰� 丕夭 毓乇卮 亘賴 賮乇卮 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘丕乇蹖爻 诏丕丿賵賳賵賮 丿乇 23 氐丨賳賴 賳賵卮鬲賴 卮丿賴 賵 丕賵賱蹖賳 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴鈥屫й� 亘賵丿賴 讴賴 亘丕 賴丿賮 丕噩乇丕 丿乇 亘蹖賳 賲乇丿賲 乇賵爻蹖赖 賵 賳賴 賮賯胤 亘乇丕蹖 胤亘賯賴 丕卮乇丕賮蹖 賳賵卮鬲賴 卮丿賴 賵 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賳馗乇 丨丕卅夭 丕賴賲蹖鬲賴. 丨賯丕 讴賴 倬賵卮讴蹖賳 丨賯 倬丿乇蹖 亘乇 诏乇丿賳 丕丿亘蹖丕鬲 乇賵爻蹖赖 丿乇 賳馗賲 賵 賳孬乇 賵 賳賲丕蹖卮 丿丕卮鬲賴貙 賴乇趩賳丿 賴蹖趩鈥屬堎傌� 丌賳賯丿乇 讴賴 卮丕蹖爻鬲賴 亘賵丿賴 賲賵乇丿 鬲賯丿蹖乇 賵 鬲賵噩賴 賯乇丕乇 賳诏乇賮鬲賴. 賲賳 卮蹖賮鬲賴 丌孬丕乇 鬲丕乇蹖禺蹖賲 賵 亘丕 禺賵賳丿賳卮 趩賳丿 鬲蹖讴賴 噩丿蹖丿 亘賴 倬丕夭賱 乇賵爻蹖赖 卮賳丕爻蹖鈥屸€屬� 丕囟丕賮賴 卮丿.
June 6, 2015
When doing the tasks for a literary birthday Challenge I am participating in, I try each month to pick authors I have never read. For June my choice was Alexander Pushkin, and I selected three titles of his, the first being Boris Godunov.
I wanted to read a bit about Pushkin himself before starting so I visited wiki and while there read a separate link about this play which gave a short outline of the main details leading up to Boris becoming Tsar in the late 1500's and what went on after that. I am embarrassed to admit I had not known that Boris Godunov had been a real person.
This is a play with only 25 short scenes, but a lot happens throughout. Court intrigue, mysterious deaths, battles, romance, treachery and murder. But was Boris really guilty of causing the death of Ivan the Terrible's youngest but illegitimate son? According to the wiki article, his guilt was never established in real life but Pushkin chose to believe Boris was guilty, in order to add more drama to the play. He also
modeled this work on Shakespeare's Henry IV, which of course I will want to read soon so I can compare the two while Boris is still fresh in my mind.
I liked the play; it flowed smoothly from scene to scene, and I was so caught up in the action I found myself holding my breath in more than one spot. This is another work that has shown me that Russian history and literature is not always as intimidating as I have thought. I am looking forward to exploring Russia more thoroughly, and will start with two more works by Pushkin.
I wanted to read a bit about Pushkin himself before starting so I visited wiki and while there read a separate link about this play which gave a short outline of the main details leading up to Boris becoming Tsar in the late 1500's and what went on after that. I am embarrassed to admit I had not known that Boris Godunov had been a real person.
This is a play with only 25 short scenes, but a lot happens throughout. Court intrigue, mysterious deaths, battles, romance, treachery and murder. But was Boris really guilty of causing the death of Ivan the Terrible's youngest but illegitimate son? According to the wiki article, his guilt was never established in real life but Pushkin chose to believe Boris was guilty, in order to add more drama to the play. He also
modeled this work on Shakespeare's Henry IV, which of course I will want to read soon so I can compare the two while Boris is still fresh in my mind.
I liked the play; it flowed smoothly from scene to scene, and I was so caught up in the action I found myself holding my breath in more than one spot. This is another work that has shown me that Russian history and literature is not always as intimidating as I have thought. I am looking forward to exploring Russia more thoroughly, and will start with two more works by Pushkin.
April 12, 2021
Hem Shakespeare hem Rus Edebiyat谋 sevenler i莽in paha bi莽ilmez bir 枚rnek 鈥淏oris Godunov鈥� tragedyas谋. Bana Macbeth鈥檌 hat谋rlatt谋. Pu艧kin鈥檌n 枚yk眉lerini, romanlar谋n谋 ve Yevgeni Onegin鈥檌ni okumu艧tum. Dovlatov鈥檜n 鈥淧u艧kin Tepeleri鈥� kitab谋n谋 okuduktan sonra Pu艧kin okumay谋 枚zledi臒imi hissedip ilk kez bir oyununu okudum ve 莽ok sevdim馃憣馃徎. Di臒er oyunlar谋n谋 da kesin okuyaca臒谋m. Tarihi tragedya sevenler mutlaka okumal谋.
January 12, 2021
賲乇丿賲 趩賳丿丕賳 丿賱 禺賵卮蹖 丕夭 丨丕讴賲 賮毓賱蹖 賳丿丕乇賳丿 賵 讴爻蹖 讴賴 禺賵丿 乇丕 賵賱蹖毓賴丿 賲蹖鈥屫з嗀� 亘丕 賳丕噩賵丕賳賲乇丿蹖 賲蹖鈥屫堌з囏� 鬲禺鬲 卮丕賴蹖 乇賵爻蹖赖 乇丕 睾氐亘 讴賳丿. 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 賴蹖趩 蹖讴 丕夭 丕蹖賳 丿賵 (丨丕讴賲 賮毓賱蹖 賵 亘毓丿蹖) 丿乇 丕氐賱 賳亘丕蹖丿 卮丕賴 賲蹖鈥屫ㄙ堌嗀� 丕賲丕 丕蹖賳 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賲毓賳蹖 賳蹖爻鬲 讴賴 丕蹖賵丕賳 賲禺賵賮 蹖丕 賵賱蹖毓賴丿丕賳賽 亘賴 丨賯卮賿 爻夭丕賵丕乇 倬丕丿丕卮丕賴蹖鈥屫з嗀�. 賴乇 讴爻蹖 讴賴 鬲夭丕乇 卮賵丿 賲乇丿賲 丿乇 乇賳噩 賵 賮賯乇 禺賵丿 禺賵丕賴賳丿 亘賵丿.
爻賳鬲 丕賳鬲賯丕賱 倬蹖丕賲賽 丿賴丕賳 亘賴 丿賴丕賳貙 亘丕毓孬 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 鬲丕 賴蹖亘鬲 丿乇賵睾蹖賳 爻倬丕賴賽 卮賵乇賵卮蹖貙 蹖讴 讴賱丕睾 趩賴賱 讴賱丕睾丕賳賴貙 亘蹖卮鬲乇 亘賴 趩卮賲 丌蹖丿 賵 賳亘賵丿 爻賳鬲 丕賳鬲賯丕丿蹖 亘丕毓孬 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 讴賴 賴乇讴爻 讴賴 亘丕 賵毓丿賴鈥屰� 卮賱 讴乇丿賳 丕毓丿丕賲鈥屬囏� 賵 芦賱胤賮禄 亘賴 禺賱賯 馗丕賴乇 卮賵丿貙 賲賵乇丿 丨賲丕蹖鬲 賲乇丿賲 賯乇丕乇 诏蹖乇丿.
爻賳鬲 丕賳鬲賯丕賱 倬蹖丕賲賽 丿賴丕賳 亘賴 丿賴丕賳貙 亘丕毓孬 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 鬲丕 賴蹖亘鬲 丿乇賵睾蹖賳 爻倬丕賴賽 卮賵乇賵卮蹖貙 蹖讴 讴賱丕睾 趩賴賱 讴賱丕睾丕賳賴貙 亘蹖卮鬲乇 亘賴 趩卮賲 丌蹖丿 賵 賳亘賵丿 爻賳鬲 丕賳鬲賯丕丿蹖 亘丕毓孬 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 讴賴 賴乇讴爻 讴賴 亘丕 賵毓丿賴鈥屰� 卮賱 讴乇丿賳 丕毓丿丕賲鈥屬囏� 賵 芦賱胤賮禄 亘賴 禺賱賯 馗丕賴乇 卮賵丿貙 賲賵乇丿 丨賲丕蹖鬲 賲乇丿賲 賯乇丕乇 诏蹖乇丿.
July 24, 2021
rus edebiyat谋 odac谋臒谋ma yeni ekledi臒im pu艧kin'in trajik, 枚臒retilerle dolu, dostoyevski ak谋c谋l谋臒谋ndaki kitab谋 boris godunov.
bitirdi臒imde hissetti臒im tatmin hissinden bi' t谋k daha ak谋lda kal谋c谋 bir olay vard谋, o da, pu艧kin'in pu艧kin isimli bir karakter yaratm谋艧 olmas谋 ve s谋k s谋k onu konu艧turmas谋...
ilkokulda kendi kendimi e臒lendirmek i莽in yazd谋臒谋m 枚yk眉leri okuyan t眉rk莽e 枚臒retmenim bir sonraki 枚yk眉mde bir karaktere kendi ismimi vermemi ve nas谋l bir his oldu臒unu ona anlatmam谋 istemi艧ti.
deneyimim 莽ok e臒lenceliydi, hem benden ba臒谋ms谋z olan hem de ne yaparsam yapay谋m hakk谋mda ipu莽lar谋 veren bir karakteri konu艧turmaya 莽al谋艧mak, en basit tabiriyle garip bir 艧eydi.
akl谋ma o 枚yk眉 geldi pu艧kin konu艧tuk莽a...
neyse, 枚zne olmaktan 莽谋k谋yorum ve tekrar kitaba d枚n眉yorum.
''belki dimitri'dir, belki d眉zmece'' gibi bir c眉mle var bir yerlerde. okudu臒umda kitab谋n kalbinin oras谋 oldu臒unu d眉艧眉nd眉m nedense.
asl谋nda pu艧kin biraz ters k枚艧e yapt谋 beni. h谋zl谋ca bitirece臒imi zannederken, sayfa sonlar谋nda d眉艧眉n眉yor halde buldum kendimi, g眉zel 艧eyleri sorgulad谋m, g眉zel 艧eyler 枚臒rendim.
mesela 艧枚yle bir k谋s谋m vard谋: ''sevgili o臒lum,
kad谋n y眉z眉n眉n kan谋n谋 co艧turdu臒u ya艧a giriyorsun,
kutsal temizli臒ini, masumlu臒unu,
gururlu utanga莽l谋臒谋n谋 kaybetme.
gen莽li臒inde duygular谋n谋
i臒ren莽 zevklere kapt谋rmaya al谋艧m谋艧 olanlar,
ya艧land谋k莽a kederli,
kan d枚k眉c眉 olurlar.
zekalar谋 vaktinden 枚nce s枚nmeye y眉z tutar''
piiiiiifiyt...
''gururlu utanga莽l谋k'' 莽ok g眉zel bir tan谋mlama olmam谋艧 m谋?
bitirdi臒imde hissetti臒im tatmin hissinden bi' t谋k daha ak谋lda kal谋c谋 bir olay vard谋, o da, pu艧kin'in pu艧kin isimli bir karakter yaratm谋艧 olmas谋 ve s谋k s谋k onu konu艧turmas谋...
ilkokulda kendi kendimi e臒lendirmek i莽in yazd谋臒谋m 枚yk眉leri okuyan t眉rk莽e 枚臒retmenim bir sonraki 枚yk眉mde bir karaktere kendi ismimi vermemi ve nas谋l bir his oldu臒unu ona anlatmam谋 istemi艧ti.
deneyimim 莽ok e臒lenceliydi, hem benden ba臒谋ms谋z olan hem de ne yaparsam yapay谋m hakk谋mda ipu莽lar谋 veren bir karakteri konu艧turmaya 莽al谋艧mak, en basit tabiriyle garip bir 艧eydi.
akl谋ma o 枚yk眉 geldi pu艧kin konu艧tuk莽a...
neyse, 枚zne olmaktan 莽谋k谋yorum ve tekrar kitaba d枚n眉yorum.
''belki dimitri'dir, belki d眉zmece'' gibi bir c眉mle var bir yerlerde. okudu臒umda kitab谋n kalbinin oras谋 oldu臒unu d眉艧眉nd眉m nedense.
asl谋nda pu艧kin biraz ters k枚艧e yapt谋 beni. h谋zl谋ca bitirece臒imi zannederken, sayfa sonlar谋nda d眉艧眉n眉yor halde buldum kendimi, g眉zel 艧eyleri sorgulad谋m, g眉zel 艧eyler 枚臒rendim.
mesela 艧枚yle bir k谋s谋m vard谋: ''sevgili o臒lum,
kad谋n y眉z眉n眉n kan谋n谋 co艧turdu臒u ya艧a giriyorsun,
kutsal temizli臒ini, masumlu臒unu,
gururlu utanga莽l谋臒谋n谋 kaybetme.
gen莽li臒inde duygular谋n谋
i臒ren莽 zevklere kapt谋rmaya al谋艧m谋艧 olanlar,
ya艧land谋k莽a kederli,
kan d枚k眉c眉 olurlar.
zekalar谋 vaktinden 枚nce s枚nmeye y眉z tutar''
piiiiiifiyt...
''gururlu utanga莽l谋k'' 莽ok g眉zel bir tan谋mlama olmam谋艧 m谋?
May 2, 2025
Pi猫ce injustement inconnue du ma卯tre alors qu鈥檈lle est tr猫s bien !!!! C鈥檈st r茅voltant鈥�.
Les notes de Markowicz nous permettent de mieux comprendre cette p茅riode m茅connue de l鈥檋istoire russe, je recommande cette 茅dition.
Les notes de Markowicz nous permettent de mieux comprendre cette p茅riode m茅connue de l鈥檋istoire russe, je recommande cette 茅dition.
November 2, 2023
丿賵 賵 賳蹖賲 卮丕蹖丿.
亘丕乇蹖爻 诏丕丿锟斤拷賳賵賮 賴蹖趩鈥屭嗃屫� 噩丿蹖丿蹖 亘乇丕蹖 賲賳 賳丿丕卮鬲. 禺胤 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 賵 賲丨鬲賵丕卮 讴丕賲賱丕 亘乇丕賲 鬲讴乇丕乇蹖 亘賵丿. 卮丕蹖丿 丕乇夭卮 鬲丕乇蹖禺蹖 禺賵丿 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 亘賴 爻賱胤賳鬲 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘丕乇蹖爻 鬲賵 乇賵爻蹖赖 賵 丕賱亘鬲賴貙 賳賲丕蹖爻賳丕賲賴鈥屫й� 讴賴 倬賵卮讴蹖賳 鬲賵 丕賵賳 爻丕賱鈥屬囏� 丕夭 丕蹖賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 賳賵卮鬲賴 噩匕丕亘蹖鬲 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘乇丕蹖 賲乇丿賲 賵賱蹖 亘乇丕蹖 賲賳 讴賴 噩匕丕亘蹖鬲 禺丕氐蹖 賳丿丕卮鬲.
亘賴 賳馗乇 賲賳貙 賲噩賲賵毓賴鈥屰� 鬲乇丕跇丿蹖鈥屬囏й� 讴賵趩讴 丨賯蹖賯丕 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴鈥屬囏й屰� 亘賴 卮丿鬲 噩匕丕亘鈥屫� 賵 噩丕賱亘鈥屫臂� 丕夭 倬賵卮讴蹖賳 賴爻鬲賳丿 鬲丕 亘丕乇蹖爻 诏丕丿賵賳賵賮.
亘丕乇蹖爻 诏丕丿锟斤拷賳賵賮 賴蹖趩鈥屭嗃屫� 噩丿蹖丿蹖 亘乇丕蹖 賲賳 賳丿丕卮鬲. 禺胤 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 賵 賲丨鬲賵丕卮 讴丕賲賱丕 亘乇丕賲 鬲讴乇丕乇蹖 亘賵丿. 卮丕蹖丿 丕乇夭卮 鬲丕乇蹖禺蹖 禺賵丿 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 亘賴 爻賱胤賳鬲 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘丕乇蹖爻 鬲賵 乇賵爻蹖赖 賵 丕賱亘鬲賴貙 賳賲丕蹖爻賳丕賲賴鈥屫й� 讴賴 倬賵卮讴蹖賳 鬲賵 丕賵賳 爻丕賱鈥屬囏� 丕夭 丕蹖賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 賳賵卮鬲賴 噩匕丕亘蹖鬲 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘乇丕蹖 賲乇丿賲 賵賱蹖 亘乇丕蹖 賲賳 讴賴 噩匕丕亘蹖鬲 禺丕氐蹖 賳丿丕卮鬲.
亘賴 賳馗乇 賲賳貙 賲噩賲賵毓賴鈥屰� 鬲乇丕跇丿蹖鈥屬囏й� 讴賵趩讴 丨賯蹖賯丕 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴鈥屬囏й屰� 亘賴 卮丿鬲 噩匕丕亘鈥屫� 賵 噩丕賱亘鈥屫臂� 丕夭 倬賵卮讴蹖賳 賴爻鬲賳丿 鬲丕 亘丕乇蹖爻 诏丕丿賵賳賵賮.
November 23, 2024
丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 丕爻鬲 丕夭 賯丿乇鬲貙 禺蹖丕賳鬲 賵 毓匕丕亘 賵噩丿丕賳. 丕蹖賳 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 鬲丕乇蹖禺蹖貙 乇賵丕蹖鬲诏乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘丕乇蹖爻 诏丕丿賵賳賵賮 丕爻鬲 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘賴 鬲丕噩鈥屬堌� 亘丕毓孬 賯鬲賱 丿賲蹖鬲乇蹖 讴賵趩讴貙 賵賱蹖毓賴丿 乇賵爻蹖赖貙 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 亘賵乇蹖爻 亘賴 鬲夭丕乇 鬲亘丿蹖賱 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 丕賲丕 丌乇丕賲卮蹖 丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 賳丿丕乇丿.
丿乇 賴賲蹖賳 夭賲丕賳貙 賲乇丿蹖 馗丕賴乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賵 丕丿毓丕 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 讴賴 丿賲蹖鬲乇蹖 賵丕賯毓蹖 丕爻鬲 賵 丕夭 賲乇诏 诏乇蹖禺鬲賴 丕爻鬲. 丕蹖賳 賲丿毓蹖貙 亘丕 丨賲丕蹖鬲 賳蹖乇賵賴丕蹖 禺丕乇噩蹖 賵 丕卮乇丕賮貙 毓賱蹖賴 亘賵乇蹖爻 賯蹖丕賲 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賵 讴卮賵乇 乇丕 丿趩丕乇 丌卮賵亘 賲蹖鈥屫池ж藏�.
亘賵乇蹖爻 讴賴 丕夭 丿乇賵賳 卮讴爻鬲賴 卮丿賴 賵 丕夭 亘蹖乇賵賳 鬲丨鬲 賮卮丕乇 丿卮賲賳丕賳 丕爻鬲貙 爻乇丕賳噩丕賲 丿乇 亘乇丕亘乇 爻乇賳賵卮鬲卮 鬲爻賱蹖賲 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 賲乇诏 丕賵 倬丕蹖丕賳蹖 丕爻鬲 亘乇 丨讴賵賲鬲蹖 讴賴 亘乇 倬丕蹖賴 禺賵賳 賵 禺蹖丕賳鬲 亘賳丕 卮丿賴 亘賵丿.
丕蹖賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丿乇 毓蹖賳 丨丕賱 讴賴 鬲氐賵蹖乇蹖 丕夭 鬲丕乇蹖禺 乇賵爻蹖赖 丕爻鬲貙 亘賴 賲賮丕賴蹖賲蹖 噩賴丕賳蹖 趩賵賳 鬲兀孬蹖乇 诏賳丕賴貙 賯丿乇鬲鈥屫焚勜ㄛ� 賵 爻乇賳賵卮鬲 賲蹖鈥屬矩必ж藏�. 倬賵卮讴蹖賳 亘丕 賯賱賲蹖 爻丕丿賴 賵 夭蹖亘丕 賳卮丕賳 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 讴賴 趩诏賵賳賴 噩丕賴鈥屫焚勜ㄛ� 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗀� 亘賴 爻賯賵胤蹖 賳丕诏夭蹖乇 賲賳噩乇 卮賵丿.
丿乇 賴賲蹖賳 夭賲丕賳貙 賲乇丿蹖 馗丕賴乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賵 丕丿毓丕 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 讴賴 丿賲蹖鬲乇蹖 賵丕賯毓蹖 丕爻鬲 賵 丕夭 賲乇诏 诏乇蹖禺鬲賴 丕爻鬲. 丕蹖賳 賲丿毓蹖貙 亘丕 丨賲丕蹖鬲 賳蹖乇賵賴丕蹖 禺丕乇噩蹖 賵 丕卮乇丕賮貙 毓賱蹖賴 亘賵乇蹖爻 賯蹖丕賲 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賵 讴卮賵乇 乇丕 丿趩丕乇 丌卮賵亘 賲蹖鈥屫池ж藏�.
亘賵乇蹖爻 讴賴 丕夭 丿乇賵賳 卮讴爻鬲賴 卮丿賴 賵 丕夭 亘蹖乇賵賳 鬲丨鬲 賮卮丕乇 丿卮賲賳丕賳 丕爻鬲貙 爻乇丕賳噩丕賲 丿乇 亘乇丕亘乇 爻乇賳賵卮鬲卮 鬲爻賱蹖賲 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 賲乇诏 丕賵 倬丕蹖丕賳蹖 丕爻鬲 亘乇 丨讴賵賲鬲蹖 讴賴 亘乇 倬丕蹖賴 禺賵賳 賵 禺蹖丕賳鬲 亘賳丕 卮丿賴 亘賵丿.
丕蹖賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丿乇 毓蹖賳 丨丕賱 讴賴 鬲氐賵蹖乇蹖 丕夭 鬲丕乇蹖禺 乇賵爻蹖赖 丕爻鬲貙 亘賴 賲賮丕賴蹖賲蹖 噩賴丕賳蹖 趩賵賳 鬲兀孬蹖乇 诏賳丕賴貙 賯丿乇鬲鈥屫焚勜ㄛ� 賵 爻乇賳賵卮鬲 賲蹖鈥屬矩必ж藏�. 倬賵卮讴蹖賳 亘丕 賯賱賲蹖 爻丕丿賴 賵 夭蹖亘丕 賳卮丕賳 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 讴賴 趩诏賵賳賴 噩丕賴鈥屫焚勜ㄛ� 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗀� 亘賴 爻賯賵胤蹖 賳丕诏夭蹖乇 賲賳噩乇 卮賵丿.
May 22, 2021
I am reluctantly giving "Boris Godunov" four stars because much as I disliked the French prose version that I read I could still see how it provided the base for what is a truly great opera.
If you have not seen the opera or about to, you would be crazy to read Pushkin's play.
"Boris Godunov", (the play and the opera), follows the formula of Nietzsche; that is to say it describes the tragic life of a great man who takes on a challenge and then fails not because of his faults but because fate is against him. In Nietzsche's view, the opera of the second half of the nineteenth century had returned to the values of Greek Tragedy in that it celebrated the absurdity of man's existence. Nietzsche felt that it was primarily Wagner who was composing works in this tragic tradition. Mussorgsky's Boris Godunov follows the same Wagnerian/Nietzschean recipe and works brilliantly. Pushkin's play as rendered into French by Turgenev and Viardot is much less successful.
Boris Godunov, a courtier at the court of Ivan the Terrible, becomes the regent of Ivan's feeble-minded son Fedor when Ivan dies. Realizing that the son lacks the ability to rule, Godunov has him murdered and usurps the throne. A faction of unhappy nobles, dominated by a strong Polish contingent, revolt. Under stress, Godunov dies of natural causes. The rebels place an impostor claiming to be Dmitry, another son of Ivan, on the throne. The play and opera stop at this point. The false Dmitry is overthrown two years after the death of Godunov. Six years later Michael Romanov will found a new dynasty that will be universally accepted by the nobility. Boris Gudunov is about in other words the attempts of a flawed man to seize control in a power vacuum and avert anarchy. It is does not deal in any way with the creation of a legitimate dynasty. The concept works as an opera but not as a play.
Go the opera at the first opportunity. Read the play if you are curious about the origins of the libretto.
If you have not seen the opera or about to, you would be crazy to read Pushkin's play.
"Boris Godunov", (the play and the opera), follows the formula of Nietzsche; that is to say it describes the tragic life of a great man who takes on a challenge and then fails not because of his faults but because fate is against him. In Nietzsche's view, the opera of the second half of the nineteenth century had returned to the values of Greek Tragedy in that it celebrated the absurdity of man's existence. Nietzsche felt that it was primarily Wagner who was composing works in this tragic tradition. Mussorgsky's Boris Godunov follows the same Wagnerian/Nietzschean recipe and works brilliantly. Pushkin's play as rendered into French by Turgenev and Viardot is much less successful.
Boris Godunov, a courtier at the court of Ivan the Terrible, becomes the regent of Ivan's feeble-minded son Fedor when Ivan dies. Realizing that the son lacks the ability to rule, Godunov has him murdered and usurps the throne. A faction of unhappy nobles, dominated by a strong Polish contingent, revolt. Under stress, Godunov dies of natural causes. The rebels place an impostor claiming to be Dmitry, another son of Ivan, on the throne. The play and opera stop at this point. The false Dmitry is overthrown two years after the death of Godunov. Six years later Michael Romanov will found a new dynasty that will be universally accepted by the nobility. Boris Gudunov is about in other words the attempts of a flawed man to seize control in a power vacuum and avert anarchy. It is does not deal in any way with the creation of a legitimate dynasty. The concept works as an opera but not as a play.
Go the opera at the first opportunity. Read the play if you are curious about the origins of the libretto.
May 21, 2017
賳賲丕賷卮賳丕賲賴 賯賵賷 賵 诏賷乇丕賷賷 亘賵丿
January 20, 2024
袛褍屑邪褞, 褔褌芯 械褋谢懈 斜褘 褝褌褍 锌褜械褋褍 胁薪懈屑邪褌械谢褜薪芯 褔懈褌邪谢懈 褌械, 泻褌芯 蟹邪薪懈屑邪械褌褋褟 锌芯谢懈褌懈泻芯泄, 薪邪褕邪 卸懈蟹薪褜 斜褘谢邪 斜褘 薪邪屑薪芯谐芯 谢褍褔褕械. 孝邪泻懈械 褌械泻褋褌褘 薪邪写芯 薪邪懈蟹褍褋褌褜 褍褔懈褌褜 胁褋械屑 褔懈薪芯胁薪懈泻邪屑 懈 薪邪褔邪谢褜薪懈泻邪屑. 袠 胁 褕泻芯谢褜薪褍褞 锌褉芯谐褉邪屑屑褍 褟 斜褘 械谐芯 褌芯卸械 胁泻谢褞褔懈谢邪 芯斜褟蟹邪褌械谢褜薪芯.
May 13, 2019
Update 13/5/19
Still really like this play!
Update 4/2/19
After rereading it to compare it with by Corneille, by Shakespeare and by Bertold Brecht, I liked it even more. (and made some great parallels!)
Clearly, this play shows a vicious circle of corruption which pollutes the power of Russia and its tsars. The Russian people is depicted as credulous, and wanting vengeance for Dimitri's death; for them, Boris will always be tainted by the blood of the child he murdered. But, when, finally,
Moreover, it's clear that Grigori wants to become tsar, not because he believes he is Dimitri, or because he wants to save Russia from Boris, but because he wants to have fun while he is young, because he wants to live an adventurous life!
I also learnt maybe things about Russia and its History: I know next to nothing about it, and it's something that I'm really interested in!
_______________________________
I didn't know this part of Russia's History! Between treachery, intrigue, usurpation and hypocrisy, power is coveted, but doesn't always protects.
Still really like this play!
Update 4/2/19
After rereading it to compare it with by Corneille, by Shakespeare and by Bertold Brecht, I liked it even more. (and made some great parallels!)
Clearly, this play shows a vicious circle of corruption which pollutes the power of Russia and its tsars. The Russian people is depicted as credulous, and wanting vengeance for Dimitri's death; for them, Boris will always be tainted by the blood of the child he murdered. But, when, finally,
Moreover, it's clear that Grigori wants to become tsar, not because he believes he is Dimitri, or because he wants to save Russia from Boris, but because he wants to have fun while he is young, because he wants to live an adventurous life!
I also learnt maybe things about Russia and its History: I know next to nothing about it, and it's something that I'm really interested in!
_______________________________
I didn't know this part of Russia's History! Between treachery, intrigue, usurpation and hypocrisy, power is coveted, but doesn't always protects.
March 6, 2014
A nutty NUUT readTranslated by Alfred Hayes
blurb - Pushkin takes many lines straight from Henry IV - P was impressed by the guilt ridden King after he had ordered the murder of Richard II and here is his version. It is written for the Tsar Nikoli I as an apology for his Decemberist friends. It is interesting to note that P was supposed to be in St.Petersberg to support his friends but a black cat had crossed his path so he returned home instead.
Later the Tsar asked P which side he would of been on and the poet answers truthfully; the Tsar then puts himself forward as to act as censor to P in future works.
bwhahaha nutty as fruitcakes but it is only 57 pages long.
December 25, 2019
Boris Godunov'u okudum. Daha 枚nce Pu艧kin okumam谋艧t谋m, bu y眉zden yazara hangi kitab谋yla ba艧lasam karars谋zl谋臒谋 i莽indeydim. Bu kitab谋n oyun oldu臒unu 枚臒renince yazara bu kitapla ba艧lamaya karar verdim.
Boris Godunov'un tarihi bir oyun oldu臒unu bilmiyordum. Kitaba ba艧lad谋ktan sonra ara verip ara艧t谋rma yap谋nca kitaba ad谋n谋 veren bu karakterin ger莽ekte ya艧am谋艧 bir Rus 脟ar谋 oldu臒unu 枚臒rendim. Biraz ara艧t谋rma yapt谋ktan sonra kitaba d枚n眉p kitab谋 bir solukta okudum.
Kitapta Shakespeare'den esinlenmeler fark etsemde kitab谋 yine de sevdim. Pu艧kin'in di臒er kitaplar谋n谋 da eyak谋nda okumay谋 planl谋yorum.
Boris Godunov'un tarihi bir oyun oldu臒unu bilmiyordum. Kitaba ba艧lad谋ktan sonra ara verip ara艧t谋rma yap谋nca kitaba ad谋n谋 veren bu karakterin ger莽ekte ya艧am谋艧 bir Rus 脟ar谋 oldu臒unu 枚臒rendim. Biraz ara艧t谋rma yapt谋ktan sonra kitaba d枚n眉p kitab谋 bir solukta okudum.
Kitapta Shakespeare'den esinlenmeler fark etsemde kitab谋 yine de sevdim. Pu艧kin'in di臒er kitaplar谋n谋 da eyak谋nda okumay谋 planl谋yorum.
March 25, 2020
Excelente recreaci贸n hist贸rica de una 茅poca.
M谩s all谩 que est谩 escrita como una obra de teatro, podr铆amos decir que Pushkin se adelant贸 a lo que hoy se conoce como "Novela hist贸rica".
Me gust贸 mucho.
M谩s all谩 que est谩 escrita como una obra de teatro, podr铆amos decir que Pushkin se adelant贸 a lo que hoy se conoce como "Novela hist贸rica".
Me gust贸 mucho.
December 31, 2011
Pushkin was a great poet, but, on the evidence of this work, not a great playwright. The work, based on Shakepeare's Macbeth, suffers in comparison. While it is eminently readable, and well-constructed, it lacks variation. Shakespeare knew the value of breaking the narrative with interludes, whether sinister (the witches in Macbeth) or humorous, as in the case of Falstaff's various appearances in his historical plays. In contrast, Pushkin doggedly pursues the narrative. Oh well, we can't ALL be Shakespeare ...
May 19, 2023
Pushkin does Shakespearean history: Tsars, usurpers, plots, and pretenders.
April 17, 2023
is this supposed to be a comedy? because it was actually funny. case in point:
A MAN
They're all crying, let us cry also, brother.
ANOTHER MAN
Brother, I'm straining but i can't.
FIRST MAN
Me too. Does anyone have onions?
Comedic gold. i'm going to include a few other scenes too, because i really got a kick out of this.
PRISONER
Our Russian sort can manage without sabers: how would you like a bit of this instead,
(shows him his fist鈥攇eneral laughter)
DESERTER
Quack quack! A foreign frog like you can quack all he wants at a Russian prince
VARLAAM
Lithuania or Russia, here or there: it's all dandy if drink is handy...and here's the brandy!
VOROTYNSKY
Sly palace rat!
Humor aside, this play had some lovely soliloquys 鈥� i experienced intense Shakespeare vibes more than once. i will say that a bit of background history goes a long way in understanding this piece.
Overall, very nice. Is Pushkin the Shakespeare of Russia?
A MAN
They're all crying, let us cry also, brother.
ANOTHER MAN
Brother, I'm straining but i can't.
FIRST MAN
Me too. Does anyone have onions?
Comedic gold. i'm going to include a few other scenes too, because i really got a kick out of this.
PRISONER
Our Russian sort can manage without sabers: how would you like a bit of this instead,
(shows him his fist鈥攇eneral laughter)
DESERTER
Quack quack! A foreign frog like you can quack all he wants at a Russian prince
VARLAAM
Lithuania or Russia, here or there: it's all dandy if drink is handy...and here's the brandy!
VOROTYNSKY
Sly palace rat!
Humor aside, this play had some lovely soliloquys 鈥� i experienced intense Shakespeare vibes more than once. i will say that a bit of background history goes a long way in understanding this piece.
Overall, very nice. Is Pushkin the Shakespeare of Russia?
February 23, 2020
Pushkin y el teatro. Claro reflejo de la sociedad rusa de la 茅poca.
Me ha recordado a Shakespeare (salvando distancias) en el sentido de hablar sobre pasiones llevadas al extremo.
Pushkin siempre bien.
Me ha recordado a Shakespeare (salvando distancias) en el sentido de hablar sobre pasiones llevadas al extremo.
Pushkin siempre bien.
December 24, 2022
Musorgski鈥檔in Boris Godunov operas谋 konusunu burdan al谋yor.
Read
March 19, 2024this kinda slayed penis ngl
January 21, 2025
Il y a eu 2 ou 3 fois le mot "orage" dans le livre, qui m鈥檃 fait pens茅 脿 "ah Varia j鈥檃i le p茅ch茅 dans les pens茅es!". C鈥檈st tout.
April 23, 2019
丕夭 賲鬲賳 讴鬲丕亘 :
蹖讴蹖 丕夭 賲乇丿賲 [丌賴爻鬲賴]: 亘乇丕蹖 趩賴 诏乇蹖賴 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀�
丿蹖诏乇蹖: 賲丕 丕夭 讴噩丕 亘丿丕賳蹖賲責 丿乇亘丕乇蹖賴丕 丕夭 丕蹖賳 趩蹖夭賴丕 爻乇 丿乇 賲蹖鈥屫①堌辟嗀� 毓賯賱 賲丕 賯丿 賳賲蹖鈥屫囏�.
夭賳[賴賲乇丕賴 亘趩賴]: 蹖毓賳蹖 趩賴責 丨丕賱丕 讴賴 賲賵賯毓 诏乇蹖賴 丕爻鬲貙 丌乇丕賲 诏乇賮鬲! 丕賱丕賳 丨爻丕亘鬲 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫必迟�! 丕賱丕賳 賱賵賱賵! 诏乇蹖賴 讴賳貙 亘蹖鈥屬呚地辟�! [亘趩賴 乇丕 亘賴 夭賲蹖賳 賲蹖鈥屫з嗀ж藏� 噩蹖睾 亘趩賴 亘賱賳丿 賲蹖鈥屫促堌痌 丌賴丕賳貙 丨丕賱丕 卮丿!
蹖讴蹖 丕夭 賲乇丿賲: 賴賲賴 诏乇蹖賴 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 賲丕 賴賲 诏乇蹖賴 讴賳蹖賲貙 亘乇丕丿乇.
馃崈
馃崈
馃崈
丕夭 賳馗乇 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 賵 賲丨鬲賵丕 賵... 讴賴 賴蹖趩蹖 賵賱蹖 倬賵卮讴蹖賳 亘蹖卮鬲乇蹖賳 夭丨賲鬲 乇賵 賵丕爻賴 丕丿亘蹖丕鬲 乇賵爻蹖赖 讴卮蹖丿賴. 賴乇趩賴 賯丿乇 丕賱丕賳 丕爻賲 丕丿亘蹖丕鬲 乇賵爻 爻乇 夭亘賵賳鈥屬囏ж池� 讴丕乇 倬賵卮讴蹖賳賴馃挅馃Х
蹖讴蹖 丕夭 賲乇丿賲 [丌賴爻鬲賴]: 亘乇丕蹖 趩賴 诏乇蹖賴 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀�
丿蹖诏乇蹖: 賲丕 丕夭 讴噩丕 亘丿丕賳蹖賲責 丿乇亘丕乇蹖賴丕 丕夭 丕蹖賳 趩蹖夭賴丕 爻乇 丿乇 賲蹖鈥屫①堌辟嗀� 毓賯賱 賲丕 賯丿 賳賲蹖鈥屫囏�.
夭賳[賴賲乇丕賴 亘趩賴]: 蹖毓賳蹖 趩賴責 丨丕賱丕 讴賴 賲賵賯毓 诏乇蹖賴 丕爻鬲貙 丌乇丕賲 诏乇賮鬲! 丕賱丕賳 丨爻丕亘鬲 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫必迟�! 丕賱丕賳 賱賵賱賵! 诏乇蹖賴 讴賳貙 亘蹖鈥屬呚地辟�! [亘趩賴 乇丕 亘賴 夭賲蹖賳 賲蹖鈥屫з嗀ж藏� 噩蹖睾 亘趩賴 亘賱賳丿 賲蹖鈥屫促堌痌 丌賴丕賳貙 丨丕賱丕 卮丿!
蹖讴蹖 丕夭 賲乇丿賲: 賴賲賴 诏乇蹖賴 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 賲丕 賴賲 诏乇蹖賴 讴賳蹖賲貙 亘乇丕丿乇.
馃崈
馃崈
馃崈
丕夭 賳馗乇 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 賵 賲丨鬲賵丕 賵... 讴賴 賴蹖趩蹖 賵賱蹖 倬賵卮讴蹖賳 亘蹖卮鬲乇蹖賳 夭丨賲鬲 乇賵 賵丕爻賴 丕丿亘蹖丕鬲 乇賵爻蹖赖 讴卮蹖丿賴. 賴乇趩賴 賯丿乇 丕賱丕賳 丕爻賲 丕丿亘蹖丕鬲 乇賵爻 爻乇 夭亘賵賳鈥屬囏ж池� 讴丕乇 倬賵卮讴蹖賳賴馃挅馃Х
April 20, 2021
P煤chkin 茅 de fato um g锚nio vision谩rio: ele escreveu um tro莽o absolutamente intoler谩vel pros palcos mas excelente pr脿s telas.
Eu, bobo, gastei tr锚s vezes mais tempo lendo sobre o per铆odo das grandes turbul锚ncias e iv茫 o terr铆vel do que lendo essa obra, achando que um vasto entendimento do contexto me faria apreci谩-la mais profundamente. Um equ铆voco. Pode chegar sem saber nada que papai Sacha te explica tudo e voc锚 nem prercebe.
Eu, bobo, gastei tr锚s vezes mais tempo lendo sobre o per铆odo das grandes turbul锚ncias e iv茫 o terr铆vel do que lendo essa obra, achando que um vasto entendimento do contexto me faria apreci谩-la mais profundamente. Um equ铆voco. Pode chegar sem saber nada que papai Sacha te explica tudo e voc锚 nem prercebe.
December 30, 2015
Adrian Mitchell's adaption of Alexander Pushkin's "Boris Gudonov" is bright and fresh and a lot less "stodgy" than some translations of Pushkin's tale of 1600's Russia that he wrote as an allegory of 1820's Russian politics. Pushkin drew heavily on Shakespeare for inspiration and there are clear flashes of "Macbeth" and the Histories, notably "Richard III" in the play. As well as livening up the text - and introducing some comic rhyming drunken monks - the main deviation from the original is in one change in scene order which makes logical sense and improves the flow. As an adaptation it's very strong and is a fitting last project for Mitchell.
The play itself though remains fraught with issues. Unlike virtually all Shakespeare plays (in my view with the exception of Julius Caesar), it is a play that tends to work better as a read than in production in my view. The story is fascinating though. Boris Gudonov is the Tsar having murdered the young son of Ivan, Dimitry, who would normally have led the country. However a bright young monk, Grigory, decides to adopt the persona of the murdered young prince, gaining support of the masses and international support to his claim.
The problem in production with the play is that, while we are told of Boris's evil nature, whenever he appears on stage with the masses, he's behaving quite well and the advice he gives his own son on ruling is not too bad. Grigory on the other hand is no more than an upstart with high ambitions. Shakespeare, for all his rounded characters, always made the evilness of his villains clear but it's not clear here who we should be siding with. Mitchell isn't able to solve this fundamental issue with the play, but it is, nevertheless, a strong, modern adaptation of this Russian classic play.
The play itself though remains fraught with issues. Unlike virtually all Shakespeare plays (in my view with the exception of Julius Caesar), it is a play that tends to work better as a read than in production in my view. The story is fascinating though. Boris Gudonov is the Tsar having murdered the young son of Ivan, Dimitry, who would normally have led the country. However a bright young monk, Grigory, decides to adopt the persona of the murdered young prince, gaining support of the masses and international support to his claim.
The problem in production with the play is that, while we are told of Boris's evil nature, whenever he appears on stage with the masses, he's behaving quite well and the advice he gives his own son on ruling is not too bad. Grigory on the other hand is no more than an upstart with high ambitions. Shakespeare, for all his rounded characters, always made the evilness of his villains clear but it's not clear here who we should be siding with. Mitchell isn't able to solve this fundamental issue with the play, but it is, nevertheless, a strong, modern adaptation of this Russian classic play.
August 4, 2015
袦芯泄 谢褞斜懈屑械泄褕懈泄 锌芯褝褌. 袨写懈薪 懈蟹 谢褞斜懈屑褘褏 锌懈褋邪褌械谢械泄.
袛褉邪屑邪 蟹邪写械谢邪 蟹邪 卸懈胁芯械. 袩芯-屑芯械屑褍 胁 褝褌芯屑 锌褉械泻褉邪褋薪芯屑 锌褉芯懈蟹胁械写械薪懈懈 (袩褍褕泻懈薪 懈 械褋褌褜 袩褍褕泻懈薪) 胁褘褉邪卸械薪邪 胁褋褟 褋褍褌褜 薪邪褉芯写邪 (褉褍褋褋泻芯谐芯, 褉芯褋褋懈泄褋泻芯谐芯). 袣褉邪泄薪芯褋褌懈, 锌褉懈褋褍褖懈械 薪邪褉芯写褍, 芯褌 泻芯褌芯褉褘泄 胁械泻邪屑懈 褋褌褉邪写邪械褌 芯薪 褋邪屑. 袙芯蟹胁褘褕械薪懈械 袘芯褉懈褋邪, 锌褉懈蟹褘胁 薪邪 锌褉邪胁谢械薪懈械, 锌芯泻谢芯薪械薪懈械 懈 写芯褋褌芯泄薪邪褟 褋谢械蟹褘 褍屑懈谢械薪懈褟 斜械蟹谐褉邪薪懈褔薪邪褟 谢褞斜芯胁褜 锌褉芯褋褌褘褏 谢褞写械泄 泻 褋胁芯械屑褍 袚芯褋褍写邪褉褞. 袨薪 械褖械 薪懈褔械屑 械械 薪械 蟹邪褋谢褍卸懈谢, 薪芯 芯薪懈 懈 薪械 褌褉械斜褍褞褌. 袧械 薪褍卸薪芯, 蟹邪褋谢褍谐, 斜邪褌褞褕泻邪, 屑褘 褍卸械 褌械斜褟 谢褞斜懈屑 斜械蟹谐褉邪薪懈褔薪芯. 袟邪泻邪薪褔懈胁邪械褌褋褟 褌褉邪谐械写懈褟 褌芯卸械 褌懈锌懈褔薪芯 "锌芯-薪邪褕械屑褍", 褋 褌邪泻懈屑 卸械 芯褋褌械褉胁械薪械薪懈械屑 褋薪械褋械薪薪褘泄 褋 锌褜械写械褋褌邪谢邪 械褖械 薪械写邪胁薪芯 谢褞斜懈屑褘泄 褑邪褉褜, 谐芯薪褜斜邪, 锌褉芯泻谢褟褌褜褟 懈 薪械 褌芯谢褜泻芯 薪邪 薪械谐芯, 邪, 锌芯 芯斜褘褔邪褞, 薪邪 胁褋褞 褋械屑褜褞 褑邪褉褋泻褍褞. 协褌芯 写褉邪屑邪 薪械 卸懈蟹薪懈 袘芯褉懈褋邪, 褝褌芯 薪械 械谐芯 谢懈褔薪邪褟 褌褉邪谐械写懈褟. 协褌芯 褌褉邪谐械写懈褟 薪邪褉芯写邪.
袩褉芯懈蟹胁械写械薪懈械, 薪邪写芯 褋泻邪蟹邪褌褜 谐谢褍斜芯泻芯 蟹邪锌邪谢芯 胁 写褍褕褍 懈 锌褉芯褔薪芯 芯斜芯褋薪芯胁邪谢芯褋褜 褌邪屑.
袛褉邪屑邪 蟹邪写械谢邪 蟹邪 卸懈胁芯械. 袩芯-屑芯械屑褍 胁 褝褌芯屑 锌褉械泻褉邪褋薪芯屑 锌褉芯懈蟹胁械写械薪懈懈 (袩褍褕泻懈薪 懈 械褋褌褜 袩褍褕泻懈薪) 胁褘褉邪卸械薪邪 胁褋褟 褋褍褌褜 薪邪褉芯写邪 (褉褍褋褋泻芯谐芯, 褉芯褋褋懈泄褋泻芯谐芯). 袣褉邪泄薪芯褋褌懈, 锌褉懈褋褍褖懈械 薪邪褉芯写褍, 芯褌 泻芯褌芯褉褘泄 胁械泻邪屑懈 褋褌褉邪写邪械褌 芯薪 褋邪屑. 袙芯蟹胁褘褕械薪懈械 袘芯褉懈褋邪, 锌褉懈蟹褘胁 薪邪 锌褉邪胁谢械薪懈械, 锌芯泻谢芯薪械薪懈械 懈 写芯褋褌芯泄薪邪褟 褋谢械蟹褘 褍屑懈谢械薪懈褟 斜械蟹谐褉邪薪懈褔薪邪褟 谢褞斜芯胁褜 锌褉芯褋褌褘褏 谢褞写械泄 泻 褋胁芯械屑褍 袚芯褋褍写邪褉褞. 袨薪 械褖械 薪懈褔械屑 械械 薪械 蟹邪褋谢褍卸懈谢, 薪芯 芯薪懈 懈 薪械 褌褉械斜褍褞褌. 袧械 薪褍卸薪芯, 蟹邪褋谢褍谐, 斜邪褌褞褕泻邪, 屑褘 褍卸械 褌械斜褟 谢褞斜懈屑 斜械蟹谐褉邪薪懈褔薪芯. 袟邪泻邪薪褔懈胁邪械褌褋褟 褌褉邪谐械写懈褟 褌芯卸械 褌懈锌懈褔薪芯 "锌芯-薪邪褕械屑褍", 褋 褌邪泻懈屑 卸械 芯褋褌械褉胁械薪械薪懈械屑 褋薪械褋械薪薪褘泄 褋 锌褜械写械褋褌邪谢邪 械褖械 薪械写邪胁薪芯 谢褞斜懈屑褘泄 褑邪褉褜, 谐芯薪褜斜邪, 锌褉芯泻谢褟褌褜褟 懈 薪械 褌芯谢褜泻芯 薪邪 薪械谐芯, 邪, 锌芯 芯斜褘褔邪褞, 薪邪 胁褋褞 褋械屑褜褞 褑邪褉褋泻褍褞. 协褌芯 写褉邪屑邪 薪械 卸懈蟹薪懈 袘芯褉懈褋邪, 褝褌芯 薪械 械谐芯 谢懈褔薪邪褟 褌褉邪谐械写懈褟. 协褌芯 褌褉邪谐械写懈褟 薪邪褉芯写邪.
袩褉芯懈蟹胁械写械薪懈械, 薪邪写芯 褋泻邪蟹邪褌褜 谐谢褍斜芯泻芯 蟹邪锌邪谢芯 胁 写褍褕褍 懈 锌褉芯褔薪芯 芯斜芯褋薪芯胁邪谢芯褋褜 褌邪屑.
June 11, 2023
First drama by Pushkin I've read. Would it be presumptuous to suggest that Pushkin could be called the Shakespeare of the Russian language? I'll know more perhaps once I've read Eugene Onegin...
February 1, 2022
BORIS GODUNOV / ALEKSANDR PU艦K陌N
陌艧 Bankas谋 kampanyas谋ndan al谋p, hemen okudu臒um ama yorumunu ancak yazd谋臒谋m kitap. Pu艧kin sevdi臒im yazarlardan ( aram谋zda kals谋n asl谋nda sevmedi臒im tek Rus yazar var: Dostoyevski飦� )
Aleksandr Pu艧kin (1799-1837), Rusya'n谋n "ulusal 艧air"i ve modern Rus Edebiyat谋n谋n kurucusu olarak kabul edilir. 8 ya艧谋nda Frans谋zca 枚臒renmi艧, 11 ya艧谋nda Frans谋zca 艧iirler ve g眉ld眉r眉ler yazmaya ba艧lam谋艧t谋. Pu艧kin; Klasik Bat谋 edebiyat谋n谋 ve Rus halk谋n谋n ruhunu sentezleyerek, Rus edebiyat谋nda "ger莽ek莽ilik ak谋m谋n谋 ba艧latan 枚nc眉 isimlerden olmu艧tur. Otuz sekiz y谋l s眉ren k谋sa hayat谋, komploya 莽ok benzeyen bir d眉elloyla son buldu臒unda Pu艧kin; 艧iirleri, romanlar谋, 枚yk眉leri ve oyunlar谋yla 莽oktan 19. Y眉zy谋l谋n ve Rus Edebiyat谋n谋n 枚nc眉 yazarlar谋ndan biri olmu艧tu.
Pu艧kin, Shakespeare鈥檌n tarihi oyunlar谋ndan etkilenerek yazd谋臒谋 Boris Godunov tragedyas谋nda insan谋n iktidarla ili艧kisini gayet yal谋n, ger莽ek莽i bir 艧iir diliyle aktarmaktad谋r. Pu艧kin鈥檌n 1825 y谋l谋nda s眉rg眉ndeyken yazd谋臒谋 oyun, sans眉r dolay谋s谋yla ve sahnelenmesinin g眉莽 oldu臒u d眉艧眉n眉ld眉臒眉nden ancak 枚l眉m眉nden sonra 1865鈥檛e sahnelenebilmi艧tir. Daha sonra pek 莽ok kez ba艧ar谋yla sahnelenen oyun, Musorgski鈥檔in ayn谋 adl谋 operas谋na da esin kayna臒谋 olmu艧tur.
Oyunun ba艧谋nda:鈥� Dehas谋ndan ilhamla yaz谋lm谋艧 bu eser, Rus halk谋 i莽in pek sayg谋de臒er Nikolay Mihaylovi莽 Karamzin鈥檌n an谋s谋na, sayg谋 ve minnettarl谋kla ithaf edilmi艧tir.鈥� Diyor. Aleksandr Pu艧kin鈥檌n ithaf yaz谋s谋n谋 okuyunca Karamzin鈥檌 ara艧t谋rmam gerekti. T眉rk as谋ll谋 Nikolay Mihaylovi莽 Karamzin (1766鈥�1826) Rus edebiyat谋ndaki duygusal ak谋m谋n 枚nc眉s眉 olmu艧. Karamzin'in 1789 y谋l谋nda "Ger莽ek Bir Rus Hik芒yesi" ba艧l谋臒谋 alt谋nda yay谋mlad谋臒谋 "Yevgeniy ve Yuliya " da gen莽 kahraman Yevgeniy'in 枚l眉m眉yle sonu莽lanan dramatik son, edebi gelene臒e ters d眉艧er. Eser, Rus edebiyat谋nda daima "iyili臒in" zaferiyle sonu莽lanan roman ve hik芒yelerin saltanat谋na son vermi艧tir. Karamzin'in hik芒yelerinde duygu ve d眉艧眉ncelerini 枚zg眉rce aktarmas谋, dili b眉y眉k 枚l莽眉de kilise Slavcas谋ndan ar谋nd谋rmas谋, ritmik ve lirik 眉slubu, macera romanlar谋na 枚zg眉 karma艧谋k ve didaktik anlat谋m bi莽iminden ka莽谋nmas谋, psikolojiye 枚nem vermesi, kahramanlar谋n谋n ruh halinden bahsetmesi, do臒a tasvirleri sunmas谋 ve 枚zellikle insan谋 ahlaki y枚nden y眉celterek ele almas谋 19. y眉zy谋l Rus edebiyat谋n谋n geli艧mesini etkileyen yeniliklerdi.
Eserde 艧iirsel bir dil kullan谋lm谋艧. Genelde kar艧谋l谋kl谋 diyaloglar 艧eklinde oyun ak谋yor.
Anlat谋m olarak di臒er tiyatro pek eserlerine benzemiyor. 脟眉nk眉 tiyatro metinlerinde; sahne, dekor ve olan hareket detayl谋 olarak ( salonda iki koltuk vard谋r, kap谋 莽al谋n谋r, adam kalkar, 莽alan kap谋y谋 a莽ar gibi) anlat谋l谋r. Burada ise bir iki kelime ile sadece hareket s枚yleniyor.(hizmet莽i girer, bir ka臒谋t uzat谋r, odalar bo艧al谋r gibi)
鈥滶vvela iyice d眉艧眉nmeliyiz de臒il mi?
Bunu yaparsak d眉nya i艧leri i莽in
Kullanmakla dine sayg谋s谋zl谋k etti臒imizi s枚ylemezler mi?鈥�
陌ddial谋 ama do臒ru bir c眉mle de臒il mi? Yaz谋lmas谋n谋n 眉zerinden 200 sene ge莽mesine ra臒men de臒i艧en bir 艧ey yok. Din, d眉nya i艧leri i莽in kullan谋l谋yor. Asl谋nda de臒i艧en 艧eylerde var. O zaman 脟ar halk谋n tepkisinden 莽ekiniyor ve manevi duygular谋 kullanm谋yor. Bug眉n ise en b眉y眉臒眉nden k眉莽眉臒眉ne 莽ekinmeden maneviyat kullan谋l谋yor 莽眉nk眉 halk tepkisiz.
T眉m klasik kitaplar gibi okunmas谋 gereken bir eser.
Boris Godunov鈥檇an replikler:
馃摐Ya h眉k眉mdar ger莽ekten
B谋km谋艧sa devlet i艧lerinden,
Ya 莽谋kmazsa ba艧s谋z kalm谋艧 tahta?
馃摐Sen akl谋n谋 bilgiyle ayd谋nlatt谋n,
Ben de eserimi sana b谋rak谋yorum.
馃摐Ama ka莽amayacaks谋n d眉nyevi adaletten,
T谋pk谋 Tanr谋鈥檔谋n adaletinden
Ka莽amayaca臒谋n gibi.
馃摐D眉nya b眉y眉k: D枚rt buca臒谋 bana yol olur.
Ard谋mdan ad谋m谋 anan olmaz.
馃摐Oku o臒lum, oku. Bilim, h谋zla gelip ge莽en
Hayat谋n tecr眉belerini
K谋sa zamanda kazanmam谋za yarar.
陌艧 Bankas谋 kampanyas谋ndan al谋p, hemen okudu臒um ama yorumunu ancak yazd谋臒谋m kitap. Pu艧kin sevdi臒im yazarlardan ( aram谋zda kals谋n asl谋nda sevmedi臒im tek Rus yazar var: Dostoyevski飦� )
Aleksandr Pu艧kin (1799-1837), Rusya'n谋n "ulusal 艧air"i ve modern Rus Edebiyat谋n谋n kurucusu olarak kabul edilir. 8 ya艧谋nda Frans谋zca 枚臒renmi艧, 11 ya艧谋nda Frans谋zca 艧iirler ve g眉ld眉r眉ler yazmaya ba艧lam谋艧t谋. Pu艧kin; Klasik Bat谋 edebiyat谋n谋 ve Rus halk谋n谋n ruhunu sentezleyerek, Rus edebiyat谋nda "ger莽ek莽ilik ak谋m谋n谋 ba艧latan 枚nc眉 isimlerden olmu艧tur. Otuz sekiz y谋l s眉ren k谋sa hayat谋, komploya 莽ok benzeyen bir d眉elloyla son buldu臒unda Pu艧kin; 艧iirleri, romanlar谋, 枚yk眉leri ve oyunlar谋yla 莽oktan 19. Y眉zy谋l谋n ve Rus Edebiyat谋n谋n 枚nc眉 yazarlar谋ndan biri olmu艧tu.
Pu艧kin, Shakespeare鈥檌n tarihi oyunlar谋ndan etkilenerek yazd谋臒谋 Boris Godunov tragedyas谋nda insan谋n iktidarla ili艧kisini gayet yal谋n, ger莽ek莽i bir 艧iir diliyle aktarmaktad谋r. Pu艧kin鈥檌n 1825 y谋l谋nda s眉rg眉ndeyken yazd谋臒谋 oyun, sans眉r dolay谋s谋yla ve sahnelenmesinin g眉莽 oldu臒u d眉艧眉n眉ld眉臒眉nden ancak 枚l眉m眉nden sonra 1865鈥檛e sahnelenebilmi艧tir. Daha sonra pek 莽ok kez ba艧ar谋yla sahnelenen oyun, Musorgski鈥檔in ayn谋 adl谋 operas谋na da esin kayna臒谋 olmu艧tur.
Oyunun ba艧谋nda:鈥� Dehas谋ndan ilhamla yaz谋lm谋艧 bu eser, Rus halk谋 i莽in pek sayg谋de臒er Nikolay Mihaylovi莽 Karamzin鈥檌n an谋s谋na, sayg谋 ve minnettarl谋kla ithaf edilmi艧tir.鈥� Diyor. Aleksandr Pu艧kin鈥檌n ithaf yaz谋s谋n谋 okuyunca Karamzin鈥檌 ara艧t谋rmam gerekti. T眉rk as谋ll谋 Nikolay Mihaylovi莽 Karamzin (1766鈥�1826) Rus edebiyat谋ndaki duygusal ak谋m谋n 枚nc眉s眉 olmu艧. Karamzin'in 1789 y谋l谋nda "Ger莽ek Bir Rus Hik芒yesi" ba艧l谋臒谋 alt谋nda yay谋mlad谋臒谋 "Yevgeniy ve Yuliya " da gen莽 kahraman Yevgeniy'in 枚l眉m眉yle sonu莽lanan dramatik son, edebi gelene臒e ters d眉艧er. Eser, Rus edebiyat谋nda daima "iyili臒in" zaferiyle sonu莽lanan roman ve hik芒yelerin saltanat谋na son vermi艧tir. Karamzin'in hik芒yelerinde duygu ve d眉艧眉ncelerini 枚zg眉rce aktarmas谋, dili b眉y眉k 枚l莽眉de kilise Slavcas谋ndan ar谋nd谋rmas谋, ritmik ve lirik 眉slubu, macera romanlar谋na 枚zg眉 karma艧谋k ve didaktik anlat谋m bi莽iminden ka莽谋nmas谋, psikolojiye 枚nem vermesi, kahramanlar谋n谋n ruh halinden bahsetmesi, do臒a tasvirleri sunmas谋 ve 枚zellikle insan谋 ahlaki y枚nden y眉celterek ele almas谋 19. y眉zy谋l Rus edebiyat谋n谋n geli艧mesini etkileyen yeniliklerdi.
Eserde 艧iirsel bir dil kullan谋lm谋艧. Genelde kar艧谋l谋kl谋 diyaloglar 艧eklinde oyun ak谋yor.
Anlat谋m olarak di臒er tiyatro pek eserlerine benzemiyor. 脟眉nk眉 tiyatro metinlerinde; sahne, dekor ve olan hareket detayl谋 olarak ( salonda iki koltuk vard谋r, kap谋 莽al谋n谋r, adam kalkar, 莽alan kap谋y谋 a莽ar gibi) anlat谋l谋r. Burada ise bir iki kelime ile sadece hareket s枚yleniyor.(hizmet莽i girer, bir ka臒谋t uzat谋r, odalar bo艧al谋r gibi)
鈥滶vvela iyice d眉艧眉nmeliyiz de臒il mi?
Bunu yaparsak d眉nya i艧leri i莽in
Kullanmakla dine sayg谋s谋zl谋k etti臒imizi s枚ylemezler mi?鈥�
陌ddial谋 ama do臒ru bir c眉mle de臒il mi? Yaz谋lmas谋n谋n 眉zerinden 200 sene ge莽mesine ra臒men de臒i艧en bir 艧ey yok. Din, d眉nya i艧leri i莽in kullan谋l谋yor. Asl谋nda de臒i艧en 艧eylerde var. O zaman 脟ar halk谋n tepkisinden 莽ekiniyor ve manevi duygular谋 kullanm谋yor. Bug眉n ise en b眉y眉臒眉nden k眉莽眉臒眉ne 莽ekinmeden maneviyat kullan谋l谋yor 莽眉nk眉 halk tepkisiz.
T眉m klasik kitaplar gibi okunmas谋 gereken bir eser.
Boris Godunov鈥檇an replikler:
馃摐Ya h眉k眉mdar ger莽ekten
B谋km谋艧sa devlet i艧lerinden,
Ya 莽谋kmazsa ba艧s谋z kalm谋艧 tahta?
馃摐Sen akl谋n谋 bilgiyle ayd谋nlatt谋n,
Ben de eserimi sana b谋rak谋yorum.
馃摐Ama ka莽amayacaks谋n d眉nyevi adaletten,
T谋pk谋 Tanr谋鈥檔谋n adaletinden
Ka莽amayaca臒谋n gibi.
馃摐D眉nya b眉y眉k: D枚rt buca臒谋 bana yol olur.
Ard谋mdan ad谋m谋 anan olmaz.
馃摐Oku o臒lum, oku. Bilim, h谋zla gelip ge莽en
Hayat谋n tecr眉belerini
K谋sa zamanda kazanmam谋za yarar.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 132 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.