What do you think?
Rate this book
螣喂 胃蔚苇蟼 蟿畏蟼 螙委蟿魏慰尾伪
螞苇纬蔚蟿伪喂 蠈蟿喂 蟽蟿畏谓 魏慰蟻蠀蠁萎 蟿蠅谓 螞蔚蠀魏蠋谓 螝伪蟻蟺伪胃委蠅谓 魏维蟺慰喂蔚蟼 纬蠀谓伪委魏蔚蟼 蔚委蠂伪谓 魏伪蟿伪蠁苇蟻蔚喂 谓伪 未喂伪蠁蠀位维尉慰蠀谓 魏伪喂 谓伪 渭蔚蟿伪蠁苇蟻慰蠀谓 伪蟺蠈 纬蔚谓喂维 蟽蔚 纬蔚谓喂维 蟿畏 蠂伪渭苇谓畏 纬喂伪 伪喂蠋谓蔚蟼 纬谓蠋蟽畏 魏伪喂 未喂伪委蟽胃畏蟽畏. 韦喂蟼 伪蟺慰魏伪位慰蠉谓 胃蔚苇蟼 蔚蟺蔚喂未萎 蔚委谓伪喂 蟽蔚 胃苇蟽畏 谓伪 胃蔚蟻伪蟺蔚蠉慰蠀谓 萎 谓伪 蟺蟻慰尾位苇蟺慰蠀谓 蟿慰 渭苇位位慰谓, 伪谓 魏伪喂 未蔚谓 蠁蟻蠈谓蟿喂蟽伪谓 纬喂伪 蟿慰 未喂魏蠈 蟿慰蠀蟼.
H 螡蟿蠈蟻伪 蔚委谓伪喂 畏 蟿蔚位蔚蠀蟿伪委伪 胃蔚维. 螖蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 伪蟺慰未蔚蠂蟿蔚委 蟿慰谓 慰蟺喂蟽胃慰未蟻慰渭喂魏蠈 蟿蟻蠈蟺慰 味蠅萎蟼 伪蠀蟿蠋谓 蟿蠅谓 纬蠀谓伪喂魏蠋谓 魏伪喂 慰蠉蟿蔚 胃苇位蔚喂 谓伪 未喂伪尾维味蔚喂 蟽蟿畏谓 蟿蔚位蔚蟿慰蠀蟻纬委伪 渭蔚 蟿慰 位喂蠅渭苇谓慰 魏蔚蟻委 蟿慰 渭苇位位慰谓 蠈蟽蠅谓 蟿畏谓 蔚蟺喂蟽魏苇蟺蟿慰谓蟿伪喂, 蠈蟺蠅蟼 苇魏伪谓蔚 畏 胃蔚委伪 蟿畏蟼 韦蔚蟻苇味喂蔚 危慰蠀蟻渭苇谓慰尾伪. 螌位伪 伪位位维味慰蠀谓 蠈渭蠅蟼 蠈蟿伪谓 蟽蠀谓蔚喂未畏蟿慰蟺慰喂蔚委 蠈蟿喂 慰喂 未蠀蟽魏慰位委蔚蟼 蟺慰蠀 蔚委蠂蔚 伪谓蟿喂渭蔚蟿蠅蟺委蟽蔚喂 渭苇蠂蟻喂 蟿蠈蟿蔚 鈥撐� 蔚纬魏位蔚喂蟽渭蠈蟼 蟿畏蟼 蟽蔚 慰喂魏慰蟿蟻慰蠁蔚委慰, 魏伪胃蠋蟼 魏伪喂 畏 谓慰蟽畏位蔚委伪 蟿畏蟼 胃蔚委伪蟼 蟿畏蟼 蟽蔚 维蟽蠀位慰鈥� 萎蟿伪谓 渭苇蟻慰蟼 蔚谓蠈蟼 蟺蟻慰蟽蔚魏蟿喂魏维 蔚蟺蔚尉蔚蟻纬伪蟽渭苇谓慰蠀 蟽蠂蔚未委慰蠀.
螔蟻喂蟽魏蠈渭伪蟽蟿蔚 蟽蟿伪 蟿苇位畏 蟿畏蟼 未蔚魏伪蔚蟿委伪蟼 蟿慰蠀 1990 魏伪喂 蟽蟿慰 违蟺慰蠀蟻纬蔚委慰 螘蟽蠅蟿蔚蟻喂魏蠋谓 蟿畏蟼 韦蟽蔚蠂喂魏萎蟼 螖畏渭慰魏蟻伪蟿委伪蟼 蠀蟺维蟻蠂蔚喂 苇谓伪蟼 蠁维魏蔚位慰蟼 蟺慰蠀 蟺蔚蟻喂渭苇谓蔚喂 谓伪 蟿慰谓 伪谓伪魏伪位蠉蠄慰蠀谓路 蟺蔚蟻喂位伪渭尾维谓蔚喂 慰蟻喂蟽渭苇谓伪 苇纬纬蟻伪蠁伪 蟿畏蟼 螒蟽蟿蠀谓慰渭委伪蟼 蟽蠂蔚蟿喂魏维 渭蔚 苇谓伪谓 蔚蠂胃蟻蠈 蟿慰蠀 魏蟻维蟿慰蠀蟼, 蟿畏 危慰蠀蟻渭苇谓慰尾伪, 胃蔚委伪 蟿畏蟼 螡蟿蠈蟻伪. 螆蟿蟽喂 畏 未蠉蟽蟺喂蟽蟿畏 螡蟿蠈蟻伪 伪谓伪魏伪位蠉蟺蟿蔚喂 位蔚蟺蟿慰渭苇蟻蔚喂蔚蟼 伪蟺蠈 蟿畏谓 维纬谓蠅蟽蟿畏 渭苇蠂蟻喂 蟿蠈蟿蔚 渭慰委蟻伪 蟿畏蟼 慰喂魏慰纬苇谓蔚喂维蟼 蟿畏蟼, 伪位位维 魏伪喂 蟿蠅谓 维位位蠅谓 胃蔚蠋谓.
螒蟺慰蟿蔚位慰蠉蟽伪谓 蟿蔚位喂魏维 魏委谓未蠀谓慰 慰喂 胃蔚苇蟼 纬喂伪 蟿慰蠀蟼 伪谓蠉蟺慰蟺蟿慰蠀蟼 伪蟽胃蔚谓蔚委蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼; 螘尉苇蠁蟻伪味伪谓 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿喂魏维 渭喂伪 喂未蔚慰位慰纬喂魏萎 伪蟺蔚喂位萎 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 魏慰喂谓蠅谓委伪 蟿蠅谓 渭蔚蟿伪蟺慰位蔚渭喂魏蠋谓 蠂蟻蠈谓蠅谓; 韦慰 蟽蠀谓伪蟻蟺伪蟽蟿喂魏蠈 渭蠀胃喂蟽蟿蠈蟻畏渭伪 蟿畏蟼 螝伪蟿蔚蟻味委谓伪 韦慰蠉蟿蟽魏慰尾伪 尾蟻委胃蔚喂 渭伪纬蔚委伪蟼 魏伪喂 蟽蠀谓伪喂蟽胃畏渭维蟿蠅谓, 蔚谓蠋 蟽蠀纬蠂蟻蠈谓蠅蟼 蠁蠅蟿委味蔚喂 苇谓伪 渭苇蟻慰蟼 蟿畏蟼 蟺蟻慰蟽蔚魏蟿喂魏维 蟽蠀纬魏蔚魏伪位蠀渭渭苇谓畏蟼 蟿蟽蔚蠂喂魏萎蟼 喂蟽蟿慰蟻委伪蟼.
H 螡蟿蠈蟻伪 蔚委谓伪喂 畏 蟿蔚位蔚蠀蟿伪委伪 胃蔚维. 螖蔚谓 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 伪蟺慰未蔚蠂蟿蔚委 蟿慰谓 慰蟺喂蟽胃慰未蟻慰渭喂魏蠈 蟿蟻蠈蟺慰 味蠅萎蟼 伪蠀蟿蠋谓 蟿蠅谓 纬蠀谓伪喂魏蠋谓 魏伪喂 慰蠉蟿蔚 胃苇位蔚喂 谓伪 未喂伪尾维味蔚喂 蟽蟿畏谓 蟿蔚位蔚蟿慰蠀蟻纬委伪 渭蔚 蟿慰 位喂蠅渭苇谓慰 魏蔚蟻委 蟿慰 渭苇位位慰谓 蠈蟽蠅谓 蟿畏谓 蔚蟺喂蟽魏苇蟺蟿慰谓蟿伪喂, 蠈蟺蠅蟼 苇魏伪谓蔚 畏 胃蔚委伪 蟿畏蟼 韦蔚蟻苇味喂蔚 危慰蠀蟻渭苇谓慰尾伪. 螌位伪 伪位位维味慰蠀谓 蠈渭蠅蟼 蠈蟿伪谓 蟽蠀谓蔚喂未畏蟿慰蟺慰喂蔚委 蠈蟿喂 慰喂 未蠀蟽魏慰位委蔚蟼 蟺慰蠀 蔚委蠂蔚 伪谓蟿喂渭蔚蟿蠅蟺委蟽蔚喂 渭苇蠂蟻喂 蟿蠈蟿蔚 鈥撐� 蔚纬魏位蔚喂蟽渭蠈蟼 蟿畏蟼 蟽蔚 慰喂魏慰蟿蟻慰蠁蔚委慰, 魏伪胃蠋蟼 魏伪喂 畏 谓慰蟽畏位蔚委伪 蟿畏蟼 胃蔚委伪蟼 蟿畏蟼 蟽蔚 维蟽蠀位慰鈥� 萎蟿伪谓 渭苇蟻慰蟼 蔚谓蠈蟼 蟺蟻慰蟽蔚魏蟿喂魏维 蔚蟺蔚尉蔚蟻纬伪蟽渭苇谓慰蠀 蟽蠂蔚未委慰蠀.
螔蟻喂蟽魏蠈渭伪蟽蟿蔚 蟽蟿伪 蟿苇位畏 蟿畏蟼 未蔚魏伪蔚蟿委伪蟼 蟿慰蠀 1990 魏伪喂 蟽蟿慰 违蟺慰蠀蟻纬蔚委慰 螘蟽蠅蟿蔚蟻喂魏蠋谓 蟿畏蟼 韦蟽蔚蠂喂魏萎蟼 螖畏渭慰魏蟻伪蟿委伪蟼 蠀蟺维蟻蠂蔚喂 苇谓伪蟼 蠁维魏蔚位慰蟼 蟺慰蠀 蟺蔚蟻喂渭苇谓蔚喂 谓伪 蟿慰谓 伪谓伪魏伪位蠉蠄慰蠀谓路 蟺蔚蟻喂位伪渭尾维谓蔚喂 慰蟻喂蟽渭苇谓伪 苇纬纬蟻伪蠁伪 蟿畏蟼 螒蟽蟿蠀谓慰渭委伪蟼 蟽蠂蔚蟿喂魏维 渭蔚 苇谓伪谓 蔚蠂胃蟻蠈 蟿慰蠀 魏蟻维蟿慰蠀蟼, 蟿畏 危慰蠀蟻渭苇谓慰尾伪, 胃蔚委伪 蟿畏蟼 螡蟿蠈蟻伪. 螆蟿蟽喂 畏 未蠉蟽蟺喂蟽蟿畏 螡蟿蠈蟻伪 伪谓伪魏伪位蠉蟺蟿蔚喂 位蔚蟺蟿慰渭苇蟻蔚喂蔚蟼 伪蟺蠈 蟿畏谓 维纬谓蠅蟽蟿畏 渭苇蠂蟻喂 蟿蠈蟿蔚 渭慰委蟻伪 蟿畏蟼 慰喂魏慰纬苇谓蔚喂维蟼 蟿畏蟼, 伪位位维 魏伪喂 蟿蠅谓 维位位蠅谓 胃蔚蠋谓.
螒蟺慰蟿蔚位慰蠉蟽伪谓 蟿蔚位喂魏维 魏委谓未蠀谓慰 慰喂 胃蔚苇蟼 纬喂伪 蟿慰蠀蟼 伪谓蠉蟺慰蟺蟿慰蠀蟼 伪蟽胃蔚谓蔚委蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼; 螘尉苇蠁蟻伪味伪谓 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿喂魏维 渭喂伪 喂未蔚慰位慰纬喂魏萎 伪蟺蔚喂位萎 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 魏慰喂谓蠅谓委伪 蟿蠅谓 渭蔚蟿伪蟺慰位蔚渭喂魏蠋谓 蠂蟻蠈谓蠅谓; 韦慰 蟽蠀谓伪蟻蟺伪蟽蟿喂魏蠈 渭蠀胃喂蟽蟿蠈蟻畏渭伪 蟿畏蟼 螝伪蟿蔚蟻味委谓伪 韦慰蠉蟿蟽魏慰尾伪 尾蟻委胃蔚喂 渭伪纬蔚委伪蟼 魏伪喂 蟽蠀谓伪喂蟽胃畏渭维蟿蠅谓, 蔚谓蠋 蟽蠀纬蠂蟻蠈谓蠅蟼 蠁蠅蟿委味蔚喂 苇谓伪 渭苇蟻慰蟼 蟿畏蟼 蟺蟻慰蟽蔚魏蟿喂魏维 蟽蠀纬魏蔚魏伪位蠀渭渭苇谓畏蟼 蟿蟽蔚蠂喂魏萎蟼 喂蟽蟿慰蟻委伪蟼.
536 pages, Paperback
First published March 12, 2012
2905 people are currently reading
11377 people want to read
About the author
Kate艡ina Tu膷kov谩
30听books395听followersKate艡ina Tu膷kov谩 (nar. 1980) vystudovala d臎jiny um臎n铆 a bohemistiku na FF MU v Brn臎, v sou膷asn茅 dob臎 pracuje jako kur谩torka. Debutovala novelou Montespani谩da (2006), v roce 2009 vydala rom谩n Vyhn谩n铆 Gerty Schnirch, za kter媒 obdr啪ela cenu Magnesia Litera 2010 鈥� Kni啪n铆 klub Cena 膷ten谩艡暖 a byla nominov谩na na Cenu Josefa 艩kvoreck茅ho, Magnesii Literu za pr贸zu a Cenu Ji艡铆ho Ortena. Je autorkou n臎kolika odborn媒ch publikac铆 z oblasti 膷esk茅ho v媒tvarn茅ho um臎n铆, na pomez铆 historie a kr谩sn茅 literatury se pohybuje beletrizovan媒 啪ivotopis M暖j otec Kamil Lhot谩k (2008).
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 720 reviews
May 10, 2025
乇賵丕賷丞 賲毓丕丿賱丞 賱丿乇噩丞 丿賰鬲賵乇丕賴 亘賲乇鬲亘丞 丕賱卮乇賮 丕賱兀賵賱賶
賱賲 賱丕... 賵丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 鬲噩乇亘丞 賲毓乇賮賷丞
乇丨賱丞 廿丿乇丕賰
丕賱乇丨賱丞
氐毓亘丞 賴賷 賷丕 氐丿賷賯賷
丕賱乇丨賱丞 賱賷爻鬲 賮乇丿賷丞 賵廿賳 賰丕賳鬲
賱賷爻鬲 賱丨馗丞 氐丕賮賷丞
賱賷爻鬲 賳賯丕亍 賱賲 賷禺鬲賱胤 亘丕賱睾亘丕乇
賱賷爻鬲 卮乇丕毓丕 賲賳爻丕亘丕 賮賷 噩乇賷丕賳 丕賱賵賯鬲 賵匕丕賰乇丞 丕賱丌禺乇賷賳 丕賱匕賷賳 賷賱賯賵賳賳丕 賲賳 爻賱賲 丕賱禺丿賲 賱賷鬲兀賳賯賵丕 丕爻鬲毓丿丕丿丕 賱禺丿丕毓 睾賷乇賳丕 賮賷 賲賯丕胤毓丕鬲 丕賱胤賲賵丨 乇睾亘丞 賮賷 賳卮賵丞 鬲爻賱胤 鬲丿丕乇賷 毓噩夭 丕賱乇賵丨
丕賱乇丨賱丞 賰亘丿 賵毓賳丕亍
賵丕賱丨賯丕卅賯 賲睾賱賮丞 亘廿丨賰丕賲 賮賷 乇賯丕卅賯 氐禺乇賷丞 賷噩賷丿 鬲毓亘卅鬲賴丕 鬲噩丕乇 丕賱兀 賵賴丕賲...
丨鬲賶 兀氐丨丕亘 丕賱兀賱賯丕亘 丕賱毓賱賲賷丞 丕賱賲鬲丿孬乇賷賳 亘丕賱兀乇賵丕亘...
丕賱賲爻鬲賳丿賷賳 賱兀亘賵丕亘 丕賱兀賰丕丿賷賲賷丞...
丕賱賲鬲噩賲賱賷賳 亘丿賷賰賵乇 丕賱賲乇丕噩毓...
賲丨丕氐乇賵賳 賮賷 丨噩乇丕鬲 囟賷賯丞...
賵丕賱乇賵丕賷丞...
鬲賰鬲亘 賰丕鬲乇賷賳丕 鬲賵鬲卮賰賵賮丕 毓賳 丕賱亘丨孬...
亘胤賱鬲賴丕 鬲賳賯亘 毓賳 鬲丕乇賷禺 賳爻丕亍 毓丕卅賱丞 賲賵氐賵賲丞 亘丕賱爻丨乇 賵丕賱噩賳賵賳...
賳爻丕亍 噩賷鬲賰賵賮丕 賷鬲賵丕乇孬賳 禺亘乇丕鬲 賲丨賱賷丞 賮賷 丨賱 丕賱賲卮丕賰賱...
賵賱毓賳丞 鬲鬲丕亘毓賴 賵鬲賱賯賶 亘賴賳 賮賷 丕賱爻噩賵賳 賵丕賱賲氐丨丕鬲...
鬲丕乇丞 亘丕爻賲 丕賱毓丿丕亍 賱賱丕卮鬲乇丕賰賷丞 賵丕爻鬲睾賱丕賱 孬乇賵丞 丕賱卮毓賵亘... 賮賴賳 賷爻鬲毓賲賱賳 丕賱兀毓卮丕亘...
賵鬲丕乇丞 賱兀賳賴賳 囟丿 丕賱毓賱賲 亘賲賮賴賵賲賴 丕賱乇兀爻賲丕賱賷 丕賱賲丐爻爻賷 丕賱丕賯鬲氐丕丿賷...
鬲亘丨孬 亘胤賱丞 爻丕丨乇丕鬲 噩賷鬲賰賵賮丕 毓賳 丕賱兀賲賴丕鬲 賵丕賱禺丕賱丕鬲 賵丕賱噩丿丕鬲 毓亘乇 兀噩賷丕賱...
賵鬲賰鬲卮賮 兀賳 賴賳丕賰 賲賳 爻賲賲 丨賷丕鬲賴賳 賵爻賲毓鬲賴賳...
賯丕丿賴丕 丕賱亘丨孬 賱賲乇丕噩毓 丕賱毓賱賲丕亍 賵賲賱賮丕鬲 丕賱賯囟丕賷丕 賵夭賷丕乇丞 丕賱毓噩丕卅夭...
兀禺匕鬲 鬲賲囟賷 亘賷賳 丕賱賲乇賵賷丕鬲 丕賱賲鬲賳丕孬乇丞 賵丕賱賲亘鬲賵乇丞...
丕賱賰丕匕亘丞 丕賱賲賵鬲賵乇丞...
丕賱賲爻鬲乇爻賱丞 賵丕賱賲亘鬲賵乇丞...
丕賱賲亘丕丨丞 賵丕賱賲賲賳賵毓丞...
賱賰賷 賷氐賱 丕賱匕賴賳 廿賱賶 丨賯賷賯丞 毓賱賲賷丞 賮賷 乇爻丕賱丞 噩丕賲毓賷丞...
賱賰賳賴丕 賮囟賱鬲 兀賳 賷氐賱 丕賱丨丿爻 賱廿丿乇丕賰 卮毓賵乇賷 賮賷 乇賵丕賷丞...
丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賴賷 丕賱賵噩賴 丕賱廿亘丿丕毓賷 丕賱丨乇 賱賱鬲丨賯賷賯 賵丕賱亘丨孬 丕賱毓賱賲賷 賵丕賱鬲丕乇賷禺... 鬲丨鬲丕噩 賱噩賴丿 賲毓乇賮賷 賱丕 賷賯賱 亘丨丕賱 賲賳 丕賱兀丨賵丕賱 毓賳 賲乇丕噩毓 賲賵爻賵毓丞 賲丨賷胤丞 亘賰孬賷乇 賲賳 丕賱賲毓丕乇賮 賵丕賱孬賯丕賮丕鬲...
賴賰匕丕 賯丿賲鬲 賰丕鬲乇卮賷賳丕 鬲賵鬲卮賰賵賮丕 爻乇丿賷丕鬲賴丕 丕賱賲卮丨賵賳丞 亘丕賱禺亘乇丕鬲 丕賱鬲丕乇賷禺賷丞 賱賲賳胤賯丞 賱賲 鬲爻鬲賰卮賮 賮賷 丕賱爻乇丿賷丕鬲 丕賱毓乇亘賷丞.
乇賵丕賷丞 爻丕丨乇丕鬲 噩賷鬲賰賵賮丕 賳賲賵匕噩 賱鬲賷丕乇 丕賱鬲丕乇賷禺賷丞 丕賱噩丿賷丿丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲爻鬲賰卮賮 賲丕 兀賴賲賱賴 丕賱賲丐乇禺賵賳 賱兀賳賴 賱丕 賷禺囟毓 賱賲毓賱賵賲丕鬲 鬲賲 丕賱鬲賵賯賷毓 毓賱賷賴丕 賲賳 丕賱賲鬲氐丕乇毓賷賳 毓賱賶 賮乇囟 丕賱賳賮賵匕.
賰賲 賲賳 丕賱賳丕爻 乇丕丨鬲 囟丨丕賷丕 賳夭賵丕鬲 丕賱丨賲賯賶 賵睾亘丕亍 丕賱噩賴賱丕亍貙 賲賳賴賲 賳爻丕亍 鬲賱賰 丕賱賲賳胤賯丞 丕賱睾丕乇賯丞 亘賷賳 丕賱爻丨乇 賵丕賱毓賱賲 賵丕賱兀賷丿賷 賱賵噩賷丕貙 賲毓匕乇丞 賲毓馗賲 賲賳丕胤賯 丕賱毓丕賱賲 賰匕賱賰貙 胤亘賯丕鬲 噩賷賵賱賵噩賷丞 鬲賳囟丨 亘丕賱兀賳孬乇賵亘賵賱賵噩賷丕 丕賱爻丨賷賯丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷賵馗賮賴丕 賰賱 賱兀睾乇丕囟賴貙 丕賱賲亘丿毓 賱賷爻 亘毓賷丿丕 毓賳 丕賱賱毓亘丞 賮賱賴 兀賵乇丕賯賴 兀賷囟丕貙 賵賴賷 噩賲賷賱丞 賵毓賲賷賯丞 賲孬賱 兀賵乇丕賯 賰丕鬲乇賷賳丕 鬲賵鬲卮賰賵賮丕貙 丕賱鬲賷 爻乇丿鬲 賳賲賵匕噩丕 賱賱亘丨孬 毓賳 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞 亘丕賱毓賱賲 賵丕賱賮賳 賵丕賱賵孬丕卅賯 丕賱賲鬲禺賷賱丞.
廿賳 乇丨賱丞 丕爻鬲賯氐丕亍 丕賱丨賯丕卅賯 賲賳 賲鬲乇丿賲 丕賱賵賴賲 賴賷 賯囟賷丞 丕賱爻乇丿 丕賱賷賵賲.
鬲丨賷丞 賱賱賲鬲乇噩賲丞 廿賷賲丕賳 廿爻賲丕毓賷賱 爻賱丕爻丞 賯賱賲賴丕 賵鬲賲丕賴賷賴丕 賲毓 氐賵鬲 丕賱賲乇兀丞 丕賱兀禺乇賶 賵賲丨丕賵賱鬲賴丕 鬲賳賵賷毓 丕賱兀爻賱賵亘 亘賲丕 賷賳丕爻亘 丕賱賲丨鬲賵賶 丕賱爻乇丿賷 丕賱賲賳氐亘 賮賷 卮賰賱 禺丕氐 丿丕禺賱 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賵爻毓賷賴丕 賱乇氐丿 丕賱賰賲 丕賱賲毓乇賮賷 賮賷 丕賱毓賲賱.
賵禺賱丕氐丞 丕賱賯賵賱 賮賷 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 兀賳賴丕 毓賲賱 噩丕丿 賲乇賴賯 賱賱賰丕鬲亘丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲爻賷乇 毓賱賶 胤乇賷賯 丕賱鬲賮賵賯 亘賲丕 鬲亘匕賱賴 賲賳 賲鬲丕亘毓丞 亘丨孬賷丞 賱賲賵囟賵毓賴丕 賵鬲賳賵賷毓丕鬲 賮賷 丕賱卮賰賱 丕賱爻乇丿賷
賱賲 賱丕... 賵丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 鬲噩乇亘丞 賲毓乇賮賷丞
乇丨賱丞 廿丿乇丕賰
丕賱乇丨賱丞
氐毓亘丞 賴賷 賷丕 氐丿賷賯賷
丕賱乇丨賱丞 賱賷爻鬲 賮乇丿賷丞 賵廿賳 賰丕賳鬲
賱賷爻鬲 賱丨馗丞 氐丕賮賷丞
賱賷爻鬲 賳賯丕亍 賱賲 賷禺鬲賱胤 亘丕賱睾亘丕乇
賱賷爻鬲 卮乇丕毓丕 賲賳爻丕亘丕 賮賷 噩乇賷丕賳 丕賱賵賯鬲 賵匕丕賰乇丞 丕賱丌禺乇賷賳 丕賱匕賷賳 賷賱賯賵賳賳丕 賲賳 爻賱賲 丕賱禺丿賲 賱賷鬲兀賳賯賵丕 丕爻鬲毓丿丕丿丕 賱禺丿丕毓 睾賷乇賳丕 賮賷 賲賯丕胤毓丕鬲 丕賱胤賲賵丨 乇睾亘丞 賮賷 賳卮賵丞 鬲爻賱胤 鬲丿丕乇賷 毓噩夭 丕賱乇賵丨
丕賱乇丨賱丞 賰亘丿 賵毓賳丕亍
賵丕賱丨賯丕卅賯 賲睾賱賮丞 亘廿丨賰丕賲 賮賷 乇賯丕卅賯 氐禺乇賷丞 賷噩賷丿 鬲毓亘卅鬲賴丕 鬲噩丕乇 丕賱兀 賵賴丕賲...
丨鬲賶 兀氐丨丕亘 丕賱兀賱賯丕亘 丕賱毓賱賲賷丞 丕賱賲鬲丿孬乇賷賳 亘丕賱兀乇賵丕亘...
丕賱賲爻鬲賳丿賷賳 賱兀亘賵丕亘 丕賱兀賰丕丿賷賲賷丞...
丕賱賲鬲噩賲賱賷賳 亘丿賷賰賵乇 丕賱賲乇丕噩毓...
賲丨丕氐乇賵賳 賮賷 丨噩乇丕鬲 囟賷賯丞...
賵丕賱乇賵丕賷丞...
鬲賰鬲亘 賰丕鬲乇賷賳丕 鬲賵鬲卮賰賵賮丕 毓賳 丕賱亘丨孬...
亘胤賱鬲賴丕 鬲賳賯亘 毓賳 鬲丕乇賷禺 賳爻丕亍 毓丕卅賱丞 賲賵氐賵賲丞 亘丕賱爻丨乇 賵丕賱噩賳賵賳...
賳爻丕亍 噩賷鬲賰賵賮丕 賷鬲賵丕乇孬賳 禺亘乇丕鬲 賲丨賱賷丞 賮賷 丨賱 丕賱賲卮丕賰賱...
賵賱毓賳丞 鬲鬲丕亘毓賴 賵鬲賱賯賶 亘賴賳 賮賷 丕賱爻噩賵賳 賵丕賱賲氐丨丕鬲...
鬲丕乇丞 亘丕爻賲 丕賱毓丿丕亍 賱賱丕卮鬲乇丕賰賷丞 賵丕爻鬲睾賱丕賱 孬乇賵丞 丕賱卮毓賵亘... 賮賴賳 賷爻鬲毓賲賱賳 丕賱兀毓卮丕亘...
賵鬲丕乇丞 賱兀賳賴賳 囟丿 丕賱毓賱賲 亘賲賮賴賵賲賴 丕賱乇兀爻賲丕賱賷 丕賱賲丐爻爻賷 丕賱丕賯鬲氐丕丿賷...
鬲亘丨孬 亘胤賱丞 爻丕丨乇丕鬲 噩賷鬲賰賵賮丕 毓賳 丕賱兀賲賴丕鬲 賵丕賱禺丕賱丕鬲 賵丕賱噩丿丕鬲 毓亘乇 兀噩賷丕賱...
賵鬲賰鬲卮賮 兀賳 賴賳丕賰 賲賳 爻賲賲 丨賷丕鬲賴賳 賵爻賲毓鬲賴賳...
賯丕丿賴丕 丕賱亘丨孬 賱賲乇丕噩毓 丕賱毓賱賲丕亍 賵賲賱賮丕鬲 丕賱賯囟丕賷丕 賵夭賷丕乇丞 丕賱毓噩丕卅夭...
兀禺匕鬲 鬲賲囟賷 亘賷賳 丕賱賲乇賵賷丕鬲 丕賱賲鬲賳丕孬乇丞 賵丕賱賲亘鬲賵乇丞...
丕賱賰丕匕亘丞 丕賱賲賵鬲賵乇丞...
丕賱賲爻鬲乇爻賱丞 賵丕賱賲亘鬲賵乇丞...
丕賱賲亘丕丨丞 賵丕賱賲賲賳賵毓丞...
賱賰賷 賷氐賱 丕賱匕賴賳 廿賱賶 丨賯賷賯丞 毓賱賲賷丞 賮賷 乇爻丕賱丞 噩丕賲毓賷丞...
賱賰賳賴丕 賮囟賱鬲 兀賳 賷氐賱 丕賱丨丿爻 賱廿丿乇丕賰 卮毓賵乇賷 賮賷 乇賵丕賷丞...
丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賴賷 丕賱賵噩賴 丕賱廿亘丿丕毓賷 丕賱丨乇 賱賱鬲丨賯賷賯 賵丕賱亘丨孬 丕賱毓賱賲賷 賵丕賱鬲丕乇賷禺... 鬲丨鬲丕噩 賱噩賴丿 賲毓乇賮賷 賱丕 賷賯賱 亘丨丕賱 賲賳 丕賱兀丨賵丕賱 毓賳 賲乇丕噩毓 賲賵爻賵毓丞 賲丨賷胤丞 亘賰孬賷乇 賲賳 丕賱賲毓丕乇賮 賵丕賱孬賯丕賮丕鬲...
賴賰匕丕 賯丿賲鬲 賰丕鬲乇卮賷賳丕 鬲賵鬲卮賰賵賮丕 爻乇丿賷丕鬲賴丕 丕賱賲卮丨賵賳丞 亘丕賱禺亘乇丕鬲 丕賱鬲丕乇賷禺賷丞 賱賲賳胤賯丞 賱賲 鬲爻鬲賰卮賮 賮賷 丕賱爻乇丿賷丕鬲 丕賱毓乇亘賷丞.
乇賵丕賷丞 爻丕丨乇丕鬲 噩賷鬲賰賵賮丕 賳賲賵匕噩 賱鬲賷丕乇 丕賱鬲丕乇賷禺賷丞 丕賱噩丿賷丿丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲爻鬲賰卮賮 賲丕 兀賴賲賱賴 丕賱賲丐乇禺賵賳 賱兀賳賴 賱丕 賷禺囟毓 賱賲毓賱賵賲丕鬲 鬲賲 丕賱鬲賵賯賷毓 毓賱賷賴丕 賲賳 丕賱賲鬲氐丕乇毓賷賳 毓賱賶 賮乇囟 丕賱賳賮賵匕.
賰賲 賲賳 丕賱賳丕爻 乇丕丨鬲 囟丨丕賷丕 賳夭賵丕鬲 丕賱丨賲賯賶 賵睾亘丕亍 丕賱噩賴賱丕亍貙 賲賳賴賲 賳爻丕亍 鬲賱賰 丕賱賲賳胤賯丞 丕賱睾丕乇賯丞 亘賷賳 丕賱爻丨乇 賵丕賱毓賱賲 賵丕賱兀賷丿賷 賱賵噩賷丕貙 賲毓匕乇丞 賲毓馗賲 賲賳丕胤賯 丕賱毓丕賱賲 賰匕賱賰貙 胤亘賯丕鬲 噩賷賵賱賵噩賷丞 鬲賳囟丨 亘丕賱兀賳孬乇賵亘賵賱賵噩賷丕 丕賱爻丨賷賯丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷賵馗賮賴丕 賰賱 賱兀睾乇丕囟賴貙 丕賱賲亘丿毓 賱賷爻 亘毓賷丿丕 毓賳 丕賱賱毓亘丞 賮賱賴 兀賵乇丕賯賴 兀賷囟丕貙 賵賴賷 噩賲賷賱丞 賵毓賲賷賯丞 賲孬賱 兀賵乇丕賯 賰丕鬲乇賷賳丕 鬲賵鬲卮賰賵賮丕貙 丕賱鬲賷 爻乇丿鬲 賳賲賵匕噩丕 賱賱亘丨孬 毓賳 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞 亘丕賱毓賱賲 賵丕賱賮賳 賵丕賱賵孬丕卅賯 丕賱賲鬲禺賷賱丞.
廿賳 乇丨賱丞 丕爻鬲賯氐丕亍 丕賱丨賯丕卅賯 賲賳 賲鬲乇丿賲 丕賱賵賴賲 賴賷 賯囟賷丞 丕賱爻乇丿 丕賱賷賵賲.
鬲丨賷丞 賱賱賲鬲乇噩賲丞 廿賷賲丕賳 廿爻賲丕毓賷賱 爻賱丕爻丞 賯賱賲賴丕 賵鬲賲丕賴賷賴丕 賲毓 氐賵鬲 丕賱賲乇兀丞 丕賱兀禺乇賶 賵賲丨丕賵賱鬲賴丕 鬲賳賵賷毓 丕賱兀爻賱賵亘 亘賲丕 賷賳丕爻亘 丕賱賲丨鬲賵賶 丕賱爻乇丿賷 丕賱賲賳氐亘 賮賷 卮賰賱 禺丕氐 丿丕禺賱 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賵爻毓賷賴丕 賱乇氐丿 丕賱賰賲 丕賱賲毓乇賮賷 賮賷 丕賱毓賲賱.
賵禺賱丕氐丞 丕賱賯賵賱 賮賷 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 兀賳賴丕 毓賲賱 噩丕丿 賲乇賴賯 賱賱賰丕鬲亘丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲爻賷乇 毓賱賶 胤乇賷賯 丕賱鬲賮賵賯 亘賲丕 鬲亘匕賱賴 賲賳 賲鬲丕亘毓丞 亘丨孬賷丞 賱賲賵囟賵毓賴丕 賵鬲賳賵賷毓丕鬲 賮賷 丕賱卮賰賱 丕賱爻乇丿賷
December 10, 2021
Madre m铆a este libro es super extra帽o. Hay cosas que me han encantado y otras con las que no he conectado para nada...
Yo pensaba que conocer铆amos la vida de varias diosas de los C谩rpatos Blancos (curanderas, herboristas... 隆brujas!), pero en realidad vamos a seguir la investigaci贸n de Dora, la 煤ltima de la estirpe (y que no ha heredado sus poderes ni ejercido como diosa) sobre el pasado de su t铆a.
El libro, que est谩 escrito de una manera muy amena y directa es verdad que choca frontalmente con la cantidad de informes que la propia Dora va encontrando y que ahondan en la figura de las diosas. Estas partes, especialmente al principio, llegaron a hac茅rseme un poco pesadas, pero r谩pidamente la historia vuelve a coger ritmo.
El tema es que es un libro que va de maldiciones, investigaciones y oscuros giros del destino, mientras que yo me esperaba costumbrismo y folklore. Hay algo de esto, pero no mucho. Como digo, lo principal son las pesquisas de Dora y c贸mo va descubriendo el pasado de su propia familia que se ve enredada en las investigaciones tanto de nazis como de los comunistas.
En general es un libro que me ha gustado y especialmente me ha sorprendido mucho, porque para nada esperaba que fuera a tomar los derroteros que tom贸... pero al mismo tiempo es tan tr谩gico todo en 茅l que me result贸 un "poco DEMASIADO" para mi gusto.
A煤n as铆, una lectura original y sorprendente que creo que voy a estar una buena temporada rumiando, lo cual es m谩s que positivo.
Yo pensaba que conocer铆amos la vida de varias diosas de los C谩rpatos Blancos (curanderas, herboristas... 隆brujas!), pero en realidad vamos a seguir la investigaci贸n de Dora, la 煤ltima de la estirpe (y que no ha heredado sus poderes ni ejercido como diosa) sobre el pasado de su t铆a.
El libro, que est谩 escrito de una manera muy amena y directa es verdad que choca frontalmente con la cantidad de informes que la propia Dora va encontrando y que ahondan en la figura de las diosas. Estas partes, especialmente al principio, llegaron a hac茅rseme un poco pesadas, pero r谩pidamente la historia vuelve a coger ritmo.
El tema es que es un libro que va de maldiciones, investigaciones y oscuros giros del destino, mientras que yo me esperaba costumbrismo y folklore. Hay algo de esto, pero no mucho. Como digo, lo principal son las pesquisas de Dora y c贸mo va descubriendo el pasado de su propia familia que se ve enredada en las investigaciones tanto de nazis como de los comunistas.
En general es un libro que me ha gustado y especialmente me ha sorprendido mucho, porque para nada esperaba que fuera a tomar los derroteros que tom贸... pero al mismo tiempo es tan tr谩gico todo en 茅l que me result贸 un "poco DEMASIADO" para mi gusto.
A煤n as铆, una lectura original y sorprendente que creo que voy a estar una buena temporada rumiando, lo cual es m谩s que positivo.
March 19, 2021
鈥溫� 匕賱賰 丕賱匕賷 賷爻鬲賯乇卅 丕賱睾賷亘貙 賱丕 賷爻鬲胤賷毓 丕賱賮賰丕賰 賲賳 兀賯丿丕乇賴!鈥�.
賰丕鬲乇卮賷賳丕 鬲賵鬲卮賰賵賮丕.
May 12, 2022
Streghe queer, folklore slavo, societ脿 matriarcali dimenticate dalla storia europea, il tutto鈥攊ncredibilmente鈥攂asato su una storia vera.
Devo dire altro?
Devo dire altro?
March 30, 2012
Je to teprve p谩r t媒dn暖, co jsem se dozv臎d臎l, 啪e maj铆 vyj铆t 沤铆tkovsk茅 bohyn臎 鈥� kniha mlad茅 (jen o p暖l roku star拧铆 ne啪 jsem j谩!) autorky Katky Tu膷kov茅. Kdysi jsem 膷etl jej铆 Vyhn谩n铆 Gerty Schnirch, ale nedo膷etl a v暖bec si u啪 nepamatuju pro膷 鈥� pro膷 na mne ta kniha neud臎lala 啪谩dn媒 dojem. Kdy啪 jsem dostal Bohyn臎 do ruky, povzdechl jsem si. P艡es 膷ty艡i sta stran. Ale pustil jsem se do 膷ten铆 鈥� a doufal jsem, 啪e to p艡e啪iju ve zdrav铆.
Prvn铆ch p谩r str谩nek jsem si moc neu啪铆val. Vlastn臎 m臎 to ani nebavilo. Mo啪n谩 jsem to 膷etl ve 拧patnou dobu, mo啪n谩 jsem m臎l my拧lenky v m铆st臎, kter茅 膷ten铆 neprosp铆valo. Myslel jsem na lidi, kte艡铆 odch谩zej铆 z m茅ho 啪ivota, byl jsem smutn媒 za mou milovanou tetu, kter谩 um铆rala v nemocnici 鈥� prost臎 my拧lenek, kter茅 膷ten铆 nepom谩haly, bylo a啪 moc.
Pak se ale p艡铆b臎h rozb臎hl, stejn臎 jako Dora z p艡铆b臎hu b臎hala po kopanick媒ch str谩n铆ch. Rozb臎hl se rychle a svou intenzitou, p暖vabem a zaj铆mavost铆 probudil m暖j 膷ten谩艡sk媒 z谩jem. Za膷al jsem hltat rozpl茅taj铆c铆 se klubko osud暖 啪铆tkovsk媒ch l茅膷itelek a v臎dem, kter茅 se pro jejich 鈥渂ohov谩n铆鈥� 艡铆kalo 鈥溑矫璽kovsk茅 bohyn臎鈥�. Ani jsem si neuv臎domil, kolik je hodin, sed臎l jsem v kav谩rn臎 nad capuccinem, kter茅 se d谩vno nedalo p铆t, ale j谩 膷etl a 膷etl.
Autorka 鈥� Kate艡ina Tu膷kov谩 鈥� n臎kolik let pracovala na tom, aby rom谩nu dala siln媒 faktografick媒 z谩klad. Studovala zdroje a rozjela se do m铆st, kde se p艡铆b臎h odehr谩val a kde dodnes 啪ij铆 lid茅, kte艡铆 啪铆tkovsk茅 bohyn臎 pamatuj铆. Sb铆rala p艡铆b臎hy a nas谩vala atmosf茅ru 鈥� a vytvo艡ila rom谩n, kter媒 je stejn臎 tak obrovsk媒, jako je n臎啪n媒. Obrovsk媒 ve v媒znamu, kter媒 m谩: p铆拧e o vym艡el茅 tradici, kter谩 se stovky let p艡ed谩vala z matek na dcery, aby ve druh茅 polovin臎 20. stolet铆 do膷ista zem艡ela. P铆拧e o tom, jak se na bohyn臎 v minulosti po艡谩da
ly 鈥渉ony na 膷arod臎jnice鈥� 鈥� 膷ast臎ji motivovan铆 sp铆拧e osobn铆mi d暖vody, ne啪 ideologi铆 a v铆rou. A n臎啪n媒 je rom谩n t铆m, jak vykresluje sv茅 啪ensk茅 hrdinky 鈥� jako 啪eny siln茅 i k艡ehk茅 z谩rove艌. Paradoxn臎 pro m臎 nebyla nejzaj铆mav臎j拧铆 postavou bohyn臎 Surmena, kolem kter茅 se to cel茅 mot谩, ale vyprav臎膷ka Dora a jej铆 osobn铆 tajemstv铆, jej铆 osobn铆 啪ivot. Objevuje sv茅 pouto k d谩vn茅 tradici, navzdory tomu, 啪e se v n铆 rozhodla nepokra膷ovat a vlastn臎 tak st谩la u konce kopanick茅ho bohov谩n铆.
Psal jsem o tom, 啪e kniha m谩 siln媒 faktografick媒 z谩klad. T臎ch teoretick媒ch pas谩啪铆 tam je hodn臎 鈥� hlavn臎 se mi zd谩lo, 啪e p艡edev拧铆m na za膷谩tku druh茅 poloviny p艡eb铆raj铆 vl谩du nad p艡铆b臎hem. T茅ma je zaj铆mav茅 a tak v谩s nudit nebude, ale kdo je la膷n媒 po p艡铆b臎hu, mus铆 si od n臎j na chv铆li odpo膷inout. Tato 鈥渁kademi膷nost鈥�, jak se to d谩 nazvat, je akor谩t tak na hranici, aby p艡铆b臎hu nep艡ek谩啪ela.
Je ale pot艡eba, aby v t茅to recenzi zazn臎la siln谩 slova. U啪 n臎kolik let jsem se nesetkal s 膷eskou knihou, kter谩 by na mne zap暖sobila tak siln臎, jako 沤铆tkovsk茅 bohyn臎 Kate艡iny Tu膷kov茅. Jejich atmosf茅ra se (ale to je d铆ky prost艡ed铆, ve kter茅m se odehr谩vaj铆) bl铆啪铆 knize 沤elary Kv臎ty Leg谩tov茅 a v臎艡te mi, 啪e v谩s pohlt铆 stejn臎 tak, jako m臎. Kate艡ina Tu膷kov谩 napsala obrovskou knihu 鈥� ne rozsahem a v媒znamem, ale silou sv茅ho p艡铆b臎hu. Vyn谩拧铆 na sv臎tlo Bo啪铆 postupn臎 zapom铆nan媒 folklor, umrtv臎lou tradici, kter谩 sama o sob臎 m暖啪e b媒t dost siln谩 na rom谩n. Kdy啪 k tomu p艡id谩me dal拧铆 prvky p艡铆b臎hu, m谩me p艡ed sebou jednu z nejlep拧铆ch knih, kter谩 u n谩s vy拧la za posledn铆ch n臎kolik let. Kate艡ina Tu膷kov谩 je mlad谩 autorka, ale napsala obrovsk媒 rom谩n hodn媒 velk媒ch jmen d臎jin 膷esko-slovensk茅 literatury.
Je to z谩啪itek, kter媒 byste si nem臎li nechat uj铆t.
Prvn铆ch p谩r str谩nek jsem si moc neu啪铆val. Vlastn臎 m臎 to ani nebavilo. Mo啪n谩 jsem to 膷etl ve 拧patnou dobu, mo啪n谩 jsem m臎l my拧lenky v m铆st臎, kter茅 膷ten铆 neprosp铆valo. Myslel jsem na lidi, kte艡铆 odch谩zej铆 z m茅ho 啪ivota, byl jsem smutn媒 za mou milovanou tetu, kter谩 um铆rala v nemocnici 鈥� prost臎 my拧lenek, kter茅 膷ten铆 nepom谩haly, bylo a啪 moc.
Pak se ale p艡铆b臎h rozb臎hl, stejn臎 jako Dora z p艡铆b臎hu b臎hala po kopanick媒ch str谩n铆ch. Rozb臎hl se rychle a svou intenzitou, p暖vabem a zaj铆mavost铆 probudil m暖j 膷ten谩艡sk媒 z谩jem. Za膷al jsem hltat rozpl茅taj铆c铆 se klubko osud暖 啪铆tkovsk媒ch l茅膷itelek a v臎dem, kter茅 se pro jejich 鈥渂ohov谩n铆鈥� 艡铆kalo 鈥溑矫璽kovsk茅 bohyn臎鈥�. Ani jsem si neuv臎domil, kolik je hodin, sed臎l jsem v kav谩rn臎 nad capuccinem, kter茅 se d谩vno nedalo p铆t, ale j谩 膷etl a 膷etl.
Autorka 鈥� Kate艡ina Tu膷kov谩 鈥� n臎kolik let pracovala na tom, aby rom谩nu dala siln媒 faktografick媒 z谩klad. Studovala zdroje a rozjela se do m铆st, kde se p艡铆b臎h odehr谩val a kde dodnes 啪ij铆 lid茅, kte艡铆 啪铆tkovsk茅 bohyn臎 pamatuj铆. Sb铆rala p艡铆b臎hy a nas谩vala atmosf茅ru 鈥� a vytvo艡ila rom谩n, kter媒 je stejn臎 tak obrovsk媒, jako je n臎啪n媒. Obrovsk媒 ve v媒znamu, kter媒 m谩: p铆拧e o vym艡el茅 tradici, kter谩 se stovky let p艡ed谩vala z matek na dcery, aby ve druh茅 polovin臎 20. stolet铆 do膷ista zem艡ela. P铆拧e o tom, jak se na bohyn臎 v minulosti po艡谩da
ly 鈥渉ony na 膷arod臎jnice鈥� 鈥� 膷ast臎ji motivovan铆 sp铆拧e osobn铆mi d暖vody, ne啪 ideologi铆 a v铆rou. A n臎啪n媒 je rom谩n t铆m, jak vykresluje sv茅 啪ensk茅 hrdinky 鈥� jako 啪eny siln茅 i k艡ehk茅 z谩rove艌. Paradoxn臎 pro m臎 nebyla nejzaj铆mav臎j拧铆 postavou bohyn臎 Surmena, kolem kter茅 se to cel茅 mot谩, ale vyprav臎膷ka Dora a jej铆 osobn铆 tajemstv铆, jej铆 osobn铆 啪ivot. Objevuje sv茅 pouto k d谩vn茅 tradici, navzdory tomu, 啪e se v n铆 rozhodla nepokra膷ovat a vlastn臎 tak st谩la u konce kopanick茅ho bohov谩n铆.
Psal jsem o tom, 啪e kniha m谩 siln媒 faktografick媒 z谩klad. T臎ch teoretick媒ch pas谩啪铆 tam je hodn臎 鈥� hlavn臎 se mi zd谩lo, 啪e p艡edev拧铆m na za膷谩tku druh茅 poloviny p艡eb铆raj铆 vl谩du nad p艡铆b臎hem. T茅ma je zaj铆mav茅 a tak v谩s nudit nebude, ale kdo je la膷n媒 po p艡铆b臎hu, mus铆 si od n臎j na chv铆li odpo膷inout. Tato 鈥渁kademi膷nost鈥�, jak se to d谩 nazvat, je akor谩t tak na hranici, aby p艡铆b臎hu nep艡ek谩啪ela.
Je ale pot艡eba, aby v t茅to recenzi zazn臎la siln谩 slova. U啪 n臎kolik let jsem se nesetkal s 膷eskou knihou, kter谩 by na mne zap暖sobila tak siln臎, jako 沤铆tkovsk茅 bohyn臎 Kate艡iny Tu膷kov茅. Jejich atmosf茅ra se (ale to je d铆ky prost艡ed铆, ve kter茅m se odehr谩vaj铆) bl铆啪铆 knize 沤elary Kv臎ty Leg谩tov茅 a v臎艡te mi, 啪e v谩s pohlt铆 stejn臎 tak, jako m臎. Kate艡ina Tu膷kov谩 napsala obrovskou knihu 鈥� ne rozsahem a v媒znamem, ale silou sv茅ho p艡铆b臎hu. Vyn谩拧铆 na sv臎tlo Bo啪铆 postupn臎 zapom铆nan媒 folklor, umrtv臎lou tradici, kter谩 sama o sob臎 m暖啪e b媒t dost siln谩 na rom谩n. Kdy啪 k tomu p艡id谩me dal拧铆 prvky p艡铆b臎hu, m谩me p艡ed sebou jednu z nejlep拧铆ch knih, kter谩 u n谩s vy拧la za posledn铆ch n臎kolik let. Kate艡ina Tu膷kov谩 je mlad谩 autorka, ale napsala obrovsk媒 rom谩n hodn媒 velk媒ch jmen d臎jin 膷esko-slovensk茅 literatury.
Je to z谩啪itek, kter媒 byste si nem臎li nechat uj铆t.
April 4, 2022
Whoo, boy. LOTS of stuff going on in my brain about The Last Goddess; had to sleep on it before attempting to put pen to paper, so to speak.
First of all, this was a _very_ grim book. The thought that is stuck in my mind is, "Man's inhumanity to man." (Man being non-gender specific, in this instance.)
Second, it was a very interesting and well-written book.....for the most part. Somewhere toward the end things got somewhat convoluted-y (a pet peeve), so much so that I went back and reread the last few chapters again this morning to make sure I wasn't mis-remembering things. Nope. Kate艡ina Tu膷kov谩 didn't present things in as straightforward a manner as she had in previous sections of the book. So, I was left wondering about why certain people had it out for certain of the goddesses; what all really was going on with those Third Reichers; who murdered a primary character and why; and what the family lineage of the last researcher really was.
I dunno, maybe if I could have read this in Czech it would have made more sense? Or, maybe it wasn't all supposed to make sense, because of the mind games the State Police played on people, and because of the mysteries inherent in the universe?
I went looking for reviews that might help me understand more, but couldn't find any. In English, at least. Help me out if you can!
PS
Got this as my "free" Amazon Kindle read for April yesterday. This is going to sound weird [even for me], but I decided to go ahead and read it insteading of continuing on with my Swedish police procedural binge because somebody in the neighborhood was pressure washing their driveway and the noise was SO MADDENING that I didn't think I would be able to focus on a hard copy book. Also, I've read some pretty lame free Kindle books over the past years, so didn't have high expectations for The Last Goddess. Figured hey, I'll start this, go back and forth between it and social media and word games, won't get my feelings hurt if it's weak sauce and I want to walk away from it.
Well, it was most definitely _not_ weak sauce. In fact, were it not for my issues with those final chapters, I would've given it 4 stars.
PPS
I would not recommend this book to anyone who is not already interested both in the ancient traditions of female healers _and_ in what life was like in a Soviet Socialist Republic satellite country. I am, so it was right up my proverbial alley.
First of all, this was a _very_ grim book. The thought that is stuck in my mind is, "Man's inhumanity to man." (Man being non-gender specific, in this instance.)
Second, it was a very interesting and well-written book.....for the most part. Somewhere toward the end things got somewhat convoluted-y (a pet peeve), so much so that I went back and reread the last few chapters again this morning to make sure I wasn't mis-remembering things. Nope. Kate艡ina Tu膷kov谩 didn't present things in as straightforward a manner as she had in previous sections of the book. So, I was left wondering about why certain people had it out for certain of the goddesses; what all really was going on with those Third Reichers; who murdered a primary character and why; and what the family lineage of the last researcher really was.
I dunno, maybe if I could have read this in Czech it would have made more sense? Or, maybe it wasn't all supposed to make sense, because of the mind games the State Police played on people, and because of the mysteries inherent in the universe?
I went looking for reviews that might help me understand more, but couldn't find any. In English, at least. Help me out if you can!
PS
Got this as my "free" Amazon Kindle read for April yesterday. This is going to sound weird [even for me], but I decided to go ahead and read it insteading of continuing on with my Swedish police procedural binge because somebody in the neighborhood was pressure washing their driveway and the noise was SO MADDENING that I didn't think I would be able to focus on a hard copy book. Also, I've read some pretty lame free Kindle books over the past years, so didn't have high expectations for The Last Goddess. Figured hey, I'll start this, go back and forth between it and social media and word games, won't get my feelings hurt if it's weak sauce and I want to walk away from it.
Well, it was most definitely _not_ weak sauce. In fact, were it not for my issues with those final chapters, I would've given it 4 stars.
PPS
I would not recommend this book to anyone who is not already interested both in the ancient traditions of female healers _and_ in what life was like in a Soviet Socialist Republic satellite country. I am, so it was right up my proverbial alley.
November 21, 2019
螖蠀蟽蟿蠀蠂蠋蟼 2,5*
螠蔚 蟿慰 蟺慰蠀 蔚委未伪 蟿慰 蔚谓 位蠈纬蠅 尾喂尾位委慰 慰渭慰位慰纬蠋 蟺蠅蟼 伪渭苇蟽蠅蟼 渭慰蠀 魏苇谓蟿蟻喂蟽蔚 蟿慰 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰谓. 螆渭慰喂伪味蔚 伪蟻魏蔚蟿维 渭蔚 魏维蟿喂 蟺慰蠀 胃伪 渭慰蠀 维蟻蔚蟽蔚, 魏维蟿喂 蟺慰蠀 渭维位位慰谓 伪谓苇尾伪蟽蔚 蟿喂蟼 蟺蟻慰蟽未慰魏委蔚蟼 渭慰蠀 蟺喂慰 蟺维谓蠅 伪蟺蠈 蠈蟿喂 胃伪 苇蟺蟻蔚蟺蔚.
螢蔚魏委谓畏蟽蔚 魏伪位维 伪位位维 蟽蟿畏谓 蟺慰蟻蔚委伪 蠂维位伪蟽蔚...
螠蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 蔚委蠂蔚 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰谓 蟽伪谓 喂蟽蟿慰蟻委伪 伪位位维 伪蟻魏蔚蟿苇蟼 蠁慰蟻苇蟼 渭蔚 魏慰蠉蟻伪味蔚 魏伪喂 苇蟺喂伪谓伪 蟿慰谓 蔚伪蠀蟿蠈 渭慰蠀 谓伪 尾伪蟻喂苇蟿伪喂. 螘魏蔚委 蟺慰蠀 蟺萎纬伪喂谓蔚 谓伪 伪蟺慰魏蟿萎蟽蔚喂 尉伪谓维 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰谓 位委纬慰 蟺伪蟻伪魏维蟿蠅 尉伪谓伪苇蟺蔚蠁蟿伪谓 慰喂 蟻蠀胃渭慰委. 螣喂 伪蟻蠂蔚喂伪魏苇蟼 伪谓伪蠁慰蟻苇蟼 未蔚 魏伪喂 蟿伪 伪蟺慰蟽蟺维蟽渭伪蟿伪 伪蟺蠈 未喂维蠁慰蟻伪 苇纬纬蟻伪蠁伪 蟺慰蠀 蟺伪蟻蔚渭尾维位位慰谓蟿伪谓 未蔚谓 尾慰畏胃慰蠉蟽伪谓, 渭维位位慰谓 蔚委蠂伪谓 伪谓蟿委胃蔚蟿伪 伪蟺慰蟿蔚位苇蟽渭伪蟿伪, 蔚谓蠋 蠋蟻蔚蟼 蠋蟻蔚蟼 胃蠉渭喂味蔚 蟺蔚蟻喂蟽蟽蠈蟿蔚蟻慰 蟿畏谓 蔚尉喂蟽蟿蠈蟻畏蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 苇蟻蔚蠀谓伪蟼 蟺慰蠀 苇魏伪谓蔚 畏 蟽蠀纬纬蟻伪蠁苇伪蟼 蟺伪蟻维 渭蠀胃喂蟽蟿蠈蟻畏渭伪.
螆胃喂纬蔚 魏维蟺慰喂伪 蠅蟻伪委伪 胃苇渭伪蟿伪, 魏蠀蟻委蠅蟼 纬喂伪 蟿畏 未蠉谓伪渭畏 蟿畏蟼 蟺委蟽蟿畏蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 蔚蟺喂蟻蟻慰萎 蟿畏蟼 蟺维谓蠅 蟽蟿慰蠀蟼 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰蠀蟼 蔚谓蠋 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺维胃畏蟽蔚 谓伪 蟺伪委尉蔚喂 魏伪喂 渭蔚 蟿慰 蟿喂 蔚委谓伪喂 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿喂魏蠈 魏伪喂 蟿喂 蠈蠂喂, 伪位位维 魏伪蟿维 蟿畏 纬谓蠋渭畏 渭慰蠀 伪蟺苇蟿蠀蠂蔚 蟺伪蟿伪纬蠅未蠋蟼 胃蠀渭委味慰谓蟿维蟼 渭慰蠀 魏维蟿喂 蟿伪蠂蠀未伪魏蟿蠀位慰蠀蟻纬慰蠉蟼/未萎胃蔚谓 渭维纬慰蠀蟼 蟺慰蠀 伪谓蟿委 谓伪 蟽蔚 未喂伪蟽魏蔚未维味慰蠀谓 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺伪胃慰蠉谓 (伪蟺慰蟿蠀蠂畏渭苇谓伪) 谓伪 蟽蔚 鈥溝兾课何佄肯呂解€� 渭蔚 蟿伪 未萎胃蔚谓 渭伪纬喂魏维 蟿慰蠀蟼.
螒谓伪蟺蠈蠁蔚蠀魏蟿伪 蔚蟺委蟽畏蟼, 渭维位位慰谓 位蠈纬蠅 胃苇渭伪蟿慰蟼, 渭蔚蟻喂魏苇蟼 蠁慰蟻苇蟼 渭慰蠀 苇蟻蠂慰谓蟿伪谓 蟽蟿慰 渭蠀伪位蠈 慰喂 蟿畏蟼 Hannah Kent, 伪位位维 魏伪蟿' 蔚渭苇 慰蠉蟿蔚 魏伪蟿维 未喂维谓蠀伪 未蔚谓 谓慰渭委味蠅 蟺蠅蟼 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 蟿慰蠀蟼 蠁蟿维蟽蔚喂 蟿慰 蟽蠀纬魏蔚魏蟻喂渭苇谓慰.
螖蔚谓 萎蟿伪谓 魏伪魏蠈 蠀蟺慰胃苇蟿蠅,伪位位维 未蔚谓 萎蟿伪谓 伪蠀蟿蠈 蟺慰蠀 蔚纬蠋 萎胃蔚位伪 谓伪 未喂伪尾维蟽蠅.
螝蟻委渭伪, 纬喂伪蟿委 蔚委蠂蔚 蟺蟻慰慰蟺蟿喂魏苇蟼...
螠蔚 蟿慰 蟺慰蠀 蔚委未伪 蟿慰 蔚谓 位蠈纬蠅 尾喂尾位委慰 慰渭慰位慰纬蠋 蟺蠅蟼 伪渭苇蟽蠅蟼 渭慰蠀 魏苇谓蟿蟻喂蟽蔚 蟿慰 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰谓. 螆渭慰喂伪味蔚 伪蟻魏蔚蟿维 渭蔚 魏维蟿喂 蟺慰蠀 胃伪 渭慰蠀 维蟻蔚蟽蔚, 魏维蟿喂 蟺慰蠀 渭维位位慰谓 伪谓苇尾伪蟽蔚 蟿喂蟼 蟺蟻慰蟽未慰魏委蔚蟼 渭慰蠀 蟺喂慰 蟺维谓蠅 伪蟺蠈 蠈蟿喂 胃伪 苇蟺蟻蔚蟺蔚.
螢蔚魏委谓畏蟽蔚 魏伪位维 伪位位维 蟽蟿畏谓 蟺慰蟻蔚委伪 蠂维位伪蟽蔚...
螠蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 蔚委蠂蔚 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰谓 蟽伪谓 喂蟽蟿慰蟻委伪 伪位位维 伪蟻魏蔚蟿苇蟼 蠁慰蟻苇蟼 渭蔚 魏慰蠉蟻伪味蔚 魏伪喂 苇蟺喂伪谓伪 蟿慰谓 蔚伪蠀蟿蠈 渭慰蠀 谓伪 尾伪蟻喂苇蟿伪喂. 螘魏蔚委 蟺慰蠀 蟺萎纬伪喂谓蔚 谓伪 伪蟺慰魏蟿萎蟽蔚喂 尉伪谓维 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰谓 位委纬慰 蟺伪蟻伪魏维蟿蠅 尉伪谓伪苇蟺蔚蠁蟿伪谓 慰喂 蟻蠀胃渭慰委. 螣喂 伪蟻蠂蔚喂伪魏苇蟼 伪谓伪蠁慰蟻苇蟼 未蔚 魏伪喂 蟿伪 伪蟺慰蟽蟺维蟽渭伪蟿伪 伪蟺蠈 未喂维蠁慰蟻伪 苇纬纬蟻伪蠁伪 蟺慰蠀 蟺伪蟻蔚渭尾维位位慰谓蟿伪谓 未蔚谓 尾慰畏胃慰蠉蟽伪谓, 渭维位位慰谓 蔚委蠂伪谓 伪谓蟿委胃蔚蟿伪 伪蟺慰蟿蔚位苇蟽渭伪蟿伪, 蔚谓蠋 蠋蟻蔚蟼 蠋蟻蔚蟼 胃蠉渭喂味蔚 蟺蔚蟻喂蟽蟽蠈蟿蔚蟻慰 蟿畏谓 蔚尉喂蟽蟿蠈蟻畏蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 苇蟻蔚蠀谓伪蟼 蟺慰蠀 苇魏伪谓蔚 畏 蟽蠀纬纬蟻伪蠁苇伪蟼 蟺伪蟻维 渭蠀胃喂蟽蟿蠈蟻畏渭伪.
螆胃喂纬蔚 魏维蟺慰喂伪 蠅蟻伪委伪 胃苇渭伪蟿伪, 魏蠀蟻委蠅蟼 纬喂伪 蟿畏 未蠉谓伪渭畏 蟿畏蟼 蟺委蟽蟿畏蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 蔚蟺喂蟻蟻慰萎 蟿畏蟼 蟺维谓蠅 蟽蟿慰蠀蟼 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰蠀蟼 蔚谓蠋 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺维胃畏蟽蔚 谓伪 蟺伪委尉蔚喂 魏伪喂 渭蔚 蟿慰 蟿喂 蔚委谓伪喂 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿喂魏蠈 魏伪喂 蟿喂 蠈蠂喂, 伪位位维 魏伪蟿维 蟿畏 纬谓蠋渭畏 渭慰蠀 伪蟺苇蟿蠀蠂蔚 蟺伪蟿伪纬蠅未蠋蟼 胃蠀渭委味慰谓蟿维蟼 渭慰蠀 魏维蟿喂 蟿伪蠂蠀未伪魏蟿蠀位慰蠀蟻纬慰蠉蟼/未萎胃蔚谓 渭维纬慰蠀蟼 蟺慰蠀 伪谓蟿委 谓伪 蟽蔚 未喂伪蟽魏蔚未维味慰蠀谓 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺伪胃慰蠉谓 (伪蟺慰蟿蠀蠂畏渭苇谓伪) 谓伪 蟽蔚 鈥溝兾课何佄肯呂解€� 渭蔚 蟿伪 未萎胃蔚谓 渭伪纬喂魏维 蟿慰蠀蟼.
螒谓伪蟺蠈蠁蔚蠀魏蟿伪 蔚蟺委蟽畏蟼, 渭维位位慰谓 位蠈纬蠅 胃苇渭伪蟿慰蟼, 渭蔚蟻喂魏苇蟼 蠁慰蟻苇蟼 渭慰蠀 苇蟻蠂慰谓蟿伪谓 蟽蟿慰 渭蠀伪位蠈 慰喂 蟿畏蟼 Hannah Kent, 伪位位维 魏伪蟿' 蔚渭苇 慰蠉蟿蔚 魏伪蟿维 未喂维谓蠀伪 未蔚谓 谓慰渭委味蠅 蟺蠅蟼 渭蟺慰蟻蔚委 谓伪 蟿慰蠀蟼 蠁蟿维蟽蔚喂 蟿慰 蟽蠀纬魏蔚魏蟻喂渭苇谓慰.
螖蔚谓 萎蟿伪谓 魏伪魏蠈 蠀蟺慰胃苇蟿蠅,伪位位维 未蔚谓 萎蟿伪谓 伪蠀蟿蠈 蟺慰蠀 蔚纬蠋 萎胃蔚位伪 谓伪 未喂伪尾维蟽蠅.
螝蟻委渭伪, 纬喂伪蟿委 蔚委蠂蔚 蟺蟻慰慰蟺蟿喂魏苇蟼...
October 27, 2018
I bought this book as I thought it'd be about the White Carpathians and herbalism. It's.. well.. not really at all. However, it had me hooked from the start till the end. It's a strange book, I've never read anything like it. On one hand, it's very history and research based for a novel, which makes it really believable and old-lady-talk based and set in very calming environments which makes it rather comforting; on the other hand it covers topics such as dark magic, murders and persecutions and keeps you on the edge of your seat. The author sews these conflicting threads together and into an original, perfectly balanced, interesting tapestry that gives you a feeling not dissimilar to that you might get when walking through a forest at night - surreally real, soothing, exciting and a bit scary. A treat.
July 20, 2021
3.5
Dora Idesov谩 posljednja je od boginja sa 沤铆tkove i ovo je njezina pri膷a. Govori se da u tim osamljenim selima na obroncima 拧ume Bijelih Karpata 啪ive 啪ene koje su uspjele sa膷uvati drevna znanja 拧to smo ih mi ostali zaboravili te da ih prenose s koljena na koljeno usprkos re啪imima i vojskama, mr啪nji i strahu, povijesti. Zovu ih boginjama jer poznaju na膷in da se obrate Bogu i zamole ga za pomo膰. Dora je znanstvenica i budu膰nost ne 啪eli 膷itati iz kapi voska, kako to 膷ini njezina tetka Surmena, ali 啪eli znati pro拧lost svoje obitelji, a mo啪da i svoju budu膰nost鈥�
Cijeli osvrt prona膽ite ovdje:
Dora Idesov谩 posljednja je od boginja sa 沤铆tkove i ovo je njezina pri膷a. Govori se da u tim osamljenim selima na obroncima 拧ume Bijelih Karpata 啪ive 啪ene koje su uspjele sa膷uvati drevna znanja 拧to smo ih mi ostali zaboravili te da ih prenose s koljena na koljeno usprkos re啪imima i vojskama, mr啪nji i strahu, povijesti. Zovu ih boginjama jer poznaju na膷in da se obrate Bogu i zamole ga za pomo膰. Dora je znanstvenica i budu膰nost ne 啪eli 膷itati iz kapi voska, kako to 膷ini njezina tetka Surmena, ali 啪eli znati pro拧lost svoje obitelji, a mo啪da i svoju budu膰nost鈥�
Cijeli osvrt prona膽ite ovdje:
December 8, 2020
Il fascino di questa storia, annunciato dal titolo e dalla copertina di Keller, colpisce a effetto ritardato. Un mondo scomparso, che a lungo 猫 sopravvissuto accanto a quello 鈥渘ormale鈥� e per un po鈥� anche a dispetto di un regime che non favoriva certo fede e credenze popolari.
Le dee erano guaritrici, conoscevano l鈥檃nimo umano e cercavano di aggredire la causa interiore del male, non solo i sintomi. Il loro dono si trasmetteva da madre a figlia. Il loro ultimo domicilio conosciuto era un villaggio nei Carpazi, un olimpo contadino in cui affluivano persone da diverse parti del paese.
Dora, ultima discendente di una famiglia di dee, cerca di ricostruirne la storia risalendo ai tempi della caccia alla streghe. I livelli stilistici del racconto sono diversi: documenti, ricerche storiche e ricordi si alternano e si intrecciano in una ricerca etnografica dietro cui si cela la necessit脿 di recuperare la propria identit脿, negata e fraintesa.
Le dee erano guaritrici, conoscevano l鈥檃nimo umano e cercavano di aggredire la causa interiore del male, non solo i sintomi. Il loro dono si trasmetteva da madre a figlia. Il loro ultimo domicilio conosciuto era un villaggio nei Carpazi, un olimpo contadino in cui affluivano persone da diverse parti del paese.
Dora, ultima discendente di una famiglia di dee, cerca di ricostruirne la storia risalendo ai tempi della caccia alla streghe. I livelli stilistici del racconto sono diversi: documenti, ricerche storiche e ricordi si alternano e si intrecciano in una ricerca etnografica dietro cui si cela la necessit脿 di recuperare la propria identit脿, negata e fraintesa.
December 30, 2022
4,5 伪蟽蟿苇蟻喂伪, 蟿慰 魏伪位蠉蟿蔚蟻慰 尾喂尾位委慰 蟿畏蟼 蠂蟻慰谓喂维蟼 蠅蟼 蟿蠋蟻伪 蔚委谓伪喂 魏维蟿喂 伪谓维渭蔚蟽伪 蟽蔚 渭蠀胃喂蟽蟿蠈蟻畏渭伪, 蠂蟻慰谓喂魏蠈 魏伪喂 渭蔚位苇蟿畏 纬喂伪 蟿喂蟼 胃蔚苇蟼 蟿畏蟼 螙喂蟿魏慰尾伪, 蠁蟿蠅蠂苇蟼 伪纬蟻伪渭渭伪蟿蔚蟼 纬蠀谓伪委魏蔚蟼 蟿蠅谓 螝伪蟻蟺伪胃委蠅谓 蟿畏蟼 韦蟽蔚蠂委伪蟼 蟺慰蠀 蠁畏渭委味慰谓蟿伪谓 纬喂伪 蟿喂蟼 喂魏伪谓蠈蟿畏蟿苇蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼 蠅蟼 渭伪谓蟿喂蟽蟽蔚蟼 魏伪喂 胃蔚蟻伪蟺蔚蠉蟿蟻喂蔚蟼. 螚 伪蠁畏纬萎蟿蟻喂伪, 伪蟺蠈纬慰谓慰蟼 渭喂伪蟼 渭伪魏蟻喂伪蟼 蟽蔚喂蟻维蟼 蟿苇蟿慰喂蠅谓 纬蠀谓伪喂魏蠋谓, 伪蠁慰蠉 蠂维谓蔚喂 蟿慰蠀蟼 纬慰谓蔚委蟼 蟿畏蟼, 渭蔚纬伪位蠋谓蔚喂 渭伪味委 渭蔚 蟿慰谓 魏伪胃蠀蟽蟿蔚蟻畏渭苇谓慰 伪未蔚位蠁蠈 蟿畏蟼 渭蔚 蟿畏 胃蔚委伪 蟿畏蟼 纬谓蠅蟽蟿萎 胃蔚维 蟿畏蟼 蟺蔚蟻喂慰蠂萎蟼 蠋蟽蟺慰蠀 魏喂 伪蠀蟿萎 蟽蠀位位伪渭尾伪谓蔚蟿伪喂 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰 魏伪胃蔚蟽蟿蠋蟼 纬喂伪 蠀蟺慰谓慰渭蔚蠀蟽畏 蟿慰蠀 蟽蠀蟽蟿萎渭伪蟿慰蟼 魏伪喂 魏位蔚委谓蔚蟿伪喂 蟽蔚 蠄蠀蠂喂伪蟿蟻蔚委慰 蠈蟺慰蠀 魏伪喂 蟺蔚胃伪委谓蔚喂. 围蟻蠈谓喂伪 渭蔚蟿维 蔚谓萎位喂魏畏 蟺喂伪 魏伪喂 渭蔚 蟽魏慰蟿蔚喂谓苇蟼 渭谓萎渭蔚蟼 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰 委未蟻蠀渭伪 蠈蟺慰蠀 尾蟻苇胃畏魏蔚 渭蔚蟿维 蟿畏 蟽蠉位位畏蠄畏 蟿畏蟼 胃蔚委伪蟼 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺伪胃蔚委 谓伪 渭维胃蔚喂 蟿畏谓 喂蟽蟿慰蟻委伪 蟿畏蟼 慰喂魏慰纬苇谓蔚喂伪蟼 蟿畏蟼 魏伪喂 蟿喂蟼 蟽蠀谓胃萎魏蔚蟼 蟽蠉位位畏蠄畏蟼 魏伪喂 胃伪谓维蟿慰蠀 蟿畏蟼 胃蔚委伪蟼 蟿畏蟼 伪位位维 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 伪位萎胃蔚喂伪 纬喂伪 蟿畏谓 魏慰蠀位蟿慰蠉蟻伪 蟿蠅谓 胃蔚蠋谓 蟿畏蟼 螙喂蟿魏慰尾伪 魏伪喂 蟿蠅谓 蟺蟻伪魏蟿喂魏蠋谓 蟿慰蠀蟼 蔚蟻蔚蠀谓慰谓蟿伪蟼 蟿伪 伪谓慰喂蠂蟿维 蟺位苇慰谓 伪蟻蠂蔚委伪 蟿畏蟼 魏慰渭渭慰蠀谓喂蟽蟿喂魏畏蟼 韦蟽蔚蠂委伪蟼 蟽蟿伪 蟺位伪委蟽喂伪 蟿畏蟼 未喂伪蟿蟻喂尾萎蟼 蟿畏蟼. 韦慰 尾喂尾位委慰 蟺慰蠀 尾伪蟽委味蔚蟿伪喂 蟽蔚 伪位畏胃喂谓维 蟽蟿慰喂蠂蔚委伪, 慰喂 胃蔚苇蟼 蟿畏蟼 螙喂蟿魏慰尾伪 蟺蟻维纬渭伪蟿喂 蠀蟺萎蟻尉伪谓, 渭蟺位苇魏蔚喂 慰蟻纬伪谓喂魏维 蟿畏谓 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿喂魏蠈蟿畏蟿伪 渭蔚 蟿畏 渭蠀胃慰蟺位伪蟽委伪 魏伪喂 蔚委谓伪喂 蟿蠈蟽慰 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰谓 魏伪喂 魏伪位慰纬蟻伪渭渭苇谓慰 蟺慰蠀 蟺伪蟻蠈位慰 蟿慰谓 蠈纬魏慰 蟿慰蠀 未蔚谓 胃苇位蔚喂蟼 谓伪 蟿蔚位蔚喂蠅蟽蔚喂.
October 21, 2020
Quelle Lolly Willowes vibes in un romanzo che dietro ha sicuramente un lavoro allucinante. Il bello di L'eredit脿 delle dee non 猫 solo che parla di streghe, miti, che crea praticamente un giallo (praticamente un thriller a un certo punto) perfetto e funzionante, ma 猫 che non tralascia nemmeno una briciola di tutta la struttura mitologica, il folklore e i rituali che stanno dietro alle bohyne. 脠 un romanzo squisitamente (avverbio non lanciato per caso) complesso e grazie Kate艡ina Tu膷kov谩 per aver reso giustizia, profondit脿 e un contesto ben costruito alle streghe.
June 1, 2013
Ke kn铆啪ce m臎 p艡ivedla sp铆拧e zv臎davost a doporu膷en铆, kter谩 jsem sl媒chala ze v拧ech stran. P艡ed t铆m jsem od Kate艡iny Tu膷kov茅 nic ne膷etla, tak啪e jsem absolutn臎 netu拧ila, s 膷铆m se budu pot媒kat. Nebudu 艡铆kat, 啪e m臎 kniha chytla hned od prvn铆 strany. Chv铆li to trvalo, ne啪 jsem se do p艡铆b臎hu dostala, ale zhruba po pades谩ti stran谩ch jsem u啪 byla natolik vta啪en谩 s takovou intenzitou, kterou jsem zpo膷谩tku opravdu ne膷ekala.
Popis b谩d谩n铆 v archivech a pro膷铆t谩n铆 si stroh媒m 煤艡ednick媒m jazykem psan茅 zpr谩vy StB, kter茅 ni膷ily 啪ivoty mnoha lidem, byl stejn臎 siln媒 z谩啪itek jako rozpl茅t谩n铆 osudu 啪itkovsk媒ch "bohy艌" samotnou Dorou. Neuv臎艡iteln臎 pevn臎 vybudovan茅 faktografick茅 z谩zem铆 rom谩nu dod谩v谩 naprosto 啪ivouc铆 s铆lu, kter谩 mnohdy d臎s铆 t铆m sp铆拧, 啪e skute膷n臎 vych谩z铆 z re谩ln媒ch p艡铆b臎h暖 a hranice mezi fikc铆 a historickou zku拧enost铆 se 膷asto prol铆naj铆 a st铆raj铆.
沤铆tkovsk茅 bohyn臎 jsou siln媒m 膷ten铆m z n臎kolika d暖vod暖. Jednak proto, 啪e odhaluj铆 膷谩st lidov茅 kultury, o kter茅 nem谩 v臎t拧ina lid铆 ani pon臎t铆, d谩le se po sv茅m vypo艡谩d谩v谩 s minulost铆 a p艡edev拧铆m odhaluje lidskou kluzkost, kterou demonstruje na dona拧e膷铆ch, kte艡铆 neomyln臎 proplouvaj铆 re啪imem (膷i sp铆拧e re啪imy) a m臎n铆 strany podle toho, jak je to zrovna v媒hodn茅. Lidsk谩 zloba, z谩vist a nep艡ej铆cnost pat艡铆 mezi hlavn铆 hybatele tohoto p艡铆b臎hu, ale sv茅 m铆sto tady m谩 i l谩ska, laskavost a touha ochra艌ovat sv茅 bl铆zk茅.
沤铆tkovsk茅 bohyn臎 jsou pro m臎 jednou z nejv媒razn臎j拧铆ch knih, kter茅 jsem letos p艡e膷etla a rozhodn臎 u啪 z暖stanou na p艡edn铆ch m铆stech v m茅m 啪eb艡铆膷ku. Jako dal拧铆 plus v nich vid铆m to, 啪e se vyplat铆 d暖v臎艡ovat 膷esk媒m autor暖m. V podstat臎 novodobou 膷eskou literaturu v暖bec nesleduji a za膷铆n谩m m铆t pocit, 啪e p艡ich谩z铆m o skv臎l茅 z谩啪itky.
Popis b谩d谩n铆 v archivech a pro膷铆t谩n铆 si stroh媒m 煤艡ednick媒m jazykem psan茅 zpr谩vy StB, kter茅 ni膷ily 啪ivoty mnoha lidem, byl stejn臎 siln媒 z谩啪itek jako rozpl茅t谩n铆 osudu 啪itkovsk媒ch "bohy艌" samotnou Dorou. Neuv臎艡iteln臎 pevn臎 vybudovan茅 faktografick茅 z谩zem铆 rom谩nu dod谩v谩 naprosto 啪ivouc铆 s铆lu, kter谩 mnohdy d臎s铆 t铆m sp铆拧, 啪e skute膷n臎 vych谩z铆 z re谩ln媒ch p艡铆b臎h暖 a hranice mezi fikc铆 a historickou zku拧enost铆 se 膷asto prol铆naj铆 a st铆raj铆.
沤铆tkovsk茅 bohyn臎 jsou siln媒m 膷ten铆m z n臎kolika d暖vod暖. Jednak proto, 啪e odhaluj铆 膷谩st lidov茅 kultury, o kter茅 nem谩 v臎t拧ina lid铆 ani pon臎t铆, d谩le se po sv茅m vypo艡谩d谩v谩 s minulost铆 a p艡edev拧铆m odhaluje lidskou kluzkost, kterou demonstruje na dona拧e膷铆ch, kte艡铆 neomyln臎 proplouvaj铆 re啪imem (膷i sp铆拧e re啪imy) a m臎n铆 strany podle toho, jak je to zrovna v媒hodn茅. Lidsk谩 zloba, z谩vist a nep艡ej铆cnost pat艡铆 mezi hlavn铆 hybatele tohoto p艡铆b臎hu, ale sv茅 m铆sto tady m谩 i l谩ska, laskavost a touha ochra艌ovat sv茅 bl铆zk茅.
沤铆tkovsk茅 bohyn臎 jsou pro m臎 jednou z nejv媒razn臎j拧铆ch knih, kter茅 jsem letos p艡e膷etla a rozhodn臎 u啪 z暖stanou na p艡edn铆ch m铆stech v m茅m 啪eb艡铆膷ku. Jako dal拧铆 plus v nich vid铆m to, 啪e se vyplat铆 d暖v臎艡ovat 膷esk媒m autor暖m. V podstat臎 novodobou 膷eskou literaturu v暖bec nesleduji a za膷铆n谩m m铆t pocit, 啪e p艡ich谩z铆m o skv臎l茅 z谩啪itky.
April 26, 2022
DNF at 13%. I got sick of trying to piece together the plot by reading government reports. A few were fine (especially as a way for the reader to discover things alongside the main character), but it became interminable; when I realized I was mentally flinching every time I saw one on the page, I remembered that life is too short to read crummy books. It鈥檚 a shame, as the plot summary sounds right up my alley. Alas!
December 8, 2023
To jedna z najlepszych ksi膮偶ek, jakie kiedykolwiek przeczyta艂am. Poruszaj膮ca, g艂臋boka, szczera i zaskakuj膮ca. Powie艣膰, kt贸ra zaprasza w podr贸偶 wg艂膮b siebie i w Bia艂e Karpaty, kt贸ra wymaga po艣wi臋cenia uwagi i gotowo艣ci na powolne odkrywanie kolejnych warstw tej historii.
W centrum opowie艣ci stoi Dora Idesov谩 - ostatnia potomkini bogi艅, czyli kobiet, kt贸re zna艂y si臋 na zio艂ach, potrafi艂y leczy膰, przepowiada膰 przysz艂o艣膰 i kierowa膰 pogod膮. Jednym s艂owem zna艂y si臋 na bogowaniu. Dora straci艂a bardzo wcze艣nie matk臋, a opiek膮 nad ni膮 i jej bratem przej臋艂a ciotka - bogini Surmenova. Dziewczyna jednak nie zosta艂a bogini膮, napisa艂a za to poprawn膮 ideologicznie prac臋 magistersk膮 o tym fenomenie. Temat ten jednak nadal j膮 g艂臋boko porusza i po upadku komunizmu i otwarciu archiw贸w zaczyna prowadzi膰 szeroko zakrojone badania, docieraj膮c do najstarszych dokument贸w dotycz膮cych bogi艅 oraz do akt s艂u偶b bezpiecze艅stwa, kt贸re na inwigilacj臋 powy偶szych k艂ad艂y szczeg贸lny nacisk. Prowadz膮c kwerend臋 oraz rozmawiaj膮c z najstarszymi mieszkankami, Dora odkrywa tak偶e prawd臋 o sobie - o swoim dziedzictwie, o kl膮twie i nieszcz臋艣liwych zbiegach okoliczno艣ci, kt贸re znacz膮co wp艂yn臋艂y na jej los.
Ta prawda zmusza kobiet臋 do pracy nad sob膮, do odnalezienia swojego przeznaczenia, zdecydowania czy jest potomkini膮 bogi艅, czy jej zadaniem jest zachowanie pami臋ci o nich. Czeka j膮 przepracowanie trudnego dzieci艅stwa - ojciec zamordowa艂 matk臋 i odsiaduje wieloletni膮 kar臋 wi臋zienia, a tak偶e opieka nad chorym na zesp贸艂 Aperta bratem i odszukanie w艂asnej seksualno艣ci. Te wszystkie problemy pojawiaj膮 si臋 mimochodem, w tle opowie艣ci o wielkich boginiach, s膮 jednak jej podsumowaniem, smutn膮 konkluzj膮. Ogrom temat贸w poruszonych przez autork臋 jest jednak tak wielki, 偶e jestem pewna, 偶e ka偶dego czytelnika mo偶e poruszy膰 inna kwestia - dzia艂ania SS czy czeskich s艂u偶b bezpiecze艅stwa, donosicielstwo, komunistyczne o艣rodki opieku艅cze, ludzka zawi艣膰, 偶ycie w odleg艂ych g贸rskich ost臋pach, tradycje, mit czarownicy itd.
Ci膮g dalszy:
W centrum opowie艣ci stoi Dora Idesov谩 - ostatnia potomkini bogi艅, czyli kobiet, kt贸re zna艂y si臋 na zio艂ach, potrafi艂y leczy膰, przepowiada膰 przysz艂o艣膰 i kierowa膰 pogod膮. Jednym s艂owem zna艂y si臋 na bogowaniu. Dora straci艂a bardzo wcze艣nie matk臋, a opiek膮 nad ni膮 i jej bratem przej臋艂a ciotka - bogini Surmenova. Dziewczyna jednak nie zosta艂a bogini膮, napisa艂a za to poprawn膮 ideologicznie prac臋 magistersk膮 o tym fenomenie. Temat ten jednak nadal j膮 g艂臋boko porusza i po upadku komunizmu i otwarciu archiw贸w zaczyna prowadzi膰 szeroko zakrojone badania, docieraj膮c do najstarszych dokument贸w dotycz膮cych bogi艅 oraz do akt s艂u偶b bezpiecze艅stwa, kt贸re na inwigilacj臋 powy偶szych k艂ad艂y szczeg贸lny nacisk. Prowadz膮c kwerend臋 oraz rozmawiaj膮c z najstarszymi mieszkankami, Dora odkrywa tak偶e prawd臋 o sobie - o swoim dziedzictwie, o kl膮twie i nieszcz臋艣liwych zbiegach okoliczno艣ci, kt贸re znacz膮co wp艂yn臋艂y na jej los.
Ta prawda zmusza kobiet臋 do pracy nad sob膮, do odnalezienia swojego przeznaczenia, zdecydowania czy jest potomkini膮 bogi艅, czy jej zadaniem jest zachowanie pami臋ci o nich. Czeka j膮 przepracowanie trudnego dzieci艅stwa - ojciec zamordowa艂 matk臋 i odsiaduje wieloletni膮 kar臋 wi臋zienia, a tak偶e opieka nad chorym na zesp贸艂 Aperta bratem i odszukanie w艂asnej seksualno艣ci. Te wszystkie problemy pojawiaj膮 si臋 mimochodem, w tle opowie艣ci o wielkich boginiach, s膮 jednak jej podsumowaniem, smutn膮 konkluzj膮. Ogrom temat贸w poruszonych przez autork臋 jest jednak tak wielki, 偶e jestem pewna, 偶e ka偶dego czytelnika mo偶e poruszy膰 inna kwestia - dzia艂ania SS czy czeskich s艂u偶b bezpiecze艅stwa, donosicielstwo, komunistyczne o艣rodki opieku艅cze, ludzka zawi艣膰, 偶ycie w odleg艂ych g贸rskich ost臋pach, tradycje, mit czarownicy itd.
Ci膮g dalszy:
April 1, 2023
Paskai膷iusi prie mieg膮 kaip ma啪as vaikas bijodavau u啪migti ir d啪iaugiausi, kad gyvenu mieste, nes kur nors kaime/gamtoj nei拧tver膷iau, viskas gird臈t懦si/vaident懦si, kamuot懦 ko拧marai arba nemiego膷iau i拧 viso.
Knyga ir baisi, ir nebaisi. T.y., visai suprantu tuos ir tas, kam pasirodys nuobodoka - vidutinio am啪iaus mokslinink臈 etnograf臈 tyrin臈ja savo kra拧to 啪iniuoni懦 - dievotoj懦 - tradicijas ir istorij膮, o i拧 ties懦 tai bando suprasti, kas atsitiko jos 拧eimai ir kod臈l. Istorija 拧okin臈ja 膷ia praeitin, 膷ia ateitin, 膷ia 寞 archyvus, 膷ia 寞 pasakojimus, 膷ia 寞 拧ios dienos mintis, ir pan. 沤od啪iu, neb奴tinai atrodys kaip ka啪kas i拧skirtinio.
I拧 kitos pus臈s, tai pasakojimas apie 寞tik臈jim膮 ir gali膮, pavyd膮 ir ker拧t膮, tradicij懦 saugojim膮 ir niekinim膮, 拧eimos paslaptis ir buvim膮 kitokia, ko nei pra拧ei, nei nori. Baisiausia, kad 膷ia ne fantasy ir ne maginis realizmas, knyga visi拧kai normalus romanas, ir b奴tent tod臈l tame normalume prasimu拧an膷ios sud臈tingos patirtys tikrai primena vaikyst臈s istorijas apie ka啪kuo keistus 啪mones ir vietas, kur geriau nel寞sti.
Knyga ir baisi, ir nebaisi. T.y., visai suprantu tuos ir tas, kam pasirodys nuobodoka - vidutinio am啪iaus mokslinink臈 etnograf臈 tyrin臈ja savo kra拧to 啪iniuoni懦 - dievotoj懦 - tradicijas ir istorij膮, o i拧 ties懦 tai bando suprasti, kas atsitiko jos 拧eimai ir kod臈l. Istorija 拧okin臈ja 膷ia praeitin, 膷ia ateitin, 膷ia 寞 archyvus, 膷ia 寞 pasakojimus, 膷ia 寞 拧ios dienos mintis, ir pan. 沤od啪iu, neb奴tinai atrodys kaip ka啪kas i拧skirtinio.
I拧 kitos pus臈s, tai pasakojimas apie 寞tik臈jim膮 ir gali膮, pavyd膮 ir ker拧t膮, tradicij懦 saugojim膮 ir niekinim膮, 拧eimos paslaptis ir buvim膮 kitokia, ko nei pra拧ei, nei nori. Baisiausia, kad 膷ia ne fantasy ir ne maginis realizmas, knyga visi拧kai normalus romanas, ir b奴tent tod臈l tame normalume prasimu拧an膷ios sud臈tingos patirtys tikrai primena vaikyst臈s istorijas apie ka啪kuo keistus 啪mones ir vietas, kur geriau nel寞sti.
October 9, 2022
Opera che ricostruisce (romanzandola) la storia delle dee: guaritrici-indovine che hanno vissuto nell鈥檃rea de Carpazi bianchi tramandando il loro sapere nei secoli di madre in figlia.
Col crollo del regime comunista la protagonista Dora (figlia 猫 nipote di dee, cresciuta con la zia Surmena, una dea potente e stimata) accede finalmente agli archivi per scoprire perch茅 la zia fu perseguitata durante il comunismo.
Scoprir脿 cos矛 anche segreti di famiglia e non, il coinvolgimento del nazismo nelle vicende della zona e la fonte delle persecuzioni.
Il romanzo 猫 stato piuttosto coinvolgente nella prima parte, nonostante il massiccio inserimento dei documenti d鈥檃rchivio (noiosissimi), ma proseguendo ho trovato tutto sempre pi霉 pretestuoso e 鈥渟gonfio鈥�. Il finale poi non l鈥檋o compreso, cosa voleva significare?
Col crollo del regime comunista la protagonista Dora (figlia 猫 nipote di dee, cresciuta con la zia Surmena, una dea potente e stimata) accede finalmente agli archivi per scoprire perch茅 la zia fu perseguitata durante il comunismo.
Scoprir脿 cos矛 anche segreti di famiglia e non, il coinvolgimento del nazismo nelle vicende della zona e la fonte delle persecuzioni.
Il romanzo 猫 stato piuttosto coinvolgente nella prima parte, nonostante il massiccio inserimento dei documenti d鈥檃rchivio (noiosissimi), ma proseguendo ho trovato tutto sempre pi霉 pretestuoso e 鈥渟gonfio鈥�. Il finale poi non l鈥檋o compreso, cosa voleva significare?
August 23, 2016
Uloga je knji啪evnosti, ponekad, dati glas uti拧anima, pravo obespravljenima, prostor izguranima ili marginaliziranima i uvjerljivom, u stvarnosti utemeljenom pri膷om ispuniti povijesne praznine. Kako bi ta uloga bila ostvarena, granice knji啪evnosti postaju proto膷nije i ona dopu拧ta ulazak drugim narativnim diskursima, progovara i njihovim glasom. No kako bi knji啪evnost ostala knji啪evnost nikada ne smije dopustiti da taj drugi glas prevlada i nadja膷a njenu melodioznost. Stapaju膰i se s drugim, knji啪evnost ne smije zaboraviti ono 拧to jest. Daju膰i glas drugima, ne smije uti拧ati svoj.
Pi拧u膰i o dru拧tvu okupljenom pod nazivom Sjena no膰i, u istoimenoj, drugoj knjizi All Souls trilogije, ameri膷ka knji啪evnica i povjesni膷arka Deborah Harkness nai拧la je na ime Matthewa Roydena, 膷lana dru拧tva 膷ije je postojanje povijest u potpunosti zanemarila. Ona mu je stoga, kao ispriku, udahnula 啪ivot postaviv拧i ga na sredi拧nje mjesto u svojoj pri膷i. Na jednak je na膷in, iste te 2012. godine u 膶e拧koj mlada knji啪evnica i povjesni膷arka umjetnosti Katerina Tu膷kova pri istra啪ivanju sudbina Boginja sa 沤itkove najve膰u pozornost posvetila iscrtavanju one koja zapravo i nije bila boginjom, Dori Idesovoj, posljednjoj pripadnici stare, poznate i vrlo mo膰ne loze 膷arobnica iz zaseoka na Bijelim Karpatima 膷ije su pretkinje proricale budu膰nost, uni拧tavale ili spa拧avale, ovisno o odabranoj strani. No vlastitu sudbinu, svom daru unato膷, nisu mogle predvidjeti i nadolaze膰e ih zlo, njihovim 膷inima toliko puta od drugih otjerano, nije zaobi拧lo.
膶ovjek ne mo啪e 啪ivjeti bez praznovjerja, ne ako je neznalica i kukavica, isti膷e Tu膷kova na jednom mjestu u romanu. Otkriva li time i razlog nemo膰i boginja spram ovladavanja vlastitom sudbinom? Je li i njima, kao i Dori, nedostajalo povjerenja u mo膰 bogovanja i je li nada doista ono klju膷no 拧to je vjeru njihovih sumje拧tana odr啪avalo sna啪nom, u pri膷i Boginja manje je bitno. Ona se usredoto膷uje na istra啪ivanje znanstvenice Dore Idesove, etnologinje zaposlene na Institutu za etnologiju i folkloristiku u Brnu, odlu膷ne u namjeri da tradiciji 拧to ju je ve膰 dvaput izdala, jednom je odbaciv拧i kao ideju i drugi je put pretvoriv拧i u suhoparan, posve nezanimljiv doprinos znanstvenom narativu, pri tre膰em poku拧aju posveti zaslu啪enu pozornost i plodove svog istra啪ivanja preto膷i u knjigu 膷iji 膰e tekst biti vrijedan doprinos, kako znanstvenom, tako i mitolo拧kom aspektu prou膷avanja ove 啪enske religije. Staza do cilja, tro拧ne kolibe na Kopanicama, vodi Doru, a s njom i 膷itatelja, kroz stotine stranica arhivskog materijala raspore膽enog po 膷e拧kim i slova膷kim ba拧tinskim institucijama, vra膰a je u daleku pro拧lost i pru啪a pogled iz drugog ugla na doga膽aje iz one nedavne.
Sla啪u膰i komadi膰e slagalice 膷iji su glavni motiv boginje, Dora spaja krhotine vlastitog napuklog ja i otkriva mra膷ne, od nje dobro skrivene fragmente obiteljske povijesti, a autorica kroz te dvije pri膷e prikazuje svu surovost bivanja druga膷ijim u totalitarnim re啪imima kakvi su se, u nacisti膷kom i komunisti膷kom obli膷ju, izmjenjivali na grani膷nom 膷e拧ko-slova膷kom podru膷ju. Nije, zapravo, va啪no jesu li te 啪ene bile boginje, vje拧tice, 膷arobnice ili tek 啪ene bez za拧tite u 膷ijem je smjeru uperen pravi prst. Va啪no je bilo 拧to su se drznule, svojim malim, gotovo bezna膷ajnim subverzivnim djelovanjem na geografski vrlo sku膷enom teritoriju ogrije拧iti o dominantnu kulturu i time, na razli膷ite na膷ine izazvati gnjev prevladavaju膰ih.
Promatran kao etnografska studija zna膷ajnog dijela 膷e拧kog, pa i slavenskog folklora i kao kritika svakog totalitarnog re啪ima i svakog protupravnog oduzimanja slobode, bila ona sloboda kretanja, govora ili mi拧ljenja, ovaj je tekst va啪an doprinos ne samo 膷e拧koj nacionalnoj ve膰 i europskoj knji啪evnosti. No premda u sebi sadr啪i elemente mnogih knji啪evnih 啪anrova i isprepli膰e povijesno s trilerskim, politi膷kim i psiholo拧kim, nije uspio postati roman u svoj punini zna膷enja te rije膷i. Napisat 膰u roman, otkrila je Tu膷kova, prema vlastitim rije膷ima, jednoj od posljednjih pre啪ivjelih suvremenica boginja. To ne mora biti lo拧e, barem 膰e ljudi sve bolje razumjeti, odgovorila joj je Al啪beta Baglarova.
膶itatelji 膰e, mo啪da, po zavr拧etku povijesno-geografskog puta po podru膷ju negda拧nje Moravske, bolje poznavati u knjizi opisan element 膷e拧ke narodne tradicije. Pozorniji 膰e 膷itatelj i bolje razumjeti, ne samo doga膽aje u 膶e拧koj ve膰 i u ostalim zemljama jednakih ratnih i poratnih pri膷a. No te拧ko 膰e biti zajedno s Dorom pro啪ivjeti pri膷u boginja i stopiti se s tekstom. Dora je, istra啪uju膰i, 膷esto zapinjala na birokratskim zaprekama. Na isti je na膷in ovaj tekst zapeo u tunelu izme膽u znanstvene studije i romana. Praznine su, svakako, ispunjene, glasovima je dodijeljena boja, no namjesto melodije, stvaraju kakofoniju. A 膷itatelj? Ba拧 kao i, mjestimice, Dora me膽u policama arhiva, ostaje izgubljen u poku拧aju srastanja i upisivanja svog osobnog, nepripadaju膰eg i druga膷ijeg.
April 8, 2024
Ja "Jumavas" m膿r姆is bija p膿c iesp膿jas sare啪模墨t 拧墨s gr膩matas non膩k拧anu 墨st膩 las墨t膩ja rok膩s, tad v膩ka izv膿le ar teikumu par "sievietes dv膿seli un ma模iju" ir perfekta. T膩p膿c pateicos tikai laim墨gam gad墨jumam, ka izlas墨ju "Domuz墨m膿" rakstu par 膷ehu literat奴ras tulkojumu vilni un tad jau ar墨 atsauksmes par 拧o gr膩matu 拧eit pat GR.
Tie拧膩m laba gr膩mata par Mor膩vijas nost奴ra Karpatu "dieviet膿m", kuru darbo拧an膩s 拧姆iet visai l墨dz墨ga m奴su pa拧u Zil膩kalna Martai, uz sare啪模墨t膩 Austrumeiropas v膿stures fona, turkl膩t ar墨 pats gr膩matas si啪ets un forma, imit膿jot un da募膿ji ar墨 l墨dzinoties p膿t墨jumam, uzrakst墨ta saisto拧i un tulkota lab膩 latvie拧u valod膩. J膩atz墨st, ka bija gr奴ti nolikt mal膩.
Tie拧膩m laba gr膩mata par Mor膩vijas nost奴ra Karpatu "dieviet膿m", kuru darbo拧an膩s 拧姆iet visai l墨dz墨ga m奴su pa拧u Zil膩kalna Martai, uz sare啪模墨t膩 Austrumeiropas v膿stures fona, turkl膩t ar墨 pats gr膩matas si啪ets un forma, imit膿jot un da募膿ji ar墨 l墨dzinoties p膿t墨jumam, uzrakst墨ta saisto拧i un tulkota lab膩 latvie拧u valod膩. J膩atz墨st, ka bija gr奴ti nolikt mal膩.
February 9, 2025
Jazykov臎, tematicky a historicky za m臎 velmi poveden谩 kn铆啪ka, ale to jsem tak n臎jak 膷ekala. Co jsem ne膷ekala, bylo m臎nilc铆 se tempo. M谩m pocit, 啪e v臎t拧inu informac铆 jsem dostala v prvn铆 t艡etin臎, a pak jsme vlastn臎 moc nev臎d臎la, kam kniha sm臎艡uje, ne啪 jsem za dal拧铆 t艡etinu dostala tu jednu kl铆膷ovou informaci, pak zas chv铆li nic, a pak nastal urychlen媒 konec 馃槄 Vlastn臎 p艡em媒拧l铆m, jestli byspisy s trochu jin媒m zpracov谩n铆m nefungovaly samostatn臎, bez hlavn铆 hrdinky, kter谩 jimi listuje. Ka啪dop谩dn臎 jsem r谩da, 啪e jsem knihu 膷etla, a ur膷it臎 bych ji doporu膷ila d谩l.
4/5*
4/5*
August 2, 2018
笑褟 泻薪懈谐邪 锌芯褔懈薪邪褦褌褜褋褟 蟹 卸邪褏谢懈胁芯褩 褋褨屑械泄薪芯褩 褌褉邪谐械写褨褩: 斜邪褌褜泻芯-邪谢泻芯谐芯谢褨泻 褍斜懈胁邪褦 写褉褍卸懈薪褍 褋芯泻懈褉芯褞. 袛谢褟 泻芯谐芯褋褜 褑械 蟹邪屑褨褌泻邪 胁 泻褉懈屑褨薪邪谢褜薪褨泄 褏褉芯薪褨褑褨, 邪 写谢褟 写胁芯褏 薪芯胁芯褋锌械褔械薪懈褏 褋懈褉褨褌 鈥� 写褨胁褔懈薪泻懈 袛芯褉懈 褨 薪械锌芯胁薪芯褋锌褉邪胁薪芯谐芯 褏谢芯锌褔懈泻邪 携褑褜泻邪 鈥� 褑械 薪械 谢懈褕械 褋褌褉邪褕薪械 谐芯褉械, 邪 泄 锌芯褔邪褌芯泻 薪芯胁芯谐芯 械褌邪锌褍 卸懈褌褌褟. 孝械锌械褉 胁芯薪懈 斜褍写褍褌褜 屑械褕泻邪褌懈 褉邪蟹芯屑 蟹褨 褋胁芯褦褞 薪械屑芯谢芯写芯褞 褌褨褌泻芯褞 孝械褉械蟹褨褦褞 小褍褉屑械薪芯胁芯褞, 邪斜芯 卸 锌褉芯褋褌芯 小褍褉屑械薪芯褞, 锌褉芯褎械褋褨褟 褟泻芯褩 "斜芯谐芯胁邪薪薪褟". 孝邪泻 薪邪蟹懈胁邪谢懈 褍 褑褨泄 屑褨褋褑械胁芯褋褌褨 褌械, 褔懈屑 蟹邪蟹胁懈褔邪泄 蟹邪泄屑邪褞褌褜 褋褨谢褜褋褜泻褨 蟹薪邪褏邪褉泻懈 鈥� 胁芯褉芯卸褨薪薪褟, 邪谢褜褌械褉薪邪褌懈胁薪邪 屑械写懈褑懈薪邪, 薪械锌褉芯褎械褋褨泄薪邪 锌褋懈褏芯谢芯谐褨褔薪邪 写芯锌芯屑芯谐邪. 袙胁邪卸邪谢芯褋褟, 褖芯 褑褨 卸褨薪泻懈 褦 褌邪泻懈屑懈 褋芯斜褨 锌芯褋械褉械写薪懈褑褟屑懈, 褟泻褨 锌械褉械写邪褞褌褜 锌褉芯褏邪薪薪褟 写芯 袘芯谐邪, 褌芯屑褍 褋邪屑 锌褉芯褑械褋 芯褌褉懈屑邪胁 薪邪蟹胁褍 "斜芯谐芯胁邪薪薪褟", 邪 卸褨薪芯泻-屑械写褨褍屑褨胁 褋褌邪谢懈 薪邪蟹懈胁邪褌懈 "斜芯谐懈薪褟屑懈". 小褍褉屑械薪邪 褦 褋锌邪写泻芯褦屑懈褑械褞 写芯胁谐芯褩 胁械褉胁械褔泻懈 褑懈褏 "斜芯谐懈薪褜". 袊褩 胁懈褏芯胁邪薪泻邪 袛芯褉邪, 锌褨写褉褨褋褕懈, 胁懈褉褨褕褍褦 锌褉懈褋胁褟褌懈褌懈 褋胁芯褦 卸懈褌褌褟 写芯褋谢褨写卸械薪薪褞 械褌薪芯谐褉邪褎褨褩, 邪 褋邪屑械 褎械薪芯屑械薪褍 卸懈褌泻芯胁褋褜泻懈褏 斜芯谐懈薪褜, 褟泻褨 薪褨斜懈褌芯 胁芯谢芯写褨谢懈 屑褨褋褌懈褔薪懈屑懈 褋懈谢邪屑懈. 袨褌, 胁谢邪褋薪械, 蟹邪 褏芯写芯屑 褩褩 褉芯蟹胁褨写泻懈 屑懈 泄 褋锌芯褋褌械褉褨谐邪褦屑芯 薪邪 褋褌芯褉褨薪泻邪褏 褑褜芯谐芯 褉芯屑邪薪褍-斜械褋褌褋械谢械褉邪. 校 蟹邪锌懈谢褞卸械薪懈褏 邪褉褏褨胁邪褏 袛芯褉邪 写芯泻芯锌褍褦褌褜褋褟 邪卸 写芯 褋械褉械写薪褜芯胁褨褔薪懈褏 褋锌褉邪胁 锌褉芯 "胁褨写褜芯屑褋褌胁芯", 邪谢械 薪邪泄斜褨谢褜褕械 褩褩, 蟹胁褨褋薪芯, 褑褨泻邪胁谢褟褌褜 卸褨薪泻懈 蟹褨 褋胁芯谐芯 褉芯写褍 褨 褩褏薪褨 "泻芯谢褦卸邪薪泻懈" 蟹 褉褨写薪懈褏 屑褨褋褑褜. 袛芯谢褟 小褍褉屑械薪懈, 褟泻邪 薪邪褉芯写懈谢邪褋褟 薪邪 锌芯褔邪褌泻褍 XX 褋褌芯谢褨褌褌褟, 锌褉芯褋褌芯 薪械 屑芯谐谢邪 斜褍褌懈 谢械谐泻芯褞, 邪写卸械 褩泄, 褟泻 褨 胁褋褨屑 褨薪褕懈屑 蟹 褩褩 锌芯泻芯谢褨薪薪褟, 写芯胁械谢芯褋褟 锌械褉械卸懈褌懈 胁褨泄薪褍, 锌褨写 褔邪褋 褟泻芯褩 胁芯薪邪 褋褌邪谢邪 芯斜'褦泻褌芯屑 褍胁邪卸薪芯谐芯 褋锌芯褋褌械褉械卸械薪薪褟 褨 写芯褋谢褨写卸械薪薪褟, 褨 褌褟卸泻褨 锌芯胁芯褦薪薪褨 褉芯泻懈, 邪写卸械 褋褨谢褜褋褜泻褨 "蟹邪斜芯斜芯薪懈" 薪械 斜褍谢懈 谢褞斜褨 褋芯褑褨邪谢褨褋褌懈褔薪褨泄 泻褉邪褩薪褨, 褌芯卸, 薪邪 卸邪谢褜, 褩泄 薪械 写芯胁械谢芯褋褟 卸懈褌懈 写芯胁谐芯 褨 褖邪褋谢懈胁芯.
小邪屑邪 褟 写褍卸械 褋泻械锌褌懈褔薪芯 褋褌邪胁谢褞褋褟 写芯 胁褋褨褏 褑懈褏 褋褨谢褜褋褜泻懈褏 蟹薪邪褏邪褉芯泻, 褟泻褨 屑邪薪褨锌褍谢褞褞褌褜 谢褞写褜屑懈, 褟泻褨 蟹胁械褉褌邪褞褌褜褋褟 写芯 薪懈褏 蟹 胁褨写褔邪褞. 袗谢械 小褍褉屑械薪邪, 褟泻 锌械褉褋芯薪邪卸泻邪, 薪邪 褖邪褋褌褟, 蟹芯斜褉邪卸械薪邪 谢褞写懈薪芯褞 蟹褨 蟹写芯褉芯胁懈屑 谐谢褍蟹写芯屑 褨 褑褨谢泻芯屑 褉邪褑褨芯薪邪谢褜薪懈屑 褋褌邪胁谢械薪薪褟屑 写芯 胁谢邪褋薪懈褏 蟹写褨斜薪芯褋褌械泄:
"鈥� 袣芯谢懈 胁卸械 蟹胁邪卸懈谢懈褋褟 锌褉懈褩褏邪褌懈 邪卸 褋褞写懈, 写芯 薪械胁褨写芯屑芯褩 斜邪斜懈, 褖芯 蟹邪 斜芯蟹薪邪-褟泻懈屑懈 褔褍褌泻邪屑懈 屑芯卸械 锌芯屑芯谐褌懈, 鈥� 褌芯, 蟹薪邪褔懈褌褜, 写芯斜褉械 锌芯锌芯褋懈写褨谢懈 屑邪泻芯屑. 袗 屑芯卸械, 褟 褩褏薪褟 芯褋褌邪薪薪褟 薪邪写褨褟? 袙芯薪懈 泄写褍褌褜 褋褞写懈 泄 斜芯褟褌褜褋褟, 斜芯 褋褍屑薪褨胁邪褞褌褜褋褟, 邪谢械 薪邪写褨褟 褩褏 褋褞写懈 褌褟谐薪械. 袉 褖芯斜 褌懈 蟹薪邪谢邪, 褔邪褋褌芯-谐褍褋褌芯 褑械 褌邪泻褨 谢褞写懈, 褍 褟泻懈褏 薪械 薪邪 褌褨谢褨 斜褨写邪, 邪 薪邪 写褍褕褨. 袗 褌邪泻懈屑 薪邪泄斜褨谢褜褕械 锌芯屑邪谐邪, 泻芯谢懈 锌械褉械褋褌邪褞褌褜 褋械斜械 屑褍褔懈褌懈 写褍褉薪懈屑懈 锌懈褌邪薪薪褟屑懈: 蟹屑芯卸褍 褔懈 薪械 蟹屑芯卸褍 褩屑 写芯锌芯屑芯谐褌懈... 袟薪邪褦褕, 褟泻 褩屑 胁褨写谢褟卸械 胁褨写 褋械褉褑褟, 泻芯谢懈 胁卸械 蟹 锌芯褉芯谐褍 胁芯薪懈 锌芯胁褨褉褟褌褜, 褖芯 屑邪褞 褔褍写芯写褨泄薪褍 褋懈谢褍? 孝邪 泄 褩屑 薪械 褌褉械斜邪 褖械 褉邪蟹 胁懈谢懈胁邪褌懈 屑械薪褨 写褍褕褍 锌褉芯 褋胁芯褩 薪械谐邪褉邪蟹写懈. 袣邪卸褍褌褜, 褖芯 胁褨褉邪 蟹褑褨谢褞褦. 袗 胁芯薪懈 胁褨褉褟褌褜, 褖芯 写芯锌芯屑芯卸褍, 褌芯屑褍 胁褋械 泄 胁懈锌芯胁薪褞褦褌褜褋褟. 袟褉芯蟹褍屑褨谢邪? 笑械 薪械 芯斜屑邪薪, 邪 屑褍写褉邪 写芯锌芯屑芯谐邪."
孝械 卸 褋邪屑械 褋褌芯褋褍褦褌褜褋褟 褨 "褉芯写懈薪薪芯谐芯 锌褉芯泻谢褟褌褌褟", 褨褋褌芯褉褨褞 褟泻芯谐芯 小褍褉屑械薪邪 褉械褌械谢褜薪芯 锌褉懈褏芯胁褍胁邪谢邪 胁褨写 胁谢邪褋薪芯褩 薪械斜芯谐懈. 袗写卸械, 薪械 褋泻谢邪写薪芯 蟹写芯谐邪写邪褌懈褋褟, 褖芯 褟泻 谢褞写懈薪褍 锌械褉械泻芯薪邪褌懈 胁 褋懈谢褨 锌褉芯泻谢褟褌褌褟, 褌芯 胁芯薪邪 胁褋褨 褋胁芯褩 写褉褨斜薪褨 褨 胁械谢懈泻褨 薪械褖邪褋褌褟 褋锌懈褏邪褌懈屑械 薪邪 "锌芯褉芯斜谢械薪芯".
袟邪谐邪谢芯屑 褑褨泻邪胁懈泄 蟹邪写褍屑, 邪谢械 褟 芯褔褨泻褍胁邪谢邪 斜褨谢褜褕芯谐芯 胁褨写 褑褜芯谐芯 褉芯屑邪薪褍.
袨褌 胁邪屑 褑褨泻邪胁懈薪泻邪 薪邪 锌褉芯褖邪薪薪褟: 褔械褋褜泻芯褞 锌芯斜邪卸邪薪薪褟 褍写邪褔褨 蟹胁褍褔懈褌褜 褟泻 "Zlom vas!", 褖芯 芯蟹薪邪褔邪褦 "袟谢邪屑邪泄 褕懈褞!". =)
小邪屑邪 褟 写褍卸械 褋泻械锌褌懈褔薪芯 褋褌邪胁谢褞褋褟 写芯 胁褋褨褏 褑懈褏 褋褨谢褜褋褜泻懈褏 蟹薪邪褏邪褉芯泻, 褟泻褨 屑邪薪褨锌褍谢褞褞褌褜 谢褞写褜屑懈, 褟泻褨 蟹胁械褉褌邪褞褌褜褋褟 写芯 薪懈褏 蟹 胁褨写褔邪褞. 袗谢械 小褍褉屑械薪邪, 褟泻 锌械褉褋芯薪邪卸泻邪, 薪邪 褖邪褋褌褟, 蟹芯斜褉邪卸械薪邪 谢褞写懈薪芯褞 蟹褨 蟹写芯褉芯胁懈屑 谐谢褍蟹写芯屑 褨 褑褨谢泻芯屑 褉邪褑褨芯薪邪谢褜薪懈屑 褋褌邪胁谢械薪薪褟屑 写芯 胁谢邪褋薪懈褏 蟹写褨斜薪芯褋褌械泄:
"鈥� 袣芯谢懈 胁卸械 蟹胁邪卸懈谢懈褋褟 锌褉懈褩褏邪褌懈 邪卸 褋褞写懈, 写芯 薪械胁褨写芯屑芯褩 斜邪斜懈, 褖芯 蟹邪 斜芯蟹薪邪-褟泻懈屑懈 褔褍褌泻邪屑懈 屑芯卸械 锌芯屑芯谐褌懈, 鈥� 褌芯, 蟹薪邪褔懈褌褜, 写芯斜褉械 锌芯锌芯褋懈写褨谢懈 屑邪泻芯屑. 袗 屑芯卸械, 褟 褩褏薪褟 芯褋褌邪薪薪褟 薪邪写褨褟? 袙芯薪懈 泄写褍褌褜 褋褞写懈 泄 斜芯褟褌褜褋褟, 斜芯 褋褍屑薪褨胁邪褞褌褜褋褟, 邪谢械 薪邪写褨褟 褩褏 褋褞写懈 褌褟谐薪械. 袉 褖芯斜 褌懈 蟹薪邪谢邪, 褔邪褋褌芯-谐褍褋褌芯 褑械 褌邪泻褨 谢褞写懈, 褍 褟泻懈褏 薪械 薪邪 褌褨谢褨 斜褨写邪, 邪 薪邪 写褍褕褨. 袗 褌邪泻懈屑 薪邪泄斜褨谢褜褕械 锌芯屑邪谐邪, 泻芯谢懈 锌械褉械褋褌邪褞褌褜 褋械斜械 屑褍褔懈褌懈 写褍褉薪懈屑懈 锌懈褌邪薪薪褟屑懈: 蟹屑芯卸褍 褔懈 薪械 蟹屑芯卸褍 褩屑 写芯锌芯屑芯谐褌懈... 袟薪邪褦褕, 褟泻 褩屑 胁褨写谢褟卸械 胁褨写 褋械褉褑褟, 泻芯谢懈 胁卸械 蟹 锌芯褉芯谐褍 胁芯薪懈 锌芯胁褨褉褟褌褜, 褖芯 屑邪褞 褔褍写芯写褨泄薪褍 褋懈谢褍? 孝邪 泄 褩屑 薪械 褌褉械斜邪 褖械 褉邪蟹 胁懈谢懈胁邪褌懈 屑械薪褨 写褍褕褍 锌褉芯 褋胁芯褩 薪械谐邪褉邪蟹写懈. 袣邪卸褍褌褜, 褖芯 胁褨褉邪 蟹褑褨谢褞褦. 袗 胁芯薪懈 胁褨褉褟褌褜, 褖芯 写芯锌芯屑芯卸褍, 褌芯屑褍 胁褋械 泄 胁懈锌芯胁薪褞褦褌褜褋褟. 袟褉芯蟹褍屑褨谢邪? 笑械 薪械 芯斜屑邪薪, 邪 屑褍写褉邪 写芯锌芯屑芯谐邪."
孝械 卸 褋邪屑械 褋褌芯褋褍褦褌褜褋褟 褨 "褉芯写懈薪薪芯谐芯 锌褉芯泻谢褟褌褌褟", 褨褋褌芯褉褨褞 褟泻芯谐芯 小褍褉屑械薪邪 褉械褌械谢褜薪芯 锌褉懈褏芯胁褍胁邪谢邪 胁褨写 胁谢邪褋薪芯褩 薪械斜芯谐懈. 袗写卸械, 薪械 褋泻谢邪写薪芯 蟹写芯谐邪写邪褌懈褋褟, 褖芯 褟泻 谢褞写懈薪褍 锌械褉械泻芯薪邪褌懈 胁 褋懈谢褨 锌褉芯泻谢褟褌褌褟, 褌芯 胁芯薪邪 胁褋褨 褋胁芯褩 写褉褨斜薪褨 褨 胁械谢懈泻褨 薪械褖邪褋褌褟 褋锌懈褏邪褌懈屑械 薪邪 "锌芯褉芯斜谢械薪芯".
袟邪谐邪谢芯屑 褑褨泻邪胁懈泄 蟹邪写褍屑, 邪谢械 褟 芯褔褨泻褍胁邪谢邪 斜褨谢褜褕芯谐芯 胁褨写 褑褜芯谐芯 褉芯屑邪薪褍.
袨褌 胁邪屑 褑褨泻邪胁懈薪泻邪 薪邪 锌褉芯褖邪薪薪褟: 褔械褋褜泻芯褞 锌芯斜邪卸邪薪薪褟 褍写邪褔褨 蟹胁褍褔懈褌褜 褟泻 "Zlom vas!", 褖芯 芯蟹薪邪褔邪褦 "袟谢邪屑邪泄 褕懈褞!". =)
October 5, 2018
脷vodn铆 t艡etina knihy pro m臎 byla emocion谩ln铆 bombou, b臎hem 150 stran se Kate艡in臎 poda艡ilo m臎 hned dvakr谩t rozbre膷et. Proces se Surmenou a popis Jakoubka mi daly prost臎 zabrat. Pak bohu啪el nastala tro拧ku pomalej拧铆 druh谩 t艡etina, kter谩 je sice zaj铆mav谩 a oce艌uji, kolik autorka vlo啪ila do rukopisu p铆le, nicm茅n臎 s n谩bojem p艡edchoz铆 膷谩sti se ned谩 rovnat. Fini拧 knihy ov拧em op臎t nab铆r谩 sp谩d a taky docela ne膷ekan媒 sm臎r a 煤pln媒 z谩v臎r m臎 dostal do kolen.
Poslouchala jsem audioknihu neskute膷n臎 skv臎le namluvenou moj铆 obl铆benkyn铆 Terezou Bebarovou, kter茅 sekundoval (taky skv臎l媒) Miroslav T谩borsk媒, a posledn铆 minuty jsem 煤pln臎 hltala. Posledn铆 kapitolu jsem si dokonce pustila dvakr谩t, proto啪e jsem nebyla schopn谩 uv臎艡it tomu, 啪e m臎 Tu膷kov谩 tak ut艡ela :D
Zvukov谩 str谩nka je v暖bec v媒born谩 - krom臎 dvou p艡edn铆ch nar谩tor暖, se m暖啪ete t臎拧it na speci谩ln铆 efekty v p艡铆pad臎 膷ten铆 archivn铆ch spis暖 a dopis暖 a houslov茅 p艡ed臎ly jednotliv媒ch 膷谩st铆.
Vynikaj铆c铆 z谩le啪itost! T臎拧铆m se na Gertu!
Poslouchala jsem audioknihu neskute膷n臎 skv臎le namluvenou moj铆 obl铆benkyn铆 Terezou Bebarovou, kter茅 sekundoval (taky skv臎l媒) Miroslav T谩borsk媒, a posledn铆 minuty jsem 煤pln臎 hltala. Posledn铆 kapitolu jsem si dokonce pustila dvakr谩t, proto啪e jsem nebyla schopn谩 uv臎艡it tomu, 啪e m臎 Tu膷kov谩 tak ut艡ela :D
Zvukov谩 str谩nka je v暖bec v媒born谩 - krom臎 dvou p艡edn铆ch nar谩tor暖, se m暖啪ete t臎拧it na speci谩ln铆 efekty v p艡铆pad臎 膷ten铆 archivn铆ch spis暖 a dopis暖 a houslov茅 p艡ed臎ly jednotliv媒ch 膷谩st铆.
Vynikaj铆c铆 z谩le啪itost! T臎拧铆m se na Gertu!
September 6, 2015
Je to sp铆拧 na 4,5 hv臎zdy, ale tady nev谩h谩m p艡iklonit se k p臎ti. Lidi tahle kniha bu膹to uchv谩t铆, nebo ji nebudou moci p艡ij铆t na jm茅no. Kniha toti啪 nen铆 p艡铆mo pro ka啪d茅ho, ale i tak si mysl铆m, 啪e dok谩啪e zaujmout docela velkou masu lid铆. Tu膷kov谩 p铆拧e skv臎le a v audiu s hlasem Terezy Bebarov茅 a Miroslava T谩borsk茅ho, to byl velk媒 z谩啪itek :)
May 10, 2022
After reading one Kate艡ina Tu膷kov谩, I decided to read another 馃槉 It was 'The Last Goddess'.
Dora is researching on her family's past. At the same time she is also researching on female healers from her hometown, who were traditionally persecuted as witches in previous centuries, but who were called 'goddesses' in her hometown. These two areas of research intertwine, of course 鈥� what is the fun otherwise 鈥� because we discover that Dora's aunt who brought her up, her mother who died when she was young, her grandmother and her female ancestors all formed a long line of 'goddesses', who were healers, who were persecuted. As Dora delves more into her family history, she discovers many secrets, some surprising and some unpleasant, and from the pages of her family's history there arises a mysterious character who seems to have played a major part in persecuting her family members. The identity of this person and the secrets that are revealed and the way Dora's family story intertwines with her country's history forms the rest of the book.
'The Last Goddess' is a very different book compared to 'Gerta' because it delves into female healers, witchcraft, witch trials. But it has one common thing with 'Gerta'. It brings to light a little known facet of Czech history. I was surprised that much of the book was based on facts, and the author has done her research well. That makes the book even more fascinating. The women characters in the book are all fascinating, even one of the characters who practises dark magic. The ending of the story was surprising and heartbreaking 鈥� I didn't see that coming.
I enjoyed reading 'The Last Goddess'. Kate艡ina Tu膷kov谩 has written one more novel in Czech. I hope it gets translated into English soon. I can't wait to read it.
I'll leave you with one of my favourite passages from the book.
"...the people of Kopanice held on to the notion that they were exceptional because they lived in an exceptional setting. Dora would have liked to begin here in the writing of her dissertation. But of course, it was nonsense to open an academic work with an essay on a mountainous landscape whose slopes were covered with forests of Carpathian beech and oak, their trunks too broad to put one鈥檚 arms around, where the hillsides were dotted with narrow tilled fields and squat little cottages and meadows that, in summer, were aglitter with rare orchids and anemones. An academic work cannot begin with a description of a fresh summer day in the mountains that gives way in a moment to winds and storms that swathe the ridges in dark, impenetrable clouds, nor with one of a hard winter when the hills are whipped with snowy gusts more reminiscent of Siberia than southern Moravia. The pages of such a work cannot describe the huge round moon and the shreds of night sky between the tips of the serried hills, nor can it observe that on a cloudless night, the hillside paths are seen almost as clearly as in daytime; that when at such a moment you stand on the crest of a hill at the threshold of your cottage, you might believe yourself in heaven, the whole world open beneath your feet; and that the lights of cottages scattered across the hillside opposite wink at you, as do those of Hrozenkov from a hollow between hills, like a babe in its cradle. Everyone knows of everyone else, regardless of the distance between them. They are alone, yet together. That would have been a proper beginning for her dissertation, showing how magical Kopanice in the White Carpathians was and that only in such a place could something as special as the goddesses originate and develop. In an academic work bound by strict rules in which aesthetics counted for naught, there was no place for it, however."
Have you read 'The Last Goddess'? What do you think about it?
Dora is researching on her family's past. At the same time she is also researching on female healers from her hometown, who were traditionally persecuted as witches in previous centuries, but who were called 'goddesses' in her hometown. These two areas of research intertwine, of course 鈥� what is the fun otherwise 鈥� because we discover that Dora's aunt who brought her up, her mother who died when she was young, her grandmother and her female ancestors all formed a long line of 'goddesses', who were healers, who were persecuted. As Dora delves more into her family history, she discovers many secrets, some surprising and some unpleasant, and from the pages of her family's history there arises a mysterious character who seems to have played a major part in persecuting her family members. The identity of this person and the secrets that are revealed and the way Dora's family story intertwines with her country's history forms the rest of the book.
'The Last Goddess' is a very different book compared to 'Gerta' because it delves into female healers, witchcraft, witch trials. But it has one common thing with 'Gerta'. It brings to light a little known facet of Czech history. I was surprised that much of the book was based on facts, and the author has done her research well. That makes the book even more fascinating. The women characters in the book are all fascinating, even one of the characters who practises dark magic. The ending of the story was surprising and heartbreaking 鈥� I didn't see that coming.
I enjoyed reading 'The Last Goddess'. Kate艡ina Tu膷kov谩 has written one more novel in Czech. I hope it gets translated into English soon. I can't wait to read it.
I'll leave you with one of my favourite passages from the book.
"...the people of Kopanice held on to the notion that they were exceptional because they lived in an exceptional setting. Dora would have liked to begin here in the writing of her dissertation. But of course, it was nonsense to open an academic work with an essay on a mountainous landscape whose slopes were covered with forests of Carpathian beech and oak, their trunks too broad to put one鈥檚 arms around, where the hillsides were dotted with narrow tilled fields and squat little cottages and meadows that, in summer, were aglitter with rare orchids and anemones. An academic work cannot begin with a description of a fresh summer day in the mountains that gives way in a moment to winds and storms that swathe the ridges in dark, impenetrable clouds, nor with one of a hard winter when the hills are whipped with snowy gusts more reminiscent of Siberia than southern Moravia. The pages of such a work cannot describe the huge round moon and the shreds of night sky between the tips of the serried hills, nor can it observe that on a cloudless night, the hillside paths are seen almost as clearly as in daytime; that when at such a moment you stand on the crest of a hill at the threshold of your cottage, you might believe yourself in heaven, the whole world open beneath your feet; and that the lights of cottages scattered across the hillside opposite wink at you, as do those of Hrozenkov from a hollow between hills, like a babe in its cradle. Everyone knows of everyone else, regardless of the distance between them. They are alone, yet together. That would have been a proper beginning for her dissertation, showing how magical Kopanice in the White Carpathians was and that only in such a place could something as special as the goddesses originate and develop. In an academic work bound by strict rules in which aesthetics counted for naught, there was no place for it, however."
Have you read 'The Last Goddess'? What do you think about it?
June 28, 2022
沤铆tkovsk茅 bohyn臎 bola kniha z 膷eskej beletrie, ktor谩 ma pril谩kala n谩zvom a ohlasmi. Zaujala ma v拧ak menej, ako som som d煤fala. Tentokr谩t mi okrem in茅ho nesadla forma. Autorka zvolila rom谩n prepoji钮 s historick媒mi aj fikt铆vnymi dokumentmi v podobe 拧t煤di铆, 膷l谩nkov, spr谩v a pod. Aj ke膹 ma to zo za膷iatku bavilo, po prvej tretine som 煤plne str谩cala z谩ujem tieto dokumenty 膷铆ta钮. Naozaj som nemala v rom谩ne n谩ladu 膷铆ta钮 trojstranov媒 extrakt z diplomovky, ke膹 u啪 vlastn煤 diplomovku sa mi nechcelo 膷铆ta钮, aby som ju mohla po sebe opravi钮. Jazykom ma tie啪 autorka nezaujala, mo啪no som bola pres媒ten谩 tou preva啪uj煤cou literat煤rou faktu.
膸al拧ia vec, ktor谩 mi nesadla bola okrem formy aj obsah. Ak by mi niekto pr铆beh Boh媒艌 povedal, ur膷ite by som uznala, 啪e je to ve木mi zauj铆mav茅 a bolo by skvel茅 pre膷铆ta钮 si o tom knihu, no autorka inform谩cie tr煤sila a pod谩vala sp么sobom, v膹aka ktor茅mu som od toho chcela viac. Ako keby sme cel媒 膷as 膷akali na nejak茅 ve木k茅 odhalenie a tajomstvo, ktor茅 sa pod木a m艌a nakoniec ani nevyplatilo a mne sa nedo膷kalo zados钮u膷inenia. Posledn茅 kapitoly boli dokonca pomaly rekapitul谩cie zisten茅ho, 膷o z谩ujmu tie啪 neprospelo. K po膷udovaniu najlep拧ia kapitola zo v拧etk茅ho bol samotn媒 epil贸g, ktor媒 obsahoval v拧etko potrebn茅, 膷o sa 膷itate木 z tejto 450-stranovej knihy mohol dozvedie钮.
Aj ke膹 som bola dos钮 sklaman谩 v niektor媒ch oh木adoch, nebolo to pre m艌a a啪 tak茅 ve木k茅 utrpenie 膷铆ta钮. T茅ma ma rozhodne zaujala, no spracovanie a forma mne osobne nesadla, 膷o v拧ak neznamen谩, 啪e tento rom谩n nie je v媒nimo膷n媒. Ur膷ite odpor煤膷am v拧etk媒m, ktor铆 ju na poli膷ke 膷eskej beletrie neobjavili a zauj铆ma ich bylink谩rstvo, 钮a啪k媒 osud rodiny/gener谩cie 膷i dokonca aj dejiny 膶eskoslovenska.
膸al拧ia vec, ktor谩 mi nesadla bola okrem formy aj obsah. Ak by mi niekto pr铆beh Boh媒艌 povedal, ur膷ite by som uznala, 啪e je to ve木mi zauj铆mav茅 a bolo by skvel茅 pre膷铆ta钮 si o tom knihu, no autorka inform谩cie tr煤sila a pod谩vala sp么sobom, v膹aka ktor茅mu som od toho chcela viac. Ako keby sme cel媒 膷as 膷akali na nejak茅 ve木k茅 odhalenie a tajomstvo, ktor茅 sa pod木a m艌a nakoniec ani nevyplatilo a mne sa nedo膷kalo zados钮u膷inenia. Posledn茅 kapitoly boli dokonca pomaly rekapitul谩cie zisten茅ho, 膷o z谩ujmu tie啪 neprospelo. K po膷udovaniu najlep拧ia kapitola zo v拧etk茅ho bol samotn媒 epil贸g, ktor媒 obsahoval v拧etko potrebn茅, 膷o sa 膷itate木 z tejto 450-stranovej knihy mohol dozvedie钮.
Aj ke膹 som bola dos钮 sklaman谩 v niektor媒ch oh木adoch, nebolo to pre m艌a a啪 tak茅 ve木k茅 utrpenie 膷铆ta钮. T茅ma ma rozhodne zaujala, no spracovanie a forma mne osobne nesadla, 膷o v拧ak neznamen谩, 啪e tento rom谩n nie je v媒nimo膷n媒. Ur膷ite odpor煤膷am v拧etk媒m, ktor铆 ju na poli膷ke 膷eskej beletrie neobjavili a zauj铆ma ich bylink谩rstvo, 钮a啪k媒 osud rodiny/gener谩cie 膷i dokonca aj dejiny 膶eskoslovenska.
March 3, 2020
Zanimljiv istorijski roman o specifi膷nom rukavcu istorije 膶e拧ke, ali bi se lako mogle na膰i i paralele sa Balkanom jer mi imamo mnogo sli膷nih 膰o拧kova u kojima se me拧aju prastari obi膷aji, narodna verovanja, praznoverje i vera, pa kad se ukrsti sa tokom doga膽aja iz "spoljnog sveta" sva拧ta je mogu膰e. Mnogo je zaista interesantne dokumentacije i拧膷itano i autorka se veoma potrudila da sve uklopi, me膽utim, vidi se da je u pitanju nevi膷an pisac jer su 拧avovi o拧tri izme膽u dokumenata i toga 拧to 啪eli da ka啪e, mnogo mnogo je podataka, imena, koja samo to ostaju, pa 膷ak i glavna junakinja je vo膽ena samo svojom sudbinom i svojim istra啪ivanjem - ni拧ta o njoj zapravo ne znamo kao o li膷nosti.
Ipak, veoma mi je drago 拧to sam je pro膷itala i nije zalud utro拧eno vreme.
Ipak, veoma mi je drago 拧to sam je pro膷itala i nije zalud utro拧eno vreme.
March 28, 2019
I classify "Zitkovsk茅 bohyne" by Katerina Tuckova (2012) with effort, because for msny reasons I liked it but at the same time I wasn't captured. I think at the bottom there's a not told which disturbed me and ruined my reading, because it is a novel, which should be less airy. It is defined as a thriller, but I disagree because there's an investigation, but it's more a search about her family, what they were than a search for a killer. On the other hand I was fascinated by the women of this book who are a mix of magic and medicine, but not enough for forgetting the obscure and patchy writing.
May 6, 2020
V poslednej dobe m谩m 拧钮astie na knihy, v ktor媒ch je 膷iasto膷nou t茅ma m谩gia. 沤itkovsk茅 bohyne spadaj煤 pr谩ve do tejto t茅my, kde sa hist贸ria prep谩ja s pr铆behmi fikt铆vnymi aj tak媒mi, ktor茅 s煤 zalo啪en茅 sa re谩lnych osob谩ch. Kniha m谩 ve木mi dobr煤 a svi啪n煤 formu, kde sa pr铆beh mie拧a so spr谩vami 艩TB. Vykreslenie hist贸rie rodiny a najm盲 jej 啪enskej l铆nie cez jedno storo膷ie m谩 v啪dy 膷o pon煤knu钮, lebo n谩m jednak ukazuje, 啪e v minulosti v么bec nebolo tak dobre, ako niektor铆 radi spom铆naj煤, ale tie啪 to, 啪e v spolo膷nosti a vo vz钮ahoch st谩le existuj煤 tie ist茅 stereotypy.
February 10, 2025
Valjda vredi po膷eti od naslovnih boginja 鈥� na啪alost u istoriji 膷esto omra啪ene 啪ene od znanja/啪ene od magije, kako ve膰 ide 膷ija interpretacija, ovde su fokus, i kroz istoriografski narativ pome拧an sa bildungsromanom p(r)ati se njihov polo啪aj u dru拧tvu kroz proto-klerofa拧izam, nacizam, i naposletku komunizam u 膶e拧koj. D葍 se o膷ekivati onda da 膰e tragedije biti na sve strane; na sre膰u, Tu膷kova mahom uspeva da ne skrene u tzv mizeri-porn (sve do pomalo naprasnog i bezveze kraja) i kroz jedan arhivski, gotovo dokumentarni narativ daje svojim subjektima rasko拧an li膷ni 啪ivot bez podila啪enju 膷itaocu preteranom ekspozicijom. Gde zasere me膽utim jeste osvrt na 鈥瀖agi膷an鈥� deo prethodno pomenutih boginja; roman po karakteristici nije magijski realizam, ve膰 poku拧ava da bude ekstremno posve膰en primarnim izvorima; kao takav, flert sa magijom mu ne prili膷i. Uz to, nacisti膷ka fascinacija onostranim kao veliki fokus drugog dela romana mi je bila mrvu odbojna, jerbo me uvek asocira na Vulfen拧tajn (svestan sam da je ovo moj problem). Sasvim solidan roman i prijatno 膷itanje, koliko to ve膰 duga istorija represije 啪enskog znanja mo啪e da bude. Osve拧膰en, pametan, i mrvicu nedozreo svojoj tematici.
3+
3+
January 22, 2021
Realno 2.5, a zbog odli膷ne ideje i autori膷inog truda oko istra啪ivanja pravih boginja sa 沤itkove ide ocjena vi拧e.
Radije bih pogledala dokumentarni film umjesto knjige - previ拧e dokumenata i izvje拧taja mi je ubilo radnju. Bez obzira 拧to je roman utemeljen na stvarnim doga膽ajima, radnja je fiktivna pa su me smetale neke isforsirane sudbine i 啪ivoti glavnih likova.
Netflix bi o tome napravio odli膷nu seriju (ili film); trebaju samo uvaliti unutra osobu druge boje ko啪e (koja ne膰e biti bijela), sve ostalo imaju u romanu.
Radije bih pogledala dokumentarni film umjesto knjige - previ拧e dokumenata i izvje拧taja mi je ubilo radnju. Bez obzira 拧to je roman utemeljen na stvarnim doga膽ajima, radnja je fiktivna pa su me smetale neke isforsirane sudbine i 啪ivoti glavnih likova.
Netflix bi o tome napravio odli膷nu seriju (ili film); trebaju samo uvaliti unutra osobu druge boje ko啪e (koja ne膰e biti bijela), sve ostalo imaju u romanu.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 720 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.