No other god of the Greeks is as widely present in the monuments and nature of Greece and Italy, in the sensuous tradition of antiquity, as Dionysos. In myth and image, in visionary experience and ritual representation, the Greeks possessed a complete expression of indestructible life, the essence of Dionysos. In this work, the noted mythologist and historian of religion Carl Kerenyi presents a historical account of the religion of Dionysos from its beginnings in the Minoan culture down to its transition to a cosmic and cosmopolitan religion of late antiquity under the Roman Empire. From the wealth of Greek literary, epigraphic, and monumental traditions, Kerenyi constructs a picture of Dionysian worship, always underlining the constitutive element of myth.
Included in this study are the secret cult scenes of the women's mysteries both within and beyond Attica, the mystic sacrificial rite at Delphi, and the great public Dionysian festivals at Athens. The way in which the Athenian people received and assimilated tragedy in its immanent connection with Dionysos is seen as the greatest miracle in all cultural history. Tragedy and New Comedy are seen as high spiritual forms of the Dionysian religion, and the Dionysian element itself is seen as a chapter in the religious history of Europe.
The plot arc about the Maenad on True Blood piqued my interest in Dionysos, but this was a serious and difficult book--no special effects, no nudity. Part of the difficulty was the author's frequent assertions of conclusions or interpretations without sufficient grounds that I could see. Another was my limited background in Greek religion, to say nothing of Minoan or Mycenaean. This second problem improved when I started reading with a reference book on Greek religion. Among the things I got from this book: Dionysos was more important to Greek culture than I had ever thought; his cult was especially important in Athens, and included three major festivals; one of these festivals included recitations of poetry honoring Dionysos and this evolved into Greek tragedy; the Greeks distinguished individual lives from Life as a whole or force; and Dionysos represented the latter. I am learning that Greek religion was more complicated than I imagined, and included rituals and festivals; the important festival of Dionysus of the new wine was celebrated in part by male citizens each sitting down and drinking an enormous amount of wine; women citizens stayed home in groups doing Dionysus only knows what to celebrate.
Mind opening to see the Minoan origins of Dionysian cult and its early roots in honey/bee symbolism, caves, (potentially) poppies and dance. Minoan women were really Dionysian.
Interessante e informativo, anche se molte citazioni in greco e in latino non sono state tradotte: inoltre le note a piè di pagina sono inutili (rimandano ad altri libri dell'autore o a scritti, e non spiegano). Nonostante questo, comunque, non si può mettere in dubbio la quantità di lavoro che ci sia stata dietro questo libro, e la raccolta di immagini nelle ultime pagine (anche se in bianco è nero) è stata una buona aggiunta.
Loved the material of this book....the writing not so much. Writing overly verbose and inaccessible too often for my taste. Recommended for people who can tolerate sifting through difficult language to get at some fascinating material. Recommended people interested in Jung, greek mythology, religion.
There were some parts of this that went a little over my head because the writing could be a bit—extremely—verbose, but as someone who devours anything that has to do with Dionysus, I thoroughly enjoyed it. Not an easy read, but well worth it.
Bir kültür mahkemesi olsaydı, bu yayınevi ve bu çevirmen mahkemeye verilebilirdi, böylesine rezalet bir çeviriye hiç denk gelmedim; belki biraz türkçeden çok arkaik bir osmanlıca ile çevrilen Schopenhauer kitapları bununla rekabet edebilir, çeviri kepazeliğinde.
Çevirmenin kendisinin kitabı okuduğundan şüpheliyim, kendisi çevirmemiş de bir çeviri programı kullanmış, ve çok hızlıca bir redaksiyon okuması yapıldığı yönünde ciddi kuşku oluştu bende. Örnek mi? “Akademik Edebiyat� nedir? Ben daha önce böyle bir tanım duymadım. Ama tabii ki “academic literature� karşılığı kullanılmış. Ya da, başka kültürülere ait iki farklı tanrısal figürün özdeşliii anlamında “identity of X and Y� , “X ve Y’nin kimliği� olarak çevrilmiş. İnsanları, bir felsefe, edebiyat dili olarak Türkçeden iyice uzaklaştırıyorlar. Artık orjinal kaynaklara ulaşmak için servet sahibi olmaya gerek yok ki; böyle berbat çeviriler varken insanlar niye Türkçeden okusun ki…Maalesef bu kitabın İngilizcesini bulamadım..
Kitabın kendisine gelirsek; berbat çeviriden çıkarsayabildiğimiz kadarıyla çok ilginç şeyler anlatıyor. Mitsel figürlerin, öyle gökten zembille inen, statik, sabit karakterler olmadığını, antik şehirler gibi farklı katmanların üst üste binmesiyle uzun zaman içinde oluştupunj iyi örnekliyor. Dionysos’un nasıl çağlar boyunca katman katman oluşan çok düzeyli bir karakter olduğunu ortaya koyuyor. Pekçok farklı kültürden, yani zoe ve bios olarak, yokedilemeyen ve geçici bireysel yaşamın diyalektiğini dile getiren benzer tanrısal figürlerin bir üst üste binmesi olduğunu anlıyoruz. Ancak kitabın ikinci yarısı bu ana temadan uzaklaşıp, çok detaylı arkeolojik spekülatif analizlere sapıyor ve aşırı sıkıcı olmaya başlıyor.
Dall'Egitto di Osiride e Iside, passando per la Creta dei micenei, il mito di Dioniso si perde nelle nebbie del tempo, arrivando quasi intatto alle soglie del tardo impero romano. Un testo formidabile e complesso per quantità di informazioni ed excursus storico-antropologico, corredato da un inserto di immagini fotografiche di reperti archeologici (vasi, bassorilievi, affreschi) che accompagnano l'evoluzione etno-iconografica del mito di dioniso e delle celebrazioni dionisiache. Un testo imprescindibile per chi voglia approfondire la storia del mito nel rapporto con le civilità in ci e nato e si è diffuso, fino alla definitiva scomparsa.
Sono solo un lettore amatoriale di questi temi, e quindi non so dire quanto le interpretazioni di Kereny siano ancora attuali. Ma la sua ricerca sul mito di Dioniso dagli albori cretesi al tardo classicismo greco e romano è sempre affascinante e a volte entusiasmante. Da tenere sul comodino per tornarci su ancora e ancora.
The book is a very complex research towards the Dionysos but it's focused a lot on a pre-historic Cretan roots of the religion and mostly on Archaic period. Too little on the Orphics vision of Dionysism and almost nothing on a syncretism period and golden-leafed tablets. But these are stories for another books I suppose.
This is pretty dated, but it’s a fun read nonetheless. I always get absolutely sucked into this kind of Jungian myth-history stuff, because it’s delightfully readable (it helps that in this case I’d already read Otto), and it does give inspiration for writing.
It is a hard book to read, its language and structure are not easily accessible. Despite the struggle, I loved reading it. It is so dense with ideas and careful observation of evidence, based on years of Kerenyi's work. It's an essential reading on Dionysus, Dionysian cults and origins of the cults of life's inscrutability such as Christianity. Kerenyi really expanded a nietzschean interpretation so prevalent in modernity. Dionysus doesn't need Apollo to be his solar rational double, as he is quite capable of such duality himself.