What do you think?
Rate this book
Yesterday Will Make You Cry
¡°There could not be a fitter time or place for the publication of this great prison novel than today¡¯s United States.¡± ¨DH. Bruce Franklin, The Nation A classic restored-the complete and unexpurgated text of a great African-American writer's brutal and lyrical novel of prison life. First published in reduced and bowdlerized form in 1952 as Cast the First Stone, Yesterday Will Make You Cry was Chester Himes's first, most powerful, and autobiographical novel. This Old School Books edition presents it for the first time precisely as Himes wrote it, a sardonic masterpiece of debasement and transfiguration in an American penitentiary and one of his most enduring literary achievements.
363 pages, Paperback
Published February 17, 1999
21 people are currently reading
761 people want to read
About the author
Chester Himes
103?books462?followersChester Bomar Himes began writing in the early 1930s while serving a prison sentence for armed robbery. From there, he produced short stories for periodicals such as Esquire and Abbott's Monthly. When released, he focussed on semi-autobiographical protest novels.
In 1953, Himes emigrated to France, where he was approached by Marcel Duhamel of Gallimard to write a detective series for S¨¦rie Noire, which had published works from the likes of Raymond Chandler, Dashiell Hammett and Jim Thompson. Himes would be the first black author included in the series. The resulting Harlem Cycle gained him celebrity when he won France's Grand Prix de Litt¨¦rature Polici¨¨re for La Reine des Pommes (now known in English as A Rage in Harlem) in 1958. Three of these novels have been adapted into movies: Cotton Comes to Harlem, directed by Ossie Davis in 1970; Come Back, Charleston Blue (based on The Heat's On) in 1972; and A Rage in Harlem, starring Gregory Hines and Danny Glover in 1991.
In 1968, Himes moved to Spain where he made his home until his death.
In 1953, Himes emigrated to France, where he was approached by Marcel Duhamel of Gallimard to write a detective series for S¨¦rie Noire, which had published works from the likes of Raymond Chandler, Dashiell Hammett and Jim Thompson. Himes would be the first black author included in the series. The resulting Harlem Cycle gained him celebrity when he won France's Grand Prix de Litt¨¦rature Polici¨¨re for La Reine des Pommes (now known in English as A Rage in Harlem) in 1958. Three of these novels have been adapted into movies: Cotton Comes to Harlem, directed by Ossie Davis in 1970; Come Back, Charleston Blue (based on The Heat's On) in 1972; and A Rage in Harlem, starring Gregory Hines and Danny Glover in 1991.
In 1968, Himes moved to Spain where he made his home until his death.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 37 reviews
November 22, 2013
After that no one said anything. Jimmy sat on his bunk. The darkness closed in and the silence became tangible. His shoulders drooped forward, his head bowed as if from the weight of the silence. His mind would not penetrate the darkness and his thoughts turned into themselves. He wished some one would start talking again because all he could hear was his own heart beating like a trip-hammer, and his thoughts became broken and scattered. He tried to say something himself, but when he opened his mouth to speak his voice would not come out.
It is never quiet in prison. Jimmy is heralded into his twenty year sentence on golden showers and rugs of body hair under slow no motion. Cat calls and caterwauling. Jimmy is not a real person. Time stoppingly handsome (he always blushes in pleasure. Wasn't it old by the billionth time?) in places the hands are the judge, jury and executioner. A college graduate (beauty before brains. This is touted plenty too, only not quite as nauseatingly often), an object in a bidding war. A bird behind bars without a song to sing. Sound escapes, hard of nothing and no flight.
Jimmy felt so very tender for the Rico whom he knew and was scared for him and wanted to protect him and change him all over from that Rico whom he did not know, the Rico who repulsed him so and whom he found so repellent on occasions. It must have been that on those times he was afraid that Rico would turn back and become the other Rico, and that he, Jimmy, would be again a goddamned, solid fool.
Have you ever looked on inmates who are headed to the big house? Some probably going for a long time. Long enough that it is forever. They are shackled to each other and the bars in mouths glow in the dark. The happy looks on their faces feels like falling. If it feels that way just to see them. If you could pull off their faces it is the corpses of the weight of dreaded centuries behind them. My stomach is pitted thinking about it. I wonder sometimes if this kind of knot inside you could turn into a self destruct capsule if you can't find a way to not think about it anymore. Yesterday Will Make You Cry is the best in the beginning when Jimmy first gets there and it is the too quiet. When it is the shift between I can't believe this is happening. He can't believe there's a poker game going on. People are laughing. It is best that Himes creates in that he sounds absolutely fake as shit in his pleasure in this. It isn't real. He's in the prison is real ball and it also isn't happening chains. They are stolen. Himes kinda fucked up making Jimmy a repeat offender, though. I can't believe that he is this naive about everything when he'd been locked up before. Jimmy becomes a-whatever-point-I-want-to-make-whim in his thoughts and beliefs. Don't believe him when he worries Rico won't love him. It won't be Rico's back walking away. I wish he had made a choice one way or the other to make Jimmy his see-through plastic bag on the face of prison, or the ducts. Jimmy doesn't know he's doing it until it is time for the shark to take a bite. I'm not empty. Fill up time. I felt so eyes in a dark room with objects to knock into (I know that's a dresser because it's always there) with him (and huge parts of the book are cringe worthy. Episodic cliches of prison life you could pick up anywhere else. If he were writing fake letters to home from camp he would sound more present). When he doesn't exist there any more they fill up whatever shape he has to take next. Maybe all of the sweat from all of the sex he has will rain down like tears on the faces of the many men who want his body so hard. Jimmy can get you anything you want. What is your poison? Newspapers, shoes, shower caps. Hey, handsome.
(This is probably trivial but I couldn't help noting the fashion. Himes was released in 1937. Men are described sporting the pants dropping drawers look. Come on, isn't it time for a new look already? I always found it interesting that so much of men's fashion is styled by the prison population. Maybe it is because so much of the population is in prison. That's depressing.)
So Chester Himes probably had this friend. Once upon a time the fat cats must've wink wink nudged nudged. "Oh, okay. Your friend. We get you." Yesterday Will Make You Cry was messed around with like fresh meat in the prison shark pool (I think it was four "retoolings"!) and called "Cast the First Stone". Yeah, we know Jimmy is written as a white man but wink wink. Decades later it is "restored" and to the original title and material. But, the cover is of a line-up of negro inmates. His "friend" Jimmy could not have been a white man, no matter it is Himes' damned book and not theirs? What gives? Famous author book blurbers such as Ishmael Reed bespeak of its "trenchant commentary about blacks living in a society that is hostile to them". I wonder if any one of the blurbers read any of the novel (or just flipped to the author photo in the back flap, probably). It is prison for everyone in there. To separate them based on color of their skin is missing it. Every moment, under the skin.
I don't get Jimmy. Okay, a lot of inmates will break your mama's back on she was so stupid she got lost on the way to Popeye's jokes. It is never quiet and a voice in the dark could be crying, or anything at all. But Jimmy doesn't hear it. He talks about wanting to hear it and THAT is the voice he and (unfortunately) myself hears. That girl I screwed when I was young was the love of my life. Blah, blah, blah shit eating grin of bravado. The abyss' abyss happens to the negro inmates, it makes a bitch out of every asshole and everyone has one of those. He turns on the fairy lights when some inmates die in a fire. I could have died! I'm going to make out with my "best friend" because what the hey, something has to happen (the kind of best friend you have with the kid who is the only kid your age living on your street).
'Yesterday' broke me during the long, long chapters of Jimmy's back story. (No one knows the troubles I've seen.) Taking him out of the prison context was another big fuck up, especially since it didn't tell me anything I didn't already know, breathe any other kind of life to make this case about how prison stops meaning that cannot pretend inside it. Walter becomes Lively and his laughter turns into Rico's half trusting face cuddling to the backs of knowing inmates. We have nothing but time. He was a socket of getting into trouble to break the time to get there in the first place (he was already on parole when he got sent up again for armed robbery). Don't forget ridiculously good looking, Mars! Jimmy may go back or he'll see some pretty face and what the hey. I wish Himes had shown the black behind his tombstone smile for others, if Jimmy was going to be so important. Maybe someone hoped for a different voice in the dark when they enacted love on his "handsome" face. Maybe their love felt like Jimmy when he had to forget what his mother looked like until he could forget what prison looked like.
September 22, 2021
Once again, as always, a book that exceeded all expectations I had. It¡¯s such a shame ¡°Yesterday Will Make You Cry¡± is relatively unknown today. NYRB¡..where are you?!
I¡¯ve read some other reviews and agree that the first portion of the novel is fragmented and jumps around a lot but to me it totally works and I thought it a really compelling way of showing Jimmy¡¯s mindset as he settles into prison life. He can¡¯t think straight, he can¡¯t focus or feel much of anything, he¡¯s still kind of stunned and every day is the same as all the others. A monotonous existence. The only things that stand out to him, the only things worth noting are the incidents - the killings, flirtations, fights, beatings, odd conversations and one stalker-type situation which is so unexpectedly unsettling I got chills. I¡¯d give the book 5 stars for the first 100 pages alone, but then there¡¯s the prison fire, a literal hellscape - disturbing and lurid and riveting.
I love the way Himes writes and the way he gets you inside Jimmy¡¯s head and pulls you down with him, the way you start feeling like you¡¯re going crazy because he¡¯s trapped, so you¡¯re trapped, not only in a prison but in his mind and body and way of thinking. He¡¯s not the most likable character, but there¡¯s a lot of history Himes goes into about his childhood, his family, growing up, that explains why Jimmy is the way he is, which made me feel for him a lot more. Not that I agree with everything he does, but Himes made me understand.
A standout scene for me is Jimmy¡¯s first experience being sent to the hole, waiting in nothing but complete darkness with nothing to do but think and sleep and listen to other convicts speak from elsewhere in the room, and they read like voices inside his head.
The the last section of the novel presents a new character, Rico, who brings out a side of Jimmy we haven¡¯t seen up until that point, and this final chapter was the most touching and interesting for me. The tone changes a bit, but after all the horror before it¡¯s a nice change of pace. The life and death of a short lived relationship. The happy parts of their relationship where they get drunk and laugh at everything, forgetting anyone else exists were some of my favorite moments of the book. My ONLY slight complaint was how often Rico called Jimmy ¡°Puggy Wuggy¡±. But everyone has their faults¡
It was shocking how openly Himes spoke about gay relationships and characters considering this was written in the 1950¡¯s. I was not expecting that to be a main focus of the story at all, but I¡¯m glad it was.
Anyway, this review really isn¡¯t doing justice to the book but it¡¯s definitely one of my favorite reads of 2021 and I highly recommend!
I¡¯ve read some other reviews and agree that the first portion of the novel is fragmented and jumps around a lot but to me it totally works and I thought it a really compelling way of showing Jimmy¡¯s mindset as he settles into prison life. He can¡¯t think straight, he can¡¯t focus or feel much of anything, he¡¯s still kind of stunned and every day is the same as all the others. A monotonous existence. The only things that stand out to him, the only things worth noting are the incidents - the killings, flirtations, fights, beatings, odd conversations and one stalker-type situation which is so unexpectedly unsettling I got chills. I¡¯d give the book 5 stars for the first 100 pages alone, but then there¡¯s the prison fire, a literal hellscape - disturbing and lurid and riveting.
I love the way Himes writes and the way he gets you inside Jimmy¡¯s head and pulls you down with him, the way you start feeling like you¡¯re going crazy because he¡¯s trapped, so you¡¯re trapped, not only in a prison but in his mind and body and way of thinking. He¡¯s not the most likable character, but there¡¯s a lot of history Himes goes into about his childhood, his family, growing up, that explains why Jimmy is the way he is, which made me feel for him a lot more. Not that I agree with everything he does, but Himes made me understand.
A standout scene for me is Jimmy¡¯s first experience being sent to the hole, waiting in nothing but complete darkness with nothing to do but think and sleep and listen to other convicts speak from elsewhere in the room, and they read like voices inside his head.
The the last section of the novel presents a new character, Rico, who brings out a side of Jimmy we haven¡¯t seen up until that point, and this final chapter was the most touching and interesting for me. The tone changes a bit, but after all the horror before it¡¯s a nice change of pace. The life and death of a short lived relationship. The happy parts of their relationship where they get drunk and laugh at everything, forgetting anyone else exists were some of my favorite moments of the book. My ONLY slight complaint was how often Rico called Jimmy ¡°Puggy Wuggy¡±. But everyone has their faults¡
It was shocking how openly Himes spoke about gay relationships and characters considering this was written in the 1950¡¯s. I was not expecting that to be a main focus of the story at all, but I¡¯m glad it was.
Anyway, this review really isn¡¯t doing justice to the book but it¡¯s definitely one of my favorite reads of 2021 and I highly recommend!
August 4, 2010
Late in his career and life, Chester Himes authored a famous PI series while living in France. This book is his first novel republished the way he originally wrote it in 1998. Much of the story takes place in an Ohio prison during the 1930s when Mr. Himes was also incarerated for seven years. The protagonist Jimmy Monroe is a white kid from Mississippi. The gritty tedium of jail is spelled by card games (with gambling) and softball leagues. Mr. Himes deals with the gay issues in probably frank ways for the time. He uses some literary flourishes that more than once reminded me of John Dos Passos' writing. Bottom line: a solid read for a prison novel without the extra violence and bitterness.
May 19, 2024
This novel is mind-blowing. It's a prison novel from the mid-1950s in the United States that tells the story of an incarcerated man named Jimmy and his relationship (this takes up most of the last third of the book) with another man called Prince Rico. This is a humane, generous study of men behind bars, and it's a really extraordinary character study.
Here's one example of the wisdom of this novel:
"It seemed so illogical to punish some poor criminal for doing something that civilization taught him how to do so he could have something that civilization taught him how to want. It seemed to him as wrong as if they had hung the gun that shot the man."
The novel is filled with brilliant, terrible insights like this, as Jimmy struggles with how he got to where he got, plagued by regret, and not fully understanding himself or his own motivations. I didn't know it was possible for a book like this to exist in the early 1950s. I guess the only book that comes close is Giovanni's Room... which was written a few years after this Chester Himes novel, though Yesterday Will Make You Cry was never published as written until after Himes' death. In any case this is a masterpiece.
Here's one example of the wisdom of this novel:
"It seemed so illogical to punish some poor criminal for doing something that civilization taught him how to do so he could have something that civilization taught him how to want. It seemed to him as wrong as if they had hung the gun that shot the man."
The novel is filled with brilliant, terrible insights like this, as Jimmy struggles with how he got to where he got, plagued by regret, and not fully understanding himself or his own motivations. I didn't know it was possible for a book like this to exist in the early 1950s. I guess the only book that comes close is Giovanni's Room... which was written a few years after this Chester Himes novel, though Yesterday Will Make You Cry was never published as written until after Himes' death. In any case this is a masterpiece.
February 12, 2018
Read it for University. Was a good book. Can see the merits but without a proper narrative it wouldn't be the sort I would read all the time.
December 31, 2013
The first hundred pages, I didn't know how I was gonna get through it. Names come and go. Things that would be disturbing in the outside world happen on the periphery and "That happened." was often the only commentary. Then there was the prison fire, a magnificent piece of writing taking up a huge chunk of the novel and of our protagonist's psyche. The digression into Jimmy's early life was a welcome break from the endless card games and innuendo, although the prose was standard and predictable. But the novel started to have a cumulative effect. I couldn't put it down. I became acutely aware of the prisoners' humanity, and "that there was nothing in a drug store that would kill them quite as dead as standing inside of a prison, looking out." Or the endless standing and waiting for nothing greater than a plate of beans or a haircut. Or how a phrase in a song can bring up emotions that cannot be repressed.
I appreciated how, as a writer, Jimmy could happen into a song or a scene in a movie and it would unleash a wave of memories, creativity and anguish that he had to ride until it subsided or the story was finished. And how he could feel touched by all of the laughter, skyscrapers, or normal people he would never know. I've worked with the juvenile probation population and with mentally ill men who have spent much of their lives in prison, and this novel made me question how well I could ever have understood them. Going forward, reading this novel will make me a better person and clinician.
This is probably a four star book but for me, the same-sex romance in the final half pushes it over the top, considering when it was written and how well it still plays. I'm not calling the relationship 'gay' because neither one of the men may actually be gay as we've come to know it. Certainly not our protagonist. The relationship between Jimmy and Rico reminded me, unfortunately, of an important but ill-fated relationship I had in the 90s with someone who was older and carried much more gay shame than I did.
My criteria for a five star novel are thus: have I learned something about myself, such that I have a different perspective on my past or my relationships? Have I gained a deeper understanding of people who are different from me? Will I approach situations differently, with more maturity and reasoning? Was the novel written in a manner that when I think back on it, it will seem like I am recalling my own memories? Did the novel manage to work its way into my dreams while I was reading it? Would the novel be worth reading again? Did I manage to get more out of the novel than I put into it? Was my only duty to sit down and read the damn thing, and in return I received innumerable riches? And did the form justify the content, and vice versa? Yes to all.
I appreciated how, as a writer, Jimmy could happen into a song or a scene in a movie and it would unleash a wave of memories, creativity and anguish that he had to ride until it subsided or the story was finished. And how he could feel touched by all of the laughter, skyscrapers, or normal people he would never know. I've worked with the juvenile probation population and with mentally ill men who have spent much of their lives in prison, and this novel made me question how well I could ever have understood them. Going forward, reading this novel will make me a better person and clinician.
This is probably a four star book but for me, the same-sex romance in the final half pushes it over the top, considering when it was written and how well it still plays. I'm not calling the relationship 'gay' because neither one of the men may actually be gay as we've come to know it. Certainly not our protagonist. The relationship between Jimmy and Rico reminded me, unfortunately, of an important but ill-fated relationship I had in the 90s with someone who was older and carried much more gay shame than I did.
My criteria for a five star novel are thus: have I learned something about myself, such that I have a different perspective on my past or my relationships? Have I gained a deeper understanding of people who are different from me? Will I approach situations differently, with more maturity and reasoning? Was the novel written in a manner that when I think back on it, it will seem like I am recalling my own memories? Did the novel manage to work its way into my dreams while I was reading it? Would the novel be worth reading again? Did I manage to get more out of the novel than I put into it? Was my only duty to sit down and read the damn thing, and in return I received innumerable riches? And did the form justify the content, and vice versa? Yes to all.
December 13, 2016
Himes wrote "literary novels" that were garish extensions of Richard Wrights social protest/white women killer fiction; and detective novels that read too much like a middle-aged expat trying to be down in Harlem. It took me forever to come up to the re-release of the original version of "Yesterday" ( although all my hip Black lit nerd friends were telling me to read it for years)
But when I did... A book about a group of men trying to come to terms with themselves, their surroundings, and their sexuality while doing bids in prison; "Yesterday" is a novel that would be explosive right now. In showing relationships between blacks and whites, fractured origin stories, and the damage the prisoners do and do to themselves, the novel is both heartbreaking and darkly beautiful. It is a revelation to see Himes Style(always his strongest suit) unfettered, free from the performative slogans, statements, and checklisted actions that dictated the "Wright Protest Genre" The novel stands up with any AA novel in the 20th century and should last and be read in the 21st
Yesterday was also a Novel that-in it's original form-didn't stand a chance in hell of getting published in 1937. In that context, the book is heartbreaking to read in that it present's a case of Himes' regression as a writer; showing the apex of his talent before he put back inside all his examined tensions and contradictions and cultivated an ugly( and at times murderous) drag persona.
But when I did... A book about a group of men trying to come to terms with themselves, their surroundings, and their sexuality while doing bids in prison; "Yesterday" is a novel that would be explosive right now. In showing relationships between blacks and whites, fractured origin stories, and the damage the prisoners do and do to themselves, the novel is both heartbreaking and darkly beautiful. It is a revelation to see Himes Style(always his strongest suit) unfettered, free from the performative slogans, statements, and checklisted actions that dictated the "Wright Protest Genre" The novel stands up with any AA novel in the 20th century and should last and be read in the 21st
Yesterday was also a Novel that-in it's original form-didn't stand a chance in hell of getting published in 1937. In that context, the book is heartbreaking to read in that it present's a case of Himes' regression as a writer; showing the apex of his talent before he put back inside all his examined tensions and contradictions and cultivated an ugly( and at times murderous) drag persona.
Want to read
August 14, 2013(FROM JACKET)In 1937 Chester Himes, newly released from a seven-year stretch in the Ohio State Penitentiary for grand larceny, began his first novel, "Yesterday Will Make You Cry". By turns brutal and lyrical and never less than totally honest, it tells the autobiographical story of young Jimmy Monroe's passage through the prison system, which tests the limits of his sanity, his capacity for suffering, and his definition of love. Stunningly candid about racism, homosexuality, and prison corruption, the book would take sixteen years and four subsequent revisions before being published in a much-altered form as "Cast the First Stone" in 1953. Even bowlderized, it was recognized as a sardonic masterpiece of debasement and transfiguration.
This edition, the first hardcover publication in Norton's Old School Books series, presents for the first time the book precisely as Himes intended it to be read, with its raw honesty and startingly compassion entirely intact. It now stands definitively as one of the great novels of prison life and one of Himes's most enduring literary achievements.
This edition, the first hardcover publication in Norton's Old School Books series, presents for the first time the book precisely as Himes intended it to be read, with its raw honesty and startingly compassion entirely intact. It now stands definitively as one of the great novels of prison life and one of Himes's most enduring literary achievements.
August 27, 2014
Unreadable.
The book mentions in the introduction that this was shopped around and rejected quite a lot before finally being published in a highly censored and reworked version. The book implies that racism and homophobia led to the revision, but I question that. I think they're using that to sell this version of the book. The book needs revision and narrative structure.
The introduction also says that the book hasn't been republished since it's initial printed in 1953, which is also untrue. It was published as a gay pulp in 1972 by Signet Books. What would lead the author to ignore this gay re-printing of this work? Homophobia?
The book itself has no narrative structure. It's difficult to read, there's slang from the period. The author is black but writes from the perspective of a white man because he thought it would help sell books. Da black folks de all be talkin like dis. The book is a series of vignettes rather than a story, impossible to follow the characters from one scene to the next when there is no description or character development.
I got to page 100 and this book started to make me cry.
The book mentions in the introduction that this was shopped around and rejected quite a lot before finally being published in a highly censored and reworked version. The book implies that racism and homophobia led to the revision, but I question that. I think they're using that to sell this version of the book. The book needs revision and narrative structure.
The introduction also says that the book hasn't been republished since it's initial printed in 1953, which is also untrue. It was published as a gay pulp in 1972 by Signet Books. What would lead the author to ignore this gay re-printing of this work? Homophobia?
The book itself has no narrative structure. It's difficult to read, there's slang from the period. The author is black but writes from the perspective of a white man because he thought it would help sell books. Da black folks de all be talkin like dis. The book is a series of vignettes rather than a story, impossible to follow the characters from one scene to the next when there is no description or character development.
I got to page 100 and this book started to make me cry.
January 11, 2015
African-American writing in 1930s, published 1953 (abridged). Reissued this time, in 1999, as it was originally written. Main characters are white persons (straight) who fall in love in prison. Interesting. Helped me to focus on the importance of ¡°place¡± in my own writing.
February 25, 2021
yesterday really will make you cry
October 16, 2023
A poignant, brutal, lyrical, and frank treatment of depression-era prison life, written by Himes in the Thirties while he was serving seven years in Ohio Penitentiary for armed robbery. After his release, Himes tried for many years to find a publisher, but the publishing industry wasn't ready to tackle a candid, soul-searching book about gay life in prison. The book was finally published in a highly censored version called Cast the First Stone in 1953. Fortunately, Norton released this unabridged version in 1998, which restores the book to its original form. Sure, it's uneven and crude, but it's also powerful, naturalistic, and gripping, and there are many shocking scenes, especially the catastrophic prison fire, which is based on a true event. It's one of the finest prison novels ever.
It surprised me that protagonist Jimmy Monroe, his two gay lovers Lively and Rico, and most of the other characters featured in the book are white. Yes, a black man can write a novel about mostly white men in prison, but it seems like an unnecessary attempt by Himes to broaden the appeal of the story. The cover photo, which features four men in a police lineup, three of whom are black, only adds to the confusion. Given Himes's decades-long attempt to publish his original novel (it was published more than a decade after his death), it¡¯s unfortunate that he chose to whitewash his story. But a writer¡¯s gotta eat.
It surprised me that protagonist Jimmy Monroe, his two gay lovers Lively and Rico, and most of the other characters featured in the book are white. Yes, a black man can write a novel about mostly white men in prison, but it seems like an unnecessary attempt by Himes to broaden the appeal of the story. The cover photo, which features four men in a police lineup, three of whom are black, only adds to the confusion. Given Himes's decades-long attempt to publish his original novel (it was published more than a decade after his death), it¡¯s unfortunate that he chose to whitewash his story. But a writer¡¯s gotta eat.
March 17, 2024
Reconozco lo impactante que debe haber sido cuando se public¨®, porque muestra de manera descarnada como se vive dentro de una prisi¨®n. No solo la violencia, sino el vocabulario y la din¨¢mica interna que imagino que el p¨²blico en general no ten¨ªa ni idea. Es una novela dur¨ªsima de leer como todas las de Chester Himes.
Ahora, yo la le¨ª en este diciembre del 2023, con 47 a?os, despu¨¦s no solo de leer novelas como las de Don Winslow y James Ellroy, sino tambi¨¦n un mont¨®n de series como Tumberos, El Marginal, Prison Break o las mism¨ªsima Breaking Bad, por eso no me sent¨ª tan impactado, y por momentos me aburri¨® y me cost¨® avanzar. Pero le atribuyo los m¨¦ritos que posee, un relato realista sobre la vida de un presidiario en las d¨¦cadas del 40 o 50, y encima de primera mano porque Himes estuvo preso en su vida real, y lo conto en este libro.
Ahora, yo la le¨ª en este diciembre del 2023, con 47 a?os, despu¨¦s no solo de leer novelas como las de Don Winslow y James Ellroy, sino tambi¨¦n un mont¨®n de series como Tumberos, El Marginal, Prison Break o las mism¨ªsima Breaking Bad, por eso no me sent¨ª tan impactado, y por momentos me aburri¨® y me cost¨® avanzar. Pero le atribuyo los m¨¦ritos que posee, un relato realista sobre la vida de un presidiario en las d¨¦cadas del 40 o 50, y encima de primera mano porque Himes estuvo preso en su vida real, y lo conto en este libro.
February 15, 2022
Sometimes when I rate a book, the rating represents how I felt when I was reading the book, or how much I liked reading it. For this rating, it rather reflects the quality of the work. I didn¡¯t quite enjoy reading this story at all times, as it droned on without a strong plot. The writing somewhat resembled the conditions of prison, in which convicts live their lives without a plot. So, the organization of the story was appropriate. I didn¡¯t understand a lot of the jokes that the characters made, or why certain comments made them angry, or what those comments even meant. This makes sense because the story is based in 1930s prison. It did make it difficult to enjoy the story.
Anyway, very well written but not especially enjoyable to read.
Anyway, very well written but not especially enjoyable to read.
February 15, 2024
As someone who has not served time in prison, the prison story has for me a rubberneck appeal; the fights, the posturing, the adaptive furtive methods of communication and leisure. This book has all of these features, but the way Mr. Himes tells it seems to eschew the exploitative aspects of gore and pulp. Instead, it focuses on his loneliness, isolation, and emotional pain in an impressionist way. The events are clear cut, and the style he uses to express the emotional response to Jimmy's painful and lonely life, and the hellscape of this prison, is uniquely superb.
February 23, 2019
Novela negra, autobiogr¨¢fica.
Narra la historia de Jimmy Monroe, un joven, a mi parecer, soci¨®pata, indiferente ante otros seres humanos, que vive s¨®lo el presente, sin los recuerdos del pasado y la esperanzas del futuro.
Sus dos m¨¢s importantes relaciones en la c¨¢rcel, con Liberly y Rico, y el episodio del incendio, lo cambian un poco.
Narra la historia de Jimmy Monroe, un joven, a mi parecer, soci¨®pata, indiferente ante otros seres humanos, que vive s¨®lo el presente, sin los recuerdos del pasado y la esperanzas del futuro.
Sus dos m¨¢s importantes relaciones en la c¨¢rcel, con Liberly y Rico, y el episodio del incendio, lo cambian un poco.
March 10, 2019
While an interesting (and apparently first-hand) portrayal of prison life in the 30s, Himes' story of a self-sabotaging two-bit criminal gets a bit long-winded in parts. As a result, the bizarre nature of imprisonment becomes mundane and nearly boring. Himes is a beautiful writer, I just wish this novel had been about 100 pages tighter.
October 24, 2017
Really need the half star on this to make it 3.5.
Read
May 16, 2018The first book of Himes' that I have read and it will not be the last. Honest and unflinching without a drop of sentimental nonsense.
December 4, 2022
That's the most underrated book I've ever read in my life.
February 8, 2023
ºÍbastard carolinaÒ»Ñù Ä¿Ç°ÐÄÀí½¡¿µ²»ÔÊÐíÎÒ¼ÌÐø¶ÁÏÂÈ¥µÄÊé µ«ÊÇÏ£ÍûÓÐÒ»ÌìÄܶÁÍê
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
June 3, 2023
Muy deprimente
April 22, 2024
las ¨²ltimas 100 p¨¢ginas mejora, pero mucha vara
October 30, 2022
A prison novel, in part based on the author's personal experiences. Offers a brutal depiction of prisons in the 1930s and a frank portrayal of homosexual relations within them. Was bowdlerized by censors in the 50s, when it was published, but can now be read in it's original form. Surprisingly the topic of race does not come up often in the novel, despite the author being a Black expatriate. Is somewhat similar to the works of Eddie Bunker or Iceberg Slim. Would recommend to anyone interested in criminal/penal literature.
December 13, 2013
The author Chester Himes of the book Yesterday will make you cry, takes you to a dark setting which is a prison. "He had celled with the other newcomers up on 5th-K, the top range of the I&K cell block, a very old block with small, grimy, and very cold cells" I like how he goes into detail when describing the setting because you can really picture it and you feel like you are part of the setting. This story shows the struggle of one man's journey through prison.
The main characters in the story were Jimmy and Rico. For me Rico was likeable but not so much Jimmy. "Where there had been hurts; now there were only shocks. Before, each moment had been all past, hurting with a deep ache of remorse; or all future, hideous with the thought of twenty years." These were Jimmy's thoughts and to me I thought he was dwelling on the past too much and being sad all the time when he was the one who got himself into the trouble. On the other hand, I liked Rico because he was very reckless and careless about everything and he always stood up for himself even when that put him in dangerous positions at times. "His eyes became wild and feverish, his face became flushed, and his whole mouth twisted into a sneer. Where I come from, when you win, you put your money in, turn your hand over and take the pot." This shows that Rico likes to prove everyone wrong because all the convicts were trying to leave him with no money while they were playing cards.
Although the book had great description and setting, it was not what I had expected. I rated this three stars because through the book I found myself getting bored really fast especially in the beginning when Jimmy was reflecting on what he did. Based on the illustration on the front cover and the title, I thought it would be more about discrimination between African Americans and whites in prison but it was the complete opposite which was a disappointment for me. I feel like there are more interesting books out there to read.
The ending of the book get more interesting which is the only thing that keeps the reader engaged. A lot of things happen between Rico and Jimmy that weren't expected and that are very shocking.
The main characters in the story were Jimmy and Rico. For me Rico was likeable but not so much Jimmy. "Where there had been hurts; now there were only shocks. Before, each moment had been all past, hurting with a deep ache of remorse; or all future, hideous with the thought of twenty years." These were Jimmy's thoughts and to me I thought he was dwelling on the past too much and being sad all the time when he was the one who got himself into the trouble. On the other hand, I liked Rico because he was very reckless and careless about everything and he always stood up for himself even when that put him in dangerous positions at times. "His eyes became wild and feverish, his face became flushed, and his whole mouth twisted into a sneer. Where I come from, when you win, you put your money in, turn your hand over and take the pot." This shows that Rico likes to prove everyone wrong because all the convicts were trying to leave him with no money while they were playing cards.
Although the book had great description and setting, it was not what I had expected. I rated this three stars because through the book I found myself getting bored really fast especially in the beginning when Jimmy was reflecting on what he did. Based on the illustration on the front cover and the title, I thought it would be more about discrimination between African Americans and whites in prison but it was the complete opposite which was a disappointment for me. I feel like there are more interesting books out there to read.
The ending of the book get more interesting which is the only thing that keeps the reader engaged. A lot of things happen between Rico and Jimmy that weren't expected and that are very shocking.
January 2, 2015
This is the version of "Cast the First Stone" with the text and title as written by the author before it was significantly changed by editors. In the late 1920's, Jimmy Munroe is sentenced to twenty years in prison in Arkansas after robbing a couple. In prison, he becomes even more corrupted by his association with other prisoners and eventually begins to find himself attracted to other men. He falls in lust with two men before he meets Prince Rico with whom he falls in love. Himes is a good writer and this supposedly was semi-autobiographical but the language he uses for the characters seems very unrealistic to me. Still was a very good read overall.
October 2, 2012
Honestly, I was expecting more interaction and controversy between black and white inmates as this book is classified under African American Studies. T'was not the case. Though autobiographical in part, this is a story of brutal self-discovery of one (white) man's twenty-year stint in the penitentiary. Difficult to read at times due to graphic scenes of violence. Worth it for the insight gained.
May 30, 2016
This book is so uneven yet so full. I can't really express all the emotions I felt reading this. At first it reads like a pulpy novel which really should have been a short story then it opens and blooms into a series of impressionistic vignettes. It dances between the lyrical and the slime. Himes is a smart writer. He has a keen understanding of human psychology and human suffering. By the final part of the novel the pulp austerity turns to a sentimental plea for humanity----just wow.
May 24, 2008
Remained one of my favorite books for a very long time. This is a REAL prison novel from someone who spent time there. Originally it was supposed to depict a black inmate, but publishers made him change his protagonist to a white boy...typical. If you read it in either voice its equally compelling, albeit a completely different novel.
November 25, 2019
Esse livro ¨¦ at¨¦ de certa forma raro e pode ser visto de duas formas: Se voc¨º quer porradaria e a??o na pris?o, voc¨º vai se frustar; Se voc¨º quer ver como funciona a cadeia nos anos 30(Digo, ali¨¢s, que ¨¦ focado intensamente nos sentimentos e a??es dos presos) voc¨º vai gostar e ver o quanto o livro ¨¦ de certa forma bem escrito. Mais uma coisa: ? um livro bem forte.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 37 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.