What do you think?
Rate this book
Hannibal Lecter #2
袦芯胁褔邪薪薪褟 褟谐薪褟褌
校 锌芯褕褍泻邪褏 褋械褉褨泄薪芯谐芯 胁斜懈胁褑褨, 褟泻懈泄 蟹薪褨屑邪褦 褕泻褨褉褍 蟹褨 褋胁芯褩褏 卸械褉褌胁, 肖袘袪 蟹胁械褉褌邪褦褌褜褋褟 蟹邪 写芯锌芯屑芯谐芯褞 写芯 胁褨写芯屑芯谐芯 蟹谢芯褔懈薪褑褟 鈥� 袚邪薪薪褨斜邪谢邪 袥械泻褌械褉邪, 褖芯 锌械褉械斜褍胁邪褦 胁 褨蟹芯谢褟褌芯褉褨 锌褋懈褏谢褨泻邪褉薪褨. 袙褨薪 锌芯谐芯写卸褍褦褌褜褋褟 胁蟹褟褌懈 褍褔邪褋褌褜 褍 锌芯褕褍泻邪褏 褍斜懈胁褑褨, 邪谢械 蟹邪 芯写薪褨褦褩 褍屑芯胁懈 鈥� 胁褨薪 褏芯褔械 谐褉邪褌懈. 袛胁邪 屑邪薪褨褟泻懈, 写胁褨 褋锌芯胁褨写褨. 袩褉芯褌械, 褖芯斜 写褨蟹薪邪褌懈褋褟 褉械邪谢褜薪褍 褨褋褌芯褉褨褞 胁斜懈胁褋褌胁 褌邪 胁褉褟褌褍胁邪褌懈 芯褋褌邪薪薪褞 卸械褉褌胁褍, 写械泻芯屑褍 锌芯褌褉褨斜薪芯 褉芯蟹锌芯胁褨褋褌懈 写芯褋懈褌褜 锌褨泻邪薪褌薪褨 锌芯写褉芯斜懈褑褨 胁谢邪褋薪芯谐芯 卸懈褌褌褟. 袛芯蟹胁芯谢褜褌械 胁斜懈胁褑褨 褋锌芯胁褨写邪褌懈褋褟 褍 褋泻芯褦薪懈褏 蟹谢芯褔懈薪邪褏鈥�
袟邪 屑芯褌懈胁邪屑懈 褌胁芯褉褍 蟹薪褟褌芯 褎褨谢褜屑 蟹 袛卸芯写褨 肖芯褋褌械褉 褌邪 袝薪褌芯薪褨 啸芯锌泻褨薪褋芯屑 褍 谐芯谢芯胁薪懈褏 褉芯谢褟褏. 袣褨薪芯褋褌褉褨褔泻邪 芯褌褉懈屑邪谢邪 5 锌褉械屑褨泄 芦袨褋泻邪褉禄 褍 薪邪泄锌褉械褋褌懈卸薪褨褕懈褏 薪芯屑褨薪邪褑褨褟褏.
袟邪 屑芯褌懈胁邪屑懈 褌胁芯褉褍 蟹薪褟褌芯 褎褨谢褜屑 蟹 袛卸芯写褨 肖芯褋褌械褉 褌邪 袝薪褌芯薪褨 啸芯锌泻褨薪褋芯屑 褍 谐芯谢芯胁薪懈褏 褉芯谢褟褏. 袣褨薪芯褋褌褉褨褔泻邪 芯褌褉懈屑邪谢邪 5 锌褉械屑褨泄 芦袨褋泻邪褉禄 褍 薪邪泄锌褉械褋褌懈卸薪褨褕懈褏 薪芯屑褨薪邪褑褨褟褏.
336 pages, Hardcover
First published July 1, 1988
6,873 people are currently reading
320k people want to read
About the author
Thomas Harris
33听books7,973听followersLibrarian Note:
There is more than one author in the 欧宝娱乐 database with this name.
Thomas Harris began his writing career covering crime in the United States and Mexico, and was a reporter and editor for the Associated Press in New York City. His first novel, Black Sunday, was printed in 1975, followed by Red Dragon in 1981, The Silence of the Lambs in 1988, Hannibal in 1999, and Hannibal Rising in 2006.
There is more than one author in the 欧宝娱乐 database with this name.
Thomas Harris began his writing career covering crime in the United States and Mexico, and was a reporter and editor for the Associated Press in New York City. His first novel, Black Sunday, was printed in 1975, followed by Red Dragon in 1981, The Silence of the Lambs in 1988, Hannibal in 1999, and Hannibal Rising in 2006.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 11,000 reviews
October 22, 2018
Why?
Many years from now, historians will look back on this story and wonder why it was so important. And believe me, my friends, important it was. Today, most thrillers and police procedurals gets measured against it.
For this review, I will refer to TSOTL as the story, because I'm going to talk about the book, movie, facts, fiction and some of my own opinions.
TSOTL was the second Dr. Hannibal Lector story. It was also the second movie adaptation - wait just a damn moment, you might be saying to me, Red Dragon was the first book but it was made after the TSOTL movie was so successful...
Correct.
However, there was an attempt at a screen adaptation of Red Dragon a few years before TSOTL, called MANHUNTER. It was directed by Michael Mann. To the best of my knowledge, it was a flop at the box office.
There are a few things TSOTL had going for it that counted in its favor. By all means, Thomas Harris is a brilliant writer - if you've read any of the books you will know this. But most movie freaks and geeks will agree with me that the story is probably one of the best adaptations from book to screen ever.
Then you look at the cast - Jody Foster managed to play a vulnerable yet strong female (IMPORTANT) lead. You know she is intelligent, yet she knows that she has no chance against the superior intellect of Dr. Hannibal Lector. In comes Anthony Hopkins, whose portrayal of the psychopathic genius is so convincing, it catapults him to one of the biggest super villains of all time, yet he is so charming that the audience can't help but like him.
And, of course, Buffalo Bill is played by Ted Levine, who is utterly convincing, even if you've seen him as the cop in MONK.
With a strong cast and story, this movie became an unlikely contender at the Academy Awards. And they won a few!
Right, lets take a step back, to the research phase of this story.
Thomas Harris, in the early 80's, were doing research and was fortunate enough to get involved with criminal profiling, which at that time had been an unproven and highly speculative science. It was during the time when they were on the trail of one Ted Bundy. If you know a bit about this famous serial killer, you will probably know that he used to fake injuries by wearing a cast and asking victims for their help - Do you remember how Buffalo Bill got that girl in the back of the van?
And while Bundy was incarcerated on death row, he was willing to help the police do a profile on another serial killer of the time, The Green River Killer. I believe Bundy told them not to remove a body when they discover it, because the killer will go back to his treasure - something that was later confirmed to have happened. Remember that agent Sterling asked Dr. Lector for his help?
And then there was the killer Ed Gein, many decades before, who robbed graves and ultimately killed people to make himself a female skin, which was apparently hard to sow without tearing. Need I explain this one?
The fact of the matter is, while some things may have seemed preposterous to us in the early eighties, like they could only happen in the movies, there were some truly messed up people out there who were doing some truly messed up things - wow, it's been a while since I've kept a sentence PG like that...I will accept your applause humbly.
Also, there was and, unfortunately, still are some stereo types about women in the FBI. Harris took the opportunity to make a statement, maybe very subtly, but still very important, about power vs. emotion. At no time does this story feel like a Hollywood blockbuster, where the star is cocky and always has a way out of a sticky situation, where it's all guns and fire and explosions, etc. No, this story was meant to cut close to home, to show the possibilities, for we are all vulnerable in this world. Agent Clarice is scared, she fears for her life, she doesn't know if she will survive, but she fights the big, bad (Goliath) killer. And she wins.
This story is also important from a psychological point of view. Whatever your feelings about profiling may be, they have discovered so much and found impossible connections through their research, and we will never know how many lives it has saved. It's a kind of Paying-it-forward thing: By doing what they do, they prevent things that may have been inevitable in a different world.
I once saw something (I can't remember exactly where) about some research they were doing on inmates. They took brain scans of a number of them, and noted that those who were certified as psychopathic, had an underdeveloped area in a certain part of their brains. If I can remember correctly, it had something to do with the mother producing too much serotonin during pregnancy, or some such scientific thing.
How is this helpful, you may ask?
Well, this is my personal opinion, so if it offends you, stop reading:
Casey Anthony...
Is she a psychopath who got away with murder?
Yes, when I look at the facts of the case, and the things her attorney's did to get her free, I'm sickened to think the jurors couldn't believe a mother would do that to her child. Nobody LIKES to believe it, but I wish I could have seen a brain scan of her compared to those other psychopaths. I wish there was a psychologist who could have explained it to them.
But enough about that.
This book is, was and always will be important, because it brought certain realities home to the world we find ourselves in.
If you haven't read it - but managed to get through this long review - what's the matter with you?
But I am not trying to convince anybody of my point of view, so feel free to disagree.
Many years from now, historians will look back on this story and wonder why it was so important. And believe me, my friends, important it was. Today, most thrillers and police procedurals gets measured against it.
For this review, I will refer to TSOTL as the story, because I'm going to talk about the book, movie, facts, fiction and some of my own opinions.
TSOTL was the second Dr. Hannibal Lector story. It was also the second movie adaptation - wait just a damn moment, you might be saying to me, Red Dragon was the first book but it was made after the TSOTL movie was so successful...
Correct.
However, there was an attempt at a screen adaptation of Red Dragon a few years before TSOTL, called MANHUNTER. It was directed by Michael Mann. To the best of my knowledge, it was a flop at the box office.
There are a few things TSOTL had going for it that counted in its favor. By all means, Thomas Harris is a brilliant writer - if you've read any of the books you will know this. But most movie freaks and geeks will agree with me that the story is probably one of the best adaptations from book to screen ever.
Then you look at the cast - Jody Foster managed to play a vulnerable yet strong female (IMPORTANT) lead. You know she is intelligent, yet she knows that she has no chance against the superior intellect of Dr. Hannibal Lector. In comes Anthony Hopkins, whose portrayal of the psychopathic genius is so convincing, it catapults him to one of the biggest super villains of all time, yet he is so charming that the audience can't help but like him.
And, of course, Buffalo Bill is played by Ted Levine, who is utterly convincing, even if you've seen him as the cop in MONK.
With a strong cast and story, this movie became an unlikely contender at the Academy Awards. And they won a few!
Right, lets take a step back, to the research phase of this story.
Thomas Harris, in the early 80's, were doing research and was fortunate enough to get involved with criminal profiling, which at that time had been an unproven and highly speculative science. It was during the time when they were on the trail of one Ted Bundy. If you know a bit about this famous serial killer, you will probably know that he used to fake injuries by wearing a cast and asking victims for their help - Do you remember how Buffalo Bill got that girl in the back of the van?
And while Bundy was incarcerated on death row, he was willing to help the police do a profile on another serial killer of the time, The Green River Killer. I believe Bundy told them not to remove a body when they discover it, because the killer will go back to his treasure - something that was later confirmed to have happened. Remember that agent Sterling asked Dr. Lector for his help?
And then there was the killer Ed Gein, many decades before, who robbed graves and ultimately killed people to make himself a female skin, which was apparently hard to sow without tearing. Need I explain this one?
The fact of the matter is, while some things may have seemed preposterous to us in the early eighties, like they could only happen in the movies, there were some truly messed up people out there who were doing some truly messed up things - wow, it's been a while since I've kept a sentence PG like that...I will accept your applause humbly.
Also, there was and, unfortunately, still are some stereo types about women in the FBI. Harris took the opportunity to make a statement, maybe very subtly, but still very important, about power vs. emotion. At no time does this story feel like a Hollywood blockbuster, where the star is cocky and always has a way out of a sticky situation, where it's all guns and fire and explosions, etc. No, this story was meant to cut close to home, to show the possibilities, for we are all vulnerable in this world. Agent Clarice is scared, she fears for her life, she doesn't know if she will survive, but she fights the big, bad (Goliath) killer. And she wins.
This story is also important from a psychological point of view. Whatever your feelings about profiling may be, they have discovered so much and found impossible connections through their research, and we will never know how many lives it has saved. It's a kind of Paying-it-forward thing: By doing what they do, they prevent things that may have been inevitable in a different world.
I once saw something (I can't remember exactly where) about some research they were doing on inmates. They took brain scans of a number of them, and noted that those who were certified as psychopathic, had an underdeveloped area in a certain part of their brains. If I can remember correctly, it had something to do with the mother producing too much serotonin during pregnancy, or some such scientific thing.
How is this helpful, you may ask?
Well, this is my personal opinion, so if it offends you, stop reading:
Casey Anthony...
Is she a psychopath who got away with murder?
Yes, when I look at the facts of the case, and the things her attorney's did to get her free, I'm sickened to think the jurors couldn't believe a mother would do that to her child. Nobody LIKES to believe it, but I wish I could have seen a brain scan of her compared to those other psychopaths. I wish there was a psychologist who could have explained it to them.
But enough about that.
This book is, was and always will be important, because it brought certain realities home to the world we find ourselves in.
If you haven't read it - but managed to get through this long review - what's the matter with you?
But I am not trying to convince anybody of my point of view, so feel free to disagree.
August 28, 2021
鈥嶵he Silence of the Lambs (Hannibal Lecter #2), Thomas Harris
The Silence of the Lambs is a novel by Thomas Harris. First published in 1988, it is the sequel to Harris' 1981 novel Red Dragon.
Both novels feature the cannibalistic serial killer Dr. Hannibal Lecter, this time pitted against FBI Special Agent Clarice Starling. Its film adaptation directed by Jonathan Demme was released in 1991 to box office success and critical acclaim.
Clarice Starling, a young FBI trainee, is asked to carry out an errand by Jack Crawford, the head of the FBI division that draws up psychological profiles of serial killers.
Starling is to present a questionnaire to the brilliant forensic psychiatrist and cannibalistic serial killer, Hannibal Lecter.
Lecter is serving nine consecutive life sentences in a Maryland mental institution for a series of murders. ...
賳禺爻鬲 賮蹖賱賲 乇丕 丿蹖丿賴 丕賲 爻倬爻 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 禺賵丕賳丿賴 丕賲貨 鬲丕乇蹖禺 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 禺賵丕賳卮: 爻丕賱 1993賲蹖賱丕丿蹖
毓賳賵丕賳: 爻讴賵鬲 亘乇賴 賴丕貨 丕孬乇: 鬲賵賲丕爻 (鬲丕賲爻) 賴乇蹖爻貨 賲鬲乇噩賲賴丕: 丕氐睾乇 丕賳丿乇賵丿蹖貙 賲噩鬲亘蹖 賲蹖賳丕卅蹖貨 賲卮禺氐丕鬲 賳卮乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 趩丕倬 賳禺爻鬲貙 1371貙 丿乇 492氐貙 趩丕倬 賴丕蹖 亘毓丿蹖貙 賳卮乇 禺丕鬲賵賳貙 1373貙 倬丕乇爻蹖丕賳貙 1374貙 賳卮乇 丕賵丨丿蹖貙 趩丕倬 賴卮鬲賲 爻丕賱 1377貙 卮丕亘讴9646376339貨 賳卮乇 丿丕蹖乇賴貙 1379貙 卮丕亘讴9646839215貨 趩丕倬 爻蹖夭丿賴賲 1395貨 卮丕亘讴 9789646839212貨 賲賵囟賵毓 丿丕爻鬲丕賳賴丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 丕蹖丕賱丕鬲 賲鬲丨丿賴 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 - 爻丿賴 20賲
毓賳賵丕賳: 爻讴賵鬲 亘乇賴 賴丕貨 丕孬乇: 鬲賵賲丕爻 (鬲丕賲爻) 賴乇蹖爻貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 毓賱蹖乇囟丕 丕賳氐丕乇蹖貙 賳卮乇 趩讴丕賵讴貙 1390貙 丿乇 384氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9789648957259貨 趩丕倬 丿賵賲 1392貨
毓賳賵丕賳: 爻讴賵鬲 亘乇賴 賴丕貨 丕孬乇: 鬲賵賲丕爻 (鬲丕賲爻) 賴乇蹖爻貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 賲丨賲賵丿 丕卮乇賮蹖貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賱讴 賱讴貙 1371貨 丿乇 506氐貨 趩丕倬 丿賵賲 1372貨
毓賳賵丕賳: 爻讴賵鬲 亘乇賴 賴丕貨 丕孬乇: 鬲賵賲丕爻 (鬲丕賲爻) 賴乇蹖爻貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 賮乇夭丕賳賴 倬賵乇賮乇夭蹖賳貨 鬲亘乇蹖夭貙 丌賳丕爻貙 1399貨 丿乇 416氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9786227095340貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲亘乇蹖夭貙 丕禺鬲乇貙 1398貙 丿乇 416氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9786004862332貨
毓賳賵丕賳: 爻讴賵鬲 亘乇賴 賴丕貨 丕孬乇: 鬲賵賲丕爻 (鬲丕賲爻) 賴乇蹖爻貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 賳蹖賱賵賮乇 賯賳丿蹖賱蹖貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 丕賮賯 亘蹖 倬丕蹖丕賳貨 1398貨 丿乇 527氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9786008120506貨
毓賳賵丕賳: 爻讴賵鬲 亘乇賴 賴丕貨 丕孬乇: 鬲賵賲丕爻 (鬲丕賲爻) 賴乇蹖爻貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 賳蹖賱賵賮乇 丕爻讴賳丿乇蹖 賮乇丿貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賳蹖讴 賮乇噩丕賲貙 1399貨 丿乇 343氐貨 卮丕亘讴9786222580155貨
禺丕賳賲 芦讴賱丕乇蹖爻 丕爻鬲丕乇賱蹖賳诏 (噩賵丿蹖 賮丕爻鬲乇)禄貙 鬲賵爻胤 芦噩讴 讴乇丕賮賵乇丿 (丕爻讴丕鬲 诏賱賳)禄 丕夭 丌讴丕丿賲蹖 丌賲賵夭卮蹖 丕賮鈥�.亘蹖鈥�.丌蹖.貙 丿乇 芦讴賵丕賳鬲蹖讴賵賵 賵蹖乇噩蹖賳蹖丕禄 亘乇诏夭蹖丿賴 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 鬲丕 芦讴乇丕賮賵乇丿禄 亘賴 丕賵 賲兀賲賵乇蹖鬲 丿賴丿貙 讴賴 亘丕 芦賴丕賳蹖亘丕賱 賱讴鬲乇 (丌賳鬲賵賳蹖 賴丕倬讴蹖賳夭)禄貙 讴賴 蹖讴 乇賵丕賳卮賳丕爻 賵 賯丕鬲賱 夭賳噩蹖乇賴鈥� 丕蹖 丕爻鬲貙 诏賮鬲诏賵 賳賲丕蹖丿貙 趩乇丕 讴賴 亘丕賵乇 丿丕乇丿貙 讴賴 芦賱讴鬲乇禄 賲賲讴賳 丕爻鬲貙 亘鬲賵丕賳丿 亘賴 丌賳賴丕 丿乇 倬蹖丿丕 讴乇丿賳 芦亘蹖賱 亘賵賮丕賱賵 (賯丕鬲賱蹖 夭賳噩蹖乇賴鈥� 丕蹖 讴賴 倬賵爻鬲 賯乇亘丕賳蹖丕賳卮 乇丕 丕夭 鬲賳卮丕賳 賲蹖鈥屭┵€賻賳賭賻丿)禄 蹖丕乇蹖 賳賲丕蹖丿貨 芦丕爻鬲丕乇賱蹖賳诏禄 亘賴 亘蹖賲丕乇爻鬲丕賳 乇賵丕賳蹖貙 丿乇 芦亘丕賱鬲蹖賲賵乇禄 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌� 賵 丿乇 丌賳噩丕 丿讴鬲乇 芦賮乇丿乇蹖讴 趩蹖賱鬲賵賳 (丌賳鬲賵賳蹖 賴蹖賱丿)禄 丕蹖卮丕賳 乇丕 亘賴 爻賱賵賱 丿讴鬲乇 芦賱讴鬲乇禄 乇丕賴賳賲丕蹖蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賳禺爻鬲 丿讴鬲乇 芦賱讴鬲乇禄 丌乇丕賲 丕爻鬲貙 丕賲丕 亘賴 賳丕诏賴丕賳 毓氐亘丕賳蹖 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 趩乇丕 讴賴 芦丕爻鬲丕乇賱蹖賳诏禄 讴賵卮卮 賲蹖讴賳丿 丕夭 丕賵貙 丕胤賱丕毓丕鬲 亘蹖乇賵賳 亘讴卮丿貨 丿乇 丨丕賱蹖讴賴 芦丕爻鬲丕乇賱蹖賳诏禄貙 亘丕 鬲乇爻貙 丿乇 丨丕賱 鬲乇讴 爻賱賵賱 丕爻鬲貙 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 亘蹖賲丕乇丕賳貙 亘賴 芦讴賱丕乇蹖爻禄 鬲賵賴蹖賳 亘丿蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 讴賴 芦賱讴鬲乇禄 丕蹖賳 毓賲賱 乇丕 亘爻蹖丕乇 夭卮鬲 賲蹖鈥屬举嗀ж必� 賵 芦丕爻鬲丕乇賱蹖賳诏禄 乇丕 氐丿丕 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 讴賴 亘乇诏乇丿丿貙 鬲丕 亘賴 丕賵 亘诏賵蹖丿 讴賴 亘賴 丿賳亘丕賱 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 亘蹖賲丕乇丕賳 爻丕亘賯卮 亘诏乇丿丿貨 丌賳 乇丕賴賳賲丕蹖蹖貙 芦丕爻鬲丕乇賱蹖賳诏禄 乇丕 亘賴 蹖讴 夭蹖乇夭賲蹖賳 爻賵賯 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 讴賴 丿乇 丌賳噩丕 噩爻丿 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 亘蹖賲丕乇丕賳 倬蹖卮蹖賳 芦賱讴鬲乇禄 乇丕 倬蹖丿丕 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 芦丕爻鬲丕乇賱蹖賳诏禄 亘賴 倬蹖卮 芦賱讴鬲乇禄 亘乇賲蹖鈥屭必� 賵 芦賱讴鬲乇禄 亘賴 丕賵 賲蹖鈥屭堐屫� 讴賴 丕蹖賳 噩爻丿 亘賴 芦亘蹖賱 亘賵賮丕賱賵禄 賲乇鬲亘胤 丕爻鬲貨 芦丕爻鬲丕乇賱蹖賳诏禄貙 亘賴 芦賱讴鬲乇禄 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 丿乇 氐賵乇鬲蹖讴賴 亘賴 丕賵 丿乇 丕蹖賳 夭賲蹖賳賴 蹖丕乇蹖 讴賳丿貙 丕夭 讴賱蹖賳蹖讴 丿讴鬲乇 芦趩蹖賱鬲賵賳禄 亘賴 噩丕蹖蹖 丿蹖诏乇蹖 賲蹖鬲賵丕賳丿 賲賳鬲賯賱 卮賵丿貨 賵 ....貨
鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴賳诏丕賲 乇爻丕賳蹖 15/08/1399賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 05/06/1400賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
The Silence of the Lambs is a novel by Thomas Harris. First published in 1988, it is the sequel to Harris' 1981 novel Red Dragon.
Both novels feature the cannibalistic serial killer Dr. Hannibal Lecter, this time pitted against FBI Special Agent Clarice Starling. Its film adaptation directed by Jonathan Demme was released in 1991 to box office success and critical acclaim.
Clarice Starling, a young FBI trainee, is asked to carry out an errand by Jack Crawford, the head of the FBI division that draws up psychological profiles of serial killers.
Starling is to present a questionnaire to the brilliant forensic psychiatrist and cannibalistic serial killer, Hannibal Lecter.
Lecter is serving nine consecutive life sentences in a Maryland mental institution for a series of murders. ...
賳禺爻鬲 賮蹖賱賲 乇丕 丿蹖丿賴 丕賲 爻倬爻 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 禺賵丕賳丿賴 丕賲貨 鬲丕乇蹖禺 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 禺賵丕賳卮: 爻丕賱 1993賲蹖賱丕丿蹖
毓賳賵丕賳: 爻讴賵鬲 亘乇賴 賴丕貨 丕孬乇: 鬲賵賲丕爻 (鬲丕賲爻) 賴乇蹖爻貨 賲鬲乇噩賲賴丕: 丕氐睾乇 丕賳丿乇賵丿蹖貙 賲噩鬲亘蹖 賲蹖賳丕卅蹖貨 賲卮禺氐丕鬲 賳卮乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 趩丕倬 賳禺爻鬲貙 1371貙 丿乇 492氐貙 趩丕倬 賴丕蹖 亘毓丿蹖貙 賳卮乇 禺丕鬲賵賳貙 1373貙 倬丕乇爻蹖丕賳貙 1374貙 賳卮乇 丕賵丨丿蹖貙 趩丕倬 賴卮鬲賲 爻丕賱 1377貙 卮丕亘讴9646376339貨 賳卮乇 丿丕蹖乇賴貙 1379貙 卮丕亘讴9646839215貨 趩丕倬 爻蹖夭丿賴賲 1395貨 卮丕亘讴 9789646839212貨 賲賵囟賵毓 丿丕爻鬲丕賳賴丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 丕蹖丕賱丕鬲 賲鬲丨丿賴 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 - 爻丿賴 20賲
毓賳賵丕賳: 爻讴賵鬲 亘乇賴 賴丕貨 丕孬乇: 鬲賵賲丕爻 (鬲丕賲爻) 賴乇蹖爻貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 毓賱蹖乇囟丕 丕賳氐丕乇蹖貙 賳卮乇 趩讴丕賵讴貙 1390貙 丿乇 384氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9789648957259貨 趩丕倬 丿賵賲 1392貨
毓賳賵丕賳: 爻讴賵鬲 亘乇賴 賴丕貨 丕孬乇: 鬲賵賲丕爻 (鬲丕賲爻) 賴乇蹖爻貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 賲丨賲賵丿 丕卮乇賮蹖貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賱讴 賱讴貙 1371貨 丿乇 506氐貨 趩丕倬 丿賵賲 1372貨
毓賳賵丕賳: 爻讴賵鬲 亘乇賴 賴丕貨 丕孬乇: 鬲賵賲丕爻 (鬲丕賲爻) 賴乇蹖爻貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 賮乇夭丕賳賴 倬賵乇賮乇夭蹖賳貨 鬲亘乇蹖夭貙 丌賳丕爻貙 1399貨 丿乇 416氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9786227095340貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲亘乇蹖夭貙 丕禺鬲乇貙 1398貙 丿乇 416氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9786004862332貨
毓賳賵丕賳: 爻讴賵鬲 亘乇賴 賴丕貨 丕孬乇: 鬲賵賲丕爻 (鬲丕賲爻) 賴乇蹖爻貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 賳蹖賱賵賮乇 賯賳丿蹖賱蹖貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 丕賮賯 亘蹖 倬丕蹖丕賳貨 1398貨 丿乇 527氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9786008120506貨
毓賳賵丕賳: 爻讴賵鬲 亘乇賴 賴丕貨 丕孬乇: 鬲賵賲丕爻 (鬲丕賲爻) 賴乇蹖爻貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 賳蹖賱賵賮乇 丕爻讴賳丿乇蹖 賮乇丿貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賳蹖讴 賮乇噩丕賲貙 1399貨 丿乇 343氐貨 卮丕亘讴9786222580155貨
禺丕賳賲 芦讴賱丕乇蹖爻 丕爻鬲丕乇賱蹖賳诏 (噩賵丿蹖 賮丕爻鬲乇)禄貙 鬲賵爻胤 芦噩讴 讴乇丕賮賵乇丿 (丕爻讴丕鬲 诏賱賳)禄 丕夭 丌讴丕丿賲蹖 丌賲賵夭卮蹖 丕賮鈥�.亘蹖鈥�.丌蹖.貙 丿乇 芦讴賵丕賳鬲蹖讴賵賵 賵蹖乇噩蹖賳蹖丕禄 亘乇诏夭蹖丿賴 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 鬲丕 芦讴乇丕賮賵乇丿禄 亘賴 丕賵 賲兀賲賵乇蹖鬲 丿賴丿貙 讴賴 亘丕 芦賴丕賳蹖亘丕賱 賱讴鬲乇 (丌賳鬲賵賳蹖 賴丕倬讴蹖賳夭)禄貙 讴賴 蹖讴 乇賵丕賳卮賳丕爻 賵 賯丕鬲賱 夭賳噩蹖乇賴鈥� 丕蹖 丕爻鬲貙 诏賮鬲诏賵 賳賲丕蹖丿貙 趩乇丕 讴賴 亘丕賵乇 丿丕乇丿貙 讴賴 芦賱讴鬲乇禄 賲賲讴賳 丕爻鬲貙 亘鬲賵丕賳丿 亘賴 丌賳賴丕 丿乇 倬蹖丿丕 讴乇丿賳 芦亘蹖賱 亘賵賮丕賱賵 (賯丕鬲賱蹖 夭賳噩蹖乇賴鈥� 丕蹖 讴賴 倬賵爻鬲 賯乇亘丕賳蹖丕賳卮 乇丕 丕夭 鬲賳卮丕賳 賲蹖鈥屭┵€賻賳賭賻丿)禄 蹖丕乇蹖 賳賲丕蹖丿貨 芦丕爻鬲丕乇賱蹖賳诏禄 亘賴 亘蹖賲丕乇爻鬲丕賳 乇賵丕賳蹖貙 丿乇 芦亘丕賱鬲蹖賲賵乇禄 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌� 賵 丿乇 丌賳噩丕 丿讴鬲乇 芦賮乇丿乇蹖讴 趩蹖賱鬲賵賳 (丌賳鬲賵賳蹖 賴蹖賱丿)禄 丕蹖卮丕賳 乇丕 亘賴 爻賱賵賱 丿讴鬲乇 芦賱讴鬲乇禄 乇丕賴賳賲丕蹖蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賳禺爻鬲 丿讴鬲乇 芦賱讴鬲乇禄 丌乇丕賲 丕爻鬲貙 丕賲丕 亘賴 賳丕诏賴丕賳 毓氐亘丕賳蹖 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 趩乇丕 讴賴 芦丕爻鬲丕乇賱蹖賳诏禄 讴賵卮卮 賲蹖讴賳丿 丕夭 丕賵貙 丕胤賱丕毓丕鬲 亘蹖乇賵賳 亘讴卮丿貨 丿乇 丨丕賱蹖讴賴 芦丕爻鬲丕乇賱蹖賳诏禄貙 亘丕 鬲乇爻貙 丿乇 丨丕賱 鬲乇讴 爻賱賵賱 丕爻鬲貙 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 亘蹖賲丕乇丕賳貙 亘賴 芦讴賱丕乇蹖爻禄 鬲賵賴蹖賳 亘丿蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 讴賴 芦賱讴鬲乇禄 丕蹖賳 毓賲賱 乇丕 亘爻蹖丕乇 夭卮鬲 賲蹖鈥屬举嗀ж必� 賵 芦丕爻鬲丕乇賱蹖賳诏禄 乇丕 氐丿丕 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 讴賴 亘乇诏乇丿丿貙 鬲丕 亘賴 丕賵 亘诏賵蹖丿 讴賴 亘賴 丿賳亘丕賱 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 亘蹖賲丕乇丕賳 爻丕亘賯卮 亘诏乇丿丿貨 丌賳 乇丕賴賳賲丕蹖蹖貙 芦丕爻鬲丕乇賱蹖賳诏禄 乇丕 亘賴 蹖讴 夭蹖乇夭賲蹖賳 爻賵賯 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 讴賴 丿乇 丌賳噩丕 噩爻丿 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 亘蹖賲丕乇丕賳 倬蹖卮蹖賳 芦賱讴鬲乇禄 乇丕 倬蹖丿丕 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 芦丕爻鬲丕乇賱蹖賳诏禄 亘賴 倬蹖卮 芦賱讴鬲乇禄 亘乇賲蹖鈥屭必� 賵 芦賱讴鬲乇禄 亘賴 丕賵 賲蹖鈥屭堐屫� 讴賴 丕蹖賳 噩爻丿 亘賴 芦亘蹖賱 亘賵賮丕賱賵禄 賲乇鬲亘胤 丕爻鬲貨 芦丕爻鬲丕乇賱蹖賳诏禄貙 亘賴 芦賱讴鬲乇禄 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 丿乇 氐賵乇鬲蹖讴賴 亘賴 丕賵 丿乇 丕蹖賳 夭賲蹖賳賴 蹖丕乇蹖 讴賳丿貙 丕夭 讴賱蹖賳蹖讴 丿讴鬲乇 芦趩蹖賱鬲賵賳禄 亘賴 噩丕蹖蹖 丿蹖诏乇蹖 賲蹖鬲賵丕賳丿 賲賳鬲賯賱 卮賵丿貨 賵 ....貨
鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴賳诏丕賲 乇爻丕賳蹖 15/08/1399賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 05/06/1400賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
June 26, 2022
I have a love hate sort of relationship with this book.
At times I marvel at the intelligence and wittiness of Hannibal and other times I can't get my mind past through the things like body shaming , status of women which is highly exploited in this book! I didn't liked the movie at all because of all those details they missed and to be honest we can't review this book without the honorable mention of movie!
We will start with what I don't like then moving on with what I like so that we can end on positive note!
Body shamming :- for most of the people who have read the book , will understand what I am trying to say but for those who haven't , the killer choose girls with thick body type and they are constantly called by slang in the book which I sort of hated because for someone like me who have been body shammed for all her teen life it was pretty triggering!
Sexism :- Clarice starling , the young beautiful FBI trainee , yes there is a need to mention she was beautiful because how every time she meets a man he falls in love with her. She was being objectified throughout the book and never once author fails to tell the readers that she is a WOMAN !
Writing :- the writing style was slightly boring at times to be fair, by the time I finished reading it I still wanted more , more answers and conversation( I loved the constant bickering between Hannibal and Clarice).
Moving on with things I like about the book!
Character development :-
'A census taker tried to quantify me once. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a big Amarone
This shit is iconic and one who said it is even more iconic, yes my friends we are talking about HANNIBAL 'THE CANNIBAL' LECTER ! One of the most iconic characters in history of literature .He may be the scariest fuck out there (certainly scarier than the supposed monster of the book, Buffalo Bill), but he just oozes style and knowledge.
And not to forget Clarice Starling , I really really like her character ( obviously not more than Hannibal) and I would have loved her more if author constantly didn't reminded us that she is beautiful and a Woman !
Better than movie :- the movie remake ved several crucial scenes, which I think hampered with the story a lot.
There is only one thing I liked about the movie ie the ending , it was one of my fav endings I really really liked it !
You need not to read the books in order you can certainly read it before the first one but I would suggest to read the first one before because of some characters which are introduced in previous book and played important role in this one too.
Recommended to everyone because it's still one of the most iconic and breathtaking book to be ever written!
At times I marvel at the intelligence and wittiness of Hannibal and other times I can't get my mind past through the things like body shaming , status of women which is highly exploited in this book! I didn't liked the movie at all because of all those details they missed and to be honest we can't review this book without the honorable mention of movie!
We will start with what I don't like then moving on with what I like so that we can end on positive note!
Body shamming :- for most of the people who have read the book , will understand what I am trying to say but for those who haven't , the killer choose girls with thick body type and they are constantly called by slang in the book which I sort of hated because for someone like me who have been body shammed for all her teen life it was pretty triggering!
Sexism :- Clarice starling , the young beautiful FBI trainee , yes there is a need to mention she was beautiful because how every time she meets a man he falls in love with her. She was being objectified throughout the book and never once author fails to tell the readers that she is a WOMAN !
Writing :- the writing style was slightly boring at times to be fair, by the time I finished reading it I still wanted more , more answers and conversation( I loved the constant bickering between Hannibal and Clarice).
Moving on with things I like about the book!
Character development :-
'A census taker tried to quantify me once. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a big Amarone
This shit is iconic and one who said it is even more iconic, yes my friends we are talking about HANNIBAL 'THE CANNIBAL' LECTER ! One of the most iconic characters in history of literature .He may be the scariest fuck out there (certainly scarier than the supposed monster of the book, Buffalo Bill), but he just oozes style and knowledge.
And not to forget Clarice Starling , I really really like her character ( obviously not more than Hannibal) and I would have loved her more if author constantly didn't reminded us that she is beautiful and a Woman !
Better than movie :- the movie remake ved several crucial scenes, which I think hampered with the story a lot.
There is only one thing I liked about the movie ie the ending , it was one of my fav endings I really really liked it !
You need not to read the books in order you can certainly read it before the first one but I would suggest to read the first one before because of some characters which are introduced in previous book and played important role in this one too.
Recommended to everyone because it's still one of the most iconic and breathtaking book to be ever written!
April 10, 2020
3.5 STARS
"Be very careful with Hannibal Lector. Dr. Chilton, the head of the mental hospital, will go over the physical procedure you use to deal with him. Don't deviate from it. Do not deviate from it one iota for any reason... We both know you have to back-and-forth a little in interviews, but you tell him no specifics about yourself. You don't want any of your personal facts in his head."
Bet you thought I was never going to write this review, huh? ;) Well, it turns out I just needed a good long pause to toss around my thoughts before attempting to wrangle them on paper. There's a lot of pressure diving into a book that has been deemed a modern classic, and you never know what side of the spectrum you'll fall on once you've experienced such, but I'm pleased that overall, this was a really enjoyable experience for me. While I've seen the movie over the years more times than I can count, somehow it didn't ruin my experience or opinion of the book. Below, there will be quite a few spoilers and discussion pertaining to specific plot points and comparisons from the book-to-film adaptation, so if you haven't read the book or seen the movie and desire to know no specifics, please stop here.
I'm going to start with all the things that I loved. Obviously, the book is way better than the movie, due to the amount of detail and characterization that is lost in translation when you must condense a 400+ page novel into a 2 hour film production. The characters are richly developed, flawed, and their decision making process and solving of the cases in general are quite progressive considering this book was published in the 1980s. The Silence of the Lambs is a wonderful example of how, we can see glimpses of the villain throughout the book, and still garner the compulsive pacing of a whodunnit.
One thing that felt odd to me was reconciling the fact that, for the time this book was published, the story is so progressive in some aspects and terribly disappointing in others. If you've seen the movie, then you probably are aware of how, at best, the movie is borderline transphobic, and this is due to the fact that they left out some crucial scenes from the book. While the movie implies maybe once or twice that Jame Gumb is not really transgender, they don't do a full job of explaining the why or how behind his choices; in fact, the movie leaves out his backstory entirely, as well as a scene that was filmed but cut from the final production portraying the investigation into the transgender clinic. In the book, it is clearly shown how transgender people are a peaceful group, and how our villain is someone who IS NOT transgender, and was rejected for reassignment surgery based on multiple red flags that occurred during the initial application. Also, the doctor that the FBI initially tries to coerce into giving up personal information regarding his patients not only defends his patients, but goes on the offensive to protect the minority group. I really loved how the book handled this SO much better than the movie.
The one thing that REALLY bugged me though, is how you can have a novel written in the '80s that was LGBT forward, but unrealistically fat shaming women from start to finish. I figured I'll be ripped a new one for this and deemed a sensitive snowflake, so I decided to mark specific passages for reference. One particular example is in chapter 34, where Starling is poking around in Catherine's apartment after she's been abducted. On page 242 (in my copy), there's an internal monologue where Clarice is flipping through her closet, and notes that at almost 6 ft tall, Catherine has sets of clothes in 2 sizes-large and "crisis fat". It's stated that the first set are when she is 145lbs and the second at 165lbs. For reference, I have a friend who is 6ft tall and was constantly asked if she was anorexic, and she weighed 185lbs. I understand that point is that Buffalo Bill is kidnapping full figured women to fit his long term outcome, but I had a hard time stomaching that we are told somewhere between 15-20 times throughout the book how OMG THESE GIRLS ARE SO FAT SO FAT SO FAT UGH DISGUSTING DON'T THEY HAVE ANY SELF RESPECT AGAIN SO FAT, and yet, according to the specific height and weight details we're given, they are medically and even socially NOT FAT. We even get a few inner monologues where Catherine knows her full figured body is attractive, but we're immediately reminded afterwards to NOT FORGET SHE'S FAT AND UGH SO GROSS!!!! *deep breath* Alright, I'm done beating that to death.
Lastly, aside from Jack Crawford's character, I felt the movie was mostly cast well, with the best being Ted Levine as Buffalo Bill. Jody Foster as Clarice was a bit of stretch for me, as the Clarice in the book isn't quite the pushover we see on screen, but still not a bad choice. I can wholly see why this is the book most refer to that initiated the mainstream craze for forensic crime scene novels, as it is a really well written procedural, and manages to feel realistic but not lose the page turning quality of suspense that it carries. Overall, I'm so glad I read this one and look forward to circling back around to Red Dragon.
"Be very careful with Hannibal Lector. Dr. Chilton, the head of the mental hospital, will go over the physical procedure you use to deal with him. Don't deviate from it. Do not deviate from it one iota for any reason... We both know you have to back-and-forth a little in interviews, but you tell him no specifics about yourself. You don't want any of your personal facts in his head."
Bet you thought I was never going to write this review, huh? ;) Well, it turns out I just needed a good long pause to toss around my thoughts before attempting to wrangle them on paper. There's a lot of pressure diving into a book that has been deemed a modern classic, and you never know what side of the spectrum you'll fall on once you've experienced such, but I'm pleased that overall, this was a really enjoyable experience for me. While I've seen the movie over the years more times than I can count, somehow it didn't ruin my experience or opinion of the book. Below, there will be quite a few spoilers and discussion pertaining to specific plot points and comparisons from the book-to-film adaptation, so if you haven't read the book or seen the movie and desire to know no specifics, please stop here.
I'm going to start with all the things that I loved. Obviously, the book is way better than the movie, due to the amount of detail and characterization that is lost in translation when you must condense a 400+ page novel into a 2 hour film production. The characters are richly developed, flawed, and their decision making process and solving of the cases in general are quite progressive considering this book was published in the 1980s. The Silence of the Lambs is a wonderful example of how, we can see glimpses of the villain throughout the book, and still garner the compulsive pacing of a whodunnit.
One thing that felt odd to me was reconciling the fact that, for the time this book was published, the story is so progressive in some aspects and terribly disappointing in others. If you've seen the movie, then you probably are aware of how, at best, the movie is borderline transphobic, and this is due to the fact that they left out some crucial scenes from the book. While the movie implies maybe once or twice that Jame Gumb is not really transgender, they don't do a full job of explaining the why or how behind his choices; in fact, the movie leaves out his backstory entirely, as well as a scene that was filmed but cut from the final production portraying the investigation into the transgender clinic. In the book, it is clearly shown how transgender people are a peaceful group, and how our villain is someone who IS NOT transgender, and was rejected for reassignment surgery based on multiple red flags that occurred during the initial application. Also, the doctor that the FBI initially tries to coerce into giving up personal information regarding his patients not only defends his patients, but goes on the offensive to protect the minority group. I really loved how the book handled this SO much better than the movie.
The one thing that REALLY bugged me though, is how you can have a novel written in the '80s that was LGBT forward, but unrealistically fat shaming women from start to finish. I figured I'll be ripped a new one for this and deemed a sensitive snowflake, so I decided to mark specific passages for reference. One particular example is in chapter 34, where Starling is poking around in Catherine's apartment after she's been abducted. On page 242 (in my copy), there's an internal monologue where Clarice is flipping through her closet, and notes that at almost 6 ft tall, Catherine has sets of clothes in 2 sizes-large and "crisis fat". It's stated that the first set are when she is 145lbs and the second at 165lbs. For reference, I have a friend who is 6ft tall and was constantly asked if she was anorexic, and she weighed 185lbs. I understand that point is that Buffalo Bill is kidnapping full figured women to fit his long term outcome, but I had a hard time stomaching that we are told somewhere between 15-20 times throughout the book how OMG THESE GIRLS ARE SO FAT SO FAT SO FAT UGH DISGUSTING DON'T THEY HAVE ANY SELF RESPECT AGAIN SO FAT, and yet, according to the specific height and weight details we're given, they are medically and even socially NOT FAT. We even get a few inner monologues where Catherine knows her full figured body is attractive, but we're immediately reminded afterwards to NOT FORGET SHE'S FAT AND UGH SO GROSS!!!! *deep breath* Alright, I'm done beating that to death.
Lastly, aside from Jack Crawford's character, I felt the movie was mostly cast well, with the best being Ted Levine as Buffalo Bill. Jody Foster as Clarice was a bit of stretch for me, as the Clarice in the book isn't quite the pushover we see on screen, but still not a bad choice. I can wholly see why this is the book most refer to that initiated the mainstream craze for forensic crime scene novels, as it is a really well written procedural, and manages to feel realistic but not lose the page turning quality of suspense that it carries. Overall, I'm so glad I read this one and look forward to circling back around to Red Dragon.
January 9, 2023
AGNELLI
Sono approdato al libro dopo aver visto il film. E per quanto il romanzo funzioni, non sia un capolavoro, ma 猫 efficace e avvincente, il film sovrasta nettamente il confronto: perch茅 il film 猫 invece magnifico, a suo modo, e nel suo genere, un autentico capolavoro.
E certo dopo 鈥� dopo libro e film 鈥� i serial killer hanno un altro spessore, sono diventati, per cos矛 dire, di casa. E probabilmente questa storia pu貌 essere considerata la madre di tutti i serial killer.
Ce n鈥櫭� uno che sequestra ragazze e fa loro cose turpi. 脠 soprannominato Buffalo Bill perch茅 si diletta nell鈥檃ttivit脿 pi霉 timidamente definita spellare, pi霉 brutalmente scuoiare. Per catturarlo, visto che 猫 arrivato a rapire la figlia di un senatore, il dirigente dell鈥橣BI (Scott Glenn nel film) sceglie una giovane recluta, Clarice Sterling (Jody Foster nel film) che ha mostrato abilit脿 di profiler. L鈥檌dea 猫 che Clarice si rivolga a un detenuto molto speciale, il dottor Lecter (Hannibal Lecter ha l鈥檌ndimenticabile volto, e talento, di Anthony Hopkins), per farsi illuminare su Buffalo Bill: psicologia, modus operandi, dettagli, forse perfino informazioni dirette. Perch茅 il dottor Lecter 猫 un serial killer ormai celebre, e detenuto da tempo: nella prima storia della serie, Red Dragon 鈥� Il delitto della terza luna (anche questo magistralmente adattato sul grande schermo dal talento visionario di Michael Mann 鈥� titolo Manhunter 鈥� Frammenti di un omicidio), il detenuto dottor Lecter mette gi脿 in mostra la sua profonda conoscenza della mente e della brutalit脿 umana fornendo indizi e aiuti al detective Will Graham, che tre anni prima lo ha catturato, nella caccia al serial killer soprannominato Lupo Mannaro (il killer preferisce invece farsi chiamare il Drago Rosso, in omaggio a un quadro di William Blake, 鈥淚l grande Drago Rosso e la donna vestita col sole鈥�).
Per quanto Clarice sia giovane e all鈥檃pparenza inesperta riesce a far parlare il diabolico dottor Lecter che le fornisce indizi per catturare Buffalo Bill. Ma Lecter non concede nulla per nulla, le impone un do ut des: Clarice dovr脿 ricambiare ogni informazione su Buffalo Bill con racconti sulla sua vita, la sua famiglia, i genitori鈥� In pratica, raccontare chi davvero 猫 al pi霉 diabolico degli assassini.
Jonathan Demme, compianto poliedrico regista, capace di passare dalla commedia a questo sanguinolento thriller a un dramma umano sull鈥橝IDS come Philadelphia a forse il mio film concerto preferito in assoluto (Stop Making Sense) vinse meritatamente l?oscar per il miglior regista proprio con questo film.
Ma io vorrei soffermarmi un attimo a riflettere su come un film pi霉 che notevole, per me e altri un capolavoro, mette in scena una serie di delitti le cui vittime sono sempre e ovviamente donne.
Per farlo prendo a prestito parole dal libro che sto leggendo proprio in questi giorni:
Nell鈥檃rte, la tortura e la morte di una bella donna o di una giovane donna o di entrambe 猫 sempre raffigurato come qualcosa di erotico, di eccitante, di piacevole, cos矛, nonostante l鈥檌nsistenza dei poltici e dei media sul fatto che crimini e violenza sono casi limite, il desiderio trova consacrazione nei film di Alfred Hitchcock, Brian De Palma, David Lynch, Quentin Tarantino, Lars von Trier, in un鈥檌nfinit脿 di film horror e di altri film e di romanzi, e poi nei videogame e nelle graphic novel dove la descrizione di assassinio fin nei particolari pi霉 raccapriccianti o il cadavere di una donna 猫 un dispositivo narrativo standard e un prodotto estetico. L鈥檃nnichilimento di lei 猫 la realizzazione di lui. Per il pubblico a cui sono destinati, tutti questi prodotti sono evidentemente erotici, perch茅 nella vita reale le donne continuano a essere uccise durante i crimini sessuali, e la paura della violenza, dello stupro, 猫 anche la paura della morte violenta鈥�
In alcuni casi i protagonisti maschi proteggono le donne, specialmente belle e giovani donne bianche, da altri uomini, e quella di protettore 猫 una faccia del loro potere, ma quella di distruttore 猫 sempre l鈥檃ltra faccia e l鈥檜na o l鈥檃ltra mettono il tuo destino di donna nelle loro mani. Proteggono ci貌 che hanno in potere di proteggere o distruggere, e a volte la trama racconta del dolore di lui per non essere stato in grado di proteggere, o della sua vendetta nei confronti di altri uomini, e altre volte 猫 lui stesso a distruggere, e la storia comunque parla solo di lui.
Sono approdato al libro dopo aver visto il film. E per quanto il romanzo funzioni, non sia un capolavoro, ma 猫 efficace e avvincente, il film sovrasta nettamente il confronto: perch茅 il film 猫 invece magnifico, a suo modo, e nel suo genere, un autentico capolavoro.
E certo dopo 鈥� dopo libro e film 鈥� i serial killer hanno un altro spessore, sono diventati, per cos矛 dire, di casa. E probabilmente questa storia pu貌 essere considerata la madre di tutti i serial killer.
Ce n鈥櫭� uno che sequestra ragazze e fa loro cose turpi. 脠 soprannominato Buffalo Bill perch茅 si diletta nell鈥檃ttivit脿 pi霉 timidamente definita spellare, pi霉 brutalmente scuoiare. Per catturarlo, visto che 猫 arrivato a rapire la figlia di un senatore, il dirigente dell鈥橣BI (Scott Glenn nel film) sceglie una giovane recluta, Clarice Sterling (Jody Foster nel film) che ha mostrato abilit脿 di profiler. L鈥檌dea 猫 che Clarice si rivolga a un detenuto molto speciale, il dottor Lecter (Hannibal Lecter ha l鈥檌ndimenticabile volto, e talento, di Anthony Hopkins), per farsi illuminare su Buffalo Bill: psicologia, modus operandi, dettagli, forse perfino informazioni dirette. Perch茅 il dottor Lecter 猫 un serial killer ormai celebre, e detenuto da tempo: nella prima storia della serie, Red Dragon 鈥� Il delitto della terza luna (anche questo magistralmente adattato sul grande schermo dal talento visionario di Michael Mann 鈥� titolo Manhunter 鈥� Frammenti di un omicidio), il detenuto dottor Lecter mette gi脿 in mostra la sua profonda conoscenza della mente e della brutalit脿 umana fornendo indizi e aiuti al detective Will Graham, che tre anni prima lo ha catturato, nella caccia al serial killer soprannominato Lupo Mannaro (il killer preferisce invece farsi chiamare il Drago Rosso, in omaggio a un quadro di William Blake, 鈥淚l grande Drago Rosso e la donna vestita col sole鈥�).
Per quanto Clarice sia giovane e all鈥檃pparenza inesperta riesce a far parlare il diabolico dottor Lecter che le fornisce indizi per catturare Buffalo Bill. Ma Lecter non concede nulla per nulla, le impone un do ut des: Clarice dovr脿 ricambiare ogni informazione su Buffalo Bill con racconti sulla sua vita, la sua famiglia, i genitori鈥� In pratica, raccontare chi davvero 猫 al pi霉 diabolico degli assassini.
Jonathan Demme, compianto poliedrico regista, capace di passare dalla commedia a questo sanguinolento thriller a un dramma umano sull鈥橝IDS come Philadelphia a forse il mio film concerto preferito in assoluto (Stop Making Sense) vinse meritatamente l?oscar per il miglior regista proprio con questo film.
Ma io vorrei soffermarmi un attimo a riflettere su come un film pi霉 che notevole, per me e altri un capolavoro, mette in scena una serie di delitti le cui vittime sono sempre e ovviamente donne.
Per farlo prendo a prestito parole dal libro che sto leggendo proprio in questi giorni:
Nell鈥檃rte, la tortura e la morte di una bella donna o di una giovane donna o di entrambe 猫 sempre raffigurato come qualcosa di erotico, di eccitante, di piacevole, cos矛, nonostante l鈥檌nsistenza dei poltici e dei media sul fatto che crimini e violenza sono casi limite, il desiderio trova consacrazione nei film di Alfred Hitchcock, Brian De Palma, David Lynch, Quentin Tarantino, Lars von Trier, in un鈥檌nfinit脿 di film horror e di altri film e di romanzi, e poi nei videogame e nelle graphic novel dove la descrizione di assassinio fin nei particolari pi霉 raccapriccianti o il cadavere di una donna 猫 un dispositivo narrativo standard e un prodotto estetico. L鈥檃nnichilimento di lei 猫 la realizzazione di lui. Per il pubblico a cui sono destinati, tutti questi prodotti sono evidentemente erotici, perch茅 nella vita reale le donne continuano a essere uccise durante i crimini sessuali, e la paura della violenza, dello stupro, 猫 anche la paura della morte violenta鈥�
In alcuni casi i protagonisti maschi proteggono le donne, specialmente belle e giovani donne bianche, da altri uomini, e quella di protettore 猫 una faccia del loro potere, ma quella di distruttore 猫 sempre l鈥檃ltra faccia e l鈥檜na o l鈥檃ltra mettono il tuo destino di donna nelle loro mani. Proteggono ci貌 che hanno in potere di proteggere o distruggere, e a volte la trama racconta del dolore di lui per non essere stato in grado di proteggere, o della sua vendetta nei confronti di altri uomini, e altre volte 猫 lui stesso a distruggere, e la storia comunque parla solo di lui.
July 31, 2008
Call me a freak, but I have a bit of a crush on Hannibal Lecter. He may be the scariest fuck out there (certainly scarier than the supposed monster of the book, Buffalo Bill), but he just oozes style and knowledge. In fact, he has so much style and knowledge that he doesn't come off as a ridiculous prick when he says things like, 'A census taker tried to quantify me once. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a big Amarone'* or 'Can you smell his sweat? That peculiar goatish odour is trans-3-methyl-2 hexenoic acid. Remember it, it's the smell of schizophrenia.' Quite the contrary -- he sounds cool saying these things. Sophisticated, even. In this and many other ways, Dr Lecter is so utterly fascinating that you'll still find yourself rooting for him after he has committed several heinous (but brilliant!) murders, hoping he'll stay out of the hands of the police and live out his life in freedom. Now that's quality writing for you.
As you can probably tell from the above, I like The Silence of the Lambs, which is to say the book on which the movie was based. Except for the fact that Harris makes Clarice rather stupid** and that the dialogue in the book is a bit too clever and masculine for its own good***, it's a solid and exciting will-they-find-him-in-time-to-save-the-girl story -- a page-turner if ever there was one. The characters aren't terribly easy to identify with, but that's all right, because for one thing, they're cool (had I mentioned that yet?), and for another, they all have a clearly defined quest. They don't necessarily have the same quest, but hey, that only serves to increase the tension.
In some regards the book is better than the film. Remember those stupid anagrams from the movie? They're not in the book (except for the bilirubin one, which I actually quite like). The book makes its connections in a much more logical, less what-the-fuck?-ish way. It also has a more realistic romance, though not necessarily a better one. On the down side, I think Thomas Harris must have kicked himself for not having come up with the closing line of the film ('I'm having an old friend for dinner') himself. In my opinion, it's the best closing line in cinematic history, unmatched by the ending of the book. Still, it's a satisfying read. Very satisfying. As satisfying as the movie, and that's saying a fair bit.
......................
* Yes, that's what he says in the book. Not 'a nice Chianti'. I've been reliably informed by those in the know (I myself do not actually drink wine) that Amarone and Chianti are not in fact the same thing. 'Chianti' does sound better than 'Amarone' in this line, doesn't it?
** In the book, Dr Lecter tells Clarice in one of their first interviews that Billy has kidnapped large-chested Catherine Martin because 'he wants a vest with tits on it'. He then goes on to say in their next meeting that 'Billy is making a girl suit out of real girls'. And despite these incredibly obvious clues (which cannot be rude jokes on Lecter's part as he's far too sophisticated to make such rude jokes) it takes Clarice, who is supposed to be really intelligent, the entire rest of the book to figure out what it is that Billy wants from his victims. They wisely changed that in the movie, where Clarice doesn't have her entire quest spelled out for her right at the beginning.
*** I've never met any women who speak to each other the way Clarice and Ardelia do. Then again, I've never met any brilliant FBI trainees, so what do I know? Perhaps they do speak to each other like that at Quantico. I guess I'll never find out. (Anyone out there have FBI-trained friends? Anyone? Bueller?)
As you can probably tell from the above, I like The Silence of the Lambs, which is to say the book on which the movie was based. Except for the fact that Harris makes Clarice rather stupid** and that the dialogue in the book is a bit too clever and masculine for its own good***, it's a solid and exciting will-they-find-him-in-time-to-save-the-girl story -- a page-turner if ever there was one. The characters aren't terribly easy to identify with, but that's all right, because for one thing, they're cool (had I mentioned that yet?), and for another, they all have a clearly defined quest. They don't necessarily have the same quest, but hey, that only serves to increase the tension.
In some regards the book is better than the film. Remember those stupid anagrams from the movie? They're not in the book (except for the bilirubin one, which I actually quite like). The book makes its connections in a much more logical, less what-the-fuck?-ish way. It also has a more realistic romance, though not necessarily a better one. On the down side, I think Thomas Harris must have kicked himself for not having come up with the closing line of the film ('I'm having an old friend for dinner') himself. In my opinion, it's the best closing line in cinematic history, unmatched by the ending of the book. Still, it's a satisfying read. Very satisfying. As satisfying as the movie, and that's saying a fair bit.
......................
* Yes, that's what he says in the book. Not 'a nice Chianti'. I've been reliably informed by those in the know (I myself do not actually drink wine) that Amarone and Chianti are not in fact the same thing. 'Chianti' does sound better than 'Amarone' in this line, doesn't it?
** In the book, Dr Lecter tells Clarice in one of their first interviews that Billy has kidnapped large-chested Catherine Martin because 'he wants a vest with tits on it'. He then goes on to say in their next meeting that 'Billy is making a girl suit out of real girls'. And despite these incredibly obvious clues (which cannot be rude jokes on Lecter's part as he's far too sophisticated to make such rude jokes) it takes Clarice, who is supposed to be really intelligent, the entire rest of the book to figure out what it is that Billy wants from his victims. They wisely changed that in the movie, where Clarice doesn't have her entire quest spelled out for her right at the beginning.
*** I've never met any women who speak to each other the way Clarice and Ardelia do. Then again, I've never met any brilliant FBI trainees, so what do I know? Perhaps they do speak to each other like that at Quantico. I guess I'll never find out. (Anyone out there have FBI-trained friends? Anyone? Bueller?)
May 15, 2019
5 STARS!! Full review up.
This was fantastic!!
I went into The Silence of the Lambs hesitant that this book would not be as great as the movie, OR I wouldn't be able to get the movie characters out of my head.
You see, I鈥檝e seen The Silence of the Lambs 3 to 4 times in my life and I know the plot too well. I've loved the movie since the first time I watched it!
The movie came out in 1991 but I didn't watch it until I was 17, in 1995. I'm glad I waited because the nightmares would have sucked at age 13!!
Ha, who am I kidding. I still had nightmares after seeing this movie for the 1st time!
Getting back to the book, I was shocked with how much I enjoyed it! The writing by Thomas Harris is well done along with more detail about the serial killer, Buffalo Bill and the women he killed. The case was more detailed, the characters were more fleshed out (heh, funny I would use that term! haha) and the ending was dynamite.
The character of Clarice Starling was great in this book! She鈥檚 more fierce and cunning then what Jodie Foster does with the character in the movie. Jodie Foster still does a damn fine job with this character but it鈥檚 hard to be exactly like a character in a book. You can鈥檛 see what she thinks or how she interprets the Buffalo Bill case and the prisoner, Hannibal Lecter.
Speaking of Dr. Hannibal Lecter, he鈥檚 a monster, sadistic, way too intelligent, and will scare the pants off you. Anthony Hopkins does such a great job with this character. Let鈥檚 just take a moment to appreciate how he took Thomas Harris鈥� creation and made Lecter unforgettable!
Besides the great characterization, the police procedural and research of serial killers that Harris does in this series is fantastic! You鈥檝e got to realize that this is wrote in the 80鈥檚 and he likely has influenced the crime detective book genre more than anyone out there! Kudos Thomas Harris!!
If you have been living under a rock for the last 30 something years and have not seen this movie, go read the book first!! You won't be disappointed.
And if you love this movie and you're worried about not getting anything from the book, take it from me. I felt the same and I just gave this 5 stars!
This was fantastic!!
I went into The Silence of the Lambs hesitant that this book would not be as great as the movie, OR I wouldn't be able to get the movie characters out of my head.
You see, I鈥檝e seen The Silence of the Lambs 3 to 4 times in my life and I know the plot too well. I've loved the movie since the first time I watched it!
The movie came out in 1991 but I didn't watch it until I was 17, in 1995. I'm glad I waited because the nightmares would have sucked at age 13!!
Ha, who am I kidding. I still had nightmares after seeing this movie for the 1st time!
Getting back to the book, I was shocked with how much I enjoyed it! The writing by Thomas Harris is well done along with more detail about the serial killer, Buffalo Bill and the women he killed. The case was more detailed, the characters were more fleshed out (heh, funny I would use that term! haha) and the ending was dynamite.
The character of Clarice Starling was great in this book! She鈥檚 more fierce and cunning then what Jodie Foster does with the character in the movie. Jodie Foster still does a damn fine job with this character but it鈥檚 hard to be exactly like a character in a book. You can鈥檛 see what she thinks or how she interprets the Buffalo Bill case and the prisoner, Hannibal Lecter.
Speaking of Dr. Hannibal Lecter, he鈥檚 a monster, sadistic, way too intelligent, and will scare the pants off you. Anthony Hopkins does such a great job with this character. Let鈥檚 just take a moment to appreciate how he took Thomas Harris鈥� creation and made Lecter unforgettable!
Besides the great characterization, the police procedural and research of serial killers that Harris does in this series is fantastic! You鈥檝e got to realize that this is wrote in the 80鈥檚 and he likely has influenced the crime detective book genre more than anyone out there! Kudos Thomas Harris!!
If you have been living under a rock for the last 30 something years and have not seen this movie, go read the book first!! You won't be disappointed.
And if you love this movie and you're worried about not getting anything from the book, take it from me. I felt the same and I just gave this 5 stars!
February 20, 2022
Me ha gustado much铆simo. La trama es espectacularmente entretenida y los personajes bien constru铆dos. Difiere un poco de la pel铆cula, pero ambas son extraordinarias.
Teniendo en cuenta que es un libro largo, la acci贸n se desarrolla en unos d铆as. Me ha sorprendido por bien.
Un apunte: Lecter es el mejor defensor de la comida vegetariana.
馃ウ馃ウ馃ウ馃ウ馃构馃构馃构馃构
Teniendo en cuenta que es un libro largo, la acci贸n se desarrolla en unos d铆as. Me ha sorprendido por bien.
Un apunte: Lecter es el mejor defensor de la comida vegetariana.
馃ウ馃ウ馃ウ馃ウ馃构馃构馃构馃构
June 26, 2011
CONTENT ANNOUNCEMENT: Out of respect for Thomas Harris鈥檚 superb novel, I have decided that no pictures of ANTHONY HOPKINS will appear in this review. Thank you for your understanding.
4.0 to 4.5 stars. Another one of those terrific situations where I saw the movie first (and loved it) and then eventually decided to read the book... and loved it too. Score!!! Now assuming that most people not suffering from the after-effects of severe head trauma know the basic plot concerning FBI trainee 鈥�Hello...Clariiiiiice鈥� Starling, while trying to kibosh a Psychotic Vera Wang wannabe named Buffalo Bill, starts an unconventional relationship with extreme culinary expert Dr. Hannibalicious Lecter, I thought I would give you my take on the whole movie wins/book wins debate.
Please note that I am going to feel completely free to drop spoilers without warning from here on out so....recognize.
MOVIE GLORY
1. First, I thought the movie鈥檚 treatment of Starling鈥檚 time on the Sheep and Horse farm was much better, probably in large part due to Jodie Foster really nailing the angst factor as she describes trying to save a spring lamb from slaughter (in the book it was horses being slaughtered that she was tripping about). Here the movie wins and I can still close my eyes and here Foster/Starling saying 鈥渢he lambs were screaming鈥� and 鈥渋t was cold, so cold.鈥� She made that scene her chew toy and it is a wonderful example of taking more and condensing it into a more powerful less.
2. The End of the movie, Lecter stalking Dr. Chilton and ending his phone conversation with Starling by saying, 鈥淚鈥檓 going to have an old friend for dinner.鈥� YUM!!! One of my favorite lines/ideas from the movie and I was very bitter that it did not have an analog in the book. The Booest of Hoos on that.
AND SURPRISINGLY...that is it for the movies clear superiority. Now don鈥檛 get me wrong, I loved the movie and think they did much EXCEPTIONALLY well. However, I was shocked in reading the book that most the best parts in the movie (including Lecter, which shocked me) were handled equally effectively in the book. Thus, where I think it was a tie or too close to call, I have decided not to put it in one camp or another. With that said....on to the book.
BOOK DOMINANCE
1. Need to start with Lector and this is a surprise because Sir Anthony made this role his like few people on movie history. However, I am not talking about what was in both the movie and the book as I think it is a push, to a slight edge to Mr. Hopkins. No, I am talking about the one AMAZING insight the book provides to the character. Namely, Lecter鈥檚 motivation is about 鈥渁musing himself.鈥� This single thread running through the book makes Lecter a far darker, far more sinister character (which also explains why hollywood downplayed it to land Hopkins in the role). Walking away from the book, the reader has a much better sense of Lector as a conscience-lacking entity of pure evil, than we get from the movie. Kudos to Mr. Harris on that point.
2. As good as Scott Glenn is in the movie, his character found way too much time on the editing room floor and the book truly develops well. His scene with the head of John Hopkins university is one that truly should have found a way on screen as I thought it was perfect.
3. James Gumb (aka Buffalo Bill). As wonderfully icky as Ted Levine is in the movie, he comes across as just a nutso on screen with the naked 鈥渢uck鈥� dance an the lotion commercials. Meanwhile, in lit land, Gumby is shown to be so....SAVAGE and calculating that all of the nutso stuff takes on a far more sinister aspect. I was deeply disturbed by the depiction of Gumb鈥檚 craft skills and the movie never hammered that home enough.
PUTTING IT IN THE NUT鈥橲 SHELL鈥橲
Overall, I was deeply impressed with both the movie and book, but the book really gets the gold star for being able to work with my love of the movie and still blow me away. In closing, if you have only seen the movie, you should read the book and if you have only read the book, you should see the movie as it is deeply respectful of the source material. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED!!
P.S. I listened to the audio version read by Frank Muller and he was his usual perfection.
P.P.S. I was fairly insulted that the movie makers felt the need to change Amarone to Chianti (in the famous fava beans scene) presumably because they didn't think the "audience" would get it. OUCH!!
4.0 to 4.5 stars. Another one of those terrific situations where I saw the movie first (and loved it) and then eventually decided to read the book... and loved it too. Score!!! Now assuming that most people not suffering from the after-effects of severe head trauma know the basic plot concerning FBI trainee 鈥�Hello...Clariiiiiice鈥� Starling, while trying to kibosh a Psychotic Vera Wang wannabe named Buffalo Bill, starts an unconventional relationship with extreme culinary expert Dr. Hannibalicious Lecter, I thought I would give you my take on the whole movie wins/book wins debate.
Please note that I am going to feel completely free to drop spoilers without warning from here on out so....recognize.
MOVIE GLORY
1. First, I thought the movie鈥檚 treatment of Starling鈥檚 time on the Sheep and Horse farm was much better, probably in large part due to Jodie Foster really nailing the angst factor as she describes trying to save a spring lamb from slaughter (in the book it was horses being slaughtered that she was tripping about). Here the movie wins and I can still close my eyes and here Foster/Starling saying 鈥渢he lambs were screaming鈥� and 鈥渋t was cold, so cold.鈥� She made that scene her chew toy and it is a wonderful example of taking more and condensing it into a more powerful less.
2. The End of the movie, Lecter stalking Dr. Chilton and ending his phone conversation with Starling by saying, 鈥淚鈥檓 going to have an old friend for dinner.鈥� YUM!!! One of my favorite lines/ideas from the movie and I was very bitter that it did not have an analog in the book. The Booest of Hoos on that.
AND SURPRISINGLY...that is it for the movies clear superiority. Now don鈥檛 get me wrong, I loved the movie and think they did much EXCEPTIONALLY well. However, I was shocked in reading the book that most the best parts in the movie (including Lecter, which shocked me) were handled equally effectively in the book. Thus, where I think it was a tie or too close to call, I have decided not to put it in one camp or another. With that said....on to the book.
BOOK DOMINANCE
1. Need to start with Lector and this is a surprise because Sir Anthony made this role his like few people on movie history. However, I am not talking about what was in both the movie and the book as I think it is a push, to a slight edge to Mr. Hopkins. No, I am talking about the one AMAZING insight the book provides to the character. Namely, Lecter鈥檚 motivation is about 鈥渁musing himself.鈥� This single thread running through the book makes Lecter a far darker, far more sinister character (which also explains why hollywood downplayed it to land Hopkins in the role). Walking away from the book, the reader has a much better sense of Lector as a conscience-lacking entity of pure evil, than we get from the movie. Kudos to Mr. Harris on that point.
2. As good as Scott Glenn is in the movie, his character found way too much time on the editing room floor and the book truly develops well. His scene with the head of John Hopkins university is one that truly should have found a way on screen as I thought it was perfect.
3. Jame
PUTTING IT IN THE NUT鈥橲 SHELL鈥橲
Overall, I was deeply impressed with both the movie and book, but the book really gets the gold star for being able to work with my love of the movie and still blow me away. In closing, if you have only seen the movie, you should read the book and if you have only read the book, you should see the movie as it is deeply respectful of the source material. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED!!
P.S. I listened to the audio version read by Frank Muller and he was his usual perfection.
P.P.S. I was fairly insulted that the movie makers felt the need to change Amarone to Chianti (in the famous fava beans scene) presumably because they didn't think the "audience" would get it. OUCH!!
May 5, 2019
4.5鈽�
Loved the movie. Loved the book. The Kindle edition is slightly, tainted, with numbers, sporadically-interweaved into the text - which I assume, judging by the percentage I was currently on (when the numbers appeared) - is the actual page number. No biggie. Just a bit jarring, as my edition of the novel had location numbering at the bottom. Don't know why they do that - but, whatever.
I'm impressed by how close the movie is to the source material, just like Manhunter was to the Red Dragon book - including some of the dialogue being verbatim. I noticed one, glaring difference: when Starling first meets Lecter and is walking down the hallway to his cell; which is on the left in the film; the right in the book. I'm also impressed by each actors' performance, in their respective roles. Jodie Foster was interested in playing the part, after reading the novel. And George A. Romero (Feb 4th, 1940 - July 16th, 2017) had a cameo role, as an FBI Agent in Memphis (unaccredited). I'll have to keep an eye-out for that, next time I watch the film, which had 66 cast members, and took $272.7 million at the box office, on a $19 million budget.
Movie cast:
Jodie Foster (Clarice Starling).
Anthony Hopkins ('Hannibal the Cannibal,' Lecter)
Ted Levine (Buffalo Bill).
Scott Glenn (Jack Crawford).
Brooke Smith (Catherine Martin).
Anthony Heald (Frederick Chilton).
Kasi Lemmons (Ardelia Mapp)
Stuart Rudin (I.J. Miggs).
Maria Skorobogatov (young Clarice) - Masha.
Darla (Precious).
Chris McGinn (autopsy victim).
A young trainee FBI-agent, Clarice Starling, is pulled from training and given an assignment: to interview Hannibal Lecter, at the Baltimore State Hospital for the Criminally Insane. A questionnaire has been developed; which applies to all-known serial-murderers in modern times. They've tried to interview and examine all thirty-two known serial-killers that they have in custody: to build a database for psychological-profiling cases, unsolved. Most were willing to cooperate; except the one they want to speak to the most - who isn't cooperative. Lecter. Starling, sniffs an opportunity, and is glad of the chance - though Crawford doesn't expect Lecter to say anything.
When she gets to the hospital, Dr. Chilton (who isn't a real doctor) - explains the rules:
"Do not reach through the bars, do not touch the bars. You pass him nothing but soft paper. No pens, no pencils. He has his own felt-tipped pens some of the time. The paper you pass him must be free of staples, paper clips, or pins. Items come back through the sliding food carrier. No exceptions. Do not accept anything he attempts to hold out to you through the barrier. Do you understand me?"
I think he forgot to mention another rule: that you shouldn't stand-still outside a particular cell, for any amount of time; especially if the person in the cell is making groaning, sounds. Ah. The infamous flying missile scene, courtesy of Miggs. I think that was the most disturbing scene in the movie (and probably the book, too). Miggs' indiscretions. In the book, Lecter is polydactyl: he has six-fingers on his left hand.
On a more positive note: it's the catalyst for Lecter giving Starling a chance and sending her to seek-out: Raspail's car for her Valentines. Yep.If you want something from Lecter, you have to take one for the team.
Lecter thinks she's there to ask if he can help in the Buffalo Bill case - which he has an interest in. He says he's willing to help, if he gets something in return. Quid Pro Quo. He wants know more about Starling. She gives him something about herself, he'll give something in return. He wants to play a game - and the stakes are high, when the daughter of Sen. Ruth Martin is abducted, believed to have been taken by Buffalo Bill. Will she be saved in time? Or will the felon have her hide? Clarice has a few obstacles in her way, so it won't be easy.
I really enjoyed this novel. Disappointed I didn't read it, sooner. There's a lot of creepy/unsettling and intense scenes. I liked the conversations, between Lecter and Starling, as she tries to extract information from him. He's too smart to outwit, so she has to play-along. He's got nothing to lose.
Loved the movie. Loved the book. The Kindle edition is slightly, tainted, with numbers, sporadically-interweaved into the text - which I assume, judging by the percentage I was currently on (when the numbers appeared) - is the actual page number. No biggie. Just a bit jarring, as my edition of the novel had location numbering at the bottom. Don't know why they do that - but, whatever.
I'm impressed by how close the movie is to the source material, just like Manhunter was to the Red Dragon book - including some of the dialogue being verbatim. I noticed one, glaring difference: when Starling first meets Lecter and is walking down the hallway to his cell; which is on the left in the film; the right in the book. I'm also impressed by each actors' performance, in their respective roles. Jodie Foster was interested in playing the part, after reading the novel. And George A. Romero (Feb 4th, 1940 - July 16th, 2017) had a cameo role, as an FBI Agent in Memphis (unaccredited). I'll have to keep an eye-out for that, next time I watch the film, which had 66 cast members, and took $272.7 million at the box office, on a $19 million budget.
Movie cast:
Jodie Foster (Clarice Starling).
Anthony Hopkins ('Hannibal the Cannibal,' Lecter)
Ted Levine (Buffalo Bill).
Scott Glenn (Jack Crawford).
Brooke Smith (Catherine Martin).
Anthony Heald (Frederick Chilton).
Kasi Lemmons (Ardelia Mapp)
Stuart Rudin (I.J. Miggs).
Maria Skorobogatov (young Clarice) - Masha.
Darla (Precious).
Chris McGinn (autopsy victim).
A young trainee FBI-agent, Clarice Starling, is pulled from training and given an assignment: to interview Hannibal Lecter, at the Baltimore State Hospital for the Criminally Insane. A questionnaire has been developed; which applies to all-known serial-murderers in modern times. They've tried to interview and examine all thirty-two known serial-killers that they have in custody: to build a database for psychological-profiling cases, unsolved. Most were willing to cooperate; except the one they want to speak to the most - who isn't cooperative. Lecter. Starling, sniffs an opportunity, and is glad of the chance - though Crawford doesn't expect Lecter to say anything.
When she gets to the hospital, Dr. Chilton (who isn't a real doctor) - explains the rules:
"Do not reach through the bars, do not touch the bars. You pass him nothing but soft paper. No pens, no pencils. He has his own felt-tipped pens some of the time. The paper you pass him must be free of staples, paper clips, or pins. Items come back through the sliding food carrier. No exceptions. Do not accept anything he attempts to hold out to you through the barrier. Do you understand me?"
I think he forgot to mention another rule: that you shouldn't stand-still outside a particular cell, for any amount of time; especially if the person in the cell is making groaning, sounds. Ah. The infamous flying missile scene, courtesy of Miggs. I think that was the most disturbing scene in the movie (and probably the book, too). Miggs' indiscretions. In the book, Lecter is polydactyl: he has six-fingers on his left hand.
On a more positive note: it's the catalyst for Lecter giving Starling a chance and sending her to seek-out: Raspail's car for her Valentines. Yep.If you want something from Lecter, you have to take one for the team.
Lecter thinks she's there to ask if he can help in the Buffalo Bill case - which he has an interest in. He says he's willing to help, if he gets something in return. Quid Pro Quo. He wants know more about Starling. She gives him something about herself, he'll give something in return. He wants to play a game - and the stakes are high, when the daughter of Sen. Ruth Martin is abducted, believed to have been taken by Buffalo Bill. Will she be saved in time? Or will the felon have her hide? Clarice has a few obstacles in her way, so it won't be easy.
I really enjoyed this novel. Disappointed I didn't read it, sooner. There's a lot of creepy/unsettling and intense scenes. I liked the conversations, between Lecter and Starling, as she tries to extract information from him. He's too smart to outwit, so she has to play-along. He's got nothing to lose.
July 17, 2022
'A census taker tried to quantify me once. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a big Amarone. Go back to school, little Starling.'
This one starts off with the FBI needing help from a imprisoned psychiatrist called Hannibal Lecter who committed at least seven cannibalistic murders, they need his insight in order to catch a serial killer called Buffalo Bill, who enjoys wearing the flayed skins of his victims.
Clarice Starling, a pretty FBI cadet is asked to visit Lecter and charm him into offering help.
My first time read of this and I've never seen the movie, shocking I know!
The plot and characters are awesome.
It鈥檚 one of the darkest and fascinating thrillers I鈥檝e ever read.
Now to watch the adaptation....
This one starts off with the FBI needing help from a imprisoned psychiatrist called Hannibal Lecter who committed at least seven cannibalistic murders, they need his insight in order to catch a serial killer called Buffalo Bill, who enjoys wearing the flayed skins of his victims.
Clarice Starling, a pretty FBI cadet is asked to visit Lecter and charm him into offering help.
My first time read of this and I've never seen the movie, shocking I know!
The plot and characters are awesome.
It鈥檚 one of the darkest and fascinating thrillers I鈥檝e ever read.
Now to watch the adaptation....
June 2, 2022
鈥淚 ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti."
(Or, "a big amarone" as in the novel.)
Thomas Harris's story of "The Silence of the Lambs" has always been a fascinating one for me, and I believe wholeheartedly that this is one of the most unique, most fascinating and most enthralling crime novels ever written (and rarely has any mystery/thriller been adapted to film so successfully). The 1991 film is one of my favorite films of all time, even though much of the praise must belong to Jodie Foster and Anthony Hopkins, both of whom committed dedicated and convincing performances to Jonathan Demme's adaptation.
It has been more than half a year since I finally read this novel, but I don't think anything has had a similar impact on me ever since finishing the book. In general, one of the biggest problems I have with crime novels is that it is so easy for them to become procedural, to feel as if they were written according to a guide on how to write a crime novel. I have a lot of trouble relating to many of these novels, and even if the mystery is intriguing and keeps you turning the pages, it often comes at a disadvantages as characters, especially investigating ones, are in constant danger of remaining too shallow, too detached for the reader to really care about what ultimately happens to them. In Thomas Harris' novel, however, we have Clarice Starling, Dr. Hannibal Lecter, Jack Crawford, Dr. Frederick Chilton, Buffalo Bill - all of them iconic and unforgettable characters in their own right. They become real persons between the binding holding together this book, and that's something many crime authors should always keep in mind while writing their novels, at least in my opinion.
Of course, it's hard to judge this book on its own. Stories surrounding Hannibal Lecter have been covered through five films (Manhunter, The Silence of the Lambs, Red Dragon, Hannibal and Hannibal Rising) and a very successful three-season TV series, and everyone has formed a different mindset about Hannibal. We may see him in the form of Brian Cox from Manhunter, Mads Mikkelsen from the TV series or Gaspard Ulliel from Hannibal Rising, but undoubtedly the man who shaped this character and made him the icon he is nowadays was Anthony Hopkins, so much that the American Film Institute even selected him as the . Reading a novel after seeing one or even several treatments of the source material by filmmakers has always been quite a challenge for me, as it generally became quite difficult to see the book in its own right without being overruled by images from the adaptations which have burned themselves into my mind, but in the case of Thomas Harris' novel, for me it just added to the pleasure of getting to know these characters and their unique fates.
You may have realized that I don't even know what to write about the book anymore, to an extent that I started rambling about the different actors who portrayed this iconic character. That's simply because it left me speechless, even now, quite a long time after watching the movie and the TV show and just a few months after reading the novel. There is no doubt I will read "Red Dragon" and "Hannibal" as well (they are already resting on my shelves): just as there is no doubt that I can only assure everyone who hasn't read this yet that "The Silence of the Lambs" is the crime/thriller/mystery novel you were waiting for.
Slightly updated this review on 2022/06/02. Have to say that it's a perfect holiday read for me thanks to its fast pacing and the interesting characters. You don't need to think about what you're reading too much, but there's still a lot of fascinating insight to be derived from the novel.
April 1, 2018
One of my favorite books and film too!
This is the second novel in the "Hannibal Lecter" book series.
GAME CHANGER
Back then, in 1991, I didn't know that Silence of the Lambs had been first a book, and even less that it was actually the second book in the literary series, but...
...I knew that the film adaptation became, in an instant, one of my all-time favorite films. A game changer indeed that swept away with the 5 most respected awards by the Academy (best film, best script, best director, best actor and best actress) that you can't diminish since this particular combination of these 5 Oscars, had been only accomplished three times in the history of the Oscars, It Happened One Night (1934) and One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (1975), along with the said film.
A curious thing is that while Dr. Hannibal Lecter became the lead character of the book series generating adaptations of each book along with a TV series inspired in the said character...
...for me, my attachment to Silence of the Lambs was the young FBI trainee Clarice Starling, since she was a formidable character facing overwhelming challenges: dealing with disturbing interviews with the insidious Dr. Hannibal Lecter, an unwilling pawn of FBI Special Agent Jack Crawford, and having to face the insanely dangerous "Buffalo Bill".
Clarice Starling is a beacon of light in the middle of a hopeless world of darkness. She is smart, intuitive, resourceful and brave.
THE END JUSTIFIES THE MEANS...
Hardly, anyone thinks himself as the villain, each character (real or fiction) thinks that they are doing the right thing and that the end justifies the means...
...and young FBI trainee Clarice Starling is "the means" for Special Agent Jack Crawford to get the insight of Dr. Hannibal Lecter about the case of the criminally insane one known as "Buffalo Bill", so exposing an unexperienced Starling to the wicked cunning Dr. Hannibal Lecter, is justified if that can accomplish the arrest of the wanted serial killer.
This kind of "justified manipulation" isn't strange to Crawford since he has done it before with Special Investigator Will Graham, that not matter his natural talent to get to know how the serial killers think, Graham was already a fragile character looking for peace of mind when he was "persuaded" to become involved once again in a serial killer case and getting inside the world of Dr. Hannibal Lecter again with disastrous outcome.
Now, it's turn for young Clarice to become a "pawn" of Jack Crawford that while his intentions are "good" in the angle that he genuinely wants to arrest criminals, he's leaving collateral damage in the path of those manhunting crusades.
Clarice may not fall now...
...but she's already in the watch of Dr. Hannibal Lecter and it was Crawford who put her there.
SERIAL KILLERS' WORLD IS SO SMALL
It seems that the serial killers world, at least in the literary universe created by Thomas Harris, is so small that a character like Dr. Hannibal Lecter, where you have to take in mind that he was a renown psychiatrist too, well, it isn't that hard to notice the particular M.O.s of each criminally insane murderers, and soon enough knowing who in the middle of that twisted club is the designer on each killing spree.
And Dr. Lecter knows that.
He knows that he is a necessary evil for being able by the forces of the law to catch other menaces of this same kind of wicked breed,
And of course, Dr. Lecter has a plan.
He is patient. There is not hurry.
He already got his payback to his accidental captor.
Now, it could be good to get his freedom back.
Since after all, the world is just too boring without him there.
And that fool Jack Crawford keeps sending him the tools to get what he wants.
Dr. Hannibal Lecter is ready to eat the whole world once again.
Be afraid.
Be very afraid...
...and turn to look if somebody is following you, ready to take you for dinner.
This is the second novel in the "Hannibal Lecter" book series.
GAME CHANGER
Back then, in 1991, I didn't know that Silence of the Lambs had been first a book, and even less that it was actually the second book in the literary series, but...
...I knew that the film adaptation became, in an instant, one of my all-time favorite films. A game changer indeed that swept away with the 5 most respected awards by the Academy (best film, best script, best director, best actor and best actress) that you can't diminish since this particular combination of these 5 Oscars, had been only accomplished three times in the history of the Oscars, It Happened One Night (1934) and One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (1975), along with the said film.
A curious thing is that while Dr. Hannibal Lecter became the lead character of the book series generating adaptations of each book along with a TV series inspired in the said character...
...for me, my attachment to Silence of the Lambs was the young FBI trainee Clarice Starling, since she was a formidable character facing overwhelming challenges: dealing with disturbing interviews with the insidious Dr. Hannibal Lecter, an unwilling pawn of FBI Special Agent Jack Crawford, and having to face the insanely dangerous "Buffalo Bill".
Clarice Starling is a beacon of light in the middle of a hopeless world of darkness. She is smart, intuitive, resourceful and brave.
THE END JUSTIFIES THE MEANS...
Hardly, anyone thinks himself as the villain, each character (real or fiction) thinks that they are doing the right thing and that the end justifies the means...
...and young FBI trainee Clarice Starling is "the means" for Special Agent Jack Crawford to get the insight of Dr. Hannibal Lecter about the case of the criminally insane one known as "Buffalo Bill", so exposing an unexperienced Starling to the wicked cunning Dr. Hannibal Lecter, is justified if that can accomplish the arrest of the wanted serial killer.
This kind of "justified manipulation" isn't strange to Crawford since he has done it before with Special Investigator Will Graham, that not matter his natural talent to get to know how the serial killers think, Graham was already a fragile character looking for peace of mind when he was "persuaded" to become involved once again in a serial killer case and getting inside the world of Dr. Hannibal Lecter again with disastrous outcome.
Now, it's turn for young Clarice to become a "pawn" of Jack Crawford that while his intentions are "good" in the angle that he genuinely wants to arrest criminals, he's leaving collateral damage in the path of those manhunting crusades.
Clarice may not fall now...
...but she's already in the watch of Dr. Hannibal Lecter and it was Crawford who put her there.
SERIAL KILLERS' WORLD IS SO SMALL
It seems that the serial killers world, at least in the literary universe created by Thomas Harris, is so small that a character like Dr. Hannibal Lecter, where you have to take in mind that he was a renown psychiatrist too, well, it isn't that hard to notice the particular M.O.s of each criminally insane murderers, and soon enough knowing who in the middle of that twisted club is the designer on each killing spree.
And Dr. Lecter knows that.
He knows that he is a necessary evil for being able by the forces of the law to catch other menaces of this same kind of wicked breed,
And of course, Dr. Lecter has a plan.
He is patient. There is not hurry.
He already got his payback to his accidental captor.
Now, it could be good to get his freedom back.
Since after all, the world is just too boring without him there.
And that fool Jack Crawford keeps sending him the tools to get what he wants.
Dr. Hannibal Lecter is ready to eat the whole world once again.
Be afraid.
Be very afraid...
...and turn to look if somebody is following you, ready to take you for dinner.
June 2, 2019
Editor's Note: I'm reposting this review because my original posted on May 9 has been infested with fake "likes." Some of you have also accumulated suspicious follows and likes beginning in late April. These are accounts created in April, May or June 2019 and feature western user names, "China" as the location, 0 friends, 0 books (or close to 0) and no profile photo.
欧宝娱乐 has notified me that these are "real people." Thanks for nothing, 欧宝娱乐. I've blocked hundreds of these accounts and noticed too many similarities in their activity to believe these are real people. Please be on the lookout for followers with new accounts and no profile photo claiming to be from China. This user is not up to anything legitimate on this site.
It's my thesis that 欧宝娱乐 can come together and agree that The Silence of the Lambs is a great novel. Published in 1988, this was the third novel by Thomas Harris, his follow-up to Black Sunday and Red Dragon, the latter of which introduced Dr. Hannibal Lecter and put Harris--who takes years to publish--into the FBI Behavioral Science Lab vs. Serial Killer business. I've seen the Oscar winning Best Picture several times but bumped the source material up as Sean Coyne, author of and the next book on my list, uses it to illustrate the application of his many story tips.
Other than a handful of scenes and a couple of story threads omitted from the screenplay by Ted Tally for the 1991 film directed by Jonathan Demme, the movie follows the novel very closely, so I won't bother to recount the plot. The Silence of the Lambs is currently streaming on Netflix and really should be in your Blu-Ray/ DVD/ laserdisc/ VHS library if it isn't already. Let's just pick up the 25th anniversary edition and jump right in:
-- The iconography of the Death-Head's Hawkmoth is such a brilliant representation of this story. Both beautiful and sinister, the nocturnal moth emerging from its pupa relates to both Clarice Starling and Jame Gumb as these characters grow into something new. If your edition of the book doesn't include the moth on the cover, you're being robbed. It was featured prominently in the movie marketing.
-- Opening paragraph. Behavioral Science, the FBI section that deals with serial murder, is on the bottom floor of the Academy building at Quantico, half-buried in the earth. Clarice Starling reached it flushed after a fast walk from Hogan's Alley on the firing range. She had grass in her hair and grass stains on her FBI Academy windbreaker from diving to the ground under fire in an arrest problem on the range. Harris doesn't describe Starling's eyes, hair, build, etc. We know who she is by where she is and what she's doing there. And her name--Clarice Starling--summarizes her beautifully.
-- For a novel that's under 100,000 words and very fast-moving (I finished it in two days) I loved how complex it is. Harris doesn't approach things in a straight-forward fashion, but at a slant. Hour-length TV cop shows have given writers the impression that criminal investigations or manhunts can be wrapped up in under an hour. Jack Crawford doesn't send Starling to ask Hannibal Lecter who "Buffalo Bill" is outright. He knows Lecter would rather toy with authority for his own amusement than help. Instead, he sends a young female cadet on a seemingly trivial matter in an attempt to establish rapport with the doctor.
-- I'm a fan of master/pupil stories and am struck with how throughout the book, Starling is a consummate student rather than some kind of crime fighting genius. This is established in the book by how hard Starling and her roommate Ardelia Mapp are studying for their exams at the FBI Academy and cramming their heads with knowledge. Starling knows a little about a lot of things--like the difference between a patent and a copyright or what triangles on a dressmaking pattern are for--as well as a lot about her specialties: forensics and psychology. She's acquired her knowledge by reading. What book lover doesn't love a protagonist who loves to read?
-- Most horror books and films involve creatures run amok or jumping out from behind corners. The Silence of the Lambs involves a serial killer interned at the Baltimore State Hospital for the Criminally Insane who, as long as you obey the rules and respect what he is, cannot get at you through his cell. Yet Dr. Hannibal Lecter is terrifying because he can't be contained to his cell. He sees through his visitors, reduces them to their weakest natures and takes advantage of them. I like how Dr. Lecter can discuss murdering his former patient and serving the pancreas to unsuspecting dinner guests, but stresses politeness and nice manners at all times.
"Raspail's dream of happiness was ruined. He put Klaus' head in a bowling bag and came back East."
"What did he do with the rest?"
"Buried it in the hills."
"He showed you the head in the car?"
"Oh yes, in the course of therapy he came to feel he could tell me anything. He went out to sit with Klaus quite often and showed him the Valentines."
"And then Raspail himself ... died. Why?"
"Frankly, I got sick and tired of his whining. Best thing for him, really. Therapy wasn't going anywhere. I expect most psychiatrists have a patient or two they'd like to refer to me. I've never discussed this before, and now I'm getting bored with it."
"And your dinner for the orchestra officials?"
"Haven't you ever had people coming over and no time to shop? You have to make do with what's in the fridge, Clarice. May I call you Clarice?"
"Yes. I think I'll just call you--"
"Dr. Lecter--that seems most appropriate to your age and station," he said.
"Yes."
"How did you feel when you went into the garage?"
"Apprehensive."
"Why?"
"Mice and insects."
"Do you have something you use when you want to get up your nerve?" Dr. Lecter asked.
"Nothing I know of that works, except wanting what I'm after."
-- If profiling a serial killer and tracking him down--Harris establishes that as of 1988 there was no precedent for a female serial killer--wasn't hard, Starling has to manage the feelings of men she comes into contact with doing her job. Hospital administrator Dr. Chilton hits on Starling within a minute of her entering his office and when rebuffed, goes out of his way to make her work difficult. Noble Pilcher, entomologist at the Smithsonian Institute, asks Starling out while she's trying to determine why Buffalo Bill has inserted an insect pupa into his victims' throats. A sheriff's deputy tries to chat with Starling while she's searching Catherine Martin's apartment and she has to tell the lawman to hush in the sweetest way possible. These are all concerns Will Graham never had to deal with in Red Dragon.
-- As thrillers go, the climax is sensational. (view spoiler) I love how Harris shoots through Starling's decision-making process on whether to find Jame Gumb, confirm that he's fled the house or help Catherine Martin out of the well in the basement. It's like an FBI Choose Your Own Adventure.
-- Closing paragraph. Far to the east, on the Chesapeake shore, Orion stood high in the clear night, above a big old house, and a room where a fire is banked for the night, its light pulsing gently with the wind above the chimneys. On a large bed there are many quilts and on the quilts and under them are several large dogs. Additional mounds beneath the covers may or may not be Noble Pilcher, it is impossible to determine in the ambient light. But the face on the pillow, rosy in the firelight, is certainly that of Clarice Starling, and she sleeps deeply, sweetly, in the silence of the lambs.
Perfect ending to the perfect novel.
Length: 94,827 words
欧宝娱乐 has notified me that these are "real people." Thanks for nothing, 欧宝娱乐. I've blocked hundreds of these accounts and noticed too many similarities in their activity to believe these are real people. Please be on the lookout for followers with new accounts and no profile photo claiming to be from China. This user is not up to anything legitimate on this site.
It's my thesis that 欧宝娱乐 can come together and agree that The Silence of the Lambs is a great novel. Published in 1988, this was the third novel by Thomas Harris, his follow-up to Black Sunday and Red Dragon, the latter of which introduced Dr. Hannibal Lecter and put Harris--who takes years to publish--into the FBI Behavioral Science Lab vs. Serial Killer business. I've seen the Oscar winning Best Picture several times but bumped the source material up as Sean Coyne, author of and the next book on my list, uses it to illustrate the application of his many story tips.
Other than a handful of scenes and a couple of story threads omitted from the screenplay by Ted Tally for the 1991 film directed by Jonathan Demme, the movie follows the novel very closely, so I won't bother to recount the plot. The Silence of the Lambs is currently streaming on Netflix and really should be in your Blu-Ray/ DVD/ laserdisc/ VHS library if it isn't already. Let's just pick up the 25th anniversary edition and jump right in:
-- The iconography of the Death-Head's Hawkmoth is such a brilliant representation of this story. Both beautiful and sinister, the nocturnal moth emerging from its pupa relates to both Clarice Starling and Jame Gumb as these characters grow into something new. If your edition of the book doesn't include the moth on the cover, you're being robbed. It was featured prominently in the movie marketing.
-- Opening paragraph. Behavioral Science, the FBI section that deals with serial murder, is on the bottom floor of the Academy building at Quantico, half-buried in the earth. Clarice Starling reached it flushed after a fast walk from Hogan's Alley on the firing range. She had grass in her hair and grass stains on her FBI Academy windbreaker from diving to the ground under fire in an arrest problem on the range. Harris doesn't describe Starling's eyes, hair, build, etc. We know who she is by where she is and what she's doing there. And her name--Clarice Starling--summarizes her beautifully.
-- For a novel that's under 100,000 words and very fast-moving (I finished it in two days) I loved how complex it is. Harris doesn't approach things in a straight-forward fashion, but at a slant. Hour-length TV cop shows have given writers the impression that criminal investigations or manhunts can be wrapped up in under an hour. Jack Crawford doesn't send Starling to ask Hannibal Lecter who "Buffalo Bill" is outright. He knows Lecter would rather toy with authority for his own amusement than help. Instead, he sends a young female cadet on a seemingly trivial matter in an attempt to establish rapport with the doctor.
-- I'm a fan of master/pupil stories and am struck with how throughout the book, Starling is a consummate student rather than some kind of crime fighting genius. This is established in the book by how hard Starling and her roommate Ardelia Mapp are studying for their exams at the FBI Academy and cramming their heads with knowledge. Starling knows a little about a lot of things--like the difference between a patent and a copyright or what triangles on a dressmaking pattern are for--as well as a lot about her specialties: forensics and psychology. She's acquired her knowledge by reading. What book lover doesn't love a protagonist who loves to read?
-- Most horror books and films involve creatures run amok or jumping out from behind corners. The Silence of the Lambs involves a serial killer interned at the Baltimore State Hospital for the Criminally Insane who, as long as you obey the rules and respect what he is, cannot get at you through his cell. Yet Dr. Hannibal Lecter is terrifying because he can't be contained to his cell. He sees through his visitors, reduces them to their weakest natures and takes advantage of them. I like how Dr. Lecter can discuss murdering his former patient and serving the pancreas to unsuspecting dinner guests, but stresses politeness and nice manners at all times.
"Raspail's dream of happiness was ruined. He put Klaus' head in a bowling bag and came back East."
"What did he do with the rest?"
"Buried it in the hills."
"He showed you the head in the car?"
"Oh yes, in the course of therapy he came to feel he could tell me anything. He went out to sit with Klaus quite often and showed him the Valentines."
"And then Raspail himself ... died. Why?"
"Frankly, I got sick and tired of his whining. Best thing for him, really. Therapy wasn't going anywhere. I expect most psychiatrists have a patient or two they'd like to refer to me. I've never discussed this before, and now I'm getting bored with it."
"And your dinner for the orchestra officials?"
"Haven't you ever had people coming over and no time to shop? You have to make do with what's in the fridge, Clarice. May I call you Clarice?"
"Yes. I think I'll just call you--"
"Dr. Lecter--that seems most appropriate to your age and station," he said.
"Yes."
"How did you feel when you went into the garage?"
"Apprehensive."
"Why?"
"Mice and insects."
"Do you have something you use when you want to get up your nerve?" Dr. Lecter asked.
"Nothing I know of that works, except wanting what I'm after."
-- If profiling a serial killer and tracking him down--Harris establishes that as of 1988 there was no precedent for a female serial killer--wasn't hard, Starling has to manage the feelings of men she comes into contact with doing her job. Hospital administrator Dr. Chilton hits on Starling within a minute of her entering his office and when rebuffed, goes out of his way to make her work difficult. Noble Pilcher, entomologist at the Smithsonian Institute, asks Starling out while she's trying to determine why Buffalo Bill has inserted an insect pupa into his victims' throats. A sheriff's deputy tries to chat with Starling while she's searching Catherine Martin's apartment and she has to tell the lawman to hush in the sweetest way possible. These are all concerns Will Graham never had to deal with in Red Dragon.
-- As thrillers go, the climax is sensational. (view spoiler) I love how Harris shoots through Starling's decision-making process on whether to find Jame Gumb, confirm that he's fled the house or help Catherine Martin out of the well in the basement. It's like an FBI Choose Your Own Adventure.
-- Closing paragraph. Far to the east, on the Chesapeake shore, Orion stood high in the clear night, above a big old house, and a room where a fire is banked for the night, its light pulsing gently with the wind above the chimneys. On a large bed there are many quilts and on the quilts and under them are several large dogs. Additional mounds beneath the covers may or may not be Noble Pilcher, it is impossible to determine in the ambient light. But the face on the pillow, rosy in the firelight, is certainly that of Clarice Starling, and she sleeps deeply, sweetly, in the silence of the lambs.
Perfect ending to the perfect novel.
Length: 94,827 words
June 4, 2019
The Silence Of The Lambs by Thomas Harris is book 2 of the Hannibal Lector series this time with another twisted psychopath Buffalo Bill and let's not forget Dr Chilton (he's just as bad as these two 馃槖)
This book is more disturbing than the first,moths and skin suit is all that needs to be said.馃槵
It doesn't matter how many times you've seen this film this book is always going to be 10X better it gives you that nervous anticipation feeling whilst your hanging off the edge of your seat screaming 'come on come go go go!!'
Hannibal Lector is that character that we love to hate even if he does chill me to the bones.
If you read the first book then you definitely need to read this one next.
This book is more disturbing than the first,moths and skin suit is all that needs to be said.馃槵
It doesn't matter how many times you've seen this film this book is always going to be 10X better it gives you that nervous anticipation feeling whilst your hanging off the edge of your seat screaming 'come on come go go go!!'
Hannibal Lector is that character that we love to hate even if he does chill me to the bones.
If you read the first book then you definitely need to read this one next.
November 11, 2023
亘毓丿 丕夭 爻丕賱鈥屬囏� 亘丕賱丕禺乇賴 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 亘诏賲 讴賴 丕诏賴 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 亘賵丿賲貙 亘丿賵賳 賴蹖趩 卮讴 賵 鬲乇丿蹖丿蹖 鬲丕賲爻 賴乇蹖爻 賲蹖鈥屫簇� . 賵 丕蹖賳 賲賵囟賵毓蹖 賳蹖爻鬲 讴賴 亘禺丕胤乇卮 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕乇賲 鬲賲丕賲 爻鬲丕乇賴鈥屬囏й� 毓丕賱賲 賴爻鬲蹖 乇賵 亘賴 倬丕蹖 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 禺乇噩 讴賳賲貙 亘賱讴賴 丕蹖賳 賲乇丿 賵 丕蹖賳 匕賴賳 賵 丕蹖賳 賯賱賲 賱丕蹖賯 趩賳蹖賳 爻鬲丕蹖卮蹖 賴爻鬲賳.
亘丕 丕蹖賳 丕賵氐丕賮 丕夭卮 賲蹖鈥屬嗁堐屫迟� 賵 丕诏乇 噩丕蹖蹖 丕丨鬲賲丕賱 賱賵 乇賮鬲賳 賵噩賵丿 丿丕卮鬲貙 丕夭 賯亘賱 禺亘乇 賲蹖丿賲 鬲丕 亘丕 禺蹖丕賱 乇丕丨鬲 亘禺賵賳蹖賳. 倬爻 胤賵賱丕賳蹖 亘賵丿賳 賳賵卮鬲賴鈥屬� 乇賵 丕蹖賳胤賵乇 鬲毓亘蹖乇 賳讴賳蹖賳 讴賴 乇蹖夭噩夭卅蹖丕鬲蹖 讴賴 賳卮禺賵丕乇 讴乇丿賲 乇賵 賯乇丕乇 賴爻鬲 亘賴 丕卮鬲乇丕讴 亘匕丕乇賲貨 趩賵賳 爻毓蹖賲 丿乇 丕蹖賳 賴爻鬲 讴賴 賲孬賱 乇蹖賵蹖賵蹖 讴鬲丕亘 賯亘賱蹖貙 亘丿賵賳 賱賵 丿丕丿賳 賲毓乇賮蹖卮 讴賳賲.
*鬲讴禺賵乇蹖 亘賴 乇賵丕蹖鬲 乇蹖賵蹖賵
鬲賲丕賲 賳讴丕鬲蹖 讴賴 亘丕蹖丿 賯亘賱 丕夭 禺賵丕賳卮 讴鬲丕亘 丿乇 賳馗乇 亘诏蹖乇蹖賳:
丕賵賱丕 丕夭 蹖丕丿 賳亘乇蹖賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘貙 噩賱丿 丿賵賲 賲噩賲賵毓賴 賴爻鬲. 丨丕賱丕 丕诏乇 亘賴 丿賱蹖賱 丕蹖賳讴賴 賮蹖賱賲卮 賲毓乇賵賮 卮丿 賵 亘賴 爻乇鬲賵賳 夭丿 讴賴 蹖賴賵 亘倬乇蹖賳 賵 噩賱丿 丿賵賲 乇賵 卮乇賵毓 讴賳蹖賳貙 丕蹖賳 乇賵 丿乇 賳馗乇 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮蹖賳 讴賴 丌賯丕蹖 賴乇蹖爻 丕爻倬賵蹖賱 亘賴 卮丿鬲 乇蹖夭蹖 亘賴 讴鬲丕亘 賯亘賱蹖卮 讴乇丿賴 賵 丿乇 丕蹖賳 丨丿 賴爻鬲 讴賴 爻乇賳賵卮鬲 卮禺氐蹖鬲 丕氐賱蹖 讴鬲丕亘 賯亘賱 乇賵 亘賴 胤乇夭 亘蹖鈥屫必呚з嗁団€屫й� 鬲賵氐蹖賮 讴乇丿賴 (丕賱亘鬲賴 丿乇 丨丿 趩賳丿 禺胤). 賳讴鬲賴鈥屰� 丿蹖诏賴 丕蹖賳 賴爻鬲 讴賴 亘丕 亘毓囟蹖 丕夭 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏й� 賲卮鬲乇讴 丕蹖賳 丿賵 讴鬲丕亘貙 鬲賵 讴鬲丕亘 賯亘賱 亘蹖卮鬲乇 丌卮賳丕 卮丿蹖賲 賵 蹖賴 卮賳丕禺鬲 賳爻亘蹖鈥屫й� 丿丕卮鬲蹖賲. 丕賲丕 胤賵乇蹖 賳蹖爻鬲 讴賴 亘丿賵賳 禺賵賳丿賳 噩賱丿 丕賵賱 賵 卮乇賵毓 噩賱丿 丿賵賲貙 賳賮賴賲蹖賲 趩蹖 亘賴 趩蹖 賴爻鬲. 倬爻 賲蹖卮賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘丕 禺蹖丕賱 丌爻賵丿賴鈥屫й� 禺賵賳丿 丕賲丕 鬲乇噩蹖丨丕 亘賴 鬲乇鬲蹖亘 倬蹖卮 亘乇蹖賳 亘賴鬲乇 賴賲 賲蹖卮賴 趩賵賳 趩胤賵乇 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗃屬� 丕夭 賵蹖賱 诏乇賴賲 讴鬲丕亘 丕賵賱 亘诏匕乇蹖賳責!
丿賵賲丕 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘貙 讴鬲丕亘蹖 賳蹖爻鬲 讴賴 賴乇 讴爻蹖 亘鬲賵賳賴 乇丕丨鬲 丕夭 倬爻 禺賵賳丿賳卮 亘乇亘蹖丕丿 賵 丿賱丕蹖賱 夭蹖丕丿蹖 賴賲 丿丕乇賴. 趩賳丿鬲丕卮 讴賴 賲賴賲賳 乇賵 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 丕卮丕乇賴 讴賳賲. 賮乇囟 讴賳蹖賳 丕讴爻倬賱賵乇 丕蹖賳爻鬲丕诏乇賲 蹖丕 賴乇 亘乇賳丕賲賴鈥屰� 讴賵賮鬲蹖鈥屫й� 乇賵 亘丕夭 讴乇丿蹖賳 賵 賲賵賯毓蹖 讴賴 賲蹖禺賵丕蹖賳 賵蹖丿卅賵蹖蹖 乇賵 亘亘蹖賳蹖賳貙 亘賴鬲賵賳 丕禺胤丕乇 賲蹖丿賴 讴賴 丨丕賵蹖 氐丨賳賴鈥屬囏й� 丿賱禺乇丕卮 賴爻鬲. 丕诏賴 丕夭 丕賵賳 丿爻鬲賴 丕賮乇丕丿蹖 賴爻鬲蹖賳 讴賴 亘丕 丕蹖賳 賵噩賵丿貙 丿賱 丿蹖丿賳 丿丕乇蹖賳 丕丨鬲賲丕賱 賲蹖乇賴 丿賱 禺賵賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賴賲 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮蹖锟斤拷. 趩賵賳 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 鬲賵氐蹖賮 賲蹖讴賳賴 趩胤賵乇 倬賵爻鬲 丌丿賲蹖 讴賳丿賴 賲蹖卮賴貙 趩胤賵乇 亘丕 噩爻丿 賲賵丕噩賴 亘卮蹖賲 賵 趩胤賵乇 匕賴賳蹖丕鬲 蹖賴 賯丕鬲賱 爻乇蹖丕賱蹖 乇賵 亘賴 胤乇夭 賵蹖乇丕賳鈥屭┵嗁嗀団€屫й� 亘賮賴賲蹖賲. 噩賵乇蹖 讴賴 亘丕 鬲丕乇蹖讴鈥屫臂屬� 賵噩賵賴 丌丿賲蹖 賵 丕毓賲丕賱蹖 讴賴 丕夭卮 爻乇 賲蹖夭賳賴 乇賵亘賴鈥屫辟� 賲蹖卮蹖賲. 丨丕賱丕 亘賴 丕蹖賳 禺丕胤乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 鬲賵 跇丕賳乇 賵丨卮鬲 賴賲 诏賳噩賵賳丿賴 卮丿賴 丕賲丕 亘賴 卮禺氐賴 爻乇 禺賵賳丿賳卮 亘賴 噩丕蹖 丕蹖賳讴賴 賵丨卮鬲鈥屫藏� 亘卮賲 丿趩丕乇 卮诏賮鬲鈥屫藏� 卮丿賲 (丕诏乇趩賴 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 丕讴孬乇蹖鬲 賵丕讴賳卮 賲鬲賮丕賵鬲 賵 賴賲乇賳诏 噩賲丕毓鬲 诏賵賳賴鈥屫й� 丿丕卮鬲賳).
爻賵賲丕 禺賵丕賴卮賲賳丿賲 丕诏乇 賮賲賳蹖爻鬲 賴爻鬲蹖賳 賵 亘賴 胤乇夭 毓噩蹖亘蹖 丕夭 丕賵賳 丿爻鬲賴鈥屫� 亘賴 卮賲丕乇 賲蹖乇蹖賳 讴賴 丨鬲蹖 趩丕賯蹖 賯乇亘丕賳蹖鈥屬囏� 乇賵 亘賴賵賳賴鈥屫й� 亘乇丕蹖 讴賵亘蹖丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗃屬嗀� 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘賴 賴蹖趩 賵噩賴 賳禺賵賳蹖賳. 趩賵賳 丕诏乇 丿乇爻鬲 亘禺賵賳蹖賳卮貙 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賯氐丿蹖 賳丿丕卮鬲賴 讴賴 賵夭賳 賯乇亘丕賳蹖鈥屬囏� 乇賵 亘乇丕蹖 鬲禺乇蹖亘 讴乇丿賳 丌丿賲鈥屬囏� 亘賴 爻禺乇賴 亘诏蹖乇賴 賵 蹖丕 丨鬲蹖 卮禺氐蹖鬲 讴賱乇蹖爻 乇賵 胤賵乇蹖 噩賱賵賴 亘丿賴 讴賴 亘禺丕胤乇 噩匕丕亘蹖鬲卮 賲賵乇丿倬爻賳丿 丕賵賳 噩丕賲毓賴鈥屰� 賲乇丿爻丕賱丕乇 賴爻鬲. 鬲賳賴丕 賱胤賮蹖 讴賴 賴乇 讴爻蹖 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 亘讴賳賴 丕蹖賳 賴爻鬲 讴賴 丕賵賱丕 亘丕 卮賳丕禺鬲 亘賴 丕賵賳 丿賵乇丕賳貙 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘禺賵賳賴 賵 丿賵賲丕 噩賵乇蹖 亘禺賵賳鬲卮 讴賴 爻胤丨蹖 賵 爻乇爻乇蹖 賳亘丕卮賴. 趩賵賳 丕讴孬乇 乇蹖賵蹖賵賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 讴賲鬲乇 丕夭 鄞 賵 丨鬲蹖 鄣 爻鬲丕乇賴 丿丕丿賳 亘賴 趩賳蹖賳 趩蹖夭蹖 丕卮丕乇賴 讴乇丿賳 賵 賵丕賯毓丕 噩丕蹖 鬲丕爻賮 丿丕乇賴!
趩赖丕乇賲丕 亘丿丕賳蹖丿 賵 丌诏丕賴 亘丕卮蹖賳 讴賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘丕蹖丿 亘丕 賳爻禺賴鈥屰� 丕氐賱蹖 賵 丕賳诏賱蹖爻蹖卮 禺賵賳丿. 鬲賳賴丕 丿賱蹖賱 賲丨讴賲賴鈥屬矩迟嗀� 讴賴 賲賵噩亘丕鬲 诏賲賳丕賲 亘賵丿賳 丕蹖賳 賲噩賲賵毓賴 乇賵 賮乇丕賴賲 讴乇丿賴貙 亘賴 丕蹖賳 禺丕胤乇 賴爻鬲 讴賴 鬲乇噩賲賴鈥屰� 賮丕乇爻蹖 丿乇爻鬲 賵 丿乇賲賵賳蹖 賳丿丕乇賴 賵 趩賵賳 禺賵丿賲 賴賲夭賲丕賳 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗀� 賲鬲賵噩賴 卮丿賲 讴賴 趩賯丿乇 丕蹖賳 賲賵囟賵毓 亘丕毓孬 賲蹖卮賴 讴賴 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 賳鬲賵賳賴 丕夭 讴鬲丕亘 賱匕鬲蹖 讴賴 賲賳 亘乇丿賲 乇賵 亘亘乇賴.
倬賳噩賲丕 讴鬲丕亘賴丕蹖 丕蹖賳 賲噩賲賵毓賴 亘丕 丌孬丕乇 丕賯鬲亘丕爻蹖 鬲賮丕賵鬲 丿丕乇賳. 賵 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘丿賵賳 賴蹖趩 鬲乇丿蹖丿蹖 丕夭 賮蹖賱賲 亘賴鬲乇 賴爻鬲貨 亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 丕賯鬲亘丕爻卮 賴賲 賲賵賮賯蹖鬲鈥屫①呟屫� 亘賵丿賴 丕賲丕 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 讴爻蹖 讴賴 鬲讴 鬲讴 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖 賲乇亘賵胤 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賲噩賲賵毓賴 乇賵 亘賱毓蹖丿賴 亘丕蹖丿 亘诏賲 賱丕丕賯賱 讴鬲丕亘 丿賵賲 丕夭 賴乇 賱丨丕馗蹖 賲丨卮乇賴 賵 丿乇 丕蹖賳 亘丕乇賴 亘蹖卮鬲乇 鬲賵囟蹖丨 賲蹖丿賲.
卮卮賲丕 丌賯丕蹖 賴乇蹖爻 亘賴 胤乇夭 卮诏賮鬲鈥屫①堌臂屫� 鬲賲丕賲 賳讴丕鬲蹖 讴賴 賲賵噩亘丕鬲 讴賲 丕賲鬲蹖丕夭 丿丕丿賳 賲乇丿賲 亘賴 噩賱丿 賯亘賱 卮丿賴 亘賵丿 乇賵 亘丕 賳賵卮鬲賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 噩亘乇丕賳 讴乇丿賴. 蹖毓賳蹖 讴蹖賮蹖鬲 讴鬲丕亘 亘丕賱丕鬲乇 丕夭 噩賱丿 倬蹖卮蹖賳 賴爻鬲. 亘賴 胤賵乇 賲孬丕賱 卮禺氐蹖鬲 賴賳蹖亘丕賱 賱讴鬲乇 乇賵 亘蹖卮鬲乇 賳卮賵賳 丿丕丿賴. 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏й� 夭賳 亘蹖卮鬲乇蹖 乇賵 鬲賵 讴鬲丕亘 丌賵乇丿賴 賵 丨鬲蹖 丕夭 诏乇丕蹖卮鈥屬囏й� 賲禺鬲賱賮 賴賲 丕爻鬲賮丕丿賴 讴乇丿賴 讴賴 爻丕禺鬲丕乇卮讴賳蹖 毓丕賱蹖鈥屫й� 丿丕卮鬲賳. 爻蹖乇 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 乇賵 賴蹖噩丕賳鈥屫з嗂屫测€屫� 讴乇丿賴 賵 亘丕毓孬 卮丿賴 賲蹖賵賳 丕鬲賮丕賯丕鬲 夭蹖丕丿貙 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 丕爻鬲乇丕丨鬲鈥屬囏й� 讴賲 賴賲 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮賴 亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 讴鬲丕亘 賯亘賱 亘賴 賳馗乇賲 亘乇毓讴爻 亘賵丿.
亘丕夭 賴賲 賲賵丕乇丿 丿蹖诏賴鈥屫й� 賵噩賵丿 丿丕乇賳 丕賲丕 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 鬲丕 賴賲蹖賳鈥屫ж� 丨賵氐賱賴鈥屰� 讴賲鬲乇 讴爻蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┴促� 賵 賴賲 禺賵丿賲 鬲賯乇蹖亘丕 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖 賲賮蹖丿蹖 讴賴 亘賴 匕賴賳賲 乇爻蹖丿賴 亘賵丿 乇賵 诏賮鬲賲.
丨丕賱丕 亘丿賵賳 禺胤乇 賱賵 乇賮鬲賳 鬲賵 丿賱 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 賲蹖乇賲 賵 鬲讴 鬲讴 賲賵丕乇丿蹖 讴賴 賲賵噩亘丕鬲 丕乇丕丿鬲賲賳丿蹖 賲賳 亘賴 丕蹖賳 噩賱丿 卮丿賴 乇賵 賲蹖诏賲.
丌卮賳丕蹖蹖 亘丕 讴鬲丕亘 亘丿賵賳 禺胤乇 賱賵 乇賮鬲賳
讴賱乇蹖爻 丕爻鬲丕乇賱蹖賳诏 亘禺丕胤乇 讴丕乇蹖 讴賴 噩讴 讴乇丕賮賵乇丿 亘賴卮 賲丨賵賱 讴乇丿賴 亘丕蹖丿 禺蹖賱蹖 爻乇蹖毓 丕胤賱丕毓丕鬲蹖 乇賵 丕夭 夭蹖乇 夭亘賵賳 讴爻蹖 亘蹖乇賵賳 亘讴卮賴 讴賴 鬲賯乇蹖亘丕 賳丕賲賲讴賳 亘賴 賳馗乇 賲蹖鈥屫必迟�. 賲乇丿蹖 讴賴 丨鬲蹖 鬲爻鬲鈥屬囏й屰� 讴賴 乇賵卮 丕賳噩丕賲 賲蹖卮賴 賴賲 鬲賵丕賳丕蹖蹖 丕賳噩丕賲 丕蹖賳 讴丕乇 乇賵 賳丿丕乇賳 鬲丕 賲鬲賵噩賴 亘卮賳 讴賴 亘賴 胤賵乇 丿賯蹖賯 趩蹖 鬲賵 匕賴賳卮 賲蹖鈥屭柏辟� 賵 趩胤賵乇 賲蹖鬲賵賳賳 亘賴 夭丕賳賵 丿乇卮 亘蹖丕乇賳. 丕賵賳 賮乇丿 讴爻蹖 賳蹖爻鬲 噩夭 丿讴鬲乇 賴賳蹖亘丕賱 賱讴鬲乇. 賴賳蹖亘丕賱蹖 讴賴 亘賴 丌丿賲禺賵丕乇蹖 卮賴乇鬲 丿丕乇賴 賵 丨丕賱丕 讴賱乇蹖爻 讴賴 讴丕乇丌賲賵夭 賵 鬲丕夭賴鈥屭┴ж臂� 亘蹖卮 賳蹖爻鬲貙 亘丕蹖丿 亘丕 趩賳蹖賳 賲賵乇丿蹖 乇賵亘賴鈥屫辟� 亘卮賴 (賲賳 亘乇丕蹖 讴賱乇蹖爻 亘賵丿賳 乇賵丨賲 乇賵 亘賴 卮蹖胤丕賳 賲蹖鈥屬佖辟堌促�).
賴賳蹖亘丕賱 丕夭 賴乇 噩賳亘賴鈥屫й� 丌丿賲蹖 乇賵 卮诏賮鬲鈥屫藏� 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�. 趩賵賳 亘乇禺賱丕賮 丕毓賲丕賱蹖 讴賴 丕夭卮 爻乇 夭丿賴貙 禺蹖賱蹖 丌丿賲 賲賵丿亘 賵 賲鬲卮禺氐蹖 賴爻鬲 賵 亘賴 鬲讴 鬲讴 夭蹖亘丕蹖蹖鈥屬囏� 賲噩匕賵亘 賲蹖卮賴 賵 亘丕 亘賳丿 亘賳丿 賵噩賵丿卮 丿乇讴卮賵賳 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�. 丕賵賳 毓丕卮賯 賲毓丕卮乇鬲 亘丕 丌丿賲鈥屬囏й屰� 賴爻鬲 讴賴 趩賴 丕夭 賳馗乇 匕賴賳蹖 趩賴 賮蹖夭蹖讴蹖 夭蹖亘丕賳. 丕夭 睾匕丕賴丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮 賵 鬲丕乇蹖禺趩賴鈥屫促堎� 丕胤賱丕毓丕鬲 夭蹖丕丿蹖 丿丕乇賴 賵 賯丕丿乇 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賴爻鬲 丨鬲蹖 丿乇 亘賳丿 賴賲 亘鬲賵賳賴 丿爻鬲賵乇 鬲賴蹖賴鈥屰� 睾匕丕蹖 噩丿蹖丿蹖 乇賵 丿乇爻鬲 讴賳賴 亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 丕賲讴丕賳丕鬲蹖 賳丿丕乇賴 鬲丕 趩蹖夭蹖 讴賴 禺賱賯 賲蹖讴賳賴 乇賵 丨鬲蹖 亘趩卮賴. 丕賲丕 亘賴 禺丕胤乇 匕賴賳 賵爻蹖毓 賵 賯丿乇鬲賲賳丿卮 鬲賵丕賳丕蹖蹖 亘賴 蹖丕丿丌賵乇丿賳 亘賵賴丕貙 賲夭賴鈥屬囏ж� 鬲氐丕賵蹖乇貙 丌丿賲鈥屬囏ж� 丕賲丕讴賳 賵 禺蹖賱蹖 趩蹖夭賴丕 乇賵 丿丕乇賴. 丕賵賳 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 亘丕 乇蹖夭噩夭卅蹖丕鬲 賵 乇噩賵毓 亘賴 禺丕胤乇丕鬲卮 胤乇丕丨蹖 丿賯蹖賯蹖 讴賳賴. 丨鬲蹖 丿乇 倬乇賵爻賴鈥屰� 爻賵丕賱 賵 噩賵丕亘 賴賲 亘賴 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖蹖 丕卮丕乇賴 賲蹖讴賳賴 讴賴 賵賯鬲蹖 爻乇趩 讴賳蹖卮 賲鬲賵噩賴 賲蹖卮蹖 亘丕 趩賴 丌丿賲 毓賲蹖賯蹖 胤乇賮蹖 (鬲讴 鬲讴 乇賮乇賳爻鈥屬囏ж� 賲賳 乇賵 亘賴 賵噩丿 丌賵乇丿賳). 丕賵賳 讴爻蹖 賴爻鬲 讴賴 卮丕蹖丿 亘蹖卮鬲乇 丕夭 賴乇 趩蹖夭蹖 亘賴 丕蹖賳 禺丕胤乇 鬲賵 丿賱鬲 乇賵 禺丕賱蹖 賲蹖讴賳賴 讴賴 丿乇爻鬲 丕賳诏卮鬲 乇賵 亘禺卮鈥屬囏й屰� 賲蹖匕丕乇賴 讴賴 禺賵丿鬲 賴賲 鬲賵丕賳 丕蹖賳 乇賵 賳丿丕乇蹖 卮禺賲卮賵賳 亘夭賳蹖. 亘賴 賴賲蹖賳 禺丕胤乇 乇賵丕賳卮賳丕爻 丨乇賮賴鈥屫й� 賲丨爻賵亘 賲蹖卮賴 賵 丕賲丕賳 丕夭 乇賵夭蹖 讴賴 賵丕乇丿 匕賴賳鬲 亘卮賴貨 趩賵賳 賳賲蹖鬲賵賳蹖 丿蹖诏賴 亘蹖乇賵賳卮 讴賳蹖! 賵 鬲丕 蹖丕丿賲 賳乇賮鬲賴 亘丕蹖丿 亘诏賲 丕蹖賳 賲乇丿 亘賴 卮丿鬲 胤賳丕夭 賴爻鬲 丕賲丕 噩賳爻 卮賵禺鈥屫坟ㄘ观屸€屬囏ж� 胤賵乇蹖 賳蹖爻鬲賳 讴賴 賴乇 讴爻蹖 亘鬲賵賳賴 亘丕賴丕卮賵賳 亘禺賳丿賴. 亘丕蹖丿 亘賴 賯丿乇蹖 亘丕賴賵卮 亘丕卮蹖 讴賴 丕卮丕乇賴鈥屫й� 讴賴 讴乇丿賴 乇賵 賲鬲賵噩賴 亘卮蹖 鬲丕 毓賲賯 讴賱丕賲卮 丕夭 丿爻鬲鬲 丿乇 賳乇賴 賵 趩賴 亘爻丕 丕诏乇 亘鬲賵賳蹖 禺賵丿鬲 乇賵 噩丕蹖 賱讴鬲乇 亘匕丕乇蹖 賱亘禺賳丿 毓賲蹖賯鈥屫臂� 乇賵 賱亘鬲 賳賯卮 賲蹖鈥屫ㄙ嗀�. 噩丕 丿丕乇賴 亘诏賲 丕夭 丕蹖賳 噩賳亘賴 鬲賳賴丕 亘丕夭蹖诏乇蹖 讴賴 亘賴 賳馗乇賲 鬲賵賳爻鬲賴 趩賳蹖賳 賲賵乇丿蹖 乇賵 乇毓丕蹖鬲 讴賳賴 丌賳鬲賵賳蹖 賴丕倬讴蹖賳夭 賳蹖爻鬲貙 賲丿爻 賲蹖讴賱爻賳 賴爻鬲 賵 亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 賵丕賯賮賲 趩賯丿乇 丕讴孬乇蹖鬲 賱讴鬲乇 乇賵 亘賴 賵丕爻胤賴鈥屰� 賴丕倬讴蹖賳夭 賲蹖卮賳丕爻賳 丕賲丕 亘賴 卮禺氐賴 賵 亘丕 乇噩賵毓 亘賴 讴鬲丕亘賴丕 倬蹖 亘乇丿賲 讴賴 趩賯丿乇 賲蹖讴賱爻賳 卮亘蹖賴 亘賴 趩蹖夭蹖 讴賴 賴乇蹖爻 倬乇丿丕禺鬲賴貙 賳賯卮 乇賵 丕蹖賮丕 讴乇丿賴.
丕诏賴 蹖讴賲 賯乇亘丕賳鈥屫地傎団€屫辟佖嗏€屬囏й� 丕賱亘鬲賴 亘賴 丨賯 乇賵 讴賲 讴賳賲 亘丕蹖丿 亘诏賲 丕蹖賳 丕孬乇 丌賳趩賴 禺賵亘丕賳 丿丕乇賳丿 乇賵 賴賲賴 蹖讴噩丕 丿丕乇賴. 蹖毓賳蹖 亘賴 賵爻蹖賱賴鈥屰� 蹖讴 倬乇賵賳丿賴鈥屰� 亘賴 馗丕賴乇 亘蹖鈥屫必ㄘ� 賵 蹖賴 鬲爻鬲蹖 讴賴 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 賲賴賲 賴賲 賳蹖爻鬲 賴賳蹖亘丕賱 亘賴卮 噩賵丕亘 亘丿賴貙 亘賴 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖蹖 賲蹖鈥屬矩必ж操� 讴賴 賲卮丕亘賴卮 乇賵 鬲賵 讴鬲丕亘鈥屬囏й� 丕蹖賳鈥屭嗁嗃屬嗃� 賳丿蹖丿賲.
賴乇蹖爻貙 丌丿賲鈥屬囏й� 爻蹖丕賴 賵 爻賮蹖丿 禺賱賯 賳賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�. 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬矩必ж槽屸€屬囏й屰� 讴賴 丕賳噩丕賲 丿丕丿賴 亘賴 賯丿乇蹖 賵丕賯毓蹖 賴爻鬲賳 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗃� 鬲氐賵乇卮賵賳 讴賳蹖 賵 亘丕 睾蹖乇賯丕亘賱鈥屬囏顿呪€屫臂屬嗀促堎� 賴賲 丕丨爻丕爻 賳夭丿蹖讴蹖 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮蹖. 趩賵賳 丌賯丕蹖 賴乇蹖爻 賵丕賯賮 賴爻鬲 讴賴 亘卮乇 禺丕讴爻鬲乇蹖 賵 倬乇 丕夭 鬲賳丕賯囟 賴爻鬲. 丨鬲蹖 讴丕乇蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 讴賴 亘丕 亘丕賮賱賵 亘蹖賱 讴賴 賲乇亘賵胤 亘賴 倬乇賵賳丿賴鈥屰� 丕氐賱蹖 賴爻鬲 賵 賯丕鬲賱蹖 亘賴 丨爻丕亘 賲蹖丕丿 讴賴 倬賵爻鬲 賯乇亘丕賳蹖鈥屬囏� 乇賵 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 賵 丿乇 丌禺乇 噩爻丿卮賵賳 乇賵 丿乇 乇賵丿禺賵賳賴鈥屬囏й� 賲禺鬲賱賮 賲蹖賳丿丕夭賴 賴賲 亘鬲賵賳蹖 賴賲匕丕鬲鈥屬举嗀ж臂� 讴賳蹖. 賵 丕蹖賳 賯丿乇鬲 賯賱賲 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賲丨爻賵亘 賳賲蹖卮賴責
賴乇蹖爻 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏й屰� 禺賱賯 讴乇丿賴 讴賴 爻丕禺鬲丕乇卮讴賳 賴爻鬲賳. 丕夭 讴賱乇蹖爻蹖 讴賴 賳賴丕蹖鬲 鬲賱丕卮卮 丿乇 噩丕賲毓賴鈥屰� 賲乇丿爻丕賱丕乇 賵 賮囟丕蹖 賲乇丿賵賳賴鈥屫й� 讴賴 丿乇卮 讴丕乇 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 丿乇 丕蹖賳 賴爻鬲 讴賴 亘禺丕胤乇 讴丕乇賴丕卮 亘倬匕蹖乇賳卮 賵 賳賴 亘賴 禺丕胤乇 噩賳爻蹖鬲卮. 丕夭 賱讴鬲乇蹖 讴賴 丕賳爻丕賳蹖鈥屫臂屬� 賵蹖跇诏蹖鈥屬囏� 乇賵 丿丕乇賴 丕賲丕 丌丿賲禺賵丕乇 賴賲 賴爻鬲 賵 爻乇賳賵卮鬲 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲乇丿賲 乇賵 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 亘丕 卮賵禺蹖鈥屬囏ж� 亘賴 爻禺乇賴 亘诏蹖乇賴. 丕夭 噩讴 讴乇丕賮賵乇丿蹖 讴賴 亘丕 賵噩賵丿 鬲賲丕賲 賲卮賯鬲鈥屬囏й� 夭賳丿诏蹖卮 爻毓蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 讴丕乇 丿乇爻鬲 乇賵 丕賳噩丕賲 亘丿賴 賵 賴賵丕蹖 夭蹖乇丿爻鬲卮 乇賵 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮賴. 丕夭 亘丕賮賱賵 亘蹖賱蹖 讴賴 亘賴 賯乇亘丕賳蹖鈥屬囏� 亘賴 趩卮賲 丌丿賲 賳诏丕賴 賳賲蹖讴賳賴 丕賲丕 禺蹖賱蹖 丕賵賯丕鬲 賲孬賱 丌丿賲鈥屬囏й� 賲毓賲賵賱蹖 乇賮鬲丕乇 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�. 丕夭 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏й屰� 讴賴 诏乇丕蹖卮鈥屬囏й� 賲禺鬲賱賮蹖 丿丕乇賳 丕賲丕 亘乇禺賱丕賮 氐賳毓鬲 爻蹖賳賲丕 讴賴 诏丕賴丕 丕夭卮賵賳 趩賴乇賴鈥屬囏й� 賲丨亘賵亘 賵 丿賱賳卮蹖賳蹖 賲蹖爻丕夭賳貙 賲丨亘賵亘 賵 丿賱賳卮蹖賳 賳蹖爻鬲賳 賵 亘賴 胤乇夭 賵蹖乇丕賳鈥屭┵嗁嗀団€屫й� 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 夭賳丿诏蹖鈥屬囏� 乇賵 禺乇丕亘 讴賳賳.
賮囟丕爻丕夭蹖 讴鬲丕亘 亘禺丕胤乇 丕蹖賳讴賴 亘丕 倬乇賵賳丿賴鈥屬囏й� 賯鬲賱 爻乇 賵 讴丕乇 丿丕乇賴 賵 蹖賴 丌賳 賲賲讴賳賴 鬲蹖乇 鬲賵 賲睾夭 卮禺氐蹖鬲 亘禺賵乇賴: 丿賱賴乇賴鈥屫①堌必� 丿賱禺乇丕卮貙 賵丨卮鬲賳丕讴貙 乇賵丕賳卮賳丕禺鬲蹖貙 丿乇丕賲貙 噩賳丕蹖蹖貙 賲毓賲丕蹖蹖貙 鬲丕乇蹖讴貙 趩賳丿卮 賵 禺蹖賱蹖 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖 丿蹖诏賴 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 乇丿蹖賮 讴賳賲 賴爻鬲. 丕賲丕 丕诏乇 蹖賴 爻胤丨 亘丕賱丕鬲乇 賴爻鬲蹖賳貨 丕夭 趩賳蹖賳 賮囟丕蹖蹖 賱匕鬲 賲蹖鈥屫ㄘ臂屬� 趩賵賳 夭蹖亘丕蹖蹖 賯賱賲貙 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬矩必ж槽� 賯賵蹖貙 賮囟丕爻丕夭蹖 賳丕亘貙 爻蹖乇 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 倬乇 讴卮卮貙 丿蹖丕賱賵诏鈥屬囏й� 毓賲蹖賯貙 賲賮賴賵賲 鬲兀賲賱鈥屫ㄘ必з嗂屫� 賵 禺蹖賱蹖 賲賵丕乇丿 丿蹖诏賴 亘丕毓孬 賲蹖卮賴 卮诏賮鬲鈥屫藏� 亘卮蹖賳 賵 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 亘賴鬲乇蹖賳 鬲噩丕乇亘 禺賵丕賳卮鬲賵賳 乇賵 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮蹖賳.
丕蹖賳 丕孬乇 亘賴 胤乇夭 毓噩蹖亘蹖 讴賱蹖卮賴鈥屬囏� 乇賵 讴賳丕乇 夭丿賴 賵 趩蹖夭蹖 乇賵 亘賴 賯賱賲 丿乇丌賵乇丿賴 讴賴 丕夭 賴乇 噩賳亘賴鈥屫й� 賲鬲賮丕賵鬲 賴爻鬲. 亘賴 胤賵乇 賲孬丕賱 丿乇 讴鬲丕亘鈥屬囏й� 噩賳丕蹖蹖-賲毓賲丕蹖蹖 賲毓賲賵賱丕 乇賵賳丿 倬蹖卮 亘乇丿賳 倬乇賵賳丿賴 乇賵 丕夭 賴乇 夭丕賵蹖賴鈥屫й� 賳賲蹖鈥屫ㄛ屬嗃屬�. 丨鬲蹖 亘丕 賯丕鬲賱 賴賲 倬蹖卮 賲蹖丕丿 讴賴 丿乇 胤賵賱 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 賴賲乇丕賴 賳蹖爻鬲蹖賲. 丕賲丕 賴乇蹖爻 讴丕乇蹖 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 丕蹖賳 賴爻鬲 讴賴 丕賳賯丿乇 丿賯蹖賯 賵 賲賵卮讴丕賮丕賳賴 丕夭 賴乇 夭丕賵蹖賴鈥屫й� 賲丕噩乇丕賴丕 乇賵 倬蹖卮 賲蹖鈥屫ㄘ辟� 讴賴 丕賳诏卮鬲 亘賴 丿賴賳 賲蹖鈥屬呝堎嗃� 趩胤賵乇 賲賲讴賳賴 丕賳賯丿乇 賯丕賳毓鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 趩賴 丕夭 夭亘賵賳 丨卮乇賴鈥屫促嗀ж� 趩賴 倬賱蹖爻 丕賽賮鈥屫ㄛ屸€屫③� 趩賴 蹖賴 賳诏賴亘丕賳 爻丕丿賴 賵... 亘賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 亘倬乇丿丕夭賴 賵 噩丕蹖 爻賵丕賱蹖 乇賵 亘丕賯蹖 賳匕丕乇賴. 蹖丕 丨鬲蹖 噩賵乇蹖 匕賴賳蹖丕鬲 賯丕鬲賱 乇賵 丿乇 亘禺卮鈥屬囏й� 賲禺鬲賱賮 鬲賵氐蹖賮 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 讴賴 丨蹖乇鬲 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗃� 趩胤賵乇 賲賲讴賳 賴爻鬲 丕夭 倬爻 丕蹖賳 鬲賵氐蹖賮丕鬲 亘蹖鈥屫必呚з嗁� 亘乇亘蹖丕丿.
丿蹖丕賱賵诏鈥屬囏й� 讴鬲丕亘 賲丨卮乇賳. 賲禺氐賵氐丕 賲賵丕賯毓蹖 讴賴 倬丕蹖 讴賱乇蹖爻 賵 賴賳蹖亘丕賱 丿乇 賲蹖賵賳 亘丕卮賴. 胤賵乇蹖 趩蹖丿賴 卮丿賳 讴賴 亘丕乇賴丕 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗃� 亘賴卮賵賳 亘乇诏乇丿蹖 賵 丿乇 毓噩亘 亘賲賵賳蹖 趩胤賵乇 亘丕 卮禺賲 夭丿賳卮賵賳 賲蹖鈥屫簇� 倬乇賵賳丿賴 乇賵 丨賱 讴乇丿.
丿乇亘丕乇賴鈥屰� 鬲乇噩賲賴鈥屸€屰� 賮丕乇爻蹖鈥屫й� 讴賴 賴賲夭賲丕賳 亘丕 丕蹖賳 賳爻禺賴 禺賵賳丿賲 賴賲 亘毓丿丕 鬲賵 乇蹖賵蹖賵蹖 賴賲賵賳 賳爻禺賴 賲蹖鈥屬嗁堐屫迟� 趩乇丕 丕賳賯丿乇 亘丿 亘賵丿 賵 丿爻鬲 賵 丿賱 丌丿賲蹖 亘賴 禺賵賳丿賳卮 賳賲蹖乇賴 賵 賲賵噩亘丕鬲 讴賲鈥屫堌囒� 亘賴 賲噩賲賵毓賴鈥屰� 賱讴鬲乇 乇賵 乇賯賲 夭丿賴.
賲賳 賳爻禺賴鈥屰� 氐賵鬲蹖 丕賳诏賱蹖爻蹖卮 乇賵 賴賲夭賲丕賳 讴賴 賳爻禺賴鈥屰� 賮蹖夭蹖讴卮 賴賲 丿爻鬲賲 亘賵丿 诏賵卮 賲蹖丿丕丿賲 讴賴 诏賵蹖賳丿賴 亘賴 卮丿鬲 賱丨賳 禺賵亘蹖 丿丕卮鬲 賵 丕賵賳 丨爻 乇賵 賲賳鬲賯賱 賲蹖鈥屭┴必� (賲禺氐賵氐丕 丿乇 賳賯胤賴鈥屰� 丕賵噩 讴鬲丕亘).
賲賵乇丿 丿蹖诏賴鈥屫й� 讴賴 賱丕夭賲 賴爻鬲 丕卮丕乇賴 讴賳賲 賮蹖賱賲 賵 爻乇蹖丕賱 賴爻鬲賳 讴賴 丌蹖丕 丕乇夭卮 丿蹖丿賳 丿丕乇賳 蹖丕 賳賴 賵 趩賴 鬲賮丕賵鬲鈥屬囏й屰� 丿乇 賲賯丕蹖爻賴 亘丕 讴鬲丕亘 丿丕乇賳. 亘丿賵賳 丕爻倬賵蹖賱 丕夭卮賵賳 丿乇 亘禺卮 亘毓丿蹖 賲蹖诏賲.
The silence of the lambs (1991)
丕蹖賳 丕賯鬲亘丕爻 亘乇丕蹖 丿蹖丿賳 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 賲蹖卮賴 趩賵賳 亘賴 禺蹖賱蹖 賲賵丕乇丿 倬丕蹖亘賳丿 亘賵丿賴 丕诏乇趩賴 亘毓囟蹖 丕夭 鬲賮丕賵鬲鈥屬囏ж� 亘賴 卮丿鬲 鬲賵 匕賵賯賲 禺賵乇丿賳鈥� 丕賲丕 丕夭 賮蹖賱賲鈥屬囏й� 丕賯鬲亘丕爻蹖 噩賱丿 賯亘賱蹖 蹖讴 爻乇 賵 诏乇丿賳 亘丕賱丕鬲乇 亘賵丿賴.
亘賴 胤賵乇 賲孬丕賱 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬矩必ж槽� 賵 賮囟丕爻丕夭蹖 鬲丕 噩丕蹖 賲賲讴賳 亘賴 賯賱賲 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賵賮丕丿丕乇 亘賵丿賳 賵 丿乇 毓蹖賳 丨丕賱 鬲賮丕賵鬲鈥屬囏й� 乇蹖夭 賵 丿乇卮鬲蹖 賴賲 丿丕卮鬲賳.
丿乇 賮蹖賱賲 卮禺氐蹖鬲 讴賱乇蹖爻 丕爻鬲丕乇賱蹖賳诏 亘丕賴賵卮鈥屫� 丕夭 趩蹖夭蹖 讴賴 亘賵丿 亘賴 鬲氐賵蹖乇 讴卮蹖丿賴 卮丿 賵 鬲丕 噩丕蹖蹖 鬲賲丕賲 讴丕乇賴丕 乇賵 丿賵卮卮 亘賵丿 賵 丕蹖賳胤賵乇 鬲毓亘蹖乇 賲蹖卮丿 讴賴 亘丕 鬲丨賱蹖賱鈥屬囏й� 禺賵丿卮 倬乇賵賳丿賴 乇賵 倬蹖卮 賲蹖鈥屫ㄘ辟� 亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 丿乇 讴鬲丕亘貙 賱讴鬲乇 丿乇 丕蹖賳 丕賲乇 賳賯卮 倬乇乇賳诏蹖 乇賵 丕蹖賮丕 讴乇丿賴 亘賵丿.
卮禺氐蹖鬲 噩讴 讴乇丕賮賵乇丿 丿乇 賮蹖賱賲 禺蹖賱蹖 丕鬲賵讴卮蹖丿賴 賵 爻乇丨丕賱 賴爻鬲 亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 鬲賵 讴鬲丕亘 亘賴 毓賱鬲 賲乇蹖囟蹖 賴賲爻乇卮 丕夭 倬丕丕賮鬲丕丿賴 賵 丕夭 趩賴乇賴鈥屫� 賳賲丕蹖丕賳 賴爻鬲 讴賴 禺爻鬲賴鈥屫池� 賵 賳蹖丕夭 亘賴 丕爻鬲乇丕丨鬲 匕賴賳蹖 丿丕乇賴. 丕蹖賳 丨鬲蹖 丿乇 倬乇賵爻賴鈥屰� 禺賵丕賳卮 亘賴 趩卮賲 賲蹖丕丿 丕賲丕 丿乇 賮蹖賱賲 賯囟蹖賴鈥屰� 賴賲爻乇 噩讴 賵噩賵丿 賳丿丕乇賴 賵 噩讴 禺蹖賱蹖 卮丕丿丕亘 丿丕乇賴 亘賴 讴丕乇卮 丕丿丕賲賴 賲蹖丿賴.
賴賳蹖亘丕賱 賱讴鬲乇 讴鬲丕亘貙 賲卮禺氐賴鈥屬囏й� 馗丕賴乇蹖 賲鬲賮丕賵鬲蹖 亘丕 賮蹖賱賲 丿丕乇賴 賵 賲卮賴賵丿鈥屫臂屬嗀� 乇賳诏 趩卮賲鈥屬囏� 賴爻鬲賳. 蹖丕 鬲毓丿丕丿 丕賳诏卮鬲 丿爻鬲 趩倬 丿讴鬲乇 讴賴 卮卮鈥屫ж池� 賵 丿乇 賮蹖賱賲 鄣鬲丕爻鬲. 賵 賳讴鬲賴鈥屰� 鬲賱禺 亘乇丕蹖 賲賳 丕蹖賳 亘賵丿 讴賴 胤賳丕夭蹖 賴賳蹖亘丕賱 丿乇 賮蹖賱賲 丕賵賳胤賵乇 讴賴 亘丕蹖丿 亘賴 趩卮賲 賳賲蹖丕丿 賵 亘丕 賱亘禺賳丿賴丕蹖 爻乇丿 賵 鬲睾蹖蹖乇 丿丕丿賳 卮賵禺蹖鈥屬囏ж� 亘賴 蹖賴 爻乇蹖 卮賵禺蹖 亘蹖鈥屬呚操� 禺乇丕亘 卮丿賴.
蹖丕 丕夭 賳馗乇 夭賲丕賳蹖 亘毓囟蹖 丕夭 丕鬲賮丕賯丕鬲 爻乇蹖毓鈥屫� 乇禺 丿丕丿賳 賵 趩賵賳 賮蹖賱賲 賴爻鬲 賯丕亘賱 丿乇讴賴 讴賴 丕賳賯丿乇 蹖賴賵蹖蹖 爻乇 丕氐賱 賲胤賱亘 賲蹖乇賳.
賲賵乇丿 倬乇乇賳诏蹖 讴賴 亘賴 丕爻賲 毓賳賵丕賳 賲乇亘賵胤 賴爻鬲 賵 賲卮禺氐 賲蹖卮賴 丿乇 賮蹖賱賲 亘丕 鬲睾蹖蹖乇 賮丕丨卮 亘丕夭诏賵 卮丿賴. 蹖丕 氐丨賳賴鈥屰� 倬丕蹖丕賳蹖 賮蹖賱賲 賵 讴鬲丕亘 亘丕 賴賲 鬲賮丕賵鬲 丿丕乇賳 賵 丿乇 毓蹖賳 丨丕賱 賴乇 丿賵卮賵賳 毓丕賱蹖賳.
丿乇 讴賱 丿蹖丿賳卮 亘毓丿 丕夭 丕蹖賳讴賴 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 禺賵賳丿蹖賳 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 賲蹖卮賴 賵 丕诏乇 丕賵賱 賴賲 賮蹖賱賲 乇賵 丿蹖丿蹖賳貙 亘丿賵賳 卮讴 讴鬲丕亘 賴賲 丿乇 丕賵賱賵蹖鬲 賯乇丕乇 亘丿蹖賳 趩賵賳 禺蹖賱蹖 禺蹖賱蹖 賲丨卮乇鬲乇 賴爻鬲.
Hannibal (2013_2015)
蹖賴 丿賱蹖賱蹖 讴賴 賲賵噩亘丕鬲 讴蹖賮 讴乇丿賳賲 丿乇 胤賵賱 禺賵丕賳卮 卮丿 丕蹖賳 亘賵丿 讴賴 賯亘賱 丕夭 丕蹖賳讴賴 賲噩賲賵毓賴 乇賵 亘禺賵賳賲 爻乇蹖丕賱 乇賵 丿蹖丿賴 亘賵丿賲. 賵 賲賵賯毓蹖 讴賴 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗀� 亘賴 丕蹖賳 倬蹖 亘乇丿賲 趩賯丿乇 爻丕夭賳丿賴鈥屰� 爻乇蹖丕賱貙 讴鬲丕亘禺賵丕乇 賲丨卮乇蹖 賴爻鬲.
蹖毓賳蹖 蹖賴 噩賵乇蹖 爻丕禺鬲鬲卮 讴賴 亘诏蹖 亘乇 丕爻丕爻 讴鬲丕亘 丕賵賱 亘賵丿賴 丕賲丕 賳禺賵賳丿賴 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 亘诏賲 丿賵 噩賱丿 丌禺乇 賴賲 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗃� 鬲賵 爻乇蹖丕賱 亘亘蹖賳蹖. 賳賴 禺蹖賱蹖 鬲丕亘賱賵 亘賱讴賴 亘丕 乇诏賴鈥屬囏й� 乇蹖夭 賵 賴賵卮賲賳丿丕賳賴.
丿蹖丕賱賵诏鈥屬囏й� 讴鬲丕亘 蹖丕 亘毓囟蹖 丕夭 氐丨賳賴鈥屬囏� 鬲賵 爻乇蹖丕賱 亘賴 氐賵乇鬲 讴賲乇賳诏蹖 倬蹖丿丕 賲蹖卮賳 丕賲丕 胤賵乇蹖 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗃� 亘賮賴賲蹖卮 讴賴 賵丕賯毓丕 爻乇蹖丕賱禺賵丕乇 禺賵亘蹖 賴賲 亘丕卮蹖. 亘乇丕蹖丕賳 賮賵賱乇 亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 丕噩丕夭賴 賳丿丕卮鬲 丕夭 丕蹖賳 噩賱丿 鬲賵 爻丕禺鬲 爻乇蹖丕賱 亘賴乇賴 亘亘乇賴 丕賲丕 亘賴 胤乇夭 毓噩蹖亘蹖 亘毓囟蹖 丕夭 亘禺卮鈥屬囏� 乇賵 诏賳噩賵賳丿.
亘乇丕蹖 賴賲蹖賳 趩賵賳 禺蹖賱蹖 乇賵 丕蹖賳 讴丕乇 乇賵 丕賳噩丕賲 賳丿丕丿貙 鬲卮乇蹖丨 丕蹖賳 賲賵丕乇丿 乇賵 亘賴 亘蹖賳賳丿賴 賵 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 賲蹖鈥屫迟矩ж辟�. 賵賱蹖 丕夭 丕賵賳噩丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丌丿賲 丿賱鈥屫必呟� 賴爻鬲賲 亘丕蹖丿 亘诏賲 爻丕禺鬲丕乇卮讴賳蹖 賴乇蹖爻 賳賴 丕賵賳胤賵乇 讴賴 爻乇 賲丕噩乇丕賴丕 丕賵賲丿賴貙 亘賱讴賴 亘丕 乇賵卮 賲鬲賮丕賵鬲 爻丕夭賳丿賴鈥屰� 爻乇蹖丕賱 賴賲 亘賴 趩卮賲 賲蹖鈥屫堌辟�. 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬矩必ж槽屸€屬囏� 禺蹖賱蹖 卮亘丕賴鬲 丿丕乇賳 賵 丿乇 毓蹖賳 丨丕賱 丕夭 賳馗乇 馗丕賴乇蹖 賴賲 卮亘蹖賴 賳蹖爻鬲賳.
丿乇 讴賱 爻乇蹖丕賱 蹖賴 噩賵乇蹖 賴爻鬲 讴賴 丕賳诏丕乇 蹖讴蹖 賲噩賲賵毓賴 乇賵 亘賱毓蹖丿賴 亘丕卮賴 賵 賳讴丕鬲 賲丨卮乇卮 乇賵 亘丕 丕爻鬲賮丕丿賴 丕夭 匕賴賳蹖丕鬲 禺賵丿卮 鬲乇讴蹖亘 讴乇丿賴 亘丕卮賴 賵 丿乇 毓蹖賳 丨丕賱 讴賴 亘賴 賯賱賲 賴乇蹖爻 賵賮丕丿丕乇 賴爻鬲 趩蹖夭 賲鬲賮丕賵鬲蹖 賴賲 禺賱賯 讴乇丿賴. 亘賳丕亘乇丕蹖賳 賳賲蹖诏賲 賯亘賱 丕夭 讴鬲丕亘鈥屬囏� 蹖丕 亘毓丿 丕夭 讴鬲丕亘鈥屬囏� 亘亘蹖賳蹖賳卮. 趩賵賳 賮乇賯蹖 賳丿丕乇賴.
丿乇 丌禺乇 亘丕蹖丿 亘诏賲 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賲丨亘賵亘鈥屫臂屬� 讴鬲丕亘 丕賲爻丕賱賲 鬲丕 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賱丨馗賴 亘賵丿賴 賵 趩賯丿乇 禺賵卮丨丕賱賲 讴賴 丕蹖賳胤賵乇 倬蹖卮 亘乇丿賲卮 賵 賱匕鬲卮 乇賵 丿賵趩賳丿丕賳 讴乇丿賲. 賵 丨蹖賮 讴賴 丕賳賯丿乇 丿乇 亘蹖賳 禺賵丕賳賳丿诏丕賳 賮丕乇爻蹖鈥屫藏ㄘз� 賮丕乇爻蹖鈥屫堌з� 賲賴噩賵乇 賲賵賳丿賴. 亘丿賵賳 卮讴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 丕乇夭卮 丕蹖賳 乇賵 丿丕乇賴 讴賴 夭亘丕賳鬲賵賳 乇賵 鬲賯賵蹖鬲 讴賳蹖賳 賵 亘丕 噩丕丿賵蹖 讴賱賲丕鬲卮 賲爻丨賵乇 亘卮蹖賳.
倬.賳: 鬲丕 爻丕毓鬲鈥屬囏� 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 丕夭卮 亘诏賲 賵 丨乇賮丕賲 鬲賴 賳丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮賴 賵賱蹖 賯乇丕乇 賳蹖爻鬲 賲睾夭鬲賵賳 乇賵 賮毓賱丕 亘噩賵賲. 亘賴 賴賲蹖賳 乇蹖賵蹖賵蹖 亘蹖鈥屫ж迟举堐屬� 賯丕賳毓 亘丕卮蹖賳. 鬲讴禺賵乇蹖 賲毓賲賵賱丕 禺蹖賱蹖 讴蹖賮 賲蹖丿賴.
亘丕 丕蹖賳 丕賵氐丕賮 丕夭卮 賲蹖鈥屬嗁堐屫迟� 賵 丕诏乇 噩丕蹖蹖 丕丨鬲賲丕賱 賱賵 乇賮鬲賳 賵噩賵丿 丿丕卮鬲貙 丕夭 賯亘賱 禺亘乇 賲蹖丿賲 鬲丕 亘丕 禺蹖丕賱 乇丕丨鬲 亘禺賵賳蹖賳. 倬爻 胤賵賱丕賳蹖 亘賵丿賳 賳賵卮鬲賴鈥屬� 乇賵 丕蹖賳胤賵乇 鬲毓亘蹖乇 賳讴賳蹖賳 讴賴 乇蹖夭噩夭卅蹖丕鬲蹖 讴賴 賳卮禺賵丕乇 讴乇丿賲 乇賵 賯乇丕乇 賴爻鬲 亘賴 丕卮鬲乇丕讴 亘匕丕乇賲貨 趩賵賳 爻毓蹖賲 丿乇 丕蹖賳 賴爻鬲 讴賴 賲孬賱 乇蹖賵蹖賵蹖 讴鬲丕亘 賯亘賱蹖貙 亘丿賵賳 賱賵 丿丕丿賳 賲毓乇賮蹖卮 讴賳賲.
*鬲讴禺賵乇蹖 亘賴 乇賵丕蹖鬲 乇蹖賵蹖賵
鬲賲丕賲 賳讴丕鬲蹖 讴賴 亘丕蹖丿 賯亘賱 丕夭 禺賵丕賳卮 讴鬲丕亘 丿乇 賳馗乇 亘诏蹖乇蹖賳:
丕賵賱丕 丕夭 蹖丕丿 賳亘乇蹖賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘貙 噩賱丿 丿賵賲 賲噩賲賵毓賴 賴爻鬲. 丨丕賱丕 丕诏乇 亘賴 丿賱蹖賱 丕蹖賳讴賴 賮蹖賱賲卮 賲毓乇賵賮 卮丿 賵 亘賴 爻乇鬲賵賳 夭丿 讴賴 蹖賴賵 亘倬乇蹖賳 賵 噩賱丿 丿賵賲 乇賵 卮乇賵毓 讴賳蹖賳貙 丕蹖賳 乇賵 丿乇 賳馗乇 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮蹖賳 讴賴 丌賯丕蹖 賴乇蹖爻 丕爻倬賵蹖賱 亘賴 卮丿鬲 乇蹖夭蹖 亘賴 讴鬲丕亘 賯亘賱蹖卮 讴乇丿賴 賵 丿乇 丕蹖賳 丨丿 賴爻鬲 讴賴 爻乇賳賵卮鬲 卮禺氐蹖鬲 丕氐賱蹖 讴鬲丕亘 賯亘賱 乇賵 亘賴 胤乇夭 亘蹖鈥屫必呚з嗁団€屫й� 鬲賵氐蹖賮 讴乇丿賴 (丕賱亘鬲賴 丿乇 丨丿 趩賳丿 禺胤). 賳讴鬲賴鈥屰� 丿蹖诏賴 丕蹖賳 賴爻鬲 讴賴 亘丕 亘毓囟蹖 丕夭 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏й� 賲卮鬲乇讴 丕蹖賳 丿賵 讴鬲丕亘貙 鬲賵 讴鬲丕亘 賯亘賱 亘蹖卮鬲乇 丌卮賳丕 卮丿蹖賲 賵 蹖賴 卮賳丕禺鬲 賳爻亘蹖鈥屫й� 丿丕卮鬲蹖賲. 丕賲丕 胤賵乇蹖 賳蹖爻鬲 讴賴 亘丿賵賳 禺賵賳丿賳 噩賱丿 丕賵賱 賵 卮乇賵毓 噩賱丿 丿賵賲貙 賳賮賴賲蹖賲 趩蹖 亘賴 趩蹖 賴爻鬲. 倬爻 賲蹖卮賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘丕 禺蹖丕賱 丌爻賵丿賴鈥屫й� 禺賵賳丿 丕賲丕 鬲乇噩蹖丨丕 亘賴 鬲乇鬲蹖亘 倬蹖卮 亘乇蹖賳 亘賴鬲乇 賴賲 賲蹖卮賴 趩賵賳 趩胤賵乇 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗃屬� 丕夭 賵蹖賱 诏乇賴賲 讴鬲丕亘 丕賵賱 亘诏匕乇蹖賳責!
丿賵賲丕 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘貙 讴鬲丕亘蹖 賳蹖爻鬲 讴賴 賴乇 讴爻蹖 亘鬲賵賳賴 乇丕丨鬲 丕夭 倬爻 禺賵賳丿賳卮 亘乇亘蹖丕丿 賵 丿賱丕蹖賱 夭蹖丕丿蹖 賴賲 丿丕乇賴. 趩賳丿鬲丕卮 讴賴 賲賴賲賳 乇賵 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 丕卮丕乇賴 讴賳賲. 賮乇囟 讴賳蹖賳 丕讴爻倬賱賵乇 丕蹖賳爻鬲丕诏乇賲 蹖丕 賴乇 亘乇賳丕賲賴鈥屰� 讴賵賮鬲蹖鈥屫й� 乇賵 亘丕夭 讴乇丿蹖賳 賵 賲賵賯毓蹖 讴賴 賲蹖禺賵丕蹖賳 賵蹖丿卅賵蹖蹖 乇賵 亘亘蹖賳蹖賳貙 亘賴鬲賵賳 丕禺胤丕乇 賲蹖丿賴 讴賴 丨丕賵蹖 氐丨賳賴鈥屬囏й� 丿賱禺乇丕卮 賴爻鬲. 丕诏賴 丕夭 丕賵賳 丿爻鬲賴 丕賮乇丕丿蹖 賴爻鬲蹖賳 讴賴 亘丕 丕蹖賳 賵噩賵丿貙 丿賱 丿蹖丿賳 丿丕乇蹖賳 丕丨鬲賲丕賱 賲蹖乇賴 丿賱 禺賵賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賴賲 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮蹖锟斤拷. 趩賵賳 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 鬲賵氐蹖賮 賲蹖讴賳賴 趩胤賵乇 倬賵爻鬲 丌丿賲蹖 讴賳丿賴 賲蹖卮賴貙 趩胤賵乇 亘丕 噩爻丿 賲賵丕噩賴 亘卮蹖賲 賵 趩胤賵乇 匕賴賳蹖丕鬲 蹖賴 賯丕鬲賱 爻乇蹖丕賱蹖 乇賵 亘賴 胤乇夭 賵蹖乇丕賳鈥屭┵嗁嗀団€屫й� 亘賮賴賲蹖賲. 噩賵乇蹖 讴賴 亘丕 鬲丕乇蹖讴鈥屫臂屬� 賵噩賵賴 丌丿賲蹖 賵 丕毓賲丕賱蹖 讴賴 丕夭卮 爻乇 賲蹖夭賳賴 乇賵亘賴鈥屫辟� 賲蹖卮蹖賲. 丨丕賱丕 亘賴 丕蹖賳 禺丕胤乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 鬲賵 跇丕賳乇 賵丨卮鬲 賴賲 诏賳噩賵賳丿賴 卮丿賴 丕賲丕 亘賴 卮禺氐賴 爻乇 禺賵賳丿賳卮 亘賴 噩丕蹖 丕蹖賳讴賴 賵丨卮鬲鈥屫藏� 亘卮賲 丿趩丕乇 卮诏賮鬲鈥屫藏� 卮丿賲 (丕诏乇趩賴 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 丕讴孬乇蹖鬲 賵丕讴賳卮 賲鬲賮丕賵鬲 賵 賴賲乇賳诏 噩賲丕毓鬲 诏賵賳賴鈥屫й� 丿丕卮鬲賳).
爻賵賲丕 禺賵丕賴卮賲賳丿賲 丕诏乇 賮賲賳蹖爻鬲 賴爻鬲蹖賳 賵 亘賴 胤乇夭 毓噩蹖亘蹖 丕夭 丕賵賳 丿爻鬲賴鈥屫� 亘賴 卮賲丕乇 賲蹖乇蹖賳 讴賴 丨鬲蹖 趩丕賯蹖 賯乇亘丕賳蹖鈥屬囏� 乇賵 亘賴賵賳賴鈥屫й� 亘乇丕蹖 讴賵亘蹖丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗃屬嗀� 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘賴 賴蹖趩 賵噩賴 賳禺賵賳蹖賳. 趩賵賳 丕诏乇 丿乇爻鬲 亘禺賵賳蹖賳卮貙 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賯氐丿蹖 賳丿丕卮鬲賴 讴賴 賵夭賳 賯乇亘丕賳蹖鈥屬囏� 乇賵 亘乇丕蹖 鬲禺乇蹖亘 讴乇丿賳 丌丿賲鈥屬囏� 亘賴 爻禺乇賴 亘诏蹖乇賴 賵 蹖丕 丨鬲蹖 卮禺氐蹖鬲 讴賱乇蹖爻 乇賵 胤賵乇蹖 噩賱賵賴 亘丿賴 讴賴 亘禺丕胤乇 噩匕丕亘蹖鬲卮 賲賵乇丿倬爻賳丿 丕賵賳 噩丕賲毓賴鈥屰� 賲乇丿爻丕賱丕乇 賴爻鬲. 鬲賳賴丕 賱胤賮蹖 讴賴 賴乇 讴爻蹖 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 亘讴賳賴 丕蹖賳 賴爻鬲 讴賴 丕賵賱丕 亘丕 卮賳丕禺鬲 亘賴 丕賵賳 丿賵乇丕賳貙 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘禺賵賳賴 賵 丿賵賲丕 噩賵乇蹖 亘禺賵賳鬲卮 讴賴 爻胤丨蹖 賵 爻乇爻乇蹖 賳亘丕卮賴. 趩賵賳 丕讴孬乇 乇蹖賵蹖賵賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 讴賲鬲乇 丕夭 鄞 賵 丨鬲蹖 鄣 爻鬲丕乇賴 丿丕丿賳 亘賴 趩賳蹖賳 趩蹖夭蹖 丕卮丕乇賴 讴乇丿賳 賵 賵丕賯毓丕 噩丕蹖 鬲丕爻賮 丿丕乇賴!
趩赖丕乇賲丕 亘丿丕賳蹖丿 賵 丌诏丕賴 亘丕卮蹖賳 讴賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘丕蹖丿 亘丕 賳爻禺賴鈥屰� 丕氐賱蹖 賵 丕賳诏賱蹖爻蹖卮 禺賵賳丿. 鬲賳賴丕 丿賱蹖賱 賲丨讴賲賴鈥屬矩迟嗀� 讴賴 賲賵噩亘丕鬲 诏賲賳丕賲 亘賵丿賳 丕蹖賳 賲噩賲賵毓賴 乇賵 賮乇丕賴賲 讴乇丿賴貙 亘賴 丕蹖賳 禺丕胤乇 賴爻鬲 讴賴 鬲乇噩賲賴鈥屰� 賮丕乇爻蹖 丿乇爻鬲 賵 丿乇賲賵賳蹖 賳丿丕乇賴 賵 趩賵賳 禺賵丿賲 賴賲夭賲丕賳 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗀� 賲鬲賵噩賴 卮丿賲 讴賴 趩賯丿乇 丕蹖賳 賲賵囟賵毓 亘丕毓孬 賲蹖卮賴 讴賴 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 賳鬲賵賳賴 丕夭 讴鬲丕亘 賱匕鬲蹖 讴賴 賲賳 亘乇丿賲 乇賵 亘亘乇賴.
倬賳噩賲丕 讴鬲丕亘賴丕蹖 丕蹖賳 賲噩賲賵毓賴 亘丕 丌孬丕乇 丕賯鬲亘丕爻蹖 鬲賮丕賵鬲 丿丕乇賳. 賵 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘丿賵賳 賴蹖趩 鬲乇丿蹖丿蹖 丕夭 賮蹖賱賲 亘賴鬲乇 賴爻鬲貨 亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 丕賯鬲亘丕爻卮 賴賲 賲賵賮賯蹖鬲鈥屫①呟屫� 亘賵丿賴 丕賲丕 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 讴爻蹖 讴賴 鬲讴 鬲讴 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖 賲乇亘賵胤 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賲噩賲賵毓賴 乇賵 亘賱毓蹖丿賴 亘丕蹖丿 亘诏賲 賱丕丕賯賱 讴鬲丕亘 丿賵賲 丕夭 賴乇 賱丨丕馗蹖 賲丨卮乇賴 賵 丿乇 丕蹖賳 亘丕乇賴 亘蹖卮鬲乇 鬲賵囟蹖丨 賲蹖丿賲.
卮卮賲丕 丌賯丕蹖 賴乇蹖爻 亘賴 胤乇夭 卮诏賮鬲鈥屫①堌臂屫� 鬲賲丕賲 賳讴丕鬲蹖 讴賴 賲賵噩亘丕鬲 讴賲 丕賲鬲蹖丕夭 丿丕丿賳 賲乇丿賲 亘賴 噩賱丿 賯亘賱 卮丿賴 亘賵丿 乇賵 亘丕 賳賵卮鬲賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 噩亘乇丕賳 讴乇丿賴. 蹖毓賳蹖 讴蹖賮蹖鬲 讴鬲丕亘 亘丕賱丕鬲乇 丕夭 噩賱丿 倬蹖卮蹖賳 賴爻鬲. 亘賴 胤賵乇 賲孬丕賱 卮禺氐蹖鬲 賴賳蹖亘丕賱 賱讴鬲乇 乇賵 亘蹖卮鬲乇 賳卮賵賳 丿丕丿賴. 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏й� 夭賳 亘蹖卮鬲乇蹖 乇賵 鬲賵 讴鬲丕亘 丌賵乇丿賴 賵 丨鬲蹖 丕夭 诏乇丕蹖卮鈥屬囏й� 賲禺鬲賱賮 賴賲 丕爻鬲賮丕丿賴 讴乇丿賴 讴賴 爻丕禺鬲丕乇卮讴賳蹖 毓丕賱蹖鈥屫й� 丿丕卮鬲賳. 爻蹖乇 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 乇賵 賴蹖噩丕賳鈥屫з嗂屫测€屫� 讴乇丿賴 賵 亘丕毓孬 卮丿賴 賲蹖賵賳 丕鬲賮丕賯丕鬲 夭蹖丕丿貙 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 丕爻鬲乇丕丨鬲鈥屬囏й� 讴賲 賴賲 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮賴 亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 讴鬲丕亘 賯亘賱 亘賴 賳馗乇賲 亘乇毓讴爻 亘賵丿.
亘丕夭 賴賲 賲賵丕乇丿 丿蹖诏賴鈥屫й� 賵噩賵丿 丿丕乇賳 丕賲丕 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 鬲丕 賴賲蹖賳鈥屫ж� 丨賵氐賱賴鈥屰� 讴賲鬲乇 讴爻蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┴促� 賵 賴賲 禺賵丿賲 鬲賯乇蹖亘丕 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖 賲賮蹖丿蹖 讴賴 亘賴 匕賴賳賲 乇爻蹖丿賴 亘賵丿 乇賵 诏賮鬲賲.
丨丕賱丕 亘丿賵賳 禺胤乇 賱賵 乇賮鬲賳 鬲賵 丿賱 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 賲蹖乇賲 賵 鬲讴 鬲讴 賲賵丕乇丿蹖 讴賴 賲賵噩亘丕鬲 丕乇丕丿鬲賲賳丿蹖 賲賳 亘賴 丕蹖賳 噩賱丿 卮丿賴 乇賵 賲蹖诏賲.
丌卮賳丕蹖蹖 亘丕 讴鬲丕亘 亘丿賵賳 禺胤乇 賱賵 乇賮鬲賳
讴賱乇蹖爻 丕爻鬲丕乇賱蹖賳诏 亘禺丕胤乇 讴丕乇蹖 讴賴 噩讴 讴乇丕賮賵乇丿 亘賴卮 賲丨賵賱 讴乇丿賴 亘丕蹖丿 禺蹖賱蹖 爻乇蹖毓 丕胤賱丕毓丕鬲蹖 乇賵 丕夭 夭蹖乇 夭亘賵賳 讴爻蹖 亘蹖乇賵賳 亘讴卮賴 讴賴 鬲賯乇蹖亘丕 賳丕賲賲讴賳 亘賴 賳馗乇 賲蹖鈥屫必迟�. 賲乇丿蹖 讴賴 丨鬲蹖 鬲爻鬲鈥屬囏й屰� 讴賴 乇賵卮 丕賳噩丕賲 賲蹖卮賴 賴賲 鬲賵丕賳丕蹖蹖 丕賳噩丕賲 丕蹖賳 讴丕乇 乇賵 賳丿丕乇賳 鬲丕 賲鬲賵噩賴 亘卮賳 讴賴 亘賴 胤賵乇 丿賯蹖賯 趩蹖 鬲賵 匕賴賳卮 賲蹖鈥屭柏辟� 賵 趩胤賵乇 賲蹖鬲賵賳賳 亘賴 夭丕賳賵 丿乇卮 亘蹖丕乇賳. 丕賵賳 賮乇丿 讴爻蹖 賳蹖爻鬲 噩夭 丿讴鬲乇 賴賳蹖亘丕賱 賱讴鬲乇. 賴賳蹖亘丕賱蹖 讴賴 亘賴 丌丿賲禺賵丕乇蹖 卮賴乇鬲 丿丕乇賴 賵 丨丕賱丕 讴賱乇蹖爻 讴賴 讴丕乇丌賲賵夭 賵 鬲丕夭賴鈥屭┴ж臂� 亘蹖卮 賳蹖爻鬲貙 亘丕蹖丿 亘丕 趩賳蹖賳 賲賵乇丿蹖 乇賵亘賴鈥屫辟� 亘卮賴 (賲賳 亘乇丕蹖 讴賱乇蹖爻 亘賵丿賳 乇賵丨賲 乇賵 亘賴 卮蹖胤丕賳 賲蹖鈥屬佖辟堌促�).
賴賳蹖亘丕賱 丕夭 賴乇 噩賳亘賴鈥屫й� 丌丿賲蹖 乇賵 卮诏賮鬲鈥屫藏� 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�. 趩賵賳 亘乇禺賱丕賮 丕毓賲丕賱蹖 讴賴 丕夭卮 爻乇 夭丿賴貙 禺蹖賱蹖 丌丿賲 賲賵丿亘 賵 賲鬲卮禺氐蹖 賴爻鬲 賵 亘賴 鬲讴 鬲讴 夭蹖亘丕蹖蹖鈥屬囏� 賲噩匕賵亘 賲蹖卮賴 賵 亘丕 亘賳丿 亘賳丿 賵噩賵丿卮 丿乇讴卮賵賳 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�. 丕賵賳 毓丕卮賯 賲毓丕卮乇鬲 亘丕 丌丿賲鈥屬囏й屰� 賴爻鬲 讴賴 趩賴 丕夭 賳馗乇 匕賴賳蹖 趩賴 賮蹖夭蹖讴蹖 夭蹖亘丕賳. 丕夭 睾匕丕賴丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮 賵 鬲丕乇蹖禺趩賴鈥屫促堎� 丕胤賱丕毓丕鬲 夭蹖丕丿蹖 丿丕乇賴 賵 賯丕丿乇 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賴爻鬲 丨鬲蹖 丿乇 亘賳丿 賴賲 亘鬲賵賳賴 丿爻鬲賵乇 鬲賴蹖賴鈥屰� 睾匕丕蹖 噩丿蹖丿蹖 乇賵 丿乇爻鬲 讴賳賴 亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 丕賲讴丕賳丕鬲蹖 賳丿丕乇賴 鬲丕 趩蹖夭蹖 讴賴 禺賱賯 賲蹖讴賳賴 乇賵 丨鬲蹖 亘趩卮賴. 丕賲丕 亘賴 禺丕胤乇 匕賴賳 賵爻蹖毓 賵 賯丿乇鬲賲賳丿卮 鬲賵丕賳丕蹖蹖 亘賴 蹖丕丿丌賵乇丿賳 亘賵賴丕貙 賲夭賴鈥屬囏ж� 鬲氐丕賵蹖乇貙 丌丿賲鈥屬囏ж� 丕賲丕讴賳 賵 禺蹖賱蹖 趩蹖夭賴丕 乇賵 丿丕乇賴. 丕賵賳 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 亘丕 乇蹖夭噩夭卅蹖丕鬲 賵 乇噩賵毓 亘賴 禺丕胤乇丕鬲卮 胤乇丕丨蹖 丿賯蹖賯蹖 讴賳賴. 丨鬲蹖 丿乇 倬乇賵爻賴鈥屰� 爻賵丕賱 賵 噩賵丕亘 賴賲 亘賴 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖蹖 丕卮丕乇賴 賲蹖讴賳賴 讴賴 賵賯鬲蹖 爻乇趩 讴賳蹖卮 賲鬲賵噩賴 賲蹖卮蹖 亘丕 趩賴 丌丿賲 毓賲蹖賯蹖 胤乇賮蹖 (鬲讴 鬲讴 乇賮乇賳爻鈥屬囏ж� 賲賳 乇賵 亘賴 賵噩丿 丌賵乇丿賳). 丕賵賳 讴爻蹖 賴爻鬲 讴賴 卮丕蹖丿 亘蹖卮鬲乇 丕夭 賴乇 趩蹖夭蹖 亘賴 丕蹖賳 禺丕胤乇 鬲賵 丿賱鬲 乇賵 禺丕賱蹖 賲蹖讴賳賴 讴賴 丿乇爻鬲 丕賳诏卮鬲 乇賵 亘禺卮鈥屬囏й屰� 賲蹖匕丕乇賴 讴賴 禺賵丿鬲 賴賲 鬲賵丕賳 丕蹖賳 乇賵 賳丿丕乇蹖 卮禺賲卮賵賳 亘夭賳蹖. 亘賴 賴賲蹖賳 禺丕胤乇 乇賵丕賳卮賳丕爻 丨乇賮賴鈥屫й� 賲丨爻賵亘 賲蹖卮賴 賵 丕賲丕賳 丕夭 乇賵夭蹖 讴賴 賵丕乇丿 匕賴賳鬲 亘卮賴貨 趩賵賳 賳賲蹖鬲賵賳蹖 丿蹖诏賴 亘蹖乇賵賳卮 讴賳蹖! 賵 鬲丕 蹖丕丿賲 賳乇賮鬲賴 亘丕蹖丿 亘诏賲 丕蹖賳 賲乇丿 亘賴 卮丿鬲 胤賳丕夭 賴爻鬲 丕賲丕 噩賳爻 卮賵禺鈥屫坟ㄘ观屸€屬囏ж� 胤賵乇蹖 賳蹖爻鬲賳 讴賴 賴乇 讴爻蹖 亘鬲賵賳賴 亘丕賴丕卮賵賳 亘禺賳丿賴. 亘丕蹖丿 亘賴 賯丿乇蹖 亘丕賴賵卮 亘丕卮蹖 讴賴 丕卮丕乇賴鈥屫й� 讴賴 讴乇丿賴 乇賵 賲鬲賵噩賴 亘卮蹖 鬲丕 毓賲賯 讴賱丕賲卮 丕夭 丿爻鬲鬲 丿乇 賳乇賴 賵 趩賴 亘爻丕 丕诏乇 亘鬲賵賳蹖 禺賵丿鬲 乇賵 噩丕蹖 賱讴鬲乇 亘匕丕乇蹖 賱亘禺賳丿 毓賲蹖賯鈥屫臂� 乇賵 賱亘鬲 賳賯卮 賲蹖鈥屫ㄙ嗀�. 噩丕 丿丕乇賴 亘诏賲 丕夭 丕蹖賳 噩賳亘賴 鬲賳賴丕 亘丕夭蹖诏乇蹖 讴賴 亘賴 賳馗乇賲 鬲賵賳爻鬲賴 趩賳蹖賳 賲賵乇丿蹖 乇賵 乇毓丕蹖鬲 讴賳賴 丌賳鬲賵賳蹖 賴丕倬讴蹖賳夭 賳蹖爻鬲貙 賲丿爻 賲蹖讴賱爻賳 賴爻鬲 賵 亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 賵丕賯賮賲 趩賯丿乇 丕讴孬乇蹖鬲 賱讴鬲乇 乇賵 亘賴 賵丕爻胤賴鈥屰� 賴丕倬讴蹖賳夭 賲蹖卮賳丕爻賳 丕賲丕 亘賴 卮禺氐賴 賵 亘丕 乇噩賵毓 亘賴 讴鬲丕亘賴丕 倬蹖 亘乇丿賲 讴賴 趩賯丿乇 賲蹖讴賱爻賳 卮亘蹖賴 亘賴 趩蹖夭蹖 讴賴 賴乇蹖爻 倬乇丿丕禺鬲賴貙 賳賯卮 乇賵 丕蹖賮丕 讴乇丿賴.
丕诏賴 蹖讴賲 賯乇亘丕賳鈥屫地傎団€屫辟佖嗏€屬囏й� 丕賱亘鬲賴 亘賴 丨賯 乇賵 讴賲 讴賳賲 亘丕蹖丿 亘诏賲 丕蹖賳 丕孬乇 丌賳趩賴 禺賵亘丕賳 丿丕乇賳丿 乇賵 賴賲賴 蹖讴噩丕 丿丕乇賴. 蹖毓賳蹖 亘賴 賵爻蹖賱賴鈥屰� 蹖讴 倬乇賵賳丿賴鈥屰� 亘賴 馗丕賴乇 亘蹖鈥屫必ㄘ� 賵 蹖賴 鬲爻鬲蹖 讴賴 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 賲賴賲 賴賲 賳蹖爻鬲 賴賳蹖亘丕賱 亘賴卮 噩賵丕亘 亘丿賴貙 亘賴 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖蹖 賲蹖鈥屬矩必ж操� 讴賴 賲卮丕亘賴卮 乇賵 鬲賵 讴鬲丕亘鈥屬囏й� 丕蹖賳鈥屭嗁嗃屬嗃� 賳丿蹖丿賲.
賴乇蹖爻貙 丌丿賲鈥屬囏й� 爻蹖丕賴 賵 爻賮蹖丿 禺賱賯 賳賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�. 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬矩必ж槽屸€屬囏й屰� 讴賴 丕賳噩丕賲 丿丕丿賴 亘賴 賯丿乇蹖 賵丕賯毓蹖 賴爻鬲賳 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗃� 鬲氐賵乇卮賵賳 讴賳蹖 賵 亘丕 睾蹖乇賯丕亘賱鈥屬囏顿呪€屫臂屬嗀促堎� 賴賲 丕丨爻丕爻 賳夭丿蹖讴蹖 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮蹖. 趩賵賳 丌賯丕蹖 賴乇蹖爻 賵丕賯賮 賴爻鬲 讴賴 亘卮乇 禺丕讴爻鬲乇蹖 賵 倬乇 丕夭 鬲賳丕賯囟 賴爻鬲. 丨鬲蹖 讴丕乇蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 讴賴 亘丕 亘丕賮賱賵 亘蹖賱 讴賴 賲乇亘賵胤 亘賴 倬乇賵賳丿賴鈥屰� 丕氐賱蹖 賴爻鬲 賵 賯丕鬲賱蹖 亘賴 丨爻丕亘 賲蹖丕丿 讴賴 倬賵爻鬲 賯乇亘丕賳蹖鈥屬囏� 乇賵 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 賵 丿乇 丌禺乇 噩爻丿卮賵賳 乇賵 丿乇 乇賵丿禺賵賳賴鈥屬囏й� 賲禺鬲賱賮 賲蹖賳丿丕夭賴 賴賲 亘鬲賵賳蹖 賴賲匕丕鬲鈥屬举嗀ж臂� 讴賳蹖. 賵 丕蹖賳 賯丿乇鬲 賯賱賲 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賲丨爻賵亘 賳賲蹖卮賴責
賴乇蹖爻 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏й屰� 禺賱賯 讴乇丿賴 讴賴 爻丕禺鬲丕乇卮讴賳 賴爻鬲賳. 丕夭 讴賱乇蹖爻蹖 讴賴 賳賴丕蹖鬲 鬲賱丕卮卮 丿乇 噩丕賲毓賴鈥屰� 賲乇丿爻丕賱丕乇 賵 賮囟丕蹖 賲乇丿賵賳賴鈥屫й� 讴賴 丿乇卮 讴丕乇 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 丿乇 丕蹖賳 賴爻鬲 讴賴 亘禺丕胤乇 讴丕乇賴丕卮 亘倬匕蹖乇賳卮 賵 賳賴 亘賴 禺丕胤乇 噩賳爻蹖鬲卮. 丕夭 賱讴鬲乇蹖 讴賴 丕賳爻丕賳蹖鈥屫臂屬� 賵蹖跇诏蹖鈥屬囏� 乇賵 丿丕乇賴 丕賲丕 丌丿賲禺賵丕乇 賴賲 賴爻鬲 賵 爻乇賳賵卮鬲 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲乇丿賲 乇賵 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 亘丕 卮賵禺蹖鈥屬囏ж� 亘賴 爻禺乇賴 亘诏蹖乇賴. 丕夭 噩讴 讴乇丕賮賵乇丿蹖 讴賴 亘丕 賵噩賵丿 鬲賲丕賲 賲卮賯鬲鈥屬囏й� 夭賳丿诏蹖卮 爻毓蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 讴丕乇 丿乇爻鬲 乇賵 丕賳噩丕賲 亘丿賴 賵 賴賵丕蹖 夭蹖乇丿爻鬲卮 乇賵 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮賴. 丕夭 亘丕賮賱賵 亘蹖賱蹖 讴賴 亘賴 賯乇亘丕賳蹖鈥屬囏� 亘賴 趩卮賲 丌丿賲 賳诏丕賴 賳賲蹖讴賳賴 丕賲丕 禺蹖賱蹖 丕賵賯丕鬲 賲孬賱 丌丿賲鈥屬囏й� 賲毓賲賵賱蹖 乇賮鬲丕乇 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�. 丕夭 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏й屰� 讴賴 诏乇丕蹖卮鈥屬囏й� 賲禺鬲賱賮蹖 丿丕乇賳 丕賲丕 亘乇禺賱丕賮 氐賳毓鬲 爻蹖賳賲丕 讴賴 诏丕賴丕 丕夭卮賵賳 趩賴乇賴鈥屬囏й� 賲丨亘賵亘 賵 丿賱賳卮蹖賳蹖 賲蹖爻丕夭賳貙 賲丨亘賵亘 賵 丿賱賳卮蹖賳 賳蹖爻鬲賳 賵 亘賴 胤乇夭 賵蹖乇丕賳鈥屭┵嗁嗀団€屫й� 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 夭賳丿诏蹖鈥屬囏� 乇賵 禺乇丕亘 讴賳賳.
賮囟丕爻丕夭蹖 讴鬲丕亘 亘禺丕胤乇 丕蹖賳讴賴 亘丕 倬乇賵賳丿賴鈥屬囏й� 賯鬲賱 爻乇 賵 讴丕乇 丿丕乇賴 賵 蹖賴 丌賳 賲賲讴賳賴 鬲蹖乇 鬲賵 賲睾夭 卮禺氐蹖鬲 亘禺賵乇賴: 丿賱賴乇賴鈥屫①堌必� 丿賱禺乇丕卮貙 賵丨卮鬲賳丕讴貙 乇賵丕賳卮賳丕禺鬲蹖貙 丿乇丕賲貙 噩賳丕蹖蹖貙 賲毓賲丕蹖蹖貙 鬲丕乇蹖讴貙 趩賳丿卮 賵 禺蹖賱蹖 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖 丿蹖诏賴 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 乇丿蹖賮 讴賳賲 賴爻鬲. 丕賲丕 丕诏乇 蹖賴 爻胤丨 亘丕賱丕鬲乇 賴爻鬲蹖賳貨 丕夭 趩賳蹖賳 賮囟丕蹖蹖 賱匕鬲 賲蹖鈥屫ㄘ臂屬� 趩賵賳 夭蹖亘丕蹖蹖 賯賱賲貙 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬矩必ж槽� 賯賵蹖貙 賮囟丕爻丕夭蹖 賳丕亘貙 爻蹖乇 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 倬乇 讴卮卮貙 丿蹖丕賱賵诏鈥屬囏й� 毓賲蹖賯貙 賲賮賴賵賲 鬲兀賲賱鈥屫ㄘ必з嗂屫� 賵 禺蹖賱蹖 賲賵丕乇丿 丿蹖诏賴 亘丕毓孬 賲蹖卮賴 卮诏賮鬲鈥屫藏� 亘卮蹖賳 賵 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 亘賴鬲乇蹖賳 鬲噩丕乇亘 禺賵丕賳卮鬲賵賳 乇賵 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮蹖賳.
丕蹖賳 丕孬乇 亘賴 胤乇夭 毓噩蹖亘蹖 讴賱蹖卮賴鈥屬囏� 乇賵 讴賳丕乇 夭丿賴 賵 趩蹖夭蹖 乇賵 亘賴 賯賱賲 丿乇丌賵乇丿賴 讴賴 丕夭 賴乇 噩賳亘賴鈥屫й� 賲鬲賮丕賵鬲 賴爻鬲. 亘賴 胤賵乇 賲孬丕賱 丿乇 讴鬲丕亘鈥屬囏й� 噩賳丕蹖蹖-賲毓賲丕蹖蹖 賲毓賲賵賱丕 乇賵賳丿 倬蹖卮 亘乇丿賳 倬乇賵賳丿賴 乇賵 丕夭 賴乇 夭丕賵蹖賴鈥屫й� 賳賲蹖鈥屫ㄛ屬嗃屬�. 丨鬲蹖 亘丕 賯丕鬲賱 賴賲 倬蹖卮 賲蹖丕丿 讴賴 丿乇 胤賵賱 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 賴賲乇丕賴 賳蹖爻鬲蹖賲. 丕賲丕 賴乇蹖爻 讴丕乇蹖 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 丕蹖賳 賴爻鬲 讴賴 丕賳賯丿乇 丿賯蹖賯 賵 賲賵卮讴丕賮丕賳賴 丕夭 賴乇 夭丕賵蹖賴鈥屫й� 賲丕噩乇丕賴丕 乇賵 倬蹖卮 賲蹖鈥屫ㄘ辟� 讴賴 丕賳诏卮鬲 亘賴 丿賴賳 賲蹖鈥屬呝堎嗃� 趩胤賵乇 賲賲讴賳賴 丕賳賯丿乇 賯丕賳毓鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 趩賴 丕夭 夭亘賵賳 丨卮乇賴鈥屫促嗀ж� 趩賴 倬賱蹖爻 丕賽賮鈥屫ㄛ屸€屫③� 趩賴 蹖賴 賳诏賴亘丕賳 爻丕丿賴 賵... 亘賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 亘倬乇丿丕夭賴 賵 噩丕蹖 爻賵丕賱蹖 乇賵 亘丕賯蹖 賳匕丕乇賴. 蹖丕 丨鬲蹖 噩賵乇蹖 匕賴賳蹖丕鬲 賯丕鬲賱 乇賵 丿乇 亘禺卮鈥屬囏й� 賲禺鬲賱賮 鬲賵氐蹖賮 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 讴賴 丨蹖乇鬲 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗃� 趩胤賵乇 賲賲讴賳 賴爻鬲 丕夭 倬爻 丕蹖賳 鬲賵氐蹖賮丕鬲 亘蹖鈥屫必呚з嗁� 亘乇亘蹖丕丿.
丿蹖丕賱賵诏鈥屬囏й� 讴鬲丕亘 賲丨卮乇賳. 賲禺氐賵氐丕 賲賵丕賯毓蹖 讴賴 倬丕蹖 讴賱乇蹖爻 賵 賴賳蹖亘丕賱 丿乇 賲蹖賵賳 亘丕卮賴. 胤賵乇蹖 趩蹖丿賴 卮丿賳 讴賴 亘丕乇賴丕 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗃� 亘賴卮賵賳 亘乇诏乇丿蹖 賵 丿乇 毓噩亘 亘賲賵賳蹖 趩胤賵乇 亘丕 卮禺賲 夭丿賳卮賵賳 賲蹖鈥屫簇� 倬乇賵賳丿賴 乇賵 丨賱 讴乇丿.
丿乇亘丕乇賴鈥屰� 鬲乇噩賲賴鈥屸€屰� 賮丕乇爻蹖鈥屫й� 讴賴 賴賲夭賲丕賳 亘丕 丕蹖賳 賳爻禺賴 禺賵賳丿賲 賴賲 亘毓丿丕 鬲賵 乇蹖賵蹖賵蹖 賴賲賵賳 賳爻禺賴 賲蹖鈥屬嗁堐屫迟� 趩乇丕 丕賳賯丿乇 亘丿 亘賵丿 賵 丿爻鬲 賵 丿賱 丌丿賲蹖 亘賴 禺賵賳丿賳卮 賳賲蹖乇賴 賵 賲賵噩亘丕鬲 讴賲鈥屫堌囒� 亘賴 賲噩賲賵毓賴鈥屰� 賱讴鬲乇 乇賵 乇賯賲 夭丿賴.
賲賳 賳爻禺賴鈥屰� 氐賵鬲蹖 丕賳诏賱蹖爻蹖卮 乇賵 賴賲夭賲丕賳 讴賴 賳爻禺賴鈥屰� 賮蹖夭蹖讴卮 賴賲 丿爻鬲賲 亘賵丿 诏賵卮 賲蹖丿丕丿賲 讴賴 诏賵蹖賳丿賴 亘賴 卮丿鬲 賱丨賳 禺賵亘蹖 丿丕卮鬲 賵 丕賵賳 丨爻 乇賵 賲賳鬲賯賱 賲蹖鈥屭┴必� (賲禺氐賵氐丕 丿乇 賳賯胤賴鈥屰� 丕賵噩 讴鬲丕亘).
賲賵乇丿 丿蹖诏賴鈥屫й� 讴賴 賱丕夭賲 賴爻鬲 丕卮丕乇賴 讴賳賲 賮蹖賱賲 賵 爻乇蹖丕賱 賴爻鬲賳 讴賴 丌蹖丕 丕乇夭卮 丿蹖丿賳 丿丕乇賳 蹖丕 賳賴 賵 趩賴 鬲賮丕賵鬲鈥屬囏й屰� 丿乇 賲賯丕蹖爻賴 亘丕 讴鬲丕亘 丿丕乇賳. 亘丿賵賳 丕爻倬賵蹖賱 丕夭卮賵賳 丿乇 亘禺卮 亘毓丿蹖 賲蹖诏賲.
The silence of the lambs (1991)
丕蹖賳 丕賯鬲亘丕爻 亘乇丕蹖 丿蹖丿賳 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 賲蹖卮賴 趩賵賳 亘賴 禺蹖賱蹖 賲賵丕乇丿 倬丕蹖亘賳丿 亘賵丿賴 丕诏乇趩賴 亘毓囟蹖 丕夭 鬲賮丕賵鬲鈥屬囏ж� 亘賴 卮丿鬲 鬲賵 匕賵賯賲 禺賵乇丿賳鈥� 丕賲丕 丕夭 賮蹖賱賲鈥屬囏й� 丕賯鬲亘丕爻蹖 噩賱丿 賯亘賱蹖 蹖讴 爻乇 賵 诏乇丿賳 亘丕賱丕鬲乇 亘賵丿賴.
亘賴 胤賵乇 賲孬丕賱 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬矩必ж槽� 賵 賮囟丕爻丕夭蹖 鬲丕 噩丕蹖 賲賲讴賳 亘賴 賯賱賲 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賵賮丕丿丕乇 亘賵丿賳 賵 丿乇 毓蹖賳 丨丕賱 鬲賮丕賵鬲鈥屬囏й� 乇蹖夭 賵 丿乇卮鬲蹖 賴賲 丿丕卮鬲賳.
丿乇 賮蹖賱賲 卮禺氐蹖鬲 讴賱乇蹖爻 丕爻鬲丕乇賱蹖賳诏 亘丕賴賵卮鈥屫� 丕夭 趩蹖夭蹖 讴賴 亘賵丿 亘賴 鬲氐賵蹖乇 讴卮蹖丿賴 卮丿 賵 鬲丕 噩丕蹖蹖 鬲賲丕賲 讴丕乇賴丕 乇賵 丿賵卮卮 亘賵丿 賵 丕蹖賳胤賵乇 鬲毓亘蹖乇 賲蹖卮丿 讴賴 亘丕 鬲丨賱蹖賱鈥屬囏й� 禺賵丿卮 倬乇賵賳丿賴 乇賵 倬蹖卮 賲蹖鈥屫ㄘ辟� 亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 丿乇 讴鬲丕亘貙 賱讴鬲乇 丿乇 丕蹖賳 丕賲乇 賳賯卮 倬乇乇賳诏蹖 乇賵 丕蹖賮丕 讴乇丿賴 亘賵丿.
卮禺氐蹖鬲 噩讴 讴乇丕賮賵乇丿 丿乇 賮蹖賱賲 禺蹖賱蹖 丕鬲賵讴卮蹖丿賴 賵 爻乇丨丕賱 賴爻鬲 亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 鬲賵 讴鬲丕亘 亘賴 毓賱鬲 賲乇蹖囟蹖 賴賲爻乇卮 丕夭 倬丕丕賮鬲丕丿賴 賵 丕夭 趩賴乇賴鈥屫� 賳賲丕蹖丕賳 賴爻鬲 讴賴 禺爻鬲賴鈥屫池� 賵 賳蹖丕夭 亘賴 丕爻鬲乇丕丨鬲 匕賴賳蹖 丿丕乇賴. 丕蹖賳 丨鬲蹖 丿乇 倬乇賵爻賴鈥屰� 禺賵丕賳卮 亘賴 趩卮賲 賲蹖丕丿 丕賲丕 丿乇 賮蹖賱賲 賯囟蹖賴鈥屰� 賴賲爻乇 噩讴 賵噩賵丿 賳丿丕乇賴 賵 噩讴 禺蹖賱蹖 卮丕丿丕亘 丿丕乇賴 亘賴 讴丕乇卮 丕丿丕賲賴 賲蹖丿賴.
賴賳蹖亘丕賱 賱讴鬲乇 讴鬲丕亘貙 賲卮禺氐賴鈥屬囏й� 馗丕賴乇蹖 賲鬲賮丕賵鬲蹖 亘丕 賮蹖賱賲 丿丕乇賴 賵 賲卮賴賵丿鈥屫臂屬嗀� 乇賳诏 趩卮賲鈥屬囏� 賴爻鬲賳. 蹖丕 鬲毓丿丕丿 丕賳诏卮鬲 丿爻鬲 趩倬 丿讴鬲乇 讴賴 卮卮鈥屫ж池� 賵 丿乇 賮蹖賱賲 鄣鬲丕爻鬲. 賵 賳讴鬲賴鈥屰� 鬲賱禺 亘乇丕蹖 賲賳 丕蹖賳 亘賵丿 讴賴 胤賳丕夭蹖 賴賳蹖亘丕賱 丿乇 賮蹖賱賲 丕賵賳胤賵乇 讴賴 亘丕蹖丿 亘賴 趩卮賲 賳賲蹖丕丿 賵 亘丕 賱亘禺賳丿賴丕蹖 爻乇丿 賵 鬲睾蹖蹖乇 丿丕丿賳 卮賵禺蹖鈥屬囏ж� 亘賴 蹖賴 爻乇蹖 卮賵禺蹖 亘蹖鈥屬呚操� 禺乇丕亘 卮丿賴.
蹖丕 丕夭 賳馗乇 夭賲丕賳蹖 亘毓囟蹖 丕夭 丕鬲賮丕賯丕鬲 爻乇蹖毓鈥屫� 乇禺 丿丕丿賳 賵 趩賵賳 賮蹖賱賲 賴爻鬲 賯丕亘賱 丿乇讴賴 讴賴 丕賳賯丿乇 蹖賴賵蹖蹖 爻乇 丕氐賱 賲胤賱亘 賲蹖乇賳.
賲賵乇丿 倬乇乇賳诏蹖 讴賴 亘賴 丕爻賲 毓賳賵丕賳 賲乇亘賵胤 賴爻鬲 賵 賲卮禺氐 賲蹖卮賴 丿乇 賮蹖賱賲 亘丕 鬲睾蹖蹖乇 賮丕丨卮 亘丕夭诏賵 卮丿賴. 蹖丕 氐丨賳賴鈥屰� 倬丕蹖丕賳蹖 賮蹖賱賲 賵 讴鬲丕亘 亘丕 賴賲 鬲賮丕賵鬲 丿丕乇賳 賵 丿乇 毓蹖賳 丨丕賱 賴乇 丿賵卮賵賳 毓丕賱蹖賳.
丿乇 讴賱 丿蹖丿賳卮 亘毓丿 丕夭 丕蹖賳讴賴 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 禺賵賳丿蹖賳 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 賲蹖卮賴 賵 丕诏乇 丕賵賱 賴賲 賮蹖賱賲 乇賵 丿蹖丿蹖賳貙 亘丿賵賳 卮讴 讴鬲丕亘 賴賲 丿乇 丕賵賱賵蹖鬲 賯乇丕乇 亘丿蹖賳 趩賵賳 禺蹖賱蹖 禺蹖賱蹖 賲丨卮乇鬲乇 賴爻鬲.
Hannibal (2013_2015)
蹖賴 丿賱蹖賱蹖 讴賴 賲賵噩亘丕鬲 讴蹖賮 讴乇丿賳賲 丿乇 胤賵賱 禺賵丕賳卮 卮丿 丕蹖賳 亘賵丿 讴賴 賯亘賱 丕夭 丕蹖賳讴賴 賲噩賲賵毓賴 乇賵 亘禺賵賳賲 爻乇蹖丕賱 乇賵 丿蹖丿賴 亘賵丿賲. 賵 賲賵賯毓蹖 讴賴 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗀� 亘賴 丕蹖賳 倬蹖 亘乇丿賲 趩賯丿乇 爻丕夭賳丿賴鈥屰� 爻乇蹖丕賱貙 讴鬲丕亘禺賵丕乇 賲丨卮乇蹖 賴爻鬲.
蹖毓賳蹖 蹖賴 噩賵乇蹖 爻丕禺鬲鬲卮 讴賴 亘诏蹖 亘乇 丕爻丕爻 讴鬲丕亘 丕賵賱 亘賵丿賴 丕賲丕 賳禺賵賳丿賴 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 亘诏賲 丿賵 噩賱丿 丌禺乇 賴賲 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗃� 鬲賵 爻乇蹖丕賱 亘亘蹖賳蹖. 賳賴 禺蹖賱蹖 鬲丕亘賱賵 亘賱讴賴 亘丕 乇诏賴鈥屬囏й� 乇蹖夭 賵 賴賵卮賲賳丿丕賳賴.
丿蹖丕賱賵诏鈥屬囏й� 讴鬲丕亘 蹖丕 亘毓囟蹖 丕夭 氐丨賳賴鈥屬囏� 鬲賵 爻乇蹖丕賱 亘賴 氐賵乇鬲 讴賲乇賳诏蹖 倬蹖丿丕 賲蹖卮賳 丕賲丕 胤賵乇蹖 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗃� 亘賮賴賲蹖卮 讴賴 賵丕賯毓丕 爻乇蹖丕賱禺賵丕乇 禺賵亘蹖 賴賲 亘丕卮蹖. 亘乇丕蹖丕賳 賮賵賱乇 亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 丕噩丕夭賴 賳丿丕卮鬲 丕夭 丕蹖賳 噩賱丿 鬲賵 爻丕禺鬲 爻乇蹖丕賱 亘賴乇賴 亘亘乇賴 丕賲丕 亘賴 胤乇夭 毓噩蹖亘蹖 亘毓囟蹖 丕夭 亘禺卮鈥屬囏� 乇賵 诏賳噩賵賳丿.
亘乇丕蹖 賴賲蹖賳 趩賵賳 禺蹖賱蹖 乇賵 丕蹖賳 讴丕乇 乇賵 丕賳噩丕賲 賳丿丕丿貙 鬲卮乇蹖丨 丕蹖賳 賲賵丕乇丿 乇賵 亘賴 亘蹖賳賳丿賴 賵 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 賲蹖鈥屫迟矩ж辟�. 賵賱蹖 丕夭 丕賵賳噩丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丌丿賲 丿賱鈥屫必呟� 賴爻鬲賲 亘丕蹖丿 亘诏賲 爻丕禺鬲丕乇卮讴賳蹖 賴乇蹖爻 賳賴 丕賵賳胤賵乇 讴賴 爻乇 賲丕噩乇丕賴丕 丕賵賲丿賴貙 亘賱讴賴 亘丕 乇賵卮 賲鬲賮丕賵鬲 爻丕夭賳丿賴鈥屰� 爻乇蹖丕賱 賴賲 亘賴 趩卮賲 賲蹖鈥屫堌辟�. 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬矩必ж槽屸€屬囏� 禺蹖賱蹖 卮亘丕賴鬲 丿丕乇賳 賵 丿乇 毓蹖賳 丨丕賱 丕夭 賳馗乇 馗丕賴乇蹖 賴賲 卮亘蹖賴 賳蹖爻鬲賳.
丿乇 讴賱 爻乇蹖丕賱 蹖賴 噩賵乇蹖 賴爻鬲 讴賴 丕賳诏丕乇 蹖讴蹖 賲噩賲賵毓賴 乇賵 亘賱毓蹖丿賴 亘丕卮賴 賵 賳讴丕鬲 賲丨卮乇卮 乇賵 亘丕 丕爻鬲賮丕丿賴 丕夭 匕賴賳蹖丕鬲 禺賵丿卮 鬲乇讴蹖亘 讴乇丿賴 亘丕卮賴 賵 丿乇 毓蹖賳 丨丕賱 讴賴 亘賴 賯賱賲 賴乇蹖爻 賵賮丕丿丕乇 賴爻鬲 趩蹖夭 賲鬲賮丕賵鬲蹖 賴賲 禺賱賯 讴乇丿賴. 亘賳丕亘乇丕蹖賳 賳賲蹖诏賲 賯亘賱 丕夭 讴鬲丕亘鈥屬囏� 蹖丕 亘毓丿 丕夭 讴鬲丕亘鈥屬囏� 亘亘蹖賳蹖賳卮. 趩賵賳 賮乇賯蹖 賳丿丕乇賴.
丿乇 丌禺乇 亘丕蹖丿 亘诏賲 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賲丨亘賵亘鈥屫臂屬� 讴鬲丕亘 丕賲爻丕賱賲 鬲丕 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賱丨馗賴 亘賵丿賴 賵 趩賯丿乇 禺賵卮丨丕賱賲 讴賴 丕蹖賳胤賵乇 倬蹖卮 亘乇丿賲卮 賵 賱匕鬲卮 乇賵 丿賵趩賳丿丕賳 讴乇丿賲. 賵 丨蹖賮 讴賴 丕賳賯丿乇 丿乇 亘蹖賳 禺賵丕賳賳丿诏丕賳 賮丕乇爻蹖鈥屫藏ㄘз� 賮丕乇爻蹖鈥屫堌з� 賲賴噩賵乇 賲賵賳丿賴. 亘丿賵賳 卮讴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 丕乇夭卮 丕蹖賳 乇賵 丿丕乇賴 讴賴 夭亘丕賳鬲賵賳 乇賵 鬲賯賵蹖鬲 讴賳蹖賳 賵 亘丕 噩丕丿賵蹖 讴賱賲丕鬲卮 賲爻丨賵乇 亘卮蹖賳.
倬.賳: 鬲丕 爻丕毓鬲鈥屬囏� 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 丕夭卮 亘诏賲 賵 丨乇賮丕賲 鬲賴 賳丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮賴 賵賱蹖 賯乇丕乇 賳蹖爻鬲 賲睾夭鬲賵賳 乇賵 賮毓賱丕 亘噩賵賲. 亘賴 賴賲蹖賳 乇蹖賵蹖賵蹖 亘蹖鈥屫ж迟举堐屬� 賯丕賳毓 亘丕卮蹖賳. 鬲讴禺賵乇蹖 賲毓賲賵賱丕 禺蹖賱蹖 讴蹖賮 賲蹖丿賴.
February 14, 2021
Much like the way Red Dragon opens to a scene with Will Graham, The Silence of the Lambs opens to Clarice Starling. It's a reminder that Will has left the life that tragically maimed him, both emotionally and physically, with memories that are tragic. Harris though, he never writes Clarice with the attempt to supplant Graham as our new hero. Like Will, she is our antihero of sorts. She is the unconventional, and therefore, very likable character. Human, as we are, with below the means family roots and upbringing. Using her past becomes her unexpected strength. That, and her uncanny ability to 鈥渟ee鈥� what others miss. And because she's a woman, she has the advantage of seeing what men simply can't. Only a few people seem to realize this: Jack Crawford and Hannibal Lecter being the main two, and the only major characters carried over from the story by Harris. Jack Crawford immediately feels like a father figure to Clarice, keeping his distance at the same time. And Hannibal...well, he feels like Hannibal. The dark father figure, if you will. Unbelievably smart. All that brain power used to play the game, slowly biding time, waiting for a mistake is made. Here in Silence, I got to know him better. Pieces of him are revealed, while he adeptly picks choice memories from Clarice's past. She plays the game too. Finding 鈥淏uffalo Bill鈥� will become more important for her than she can know.
I wouldn't have thought it possible to like Silence of the Lambs more than I had liked Red Dragon, but there it is. And I don't think I could find a real flaw in this story, even if I hunted for one.
I wouldn't have thought it possible to like Silence of the Lambs more than I had liked Red Dragon, but there it is. And I don't think I could find a real flaw in this story, even if I hunted for one.
May 3, 2022
Exceeded all my expectations. Loved it even though I knew exactly what was coming! 5 stars.
October 16, 2023
Now this was scary that gives you chills, makes you look over your shoulder, and leaves you high on adrenaline with that ending.
November 19, 2022
Wow! I loved this just as much as the first. I did miss Will though, as I thought I would. But Clarice is awesome too. I wont mention much. If possible, go in without knowing too much. There is a serial killer. Can Dr. Hannibal Lecter help them find him? Actually, will he? He can, but most likely wont. It's all a way for him to entertain himself. He certainly doesn't care about the victims, young women being killed and skinned then dumped in rivers. He seems willing to talk a little with Clarice Starling. It goes from there. Excellent and utterly absorbing.
I am finding these books absolutely gripping to read, and am going straight on to the next one. They are holding my attention completely, and I'm flying through them! This next one is a lot longer, and seems to be less popular, but I'm eager to find out my own opinion on it.
December 1, 2020
I read this book when I was in college. The movie came out a few years before and it was all everyone could talk about that year. I was on a summer youth trip and one of the chaperone's was reading this book and it was the first time I realized the movie was based on a book. Later that summer, I got this book and gave it a read.
It was probably scarier than the movie. Hannibal Lecter is simply so smart which means Thomas Harris had to be that smart to write him. It's a master work on terror and shock and the twist at the end is so good. I have seen the movie many times and that is mostly what sticks in my mind. I do remember reading this and getting more info on how twisted Buffalo Bill was from Hannibal.
If you are looking for a scary read, this is still one of the best books out there. The tension is all the way through.
It was probably scarier than the movie. Hannibal Lecter is simply so smart which means Thomas Harris had to be that smart to write him. It's a master work on terror and shock and the twist at the end is so good. I have seen the movie many times and that is mostly what sticks in my mind. I do remember reading this and getting more info on how twisted Buffalo Bill was from Hannibal.
If you are looking for a scary read, this is still one of the best books out there. The tension is all the way through.
April 13, 2025
袛芯褋褌邪 褏芯褉邪 褋械 褔褍写褟褌, 泻邪泻 写褉褍谐懈 锌褉械锌褉芯褔懈褌邪褌 泻薪懈谐懈, 褔械 懈 薪械 胁械写薪褗卸, 邪 锌芯 薪褟泻芯谢泻芯 锌褗褌懈.
袝褌芯, 褔械 锌褉懈 褌芯蟹懈 锌芯褉械写械薪 锌褉芯褔懈褌 薪邪 "袦褗谢褔邪薪懈械褌芯 薪邪 邪谐薪械褌邪褌邪" 褍褋褌邪薪芯胁懈褏 泻芯泄 械 锌褉芯褌芯褌懈锌邪 薪邪 褋械褉懈泄薪懈褟 褍斜懈械褑, 邪 懈屑械薪薪芯 袝写 袣械屑锌褗褉, 懈蟹胁械褋褌械薪 泻邪褌芯 "校斜懈械褑褗褌 薪邪 褋褌褍写械薪褌泻懈". 袝写 褋懈 械 卸懈胁 懈 蟹写褉邪胁 懈 写芯 写薪械褋 懈 械 胁褗写胁芯褉械薪 写芯卸懈胁芯褌 胁 锌褋懈褏懈邪褌褉懈褔薪邪 泻谢懈薪懈泻邪 - 蟹邪褌胁芯褉 胁 小袗些. 袟邪 薪械谐芯 薪邪褍褔懈褏 芯褌 锌芯锌褍谢褟褉薪懈褟 褋械褉懈邪谢 薪邪 袧械褌褎谢懈泻褋 "Mindhunter" - 谐芯褉械褖芯 谐芯 锌褉械锌芯褉褗褔胁邪屑.
袣薪懈谐邪褌邪 械 褔褍写械褋薪邪, 械写懈薪 薪邪锌褉械谐薪邪褌 谢芯胁 薪邪 褔褍写芯胁懈褖械, 锌褉械屑懈薪邪谢芯 胁褋褟泻邪泻胁懈 谐褉邪薪懈褑懈.
袚谢邪胁薪邪褌邪 谐械褉芯懈薪褟, 胁褋械 芯褖械 芯斜褍褔邪胁邪褖邪褌邪 褋械 胁 褕泻芯谢邪褌邪 薪邪 肖袘袪 袣谢邪褉懈褋 小褌邪褉谢懈薪谐 懈屑邪 锌芯褋褌邪胁械薪邪 褋褌褉邪褏芯胁懈褌邪 蟹邪写邪褔邪 - 写邪 褋械 芯锌懈褌邪 写邪 屑邪薪懈锌褍谢懈褉邪 懈 写邪 薪邪泻邪褉邪 写邪 褋褗写械泄褋褌胁邪 薪邪 褉邪蟹褋谢械写胁邪薪械褌芯 褋邪屑懈褟 写-褉 袥械泻褌褗褉, 蟹邪褌胁芯褉械薪 写芯 卸懈胁芯褌 胁 蟹邪褌胁芯褉 - 锌褋懈褏懈邪褌褉懈褟! 袠 泻芯泄褌芯, 薪邪泄-芯斜懈褔邪 懈谐褉邪褌邪 薪邪 泻芯褌泻邪 懈 屑懈褕泻邪. 袗斜褋芯谢褞褌薪芯 斜械蟹锌芯褖邪写械薪!
袝褋褌械褋褌胁械薪芯, 褎懈谢屑褗褌 蟹邪褋械薪褔胁邪 泻薪懈谐邪褌邪, 懈谐褉邪褌邪 薪邪 肖芯褋褌褗褉 懈 啸芯锌泻懈薪褋 械 锌褉械胁褗蟹褏芯写薪邪 懈 褌芯泄 褋械 械 锌褉械胁褗褉薪邪谢 胁 屑芯写械褉薪邪 泻谢邪褋懈泻邪.
笑懈褌邪褌:
"袣芯谐邪褌芯 谢懈褋褍谐械褉褗褌 褔褍械 蟹邪械泻 写邪 锌懈褖懈, 锌褉懈褋褌懈谐邪 褌懈褔邪泄泻懈, 薪芯 薪械 蟹邪 写邪 锌芯屑芯谐薪械."
P.S. 袟邪 褋褗卸邪谢械薪懈械 懈 褌褍泻 锌褉械胁芯写褗褌 写芯褋褌邪 泻褍褑邪.
袝褌芯, 褔械 锌褉懈 褌芯蟹懈 锌芯褉械写械薪 锌褉芯褔懈褌 薪邪 "袦褗谢褔邪薪懈械褌芯 薪邪 邪谐薪械褌邪褌邪" 褍褋褌邪薪芯胁懈褏 泻芯泄 械 锌褉芯褌芯褌懈锌邪 薪邪 褋械褉懈泄薪懈褟 褍斜懈械褑, 邪 懈屑械薪薪芯 袝写 袣械屑锌褗褉, 懈蟹胁械褋褌械薪 泻邪褌芯 "校斜懈械褑褗褌 薪邪 褋褌褍写械薪褌泻懈". 袝写 褋懈 械 卸懈胁 懈 蟹写褉邪胁 懈 写芯 写薪械褋 懈 械 胁褗写胁芯褉械薪 写芯卸懈胁芯褌 胁 锌褋懈褏懈邪褌褉懈褔薪邪 泻谢懈薪懈泻邪 - 蟹邪褌胁芯褉 胁 小袗些. 袟邪 薪械谐芯 薪邪褍褔懈褏 芯褌 锌芯锌褍谢褟褉薪懈褟 褋械褉懈邪谢 薪邪 袧械褌褎谢懈泻褋 "Mindhunter" - 谐芯褉械褖芯 谐芯 锌褉械锌芯褉褗褔胁邪屑.
袣薪懈谐邪褌邪 械 褔褍写械褋薪邪, 械写懈薪 薪邪锌褉械谐薪邪褌 谢芯胁 薪邪 褔褍写芯胁懈褖械, 锌褉械屑懈薪邪谢芯 胁褋褟泻邪泻胁懈 谐褉邪薪懈褑懈.
袚谢邪胁薪邪褌邪 谐械褉芯懈薪褟, 胁褋械 芯褖械 芯斜褍褔邪胁邪褖邪褌邪 褋械 胁 褕泻芯谢邪褌邪 薪邪 肖袘袪 袣谢邪褉懈褋 小褌邪褉谢懈薪谐 懈屑邪 锌芯褋褌邪胁械薪邪 褋褌褉邪褏芯胁懈褌邪 蟹邪写邪褔邪 - 写邪 褋械 芯锌懈褌邪 写邪 屑邪薪懈锌褍谢懈褉邪 懈 写邪 薪邪泻邪褉邪 写邪 褋褗写械泄褋褌胁邪 薪邪 褉邪蟹褋谢械写胁邪薪械褌芯 褋邪屑懈褟 写-褉 袥械泻褌褗褉, 蟹邪褌胁芯褉械薪 写芯 卸懈胁芯褌 胁 蟹邪褌胁芯褉 - 锌褋懈褏懈邪褌褉懈褟! 袠 泻芯泄褌芯, 薪邪泄-芯斜懈褔邪 懈谐褉邪褌邪 薪邪 泻芯褌泻邪 懈 屑懈褕泻邪. 袗斜褋芯谢褞褌薪芯 斜械蟹锌芯褖邪写械薪!
袝褋褌械褋褌胁械薪芯, 褎懈谢屑褗褌 蟹邪褋械薪褔胁邪 泻薪懈谐邪褌邪, 懈谐褉邪褌邪 薪邪 肖芯褋褌褗褉 懈 啸芯锌泻懈薪褋 械 锌褉械胁褗蟹褏芯写薪邪 懈 褌芯泄 褋械 械 锌褉械胁褗褉薪邪谢 胁 屑芯写械褉薪邪 泻谢邪褋懈泻邪.
笑懈褌邪褌:
"袣芯谐邪褌芯 谢懈褋褍谐械褉褗褌 褔褍械 蟹邪械泻 写邪 锌懈褖懈, 锌褉懈褋褌懈谐邪 褌懈褔邪泄泻懈, 薪芯 薪械 蟹邪 写邪 锌芯屑芯谐薪械."
P.S. 袟邪 褋褗卸邪谢械薪懈械 懈 褌褍泻 锌褉械胁芯写褗褌 写芯褋褌邪 泻褍褑邪.
August 29, 2022
賲鬲賳 夭蹖乇 乇賵 丕夭 讴倬卮賳 蹖賴 倬爻鬲 丕蹖賳爻鬲丕诏乇丕賲 讴倬蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 讴賴 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 丕賴賲蹖鬲 卮禺氐蹖鬲 讴賱丕乇蹖爻 丕爻鬲丕乇賱蹖賳诏 賵 趩乇丕 丕蹖賳 卮禺氐蹖鬲 丕蹖賳賯丿乇 賲賴賲賴
禺賵丕爻鬲賲 禺賵丿賲 亘賳賵蹖爻賲 賵賱蹖 丿蹖丿賲 丕蹖賳 賲鬲賳 賴賲賴鈥屰� 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丿賵爻 丿丕乇賲 亘诏賲 乇賵 禺蹖賱蹖 亘賴鬲乇 亘蹖丕賳 讴乇丿賴
诏乇趩賴 亘乇丕蹖 賮蹖賱賲 賳賵卮鬲賴 卮丿賴 賵賱蹖 趩賳丿丕賳 丕賴賲蹖鬲蹖 賳丿丕乇賴
賮蹖賱賲 賵 讴鬲丕亘 賴乇 丿賵 丕蹖賳 賲賵囟賵毓 乇賵 亘賴 禺賵亘蹖 亘蹖丕賳 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 賵賱蹖 賮讴乇 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 鬲賵蹖 賮蹖賱賲 讴賲蹖 亘賴鬲乇 丕夭 讴丕乇 丿乇 丕賵賲丿賴
丿乇 讴賱 賮蹖賱賲 亘賴 丕賳丿丕夭賴鈥屰� 讴丕賮蹖 毓丕賱蹖 賴爻鬲 讴賴 賳蹖丕夭 賳亘丕卮賴 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘禺賵賳蹖丿貙 賮賯胤 賲賯丿丕乇蹖 丕夭 噩夭卅蹖丕鬲 丿乇 噩賴鬲 爻乇毓鬲 丿丕丿賳 亘賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 鬲睾蹖蹖乇 讴乇丿賴 蹖丕 丨匕賮 卮丿賴. 禺氐賵氐丕賸 丕诏賴 賯乇丕乇 亘丕卮賴 賴夭蹖賳賴 讴賳蹖丿 賵 爻乇丕睾 丕蹖賳 鬲乇噩賲賴 亘乇蹖丿 讴賴 賲賳 丕氐賱丕賸 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 賳賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�
亘賴 賳馗乇賲 蹖丕 亘賴 賮蹖賱賲 亘爻賳丿賴 讴賳蹖丿 蹖丕 賳爻禺賴 丕氐賱蹖 亘禺賵賳蹖丿
------------
丕蹖賳賲 趩賳丿鬲丕 丌乇鬲 丕夭 爻讴賵鬲 亘乇賴鈥屬囏�
禺賵丕爻鬲賲 禺賵丿賲 亘賳賵蹖爻賲 賵賱蹖 丿蹖丿賲 丕蹖賳 賲鬲賳 賴賲賴鈥屰� 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丿賵爻 丿丕乇賲 亘诏賲 乇賵 禺蹖賱蹖 亘賴鬲乇 亘蹖丕賳 讴乇丿賴
诏乇趩賴 亘乇丕蹖 賮蹖賱賲 賳賵卮鬲賴 卮丿賴 賵賱蹖 趩賳丿丕賳 丕賴賲蹖鬲蹖 賳丿丕乇賴
丿蹖丿诏丕賴 賮賲賳蹖爻鬲蹖 賲丕賳丿诏丕乇 賮蹖賱賲 爻讴賵鬲 亘乇賴鈥屬囏�
趩乇丕 讴賱丕乇蹖爻 丕賽爻鬲乇賱蹖賳诏 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 賲賴賲鈥屫臂屬� 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏й� 夭賳 丿乇 鬲丕乇蹖禺 爻蹖賳賲丕 丕爻鬲責
丕诏乇 丕賵 (亘蹖賱) 丕賵賳 丿禺鬲乇 乇賵 亘賴 趩卮賲 蹖讴 賮乇丿 亘亘蹖賳賴貙 賳賴 蹖讴 卮蹖貙 丌爻蹖亘 乇爻賵賳丿賳 亘賴 丕賵賳 丿禺鬲乇 亘乇丕卮 爻禺鬲鈥屫� 賲蹖鈥屫促�
噩賲賱賴鈥屰� 亘丕賱丕 鬲賵爻胤 讴賱丕乇蹖爻 丕爻鬲乇賱蹖賳诏 诏賮鬲賴 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 讴丕乇丕讴鬲乇 丕賮爻丕賳賴鈥屫й� 讴賴 噩賵丿蹖 賮丕爻鬲乇 丿乇 賮蹖賱賲 讴賱丕爻蹖讴 跇丕賳乇 賵丨卮鬲 芦爻讴賵鬲 亘乇賴鈥屬囏� 亘賴 丌賳 噩丕賳 亘禺卮蹖丿賴 丕爻鬲. 賯胤毓丕 丿蹖丕賱賵诏蹖 讴賴 丿乇 亘丕賱丕 匕讴乇 卮丿貙 亘賴 蹖丕丿 賲丕賳丿賳蹖鈥屫臂屬� 賳賯賱鈥屬傎堎� 丿乇 賮蹖賱賲 賳蹖爻鬲 丕賲丕 丌賳 賳賯賱鈥屬傎堎� 丕夭 讴賱丕乇蹖爻 亘賴 賯賱亘賽 趩蹖夭蹖 丿乇 賲乇讴夭 乇賵丕蹖鬲 賮蹖賱賲 丕卮丕乇賴 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�: 丕賴賲蹖鬲 賲卮丕乇讴鬲賽 夭賳丕賳賴
丿蹖丕賱賵诏蹖 讴賴 丿乇 丕亘鬲丿丕蹖 賳賵卮鬲賴 禺賵丕賳丿蹖丿 丕夭 丌賳 噩賴鬲 賲賴賲 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丿乇 賮蹖賱賲 讴賱丕乇蹖爻 丿乇 丌賳 丿蹖丕賱賵诏 亘賴 亘賵賮丕賱賵 亘蹖賱 丕乇噩丕毓 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 丌賳 丿蹖丕賱賵诏 亘賴 丕蹖丿賴鈥屰� 讴賱蹖賽 賳賴賮鬲賴 丿乇 賮蹖賱賲 讴賴 賴賲丕賳丕 囟丿蹖鬲 亘丕 禺蹖乇诏蹖 賲乇丿丕賳賴 丕爻鬲 丕卮丕乇賴 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�
亘乇丕蹖 鬲賵囟蹖丨 亘蹖卮鬲乇貙 禺蹖乇诏蹖賽 賲乇丿丕賳賴 丕亘鬲丿丕 鬲賵爻胤 賲賳鬲賯丿 賮蹖賱賲賽 賮賲賳蹖爻鬲貙禺丕賳賲 賱賵乇丕 賲丕賱賵賽蹖 丿乇 賲賯丕賱賴鈥屰� 鬲丕孬蹖乇鈥屭柏ж必� 亘賴 賳丕賲 芦賱匕鬲 亘氐乇蹖 賵 爻蹖賳賲丕蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖禄 賲胤乇丨 卮丿. 賮乇囟 禺丕賳賲 賲丕賱賵賽蹖 亘乇 丌賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丿乇 蹖讴 噩丕賲毓賴鈥屰� 倬丿乇爻丕賱丕乇貙 賮蹖賱賲鈥屬囏� 賳蹖夭 賮蹖鈥屬嗁佖迟� 賴賲丕賳 賳诏丕賴 爻賱胤賴鈥屫堐屫з嗁� 賲乇丿丕賳賴 乇丕 亘丕夭鬲丕亘 賲蹖鈥屫囐嗀� 趩賴 亘賴 氐賵乇鬲 賳丕禺賵丿丌诏丕賴 蹖丕 趩賴 亘賴 氐賵乇鬲 賵丕囟丨 賵 丌卮讴丕乇. 賲丕賱賵賽蹖 賲蹖鈥屭堐屫� 爻蹖賳賲丕 亘蹖賳賳丿賴 乇丕 亘賴 爻賲鬲蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┴簇з嗀� 讴賴 丿蹖丿诏丕賴 賲乇丿丕賳 賴鬲乇賵爻讴卮賵丕賱 乇丕 亘乇丕蹖 禺賵丿 亘乇诏夭蹖賳賳丿 丿乇 賳鬲蹖噩賴 [爻蹖賳賲丕] 夭賳丕賳 乇丕 亘乇 乇賵蹖 倬乇丿賴 亘賴 卮蹖 鬲賯賱蹖賱 賲蹖鈥屫囏�. 亘賴 讴丕乇诏蹖乇蹖 趩賳蹖賳 丿蹖丿诏丕賴蹖貙 賲丕賳毓 卮讴賱鈥屭屫臂� 卮禺氐蹖鬲賽 讴丕乇丕讴鬲乇鈥屬囏й� 夭賳 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賵 亘賴 噩丕蹖鈥屫ж� 丌賳賴丕 乇丕 亘賴 賲丕賳賳丿 丕卮蹖丕蹖蹖 亘賴 賯氐丿 賱匕鬲 亘蹖賳賳丿賴 毓乇囟賴 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�. 亘賴 亘蹖丕賳蹖 丿蹖诏乇貙 賲丕賱賵賽蹖 賲蹖鈥屭堐屫� 讴賴 賮蹖賱賲 亘賴 賲孬丕亘賴 賮乇賲蹖 丕夭 丕爻讴賵倬賮蹖賱蹖丕 毓賲賱 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 讴賴 亘賴 賲毓賳蹖 賱匕鬲 亘乇丿賳 丕夭 胤乇蹖賯 賳诏丕賴 讴乇丿賳 丕爻鬲. 爻蹖賳賲丕 卮讴賱蹖 丕夭 丿蹖丿賳鈥� 夭丿賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丿乇 丌賳 亘蹖賳賳丿賴 賱匕鬲蹖 乇丕 丕夭 胤乇蹖賯 丿乇 丕禺鬲蹖丕乇 丿丕卮鬲賳 賯丿乇鬲 禺蹖乇诏蹖鈥屫й� 讴賴 夭賳丕賳 乇丕 亘賴 卮蹖 鬲賯賱蹖賱 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 丿乇蹖丕賮鬲 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�. 賯胤毓丕 丕蹖賳 賳馗乇蹖賴 乇丕 賳賲蹖鈥屫堌з� 亘賴 鬲賲丕賲蹖 賮蹖賱賲鈥屬囏� 賳爻亘鬲 丿丕丿貙 丕賲丕 丿乇 氐賳毓鬲蹖 讴賴 丕讴孬乇 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 賵 讴丕乇诏乇丿丕賳丕賳卮 乇丕 賲乇丿丕賳 鬲卮讴蹖賱 賲蹖鈥屫囐嗀� 倬蹖丿丕 讴乇丿賳 卮丕賴丿 賲孬丕賱蹖 亘乇丕蹖 賳馗乇蹖賴鈥屰� 禺丕賳賲 賲丕賱賵賽蹖 讴丕乇 趩賳丿丕賳 爻禺鬲蹖 賳蹖爻鬲
亘賴 賳馗乇賽 讴賱丕乇蹖爻貙 亘乇丕蹖 賯丕鬲賱蹖 賳馗蹖乇 亘賵賮丕賱賵 亘蹖賱貙 鬲氐賵乇 夭賳 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 蹖讴 賮乇丿 賵 賳賴 亘賴 爻丕丿诏蹖 蹖讴 卮蹖貙 丕爻鬲賮丕丿賴 賵 丿夭丿蹖丿賳 夭賳丕賳 乇丕 亘乇丕蹖 亘蹖賱 爻禺鬲鈥屫� 賵 倬蹖趩蹖丿賴鈥屫� 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�.賴賲蹖賳 丿蹖丿诏丕賴 賳蹖夭 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 賮蹖賱賲 丕夭 賲賳馗乇 賴賳乇蹖 賵 亘丕 鬲锟斤拷噩賴 亘賴 賳馗乇蹖賴鈥屰� 賲丕賱賵賽蹖 氐丕丿賯 丕爻鬲.亘丕 卮蹖鈥屫з嗂ж臂� 夭賳丕賳 丿乇 賮蹖賱賲 亘乇丕蹖 賱匕鬲 亘氐乇蹖貙賲丕 賴賵蹖鬲鈥屫簇з� 乇丕 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 蹖讴 丕賳爻丕賳 爻賱亘 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗃屬�. 芦爻讴賵鬲 亘乇賴鈥屬囏� 賳賲賵賳賴鈥屫й� 丕夭 蹖讴 賮蹖賱賲 賳丕丿乇 丕爻鬲 讴賴 禺蹖乇诏蹖賽 賲乇丿丕賳賴 乇丕 亘賴 夭蹖乇 賲蹖鈥屭┴簇�
讴丕乇诏乇丿丕賳 賮蹖賱賲 賲丕 乇丕 賵丕 賲蹖鈥屫ж必� 鬲丕 讴賱丕乇蹖爻 賵 鬲賲丕賲 夭賳丕賳 乇丕 亘丕 丿蹖丿蹖 賮乇丕禺鈥屫� 亘亘蹖賳蹖賲貙 賴賲丕賳鈥屫焚堌� 讴賴 丿蹖丕賱賵诏 賳賯賱鈥屬傎堎� 卮丿賴 丿乇 丕亘鬲丿丕蹖 賳賵卮鬲賴 亘蹖丕賳 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 亘賴 賲孬丕亘賴 丕賳爻丕賳 賵 賳賴 賮賯胤 蹖讴 卮蹖
丿乇 乇丿 禺蹖乇诏蹖 賲乇丿丕賳賴貙 丿賽賲蹖 (讴丕乇诏乇丿丕賳) 賵 噩賵丿蹖 賮丕爻鬲乇 丕蹖賳 鬲賵丕賳丕蹖蹖 乇丕 丿丕乇賳丿 鬲丕 丕夭 讴賱丕乇蹖爻 蹖讴 卮禺氐蹖鬲 毓賲蹖賯賽 亘丕賵乇倬匕蹖乇 賵 倬禺鬲賴 亘爻丕夭賳丿. 讴賱丕乇蹖爻 賮乇丿 丿賵爻鬲鈥屫ж簇嗃� 賵 趩賳丿鈥屬勜й屬� 丕爻鬲 賳賴 氐乇賮丕 蹖讴 卮蹖. 亘乇丕蹖 倬丕爻禺 亘賴 倬乇爻卮 賴丕賳蹖亘丕賱貙 賲胤賲卅賳丕賸貙 讴賱丕乇蹖爻 賳蹖夭 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗀� 賴賲丕賳賳丿 鬲賲丕賲 夭賳丕賳 丿蹖诏乇貙 丨乇讴鬲 趩卮賲丕賳 胤賲丕毓 乇丕 亘乇 乇賵蹖 亘丿賳卮 丨爻 讴賳丿. 賳讴鬲賴 賲賴賲 丕蹖賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賮蹖賱賲 亘蹖賳賳丿賴 乇丕 賵丕 賲蹖鈥屫ж必� 鬲丕 丌賳 鬲噩乇亘賴鈥屰� 賲賵乇丿 丿蹖丿 夭丿賴 卮丿賳 乇丕 鬲噩乇亘賴 讴賳丿 亘賴 噩丕蹖 丌賳讴賴 禺賵丿卮 賳蹖夭 丿乇 毓賲賱賽 丿蹖丿賳鈥� 夭丿賳 賲卮丕乇讴鬲 讴賳丿. 氐丨賳賴鈥屬囏й� 亘爻蹖丕乇蹖 丿乇 賮蹖賱賲 賵噩賵丿 丿丕乇丿 讴賴 丌賳 丨爻 賲卮賴賵丿 賳丕禺卮賳賵丿蹖 乇丕 讴賴 夭賳丕賳 丿乇 卮乇丕蹖胤 禺丕氐蹖 丨爻 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 乇丕 亘賴 禺賵亘蹖 賳卮丕賳 賲蹖鈥屫囏�
賮蹖賱賲 賵 讴鬲丕亘 賴乇 丿賵 丕蹖賳 賲賵囟賵毓 乇賵 亘賴 禺賵亘蹖 亘蹖丕賳 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 賵賱蹖 賮讴乇 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 鬲賵蹖 賮蹖賱賲 讴賲蹖 亘賴鬲乇 丕夭 讴丕乇 丿乇 丕賵賲丿賴
丿乇 讴賱 賮蹖賱賲 亘賴 丕賳丿丕夭賴鈥屰� 讴丕賮蹖 毓丕賱蹖 賴爻鬲 讴賴 賳蹖丕夭 賳亘丕卮賴 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘禺賵賳蹖丿貙 賮賯胤 賲賯丿丕乇蹖 丕夭 噩夭卅蹖丕鬲 丿乇 噩賴鬲 爻乇毓鬲 丿丕丿賳 亘賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 鬲睾蹖蹖乇 讴乇丿賴 蹖丕 丨匕賮 卮丿賴. 禺氐賵氐丕賸 丕诏賴 賯乇丕乇 亘丕卮賴 賴夭蹖賳賴 讴賳蹖丿 賵 爻乇丕睾 丕蹖賳 鬲乇噩賲賴 亘乇蹖丿 讴賴 賲賳 丕氐賱丕賸 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 賳賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�
亘賴 賳馗乇賲 蹖丕 亘賴 賮蹖賱賲 亘爻賳丿賴 讴賳蹖丿 蹖丕 賳爻禺賴 丕氐賱蹖 亘禺賵賳蹖丿
------------
丕蹖賳賲 趩賳丿鬲丕 丌乇鬲 丕夭 爻讴賵鬲 亘乇賴鈥屬囏�
December 28, 2008
I'm assuming this book was once shocking and groundbreaking. And okay, yes, eww with the eating people and the skinning. But also? Shut the fuck up, Thomas Harris. There are few things more obnoxious than a male author with a hard-on for his female protagonist. Worth reading for Hannibal the Cannibal, because I dig that abnormal psychology stuff, but did I mention the objectification? The sexism? The way the reader is never allowed to forget
about gender? How every male she meets falls for the heroin? Yeah, as it turns out, the unnamed and hovering Harris narrator is by far the most hateful and creepy personality around, and that's including the aforementioned cannibal.
about gender? How every male she meets falls for the heroin? Yeah, as it turns out, the unnamed and hovering Harris narrator is by far the most hateful and creepy personality around, and that's including the aforementioned cannibal.
February 7, 2024
A Clarice Starling, joven y ambiciosa estudiante de la academia del FBI, le recomiendan que entreviste a Hannibal Lecter, brillantepsiquiatra y despiadado asesino, para conseguir su colaboraci贸n en la resoluci贸n de un caso de asesinatos en serie. El asombroso conocimiento de Lecter del comportamiento humano y su poderosa pe rsonalidad cautivar谩n de inmediato a Clarice, quien, incapaz de dominarse, establecer谩 con 茅l una ambigua, inquietante y peligrosa relaci贸n..
"Memoria, agente Starling, es lo que tengo en lugar de una vista"
He visto la pel铆cula innumerables veces y he gozado del libro. Sobretodo poni茅ndoles cara y voces. Anthony hizo un papel extraordinario.
"Ya veo. Yo mismo no puedo. Usas la crema para la piel Evyan, ya veces usas L'Air du Temps, pero no hoy"
El libro de Thomas Harris est谩 muy bien hecho y planteado. Cuenta con m谩s detalles sobre el asesino en serie, Buffalo Bill y las mujeres que mat贸. El caso es m谩s detallado, los personajes estaban m谩s desarrollados y los momentos de Anibal Lecter causan verdadero impacto.
Hay tantas citas soberbias de este libro y de la pel铆cula.
鈥淯na vez, un empadronador intent贸 ponerme a prueba. Me com铆 su h铆gado con frijoles y un buen Chianti.鈥�
El personaje de Clarice me sorprendi贸. Es m谩s directa y atrevida que la versi贸n de Jodie con gran personaje que interpret贸 enla pel铆cula. Por otra parte no se ve lo que piensa Buffalo Bill o Hannibal Lecter y lo hace m谩s sombr铆o.
Lo mejor sin duda es el Dr. Hannibal Lecter, un monstruo, s谩dico, inteligente y que asusta a la propia muerte. Un personajes convertido en una leyenda.
Adem谩s de la gran caracterizaci贸n y trama el procedimiento policial y las investigaciones est谩n muy bien. Adem谩s de haber sido escrito en la 茅poca que fue es un libro que sin duda ha influido asentando ciertas bases en el g茅nero..鉁嶏笍馃帺
"No tengo planes de visitarte, Clarice. El mundo es m谩s interesante contigo en 茅l"
"Memoria, agente Starling, es lo que tengo en lugar de una vista"
He visto la pel铆cula innumerables veces y he gozado del libro. Sobretodo poni茅ndoles cara y voces. Anthony hizo un papel extraordinario.
"Ya veo. Yo mismo no puedo. Usas la crema para la piel Evyan, ya veces usas L'Air du Temps, pero no hoy"
El libro de Thomas Harris est谩 muy bien hecho y planteado. Cuenta con m谩s detalles sobre el asesino en serie, Buffalo Bill y las mujeres que mat贸. El caso es m谩s detallado, los personajes estaban m谩s desarrollados y los momentos de Anibal Lecter causan verdadero impacto.
Hay tantas citas soberbias de este libro y de la pel铆cula.
鈥淯na vez, un empadronador intent贸 ponerme a prueba. Me com铆 su h铆gado con frijoles y un buen Chianti.鈥�
El personaje de Clarice me sorprendi贸. Es m谩s directa y atrevida que la versi贸n de Jodie con gran personaje que interpret贸 enla pel铆cula. Por otra parte no se ve lo que piensa Buffalo Bill o Hannibal Lecter y lo hace m谩s sombr铆o.
Lo mejor sin duda es el Dr. Hannibal Lecter, un monstruo, s谩dico, inteligente y que asusta a la propia muerte. Un personajes convertido en una leyenda.
Adem谩s de la gran caracterizaci贸n y trama el procedimiento policial y las investigaciones est谩n muy bien. Adem谩s de haber sido escrito en la 茅poca que fue es un libro que sin duda ha influido asentando ciertas bases en el g茅nero..鉁嶏笍馃帺
"No tengo planes de visitarte, Clarice. El mundo es m谩s interesante contigo en 茅l"
November 30, 2023
Vegetarian friendly. Zero lambs are eaten during the course of this book. Only humans. 5 starts.
August 8, 2022
Not many books to movie adaptations do justice, but this is definitely how you go about it.Love the slow build up of characters and although saw movie first. I am just going slow as I marvel at a well-written book.When a book asks you to take your time, you are absolutely thrilled. Not many books can command that kind of respect.The book is daring me to read another book, it quite confident that I will come back and remember it!!!
Alright so I finished the thriller and it just made me so happy.Now I am a tough cookie when it comes to movie adaptions and so many have failed either bookwise or as a movie.You have to give credit to the author for creating a villain you actually rooting for
Hannibal Lector is half beauty(Intelligence, civility, his cussing doesn't irk you) and half beast(Cannibalistic in nature, psychopath).Clarisse
Starling is strong female character yet Hannibal plays with her emotions and compliments him.
I did not want to give any spoilers, rather you enjoy the thriller for yourself.But what makes a really good book-Well if it has the ability to make the movie in your head right!!So the book is asking me to rather than stay happy with the book.Who in your opinion can match this amazing individual?Well someone who can take him on an emotional ride.Well, none other than Sherlock Holmes.
Now some people might disagree with me, but I will state my points.Sherlock(Loves a challenge, takes his opponent head on, not emotionally
involved, mostly solves crimes and has a keen eye for detail).So an author who creates on these two characters would have a tough task.Both are strong characters in their respective fields of expertise!!!
Alright so I finished the thriller and it just made me so happy.Now I am a tough cookie when it comes to movie adaptions and so many have failed either bookwise or as a movie.You have to give credit to the author for creating a villain you actually rooting for
Hannibal Lector is half beauty(Intelligence, civility, his cussing doesn't irk you) and half beast(Cannibalistic in nature, psychopath).Clarisse
Starling is strong female character yet Hannibal plays with her emotions and compliments him.
I did not want to give any spoilers, rather you enjoy the thriller for yourself.But what makes a really good book-Well if it has the ability to make the movie in your head right!!So the book is asking me to rather than stay happy with the book.Who in your opinion can match this amazing individual?Well someone who can take him on an emotional ride.Well, none other than Sherlock Holmes.
Now some people might disagree with me, but I will state my points.Sherlock(Loves a challenge, takes his opponent head on, not emotionally
involved, mostly solves crimes and has a keen eye for detail).So an author who creates on these two characters would have a tough task.Both are strong characters in their respective fields of expertise!!!
September 20, 2018
Unquestionably one of the best books ever written in the thriller genre. I'd call this required reading for anyone who enjoys, or wishes to write, popular fiction. I'm incredibly hesitant to call anything contemporary a "modern day masterpiece", but there are a handful of exceptions, and this offering from Thomas Harris is undoubtedly one of them.
'The Silence Of The Lambs' is one of the novels I teach in my 鈥榃riting Popular Fiction鈥� course at the University of Toronto, and for good reason: Well written, great plotting/pacing, fantastic complex characters, in-depth research, and excellent dialogue. Clarice Starling is one hell of a protagonist, and Hannibal Lecter is one of the greatest fictional villains in the history of literature (not to mention his pages run parallel to serial killer Buffalo Bill, yet another high-ranking antagonist in the catalogue of men who have become monsters).
Harris' writing hits you in the heart, spears you in the gut, and raises the hairs on the back of your neck all too often. The insatiable hunger of human predators goes several shades darker in this masterpiece, pushing the envelope at all four corners until they tear. There is so much to experience, digest, and unpack in this novel that it is worth reading more than once. Personally, I've read it about half a dozen times. For an extra treat, listen to the audiobook narrated by none other than the great Kathy Bates. Her rendition of Hannibal The Cannibal will chill your blood.
'The Silence Of The Lambs' is one of the novels I teach in my 鈥榃riting Popular Fiction鈥� course at the University of Toronto, and for good reason: Well written, great plotting/pacing, fantastic complex characters, in-depth research, and excellent dialogue. Clarice Starling is one hell of a protagonist, and Hannibal Lecter is one of the greatest fictional villains in the history of literature (not to mention his pages run parallel to serial killer Buffalo Bill, yet another high-ranking antagonist in the catalogue of men who have become monsters).
Harris' writing hits you in the heart, spears you in the gut, and raises the hairs on the back of your neck all too often. The insatiable hunger of human predators goes several shades darker in this masterpiece, pushing the envelope at all four corners until they tear. There is so much to experience, digest, and unpack in this novel that it is worth reading more than once. Personally, I've read it about half a dozen times. For an extra treat, listen to the audiobook narrated by none other than the great Kathy Bates. Her rendition of Hannibal The Cannibal will chill your blood.
April 20, 2021
Maravilloso libro que no puedes soltar en cuanto lo empiezas. Clarice Starling se va a quedar conmigo como uno de mis personajes favoritos (y su amiga Ardelia tambi茅n es genial). Poco puedo decir que otros no hayan dicho ya sobre esta historia que ha marcado un hito en la cultura popular y en la literatura sobre asesinos. Me gusta que Harris hace un esfuerzo por mostrarnos los retos a los que Starling se enfrenta por ser una mujer desempe帽谩ndose en un cuerpo policiaco tradicionalmente machista. Me pregunto si esto es un esfuerzo consciente despu茅s de que en Drag贸n Rojo no hay realmente personajes femeninos. Por otro lado, ten铆a miedo de encontrarme con un retrato transf贸bico en esta historia escrita en 1988, pero Harris se asegura de incluir a un personaje que hace 茅nfasis en decir que no puede, ni debe estigmatizarse a las personas trans por las acciones de un individuo (no puedo adentrarme mucho en esto porque ser铆a spoiler).
Tiene dos escenas aterradoras en mi opini贸n: la bodega y el descubrimiento en la tina. Puntos extra de pesadilla porque destesto a los insectos y pensar en esas polillas me hizo alucinar que las ve铆a en todos lados.
Tiene dos escenas aterradoras en mi opini贸n: la bodega y el descubrimiento en la tina. Puntos extra de pesadilla porque destesto a los insectos y pensar en esas polillas me hizo alucinar que las ve铆a en todos lados.
January 5, 2019
There鈥檚 a very good reason that this is the Hannibal Lecter novel that put Thomas Harris on the map. Red Dragon was good. The Silence of the Lambs is better. Harris takes everything he did well in the previous novel and fine-tunes it 鈥� we have a better killer, a more dramatic race against time, a more compelling protagonist, and of course, much more time with dear Dr. Lecter, who finally gets to take center stage after being little more than a cameo in Red Dragon. Unlike Francis Dolarhryde, Thomas Harris is not particularly concerned with the tragic backstory of Buffalo Bill, or interested in exploring his motivations. We get satisfying answers to both of those questions, of course, but this is not a book about Buffalo Bill. This is a story about Clarice Starling, and the dangerous quasi-partnership she cultivates with a serial killer in order to catch another serial killer.
It鈥檚 also, brilliantly, a revealing look at how much of a daily struggle it is to be a woman in a male-dominated field. There鈥檚 a great moment early in the movie adaptation of The Silence of the Lambs where Starling gets into an elevator filled with her fellow FBI trainees, and we see Jodie Foster in a tight space surrounded by men who are all at least six inches taller than her. It鈥檚 a brief shot, and isn鈥檛 over-emphasized, but it tells us everything we need to know about what Starling鈥檚 daily routine is like. And the best part is that we don鈥檛 even get any obvious scenes of outright gender discrimination 鈥� just constant little things, in every single interaction Starling has with other characters. (Starling can鈥檛 escape even when she鈥檚 performing everyday, unexciting tasks 鈥� an errand to the Smithsonian ends with one of the scientists asking her out, and what鈥檚 especially funny is that Starling isn鈥檛 even mad that this guy couldn鈥檛 see her as an FBI agent first and a woman second, she鈥檚 just annoyed that he asked her out and not his cuter coworker)
I鈥檒l have to track down Hannibal soon, because I definitely need more Clarice Starling in my life.
鈥淲e rarely get to prepare ourselves in meadows or on graveled walks; we do it on short notice in places without windows, hospital corridors, rooms like this lounge with its cracked plastic sofa and Cinzano ashtrays, where the caf茅 curtains cover blank concrete. In rooms like this, with so little time, we prepare our gestures, get them by heart so we can do them when we鈥檙e frightened in the face of Doom. Starling was old enough to know that; she didn鈥檛 let the room affect her.
Starling walked up and down. She gestured to the air. 鈥楬old on, girl,鈥� she said aloud. She said it to Catherine Martin and she said it to herself. 鈥榃e鈥檙e better than this room. We鈥檙e better than this fucking place,鈥� she said aloud. 鈥榃e鈥檙e better than wherever he鈥檚 got you. Help me. Help me. Help me.鈥� She thought for an instant of her late parents. She wondered if they would be ashamed of her now 鈥� just that question, not its pertinence, no qualifications 鈥� the way we always ask it. The answer was no, they would not be ashamed of her.
She washed her face and went out into the hall.鈥�
It鈥檚 also, brilliantly, a revealing look at how much of a daily struggle it is to be a woman in a male-dominated field. There鈥檚 a great moment early in the movie adaptation of The Silence of the Lambs where Starling gets into an elevator filled with her fellow FBI trainees, and we see Jodie Foster in a tight space surrounded by men who are all at least six inches taller than her. It鈥檚 a brief shot, and isn鈥檛 over-emphasized, but it tells us everything we need to know about what Starling鈥檚 daily routine is like. And the best part is that we don鈥檛 even get any obvious scenes of outright gender discrimination 鈥� just constant little things, in every single interaction Starling has with other characters. (Starling can鈥檛 escape even when she鈥檚 performing everyday, unexciting tasks 鈥� an errand to the Smithsonian ends with one of the scientists asking her out, and what鈥檚 especially funny is that Starling isn鈥檛 even mad that this guy couldn鈥檛 see her as an FBI agent first and a woman second, she鈥檚 just annoyed that he asked her out and not his cuter coworker)
I鈥檒l have to track down Hannibal soon, because I definitely need more Clarice Starling in my life.
鈥淲e rarely get to prepare ourselves in meadows or on graveled walks; we do it on short notice in places without windows, hospital corridors, rooms like this lounge with its cracked plastic sofa and Cinzano ashtrays, where the caf茅 curtains cover blank concrete. In rooms like this, with so little time, we prepare our gestures, get them by heart so we can do them when we鈥檙e frightened in the face of Doom. Starling was old enough to know that; she didn鈥檛 let the room affect her.
Starling walked up and down. She gestured to the air. 鈥楬old on, girl,鈥� she said aloud. She said it to Catherine Martin and she said it to herself. 鈥榃e鈥檙e better than this room. We鈥檙e better than this fucking place,鈥� she said aloud. 鈥榃e鈥檙e better than wherever he鈥檚 got you. Help me. Help me. Help me.鈥� She thought for an instant of her late parents. She wondered if they would be ashamed of her now 鈥� just that question, not its pertinence, no qualifications 鈥� the way we always ask it. The answer was no, they would not be ashamed of her.
She washed her face and went out into the hall.鈥�
Displaying 1 - 30 of 11,000 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.