What do you think?
Rate this book
亘丕夭賲丕賳丿赖
丕賷賳噩丕 丿乇 丨丕賱 爻賯賵胤貙 鬲賵蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 禺賵丿賲貙 鬲賵蹖 賰丕亘賷賳 賴賵丕倬賷賲丕 夭賳丿丕賳蹖 卮丿賴鈥屬�. 禺賷賱蹖 趩賷夭賴丕 賴爻鬲 賰賴 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕乇賲 鬲睾賷賷乇 亘丿賲貙 賵賱蹖 賳賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁�. 鬲賲賵賲 卮丿. 丨丕賱丕 丿賷诏賴 賮賯胤 賷賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳賴. 丕賷賳 夭賳丿诏蹖 賵 賲乇诏 鬲賳丿乇 亘乇丕賳爻賵賳賴 賵 賲賳 賳賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 丕夭 丕賵賳 賮乇丕乇 賰賳賲. 丌爻賲賵賳 丌亘賷賴 賵 禺賵乇卮賷丿 亘賴 賴賲賴鈥屫� 賲蹖鈥屫жㄙ�. 禺賵乇卮賷丿 賲孬賱 賷賴 賳賯胤賴鈥屰� 丿乇禺卮丕賳 賵爻胤 丌爻賲賵賳 賲蹖鈥屫жㄙ�. 丕賲乇賵夭 乇賵夭 夭賷亘丕賷賷賴... 貨
287 pages, Paperback
First published February 17, 1999
1804 people are currently reading
46258 people want to read
About the author
Chuck Palahniuk
249听books131k听followersWritten in stolen moments under truck chassis and on park benches to a soundtrack of The Downward Spiral and Pablo Honey, Fight Club came into existence. The adaptation of Fight Club was a flop at the box office, but achieved cult status on DVD. The film鈥檚 popularity drove sales of the novel. Chuck put out two novels in 1999, Survivor and Invisible Monsters. Choke, published in 2001, became Chuck鈥檚 first New York Times bestseller. Chuck鈥檚 work has always been infused with personal experience, and his next novel, Lullaby, was no exception. Chuck credits writing Lullaby with helping him cope with the tragic death of his father. Diary and the non-fiction guide to Portland, Fugitives and Refugees, were released in 2003. While on the road in support of Diary, Chuck began reading a short story entitled 'Guts,' which would eventually become part of the novel Haunted.
In the years that followed, he continued to write, publishing the bestselling Rant, Snuff, Pygmy, Tell-All, a 'remix' of Invisible Monsters, Damned, and most recently, Doomed.
Chuck also enjoys giving back to his fans, and teaching the art of storytelling has been an important part of that. In 2004, Chuck began submitting essays to ChuckPalahniuk.net on the craft of writing. These were 'How To' pieces, straight out of Chuck's personal bag of tricks, based on the tenants of minimalism he learned from Tom Spanbauer. Every month, a 鈥淗omework Assignment鈥� would accompany the lesson, so Workshop members could apply what they had learned. (all 36 of these essays can currently be found on The Cult's sister-site, LitReactor.com).
Then, in 2009, Chuck increased his involvement by committing to read and review a selection of fan-written stories each month. The best stories are currently set to be published in Burnt Tongues, a forthcoming anthology, with an introduction written by Chuck himself.
His next novel, Beautiful You, is due out in October 2014.
In the years that followed, he continued to write, publishing the bestselling Rant, Snuff, Pygmy, Tell-All, a 'remix' of Invisible Monsters, Damned, and most recently, Doomed.
Chuck also enjoys giving back to his fans, and teaching the art of storytelling has been an important part of that. In 2004, Chuck began submitting essays to ChuckPalahniuk.net on the craft of writing. These were 'How To' pieces, straight out of Chuck's personal bag of tricks, based on the tenants of minimalism he learned from Tom Spanbauer. Every month, a 鈥淗omework Assignment鈥� would accompany the lesson, so Workshop members could apply what they had learned. (all 36 of these essays can currently be found on The Cult's sister-site, LitReactor.com).
Then, in 2009, Chuck increased his involvement by committing to read and review a selection of fan-written stories each month. The best stories are currently set to be published in Burnt Tongues, a forthcoming anthology, with an introduction written by Chuck himself.
His next novel, Beautiful You, is due out in October 2014.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 4,498 reviews
December 4, 2013
I'm going to be honest, I'm starting to become less and less impressed with Palahniuk's work in general-- and it saddens me to admit this. I've read five of his books now (one non-fiction; one too plodding to even finish), and it's becoming too obvious that every character voice is exactly the same. They are all written the same, they all have the same delivery of speech and thought patterns, they are all perfectly one-dimensional. Blank, emotionless, cruel, somewhat hateful. Disenchanted with the world, anti- and asocial. There's no depth of feeling; even when Palahniuk attempts to create a characteristic turn-around, it falters and falls short (with the singular exception of Fight Club). The "hero" always knows a handful of miscellaneous facts that loosely relate to the content enough to serve as cynical metaphor (how to make soap, how to clean up evidence of violence, etc.); this miscellany is always interspersed with social commentary and scraps of dialogue, absolutely routine by now. It works for one book, creating such a by-the-book nihilistic protagonist through disjointed prose, but when every. single. character. is a misanthropic maggot, it gets old.
The writing is still "sharp," if you want to call it that, but completely formulaic. Disappointing to discover this about Palahniuk's style.
That said, this one is at least holding my attention a little more than Diary, so I'll probably finish it.
The writing is still "sharp," if you want to call it that, but completely formulaic. Disappointing to discover this about Palahniuk's style.
That said, this one is at least holding my attention a little more than Diary, so I'll probably finish it.
March 4, 2022
A book much better appreciated on a second reading. An early Palahniuk heavily dead-pan / dark satire on the nature of fame and worship, as well as a beautifully unnerving attack on American cults! Definitely one of the must-reads of his works. A well deserved 7 out of 12 from me, 3 points more than what I gave it when I first read it in 2003!
2018 read, 2003 read
2018 read, 2003 read
December 4, 2013
chuck palahniuk will mess you up. he messed me up. 'fight club' put chuck on the map, but in my opinion, 'survivor' is where he really earned his paycheck.
as others have mentioned, the book starts on page 247 or so and goes backwards to page 1. a simple, but clever gimmick that made me buy the book in the first place. and since the novel's protagonist, if we can call him that, is on a doomed airplane, the page numbering is highly appropriate.
palahniuk expertly traces one man's rise to fame. tender branson is the sole survivor of 'the creedish cult' who decide to stage their own johnstown massacre. consequently he becomes something of a media darling, everyone wanting a piece of the action. palahniuk illustrates just how really susceptible we americans are to clever marketing and the completely ridiculous idea of celebrity. what, exactly, is our fascination with 'celebrities' and hollywood types? i started thinking about the ridiculous number of tv shows dedicated to following celebrities: et, access hollywood, celebrity justice, etc, etc, etc, and not to mention an entire tv channel (E!) devoted to a shoving unrealistic hopes, dreams, and ideals down the throats of the every day, average american who has no hopes of ever achieving 'the hollywood life.' i'm pretty sure hollywood is ruining america.
i think palahniuk's masterstroke, however, is showing us tender branson's 'book of prayer.' it's a sorry commentary on the state of christianity in america. so-called 'christians' who actually try to sell prayers. unreal. (and this from a VERY christian individual) it wouldn't be as funny if it weren't true. he shows our proclivity to bandwagon, to flock to 'the new thing' simply because it's 'the new thing,' regardless of it's actual value or merit.
chuck palahniuk isn't for the faint of heart. like i said, he'll mess you up. this book stayed with me for weeks after reading it. it'll do the same for you. but i don't think that's necessarily a bad thing.
a biting commentary on contemporary american culture.
as others have mentioned, the book starts on page 247 or so and goes backwards to page 1. a simple, but clever gimmick that made me buy the book in the first place. and since the novel's protagonist, if we can call him that, is on a doomed airplane, the page numbering is highly appropriate.
palahniuk expertly traces one man's rise to fame. tender branson is the sole survivor of 'the creedish cult' who decide to stage their own johnstown massacre. consequently he becomes something of a media darling, everyone wanting a piece of the action. palahniuk illustrates just how really susceptible we americans are to clever marketing and the completely ridiculous idea of celebrity. what, exactly, is our fascination with 'celebrities' and hollywood types? i started thinking about the ridiculous number of tv shows dedicated to following celebrities: et, access hollywood, celebrity justice, etc, etc, etc, and not to mention an entire tv channel (E!) devoted to a shoving unrealistic hopes, dreams, and ideals down the throats of the every day, average american who has no hopes of ever achieving 'the hollywood life.' i'm pretty sure hollywood is ruining america.
i think palahniuk's masterstroke, however, is showing us tender branson's 'book of prayer.' it's a sorry commentary on the state of christianity in america. so-called 'christians' who actually try to sell prayers. unreal. (and this from a VERY christian individual) it wouldn't be as funny if it weren't true. he shows our proclivity to bandwagon, to flock to 'the new thing' simply because it's 'the new thing,' regardless of it's actual value or merit.
chuck palahniuk isn't for the faint of heart. like i said, he'll mess you up. this book stayed with me for weeks after reading it. it'll do the same for you. but i don't think that's necessarily a bad thing.
a biting commentary on contemporary american culture.
July 5, 2021
乇賵丕賷丞 賲禺鬲賱賮丞 賮賷 丕賱賮賰乇丞 賵胤乇賷賯丞 丕賱爻乇丿.. 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 丕爻鬲胤丕毓 兀賳 賷卮丿 丕賱丕賳鬲亘丕賴 賲賳 丕賱爻胤賵乇 丕賱兀賵賱賶 賱賱乇賵丕賷丞
賮賷 胤丕卅乇丞 亘丿賵賳 胤賷丕乇 賷噩賱爻 亘胤賱 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賵丨賷丿丕 賵賮賷 賴丿賵亍 賷丨賰賷 毓賳 丨賷丕鬲賴
賰賷賮 鬲丨賵賱 賲賳 毓丕賲賱 亘爻賷胤 賷鬲亘毓 鬲毓丕賱賷賲 胤丕卅賮鬲賴 丕賱丿賷賳賷丞 廿賱賶 卮禺氐 賲卮賴賵乇 廿毓賱丕賲賷丕 賷賲賱賰 賯丿乇丞 丕賱鬲兀孬賷乇 賮賷 丕賱賳丕爻
爻禺乇賷丞 賲賳 氐賳丕毓丞 丕賱乇賲賵夭 賮賷 丕賱廿毓賱丕賲 賵賲賳 丕賱卮賴乇丞 丕賱賲夭賷賮丞 賵鬲爻賵賷賯 丕賱兀賵賴丕賲
乇賵丕賷丞 鬲賰卮賮 毓賳 丕賱賵丕賯毓 賵毓賳 丕賱賴賵爻 亘丕賱馗賵丕賴乇 睾賷乇 丕賱丨賯賷賯賷丞 賮賷 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓
丕賱兀賮賰丕乇 丕賱賲胤乇賵丨丞 賮賷 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賲賴賲丞 賵兀爻賱賵亘 亘賵賱丕賳賷賰 賮賷 丕賱鬲毓亘賷乇 毓賳賴丕 賲賲鬲毓
賱賰賳 丕賱鬲賮丕氐賷賱 賮賷 亘毓囟 丕賱兀噩夭丕亍 賰丕賳鬲 賲胤賵賱丞, 賵丕賱鬲乇噩賲丞 賲賲鬲丕夭丞 賱賴卮丕賲 賮賴賲賷
賮賷 胤丕卅乇丞 亘丿賵賳 胤賷丕乇 賷噩賱爻 亘胤賱 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賵丨賷丿丕 賵賮賷 賴丿賵亍 賷丨賰賷 毓賳 丨賷丕鬲賴
賰賷賮 鬲丨賵賱 賲賳 毓丕賲賱 亘爻賷胤 賷鬲亘毓 鬲毓丕賱賷賲 胤丕卅賮鬲賴 丕賱丿賷賳賷丞 廿賱賶 卮禺氐 賲卮賴賵乇 廿毓賱丕賲賷丕 賷賲賱賰 賯丿乇丞 丕賱鬲兀孬賷乇 賮賷 丕賱賳丕爻
爻禺乇賷丞 賲賳 氐賳丕毓丞 丕賱乇賲賵夭 賮賷 丕賱廿毓賱丕賲 賵賲賳 丕賱卮賴乇丞 丕賱賲夭賷賮丞 賵鬲爻賵賷賯 丕賱兀賵賴丕賲
乇賵丕賷丞 鬲賰卮賮 毓賳 丕賱賵丕賯毓 賵毓賳 丕賱賴賵爻 亘丕賱馗賵丕賴乇 睾賷乇 丕賱丨賯賷賯賷丞 賮賷 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓
丕賱兀賮賰丕乇 丕賱賲胤乇賵丨丞 賮賷 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賲賴賲丞 賵兀爻賱賵亘 亘賵賱丕賳賷賰 賮賷 丕賱鬲毓亘賷乇 毓賳賴丕 賲賲鬲毓
賱賰賳 丕賱鬲賮丕氐賷賱 賮賷 亘毓囟 丕賱兀噩夭丕亍 賰丕賳鬲 賲胤賵賱丞, 賵丕賱鬲乇噩賲丞 賲賲鬲丕夭丞 賱賴卮丕賲 賮賴賲賷
April 23, 2020
When you open this it soon becomes bewildering. It's impossible to find continuity between one page and another. It took me about fifteen minutes to discover the trick of reading it. You have to start at the last page and read backwards from right to left. The narrator is one of the last surviving members of a religious death cult and those few who didn't commit suicide at the appointed hour are being hunted down and murdered. He tells his story from the cockpit of a plane he has hijacked and which will crash when it runs out of fuel.
It's a madcap and often very wise and funny satire of the modern world and its support system. My only reason for deducting a star was occasionally I felt Palahniuk got carried away with his searing lunatic vision. One image I'll never forget is the detailed instructions on how to eat a lobster. It's one of those most macabre horrifying things I've ever read!
It's a madcap and often very wise and funny satire of the modern world and its support system. My only reason for deducting a star was occasionally I felt Palahniuk got carried away with his searing lunatic vision. One image I'll never forget is the detailed instructions on how to eat a lobster. It's one of those most macabre horrifying things I've ever read!
May 9, 2018
" 賴賷 乇丨賱丞 賲囟胤乇亘丞 賴丕卅噩丞 毓賳 鬲賯賱亘丕鬲 丕賱卮賴乇丞 賵胤亘賷毓丞 丕賱廿賷賲丕賳 " ...
賴賰匕丕 賯丕賱賵丕 毓賳 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞...
賴賷 乇丨賱丞 鬲亘丿兀 賲賳 賳賯胤丞 丕賱氐賮乇 賲賳 賯亘賱 兀丨丿 丌禺乇 兀賮乇丕丿 胤丕卅賮丞 丿賷賳賷丞.. 丕賱乇丨賱丞 丕賱丕賳鬲丨丕乇賷丞 毓賱賶 賲鬲賳 胤丕卅乇丞 乇賰丕亘 賲鬲噩賴丞 賳丨賵 睾賷丕賴亘 丕賱氐丨乇丕亍 丕賱丕爻鬲乇丕賱賷丞..
兀賲丕 毓賳 賲丿賶 廿囟胤乇丕亘 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賮丨丿孬 賵賱丕 丨乇噩 賰兀賳賰 鬲賯乇兀 毓賱賶 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 毓賱賶 賱賵丨賺 禺卮亘賷 賮賷 賵爻胤 丕賱亘丨乇貙貙 丕賱賰乇丿賷卮賷 丕賱賲噩賳賵賳 (丕賱賳丕噩賷 丕賱兀禺賷乇) 丕賱匕賷 鬲鬲丨賵賱 丨賷丕鬲賴 賲賳 胤賮賱 賲賳亘賵匕 丕賱賶 禺丕丿賲 賮賷 賲賳夭賱 孬乇賷 孬賲 賲爻鬲卮丕乇 賳賮爻賷 丕賱賶 賯丕卅丿 丿賷賳賷 鬲鬲氐丿乇 賰鬲亘賴 賯丕卅賲丞 丕賱賲亘賷毓丕鬲 亘鬲賱賰 丕賱丕丿毓賷丞 丕賱睾乇賷亘丞 ..
丕賱鬲賮丕氐賷賱 鬲睾賱亘 毓賱賶 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 丿賵賳 丕賱丕丨丿丕孬.. 鬲賮丕氐賷賱貙 鬲賮丕氐賷賱 貙爻乇丿 貙鬲賮丕氐賷賱 賷賯賵丿 賳丨賵 丕賱噩賳賵賳.. 鬲賮丕氐賷賱 毓賳 兀賷 卮卅 賷鬲禺賷賱賴 丕賱毓賯賱 賵賲丕 亘毓丿 丕賱毓賯賱..
丕賱賳賯胤丞 丕賱亘丕乇夭丞 賮賷 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賴賷 丕賱鬲丨丿孬 毓賳 丕賱噩賲丕毓丕鬲 丕賱丿賷賳賷丞 丕賱睾乇賷亘丞 賵胤亘賷毓丞 丕賱丕賷賲丕賳 賮賷賴丕 賵睾乇丕亘丞 丕賱亘卮乇 賮賷 廿禺鬲乇丕毓 胤乇賯 賱賱兀賷賲丕賳 賵丕賱毓丕丿丕鬲 賵丕賱鬲賯丕賱賷丿 丕賱賲氐丕丨亘丞 賱賴丕..
丕賱賳賯胤丞 丕賱孬丕賳賷丞 毓賳 毓夭賱丞 丕賱丕賳爻丕賳 賮賷 亘賷卅丞 鬲賲丕乇爻 鬲賯丕賱賷丿 賲毓賷賳丞 孬賲 廿賳鬲賯丕賱賴 丕賱賶 氐禺亘 丕賱丨賷丕丞 賮賷 丕賱賲丿賳..
丕賱孬丕賱孬丞 毓賳 丕賱卮賴乇丞貙貙 丕賱氐毓賵丿 賳丨賵 丕賱賶 丕賱賯賲丞 孬賲 丕賱賴亘賵胤 賳丨賵 兀爻賮賱 爻丕賮賱賷賳..
丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賲噩賳賵賳丞 賴丕卅噩丞 亘賰賱 丨匕丕賮賷乇賴丕 鬲囟賷毓 丕賱賯丕乇卅 賮賷 賲鬲丕賴丕鬲 丕賱鬲賮丕氐賷賱 賵胤乇賯 丕賱爻乇丿 丕賱賲賱鬲賵賷丞..
~* 賲賱丕丨馗丞 *~
" 毓夭賷夭賷 丕賱賯丕乇卅 廿匕丕 兀乇丿鬲 丕賱丨賮丕馗 毓賱賶 爻賱丕賲丞 毓賯賱賰 賮賱丕 鬲賯鬲乇亘 賲賳 賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 貙貙乇噩丕亍 "
December 27, 2014
Chuck Palahniuk is my guilty pleasure. His books aren鈥檛 good or anything but I just like reading them ironically. They鈥檙e palate cleansers y鈥檏now. This one is basically Chuck trying to write Fight Club again but it isn鈥檛 really working. It鈥檚 handy that the page numbers are backwards because then you know how many pages are left. Ugh. It鈥檚 fine.
February 17, 2009
Palahnuik has a formula to his story-writing, and it's becoming more and more clear that every work becomes less and less impressive upon further examination. Every main character seems plagued by the same sense of nihilism and self-defeat like his Fight club protagonist, as well as the same delivery of speech, and thought patterns.
So. After reading about 3 books in a row with this consistent formula, I was about ready to abandon my faith in him.
But. Then I read this book, and what a fresh breath of air it was. Yes, it applied the formula. Yes, it had the same nihilistic, disenchanted, one-dimensional main character, but it also didn't try to surprise me with the ending like most of his books usually do. (i.e. 'Lullaby', 'Diary', and 'Choke')
I truly believe that because of this, the novel was saved from being a duplicate, boring disaster. This book was compelling, albeit slow to start. You really won't feel interested until probably half-way through. But it's well worth the wait.
If there's two books you read from this author, I would suggest 'Fight Club', and 'Survivor'. In that order.
So. After reading about 3 books in a row with this consistent formula, I was about ready to abandon my faith in him.
But. Then I read this book, and what a fresh breath of air it was. Yes, it applied the formula. Yes, it had the same nihilistic, disenchanted, one-dimensional main character, but it also didn't try to surprise me with the ending like most of his books usually do. (i.e. 'Lullaby', 'Diary', and 'Choke')
I truly believe that because of this, the novel was saved from being a duplicate, boring disaster. This book was compelling, albeit slow to start. You really won't feel interested until probably half-way through. But it's well worth the wait.
If there's two books you read from this author, I would suggest 'Fight Club', and 'Survivor'. In that order.
July 27, 2020
丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 倬丕乇爻丕賱 禺賵賵賳丿賲貙 乇蹖賵蹖賵卮 賴賲 丿乇 亘乇賳丕賲賴 蹖丕丿丿丕卮鬲賴丕蹖 賲賵亘丕蹖賱賲 賳賵卮鬲賲貙 鬲讴賴鈥屬囏й屰� 丕夭 讴鬲丕亘 賴賲 亘乇丿丕卮鬲賲... 丕賲丕 诏賵卮蹖賲 乇賵 乇蹖爻鬲 讴乇丿賲 賵鈥� 賲賳賽 亘蹖鈥屫堌ж� 亘丕毓孬 卮丿賲 讴賴 鬲賲丕賲 蹖丕丿丿丕卮鬲鈥屬囏з� 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 讴鬲丕亘賴丕賲 亘倬乇賴 馃槙
丕賲丕 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 讴賴 讴鬲丕亘 賮賵賯鈥屫з勜关ж� 賵 亘爻蹖丕乇 禺丕氐蹖 亘賵丿 賵 禺蹖賱蹖 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘禺賵賵賳蹖丿 賵 丨鬲蹖 亘禺乇蹖丿 馃摎
丕賱亘鬲賴 丕蹖賳賲 亘诏賲 讴賴 噩賭賱丿 讴鬲丕亘 賮丕噩毓賴鈥屫ж� 賵 賳賲蹖丿賵賳賲 亘乇 趩賴 丕爻丕爻蹖貙 亘乇丕蹖 賴賲趩蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘蹖貙 丕蹖賳 噩賱丿 讴賵丿讴丕賳賴 乇賵 賯乇丕乇 丿丕丿賳丿 :|
丕賲丕 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 讴賴 讴鬲丕亘 賮賵賯鈥屫з勜关ж� 賵 亘爻蹖丕乇 禺丕氐蹖 亘賵丿 賵 禺蹖賱蹖 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘禺賵賵賳蹖丿 賵 丨鬲蹖 亘禺乇蹖丿 馃摎
丕賱亘鬲賴 丕蹖賳賲 亘诏賲 讴賴 噩賭賱丿 讴鬲丕亘 賮丕噩毓賴鈥屫ж� 賵 賳賲蹖丿賵賳賲 亘乇 趩賴 丕爻丕爻蹖貙 亘乇丕蹖 賴賲趩蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘蹖貙 丕蹖賳 噩賱丿 讴賵丿讴丕賳賴 乇賵 賯乇丕乇 丿丕丿賳丿 :|
September 11, 2022
YouTube kanal谋mda G枚steri Peygamberi kitab谋n谋 枚nerip yeralt谋 edebiyat谋n谋 anlatt谋m:
Bu incelemeyi be臒en. Bu hesab谋 takip et. Bu kitab谋 oku. Ahlak bek莽ili臒i yap. Mutlulu臒uma ortak ol, 莽眉nk眉 sen de mutlu olmak istiyorsun, biliyorum.
Bu incelemede sana g枚steri peygamberli臒i yapaca臒谋m. Sana ne yapman gerekiyorsa hepsini ben s枚yleyece臒im, 莽眉nk眉 senin ald谋臒谋n kararlar bug眉ne kadar pek mant谋kl谋 de臒ildi. Bunu en iyi sen biliyorsun. Ama maalesef yine en iyi sen bilmiyorsun. Kendi d眉艧眉nce evrenini kendi kendine olu艧turabilece臒in s枚ylenmedi, bu y眉zden sen de onaylanmak, be臒enilmek, tan谋nmak ve s谋radan olmamak istedin. 脟眉nk眉 mutlu olan ve s谋radan olmayan insan谋 severlerdi, bilirdin.
Olay sadece ne kadar g枚z眉n senin 眉st眉nde olmas谋yla ilgili, olay sadece bu incelemenin be臒eni butonuna t谋klad谋臒谋n ve benim dediklerimi onaylad谋臒谋n kadar谋yla s谋n谋rl谋. 脟眉nk眉 be臒eni butonuna t谋klad谋臒谋nda esas kalbinden ge莽en duyguyu de臒il s谋rf be臒eni butonuna dokunmak i莽in bunu yapt谋臒谋n zamanlar oldu臒unu sen de 莽ok iyi biliyorsun. Gerisi benim yeralt谋 d眉nyam.
Umar谋m 艧u ana kadar duymak istediklerini s枚ylebilmi艧imdir, 莽眉nk眉 seni mutsuz edecek ve esas ger莽eklerin fark谋na varman谋 sa臒layacak 艧eyler s枚ylemeyi istemem. Seni yeralt谋ndaki sakl谋 d眉nyamla tan谋艧t谋rmak istiyorum...
Evet, bu kitaptaki Creedish gibi bir tarikat ya da mezhebe ba臒l谋 olmayabilirim. Fakat size sadece duymak istediklerinizi s枚ylememle ve s谋radan olmad谋臒谋m谋 kan谋tlamamla bana tapma ihtimalinizin bulundu臒unu biliyor musunuz? Ben, 艧u an bir tarikat kurup, ba艧谋ma da 艧eyhlik yapacak bir g枚steri peygamberi bulsayd谋m sizin m眉rit olmaman谋z i莽in geriye hi莽bir sebep kalmam谋艧 olurdu. 脟眉nk眉 medyan谋n benim 莽谋karlar谋ma bu kadar yard谋m etti臒i bir 莽a臒da 莽ok rahat manip眉le edilebilirsin, 莽ok 莽abuk beynin y谋kanabilir ve toplumun sorgulamadan onaylad谋臒谋 bir insana Tanr谋 枚zellikleri atfedebilirsin.
Evet atfedebilirsin, 莽眉nk眉 Hitit mitolojisindeki yeralt谋 d眉nyas谋 da b枚yledir. Yeralt谋na inmek onlar i莽in sadece 枚lmekle m眉mk眉n oldu臒u gibi geriye canl谋 olarak 莽谋kmak Tanr谋 bile olunsa m眉mk眉n de臒ildi mesela. Bir kere g枚steri peygamberi oldun mu, art谋k m眉rit toplamaya ve beyin y谋kamaya bakmal谋s谋n. Ne kadar 莽ok y谋kanm谋艧 beyin varsa elinde de o kadar g眉莽 var demektir.
Evet g眉莽 var demektir, 莽眉nk眉 Yunan mitolojisindeki yeralt谋 d眉nyas谋 da b枚yledir. Zalim bir tanr谋 olan Hades鈥檌n h眉k眉m s眉rd眉臒眉, g枚lgeler halindeki 枚l眉lere terk edilmi艧, her girenin kabul edildi臒i ama bir daha asla d谋艧ar谋 b谋rak谋lmad谋臒谋 ac谋mas谋zl谋kla y枚netilen bir d眉nyad谋r yerin alt谋. Ben hen眉z o kadar ac谋mas谋z olmay谋 ba艧aramad谋m.
Sana bu kitaptaki gibi yalanc谋 陌sal谋k yapmak istemem, 莽眉nk眉 yeralt谋, hem Bat谋'da hem de Anadolu鈥檇a karanl谋k 莽谋kar hesaplar谋n谋n g枚r眉ld眉臒眉 yer olarak bilinir. E臒er aram谋zda karanl谋k herhangi bir 莽谋kar g眉tme olsayd谋 ad谋m谋z okur olmazd谋 zaten. Palahniuk'un kurgulad谋臒谋 yeralt谋 d眉nyas谋n谋n asl谋nda dini e臒itim sistemlerine, klon 莽ocuklar yeti艧tirmenin sebebi olan niteliksiz e臒itim sistemlerine ve salt haz odakl谋 modernist topluma ele艧tiri oldu臒unu da anlayamazd谋n.
Se莽im tamamen senin, bu bir metro reklam谋 de臒il. Yeralt谋n谋 yanl谋艧 anlamamal谋s谋n ve bu incelemeyi be臒enmelisin. 脟眉nk眉 yapman gerekenler sana s枚ylenmeden bir 艧ey yapam谋yorsun. Korkaks谋n. Zaten bu kitaptaki ba艧 karakter olan Tender'谋n kelime anlam谋 da, gen莽 ve zay谋f demek. Sen de 枚ylesin, zay谋fs谋n ve seni g眉莽l眉 hissettirecek ego tatminleri istiyorsun. 厂辫颈谤颈迟眉别濒颈锄尘 istiyorsun. Sevgi ve 谋艧谋k istiyorsun. Cinselli臒in kap谋lar谋n谋n kilitli oldu臒u bir ev istiyorsun. Mutlu g枚r眉nmek ve sanal ger莽eklikler u臒runa kendi ger莽ekli臒ini k眉莽眉k kar艧谋l谋klarla de臒i艧tirmek istiyorsun. 脟谋k谋艧谋 olmayan bu sistemde pop眉ler k眉lt眉r ve medyan谋n boyunduru臒u alt谋na girip sen de g枚steri peygamberlerinin s谋radan bir m眉ridi haline geliyorsun.
Yoksa sen de mi bir g枚steri peygamberi olmay谋 arzuluyorsun?
O zaman bu incelemeyi 莽ok iyi okumal谋s谋n.
艦imdilik yer 眉st眉nde ya艧谋yor olabilirim, karanl谋k 莽谋kar hesaplar谋m yok, y眉z眉mdeki mutluluk saf bir mutluluk ve mutlu g枚r眉nmek i莽in de臒il ger莽ekten mutlu oldu臒um i莽in 枚yle g眉l眉yorum. Ama e臒er ki bir g眉n kendime tap谋lmas谋n谋 istersem bu 眉lkede m眉rit bulabilece臒imden de hi莽 艧眉phe yok. 脟眉nk眉 莽ok rahat manip眉le edilebilirsin, 莽ok 莽abuk beynin y谋kanabilir ve toplumun sorgulamadan onaylad谋臒谋 bir insana Tanr谋 枚zellikleri atfedebilirsin. Bunlar senin tarih boyunca yapt谋臒谋n 艧eyler insano臒lu.
Bu incelemeyi be臒en. Bu hesab谋 takip et. Ahlak bek莽ili臒i yap. Yapman gerekenlerin hepsini ben biliyorum.
Bu incelemeyi be臒en. Bu hesab谋 takip et. Bu kitab谋 oku. Ahlak bek莽ili臒i yap. Mutlulu臒uma ortak ol, 莽眉nk眉 sen de mutlu olmak istiyorsun, biliyorum.
Bu incelemede sana g枚steri peygamberli臒i yapaca臒谋m. Sana ne yapman gerekiyorsa hepsini ben s枚yleyece臒im, 莽眉nk眉 senin ald谋臒谋n kararlar bug眉ne kadar pek mant谋kl谋 de臒ildi. Bunu en iyi sen biliyorsun. Ama maalesef yine en iyi sen bilmiyorsun. Kendi d眉艧眉nce evrenini kendi kendine olu艧turabilece臒in s枚ylenmedi, bu y眉zden sen de onaylanmak, be臒enilmek, tan谋nmak ve s谋radan olmamak istedin. 脟眉nk眉 mutlu olan ve s谋radan olmayan insan谋 severlerdi, bilirdin.
Olay sadece ne kadar g枚z眉n senin 眉st眉nde olmas谋yla ilgili, olay sadece bu incelemenin be臒eni butonuna t谋klad谋臒谋n ve benim dediklerimi onaylad谋臒谋n kadar谋yla s谋n谋rl谋. 脟眉nk眉 be臒eni butonuna t谋klad谋臒谋nda esas kalbinden ge莽en duyguyu de臒il s谋rf be臒eni butonuna dokunmak i莽in bunu yapt谋臒谋n zamanlar oldu臒unu sen de 莽ok iyi biliyorsun. Gerisi benim yeralt谋 d眉nyam.
Umar谋m 艧u ana kadar duymak istediklerini s枚ylebilmi艧imdir, 莽眉nk眉 seni mutsuz edecek ve esas ger莽eklerin fark谋na varman谋 sa臒layacak 艧eyler s枚ylemeyi istemem. Seni yeralt谋ndaki sakl谋 d眉nyamla tan谋艧t谋rmak istiyorum...
Evet, bu kitaptaki Creedish gibi bir tarikat ya da mezhebe ba臒l谋 olmayabilirim. Fakat size sadece duymak istediklerinizi s枚ylememle ve s谋radan olmad谋臒谋m谋 kan谋tlamamla bana tapma ihtimalinizin bulundu臒unu biliyor musunuz? Ben, 艧u an bir tarikat kurup, ba艧谋ma da 艧eyhlik yapacak bir g枚steri peygamberi bulsayd谋m sizin m眉rit olmaman谋z i莽in geriye hi莽bir sebep kalmam谋艧 olurdu. 脟眉nk眉 medyan谋n benim 莽谋karlar谋ma bu kadar yard谋m etti臒i bir 莽a臒da 莽ok rahat manip眉le edilebilirsin, 莽ok 莽abuk beynin y谋kanabilir ve toplumun sorgulamadan onaylad谋臒谋 bir insana Tanr谋 枚zellikleri atfedebilirsin.
Evet atfedebilirsin, 莽眉nk眉 Hitit mitolojisindeki yeralt谋 d眉nyas谋 da b枚yledir. Yeralt谋na inmek onlar i莽in sadece 枚lmekle m眉mk眉n oldu臒u gibi geriye canl谋 olarak 莽谋kmak Tanr谋 bile olunsa m眉mk眉n de臒ildi mesela. Bir kere g枚steri peygamberi oldun mu, art谋k m眉rit toplamaya ve beyin y谋kamaya bakmal谋s谋n. Ne kadar 莽ok y谋kanm谋艧 beyin varsa elinde de o kadar g眉莽 var demektir.
Evet g眉莽 var demektir, 莽眉nk眉 Yunan mitolojisindeki yeralt谋 d眉nyas谋 da b枚yledir. Zalim bir tanr谋 olan Hades鈥檌n h眉k眉m s眉rd眉臒眉, g枚lgeler halindeki 枚l眉lere terk edilmi艧, her girenin kabul edildi臒i ama bir daha asla d谋艧ar谋 b谋rak谋lmad谋臒谋 ac谋mas谋zl谋kla y枚netilen bir d眉nyad谋r yerin alt谋. Ben hen眉z o kadar ac谋mas谋z olmay谋 ba艧aramad谋m.
Sana bu kitaptaki gibi yalanc谋 陌sal谋k yapmak istemem, 莽眉nk眉 yeralt谋, hem Bat谋'da hem de Anadolu鈥檇a karanl谋k 莽谋kar hesaplar谋n谋n g枚r眉ld眉臒眉 yer olarak bilinir. E臒er aram谋zda karanl谋k herhangi bir 莽谋kar g眉tme olsayd谋 ad谋m谋z okur olmazd谋 zaten. Palahniuk'un kurgulad谋臒谋 yeralt谋 d眉nyas谋n谋n asl谋nda dini e臒itim sistemlerine, klon 莽ocuklar yeti艧tirmenin sebebi olan niteliksiz e臒itim sistemlerine ve salt haz odakl谋 modernist topluma ele艧tiri oldu臒unu da anlayamazd谋n.
Se莽im tamamen senin, bu bir metro reklam谋 de臒il. Yeralt谋n谋 yanl谋艧 anlamamal谋s谋n ve bu incelemeyi be臒enmelisin. 脟眉nk眉 yapman gerekenler sana s枚ylenmeden bir 艧ey yapam谋yorsun. Korkaks谋n. Zaten bu kitaptaki ba艧 karakter olan Tender'谋n kelime anlam谋 da, gen莽 ve zay谋f demek. Sen de 枚ylesin, zay谋fs谋n ve seni g眉莽l眉 hissettirecek ego tatminleri istiyorsun. 厂辫颈谤颈迟眉别濒颈锄尘 istiyorsun. Sevgi ve 谋艧谋k istiyorsun. Cinselli臒in kap谋lar谋n谋n kilitli oldu臒u bir ev istiyorsun. Mutlu g枚r眉nmek ve sanal ger莽eklikler u臒runa kendi ger莽ekli臒ini k眉莽眉k kar艧谋l谋klarla de臒i艧tirmek istiyorsun. 脟谋k谋艧谋 olmayan bu sistemde pop眉ler k眉lt眉r ve medyan谋n boyunduru臒u alt谋na girip sen de g枚steri peygamberlerinin s谋radan bir m眉ridi haline geliyorsun.
Yoksa sen de mi bir g枚steri peygamberi olmay谋 arzuluyorsun?
O zaman bu incelemeyi 莽ok iyi okumal谋s谋n.
艦imdilik yer 眉st眉nde ya艧谋yor olabilirim, karanl谋k 莽谋kar hesaplar谋m yok, y眉z眉mdeki mutluluk saf bir mutluluk ve mutlu g枚r眉nmek i莽in de臒il ger莽ekten mutlu oldu臒um i莽in 枚yle g眉l眉yorum. Ama e臒er ki bir g眉n kendime tap谋lmas谋n谋 istersem bu 眉lkede m眉rit bulabilece臒imden de hi莽 艧眉phe yok. 脟眉nk眉 莽ok rahat manip眉le edilebilirsin, 莽ok 莽abuk beynin y谋kanabilir ve toplumun sorgulamadan onaylad谋臒谋 bir insana Tanr谋 枚zellikleri atfedebilirsin. Bunlar senin tarih boyunca yapt谋臒谋n 艧eyler insano臒lu.
Bu incelemeyi be臒en. Bu hesab谋 takip et. Ahlak bek莽ili臒i yap. Yapman gerekenlerin hepsini ben biliyorum.
February 25, 2022
鈥漈esting, testing. One, two, three.鈥�This plane is going down, but before it does Tender Branson is going to tell you his tale. He will lay it all out and explain, if he can, just how he ended up here alone to die like the fellow Creedish brethren before him, though in far bigger fashion. The how is pretty out there. The why is more so. Who he is may make you hate him, but probably not.
While reading this Palahniuk story, I happened to think of Philip K. Dick. They don't write in the same voice, or even about the same topics, but both have spin (spun) plots as imagined and fantastical as I've read, with each being grounded in social questions and reasoning. I cannot claim to explain every detail within their stories, and you know, maybe that's just the way of it. I will tell you that Survivor is a dark, often funny, satiric comedy about those fifteen minutes of fame people often seek, or create. Palahniuk doesn't seem to write a book that doesn't use satire. The vice here is ultra commercialism (in this world, don't we know all about it?), and the excess we find in just about anything these days. It's all explained by way of Tender Branson's rise from nothing-to-something, him being the last remaining member of a fanatical religious sect, whether it's his idea or not, whether he wants it or not. Sound unusual? It is.
PS. People say that the ending may not be what you think. I didn't see it that way. Then I read that I was wrong.
March 1, 2020
螣 蟿蔚位蔚蠀蟿伪委慰蟼 谓蔚魏蟻蠈蟼 蔚蟺喂味蠋谓. 螣 蔚蟺喂味蠋谓 蟿畏蟼 伪委蟻蔚蟽畏蟼 蟿蠅谓 蟺喂蟽蟿蠋谓 渭喂伪蟼 伪蠀蟿慰蔚魏蟺位畏蟻慰蠉渭蔚谓畏蟼 蟺蟻慰蠁畏蟿蔚委伪蟼 渭伪味喂魏萎蟼 伪蠀蟿慰蠂蔚喂蟻委伪蟼 魏伪喂 伪蟺蔚位蔚蠀胃苇蟻蠅蟽畏蟼.
韦慰 蟽蠉谓未蟻慰渭慰 伪蟺蠈蟽蠀蟻蟽畏蟼 蟺蟻慰蟽慰蠂萎蟼 蟺位畏渭渭蠀蟻委味蔚喂 蟿慰谓 渭慰谓伪未喂魏蠈 蔚蟺喂味蠋谓蟿伪, 慰 慰蟺慰委慰蟼 尾蟻委蟽魏蔚蟿伪喂 谓伪 蟿伪尉喂未蔚蠉蔚喂
渭蔚 蟿畏谓 蟺蟿萎蟽畏 2039 蔚谓蠈蟼 螠蟺蠈喂谓纬魏 747-400
蟽蟿慰谓 伪蠀蟿蠈渭伪蟿慰 蟺喂位蠈蟿慰, 魏伪蟿蔚蠀胃蠀谓蠈渭蔚谓慰蟼 蟺蟻慰蟼 蟿畏谓 螒蠀蟽蟿蟻伪位委伪, 蟺蟻慰蟼 蟿慰 蟿苇位慰蟼 蟿慰蠀 尾委慰蠀 魏伪喂 蟿畏蟼 蟺慰位喂蟿蔚委伪蟼 蟿慰蠀, 蟽蔚 渭喂伪 蔚蠀胃蔚委伪 纬蟻伪渭渭萎 渭蔚 谓慰蟿喂慰未蠀蟿喂魏蠈 蟺蟻慰蟽伪谓伪蟿慰位喂蟽渭蠈 渭苇蠂蟻喂 谓伪 蟽蟿伪渭伪蟿萎蟽慰蠀谓 伪蟺慰 苇位位蔚喂蠄畏 魏伪蠀蟽委渭蠅谓 魏伪喂 慰喂 蟿苇蟽蟽蔚蟻喂蟼 渭畏蠂伪谓苇蟼 蟿慰蠀 伪蔚蟻慰蟽魏维蠁慰蠀蟼.
螒蟺慰 蟿慰谓 魏伪蟿伪纬蟻伪蠁苇伪 蟿畏蟼 蟺蟿萎蟽畏蟼 2039 伪魏慰蠉渭蔚
蟽蔚 蟺蟻蠋蟿慰 蟺蟻蠈蟽蠅蟺慰 蠈位畏 蟿畏谓 喂蟽蟿慰蟻委伪 蟿畏蟼 味蠅萎蟼 蟿慰蠀 桅蟻慰谓蟿喂蟽蟿萎 螠蟺蟻维谓蟽慰谓, 渭苇位慰蠀蟼 蟿畏蟼 渭蠀蟽蟿畏蟻喂蠋未慰蠀蟼 伪委蟻蔚蟽畏蟼 蟿蠅谓 蟺喂蟽蟿蠋谓 伪谓伪蠂蠅蟻畏蟿蠋谓, 蟿畏蟼 尾委伪蟼, 蟿畏蟼 蟽魏位伪尾喂维蟼, 蟿畏蟼 伪蟿委渭蠅蟽畏蟼, 蟿畏蟼 魏伪蟿伪蟺委蔚蟽畏蟼 蠁蠀蟽喂魏蠋谓 蔚谓慰蟻渭萎蟽蔚蠅谓 蠄蠀蠂喂魏蠋谓 萎 蟽蠅渭伪蟿喂魏蠋谓 魏伪喂 蟿畏蟼 蟽蔚尉慰蠀伪位喂魏萎蟼 蟺伪蟻维位蠀蟽畏蟼 渭苇蟽蠅 蠁喂位萎未慰谓蠅谓 魏伪谓委尾伪位蠅谓 蟺伪喂未喂魏萎蟼 蟽维蟻魏伪蟼.
螠喂伪 胃蟻畏蟽魏蔚蠀蟿喂魏萎 伪委蟻蔚蟽畏 伪蟺蠈位蠀蟿畏蟼 蔚纬魏蟻维蟿蔚喂伪蟼 纬喂伪 味蠅萎 魏伪喂 位慰尾慰蟿慰渭畏渭苇谓畏蟼 魏蠀蟻喂伪蟻蠂委伪蟼 伪蠀蟿蠈魏位畏蟿慰蠀 胃伪谓维蟿慰蠀.
螒蟺蠈 蟿慰 渭伪蠉蟻慰 魏喂尾蠋蟿喂慰 蟿畏蟼 蔚蟽蠂伪蟿喂维蟼 胃伪 伪蟺慰魏伪位蠀蠁胃蔚委
渭蔚 魏维胃蔚 位蔚蟺蟿慰渭苇蟻蔚喂伪 畏 喂蟽蟿慰蟻委伪 蟿慰蠀 蟿蔚位蔚蠀蟿伪委慰蠀 蔚蟺喂味蠋谓蟿伪 蟺慰蠀 蟺萎蟻蔚 伪蟺蟻慰蟽未蠈魏畏蟿畏 蠁萎渭畏 魏伪喂 未蠈尉伪,
蟺慰蠀 伪谓伪纬谓蠅蟻委蟽蟿畏魏蔚 蠅蟼 胃蟻畏蟽魏蔚蠀蟿喂魏蠈蟼 畏纬苇蟿畏蟼, 蟺蟻慰蠁萎蟿畏蟼, 渭维纬慰蟼, 渭蔚蟽委伪蟼, 喂蔚蟻慰蔚尉蔚蟿伪蟽蟿萎蟼 魏伪喂 未喂魏伪蟽蟿萎蟼 渭苇蟽伪 伪蟺慰 渭喂伪 渭伪蠉蟻畏 魏伪蠀蟽蟿喂魏萎 蟽维蟿喂蟻伪 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺喂谓畏, 伪谓委伪蟿畏, 蟺伪蟻伪喂蟽胃畏蟽喂慰纬蠈谓伪, 渭伪蟿伪喂蠈未慰尉畏 魏伪喂 蟺伪谓未畏渭喂魏萎 伪蟽胃苇谓蔚喂伪 蟿畏蟼 蠁萎渭畏蟼, 蟿畏蟼 胃蟻畏蟽魏慰位畏蟺蟿喂魏萎蟼 未慰蠀位蔚委伪蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏蟼 蠀蟺蔚蟻慰蠂萎蟼.
螒蠀蟿蠈 蟿慰 渭蠀胃喂蟽蟿蠈蟻畏渭伪 魏维谓蔚喂 苇纬蠂蠀蟽畏 伪谓伪喂蟽胃畏蟿喂魏慰蠉 魏伪喂 伪谓蟿慰蠂萎蟼 蟽蔚 魏维胃蔚 位苇尉畏, 伪谓慰蠂萎蟼 魏伪喂 魏伪蟿伪谓蠈畏蟽畏蟼 蟽蔚 魏维胃蔚 蟺伪蟻伪纬蟻维蠁慰, 蠂伪蟻渭慰位蠉蟺畏蟼 魏伪喂 伪蠀蟿慰蟺蟻慰蟽未喂慰蟻喂蟽渭慰蠉 蟽蔚 魏维胃蔚 蟽蔚位委未伪,魏伪胃蠋蟼 蔚尉蔚位委蟽蟽蔚蟿伪喂 伪蟺慰 蟿慰 蟿苇位慰蟼 蟿畏蟼 蠁蠀位位慰渭苇蟿蟻畏蟽畏蟼 蟺蟻慰蟼 蟿畏谓 伪蟻蠂萎
魏伪喂 伪蟺慰 蟿畏谓 伪蟻蠂萎 渭苇蠂蟻喂 蟿慰 蟿苇位慰蟼 蟿畏蟼 喂蟽蟿慰蟻委伪蟼,
蔚委谓伪喂 蟽蠂蔚未蠈谓 伪未蠉谓伪蟿慰 谓伪 蔚蟺喂蟿蟻伪蟺蔚委
伪蟺蠈蟽蟺伪蟽畏 蟺蟻慰蟽慰蠂萎蟼 渭苇蠂蟻喂 谓伪 蠁蟿维蟽慰蠀渭蔚 蟽蟿畏谓 蟿蔚位蔚蠀蟿伪委伪 蟿慰蠀 蠁蟻维蟽畏.
螤蟻蠅蟿慰蟺慰蟻喂伪魏萎 魏伪喂 蟺蟻蠅蟿蠈蟿蠀蟺畏 纬蟻伪蠁萎 伪蟺慰 苇谓伪 伪尉喂慰位维蟿蟻蔚蠀蟿慰 蟽蠀纬纬蟻伪蠁喂魏蠈 蟿伪位苇谓蟿慰.
违蟺维蟻蠂慰蠀谓 蔚位维蠂喂蟽蟿慰喂 蟽蠀纬纬蟻伪蠁蔚委蟼 蟺慰蠀 渭蟺慰蟻慰蠉谓 谓伪 蟺蟻慰蟽蠁苇蟻慰蠀谓 蟿畏谓 委未喂伪 蔚尉蔚位喂纬渭苇谓畏 维渭尾位蠀谓蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 魏蟻喂蟿喂魏萎蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼 蟿蠈蟽慰 纬喂伪 蟿喂蟼 蠀蟺蔚蟻尾慰位苇蟼, 蠈蟽慰 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 蟻畏蠂萎,
蔚渭渭慰谓喂魏萎 蟽魏苇蠄畏 蟿畏蟼 蟽蠉纬蠂蟻慰谓畏蟼 伪渭蔚蟻喂魏伪谓喂魏萎蟼 魏慰喂谓蠅谓委伪蟼, 蟿畏蟼 渭维味伪蟼, 蟿慰蠀 蟺慰位位伪蟺位慰蠉 魏蔚蟻未慰蟽魏慰蟺喂魏慰蠉 魏伪喂 蠁伪喂谓慰渭蔚谓喂魏慰蠉 慰蟻纬伪蟽渭慰蠉.
螣 螤蠈位伪谓喂魏 蟻委蠂谓蔚喂 蟿伪 蠂蟿蠀蟺萎渭伪蟿伪 蟿慰蠀 蟺伪蟻伪未委未慰谓蟿伪蟼 渭伪胃萎渭伪蟿伪 蠄蠀蠂喂魏萎蟼 未喂蔚蟻纬伪蟽委伪蟼 魏伪喂 蟽魏苇蠄畏蟼, 蠂蟻畏蟽喂渭慰蟺慰喂蠋谓蟿伪蟼 苇谓伪谓 蔚魏蟺位畏魏蟿喂魏蠈 蟽蠀谓未蠀伪蟽渭蠈 蠀蟺蔚蟻尾慰位喂魏萎蟼 位蔚蟺蟿蠈蟿畏蟿伪蟼 魏伪喂 纬蔚位慰委伪蟼 蟺蔚蟻喂蠁蟻蠈谓畏蟽畏蟼.
螔位苇蟺蔚喂 蟿畏谓 蠄蔚蠀未伪委蟽胃畏蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 蟽蠉纬蠂蟻慰谓畏蟼 味蠅萎蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 伪谓伪位蠉蔚喂 渭蔚 渭蠀蟽蟿伪纬蠅纬喂魏萎 蟽维蟿喂蟻伪 蠁喂位慰蟽慰蠁畏渭苇谓畏蟼 蟽魏苇蠄畏蟼 伪位位维 魏伪喂 渭蔚 渭蔚纬维位畏 蔚蠀伪喂蟽胃畏蟽委伪 魏伪喂 慰渭慰蟻蠁喂维 蟿苇蠂谓畏蟼.
螚 螒渭蔚蟻喂魏萎 苇蠂蔚喂 蠂维蟽蔚喂 蟿伪 蟺维谓蟿伪 伪谓维渭蔚蟽伪 蟽蔚 蠄蔚蠀未伪喂蟽胃萎蟽蔚喂蟼 魏伪喂 蠈谓蔚喂蟻伪 未喂伪蠁畏渭喂蟽蟿喂魏蠋谓 蟺伪蟻蔚渭尾维蟽蔚蠅谓 魏伪喂 蠂蔚喂蟻慰蠀蟻纬喂魏蠋谓 蔚蟺蔚渭尾维蟽蔚蠅谓.
螣 螤蠈位伪谓喂魏 未蔚谓 蠁慰尾维蟿伪喂 谓伪 蟺伪蔚喂 魏蠈谓蟿蟻伪 蟽蟿畏谓
蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏萎 慰蟻胃蠈蟿畏蟿伪 魏伪喂 谓伪 伪蟺蔚喂魏慰谓委蟽蔚喂 蟿畏谓 蟺谓蔚蠀渭伪蟿喂魏萎 伪谓伪蟿蟻慰蟺萎 蟿畏蟼 蠂蠋蟻伪 蟿慰蠀.
围蠅蟻委蟼 畏蟻蠅喂蟽渭慰蠉蟼 蔚蟽蠅蟿蔚蟻喂魏萎蟼 魏伪蟿慰位委蟽胃畏蟽畏蟼, 蠂蠅蟻委蟼 魏伪蟿伪胃位喂蟺蟿喂魏慰蠉蟼 慰蟻伪渭伪蟿喂蟽渭慰蠉蟼, 蠁蟿喂维蠂谓蔚喂 蟿慰 苇蟻纬慰 蟿慰蠀 渭蔚 维蟻蠅渭伪 伪喂蟽胃萎蟽蔚蠅谓 渭慰谓伪尉喂维蟼 魏伪喂 纬蔚蠉蟽蔚喂蟼 伪蟺慰 蟺喂魏维谓蟿喂魏蔚蟼 蔚位蟺委未蔚蟼.
螤蟻慰蟽蟺伪胃蔚委 谓伪 蠁胃维蟽蔚喂 蟽蟿畏谓 胃苇蠅蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 蠀蟺伪蟻尉喂伪魏萎蟼 慰谓蟿蠈蟿畏蟿伪蟼 蔚魏胃苇蟿慰谓蟿伪蟼 蟽蟿喂纬渭苇蟼 蟺蔚蟻喂蟺位维谓畏蟽畏蟼 魏维蟺慰蠀 渭蔚蟿伪尉蠉 蟿畏蟼 尾慰蠉位畏蟽畏蟼, 蟿畏蟼 维谓蔚蟽畏蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏蟼 伪纬维蟺畏蟼, 蠂蠅蟻委蟼 蟺位伪蟽蟿喂魏苇蟼 蠂蔚喂蟻慰蠀蟻纬喂魏苇蟼 伪尉委蔚蟼 魏伪喂 蠀蠄畏位萎 胃蔚伪渭伪蟿喂魏蠈蟿畏蟿伪 伪位位慰喂蠅渭苇谓畏蟼 蔚谓畏渭苇蟻蠅蟽畏蟼,
蟺慰蠀 蠂伪蟻委味慰蠀谓 伪胃伪谓伪蟽委伪 魏伪喂 蟺慰蠀位维谓蔚 位喂蠅渭渭苇谓伪 魏蔚蟻喂维
蟽蔚 谓伪慰蠉蟼 蟺喂蟽蟿萎蟼 伪魏慰位伪蟽委伪蟼 魏伪喂 蟺位伪蟽蟿喂魏维 位慰蠀位慰蠉未喂伪 纬喂伪 蠄蔚蠉蟿喂魏蔚蟼 蟺蟻慰蟽蔚蠀蠂苇蟼 蟽蠅蟿畏蟻委伪蟼 魏伪喂 伪谓伪尉喂蠈蟺喂蟽蟿蔚蟼 胃蔚蠆魏苇蟼 蟺伪蟻蔚渭尾维蟽蔚喂蟼 蟽蔚 蟽蠋渭伪蟿伪 蔚尉喂位伪蟽蟿萎蟻喂蠅谓 胃蠀渭维蟿蠅谓 魏伪喂 伪魏伪蟿伪谓蠈畏蟿蠅谓 蟽蠀渭尾蠈位蠅谓 魏伪喂 蟽蠀渭尾慰位喂蟽渭蠋谓.
韦慰 谓蔚魏蟻慰蟿伪蠁蔚委慰 蟿蠅谓 蔚蟺喂味蠋谓蟿蠅谓 苇蠂蔚喂 慰喂魏慰蠀渭蔚谓喂魏萎 胃谓畏蟽喂渭蠈蟿畏蟿伪 渭蠀伪位蠋谓 魏伪喂 慰喂 蟽蟿慰蠂伪蟽蟿苇蟼 蟺慰蠀 胃伪 渭伪蟼 蟽蠋蟽慰蠀谓 苇渭蔚喂谓伪谓 谓伪 胃伪蠀渭维味慰蠀谓 蟿畏谓 蔚蟺慰蠂萎 蟿畏蟼 螒谓伪纬苇谓谓畏蟽畏蟼
螝伪位畏 伪谓维纬谓蠅蟽畏.
螤慰位位慰蠉蟼 伪蟽蟺伪蟽渭慰蠉蟼.
韦慰 蟽蠉谓未蟻慰渭慰 伪蟺蠈蟽蠀蟻蟽畏蟼 蟺蟻慰蟽慰蠂萎蟼 蟺位畏渭渭蠀蟻委味蔚喂 蟿慰谓 渭慰谓伪未喂魏蠈 蔚蟺喂味蠋谓蟿伪, 慰 慰蟺慰委慰蟼 尾蟻委蟽魏蔚蟿伪喂 谓伪 蟿伪尉喂未蔚蠉蔚喂
渭蔚 蟿畏谓 蟺蟿萎蟽畏 2039 蔚谓蠈蟼 螠蟺蠈喂谓纬魏 747-400
蟽蟿慰谓 伪蠀蟿蠈渭伪蟿慰 蟺喂位蠈蟿慰, 魏伪蟿蔚蠀胃蠀谓蠈渭蔚谓慰蟼 蟺蟻慰蟼 蟿畏谓 螒蠀蟽蟿蟻伪位委伪, 蟺蟻慰蟼 蟿慰 蟿苇位慰蟼 蟿慰蠀 尾委慰蠀 魏伪喂 蟿畏蟼 蟺慰位喂蟿蔚委伪蟼 蟿慰蠀, 蟽蔚 渭喂伪 蔚蠀胃蔚委伪 纬蟻伪渭渭萎 渭蔚 谓慰蟿喂慰未蠀蟿喂魏蠈 蟺蟻慰蟽伪谓伪蟿慰位喂蟽渭蠈 渭苇蠂蟻喂 谓伪 蟽蟿伪渭伪蟿萎蟽慰蠀谓 伪蟺慰 苇位位蔚喂蠄畏 魏伪蠀蟽委渭蠅谓 魏伪喂 慰喂 蟿苇蟽蟽蔚蟻喂蟼 渭畏蠂伪谓苇蟼 蟿慰蠀 伪蔚蟻慰蟽魏维蠁慰蠀蟼.
螒蟺慰 蟿慰谓 魏伪蟿伪纬蟻伪蠁苇伪 蟿畏蟼 蟺蟿萎蟽畏蟼 2039 伪魏慰蠉渭蔚
蟽蔚 蟺蟻蠋蟿慰 蟺蟻蠈蟽蠅蟺慰 蠈位畏 蟿畏谓 喂蟽蟿慰蟻委伪 蟿畏蟼 味蠅萎蟼 蟿慰蠀 桅蟻慰谓蟿喂蟽蟿萎 螠蟺蟻维谓蟽慰谓, 渭苇位慰蠀蟼 蟿畏蟼 渭蠀蟽蟿畏蟻喂蠋未慰蠀蟼 伪委蟻蔚蟽畏蟼 蟿蠅谓 蟺喂蟽蟿蠋谓 伪谓伪蠂蠅蟻畏蟿蠋谓, 蟿畏蟼 尾委伪蟼, 蟿畏蟼 蟽魏位伪尾喂维蟼, 蟿畏蟼 伪蟿委渭蠅蟽畏蟼, 蟿畏蟼 魏伪蟿伪蟺委蔚蟽畏蟼 蠁蠀蟽喂魏蠋谓 蔚谓慰蟻渭萎蟽蔚蠅谓 蠄蠀蠂喂魏蠋谓 萎 蟽蠅渭伪蟿喂魏蠋谓 魏伪喂 蟿畏蟼 蟽蔚尉慰蠀伪位喂魏萎蟼 蟺伪蟻维位蠀蟽畏蟼 渭苇蟽蠅 蠁喂位萎未慰谓蠅谓 魏伪谓委尾伪位蠅谓 蟺伪喂未喂魏萎蟼 蟽维蟻魏伪蟼.
螠喂伪 胃蟻畏蟽魏蔚蠀蟿喂魏萎 伪委蟻蔚蟽畏 伪蟺蠈位蠀蟿畏蟼 蔚纬魏蟻维蟿蔚喂伪蟼 纬喂伪 味蠅萎 魏伪喂 位慰尾慰蟿慰渭畏渭苇谓畏蟼 魏蠀蟻喂伪蟻蠂委伪蟼 伪蠀蟿蠈魏位畏蟿慰蠀 胃伪谓维蟿慰蠀.
螒蟺蠈 蟿慰 渭伪蠉蟻慰 魏喂尾蠋蟿喂慰 蟿畏蟼 蔚蟽蠂伪蟿喂维蟼 胃伪 伪蟺慰魏伪位蠀蠁胃蔚委
渭蔚 魏维胃蔚 位蔚蟺蟿慰渭苇蟻蔚喂伪 畏 喂蟽蟿慰蟻委伪 蟿慰蠀 蟿蔚位蔚蠀蟿伪委慰蠀 蔚蟺喂味蠋谓蟿伪 蟺慰蠀 蟺萎蟻蔚 伪蟺蟻慰蟽未蠈魏畏蟿畏 蠁萎渭畏 魏伪喂 未蠈尉伪,
蟺慰蠀 伪谓伪纬谓蠅蟻委蟽蟿畏魏蔚 蠅蟼 胃蟻畏蟽魏蔚蠀蟿喂魏蠈蟼 畏纬苇蟿畏蟼, 蟺蟻慰蠁萎蟿畏蟼, 渭维纬慰蟼, 渭蔚蟽委伪蟼, 喂蔚蟻慰蔚尉蔚蟿伪蟽蟿萎蟼 魏伪喂 未喂魏伪蟽蟿萎蟼 渭苇蟽伪 伪蟺慰 渭喂伪 渭伪蠉蟻畏 魏伪蠀蟽蟿喂魏萎 蟽维蟿喂蟻伪 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺喂谓畏, 伪谓委伪蟿畏, 蟺伪蟻伪喂蟽胃畏蟽喂慰纬蠈谓伪, 渭伪蟿伪喂蠈未慰尉畏 魏伪喂 蟺伪谓未畏渭喂魏萎 伪蟽胃苇谓蔚喂伪 蟿畏蟼 蠁萎渭畏蟼, 蟿畏蟼 胃蟻畏蟽魏慰位畏蟺蟿喂魏萎蟼 未慰蠀位蔚委伪蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏蟼 蠀蟺蔚蟻慰蠂萎蟼.
螒蠀蟿蠈 蟿慰 渭蠀胃喂蟽蟿蠈蟻畏渭伪 魏维谓蔚喂 苇纬蠂蠀蟽畏 伪谓伪喂蟽胃畏蟿喂魏慰蠉 魏伪喂 伪谓蟿慰蠂萎蟼 蟽蔚 魏维胃蔚 位苇尉畏, 伪谓慰蠂萎蟼 魏伪喂 魏伪蟿伪谓蠈畏蟽畏蟼 蟽蔚 魏维胃蔚 蟺伪蟻伪纬蟻维蠁慰, 蠂伪蟻渭慰位蠉蟺畏蟼 魏伪喂 伪蠀蟿慰蟺蟻慰蟽未喂慰蟻喂蟽渭慰蠉 蟽蔚 魏维胃蔚 蟽蔚位委未伪,魏伪胃蠋蟼 蔚尉蔚位委蟽蟽蔚蟿伪喂 伪蟺慰 蟿慰 蟿苇位慰蟼 蟿畏蟼 蠁蠀位位慰渭苇蟿蟻畏蟽畏蟼 蟺蟻慰蟼 蟿畏谓 伪蟻蠂萎
魏伪喂 伪蟺慰 蟿畏谓 伪蟻蠂萎 渭苇蠂蟻喂 蟿慰 蟿苇位慰蟼 蟿畏蟼 喂蟽蟿慰蟻委伪蟼,
蔚委谓伪喂 蟽蠂蔚未蠈谓 伪未蠉谓伪蟿慰 谓伪 蔚蟺喂蟿蟻伪蟺蔚委
伪蟺蠈蟽蟺伪蟽畏 蟺蟻慰蟽慰蠂萎蟼 渭苇蠂蟻喂 谓伪 蠁蟿维蟽慰蠀渭蔚 蟽蟿畏谓 蟿蔚位蔚蠀蟿伪委伪 蟿慰蠀 蠁蟻维蟽畏.
螤蟻蠅蟿慰蟺慰蟻喂伪魏萎 魏伪喂 蟺蟻蠅蟿蠈蟿蠀蟺畏 纬蟻伪蠁萎 伪蟺慰 苇谓伪 伪尉喂慰位维蟿蟻蔚蠀蟿慰 蟽蠀纬纬蟻伪蠁喂魏蠈 蟿伪位苇谓蟿慰.
违蟺维蟻蠂慰蠀谓 蔚位维蠂喂蟽蟿慰喂 蟽蠀纬纬蟻伪蠁蔚委蟼 蟺慰蠀 渭蟺慰蟻慰蠉谓 谓伪 蟺蟻慰蟽蠁苇蟻慰蠀谓 蟿畏谓 委未喂伪 蔚尉蔚位喂纬渭苇谓畏 维渭尾位蠀谓蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 魏蟻喂蟿喂魏萎蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼 蟿蠈蟽慰 纬喂伪 蟿喂蟼 蠀蟺蔚蟻尾慰位苇蟼, 蠈蟽慰 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 蟻畏蠂萎,
蔚渭渭慰谓喂魏萎 蟽魏苇蠄畏 蟿畏蟼 蟽蠉纬蠂蟻慰谓畏蟼 伪渭蔚蟻喂魏伪谓喂魏萎蟼 魏慰喂谓蠅谓委伪蟼, 蟿畏蟼 渭维味伪蟼, 蟿慰蠀 蟺慰位位伪蟺位慰蠉 魏蔚蟻未慰蟽魏慰蟺喂魏慰蠉 魏伪喂 蠁伪喂谓慰渭蔚谓喂魏慰蠉 慰蟻纬伪蟽渭慰蠉.
螣 螤蠈位伪谓喂魏 蟻委蠂谓蔚喂 蟿伪 蠂蟿蠀蟺萎渭伪蟿伪 蟿慰蠀 蟺伪蟻伪未委未慰谓蟿伪蟼 渭伪胃萎渭伪蟿伪 蠄蠀蠂喂魏萎蟼 未喂蔚蟻纬伪蟽委伪蟼 魏伪喂 蟽魏苇蠄畏蟼, 蠂蟻畏蟽喂渭慰蟺慰喂蠋谓蟿伪蟼 苇谓伪谓 蔚魏蟺位畏魏蟿喂魏蠈 蟽蠀谓未蠀伪蟽渭蠈 蠀蟺蔚蟻尾慰位喂魏萎蟼 位蔚蟺蟿蠈蟿畏蟿伪蟼 魏伪喂 纬蔚位慰委伪蟼 蟺蔚蟻喂蠁蟻蠈谓畏蟽畏蟼.
螔位苇蟺蔚喂 蟿畏谓 蠄蔚蠀未伪委蟽胃畏蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 蟽蠉纬蠂蟻慰谓畏蟼 味蠅萎蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 伪谓伪位蠉蔚喂 渭蔚 渭蠀蟽蟿伪纬蠅纬喂魏萎 蟽维蟿喂蟻伪 蠁喂位慰蟽慰蠁畏渭苇谓畏蟼 蟽魏苇蠄畏蟼 伪位位维 魏伪喂 渭蔚 渭蔚纬维位畏 蔚蠀伪喂蟽胃畏蟽委伪 魏伪喂 慰渭慰蟻蠁喂维 蟿苇蠂谓畏蟼.
螚 螒渭蔚蟻喂魏萎 苇蠂蔚喂 蠂维蟽蔚喂 蟿伪 蟺维谓蟿伪 伪谓维渭蔚蟽伪 蟽蔚 蠄蔚蠀未伪喂蟽胃萎蟽蔚喂蟼 魏伪喂 蠈谓蔚喂蟻伪 未喂伪蠁畏渭喂蟽蟿喂魏蠋谓 蟺伪蟻蔚渭尾维蟽蔚蠅谓 魏伪喂 蠂蔚喂蟻慰蠀蟻纬喂魏蠋谓 蔚蟺蔚渭尾维蟽蔚蠅谓.
螣 螤蠈位伪谓喂魏 未蔚谓 蠁慰尾维蟿伪喂 谓伪 蟺伪蔚喂 魏蠈谓蟿蟻伪 蟽蟿畏谓
蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏萎 慰蟻胃蠈蟿畏蟿伪 魏伪喂 谓伪 伪蟺蔚喂魏慰谓委蟽蔚喂 蟿畏谓 蟺谓蔚蠀渭伪蟿喂魏萎 伪谓伪蟿蟻慰蟺萎 蟿畏蟼 蠂蠋蟻伪 蟿慰蠀.
围蠅蟻委蟼 畏蟻蠅喂蟽渭慰蠉蟼 蔚蟽蠅蟿蔚蟻喂魏萎蟼 魏伪蟿慰位委蟽胃畏蟽畏蟼, 蠂蠅蟻委蟼 魏伪蟿伪胃位喂蟺蟿喂魏慰蠉蟼 慰蟻伪渭伪蟿喂蟽渭慰蠉蟼, 蠁蟿喂维蠂谓蔚喂 蟿慰 苇蟻纬慰 蟿慰蠀 渭蔚 维蟻蠅渭伪 伪喂蟽胃萎蟽蔚蠅谓 渭慰谓伪尉喂维蟼 魏伪喂 纬蔚蠉蟽蔚喂蟼 伪蟺慰 蟺喂魏维谓蟿喂魏蔚蟼 蔚位蟺委未蔚蟼.
螤蟻慰蟽蟺伪胃蔚委 谓伪 蠁胃维蟽蔚喂 蟽蟿畏谓 胃苇蠅蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 蠀蟺伪蟻尉喂伪魏萎蟼 慰谓蟿蠈蟿畏蟿伪蟼 蔚魏胃苇蟿慰谓蟿伪蟼 蟽蟿喂纬渭苇蟼 蟺蔚蟻喂蟺位维谓畏蟽畏蟼 魏维蟺慰蠀 渭蔚蟿伪尉蠉 蟿畏蟼 尾慰蠉位畏蟽畏蟼, 蟿畏蟼 维谓蔚蟽畏蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏蟼 伪纬维蟺畏蟼, 蠂蠅蟻委蟼 蟺位伪蟽蟿喂魏苇蟼 蠂蔚喂蟻慰蠀蟻纬喂魏苇蟼 伪尉委蔚蟼 魏伪喂 蠀蠄畏位萎 胃蔚伪渭伪蟿喂魏蠈蟿畏蟿伪 伪位位慰喂蠅渭苇谓畏蟼 蔚谓畏渭苇蟻蠅蟽畏蟼,
蟺慰蠀 蠂伪蟻委味慰蠀谓 伪胃伪谓伪蟽委伪 魏伪喂 蟺慰蠀位维谓蔚 位喂蠅渭渭苇谓伪 魏蔚蟻喂维
蟽蔚 谓伪慰蠉蟼 蟺喂蟽蟿萎蟼 伪魏慰位伪蟽委伪蟼 魏伪喂 蟺位伪蟽蟿喂魏维 位慰蠀位慰蠉未喂伪 纬喂伪 蠄蔚蠉蟿喂魏蔚蟼 蟺蟻慰蟽蔚蠀蠂苇蟼 蟽蠅蟿畏蟻委伪蟼 魏伪喂 伪谓伪尉喂蠈蟺喂蟽蟿蔚蟼 胃蔚蠆魏苇蟼 蟺伪蟻蔚渭尾维蟽蔚喂蟼 蟽蔚 蟽蠋渭伪蟿伪 蔚尉喂位伪蟽蟿萎蟻喂蠅谓 胃蠀渭维蟿蠅谓 魏伪喂 伪魏伪蟿伪谓蠈畏蟿蠅谓 蟽蠀渭尾蠈位蠅谓 魏伪喂 蟽蠀渭尾慰位喂蟽渭蠋谓.
韦慰 谓蔚魏蟻慰蟿伪蠁蔚委慰 蟿蠅谓 蔚蟺喂味蠋谓蟿蠅谓 苇蠂蔚喂 慰喂魏慰蠀渭蔚谓喂魏萎 胃谓畏蟽喂渭蠈蟿畏蟿伪 渭蠀伪位蠋谓 魏伪喂 慰喂 蟽蟿慰蠂伪蟽蟿苇蟼 蟺慰蠀 胃伪 渭伪蟼 蟽蠋蟽慰蠀谓 苇渭蔚喂谓伪谓 谓伪 胃伪蠀渭维味慰蠀谓 蟿畏谓 蔚蟺慰蠂萎 蟿畏蟼 螒谓伪纬苇谓谓畏蟽畏蟼
螝伪位畏 伪谓维纬谓蠅蟽畏.
螤慰位位慰蠉蟼 伪蟽蟺伪蟽渭慰蠉蟼.
May 14, 2022
You will like this story if:
1) You enjoy anti-social, nihilistic, misanthropic, sociopathic protagonists.
2) If you desire to have someones (the authors) narrative of socio-political dogma and doctrines drilled into your ear in a very repetitious, ridiculous and unbelievable package disguised as a story.
There are moments when the story has a bite of sarcasm that can be found amusing. It's just unfortunate that it's repeated ad nauseam.
I actually felt dumber after reading this book. There was very little to like about the story. It's violent, vulgar and often disgusting. There is absolutely nothing to be gained by reading this story. Do yourself a favor and read the contents of a soup can. ;-) 1 star, for the nice silver cover.
1) You enjoy anti-social, nihilistic, misanthropic, sociopathic protagonists.
2) If you desire to have someones (the authors) narrative of socio-political dogma and doctrines drilled into your ear in a very repetitious, ridiculous and unbelievable package disguised as a story.
There are moments when the story has a bite of sarcasm that can be found amusing. It's just unfortunate that it's repeated ad nauseam.
I actually felt dumber after reading this book. There was very little to like about the story. It's violent, vulgar and often disgusting. There is absolutely nothing to be gained by reading this story. Do yourself a favor and read the contents of a soup can. ;-) 1 star, for the nice silver cover.
January 10, 2022
I can't be entirely objective when it comes to this book, but hear me out.
Of course I watched Fight Club in 1999. It gave a name to all of the existential dread I felt at the time as a homeschooled Mormon teen who was just starting to realize something was wrong with my upbringing. I was about to turn fifteen, so I couldn鈥檛 yet see an R rated movie on my own, but my brother was nine years older and took me to see it with his boss and his boss's boss's hyper-evangelical teenage son. The options at the theater were slim: Bringing Out the Dead, The Omega Code (evangelical kid had already seen it, of course), and something called Fight Club that nobody knew anything about. My brother and I pushed hard for Fight Club, and his boss was the swing vote.
This movie rocked evangelical kid to his core. I remember he walked out of there with a thousand yard stare, looking like he wanted nothing more than to go home and beg forgiveness. For me it was kind of an awakening. I latched on hard to the counter-capitalist, anti-marketing, anarchist, fuck you attitude it embodied and lived on those fumes for the next few years. I had finally found something that I related with. I wanted more, as soon as possible. But mostly, I wanted to understand the themes and how they related to my experience.
My girlfriend at the time was busy being dragged across Ireland by her uber-wealthy high school friend on vacation, and I had nothing else to do but work my full time job as a prep cook in a psuedo-restaurant in the mall (not strictly legal at fifteen, but they didn't care, until they were fined for breaking child labor laws), make bad ripoffs of Crystal Method and Prodigy songs in demoscene trackers on my family's Pentium II, and drive around in my 1987 Ford Tempo, blowing my disposable income on cheap clothes and entertainment. It was around this time I learned that Fight Club was based on a novel by Chuck Palahniuk.
At that point in my life, I wasn't a big reader. Publishers hadn't yet realized that YA was a marketable category, so instead of the ridiculous variety of options teens have now, I faced a huge gulf between kids鈥� books and adult books, neither sounding interesting to me. With the new found freedom of my driver鈥檚 license and a barely functioning vehicle, I drove to Barnes and Noble and picked up a copy of Survivor, newly out in paperback.
I devoured it.
It fed the still small voice in me that was saying 鈥淵ou鈥檙e in cult鈥� and 鈥淭his is not normal鈥�. Of course, my upbringing wasn鈥檛 nearly as harrowing as Tender Branson鈥檚, but Survivor was a safe way for me to explore the darker corners of my world, and my own experience through the lens of something much worse.
More than twenty years later I鈥檓 finally rereading Survivor, and it鈥檚 impossible to not experience it as a period piece of the late nineties/early aughts. The consumerism and problems of the late nineties that it is concerned with come across as quant compared to the myriad problems facing Zoomers today. It鈥檚 almost adorable now, considering how unbelievably fucked the world has become in the last twenty-two years. The core of the story still works though, which is a character dealing with disillusionment, desire, and sudden celebrity in a world that seems entirely alien to them.
This could be made into an unbelievably engaging TV series. It is so ripe with adaptive potential. For a while in 2001 Francis Lawrence had optioned the rights, and Trent Reznor reached out, looking to get into film scoring, and then 9/11 cancelled any project that involved plane crashes. It bounced around from producer to producer over the last two decades, never getting off the ground. At one point, Fight Club screenwriter Jim Uhls was even attached to it. In late 2019 it finally found its way back to Lawrence, who announced that he was planning to approach it as a TV series. Hopefully he remembers and reaches back out to Reznor, now one half of the most in demand composer duo in the world, to bring the score to life.
That is, of course, if it can gain flight this time.
In the meantime, if you鈥檙e looking for a peek into what was going on among the collective dissatisfied counter-culturalists of the late nineties, Survivor is a brisk, worthy read. You can probably knock it out in an afternoon. Just be prepared for a lot of repetition, nihilistic malaise, and general unsatisfiedness from all characters present and accounted for.
Dial back the clock twenty years. It鈥檚 a fun ride.
Of course I watched Fight Club in 1999. It gave a name to all of the existential dread I felt at the time as a homeschooled Mormon teen who was just starting to realize something was wrong with my upbringing. I was about to turn fifteen, so I couldn鈥檛 yet see an R rated movie on my own, but my brother was nine years older and took me to see it with his boss and his boss's boss's hyper-evangelical teenage son. The options at the theater were slim: Bringing Out the Dead, The Omega Code (evangelical kid had already seen it, of course), and something called Fight Club that nobody knew anything about. My brother and I pushed hard for Fight Club, and his boss was the swing vote.
This movie rocked evangelical kid to his core. I remember he walked out of there with a thousand yard stare, looking like he wanted nothing more than to go home and beg forgiveness. For me it was kind of an awakening. I latched on hard to the counter-capitalist, anti-marketing, anarchist, fuck you attitude it embodied and lived on those fumes for the next few years. I had finally found something that I related with. I wanted more, as soon as possible. But mostly, I wanted to understand the themes and how they related to my experience.
My girlfriend at the time was busy being dragged across Ireland by her uber-wealthy high school friend on vacation, and I had nothing else to do but work my full time job as a prep cook in a psuedo-restaurant in the mall (not strictly legal at fifteen, but they didn't care, until they were fined for breaking child labor laws), make bad ripoffs of Crystal Method and Prodigy songs in demoscene trackers on my family's Pentium II, and drive around in my 1987 Ford Tempo, blowing my disposable income on cheap clothes and entertainment. It was around this time I learned that Fight Club was based on a novel by Chuck Palahniuk.
At that point in my life, I wasn't a big reader. Publishers hadn't yet realized that YA was a marketable category, so instead of the ridiculous variety of options teens have now, I faced a huge gulf between kids鈥� books and adult books, neither sounding interesting to me. With the new found freedom of my driver鈥檚 license and a barely functioning vehicle, I drove to Barnes and Noble and picked up a copy of Survivor, newly out in paperback.
I devoured it.
It fed the still small voice in me that was saying 鈥淵ou鈥檙e in cult鈥� and 鈥淭his is not normal鈥�. Of course, my upbringing wasn鈥檛 nearly as harrowing as Tender Branson鈥檚, but Survivor was a safe way for me to explore the darker corners of my world, and my own experience through the lens of something much worse.
More than twenty years later I鈥檓 finally rereading Survivor, and it鈥檚 impossible to not experience it as a period piece of the late nineties/early aughts. The consumerism and problems of the late nineties that it is concerned with come across as quant compared to the myriad problems facing Zoomers today. It鈥檚 almost adorable now, considering how unbelievably fucked the world has become in the last twenty-two years. The core of the story still works though, which is a character dealing with disillusionment, desire, and sudden celebrity in a world that seems entirely alien to them.
This could be made into an unbelievably engaging TV series. It is so ripe with adaptive potential. For a while in 2001 Francis Lawrence had optioned the rights, and Trent Reznor reached out, looking to get into film scoring, and then 9/11 cancelled any project that involved plane crashes. It bounced around from producer to producer over the last two decades, never getting off the ground. At one point, Fight Club screenwriter Jim Uhls was even attached to it. In late 2019 it finally found its way back to Lawrence, who announced that he was planning to approach it as a TV series. Hopefully he remembers and reaches back out to Reznor, now one half of the most in demand composer duo in the world, to bring the score to life.
That is, of course, if it can gain flight this time.
In the meantime, if you鈥檙e looking for a peek into what was going on among the collective dissatisfied counter-culturalists of the late nineties, Survivor is a brisk, worthy read. You can probably knock it out in an afternoon. Just be prepared for a lot of repetition, nihilistic malaise, and general unsatisfiedness from all characters present and accounted for.
Dial back the clock twenty years. It鈥檚 a fun ride.
January 6, 2024
Uno, due, tre. Prova.
Uno, due, tre. Prova. Prova.
Forse quest'affare funziona. Non lo so. Neanche so se riuscite a sentirmi.
Ma sono qui per raccontarvi la sua storia, la storia di Tender Branson. Tender che non 猫 il suo nome ,ma lo status datogli dalla setta Creedish in cui 猫 cresciuto, dove 猫 stato indottrinato per 17 anni, dove il suo scopo nella vita era servire il mondo, lavorare per "quelli di fuori" come schiavo. Gi脿 uno schiavo della vita e dalla quale non ha avuto nulla fino allo sterminio di massa che l'ha reso l'ultimo...il sopravvissuto.
Fin dalle prime pagine Tender entrer脿 a pugni tesi nella tua di vita, ti prender脿 a scarpate sugli stinchi e ti far脿 dire :" Come costruisce anti eroi Palahniuk nessuno mai" e qui di anti eroi non c'猫 solo il povero, sfigato, stupido, plagiato Tender, ma anche Fertility. Una ragazza straordinaria nella sua stranezza, certo non poteva che essere cos矛.
Chuck riesce ad inserire in tutti i suoi libri temi molto delicati e lo fa con un umorismo nero tutto suo. Anticonformista, narcisista e accomodante 猫 la societ脿 descritta, ma qui parliamo soprattutto di un mondo dove la fede viene sfruttata. In un mondo che cade a pezzi, la gente cerca un messia, un salvatore e se non lo trova lo crea.
C'猫 gente pronta a morire per i brutti voti a scuola. Per i litigi in famiglia. Per i problemi col fidanzato.
脠 soltanto con le droghe o con la morte che vediamo qualcosa di nuovo, e la morte 猫 un po' troppo definitiva. La nostra sfiducia nel futuro ci rende difficile il distacco dal passato.
No, tutti pensano che la loro vita dovrebbe essere divertente almeno quanto la masturbazione.
Nella toilette dove sto io c'猫 scritto, Storia della mia vita.
Accanto c'猫 scritto, Baciami il culo.
Accanto c'猫 scritto, Con piacere.
Sul muro 猫 inciso, Sai come finiscono sia la vita che i film porno. L'unica differenza 猫 che la vita comincia con un orgasmo.
Amen
Uno, due, tre. Prova. Prova.
Forse quest'affare funziona. Non lo so. Neanche so se riuscite a sentirmi.
Ma sono qui per raccontarvi la sua storia, la storia di Tender Branson. Tender che non 猫 il suo nome ,ma lo status datogli dalla setta Creedish in cui 猫 cresciuto, dove 猫 stato indottrinato per 17 anni, dove il suo scopo nella vita era servire il mondo, lavorare per "quelli di fuori" come schiavo. Gi脿 uno schiavo della vita e dalla quale non ha avuto nulla fino allo sterminio di massa che l'ha reso l'ultimo...il sopravvissuto.
Fin dalle prime pagine Tender entrer脿 a pugni tesi nella tua di vita, ti prender脿 a scarpate sugli stinchi e ti far脿 dire :" Come costruisce anti eroi Palahniuk nessuno mai" e qui di anti eroi non c'猫 solo il povero, sfigato, stupido, plagiato Tender, ma anche Fertility. Una ragazza straordinaria nella sua stranezza, certo non poteva che essere cos矛.
Chuck riesce ad inserire in tutti i suoi libri temi molto delicati e lo fa con un umorismo nero tutto suo. Anticonformista, narcisista e accomodante 猫 la societ脿 descritta, ma qui parliamo soprattutto di un mondo dove la fede viene sfruttata. In un mondo che cade a pezzi, la gente cerca un messia, un salvatore e se non lo trova lo crea.
C'猫 gente pronta a morire per i brutti voti a scuola. Per i litigi in famiglia. Per i problemi col fidanzato.
脠 soltanto con le droghe o con la morte che vediamo qualcosa di nuovo, e la morte 猫 un po' troppo definitiva. La nostra sfiducia nel futuro ci rende difficile il distacco dal passato.
No, tutti pensano che la loro vita dovrebbe essere divertente almeno quanto la masturbazione.
Nella toilette dove sto io c'猫 scritto, Storia della mia vita.
Accanto c'猫 scritto, Baciami il culo.
Accanto c'猫 scritto, Con piacere.
Sul muro 猫 inciso, Sai come finiscono sia la vita che i film porno. L'unica differenza 猫 che la vita comincia con un orgasmo.
Amen
May 1, 2025
A morbid dark sense of humour required for this one. Like Fight Club, this is a full frontal satire that attacks from all sides - death cults , body image, celebrity & fame, religion, consumerism, greed, nihilism, porn, diet, messiahs, face creams, steroids, the media, and more.
I actually preferred this to Fight Club. Its darkly comic vibes hit in all the right places, I found this a lot harsher, more disturbing, more poignant - yup, chuck can be poignant too - and razor-edged when it comes to sarcasm. Chuck always seems to throw in a surprise when it comes to novel structure, and here it's in the form of descending page numbers. This works great, as basically it's a count down. And yes, the cover is a big give away. It's a wild ride at times, and yet never loses its awareness when it comes to holding a mirror up against the modern world and human nature.
I loved it. Chuck had me right from its opening few sentences. I stand up and give him a one man round of applause. This is some 100 pages longer than Fight Club and yet it whizzed on by. When I think of him in general though after six novels, he is still very much hit and miss for me.
January 16, 2023
Cat (te) costa sa fii celebru? te intreaba Palahniuk in acest roman.
Autorul este baiatul rebel al literaturii cu romanul sau cult "Fight Club", devenit un fel de biblie al nonconformistilor, o carte originala si provocatoare ce a fost refuzata de edituri fiind considerata "prea intunecata si prea riscanta".
Romanul de fata il are in prim plan pe Tender Branson care tocmai deturneaza un Boeing, debarca pasagerii si pilotul sub amenintarea pistolului si ramane singur in avionul condus de pilotul automat. Mai are combustibil cat pentru 7 ore de zbor si curand va incepe sa piarda rand pe rand din cele 4 motoare.
Tender incepe sa-si spuna povestea vietii care se inregistreaza in cutia neagra a avionului. Aflam astfel ca a crescut intr-o colonie parohiala, intr-un fel de secta, de unde pleaca la 17 ani si incepe sa faca curatenie prin casele bogatilor (Numele sau vine de la verbul "tend"). Se pare ca este ultimul Supravietuitor dintre toti cei care au parasit colonia, caci cu totii ori s-au sinucis ori au fost omorati de un criminal in serie.
Intre timp se indragosteste de Felicity, o tipa care il considera urat si ratat, insa are o capacitate aparte: poate sa prevada dezastrele inainte sa se intample. Cei doi au obiceiul sa se duca la locul dezastrelor ca niste observatori si aici ne aducem aminte de Fight Club si de Rant.
Fiind ultimul Supravietuitor Tender ajunge celebru si apare la televizor, la radio - peste tot; curand are propria lui carte, emisiune, reclame - tot pachetul de celebritate. El devine astfel un fel de superstar pop, un fel de Mesia. Evident, cu asta vine si transformarea: i se pun botox, implant de par, dinti de portelan, slabeste, are patratele la abdomen, bronz la solar, haine de branduri celebre la vedere, etc. - o transformare in plastic atat de ceruta in ziua de azi.
Romanul este inedit, capitolele si paginile sunt numerotate invers, asadar citim romanul de la coada la cap. Este amuzant, ironic, inteligent, creativ, original si foarte distractiv. O satira foarte reusita a culturii pop, a mass-mediei americane si a celebritatii.
Desigur ca s-ar putea face un film foarte reusit dupa acest roman, dar in ziua de azi nu se mai pot face filme care sa deschida ochii maselor...
Tender este simpatic si are indeletniciri amuzante a la Tyler Durden ori Rant. Enumar cateva pe care le-am retinut:
- arunca pastila de Valium pestisorului din acvariu pentru ca acesta inota "ca disperatul".
- se angajeaza la McDonald's pentru ca acolo sunt recrutate fete de diferite rase si verificate sa nu aiba boli venerice. I se pare ca e mai sigur sa agati asa decat de pe strada.
- oamenii il suna cand vor sa se sinucida ca sa-i convinga sa se razgandeasca, insa el le spune sa se grabeasca odata cu sinuciderea caci nu poate sa gateasca snitele cu o singura mana. :)
- fura flori artificiale de la morminte pe care le planteaza in gradinile unde lucreaza drept gradinar. Periodic le revopseste si parfumeaza. Oamenii nu observa ca florile nu sunt vii si se mandresc cu gradinile lor.
- cumpara din magazine o cutie de vopsea in care doseste un obiect valoros, caci stie ca razele X de la scannerul de securitate nu trec prin cutia de fier a vopselei.
- recomanda sa duci o pisica bolnava de leucemie la veterinar pentru ca acesta ii prescrie steroizi superiori asemanatori cu cei umani. Astfel faci rost de aceste suplimente la discretie.
In incheiere atasez mai multe citate inteligente si oarecum amuzante ca 'ponturi pentru agatat':
"Nimeni nu vrea de fapt sa-si rezolve problemele. Dramele. Disperarile. Sa-si aline necazurile. Sa scape de toate porcariile. Daca ar face-o ce le-ar mai ramane? Doar ditamai necunoscutul, mare si infricosator."
"Ii spun ca lumea nu-i asa de frumoasa incat sa merite sa traiasca si sa sufere. De fapt, nu prea e nimic de capul lumii asteia."
"Iar orice gentleman care a fost vreodata zgariat de inelul cu diamant al unei doamne care i-a aplicat un dos de palma trebuie sa stie ca un creion hemostatic opreste sangerarea."
"Asa ca am un plan, un plan teribil: s-o fac sa ma urasca si, totodata, sa se indragosteasca de mine. O contraseductie. S-o fac sa nu se simta deloc atrasa de mine."
"Marele meu plan nu presupune sa arat bine. Marele meu plan presupune sa arat ca si cum as ascunde un potential imens."
"Iti dai seama ca n-are rost sa faci nimic daca nu e cineva care sa te priveasca."
"Potrivit agentului, secretul ca sa ajungi celebru e sa spui tot timpul da."
Autorul este baiatul rebel al literaturii cu romanul sau cult "Fight Club", devenit un fel de biblie al nonconformistilor, o carte originala si provocatoare ce a fost refuzata de edituri fiind considerata "prea intunecata si prea riscanta".
Romanul de fata il are in prim plan pe Tender Branson care tocmai deturneaza un Boeing, debarca pasagerii si pilotul sub amenintarea pistolului si ramane singur in avionul condus de pilotul automat. Mai are combustibil cat pentru 7 ore de zbor si curand va incepe sa piarda rand pe rand din cele 4 motoare.
Tender incepe sa-si spuna povestea vietii care se inregistreaza in cutia neagra a avionului. Aflam astfel ca a crescut intr-o colonie parohiala, intr-un fel de secta, de unde pleaca la 17 ani si incepe sa faca curatenie prin casele bogatilor (Numele sau vine de la verbul "tend"). Se pare ca este ultimul Supravietuitor dintre toti cei care au parasit colonia, caci cu totii ori s-au sinucis ori au fost omorati de un criminal in serie.
Intre timp se indragosteste de Felicity, o tipa care il considera urat si ratat, insa are o capacitate aparte: poate sa prevada dezastrele inainte sa se intample. Cei doi au obiceiul sa se duca la locul dezastrelor ca niste observatori si aici ne aducem aminte de Fight Club si de Rant.
Fiind ultimul Supravietuitor Tender ajunge celebru si apare la televizor, la radio - peste tot; curand are propria lui carte, emisiune, reclame - tot pachetul de celebritate. El devine astfel un fel de superstar pop, un fel de Mesia. Evident, cu asta vine si transformarea: i se pun botox, implant de par, dinti de portelan, slabeste, are patratele la abdomen, bronz la solar, haine de branduri celebre la vedere, etc. - o transformare in plastic atat de ceruta in ziua de azi.
Romanul este inedit, capitolele si paginile sunt numerotate invers, asadar citim romanul de la coada la cap. Este amuzant, ironic, inteligent, creativ, original si foarte distractiv. O satira foarte reusita a culturii pop, a mass-mediei americane si a celebritatii.
Desigur ca s-ar putea face un film foarte reusit dupa acest roman, dar in ziua de azi nu se mai pot face filme care sa deschida ochii maselor...
Tender este simpatic si are indeletniciri amuzante a la Tyler Durden ori Rant. Enumar cateva pe care le-am retinut:
- arunca pastila de Valium pestisorului din acvariu pentru ca acesta inota "ca disperatul".
- se angajeaza la McDonald's pentru ca acolo sunt recrutate fete de diferite rase si verificate sa nu aiba boli venerice. I se pare ca e mai sigur sa agati asa decat de pe strada.
- oamenii il suna cand vor sa se sinucida ca sa-i convinga sa se razgandeasca, insa el le spune sa se grabeasca odata cu sinuciderea caci nu poate sa gateasca snitele cu o singura mana. :)
- fura flori artificiale de la morminte pe care le planteaza in gradinile unde lucreaza drept gradinar. Periodic le revopseste si parfumeaza. Oamenii nu observa ca florile nu sunt vii si se mandresc cu gradinile lor.
- cumpara din magazine o cutie de vopsea in care doseste un obiect valoros, caci stie ca razele X de la scannerul de securitate nu trec prin cutia de fier a vopselei.
- recomanda sa duci o pisica bolnava de leucemie la veterinar pentru ca acesta ii prescrie steroizi superiori asemanatori cu cei umani. Astfel faci rost de aceste suplimente la discretie.
In incheiere atasez mai multe citate inteligente si oarecum amuzante ca 'ponturi pentru agatat':
"Nimeni nu vrea de fapt sa-si rezolve problemele. Dramele. Disperarile. Sa-si aline necazurile. Sa scape de toate porcariile. Daca ar face-o ce le-ar mai ramane? Doar ditamai necunoscutul, mare si infricosator."
"Ii spun ca lumea nu-i asa de frumoasa incat sa merite sa traiasca si sa sufere. De fapt, nu prea e nimic de capul lumii asteia."
"Iar orice gentleman care a fost vreodata zgariat de inelul cu diamant al unei doamne care i-a aplicat un dos de palma trebuie sa stie ca un creion hemostatic opreste sangerarea."
"Asa ca am un plan, un plan teribil: s-o fac sa ma urasca si, totodata, sa se indragosteasca de mine. O contraseductie. S-o fac sa nu se simta deloc atrasa de mine."
"Marele meu plan nu presupune sa arat bine. Marele meu plan presupune sa arat ca si cum as ascunde un potential imens."
"Iti dai seama ca n-are rost sa faci nimic daca nu e cineva care sa te priveasca."
"Potrivit agentului, secretul ca sa ajungi celebru e sa spui tot timpul da."
November 9, 2014
亘毓丿 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 丿賷 兀毓鬲賯丿 兀賳賷 賮毓賱丕賸 亘丨丕噩丞 賱乇丐賷丞 胤亘賷亘 賳賮爻賷 賱賱賲乇丞 丕賱兀賵賱賶貙 賱賷氐賱丨 賲丕 兀賮爻丿鬲賴 賮賷賾.
丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賲囟胤乇亘丞 亘噩賳賵賳貙 卮禺氐賷鬲賴丕 賲噩賳賵賳丞貙 賵乇亘賲丕 丕賱毓丕賱賲 賴賵 丕賱賲噩賳賵賳貙 賵賰丕賳 鬲賳丿乇 亘乇丕賳爻賳貙 亘胤賱 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞貙 賴賵 丕賱毓丕賯賱 丕賱賵丨賷丿責
賷丨賰賷 亘丕賱丕賳賷賰 賯氐丞 鬲賳丿乇 亘乇丕賳爻賳貙 賵乇丨賱鬲賴 賲賳 賮鬲賷 賰乇賷丿卮賷 賲胤賷毓 賷噩夭 丕賱毓卮亘 賵賷賳馗賮 丕賱亘賯毓 廿賱賶 "丕賱賳丕噩賷 丕賱兀禺賷乇" 賲賳 胤丕卅賮丞 丕賱賰乇賷丿卮 丕賱丕賳鬲丨丕乇賷丞 賵丕賱賯丕卅丿 丕賱丿賷賳賷 丕賱賲賱賴賲.
賵賷賯丿賲 亘丕賱丕賳賷賰 卮禺氐賷丕鬲 賲孬賷乇丞 賲孬賱 賮乇鬲賷賱賷鬲賷 丕賱睾丕賲囟丞丕賱鬲賷 鬲鬲賳亘卅 亘丕賱賲爻鬲賯亘賱貙 丌丿賲 丕賱囟丕賱貙 賲賵馗賮丞 丕賱鬲丨乇賷丕鬲 丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 賰丕賳鬲 亘丨丕噩丞 卮丿賷丿丞 賱賱賲爻丕毓丿丞 賯亘賱 兀賳 鬲爻丕賴賲 賮賷 賲爻丕毓丿丞 兀丨丿賴賲 賵睾賷乇賴賲 賲賳 卮禺氐賷丕鬲 亘丕賱丕賳賷賰 丕賱鬲賷 賵廿賳 鬲卮丕亘賴鬲 賮賷 丕賲乇丕囟賴丕 丕賱賳賮爻賷丞 廿賱丕 兀賳賷 爻毓丿鬲 亘賯乇丕亍丞 賲丕 賷賮賰乇賵賳 賮賷賴貙 賮賷 賱丨馗丕鬲 賲丕 賯亘賱 丕賱賲賵鬲貙 賲賳 禺賱丕賱 鬲賳丿乇 亘丕賱匕丕鬲.
鬲賳丿乇 亘乇丕賳爻賳 卮禺氐賷丞 賲毓賯丿丞 賵賲囟胤乇亘丞貙 賱丕 鬲鬲囟丨 兀爻亘丕亘 賴匕丕 丕賱鬲毓賯賷丿 廿賱丕 亘毓丿 賯胤毓 卮賵胤 賰亘賷乇 賲賳 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞貙 賵賱賰賳 賲毓 亘丿丕賷丞 丕賱氐賮丨丕鬲 丕賱兀賵賱賶 賵賳卮丕胤賴 "丕賱賴丕鬲賮賷" 賵賷馗賴乇 賰賲 賲毓賯丿 賴賵貙 賵賲丕 兀賳鬲 毓賱賶 賵卮賰 丕賳 鬲賯乇丕賴 賱賷爻 毓丕丿賷.
爻賲毓鬲 丕賱賰孬賷乇 毓賳 兀爻賱賵亘 亘丕賱丕賳賷賰 丕賱賲卮賵賯貙 賵乇賵丕賷丞 "賳丕丿賷 丕賱賯鬲丕賱" 毓賱賶 賯丕卅賲丞 賯乇丕卅丕鬲賷 賲賳匕 賮鬲乇丞 胤賵賷賱丞貙 賵賱賰賳賷 爻毓賷丿丞 亘丕賳 賴匕賴 兀賵賱 賯乇丕卅丕鬲賷 賱亘丕賱丕賳賷賰貙 賰賳鬲 亘丨丕噩丞 亘卮卅 賲禺鬲賱賮 賵兀毓鬲賯丿 兀賳賳賷 賵噩丿鬲賴 賮賷 賰鬲丕亘丕鬲 賴匕丕 丕賱乇噩賱.
丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 鬲鬲毓丕賲賱 賲毓 "丕賱丿賷賳" 賰賮賰乇丞 賵賰賲毓鬲賳賯 賵賰賵爻賷賱丞 賷鬲賱丕毓亘 亘賴丕 丕賱丌禺乇賵賳 亘丕賱賳丕爻 爻賵丕亍 毓賳 胤乇賷賯 丕賱丿毓丕賷丞 兀賵 丕賱鬲爻賵賷賯 兀賵 毓賳 胤乇賷賯 丕賱廿乇賴丕亘 丕賱毓賯賱賷 賵丕賱噩爻丿賷. 毓賳 賲丿賶 賮賴賲賳丕 賵賵毓賳丕 賱賱丿賷賳貙 賵毓賳 丨丿 丕賱鬲丿賷賳 丕賱賲賳丕爻亘 賮賷 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓貙 賵賲丕 丕賱賮丕乇賯 亘賷賳 賰賱 賲鬲丿賷賳 "亘胤乇賷賯鬲賴". 賵亘賴匕丕 賷氐亘丨 丕賱丿賷賳 丕賱賲賵囟賵毓 丕賱兀爻丕爻賷 賱賱乇賵丕賷丞貙 賵亘賵噩賵丿 丕賱丿賷賳 賱丕 亘丿 賲賳 賵噩賵丿 丕賱毓賳氐乇 丕賱孬丕賳賷 "丕賱鬲丕亘賵" 賮賷 兀賷 乇賵丕賷丞 賵賴賵 丕賱噩賳爻. 丕賱噩賳爻 賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賷鬲賲 丕賱鬲毓丕賲賱 賲毓賴 賰卮卅 丨乇賲鬲賴 丿賷丕賳丞 賲毓賷賳丞貙 賱賲丕 賵賰賷賮 丨乇賲鬲賴貙 賰賷賮 兀乇賴亘鬲 兀鬲亘丕毓賴丕 賲賳 賲賲丕乇爻鬲賴貙 賲賳 賮賰乇丞 丕賱夭賵丕噩 兀氐賱丕賸貙 賴賷 賲丨賵乇 丌禺乇 賱賱乇賵丕賷丞.
丕賱鬲丨賵賱 丕賱賲賮丕噩卅 賮賷 丨賷丕丞 鬲賳丿乇 賲賳 禺丕丿賲 廿賱賶 賯丕卅丿 丿賷賳賷 賵賲賳 孬賲 廿賱賶 賱丕 卮卅 賲乇丞 兀禺乇賶貙 賲賳 丕賱氐毓亘 廿丨鬲賲丕賱賴 丿賮毓丞 賵丕丨丿丞. 賮鬲賳丿乇 丕賱賲睾賱賵亘 毓賱賶 兀賲乇賴 毓賱賶 丕賱丿賵丕賲 賷賲鬲孬賱 賱兀賵丕賲乇 兀賷 卮禺氐貙 賵亘毓丿 廿禺鬲賮丕亍 乇丕毓賷賴貙 賷亘丿兀 亘丕賱亘丨孬 毓賳 卮禺氐 丌禺乇 賷亘丿兀 亘廿毓胤丕丐賴 丕賱兀賵丕賲乇 賰丕賳 賲爻鬲賮夭丕賸 賮賷 兀丨賷丕賳 賰孬賷乇丞貙 賵賱賰賳賳賷 賰賳鬲 賲鬲卮賵賯丞 丿賵賲賸丕 賱賲毓乇賮丞 "賲丕匕丕 爻賷賮毓賱 丕賱丌賳".
賵亘丕賱胤亘毓 賲賳 兀賴賲 賲賲賷夭丕鬲 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賴賷 丕賱鬲乇噩賲丞貙 賮毓賳丿賲丕 賷賰賵賳 丕賱賲鬲乇噩賲 賲毓噩亘賸丕 賰亘賷乇賸丕 亘丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賵丕賱賰丕鬲亘 兀氐賱丕賸 賷亘丿賵 賴匕丕 賵丕囟丨賸丕 賲賳 丕賱賲噩賴賵丿 丕賱賲亘匕賵賱 賮賷 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞. 賵賴卮丕賲 賮賴賲賷 賲賳 丕賱賵丕囟丨 兀賳賴 賲毓噩亘 賱兀賯氐賶 丕賱丨丿賵丿 亘兀爻賱賵亘 亘丕賱丕賳賷賰貙 賮賲噩賴賵丿賴 賮賷 丕賱鬲乇噩賲丞 兀賲鬲毓賳賷 賱丿乇噩丞 賱賲 兀賰賳 兀毓鬲賯丿 兀賳賷 賰賳鬲 賱兀爻鬲賲鬲毓 亘賴丕 賱賵 賯乇丕鬲賴丕 賮賷 賱睾鬲賴丕 丕賱兀氐賱賷丞.
乇賵丕賷丞 賲賮丕噩卅丞 賵氐丕丿賲丞 賵賱賷爻鬲 賲賳丕爻亘丞 賱噩賱爻丞 賯乇丕亍丞 禺賮賷賮丞貙 賵賯丿 鬲丨鬲丕噩 賱胤亘賷亘 賳賮爻賷 亘毓丿 丕賳鬲賴丕丐賰 賲賳賴丕.
丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賲囟胤乇亘丞 亘噩賳賵賳貙 卮禺氐賷鬲賴丕 賲噩賳賵賳丞貙 賵乇亘賲丕 丕賱毓丕賱賲 賴賵 丕賱賲噩賳賵賳貙 賵賰丕賳 鬲賳丿乇 亘乇丕賳爻賳貙 亘胤賱 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞貙 賴賵 丕賱毓丕賯賱 丕賱賵丨賷丿責
賷丨賰賷 亘丕賱丕賳賷賰 賯氐丞 鬲賳丿乇 亘乇丕賳爻賳貙 賵乇丨賱鬲賴 賲賳 賮鬲賷 賰乇賷丿卮賷 賲胤賷毓 賷噩夭 丕賱毓卮亘 賵賷賳馗賮 丕賱亘賯毓 廿賱賶 "丕賱賳丕噩賷 丕賱兀禺賷乇" 賲賳 胤丕卅賮丞 丕賱賰乇賷丿卮 丕賱丕賳鬲丨丕乇賷丞 賵丕賱賯丕卅丿 丕賱丿賷賳賷 丕賱賲賱賴賲.
賵賷賯丿賲 亘丕賱丕賳賷賰 卮禺氐賷丕鬲 賲孬賷乇丞 賲孬賱 賮乇鬲賷賱賷鬲賷 丕賱睾丕賲囟丞丕賱鬲賷 鬲鬲賳亘卅 亘丕賱賲爻鬲賯亘賱貙 丌丿賲 丕賱囟丕賱貙 賲賵馗賮丞 丕賱鬲丨乇賷丕鬲 丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 賰丕賳鬲 亘丨丕噩丞 卮丿賷丿丞 賱賱賲爻丕毓丿丞 賯亘賱 兀賳 鬲爻丕賴賲 賮賷 賲爻丕毓丿丞 兀丨丿賴賲 賵睾賷乇賴賲 賲賳 卮禺氐賷丕鬲 亘丕賱丕賳賷賰 丕賱鬲賷 賵廿賳 鬲卮丕亘賴鬲 賮賷 丕賲乇丕囟賴丕 丕賱賳賮爻賷丞 廿賱丕 兀賳賷 爻毓丿鬲 亘賯乇丕亍丞 賲丕 賷賮賰乇賵賳 賮賷賴貙 賮賷 賱丨馗丕鬲 賲丕 賯亘賱 丕賱賲賵鬲貙 賲賳 禺賱丕賱 鬲賳丿乇 亘丕賱匕丕鬲.
鬲賳丿乇 亘乇丕賳爻賳 卮禺氐賷丞 賲毓賯丿丞 賵賲囟胤乇亘丞貙 賱丕 鬲鬲囟丨 兀爻亘丕亘 賴匕丕 丕賱鬲毓賯賷丿 廿賱丕 亘毓丿 賯胤毓 卮賵胤 賰亘賷乇 賲賳 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞貙 賵賱賰賳 賲毓 亘丿丕賷丞 丕賱氐賮丨丕鬲 丕賱兀賵賱賶 賵賳卮丕胤賴 "丕賱賴丕鬲賮賷" 賵賷馗賴乇 賰賲 賲毓賯丿 賴賵貙 賵賲丕 兀賳鬲 毓賱賶 賵卮賰 丕賳 鬲賯乇丕賴 賱賷爻 毓丕丿賷.
爻賲毓鬲 丕賱賰孬賷乇 毓賳 兀爻賱賵亘 亘丕賱丕賳賷賰 丕賱賲卮賵賯貙 賵乇賵丕賷丞 "賳丕丿賷 丕賱賯鬲丕賱" 毓賱賶 賯丕卅賲丞 賯乇丕卅丕鬲賷 賲賳匕 賮鬲乇丞 胤賵賷賱丞貙 賵賱賰賳賷 爻毓賷丿丞 亘丕賳 賴匕賴 兀賵賱 賯乇丕卅丕鬲賷 賱亘丕賱丕賳賷賰貙 賰賳鬲 亘丨丕噩丞 亘卮卅 賲禺鬲賱賮 賵兀毓鬲賯丿 兀賳賳賷 賵噩丿鬲賴 賮賷 賰鬲丕亘丕鬲 賴匕丕 丕賱乇噩賱.
丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 鬲鬲毓丕賲賱 賲毓 "丕賱丿賷賳" 賰賮賰乇丞 賵賰賲毓鬲賳賯 賵賰賵爻賷賱丞 賷鬲賱丕毓亘 亘賴丕 丕賱丌禺乇賵賳 亘丕賱賳丕爻 爻賵丕亍 毓賳 胤乇賷賯 丕賱丿毓丕賷丞 兀賵 丕賱鬲爻賵賷賯 兀賵 毓賳 胤乇賷賯 丕賱廿乇賴丕亘 丕賱毓賯賱賷 賵丕賱噩爻丿賷. 毓賳 賲丿賶 賮賴賲賳丕 賵賵毓賳丕 賱賱丿賷賳貙 賵毓賳 丨丿 丕賱鬲丿賷賳 丕賱賲賳丕爻亘 賮賷 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓貙 賵賲丕 丕賱賮丕乇賯 亘賷賳 賰賱 賲鬲丿賷賳 "亘胤乇賷賯鬲賴". 賵亘賴匕丕 賷氐亘丨 丕賱丿賷賳 丕賱賲賵囟賵毓 丕賱兀爻丕爻賷 賱賱乇賵丕賷丞貙 賵亘賵噩賵丿 丕賱丿賷賳 賱丕 亘丿 賲賳 賵噩賵丿 丕賱毓賳氐乇 丕賱孬丕賳賷 "丕賱鬲丕亘賵" 賮賷 兀賷 乇賵丕賷丞 賵賴賵 丕賱噩賳爻. 丕賱噩賳爻 賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賷鬲賲 丕賱鬲毓丕賲賱 賲毓賴 賰卮卅 丨乇賲鬲賴 丿賷丕賳丞 賲毓賷賳丞貙 賱賲丕 賵賰賷賮 丨乇賲鬲賴貙 賰賷賮 兀乇賴亘鬲 兀鬲亘丕毓賴丕 賲賳 賲賲丕乇爻鬲賴貙 賲賳 賮賰乇丞 丕賱夭賵丕噩 兀氐賱丕賸貙 賴賷 賲丨賵乇 丌禺乇 賱賱乇賵丕賷丞.
丕賱鬲丨賵賱 丕賱賲賮丕噩卅 賮賷 丨賷丕丞 鬲賳丿乇 賲賳 禺丕丿賲 廿賱賶 賯丕卅丿 丿賷賳賷 賵賲賳 孬賲 廿賱賶 賱丕 卮卅 賲乇丞 兀禺乇賶貙 賲賳 丕賱氐毓亘 廿丨鬲賲丕賱賴 丿賮毓丞 賵丕丨丿丞. 賮鬲賳丿乇 丕賱賲睾賱賵亘 毓賱賶 兀賲乇賴 毓賱賶 丕賱丿賵丕賲 賷賲鬲孬賱 賱兀賵丕賲乇 兀賷 卮禺氐貙 賵亘毓丿 廿禺鬲賮丕亍 乇丕毓賷賴貙 賷亘丿兀 亘丕賱亘丨孬 毓賳 卮禺氐 丌禺乇 賷亘丿兀 亘廿毓胤丕丐賴 丕賱兀賵丕賲乇 賰丕賳 賲爻鬲賮夭丕賸 賮賷 兀丨賷丕賳 賰孬賷乇丞貙 賵賱賰賳賳賷 賰賳鬲 賲鬲卮賵賯丞 丿賵賲賸丕 賱賲毓乇賮丞 "賲丕匕丕 爻賷賮毓賱 丕賱丌賳".
賵亘丕賱胤亘毓 賲賳 兀賴賲 賲賲賷夭丕鬲 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賴賷 丕賱鬲乇噩賲丞貙 賮毓賳丿賲丕 賷賰賵賳 丕賱賲鬲乇噩賲 賲毓噩亘賸丕 賰亘賷乇賸丕 亘丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賵丕賱賰丕鬲亘 兀氐賱丕賸 賷亘丿賵 賴匕丕 賵丕囟丨賸丕 賲賳 丕賱賲噩賴賵丿 丕賱賲亘匕賵賱 賮賷 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞. 賵賴卮丕賲 賮賴賲賷 賲賳 丕賱賵丕囟丨 兀賳賴 賲毓噩亘 賱兀賯氐賶 丕賱丨丿賵丿 亘兀爻賱賵亘 亘丕賱丕賳賷賰貙 賮賲噩賴賵丿賴 賮賷 丕賱鬲乇噩賲丞 兀賲鬲毓賳賷 賱丿乇噩丞 賱賲 兀賰賳 兀毓鬲賯丿 兀賳賷 賰賳鬲 賱兀爻鬲賲鬲毓 亘賴丕 賱賵 賯乇丕鬲賴丕 賮賷 賱睾鬲賴丕 丕賱兀氐賱賷丞.
乇賵丕賷丞 賲賮丕噩卅丞 賵氐丕丿賲丞 賵賱賷爻鬲 賲賳丕爻亘丞 賱噩賱爻丞 賯乇丕亍丞 禺賮賷賮丞貙 賵賯丿 鬲丨鬲丕噩 賱胤亘賷亘 賳賮爻賷 亘毓丿 丕賳鬲賴丕丐賰 賲賳賴丕.
April 28, 2020
Vonnegut,Kozinski,Christopher Moore and now Chuck Pahlaniuk have tapped the black humour of all the mainstream sacred cows, with stylish grace and the prescient ability to extrapolate the consequences of our most innocuous acts.
Another commonality: they all have the uncanny ability to transform our feelings for their ungainly, unlikely, unlikable, sometimes even rather repulsive oddball freak heroes from clinically detached to warm and fuzzy. Quite a class act.
We may not like them, but they are us. No matter that we are not flitting about in our private jet nor yet hijacking someone else's flight, not slogging through dense undergrowth or along remote mountain passes, we can see the logic in the extreme actions of the characters, and can easily place ourselves in the action.
If you can get past the truly awful bits at the beginning and want to know anything more about a powertripping,manipulative, emotionally stunted slob, you may read on to reluctantly accept that this is an apt archetype for the kind of people the system (church,state, and economic)are churning out. CP has brilliantly exposed the paradoxes of power and the vacuum in the soul of American culture.
CP's irony is consistently in your face but he can also be subtle. His trick of pagination starting at the beginning of the end with the countdown to zero, was not something GR could handle. My reading graph for this book is hilarious. But how fitting the metaphor for societies negative progress.
The Irony of Names...
First, the irony of Tender being the generic name for boys brought up to obey without question,the authority and the rules instilled in them by their elders.This entailed suppression of all the qualities, compassion, emotional depth and sensitivity to ones own as well as primarily the feelings of others,that most prominently define the original meaning of the word.
That Our Hero continues to use this name, almost as a pseudonym,even when discarding his uniform of faith, confirms his passive/accepting character. He is lost without instructions, yet he feeds on praise and goes through severe withdrawal when deprived of his audience.
That our unflappable heroine, the plucky and prescient Fertility Hollis, believes that she is sterile,gives her the protection she requires for the most distressing aspect of her job as a surrogate mother, the possibility of actually having to conceive and carry off a pregnancy. I think CP is rubbing it in here with his imagery of a depraved and barren aspect of the abundance that surrounds us, always hungry for more. I found it rather chilling that Fertility achieved her blase attitude to the disasters she predicted by accepting the fact that it was useless to warn people because not only would they not believe her, they would question her ability.
It is interesting to note the wide variety of responses posted for this book on GR.I can see that some people might get bogged down in being offended. I thought it was great reading and a wickedly accurate assessment of the situation here as it is evolving.
There are also scattered about this terrific, provocative book some really basic and practical helpful hints for stain removal and basic household micro management.
Another commonality: they all have the uncanny ability to transform our feelings for their ungainly, unlikely, unlikable, sometimes even rather repulsive oddball freak heroes from clinically detached to warm and fuzzy. Quite a class act.
We may not like them, but they are us. No matter that we are not flitting about in our private jet nor yet hijacking someone else's flight, not slogging through dense undergrowth or along remote mountain passes, we can see the logic in the extreme actions of the characters, and can easily place ourselves in the action.
If you can get past the truly awful bits at the beginning and want to know anything more about a powertripping,manipulative, emotionally stunted slob, you may read on to reluctantly accept that this is an apt archetype for the kind of people the system (church,state, and economic)are churning out. CP has brilliantly exposed the paradoxes of power and the vacuum in the soul of American culture.
CP's irony is consistently in your face but he can also be subtle. His trick of pagination starting at the beginning of the end with the countdown to zero, was not something GR could handle. My reading graph for this book is hilarious. But how fitting the metaphor for societies negative progress.
The Irony of Names...
First, the irony of Tender being the generic name for boys brought up to obey without question,the authority and the rules instilled in them by their elders.This entailed suppression of all the qualities, compassion, emotional depth and sensitivity to ones own as well as primarily the feelings of others,that most prominently define the original meaning of the word.
That Our Hero continues to use this name, almost as a pseudonym,even when discarding his uniform of faith, confirms his passive/accepting character. He is lost without instructions, yet he feeds on praise and goes through severe withdrawal when deprived of his audience.
That our unflappable heroine, the plucky and prescient Fertility Hollis, believes that she is sterile,gives her the protection she requires for the most distressing aspect of her job as a surrogate mother, the possibility of actually having to conceive and carry off a pregnancy. I think CP is rubbing it in here with his imagery of a depraved and barren aspect of the abundance that surrounds us, always hungry for more. I found it rather chilling that Fertility achieved her blase attitude to the disasters she predicted by accepting the fact that it was useless to warn people because not only would they not believe her, they would question her ability.
It is interesting to note the wide variety of responses posted for this book on GR.I can see that some people might get bogged down in being offended. I thought it was great reading and a wickedly accurate assessment of the situation here as it is evolving.
There are also scattered about this terrific, provocative book some really basic and practical helpful hints for stain removal and basic household micro management.
January 31, 2020
噩賵賴乇 賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 鬲鬲賰賱賲 毓賳 賳馗丕賲 丕賱鬲毓賱賷賲 貙 丕賱丕胤賮丕賱 賱丕 賷鬲賲 鬲毓賱賷賲賴賲 兀賵 鬲丿乇賷亘賴賲 廿賱丕 賱賰賷 賷氐賷乇賵丕 兀賮囟賱 鬲乇賵爻 賲賲賰賳丞 賮賷 賲丕賰賷賳丕鬲 丕賱卮乇賰丕鬲 丕賱賰亘乇賷 賱丕 兀賰孬乇 ... 兀賳賴賲 賱丕 賷鬲毓賱賲賵賳 兀亘丿丕 賰賷賮 賷氐亘丨賵賳 兀賯賵賷丕亍 賮毓賾丕賱賷賳 賵賰賷賮 賷賮鬲鬲丨賵賳 卮乇賰丕鬲賴賲 丕賱禺丕氐丞 賮賷 爻亘賷賱 兀賳 賷卮賾賰賱賵丕 丨賷丕鬲賴賲 賵賷賯乇乇賵丕 賲氐丕卅乇賴賲 亘兀賳賮爻賴賲
廿賳賴賲 賷毓賱賲賵賳賴賲 兀賳 賷賰賵賳賵丕 賲噩乇丿 賲賵馗賮賷賳 賲噩鬲賴丿賷賳 賱丕 睾賷乇 ... 兀賳 賷氐賷乇賵丕 噩夭亍丕 賲賳 丕賱賯胤賷毓
毓賳丿賲丕 鬲賰賵賳 賲賯丿賲丞 乇賵丕賷丞 賲孬賱 賴匕賴 賮兀毓賱賲 丕賳 賰丕鬲亘 賳丕丿賷 丕賱賯鬲丕賱 賷賯丿賲 賱賳丕 乇賵丕賷丞 賲禺鬲賱賮丞 賲賲賷夭丞 賰毓丕丿鬲賴 鬲噩毓賱賰 鬲毓賷丿 鬲賮賰賷乇賰 賮賷 賰賱 卮賶 丨賵賱賰..丕賱乇兀爻賲丕賱賷丞 ..賵賰賷賮 賷亘賷毓賵賳 賱賰 丕賱賵賴賲 丨鬲賷 賮賷 丕賱丿賷賳...丕賱廿毓賱丕賲 ...賰賷賮 賷噩毓賱賵賰 爻賱毓丞..賰賷賮 鬲爻賲毓 賰賱 賲丕 賷賯丕賱 賱賰 賵鬲亘乇賲噩 毓賱賷 丕賳 鬲賳賮匕 丕賱丕賵丕賲乇 胤賵丕賱 丨賷丕鬲賰 亘丿賵賳 丨鬲賷 丕賳 鬲賮賴賲 兀賳賰 亘丕賱賳爻亘丞 賱賴賲 賲噩乇丿 毓亘丿 賷鬲賲 鬲噩賴賷夭賴 賱亘賷毓賴 亘兀賮囟賱 爻毓乇
賰賱賳丕 賳卮丕賴丿 丕賱亘乇丕賲噩 丕賱鬲賱賷賮夭賷賵賳賷丞 賳賮爻賴丕 貙 賳賰乇乇 賳賮爻 丕賱賰賱丕賲 賱亘毓囟賳丕 丕賱亘毓囟 貙 丨賷丕鬲賳丕 賰賱賴丕 亘乇丕賲噩 賲毓丕丿丞 貙 賰賱賳丕 鬲乇亘賷賳丕 毓賱賷 賳賮爻 丕賱亘乇丕賲噩 賵丕賱賲爻賱爻賱丕鬲貙 賰兀賳 賴賳丕賰 卮乇賷丨丞 匕丕賰乇丞 氐賳丕毓賷丞 賲夭乇賵毓丞 賮賷 丿賲丕睾 賰賱 賵丕丨丿 賲賳丕 賱丕 鬲禺鬲賱賮 丕賱賵丕丨丿丞 賲賳賴丕 毓賳 丕賱丕禺乇賷 貙 丕賳賳丕 賱丕 賳匕賰乇 卮賷卅丕 鬲賯乇賷亘丕 毓賳 胤賮賵賱鬲賳丕 賵賱賰賳賳丕 賳匕賰乇 賰賱 卮卅 丨丿孬 賱賴匕賴 丕賱毓丕卅賱丞 丕賵 鬲賱賰 賮賷 丕賱賲爻賱爻賱 貙 賰賱賳丕 賱丿賷賳丕 丕賱丕賴丿丕賮 賵丕賱賲禺丕賵賮 丕賱兀爻丕爻賷丞 賳賮爻賴丕
乇賵丕賷丞 鬲賯乇兀 賵鬲賯乇兀 賳賯丿賷 賱賳賯胤鬲賷賳 賮賯胤 : 兀賵賱賴賲 賱丕 丕爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賳 兀噩夭賲 賵賱賰賳賷 賮賷 亘毓囟 丕賱爻胤賵乇 卮毓乇鬲 丕賳賴 賷賵噩丿 亘毓囟 丕賱賳賯丿 賱鬲毓丕賱賷賲 丕賱丿賷賳 毓賲賵賲丕 貙 賵孬丕賳賷丕賸 賷賵噩丿 亘毓囟 丕賱賲賱賱 賵丕賱鬲賮丕氐賷賱 賮賷 丕賵賱 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賵賱賰賳 賳氐賷丨丞 賱丕氐丿賯丕卅賷 賴賷 丕賵賱賴丕 賮賯胤 賵爻乇賷毓丕 爻鬲卮丿賰 丕賱丕丨丿丕孬 賵鬲賳丿賲噩 賲毓賴丕
鬲賯賷賷賲賷 3.5
Read
January 18, 2022palahniuk鈥檜 t眉rkiye鈥檇e pek 莽ok ki艧iyle tan谋艧t谋ran ve bir anlamda 鈥渕oda yapan鈥� kitab谋 fight club鈥檇谋r elbette. s谋radan, pop眉list ve kli艧e edebiyattan s谋k谋lan kitap okurlar谋 palahniuk鈥檃 adeta 鈥渟ald谋rm谋艧鈥� ve genel alg谋lar谋n d谋艧谋na 莽谋kan tarz谋na; sert 眉slubuna hayran kalm谋艧.
ancak, en az fight club kadar sistem kar艧谋t谋, ve en az onun kadar sars谋c谋 bir roman谋 daha var: g枚steri peygamberi.
d眉nyadan yal谋t谋lm谋艧, belli bir alg谋 莽er莽evesinden hi莽 莽谋kmam谋艧 asl谋nda tamamen 鈥渟谋radan鈥� olan birey, korkun莽 t眉ketim toplumu i莽inde bir metaya d枚n眉艧meye ba艧l谋yor. 眉nleniyor, 眉n眉 y眉kseldik莽e insanlar onun 眉zerine daha fazla gidiyor. 眉zerindeki gizem, pop眉laritesini art谋rd谋k莽a art谋r谋yor.
sonunda, kas geli艧tirici destekler, makyaj, ila莽lar, aminoasitler, takviyeler vs derken asl谋nda 莽ift tarafl谋 bir ba臒谋ml谋l谋k ba艧l谋yor. kahraman谋m谋z da t眉ketim toplumuna ba臒谋ml谋 hale geliyor.
palahniuk, bizi bu 鈥渮avall谋鈥� 眉nl眉n眉n dram谋 ile ba艧ba艧a b谋rak谋yor.
t眉ketim toplumunun karanl谋k y枚nlerini t眉m 莽谋plakl谋臒谋yla 枚n眉m眉ze seren yazar; kitab谋na hayata dair pek 莽ok ilgin莽 bilgiyi de yazmadan duramam谋艧. ayn谋 艧eyi fight club, choke gibi romanlar谋nda da g枚r眉yoruz. palahniuk bunu seviyor, 枚rne臒in karides nas谋l pi艧irilir, hal谋daki kan lekesi nas谋l temizlenir gibi g眉ndelik bilgilerin yan谋 s谋ra; napalm nas谋l yap谋l谋ra kadar pek 莽ok 艧eyi kitab谋n谋n oras谋na buras谋na s谋k谋艧t谋r谋yor. elbette 鈥渁k谋c谋l谋臒谋ndan鈥� 枚d眉n vermese de, kimi okurlar bu 鈥溍赌焤etici鈥� 眉slubun rahats谋zl谋臒谋n谋 莽ekiyor. baz谋 insanlar bunu bir t眉r bilgi g枚sterisi veya 枚臒retmenlik k眉stahl谋臒谋 olarak g枚rebiliyor. ben b枚yle d眉艧眉nm眉yorum, bana g枚re palahniuk鈥檜n tarz谋 zaten 鈥渂a艧ka insanlar ne d眉艧眉n眉r鈥� 眉zerinden gitmiyor. o ak谋c谋l谋臒谋ndan 枚d眉n verseydi bile bunu yapard谋.
kitab谋n pek 莽ok 艧eyi birden ele艧tiriyor olmas谋 onun bir ba艧ka ba艧ar谋s谋. t眉ketim toplumu i莽inde h谋zla y眉kselen masum ve zavall谋 bireyin 眉zerinden ayn谋 zamanda ona korkun莽 bir savunmas谋zl谋k ve safl谋k veren 鈥渒apal谋 mezhep toplumu鈥� da ele艧tiriliyor. 莽ocukken cinsellik hakk谋nda verilen yanl谋艧 bilgiler, onu korumak i莽in yap谋lm谋艧 olsa da onu korkun莽 bir savunmas谋zl谋臒a itiyor. bu bana, k枚yden kente g枚莽en masum gen莽 k谋zlar谋n g眉zellik, moda sekt枚r眉 i莽inde harcanmas谋n谋 hat谋rlat谋yor.
kitapta bahsedilen tarikat谋n ilgin莽 bir ilkesi var, bu da d谋艧 d眉nyaya kapal谋l谋k. her t眉r teknolojik aletten, d谋艧 d眉nyadan gelebilecek veriden uzak durmaya 莽al谋艧谋yorlar. bunda bir 鈥渄眉zen bozulmas谋n鈥� dan 莽ok fazlas谋 var, bu adeta dinin kendisi haline gelmi艧. tabi, sat谋r aralar谋na gizledi臒i 艧枚yle bir c眉mle ile bunun t眉m dinlere kar艧谋 oldu臒unu anlayabilirsiniz: 鈥渒itab-谋 mukaddeste insanlar s眉rekli bir yerlere ka莽谋p dururlar鈥�. evet, din; bir ka莽谋艧t谋r. ama iki ucu u莽urum olan bir s眉re莽; palahniuk鈥檜n kafas谋ndaki din-medya ikilemi. bir ucunda 莽谋lg谋n t眉ketim toplumu var; di臒er ucunda ise ka莽an ve d眉nyaya kendini kapayan asketik bir sefalet. palahniuk, bize do臒ru yolu g枚stermiyor. bize yol olmad谋臒谋n谋 g枚steriyor, bu nietzsche鈥檔in 艧u s枚z眉n眉 yank谋lat谋yor:
鈥渂ana yol soranlara 艧枚yle dedim,
yol mu? yol diye bir 艧ey yoktur鈥︹€�
ancak, en az fight club kadar sistem kar艧谋t谋, ve en az onun kadar sars谋c谋 bir roman谋 daha var: g枚steri peygamberi.
d眉nyadan yal谋t谋lm谋艧, belli bir alg谋 莽er莽evesinden hi莽 莽谋kmam谋艧 asl谋nda tamamen 鈥渟谋radan鈥� olan birey, korkun莽 t眉ketim toplumu i莽inde bir metaya d枚n眉艧meye ba艧l谋yor. 眉nleniyor, 眉n眉 y眉kseldik莽e insanlar onun 眉zerine daha fazla gidiyor. 眉zerindeki gizem, pop眉laritesini art谋rd谋k莽a art谋r谋yor.
sonunda, kas geli艧tirici destekler, makyaj, ila莽lar, aminoasitler, takviyeler vs derken asl谋nda 莽ift tarafl谋 bir ba臒谋ml谋l谋k ba艧l谋yor. kahraman谋m谋z da t眉ketim toplumuna ba臒谋ml谋 hale geliyor.
palahniuk, bizi bu 鈥渮avall谋鈥� 眉nl眉n眉n dram谋 ile ba艧ba艧a b谋rak谋yor.
t眉ketim toplumunun karanl谋k y枚nlerini t眉m 莽谋plakl谋臒谋yla 枚n眉m眉ze seren yazar; kitab谋na hayata dair pek 莽ok ilgin莽 bilgiyi de yazmadan duramam谋艧. ayn谋 艧eyi fight club, choke gibi romanlar谋nda da g枚r眉yoruz. palahniuk bunu seviyor, 枚rne臒in karides nas谋l pi艧irilir, hal谋daki kan lekesi nas谋l temizlenir gibi g眉ndelik bilgilerin yan谋 s谋ra; napalm nas谋l yap谋l谋ra kadar pek 莽ok 艧eyi kitab谋n谋n oras谋na buras谋na s谋k谋艧t谋r谋yor. elbette 鈥渁k谋c谋l谋臒谋ndan鈥� 枚d眉n vermese de, kimi okurlar bu 鈥溍赌焤etici鈥� 眉slubun rahats谋zl谋臒谋n谋 莽ekiyor. baz谋 insanlar bunu bir t眉r bilgi g枚sterisi veya 枚臒retmenlik k眉stahl谋臒谋 olarak g枚rebiliyor. ben b枚yle d眉艧眉nm眉yorum, bana g枚re palahniuk鈥檜n tarz谋 zaten 鈥渂a艧ka insanlar ne d眉艧眉n眉r鈥� 眉zerinden gitmiyor. o ak谋c谋l谋臒谋ndan 枚d眉n verseydi bile bunu yapard谋.
kitab谋n pek 莽ok 艧eyi birden ele艧tiriyor olmas谋 onun bir ba艧ka ba艧ar谋s谋. t眉ketim toplumu i莽inde h谋zla y眉kselen masum ve zavall谋 bireyin 眉zerinden ayn谋 zamanda ona korkun莽 bir savunmas谋zl谋k ve safl谋k veren 鈥渒apal谋 mezhep toplumu鈥� da ele艧tiriliyor. 莽ocukken cinsellik hakk谋nda verilen yanl谋艧 bilgiler, onu korumak i莽in yap谋lm谋艧 olsa da onu korkun莽 bir savunmas谋zl谋臒a itiyor. bu bana, k枚yden kente g枚莽en masum gen莽 k谋zlar谋n g眉zellik, moda sekt枚r眉 i莽inde harcanmas谋n谋 hat谋rlat谋yor.
kitapta bahsedilen tarikat谋n ilgin莽 bir ilkesi var, bu da d谋艧 d眉nyaya kapal谋l谋k. her t眉r teknolojik aletten, d谋艧 d眉nyadan gelebilecek veriden uzak durmaya 莽al谋艧谋yorlar. bunda bir 鈥渄眉zen bozulmas谋n鈥� dan 莽ok fazlas谋 var, bu adeta dinin kendisi haline gelmi艧. tabi, sat谋r aralar谋na gizledi臒i 艧枚yle bir c眉mle ile bunun t眉m dinlere kar艧谋 oldu臒unu anlayabilirsiniz: 鈥渒itab-谋 mukaddeste insanlar s眉rekli bir yerlere ka莽谋p dururlar鈥�. evet, din; bir ka莽谋艧t谋r. ama iki ucu u莽urum olan bir s眉re莽; palahniuk鈥檜n kafas谋ndaki din-medya ikilemi. bir ucunda 莽谋lg谋n t眉ketim toplumu var; di臒er ucunda ise ka莽an ve d眉nyaya kendini kapayan asketik bir sefalet. palahniuk, bize do臒ru yolu g枚stermiyor. bize yol olmad谋臒谋n谋 g枚steriyor, bu nietzsche鈥檔in 艧u s枚z眉n眉 yank谋lat谋yor:
鈥渂ana yol soranlara 艧枚yle dedim,
yol mu? yol diye bir 艧ey yoktur鈥︹€�
February 8, 2017
丕賱賳丕噩賷 丕賱兀禺賷乇
賲賳 賷匕賰乇 (賳丕丿賷 丕賱賯鬲丕賱) 爻賷噩匕亘賴 丕爻賲 鬲卮丕賰 亘丕賱丕賳賷賰貙 賰賱賳丕 卮丕賴丿賳丕 丕賱賮賷賱賲 丕賱匕賷 賱毓亘 亘胤賵賱鬲賴 廿丿賵丕乇丿 賳賵乇鬲賳 賵亘乇丕丿 亘鬲 賵丕賱匕賷 丕毓鬲賲丿 毓賱賶 乇賵丕賷丞 賱亘丕賱丕賳賷賰貙 賰丕賳 賱賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 兀賳 賷鬲丨賵賱 賱賮賷賱賲 亘丿賵乇賴 賵賯丿 賳卮乇 賮賷 賳賴丕賷丞 丕賱鬲爻毓賷賳丕鬲貙 賵賱賰賳 賲卮乇賵毓 鬲丨賵賷賱賴 賱賮賷賱賲 鬲賵賯賮 亘爻亘亘 兀丨丿丕孬 11 爻亘鬲賲亘乇貙 賵禺丕氐丞 兀賳 丕賮鬲鬲丕丨賷丞 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賱賷爻鬲 廿賱丕 賲卮賴丿 禺胤賮 胤丕卅乇丞 賷賯賵賲 亘賴 丕賱亘胤賱貙 賵丕賱匕賷 賲賳 禺賱丕賱 丕禺鬲胤丕賮 丕賱胤丕卅乇丞 賵丕賱爻賷乇 亘賴丕 賱廿爻賯丕胤賴丕 賮賷 氐丨丕乇賷 兀爻鬲乇丕賱賷丕貙 亘毓丿賲丕 兀賳夭賱 賰賱 丕賱乇賰丕亘 賵丨鬲賶 丕賱胤賷丕乇貙 賷乇賵賷 賯氐丞 丨賷丕鬲賴 賱賱氐賳丿賵賯 丕賱兀爻賵丿貙 廿賳賴丕 賯氐丞 胤賵賷賱丞貙 賱卮丕亘 賲賳 胤丕卅賮丞 丿賷賳賷丞 丕賳鬲丨丕乇賷丞 鬲丿毓賶 丕賱胤丕卅賮丞 丕賱賰乇賷丿卮賷丞貙 賵賴賷 胤丕卅賮丞 賷氐賮 賱賳丕 丕賱亘胤賱 胤賯賵爻賴丕 賵丕毓鬲賯丕丿丕鬲賴丕貙 賵賲賳 孬賲 賵賱兀賳 丕賱亘胤賱 賵丕爻賲賴 鬲賳丿乇 亘乇丕賳爻賳 賴賵 丕賱賳丕噩賷 丕賱兀禺賷乇 賲賳 丕賱胤丕卅賮丞 亘毓丿 丕賳鬲丨丕乇 丕賱亘賯賷丞貙 鬲丨賵賱賴 丕賱乇兀爻賲丕賱賷丞 廿賱賶 乇賲夭 丿賷賳賷貙 賵鬲賯賵賲 亘鬲睾賷賷乇丕鬲 卮賰賱賷丞 賰亘賷乇丞 賱賴貙 賵賷丨賯賳 亘兀丿賵賷丞 賵賲賳卮胤丕鬲 賱丕 賳賴丕賷丞 賱賴丕貙 廿賳賴丕 爻禺乇賷丞 賲乇賷乇丞 賲賳 鬲爻賵賷賯 丕賱乇兀爻賲丕賱賷丞 賱賱禺乇丕賮丞貙 賵丕爻鬲睾賱丕賱賴丕 丨鬲賶 賱賲丕 賷賮鬲乇囟 亘賴 兀賳 賷賰賵賳 卮兀賳丕賸 乇賵丨賷丕賸貙 賳鬲丕亘毓 賯氐丞 鬲賳丿乇 賵毓賱丕賯鬲賴 亘賮鬲丕丞 賲鬲賳亘卅丞 鬲丿毓賶 賮賷乇鬲賷賱鬲賷 賴賵賱賷爻貙 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賱丕 亘兀爻 亘賴丕貙 乇睾賲 賲匕丕賯賴丕 丕賱兀賲乇賷賰賷 丕賱賯丨 賵丕賱匕賷 賷噩毓賱賰 鬲卮毓乇 亘兀賳賴丕 賰鬲亘鬲 賱賱卮丕卮丞 兀爻丕爻丕賸.
賲賳 賷匕賰乇 (賳丕丿賷 丕賱賯鬲丕賱) 爻賷噩匕亘賴 丕爻賲 鬲卮丕賰 亘丕賱丕賳賷賰貙 賰賱賳丕 卮丕賴丿賳丕 丕賱賮賷賱賲 丕賱匕賷 賱毓亘 亘胤賵賱鬲賴 廿丿賵丕乇丿 賳賵乇鬲賳 賵亘乇丕丿 亘鬲 賵丕賱匕賷 丕毓鬲賲丿 毓賱賶 乇賵丕賷丞 賱亘丕賱丕賳賷賰貙 賰丕賳 賱賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 兀賳 賷鬲丨賵賱 賱賮賷賱賲 亘丿賵乇賴 賵賯丿 賳卮乇 賮賷 賳賴丕賷丞 丕賱鬲爻毓賷賳丕鬲貙 賵賱賰賳 賲卮乇賵毓 鬲丨賵賷賱賴 賱賮賷賱賲 鬲賵賯賮 亘爻亘亘 兀丨丿丕孬 11 爻亘鬲賲亘乇貙 賵禺丕氐丞 兀賳 丕賮鬲鬲丕丨賷丞 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賱賷爻鬲 廿賱丕 賲卮賴丿 禺胤賮 胤丕卅乇丞 賷賯賵賲 亘賴 丕賱亘胤賱貙 賵丕賱匕賷 賲賳 禺賱丕賱 丕禺鬲胤丕賮 丕賱胤丕卅乇丞 賵丕賱爻賷乇 亘賴丕 賱廿爻賯丕胤賴丕 賮賷 氐丨丕乇賷 兀爻鬲乇丕賱賷丕貙 亘毓丿賲丕 兀賳夭賱 賰賱 丕賱乇賰丕亘 賵丨鬲賶 丕賱胤賷丕乇貙 賷乇賵賷 賯氐丞 丨賷丕鬲賴 賱賱氐賳丿賵賯 丕賱兀爻賵丿貙 廿賳賴丕 賯氐丞 胤賵賷賱丞貙 賱卮丕亘 賲賳 胤丕卅賮丞 丿賷賳賷丞 丕賳鬲丨丕乇賷丞 鬲丿毓賶 丕賱胤丕卅賮丞 丕賱賰乇賷丿卮賷丞貙 賵賴賷 胤丕卅賮丞 賷氐賮 賱賳丕 丕賱亘胤賱 胤賯賵爻賴丕 賵丕毓鬲賯丕丿丕鬲賴丕貙 賵賲賳 孬賲 賵賱兀賳 丕賱亘胤賱 賵丕爻賲賴 鬲賳丿乇 亘乇丕賳爻賳 賴賵 丕賱賳丕噩賷 丕賱兀禺賷乇 賲賳 丕賱胤丕卅賮丞 亘毓丿 丕賳鬲丨丕乇 丕賱亘賯賷丞貙 鬲丨賵賱賴 丕賱乇兀爻賲丕賱賷丞 廿賱賶 乇賲夭 丿賷賳賷貙 賵鬲賯賵賲 亘鬲睾賷賷乇丕鬲 卮賰賱賷丞 賰亘賷乇丞 賱賴貙 賵賷丨賯賳 亘兀丿賵賷丞 賵賲賳卮胤丕鬲 賱丕 賳賴丕賷丞 賱賴丕貙 廿賳賴丕 爻禺乇賷丞 賲乇賷乇丞 賲賳 鬲爻賵賷賯 丕賱乇兀爻賲丕賱賷丞 賱賱禺乇丕賮丞貙 賵丕爻鬲睾賱丕賱賴丕 丨鬲賶 賱賲丕 賷賮鬲乇囟 亘賴 兀賳 賷賰賵賳 卮兀賳丕賸 乇賵丨賷丕賸貙 賳鬲丕亘毓 賯氐丞 鬲賳丿乇 賵毓賱丕賯鬲賴 亘賮鬲丕丞 賲鬲賳亘卅丞 鬲丿毓賶 賮賷乇鬲賷賱鬲賷 賴賵賱賷爻貙 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賱丕 亘兀爻 亘賴丕貙 乇睾賲 賲匕丕賯賴丕 丕賱兀賲乇賷賰賷 丕賱賯丨 賵丕賱匕賷 賷噩毓賱賰 鬲卮毓乇 亘兀賳賴丕 賰鬲亘鬲 賱賱卮丕卮丞 兀爻丕爻丕賸.
July 1, 2016
4.5
""And he has these gross little monkey hands."
Right now, getting killed would be a breath of spring.
"That's supposed to mean he has a little wiener dick."
If Fertility keeps talking, my caseworker will have one less client in the morning.
"And he's not obese," Fertility says, "he's not a whale, but he's too fat for me."
In case there's a sniper outside, I open the blinds and stand my gross obese body in the window. Please, anybody with a rifle and a scope. Shoot me right here. Right in my big fat heart. Right in my little Wiener."
Oh Chuck. what the f...? I love it. I can get a great discussion on comedy and tragedy from Dante if I want, but in this 21st century I think I prefer Palahniuk's version. Chuck doesn't deliver thoughts, emotions, real life experiences with kid gloves. No, he throws them right in your face like a big cream pie.
If I wanted a discussion on the negative liabilities of religion and ensuing corporate greed I could browse some Dawkins. But again... I very much enjoy Chuck's version.
A satirical punch in the gut look at cults and the flock of sheep that follow modern days greener grass.
This is my 5th Palahniuk novel and I am starting to think I would like to read all his novels.
""And he has these gross little monkey hands."
Right now, getting killed would be a breath of spring.
"That's supposed to mean he has a little wiener dick."
If Fertility keeps talking, my caseworker will have one less client in the morning.
"And he's not obese," Fertility says, "he's not a whale, but he's too fat for me."
In case there's a sniper outside, I open the blinds and stand my gross obese body in the window. Please, anybody with a rifle and a scope. Shoot me right here. Right in my big fat heart. Right in my little Wiener."
Oh Chuck. what the f...? I love it. I can get a great discussion on comedy and tragedy from Dante if I want, but in this 21st century I think I prefer Palahniuk's version. Chuck doesn't deliver thoughts, emotions, real life experiences with kid gloves. No, he throws them right in your face like a big cream pie.
If I wanted a discussion on the negative liabilities of religion and ensuing corporate greed I could browse some Dawkins. But again... I very much enjoy Chuck's version.
A satirical punch in the gut look at cults and the flock of sheep that follow modern days greener grass.
This is my 5th Palahniuk novel and I am starting to think I would like to read all his novels.
January 5, 2024
丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 毓噩蹖亘 賵 噩丕賱亘 丿乇亘丕乇賴 蹖讴 賮乇賯賴 賲匕賴亘蹖 賳丕賲鬲毓丕乇賮 賵 丕賮乇丕胤蹖
December 29, 2020
Mi 猫 piaciuta la questione sul sesso.
Mi 猫 piaciuta anche la vicenda dei medicinali finti zuccherini placebo che verranno.
Mi 猫 sembrato per貌 un dlc di Invisible monster.
Mi 猫 piaciuta anche la vicenda dei medicinali finti zuccherini placebo che verranno.
Mi 猫 sembrato per貌 un dlc di Invisible monster.
February 22, 2016
"If you worry about disaster all the time, that's what you're going to get"
Ovo je bila turbulentna vo啪nja!
Na po膷etku romana Palahniuk je napisao napomenu: "The books are never about what you think they are about", i da je ovaj roman ponajvi拧e o (ameri膷kom) 拧kolskom sustavu koji djecu u膷i da se uklope i budu dobri radnici, odnosno: "to be the best possible cogs in some big corporate machine", a ne da razmi拧ljaju svojom glavom i osnuju svoje firme i upravljaju svojim 啪ivotom. Iako i nije ba拧 o tome. Roman obradjuje dvije teme: 1. 拧ta se de拧ava kada se vjerskoj zajednici dopusti da imaju potpunu kontrolu nad edukacijom djece, 2. kako je dru拧tvo opsjednuto slavnim osobama.
鈥淒id perpetual happiness in the Garden of Eden maybe get so boring that eating the apple was justified?鈥�
Roman je satira pa su neki dijelovi karikirani pa i nadrealni, ima tu i paranormalnog, ma ima svega i zabavno je, ali mislim da se malo previ拧e udaljio od realnosti da bi ovo bila ozbiljna kritika bilo 膷ega. Tako膽er se ponavlja... i ponavlja. 膶ak i dobra fora postane naporna kada dodaje punchline na punchline.
No, op膰enito mi se svi膽a njegov stil pisanja. Jednostavan je i 啪ivahan. Palahniuk u svoje romane uvijek ubaci zanimljive informacije ili pri膷e koje 膷uje od poznanika i prijatelja. Podsjetio me na Camusa i njegovog Stranca kojeg sam nedavno 膷itao i to ne samo po jednostavnom stilu pisanja nego i po nejasno definiranom glavnom liku. Kasnije sam pro膷itao da je i sam Palahniuk naveo Camusa kao jednog od svojih glavnih uzora.
鈥淪ince change is con颅stant, you won颅der if peo颅ple crave death be颅cause it鈥檚 the on颅ly way they can get any颅thing re颅al颅ly fin颅ished.鈥�
Dakle, roman svakako vrijedi pro膷itati. Kratak je i ima tu stvarno za svakoga pone拧to. Kritizira ono za 拧to mislim da bi i trebao kritizirati, no likovi i radnja jednostavno nisu dovoljnu uvjerljivi i zanimljivi da bi me potpuno uvukli i zainteresirali. Tako da je ovo slaba 膷etvorka. Mo啪da bi bolje funkcioniralo kao malo du啪i esej.
鈥淚 shvatite kako nam upravo nepovjerenje spram budu膰nosti toliko ote啪ava odricanje od pro拧losti. Ne mo啪emo se odre膰i vlastite ideje o tome tko smo bili. Svi oni odrasli koji se igraju arheologa po buvljacima i tragaju za predmetima iz djetinjstva, igricama, 膷ovje膷e ne ljuti se - svi redom su prestravljeni. Sme膰e se pretvara u sveta膷ke relikvije. Monopoli. Hula-hop. Nostalgija za onim 拧to bacamo u otpad samo je prikaz na拧eg straha pred vlastitim razvojem.鈥�
Ovo je bila turbulentna vo啪nja!
Na po膷etku romana Palahniuk je napisao napomenu: "The books are never about what you think they are about", i da je ovaj roman ponajvi拧e o (ameri膷kom) 拧kolskom sustavu koji djecu u膷i da se uklope i budu dobri radnici, odnosno: "to be the best possible cogs in some big corporate machine", a ne da razmi拧ljaju svojom glavom i osnuju svoje firme i upravljaju svojim 啪ivotom. Iako i nije ba拧 o tome. Roman obradjuje dvije teme: 1. 拧ta se de拧ava kada se vjerskoj zajednici dopusti da imaju potpunu kontrolu nad edukacijom djece, 2. kako je dru拧tvo opsjednuto slavnim osobama.
鈥淒id perpetual happiness in the Garden of Eden maybe get so boring that eating the apple was justified?鈥�
Roman je satira pa su neki dijelovi karikirani pa i nadrealni, ima tu i paranormalnog, ma ima svega i zabavno je, ali mislim da se malo previ拧e udaljio od realnosti da bi ovo bila ozbiljna kritika bilo 膷ega. Tako膽er se ponavlja... i ponavlja. 膶ak i dobra fora postane naporna kada dodaje punchline na punchline.
No, op膰enito mi se svi膽a njegov stil pisanja. Jednostavan je i 啪ivahan. Palahniuk u svoje romane uvijek ubaci zanimljive informacije ili pri膷e koje 膷uje od poznanika i prijatelja. Podsjetio me na Camusa i njegovog Stranca kojeg sam nedavno 膷itao i to ne samo po jednostavnom stilu pisanja nego i po nejasno definiranom glavnom liku. Kasnije sam pro膷itao da je i sam Palahniuk naveo Camusa kao jednog od svojih glavnih uzora.
鈥淪ince change is con颅stant, you won颅der if peo颅ple crave death be颅cause it鈥檚 the on颅ly way they can get any颅thing re颅al颅ly fin颅ished.鈥�
Dakle, roman svakako vrijedi pro膷itati. Kratak je i ima tu stvarno za svakoga pone拧to. Kritizira ono za 拧to mislim da bi i trebao kritizirati, no likovi i radnja jednostavno nisu dovoljnu uvjerljivi i zanimljivi da bi me potpuno uvukli i zainteresirali. Tako da je ovo slaba 膷etvorka. Mo啪da bi bolje funkcioniralo kao malo du啪i esej.
鈥淚 shvatite kako nam upravo nepovjerenje spram budu膰nosti toliko ote啪ava odricanje od pro拧losti. Ne mo啪emo se odre膰i vlastite ideje o tome tko smo bili. Svi oni odrasli koji se igraju arheologa po buvljacima i tragaju za predmetima iz djetinjstva, igricama, 膷ovje膷e ne ljuti se - svi redom su prestravljeni. Sme膰e se pretvara u sveta膷ke relikvije. Monopoli. Hula-hop. Nostalgija za onim 拧to bacamo u otpad samo je prikaz na拧eg straha pred vlastitim razvojem.鈥�
October 27, 2022
鈥淧eople don't want their lives fixed. Nobody wants their problems solved. Their dramas. their distractions. Their stories resolved. Their messes cleaned up. Because what would they have left? Just the big scary unknown.鈥�
鈥� Chuck Palahniuk, Survivor
Survivor Chuck Palahniuk , a brain parked funny as hell story, a wound up so tight virgin Tender Branson the whiniest, wimpiest, complainiest guy ever created, sole survivor of a mass suicide religious cult reminisences his short life while his hijacked plane slowly runs out off fuel and you know crashes. Its pretty much got it all, cynicism, sarcasism, narcism, sexism, few other isms I can't remember, bit of pyschology astrology, supernatural predictions, bible bashing, you know all that good crazy as heck fluffy stuff, enjoyable as a 3rd wheel, like watching a train crash in slow motion.
Kind of similar but not really to the cult film, Fight Club, one with Brad Pitt, the one with the big rule, first rule of fight club you don't talk about fight club, haha really. The similarities and differences are a treat, so many one liners full gambit from crap to really crap. Dark Comedy at its 80s Young ones best mostly.
鈥� Chuck Palahniuk, Survivor
Survivor Chuck Palahniuk , a brain parked funny as hell story, a wound up so tight virgin Tender Branson the whiniest, wimpiest, complainiest guy ever created, sole survivor of a mass suicide religious cult reminisences his short life while his hijacked plane slowly runs out off fuel and you know crashes. Its pretty much got it all, cynicism, sarcasism, narcism, sexism, few other isms I can't remember, bit of pyschology astrology, supernatural predictions, bible bashing, you know all that good crazy as heck fluffy stuff, enjoyable as a 3rd wheel, like watching a train crash in slow motion.
Kind of similar but not really to the cult film, Fight Club, one with Brad Pitt, the one with the big rule, first rule of fight club you don't talk about fight club, haha really. The similarities and differences are a treat, so many one liners full gambit from crap to really crap. Dark Comedy at its 80s Young ones best mostly.
February 9, 2017
The only Palahniuk book I've read to date is "Fight Club" - and that is such a great book with such a great movie adaptation (watched it before I read it btw).
"Survivor" was an interesting story, with the (somewhat gimmicky) page numbers going backwards (to compel you to get to the end?). Haha. What was this about? A poke at marketing-driven franchises? The sorry state of money driven religions/churches? A handbook of cleaning tips (a part of me was hoping for the secrets of the removal of chewing gum from clothes would be mentioned somewhere - no such luck, I was tempted to take notes though)?
The voice is actually quite similar to "Fight Club" in feel. Endless rattling of anecdotal statistics/facts in between commentaries and it even has it's own version of Marla and Tyler Durden type characters.
Quite an interesting read actually. Liked it.
Writing: 5, Story: 3, Cleaning tips: 4 (chewing gum, man, chewing gum!). So... 4?
I am interested to see how Palahniuk's other titles read now, I wonder if they all sound 'similar'. Hmm...
"Survivor" was an interesting story, with the (somewhat gimmicky) page numbers going backwards (to compel you to get to the end?). Haha. What was this about? A poke at marketing-driven franchises? The sorry state of money driven religions/churches? A handbook of cleaning tips (a part of me was hoping for the secrets of the removal of chewing gum from clothes would be mentioned somewhere - no such luck, I was tempted to take notes though)?
The voice is actually quite similar to "Fight Club" in feel. Endless rattling of anecdotal statistics/facts in between commentaries and it even has it's own version of Marla and Tyler Durden type characters.
Quite an interesting read actually. Liked it.
Writing: 5, Story: 3, Cleaning tips: 4 (chewing gum, man, chewing gum!). So... 4?
I am interested to see how Palahniuk's other titles read now, I wonder if they all sound 'similar'. Hmm...
June 19, 2024
I wasn't expecting much out of this one, but I was pleasantly surprised. I wasn't aware I was reading Palahniuk's love letter to Vonnegut. The crazy plot and characters, the odd narration style, and the whole thing is stuffed with social commentary disguised as humor. It was a backward rollercoaster from start to finish, with no pauses in between. It only gets more frantic as you dive further into it. This requires a re-read to fully understand the insanity that is the Creedish way of life.
August 6, 2021
亘丕夭賲丕賳丿赖貙 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 夭賳丿诏蹖 " 鬲賳丿乇 亘乇丕賳爻賵賳 " 丕爻鬲. 倬爻乇蹖 讴賴 丕夭 亘丿賵 鬲賵賱丿 鬲丕 賴賮丿賴 爻丕賱诏蹖鈥屫ж� 乇丕 丿乇 蹖讴 讴賱蹖爻丕 亘丕 賮乇賯賴 丕蹖 爻丕禺鬲诏蹖 亘賴 賳丕賲 讴乇蹖丿蹖卮 爻倬乇蹖 讴乇丿賴 賵 鬲丨鬲 鬲毓丕賱蹖賲 爻禺鬲诏蹖乇丕賳賴 賵 丕賮乇丕胤蹖 讴賱蹖爻丕 倬乇賵乇卮 蹖丕賮鬲賴 丕爻鬲.
鬲賳丿乇 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 禺丿賲鬲讴丕乇 丕夭 胤乇賮 讴賱蹖爻丕蹖 讴乇蹖丿蹖卮 賲丕賲賵乇 卮丿賴 鬲丕 亘蹖乇賵賳 讴丕乇 讴賳丿 賵 毓丕蹖丿蹖鈥屸€屫ж� 乇丕 亘賴 讴賱蹖爻丕 亘丿賴丿.
丕賵 丕夭 亘丕夭賲丕賳丿诏丕賳 蹖讴 禺賵丿讴卮蹖 丿丕賵胤賱亘丕賳賴 丿爻鬲賴 噩賲毓蹖 讴賱蹖爻丕蹖卮 丕爻鬲.
賮氐賱 賴丕蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丕夭 丕賳鬲賴丕 亘賴 丕亘鬲丿丕 賲蹖鈥屫辟堎嗀� 賵 賮氐賱 蹖讴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 賮氐賱 丕賳鬲賴丕蹖蹖 丕爻鬲.
丕蹖賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丿賵乇賳賲丕蹖蹖 乇毓亘鈥屫①堌� 賵 賲爻禺乇賴 丕夭 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲匕賴亘蹖 丕賮乇丕胤蹖 賵 賯蹖丿 賵 亘賳丿賴丕蹖 禺賵丿爻丕禺鬲賴鈥屰� 丕賳爻丕賳 丕賲乇賵夭蹖 賲蹖鈥屫囏�.
郾鄞郯郯/郾/鄣
鬲賳丿乇 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 禺丿賲鬲讴丕乇 丕夭 胤乇賮 讴賱蹖爻丕蹖 讴乇蹖丿蹖卮 賲丕賲賵乇 卮丿賴 鬲丕 亘蹖乇賵賳 讴丕乇 讴賳丿 賵 毓丕蹖丿蹖鈥屸€屫ж� 乇丕 亘賴 讴賱蹖爻丕 亘丿賴丿.
丕賵 丕夭 亘丕夭賲丕賳丿诏丕賳 蹖讴 禺賵丿讴卮蹖 丿丕賵胤賱亘丕賳賴 丿爻鬲賴 噩賲毓蹖 讴賱蹖爻丕蹖卮 丕爻鬲.
賮氐賱 賴丕蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丕夭 丕賳鬲賴丕 亘賴 丕亘鬲丿丕 賲蹖鈥屫辟堎嗀� 賵 賮氐賱 蹖讴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丿乇 賵丕賯毓 賮氐賱 丕賳鬲賴丕蹖蹖 丕爻鬲.
丕蹖賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丿賵乇賳賲丕蹖蹖 乇毓亘鈥屫①堌� 賵 賲爻禺乇賴 丕夭 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲匕賴亘蹖 丕賮乇丕胤蹖 賵 賯蹖丿 賵 亘賳丿賴丕蹖 禺賵丿爻丕禺鬲賴鈥屰� 丕賳爻丕賳 丕賲乇賵夭蹖 賲蹖鈥屫囏�.
郾鄞郯郯/郾/鄣
Displaying 1 - 30 of 4,498 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.