What do you think?
Rate this book
丌蹖丕 丿賲賵讴乇丕爻蹖 丿乇 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 賲賲讴賳 丕爻鬲責
賲鬲賳 賲毓乇賮蹖: 丕夭 賲賯丿賲赖鈥屰� 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴貙 丿乇 丕蹖賳 賵蹖乇丕蹖卮: 賲賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 亘賴 丕蹖賳 丿賱蹖賱 賳賵卮鬲賴鈥屫з� 讴賴 賲毓鬲賯丿賲 賲丕 丿乇 丿賵乇賴鈥屫й� 賯乇丕乇 丿丕乇蹖賲 讴賴 丕蹖丕賱丕鬲 賲鬲丨丿賴 丿乇 賲毓乇囟 禺胤乇 爻蹖丕爻蹖 禺丕氐蹖 賯乇丕乇 丿丕乇丿貨 賲賳馗賵乇賲 禺胤乇 賳亘賵丿 亘丨孬 爻蹖丕爻蹖 丿乇 丌賲乇蹖讴丕蹖 爻丕賱鈥屬囏й� 丌睾丕夭蹖賳 賯乇賳 亘蹖爻鬲鈥屬堐屭┵� 丕爻鬲.
賲賵囟賵毓丕鬲 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘貙 讴賲鈥屫� 賲賯蹖丿 亘賴 賮乇賴賳诏 爻蹖丕爻蹖 蹖讴 讴卮賵乇 禺丕氐 丕爻鬲 夭蹖乇丕 賴乇 噩丕賲毓賴鈥屰� 爻蹖丕爻蹖 讴賴 亘乇禺賵乇丿丕乇 丕夭 賮乇賴賳诏蹖 賲鬲讴孬乇 賵 丕賯鬲氐丕丿蹖 倬蹖卮乇賮鬲賴 亘丕卮丿貙 賳丕诏夭蹖乇 丕爻鬲 賲蹖丕賳 賳馗乇蹖賴鈥屬囏й� 乇賯蹖亘 丿爻鬲 亘賴 丕賳鬲禺丕亘 亘夭賳丿貨 賳馗乇蹖賴鈥屬囏й屰� 讴賴 胤蹖賮 诏爻鬲乇丿賴鈥屫й� 丕夭 賲賵囟賵毓丕鬲 乇丕 丿乇 亘乇 賲蹖鈥屭屫辟嗀� 賲丕賳賳丿: 賲丕賴蹖鬲 賵 噩丕蹖诏丕賴 丨賯賵賯 亘卮乇貙 賳賯卮 丿蹖賳 丿乇 爻蹖丕爻鬲貙 鬲賵夭蹖毓 乇賮丕賴 丕賯鬲氐丕丿蹖 丿乇 噩丕賲毓賴 賵 賴賵蹖鬲 賳馗丕賲鈥屬囏й� 鬲氐賲蹖賲鈥屭屫臂�.
賲賵囟賵毓丕鬲 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘蹖賳鈥屫з勝呝勝勠� 賴爻鬲賳丿 賵 亘賴 賴蹖趩 丿賴賴鈥屰� 禺丕氐蹖 賳蹖夭 鬲毓賱賯 賳丿丕乇賳丿.
丌蹖丕 爻蹖丕爻鬲 賳賵毓蹖 賵乇夭卮 乇夭賲蹖 丕爻鬲責 賳賴. 倬爻 賲丕 賳蹖夭 丿乇 爻蹖丕爻鬲鈥屬堌必槽屸€屬囏й屸€屬呚з� 亘丕蹖丿 乇丕賴蹖 亘蹖丕亘蹖賲 鬲丕 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 賲爻丕卅賱鈥屬呚з� 賮賯胤 亘賴 丿乇诏蹖乇卮丿賳 亘丕 賴賲 賳倬乇丿丕夭蹖賲 亘賱鈥屭┵� 亘鬲賵丕賳蹖賲 丕氐賵賱蹖 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 胤乇賮蹖賳 賯丕亘賱 倬匕蹖乇卮 亘丕卮丿 乇丕 賲亘賳丕蹖 賵乇賵丿 亘賴 亘丨孬鈥屬囏й屸€屬呚з� 賯乇丕乇 丿賴蹖賲. 丕賲蹖丿賵丕乇賲 賲賳 賳蹖夭 丿乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘鬲賵丕賳賲 趩賳蹖賳 丕氐賵賱蹖 乇丕 亘蹖丕亘賲貙 賵 丌賳鈥屬囏� 乇丕 胤賵乇蹖 鬲亘蹖蹖賳 讴賳賲 讴賴 丕賲讴丕賳 賳賵毓蹖 亘丨孬 倬蹖鈥屭屫必з嗁� 乇丕 賲蹖爻乇 讴賳丿 丨鬲蹖 賲蹖丕賳 賯胤亘鈥屬囏й屰� 讴賴 丕賲乇賵夭賴 丕蹖噩丕丿讴賳賳丿賴鈥屰� 卮讴丕賮鈥屬囏й� 倬乇賳卮丿賳蹖 丿乇 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 鬲氐賵乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堎嗀�.
丌蹖丕 禺賵丿禺賵丕賴蹖鈥屬囏� 賵 鬲毓賴丿丕鬲 卮禺氐蹖 賲乇丿賲 丌卮鬲蹖 賳丕倬匕蹖乇賳丿責
丕诏乇 亘倬匕蹖乇蹖賲 讴賴 亘賴鬲乇蹖賳 爻賳鬲 丿賲賵讴乇丕爻蹖 丿乇 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 芦爻賳鬲 賲卮丕乇讴鬲 丌夭丕丿丕賳賴鈥屫й� 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賴賲賴 乇丕 丿乇 亘乇 亘诏蹖乇丿禄貙 賲賳 賳蹖夭 爻毓蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 亘乇倬丕蹖賴鈥屰� 賴賲蹖賳 爻賳鬲貙 禺賵丕賳賳丿诏丕賳 亘蹖卮鈥屫臂� 乇丕 亘賴 倬匕蹖乇卮 賮乇賲賵賱鈥屬囏й� 賱蹖亘乇丕賱蹖 禺賵丿 賲噩丕亘 讴賳賲貨 賮乇賲賵賱 賵 爻賳鬲蹖 讴賴 賲毓鬲賯丿賲 丿乇 趩賳丿 丿賴賴鈥屰� 丕禺蹖乇 丕夭 爻賵蹖 賲禺丕賱賮丕賳卮 賵 賴賲蹖賳鈥屫焚堌� 鬲丕丨丿蹖 賲賵丕賮賯丕賳卮 睾賱胤 賲毓乇賮蹖 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲. 亘乇 倬丕蹖賴鈥屰� 趩賳蹖賳 丿蹖丿诏丕賴蹖貙 爻毓蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 賳诏乇卮 禺賵丿 乇丕 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 乇賵蹖讴乇丿 丕丨鬲蹖丕胤蹖 亘賴 毓丿丕賱鬲 鬲賵夭蹖毓蹖 賳蹖夭 卮乇丨 丿賴賲.
丿乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘賴 賲爻丕卅賱 爻蹖丕爻蹖鈥屫й� 倬乇丿丕禺鬲賴鈥屫з� 讴賴 丕夭 賳馗乇 賲賳 亘丕 丕氐賵賱 賲乇亘賵胤 亘賴 讴乇丕賲鬲 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 丕乇鬲亘丕胤 鬲賳诏丕鬲賳诏 賵 夭蹖丕丿蹖 丿丕乇賳丿 賵 丕夭 賵乇賵丿 亘賴 亘丨孬鈥屬囏й� 讴賲 丕乇鬲亘丕胤鈥屫� 丿蹖诏乇 禺賵丿丿丕乇蹖 讴乇丿賴鈥屫з�.
-賲丕乇爻 2006-
卮賳丕爻賳丕賲賴 賵 賲卮禺氐丕鬲 馗丕賴乇蹖
爻乇卮賳丕爻赖: 丿賵乇讴蹖賳貙 乇賵賳丕賱丿貙 2013-1931賲
毓賳賵丕賳: 丌蹖丕 丿賲賵讴乇丕爻蹖 丿乇 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 賲賲讴賳 丕爻鬲責
倬丿蹖丿丌賵乇: 乇賵賳丕賱丿 丿賵乇讴蹖賳 Ronald Dworkin
賲卮禺氐丕鬲 賳卮乇: 鬲賴乇丕賳: 賲蹖賳賵蹖 禺乇丿貙 1392卮
賲卮禺氐丕鬲 馗丕賴乇蹖: 175 氐賮丨赖貙 21.1 丿乇 14.4 爻丕賳鬲蹖鈥属呚�
卮丕亘讴: 9786006220352
鬲乇噩賲賴 丕夭: Is Democracy Possible Here?: Principles for a New Political Debate, 2006
賲賵囟賵毓: 丕蹖丕賱丕鬲 賲鬲丨丿賴: 賲卮丕乇讴鬲 爻蹖丕爻蹖貙 賮乇賴賳诏 爻蹖丕爻蹖貙 讴賱蹖爻丕 賵 丿賵賱鬲貙 鬲乇賵乇蹖爻賲貙 毓丿丕賱鬲 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖貙 爻蹖丕爻鬲 賵 丨讴賵賲鬲貙 1989賲
卮賲丕乇賴鈥屰� 讴鬲丕亘鈥屫促嗀ж驰� 賲賱蹖: 3206146
賲鬲乇噩賲丕賳: 賲丨賲賵丿 丨亘蹖亘蹖貙 1334卮 / 禺卮丕蹖丕乇 丿蹖賴蹖賲蹖貙 1334卮
賳賵亘鬲 趩丕倬: 丕賵賱
爻丕賱 丕賳鬲卮丕乇: 1392卮
卮賲丕乇诏丕賳: 1500 賳爻禺賴
賯蹖賲鬲: 10000 鬲賵賲丕賳
賮赖乇爻鬲
賲賯丿賲赖 6
賮氐賱 丕賵賱: 賲亘賳丕蹖 賲卮鬲乇讴 丿乇 噩爻鬲噩賵蹖 亘丨孬 10
賮氐賱 丿賵賲: 鬲乇賵乇蹖爻賲 賵 丨賯賵賯 亘卮乇 34
賮氐賱 爻賵賲: 丿蹖賳 賵 讴乇丕賲鬲 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 64
賮氐賱 趩賴丕乇賲: 賲丕賱蹖丕鬲 賵 賲卮乇賵毓蹖鬲 100
賮氐賱 倬賳噩賲: 丌蹖丕 丿賲賵讴乇丕爻蹖 丿乇 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 賲賲讴賳 丕爻鬲責 138
賲丐禺乇赖 170
賲賵囟賵毓丕鬲 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘貙 讴賲鈥屫� 賲賯蹖丿 亘賴 賮乇賴賳诏 爻蹖丕爻蹖 蹖讴 讴卮賵乇 禺丕氐 丕爻鬲 夭蹖乇丕 賴乇 噩丕賲毓賴鈥屰� 爻蹖丕爻蹖 讴賴 亘乇禺賵乇丿丕乇 丕夭 賮乇賴賳诏蹖 賲鬲讴孬乇 賵 丕賯鬲氐丕丿蹖 倬蹖卮乇賮鬲賴 亘丕卮丿貙 賳丕诏夭蹖乇 丕爻鬲 賲蹖丕賳 賳馗乇蹖賴鈥屬囏й� 乇賯蹖亘 丿爻鬲 亘賴 丕賳鬲禺丕亘 亘夭賳丿貨 賳馗乇蹖賴鈥屬囏й屰� 讴賴 胤蹖賮 诏爻鬲乇丿賴鈥屫й� 丕夭 賲賵囟賵毓丕鬲 乇丕 丿乇 亘乇 賲蹖鈥屭屫辟嗀� 賲丕賳賳丿: 賲丕賴蹖鬲 賵 噩丕蹖诏丕賴 丨賯賵賯 亘卮乇貙 賳賯卮 丿蹖賳 丿乇 爻蹖丕爻鬲貙 鬲賵夭蹖毓 乇賮丕賴 丕賯鬲氐丕丿蹖 丿乇 噩丕賲毓賴 賵 賴賵蹖鬲 賳馗丕賲鈥屬囏й� 鬲氐賲蹖賲鈥屭屫臂�.
賲賵囟賵毓丕鬲 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘蹖賳鈥屫з勝呝勝勠� 賴爻鬲賳丿 賵 亘賴 賴蹖趩 丿賴賴鈥屰� 禺丕氐蹖 賳蹖夭 鬲毓賱賯 賳丿丕乇賳丿.
丌蹖丕 爻蹖丕爻鬲 賳賵毓蹖 賵乇夭卮 乇夭賲蹖 丕爻鬲責 賳賴. 倬爻 賲丕 賳蹖夭 丿乇 爻蹖丕爻鬲鈥屬堌必槽屸€屬囏й屸€屬呚з� 亘丕蹖丿 乇丕賴蹖 亘蹖丕亘蹖賲 鬲丕 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 賲爻丕卅賱鈥屬呚з� 賮賯胤 亘賴 丿乇诏蹖乇卮丿賳 亘丕 賴賲 賳倬乇丿丕夭蹖賲 亘賱鈥屭┵� 亘鬲賵丕賳蹖賲 丕氐賵賱蹖 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 胤乇賮蹖賳 賯丕亘賱 倬匕蹖乇卮 亘丕卮丿 乇丕 賲亘賳丕蹖 賵乇賵丿 亘賴 亘丨孬鈥屬囏й屸€屬呚з� 賯乇丕乇 丿賴蹖賲. 丕賲蹖丿賵丕乇賲 賲賳 賳蹖夭 丿乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘鬲賵丕賳賲 趩賳蹖賳 丕氐賵賱蹖 乇丕 亘蹖丕亘賲貙 賵 丌賳鈥屬囏� 乇丕 胤賵乇蹖 鬲亘蹖蹖賳 讴賳賲 讴賴 丕賲讴丕賳 賳賵毓蹖 亘丨孬 倬蹖鈥屭屫必з嗁� 乇丕 賲蹖爻乇 讴賳丿 丨鬲蹖 賲蹖丕賳 賯胤亘鈥屬囏й屰� 讴賴 丕賲乇賵夭賴 丕蹖噩丕丿讴賳賳丿賴鈥屰� 卮讴丕賮鈥屬囏й� 倬乇賳卮丿賳蹖 丿乇 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 鬲氐賵乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堎嗀�.
丌蹖丕 禺賵丿禺賵丕賴蹖鈥屬囏� 賵 鬲毓賴丿丕鬲 卮禺氐蹖 賲乇丿賲 丌卮鬲蹖 賳丕倬匕蹖乇賳丿責
丕诏乇 亘倬匕蹖乇蹖賲 讴賴 亘賴鬲乇蹖賳 爻賳鬲 丿賲賵讴乇丕爻蹖 丿乇 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 芦爻賳鬲 賲卮丕乇讴鬲 丌夭丕丿丕賳賴鈥屫й� 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賴賲賴 乇丕 丿乇 亘乇 亘诏蹖乇丿禄貙 賲賳 賳蹖夭 爻毓蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 亘乇倬丕蹖賴鈥屰� 賴賲蹖賳 爻賳鬲貙 禺賵丕賳賳丿诏丕賳 亘蹖卮鈥屫臂� 乇丕 亘賴 倬匕蹖乇卮 賮乇賲賵賱鈥屬囏й� 賱蹖亘乇丕賱蹖 禺賵丿 賲噩丕亘 讴賳賲貨 賮乇賲賵賱 賵 爻賳鬲蹖 讴賴 賲毓鬲賯丿賲 丿乇 趩賳丿 丿賴賴鈥屰� 丕禺蹖乇 丕夭 爻賵蹖 賲禺丕賱賮丕賳卮 賵 賴賲蹖賳鈥屫焚堌� 鬲丕丨丿蹖 賲賵丕賮賯丕賳卮 睾賱胤 賲毓乇賮蹖 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲. 亘乇 倬丕蹖賴鈥屰� 趩賳蹖賳 丿蹖丿诏丕賴蹖貙 爻毓蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 賳诏乇卮 禺賵丿 乇丕 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 乇賵蹖讴乇丿 丕丨鬲蹖丕胤蹖 亘賴 毓丿丕賱鬲 鬲賵夭蹖毓蹖 賳蹖夭 卮乇丨 丿賴賲.
丿乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘賴 賲爻丕卅賱 爻蹖丕爻蹖鈥屫й� 倬乇丿丕禺鬲賴鈥屫з� 讴賴 丕夭 賳馗乇 賲賳 亘丕 丕氐賵賱 賲乇亘賵胤 亘賴 讴乇丕賲鬲 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 丕乇鬲亘丕胤 鬲賳诏丕鬲賳诏 賵 夭蹖丕丿蹖 丿丕乇賳丿 賵 丕夭 賵乇賵丿 亘賴 亘丨孬鈥屬囏й� 讴賲 丕乇鬲亘丕胤鈥屫� 丿蹖诏乇 禺賵丿丿丕乇蹖 讴乇丿賴鈥屫з�.
-賲丕乇爻 2006-
卮賳丕爻賳丕賲賴 賵 賲卮禺氐丕鬲 馗丕賴乇蹖
爻乇卮賳丕爻赖: 丿賵乇讴蹖賳貙 乇賵賳丕賱丿貙 2013-1931賲
毓賳賵丕賳: 丌蹖丕 丿賲賵讴乇丕爻蹖 丿乇 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 賲賲讴賳 丕爻鬲責
倬丿蹖丿丌賵乇: 乇賵賳丕賱丿 丿賵乇讴蹖賳 Ronald Dworkin
賲卮禺氐丕鬲 賳卮乇: 鬲賴乇丕賳: 賲蹖賳賵蹖 禺乇丿貙 1392卮
賲卮禺氐丕鬲 馗丕賴乇蹖: 175 氐賮丨赖貙 21.1 丿乇 14.4 爻丕賳鬲蹖鈥属呚�
卮丕亘讴: 9786006220352
鬲乇噩賲賴 丕夭: Is Democracy Possible Here?: Principles for a New Political Debate, 2006
賲賵囟賵毓: 丕蹖丕賱丕鬲 賲鬲丨丿賴: 賲卮丕乇讴鬲 爻蹖丕爻蹖貙 賮乇賴賳诏 爻蹖丕爻蹖貙 讴賱蹖爻丕 賵 丿賵賱鬲貙 鬲乇賵乇蹖爻賲貙 毓丿丕賱鬲 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖貙 爻蹖丕爻鬲 賵 丨讴賵賲鬲貙 1989賲
卮賲丕乇賴鈥屰� 讴鬲丕亘鈥屫促嗀ж驰� 賲賱蹖: 3206146
賲鬲乇噩賲丕賳: 賲丨賲賵丿 丨亘蹖亘蹖貙 1334卮 / 禺卮丕蹖丕乇 丿蹖賴蹖賲蹖貙 1334卮
賳賵亘鬲 趩丕倬: 丕賵賱
爻丕賱 丕賳鬲卮丕乇: 1392卮
卮賲丕乇诏丕賳: 1500 賳爻禺賴
賯蹖賲鬲: 10000 鬲賵賲丕賳
賮赖乇爻鬲
賲賯丿賲赖 6
賮氐賱 丕賵賱: 賲亘賳丕蹖 賲卮鬲乇讴 丿乇 噩爻鬲噩賵蹖 亘丨孬 10
賮氐賱 丿賵賲: 鬲乇賵乇蹖爻賲 賵 丨賯賵賯 亘卮乇 34
賮氐賱 爻賵賲: 丿蹖賳 賵 讴乇丕賲鬲 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 64
賮氐賱 趩賴丕乇賲: 賲丕賱蹖丕鬲 賵 賲卮乇賵毓蹖鬲 100
賮氐賱 倬賳噩賲: 丌蹖丕 丿賲賵讴乇丕爻蹖 丿乇 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 賲賲讴賳 丕爻鬲責 138
賲丐禺乇赖 170
175 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2006
10 people are currently reading
247 people want to read
About the author
Ronald Dworkin
65听books152听followersRonald Dworkin, QC, FBA was an American philosopher of law. He was a Jeremy Bentham Professor of Law and Philosophy at University College London, Frank Henry Sommer Professor of Law at New York University, and has taught previously at Yale Law School and the University of Oxford. An influential contributor to both philosophy of law and political philosophy, Dworkin received the 2007 Holberg International Memorial Prize in the Humanities for "his pioneering scholarly work" of "worldwide impact." His theory of law as integrity is amongst the most influential contemporary theories about the nature of law.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 15 of 15 reviews
January 9, 2016
讴鬲丕亘 乇賵賳丕賱丿 丿賽賵購乇讴蹖賳貙 丿乇爻鈥屬嗀з呝団€屫й� 亘乇丕蹖 丿賲賵讴乇丕爻蹖 丿乇丕賲乇蹖讴丕爻鬲. 丕賱亘鬲賴 毓賲賵賲蹖鬲 賲亘丕丨孬 讴鬲丕亘 丌賳 乇丕 亘乇丕蹖 賴乇 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴鈥屫й� 賯丕亘賱 賲胤丕賱毓賴 讴乇丿賴 丕爻鬲. 賲賴賲鈥屫臂屬� 賲亘丕丨孬 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 倬乇丿丕禺鬲賳 亘賴 丕氐賱 亘乇丕亘乇蹖 賵 丌夭丕丿蹖貙 丨賯賵賯 亘卮乇貙 丿蹖賳貙 賲丕賱蹖丕鬲 賵 賲卮乇賵毓蹖鬲 丿乇 丕賲乇蹖讴丕 -亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 賲賳丕夭毓丕鬲蹖 亘蹖賳 賱蹖亘乇丕賱鈥屬囏� 賵 賲丨丕賮馗賴鈥屭┴ж必з� 丕爻鬲
Want to read
January 25, 2016丌蹖丕 丿賲賵讴乇丕爻蹖 丿乇 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 賲賲讴賳 丕爻鬲責 / 乇賵賳丕賱丿 丿賵乇讴蹖賳 / 鬲賴乇丕賳: 賲蹖賳賵蹖 禺乇丿貙 趩丕倬賽 丕賵賱 1392
賲卮丕乇讴鬲賽 爻蹖丕爻蹖
賮乇賴賳诏賽 爻蹖丕爻蹖
讴賱蹖爻丕 賵 丿賵賱鬲 賵 鬲乇賵乇蹖爻賲
毓丿丕賱鬲賽 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖
爻蹖丕爻鬲 賵 丨讴賵賲鬲: 丕蹖丕賱丕鬲賽 賲鬲丨丿賴貙 1989賲
[...]
賲鬲賳 賲毓乇賮蹖: 丕夭 賲賯丿賲赖鈥屰� 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴貙 丿乇 丕蹖賳 賵蹖乇丕蹖卮: 賲賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 亘賴 丕蹖賳 丿賱蹖賱 賳賵卮鬲賴鈥屫з� 讴賴 賲毓鬲賯丿賲 賲丕 丿乇 丿賵乇賴鈥屫й� 賯乇丕乇 丿丕乇蹖賲 讴賴 丕蹖丕賱丕鬲 賲鬲丨丿賴 丿乇 賲毓乇囟 禺胤乇 爻蹖丕爻蹖 禺丕氐蹖 賯乇丕乇 丿丕乇丿. 亘賴鈥屬嗁堌观� 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 丿乇亘丕乇賴鈥屰� 賳亘賵丿 亘丨孬 爻蹖丕爻蹖 丿乇 丌賲乇蹖讴丕蹖 爻丕賱鈥屬囏й� 丌睾丕夭蹖賳 賯乇賳 亘蹖爻鬲鈥屬堐屭┵� 丕爻鬲. 賲賵囟賵毓丕鬲 丌賳 賳蹖夭 讴賲鈥屫� 賲賯蹖丿 亘賴 賮乇賴賳诏 爻蹖丕爻蹖 蹖讴 讴卮賵乇 禺丕氐 丕爻鬲. 夭蹖乇丕 賴乇 噩丕賲毓賴鈥屰� 爻蹖丕爻蹖 讴賴 亘乇禺賵乇丿丕乇 丕夭 賮乇賴賳诏蹖 賲鬲讴孬乇 賵 丕賯鬲氐丕丿蹖 倬蹖卮乇賮鬲賴 亘丕卮丿貙 賳丕诏夭蹖乇 丕爻鬲 賲蹖丕賳 賳馗乇蹖賴鈥屬囏й� 乇賯蹖亘 亘賴 丕賳鬲禺丕亘 丿爻鬲 亘夭賳丿貨 賳馗乇蹖賴鈥屬囏й屰� 讴賴 胤蹖賮 诏爻鬲乇丿賴鈥屫й� 丕夭 賲賵囟賵毓丕鬲 乇丕 丿乇 亘乇 賲蹖鈥屭屫辟嗀� 賲丕賳賳丿: 賲丕賴蹖鬲 賵 噩丕蹖诏丕賴 丨賯賵賯 亘卮乇貙 賳賯卮 丿蹖賳 丿乇 爻蹖丕爻鬲貙 鬲賵夭蹖毓 乇賮丕賴 丕賯鬲氐丕丿蹖 丿乇 噩丕賲毓賴 賵 賴賵蹖鬲 賳馗丕賲鈥屬囏й� 鬲氐賲蹖賲鈥屭屫臂�.
賲賵囟賵毓丕鬲 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘蹖賳鈥屫з勝呝勝勠� 賴爻鬲賳丿 賵 亘賴 賴蹖趩 丿賴賴鈥屰� 禺丕氐蹖 賳蹖夭 鬲毓賱賯 賳丿丕乇賳丿.
爻蹖丕爻鬲 讴賴 賳賵毓蹖 賵乇夭卮 乇夭賲蹖 賳蹖爻鬲貙 倬爻 賲丕 賳蹖夭 丿乇 爻蹖丕爻鬲鈥屬堌必槽屸€屬囏й屸€屬呚з� 亘丕蹖丿 乇丕賴蹖 亘蹖丕亘蹖賲 鬲丕 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 賲爻丕卅賱鈥屬呚з� 賮賯胤 亘賴 丿乇诏蹖乇卮丿賳 亘丕 賴賲 賳倬乇丿丕夭蹖賲 亘賱鈥屭┵� 亘鬲賵丕賳蹖賲 丕氐賵賱蹖 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 胤乇賮蹖賳 賯丕亘賱 倬匕蹖乇卮 亘丕卮丿 乇丕 賲亘賳丕蹖 賵乇賵丿 亘賴 亘丨孬鈥屬囏й屸€屬呚з� 賯乇丕乇 丿賴蹖賲. 丕賲蹖丿賵丕乇賲 賲賳 賳蹖夭 丿乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘鬲賵丕賳賲 趩賳蹖賳 丕氐賵賱蹖 乇丕 亘蹖丕亘賲貙 賵 丌賳鈥屬囏� 乇丕 胤賵乇蹖 鬲亘蹖蹖賳 讴賳賲 讴賴 丕賲讴丕賳 賳賵毓蹖 亘丨孬 倬蹖鈥屭屫必з嗁� 乇丕 賲蹖爻乇 讴賳丿 丨鬲蹖 賲蹖丕賳 賯胤亘鈥屬囏й屰� 讴賴 丕賲乇賵夭賴 丕蹖噩丕丿讴賳賳丿賴鈥屰� 卮讴丕賮鈥屬囏й� 倬乇賳卮丿賳蹖 丿乇 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 鬲氐賵乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堎嗀�.
丌蹖丕 禺賵丿禺賵丕賴蹖鈥屬囏� 賵 鬲毓賴丿丕鬲 卮禺氐蹖 賲乇丿賲 丌卮鬲蹖 賳丕倬匕蹖乇賳丿責
丕诏乇 亘倬匕蹖乇蹖賲 讴賴 亘賴鬲乇蹖賳 爻賳鬲 丿賲賵讴乇丕爻蹖 丿乇 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 芦爻賳鬲 賲卮丕乇讴鬲 丌夭丕丿丕賳賴鈥屫й� 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賴賲賴 乇丕 丿乇 亘乇 亘诏蹖乇丿禄貙 賲賳 賳蹖夭 爻毓蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 亘乇倬丕蹖賴鈥屰� 賴賲蹖賳 爻賳鬲貙 禺賵丕賳賳丿诏丕賳 亘蹖卮鈥屫臂� 乇丕 亘賴 倬匕蹖乇卮 賮乇賲賵賱鈥屬囏й� 賱蹖亘乇丕賱蹖 禺賵丿 賲噩丕亘 讴賳賲貨 爻賳鬲蹖 讴賴 賲毓鬲賯丿賲 丿乇 趩賳丿 丿賴賴鈥屰� 丕禺蹖乇 丕夭 爻賵蹖 賲禺丕賱賮丕賳卮 賵 賴賲蹖賳鈥屫焚堌� 鬲丕丨丿蹖 賲賵丕賮賯丕賳卮 睾賱胤 賲毓乇賮蹖 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲. 亘乇 倬丕蹖賴鈥屰� 趩賳蹖賳 爻賳鬲蹖貙 爻毓蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 丿蹖丿诏丕賴鈥屬囏й� 禺賵丿 乇丕 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 乇賵蹖讴乇丿 丕丨鬲蹖丕胤蹖 亘賴 毓丿丕賱鬲 鬲賵夭蹖毓蹖 賳蹖夭 賲胤乇丨 讴賳賲.
丿乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘賴 賲爻丕卅賱 爻蹖丕爻蹖鈥屫й� 倬乇丿丕禺鬲賴鈥屫з� 讴賴 丕夭 賳馗乇 賲賳 亘丕 丕氐賵賱 賲乇亘賵胤 亘賴 讴乇丕賲鬲 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 丕乇鬲亘丕胤 鬲賳诏丕鬲賳诏 賵 夭蹖丕丿蹖 丿丕乇賳丿 賵 丕夭 賵乇賵丿 亘賴 亘丨孬鈥屬囏й� 讴賲 丕乇鬲亘丕胤鈥屫� 丿蹖诏乇 禺賵丿丿丕乇蹖 讴乇丿賴鈥屫з�.
賮赖乇爻鬲
賲賯丿賲赖6
賮氐賱 丕賵賱: 賲亘賳丕蹖 賲卮鬲乇讴 丿乇 噩爻鬲噩賵蹖 亘丨孬 10
賮氐賱 丿賵賲: 鬲乇賵乇蹖爻賲 賵 丨賯賵賯 亘卮乇 34
賮氐賱 爻賵賲: 丿蹖賳 賵 讴乇丕賲鬲 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 64
賮氐賱 趩賴丕乇賲: 賲丕賱蹖丕鬲 賵 賲卮乇賵毓蹖鬲 100
賮氐賱 倬賳噩賲: 丌蹖丕 丿賲賵讴乇丕爻蹖 丿乇 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 賲賲讴賳 丕爻鬲責 138
賲丐禺乇赖 170
卮賳丕爻賳丕賲賴 賵 賲卮禺氐丕鬲 馗丕賴乇蹖
爻乇卮賳丕爻赖: 丿賵乇讴蹖賳貙 乇賵賳丕賱丿貙 2013-1931賲
毓賳賵丕賳: 丌蹖丕 丿賲賵讴乇丕爻蹖 丿乇 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 賲賲讴賳 丕爻鬲責
倬丿蹖丿丌賵乇: 乇賵賳丕賱丿 丿賵乇讴蹖賳 Ronald Dworkin
賲卮禺氐丕鬲 賳卮乇: 鬲賴乇丕賳: 賲蹖賳賵蹖 禺乇丿貙 1392卮
賲卮禺氐丕鬲 馗丕賴乇蹖: 175 氐賮丨赖貙 21.1 丿乇 14.4 爻丕賳鬲蹖鈥属呚�
卮丕亘讴: 9786006220352
鬲乇噩賲賴 丕夭: Is Democracy Possible Here?: Principles for a New Political Debate, 2006
賲賵囟賵毓: 賲卮丕乇讴鬲 爻蹖丕爻蹖 / 賮乇賴賳诏 爻蹖丕爻蹖 / 讴賱蹖爻丕 賵 丿賵賱鬲 賵 鬲乇賵乇蹖爻賲 / 毓丿丕賱鬲 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖 / 爻蹖丕爻鬲 賵 丨讴賵賲鬲: 丕蹖丕賱丕鬲 賲鬲丨丿賴貙 1989賲
卮賲丕乇賴鈥屰� 讴鬲丕亘鈥屫促嗀ж驰� 賲賱蹖: 3206146
賲鬲乇噩賲丕賳: 賲丨賲賵丿 丨亘蹖亘蹖貙 1334卮 / 禺卮丕蹖丕乇 丿蹖賴蹖賲蹖貙 1334卮
賳賵亘鬲 趩丕倬: 丕賵賱
爻丕賱 丕賳鬲卮丕乇: 1392卮
卮賲丕乇诏丕賳: 1500 賳爻禺賴
賯蹖賲鬲: 10000 鬲賵賲丕賳
賲卮丕乇讴鬲賽 爻蹖丕爻蹖
賮乇賴賳诏賽 爻蹖丕爻蹖
讴賱蹖爻丕 賵 丿賵賱鬲 賵 鬲乇賵乇蹖爻賲
毓丿丕賱鬲賽 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖
爻蹖丕爻鬲 賵 丨讴賵賲鬲: 丕蹖丕賱丕鬲賽 賲鬲丨丿賴貙 1989賲
[...]
賲鬲賳 賲毓乇賮蹖: 丕夭 賲賯丿賲赖鈥屰� 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴貙 丿乇 丕蹖賳 賵蹖乇丕蹖卮: 賲賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 亘賴 丕蹖賳 丿賱蹖賱 賳賵卮鬲賴鈥屫з� 讴賴 賲毓鬲賯丿賲 賲丕 丿乇 丿賵乇賴鈥屫й� 賯乇丕乇 丿丕乇蹖賲 讴賴 丕蹖丕賱丕鬲 賲鬲丨丿賴 丿乇 賲毓乇囟 禺胤乇 爻蹖丕爻蹖 禺丕氐蹖 賯乇丕乇 丿丕乇丿. 亘賴鈥屬嗁堌观� 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 丿乇亘丕乇賴鈥屰� 賳亘賵丿 亘丨孬 爻蹖丕爻蹖 丿乇 丌賲乇蹖讴丕蹖 爻丕賱鈥屬囏й� 丌睾丕夭蹖賳 賯乇賳 亘蹖爻鬲鈥屬堐屭┵� 丕爻鬲. 賲賵囟賵毓丕鬲 丌賳 賳蹖夭 讴賲鈥屫� 賲賯蹖丿 亘賴 賮乇賴賳诏 爻蹖丕爻蹖 蹖讴 讴卮賵乇 禺丕氐 丕爻鬲. 夭蹖乇丕 賴乇 噩丕賲毓賴鈥屰� 爻蹖丕爻蹖 讴賴 亘乇禺賵乇丿丕乇 丕夭 賮乇賴賳诏蹖 賲鬲讴孬乇 賵 丕賯鬲氐丕丿蹖 倬蹖卮乇賮鬲賴 亘丕卮丿貙 賳丕诏夭蹖乇 丕爻鬲 賲蹖丕賳 賳馗乇蹖賴鈥屬囏й� 乇賯蹖亘 亘賴 丕賳鬲禺丕亘 丿爻鬲 亘夭賳丿貨 賳馗乇蹖賴鈥屬囏й屰� 讴賴 胤蹖賮 诏爻鬲乇丿賴鈥屫й� 丕夭 賲賵囟賵毓丕鬲 乇丕 丿乇 亘乇 賲蹖鈥屭屫辟嗀� 賲丕賳賳丿: 賲丕賴蹖鬲 賵 噩丕蹖诏丕賴 丨賯賵賯 亘卮乇貙 賳賯卮 丿蹖賳 丿乇 爻蹖丕爻鬲貙 鬲賵夭蹖毓 乇賮丕賴 丕賯鬲氐丕丿蹖 丿乇 噩丕賲毓賴 賵 賴賵蹖鬲 賳馗丕賲鈥屬囏й� 鬲氐賲蹖賲鈥屭屫臂�.
賲賵囟賵毓丕鬲 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘蹖賳鈥屫з勝呝勝勠� 賴爻鬲賳丿 賵 亘賴 賴蹖趩 丿賴賴鈥屰� 禺丕氐蹖 賳蹖夭 鬲毓賱賯 賳丿丕乇賳丿.
爻蹖丕爻鬲 讴賴 賳賵毓蹖 賵乇夭卮 乇夭賲蹖 賳蹖爻鬲貙 倬爻 賲丕 賳蹖夭 丿乇 爻蹖丕爻鬲鈥屬堌必槽屸€屬囏й屸€屬呚з� 亘丕蹖丿 乇丕賴蹖 亘蹖丕亘蹖賲 鬲丕 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 賲爻丕卅賱鈥屬呚з� 賮賯胤 亘賴 丿乇诏蹖乇卮丿賳 亘丕 賴賲 賳倬乇丿丕夭蹖賲 亘賱鈥屭┵� 亘鬲賵丕賳蹖賲 丕氐賵賱蹖 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 胤乇賮蹖賳 賯丕亘賱 倬匕蹖乇卮 亘丕卮丿 乇丕 賲亘賳丕蹖 賵乇賵丿 亘賴 亘丨孬鈥屬囏й屸€屬呚з� 賯乇丕乇 丿賴蹖賲. 丕賲蹖丿賵丕乇賲 賲賳 賳蹖夭 丿乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘鬲賵丕賳賲 趩賳蹖賳 丕氐賵賱蹖 乇丕 亘蹖丕亘賲貙 賵 丌賳鈥屬囏� 乇丕 胤賵乇蹖 鬲亘蹖蹖賳 讴賳賲 讴賴 丕賲讴丕賳 賳賵毓蹖 亘丨孬 倬蹖鈥屭屫必з嗁� 乇丕 賲蹖爻乇 讴賳丿 丨鬲蹖 賲蹖丕賳 賯胤亘鈥屬囏й屰� 讴賴 丕賲乇賵夭賴 丕蹖噩丕丿讴賳賳丿賴鈥屰� 卮讴丕賮鈥屬囏й� 倬乇賳卮丿賳蹖 丿乇 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 鬲氐賵乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堎嗀�.
丌蹖丕 禺賵丿禺賵丕賴蹖鈥屬囏� 賵 鬲毓賴丿丕鬲 卮禺氐蹖 賲乇丿賲 丌卮鬲蹖 賳丕倬匕蹖乇賳丿責
丕诏乇 亘倬匕蹖乇蹖賲 讴賴 亘賴鬲乇蹖賳 爻賳鬲 丿賲賵讴乇丕爻蹖 丿乇 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 芦爻賳鬲 賲卮丕乇讴鬲 丌夭丕丿丕賳賴鈥屫й� 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賴賲賴 乇丕 丿乇 亘乇 亘诏蹖乇丿禄貙 賲賳 賳蹖夭 爻毓蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 亘乇倬丕蹖賴鈥屰� 賴賲蹖賳 爻賳鬲貙 禺賵丕賳賳丿诏丕賳 亘蹖卮鈥屫臂� 乇丕 亘賴 倬匕蹖乇卮 賮乇賲賵賱鈥屬囏й� 賱蹖亘乇丕賱蹖 禺賵丿 賲噩丕亘 讴賳賲貨 爻賳鬲蹖 讴賴 賲毓鬲賯丿賲 丿乇 趩賳丿 丿賴賴鈥屰� 丕禺蹖乇 丕夭 爻賵蹖 賲禺丕賱賮丕賳卮 賵 賴賲蹖賳鈥屫焚堌� 鬲丕丨丿蹖 賲賵丕賮賯丕賳卮 睾賱胤 賲毓乇賮蹖 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲. 亘乇 倬丕蹖賴鈥屰� 趩賳蹖賳 爻賳鬲蹖貙 爻毓蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 丿蹖丿诏丕賴鈥屬囏й� 禺賵丿 乇丕 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 乇賵蹖讴乇丿 丕丨鬲蹖丕胤蹖 亘賴 毓丿丕賱鬲 鬲賵夭蹖毓蹖 賳蹖夭 賲胤乇丨 讴賳賲.
丿乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘賴 賲爻丕卅賱 爻蹖丕爻蹖鈥屫й� 倬乇丿丕禺鬲賴鈥屫з� 讴賴 丕夭 賳馗乇 賲賳 亘丕 丕氐賵賱 賲乇亘賵胤 亘賴 讴乇丕賲鬲 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 丕乇鬲亘丕胤 鬲賳诏丕鬲賳诏 賵 夭蹖丕丿蹖 丿丕乇賳丿 賵 丕夭 賵乇賵丿 亘賴 亘丨孬鈥屬囏й� 讴賲 丕乇鬲亘丕胤鈥屫� 丿蹖诏乇 禺賵丿丿丕乇蹖 讴乇丿賴鈥屫з�.
賮赖乇爻鬲
賲賯丿賲赖6
賮氐賱 丕賵賱: 賲亘賳丕蹖 賲卮鬲乇讴 丿乇 噩爻鬲噩賵蹖 亘丨孬 10
賮氐賱 丿賵賲: 鬲乇賵乇蹖爻賲 賵 丨賯賵賯 亘卮乇 34
賮氐賱 爻賵賲: 丿蹖賳 賵 讴乇丕賲鬲 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 64
賮氐賱 趩賴丕乇賲: 賲丕賱蹖丕鬲 賵 賲卮乇賵毓蹖鬲 100
賮氐賱 倬賳噩賲: 丌蹖丕 丿賲賵讴乇丕爻蹖 丿乇 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 賲賲讴賳 丕爻鬲責 138
賲丐禺乇赖 170
卮賳丕爻賳丕賲賴 賵 賲卮禺氐丕鬲 馗丕賴乇蹖
爻乇卮賳丕爻赖: 丿賵乇讴蹖賳貙 乇賵賳丕賱丿貙 2013-1931賲
毓賳賵丕賳: 丌蹖丕 丿賲賵讴乇丕爻蹖 丿乇 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 賲賲讴賳 丕爻鬲責
倬丿蹖丿丌賵乇: 乇賵賳丕賱丿 丿賵乇讴蹖賳 Ronald Dworkin
賲卮禺氐丕鬲 賳卮乇: 鬲賴乇丕賳: 賲蹖賳賵蹖 禺乇丿貙 1392卮
賲卮禺氐丕鬲 馗丕賴乇蹖: 175 氐賮丨赖貙 21.1 丿乇 14.4 爻丕賳鬲蹖鈥属呚�
卮丕亘讴: 9786006220352
鬲乇噩賲賴 丕夭: Is Democracy Possible Here?: Principles for a New Political Debate, 2006
賲賵囟賵毓: 賲卮丕乇讴鬲 爻蹖丕爻蹖 / 賮乇賴賳诏 爻蹖丕爻蹖 / 讴賱蹖爻丕 賵 丿賵賱鬲 賵 鬲乇賵乇蹖爻賲 / 毓丿丕賱鬲 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖 / 爻蹖丕爻鬲 賵 丨讴賵賲鬲: 丕蹖丕賱丕鬲 賲鬲丨丿賴貙 1989賲
卮賲丕乇賴鈥屰� 讴鬲丕亘鈥屫促嗀ж驰� 賲賱蹖: 3206146
賲鬲乇噩賲丕賳: 賲丨賲賵丿 丨亘蹖亘蹖貙 1334卮 / 禺卮丕蹖丕乇 丿蹖賴蹖賲蹖貙 1334卮
賳賵亘鬲 趩丕倬: 丕賵賱
爻丕賱 丕賳鬲卮丕乇: 1392卮
卮賲丕乇诏丕賳: 1500 賳爻禺賴
賯蹖賲鬲: 10000 鬲賵賲丕賳
January 22, 2018
This is a book with several facets. It is Dworkin's attempt to provide philosophical and argumentative foundations for democratic debate. Meaning, Dworkin provides the foundational ideas upon which all other argument, from both left and right, should and must be based on. It just so happens that Dworkin thinks these foundational starting points inevitably lead to his preferred progressive politics. Shocker! Regardless, Dworkin goes out of his way to invite his intellectual opponents to disagree with him and provide him with counter arguments (but still with the starting points he lays out).
The book's title is a little misleading. This is not a legal, political, and philosophical look into whether democracy is possible in the United States. The first 3/4 is Dworkin giving his foundations and then providing arguments for the author's preferred general policy ends. The last 1/4 feels less like a philosophical inquiry and more like Dworkin shaking his fist at clouds (clouds that may be more conservative in tone or viewpoint).
The book was first written in ~2005-6, and the paperback was in 2008. This means that the examples used are just old enough, but also just recent enough, to feel odd, like the Terry Schaivo controversy. It serves as a nice reminder of what people cared about!
I had read another book a few years back called "The Thirteen American Argument," which this book reminds me of. It's an attempt to identify things that we have in common, but unlike that earlier book, Dworkin does more than "Hey, look, common arguments, isn't that cool!" Instead, Dworkin attempts to engage the arguments and the readers.
The book's title is a little misleading. This is not a legal, political, and philosophical look into whether democracy is possible in the United States. The first 3/4 is Dworkin giving his foundations and then providing arguments for the author's preferred general policy ends. The last 1/4 feels less like a philosophical inquiry and more like Dworkin shaking his fist at clouds (clouds that may be more conservative in tone or viewpoint).
The book was first written in ~2005-6, and the paperback was in 2008. This means that the examples used are just old enough, but also just recent enough, to feel odd, like the Terry Schaivo controversy. It serves as a nice reminder of what people cared about!
I had read another book a few years back called "The Thirteen American Argument," which this book reminds me of. It's an attempt to identify things that we have in common, but unlike that earlier book, Dworkin does more than "Hey, look, common arguments, isn't that cool!" Instead, Dworkin attempts to engage the arguments and the readers.
June 23, 2011
If there's one thing I'll take away from this book it is that anyone with a vested interest in the topic at hand should, at all costs, avoid getting in an argument with Ronald Dworkin! Unless, that is, they're bent on losing from the outset!
Okay, that's not really the best conclusion, in that the whole book argues just the opposite, but either way, from reading this book it is clear that arguing with Dworkin would be no walk in the park!
He begins the book by telling readers exactly what he's out to argue and the means by which he'll arrive at his conclusions. He sets out two basic principles that he is sure most readers will adopt and then moves forward through logical reasoning to arrive at the claims that he unabashedly supports! It's one thing to have someone make a point, it's another for them to tell you they're going to, show you how they're doing it, and then invite you to counter them! No wonder the man is a preeminent lawyer!
In 'Is Democracy Possible Here?', Dworkin denounces the lack of political debate in American politics. Looking at the two primary groups that have formed along ideological divisions, Dworkin notes that there is great disagreement between the two, but very little, if any, legitimate discussion. It is a return to the later for which Dworkin argues.
He outlines two basic principles of human dignity, the value of all human life and the responsibility of individuals over their own lives. From these principles, he demonstrates, through four concrete examples, that political arguments must come from a common ground in order to be productive. Thus, by adopting the basic tenants of Dworkin's human dignity, political arguments can be legitimately developed for issues such as gay rights, torture, taxation and democratic processes.
Only through discussions the impact of political decisions on the shared interests of human dignity, Dworkin argues, can we have an effective political debate, and in turn, a legitimate democracy.
While, admittedly, falling on the far liberal side of many arguments he lays out, Dworkin challenges readers who disagree with him to develop counter arguments along similar lines of reason. At the end of chapter three, he implores "Who will argue--not just declare--that I am wrong?"
Not me I say, not me!
Okay, that's not really the best conclusion, in that the whole book argues just the opposite, but either way, from reading this book it is clear that arguing with Dworkin would be no walk in the park!
He begins the book by telling readers exactly what he's out to argue and the means by which he'll arrive at his conclusions. He sets out two basic principles that he is sure most readers will adopt and then moves forward through logical reasoning to arrive at the claims that he unabashedly supports! It's one thing to have someone make a point, it's another for them to tell you they're going to, show you how they're doing it, and then invite you to counter them! No wonder the man is a preeminent lawyer!
In 'Is Democracy Possible Here?', Dworkin denounces the lack of political debate in American politics. Looking at the two primary groups that have formed along ideological divisions, Dworkin notes that there is great disagreement between the two, but very little, if any, legitimate discussion. It is a return to the later for which Dworkin argues.
He outlines two basic principles of human dignity, the value of all human life and the responsibility of individuals over their own lives. From these principles, he demonstrates, through four concrete examples, that political arguments must come from a common ground in order to be productive. Thus, by adopting the basic tenants of Dworkin's human dignity, political arguments can be legitimately developed for issues such as gay rights, torture, taxation and democratic processes.
Only through discussions the impact of political decisions on the shared interests of human dignity, Dworkin argues, can we have an effective political debate, and in turn, a legitimate democracy.
While, admittedly, falling on the far liberal side of many arguments he lays out, Dworkin challenges readers who disagree with him to develop counter arguments along similar lines of reason. At the end of chapter three, he implores "Who will argue--not just declare--that I am wrong?"
Not me I say, not me!
November 17, 2020
This is a wonderful book. As the title implies the books central question is "is real democracy possible here?" Why is democracy in question, you may ask? His answer, given the current state of polarization real political debate in the truest democratic sense is not possible. This is a dangerous situation .
He points to two principles that should be the underpinning of any democratic society and that could help assuage the bitter recriminations between these polarized groups:
The Principle of Intrinsic value and the principle of personal responsibility.
The first raises and acknowledges the importance of each human life and accordingly that we should all regret a wasted life. This ties to ideals of equality i.e. it has to apply to all.
The second principle: Personal responsibility relates to ideals of liberty. That each of us has a personal responsibility for realizing the success of his own life, choosing there paths- the author writes we have the sovereign responsibility for one's own life. These two principles define the basis of human dignity. Dignity that we should all be accorded. We have to work out the implications of each in the light of the other, he states. There are no grounds under which you can say that yes I should make the most of my life, but at the same time deny it to others. It applies to everyone for if you deny it to anyone logically you deny it to yourself.
I thought that the way the author builds up the case for his principles and how they demonstrate that we do in fact have common ideals that should allow us to bridge some of our differences was wonderful. The author then uses this theoretical base to discuss Terrorism, human rights, religion , tax systems and its legitimacy, to name a few. A must read!!
He points to two principles that should be the underpinning of any democratic society and that could help assuage the bitter recriminations between these polarized groups:
The Principle of Intrinsic value and the principle of personal responsibility.
The first raises and acknowledges the importance of each human life and accordingly that we should all regret a wasted life. This ties to ideals of equality i.e. it has to apply to all.
The second principle: Personal responsibility relates to ideals of liberty. That each of us has a personal responsibility for realizing the success of his own life, choosing there paths- the author writes we have the sovereign responsibility for one's own life. These two principles define the basis of human dignity. Dignity that we should all be accorded. We have to work out the implications of each in the light of the other, he states. There are no grounds under which you can say that yes I should make the most of my life, but at the same time deny it to others. It applies to everyone for if you deny it to anyone logically you deny it to yourself.
I thought that the way the author builds up the case for his principles and how they demonstrate that we do in fact have common ideals that should allow us to bridge some of our differences was wonderful. The author then uses this theoretical base to discuss Terrorism, human rights, religion , tax systems and its legitimacy, to name a few. A must read!!
March 10, 2014
I was first introduced to Dworkin nearly 30 years ago in law school. Dworkin's theme is essentially that given a certain set of fundamental premises, the political debate should have a certain outcome and if you get a different outcome, then the argument's aren't coming from the same premise. Logically the argument is compelling. The reality of course is harder to make happen, but in some ways this should be a guide book on how to structure political argument.
Values of individual liberty and human dignity ("all are created equal") should not be shoddily abdicated to the unthinking talking points machine. Our arguments need to stem from these fundamentals and argued back to fundamentals.
This isn't unrealistic even in a time when money and mass media seems to have co-opted our democracy, such that it is. The influence of the economic interests are as old as the country, but look how long we have come in a little over 238 years. We got this far because people like Dworkin argued and fought from fundamental concepts. There is no reason to think that a continued effort won't eventually lead to similar results. I'm particularly interested in looking at treating the poor as a protected class, doing that actively attacks the moneyed interests that control so much of our law making.
I even used Dworkin in an I wrote for our local paper. Dworkin's ideas are important and need to be discussed, not just reviewed on GoodReads and elsewhere.
Values of individual liberty and human dignity ("all are created equal") should not be shoddily abdicated to the unthinking talking points machine. Our arguments need to stem from these fundamentals and argued back to fundamentals.
This isn't unrealistic even in a time when money and mass media seems to have co-opted our democracy, such that it is. The influence of the economic interests are as old as the country, but look how long we have come in a little over 238 years. We got this far because people like Dworkin argued and fought from fundamental concepts. There is no reason to think that a continued effort won't eventually lead to similar results. I'm particularly interested in looking at treating the poor as a protected class, doing that actively attacks the moneyed interests that control so much of our law making.
I even used Dworkin in an I wrote for our local paper. Dworkin's ideas are important and need to be discussed, not just reviewed on GoodReads and elsewhere.
February 15, 2013
This was an intriguing read. Dworkin is spot on that our polarized politics have led to a diminishment of productive discourse in the U.S. and his thesis that we need to identify core principles in which we all agree on, but the implementation of which we could theoretically disagree on in on the right track. I also think that the two core principles he identifies-a belief in the value of all human life and a belief in personal responsibility-are appropriate, though I'm not convinced they're as universally appreciated as Dworkin argues. Dworkin is also well-reasoned and convincing when discussing the implications of these core values when applied to some of our traditionally intractable political problems, such as taxes rates and the separation of church and state, while his reasoning regarding the details of other issues, such as what taxes should be spent on, is less sharp. At several points Dworkin refers to arguments that he has articulated in other works, and it may well be that these sources go into the depth I felt was lacking in certain issues; having not read them, however, I'm currently not convinced in the correctness of some of his conclusions. I also found the overall tone pleasant and respectful, yet a little bland, which made for slower than normal reading. Still, an overall interesting and cognitively stimulating book, whose brevity and concision easily make up for its languid pacing.
August 13, 2010
Disappointing. I sat patiently through all of these syllogisms, etc., hoping the book really was going to propose some practical and politically feasible solutions to our deeply polarized and trivialized political process, but it never really did. All of Dworkin's arguments are logically sound and lead to the same conclusions I already share, but in most cases there's a much simpler and more compelling argument that leads to the same conclusion, I kept thinking.
Reading this book was depressing. Makes me want to revert to my pessimistic default position that what we really need is more effective demagoguery.
(Also makes me think maybe I need a break from this genre for a while! :) )
Reading this book was depressing. Makes me want to revert to my pessimistic default position that what we really need is more effective demagoguery.
(Also makes me think maybe I need a break from this genre for a while! :) )
March 7, 2013
Ronald Dworkin seems to be pleading for the introduction of common sense into the political debate in our Country, but any immediate resolution seems far down the road. Overall, I felt this was a somewhat uninspired, boring discussion of underlying principles which could lead to reaching agreement by those on the left and those on the right, and thereby lead to a functioning democracy instead of the partisan divide we presently have in Washington D.C.
Read
July 15, 2014Dworkin outlines a normative account of political justice and legitimacy, and its implications for human rights, religion and taxation, based on two fundamental principals: intrinsic value and personal responsibility.
His unique contribution stems from his argument that legitimacy is derived not from consent but the states equal concern for all citizens.
His unique contribution stems from his argument that legitimacy is derived not from consent but the states equal concern for all citizens.
August 19, 2008
Dworkin is very accessible, you don't need to be a Political Science student to get into this book. Very engaging.
February 27, 2013
Erudite, thoughtful, and engaging. While not always agreeing woth Dworkin's perspective, hisbrilliance and passion are.most admirable.
January 7, 2013
Thoroughly thought-provoking.
abandoned
February 11, 2017I could not follow his tortured sentence structure. I found it very difficult to track his thought processes from one point to the next.
November 16, 2015
螤蟻蠅蟿畏 蠁慰蟻伪 蔚蟺喂伪蟽伪 谓伪 未喂伪尾伪蟽蠅 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏畏 蠁喂位慰蟽慰蠁喂伪 魏喂 蔚蠀蟿蠀蠂蠅蟼 蔚蟿蠀蠂蔚 谓伪 蔚喂谓伪喂 伪蠀蟿慰 蟿慰 尾喂尾位喂慰. 螚 渭蔚胃慰未慰蟼 蟿畏蟼 蔚蟺喂蠂蔚喂蟻畏渭伪蟿慰位慰纬喂伪蟼 蟽蟿伪 魏伪位蠀蟿蔚蟻伪 蟿畏蟼.
Displaying 1 - 15 of 15 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.