What do you think?
Rate this book
乇賯丞 丕賱匕卅丕亘
廿賳 "乇賯丞 丕賱匕卅丕亘" 毓亘丕乇丞 毓賳 賲夭賷噩 亘賵賱賷爻賶 鬲丕乇賷禺賶 賷丨鬲賵賶 毓賱賶 賯丿乇 賲賳 丕賱賲睾丕賲乇丞 丕賱鬲賯賱賷丿賷丞.
鬲賯丿賲 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 乇氐丿丕賸 賱爻賷丕爻丕鬲 丕賱丕丨鬲賰丕乇 丕賱廿賲亘乇賷丕賱賷丞 賵丕爻鬲睾賱丕賱 丕賱毓賲丕賱丞 亘卮賰賱 睾賷乇 廿賳爻丕賳賶 賱鬲丨賯賷賯 兀毓賱賶 賴賵丕賲卮 乇亘丨貙 賰賲丕 兀賱賯鬲 丕賱賲丐賱賮丞 丕賱囟賵亍 毓賱賶 賲噩賲賵毓丞 賲賳 丕賱胤乇賯 丕賱賲禺鬲賱賮丞 賱賱鬲賮賰賷乇 丕賱丕賯鬲氐丕丿賶 丕賱賵丕毓賶. 賵 鬲賯丿賲 兀賷囟丕 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賳賵毓 賲賳 兀賳賵丕毓 丕賱賲睾丕賲乇丞 賵丕賱鬲卮賵賷賯 丕賱鬲賶 鬲卮亘賴 廿賱賶 丨丿 賰亘賷乇 賯氐氐 丕賱睾乇亘 丕賱兀賲乇賷賰賶 丕賱鬲賶 賷爻丕賮乇 賮賷賴丕 丕賱亘胤賱 賱賱亘丨孬 毓賳 丕賱孬乇賵丞 賵丕賱賲丕賱貙 賰賲丕 賯丿賲鬲 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 兀賷囟丕賸 賵氐賮丕賸 賲鬲賰丕賲賱丕賸 賱賱胤亘賷毓丞 丕賱噩睾乇丕賮賷丞 丕賱禺丕氐丞 亘丕賱孬賱賵噩 賵丕賱亘乇丿.
賷匕賰乇 兀賳 "乇賯丞 丕賱匕卅丕亘" 賴賶 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 丕賱兀賵賱賶 賱賭"爻鬲賷賮 亘賷賳賶"貙 賵賯丿 丕爻鬲睾乇賯鬲 賮賶 賰鬲丕亘鬲賴丕 丨賵丕賱賶 毓賲賷賳 賵賳氐賮 丕賱毓丕賲 賵丨丕夭鬲 毓賳賴丕 毓賱賶 噩丕卅夭丞 賰賵爻鬲丕 賵賴賶 兀丨丿 丕賱噩賵丕卅夭 丕賱賰亘乇賶 賮賶 亘乇賷胤丕賳賷丕 賵兀賷乇賱賳丿丕 亘毓丿 噩丕卅夭丞 丕賱賲丕賳 亘賵賰乇.
賵鬲毓賲賱 "亘賷賳賶" 賮賶 丕賱兀爻丕爻 賰賲禺乇噩丞 爻賷賳賲丕卅賷丞 丨賷孬 丿乇爻鬲 氐賳丕毓丞 丕賱兀賮賱丕賲 亘賰賱賷丞 丕賱賮賳賵賳 賮賶 噩丕賲毓丞 亘賵乇賳賲賵孬貙 賵兀禺乇噩鬲 丕賱毓丿賷丿 賲賳 丕賱兀賮賱丕賲 丕賱賯氐賷乇丞
鬲賯丿賲 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 乇氐丿丕賸 賱爻賷丕爻丕鬲 丕賱丕丨鬲賰丕乇 丕賱廿賲亘乇賷丕賱賷丞 賵丕爻鬲睾賱丕賱 丕賱毓賲丕賱丞 亘卮賰賱 睾賷乇 廿賳爻丕賳賶 賱鬲丨賯賷賯 兀毓賱賶 賴賵丕賲卮 乇亘丨貙 賰賲丕 兀賱賯鬲 丕賱賲丐賱賮丞 丕賱囟賵亍 毓賱賶 賲噩賲賵毓丞 賲賳 丕賱胤乇賯 丕賱賲禺鬲賱賮丞 賱賱鬲賮賰賷乇 丕賱丕賯鬲氐丕丿賶 丕賱賵丕毓賶. 賵 鬲賯丿賲 兀賷囟丕 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賳賵毓 賲賳 兀賳賵丕毓 丕賱賲睾丕賲乇丞 賵丕賱鬲卮賵賷賯 丕賱鬲賶 鬲卮亘賴 廿賱賶 丨丿 賰亘賷乇 賯氐氐 丕賱睾乇亘 丕賱兀賲乇賷賰賶 丕賱鬲賶 賷爻丕賮乇 賮賷賴丕 丕賱亘胤賱 賱賱亘丨孬 毓賳 丕賱孬乇賵丞 賵丕賱賲丕賱貙 賰賲丕 賯丿賲鬲 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 兀賷囟丕賸 賵氐賮丕賸 賲鬲賰丕賲賱丕賸 賱賱胤亘賷毓丞 丕賱噩睾乇丕賮賷丞 丕賱禺丕氐丞 亘丕賱孬賱賵噩 賵丕賱亘乇丿.
賷匕賰乇 兀賳 "乇賯丞 丕賱匕卅丕亘" 賴賶 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 丕賱兀賵賱賶 賱賭"爻鬲賷賮 亘賷賳賶"貙 賵賯丿 丕爻鬲睾乇賯鬲 賮賶 賰鬲丕亘鬲賴丕 丨賵丕賱賶 毓賲賷賳 賵賳氐賮 丕賱毓丕賲 賵丨丕夭鬲 毓賳賴丕 毓賱賶 噩丕卅夭丞 賰賵爻鬲丕 賵賴賶 兀丨丿 丕賱噩賵丕卅夭 丕賱賰亘乇賶 賮賶 亘乇賷胤丕賳賷丕 賵兀賷乇賱賳丿丕 亘毓丿 噩丕卅夭丞 丕賱賲丕賳 亘賵賰乇.
賵鬲毓賲賱 "亘賷賳賶" 賮賶 丕賱兀爻丕爻 賰賲禺乇噩丞 爻賷賳賲丕卅賷丞 丨賷孬 丿乇爻鬲 氐賳丕毓丞 丕賱兀賮賱丕賲 亘賰賱賷丞 丕賱賮賳賵賳 賮賶 噩丕賲毓丞 亘賵乇賳賲賵孬貙 賵兀禺乇噩鬲 丕賱毓丿賷丿 賲賳 丕賱兀賮賱丕賲 丕賱賯氐賷乇丞
474 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2006
629 people are currently reading
8378 people want to read
About the author
Stef Penney
10听books315听followersStef Penney grew up in the Scottish capital and turned to film-making after a degree in Philosophy and Theology from Bristol University. She made three short films before studying Film and TV at Bournemouth College of Art, and on graduation was selected for the Carlton Television New Writers Scheme. She has also written and directed two short films; a BBC 10 x 10 starring Anna Friel and a Film Council Digital Short in 2002 starring Lucy Russell.
She won the 2006 Costa Book Awards with her debut novel The Tenderness of Wolves which is set in Canada in the 1860s. As Stef Penney suffered from agoraphobia at the time of writing this novel, she did all the research in the libraries of London and never visited Canada.
-Wikipedia
She won the 2006 Costa Book Awards with her debut novel The Tenderness of Wolves which is set in Canada in the 1860s. As Stef Penney suffered from agoraphobia at the time of writing this novel, she did all the research in the libraries of London and never visited Canada.
-Wikipedia
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,850 reviews
May 12, 2020
Wilderness
What makes The Tenderness of Wolves a memorable story is the location, the desolate snow-covered wilds of Canada in the late 1860s. An unforgiving time when settlers and native Indians sought to live off the land and often suspicious of each other. The fur trappers and the Hudson Bay Company were at the heart of all trade and their power and influence were extensive and decisive.
When a trapper Laurent Jammet is murdered, Francis Ross disappears into the frozen wilderness and makes himself the prime suspect. Francis鈥� mother convinced of his innocence sets off with William Parker, a half-Indian tracker, to find her son and prove his innocence. Tantalisingly Parker is also a suspect! This is an intriguing whodunit with several characters that we're not quite sure of their motives or hidden agendas. The story provides a compelling mystery full of suspense and that air of threat if only you knew which direction it was coming from.
The multiple threads weave together in a captivating plot that is subtly developed. A plot which deals with a murderer on the loose, corruption, local politics, settlement issues, and the different guises of love interests and sexual desire.
This is a magical book and created beautiful vivid imagery of a harsh but extremely beautiful country. The cold and fragility of life seeped into my skin and I imagined how difficult settlers鈥� lives were. What makes this more remarkable is that Stef Penney achieved this without ever visiting Northern Canada and received criticism as a consequence. Hmmm. That's what writers do.
I thoroughly enjoyed this book and would recommend it. I also have to say, I love the title.
What makes The Tenderness of Wolves a memorable story is the location, the desolate snow-covered wilds of Canada in the late 1860s. An unforgiving time when settlers and native Indians sought to live off the land and often suspicious of each other. The fur trappers and the Hudson Bay Company were at the heart of all trade and their power and influence were extensive and decisive.
When a trapper Laurent Jammet is murdered, Francis Ross disappears into the frozen wilderness and makes himself the prime suspect. Francis鈥� mother convinced of his innocence sets off with William Parker, a half-Indian tracker, to find her son and prove his innocence. Tantalisingly Parker is also a suspect! This is an intriguing whodunit with several characters that we're not quite sure of their motives or hidden agendas. The story provides a compelling mystery full of suspense and that air of threat if only you knew which direction it was coming from.
The multiple threads weave together in a captivating plot that is subtly developed. A plot which deals with a murderer on the loose, corruption, local politics, settlement issues, and the different guises of love interests and sexual desire.
This is a magical book and created beautiful vivid imagery of a harsh but extremely beautiful country. The cold and fragility of life seeped into my skin and I imagined how difficult settlers鈥� lives were. What makes this more remarkable is that Stef Penney achieved this without ever visiting Northern Canada and received criticism as a consequence. Hmmm. That's what writers do.
I thoroughly enjoyed this book and would recommend it. I also have to say, I love the title.
February 8, 2011
Sometimes insightful remarks are made which are so reductive they have the power to diminish life even as they explain it. In 1939 explained in a lecture at Columbia University: "We have a name in the studio, and we call it the 'MacGuffin.' It is the mechanical element that usually crops up in any story. In crook stories it is almost always the necklace and in spy stories it is most always the papers." Wikipedia elaborates:
A MacGuffin is a plot device that motivates the characters or advances the story, but the details of which are of little or no importance otherwise. The element that distinguishes a MacGuffin from other types of plot devices is that it is not important what the object specifically is. Anything that serves as a motivation will do.
This is one of the principal reasons why spy and "mystery" novels bore the living bejesus out of me, and alas, when I realised "The Tenderness of Wolves" was not, in fact, a cookery book as I had been led to believe, I found it was a "mystery" novel, a stone whodunnit in fact. The victim is murdered because of the big fat MacGuffin which in this book takes the form of a bone tablet which some guys think is valuable because it may indicate there once was a literate Indian society. So in this book people do a lot of following trails, which as this book takes place in the Frozen North are actual footprints in the snow. I won't give the ending away, but they do so much tracking they almost find the Woozle.
I liked the chaotic flailing about which takes up most of the plot, it reminded me of two great Coen Brothers movies, Blood Simple and Fargo. But enjoying the bafflement of others only takes you so far.
The other thing which bugged me about this book was The Historical Present. It's weird enough when authors write in the first person past tense but you can suspend enough disbelief and imagine (if the self-consciousness of reading imaginary narratives ever surfaces) that you are hearing a perfect recollection by the narrator. The Historical Present smashes this conceit. "I am not gentle but he makes no sound as I clean the wounds with rubbing alcohol. He has his eyes shut. From the corner of my eye Parker seems to be watching us..." That kind of thing. It's a strange idea - instead of the perfect recollection the perfect real-time self-description like you are on an advanced driving test - "Describe your observations Mr Bryant" "In my rear view mirror I see a black Fiat Punto with a blond male driver and a woman with a leopardskin coat, can't see if it's fake fur but I am assuming so; now I am making a left turn into Cold Potato Street, avoiding the cyclist who has large earrings and is weaving slightly as his panniers are overfilled".
And finally - this book was famously written by a woman who suffered so much from agrophobia that she did not leave a wooden box measuring three feet by six feet by ten feet for over two years. So the book was written entirely out of research and imagination (she would poke her arm out of the box and friends would place interesting articles about Ancient Canada into her open hand). I like this idea a lot because after all, fiction is made up, and I have little time for autobiographical coming of age novels (except for Edmund White). However - if I look at the author blurb and I see "John Weebblebeeble has been a lecturer at the Creative Writing School of the University of Do As You like, Minnesota for 37 years" or I see "John Weeblebeeble has been employed variously as a prizefighter, royal embroiderer, catamite, chef on board a nuclear submarine and private detective; John was born Stephanie MacGuffin and transgendered at the age of 31. He now lives in a community for the blind and limbless in Katmandu" - I kind of get the notion that the latter's interesting experiences will make the better writer. Literature proves this prejudice nonsense, but it lingers.
A MacGuffin is a plot device that motivates the characters or advances the story, but the details of which are of little or no importance otherwise. The element that distinguishes a MacGuffin from other types of plot devices is that it is not important what the object specifically is. Anything that serves as a motivation will do.
This is one of the principal reasons why spy and "mystery" novels bore the living bejesus out of me, and alas, when I realised "The Tenderness of Wolves" was not, in fact, a cookery book as I had been led to believe, I found it was a "mystery" novel, a stone whodunnit in fact. The victim is murdered because of the big fat MacGuffin which in this book takes the form of a bone tablet which some guys think is valuable because it may indicate there once was a literate Indian society. So in this book people do a lot of following trails, which as this book takes place in the Frozen North are actual footprints in the snow. I won't give the ending away, but they do so much tracking they almost find the Woozle.
I liked the chaotic flailing about which takes up most of the plot, it reminded me of two great Coen Brothers movies, Blood Simple and Fargo. But enjoying the bafflement of others only takes you so far.
The other thing which bugged me about this book was The Historical Present. It's weird enough when authors write in the first person past tense but you can suspend enough disbelief and imagine (if the self-consciousness of reading imaginary narratives ever surfaces) that you are hearing a perfect recollection by the narrator. The Historical Present smashes this conceit. "I am not gentle but he makes no sound as I clean the wounds with rubbing alcohol. He has his eyes shut. From the corner of my eye Parker seems to be watching us..." That kind of thing. It's a strange idea - instead of the perfect recollection the perfect real-time self-description like you are on an advanced driving test - "Describe your observations Mr Bryant" "In my rear view mirror I see a black Fiat Punto with a blond male driver and a woman with a leopardskin coat, can't see if it's fake fur but I am assuming so; now I am making a left turn into Cold Potato Street, avoiding the cyclist who has large earrings and is weaving slightly as his panniers are overfilled".
And finally - this book was famously written by a woman who suffered so much from agrophobia that she did not leave a wooden box measuring three feet by six feet by ten feet for over two years. So the book was written entirely out of research and imagination (she would poke her arm out of the box and friends would place interesting articles about Ancient Canada into her open hand). I like this idea a lot because after all, fiction is made up, and I have little time for autobiographical coming of age novels (except for Edmund White). However - if I look at the author blurb and I see "John Weebblebeeble has been a lecturer at the Creative Writing School of the University of Do As You like, Minnesota for 37 years" or I see "John Weeblebeeble has been employed variously as a prizefighter, royal embroiderer, catamite, chef on board a nuclear submarine and private detective; John was born Stephanie MacGuffin and transgendered at the age of 31. He now lives in a community for the blind and limbless in Katmandu" - I kind of get the notion that the latter's interesting experiences will make the better writer. Literature proves this prejudice nonsense, but it lingers.
August 22, 2021
鈥楾he Tenderness of Wolves鈥� by Stef Penney won the 2006 Costa Book of the Year award, formerly known as the Whitbread Book Awards. This award recognizes English language writers from Britain and Ireland. According to Wikipedia, the book should have literary merit but also be enjoyable to read. That seems to describe this book perfectly. Penney鈥檚 debut novel has firm roots in the soil of lush language, especially in describing the wintery landscape of Canada, but it doesn鈥檛 neglect readers of popular fiction. With a murder mystery at its heart, the pages were, for me, a page turning marvel. I鈥檝e been in a reading slump for a while, and it was beyond nice, to at last, get my hands on a book that provided an impetus to keep turning pages.
Mrs. Ross needs to find out who murdered Laurent Jammet, because her seventeen-year-old son, Francis, who disappeared the night of the murder, stands accused. Written from the first person point of view, it is her perspective that I find most interesting. Penney, suffering from agoraphobia, during the writing of the novel, chooses a liberating adventure for her main character. Mrs. Ross comes across as a person one does not easily warms up to; distant. Unhappy, closed-off, she nevertheless has a lively intellect and pointed opinions. Mrs. Ross is honest with herself about her feelings when she decides to go after her son. She is 鈥渟cared to death.鈥� Leaving behind the husband who searched for their son at his favorite fishing spot and came home without him, she dares to face her fears.
Secondary characters are so vivid in this tale that it鈥檚 difficult to call them secondary. Each carries a message, a specific importance. Most vivid to me is William Parker, a half breed man whose appearance Mrs. Ross likens to that of 鈥楩rankenstein鈥� in Mary Shelley鈥檚 work.
鈥淏ut it is his face that makes me think of the story of the artificial man. He has a low, broad forehead, high cheekbones, and a nose and mouth that turn downward like a raptor鈥檚 beak and give a powerful impression of wildness and cruelty.鈥�
Mrs. Ross鈥檚 opinions of William Parker will be challenged. He is representative of the wolf and of the nature of a world in which Mrs. Ross has not participated. The 1860s landscape of northern Canada provides a brilliant backdrop for these fascinating characters. Greed, honor, reputation, and clarity of vision and purpose are themes. Penney closes out the novel with thematic images of 鈥榬eturning鈥� which is to say bittersweet and also brilliant.
Mrs. Ross needs to find out who murdered Laurent Jammet, because her seventeen-year-old son, Francis, who disappeared the night of the murder, stands accused. Written from the first person point of view, it is her perspective that I find most interesting. Penney, suffering from agoraphobia, during the writing of the novel, chooses a liberating adventure for her main character. Mrs. Ross comes across as a person one does not easily warms up to; distant. Unhappy, closed-off, she nevertheless has a lively intellect and pointed opinions. Mrs. Ross is honest with herself about her feelings when she decides to go after her son. She is 鈥渟cared to death.鈥� Leaving behind the husband who searched for their son at his favorite fishing spot and came home without him, she dares to face her fears.
Secondary characters are so vivid in this tale that it鈥檚 difficult to call them secondary. Each carries a message, a specific importance. Most vivid to me is William Parker, a half breed man whose appearance Mrs. Ross likens to that of 鈥楩rankenstein鈥� in Mary Shelley鈥檚 work.
鈥淏ut it is his face that makes me think of the story of the artificial man. He has a low, broad forehead, high cheekbones, and a nose and mouth that turn downward like a raptor鈥檚 beak and give a powerful impression of wildness and cruelty.鈥�
Mrs. Ross鈥檚 opinions of William Parker will be challenged. He is representative of the wolf and of the nature of a world in which Mrs. Ross has not participated. The 1860s landscape of northern Canada provides a brilliant backdrop for these fascinating characters. Greed, honor, reputation, and clarity of vision and purpose are themes. Penney closes out the novel with thematic images of 鈥榬eturning鈥� which is to say bittersweet and also brilliant.
December 13, 2007
For what it's worth, this is the first book I've read since I joined 欧宝娱乐 to which I've given five stars. So, at the risk of gushing, I'm telling you to run, don't walk, to reserve this at your local library or buy it.
The setting is the 1860s in Canada, where the small community of Caulfield and cabins strung along the Dove River sit at the edge of the great North Woods. The book opens with the murder of French-Canadian trapper, and that event unlocks several intertwined subplots among the people who live in this wintry landscape, dominated by the Hudson Bay Company.
The sharp description of the landscape and lives of European settlers and Indians alike is all the more remarkable because Stef Penney was agoraphobic when she wrote this and was unable to visit the scene of her novel, instead doing all of her research from the safe womb of the British Library.
This is also much more than a mystery, with finely drawn human portraits, stories of forbidden love and heartbreaking loss, all set in a time and place that is vividly evoked. If it were possible, I'd coin the term histery for this amalgam.
When the trapper is found dead in his cabin, a young man, Francis Ross, also disappears and is the first suspect. His father hunts for him briefly, but after he returns home empty-handed, Francis' mother is determined to search for him herself, and to her own surprise, she ends up going off secretly with a man named William Parker who is half-Indian and who has just escaped from official custody as a suspect in the murder.
The killing is the biggest sensation in the community since the disapperance several years earlier of two girls, who some feel died in the woods and were eaten by wolves, a story none of the experienced woodspeople believe, and a chapter of history that will make an eerie reappearance as the novel progresses.
Penney is a screenwriter by trade, and part of the sheer enjoyment of this book is the movie-like pacing, with short chapters weaving expertly back and forth between three and four subplots (I'd be surprised if this isn't made into a movie at some point). Mixed into this cast of characters is a venal and paranoid Hudson Bay official, a utopian settlement of Norwegian Christians deep in the woods, a charismatic but troubled Hudson Bay officer who lives deep in the forest, a new Company employee who is trying to prove himself and trying to decide which woman he loves, and the mysterious man that young Francis Ross saw and followed after the murder.
Penney's gift for language also elevates this above many a plot-driven mystery. At one point, she describes a narrow-minded resident of the village this way: "She considers herself a well-traveled woman, and from each place she has been to, she has brought away a prejudice as a souvenir."
Or this landscape description: "As suddenly as a smile, the sun causes beauty to break out on this sullen plain. Beyond the pallisade lies a perfect landscape, like a sculpture carved in salt, crystalline and pure. Meanwhile we trudge through roiled slush and dirt, trampled and stained with the effluent of dogs."
And near the end of the book, a description of the son's recuperation: "It has been weeks that he has lain up in the white room, his muscles softening and his skin growing pale like rhubarb under a pot."
A page turner with bonuses. You can't ask for more.
The setting is the 1860s in Canada, where the small community of Caulfield and cabins strung along the Dove River sit at the edge of the great North Woods. The book opens with the murder of French-Canadian trapper, and that event unlocks several intertwined subplots among the people who live in this wintry landscape, dominated by the Hudson Bay Company.
The sharp description of the landscape and lives of European settlers and Indians alike is all the more remarkable because Stef Penney was agoraphobic when she wrote this and was unable to visit the scene of her novel, instead doing all of her research from the safe womb of the British Library.
This is also much more than a mystery, with finely drawn human portraits, stories of forbidden love and heartbreaking loss, all set in a time and place that is vividly evoked. If it were possible, I'd coin the term histery for this amalgam.
When the trapper is found dead in his cabin, a young man, Francis Ross, also disappears and is the first suspect. His father hunts for him briefly, but after he returns home empty-handed, Francis' mother is determined to search for him herself, and to her own surprise, she ends up going off secretly with a man named William Parker who is half-Indian and who has just escaped from official custody as a suspect in the murder.
The killing is the biggest sensation in the community since the disapperance several years earlier of two girls, who some feel died in the woods and were eaten by wolves, a story none of the experienced woodspeople believe, and a chapter of history that will make an eerie reappearance as the novel progresses.
Penney is a screenwriter by trade, and part of the sheer enjoyment of this book is the movie-like pacing, with short chapters weaving expertly back and forth between three and four subplots (I'd be surprised if this isn't made into a movie at some point). Mixed into this cast of characters is a venal and paranoid Hudson Bay official, a utopian settlement of Norwegian Christians deep in the woods, a charismatic but troubled Hudson Bay officer who lives deep in the forest, a new Company employee who is trying to prove himself and trying to decide which woman he loves, and the mysterious man that young Francis Ross saw and followed after the murder.
Penney's gift for language also elevates this above many a plot-driven mystery. At one point, she describes a narrow-minded resident of the village this way: "She considers herself a well-traveled woman, and from each place she has been to, she has brought away a prejudice as a souvenir."
Or this landscape description: "As suddenly as a smile, the sun causes beauty to break out on this sullen plain. Beyond the pallisade lies a perfect landscape, like a sculpture carved in salt, crystalline and pure. Meanwhile we trudge through roiled slush and dirt, trampled and stained with the effluent of dogs."
And near the end of the book, a description of the son's recuperation: "It has been weeks that he has lain up in the white room, his muscles softening and his skin growing pale like rhubarb under a pot."
A page turner with bonuses. You can't ask for more.
August 1, 2008
This book is directed at readers rather than thinkers. I can understand why people like it because there are plenty of wonderfully crafted moments, but the novel lacks focus and depth. I've read a few reviews that ooh and aah over the fact that it's a murder mystery wrapped in a love story hog-tied to a western deep fried in good ol fashioned wilderness tale, but I've always felt that genre divisions are a crutch for people who need the books they read to conform to a series of prearranged attributes.
However, what people take away from a novel (or any work of art), as well as the baggage they bring, isn't something the author can be held accountable for. Though Stef Penney was obviously writing for a target audience based on her experience as a screenwriter (I don't like it when I can see the machinery turning), nearly every other review I've read drags in aspects of her personal life, giving them a disproportionate weight that colors one's appreciation of the narrative. The kind of gossip useless to any serious literary discussion.
Aside from the pockets of wonderful writing scattered throughout, what I liked about this novel was the title. Wolves generally rank above snakes but below mice on the Wheel of Tenderness, but I liked the attempt to turn our thinking around. Those of you with access to the discovery channel know that wolves mate for life (a...), but that their lives are determined mainly by a constant struggle for physical dominance within the pack. Food is always scarce; most packs can only support one litter of cubs and any youngsters that don't belong to the pair at the top are killed out of hand, and even for mature wolves their main predators remain other wolf packs. If there is a tenderness of wolves it is characterized by a vicious, selective intensity focused ultimately on survival. Draw whatever parallels you please between the previous statement and people you know and love, or substitute wilderness for wolves.
Where the novel runs aground is the arbitrarily neat division into four sections. Not only do they break the flow of the story, they feel forced, as if Penney was already thinking about where to insert the commercial breaks. At the beginning of 'Fields of Heaven' Penney introduces a number of minor characters that, while well-drawn, don't add anything to the novel, or contribute to it's resolution. Everyone in Himmelvanger is background noise except for Line, who didn't serve any real purpose aside from informing Angus at the end about his wife and son (simultaneously robbing the reader of a scene where Angus comes across his wife with Parker ). At the same time, all of the conflict built up in the first section between Knox, McKinley, and Sturrock is set aside and ultimately left unexplored like so many other plot threads. Sturrock and Marie in particular get robbed in this book; after building them up in the beginning, they spend the rest of the novel literally sitting around.
Overall this book confused me, and not in a tantalizing way. I felt jerked around, as though Penney had started to say something, changed her mind, and then sprung mid-sentence in a completely different direction.
However, what people take away from a novel (or any work of art), as well as the baggage they bring, isn't something the author can be held accountable for. Though Stef Penney was obviously writing for a target audience based on her experience as a screenwriter (I don't like it when I can see the machinery turning), nearly every other review I've read drags in aspects of her personal life, giving them a disproportionate weight that colors one's appreciation of the narrative. The kind of gossip useless to any serious literary discussion.
Aside from the pockets of wonderful writing scattered throughout, what I liked about this novel was the title. Wolves generally rank above snakes but below mice on the Wheel of Tenderness, but I liked the attempt to turn our thinking around. Those of you with access to the discovery channel know that wolves mate for life (a...), but that their lives are determined mainly by a constant struggle for physical dominance within the pack. Food is always scarce; most packs can only support one litter of cubs and any youngsters that don't belong to the pair at the top are killed out of hand, and even for mature wolves their main predators remain other wolf packs. If there is a tenderness of wolves it is characterized by a vicious, selective intensity focused ultimately on survival. Draw whatever parallels you please between the previous statement and people you know and love, or substitute wilderness for wolves.
Where the novel runs aground is the arbitrarily neat division into four sections. Not only do they break the flow of the story, they feel forced, as if Penney was already thinking about where to insert the commercial breaks. At the beginning of 'Fields of Heaven' Penney introduces a number of minor characters that, while well-drawn, don't add anything to the novel, or contribute to it's resolution. Everyone in Himmelvanger is background noise except for Line, who didn't serve any real purpose aside from informing Angus at the end about his wife and son (simultaneously robbing the reader of a scene where Angus comes across his wife with Parker ). At the same time, all of the conflict built up in the first section between Knox, McKinley, and Sturrock is set aside and ultimately left unexplored like so many other plot threads. Sturrock and Marie in particular get robbed in this book; after building them up in the beginning, they spend the rest of the novel literally sitting around.
Overall this book confused me, and not in a tantalizing way. I felt jerked around, as though Penney had started to say something, changed her mind, and then sprung mid-sentence in a completely different direction.
April 11, 2021
Something about the title of the book had attracted my attention. We do not assign any qualities remotely resembling 鈥渢enderness鈥� to wolves! The extract of the review from People on the cover page further piqued my curiosity. What was so special about the said review? I quote it verbatim for you, dear reader: 鈥淭hink Cold Mountain 鈥� only colder....
Mystery, romance, and really
bad weather 鈥� just try putting this one down.鈥�
Now, such a comparison with which is a wonderful novel would surely grab a reader鈥檚 attention. Finally the blurb made me buy this book.
This debut novel takes us back in time to 1867. The events unfold in a tiny isolated settlement in Northern Territory, Canada. The protagonist 鈥� the plucky Mrs. Ross discovers a murder and sets in motion the story. Mrs. Ross鈥檚 adopted son would disappear and naturally emerge as the prime suspect. She, in defiance of social conventions and regards for her own safety, would embark on a perilous journey into the Canadian tundra with a 鈥渉alf-breed Native American trapper鈥� who himself was a suspect in the said murder.
I won鈥檛 delve much into the story or the individual characters, but share my observations and experience with the book. I must say that for a debut novel this novel is quite ambitious in its scope. A murder mystery is at the heart of the story, but the author has attempted to explore a diverse range of themes 鈥� the life of immigrants, gender roles, racial tensions, commercial domination, sexuality, marriage, love and religious dogma. Many of the characters were well fleshed out and the description of the vast tundra was commendable. The author has also tried to use foreshadowing in the narrative and done a pretty good job.
There was also a mention of a relic belonging to a 鈥渇orgotten Native American culture鈥� , but that point was not elaborated upon. The relic only played the role of a catalyst. I don鈥檛 know 鈥� maybe the author could have fleshed out this aspect a bit more. I certainly understand the limitations also.
One interesting point about the narration was that only Mrs. Ross had a first person point of view, the rest all had a third person narration. Did I tell you that during the entire length of the novel, we don鈥檛 get to hear the protagonist鈥檚 first name! The whole world calls her Mrs. Ross.
For a debut novel, I do appreciate the efforts of the author. However, weaving so many themes in one story is not an easy task. At times, these acted liked digressions from the main plot. As for comparison with Cold Mountain, in my humble opinion, let us not go for any such comparisons. But, as a novel, I think Charles Frazier did a much better job with his Cold Mountain. Having said this, we should also keep in mind that this book was a debut novel.
The discussion guide and author interview at the end of the book would shed more light on the author鈥檚 intentions.
Overall, a decent read. The book had the potential to be a lot more. I would like to explore more of the author鈥檚 works if I come across them during my book hunts in used book stores.
Mystery, romance, and really
bad weather 鈥� just try putting this one down.鈥�
Now, such a comparison with which is a wonderful novel would surely grab a reader鈥檚 attention. Finally the blurb made me buy this book.
This debut novel takes us back in time to 1867. The events unfold in a tiny isolated settlement in Northern Territory, Canada. The protagonist 鈥� the plucky Mrs. Ross discovers a murder and sets in motion the story. Mrs. Ross鈥檚 adopted son would disappear and naturally emerge as the prime suspect. She, in defiance of social conventions and regards for her own safety, would embark on a perilous journey into the Canadian tundra with a 鈥渉alf-breed Native American trapper鈥� who himself was a suspect in the said murder.
I won鈥檛 delve much into the story or the individual characters, but share my observations and experience with the book. I must say that for a debut novel this novel is quite ambitious in its scope. A murder mystery is at the heart of the story, but the author has attempted to explore a diverse range of themes 鈥� the life of immigrants, gender roles, racial tensions, commercial domination, sexuality, marriage, love and religious dogma. Many of the characters were well fleshed out and the description of the vast tundra was commendable. The author has also tried to use foreshadowing in the narrative and done a pretty good job.
There was also a mention of a relic belonging to a 鈥渇orgotten Native American culture鈥� , but that point was not elaborated upon. The relic only played the role of a catalyst. I don鈥檛 know 鈥� maybe the author could have fleshed out this aspect a bit more. I certainly understand the limitations also.
One interesting point about the narration was that only Mrs. Ross had a first person point of view, the rest all had a third person narration. Did I tell you that during the entire length of the novel, we don鈥檛 get to hear the protagonist鈥檚 first name! The whole world calls her Mrs. Ross.
For a debut novel, I do appreciate the efforts of the author. However, weaving so many themes in one story is not an easy task. At times, these acted liked digressions from the main plot. As for comparison with Cold Mountain, in my humble opinion, let us not go for any such comparisons. But, as a novel, I think Charles Frazier did a much better job with his Cold Mountain. Having said this, we should also keep in mind that this book was a debut novel.
The discussion guide and author interview at the end of the book would shed more light on the author鈥檚 intentions.
Overall, a decent read. The book had the potential to be a lot more. I would like to explore more of the author鈥檚 works if I come across them during my book hunts in used book stores.
February 11, 2022
"Ori de cate ori melancolia pune stapanire pe mine, lucru frecvent de-o vreme incoace, imi impun sa-mi aduc aminte ca el tremura cand ma atingea, ca am fost candva muza cuiva."
O carte superba care a devenit, fara efort, una dintre preferatele mele. Imi place foarte mult si titlul original, "The tenderness of wolves", iar dupa ce o terminam, daca ne gandim ca este romanul de debut al autorului, ajungem la concluzia ca este o carte absolut remarcabila.
Intr-o comunitate izolata de imigranti din nordul Canadei, numita Dove River, un negustor de blanuri francez este gasit mort. Coincidenta face ca tocmai in acea zi si vecinul sau, Francis Ross, un baiat tanar, dispare fara urma. Banuiala cade asupra sa, mai ales ca era vazut des in tovarasia strainului.
Crima este cercetata de reprezentantul Companiei Hudson Bay, tanarul si naivul Donald Moody si de fostul magistrat Knox care are o drama in trecutul familei sale.
Batranul si excentricul Thomas Surrok vine si el in Dove River, cand aude de moartea negustorului, fiind interesat de o placuta cu tot felul de semne necunoscute, care ar putea fi valoroasa din punct de vedere arheologic.
Cand vanatorul William Parker ajunge si el in asezamant si este gasit in jurul cabanei mortului va fi considerat suspect, mai ales ca are origini indiene si mortul fusese scalpat. Mama lui Francis Ross reuseste sa-l convinga sa plece impreuna cu ea pe urmele baiatului ei, fiind sigura ca enigmaticul vanator reprezinta singura ei sansa de a demonstra nevinovatia baiatului. Curand va afla ca vanatorul este singura ei sansa si de a cunoaste iubirea adevarata. Va fi cucerita de tandretea acestui 'lup salbatic'.
Romanul este absolut superb prin descrierile minunate ale tinutului vitreg si inghetat, al vantului si conditiilor aspre. Adesea calatoria celor doi este insotita de urletele feroce ale lupilor, de frigul crancen, de albul orbitor al peisajului si de perfectiunea fulgilor de zapada.
Pe langa faptul ca prezinta, din punct de vedere istoric, intemeierea acestor asezaminte in nordul Canadei de catre imigranti din Scotia, este si un roman politist in care doamna Ross este detectivul, plecand pe urmele baiatului ei si punand indiciile cap la cap alaturi de inexperimentatul dar corectul Donald Moody.
Nu in ultimul rand este si un roman de dragoste prin sentimentele care se infiripa intre doamna Ross si William Parker. Acestea sunt retinute in concordanta cu peisajul glacial dar cititorul realizeaza ca ele mocnesc inauntrul lor si sunt foarte puternice. Mi-a placut foarte mult ce gandeste ea despre el: "Ma gandesc, fireste, la Parker, iar cand dorm, il visez. Si stiu macar atat: si el se gandeste la mine. [...] Iubire. Magnet. Adevaratul meu nord. Ma intorc mereu spre el." Este asadar o iubire nemarturisita dar pe care amandoi o simt si o stiu si pentru care nici nu sunt necesare cuvintele rostite.
In incheiere va recomand romanul pentru ca are foarte multa personalitate si fler si pentru ca o sa indragiti majoritatea personajelor, avand pe alocuri chiar un aer de Jack London.
Atasez cateva citate pe care le-am cules si care merita retinute:
"Si uneori te trezesti privindu-ti sotul si intrebandu-te: este el barbatul necomplicat care crezi ca este - cel care castiga painea, prieten, povestitor de glume slabe care te fac oricum sa zambesti - sau are si el adancuri pe care nu le-ai vazut niciodata? De ce anume n-ar fi in stare?"
"Dar, asa cum am constatat atat de des in viata, lucrurile dupa care tanjesti cu adevarat te ocolesc."
"Simplul fapt ca-ti place de un om nu inseamna ca poti avea incredere in el."
"Presupun ca, daca ai pierdut deja ceea ce ai mai scump, lucrurile marunte precum reputatia si onoarea isi pierd si ele din stralucire."
O carte superba care a devenit, fara efort, una dintre preferatele mele. Imi place foarte mult si titlul original, "The tenderness of wolves", iar dupa ce o terminam, daca ne gandim ca este romanul de debut al autorului, ajungem la concluzia ca este o carte absolut remarcabila.
Intr-o comunitate izolata de imigranti din nordul Canadei, numita Dove River, un negustor de blanuri francez este gasit mort. Coincidenta face ca tocmai in acea zi si vecinul sau, Francis Ross, un baiat tanar, dispare fara urma. Banuiala cade asupra sa, mai ales ca era vazut des in tovarasia strainului.
Crima este cercetata de reprezentantul Companiei Hudson Bay, tanarul si naivul Donald Moody si de fostul magistrat Knox care are o drama in trecutul familei sale.
Batranul si excentricul Thomas Surrok vine si el in Dove River, cand aude de moartea negustorului, fiind interesat de o placuta cu tot felul de semne necunoscute, care ar putea fi valoroasa din punct de vedere arheologic.
Cand vanatorul William Parker ajunge si el in asezamant si este gasit in jurul cabanei mortului va fi considerat suspect, mai ales ca are origini indiene si mortul fusese scalpat. Mama lui Francis Ross reuseste sa-l convinga sa plece impreuna cu ea pe urmele baiatului ei, fiind sigura ca enigmaticul vanator reprezinta singura ei sansa de a demonstra nevinovatia baiatului. Curand va afla ca vanatorul este singura ei sansa si de a cunoaste iubirea adevarata. Va fi cucerita de tandretea acestui 'lup salbatic'.
Romanul este absolut superb prin descrierile minunate ale tinutului vitreg si inghetat, al vantului si conditiilor aspre. Adesea calatoria celor doi este insotita de urletele feroce ale lupilor, de frigul crancen, de albul orbitor al peisajului si de perfectiunea fulgilor de zapada.
Pe langa faptul ca prezinta, din punct de vedere istoric, intemeierea acestor asezaminte in nordul Canadei de catre imigranti din Scotia, este si un roman politist in care doamna Ross este detectivul, plecand pe urmele baiatului ei si punand indiciile cap la cap alaturi de inexperimentatul dar corectul Donald Moody.
Nu in ultimul rand este si un roman de dragoste prin sentimentele care se infiripa intre doamna Ross si William Parker. Acestea sunt retinute in concordanta cu peisajul glacial dar cititorul realizeaza ca ele mocnesc inauntrul lor si sunt foarte puternice. Mi-a placut foarte mult ce gandeste ea despre el: "Ma gandesc, fireste, la Parker, iar cand dorm, il visez. Si stiu macar atat: si el se gandeste la mine. [...] Iubire. Magnet. Adevaratul meu nord. Ma intorc mereu spre el." Este asadar o iubire nemarturisita dar pe care amandoi o simt si o stiu si pentru care nici nu sunt necesare cuvintele rostite.
In incheiere va recomand romanul pentru ca are foarte multa personalitate si fler si pentru ca o sa indragiti majoritatea personajelor, avand pe alocuri chiar un aer de Jack London.
Atasez cateva citate pe care le-am cules si care merita retinute:
"Si uneori te trezesti privindu-ti sotul si intrebandu-te: este el barbatul necomplicat care crezi ca este - cel care castiga painea, prieten, povestitor de glume slabe care te fac oricum sa zambesti - sau are si el adancuri pe care nu le-ai vazut niciodata? De ce anume n-ar fi in stare?"
"Dar, asa cum am constatat atat de des in viata, lucrurile dupa care tanjesti cu adevarat te ocolesc."
"Simplul fapt ca-ti place de un om nu inseamna ca poti avea incredere in el."
"Presupun ca, daca ai pierdut deja ceea ce ai mai scump, lucrurile marunte precum reputatia si onoarea isi pierd si ele din stralucire."
October 10, 2010
This is a frustrating novel on so many levels. It's one of those books you read where it could and should be brilliant, but suffers from an excess of trying to be too clever, hip and cutting edge in character development and writing technique.
The POV changes constantly from first person to third person in a sometimes confusing, backtrack-several-paragraphs-to-figure-out-who-is-talking kind of way. There are far, far too many characters and storylines happening as well. This would be ok if each storyline was distinct and wrapped up by the book's end. Unfortunately, they aren't, and it left me with a big 'ole "WTH happened to ??" by the last page. Lastly, this book tapped into one of my reader pet peeves - assigning present day moires within a historical context. I'm sorry, but I have a really hard time shallowing a gay fur trapper in 1860's Canada (a regrettable choice of words on my part, I'll admit). Then again, perhaps the only beaver he could access was the kind with silky fur and sharp front teeth, and he turned to men instead - who knows?
Anyway, this book had potential, but it lost me in it's forced cleverness.
The POV changes constantly from first person to third person in a sometimes confusing, backtrack-several-paragraphs-to-figure-out-who-is-talking kind of way. There are far, far too many characters and storylines happening as well. This would be ok if each storyline was distinct and wrapped up by the book's end. Unfortunately, they aren't, and it left me with a big 'ole "WTH happened to ??" by the last page. Lastly, this book tapped into one of my reader pet peeves - assigning present day moires within a historical context. I'm sorry, but I have a really hard time shallowing a gay fur trapper in 1860's Canada (a regrettable choice of words on my part, I'll admit). Then again, perhaps the only beaver he could access was the kind with silky fur and sharp front teeth, and he turned to men instead - who knows?
Anyway, this book had potential, but it lost me in it's forced cleverness.
December 26, 2019
Whew! Is this book perfect? It does have flaws but minor. Yet it was hard to put down- blew the others I was reading at the start out of the water. And at points it reminded me of a John Wayne movie for the soap opera dilemma aspects of reoccurring crisis. Especially the movie "Stagecoach" when John Wayne becomes encumbered by a happenstance rescue of ladies and other dumb innocents within and from an unforgiving environment. So why the 5 stars?
The 5 stars are for complete and galloping entertainment. And this is her debut novel. Can you tell she is a screen writer! Superb mix of characters, more than 20 of them. Epic issues within distances of trapper "Company" Georgian Bay territory Canada. It's early winter and it's just getting worse and worse. Not only outside in the open either.
I believe Stef Penney has covered nearly all the demographics for reader interest in this one. And she did it without foul language or politico preach speak for the length on top of it. It's long and there was a short bit about a third of the way through that dragged. But if you keep your mittens on, do NOT lose your compass, and remember to cover your eyes against white out- you will have a start with this one. Also you need to fire up and melt your brain cells to placement and name memory. Because there are many characters and for their number, they have depth. Different languages they may speak and absolutely different cultures of thought and action. More than three. Not all the Native Americans consider themselves attune to similarity. But the religions, the nationalities, the cultures, the crimes- they all twine into the plot. And the numerous sub-plots.
Does it knot too thoroughly? What mish-mass results. How are the dogs and wolves involved?
Is it a love story between couples? Are all the couples married? How many fall into "like"? Who knows how to trace patterns and track? How many locations do we track them to and for what reasons? Why, when the weather conditions and paths for these journeys are absolutely life-threatening? When is there a choice to "stay" instead?
Read this one and find out. You might even discover what happened to those Seton sisters of 11 and 12 who went off to pick berries a decade ago and never came home. Or who is not just a soft push-over tenderfoot in the end. But does sadly share a fate of the hopelessly naive.
Many posters reject the mixed writing style of narrator change. Mrs. Ross (those who count never know her first name) is the primary narrator. Other revolving chapters are third person narration. And although 90% chronological- you will still get that 10% flashback memory of something or some place that has gone on long before to clarify the picture or the emotion or the motive. Readers have taken out 2 stars for some of that stylistic formation. Not I. It worked sublimely here in knowing the motives and context quite far, far beyond the actions of the plot progression.
Lyrical and cutting of phrase? Donald tries the poetic. And the sentimental. It's the wrong place for either, IMHO. Unless it is an Indian saga upon a motherly wolf.
But it is the right place for this 3 or 4 month long tale. Lake Edgar, Himmelvanger, Caulfield, Dove River and all the "Company" stations in late 1867 Canadian territory come howling and creaking and chapping. They seem just as alive as the characters. Or NOT.
There were several delicious quotes in each section. I can only pick a few. Or one, just a longish one before Mrs. Ross decides to track after her son, Francis.
Here's one for the Chick Lit. readers:
"So that's how it happens: mutual need is what makes people cooperate- nothing to do with trust or kindness or any such sentimental notion. I don't really take in what he says about Knox and why he released him in this underhand way, but looking at his violated face I can believe that Mackinley has done it. Parker wants a rifle and food and his dogs, and I want a guide to follow Francis, and maybe he thinks Francis will talk more readily if I am there- Francis has something he wants too.
And so while my husband sleeps upstairs we pack- and I prepare to go into the wilderness with a suspected killer. What's worse, a man I haven't been properly introduced to. I am shocked to feel fear, too excited to care about the impropriety of it. I suppose if you have already lost what matters most, then little things like reputation and honor lose their luster. (Besides, if the worse comes to the worst, I can remind myself of that, if I have to.)"
Don't think it's all in that vein. There is something in this book for the Native American anthropology interest, for the adventurer par excellence, for the mixed race multitudes, for the big "L" users (instead of the big "H" of heroin), for couples of the same sex, for the God doubters, for the rebellious and disloyal employee, for thieves, for murderers. And especially for the daughter who does not answer to her original name or blood father.
It is somewhat adventure, somewhat thriller, somewhat suspense, somewhat a psychological study, somewhat murder mystery, somewhat "what's it all about" revelations- but almost entirely page turning. That's why I gave it a 5.
Took me longer to read than two other books of the same length or nature. You need to reread almost every first 4 paragraphs of each chapter. Not to the whom, but to the what and where. But somehow that feature never once pulled me out of the Mrs. Ross motives/ connection to the whole.
It was massively entertaining to read this in 98 degree heat too. It absolutely kept me cool.
The 5 stars are for complete and galloping entertainment. And this is her debut novel. Can you tell she is a screen writer! Superb mix of characters, more than 20 of them. Epic issues within distances of trapper "Company" Georgian Bay territory Canada. It's early winter and it's just getting worse and worse. Not only outside in the open either.
I believe Stef Penney has covered nearly all the demographics for reader interest in this one. And she did it without foul language or politico preach speak for the length on top of it. It's long and there was a short bit about a third of the way through that dragged. But if you keep your mittens on, do NOT lose your compass, and remember to cover your eyes against white out- you will have a start with this one. Also you need to fire up and melt your brain cells to placement and name memory. Because there are many characters and for their number, they have depth. Different languages they may speak and absolutely different cultures of thought and action. More than three. Not all the Native Americans consider themselves attune to similarity. But the religions, the nationalities, the cultures, the crimes- they all twine into the plot. And the numerous sub-plots.
Does it knot too thoroughly? What mish-mass results. How are the dogs and wolves involved?
Is it a love story between couples? Are all the couples married? How many fall into "like"? Who knows how to trace patterns and track? How many locations do we track them to and for what reasons? Why, when the weather conditions and paths for these journeys are absolutely life-threatening? When is there a choice to "stay" instead?
Read this one and find out. You might even discover what happened to those Seton sisters of 11 and 12 who went off to pick berries a decade ago and never came home. Or who is not just a soft push-over tenderfoot in the end. But does sadly share a fate of the hopelessly naive.
Many posters reject the mixed writing style of narrator change. Mrs. Ross (those who count never know her first name) is the primary narrator. Other revolving chapters are third person narration. And although 90% chronological- you will still get that 10% flashback memory of something or some place that has gone on long before to clarify the picture or the emotion or the motive. Readers have taken out 2 stars for some of that stylistic formation. Not I. It worked sublimely here in knowing the motives and context quite far, far beyond the actions of the plot progression.
Lyrical and cutting of phrase? Donald tries the poetic. And the sentimental. It's the wrong place for either, IMHO. Unless it is an Indian saga upon a motherly wolf.
But it is the right place for this 3 or 4 month long tale. Lake Edgar, Himmelvanger, Caulfield, Dove River and all the "Company" stations in late 1867 Canadian territory come howling and creaking and chapping. They seem just as alive as the characters. Or NOT.
There were several delicious quotes in each section. I can only pick a few. Or one, just a longish one before Mrs. Ross decides to track after her son, Francis.
Here's one for the Chick Lit. readers:
"So that's how it happens: mutual need is what makes people cooperate- nothing to do with trust or kindness or any such sentimental notion. I don't really take in what he says about Knox and why he released him in this underhand way, but looking at his violated face I can believe that Mackinley has done it. Parker wants a rifle and food and his dogs, and I want a guide to follow Francis, and maybe he thinks Francis will talk more readily if I am there- Francis has something he wants too.
And so while my husband sleeps upstairs we pack- and I prepare to go into the wilderness with a suspected killer. What's worse, a man I haven't been properly introduced to. I am shocked to feel fear, too excited to care about the impropriety of it. I suppose if you have already lost what matters most, then little things like reputation and honor lose their luster. (Besides, if the worse comes to the worst, I can remind myself of that, if I have to.)"
Don't think it's all in that vein. There is something in this book for the Native American anthropology interest, for the adventurer par excellence, for the mixed race multitudes, for the big "L" users (instead of the big "H" of heroin), for couples of the same sex, for the God doubters, for the rebellious and disloyal employee, for thieves, for murderers. And especially for the daughter who does not answer to her original name or blood father.
It is somewhat adventure, somewhat thriller, somewhat suspense, somewhat a psychological study, somewhat murder mystery, somewhat "what's it all about" revelations- but almost entirely page turning. That's why I gave it a 5.
Took me longer to read than two other books of the same length or nature. You need to reread almost every first 4 paragraphs of each chapter. Not to the whom, but to the what and where. But somehow that feature never once pulled me out of the Mrs. Ross motives/ connection to the whole.
It was massively entertaining to read this in 98 degree heat too. It absolutely kept me cool.
March 17, 2017
BEAU-ti-ful book! Highly recommended!
November 29, 2012
Set in the small village of Caulfield in Ontario during the winter of 1867, The Tenderness of Wolves tells the story of a woman's journey into the Canadian wilderness to find her missing seventeen year old son Francis, who has disappeared after a man, who was a friend of her son's, was found brutally murdered.
First off, I don't know why the author gave the novel this title as wolves do not figure in the plot much at all. They are mentioned once or twice but that's about it!
The plot was engaging and compelling at the beginning of the novel, but for about 100 pages or so in the middle it suddenly got very slow and boring, but it did pick up again in the last quarter of the novel. I thought the location of the novel was interesting. I loved the setting and the vivid descriptions of pioneer life in the Canadian wilderness in the mid-nineteenth century.
At times, the novel got extremely confusing! I loved most of Penney's characters but there was simply too many of them. I found it hard to keep track of all of them. I wished Penney had thinned these out as a lot of these "extra" characters weren't vital to the plot. I don't know why she included so many of these characters! She should have spent more time developing the characters that were central to the plot!
Stef Penney wrote all of her characters in the first person so sometimes it wasn't clear which character was doing the talking! Because of this I had to go back and re-read multiple chapters to figure out what was happening in the story. Very annoying!
The ending of the novel was very abrupt. There were TOO MANY loose ends. I desperately wanted some romance in this novel to balance the story out!
This novel wasn't as good as all the hype made it out to be. I think Ms Penney should fire her editor. Jane Wood did definitely not do a good job editing this book! Good editing would have fixed most of the problems with this novel. But overall, I felt it was a good attempt at a first novel by the author. It was an interesting and mostly enjoyable read but it's a shame the ending is very unsatisfying. However, I would read another novel by this author. I think she has potential.
Three stars!
PS: If you want to know what Mrs Ross's first name is it is on page 170 of the paperback version. It's in the paragraph where she describes Parker's dogs :)
First off, I don't know why the author gave the novel this title as wolves do not figure in the plot much at all. They are mentioned once or twice but that's about it!
The plot was engaging and compelling at the beginning of the novel, but for about 100 pages or so in the middle it suddenly got very slow and boring, but it did pick up again in the last quarter of the novel. I thought the location of the novel was interesting. I loved the setting and the vivid descriptions of pioneer life in the Canadian wilderness in the mid-nineteenth century.
At times, the novel got extremely confusing! I loved most of Penney's characters but there was simply too many of them. I found it hard to keep track of all of them. I wished Penney had thinned these out as a lot of these "extra" characters weren't vital to the plot. I don't know why she included so many of these characters! She should have spent more time developing the characters that were central to the plot!
Stef Penney wrote all of her characters in the first person so sometimes it wasn't clear which character was doing the talking! Because of this I had to go back and re-read multiple chapters to figure out what was happening in the story. Very annoying!
The ending of the novel was very abrupt. There were TOO MANY loose ends. I desperately wanted some romance in this novel to balance the story out!
This novel wasn't as good as all the hype made it out to be. I think Ms Penney should fire her editor. Jane Wood did definitely not do a good job editing this book! Good editing would have fixed most of the problems with this novel. But overall, I felt it was a good attempt at a first novel by the author. It was an interesting and mostly enjoyable read but it's a shame the ending is very unsatisfying. However, I would read another novel by this author. I think she has potential.
Three stars!
PS: If you want to know what Mrs Ross's first name is it is on page 170 of the paperback version. It's in the paragraph where she describes Parker's dogs :)
March 3, 2019
In a small Canadian town by the Georgian Bay, Mrs Ross finds the body of her murdered neighbor, trapper and fur trader Laurent Jammet. Her adopted 17 year old son is also missing, and there are several sets of footprints heading north. The Hudson Bay Company sends their men to investigate several suspects. Mrs Ross sets off with a half-Indian guide, William Parker, to find her son.
The book is full of atmospheric details so the reader can feel for the 1867 immigrant and Indian characters as they deal with the cold, the exhausting travel by foot, and the fear of the howling wolves in the wilderness. There are several other murder suspects, including a man who wants an Indian archeological find owned by Jammet. In addition to being a historical mystery, the book is also about love in its many forms and a riveting adventure tale. Author Stef Penney, a screenwriter, won the Costa Book Award in 2006.
The book is full of atmospheric details so the reader can feel for the 1867 immigrant and Indian characters as they deal with the cold, the exhausting travel by foot, and the fear of the howling wolves in the wilderness. There are several other murder suspects, including a man who wants an Indian archeological find owned by Jammet. In addition to being a historical mystery, the book is also about love in its many forms and a riveting adventure tale. Author Stef Penney, a screenwriter, won the Costa Book Award in 2006.
February 9, 2021
This was really good. Set in a remote Canadian settlement in 1867, a man is brutally murdered! It鈥檚 dark and bleak and full of atmosphere. Just what I needed right now to be honest.
October 6, 2014
"And so while my husband sleeps upstairs we pack鈥揳nd I prepare to go into the wilderness with a suspected killer. What鈥檚 worse, a man I haven鈥檛 been properly introduced to. I am too shocked to feel fear, too excited to care about the impropriety of it. I suppose if you have already lost what matters most, then little things like reputation and honour lose their lustre. (Besides, if the worst comes to the worst, I can remind myself that I have sold my honour far more cheaply than this. I can remind myself of that, if I have to.)"
As the nights are drawing in and the temperatures are dropping to the point that I needed to switch the heating on, this was the perfect book to get in the mood for the upcoming season.
There are a few things that I could criticize about this book - like the holes in some of the sub-plots, anachronisms, the use of 20th century expressions and attitudes that detract from the 1867 setting - but all in all these are minor flaws.
I loved this book. Not least for its writing:
"Sometimes, you find yourself looking at the forest in a different way. Sometimes it鈥檚 no more than the trees that provide houses and warmth, and hide the earth鈥檚 nakedness, and you鈥檙e glad of it. And then sometimes, like tonight, it is a vast dark presence that you can never see the end of; it might, for all you know, have not just length and breadth to lose yourself in, but also an immeasurable depth, or something else altogether. And sometimes, you find yourself looking at your husband and wondering: is he the straightforward man you think you know鈥損rovider, friend, teller of poor jokes that nonetheless make you smile鈥搊r does he too have depths that you have never seen? What might he not be capable of?"
So what that the language doesn't fit into 1867? The same concept worked for Marty McFly... Anyway, just to clarify, this book is not about time travel.
The Tenderness of Wolves is a mystery set in the wintry northeast of Canada between communities of immigrants and natives, where the murder of a local trapper and the disappearance of a local youth set in motion an unlikely turn of events.
But it is not just a murder mystery. What I loved about the book is what some other reviewers found distracting - that it a number of subplots.
There are stories of people looking for something they have lost, of people looking for their own way in life, of people trying to remember who they are, of people trying to make new starts. Some fail, some succeed.
The subplots add a great deal of depth to the characters and bring to life how in a largely isolated small community nearly everything is connected. Ironically, for a story set in the freezing north, there is a lot of warmth; and for a story largely set in the wilderness, there is a lot of humanity, even though the stoicism portrayed by characters and the brutality of some of the events ensure that this is by no means a cozy read.
This review was first posted on BookLikes:
As the nights are drawing in and the temperatures are dropping to the point that I needed to switch the heating on, this was the perfect book to get in the mood for the upcoming season.
There are a few things that I could criticize about this book - like the holes in some of the sub-plots, anachronisms, the use of 20th century expressions and attitudes that detract from the 1867 setting - but all in all these are minor flaws.
I loved this book. Not least for its writing:
"Sometimes, you find yourself looking at the forest in a different way. Sometimes it鈥檚 no more than the trees that provide houses and warmth, and hide the earth鈥檚 nakedness, and you鈥檙e glad of it. And then sometimes, like tonight, it is a vast dark presence that you can never see the end of; it might, for all you know, have not just length and breadth to lose yourself in, but also an immeasurable depth, or something else altogether. And sometimes, you find yourself looking at your husband and wondering: is he the straightforward man you think you know鈥損rovider, friend, teller of poor jokes that nonetheless make you smile鈥搊r does he too have depths that you have never seen? What might he not be capable of?"
So what that the language doesn't fit into 1867? The same concept worked for Marty McFly... Anyway, just to clarify, this book is not about time travel.
The Tenderness of Wolves is a mystery set in the wintry northeast of Canada between communities of immigrants and natives, where the murder of a local trapper and the disappearance of a local youth set in motion an unlikely turn of events.
But it is not just a murder mystery. What I loved about the book is what some other reviewers found distracting - that it a number of subplots.
There are stories of people looking for something they have lost, of people looking for their own way in life, of people trying to remember who they are, of people trying to make new starts. Some fail, some succeed.
The subplots add a great deal of depth to the characters and bring to life how in a largely isolated small community nearly everything is connected. Ironically, for a story set in the freezing north, there is a lot of warmth; and for a story largely set in the wilderness, there is a lot of humanity, even though the stoicism portrayed by characters and the brutality of some of the events ensure that this is by no means a cozy read.
This review was first posted on BookLikes:
August 3, 2011
The hero of this novel is only ever referred to by two names: Mrs Ross, and Mama. In their brief moments together at the beginning of the novel, Angus Ross never speaks to his wife, and she does not have a single good friend who knows her well enough to address her by her first name. She is reserved, polite and, as a married woman in these stifled Scottish, Presbyterian, conclaves in 19th Century Canada, almost invisible: when a self-important local figure demands, 鈥業s you husband in?鈥�, she notes that 鈥淎s a woman I鈥檓 obviously not supposed to know anything鈥�. She appears to have little self-esteem, admitting that 鈥渋n fact long ago gave up the notion that I have any remarkable qualities鈥�. When her teenage son disappears in the aftermath of the murder of a local fur-trader, Laurent Jammet, she is for a while paralysed by indecision.
Yet, from this unpromising start, she demonstrates that she is in fact quite remarkable: she shows enormous physical strength to drag herself through the barren Canadian landscape, not once but three times; greater mental strength to embark on the subsequent quests and to stand up to those trying to advise her against this. And towards the end, as the Cat & Mouse game to find Jammet鈥檚 murderer reaches its conclusion, she puts her life at risk. But most revealing of all, it turns out she is not shy, just quiet. She does not lack self-esteem, she is in fact very funny and self-deprecating. She may still appear to be almost invisible but she misses nothing, particularly in the hubris of the numerous self-important men that she meets. She is deeply passionate, stifled through her current circumstances. Had she not been denied educational opportunity because she was subjected to a 19th Century version of 鈥渟ectioning鈥�, she would have certainly achieved more in life 鈥� and yet she does not dwell on this or feel any self-pity. Perhaps this is for the best: beyond the end of the book, we know that she must go back to her husband, who will remain unaware that he is married to such a wonderful woman.
Yet, from this unpromising start, she demonstrates that she is in fact quite remarkable: she shows enormous physical strength to drag herself through the barren Canadian landscape, not once but three times; greater mental strength to embark on the subsequent quests and to stand up to those trying to advise her against this. And towards the end, as the Cat & Mouse game to find Jammet鈥檚 murderer reaches its conclusion, she puts her life at risk. But most revealing of all, it turns out she is not shy, just quiet. She does not lack self-esteem, she is in fact very funny and self-deprecating. She may still appear to be almost invisible but she misses nothing, particularly in the hubris of the numerous self-important men that she meets. She is deeply passionate, stifled through her current circumstances. Had she not been denied educational opportunity because she was subjected to a 19th Century version of 鈥渟ectioning鈥�, she would have certainly achieved more in life 鈥� and yet she does not dwell on this or feel any self-pity. Perhaps this is for the best: beyond the end of the book, we know that she must go back to her husband, who will remain unaware that he is married to such a wonderful woman.
May 22, 2008
Well it's 1:20 AM and I just finished this well written page turner. Would probably give it 4 1/2 for capturing my interest. When my book club chose this I didn't think I would like it because I usually don't read murder mysteries. However, I was pleasantly surprised. I liked the weaving storylines and plots and the way the characters were connected in what I was imagining to be a vast wintery wilderness. I also enjoyed the contrast of the first and third person narratives. I'm not sure I get the title.
Although it took me a while to warm up to Mrs. Ross (in the beginning she seemed kind of simple and mousey) but as the story went on I really admired her. I was pulling for her all the way. And...cuddling with Parker in the cabin for warmth...much better than...you know. I could feel it!
I got a little confused with some of the characters and keeping them straight and I still don't get the Seton girls - can't wait to talk about this at book club. Were they both alive or only one of them??? I don't get it!?
I was mildly disappointed in the ending. I wanted a little more. I didn't feel that everything got wrapped up well enough, but that could be because I'm always one for the fairytale endings, girl gets the guy, conflicts are resolved, etc. AND what the hell is her first name??
Although it took me a while to warm up to Mrs. Ross (in the beginning she seemed kind of simple and mousey) but as the story went on I really admired her. I was pulling for her all the way. And...cuddling with Parker in the cabin for warmth...much better than...you know. I could feel it!
I got a little confused with some of the characters and keeping them straight and I still don't get the Seton girls - can't wait to talk about this at book club. Were they both alive or only one of them??? I don't get it!?
I was mildly disappointed in the ending. I wanted a little more. I didn't feel that everything got wrapped up well enough, but that could be because I'm always one for the fairytale endings, girl gets the guy, conflicts are resolved, etc. AND what the hell is her first name??
March 11, 2008
This book received the Costa (Whitbred)Award which I find totally surprising. Certainly the book has all the makings of a great novel. But it is not.
A host of interesting characters, a dramatic environment, a historical setting, even a murder mystery. Lots of interesting characters and criss-crossing paths. Yet it feels more like a soap opera at times than anything else.
I think the choice of the author to give a first person voice to one character and then use third person all the rest of the way through the book is a major mistake (in the discussion in the book she says Dickens did it in Bleak House so why can't I -- because he is a literary genius, that's why). Although all of the characters are interesting, the author gives us more insights into some than others. The result is a feeling that this was designed to be a Dickensian book but the author just wasn't up to it.
I don't think you will feel that you wasted time reading this book and there are some wonderful passages about life in wintry Canada. But I wouldn't put it at the top of my list.
A host of interesting characters, a dramatic environment, a historical setting, even a murder mystery. Lots of interesting characters and criss-crossing paths. Yet it feels more like a soap opera at times than anything else.
I think the choice of the author to give a first person voice to one character and then use third person all the rest of the way through the book is a major mistake (in the discussion in the book she says Dickens did it in Bleak House so why can't I -- because he is a literary genius, that's why). Although all of the characters are interesting, the author gives us more insights into some than others. The result is a feeling that this was designed to be a Dickensian book but the author just wasn't up to it.
I don't think you will feel that you wasted time reading this book and there are some wonderful passages about life in wintry Canada. But I wouldn't put it at the top of my list.
March 19, 2008
A historical mystery set in Canada, and featuring what are essentially the precursors to Mounties and gay characters. I really thought I was going to like this book. Instead, I struggled to keep up with its meandering pace and mostly unsympathetic characters, only to be confronted by a conclusion that just cuts out like the end of 鈥淚 Want You (She鈥檚 So Heavy).鈥� I know that sort of thing is supposed to be arty and true-to-life, but is a little bit of closure so much to ask? Several plot threads are completely abandoned, dropped five or ten or fifteen pages from the end and never picked up again. Blargh. Forgive me, but I was reading to find out what happens, not to鈥 don鈥檛 know, muse on how mostly things suck and it鈥檚 very cold in Canada.
July 29, 2020
A lovely story.
October 6, 2018
In this historical fiction set in the Canadian wilderness in the mid-19th century, a French-Canadian trapper living near an isolated village is found murdered in his bed. Our protagonist, Mrs. Ross, discovers the body and alerts the authorities. Upon returning home she finds that her seventeen-year-old son, Francis, a friend of the murdered man, has disappeared. Suspicion falls upon her son and a mixed-race tracker. After her husband searches, but fails to find Francis, she and the tracker set off to locate him and determine what happened. This book contains an intricately woven mystery, with several subordinate mysteries embedded into the main storyline. The Canadian legacy of fur-trapping and the Hudson Bay Company play an important role in the narrative.
This book is filled with striking characters, such as the ambitious and ruthless company-man in charge of the investigation, his inexperienced assistant whose heart is in the right place but makes questionable decisions, two daughters of the town magistrate that engender romantic feelings in the assistant, and a Native American guide serving as a personal protector. The author offers insight into human motivations, complexities and incongruities of character, and the yearning for answers, sometimes at the cost of inventing a solution.
It is divided into four sections with many short chapters using different narrative perspectives. The setting becomes a significant part of the story. The writing style is eloquent. The atmospheric descriptions of the harsh landscape of the Canadian winter deliver an almost palpable feeling of icy desolation. Like the titular wolf, people can be misunderstood or judged by their appearance. The author deftly explores this theme in subtle ways throughout the story, showing we are often wrong about that which we do not understand.
An amazing amalgamation of history, adventure, betrayal, tragic loss, and forbidden love, it is not solely a riveting mystery but also an impressive literary achievement. Highly recommended.
This book is filled with striking characters, such as the ambitious and ruthless company-man in charge of the investigation, his inexperienced assistant whose heart is in the right place but makes questionable decisions, two daughters of the town magistrate that engender romantic feelings in the assistant, and a Native American guide serving as a personal protector. The author offers insight into human motivations, complexities and incongruities of character, and the yearning for answers, sometimes at the cost of inventing a solution.
It is divided into four sections with many short chapters using different narrative perspectives. The setting becomes a significant part of the story. The writing style is eloquent. The atmospheric descriptions of the harsh landscape of the Canadian winter deliver an almost palpable feeling of icy desolation. Like the titular wolf, people can be misunderstood or judged by their appearance. The author deftly explores this theme in subtle ways throughout the story, showing we are often wrong about that which we do not understand.
An amazing amalgamation of history, adventure, betrayal, tragic loss, and forbidden love, it is not solely a riveting mystery but also an impressive literary achievement. Highly recommended.
March 2, 2012
It staggers me to see poor reviews of this novel. I suppose that it just shows the difference between people! I was given this book about three years ago, and such is my "To Be Read" pile that I've only got around it reading it now. Well, it was worth the wait. Although it took me some time to become absorbed by the story, I soon couldn't put it down. Penney's writing kept me interested. She can definitely weave words, and her recreation of 19th C. backwoods Canada has a really authentic feel to it. Who cares if she never went to Canada? She has succeeded in creating an intriguing story set in a truly captivating world, peopled with multiple interesting characters. To criticise Penney because she didn't go to Canada to research it (as apparently happened) is in my mind nothing more than a form of literary snobbery. It's similar to saying that even if someone reads lots about a country and say, its political situation, they are not entitled to comment on it unless they have been there to study it first hand. Tosh. I haven't been to all of the places in my novels, yet I believe that I have created credible descriptions of them.
I digress. I was interested by the number of characters relating the story (more than six) in The Tenderness of Wolves and also immeditely concerned that the story would suffer because of it. It's difficult to carry off so many characters, but Penney does it with aplomb. The tale hangs upon the murder of a trapper, Laurence Jamment. We see the effects this tragedy has on the local community, which of course has more to it than meets the eye. The plot makes intricate weaves and turns, making a deeply satisfying read. It's full of sharp and poignant observations of the human character, and I was sorry to reach the final page. That in my mind is the mark of an excellent book
I digress. I was interested by the number of characters relating the story (more than six) in The Tenderness of Wolves and also immeditely concerned that the story would suffer because of it. It's difficult to carry off so many characters, but Penney does it with aplomb. The tale hangs upon the murder of a trapper, Laurence Jamment. We see the effects this tragedy has on the local community, which of course has more to it than meets the eye. The plot makes intricate weaves and turns, making a deeply satisfying read. It's full of sharp and poignant observations of the human character, and I was sorry to reach the final page. That in my mind is the mark of an excellent book
March 31, 2016
Hoy os traigo un libro que me ha gustado much铆simo.
Una de las cosas que m谩s me ha llamado la atenci贸n es, que a m铆 me suelen gustar los libros con un ritmo m谩s bien ligero, en cambio esta vez he disfrutado much铆simo con La ternura de los lobos pese a tener un desarrollo pausado. Es una lectura que se disfruta sin prisa pero sin pausa.
Estaba pensando qu茅 aspectos de la novela empezar a destacar pero, realmente, no s茅 bien por cual comenzar porque me estoy dando cuenta de que creo que todo me ha gustado. As铆 que lo har茅 aleatoriamente.
Si comenzamos por la ambientaci贸n, os dir茅 que es muy propicia y adecuada para imbuirnos en la historia totalmente, ya que el crimen cometido y los misterios que se nos van planteando casan maravillosamente dentro de este marco helado que nos rodea durante toda la narraci贸n y convierte la trama en m谩s misteriosa y estremecedora. Nos veremos rodeados todo el tiempo por inmensos parajes helados y por peque帽as poblaciones aisladas que nos resultar谩n, en ocasiones, inquietantes.
Por otra parte, los personajes me han gustado much铆simo, pienso que todos est谩n bien trabajados. Sobre todo el de nuestra protagonista, la se帽ora Ross, ya que, adem谩s, cada vez que toma la voz en la narraci贸n lo hace en primera persona, cosa que el resto de personajes se nos presentan en tercera. Esto hace que nos sintamos aun m谩s identificados con ella que con el resto, aunque todos los dem谩s tambi茅n nos resultar谩n cercanos.
La trama me ha parecido que est谩 bien desarrollada pese a tener un ritmo algo lento, como he comentado al principio, pero yo no he perdido el inter茅s en ning煤n momento, y s铆 estaba deseando avanzar en la historia para averiguar qu茅 estaba sucediendo realmente y c贸mo iba a terminar todo. Considero que la autora tiene un estilo narrativo de gran calidad, me ha gustado mucho su forma de escribir.
En definitiva, una historia que pienso que roza lo sublime, con un lenguaje elegante y delicado, que mantendr谩 nuestro inter茅s en todo momento gracias a su trama y a sus bien perfilados personajes pese a tener un ritmo un poco lento. Algo que, raro en m铆, en esta ocasi贸n no me ha importado ni molestado.
Mi puntuaci贸n es: 8/10
Una de las cosas que m谩s me ha llamado la atenci贸n es, que a m铆 me suelen gustar los libros con un ritmo m谩s bien ligero, en cambio esta vez he disfrutado much铆simo con La ternura de los lobos pese a tener un desarrollo pausado. Es una lectura que se disfruta sin prisa pero sin pausa.
Estaba pensando qu茅 aspectos de la novela empezar a destacar pero, realmente, no s茅 bien por cual comenzar porque me estoy dando cuenta de que creo que todo me ha gustado. As铆 que lo har茅 aleatoriamente.
Si comenzamos por la ambientaci贸n, os dir茅 que es muy propicia y adecuada para imbuirnos en la historia totalmente, ya que el crimen cometido y los misterios que se nos van planteando casan maravillosamente dentro de este marco helado que nos rodea durante toda la narraci贸n y convierte la trama en m谩s misteriosa y estremecedora. Nos veremos rodeados todo el tiempo por inmensos parajes helados y por peque帽as poblaciones aisladas que nos resultar谩n, en ocasiones, inquietantes.
Por otra parte, los personajes me han gustado much铆simo, pienso que todos est谩n bien trabajados. Sobre todo el de nuestra protagonista, la se帽ora Ross, ya que, adem谩s, cada vez que toma la voz en la narraci贸n lo hace en primera persona, cosa que el resto de personajes se nos presentan en tercera. Esto hace que nos sintamos aun m谩s identificados con ella que con el resto, aunque todos los dem谩s tambi茅n nos resultar谩n cercanos.
La trama me ha parecido que est谩 bien desarrollada pese a tener un ritmo algo lento, como he comentado al principio, pero yo no he perdido el inter茅s en ning煤n momento, y s铆 estaba deseando avanzar en la historia para averiguar qu茅 estaba sucediendo realmente y c贸mo iba a terminar todo. Considero que la autora tiene un estilo narrativo de gran calidad, me ha gustado mucho su forma de escribir.
En definitiva, una historia que pienso que roza lo sublime, con un lenguaje elegante y delicado, que mantendr谩 nuestro inter茅s en todo momento gracias a su trama y a sus bien perfilados personajes pese a tener un ritmo un poco lento. Algo que, raro en m铆, en esta ocasi贸n no me ha importado ni molestado.
Mi puntuaci贸n es: 8/10
November 1, 2024
5 stars per page x 450 pages = a galaxy of blissful reading.
A gruesome murder, a trail of footprints leaving the crime scene, a missing person/suspect, set in a remote Canadian settlement in the year 1867.
Everything about it was perfect:
The characters were incredible: deep, easily distinguishable, and varied in intellect, emotion and drive. Penney included a wealth of emotional intelligence to most of the characters using multiple POVs. If one character felt condescended, the other would feel scrutinised, each feeling the other was somehow smarter/funner/more likeable than themself. Penney excels in relationship dynamics.
The pace was excellent. An initial setting of the scene, followed by a platter of potential suspects, upping the stakes, setting the new scene and so forth. Excellent tension and suspense but not overbearingly so.
The community presence and cultural sentiment felt real for the time, as I would imagine it. The setting was incredible, such isolation and bleakness but also contentment, in some more than others. There is the magnetic pull of characters wanting something else, others being more than happy. Elements of exploitation and coerced dependency thrive. Power dynamics of those who rule the small outpost and those subdugated are other issues.
I鈥檓 a city boy but I imagine small towns are places where romantic options are limited and hence the need for defending one鈥檚 perceived territory is high. The miniscule population here creates love stories as complicated as the course of a braided river. It fit the solving of the crime to a tee. I thought I had solved it at page 6 but unfortunately I was way off and the ending caught me by surprise to my delight.
I have no idea about the relevance of the title but it got me to read it and the story more than made up for my lack of understanding.
A gruesome murder, a trail of footprints leaving the crime scene, a missing person/suspect, set in a remote Canadian settlement in the year 1867.
Everything about it was perfect:
The characters were incredible: deep, easily distinguishable, and varied in intellect, emotion and drive. Penney included a wealth of emotional intelligence to most of the characters using multiple POVs. If one character felt condescended, the other would feel scrutinised, each feeling the other was somehow smarter/funner/more likeable than themself. Penney excels in relationship dynamics.
The pace was excellent. An initial setting of the scene, followed by a platter of potential suspects, upping the stakes, setting the new scene and so forth. Excellent tension and suspense but not overbearingly so.
The community presence and cultural sentiment felt real for the time, as I would imagine it. The setting was incredible, such isolation and bleakness but also contentment, in some more than others. There is the magnetic pull of characters wanting something else, others being more than happy. Elements of exploitation and coerced dependency thrive. Power dynamics of those who rule the small outpost and those subdugated are other issues.
I鈥檓 a city boy but I imagine small towns are places where romantic options are limited and hence the need for defending one鈥檚 perceived territory is high. The miniscule population here creates love stories as complicated as the course of a braided river. It fit the solving of the crime to a tee. I thought I had solved it at page 6 but unfortunately I was way off and the ending caught me by surprise to my delight.
I have no idea about the relevance of the title but it got me to read it and the story more than made up for my lack of understanding.
February 18, 2016
La historia que nos narra la escritora escocesa Stef Penney en 鈥楲a ternura de los lobos鈥�, nos traslada al a帽o 1867, al nordeste de Canad谩. Dove River es un poblado fundado por pioneros escoceses, en el que el trampero Laurent Jammet ha sido asesinado. Unido a este hecho, hay que a帽adir la desaparici贸n de un adolescente, del que se cree autor del crimen. En los inh贸spitos y nevados paisajes canadienses, transcurre esta novela coral. Quiz谩s la protagonista principal sea la se帽ora Ross, la madre de Francis, el adolescente sospechoso, cuyas partes est谩n narradas en primera persona. La se帽ora Ross emprende la b煤squeda de su hijo en un duro viaje a trav茅s de nieve y hielo, acompa帽ada de los investigadores enviados por la Compa帽铆a, encargada de impartir justicia. El resto de personajes principales, familiares, nativos, cazadores, son voces omniscientes, que nos ayudan a comprender y saber de la vida en este inh贸spito lugar. De este modo, entre el misterio del crimen, un secreto arqueol贸gico y secretos varios, tambi茅n hay que destacar la introspecci贸n de los personajes.
鈥楲a ternura de los lobos鈥� es una novela bien escrita, con aroma de thriller, en la que destaca la condici贸n humana sobre el misterio. Interesante.
鈥楲a ternura de los lobos鈥� es una novela bien escrita, con aroma de thriller, en la que destaca la condici贸n humana sobre el misterio. Interesante.
January 1, 2008
This is easily one of the most beautifully written books I have read in a long time. The prose, particularly when used in the first person perspective of Mrs. Ross, really drew me in. This combined with the very human nature of both the story and characters made them human. Being from areas near and similar to the setting in the book I was surprised at the author鈥檚 ability to craft the feeling of the Northwood鈥檚 in winter, and particularly the feelings I had as a child during my first experiences with the intimidation that can be caused by the isolation and alien nature of the woods. This is particularly impressive for someone who has never visited a place of such beauty and isolation. I think Penney weaved beautifully issues of the human condition both modern and timeless in a way that felt real, and while there is no Hollywood ending the ending is better for being honest and true to both the characters and real life.
October 17, 2008
Outstanding debut novel from this Scottish author. Penney captures the voices, terrain, and myriad of cultures of the remote and vast Hudson Bay territory. The bitter chill of winter 1867 matches the chill of murder and suspicion that invades a tiny town. An excellent read!
April 24, 2009
My interest in this novel was heighted by two outside pieces of information: that the author was a screenwriter and that she had never been to the area north of Georgian Bay where the novel is set (and had been criticized for it). The first interested me because the novel is 鈥渃inematic鈥� and written in scenes鈥攁nd moves forward at a compelling pace; the second, because I鈥檝e been decrying the place that research has assumed in novel writing these days and completely accept the author鈥檚 counter that this is, after all, a work of the imagination. The setting is tangible and immediate; whether it is 鈥渞eal鈥� doesn鈥檛 matter as far as I can tell.
The Tenderness of Wolves is essentially a mystery which takes place 1860s Ontario, on Georgian Bay, a large bay to the northeast of Lake Huron. The action takes place in Caulfield on Dove River, a small settlement with no buildings over 13 years old, in a Norwegian religious colony and on a trading post of the Hudson Bay Company鈥攁nd in the snow-covered plains and forests lying between. A trader and ex-Company man is murdered in his house on the edge of Dove River and found by a neighboring farmer鈥檚 wife. The plot is complex with many characters and basically follows the actions of those who want to find out who murdered Laurent Jammet. The only first person voice is that of Mrs. Ross, who woman who discovers the body and whose son is suspected of the murder, but most of the novel it not first person narration.
The structure is interesting. There are four main sections, corresponding to the different settings and to the stages in the investigation. Within each section are subsections, using focusing on different characters. Mrs. Ross actually narrates the sections where she鈥檚 the main focus, but you see her from the outside when she appears in the other sections. The other sections use a sort of Jamesian center of consciousness, with the narrator getting into the head of another character. One can easily see the influence of film.
It鈥檚 a complex plot with lots of characters and no real interest in the man who was killed except that the wrong persons are being accused. I found this a page turner until maybe two-thirds of the way through where it suddenly occurred to me I didn鈥檛 really care about any of the characters. Nor did I care who killed the trapper since it was clear it wasn鈥檛 the two sympathetic characters who were accused. Nor were they in any real danger of punishment for a crime they didn't commit.
The role of 鈥淭he Company鈥� that controlled the fur trade in British North America, in the novel and in the community, is interesting and Company men are generally bad guys, except Moody who 鈥渇igures it out鈥� during the course of the novel. But that theme is generally ancillary and not really developed. (I was astounded when I first went shopping in Calgary years ago to find the main department store, referred to by initiates as 鈥渢he Bay鈥�, was that same company which Wikipedia describes as the 鈥渙ldest commercial corporation in North America鈥�.
My assessment of this novel: the structure is near perfect, the setting is powerful, the plot is OK, and the characters are skillfully imagined but ultimately bloodless. Mrs. Ross, for example, narrates bits of her past in an insane asylum where she evidently was the favorite of a nutty doctor (made me think of the main character in Atwood鈥檚 Alias Grace) but the background generates questions that are never answered. That鈥檚 true with other characters as well. Perhaps the difference is that the characterization in film, which of necessity relies on snippets, isn鈥檛 really enough for a really effective novel.
The Tenderness of Wolves is essentially a mystery which takes place 1860s Ontario, on Georgian Bay, a large bay to the northeast of Lake Huron. The action takes place in Caulfield on Dove River, a small settlement with no buildings over 13 years old, in a Norwegian religious colony and on a trading post of the Hudson Bay Company鈥攁nd in the snow-covered plains and forests lying between. A trader and ex-Company man is murdered in his house on the edge of Dove River and found by a neighboring farmer鈥檚 wife. The plot is complex with many characters and basically follows the actions of those who want to find out who murdered Laurent Jammet. The only first person voice is that of Mrs. Ross, who woman who discovers the body and whose son is suspected of the murder, but most of the novel it not first person narration.
The structure is interesting. There are four main sections, corresponding to the different settings and to the stages in the investigation. Within each section are subsections, using focusing on different characters. Mrs. Ross actually narrates the sections where she鈥檚 the main focus, but you see her from the outside when she appears in the other sections. The other sections use a sort of Jamesian center of consciousness, with the narrator getting into the head of another character. One can easily see the influence of film.
It鈥檚 a complex plot with lots of characters and no real interest in the man who was killed except that the wrong persons are being accused. I found this a page turner until maybe two-thirds of the way through where it suddenly occurred to me I didn鈥檛 really care about any of the characters. Nor did I care who killed the trapper since it was clear it wasn鈥檛 the two sympathetic characters who were accused. Nor were they in any real danger of punishment for a crime they didn't commit.
The role of 鈥淭he Company鈥� that controlled the fur trade in British North America, in the novel and in the community, is interesting and Company men are generally bad guys, except Moody who 鈥渇igures it out鈥� during the course of the novel. But that theme is generally ancillary and not really developed. (I was astounded when I first went shopping in Calgary years ago to find the main department store, referred to by initiates as 鈥渢he Bay鈥�, was that same company which Wikipedia describes as the 鈥渙ldest commercial corporation in North America鈥�.
My assessment of this novel: the structure is near perfect, the setting is powerful, the plot is OK, and the characters are skillfully imagined but ultimately bloodless. Mrs. Ross, for example, narrates bits of her past in an insane asylum where she evidently was the favorite of a nutty doctor (made me think of the main character in Atwood鈥檚 Alias Grace) but the background generates questions that are never answered. That鈥檚 true with other characters as well. Perhaps the difference is that the characterization in film, which of necessity relies on snippets, isn鈥檛 really enough for a really effective novel.
March 13, 2022
賲爻鬲賵胤賳丞 丿賵冥 乇賷冥乇 賮賷 卮賲丕賱 賰賳丿丕貙 賵禺乇賷賮 丕賱毓丕賲 佟侉佴侑
賵丕賱卮鬲丕亍 丕賱賯丕乇爻 賷鬲賯丿賲 亘亘胤亍 賵亘賯賵丞 鬲丕乇賰賸丕 丌孬丕乇賴 毓賱賶 兀卮噩丕乇 丕賱亘鬲賵賱丕 賵兀賵乇丕賯賴丕 丕賱賲睾胤丕丞 亘丕賱噩賱賷丿 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賴賲爻 亘丕賱卮鬲丕亍 丕賱賯丕丿賲貙 賵鬲賴賲爻 亘丨賰丕賷丕鬲 丕賱亘乇賷丞 丕賱賲鬲噩賲丿丞 丕賱賲禺賷賮丞 丕賱鬲賷 丿丕卅賲賸丕 賲丕 賷毓賵丿 匕賰乇賴丕 丨賵賱 賲賵丕賯丿 丕賱卮鬲丕亍 賰賱賲丕 匕購賰乇鬲 丕賱匕卅丕亘 賵賮乇丕卅賴丕 丕賱賳丕毓賲 丕賱孬賲賷賳貙
賱睾夭 賯丿賷賲 賱丕禺鬲賮丕亍 賮鬲丕鬲賷賳 賲乇丕賴賯鬲賷賳 賲賳 丿賵冥 乇賷冥乇貙 禺乇噩鬲丕 賲毓 氐丿賷賯丞 賱賴賲丕 賱噩賲毓 丕賱鬲賵鬲 賵丕賱鬲賳夭賴 亘噩賵丕乇 丕賱亘丨賷乇丞貙 賵賰丕賳 賲賵毓丿 毓賵丿鬲賴賳 賯亘賱 睾乇賵亘 丕賱卮賲爻貙 賵賱賰賳 丕賱氐丿賷賯丞 毓丕丿鬲 賲鬲兀禺乇丞 賵賮賷 丨丕賱丞 亘丕卅爻丞 亘丿賵賳賴賲丕 亘毓丿 兀賳 禺乇噩 丕賱噩賲賷毓 賱賱亘丨孬 毓賳賴賳貙
賴匕丕 丕賱賱睾夭 丕賱匕賷 賱賲 賷購丨賱 兀亘丿賸丕 賵兀氐亘丨 丨賰丕賷丞 鬲丨賰賷賴丕 丕賱毓丕卅賱丕鬲貙 鬲購丨賰賷 賮賷 兀賲爻賷丕鬲 丕賱卮鬲丕亍 兀賲丕賲 丕賱賳丕乇貙 兀毓丕丿賴 廿賱賶 丕賱爻胤丨
丕賰鬲卮丕賮 丕賱爻賷丿丞 乇賵爻 賲賯鬲賱 氐賷丕丿 賮乇賳爻賷 賰賳丿賷 賴賵 賱賵乇丕賳 噩丕賲賷賴 賮賷 賰賵禺賴 毓賱賶 囟賮丞 丕賱賳賴乇貙
賵賮賷 賳賮爻 丕賱賷賵賲 丕賰鬲卮賮鬲 丕禺鬲賮丕亍 丕亘賳賴丕 亘丕賱鬲亘賳賷 丕賱賲乇丕賴賯 丕賱匕賷 禺乇噩 廿賱賶 丕賱氐賷丿 賮賷 丕賱睾丕亘丞貙
鬲亘丿兀 丕賱鬲丨乇賷丕鬲 賱丨賱 賱睾夭 丕賱賯鬲賱 賵丕賱丕禺鬲賮丕亍貙 賲賳 乇噩丕賱 丿丕禺賱 丕賱賲爻鬲賵胤賳丞貙 賵丌禺乇賷賳 賲賳 禺丕乇噩賴丕 賲賳賴賲 賲賻賳 噩丕亍 賱賱亘丨孬 賵丨賱 丕賱賱睾夭 賵賲賳賴賲 賲丕 賷亘丿賵 兀賳賴 噩丕亍 賱丕爻鬲睾賱丕賱 丕賱兀賲乇貙 賵丕賱丨賯賷賯丞 兀賳 丕賱噩賲賷毓 賮賷 丿賵冥 乇賷冥乇 丕卮鬲乇賰賵丕 亘丌乇丕卅賴賲 賵丕爻鬲賳鬲丕噩丕鬲賴賲 賵鬲丨乇賷丕鬲賴賲 丕賱卮禺氐賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 賰丕賳鬲 賲毓馗賲賴丕 鬲丨賵賲 丨賵賱 丕賱賰賵禺 毓賱賶 囟賮丞 丕賱賳賴乇貙
賵賱賰賳 賲毓 馗賴賵乇 丕賮鬲乇丕囟 丕乇鬲賰丕亘 丕亘賳 丕賱爻賷丿丞 乇賵爻 賱賱噩乇賷賲丞貙
賱賲 賷賰賳 兀賲丕賲賴丕 爻賵賶 丕賱爻毓賷 賱鬲亘乇卅丞 廿亘賳賴丕 亘賳賮爻賴丕貙 賮丕賳胤賱賯鬲 賮賷 丕賱亘丨孬 賵丕賱鬲丨乇賷 賵鬲鬲亘毓 丕賱丌孬丕乇 毓賱賶 丕賱噩賱賷丿 丕賱鬲賷 賰丕賳鬲 賰賱賴丕 鬲賯賵丿 賲賳 丕賱賰賵禺 丕賱氐睾賷乇 毓亘乇 丕賱爻賵丕丨賱 丕賱賲睾胤丕丞 亘丕賱孬賱賵噩 廿賱賶 丕賱卮賲丕賱 賳丨賵 丕賱亘乇賷丞貙 賵賰丕賳 毓賱賷賴丕 兀賳 鬲爻乇毓 賯亘賱 鬲爻丕賯胤 丕賱孬賱賵噩 丕賱賰孬賷賮貙 賮賱胤丕賱賲丕 賰丕賳 丕賱孬賱噩 亘丕乇毓賸丕 賮賷 胤賲爻 兀賷 丌孬乇 賮賷 亘乇賷丞 丿賵冥 乇賷冥乇貙
乇賵丕賷丞 噩乇賷賲丞 丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷丞 賵鬲丕乇賷禺賷丞 賲卮賵賯丞貙 賲賰鬲賵亘丞 賵賲賳爻賵噩丞 亘廿鬲賯丕賳貙
鬲馗賳 兀賳賰 兀賲爻賰鬲 亘胤乇賮 丕賱禺賷胤貙 賮賷賳賮賱鬲 賲賳 賷丿賷賰 賲乇丞 丌禺乇賶 乇睾賲 賯賵丞 兀丿賱鬲賴貙 賮鬲亘丨孬 毓賳 丌禺乇 噩丿賷丿貙
賵乇睾賲 亘胤亍 丕賱爻乇丿 丕賱賲夭丿丨賲 亘丕賱卮禺氐賷丕鬲 賵丕賱丨賵丕乇丕鬲貙 賱賰賳 賰卮賮 丕賱賱睾夭 賵丕賱賵氐賵賱 廿賱賶 丕賱爻亘亘 丕賱賲禺賷賮 丕賱睾賷乇 賲鬲賵賯毓 賰丕賳 丨丕賮夭賸丕 賱賱鬲賯丿賲 賮賷 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞
11.3.2022
賵丕賱卮鬲丕亍 丕賱賯丕乇爻 賷鬲賯丿賲 亘亘胤亍 賵亘賯賵丞 鬲丕乇賰賸丕 丌孬丕乇賴 毓賱賶 兀卮噩丕乇 丕賱亘鬲賵賱丕 賵兀賵乇丕賯賴丕 丕賱賲睾胤丕丞 亘丕賱噩賱賷丿 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賴賲爻 亘丕賱卮鬲丕亍 丕賱賯丕丿賲貙 賵鬲賴賲爻 亘丨賰丕賷丕鬲 丕賱亘乇賷丞 丕賱賲鬲噩賲丿丞 丕賱賲禺賷賮丞 丕賱鬲賷 丿丕卅賲賸丕 賲丕 賷毓賵丿 匕賰乇賴丕 丨賵賱 賲賵丕賯丿 丕賱卮鬲丕亍 賰賱賲丕 匕購賰乇鬲 丕賱匕卅丕亘 賵賮乇丕卅賴丕 丕賱賳丕毓賲 丕賱孬賲賷賳貙
賱睾夭 賯丿賷賲 賱丕禺鬲賮丕亍 賮鬲丕鬲賷賳 賲乇丕賴賯鬲賷賳 賲賳 丿賵冥 乇賷冥乇貙 禺乇噩鬲丕 賲毓 氐丿賷賯丞 賱賴賲丕 賱噩賲毓 丕賱鬲賵鬲 賵丕賱鬲賳夭賴 亘噩賵丕乇 丕賱亘丨賷乇丞貙 賵賰丕賳 賲賵毓丿 毓賵丿鬲賴賳 賯亘賱 睾乇賵亘 丕賱卮賲爻貙 賵賱賰賳 丕賱氐丿賷賯丞 毓丕丿鬲 賲鬲兀禺乇丞 賵賮賷 丨丕賱丞 亘丕卅爻丞 亘丿賵賳賴賲丕 亘毓丿 兀賳 禺乇噩 丕賱噩賲賷毓 賱賱亘丨孬 毓賳賴賳貙
賴匕丕 丕賱賱睾夭 丕賱匕賷 賱賲 賷購丨賱 兀亘丿賸丕 賵兀氐亘丨 丨賰丕賷丞 鬲丨賰賷賴丕 丕賱毓丕卅賱丕鬲貙 鬲購丨賰賷 賮賷 兀賲爻賷丕鬲 丕賱卮鬲丕亍 兀賲丕賲 丕賱賳丕乇貙 兀毓丕丿賴 廿賱賶 丕賱爻胤丨
丕賰鬲卮丕賮 丕賱爻賷丿丞 乇賵爻 賲賯鬲賱 氐賷丕丿 賮乇賳爻賷 賰賳丿賷 賴賵 賱賵乇丕賳 噩丕賲賷賴 賮賷 賰賵禺賴 毓賱賶 囟賮丞 丕賱賳賴乇貙
賵賮賷 賳賮爻 丕賱賷賵賲 丕賰鬲卮賮鬲 丕禺鬲賮丕亍 丕亘賳賴丕 亘丕賱鬲亘賳賷 丕賱賲乇丕賴賯 丕賱匕賷 禺乇噩 廿賱賶 丕賱氐賷丿 賮賷 丕賱睾丕亘丞貙
鬲亘丿兀 丕賱鬲丨乇賷丕鬲 賱丨賱 賱睾夭 丕賱賯鬲賱 賵丕賱丕禺鬲賮丕亍貙 賲賳 乇噩丕賱 丿丕禺賱 丕賱賲爻鬲賵胤賳丞貙 賵丌禺乇賷賳 賲賳 禺丕乇噩賴丕 賲賳賴賲 賲賻賳 噩丕亍 賱賱亘丨孬 賵丨賱 丕賱賱睾夭 賵賲賳賴賲 賲丕 賷亘丿賵 兀賳賴 噩丕亍 賱丕爻鬲睾賱丕賱 丕賱兀賲乇貙 賵丕賱丨賯賷賯丞 兀賳 丕賱噩賲賷毓 賮賷 丿賵冥 乇賷冥乇 丕卮鬲乇賰賵丕 亘丌乇丕卅賴賲 賵丕爻鬲賳鬲丕噩丕鬲賴賲 賵鬲丨乇賷丕鬲賴賲 丕賱卮禺氐賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 賰丕賳鬲 賲毓馗賲賴丕 鬲丨賵賲 丨賵賱 丕賱賰賵禺 毓賱賶 囟賮丞 丕賱賳賴乇貙
賵賱賰賳 賲毓 馗賴賵乇 丕賮鬲乇丕囟 丕乇鬲賰丕亘 丕亘賳 丕賱爻賷丿丞 乇賵爻 賱賱噩乇賷賲丞貙
賱賲 賷賰賳 兀賲丕賲賴丕 爻賵賶 丕賱爻毓賷 賱鬲亘乇卅丞 廿亘賳賴丕 亘賳賮爻賴丕貙 賮丕賳胤賱賯鬲 賮賷 丕賱亘丨孬 賵丕賱鬲丨乇賷 賵鬲鬲亘毓 丕賱丌孬丕乇 毓賱賶 丕賱噩賱賷丿 丕賱鬲賷 賰丕賳鬲 賰賱賴丕 鬲賯賵丿 賲賳 丕賱賰賵禺 丕賱氐睾賷乇 毓亘乇 丕賱爻賵丕丨賱 丕賱賲睾胤丕丞 亘丕賱孬賱賵噩 廿賱賶 丕賱卮賲丕賱 賳丨賵 丕賱亘乇賷丞貙 賵賰丕賳 毓賱賷賴丕 兀賳 鬲爻乇毓 賯亘賱 鬲爻丕賯胤 丕賱孬賱賵噩 丕賱賰孬賷賮貙 賮賱胤丕賱賲丕 賰丕賳 丕賱孬賱噩 亘丕乇毓賸丕 賮賷 胤賲爻 兀賷 丌孬乇 賮賷 亘乇賷丞 丿賵冥 乇賷冥乇貙
乇賵丕賷丞 噩乇賷賲丞 丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷丞 賵鬲丕乇賷禺賷丞 賲卮賵賯丞貙 賲賰鬲賵亘丞 賵賲賳爻賵噩丞 亘廿鬲賯丕賳貙
鬲馗賳 兀賳賰 兀賲爻賰鬲 亘胤乇賮 丕賱禺賷胤貙 賮賷賳賮賱鬲 賲賳 賷丿賷賰 賲乇丞 丌禺乇賶 乇睾賲 賯賵丞 兀丿賱鬲賴貙 賮鬲亘丨孬 毓賳 丌禺乇 噩丿賷丿貙
賵乇睾賲 亘胤亍 丕賱爻乇丿 丕賱賲夭丿丨賲 亘丕賱卮禺氐賷丕鬲 賵丕賱丨賵丕乇丕鬲貙 賱賰賳 賰卮賮 丕賱賱睾夭 賵丕賱賵氐賵賱 廿賱賶 丕賱爻亘亘 丕賱賲禺賷賮 丕賱睾賷乇 賲鬲賵賯毓 賰丕賳 丨丕賮夭賸丕 賱賱鬲賯丿賲 賮賷 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞
11.3.2022
February 16, 2010
The cold snows of Canada seemed like a suitable place to be when the weather here is so wintry. Stef Penney's smoothly written debut novel is an engaging and pacy mystery set in mid nineteenth century Northern Territory. The solution to the crime is satisfying, but my main criticism is that the novel is over-loaded: there are too many minor characters, there's at least one sub-plot too many and there are motifs that Ms Penney seemed to get bored with: the tablet with the mysterious signs just got lost near the end, oh well, never mind, and although the idea of one main character who is also a narrator having a shameful past in an asylum was interesting, it left too many unanswered questions (how did she get out? What does her past have to do with the present?). Good, but needed editing.
January 14, 2024
Nota 7,5
Es un libro que me ha gustado, la autora escribe bien y sobre todo, ambienta muuuy bien. Me ha parecido estar caminando por esas regiones nevadas de Canad谩. Pero no le谩is este libro si lo que busc谩is es una historia de ritmo trepidante porque, aunque lo diga en la contraportada, es mentira. Estamos ante un libro LENTO.
Eso s铆, a m铆 me ha interesado bastante m谩s esa parte lenta que las 煤nicas 10 o 12 p谩ginas trepidantes que tiene que me han dejado indiferente.
Recomendable s铆, pero no gustar谩 a todo el mundo.
Es un libro que me ha gustado, la autora escribe bien y sobre todo, ambienta muuuy bien. Me ha parecido estar caminando por esas regiones nevadas de Canad谩. Pero no le谩is este libro si lo que busc谩is es una historia de ritmo trepidante porque, aunque lo diga en la contraportada, es mentira. Estamos ante un libro LENTO.
Eso s铆, a m铆 me ha interesado bastante m谩s esa parte lenta que las 煤nicas 10 o 12 p谩ginas trepidantes que tiene que me han dejado indiferente.
Recomendable s铆, pero no gustar谩 a todo el mundo.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,850 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.