What do you think?
Rate this book
Good Book: The Bizarre, Hilarious, Disturbing, Marvelous, and Inspiring Things I Learned When I Read Every Single Word of the Bible
At a time when wars are fought over scriptural interpretation, when the influence of religion on American politics has never been greater, when many Americans still believe in the Bible’s literal truth, it has never been more important to get to know the Bible. Good Book is what happens when a regular guy—an average Job—actually reads the book on which his religion, his culture, and his world are based. Along the way, he grapples with the most profound theological questions: How many commandments do we actually need? Does God prefer obedience or good deeds? And the most unexpected ones: Why are so many women in the Bible prostitutes? Why does God love bald men so much? Is Samson really that stupid?
496 pages, Paperback
First published March 1, 2009
188 people are currently reading
2,848 people want to read
About the author
David Plotz
11Ìýbooks43ÌýfollowersPlotz, an American journalist, has been a writer with Slate since its inception and was designated as the online magazine's editor in June 2008.
He is the author of "The Genius Factory: The Curious History of the Nobel Prize Sperm Bank" (2005) and "Good Book: The Bizarre, Hilarious, Disturbing, Marvelous, and Inspiring Things I Learned when I Read Every Single Word of the Bible" (2009).
He is the author of "The Genius Factory: The Curious History of the Nobel Prize Sperm Bank" (2005) and "Good Book: The Bizarre, Hilarious, Disturbing, Marvelous, and Inspiring Things I Learned when I Read Every Single Word of the Bible" (2009).
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 272 reviews
December 13, 2015
This is a fascinating, irreverent book that that summarizes the Bible, chapter by chapter. Oh, some chapters are bypassed, because in the words of David Plotz, "it is boring."
The last chapter stands out as the most interesting, as the author asks the question, "Should you read the Bible?" The first reason is that so much of Western culture comes from the Bible. Plotz writes that it is difficult to get through a chapter--even a chapter in some obscure book--"without encountering a phrase, a name, a character, or an idea that has come down to us from 3,000 years ago." So many plot twists and fundamental ideas come to us from the Bible. And, throughout the book, Plotz reminds readers when a particular chapter contains these fundamental ideas, names, or phrases. The second reason for reading the Bible is to understand religious traditions--even traditions with which one does not agree.
After reading the Bible, it is difficult to answer the question, "Why believe in a God that is unjust, merciless, unforgiving, and unloving?" That question comes up because the God described in the Bible is all those things. And besides, God is fickle and inconsistent! So much of the Bible is filled with barbaric concepts and commandments; at least by today's standards. These barbaric acts were probably commonplace in their own time. But then, how can we possibly say that the concept of a God makes moral laws absolute?
I have never read the Bible in full. I guess I only have read the Sunday School portions. For example, in the Book of Esther, I thought that the book ended when the evil Haman was killed. But I do not recall that later, Esther persuaded the king to allow an extra day for a killing spree against the Jews' enemies. I never realized that Lot's daughters got their father drunk in order to commit incest. In Leviticus, God killed Aaron's sons because they used the wrong type of incense. And, if you have a disobedient son, you can take him to the elders of the town and have him stoned to death.
This book, by recounting some of the inconsistencies in the Bible's precepts, is quite hilarious. David Plotz tries to get to the bottom of some of the motivations of the characters. For example, when God causes the ten plagues on the Pharoah, when you get down to it, the reason for the plagues is that God wanted us to tell stories about them! Plotz wonders why, when the Israelites were wandering through the desert for forty years, they were in constant rebellion. After all, didn't they recall all the amazing miracles that were happening all that time?
In many of the chapters, Plotz shows how God hates brothers, detests women, but loves bald people. God likes carnivores, but not vegetarians. To get a flavor for the book, I offer this quote from the section on Chapter 16 of Ezekiel,
The last chapter stands out as the most interesting, as the author asks the question, "Should you read the Bible?" The first reason is that so much of Western culture comes from the Bible. Plotz writes that it is difficult to get through a chapter--even a chapter in some obscure book--"without encountering a phrase, a name, a character, or an idea that has come down to us from 3,000 years ago." So many plot twists and fundamental ideas come to us from the Bible. And, throughout the book, Plotz reminds readers when a particular chapter contains these fundamental ideas, names, or phrases. The second reason for reading the Bible is to understand religious traditions--even traditions with which one does not agree.
After reading the Bible, it is difficult to answer the question, "Why believe in a God that is unjust, merciless, unforgiving, and unloving?" That question comes up because the God described in the Bible is all those things. And besides, God is fickle and inconsistent! So much of the Bible is filled with barbaric concepts and commandments; at least by today's standards. These barbaric acts were probably commonplace in their own time. But then, how can we possibly say that the concept of a God makes moral laws absolute?
I have never read the Bible in full. I guess I only have read the Sunday School portions. For example, in the Book of Esther, I thought that the book ended when the evil Haman was killed. But I do not recall that later, Esther persuaded the king to allow an extra day for a killing spree against the Jews' enemies. I never realized that Lot's daughters got their father drunk in order to commit incest. In Leviticus, God killed Aaron's sons because they used the wrong type of incense. And, if you have a disobedient son, you can take him to the elders of the town and have him stoned to death.
This book, by recounting some of the inconsistencies in the Bible's precepts, is quite hilarious. David Plotz tries to get to the bottom of some of the motivations of the characters. For example, when God causes the ten plagues on the Pharoah, when you get down to it, the reason for the plagues is that God wanted us to tell stories about them! Plotz wonders why, when the Israelites were wandering through the desert for forty years, they were in constant rebellion. After all, didn't they recall all the amazing miracles that were happening all that time?
In many of the chapters, Plotz shows how God hates brothers, detests women, but loves bald people. God likes carnivores, but not vegetarians. To get a flavor for the book, I offer this quote from the section on Chapter 16 of Ezekiel,
This chapter is like the bad parts of Portrait of a Lady, Madame Bovary, and Married with Children all rolled up into a ball of rage. It's the first story to correctly understand that the psychological relationship between God and His people is not parent and child, but spouses.Returning to the question of why God would act like this, Plotz mentions the usual answer that "God acts in mysterious ways." But, he points out that we were born as rational beings. If God made us, giving us the tools to think, then we must examine God with "rational and moral inquiry. And He fails that examination."
July 13, 2016
An ignorant Jewish writer decided to read the Tanakh (Jewish Bible) for the first time and write about the experience book by book. Billed as "hilarious" and "inspiring" it isn't much of either in large part because of the lack of any real Jewish knowledge by the author. He reads Psalm 118 and says, "I don't think this psalm has much sway over Jews..." unaware that it is part of the Hallel service that is part of every holiday service and then skips over Psalm 145 (Ashrei) which is read three times a day, every day, in Jewish prayer services.
It is that complete lack of knowledge that makes his discussion "hilarious" but only in the sense of being laughable, as when he introduces the Book of Deuteronomy by calling it "obscure" adding, that he has "never heard anyone recite Deuteronomy in the synagogue." By chapter 6 he's admitting he was wrong when he discovers the "Shema" there.
Perhaps as a sequel he could read other texts he knows nothing about and share his ignorance on those. "I've never heard anyone mention the Sixth Amendment..."
It is that complete lack of knowledge that makes his discussion "hilarious" but only in the sense of being laughable, as when he introduces the Book of Deuteronomy by calling it "obscure" adding, that he has "never heard anyone recite Deuteronomy in the synagogue." By chapter 6 he's admitting he was wrong when he discovers the "Shema" there.
Perhaps as a sequel he could read other texts he knows nothing about and share his ignorance on those. "I've never heard anyone mention the Sixth Amendment..."
March 9, 2009
David Plotz, a secular Jew, discovers a horrifying story while browsing the Old Testament in a fit of boredom during an infrequent visit to a Temple service. So horrifying that he is compelled to pick up the Book and read the whole thing to see what other horrors he has missed. This book is a chapter by chapter (mostly) synopsis of the Old Testament, with commentary and some biting observations. I found his play by play color commentary to be insightful at times, and did very much enjoy this work. I DON'T recommend this for the savagely pious in any faith, it WILL piss them off. Fence sitters beware, this one might knock you off the fence, and not in the direction you think.
July 7, 2014
Not quite the book I was hoping for but an interesting read none the less. Further, the book illustrates a contradiction that has perplexed me for years: faith despite wisdom.
The author is a self-described faithful Jew whose rather shaky faith was greatly strengthened by reading every word of the bible. This despite the fact that doing so caused him to write a book that - very gently but also thoroughly - pokes holes both great and small in the fabric of the text throughout, leaving a tattered mess in his wake. How capricious and vicious is the god described, how sexually obsessed, violent, and ridiculous are the characters, how contradictory, disturbing, derivative, and utterly unbelievable the stories are.
How anyone with the ability to see through this mess of poorly concocted fables could come away from the book with their faith strengthened is beyond me ... Fascinating are the illusions of man's need.
The author is a self-described faithful Jew whose rather shaky faith was greatly strengthened by reading every word of the bible. This despite the fact that doing so caused him to write a book that - very gently but also thoroughly - pokes holes both great and small in the fabric of the text throughout, leaving a tattered mess in his wake. How capricious and vicious is the god described, how sexually obsessed, violent, and ridiculous are the characters, how contradictory, disturbing, derivative, and utterly unbelievable the stories are.
How anyone with the ability to see through this mess of poorly concocted fables could come away from the book with their faith strengthened is beyond me ... Fascinating are the illusions of man's need.
June 19, 2011
100% recommended! This romp through the Hebrew Bible is much more than just fascinating and funny. It’s also engrossing, mildly irreverent, thought-provoking, disturbing--you'll love the Good Book whether you’re a believer or not. This is the Bible unveiled in all its grime and greatness. The characters in Genesis are especially unforgettable, from the story of Abimalech lusting after a 90-year-old woman (Sarah, Abraham's wife) to a diabolical mother-and-son plot to rob the simple-minded Esau of his blessing from an over-trusting father.
Book by book, Plotz takes us through the scripture. If Genesis is the best part, then the appendix runs a close second. There you'll learn the Bible's twelve best pick-up lines, the thirteen most spectacular murders, the nine best parties, the best prostitutes, the most hellacious divine punishment, the trippiest dreams, and more.
This is for all you skeptics who think reading the Bible is a waste of time. Plotz apparently thought the same thing before taking on this project. After thirty-nine books, 929 chapters, more than 600,000 words, and just over a year, Plotz admits he's become "a full-on Bible thumper. Everyone should read it--all of it! In fact, the less you believe, the more you should read."
Start with this book as an introduction to get the juices flowing. Plotz is more than a good researcher, he's a great writer. I'm in awe. I could enthusiastically read anything he writes, I'm sure of it. So, when he tackles a topic already fascinating to me (the Bible) it's pure delight. He's also unfortunately a Jew, which means we only get the Old Testament in his Good Book. Please, David, can't you give Billy Graham a listen?
Book by book, Plotz takes us through the scripture. If Genesis is the best part, then the appendix runs a close second. There you'll learn the Bible's twelve best pick-up lines, the thirteen most spectacular murders, the nine best parties, the best prostitutes, the most hellacious divine punishment, the trippiest dreams, and more.
This is for all you skeptics who think reading the Bible is a waste of time. Plotz apparently thought the same thing before taking on this project. After thirty-nine books, 929 chapters, more than 600,000 words, and just over a year, Plotz admits he's become "a full-on Bible thumper. Everyone should read it--all of it! In fact, the less you believe, the more you should read."
Start with this book as an introduction to get the juices flowing. Plotz is more than a good researcher, he's a great writer. I'm in awe. I could enthusiastically read anything he writes, I'm sure of it. So, when he tackles a topic already fascinating to me (the Bible) it's pure delight. He's also unfortunately a Jew, which means we only get the Old Testament in his Good Book. Please, David, can't you give Billy Graham a listen?
September 16, 2009
Because I grew up in a religious environment, I find secular views on the bible interesting. David Plotz made the choice to read his Jewish Bible for the first time. This was a new experience for him as he had forgotten most of the things he learned in Hebrew School.
David writes this book in a chapter by chapter approach; the reader can see his understanding grow and his reactions change throughout the book. Many of his musings are notable, but two stand out: his acceptable name list and his realization that God loves those who think rather than follow blindly.
Mr. Plotz discovers that the favorite people of God from the Bible, Abraham, Moses, David, Jacob, Elijah, etc., all argue, negotiate, make demands of God, and remind Him of His covenants. The God of the Bible does not like the automatrons, that blindly follow like sheep. I can see Yahweh saying, "I created you with free will, Me-Dammit, so you better use it!"
David writes this book in a chapter by chapter approach; the reader can see his understanding grow and his reactions change throughout the book. Many of his musings are notable, but two stand out: his acceptable name list and his realization that God loves those who think rather than follow blindly.
Mr. Plotz discovers that the favorite people of God from the Bible, Abraham, Moses, David, Jacob, Elijah, etc., all argue, negotiate, make demands of God, and remind Him of His covenants. The God of the Bible does not like the automatrons, that blindly follow like sheep. I can see Yahweh saying, "I created you with free will, Me-Dammit, so you better use it!"
February 27, 2013
What I enjoyed about this book:
Seeing this through the eyes of a non-christian. He actually takes the time to read the OT.
The things that caught his attention were interesting.
What I didn't enjoy:
Taking some of the OT narrative wildly out of context and reducing the actions of Almighty God to a petty, vindictive, and unjustly punitive God. It is unfortunate, but I know he is not the only one who sees it this way. It is his misunderstanding of human nature and the requisite judicial actions of God.
Seeing this through the eyes of a non-christian. He actually takes the time to read the OT.
The things that caught his attention were interesting.
What I didn't enjoy:
Taking some of the OT narrative wildly out of context and reducing the actions of Almighty God to a petty, vindictive, and unjustly punitive God. It is unfortunate, but I know he is not the only one who sees it this way. It is his misunderstanding of human nature and the requisite judicial actions of God.
November 11, 2012
Have I mentioned my profound contempt and loathing of religious fundamentalists? Probably. I was reminded today of the staggering loopiness of these right-wingnuts when Bobo Smyth-Bullard sent me a clipping concerning a fundamentalist's response to the late unpleasantness at Sea World, in which Shamu the "Killer Whale" lived up to his description and iced one of his trainers.
Said response was swift and merciless; according to scripture, Shamu must be killed forthwith - via stoning. (How do you stone to death something that lives underwater?) Also, his surviving trainers must likewise be stoned to death for good measure, says the Bible. As often claimed, the Good Book has a solution for every problem, even if most of them involving throwing rocks at people (or aquatic mammals).
I mention this as an introduction to a delightful book by David Plotz, the editor of Slate, in which he describes, chapter by chapter, his experience reading the whole of the Old Testament. (Like myself, Plotz is a mostly non-observant Jew - neither of us has much interest in the events that follow.) The result is an informative, thoughtful, and very, very funny look at the Good Book's many contradictions, acts of violence, pornographic interludes, and refreshing bits of fine poetry.
Seriously, though - the Old Testament (which includes the five books of the Torah, plus a bunch of books about Prophets, Judges, Psalms, and a poor bastard named Job), is completely whacked. Some of the more outlandish incidents involve: golden hemorrhoids, a mountain of foreskins, killing a thousand people with a donkey's jawbone, the genocide of a dozen or more societies, and an almost endless number of hookers. Any fundie who claims to literally believe everything in here is unquestionably certifiable.
Its not all hookers and hemorrhoids, though. Plotz's evaluation of the Bible, while frequently snarky, is also frequently thoughtful and respectful. His chief problem seems to lie in reconciling the notion of a loving and merciful God with the psychotically jealous and angry deity that informs most of the Bible's events. And it is a tough problem - frankly God's actions throughout tend to make lowly humans seem like paragons of virtue and sanity.
Much of the wackiness of fundamentalism must come from trying to integrate the bitchy, vengeful God of the Old Testament with the cuddly, loving God of the Jesus era. In my opinion, fundies would save themselves a lot of needless anxiety by simply stipulating that God had a stroke sometime around 50 BC, and afterward had a whole different personality.
Anyway, Plotz is at his best when he tries to resolve the violence, misogyny, and chaos of the Bible by applying his own personal interpretations of the text - simultaneously perplexed, humorous and humane, he demonstrates that taking anything in the book literally is the worst possible move. Ultimately, he advises his readers to do the work themselves - read the book, and work through the many contradictions on their own, and, as he did, find themselves deriving new inspiration from the process. I plan to start soon, and will post a review of the Good Book in due course.
Said response was swift and merciless; according to scripture, Shamu must be killed forthwith - via stoning. (How do you stone to death something that lives underwater?) Also, his surviving trainers must likewise be stoned to death for good measure, says the Bible. As often claimed, the Good Book has a solution for every problem, even if most of them involving throwing rocks at people (or aquatic mammals).
I mention this as an introduction to a delightful book by David Plotz, the editor of Slate, in which he describes, chapter by chapter, his experience reading the whole of the Old Testament. (Like myself, Plotz is a mostly non-observant Jew - neither of us has much interest in the events that follow.) The result is an informative, thoughtful, and very, very funny look at the Good Book's many contradictions, acts of violence, pornographic interludes, and refreshing bits of fine poetry.
Seriously, though - the Old Testament (which includes the five books of the Torah, plus a bunch of books about Prophets, Judges, Psalms, and a poor bastard named Job), is completely whacked. Some of the more outlandish incidents involve: golden hemorrhoids, a mountain of foreskins, killing a thousand people with a donkey's jawbone, the genocide of a dozen or more societies, and an almost endless number of hookers. Any fundie who claims to literally believe everything in here is unquestionably certifiable.
Its not all hookers and hemorrhoids, though. Plotz's evaluation of the Bible, while frequently snarky, is also frequently thoughtful and respectful. His chief problem seems to lie in reconciling the notion of a loving and merciful God with the psychotically jealous and angry deity that informs most of the Bible's events. And it is a tough problem - frankly God's actions throughout tend to make lowly humans seem like paragons of virtue and sanity.
Much of the wackiness of fundamentalism must come from trying to integrate the bitchy, vengeful God of the Old Testament with the cuddly, loving God of the Jesus era. In my opinion, fundies would save themselves a lot of needless anxiety by simply stipulating that God had a stroke sometime around 50 BC, and afterward had a whole different personality.
Anyway, Plotz is at his best when he tries to resolve the violence, misogyny, and chaos of the Bible by applying his own personal interpretations of the text - simultaneously perplexed, humorous and humane, he demonstrates that taking anything in the book literally is the worst possible move. Ultimately, he advises his readers to do the work themselves - read the book, and work through the many contradictions on their own, and, as he did, find themselves deriving new inspiration from the process. I plan to start soon, and will post a review of the Good Book in due course.
July 1, 2016
I enjoyed the slightly irreverent look at his chapter-by-chapter reading of the Old Testament. Each Biblical chapter of significance (his opinion) is addressed through a brief summary of what is happening in “everyday� language and his humorous lens. It will shed new light on all those biblical stories you’ve heard about since you were a child. The appendix was especially interesting as it was a synopsis of useful (and not so useful) Bible lists. You never really knew what was in the Bible until you read/listen to this take on it. Finally, kudos to the author on doing a great job of narrating the book himself.
May 24, 2009
One of the funniest books I've ever read. I loved it! Good Book is a summary of the Old Testament, told by David Plotz, an editor for Slate Magazine. It is his sincere effort to better understand the bible but his compendium is sarcastic, sardonic, and hilarious.
I enjoyed the first half a lot more than I enjoyed the second half but that is not really Plotz's fault. The first half of the Old Testament has a lot more action than the last half. Still, the writing is fun enough to keep you engaged.
Ii is interesting that researching the bible left Plotz more committed to Judaism, yet less committed to God. He concludes that there must not be a God, at least not the one that is described in the bible.
I really can't do Plotz's humor justice so here are a few of my favorite snippets:
"In other words, God is causing the plagues so that we can tell stories about the plagues. He's torturing the Egyptians so that we will worship Him. What kind of insecure and cruel God murders children so that His followers will obey Him, and will tell stories about him? This is the behavior of a serial killer."
"Once we finish with slavery, it becomes clear that God is a hanging judge. His punishment for intentional killing is death. Punishment for kidnapping: death. Punishment for idolatry: death. Punishment for striking a parent: death. Punishment for insulting a parent: death. Punishment for bestiality: death. On the other hand, if you seduce a virgin, you only have to pay off her family. I don't understand how modern liberal Catholics, Jews, and Protestants can use the bible to justify their opposition to capital punishment. If there is one thing God truly believes in, it's a good old firing squad."
"It turns out Deuteronomy consists of several rambling, Fidel Castro-length speeches by the dying Moses to his people. Think of it as the Moses farewell tour."
"And there, my friends, you have practically the entire history of Israel, of the Middle East, and of planet Earth, in two short sentences. Your God says it's yours. Our god says it's ours. Meet you at nine AM on the battlefield."
I enjoyed the first half a lot more than I enjoyed the second half but that is not really Plotz's fault. The first half of the Old Testament has a lot more action than the last half. Still, the writing is fun enough to keep you engaged.
Ii is interesting that researching the bible left Plotz more committed to Judaism, yet less committed to God. He concludes that there must not be a God, at least not the one that is described in the bible.
I really can't do Plotz's humor justice so here are a few of my favorite snippets:
"In other words, God is causing the plagues so that we can tell stories about the plagues. He's torturing the Egyptians so that we will worship Him. What kind of insecure and cruel God murders children so that His followers will obey Him, and will tell stories about him? This is the behavior of a serial killer."
"Once we finish with slavery, it becomes clear that God is a hanging judge. His punishment for intentional killing is death. Punishment for kidnapping: death. Punishment for idolatry: death. Punishment for striking a parent: death. Punishment for insulting a parent: death. Punishment for bestiality: death. On the other hand, if you seduce a virgin, you only have to pay off her family. I don't understand how modern liberal Catholics, Jews, and Protestants can use the bible to justify their opposition to capital punishment. If there is one thing God truly believes in, it's a good old firing squad."
"It turns out Deuteronomy consists of several rambling, Fidel Castro-length speeches by the dying Moses to his people. Think of it as the Moses farewell tour."
"And there, my friends, you have practically the entire history of Israel, of the Middle East, and of planet Earth, in two short sentences. Your God says it's yours. Our god says it's ours. Meet you at nine AM on the battlefield."
April 13, 2018
David Plotz is a secular Jew who stumbled upon a biblical story that was so outrageous and appalling that it made him question his education (at a Jewish school) and his memory. He decided to read the Jewish Bible (aka Old Testament) to see what other bits of melodramatic crazy was tucked away in there. This book is the result of his effort to make sense of it. It is fascinating, subjective, and hilarious. Bible literalists and "because God says so" types are going to hate it.
Those of us who have heard/read these stories and muttered, "Now wait just a dang minute..." will love it.
When I was a kid and being dragged to a fundie church by my grandmother, I got into a heap of trouble for asking questions such as "If Adam and Ever were the first people and we're all descended form them, where did Adam and Eve's kids find their spouses unless there was some inbreeding going on?" and "If the only people who survived the great flood were those on the Ark, who were all related, then how did the repopulate the earth without...ok, again, incest?" (It's not that I was fixated on incest; it's that the expulsion from Eden and The Great Flood are on very heavy rotation in most Baptist Sunday Schools, so after a million repetitions, the flaws became obvious.) There was also, "Why, if God is supposedly omniscient, would he need a census taken? And then when David complies and takes one, why did God get all pissed off about it and punish David?" The answer to all the above and the bazillion others I came up with was "because." As anyone above the age of four knows, that's not an answer.
Churches that practice literal interpretation twist themselves in knots trying to explain the inconsistencies. My opinion has always been that the answer to them is pretty simple: the Bible is comprised of folk tales. I'd read enough fairy tales, fables, and folklore when I was a kid to recognize the structure even then. Also? I was/am fairly certain that no one in the ancient Middle East spoke Elizabethan English, so there was no way to take anything in the KJV (or any version derived from it) literally.
So, I was exposed to the Sunday School versions of these stories as a kid, then I read the whole Bible in college when I took world religion--and because our American Lit professor suggested a basic familiarity with the not-so-good book made understanding the neurosis of early American authors so much easier. I came to three conclusions about it: first, it's a hot mess (God apparently needs a good editor...and a anger management class); second, in order to be culturally literate in the western world, one needs a passing acquaintance with that hot mess because so many words, metaphors, and idioms are derived from it; three, all the stuff that people condemn other religions for is no worse or crazier than what can be found in the Old Testament. Murder, human sacrifice, infanticide, rape, torture, killing 100 men for their foreskins to buy a bride -- oh, yeah, and incest -- it's all in there. It makes Game of Thrones look like a Disney film. Still, I'd forgotten (or never absorbed) a lot of the things Plotz points out as he does his chapter by chapter read through the OT.
It took a long time for me to read this because I had to keep pulling out the KJV to see if Plotz was exaggerating. (He wasn't.) The other reason it took forever is that the library only had the print version, and it has tiny crap font and lots of passages in teeny-tiny italics. My advice would be to go for the e-book version both to save eyestrain and to make looking up the original material easier should one have a "Wait...what?" moment.
I wish Plotz would take on the New Testament next. I know he says that it's "not his book," but the argument can be made that the OT really wasn't either since he considered himself an agnostic secular Jew. The cultural literacy argument can be made for the NT as easily as the OT. Granted the NT isn't nearly as melodramatic and full of crazy as the OT, but I still think Plotz' read-along of it would be entertaining.
NOTE: Religion tends to bring out the emotional and argumentative side of people heavily invested in it. These are my opinions and notes, not an invitation to argue, bait, or proselytize. If you come across this and don't agree with it or me, that's cool. Just move on. The internet is a big place.
Those of us who have heard/read these stories and muttered, "Now wait just a dang minute..." will love it.
When I was a kid and being dragged to a fundie church by my grandmother, I got into a heap of trouble for asking questions such as "If Adam and Ever were the first people and we're all descended form them, where did Adam and Eve's kids find their spouses unless there was some inbreeding going on?" and "If the only people who survived the great flood were those on the Ark, who were all related, then how did the repopulate the earth without...ok, again, incest?" (It's not that I was fixated on incest; it's that the expulsion from Eden and The Great Flood are on very heavy rotation in most Baptist Sunday Schools, so after a million repetitions, the flaws became obvious.) There was also, "Why, if God is supposedly omniscient, would he need a census taken? And then when David complies and takes one, why did God get all pissed off about it and punish David?" The answer to all the above and the bazillion others I came up with was "because." As anyone above the age of four knows, that's not an answer.
Churches that practice literal interpretation twist themselves in knots trying to explain the inconsistencies. My opinion has always been that the answer to them is pretty simple: the Bible is comprised of folk tales. I'd read enough fairy tales, fables, and folklore when I was a kid to recognize the structure even then. Also? I was/am fairly certain that no one in the ancient Middle East spoke Elizabethan English, so there was no way to take anything in the KJV (or any version derived from it) literally.
So, I was exposed to the Sunday School versions of these stories as a kid, then I read the whole Bible in college when I took world religion--and because our American Lit professor suggested a basic familiarity with the not-so-good book made understanding the neurosis of early American authors so much easier. I came to three conclusions about it: first, it's a hot mess (God apparently needs a good editor...and a anger management class); second, in order to be culturally literate in the western world, one needs a passing acquaintance with that hot mess because so many words, metaphors, and idioms are derived from it; three, all the stuff that people condemn other religions for is no worse or crazier than what can be found in the Old Testament. Murder, human sacrifice, infanticide, rape, torture, killing 100 men for their foreskins to buy a bride -- oh, yeah, and incest -- it's all in there. It makes Game of Thrones look like a Disney film. Still, I'd forgotten (or never absorbed) a lot of the things Plotz points out as he does his chapter by chapter read through the OT.
It took a long time for me to read this because I had to keep pulling out the KJV to see if Plotz was exaggerating. (He wasn't.) The other reason it took forever is that the library only had the print version, and it has tiny crap font and lots of passages in teeny-tiny italics. My advice would be to go for the e-book version both to save eyestrain and to make looking up the original material easier should one have a "Wait...what?" moment.
I wish Plotz would take on the New Testament next. I know he says that it's "not his book," but the argument can be made that the OT really wasn't either since he considered himself an agnostic secular Jew. The cultural literacy argument can be made for the NT as easily as the OT. Granted the NT isn't nearly as melodramatic and full of crazy as the OT, but I still think Plotz' read-along of it would be entertaining.
NOTE: Religion tends to bring out the emotional and argumentative side of people heavily invested in it. These are my opinions and notes, not an invitation to argue, bait, or proselytize. If you come across this and don't agree with it or me, that's cool. Just move on. The internet is a big place.
August 27, 2012
Full of wit and insight, this book gives us the play-by-play on each book of the Hebrew Bible. I especially like the fact that Plotz approaches the Bible as an outsider. His critiques and observations are rarely theological, but are more often personal, ethical or literary in nature. He relates the Bible to us, not as a priest, but as a reader. Rather than getting into the murky scholarship of what the religious intent behind a passage might be, he usually opts for lay analysis along the lines of what a jerk Samson was, how spineless Aaron is being, or noting that God seems to prefer crafty winners to righteous whiners.
Having just finished writing a book on the Bible myself, I noted a few minor differences between my interpretation of certain passages and his. For instance, when the Philistines captured the Ark of the Covenant in 1st Samuel, I had God afflicting them with tumors, whereas he has them suffering from a more benign case of hemorrhoids. Perhaps this case of divine rectal punishment is the result of different translations. He was working primarily from the Hebrew Bible, whereas I worked from the New International Version of the Christian Bible. I just like to imagine that somewhere Biblical scholars are locked in heated debate over the Hemorrhoid Question.
The book is somewhat uneven, as its analysis of the history and law of the Hebrew Bible is more interesting than what it has to say about the Bible's poetry and prophecy, but I blame this more on the Bible than I do Plotz. The former loan themselves more to narrative and are generally filled with sex and violence and gossip, so the former naturally works better as source material than the abstract whimpering and bad love poetry of the latter.
All in all, though, I found Plotz to be an able guide through a book full of treacherous waters and I can recommend this book in good conscience to anyone wanting to learn about the Hebrew Bible, aka the Old Testament.
Having just finished writing a book on the Bible myself, I noted a few minor differences between my interpretation of certain passages and his. For instance, when the Philistines captured the Ark of the Covenant in 1st Samuel, I had God afflicting them with tumors, whereas he has them suffering from a more benign case of hemorrhoids. Perhaps this case of divine rectal punishment is the result of different translations. He was working primarily from the Hebrew Bible, whereas I worked from the New International Version of the Christian Bible. I just like to imagine that somewhere Biblical scholars are locked in heated debate over the Hemorrhoid Question.
The book is somewhat uneven, as its analysis of the history and law of the Hebrew Bible is more interesting than what it has to say about the Bible's poetry and prophecy, but I blame this more on the Bible than I do Plotz. The former loan themselves more to narrative and are generally filled with sex and violence and gossip, so the former naturally works better as source material than the abstract whimpering and bad love poetry of the latter.
All in all, though, I found Plotz to be an able guide through a book full of treacherous waters and I can recommend this book in good conscience to anyone wanting to learn about the Hebrew Bible, aka the Old Testament.
January 25, 2014
When I began reading this book, I was sure I would be left feeling even more “Bible illiterate� than before, but I found the author to be enlightening and entertaining. I found him to be humorous, yet he seemed more real to me than many other authors who take on this type of commitment. I read the Old Testament as a child, but have to admit that I’d forgotten more than I realized, and never understood much of what I’d read. I also found it interesting that the church tends to pick pieces from the Bible to teach, ignoring the outer edges of the circumstances. For example, the church teaches children about the story of Daniel and the lions…but leaves out the fact that the people who turned him in for not praying to the king—along with their spouses and children—were thrown into the den after Daniel walked out. I also find it disturbing that women were rarely given attention (or even given a name), and a great many of them were prostitutes. Most women were lying, conniving, and evil. It honestly makes me wonder why women seem to be more willing to follow the Bible than men…when we get so little respect within its pages. The thing I like the most about this book is the author’s summary. He doesn’t make it sappy, and doesn’t try to explain it to fit within his ideal. He is clear and straightforward, allowing the reader to make up his or her own mind about the stories told within the Bible.
July 2, 2010
There are several aspects of this book that I enjoyed. Firstly, the humor. David Plotz is is laugh out loud funny. Second, his Jewishness. It is my experience that while both Jews and Christians can write about God with various degrees of piety, disbelief, or irreverence, Jewish writers seem much more comfortable arguing with God. I'm Catholic so I find this fascinating... and a bit thrilling. Writers in my tradition seem to maintain a more pious attitude unless they've turned their back on God and/or the Church. I like that Plotz can appreciate that the Bible is a "messy Bible" for a messy world and find that satisfying. I appreciate that while Plotz's journey has lead him to be an agnostic leaning heavily toward atheism, he feels more connected to his own Jewishness and better appreciates the depth of influence the Bible has in Western culture and its enduring value. Most of all, I admire that he candidly states upfront his biblical illiteracy and responds to what he reads with an open mind. This is in massive contrast to most popular literature on religious topics where the norm seems to be a combination of unacknowleged ignorance and arrogance.
June 25, 2009
I have a family member who belongs to a church where you can't play music. But in the Bible, God clearly loves music - see David (he loved to dance....wait for it!) and all of Psalms.
Also, David (yes, that David who killed Goliath) was gay. That's quite a shocker. His lover, Jonathan, was the recipient of his tears, kisses, and the confession that his love meant more to him than any woman. If that's not gay, then I don't know what is. It's interesting that Leviticus calls lying with a man as you would a woman an abomination, but there is no mention from God about David's blatant homosexuality. David ends up King and the recipient of God's good will. No smitting, or smotting...however you say it. Quite curious.
Oh yeah and there are two (or is it three?) Ten Commandments.
Priests and rabbis have watered down the Bible so much for their flock, it's no wonder the religion that's spurted out makes absolutely no sense. Modern Americans are simply too lazy to bother reading 600,000 words of anything.
Plotz put in a good effort. And I am happily without theism.
Also, David (yes, that David who killed Goliath) was gay. That's quite a shocker. His lover, Jonathan, was the recipient of his tears, kisses, and the confession that his love meant more to him than any woman. If that's not gay, then I don't know what is. It's interesting that Leviticus calls lying with a man as you would a woman an abomination, but there is no mention from God about David's blatant homosexuality. David ends up King and the recipient of God's good will. No smitting, or smotting...however you say it. Quite curious.
Oh yeah and there are two (or is it three?) Ten Commandments.
Priests and rabbis have watered down the Bible so much for their flock, it's no wonder the religion that's spurted out makes absolutely no sense. Modern Americans are simply too lazy to bother reading 600,000 words of anything.
Plotz put in a good effort. And I am happily without theism.
July 26, 2011
As someone who has read the Bible numerous times, I read this with a grin on my face and enjoyed it very much. Plotz admits at the beginning that while he has gone to synagogue all his life and even went to an Episcopal high school, he has never read the Bible and intends to read it for the first time while blogging about the experience. I read most of this on slate.com when it was just a blog and the book is even more fun.
He takes the Bible straight and writes about what he finds in it, his shock and amazement (THAT'S in there? yes it is) and discoveries both distasteful and joyful. His honesty and candor is refreshing. I would love to read something similar about the New Testament (Plotz, being Jewish, sticks with the Hebrew Scriptures). He is also hysterically funny to read.
This is not a Bible study book, if you read it for that reason you will be disappointed. He is also not taking potshots at your faith, but he will raise perfectly good questions that are worth thinking about.
He takes the Bible straight and writes about what he finds in it, his shock and amazement (THAT'S in there? yes it is) and discoveries both distasteful and joyful. His honesty and candor is refreshing. I would love to read something similar about the New Testament (Plotz, being Jewish, sticks with the Hebrew Scriptures). He is also hysterically funny to read.
This is not a Bible study book, if you read it for that reason you will be disappointed. He is also not taking potshots at your faith, but he will raise perfectly good questions that are worth thinking about.
Read
January 26, 2011Simply excellent! I only made it through Exodus in my one attempt to read the bible, but through the conduit of David Plotz, I was riveted. And I assure you, he noticed far more of the consistencies (the importance of the number 40, the parallels or... em borrowed bits from one famous story to the next)and inconsistencies (in one chapter family values reigns supreme, in the next, women and children are cast off into the desert) than I ever would have.
I feel more connected to the anthropological past than I ever have before, more respectful of the bible for the mere fact that it has survived all of these years, and more informed about the complex and messy stories contained in that book.
Now, I'll have to see if someone has tackled the New Testament in a thorough and thoughtful a manner.
I feel more connected to the anthropological past than I ever have before, more respectful of the bible for the mere fact that it has survived all of these years, and more informed about the complex and messy stories contained in that book.
Now, I'll have to see if someone has tackled the New Testament in a thorough and thoughtful a manner.
May 24, 2015
I didn't expect to like this as much as I did. Plotz reads the entire Bible and basically sums it up in this book. I found his tone perfect-- irreverent but not insulting. This was a nice way to be refreshed on a lot of the parts of the Bible I had forgotten.
January 10, 2012
Extremely engaging and not only provides a superb overview of the old Testament but also insights into the books from a textual perspective. The humor adds tot eh irony and distance between the times in which it was written and our own.
March 9, 2015
Interesting, but a bit irreverent. Most of his comments were based on a literal English reading of the text,and were similar to those from people who haven't actually taken the time to study or understand the culture or history of the Bible.
September 14, 2012
The premise of the book is great. I enjoyed the first few chapters... and then... it gets really boring and repetitive....
July 29, 2017
Loved the appendix with all the lists. Interesting read, review to come soon.
++++++++++++++++++++++
My book blog:
As anyone who knows me may have guessed by now, I am something of a reader. I devoured books left and right from elementary school on, and this love of reading (and writing!) was fostered even more in 6th grade by quite possibly one of the best teachers I have ever had, Mr. Hanzlik - more affectionately referred to simply as H. Seriously, he's one cool cat, and even the kids who hated reading loved his class. Well, in 7th grade I proudly told Mr. H I had finally found a book that might slow me down a little in my reading endeavors - the Bible. I remember this moment and him chuckling, saying only that it might. I had started it in an attempt to read it cover to cover and made it to Deuteronomy. I am kind of embarrassed to admit that in terms of cover-to-cover, I never made it any farther. Since then I have read different books of the Bible, there are my favorites that I can read over and over (Hello, Matthew!), but I have never been able to go start to finish, and my lone attempt remains that try in 7th grade. However, after reading this book, I am inspired to try again, but more about that later.
Firstly, the author, David Plotz, is Jewish, so naturally his interpretation and relationship to the Bible is going to be different than mine. I am, to use the umbrella term, Protestant; baptized Lutheran, confirmed Methodist, now a member of a very wonderful Covenant church that is everything I have ever wanted a church to be with wonderful pastors and a congregation that has made me feel so welcome since my first service a year and a half ago. Plotz set out on this journey to read the Bible (or, the Old Testament, for us Christians) to see what kinds of insights and such he can glean for himself without someone telling him what this story or that really means. He is a self-proclaimed non-practicing Jew - one who is not particularly observant, vaguely knowing it when it is Sabbath, and rarely attending Synagogue. While at a cousin's bat mitzvah, he grows bored and opens the Torah, coming across the story of Dinah's rape and her brothers' subsequent revenge. Plotz is horrified not only by the story, but kind of of the realization that there is a lot in the Bible that he thought he knew, but actually doesn't. This book is the product of his year spent reading the Bible and his observations and thoughts along the way. He points at that even in the stories he thought he knew, those of Jacob vs. Esau, Cain vs. Abel, David, Solomon, etc., there were many things he did not.
While Plotz uses humor and sarcasm, he has some really great insights that I think a lot of people might come to when reading the Bible on their own. I do take issue with some of the conclusions he draws, as he sometimes looked only at a specific event instead of the big picture. But by and large that was not terribly common and he made a lot of great observations.
In the middle of Plotz's Biblical journey, he takes a trip to Jerusalem, to walk in these places that he is reading about. I am very jealous, as this is something I want so badly to do. I can't even begin to imagine being in these places where so much history has occurred, and to walk the place of the Bible, to see some of these places unchanged for thousands of years. I feel a kind of sadness for Plotz though, as the trip has brought him closer to the places he is reading about, but not to God. He says of the trip, "but I leave no more certain that God was here when it happened." Plotz talked about how thrilling it was to see these places, but I felt as I was reading that couldn't that be God working though his experience with him, speaking to him? I don't get the sense from Plotz that he really WANTS to believe in God, so maybe that is why this does not occur to him? He just doesn't see to be able to acknowledge perhaps he feels this way because God is present with him at that moment.
Plotz continues to read the rest of the Old Testament, and his own conclusion leaves me a bit heartbroken for him. I find it interesting that this journey through the Bible brought him closer to his religion, his Jewishness, so to speak, but farther from God, if possible. He says, "I leave the Bible as a hopeless and angry agnostic. I'm broken-hearted about God." And this is perhaps where the differences of our two faiths became most apparent as I was reading, and this is something Plotz acknowledges. He relates how he has discussed this with Christian friends, who say it is all a set-up for the New Testament. Plotz points out though, "But that doesn't work for me. I'm a Jew. I don't, and I can't, believe that Christ died for my sins. And even if he did, I still don't think that would wash away God's epic crimes in the Old Testament." This line made me just so sad for him. But again, that shows where and how our beliefs differ from Judaism to Christianity.
There were a lot of great quotes Plotz has throughout. Here are a few of my favorites:
In regards to the laws of Leviticus (page 59): "But if there's anything I've learned from these months with the Good Book, it;s that we all have our own Bible. We linger on the passages we love and blot out, or ague with, or skim the verses that repel us. My Bible, I suppose, has a very long Leviticus 19, and a very short Leviticus 18."
Page 81: "So Numbers 27 is a liberal's paradise: the first lawsuit, the first women's rights, the separation of church and state."
Page 128: "Saul, like a greedy president or King Henry VIII, is trying to undo the separation of powers."
Page 131: " 'The shaft of his spear was like a weaver's beam, and his spear head weighed 600 shekels.' I don't know what that means, but it sounds scary."
Page 142: "Question: how do Christian denominations and colleges that forbid dancing reconcile their position with God's obvious love for the cha-cha."
I really appreciated Plotz taking on such a behemoth of a task. Like the author, there were many things I thought I knew about the Old Testament, that I learned in Sunday School or Confirmation classes in high school, but it turned out I only had part of the story. I would agree with Plotz that Samson was a total meat head - how did he NEVER catch on that Delilah was plotting against him the whole time?! I also didn't know he had been married before Delilah came along. I was also unaware that David had a son with Bathsheba BEFORE SOLOMON. I don't know why this is news to me, and I felt at times as I was reading like the Bible was a completely foreign text to me. I also didn't know/recall Jonah being such a baby when God decided to save Nineveh after He ordered Jonah to go and Jonah first refused (and thus the whale had to help him along on his journey).
I also never realized how many phrases we still use today have their roots in the Bible. Plotz points out many of them, more than I made note of, but a few examples include a leopard not being able to change his spots, and the root of the awful word jeremiad (I can't remember the book I recently read that used this word incessantly, but now I know where it came from - Jeremiah and his long-windedness!) The phrase about 'picking up the mantle' is another example. Plotz sums it up nicely, saying (page 300): "It was as if I lifted a veil off my culture. You can't get through a chapter of the Bible, even the most obscure book, without encountering a phrase, a name, a character, or an idea that has come down to us from 3,000 years ago,"
A few other things of note as I wrap this up:
I was glad to see that the story of David and Goliath lived up to Plotz's childhood memories and that in turn it lived up to mine too. This has always been one of my favorite stories and as we approached it, I was concerned there would be something I had not been taught in Sunday School that would come to light and ruin it. Luckily, this did not happen and my memory of this story is safe.
Plotz suggests, due to Isaiah's temperament (he describes reading Isaiah's book as "like being trapped in an elevator with Al Sharpton") adding the phrase "You idiots!" to the end of any verse in Isaiah. it turns out pretty funny. I recommend you try it too.
From Plotz's summary alone, Ruth might be my favorite book. I have yet to read it in its entirety, but I plan to very shortly. Maybe even after I finish this review.
So, in the end, I highly recommend this book. You may not agree with every conclusion that Plotz comes to, but I learned so much more about the Old Testament than I thought I would - mostly because I thought I already knew these big stories. Turns out I didn't know them as well as I thought. Like Plotz, many things God did made me angry, made me question Him, made me want to know more. It also made me angry at times at David, Solomon, and a myriad of others I thought were so upright and constantly faithful.
The last quote I will leave you with sums up nicely how to reconcile this very problem:
"It reminds us that the Bible is not an idealization, but a book written by (and about) real people, who can be both scornful and kind, faithful and cruel, sarcastic and sweet - as their God can be, too." I think this is so important to remember. I learned so much more about people from the Bible who I thought I knew, but it is important to remember that they were people too. Not perfect, but sometimes deeply flawed. Still, God chose them to perform amazing feats, in spite of or because of those very flaws. I am inspired to start again - and this time finish - what I began in 7th grade. It might take me a year - or longer, as I of course intend to read the New Testament as well - but that is my goal.
++++++++++++++++++++++
My book blog:
As anyone who knows me may have guessed by now, I am something of a reader. I devoured books left and right from elementary school on, and this love of reading (and writing!) was fostered even more in 6th grade by quite possibly one of the best teachers I have ever had, Mr. Hanzlik - more affectionately referred to simply as H. Seriously, he's one cool cat, and even the kids who hated reading loved his class. Well, in 7th grade I proudly told Mr. H I had finally found a book that might slow me down a little in my reading endeavors - the Bible. I remember this moment and him chuckling, saying only that it might. I had started it in an attempt to read it cover to cover and made it to Deuteronomy. I am kind of embarrassed to admit that in terms of cover-to-cover, I never made it any farther. Since then I have read different books of the Bible, there are my favorites that I can read over and over (Hello, Matthew!), but I have never been able to go start to finish, and my lone attempt remains that try in 7th grade. However, after reading this book, I am inspired to try again, but more about that later.
Firstly, the author, David Plotz, is Jewish, so naturally his interpretation and relationship to the Bible is going to be different than mine. I am, to use the umbrella term, Protestant; baptized Lutheran, confirmed Methodist, now a member of a very wonderful Covenant church that is everything I have ever wanted a church to be with wonderful pastors and a congregation that has made me feel so welcome since my first service a year and a half ago. Plotz set out on this journey to read the Bible (or, the Old Testament, for us Christians) to see what kinds of insights and such he can glean for himself without someone telling him what this story or that really means. He is a self-proclaimed non-practicing Jew - one who is not particularly observant, vaguely knowing it when it is Sabbath, and rarely attending Synagogue. While at a cousin's bat mitzvah, he grows bored and opens the Torah, coming across the story of Dinah's rape and her brothers' subsequent revenge. Plotz is horrified not only by the story, but kind of of the realization that there is a lot in the Bible that he thought he knew, but actually doesn't. This book is the product of his year spent reading the Bible and his observations and thoughts along the way. He points at that even in the stories he thought he knew, those of Jacob vs. Esau, Cain vs. Abel, David, Solomon, etc., there were many things he did not.
While Plotz uses humor and sarcasm, he has some really great insights that I think a lot of people might come to when reading the Bible on their own. I do take issue with some of the conclusions he draws, as he sometimes looked only at a specific event instead of the big picture. But by and large that was not terribly common and he made a lot of great observations.
In the middle of Plotz's Biblical journey, he takes a trip to Jerusalem, to walk in these places that he is reading about. I am very jealous, as this is something I want so badly to do. I can't even begin to imagine being in these places where so much history has occurred, and to walk the place of the Bible, to see some of these places unchanged for thousands of years. I feel a kind of sadness for Plotz though, as the trip has brought him closer to the places he is reading about, but not to God. He says of the trip, "but I leave no more certain that God was here when it happened." Plotz talked about how thrilling it was to see these places, but I felt as I was reading that couldn't that be God working though his experience with him, speaking to him? I don't get the sense from Plotz that he really WANTS to believe in God, so maybe that is why this does not occur to him? He just doesn't see to be able to acknowledge perhaps he feels this way because God is present with him at that moment.
Plotz continues to read the rest of the Old Testament, and his own conclusion leaves me a bit heartbroken for him. I find it interesting that this journey through the Bible brought him closer to his religion, his Jewishness, so to speak, but farther from God, if possible. He says, "I leave the Bible as a hopeless and angry agnostic. I'm broken-hearted about God." And this is perhaps where the differences of our two faiths became most apparent as I was reading, and this is something Plotz acknowledges. He relates how he has discussed this with Christian friends, who say it is all a set-up for the New Testament. Plotz points out though, "But that doesn't work for me. I'm a Jew. I don't, and I can't, believe that Christ died for my sins. And even if he did, I still don't think that would wash away God's epic crimes in the Old Testament." This line made me just so sad for him. But again, that shows where and how our beliefs differ from Judaism to Christianity.
There were a lot of great quotes Plotz has throughout. Here are a few of my favorites:
In regards to the laws of Leviticus (page 59): "But if there's anything I've learned from these months with the Good Book, it;s that we all have our own Bible. We linger on the passages we love and blot out, or ague with, or skim the verses that repel us. My Bible, I suppose, has a very long Leviticus 19, and a very short Leviticus 18."
Page 81: "So Numbers 27 is a liberal's paradise: the first lawsuit, the first women's rights, the separation of church and state."
Page 128: "Saul, like a greedy president or King Henry VIII, is trying to undo the separation of powers."
Page 131: " 'The shaft of his spear was like a weaver's beam, and his spear head weighed 600 shekels.' I don't know what that means, but it sounds scary."
Page 142: "Question: how do Christian denominations and colleges that forbid dancing reconcile their position with God's obvious love for the cha-cha."
I really appreciated Plotz taking on such a behemoth of a task. Like the author, there were many things I thought I knew about the Old Testament, that I learned in Sunday School or Confirmation classes in high school, but it turned out I only had part of the story. I would agree with Plotz that Samson was a total meat head - how did he NEVER catch on that Delilah was plotting against him the whole time?! I also didn't know he had been married before Delilah came along. I was also unaware that David had a son with Bathsheba BEFORE SOLOMON. I don't know why this is news to me, and I felt at times as I was reading like the Bible was a completely foreign text to me. I also didn't know/recall Jonah being such a baby when God decided to save Nineveh after He ordered Jonah to go and Jonah first refused (and thus the whale had to help him along on his journey).
I also never realized how many phrases we still use today have their roots in the Bible. Plotz points out many of them, more than I made note of, but a few examples include a leopard not being able to change his spots, and the root of the awful word jeremiad (I can't remember the book I recently read that used this word incessantly, but now I know where it came from - Jeremiah and his long-windedness!) The phrase about 'picking up the mantle' is another example. Plotz sums it up nicely, saying (page 300): "It was as if I lifted a veil off my culture. You can't get through a chapter of the Bible, even the most obscure book, without encountering a phrase, a name, a character, or an idea that has come down to us from 3,000 years ago,"
A few other things of note as I wrap this up:
I was glad to see that the story of David and Goliath lived up to Plotz's childhood memories and that in turn it lived up to mine too. This has always been one of my favorite stories and as we approached it, I was concerned there would be something I had not been taught in Sunday School that would come to light and ruin it. Luckily, this did not happen and my memory of this story is safe.
Plotz suggests, due to Isaiah's temperament (he describes reading Isaiah's book as "like being trapped in an elevator with Al Sharpton") adding the phrase "You idiots!" to the end of any verse in Isaiah. it turns out pretty funny. I recommend you try it too.
From Plotz's summary alone, Ruth might be my favorite book. I have yet to read it in its entirety, but I plan to very shortly. Maybe even after I finish this review.
So, in the end, I highly recommend this book. You may not agree with every conclusion that Plotz comes to, but I learned so much more about the Old Testament than I thought I would - mostly because I thought I already knew these big stories. Turns out I didn't know them as well as I thought. Like Plotz, many things God did made me angry, made me question Him, made me want to know more. It also made me angry at times at David, Solomon, and a myriad of others I thought were so upright and constantly faithful.
The last quote I will leave you with sums up nicely how to reconcile this very problem:
"It reminds us that the Bible is not an idealization, but a book written by (and about) real people, who can be both scornful and kind, faithful and cruel, sarcastic and sweet - as their God can be, too." I think this is so important to remember. I learned so much more about people from the Bible who I thought I knew, but it is important to remember that they were people too. Not perfect, but sometimes deeply flawed. Still, God chose them to perform amazing feats, in spite of or because of those very flaws. I am inspired to start again - and this time finish - what I began in 7th grade. It might take me a year - or longer, as I of course intend to read the New Testament as well - but that is my goal.
October 27, 2009
This book was many things, and ultimately I think it worked pretty well.
The voice and tone was consistent and I learned a lot... so, I'll say what I didn't like first and then get into what I did.
I have to be honest, the cataloging style of this, chapter by chapter, piece by piece, without overarching themes, was distracting and seemed too easy to me. Of course, it started out as a blogging project, so I guess I could let it slide. Also, of course, duh, the fact that he's a secular Jew and the Slate editor with a serious lack of misty-eyed reverence for tradition, meant that he wasn't talking about the Bible in the context of the traditions that reflected it. Also, sometimes he was a little overly self-conscious about saying "I don't believe this stuff." Ok, dude, cool, doesn't matter to the reade. So...I like those traditions, of course, and would like to know more about the connections, and thought maybe he would find the opportunity to talk about them. His humor seemed a bit flat to me because I felt like the humor of religious context adds to the stories -- references to Hannukah and Purim looking a bit different much appreciated though.
But of course, there's an upside to his single-mindness. The book really makes clear how varied in tone and subject the O.T. is, how it is largely a Israelite history, and how God was a big old jerk a lot of the time. Plotz seems to appreciate laws a lot. He also makes a really great point about how just because God gives people gifts doesn't mean they use them well (Samson, Solomon), and some of the best people do great (and holy) stuff not for God, but because they care about their fellow man. Ruth is particularly good on that. I did like it when he brought meaning together from the disparate text, and I wish he had done it a bit more.
I loved the last chapter where he said - I'm brokenhearted about God, and angry and arguing with him, but 't isn't engaging in argument with God and his supposed text a form of belief in itself? I think so. To each his own, it is a scary thing to think about, and it's nice that he admits that.
The O.T., The Hebrew Bible, etc. It's pretty violent and hard to take, but has some lovely moments (oh, you Song of Songs, you...Psalms, some crazy prophets) and it was nice to learn about that and maybe a bit will stick. Of course, my main source of O.T. knowledge remains Veggie Tales, and I like that too, maybe a little more. Shadrach, Meesach, and a Bumblebee, indeed.
The voice and tone was consistent and I learned a lot... so, I'll say what I didn't like first and then get into what I did.
I have to be honest, the cataloging style of this, chapter by chapter, piece by piece, without overarching themes, was distracting and seemed too easy to me. Of course, it started out as a blogging project, so I guess I could let it slide. Also, of course, duh, the fact that he's a secular Jew and the Slate editor with a serious lack of misty-eyed reverence for tradition, meant that he wasn't talking about the Bible in the context of the traditions that reflected it. Also, sometimes he was a little overly self-conscious about saying "I don't believe this stuff." Ok, dude, cool, doesn't matter to the reade. So...I like those traditions, of course, and would like to know more about the connections, and thought maybe he would find the opportunity to talk about them. His humor seemed a bit flat to me because I felt like the humor of religious context adds to the stories -- references to Hannukah and Purim looking a bit different much appreciated though.
But of course, there's an upside to his single-mindness. The book really makes clear how varied in tone and subject the O.T. is, how it is largely a Israelite history, and how God was a big old jerk a lot of the time. Plotz seems to appreciate laws a lot. He also makes a really great point about how just because God gives people gifts doesn't mean they use them well (Samson, Solomon), and some of the best people do great (and holy) stuff not for God, but because they care about their fellow man. Ruth is particularly good on that. I did like it when he brought meaning together from the disparate text, and I wish he had done it a bit more.
I loved the last chapter where he said - I'm brokenhearted about God, and angry and arguing with him, but 't isn't engaging in argument with God and his supposed text a form of belief in itself? I think so. To each his own, it is a scary thing to think about, and it's nice that he admits that.
The O.T., The Hebrew Bible, etc. It's pretty violent and hard to take, but has some lovely moments (oh, you Song of Songs, you...Psalms, some crazy prophets) and it was nice to learn about that and maybe a bit will stick. Of course, my main source of O.T. knowledge remains Veggie Tales, and I like that too, maybe a little more. Shadrach, Meesach, and a Bumblebee, indeed.
March 25, 2012
Review posted on Reading Lark After Dark (18+ reviews):
Excuse me? What is a book about The Bible doing in an adult only book review blog? You may well ask. It is non-fiction but any book featuring murder, rape, incest, bestiality, masturbation, the rhythm method, mental illness, betrayal, property fraud, genocide, natural disasters and a talking snake has got to count for 18+, right?
I will start with a disclaimer. I picked this book up quite by accident. I was not looking for anything biblical and although I am Christian, it is only in the loosest sense of the term. Beware! This book will get you thinking, but maybe not in the way you could predict.
Plotz is editor at Slate.com and is a secular Jew who decided to read the bible (well, his Bible which is the Old Testament) and blog his thoughts on it, out of which was born this book. He has a dry sardonic sense of humour and his comments occasionally verge on the smartarse but his irreverently reverent approach to this is truly engaging.
This is not a theological exegesis. It is a hilarious romp through thousands of years of Jewish history, with true glimpses of horror at both God and man’s cruelty. You may think you know the plot of the Old Testament, but I can assure you, you don’t! The God of the Israelites is mostly capricious, litigious and cruel. He favours those who argue with him rather than the blindly faithful, and he loves the bald men! Really.
I enjoyed the author’s recontextualising of past events using modern pop culture reference points- Steven Spielberg apparently missed a plot point to do with the Ark, David and Jonathon may have been going all Brokeback, and the first High Priest, Aaron was the Fredo Corleone of the Sinai.
Just to give you a flavour of his writing style, I will leave you with a quote from the chapter on the Song of Songs:
‘The Song of Songs- also called the ‘Song of Solomon- is like nothing else in the Bible, a steamy poem narrated by two lovers. She is foxy, young, and dark. He is strong,sexy, and seductive. �. Some biblical scholars, whose libidos we must question, insist that the song is merely an allegory, that the verses are just enthusiastic prayers. No way. This is no religious metaphor. This is Last Tango in Judah.�
Overall I really enjoyed his writing style. I laughed - a lot, out loud- and I certainly learnt more about Jewish culture and religion.
Excuse me? What is a book about The Bible doing in an adult only book review blog? You may well ask. It is non-fiction but any book featuring murder, rape, incest, bestiality, masturbation, the rhythm method, mental illness, betrayal, property fraud, genocide, natural disasters and a talking snake has got to count for 18+, right?
I will start with a disclaimer. I picked this book up quite by accident. I was not looking for anything biblical and although I am Christian, it is only in the loosest sense of the term. Beware! This book will get you thinking, but maybe not in the way you could predict.
Plotz is editor at Slate.com and is a secular Jew who decided to read the bible (well, his Bible which is the Old Testament) and blog his thoughts on it, out of which was born this book. He has a dry sardonic sense of humour and his comments occasionally verge on the smartarse but his irreverently reverent approach to this is truly engaging.
This is not a theological exegesis. It is a hilarious romp through thousands of years of Jewish history, with true glimpses of horror at both God and man’s cruelty. You may think you know the plot of the Old Testament, but I can assure you, you don’t! The God of the Israelites is mostly capricious, litigious and cruel. He favours those who argue with him rather than the blindly faithful, and he loves the bald men! Really.
I enjoyed the author’s recontextualising of past events using modern pop culture reference points- Steven Spielberg apparently missed a plot point to do with the Ark, David and Jonathon may have been going all Brokeback, and the first High Priest, Aaron was the Fredo Corleone of the Sinai.
Just to give you a flavour of his writing style, I will leave you with a quote from the chapter on the Song of Songs:
‘The Song of Songs- also called the ‘Song of Solomon- is like nothing else in the Bible, a steamy poem narrated by two lovers. She is foxy, young, and dark. He is strong,sexy, and seductive. �. Some biblical scholars, whose libidos we must question, insist that the song is merely an allegory, that the verses are just enthusiastic prayers. No way. This is no religious metaphor. This is Last Tango in Judah.�
Overall I really enjoyed his writing style. I laughed - a lot, out loud- and I certainly learnt more about Jewish culture and religion.
May 11, 2017
David Plotz is no fool, but he does rush in where angels fear to tread, reading his way through the Hebrew Bible without much help from the massive and multi-generational tradition of commentary on the work. He's irreverent and skeptical, yet not dourly obsessed with disproving the Bible; he's also more sophisticated and well-read than his frequent self-deprecation would lead one to believe. The result is an account that's thoughtful, sensitive, and frequently laugh-out-loud hilarious, though it shows its origin as a blog in its unevenness (e.g., among other things, Plotz doesn't have an entry for every chapter in the Bible, and some entries are themselves perfunctory). The fact that Plotz is an agnostic Jew with scholastic and friendship links with Christianity makes his book appropriate for Jews, Christians, and non-believers alike.
In his march through the Bible, Plotz makes numerous interesting connections and draws enlightening conclusions. I wasn't surprised by his anguished discovery of lots of nigh-genocidal violence, unethical sex, and family conflict in Scripture, but I was particularly struck by his observation that God seems to prefer clever (e.g., Solomon) and contentious (e.g., Moses) spokesmen above the naive and the good (e.g., Esau). At a higher level, I also appreciated Plotz's evolutionary analysis of the Bible, marking its progression from the self-interested motivations of the patriarchs to the ethical imperative of Samuel to the universal morality of the literary prophets; and from the ethnocentric insularity of the Torah-era community to the universal morality of some of the later writings and even to the world-weary skepticism of Habakkuk and Ecclesiastes.
In the end, Plotz encourages a study of the Bible as indispensable for any well-rounded person. Its metaphors are the foundation of Western languages like English, its books are often the first treatment of particular theological and philosophical subjects in Western civilization, and its pronouncements are the bedrock of our religious and social life to this day. He's less optimistic about God, whose vengeful biblical characteristics he finds alienating. But he notes, in a classically Judaic coda, that engaging with the God of the Bible got him to think seriously about numerous moral and theological topics: this engagement, rather than resigned belief, is the real import of the Bible's theophany.
In his march through the Bible, Plotz makes numerous interesting connections and draws enlightening conclusions. I wasn't surprised by his anguished discovery of lots of nigh-genocidal violence, unethical sex, and family conflict in Scripture, but I was particularly struck by his observation that God seems to prefer clever (e.g., Solomon) and contentious (e.g., Moses) spokesmen above the naive and the good (e.g., Esau). At a higher level, I also appreciated Plotz's evolutionary analysis of the Bible, marking its progression from the self-interested motivations of the patriarchs to the ethical imperative of Samuel to the universal morality of the literary prophets; and from the ethnocentric insularity of the Torah-era community to the universal morality of some of the later writings and even to the world-weary skepticism of Habakkuk and Ecclesiastes.
In the end, Plotz encourages a study of the Bible as indispensable for any well-rounded person. Its metaphors are the foundation of Western languages like English, its books are often the first treatment of particular theological and philosophical subjects in Western civilization, and its pronouncements are the bedrock of our religious and social life to this day. He's less optimistic about God, whose vengeful biblical characteristics he finds alienating. But he notes, in a classically Judaic coda, that engaging with the God of the Bible got him to think seriously about numerous moral and theological topics: this engagement, rather than resigned belief, is the real import of the Bible's theophany.
April 12, 2010
4.5 stars
I really enjoyed this book. The author is Jewish so it only covers the Old Testament.
In a fluke move, the author picks up a Bible and reads the story of Dinah and is horrified by it. This is not the warm fuzzy Bible he remembers from teachings when he was young. So, he decides to read the entire thing to see what's really in there.
And goodness, is it crazy. We quickly jump in to Noah's story, which gives an example of how we usually only know the cleaned-up easy version. You know the basics: God is punishing the wickedness in the world through the big flood. Noah takes the animals aboard the ark presumably to save them from the flood. However, as soon as he's back on land he makes an animal sacrifice. (I feel like a sacrificial altar should be included in kids' playsets of Noah and his ark.) And really, what were people doing that was so awful they deserved to be wiped off the face of the earth?
Many of the stories are awful. It's obvious to see the basis of the Crusades, hatred of homosexuals, and other follies: It's certainly acceptable, even expected to kill those who do not have the same beliefs. The innocent are regularly killed or harmed. Women are rarely seen, except for the prostitutes, and always treated as lesser individuals.
As the author says, "Why would I want any 'relationship' with such a jealous, erratic, brutal, unmerciful, unloving, unkind God?" I am really turned off to this image of God.
I've never read the Bible so one might argue I need to do that before I pass any judgments. And, in fact, the author does advocate reading the Bible. His suggestion makes a lot of sense as the Bible is so important in our culture. I am interested in reading some of the books myself. I don't think reading them directly for myself will change the impressions I have though.
At the end of the book, Plotz has a number of Bible lists. Bible's best pick-up lines, "heroes" you don't want to be named after (Aaron, Jacob, Sarah, and more), spectacular murders are a couple of my favorite.
All in all, even though I found the Old Testament so appalling, I really enjoyed this book. Plotz's commentary is humorous and thoughtful. I learned a lot about the Bible.
I really enjoyed this book. The author is Jewish so it only covers the Old Testament.
In a fluke move, the author picks up a Bible and reads the story of Dinah and is horrified by it. This is not the warm fuzzy Bible he remembers from teachings when he was young. So, he decides to read the entire thing to see what's really in there.
And goodness, is it crazy. We quickly jump in to Noah's story, which gives an example of how we usually only know the cleaned-up easy version. You know the basics: God is punishing the wickedness in the world through the big flood. Noah takes the animals aboard the ark presumably to save them from the flood. However, as soon as he's back on land he makes an animal sacrifice. (I feel like a sacrificial altar should be included in kids' playsets of Noah and his ark.) And really, what were people doing that was so awful they deserved to be wiped off the face of the earth?
Many of the stories are awful. It's obvious to see the basis of the Crusades, hatred of homosexuals, and other follies: It's certainly acceptable, even expected to kill those who do not have the same beliefs. The innocent are regularly killed or harmed. Women are rarely seen, except for the prostitutes, and always treated as lesser individuals.
As the author says, "Why would I want any 'relationship' with such a jealous, erratic, brutal, unmerciful, unloving, unkind God?" I am really turned off to this image of God.
I've never read the Bible so one might argue I need to do that before I pass any judgments. And, in fact, the author does advocate reading the Bible. His suggestion makes a lot of sense as the Bible is so important in our culture. I am interested in reading some of the books myself. I don't think reading them directly for myself will change the impressions I have though.
At the end of the book, Plotz has a number of Bible lists. Bible's best pick-up lines, "heroes" you don't want to be named after (Aaron, Jacob, Sarah, and more), spectacular murders are a couple of my favorite.
All in all, even though I found the Old Testament so appalling, I really enjoyed this book. Plotz's commentary is humorous and thoughtful. I learned a lot about the Bible.
May 24, 2016
I found this fascinating. David Plotz, nominally Jewish, schooled as a child in Hebrew school, and as an adolescent in an Episcopalian high school, was pretty sure he knew the Bible well. But at his cousin’s bat mitzvah, picking up a pew-rack Torah and thumbing through, he was startled by the story of Dinah’s rape, a story he never remembered having read, or even heard about. Further, this wasn’t the happily-ever-after sort of Bible story he was accustomed to hearing. His curiosity piqued, Plotz decided to read the Bible (the Hebrew Bible, or what Christians call the Old Testament), and this book is a distilling of his gut-reaction journal, kept as he read. It’s an eye-opener for me, a sort of complacent Bible reader, raised on the Sunday-school versions of these stories. I have read the whole Bible, even studied it, but always guided by a book by some Christian writer or other who explains what it means. To see it through Plotz’s eyes, to read his thinking and reaction to the words on the pages, is to me to hear another voice entirely, one without an agenda to teach me something, or to make me see the Bible as he does. He says, “By reading the whole book, I have given myself a Bible that’s vastly more interesting than the vanilla-pudding version I was fed by Sunday school teachers and the popular culture. The Bible’s gatekeepers have attempted to dupe us into adopting a Bible with a straightforward morality and delightful heroes. The real book is messier, nastier, and infinitely more complex. In other words, it’s much more like life.� He urges us all to read the Bible, for the cultural, literary, and intellectual references that inform Western society. On a personal level, it did not make him a “true believer� of any ilk. He writes, “I came to the Bible hoping to be inspired and awed. I have been, sometimes. But mostly I’ve ended up in a yearlong argument with my Boss. This argument has weakened my faith, and turned me against my God. Yet the argument itself represents a kind of belief, because it commits me to engaging with God.� I laughed out loud in some places. I thought about things I had never thought about before when reading the Bible, or thinking about religion. Well worth the read.
August 28, 2015
I listened to the audio book narrated by the author. I never read Plotz' "Blogging the Bible" on slate.com but I'm assuming pretty much everything in the blog ended up in this book. Good Book is not a work of biblical scholarship, but it is a funny and irreverent look at a text that people think they know better than they actually do.
Plotz reads the entire Jewish (Hebrew) Bible and writes about the experience; he summarizes the interesting parts, muses about the "why" of surprising sections, moans about the boring bits and explores his own experience of being Jewish and his relationship with religion. Unlike most people who would characterize themselves as unbelievers or agnostics, Plotz has a real affection for this book. He doesn't see it as the literal word of a supreme being, but he has respect for its place in human (and particularly Jewish) history and literature and thinks everyone should be more familiar with it.
He talks about struggling to balance his rationalist world view (and lack of belief) with his desire to pass on what are essentially religious traditions to his children; it's a common dilemma - we crave a connection with the past, but we know much more about how the world works than our ancestors did and it can be hard to reconcile the two.
I really enjoyed the retelling of familiar Bible stories as well as hearing the sections which were apparently omitted from my evangelical Christian upbringing. I also felt like I finally saw the Old Testament from a Jewish point of view; I guess my experience of the Bible was Protestant-centric which seems odd to me after reading this book. (Just to clarify for uninformed folks like me - the Hebrew bible is pretty much the
Protestant Old Testament, but arranged in a slightly different order.)
By the end of the book, I had to agree with Plotz that everyone should be more familiar with what's actually written in the Bible; so long as there are people promoting a literal interpretation of this ancient book as the guide to good governance, all of us need to better understand the details of what's being promoted.
Note specific to the audio: Plotz isn't a professional narrator, but he's not bad, and since the book is part memoir, I liked hearing it read by the author.
Plotz reads the entire Jewish (Hebrew) Bible and writes about the experience; he summarizes the interesting parts, muses about the "why" of surprising sections, moans about the boring bits and explores his own experience of being Jewish and his relationship with religion. Unlike most people who would characterize themselves as unbelievers or agnostics, Plotz has a real affection for this book. He doesn't see it as the literal word of a supreme being, but he has respect for its place in human (and particularly Jewish) history and literature and thinks everyone should be more familiar with it.
He talks about struggling to balance his rationalist world view (and lack of belief) with his desire to pass on what are essentially religious traditions to his children; it's a common dilemma - we crave a connection with the past, but we know much more about how the world works than our ancestors did and it can be hard to reconcile the two.
I really enjoyed the retelling of familiar Bible stories as well as hearing the sections which were apparently omitted from my evangelical Christian upbringing. I also felt like I finally saw the Old Testament from a Jewish point of view; I guess my experience of the Bible was Protestant-centric which seems odd to me after reading this book. (Just to clarify for uninformed folks like me - the Hebrew bible is pretty much the
Protestant Old Testament, but arranged in a slightly different order.)
By the end of the book, I had to agree with Plotz that everyone should be more familiar with what's actually written in the Bible; so long as there are people promoting a literal interpretation of this ancient book as the guide to good governance, all of us need to better understand the details of what's being promoted.
Note specific to the audio: Plotz isn't a professional narrator, but he's not bad, and since the book is part memoir, I liked hearing it read by the author.
April 22, 2019
The difficulty with a book such as this -- a book of a person's thoughts and opinions as they engage with some piece of literature or television or whatever-it-is -- is that so much depends upon the reader enjoying the writer. I did not enjoy David Plotz; I do not judge him as a person, but his worldview had so many assumptions about men and women, so many judgements about relationships and people, and so much belief in capitalism and property rights and such, that even when he was funny or interesting I kept running into these assumptions like tripping over large rocks in a path. I wish he had interrogated his own ideas more -- just why is he so shocked by the number of sex workers in the Bible, and why is it he thinks that talking about them is somehow funny or risque or disturbing or whatever else it is he seems to think? And it is like that for the entire book, so... I finished it because I did like the overview of the entirety of the Torah, which I have not read front to back since childhood, but I cannot really recommend it.
January 22, 2010
"The Good Book" is one man's journey through the Bible. What is interesting is that it is not the account of a religious man that reveres the book in any particularly strong way; David Plotz is an agnostic Jew.
"The Good Book" is a chapter-by-chapter account as Plotz reads through the entire Old Testament (it's worth mentioning that "The Bible" refers to the Hebrew Bible, which may disappoint Christians). It is generally as interesting as its source material. The book is engrossing when covering many of the earlier books of the Hebrew Bible, such as Exodus or Leviticus, but dull when covering many other books. To Plotz's credit, he speeds through particularly boring books and makes some of the less interesting books more interesting.
When I was younger, I decided to read the entire Bible from cover to cover. I had grown up Christian, and I felt it was my duty. Of course, I read the book as a Christian, and viewed everything through very Christian eyes. Some of the more despicable deeds of God were shrugged off or rationalized at the time. Sometimes I skimmed difficult parts. This fact made "The Good Book" even more interesting to me.
Hearing Plotz take on the Bible is quite an experience - it's like convincing a friend who has never seen one of your favorite movies to watch it with you. As you sit there, watching a movie you've seen a hundred times before, because you know someone else is experiencing it for the first time, you watch it almost through objective eyes. Some parts of the movie may stick out as particularly embarrassing, even though you never noticed anything strange about them before. Since Plotz reads the Bible without any preconceptions, you are taken on an adventure through the book from objective eyes. I view a number of parts of the Bible differently now than I did before reading "The Good Book".
I recommend "The Good Book" to any Jewish or Christian person that takes their bible very seriously, if for no other reason than when Plotz encounters what he calls the "messy bible" - the nastier bits of the bible that surround some of the stories our culture knows.
"The Good Book" is a chapter-by-chapter account as Plotz reads through the entire Old Testament (it's worth mentioning that "The Bible" refers to the Hebrew Bible, which may disappoint Christians). It is generally as interesting as its source material. The book is engrossing when covering many of the earlier books of the Hebrew Bible, such as Exodus or Leviticus, but dull when covering many other books. To Plotz's credit, he speeds through particularly boring books and makes some of the less interesting books more interesting.
When I was younger, I decided to read the entire Bible from cover to cover. I had grown up Christian, and I felt it was my duty. Of course, I read the book as a Christian, and viewed everything through very Christian eyes. Some of the more despicable deeds of God were shrugged off or rationalized at the time. Sometimes I skimmed difficult parts. This fact made "The Good Book" even more interesting to me.
Hearing Plotz take on the Bible is quite an experience - it's like convincing a friend who has never seen one of your favorite movies to watch it with you. As you sit there, watching a movie you've seen a hundred times before, because you know someone else is experiencing it for the first time, you watch it almost through objective eyes. Some parts of the movie may stick out as particularly embarrassing, even though you never noticed anything strange about them before. Since Plotz reads the Bible without any preconceptions, you are taken on an adventure through the book from objective eyes. I view a number of parts of the Bible differently now than I did before reading "The Good Book".
I recommend "The Good Book" to any Jewish or Christian person that takes their bible very seriously, if for no other reason than when Plotz encounters what he calls the "messy bible" - the nastier bits of the bible that surround some of the stories our culture knows.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 272 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.