Born: 19 October 1962 in Washington, DC. Youngest of 3 children. Father was a photographer for The Washington Post.
Childhood: Nerdy. Spent a lot of time lying on my bed reading. Favorite authors back then: Laura Ingalls Wilder, Madeleine L鈥橢ngle, Zilpha Keatley Snyder, Joan Aiken, Susan Cooper, Lloyd Alexander. Book I would have taken to a desert island: Anne of Green Gables by L.M. Montgomery.
Education: BA in English, Oberlin College, Ohio, 1984. No one was surprised that I went there; I was made for such a progressive, liberal place.
MA in creative writing, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England, 1994. There鈥檚 a lot of debate about whether or not you can be taught to write. Why doesn鈥檛 anyone ask that of professional singers, painters, dancers? That year forced me to write all the time and take it seriously.
Geography: Moved to London after graduating from Oberlin in 1984. I had studied for a semester in London and thought it was a great place, so came over for fun, expecting to go back to the US after 6 months to get serious. I鈥檓 still in London, and still not entirely serious. Even have dual citizenship 鈥� though I keep the American accent intact.
Family: 1 English husband + 1 English son.
Career: Before writing, was a reference book editor, working on encyclopedias about writers. (Yup, still nerdy.) Learned how to research and how to make sentences better. Eventually I wanted to fix my own sentences rather than others鈥�, so I quit and did the MA.
Writing: Talked a lot about becoming a writer as a kid, but actual pen to paper contact was minimal. Started writing short stories in my 20s, then began first novel, The Virgin Blue, during the MA year. With Girl With a Pearl Earring (written in 1998), I became a full-time writer.
I've read all of Chevalier's novels and have always thought of this one as my favourite. A reread didn't change that, so I've bumped my rating up. I loved the neat structure that bookends the action between the death of Queen Victoria and the death of Edward VII, and the focus on funerary customs (with Highgate Cemetery as a major setting) and women's rights is right up my street. The switching between first-person POVs makes it such easy and engaging reading. She hits the absolute sweet spot between women's and literary fiction. Any and all melodrama is excused! The title is literal re: grave furniture, but also refers to shooting stars and erring humans.
A favourite passage:
(Kitty) "I have spent my life waiting for something to happen. And I have come to understand that nothing will. Or it already has, and I blinked during that moment and it's gone. I don't know which is worse - to have missed it or to know there is nothing to miss."
Gaslit England during the turn of the century. The story starts during the funeral of Queen Victoria (1837-1901) and ends during the funeral of King Edward VII (1901-1910). On their visit to the cemetery to pay respect to their beloved queen, two families meet: the Colemans and the Waterhouses and their relationships are started by the friendship between their two 5-y/o daughters, Maude Coleman and Lavinia Waterhouse. They meet when they are 5 years old and the story ends when they are in the brink of adulthood at the age of 15.
One noteworthy aspect of this novel: narrated in first person by each of the major characters without losing the story鈥檚 focus and the delivery of its message: that women are not the weaker sex.
The plot is thin and the prose is easy yet mesmerizing in its beauty. The frequent reference to cemeteries and death seems to be a reminder to its readers that we are all mortals and all of us will die sooner or later. So, it is but proper that we do what is right and contribute in our own ways to leave this world a better place just like what Kitty Coleman and her support to suffragettes鈥� dream of having women vote during elections. It also teaches us that we are all human being and we commit mistakes like Jenny Whitby鈥檚 pregnancy and Kitty鈥檚 affair with Richard and the abortion of their baby. It also shows us that time changes no matter what we do like how the Waterhouses try to hold on to their conventional beliefs compared to the openness of the Colemans to change.
The title comes from the angel in the grave of the Waterhouses that falls and breaks into parts in one of the scene. In another, it is Lavinia鈥檚 belief, being a more imaginative child, that the falling stars are actually falling angels that are falling because they are going to earth to deliver some messages. The more practical-minded Maude insists that they are meteorites and not angels. These are 5 year old girls in England in 1901 and this is an example of how Chevalier provides the contrast between the two girls.
Okay, those really are not new. The novel is cute though. Smooth reading and Chevalier鈥檚 attention to details and making use of those details to make her story worth-reading is something that I appreciated. There are still nice novels that do not need to have huge political impact, endorse some earth-shaking philosophy or use big words for me to enjoy. Sometimes, surprises come in small package and this novel for me definitely falls in that category. Not a 1001. Not a 501. No awards from Pulitzer, Booker, etc. No one of my friends here in 欧宝娱乐 recommended this but definitely a joy, although there are two deaths towards the end, to read.
This book grabbed me from the very first page. Set at the turn of the century, the story takes place amidst the women's suffrage movement. Gender issues are also noted, whereas the man was the head of the household and "handled" the wife. Each character speaks individually, allowing the reader to listen and decide for themselves where to put the importance of each character. The voice of the youngest children is included, as is the maid, cook, grave digger to the "gubner." Issues of class are also raised in this story from the servants and grave diggers to those of the most forward thinking family.
Falling Angels by Tracy Chevalier was a book set in Victorian England after the death of Queen Victoria in January 1901. In keeping with the tradition of public mourning, two families visiting neighboring graves become acquainted as each in horror sees that while one gravesite has an urn, the other has an ostentatious angel reaching out. The Coleman family and the Waterhouse family each have a five-year-old daughter and Maude and Lavinia become instant friends as they steel away to explore the cemetery and meeting Simon, the gravedigger's son.
This book transpires over a ten-year period during the height of Victorian England complete with gaslights and hansom cabs. The setting was exquisite as one could vividly imagine the scenes invoked. These two families become more entwined over the next ten years when the book ends with the death of King Edward.
There are many points of view as we go through the lives of these families during the ten years between these historic reigns. At times I was riveted to the narrative and at other times, it seemed tedious. All in all there is a heartbreaking story in these pages. I have read other books by this author and I will continue to follow her work.
Chevalier鈥檚 second novel shifts from 17th-century Delft to London between the deaths of Queen Victoria and Edward VII. A lot of the action takes place in a cemetery, much like Highgate, populated by some 30 angel monuments, one of which eventually topples. The title presumably also refers to some of the female characters, who are in the process of abandoning the Victorian pedestals that have kept them somewhat set in stone. The narrative unfolds in a stream of brief, first-person accounts, less like letters (in which writers might choose their words less with 鈥渢ruth鈥� than with ulterior motives in mind) and more like diary entries (supposedly unguarded and spoken 鈥渇rom the heart鈥濃€攖hough characters can, and do, lie to themselves). Chevalier observes appropriate class distinctions in putting words in lower class mouths (e.g., those of cooks, housemaids, the youthful gravedigger, or 鈥渘aughty boy,鈥� who becomes chums across class lines with two young girls, habitu茅s of the cemetery, who serve as chief protagonists); from a very early age the precocious Maude and Lavinia, on the other hand, sound little different than their parents.
Maude鈥檚 mother, the restive Kitty, contrasts notably with Lavinia鈥檚 mother, Gertrude (much mired in Victorian proprieties), not to mention with Kitty鈥檚 mother-in-law (a thoroughly unlikable version of Maggie Smith from Downton Abbey, without the wit). Fallen Angels and its cast perhaps resemble Upstairs, Downstairs of blessed memory more than that most recent BBC stately home juggernaut.
One experiences a lot about the Edwardian way of death as all these women (and their less visible husbands and paramours) confront Britain鈥檚 post-Victorian social growing pains. These include women鈥檚 suffrage, to which Kitty becomes thoroughly committed. Chevalier also suggests the sorts of unfortunate consequences that can result when various characters remain so unswervingly faithful to Principle that they forget or ignore "lesser" concerns. Humanity, it seems, is sometime left in this story to those who have little time for and can ill afford such principles.
Pensei que estar com outra mulher traria Kitty de volta, que o ci煤me a faria abrir-me de novo a porta do seu quarto. Contudo, duas semanas depois n茫o me deixava l谩 entrar mais vezes do que antes. N茫o gosto de pensar que sou um homem desesperado, mas n茫o percebo porque 茅 a minha mulher t茫o dif铆cil. Dei-lhe uma vida boa, mas continua infeliz, embora n茫o possa, ou n茫o queira, dizer porqu锚. 脡 o suficiente para levar um homem a trocar de mulher, ainda que seja por uma noite.
脡 do dom铆nio de um bom escritor transformar a hist贸ria em est贸ria sem ferir a sensibilidade est茅tica do leitor, e eu, pelo menos, n茫o me senti nada ofendida com esta interpreta莽茫o (simb贸lica) de Chevalier daquele que 茅 o fim da era vitoriana e o in铆cio de um novo s茅culo repleto de possibilidades (ou n茫o) para todas aquelas mulheres que aspiravam a ter um lugar numa sociedade desenhada em fun莽茫o do homem e dominada pelo homem.
Entremeado de eventos ver铆dicos ou, no m铆nimo, plaus铆veis, Quando os Anjos Caem 茅 um romance muito bem conseguido sobre, 茅 certo, a amizade de v谩rias crian莽as, sobre as dores do crescimento e da perda, sobre o momento em que a realidade atinge cada um de n贸s e nos arranca dos nossos alicerces, mas cujo n煤cleo duro reside na for莽a com que transmite uma mensagem que, desde que pela primeira vez foi passada, ainda n茫o perdeu o seu valor: a defesa da igualdade de g茅nero.
- Uma menina precisa de aprender estas coisas. Como vai a costura dela? -N茫o muito bem - respondeu francamente a m茫e. - Herdou de mim a falta de jeito. Mas l锚 muito bem. Est谩 a ler Sensibilidade e Bom Senso, n茫o est谩s, Maude? Acenei afirmativamente. - E tamb茅m Alice do Outro Lado do Espelho. O pai e eu recri谩mos o jogo de xadrez a partir dele. - A ler! - A av贸 empertigou-se- Isso n茫o leva a rapariga a lado nenhum. S贸 lhe mete ideias na cabe莽a. Sobretudo lixo, como o daqueles livros da Alice. A m茫e endireitou-se. Ela est谩 sempre a ler. -Que mal h谩 em que as mulheres tenham ideias, m茫e? -Nada as satisfaz. Como a ti.(...)Queres sempre mais alguma coisa, embora nem tu saibas o qu锚.
N茫o ser谩 por isso de estranhar que, embora as rela莽玫es entre as fam铆lias Waterhouse (tradicionalista) e Coleman (mais progressista, ou talvez nem tanto assim) sejam um dos focos da narrativa, e a rela莽茫o entre as filhas de ambas as fam铆lias sirva de fio condutor da hist贸ria, seja, na realidade, a transi莽茫o de Kitty Coleman, de mulher de fam铆lia a arreigada sufragista o evento que suscita maior interesse e perspetivas de an谩lise em todo o livro.
Ligando a morte da rainha Vit贸ria com o surgimento de um novo s茅culo, Chevalier faz despertar na sua anti-hero铆na desejos de uma vida de maior liberdade intelectual, f铆sica e espiritual. Para Kitty, a morte da rainha representa a morte de uma era em que a mulher est谩 subordinada ao papel de m茫e e esposa e essa rutura, sentida profundamente, ir谩 ditar o seu comportamento futuro.
N茫o me atrevo a dizer a ningu茅m, sen茫o sou acusada de trai莽茫o, mas fiquei tremendamente animada quando soube que rainha tinha morrido. (...)A viragem do s茅culo foi uma simples altera莽茫o de n煤meros, mas agora vamos ter uma verdadeira mudan莽a de chefia e n茫o posso deixar de pensar que Eduardo 茅 mais representativo de todos n贸s do que a sua m茫e.
Kitty, como se ver谩, est谩 disposta a pagar o seu pre莽o pelo legado que ter谩 a possibilidade de deixar, mas tamb茅m pela miss茫o, pelo sentimento de completude e prop贸sito que a iniciativa lhe traz, uma mudan莽a de comportamento que 茅 tudo menos inofensiva, com ou sem morte da rainha.
Esse retrato do que era a mulher que sai de uma era de repress茫o est谩 muito bem desenhado pela autora que recorre a figuras e eventos m铆ticos da luta pela igualdade de g茅nero e pelo direito ao sufr谩gio, sobretudo porque n茫o se fica por a铆 e vai mais longe procurando tra莽ar as motiva莽玫es pessoais, os desafios familiares, as press玫es sociais e de classe e o embara莽o institucional que cerceia a vida destas mulheres e de um movimento que era tudo menos pac铆fico para o sistema pol铆tico, social e familiar estabelecido.
- Aprendeste a li莽茫o? - perguntou o pai. A m茫e franziu a testa. - Que queres dizer com 芦li莽茫o禄>? - Basta. Quando saires podemos voltar 脿 vida normal. - Depende muito daquilo a que chamas normals. O pai n茫o respondeu. - Est谩s a sugerir que desista da luta? - Com certeza que n茫o vais continuar. - Pelo contr谩rio, Richard, acho que a pris茫o foi a minha realiza莽茫o. 脡 estranho, mas a tristeza transformou-me numa vara de ferro, 芦o que n茫o me derrota torna-me mais forte禄... Uma frase de Nietzsche, sabes? - Leste demasiado. - disse o pai. A m茫e sorriu. - N茫o pensavas assim quando me conheceste. Ali谩s, quando sair, vou ter muito mais que fazer e ler. - Discutiremos isso quando voltares para casa. (...) Aqui n茫o podes pensar convenientemente -N茫o h谩 nada a discutir. J谩 tomei a minha decis茫o. N茫o tens de te intrometer. - Claro que tenho... Sou o teu marido!
A luta pelo direito ao sufr谩gio est谩 assim vinculada 脿 liberdade de pensamento, 脿 liberdade sexual, 脿 liberdade ideol贸gica e de a莽茫o, e dela n茫o se liberta nem pode libertar pois 茅 neste emaranhado que se alicer莽a a miss茫o destas mulheres que, como a fict铆cia Kitty, ofereceram a sua vida como penhor de tempos mais justos.
- Sinto-me importante - respondeu a m茫e - porque talvez pela primeira vez na minha vida tenho uma tarefa, Richard. Estou a trabalhar! Posso n茫o ser optimista como a Caroline e Mrs. Pankhurst quanto a ver o sufr谩gio votado ainda durante a minha vida. Mas o nosso trabalho a isso conduzir谩. A Maude beneficiar谩 dos resultados, mesmo que eu n茫o os veja.
Well I thought it would be difficult to make another book as good as the The Girl with the Pearl Earring which was superb. Don鈥檛 get me wrong this was still a great book. Simple story focusses on two families and their daughters in the period from the day of Queen Victoria鈥檚 death to that of the King who succeeded her. Incorporating the Suffragette movement.
Short paragraphs alternate with POV鈥檚 of the main characters. Most of the action taking place within and about the local cemetery. The Author captures the feeling of the times well. As with the Pearl this is a sad book. I will look out more books by this author. They are modern day classics.
This book finished on day 1 of current ( yes another) Madeira holiday馃憤
When I picked the book I was intrigued by the time period and the vehicle of using several characters and their point of view to narrate the story. I read 鈥淕irl with the Pearl Earring鈥� which I liked very much and thought the author did a marvelous job researching the period and bringing the time period and the characters were well developed. Based on my past experience with this author I thought I鈥檇 give it a try. Unfortunately I was deeply disappointed with this book.
Various characters in the story told short descriptions of events in the story 鈥� the descriptions by each character were too short to capture and develop the character and they told so little in each of their sections鈥 was begging for more detail and information. These brief narrations by the speaker causes the character to be undeveloped, flat, uninteresting and as a reader I was not able to get very involved with the character. I did not find that each character had their own distinctive voice such that without looking at the title of who was speaking I could immediately tell who was speaking. (In fact when the young girls were five they were speaking and thinking about things much too adult and sophisticated for their age so their voices felt believable.) For most of the beginning of the book the comings and goings and discussions focused around a cemetery 鈥揵oring. I was more than half way through the book before I saw a glimmer of a plot. At first I thought the plot would center on turn of the century women and unhappy marriage, affairs, unwanted pregnancy, finding a soul mate but that never really developed. As the plot switches away onto something else (women鈥檚 rights in turn of the century London, women suffragettes) I thought, at last here is the real plot but that was never really developed either. So much more could have been done to describe the women鈥檚 suffragette movement, the hardships, the imprisonment of the women and the frustration embarrassment and misunderstanding on the part of the men and society. I imagine the author did extensive research on the era but that never came out in the story. The rich details, descriptions, of the times and the deep feelings, frustrations, fears and concerns of the characters were not brought out. I found the ending came abruptly but I guess after wondering all over the place the author had to finally just stop.
Overall this book was a big disappointment but I kept reading to the end to see why this book was published 鈥 thought surely it must have something meaningful to contribute.
I had the audiobook only (I have really no idea why I picked this one up), so can鈥檛 provide any of the many, many quotes that made me laugh.
The tone of the book was wonderful. Very irreverent in some parts and very intentionally unintentionally funny 鈥� i.e. very uptight Victorian attitudes were written so stiffly that they made me giggle. For large parts, this book read like a satire.
And this is where my problem with the book lay: the very light tone narration (each character gets a turn to tell the story from their point of view in alternating chapters) didn鈥檛 quite fit the story.
We first meet all of the protagonists when two Victorian London families meet in a graveyard, having bought adjacent family plots, and fall out over the hideousness of the adornments they each bought for the graves: a huge urn on one and a grotesque angel on the other.
We then follow the families as their daughters strike up a close friendship and see how their lives unravel, as the angels fall, as one mother suffers from depression, there is an unwanted pregnancy, etc., the engagement in politics as one member joins the suffragettes, a murder that gets absolutely not talked about, and so on.
There are a plethora of serious issues that Chevalier takes up in her book, but they all seem to get glanced over.
For example, the cause of the suffragettes is criticised by the household staff as being of no use to them because they would not get the vote under what the suffragettes were proposing (votes for 鈥渟ome鈥� women, but not all at this stage) and the way that the suffragettes are portrayed is outrageously self-indulgent and actually leads to catastrophe. Yet, I as a reader found it hard not to take issue with the portrayal because even that criticism was left largely unexplained. I had a hard time following the author鈥檚 choices in this one.
I was missing some complexity and depth in this book which left me feeling that this was more of an exercise in creative writing (of historical fiction) than an actual story that had a point.
Still, I laughed quite a bit at some of the characters.
Victorians were obsessed with death and sex. This book opens with the death of Queen Victoria, and ends with the death of King Edward, placing it squarely in Edwardian times, but the Victorian obsessions of death and sex are the two themes of this novel, pushing and pulling each other forward to modern times or back towards the Victorian age.
The book follows two rival families sharing adjacent cemetery plots and who eventually become next door neighbors. The two little girls become friends, the fathers play cricket and go to pubs together, but the mothers are constantly comparing themselves to the other in every way.
Through the point of view of all of the different family members, servants, and the gravedigger's son, the nature of the families' friendship and rivalry is uncovered. This style of shifting 1st person narration was very effective for this book. With headings indicate who was writing, it was never confusing, and the plot unfolded itself slowly and beautifully as motivations for past actions others observed became clear.
Death surrounded these families. The girls were just old enough to understand death when Queen Victoria died. They live next door to the cemetery and visit their family plots. They learn how to mourn. They live in the shadow of death every day.
Sex was ever present as well: the wife that turned her husband away; the husband that went to wife swapping parties; sexual escapades with men who work at the graveyard, and the consequences of those actions. Sexual roles were explored as well, as men are told to handle their woman as one handles a horse, and an accidental encounter with a leading suffragette leads one of the wives deep into that movement.
Eventually, the families become too entangled with each other and with the Suffragette movement so that even the smallest things that these rivals and friends do will have unintended and drastic consequences.
I hadn鈥檛 read any of Tracey Chevalier books before although I had heard of The Girl With The Pearl Earring. This book was at first a little off putting with the extremely short chapters and the fact that each chapter was dealing with a different character. Having said that I was blown away by this story and although it was a little dark in places the way it was written brought the 1900鈥檚 to life. It鈥檚 not an exciting narrative but, it鈥檚 historical and very well written and such a lovely story. I shall be reading her other books in time.
The second book of I read in a short time and what I can say is that it offered me another special reading experience. I can't explain it exactly based on logic but this quiet way writing and these simple but special stories that are written with attention to detail create an effect that is particularly enjoyable to me. Of course in the case of this book I confess that in the beginning I struggled a bit, this strange structure with the very small chapters and the continuously alternating POV so I believed that the final impression would be rather mediocre. As, however, got used in this structure and could follow better story that was unfolding in front 螜 started to like the book more and more and until I got to the end I was really enchanted.
To get things right from the start, the author takes us to the day of the death of Queen Victoria, in 1901 in a typical British cemetery of the era. There, under the gaze of a stone Angel, two young girls become friends and then we follow their common path within the next 10 years, a course that largely revolves around this cemetery. This decade marks a transitional era, of course, is the end of the Victorian era, the beginning of a new century that was supposed to bring massive changes in all sectors. In these years the two girlfriends live through sorrows and joys, growing up and maturing, watching puzzled the social changes of the era and all aspects of life of adults who show the same puzzlement, that in some reaches the point of great turmoil. The writer giving us the perspective of many people creates a fairly comprehensive picture of how people were facing this new era. Others faced it with disbelief, others with indifference, others were trying to become part of this wave of change.
in short we have a touching story of friendship, a record of the life of the people of the era, of their hopes and their concerns against a backdrop of social changes and the Victorian obsession with death and mourning etiquette. The last is that it gives a romantic tone throughout the book, and as it is the subject of extensive study by the author makes it stand out, at least in my own eyes. A book that moved me, made me reflect, somewhere brought tears to my eyes and in the end left me with a bitter smile by realising that it is not a story about death but about life that always finds a way to continue, with the ceremonial rites of death and mourning to play an important role. A really wonderful book.
Once again Tracy Chevalier weaves a tale of everyday life in a different time- takes us gently through the customs and mores that define a particular point in hostory. She also allows her characters to unfold, not from one single point of view or from an omnipotent observer, but each from their own perspective. Through her words, they each grow and evolve- even the most shallow of characters shows surprising depth. The descriptive quality, simple prose, multiple perspectives, all help the story unfold.
This period of English history is not one I know that much about, but I found the customs fascinating. (My knowledge of the suffragette movement in England was for a long time limited to the mother in Mary Poppins). I really feel that I learned a great deal about the customs of the time.
I am perhaps an odd duck, because I really like reading the acknowlegdements and afterwards in books. Chevalier made me smile when she wrote in hers:
"The acknowledgements is the only section of a novel that reveals the author's "normal" voice. As a result I wlways read them looking for clues that will shed light on writers and their working methods and lives, as well as their connections with the real world. I suspect some of them are written in code. Alas, however, there are no hidden meanings in this one-just an everyday voice that wants to express gratitude for help in several forms."
Loved this historical fiction family drama that begins in 1901 and the death of Queen Victoria that sets the scene and the tone of the book. Multiple point of views keep this moving at a brisk pace as we sample the lives of each different character; both male and female, rich and poor.
Read this the first time in 2017 and I only gave it two stars, don't know my reason behind that but this time I've enjoyed it more, it's an interesting look at life in early 1900s. I thought it was interesting to see different behavior and what they thought was right and wrong. Not my favorite Tracy Chevalier but it was a good book nevertheless
I found this book to be initially better than the infuriating "Girl with a Pearl Earring", maybe because it tried to present the story from different points of view, but then I got angry because the promise was totally unfulfilled. The characters were unbelievable and flat, as if written with some sort of manual in hand.
There were two girls who became friends despite the differences between their families and personalities, but nothing came out of it, because simply labeling one girl as "shallow & pretty" and the other as "intelligent and plain" couldn't make for developing their characters. Actually I liked the stupid and pretty Lavinia better, she was at least some fun. Maude I can't say anything about for the life of me, and she was the stupider one, what with her being so oblivious about Jenny the servant or Simon or her mum. She only cared about herself. The mothers, the grandmother, the fathers were even worse, one-dimensional tools good only for thinking textbook thoughts about "the spirit of the day", politics, suffrage and such - no character development, no independent thought, just timid agreement to be obvious puppets of the author.
The story was so predictable it was sad. Of course something bad was going to happen during the suffrage rally. Of course the poor boy would fall in love with rich ladies, and think about them lots of gentle stuff. Of course the independent woman would neglect her daughter. Of course all the internal monologues would consist entirely of hypocritical exclamations, declarations and declamations, what with all these persons being, y'know, Victorians and stuff.
So why 2 stars? Because it was a fast read and I like POV changes. But grrr.
This takes place in Edwardian London, beginning the day after Victoria's death in 1901 and ending with the death of Edward VII in 1910. It concerns how the turn of the 20th Century affects two neighboring families, one of which hearkens back to the Victorian Era and one of which looks ahead to a new time. It especially concerns the incredibly stifling lives of women at the time. The mother in the forward family becomes a suffragette, pushing them forward perhaps a bit faster than they would wish to go. The climactic moment is a fictional account of a real event of the time, a huge demonstration demanding votes for women. It has tragic results for both families--the young girls of each family are especially affected. The novel is told in Spoon River Anthology style, with different characters taking the narrative voice of succeeding chapters, as if the reader were glimpsing into their personal journals. The differing reactions of one character to events deepen your understanding of the character who spoke before, and you piece out the story by taking in all the characters. There was an Upstairs, Downstairs quality as well because she gives a voice to everyone from the dictatorial grandmother to the poor upstairs maid to the barefoot boy who digs graves. It was a bit of a depressing book, but oddly uplifting when you finished seeing the whole picture. I enjoyed the author's "Girl with the Pearl Earring," and I enjoyed this one as well even though it was so different.
Just as a side note: it is incredible to me when I think of it that my own grandmothers were not allowed to vote until well after they became mothers. God bless those suffragettes.
I love everything Chevalier has written but this unique story set in Edwardian London has been a particular, long-time favorite. The story focuses on the friendship of two young girls from different backgrounds and includes several perspectives, including that of a gravedigger's son and an ardent suffragette. A well-researched piece of historical fiction and a gripping story.
I love how this book exposes so many different aspects of the Victorian lifestyle; from people with high society statuses, to servants and even a gravedigger's son. The fact that the story is told through the eyes of thirteen very different characters makes it even more interesting to read, since I never seemed to get bored with the whole concept of the story.
Through this book I can delve into the past and examine the London lifestyle in the Victorian era that I didn't have much clue about before. I didn't know how difficult life was to women during those years. They didn't have what modern women now take for granted: the freedom of choice, of speech, and of having equality.
This novel is romantic, heart wrenching, tragic, entertaining, and just simply beautifully written. I finished it in less than a week. I cried when Kitty Coleman and Ivy May passed away. I simply couldn't put it down. Praise for Tracy Chevalier. I am a fan.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
Hmpf. Hmpf,hmpf. This book was a bad try at writing dark. Well all the books from this author are that,but still! I had a real problem whit the destiny of the main character and her mother. At least she was the main character to me. All the others were so horrible you wanted to beat them whit a stick! So,the mother dies.And the girl does not get the boy she wants because of her winy bratty friend that indirectly messed up her and her mothers life. Go figure. I just have enough of injustice to look at in real life.Why read about shallow evil people that tend to make life miserable for the marginally good ones?
I gave it the second star because it was not badly written when it comes to form.Just when we consider the plot.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
This is a historical drama which was not as fulfilling as I had hoped. In my opinion, not a lot happens, except for a lot of loitering around a cemetery. I was excited about the time period and thought this would prove quite interesting, but I don鈥檛 think the story ever gets going.
I enjoyed this book from the first to the last page. When Maude Coleman and Lavinia Waterhouse, both five years of age, meet at their families' adjoining cemetery plots on the day after Queen Victoria's death, the friendship that results between sensitive, serious-minded Maude and narcissistic, melodramatic Livy is not unlikely, despite the difference in social classes. But the continuing presence in their lives of a young gravedigger, Simon Field, is. Far too cheeky for a boy of his age and class, Simon plays an important part in the troubles that will overtake the two families. Other characters are gifted with insights inappropriate to their age or station in life. Yet Chevalier again proves herself an astute observer of a social era, especially in her portrayal of the lingering sentimentality, prejudices and early stirrings of social change of the Victorian age. When Maude's mother, Kitty, becomes obsessively involved with the emerging suffragette movement, the plot gathers momentum. While it's obvious that tragedy is brewing, Chevalier shows imaginative skill in two neatly accomplished surprises, and the denouement packs an emotional wallop.