What do you think?
Rate this book
Thoreau: Walden and Other Writings
Naturalist, philosopher, champion of self-reliance and moral independence, Henry David Thoreau remains not only one of our most influential writers but also one of our most contemporary. This edition gathers all of Thoreau's most significant works, including his masterpiece, "Walden", "A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers", "Cape Cod", "The Maine Woods", as well as "The Journal", "Civil Disobedience" and "Life Without Principle". Taken together, they reveal the astounding range, subtlety, artistry, and depth of thought of this true American original.
433 pages, Mass Market Paperback
First published August 1, 1854
561 people are currently reading
6,824 people want to read
About the author
Henry David Thoreau
2,091books6,419followersHenry David Thoreau (born David Henry Thoreau) was an American author, naturalist, transcendentalist, tax resister, development critic, philosopher, and abolitionist who is best known for Walden, a reflection upon simple living in natural surroundings, and his essay, Civil Disobedience, an argument for individual resistance to civil government in moral opposition to an unjust state.
Thoreau's books, articles, essays, journals, and poetry total over 20 volumes. Among his lasting contributions were his writings on natural history and philosophy, where he anticipated the methods and findings of ecology and environmental history, two sources of modern day environmentalism.
In 1817, Henry David Thoreau was born in Massachusetts. He graduated from Harvard University in 1837, taught briefly, then turned to writing and lecturing. Becoming a Transcendentalist and good friend of Emerson, Thoreau lived the life of simplicity he advocated in his writings. His two-year experience in a hut in Walden, on land owned by Emerson, resulted in the classic, Walden: Life in the Woods (1854). During his sojourn there, Thoreau refused to pay a poll tax in protest of slavery and the Mexican war, for which he was jailed overnight. His activist convictions were expressed in the groundbreaking On the Duty of Civil Disobedience (1849). In a diary he noted his disapproval of attempts to convert the Algonquins "from their own superstitions to new ones." In a journal he noted dryly that it is appropriate for a church to be the ugliest building in a village, "because it is the one in which human nature stoops to the lowest and is the most disgraced." (Cited by James A. Haught in 2000 Years of Disbelief.) When Parker Pillsbury sought to talk about religion with Thoreau as he was dying from tuberculosis, Thoreau replied: "One world at a time."
Thoreau's philosophy of nonviolent resistance influenced the political thoughts and actions of such later figures as Leo Tolstoy, Mohandas K. Gandhi, and Martin Luther King, Jr. D. 1862.
More:
Thoreau's books, articles, essays, journals, and poetry total over 20 volumes. Among his lasting contributions were his writings on natural history and philosophy, where he anticipated the methods and findings of ecology and environmental history, two sources of modern day environmentalism.
In 1817, Henry David Thoreau was born in Massachusetts. He graduated from Harvard University in 1837, taught briefly, then turned to writing and lecturing. Becoming a Transcendentalist and good friend of Emerson, Thoreau lived the life of simplicity he advocated in his writings. His two-year experience in a hut in Walden, on land owned by Emerson, resulted in the classic, Walden: Life in the Woods (1854). During his sojourn there, Thoreau refused to pay a poll tax in protest of slavery and the Mexican war, for which he was jailed overnight. His activist convictions were expressed in the groundbreaking On the Duty of Civil Disobedience (1849). In a diary he noted his disapproval of attempts to convert the Algonquins "from their own superstitions to new ones." In a journal he noted dryly that it is appropriate for a church to be the ugliest building in a village, "because it is the one in which human nature stoops to the lowest and is the most disgraced." (Cited by James A. Haught in 2000 Years of Disbelief.) When Parker Pillsbury sought to talk about religion with Thoreau as he was dying from tuberculosis, Thoreau replied: "One world at a time."
Thoreau's philosophy of nonviolent resistance influenced the political thoughts and actions of such later figures as Leo Tolstoy, Mohandas K. Gandhi, and Martin Luther King, Jr. D. 1862.
More:
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 238 reviews
March 2, 2025
I first read this paean to a rustic, forgotten - and mostly vanished - way of life in the Purple Passion Pit.
I'll try to clarify my apparent lapse into levity...
You see, the Pit was the ultra-modern reading room in a converted 19th century chapel within the Victorian Gothic stone and ivy-covered walls of our university library.
It had been given the odd sobriquet by a student body infected by the prevailing presence of a Flower Power-enraptured free-and-easy American lifestyle - thus assimilating the mood of protest sweeping across the Power to the south of our pacifistic and benign North Country.
It was the time of the Kent State tragedy, and here I was reading one of the literary pillars of the American Way of Life, in an up-to-date and safely settled Canadian academic haven.
It was all so strangely inappropriate...
So what’s WRONG with this picture?
In those days it was common knowledge among us young people that politicians were distorting the truth, and their refracting of the obvious in their tiny distorting lenses made no sense to any rational being with a modicum of education.
Their language was composed of dead words.
And Thoreau hit us as an honest man as we read him, all of a “sudden, in a shaft of sunlight.� He didn’t split nonexistent truths. He spoke forthrightly, candidly and Truthfully. And his words were words of LIFE.
Oh, you can trace the back-to-the-Land movement of my forgotten generation to many sources. But the primary source, Henry David Thoreau might tell you, is simply finding an undisturbed location AWAY from civilized noise. Cause you know what happens?
You witness the slow movement of your mind as it dances in harmony with the natural world. And you know for the first time that now, finally, you are witnessing the Unvarnished Truth - without the obfuscating overlays of jabberwockish Newspeak.
You are free. You are alive. No longer among the fast talking undead of cable news.
And of course there weren’t any mass media back then, but this book’s direct, scaled-down and peaceful message enthralled me!
I was entranced by Thoreau's simple and lingering description of planting beans in a neat little row out in the Massachussetts semi-wilderness not far from the madding crowd - but far Enough to be free of it.
All for the purpose of putting simple food on the table.
Simple gifts of the soil in the vicinity of the competitive spirit of the City of Darkness.
Over the next week, now on my own, I immersed myself in this gentle and soft-spoken protest against the horrid place our world, even then, was becoming.
The speed, the noise, the violence of it all...
THIS was a valid response to that! And it unravelled the complexities of our young carefully-molded minds.
It was Saint Francis amidst the bucolic simplicity of a bean field - not far from the bustling commerce of a downtown American business centre. With a lot of common sense thrown in.
The disciplined regimen of a way of life dedicated to spiritual rather than physical gifts.
And since that long-ago time, my wife and I have, step-by-step, removed many of the accoutrements of "modern" life from our home.
We are stuck in a time warp. And we like it that way. And, of course, we can be honest with each other about this crazy world.
Thanks, Henry David Thoreau. You came at the right time in our life to plant a fertile seed in our souls.
And it would later bear a significant, real harvest of the spirit for us.
Five full stars to you.
I'll try to clarify my apparent lapse into levity...
You see, the Pit was the ultra-modern reading room in a converted 19th century chapel within the Victorian Gothic stone and ivy-covered walls of our university library.
It had been given the odd sobriquet by a student body infected by the prevailing presence of a Flower Power-enraptured free-and-easy American lifestyle - thus assimilating the mood of protest sweeping across the Power to the south of our pacifistic and benign North Country.
It was the time of the Kent State tragedy, and here I was reading one of the literary pillars of the American Way of Life, in an up-to-date and safely settled Canadian academic haven.
It was all so strangely inappropriate...
So what’s WRONG with this picture?
In those days it was common knowledge among us young people that politicians were distorting the truth, and their refracting of the obvious in their tiny distorting lenses made no sense to any rational being with a modicum of education.
Their language was composed of dead words.
And Thoreau hit us as an honest man as we read him, all of a “sudden, in a shaft of sunlight.� He didn’t split nonexistent truths. He spoke forthrightly, candidly and Truthfully. And his words were words of LIFE.
Oh, you can trace the back-to-the-Land movement of my forgotten generation to many sources. But the primary source, Henry David Thoreau might tell you, is simply finding an undisturbed location AWAY from civilized noise. Cause you know what happens?
You witness the slow movement of your mind as it dances in harmony with the natural world. And you know for the first time that now, finally, you are witnessing the Unvarnished Truth - without the obfuscating overlays of jabberwockish Newspeak.
You are free. You are alive. No longer among the fast talking undead of cable news.
And of course there weren’t any mass media back then, but this book’s direct, scaled-down and peaceful message enthralled me!
I was entranced by Thoreau's simple and lingering description of planting beans in a neat little row out in the Massachussetts semi-wilderness not far from the madding crowd - but far Enough to be free of it.
All for the purpose of putting simple food on the table.
Simple gifts of the soil in the vicinity of the competitive spirit of the City of Darkness.
Over the next week, now on my own, I immersed myself in this gentle and soft-spoken protest against the horrid place our world, even then, was becoming.
The speed, the noise, the violence of it all...
THIS was a valid response to that! And it unravelled the complexities of our young carefully-molded minds.
It was Saint Francis amidst the bucolic simplicity of a bean field - not far from the bustling commerce of a downtown American business centre. With a lot of common sense thrown in.
The disciplined regimen of a way of life dedicated to spiritual rather than physical gifts.
And since that long-ago time, my wife and I have, step-by-step, removed many of the accoutrements of "modern" life from our home.
We are stuck in a time warp. And we like it that way. And, of course, we can be honest with each other about this crazy world.
Thanks, Henry David Thoreau. You came at the right time in our life to plant a fertile seed in our souls.
And it would later bear a significant, real harvest of the spirit for us.
Five full stars to you.
January 20, 2020
Introduction, by Ralph Waldo Emerson
--Walden
--A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers
--Cape Cod [A Selection]
--The Allegash and East Branch [Abridged]
--Walking
--Civil Disobedience
--Slavery in Massachusetts
--A Plea for Captain John Brown
--Life Without Principle
Commentary
Reading Group Guide
--Walden
--A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers
--Cape Cod [A Selection]
--The Allegash and East Branch [Abridged]
--Walking
--Civil Disobedience
--Slavery in Massachusetts
--A Plea for Captain John Brown
--Life Without Principle
Commentary
Reading Group Guide
September 10, 2021
Whodathunk that Thoreau (1817�62) would be the ideal corrective for 2020? Solitude, civil resistance, ecology, fake news, the evils of capitalism... Thoreau treats all these themes (and more) with insight, feeling and a wiry sort of eloquence.
The titular Walden is, without a doubt, the crown jewel of the bunch. With the other works, Thoreau tends more toward straightforward travel writing (Cape Cod, The Maine Woods) or political-philosophical dissertation (A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers, the various essays). But Walden achieves a perfect synthesis of the two.
"Essential" probably isn't too strong a word.
The titular Walden is, without a doubt, the crown jewel of the bunch. With the other works, Thoreau tends more toward straightforward travel writing (Cape Cod, The Maine Woods) or political-philosophical dissertation (A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers, the various essays). But Walden achieves a perfect synthesis of the two.
"Essential" probably isn't too strong a word.
June 19, 2008
I am giving 5 stars to "Life without Principle," "On Civil Disobedience," and the following chapters from Walden: Economy, Where I Lived and What I Lived For, Reading, Solitude, Higher Laws, Conclusion. The rest of the book was about nature. While I'm thumbs up when it comes to experiencing nature, I'm thumbs down when it comes to reading about it. I wish I could appreciate the way he describes grass blowing in the wind and ants fighting with each other, but I just couldn't, so I'm not rating his nature writings. His philosophy, however, is great. He can be a sarcastic little bastard too. I didn't learn much from his philosophy, since I already have his beliefs and a very simple lifestyle, albeit not in the woods. But it was very comforting having a dead friend to hang out with for awhile.
Everyone considering joining the military should read "On Civil Disobedience" and the Conclusion to Walden. I wish I would've had Henry as a respectable reference the time a date walked out on me for calling military men mindless robots. I wish I would've had Henry as a reference all those times people criticized me for never reading the newspaper or for not owning a home. But I have that sexy pile of bones as a reference now! Oh Henry, I wish I could be the hoe you used on your bean field! Anyway, below are some of my favorite quotes:
"In proportion as our inward life fails, we go more constantly and desperately to the post office. You may depend on it, that the poor fellow who walks away with the greatest number of letters, proud of his extensive correspondence, has not heard from himself this long while." (Replace post office with cell phones and blackberries and the world is flooded with inward life failures).
"Nations are possessed with an insane ambition to perpetuate the memory of themselves by the amount of hammered stone they leave. What if equal pains were taken to smooth and polish their manners? ....As for the pyramids, there is nothing to wonder at in them so much as the fact that so many men could be found degraded enough to spend their lives constructing a tomb for some ambitious booby, whom it would have been wiser and manlier to have drowned in the Nile, and then given his body to the dogs."
"To a philosopher all news , as it is called, is gossip, and they who edit and read it are old women over their tea."
"The news we hear, for the most part, is not news to our genius. It is the stalest repetition."
"What is called politics is comparatively something so superficial and inhuman, that practically I have never fairly recognized that it concerns me at all."
"Of what use the friendliest disposition even, if there are no hours given to friendship, if it is forever postponed to unimportant duties and relations?"
"Public opinion is a weak tyrant compared with our own private opinion. What a man thinks of himself, that it is which determines, or rather indicates, his fate."
"The cost of a thing is the amount of what I will call life which is required to be exchanged for it."
"...for our houses are such unwieldy property that we are often imprisoned rather than housed in them."
"Men have become the tools of their tools."
"...be a Columbus to whole new continents and worlds within you, opening new channels, not of trade, but of thought."
"Merely to come into the world the heir of a fortune is not to be born, but to be stillborn, rather."
"What is it to be born free and not to live free?"
Everyone considering joining the military should read "On Civil Disobedience" and the Conclusion to Walden. I wish I would've had Henry as a respectable reference the time a date walked out on me for calling military men mindless robots. I wish I would've had Henry as a reference all those times people criticized me for never reading the newspaper or for not owning a home. But I have that sexy pile of bones as a reference now! Oh Henry, I wish I could be the hoe you used on your bean field! Anyway, below are some of my favorite quotes:
"In proportion as our inward life fails, we go more constantly and desperately to the post office. You may depend on it, that the poor fellow who walks away with the greatest number of letters, proud of his extensive correspondence, has not heard from himself this long while." (Replace post office with cell phones and blackberries and the world is flooded with inward life failures).
"Nations are possessed with an insane ambition to perpetuate the memory of themselves by the amount of hammered stone they leave. What if equal pains were taken to smooth and polish their manners? ....As for the pyramids, there is nothing to wonder at in them so much as the fact that so many men could be found degraded enough to spend their lives constructing a tomb for some ambitious booby, whom it would have been wiser and manlier to have drowned in the Nile, and then given his body to the dogs."
"To a philosopher all news , as it is called, is gossip, and they who edit and read it are old women over their tea."
"The news we hear, for the most part, is not news to our genius. It is the stalest repetition."
"What is called politics is comparatively something so superficial and inhuman, that practically I have never fairly recognized that it concerns me at all."
"Of what use the friendliest disposition even, if there are no hours given to friendship, if it is forever postponed to unimportant duties and relations?"
"Public opinion is a weak tyrant compared with our own private opinion. What a man thinks of himself, that it is which determines, or rather indicates, his fate."
"The cost of a thing is the amount of what I will call life which is required to be exchanged for it."
"...for our houses are such unwieldy property that we are often imprisoned rather than housed in them."
"Men have become the tools of their tools."
"...be a Columbus to whole new continents and worlds within you, opening new channels, not of trade, but of thought."
"Merely to come into the world the heir of a fortune is not to be born, but to be stillborn, rather."
"What is it to be born free and not to live free?"
August 19, 2018
G.K. Chesterton once said, “There are no boring subjects, only disinterested minds.� I believe this vision of the world is one of the main themes that runs throughout Walden. Thoreau writes about seemingly every minute detail during his experience at Walden Pond, and he mixes in his precious New England Transcendentalism, captivating nature writing, and clever cultural commentary (commentary that I thought is pertinent even today). I really enjoyed this account of ճǰ’s first of two years (After 262 pages of describing his first year he writes, “Thus was my first year’s life in the woods complete; and the second year was similar to it.� I guess even nature becomes mundane) on the shores of Walden Pond.
During a recent trip to Boston, I considered visiting Walden Pond and sitting on its banks to see it as Thoreau saw it (sort of). However, I didn’t want to pay the admission fee, so I opted out. I’d like to think Henry Thoreau supported my decision.
During a recent trip to Boston, I considered visiting Walden Pond and sitting on its banks to see it as Thoreau saw it (sort of). However, I didn’t want to pay the admission fee, so I opted out. I’d like to think Henry Thoreau supported my decision.
January 27, 2020
Robust intertwined structures of thoughts and senses to delight our minds with multicoloured pixels of projections into worlds belonging to what physical contours hold dearly.
‘The water willow, salix Purshiana, when it is of large size and entire, is the most graceful and ethereal of our trees. Its masses of light green foliage, piled one upon another to the height of twenty or thirty feet, seemed to float on the surface of the water, while the slight gray stems and the shore were hardly visible between them. No tree is so wedded to the water, and harmonizes so well with still streams. It is even more graceful than the weeping willow, or any pendulous trees, which dip their branches in the stream instead of being buoyed up by it. Its limbs curved outward over the surface as if attracted by it.�
“If we knew all the laws of Nature, we should need only one fact, or the description of one actual phenomenon, to infer all the particular results at that point. Now we know only a few laws, and
our result is vitiated, not, of course, by any confusion or irregularity in Nature, but by our ignorance of essential elements in the calculation. Our notions of law and harmony are commonly confined to those instances which we detect; but the harmony which results from a far greater number of seemingly conflicting, but really concurring, laws, which we have not detected, is still more wonderful. �
‘The water willow, salix Purshiana, when it is of large size and entire, is the most graceful and ethereal of our trees. Its masses of light green foliage, piled one upon another to the height of twenty or thirty feet, seemed to float on the surface of the water, while the slight gray stems and the shore were hardly visible between them. No tree is so wedded to the water, and harmonizes so well with still streams. It is even more graceful than the weeping willow, or any pendulous trees, which dip their branches in the stream instead of being buoyed up by it. Its limbs curved outward over the surface as if attracted by it.�
“If we knew all the laws of Nature, we should need only one fact, or the description of one actual phenomenon, to infer all the particular results at that point. Now we know only a few laws, and
our result is vitiated, not, of course, by any confusion or irregularity in Nature, but by our ignorance of essential elements in the calculation. Our notions of law and harmony are commonly confined to those instances which we detect; but the harmony which results from a far greater number of seemingly conflicting, but really concurring, laws, which we have not detected, is still more wonderful. �
November 15, 2020
Civil Disobedience is worth engaging, but my god I don't even have a shitpost for how inane and boring Walden is. I've also been to the pond; it's just as boring as the text, and I couldn't get a moment to myself.
February 27, 2023
This book is a treasure for lovers of the simplicity movement. It is now one of my favourite, and one which I would come back to again and again.
It’s not just ճǰ’s message of simplicity, self-reliance and independent thinking which resonates strongly with me. The passion, vigour and clarity in which he puts forward his arguments is incisive and convincing. His writing style is exactly as he is � straightforward, concise, uncompromising and often sarcastic and contemptuous against those he believes to be hypocrites, who allow the mundane to obscure higher spiritual truths and who let expediency over-ride their conscience.
Him being a giant and me being a mere mortal, I am guilty of many short-comings that he riled against so a part of me is also a target of his critique. Yet his sarcasm is sometimes so wicked, I just could not help but laugh at myself at the same time.
You can hardly rely on Thoreau obediently flow with the conventional wisdom of his day. He criticizes men for giving up freedom and allowing themselves to be imprisoned by mundane materialistic life; defends the vilified radical abolitionist Captain John Brown as a man of principle and courage against the vast majority; and refused to pay taxes to support the state government whose support of the Fugitive Slave Law he believed to be morally-wrong. He is unapologetic about his beliefs and uncompromising with his principles. To go with mainstream thought and behaviour when is against truth and conscience is unacceptable. From his writings, it is clear that he believes in the maxim that oftimes, majority simply means that all fools happen to be on the same side.
“Public opinion is a weak tyrant compared with our own private opinion. What a man thinks of himself, that is which determines or rather indicates, his fate.�
“If a man does not keep pace with his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer.�
His rally call is in Walden - for men to unchain themselves, live simple lives, appreciate and learn the lessons that nature has to offer, and to aspire to higher spiritual lives.
“The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation. What is called resignation is confirmed desperation.�
“The spending of the best part of one’s life earning money in order to enjoy a questionable liberty during the less valuable part of it reminds me of an Englishman who went to India to make a fortune first, in order that he might return to England and live the live of a poet. He should have gone up garret at once.� (Yes, carpe diem spirit!)
ճǰ’s experiment in the woods near Walden Pond shows that one can live simply and have more time to observe nature, and more time for higher learning which is important for spiritual growth, lest one should die and not having lived.
On simplicity, he has this to say:
“In proportion as he simplifies his life, the laws of the universe will appear less complex, and solitude will not be solitude, nor poverty poverty, nor weakness weakness.� (This I truly believe, after I have started the road to simplity.)
“Superfluous wealth can buy superfluities only. Money is not required to buy one necessary of the soul.�
“None can be an impartial or wise observer of the human life but form the vantage ground of what we should call voluntary poverty.� (Three cheers to Thoreau � our grandfather of voluntary simplicity!)
Ultimately, Thoreau argues against being settled in one’s way out of tradition or habit, and for each to develop independent thinking:
“It is remarkable how easily and insensibly we fall into a particular route, and make a beaten track for ourselves�.How worn and dusty, then, must be the highways of the world, how deep the ruts of tradition and conformity!�
“Our universe is wider than our views of it…Nay, be a Columbus to whole new continents and worlds within you, opening new channels, not of trade, but of thought.�
“I had learned this, at least, by experiment: that if one advances confidently in the direction of his dreams, and endeavours to live the life which he has imagined, he will meet with a success in uncommon hours. He will put some things behind, will pass and invisible boundary; new, universal and more liberal laws will begin to establish themselves around and within him; or the old laws be expanded, and interpreted in his favour in a more liberal sense and he will live with the license of a higher order of beings.� (similar to the message in Jonathan Livingston Seagull)
I could go on and on but this would suffice, to encourage others to read Thoreau.
Lastly, Thoreau's exhortation for solitude, for an inner life, is similar to what the yoga and Buddhism advocate in meditation and quietness of mind, as well as the Christian approach for quiet time for prayer and contemplation.
“When our lives cease to be inward and private, conversation degenerates into mere gossip�
I identify with his praise of the sacred hour of dawn for higher inspiration, which is what yogis, spiritual aspirants and poets share. He said that our lives are “frittered away by details� and kept asking us to “Simplify! Simplify! Simplify!� because:
“Knowledge does not come to us by details, but in flashes of light from heaven.� (Amen!)
*Last word � interestingly, Thoreau used the word “pow-wow� 150 years ago. I thought that this is a recent American invention! Also, he mentioned Singapore (where I live!) "We are told that within three miles of the centre of the East Indian city of Singapore, some of the inhabitants are annually carried off by tigers...". Yes Mr Thoreau, but the very last tiger in Singapore was shot in the Long Bar in the now famous and very, very expensive Raffles Hotel. The only tigers are now in the Singapore Zoo...very nice tourist attraction too...
**Last, last word - the commentaries of Thoreau by Van Wyck Brooks and EB White at the end of the big are gems, throwing more light on this strange creature, this accident (and gift) of nature called Thoreau. EB white is especially entertaining and witty in his account (a must read).
***Last, last, last word - As I am impatient, I had intended to skip the sections on nature but they really deserve a reading because they are not merely descriptive. Thoreau writes beautifully and evocatively for one, but the nature writings also show him to be an innovative and scientific naturalist eg the method he uses to measure the depth of Walden pond. I am amazed that he describes the pond almost like giving a tribute to a lover, and by the energetic manner in which he gives a "live" commentary on a battle between one big black ant and two small ones - like on wrestlemania haha.
It’s not just ճǰ’s message of simplicity, self-reliance and independent thinking which resonates strongly with me. The passion, vigour and clarity in which he puts forward his arguments is incisive and convincing. His writing style is exactly as he is � straightforward, concise, uncompromising and often sarcastic and contemptuous against those he believes to be hypocrites, who allow the mundane to obscure higher spiritual truths and who let expediency over-ride their conscience.
Him being a giant and me being a mere mortal, I am guilty of many short-comings that he riled against so a part of me is also a target of his critique. Yet his sarcasm is sometimes so wicked, I just could not help but laugh at myself at the same time.
You can hardly rely on Thoreau obediently flow with the conventional wisdom of his day. He criticizes men for giving up freedom and allowing themselves to be imprisoned by mundane materialistic life; defends the vilified radical abolitionist Captain John Brown as a man of principle and courage against the vast majority; and refused to pay taxes to support the state government whose support of the Fugitive Slave Law he believed to be morally-wrong. He is unapologetic about his beliefs and uncompromising with his principles. To go with mainstream thought and behaviour when is against truth and conscience is unacceptable. From his writings, it is clear that he believes in the maxim that oftimes, majority simply means that all fools happen to be on the same side.
“Public opinion is a weak tyrant compared with our own private opinion. What a man thinks of himself, that is which determines or rather indicates, his fate.�
“If a man does not keep pace with his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer.�
His rally call is in Walden - for men to unchain themselves, live simple lives, appreciate and learn the lessons that nature has to offer, and to aspire to higher spiritual lives.
“The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation. What is called resignation is confirmed desperation.�
“The spending of the best part of one’s life earning money in order to enjoy a questionable liberty during the less valuable part of it reminds me of an Englishman who went to India to make a fortune first, in order that he might return to England and live the live of a poet. He should have gone up garret at once.� (Yes, carpe diem spirit!)
ճǰ’s experiment in the woods near Walden Pond shows that one can live simply and have more time to observe nature, and more time for higher learning which is important for spiritual growth, lest one should die and not having lived.
On simplicity, he has this to say:
“In proportion as he simplifies his life, the laws of the universe will appear less complex, and solitude will not be solitude, nor poverty poverty, nor weakness weakness.� (This I truly believe, after I have started the road to simplity.)
“Superfluous wealth can buy superfluities only. Money is not required to buy one necessary of the soul.�
“None can be an impartial or wise observer of the human life but form the vantage ground of what we should call voluntary poverty.� (Three cheers to Thoreau � our grandfather of voluntary simplicity!)
Ultimately, Thoreau argues against being settled in one’s way out of tradition or habit, and for each to develop independent thinking:
“It is remarkable how easily and insensibly we fall into a particular route, and make a beaten track for ourselves�.How worn and dusty, then, must be the highways of the world, how deep the ruts of tradition and conformity!�
“Our universe is wider than our views of it…Nay, be a Columbus to whole new continents and worlds within you, opening new channels, not of trade, but of thought.�
“I had learned this, at least, by experiment: that if one advances confidently in the direction of his dreams, and endeavours to live the life which he has imagined, he will meet with a success in uncommon hours. He will put some things behind, will pass and invisible boundary; new, universal and more liberal laws will begin to establish themselves around and within him; or the old laws be expanded, and interpreted in his favour in a more liberal sense and he will live with the license of a higher order of beings.� (similar to the message in Jonathan Livingston Seagull)
I could go on and on but this would suffice, to encourage others to read Thoreau.
Lastly, Thoreau's exhortation for solitude, for an inner life, is similar to what the yoga and Buddhism advocate in meditation and quietness of mind, as well as the Christian approach for quiet time for prayer and contemplation.
“When our lives cease to be inward and private, conversation degenerates into mere gossip�
I identify with his praise of the sacred hour of dawn for higher inspiration, which is what yogis, spiritual aspirants and poets share. He said that our lives are “frittered away by details� and kept asking us to “Simplify! Simplify! Simplify!� because:
“Knowledge does not come to us by details, but in flashes of light from heaven.� (Amen!)
*Last word � interestingly, Thoreau used the word “pow-wow� 150 years ago. I thought that this is a recent American invention! Also, he mentioned Singapore (where I live!) "We are told that within three miles of the centre of the East Indian city of Singapore, some of the inhabitants are annually carried off by tigers...". Yes Mr Thoreau, but the very last tiger in Singapore was shot in the Long Bar in the now famous and very, very expensive Raffles Hotel. The only tigers are now in the Singapore Zoo...very nice tourist attraction too...
**Last, last word - the commentaries of Thoreau by Van Wyck Brooks and EB White at the end of the big are gems, throwing more light on this strange creature, this accident (and gift) of nature called Thoreau. EB white is especially entertaining and witty in his account (a must read).
***Last, last, last word - As I am impatient, I had intended to skip the sections on nature but they really deserve a reading because they are not merely descriptive. Thoreau writes beautifully and evocatively for one, but the nature writings also show him to be an innovative and scientific naturalist eg the method he uses to measure the depth of Walden pond. I am amazed that he describes the pond almost like giving a tribute to a lover, and by the energetic manner in which he gives a "live" commentary on a battle between one big black ant and two small ones - like on wrestlemania haha.
September 4, 2015
I never have understood why this dense book is assigned for schoolkids to read. Yes, it is unprecedented in American literature, a great book--without being particularly "good reading." It's formidable, and I have never gotten through it, chapter after chapter. I find it a great dippers' book, and maybe those who assign it are exactly that, dippers. Several of Thoreau's other works are more engaging and accessible, from the Maine Woods (perhaps my favorite) to Cape Cod, even A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers, and especially, Selections from the Journals (see my GRds rev). The Maine Woods has its challenges, too--for example, Thoreau's fascination with, and dictionary of, native Indian language (Abnaki, not Pasamoquoddy). Also, as ever in Thoreau, botanical classifications in Latin--his Harvard education actually benefitted him as Bill Gates' arguably did not, except for affiliations (no reason to go to school, yet the prime reason in 21st C for most status schools like Harvard Biz).
HDT's Cape Cod varies tremendously, including journalistic reporting of a terrible shipwreck on the South shore of Massachusetts (not unlike the one that killed Margaret Fuller returning from Garibaldi's Italian revolution and losing her MS on that seminal event). But also, perhaps Thoreau's funniest story ever, the Wellfleet Oysterman chapter. Hilarious.
Thoreau often writes with humor in his Journals, too, especially when his publisher sends him the remaindered 706 copies (out of the edition of 1000) of his A Week on the Concord and Merrimack River: "I now have a library of nearly nine hundred volumes, over seven hundred of which I wrote myself." His story of chasing the pig is a classic, very different from my own family story. My grandfather had a pig, Delfiney, who had the run of the little house-backhouse and barn, but escaped anyway one day. Gramp enlisted his ony neighbor within a mile, who reluctantly agreed to the futile task. When they got about three quarters of a mile, they sighted the pig and Gramp called, "DelFINEY!!" The pig came running to him.
Thoreau reaches down into a bullhead nest to discover their pattern of habitation. Here's part of his long encounter with a Woodchuck.After a long run, he exhausts the creature: "I sat down by his side within a foot. I talked to him quasi forest lingo, baby-talk, at any rate in a conciliatroy tone, and throughout that I had some influence on him. He gritted his teeth less. I chewed checkerberry leaves and presented them to his nose at last without a grit, though I saw that by so much gritting of the teeth he had worn them rapidly and they were covered with a fine white powder, which, if you measured it thus, would have made his anger terrible." These journals prove HDT a worldclass botanist and taxonomist; in fact, he died a martyr to science, counting tree rings (see T Baird's "Corn Grows in the Night" in the Norton Walden.)
Ironically, Walden is not Thoreau's best book, but it is the only one most students ever encounter.
It vocalizes the aspirations of a young college grad to higher thoughts--and such thoughts permeated the literature of the Nineteenth Century, especially in America.
HDT's Cape Cod varies tremendously, including journalistic reporting of a terrible shipwreck on the South shore of Massachusetts (not unlike the one that killed Margaret Fuller returning from Garibaldi's Italian revolution and losing her MS on that seminal event). But also, perhaps Thoreau's funniest story ever, the Wellfleet Oysterman chapter. Hilarious.
Thoreau often writes with humor in his Journals, too, especially when his publisher sends him the remaindered 706 copies (out of the edition of 1000) of his A Week on the Concord and Merrimack River: "I now have a library of nearly nine hundred volumes, over seven hundred of which I wrote myself." His story of chasing the pig is a classic, very different from my own family story. My grandfather had a pig, Delfiney, who had the run of the little house-backhouse and barn, but escaped anyway one day. Gramp enlisted his ony neighbor within a mile, who reluctantly agreed to the futile task. When they got about three quarters of a mile, they sighted the pig and Gramp called, "DelFINEY!!" The pig came running to him.
Thoreau reaches down into a bullhead nest to discover their pattern of habitation. Here's part of his long encounter with a Woodchuck.After a long run, he exhausts the creature: "I sat down by his side within a foot. I talked to him quasi forest lingo, baby-talk, at any rate in a conciliatroy tone, and throughout that I had some influence on him. He gritted his teeth less. I chewed checkerberry leaves and presented them to his nose at last without a grit, though I saw that by so much gritting of the teeth he had worn them rapidly and they were covered with a fine white powder, which, if you measured it thus, would have made his anger terrible." These journals prove HDT a worldclass botanist and taxonomist; in fact, he died a martyr to science, counting tree rings (see T Baird's "Corn Grows in the Night" in the Norton Walden.)
Ironically, Walden is not Thoreau's best book, but it is the only one most students ever encounter.
It vocalizes the aspirations of a young college grad to higher thoughts--and such thoughts permeated the literature of the Nineteenth Century, especially in America.
December 22, 2012
I find Thoreau's command of the written language to be astounding. I very much liked this book and I'm surprised that I wasn't required to read this in high school or college.
November 4, 2017
The thing is, I look for simplicity in philosophical writing for I agree with Albert Einstein when he talked about how if one cannot explain something to a child, one doesn't truly know it. My knowledge and my understanding are intertwined, and thus when I don't understand (tangents, for example, are difficult for me because I get bored and skim and then only understand some bits), it isn't fun to read.
October 5, 2011
Have to agree with E.B. White (author of Charlotte's Web, among other things) who once said that every high school senior should be given a copy of Walden upon graduation. Many of course will choose not to read it but for those who do, and make it through the slog that is the first chapter, Thoreau's timeless classic offers much wisdom on thoughtful living. Why thoughtful living? Because Walden is full of what of what buddhists refer to as the fire of attention. Each chapter, even the dreadful first, Economy, is full of an intense attention to detail both philosophical and practical. Walden may have been written by a 19th century New Englander but it's implications travel far beyond that limited scope of time and space. At the very least, readers of Walden in any age will be encouraged to forgo the way of the lemming and instead give a little thought to each step taken in life, as opposed to just mindlessly stumbling off the proverbial cliff of life.
November 17, 2013
If Edgar Allan Poe was the original goth, Henry David Thoreau was the original obnoxious vegan. His tone at the beginning of the book is like a know-it-all kid in his first year of self-employment: smarmy and convinced he's cracked the code on the only right way to live. As the book goes on, he mellows out a little. I guess living in the woods was good for him. While still being condescending of his neighbors (“…his little broad-faced son worked cheerfully at his father's side the while, not knowing how poor a bargain the latter had made�), it’s the side-stories, like meeting fishermen, ice-cutters and packs of free-roving hounds, and the native american legends of the lake, that make up the parts worth reading. I wanted to like this book, because I appreciate how it’s inspired some people I respect (Don Henley?), but it was so difficult to read, it put me to sleep every time I tried to read a page until I switched to the audio version.
July 18, 2016
I'm just gonna say it, I like Ralph Waldo Emerson's essays and poetry better. His writing is more refined and stylistically pleasing. Reading "Civil Disobedience" is like bachelorhood being shoved in your face. Thoreau clearly isn't speaking of a method of action that could ever be followed by the family-man or woman or young adult. I understand his ideology and thought-process, but it doesn't seem to include an ounce of practicality in it.
Nonetheless, he's a good essayist who has respectable views and beliefs on important topics like slavery, military, war, government, society, voting, nonviolence, nature, individualism, religion, etc. Don't skim this if you have to read it for school. It's an invaluable asset to understanding and criticizing politics, religion, society and the U.S. government.
Nonetheless, he's a good essayist who has respectable views and beliefs on important topics like slavery, military, war, government, society, voting, nonviolence, nature, individualism, religion, etc. Don't skim this if you have to read it for school. It's an invaluable asset to understanding and criticizing politics, religion, society and the U.S. government.
May 21, 2019
It is a pity--as so often is the case--that I only got round to reading Thoreau after I had left school. There is enough wisdom in Walden alone to last a lifetime. It is worth reading more than once.
Here is just one brief example. However mean your life is, meet it and live it; do not shun it and call it hard names. It is not so bad as you are. It looks poorest when you are richest. The faultfinder will find faults even in paradise.
August 3, 2011
Thoreau is kind of a douche. Not gonna lie. This is a guy who thought that he would get back to nature by living in a shack on mommy and daddy's property. He makes some good points of philosophy but so does the drunk at the end of most bars. All in all, I think that Thoreau is vastly overrated.
July 11, 2017
On or about July 23, 1846 Henry David Thoreau was detained in Concord for nonpayment of the poll tax, and he spent the night in the Concord Jail. He described his experience in jail thus: "The rooms were whitewashed once a month; and this one, at least, was the whitest, most simply furnished, and probably the neatest apartment in the town." He described his fellow inmate ("room-mate") as someone accused of "burning a barn" who had been incarcerated for three months waiting for trial. He was "quite domesticated and contented, since he got his board for nothing, and thought that he was well treated." They each had a window of their own to look out and Thoreau noted that "It was like traveling to a far country, such as I had never expected to behold, to lie there for one night." The next day some anonymous person paid the tax and Thoreau was once again a free man.
The episode would be little noted but for the essay that Thoreau proceeded to write, an essay that would become one of the great Western statements on the importance of conscience. The essay is now known as "On Civil Disobedience" although its original title was "Resistance to Civil Government". It is short, less than twenty pages in the edition I read, but it lays out Thoreau's thoughts on the nature of Government: where it gets its authority, when it must be resisted, and more.
He begins the essay with the motto, "That government is best which governs least;" and he immediately makes a case for a government that "governs not at all", at least when men are "prepared for it". He will go on to identify three objections that he, and others, have against the government: namely, maintaining a standing army, the mistreatment of native Americans, and the institution of slavery. He claims that the American government has lost some of its integrity and is not worthy of our respect. However he quickly notes that he is not a "no-government man", because "to speak practically and as a citizen" he does not want no-government but merely "better government". That is he wants a government he can respect.
How does he recommend that he and his friends should resist a government that has lost his respect? He does not speak of a "call to arms". He is not a man like John Brown would become in less than a decade; rather he lays out a pacifist strategy of civil resistance to the government. He describes this resistance in several ways throughout the essay, including: refusing allegiance to the state of Massachusetts; receding from government (withdrawing his association with it); resigning your office (for those who have been appointed); refusing to pay taxes; and refusing to serve in an "unjust war" (the Mexican-American war had begun in April, 1846 and would continue until February, 1848).
To a great extent the essay is both anti-war and anti-slavery. Thoreau references sources as disparate as Confucius and the Bible to under gird his arguments. Although he makes an effort to sound practical at times his primary tendency is one of dissociation from the current American government. His rhetoric demonstrates a moral absolutism that is reminiscent of the speeches of William Lloyd Garrison. He is a genuine radical as he makes statements like: "If I have unjustly wrested a plank from a drowning man, I must restore it to him though I drown myself . . . The people must cease to hold slaves, and to make war on Mexico, though it cost them their existence as a people." He castigates as "the most serious obstacle to reform" those liberals who personally disapprove of slavery or the war yet still support the government. Moreover, he observes that "action from principle . . . is essentially revolutionary". His personal episode in jail is one small example of the consequences of his adherence to principle. "Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also a prison."
These are strong words that suggest why the ideas presented in this essay have continued to have a profound effect until our own day. It is why the essay has influenced subsequent thinkers like Gandhi, Martin Luther King, and others. It is why this essay is considered one of the "great essays" of Thoreau's era and our own.
The episode would be little noted but for the essay that Thoreau proceeded to write, an essay that would become one of the great Western statements on the importance of conscience. The essay is now known as "On Civil Disobedience" although its original title was "Resistance to Civil Government". It is short, less than twenty pages in the edition I read, but it lays out Thoreau's thoughts on the nature of Government: where it gets its authority, when it must be resisted, and more.
He begins the essay with the motto, "That government is best which governs least;" and he immediately makes a case for a government that "governs not at all", at least when men are "prepared for it". He will go on to identify three objections that he, and others, have against the government: namely, maintaining a standing army, the mistreatment of native Americans, and the institution of slavery. He claims that the American government has lost some of its integrity and is not worthy of our respect. However he quickly notes that he is not a "no-government man", because "to speak practically and as a citizen" he does not want no-government but merely "better government". That is he wants a government he can respect.
How does he recommend that he and his friends should resist a government that has lost his respect? He does not speak of a "call to arms". He is not a man like John Brown would become in less than a decade; rather he lays out a pacifist strategy of civil resistance to the government. He describes this resistance in several ways throughout the essay, including: refusing allegiance to the state of Massachusetts; receding from government (withdrawing his association with it); resigning your office (for those who have been appointed); refusing to pay taxes; and refusing to serve in an "unjust war" (the Mexican-American war had begun in April, 1846 and would continue until February, 1848).
To a great extent the essay is both anti-war and anti-slavery. Thoreau references sources as disparate as Confucius and the Bible to under gird his arguments. Although he makes an effort to sound practical at times his primary tendency is one of dissociation from the current American government. His rhetoric demonstrates a moral absolutism that is reminiscent of the speeches of William Lloyd Garrison. He is a genuine radical as he makes statements like: "If I have unjustly wrested a plank from a drowning man, I must restore it to him though I drown myself . . . The people must cease to hold slaves, and to make war on Mexico, though it cost them their existence as a people." He castigates as "the most serious obstacle to reform" those liberals who personally disapprove of slavery or the war yet still support the government. Moreover, he observes that "action from principle . . . is essentially revolutionary". His personal episode in jail is one small example of the consequences of his adherence to principle. "Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also a prison."
These are strong words that suggest why the ideas presented in this essay have continued to have a profound effect until our own day. It is why the essay has influenced subsequent thinkers like Gandhi, Martin Luther King, and others. It is why this essay is considered one of the "great essays" of Thoreau's era and our own.
April 2, 2012
The introduction to the edition I read quoted American philosopher and Harvard professor Stanley Cavell as saying "Emerson and Thoreau... are the founding philosophers of America" and comparable in complexity to Plato. As you can tell from my disparate ratings below, I nevertheless found reading Thoreau a decidedly mixed bag. Given their influence on the environmental movement and non-violent mass protest movements, I'd highly recommend reading Walden and the article "Civil Disobedience" no matter what your personal beliefs. If you then find you really love this man's philosophy and writing style, then... well there sure is plenty more to read. This is one book where my rating suffered from including too much. If it had included just the works mentioned above I'd have added at least a star.
Walden - This book in particular is often cited as one of the origins of the environmentalist movement. What struck me from the beginning is that Thoreau's a truly impressive writer. I was often entranced by the sheer beauty of the prose even when he was expressing ideas antithetical to my worldview. Frequently I'd come across familiar lines such as the "mass of men live lives of quiet desperation" and "if a man does not keep pace with his companions, perhaps he hears a different drummer." And how can I not appreciate his "Reading" chapter with its lyrical praise of books? The first chapter though, "Economies," often had me lifting a cynical brow. His mantra in the book is simplicity, simplicity, simplicity! And though I can see his point about the futility of yearning after many superfluous things just because they're in fashion and impoverishing yourself trying to keep up with the Joneses, some of his encomiums on his frugality... Well, he's at his worst in the "Baker Farm" chapter where he lectured this poor hard-working Irish immigrant with several children on how he should live. Given Thoreau was squatting on Emerson's land and bringing his laundry home to his mother, it sounded like this guy ranting about how to make ends meet while he's living in his parents' basement rent-free. And all his talk about self-sufficiency and living the natural way? As much as we take such objects for granted today, such things as Thoreau used to build his cabin such as panes of glass, nails, screws, planks, are products of specialization and even industrialization--at least produced cheaply for use of the ordinary men, and I could wish that Thoreau would, if not appreciate that, acknowledge it. I don't resonate with a lot of the book's messages--and was at times bored with Thoreau's lengthy rhapsodies on nature. There's definitely gorgeous writing and food for thought here nevertheless. If you'd call yourself an environmentalist or naturalist I think that's worth adding at least an additional star in rating. 298 pages Four Stars
A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers - A travelogue of Thoreau's travels on the river with his brother. I've read claims this is second only to Walden in importance among Thoreau's works. I think if you loved Walden, and I mean loved it and you can't get enough Thoreau, by all means read this and the others below--especially if you love Nature studies studded with loads of classical allusions. That said, even though some parts bored me, other parts definitely were worth the read. Especially the chapter "Atlantides" dealing with friendship that featured the line: "It takes two to speak the truth,--one to speak and another to hear." I loved the discussion of Chaucer too. One where I liked the digressions more than the main narrative. 138 pages Three and a Half Stars
Cape Cod - My edition included four of the chapters. The first chapter, "The Shipwreck" was interesting for it's depiction of tragedy but then subverts the seeming compassion of the account in a disconcerting way. "The Wellfleet Oysterman" is interesting for it's title character--an elderly man who can remember the Revolutionary War. "The Highland Light" and "Provincetown" is vintage Thoreau--in other words, I at times found myself bored. 66 pages Two and a Half Stars
The Allegash and East Branch - The final of three essays collected in The Maine Woods. Definitely for those nature groupies who loved all that stuff about the loons and the ants on Walden or just like to revel in a bit of 19th century history. I skimmed. A lot. 92 pages One and a Half Stars
Walking - Thoreau's ode to walking. Reading it I couldn't help but think of a book by Rory Stewart I recently read. The Places in Between recounts Stewart's 22 month walk across Afghanistan beginning weeks after the Taliban fell. Thoreau walks to commune with Nature (definitely with a capital "N.") Stewart to understand the people. I prefer Stewart. 38 pages Two Stars
On Civil Disobedience - This is an enormously influential and eloquent essay. Gandhi said of it that, "It left a deep impression on me" and Martin Luther King also was influenced by it. It doesn't always make for comfortable reading. In its main thrust it seems to support anarchy. I think there's a difference between civil disobedience against a specific unjust law or institution, such as the boycott of the segregated Montgomery buses, or even refusal to fight in what you believe is an unjust war, and to do as Thoreau suggests and refuse to pay taxes altogether. To refuse to pay taxes (unless a specific tax itself or what it specifically is earmarked for is inherently unjust) is to protest government itself, and I'm not quite willing to go that far. Because if the test as to whether I have a moral imperative to refuse to pay taxes is whether I agree with everything the government does, then I can't imagine any government on Earth meeting that standard--for anyone. For a libertarian the issue might be the drug war, a liberal the latest military intervention abroad and for a conservative abortion. And again, it's not simply that Thoreau says you have the right to withhold taxes, but that if you're a person of conscience you must not pay them if you disagree with government policy--and be ready to go to jail for the privilege. Nevertheless, I can appreciate Thoreau's passion on the issue of slavery at the heart of this essay published in 1848. And two of his tax protests even meet my test above. One was a poll tax--which I consider inherently unjust, and the other was earmarked to pay a minister's salary even though Thoreau wasn't a member of the church. And he did spend time in jail as a result. I can't help admire that. Yet I admit in his situation I would have probably just paid the tax. That's part of what makes the essay unsettling--because at times I wondered. Is it so much that I really think Thoreau is wrong--or is it just I don't have his courage? Given how thought-provoking and challenging to complacency I found this work, I can't help but give it top marks. A must read. 28 pages Five stars
Slavery in Massachusetts - A passionate fire-eating speech condemning the state of Massachusetts for it's support of the Fugitive Slave Law. Interesting as a slice of history that demonstrates the incendiary atmosphere that flamed into the American Civil War in less than a decade. Three stars 20 pages
A Plea for Captain John Brown - This was Thoreau's elegy for John Brown, who helped spark the American Civil War. An abolitionist who preached (and practiced) armed resurrection, he was responsible for the murder of several men and has the distinction of being called America's first domestic terrorist. He was obviously Thoreau's hero. He's not mine. Color me unmoved at this panegyric. It's ironic that the man who inspired Tolstoy, Gandhi and Martin Luther King to develop forms of non-violent resistance would count John Brown a hero--and could end this essay calling for "revenge." (I'd add, I later came across an address by Frederick Douglas about John Brown I found more nuanced, eloquent and moving that made a better case for John Brown than Thoreau or Emerson did.) 28 pages Half Star
Life Without Principle - I found this Thoreau at his very worst. Cranky and a crank, misanthropic and dismissive of work whether of physical labor to make a living or building a commercial enterprise. Anyone, in other words, not living the way he does. Hated it. 21 pages. One Star
Walden - This book in particular is often cited as one of the origins of the environmentalist movement. What struck me from the beginning is that Thoreau's a truly impressive writer. I was often entranced by the sheer beauty of the prose even when he was expressing ideas antithetical to my worldview. Frequently I'd come across familiar lines such as the "mass of men live lives of quiet desperation" and "if a man does not keep pace with his companions, perhaps he hears a different drummer." And how can I not appreciate his "Reading" chapter with its lyrical praise of books? The first chapter though, "Economies," often had me lifting a cynical brow. His mantra in the book is simplicity, simplicity, simplicity! And though I can see his point about the futility of yearning after many superfluous things just because they're in fashion and impoverishing yourself trying to keep up with the Joneses, some of his encomiums on his frugality... Well, he's at his worst in the "Baker Farm" chapter where he lectured this poor hard-working Irish immigrant with several children on how he should live. Given Thoreau was squatting on Emerson's land and bringing his laundry home to his mother, it sounded like this guy ranting about how to make ends meet while he's living in his parents' basement rent-free. And all his talk about self-sufficiency and living the natural way? As much as we take such objects for granted today, such things as Thoreau used to build his cabin such as panes of glass, nails, screws, planks, are products of specialization and even industrialization--at least produced cheaply for use of the ordinary men, and I could wish that Thoreau would, if not appreciate that, acknowledge it. I don't resonate with a lot of the book's messages--and was at times bored with Thoreau's lengthy rhapsodies on nature. There's definitely gorgeous writing and food for thought here nevertheless. If you'd call yourself an environmentalist or naturalist I think that's worth adding at least an additional star in rating. 298 pages Four Stars
A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers - A travelogue of Thoreau's travels on the river with his brother. I've read claims this is second only to Walden in importance among Thoreau's works. I think if you loved Walden, and I mean loved it and you can't get enough Thoreau, by all means read this and the others below--especially if you love Nature studies studded with loads of classical allusions. That said, even though some parts bored me, other parts definitely were worth the read. Especially the chapter "Atlantides" dealing with friendship that featured the line: "It takes two to speak the truth,--one to speak and another to hear." I loved the discussion of Chaucer too. One where I liked the digressions more than the main narrative. 138 pages Three and a Half Stars
Cape Cod - My edition included four of the chapters. The first chapter, "The Shipwreck" was interesting for it's depiction of tragedy but then subverts the seeming compassion of the account in a disconcerting way. "The Wellfleet Oysterman" is interesting for it's title character--an elderly man who can remember the Revolutionary War. "The Highland Light" and "Provincetown" is vintage Thoreau--in other words, I at times found myself bored. 66 pages Two and a Half Stars
The Allegash and East Branch - The final of three essays collected in The Maine Woods. Definitely for those nature groupies who loved all that stuff about the loons and the ants on Walden or just like to revel in a bit of 19th century history. I skimmed. A lot. 92 pages One and a Half Stars
Walking - Thoreau's ode to walking. Reading it I couldn't help but think of a book by Rory Stewart I recently read. The Places in Between recounts Stewart's 22 month walk across Afghanistan beginning weeks after the Taliban fell. Thoreau walks to commune with Nature (definitely with a capital "N.") Stewart to understand the people. I prefer Stewart. 38 pages Two Stars
On Civil Disobedience - This is an enormously influential and eloquent essay. Gandhi said of it that, "It left a deep impression on me" and Martin Luther King also was influenced by it. It doesn't always make for comfortable reading. In its main thrust it seems to support anarchy. I think there's a difference between civil disobedience against a specific unjust law or institution, such as the boycott of the segregated Montgomery buses, or even refusal to fight in what you believe is an unjust war, and to do as Thoreau suggests and refuse to pay taxes altogether. To refuse to pay taxes (unless a specific tax itself or what it specifically is earmarked for is inherently unjust) is to protest government itself, and I'm not quite willing to go that far. Because if the test as to whether I have a moral imperative to refuse to pay taxes is whether I agree with everything the government does, then I can't imagine any government on Earth meeting that standard--for anyone. For a libertarian the issue might be the drug war, a liberal the latest military intervention abroad and for a conservative abortion. And again, it's not simply that Thoreau says you have the right to withhold taxes, but that if you're a person of conscience you must not pay them if you disagree with government policy--and be ready to go to jail for the privilege. Nevertheless, I can appreciate Thoreau's passion on the issue of slavery at the heart of this essay published in 1848. And two of his tax protests even meet my test above. One was a poll tax--which I consider inherently unjust, and the other was earmarked to pay a minister's salary even though Thoreau wasn't a member of the church. And he did spend time in jail as a result. I can't help admire that. Yet I admit in his situation I would have probably just paid the tax. That's part of what makes the essay unsettling--because at times I wondered. Is it so much that I really think Thoreau is wrong--or is it just I don't have his courage? Given how thought-provoking and challenging to complacency I found this work, I can't help but give it top marks. A must read. 28 pages Five stars
Slavery in Massachusetts - A passionate fire-eating speech condemning the state of Massachusetts for it's support of the Fugitive Slave Law. Interesting as a slice of history that demonstrates the incendiary atmosphere that flamed into the American Civil War in less than a decade. Three stars 20 pages
A Plea for Captain John Brown - This was Thoreau's elegy for John Brown, who helped spark the American Civil War. An abolitionist who preached (and practiced) armed resurrection, he was responsible for the murder of several men and has the distinction of being called America's first domestic terrorist. He was obviously Thoreau's hero. He's not mine. Color me unmoved at this panegyric. It's ironic that the man who inspired Tolstoy, Gandhi and Martin Luther King to develop forms of non-violent resistance would count John Brown a hero--and could end this essay calling for "revenge." (I'd add, I later came across an address by Frederick Douglas about John Brown I found more nuanced, eloquent and moving that made a better case for John Brown than Thoreau or Emerson did.) 28 pages Half Star
Life Without Principle - I found this Thoreau at his very worst. Cranky and a crank, misanthropic and dismissive of work whether of physical labor to make a living or building a commercial enterprise. Anyone, in other words, not living the way he does. Hated it. 21 pages. One Star
Read
March 18, 2021I have yet to read anything but chapter eighteen.
June 12, 2017
It's not that I'm not interested in the remaining stories, but there's only so much Thoreau I can take at once. I'll try the rest on the collection as individual e-books.
August 10, 2007
This book just edged out the and Money: How to Get as Much as You Can of It!!!! as my favorite book of all time. Not getting results at work? This book can help! A classic self-help manual, this book can teach you how to make money and become the most popular person of all time, just like its handsome, wealthy, much adored author. You can even learn how much it costs to build a 1840's style log-cabin. Did you know that pumpkins make good chairs? I bet that even if you did, you probably thought that Martha Stewart was the first person to think of it. Well, she wasn't. H. Dave Thoreau (as his numerous fellow tea party goers knew him) was! Read the book that inspired Abercrombie to team with his old buddy Mr. Fitch to invent the shopping mall. Read the book that the OED has credited as the earliest to use such immortal terms as LOL; OMFG; :-) ; foshizzle; phat beatz; and shopaholic (with a hint towards the later evolution of the term into chocoholic). If you can find this book in print (it's pretty rare), I'd check it out. You might even discover a surefire way to convince that girl (or guy) you have your eye on to start noticing you and figure our the quickest way to get a raise while working even less hours at your glorious bureaucratic administrative/management position!!!
June 9, 2015
At long last. It took me a while to make it through this. It's not something that I could power through 30 pages of on my lunch break. Reading Walden is a lot like watching paint drying. And I mean that in the most complimentary way possible. Like if you could really experience the paint drying.
Thoreau was way ahead of his time. A lot of people are starting to come to the same conclusions he came to some 150 odd years ago: Man has a deep connection to nature, and nature fills a need in man that modern capitalist society cannot. We are all caged animals to modernity. I'm going to find out if Cornel West has anything to say about Thoreau.
He refers to the Vedas and Bhagavad Gita, which I found pleasantly surprising. So there is a hint of Eastern mysticism to his philosophy. Thoreau's words are flowery and his descriptions verbose. But if you follow him to his point, his ideas are beautiful, relevant, and necessary.
Thoreau was way ahead of his time. A lot of people are starting to come to the same conclusions he came to some 150 odd years ago: Man has a deep connection to nature, and nature fills a need in man that modern capitalist society cannot. We are all caged animals to modernity. I'm going to find out if Cornel West has anything to say about Thoreau.
He refers to the Vedas and Bhagavad Gita, which I found pleasantly surprising. So there is a hint of Eastern mysticism to his philosophy. Thoreau's words are flowery and his descriptions verbose. But if you follow him to his point, his ideas are beautiful, relevant, and necessary.
January 15, 2022
I was going to say something silly and Garden State-y about how Walden changed my life, but am rewording because the experience of reading this book was more like...confirmation. Which is to say, I've chosen a certain way to live that I believe is the right one for me, and reading Walden was like being told, "That's right, that's what you need to do. Keep on keeping on, you're heading in the right direction." Except that the life Thoreau writes about is not directional in the least. But you get what I mean.
"So that was a big deal too..."
"So that was a big deal too..."
August 7, 2016
Only read two chapters, but they were interesting to read, it shows how a government is run, by good men or honest men ? it makes us wonder if our current government is right or is it wrong?
and if it's wrong, should we still follow it ?
and if it's wrong, should we still follow it ?
May 29, 2016
Amo a este hombre.
November 1, 2020
I started reading this book expecting a transformative experience (which it was not quite the way I expected it to be) having been introduced to Thoreau in bits and quotes years ago by another transformative experience, i.e. while watching Dead Poets Society, the movie.
For a long time, my only reference point to Thoreau had been that edict to "suck the marrow out of life!" To live fullest with minimum of things (essential things) as possible.
However, while reading him I couldn't remain very sure whether he stood for sucking the marrow out of life or following a path of ascetic renunciation. He is self-contradictory. His politics is complex and uncategorizable. He wants to live beside a pond among the woods and then goes to the town (most probably for gossip, if I may say so) every other day. But then I got it! What he stands for is this very individual freedom to be complex and self-contradictory.
In probably a desperate attempt to relate to the text, I am inclined to think that he went to the woods because he was sick of the state, the newspaper, the shallow piety of some of the believers, the self-righteousness of some of the abolishinists, the violence of well-meaning patriotic indifference, and the evils of slave-owners. He wanted to meet himself afresh, to think what he wants to think and not what he is made to think. I deeply related to these sentiments which are strewn time and again in his writings. I disagreed with many more. But reading him also re-taught me tolerance of difference of opinion, which I found myself struggling with before I started reading this book.
I feel like what I am trying to do with leaving all mainstream social media is my version of going to the woods. And indeed, Thoreau quite unexpectedly was a great companion in my journey.
A common mistake we tend to do is to judge Thoreau by just Walden and not his whole life. He went to the woods for just around two years of his whole life. He did not practice permanent withdrawal from society. In the end of Walden, he says he left the woods because he has many other lives to live. He was a conscientious dissenter all his life, refusing to pay taxes that directly supported slave-owing practices. His "Civil Disobedience" influenced the likes of Gandhi and Tolstoy. A proponent of non-violence, he ended up supporting an extremist abolishinist who murdered multiple slave-owners.
And this, I think, how he should be judged. A champion of human freedom above all, which obligatorily (is that a word?) includes the freedom to be something that is a contradiction to what they are considered to be.
In the end, I can say it was probably not as transformative as, for example reading Dostoevsky, was for me. But it was exactly what I needed in this phase of my life.
P.S. It was not a very easy read for me. I slogged through it. Put it down temporarily multiple times, but never really abandoned it. And although I was bored many times, the over all effect of reading it was time well spent.
P.P.S. The elephant in the room - Yes, some of his writings do have a homo-romantic undertone, most notably his poem Sympathy and texts on friendship in A week in Concord and Merrimack Rivers. But, they expound a love or friendship (for him, they are the same) more gender-age-body neutral. His pronouns for a loved one (with no connotation to sexual intimacy) are though always he/him.
For a long time, my only reference point to Thoreau had been that edict to "suck the marrow out of life!" To live fullest with minimum of things (essential things) as possible.
However, while reading him I couldn't remain very sure whether he stood for sucking the marrow out of life or following a path of ascetic renunciation. He is self-contradictory. His politics is complex and uncategorizable. He wants to live beside a pond among the woods and then goes to the town (most probably for gossip, if I may say so) every other day. But then I got it! What he stands for is this very individual freedom to be complex and self-contradictory.
In probably a desperate attempt to relate to the text, I am inclined to think that he went to the woods because he was sick of the state, the newspaper, the shallow piety of some of the believers, the self-righteousness of some of the abolishinists, the violence of well-meaning patriotic indifference, and the evils of slave-owners. He wanted to meet himself afresh, to think what he wants to think and not what he is made to think. I deeply related to these sentiments which are strewn time and again in his writings. I disagreed with many more. But reading him also re-taught me tolerance of difference of opinion, which I found myself struggling with before I started reading this book.
I feel like what I am trying to do with leaving all mainstream social media is my version of going to the woods. And indeed, Thoreau quite unexpectedly was a great companion in my journey.
A common mistake we tend to do is to judge Thoreau by just Walden and not his whole life. He went to the woods for just around two years of his whole life. He did not practice permanent withdrawal from society. In the end of Walden, he says he left the woods because he has many other lives to live. He was a conscientious dissenter all his life, refusing to pay taxes that directly supported slave-owing practices. His "Civil Disobedience" influenced the likes of Gandhi and Tolstoy. A proponent of non-violence, he ended up supporting an extremist abolishinist who murdered multiple slave-owners.
And this, I think, how he should be judged. A champion of human freedom above all, which obligatorily (is that a word?) includes the freedom to be something that is a contradiction to what they are considered to be.
In the end, I can say it was probably not as transformative as, for example reading Dostoevsky, was for me. But it was exactly what I needed in this phase of my life.
P.S. It was not a very easy read for me. I slogged through it. Put it down temporarily multiple times, but never really abandoned it. And although I was bored many times, the over all effect of reading it was time well spent.
P.P.S. The elephant in the room - Yes, some of his writings do have a homo-romantic undertone, most notably his poem Sympathy and texts on friendship in A week in Concord and Merrimack Rivers. But, they expound a love or friendship (for him, they are the same) more gender-age-body neutral. His pronouns for a loved one (with no connotation to sexual intimacy) are though always he/him.
September 26, 2023
Walden And Other Writings by Henry David Thoreau is a collection of essays that explore the author’s views on society, nature, and self-reliance. Thoreau was a transcendentalist writer who advocated for individual freedom and social tolerance through literature. He also anticipated some of the feminist and sociological concepts that emerged later in history. In this book, Thoreau challenges the conventional notions of economy, civility, and identity that he saw as oppressive and limiting. He proposes a different way of living that embraces diversity, simplicity, and authenticity.
One of the main themes in ճǰ’s writings is the relationship between the domestic and the public spheres. Thoreau redefines “economy� by analyzing his own experience of living in a cabin near Walden Pond. He shows how the home economy mirrors the public economy, and how both can be improved by reducing unnecessary consumption and increasing self-reliance. He also criticizes the American economy for imposing rigid social norms that prevent people from enjoying life’s “finer fruits.� ճǰ’s analysis of the domestic sphere as a political space was later recognized by feminists who argued for the recognition and empowerment of women’s work and roles in the household.
Another theme in ճǰ’s writings is the value of diversity and difference. Thoreau criticizes the “proper� men who disregard variety and only respect what is “civil.� He sees civility as a shallow acceptance (“vaporous generosity�) of those who are culturally different. He argues that true civility is based on mutual respect and understanding, not on conformity and assimilation. Thoreau also explores the concept of identity and how it is shaped by social forces. He contends that the most effective tool of domination is the individual’s mind, which can become a “slavedriver� for the status quo if it internalizes cultural norms as personal truths. He suggests that the only way to resist this inner-control is to free oneself from emotional and mental attachment to “public opinion� as a form of civil disobedience. ճǰ’s views on diversity and identity resonate with modern feminists who challenge the binary and essentialist constructions of identity. ճǰ’s society faced the same pressure to fit into the dominant system as today’s global community.
ճǰ’s Walden And Other Writings is a timeless (though often wordy) masterpiece that invites us to question our assumptions, values, and truths. Through his essays on nature and self-reliance, he challenged the dominant views of his time on gender, sexuality, and sociability, and anticipated some of the key insights of contemporary feminist philosophy. He also suggested a way out of the cultural and feminist stagnation: embracing life’s diverse nature and living deliberately. By using nature as a metaphor for human diversity and creativity, he showed how the appreciation of variety can overcome the denial of universal differences and promote social progress. This book is a profound exploration of the human condition, the social forces that shape it, and the possibilities for transcendence and liberation. It deserves to be read and re-read by anyone who cares about the meaning of life.
One of the main themes in ճǰ’s writings is the relationship between the domestic and the public spheres. Thoreau redefines “economy� by analyzing his own experience of living in a cabin near Walden Pond. He shows how the home economy mirrors the public economy, and how both can be improved by reducing unnecessary consumption and increasing self-reliance. He also criticizes the American economy for imposing rigid social norms that prevent people from enjoying life’s “finer fruits.� ճǰ’s analysis of the domestic sphere as a political space was later recognized by feminists who argued for the recognition and empowerment of women’s work and roles in the household.
Another theme in ճǰ’s writings is the value of diversity and difference. Thoreau criticizes the “proper� men who disregard variety and only respect what is “civil.� He sees civility as a shallow acceptance (“vaporous generosity�) of those who are culturally different. He argues that true civility is based on mutual respect and understanding, not on conformity and assimilation. Thoreau also explores the concept of identity and how it is shaped by social forces. He contends that the most effective tool of domination is the individual’s mind, which can become a “slavedriver� for the status quo if it internalizes cultural norms as personal truths. He suggests that the only way to resist this inner-control is to free oneself from emotional and mental attachment to “public opinion� as a form of civil disobedience. ճǰ’s views on diversity and identity resonate with modern feminists who challenge the binary and essentialist constructions of identity. ճǰ’s society faced the same pressure to fit into the dominant system as today’s global community.
ճǰ’s Walden And Other Writings is a timeless (though often wordy) masterpiece that invites us to question our assumptions, values, and truths. Through his essays on nature and self-reliance, he challenged the dominant views of his time on gender, sexuality, and sociability, and anticipated some of the key insights of contemporary feminist philosophy. He also suggested a way out of the cultural and feminist stagnation: embracing life’s diverse nature and living deliberately. By using nature as a metaphor for human diversity and creativity, he showed how the appreciation of variety can overcome the denial of universal differences and promote social progress. This book is a profound exploration of the human condition, the social forces that shape it, and the possibilities for transcendence and liberation. It deserves to be read and re-read by anyone who cares about the meaning of life.
November 6, 2019
Correction.. I finished the Walden section of this book for ENL 160.
I really enjoyed reading Walden. I had skipped through it once before, but being required to read it all the way through definitely gave enough structure to sit down and actually read the dull parts... C'mon Thoreau, nobody really enjoys reading how you measured the depth of the pond.
Seriously, though. The Transcendentalists were good writers, and I enjoy Thoreau's style. He peppers in philosophy and faith in with nature appreciation, which means my book won't shut all the way because of how much I've highlighted and sticky-noted.
I really enjoyed reading Walden. I had skipped through it once before, but being required to read it all the way through definitely gave enough structure to sit down and actually read the dull parts... C'mon Thoreau, nobody really enjoys reading how you measured the depth of the pond.
Seriously, though. The Transcendentalists were good writers, and I enjoy Thoreau's style. He peppers in philosophy and faith in with nature appreciation, which means my book won't shut all the way because of how much I've highlighted and sticky-noted.
September 24, 2017
Certainly not in the headspace for what Thoreau had in this collection of his works. Perhaps if I had read just one or two of his essays or works instead of trying to read them all together and I would have had more patience. But I don't. One of those that I'll revisit in another decade to see if life experience changes my thoughts and lens through which I read this.
January 5, 2019
Good anthology of important works. Still relevant today for its environmental and political insights.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 238 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.