Guillermo Mart铆nez is an Argentine novelist and short story writer. He gained a PhD in mathematical logic at the University of Buenos Aires.
After his degree in Argentina, he worked for two years in a postdoctoral position at the Mathematical Institute, Oxford.
His most successful novel has been The Oxford Murders, written in 2003. In the same year, he was awarded the Planeta Prize for this novel, which has been translated into a number of languages.
This novel has more red herrings than a communist fish market.
But that's OK because I like novels that throws you off and keeps you guessing. Even if some of the herrings are obvious, there are always a few that swim by when you are not expecting them. The Oxford Murders is a nifty mystery about two Oxford academics that are trying to solve a murder and if it seems a little...well...academic. it's because it is. Martinez mixes a nice share of mathematics, Wittgensteinian philosophy and even some mythology to make a very different tale of murder. It may be the most fun book I ever read that involved mathematics professors, and we all know mathematics professors can be real party animals....or not.
First off, if you've considered this book, do not do so for the mystery. It is not it's strong point. Also, this is not a palate cleanser book.
On the surface, this looks like very English murder mystery - amateur sleuths, a steely eyed intelligent DCI, a possible serial killer, and a little bit of the occult. That is not what the story is about. The real story is the dark side of human relationships and an exploration of philosophy (which often partners mathematics).
鉁旓笍 Dark Academia 鉁旓笍 A stranger in a strange land 鉁旓笍 A hint of magical realism (our protagonist IS Argentinean) 鉁旓笍 Symbolism galore
You may feel you need to Google some of the mathematical/ philosophical concepts.
The way women were described in this book just seemed like a horny teenage boy would. It was like 鈥渢its tits tits. Wow. Ass. Hmmm, under that shirt could be some more ass. Tits again.鈥� The 鈥渟exy鈥� talk definitely also seemed like a teenage boy鈥檚 fantasy. I didn鈥檛 really like it. It took me out of the reading flow.
鈥淟os cr铆menes de Oxford鈥� es una novela que ten铆a potencial para m谩s. Es interesante, es corta, pero no llega a despegar del todo, qued谩ndose a medio camino. Los personajes tampoco ayudan mucho, pues est谩n m铆nimamente desarrollados. Es una especie de 鈥淐贸digo Da Vinci鈥� que se pierde en disquisiciones que no terminan de funcionar. T铆pica lectura veraniega, que a m铆 no me dej贸 ninguna huella, pero que tampoco lament茅 haber le铆do.
Not much of a "mystery" - I had it pegged maybe 1/3 of the way through - except for the spin at the end. That would be ok if there were some positives offsetting it. Unfortunately, except for a few graceful passages of writing about Oxford (I've never been there, but what Mr. Martinez wrote felt real to me), there's not much I can say that's positive. The conversations about mathematics were boring and mostly beyond my understanding - not to mention false sounding (real mathematicians wouldn't have to explain basic things to one another.) I wouldn't expect Mr. Martinez to dumb his book down, but he should have found a way to explain the mathematics part of the story in a more believeable fashion. There were too many coincidences, and life's not that coincidental. And the characters either weren't very interesting or were left unexplored. Would I ever reread this? No, I'd much rather watch an Inspector Morse or an Inspector Lewis video. Would I recommend it to a friend? Not unless I was planning on cutting off the friendship. So two stars.
I watched about one third of (starring Frodo Baggins and Winston Smith) and I found the story quite good and interesting enough to switch over to the book before being spoiled by moving pictures.
A series of murders in Oxford, seemingly based on a logical sequence of symbols with some Wittgenstein philosopy, G枚del incompleteness and Heisenberg uncertainty added to the mix.
What鈥檚 not to like when mathematics meets murder and logical reasoning solves mysteries? Well, finding the one single 鈥渢ruth鈥�, isn鈥檛 always that simple and sometimes even Occam鈥檚 razor doesn鈥檛 cut it right.
O lectur茫 agreabil茫, de sezon. O poveste politist茫 pres茫rat茫 cu teorii complicate de matematic茫 (v茫 mai aminti牛i de 艧iruri de numere, de liniaritate, de Fibonacci, Fermat 艧i de Pitagora?). N-am 卯nteles de ce 卯n prezentarea c茫r葲ii s-a f茫cut referire la codul Enigma, doar prima victim茫 participase 卯n tinere牛e la acea descoperire remarcabil茫. Crime, matematic茫, magie, ceva filozofie 艧i mult omenesc.
I bought this book a few years ago and never picked it up. When I reorganised one of my bookshelves, I came across it and decided to finally read it. I quite enjoyed it because I鈥檓 interested in philosophy but most parts about logic and mathematics went straight over my head. The plot is interesting enough, but it is a very short book in which you don鈥檛 really get to know the characters. Overall an enjoyable quick read.
Ja vajadz膿tu 墨si raksturot 拧o gr膩matu, sauktu to par intelektu膩lo detekt墨vu. Daudz zin膩tnes, filozofijas, maz膩k detekt墨va darb墨bas. Nek膩das slepkavas vaj膩拧anas un c墨艈u ainas 拧eit nav atrodamas. Papildus prieks par referenc膿m uz v膿sturiskajiem notikumiem.
Vair膩k filozofijas, nek膩 izmekl膿拧anas, bet bija interesanti un patika. Ar墨 nosl膿gums, kur var turpin膩t pakav膿ties pie mor膩les un motiv膩cijas.
Pirms p膩rizdo拧anas gan b奴tu der膿jis ar墨 p膩rlas墨t eso拧o tulkojumu, nevis tikai uzlikt jaunu v膩ku, lai nepaliek vis膩di 鈥溎D搉iji pudel膿鈥� un taml墨dz墨gi br墨numi.
鈥淛ebkura slepkav墨ba, ikkatra n膩ve tik tikko liek ievirmoties 奴de艈iem un k募奴st neman膩ma.鈥�
Altro libro letto per condividere (anche se mi sa che qualcuno bara) con mio figlio. Il suo prof a questo giro si 猫 spinto oltre il classico. Un bel giallo matematico che, per un liceo scientifico, 猫 la MORTE sua. Molti rifermenti appunto a matematici e teoremi vari. Contornato da musica e magia, questa lettura scorre via abbastanza bene.
T膩ds diezgan viendimension膩ls klasiska stila detekt墨vrom膩ns ar matem膩tisku piesitienu. 膧tra un viegla las膩mviela atslodzei, ja pat墨k 拧膩da 啪anra darbi. Grib膿j膩s vair膩k mist膿rijas un kaut k膩da dzi募uma, jo ideja 拧姆ita intri模膿jo拧a. Da募膿ja vil拧an膩s laikam ir ar墨 t膩d膿募, ka lik膩s, ka lasu klasisku britu detekt墨vrom膩nu argent墨nie拧u rakstnieka izpild墨jum膩... un neman墨ju 墨sti nek膩das lat墨艈amerik膩niskas v膿smas.
Ayer le dec铆a a mi marido, "qu茅 lindo, despu茅s de mucho tiempo, leer una novela en 2 tardes y quedar satisfecha". Parece que ahora la moda es sacar novelas de 600 p谩ginas m铆nimo, as铆 los compradores saben que hacen rendir su dinero (el contenido da lo mismo). Esta novela entrega lo que promete: entretenida, agradable de leer, el misterio es interesante y sacando algunos desvar铆os matem谩ticos y filos贸ficos que le dan cierta verosimilitud a la trama, no es tampoco muy rebuscada. (Aunque tuve que googlear a Wittgenstein, de quien no le铆 nunca nada). Todo esto en menos de 250 p谩ginas. Se le podr铆a achacar que hay ciertos momentos donde parece que uno adivina el final, luego que no, nos distraen por ac谩 y por all谩, y como al protagonista, nos parece que hay algo muy obvio que no estamos viendo pero que lo vamos a descubrir en cualquier momento. El argumento por excelencia de toda buena novela policial.
No se puede hacer m谩s lento
Como en el truco de Ren茅 Lavand y que ocupa todo un cap铆tulo del libro, la verdad es realmente simple, y nos han mostrado todos los indicios de manera totalmente obvia.
This is a deceptively easy page-turner and more challenging than it first seems. The intriguing links between mathematics, magic and crime-solving make for a tongue-in-cheek take on the traditional cosy English murder mystery. What's more, the reader can enjoy the added bonus of painlessly absorbing some interesting philosophical concepts along the way.
Extract:- 'The mechanism for corroborating the truth that goes all the way back to Aristotle and Euclid, the proud machinery that starts from true statements, from irrefutable first principles, and advances in strictly logical steps towards a thesis - what we call the axiomatic method - is sometimes just as inadequate as the unreliable, approximative criteria applied by the law.'
P.S. There is a film based on this novel starring John Hurt and other notable actors. I haven't seen it but it got very poor reviews - so probably best to avoid!
First Sentence: Now that the years have passed and everything鈥檚 been forgotten, and now that I鈥檝e received a terse e-mail from Scotland with the sad news of Seldom鈥檚 death, I feel I can break my silence (which he never asked for anyway) and tell the truth about events that reached the British papers in the summer of 鈥�93 with macabre and sensationalist headlines, but to which Seldom and I always referred 鈥� perhaps due to the mathematical connotation 鈥� simply as the series, or the Oxford Series.
An Argentinean graduate student comes to Oxford taking a room within the house of an elderly lady who had helped decipher the Enigma Code during WWII. He meets Arthur Seldom, a renowned logician who is an idol of his. When the student finds his landlady murdered in her parlor, he learns Seldom had received an anonymous note containing a symbol and indication that this was only the first murder to come.
I must confess that math and puzzles of logic are a foreign language to me so many of the discussions in this book were beyond me. As a mystery, it didn鈥檛 have much to offer.
Normally, I love books set in England. Here, it didn鈥檛 really matter as there was no real sense of place. There was also little character development, including the fact that we never new the name of the narrator nor had any real reason to care about any of the characters.
The book read very flat. There was nothing to draw me in; no suspense, no fascinating characters, no strong sense of place, and event the murders were uneventful. The worst was that I identified the killer almost immediately and, in spite of the twists which ended up being rather silly. I found the ending totally unsatisfying.
The best thing is that the book was short and enables me to move on to my next book very quickly. Mathematicians or logisticians might enjoy this book. I recommend mystery lovers give it a pass.
Segunda vez que lo leo y qu茅 bueno poder disfrutar de releer una historia que me tuvo enganchada desde la primer p谩gina y sorprendi贸 el final, la primera vez, por inesperado pero en esta, sabi茅ndolo, pude encontrar cosas que antes habia pasado por alto. Un placer cada una de sus historias y una pel铆cula pendiente desde hace muchos a帽os.
My actual rating for The Oxford Murders is probably about 3.5 stars because Guillermo Martinez is a good writer. But I would describe this book as a novel written by a mathematician for mathematicians. Almost all the characters, except for the detective, are either professional or amateur mathematicians--including the first victim. And a significant percentage of the 197 pages of the novel consist not of story, but of one mathematician talking to another mathematician about some other mathematician or about some theory of mathematics. Short sections of narrative action, with just enough occasional romance and a little sex, are interspersed like small oases in a desert of cognition.
This may sound worse than I intend it to. I did enjoy reading the novel, though its brevity is probably a good thing. And the ending is an interesting twist. And it does have Oxford as a setting, after all. I give the novel a qualified recommendation. It's hard to escape the reality that any crime drama set in Oxford is just asking to be compared to Colin Dexter's Inspector Morse series (and, of course, the Inspector Lewis spin-off and the Endeavor spin-off on the telly). Not an easy thing to live up to.
I like watching Inspector Morse and Inspector Lewis. (Okay, for Inspector Lewis it's because I like Hathaway, but still). I liked Numbers for a bit.
I didn't like this book.
Sometimes I don't mind when you can figure out the solution by page 30. is somewhat like that but it is still a good read because of the characters.
Not interesting characters here.
And boy, did I mind.
And the book is like Numbers but after the first season and a half, you know when it got stupid (Honestly, Charlie has to tell the FBI, including a profiler, that they should negoiate!!) and then every single storyline Charlie is alway right and never, ever wrong because he's like God or something.
And math people wouldn't explain all that stuff to each other. Honestly, they really wouldn't. And I'm sorry, the guy becomes so smart about murder because he read crime novels? Novels mean fiction. He should be reading real accounts. I hope that was a translation issue. I hate Miss Marple (unless its Rutherford; she's just grand).
1,5. Muy, muy, muy aburrido. Hace mucho tiempo... No, miento, NUNCA me he echado a la cara una novela de misterio tan soberanamente aburrida como esta. He escuchado el audiolibro y ten铆a que hacer unos esfuerzos sobrehumanos para concentrarme. Lo 煤nico que merece la pena es la resoluci贸n del caso, que es bastante interesante y logra sorprender un poco (un poco, eh) al lector, pero todo el recorrido es tan aburrido e insustancial que cuando llegas al final lo 煤nico que quieres es que termine ya. Escuch茅 este audiolibro porque hab铆a otro del autor que me llamaba la atenci贸n, "Los cr铆menes de Alicia", en el que aparece el mismo protagonista y pens茅 en leer este primero por si hab铆a similitudes en la trama o alg煤n detalle que necesitaba conocer, pero visto lo visto se me han quitado todas las ganas de leer nada m谩s de este se帽or. Y encima esta novela se llev贸 el Premio Planeta Argentina. Vale que en general el Planeta es un premio del que no se esperan grandes cosas pero lo de este libro es sangrante. La estrella y media se la lleva sobre todo por el final y por una frase que a m铆 me ha parecido tremendamente iluminadora: "la repetici贸n crea deseos, y el deseo crea obsesiones".
Hay algo hermoso en releer los libros que te iniciaron en el mundo de la literatura.
Esta novela la le铆 por primera vez a los doce a帽os y con ella empec茅 a ser un lector serio.
Para cuando en quinto a帽o, una profesora me hizo encontrarme con los cuentos de Infierno Grande y me acerc贸 Acerca de Roderer dici茅ndome "esto lo tenes que leer s铆 o s铆" ya ten铆a decidido que iba a ser escritor y Guillermo Mart铆nez no hizo m谩s que confirmarme ese deseo.
El redescubrirse a uno mismo como lector es una experiencia por la que todos tenemos que pasar. Asimismo, la lectura de esta novela deber铆a ser obligatoria.
Tal vez no es el mejor libro del mundo, pero fue el puntapi茅 para estar donde estoy hoy y esas cosas nunca de olvidan.
El policial cl谩sico, con esa mezcla de la sutileza Argentina y la elegancia Inglesa es lo que se irradia en todas estas p谩ginas. El crimen te lleva, los personajes te revelan a vos mismo y la historia cierra con el lector un intenso aro emocional.
Un luminare della matematica, docente a Oxford, indaga su una serie di 鈥渄elitti impercettibili鈥�, cio猫 che tendono a non apparire tali. A raccontare tutta la storia (e a essere coinvolto nella ricerca) un giovane studente argentino. Molti i riferimenti alla logica e alla matematica, dal teorema di Fermat alla dottrina esoterica dei pitagorici ai paradossi di Lewis Carroll. Se non ci si sofferma troppo su qualche elucubrazione teorica tutto scorre piacevolmente...fino alla sorpresa finale.