What do you think?
Rate this book
鈥官� 丕賱丿賵賱丞: 丿乇賵爻 賮賷 丕賱賰賵賱賷噩 丿賵 賮乇丕賳爻 (1989 - 1992) (爻賱爻賱丞 鬲乇噩賲丕賳)鈥�
丕賱丿賵賱丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷鬲丨丿孬 毓賳賴丕 亘賵乇丿賷賵 賮賷 丿乇賵爻賴 賴匕賴 賴賷 丕賱丿賵賱丞 丕賱睾乇亘賷丞貙 匕丕鬲 禺氐賵氐賷丞 賮賷 賳卮兀鬲賴丕 賵鬲胤賵乇賴丕貙 賱賰賳賴丕 亘丕鬲鬲 鬲鬲禺匕 氐賮丞 丕賱賰賵賳賷丞貙 兀賵 氐賮丞 丕賱賰賱賷 丕賱噩丕賲毓. 賵賴賷 賱賲 鬲鬲禺匕 賴匕賴 丕賱氐賮丞 丕賱噩丕賲毓丞 鬲賱賯丕卅賷賸丕貙 亘賱 亘丕賱毓賳賮 兀爻丕爻賸丕. 賮丕賱丿賵賱丞 賴賷 丕丨鬲賰丕乇賹 賱賱毓賳賮 丕賱賲丕丿賷 賵丕賱乇賲夭賷 兀賵 丕賱丕毓鬲亘丕乇賷. 賵賴匕丕 丕賱丕丨鬲賰丕乇 賷賲賱賰賴 賲丨鬲賰乇貙 賵丕賱賲丨鬲賰賽乇 賴賵 賲賻賱賽賰賹 兀賵 爻賱丕賱丞 賲賱賰賷丞 兀賵 胤亘賯丞. 賵賱毓賱賲丕亍 丕噩鬲賲丕毓 丕賱丿賵賱丞 賲孬丕賱丕賳 賰賱丕爻賷賰賷丕賳 鬲賯賱賷丿賷丕賳貙 賰賱丕賴賲丕 兀賵乇賵亘賷貙 賮賷 賲丕 賷禺氐 賴匕丕 丕賱賲賵囟賵毓貙 賵賲賳賴賲丕 鬲鬲賵爻毓 丕賱丿乇丕爻丕鬲 賱鬲卮賲賱 兀賲賲賸丕 兀賵乇賵亘賷丞 兀禺乇賶 (賲賲賳 鬲賯賱丿鬲賴賲丕 賮賷 丕賱睾丕賱亘)貙 賮亘丨爻亘 亘賵乇丿賷賵 賲丕 禺賱賻賾賮賴 丕賱丕爻鬲毓賲丕乇貙 亘丕鬲 賲賷乇丕孬賳丕貙 賳乇孬賴 賵賷乇孬賳丕. 賴匕賴 丕賱丿賵賱貙 氐丕乇鬲 廿匕賸丕 丿賵賱賳丕 賵 賯賻丿賻乇賻賳丕 賵亘丕禺鬲氐丕乇 賲賴賲丕 賯丕賱 亘賵乇丿賷賵 毓賳 丕賱丿賵賱丞貙 爻賵爻賷賵賱賵噩賷賸丕貙 賮孬賲丞 賮賷 賰賱丕賲賴 賲丕 賴賵 賲丕賵乇丕卅賷貙 亘丕毓鬲亘丕乇賴 丕
592 pages, Kindle Edition
First published January 5, 2012
33 people are currently reading
480 people want to read
About the author
Pierre Bourdieu
343听books1,217听followersBourdieu pioneered investigative frameworks and terminologies such as cultural, social, and symbolic capital, and the concepts of habitus, field or location, and symbolic violence to reveal the dynamics of power relations in social life. His work emphasized the role of practice and embodiment or forms in social dynamics and worldview construction, often in opposition to universalized Western philosophical traditions. He built upon the theories of Ludwig Wittgenstein, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Edmund Husserl, Georges Canguilhem, Karl Marx, Gaston Bachelard, Max Weber, 脡mile Durkheim, Erwin Panofsky, and Marcel Mauss. A notable influence on Bourdieu was Blaise Pascal, after whom Bourdieu titled his Pascalian Meditations.
Bourdieu rejected the idea of the intellectual "prophet", or the "total intellectual", as embodied by Sartre. His best known book is Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, in which he argues that judgments of taste are related to social position. His argument is put forward by an original combination of social theory and data from surveys, photographs and interviews, in an attempt to reconcile difficulties such as how to understand the subject within objective structures. In the process, he tried to reconcile the influences of both external social structures and subjective experience on the individual (see structure and agency).
Bourdieu rejected the idea of the intellectual "prophet", or the "total intellectual", as embodied by Sartre. His best known book is Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, in which he argues that judgments of taste are related to social position. His argument is put forward by an original combination of social theory and data from surveys, photographs and interviews, in an attempt to reconcile difficulties such as how to understand the subject within objective structures. In the process, he tried to reconcile the influences of both external social structures and subjective experience on the individual (see structure and agency).
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews
February 10, 2016
These lectures delivered over 3 years at the College de France expose the state - and our abiding belief in it - as a 400-year old political fiction brought to life by its many agents through their collective acts done in the name of the state. If this sounds tautological, it is - the state exists because we act as if it does. Its power is dispersed through rituals and routines that may seem innocuous or inevitable - the calendar, geography, spelling, licenses, disciplines taught in school as discrete knowledges, housing practices, taxes - but that make its subjects serve it and those who have access to its symbolic capital. To read the state at this level (where it is brought into being in both long range and intimate day to day ways) requires Weber, Marx and Durkheim to bear.
November 8, 2021
Sempre que me debru莽o sobre Bourdieu chego 脿 mesma conclus茫o: se foi cedo demais. E essa s茅rie de aulas 茅 prova definitiva de qu茫o inteligente e complexo (sem tender ao complicado) o pensamento (sempre em movimento, diga-se de passagem) de Pierre Bourdieu sempre foi. Sobre o Estado 茅 mais do que uma cole莽茫o de palestras, 茅 uma chance de espiar o que ainda poderia ser caso o soci贸logo ainda estivesse vivo.
Leitura obrigat贸ria.
Leitura obrigat贸ria.
April 23, 2018
莽ok iyi.
Read
June 16, 20202014
Read
April 22, 2023sa f茅 reflexir
June 2, 2015
Bourdieu is a brilliant thinker, but a mediocre rhetorician. Most annoying are his slanderous remarks about Marxism. He caricatures the ideas of Marx to make his own seem more original. Classic example: he claims that the ideas of lawyers are products of their material struggle about power and influence, but you should not use the base/superstructure model to analyze this! (For the uninitiated: what Bourdieu describes here is an excellent illustration of the base/superstructure model, where the superstructure (culture, ideas, institutions) are constructed over a material base.)
September 23, 2015
While criticizing the conventional approaches to state including Weberian, institutional and particularly Marxist approaches; Bourdieu mainly addresses the ways of analysing the state and suggests an ethno- methodological approach as a way to analyse this 鈥渦nthinkable object鈥�. At least you have to ask anthropological, ethno methodological questions together with the global questions to have adequate questions on the state (p.171). State is primarily a legitimator.
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.