What do you think?
Rate this book
56 pages, Paperback
First published March 7, 2017
Your feminist premise should be: I matter. I matter equally. Not “if only.� Not “as long as.� I matter equally. Full stop.
And please reject the language of help. Chudi is not “helping� you by caring for his child. He is doing what he should. When we say fathers are “helping,� we are suggesting that child care is a mother’s territory, into which fathers valiantly venture. It is not.
Teach her that if you criticize X in women but do not criticize X in men, then you do not have a problem with X, you have a problem with women.
“Because you are a girl� is never a reason for anything. Ever.
mothers of baby girls were very restraining, constantly telling the girls ‘don’t touch� or ‘stop and be nice,� and she noticed that the baby boys were not restrained as much and were almost never told to ‘be nice.�Adichie notes that �parents unconsciously start very early to teach girls how to be, that baby girls are given less room and more rules and baby boys more room and fewer rules.� This sort of early guidance into the world begins a chain of behaviors that becomes very difficult to unlearn and sets girls up to feel they must be restrained their whole lives, and this is a problem. We cannot teach girls to fold themselves in and make way for boys, as much as we cannot teach boys that they have a dominant rule of the playroom and, therefore, world. The idea that ‘boys will be boys�, which is applied to a dangerously vast array of behaviors from roughhousing to sexual lusts, is an idea that must be stomped out like a cigarette butt. It gives a lower set of standards to boys and is a dangerous pass in the world. Concepts such as this allowed people to dismiss accusations of sexual assault as mere ‘locker room talk� (another horrifically misogynist phrase that gives a pass to repulsive behavior) because ‘boys will be boys�.
Many cultures and religions control women’s bodies in one way or another...the reason is not about women, but about men. Women must be ‘covered up� to protect men. I find this deeply dehumanizing because it reduces women to mere props used to manage the appetites of men.This plays into the reprehensible ‘boys will be boys� idea again--that males cannot control their sexual urges and it is women's responsibility to dress themselves accordingly. This is downright disgusting. Adichie notes that many cultures like a woman to be sexy but never sexual while never setting a similar standard for the sexual behavior of men. That male sexuality is seen as normal with all the high-fives and bullshit bravado and female sexuality is met with shaming and jeers is something we must not stand for. �Feminism and femininity are not mutually exclusive,� Adichie says, and a female must not feel ashamed for taking pride in their appearance or body. Shaming women for their style of dress has me at all times one snappy retort away from declaring overgrown beards as a phallic symbol of maleness--society judges women for body hair but not men--and therefore overtly misogynistic. It doesn't feel so good when turned around does it?
Teach her to question language. Language is the repository of our prejudices, our beliefs, our assumptions.It is only by questioning language, and the impetus behind words, that we can re-harness language and reshape our society. Language is our greatest tool to assess, address and affect the world around us. Remember that words come bearing connotative weight that can be detrimental even despite our best intentions. Adichie highlights the term ‘princess� for girls which, she says, �is loaded with assumptions of a girl’s delicacy, of the prince who will come to save her, etc.� Adichie prefers the term ‘angel�, though personally I use ‘Queen� or ‘heroine� with my own daughter (a favourite game of ours is for me to hide in a play structure--the castle--and she is the princess that has to rescue the knight. Admittedly it’s a good excuse for me to sit and relax awhile until she finds me, but I like to think it gives agency to the role of a princess).
There is a terrible imbalance from the start. The girls will grow up to be women preoccupied with marriage. The boys will grow up to be men who are not�.The women marry these men. The relationship is automatically uneven because the institution matters more to one than the other. Is it any wonder that...women sacrifice more, at a loss to themselves, because they have to constantly maintain an uneven exchange?Adichie asks for a balance in marriage and addresses the language used in it. A father is never ‘babysitting� or ‘helping� the mother, no, he is doing his duty as a father. The duties must be shared and not done resentfully so--like any instructional on love would suggest. �When there is true equality, resentment does not exist.� We must also not refer to women as being ‘allowed� to do things by the man. She cites many examples of this in society. Adichie continues to focus on working women, the philosophy behind names, and the idea of keeping family members around that project positive non-gender-normative roles for the child to aspire to. This goes for both boys and girls.
Here is a sad truth: Our world is full of men and women who do not like powerful women. We have been so conditioned to think of power as male that a powerful woman is an aberration. And so she is policed. We ask of powerful women: Is she humble? Does she smile? Is she grateful enough? Does she have a domestic side? Questions we do not ask of powerful men, which shows that our discomfort is not with power itself, but with women.Adiche also strongly cautions against the idea of ‘Feminism Lite,� which amounts to a misunderstanding of what feminism is. I would argue that this also applies to much of the feminism of the white-privilege bent that ignores intersectionality. While many women made great strides for feminism in the past decades, by modern standards it often reeks of privilege. This is another thing to avoid.
Your feminist premise should be: I matter. I matter equally. Not “if only.� Not “as long as.� I matter equally. Full stop.