欧宝娱乐

Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

爻丕夭 賵 讴丕乇 賮丕卮蹖爻賲: 爻蹖丕爻鬲 賲丕 賵 丌賳賴丕

Rate this book
鈥淲ith unsettling insight and disturbing clarity, How Fascism Works is an essential guidebook to our current national dilemma of democracy vs. authoritarianism.鈥濃€擩elani Cobb, New Yorker staff writer

鈥淣o single book is as relevant to the present moment.鈥濃€擟laudia Rankine, author of Citizen

NEW YORK TIMES BOOK REVIEW EDITORS鈥� CHOICE 鈥� With a new preface 鈥� A Yale philosopher identifies the ten pillars of fascist politics, and charts their horrifying rise and deep history.

As the child of refugees of World War II Europe and a renowned philosopher and scholar of propaganda, Jason Stanley has a deep understanding of how democratic societies can be vulnerable to fascism: Nations don鈥檛 have to be fascist to suffer from fascist politics. In fact, fascism鈥檚 roots have been present in the United States long before Donald Trump.

Alarmed by the pervasive rise of fascist tactics both at home and around the globe, Stanley focuses here on the structures that unite them, laying out and analyzing the ten pillars of fascist politics鈥攖he language and beliefs that separate people into an 鈥渦s鈥� and a 鈥渢hem.鈥� He knits together reflections on history, philosophy, sociology, and critical race theory with stories from contemporary Hungary, Poland, India, Myanmar, and the United States, among other nations. He makes clear the immense danger of underestimating the cumulative power of these tactics, which include

鈥� exploiting a mythic version of a nation鈥檚 past
鈥� propaganda that twists the language of democratic ideals against themselves
鈥� anti-intellectualism directed against universities and experts
鈥� law and order politics predicated on the assumption that members of minority groups are criminals
鈥� fierce attacks on labor groups and welfare

These mechanisms all build on one another, creating and reinforcing divisions and shaping a society vulnerable to the appeals of authoritarian leadership.

By uncovering disturbing patterns that are as prevalent today as ever, Stanley reveals that the stuff of politics鈥攃harged by rhetoric and myth鈥攃an quickly become policy and reality. Only by recognizing fascists politics, he argues, may we resist its most harmful effects and return to democratic ideals.

176 pages, Paperback

First published September 4, 2018

2920 people are currently reading
32407 people want to read

About the author

Jason F. Stanley

7books480followers
Jason Stanley is the Jacob Urowsky Professor of Philosophy at Yale University. He is the author of five books, including How Propaganda Works, winner of the Prose Award in Philosophy from the Association of American Publishers, and How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them, about which Citizens author Claudia Rankine says: 鈥淣o single book is as relevant to the present moment.鈥� Stanley serves on the board of the Prison Policy Initiative and writes frequently about propaganda, free speech, mass incarceration, democracy, and authoritarianism for The New York Times, The Washington Post, Boston Review, The Chronicle of Higher Education, and The Guardian.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
4,865 (42%)
4 stars
4,757 (41%)
3 stars
1,458 (12%)
2 stars
281 (2%)
1 star
120 (1%)
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,591 reviews
Profile Image for Julie.
1,932 reviews605 followers
February 16, 2025
When I finished reading this book, I had to think deep thoughts for awhile before I could attempt a review. While I found the information informative and very interesting, I also was disappointed by the way the author presented the information. I really wanted to read a unbiased, informational look at the history, effects and basics of fascism. I don't feel that's what this book presents.

Stanley discusses the basic components of fascism and how it gains control. The use of mythic tales of the past, dehumanizing portions of the population, propaganda, conspiracy theories and fake news to manipulate citizens, creating a state of control that creeps up quietly. I do agree whole heartedly that Americans and others around the world should be very concerned at the tendency of modern politics to descend into lies, manipulation and tricks.

The best way to overtake a nation is to divide, manipulate and conquer. Both extremes in the American political arena are attempting to do this. The end result is NOTHING is ever accomplished. No matter which side is the victor in any election, they spend all their time un-doing the work of past administrations, changing things to ensure their re-election or keeping the seats/positions their party currently controls and keeping the general population riled up. How is this in any way a healthy, productive or democratic situation?? Party politics has become a fascist tool. And both sides are pointing fingers at the other screaming terms like fascism, socialism, communism....so many isms. When in the end, both sides are completely guilty of fucking over the very people they are elected to represent and care about.

I enjoyed the basic information this book presented. I expected a neutral presentation of facts.....and ended up disappointed because the author pretty much just gives his opinions and leaves a lot of the in-depth details that I wanted out of the mix. Great basic information on fascism. I would have liked a longer book that included basic history on some of the fascist regimes that have existed in history, plus more details on why those regimes ultimately failed and what political environment replaced them. In the end, this book touched on basics and used them to support the author's political views. More of an editorialized spewing of knowledge than a non-fiction non-biased sharing of information about a dangerous political situation.

I'm still looking for a book on fascism that gives the facts so that I can read, learn and form my own opinion. I do not need an opinion fed to me.

**I voluntarily read a review copy of this book from Random House via NetGalley. All opinions expressed are entirely my own. PLEASE VOTE -- your voice does matter!!!!!**
Profile Image for Jenny.
268 reviews114 followers
August 25, 2018
Fascism is iniguitous. It creeps into the many weaknesses of democracy until the system is fatally damaged. In How Facism Works, Jason Stanley lists the various ways that facism undermines democracy.
The appeal of facism lies in its radical authoritarian ultranational stance. Immigrants and minorities, in other words those not like the major population, are the first to be blamed for woes facing the nation. Propaganda is ramped up. Sexual proclivity is exposed and demonized. The blame game continues and intensifies until the ruling heirarchy winnowed to a small select faction.
Ten separate facets of facism are listed, explained and documented in the book. There are facist states in the world today. Facism didn鈥檛 end in Nazi Germany. This makes for stressful reading. It becomes clear that facism is not a tidal wave of the past but is the riptide that flows beneath the surface of the river of our civilization.
Please read the book and let yourself think.
I received an advance copy of this book from Netgalley. #netgalley #howfacismworks
Profile Image for Darwin8u.
1,774 reviews8,945 followers
January 11, 2024
"Trump, trump, trump, trump, trump."
- Trump, Trump

description

Trump, trump, trump, trump. The Mythic Past. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump? Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Hitler. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump; Trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Propaganda. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump! Trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump? Trump, trump, trump, trump -- trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Anti-Intellectual. Trump, trump, trump, trump.

Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Viktor Orb谩n. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Unreality. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump? Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump; Trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Hierarchy. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump! Trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Victimhood. Trump, trump, trump, trump? Trump, trump, trump, trump -- trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Recep Tayyip Erdo臒an. Trump, trump, trump, trump.

Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Law and Order. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Vladimir Putin. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump? Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump; Trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Sexual Anxiety. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Sodom and Gommorah. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump! Trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Benito Mussolini. Trump, trump, trump, trump? Trump, trump, trump, trump -- trump. Arbeit Macht Frei. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump. Trump, trump, trump, trump.
Profile Image for Richard Derus.
3,642 reviews2,193 followers
May 14, 2025
I RECEIVED A DRC FROM THE PUBLISHER VIA NETGALLEY. THANK YOU.

My Review
: The reason I want to review this right now is the and its root cause, the idiotic and racist replacement theory. It is a pernicious and evil set of beliefs demanding that white people remain in power forever because it's theirs by right. Colonialism and racism and fascism are in lock step, and their grip on the unintelligent, badly educated, and ill-informed is only strengthening.

I make no apologies for my opinions, or for expressing them in strong and probably insulting terms, as those who subscribe to these idiotic beliefs make no apologies for theirs or their own method of expressing them. I oppose these views. I oppose their open, uncontested expression. I oppose people who make their own need to control others, body, mind, and soul, their purpose for public action. And no, demanding that these True Believers NOT be allowed to dictate the continued lives, personal liberties, and rise to political power of those who are not them, is not at all the same thing.

This book is a compendium of pithily expressed, carefully researched, and very well-sourced conclusions that are not readily dismissable based on modern evidence. I cede the floor to Author Stanley:
Fascist politics does not necessarily lead to an explicitly fascist state, but it is dangerous nonetheless. Fascist politics includes many distinct strategies: the mythic past, propaganda, anti-intellectualism, unreality, hierarchy, victimhood, law and order, sexual anxiety, appeals to the heartland, and a dismantling of public welfare and unity.


On fascism's roots:
In book 8 of Plato鈥檚 Republic, Socrates argues that people are not naturally led to self-governance but rather seek a strong leader to follow. Democracy, by permitting freedom of speech, opens the door for a demagogue to exploit the people鈥檚 need for a strongman; the strongman will use this freedom to prey on the people鈥檚 resentments and fears. Once the strongman seizes power, he will end democracy, replacing it with tyranny. In short, book 8 of The Republic argues that democracy is a self-undermining system whose very ideals lead to its own demise. Fascists have always been well acquainted with this recipe for using democracy鈥檚 liberties against itself; Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels once declared, 鈥淭his will always remain one of the best jokes of democracy, that it gave its deadly enemies the means by which it was destroyed.鈥� Today is no different from the past. Again, we find the enemies of liberal democracy employing this strategy, pushing the freedom of speech to its limits and ultimately using it to subvert others鈥� speech.

鈥揳苍诲鈥�

In a 1922 speech at the Fascist Congress in Naples, Benito Mussolini declared: We have created our myth. The myth is a faith, a passion. It is not necessary for it to be a reality鈥�.Our myth is the nation, our myth is the greatness of the nation! And to this myth, this greatness, which we want to translate into a total reality, we subordinate everything. Here, Mussolini makes clear that the fascist mythic past is intentionally mythical. The function of the mythic past, in fascist politics, is to harness the emotion of nostalgia to the central tenets of fascist ideology鈥攁uthoritarianism, hierarchy, purity, and struggle.


On racism's roots and branches:
鈥淐heck your privilege鈥� is a call to whites to recognize the insulated social reality they navigate daily.

鈥揳苍诲鈥�

Hutu power movement was a fascist ethnic supremacist movement that arose in Rwanda in the years before the 1994 Rwandan genocide.

鈥揳苍诲鈥�

Nixon鈥檚 chief of staff, H. R. Haldeman: 鈥淵ou have to face the fact that the whole problem is really the blacks,鈥� Haldeman quoted Nixon as saying in a diary entry from April 1969. 鈥淭he key is to devise a system that recognizes this while not appearing to.鈥�

鈥揳苍诲鈥�

Mussolini denounce{d} the world鈥檚 great cities, such as New York, for their teeming populations of nonwhites. In fascist ideology, the city is a place where members of the nation go to age and die, childless, surrounded by the vast hordes of despised others, breeding out of control, their children permanent burdens on the state.


See also my review of for extra and personal information about the racist roots of Rwanda's genocide. See my review of for a prescient prefiguring of the Othering that racism relies on's horrific costs.

Author Stanley doesn't, I think I've shown, pull punches. He also sources his claims with admirable clarity. There are dozens of notes in each chapter; there are dozens of reputable scholars cited. In his Epilogue, Author Stanley considers the hazards and risks we're running simply by normalizing (or really continuing to normalize) the ongoing fascist politicizations we see around us now.
Pratap Mehta wrote: 'The targeting of enemies鈥攎inorities, liberals, secularists, leftists, urban naxals, intellectuals, assorted protestors鈥攊s not driven by a calculus of ordinary politics鈥�.When you legitimize yourself entirely by inventing enemies, the truth ceases to matter, normal restraints of civilization and decency cease to matter, the checks and balances of normal politics cease to matter.'

鈥揳苍诲鈥�

In fascist politics, women who do not fit traditional gender roles, nonwhites, homosexuals, immigrants, 鈥渄ecadent cosmopolitans,鈥� those who do not have the dominant religion, are in their very existence violations of law and order. By describing black Americans as a threat to law and order, demagogues in the United States have been able to create a strong sense of white national identity that requires protection from the nonwhite 鈥渢hreat.鈥�

鈥揳苍诲鈥�

The dangers of fascist politics come from the particular way in which it dehumanizes segments of the population. By excluding these groups, it limits the capacity for empathy among other citizens, leading to the justification of inhumane treatment, from repression of freedom, mass imprisonment, and expulsion to, in extreme cases, mass extermination.


What's happening now is not the Will of the People. It's not the inevitable outcome of "them" becoming a threat. This is proof of "...a growing body of social psychological evidence substantiates the phenomenon of dominant group feelings of victimization at the prospect of sharing power equally with members of minority groups. A great deal of recent attention has been paid in the United States to the fact that around 2050, the United States will become a 'majority-minority' country, meaning that whites will no longer be a majority of Americans," threatening 鈥�...the lengthy history of ranking Americans into a hierarchy of worth by race, the 鈥渄eserving鈥� versus the 鈥渦ndeserving.鈥� And I feel confident I need not say directly that deserving = white for you to get the full, appalling picture. If you're up for more, there's , which I've reviewed; it's another, and shorter, work of synthesis and explication.

Where do we go from here? How do the majority of US citizens resist this ever-worsening attack on our bodies, our minds, our freedoms and rights?

First, VOTE. Second, read and learn from the folks farther along the trail through the thickets of trouble and outrage meant to scare and dishearten you. Nothing about the fascism threatening reason and freedom in the US is inevitable or unstoppable or, most importantly, right and correct. You've watched and read ...you know what's at stake for women, and every single one of you knows a woman; also for QUILTBAG folks, and if you're reading this you know at least one of those (me). Act like this is an emergency.

Because it very much is.
Profile Image for Sharad Pandian.
428 reviews156 followers
February 9, 2022
A book commendable in its breadth, but almost entirely lacking in depth.

I. Breadth

Jason Stanley creates a model for identifying "fascist politics", which he thinks of as tactics that rely on "ultranationalism of some variety (ethnic, religious, cultural), with the nation represented in the person of an authoritarian leader who speaks on its behalf" as a "mechanism to achieve power".

He then identifies 10 distinct strategies, each of which gets a chapter dedicated to it:
1. the mythic past
2. propaganda
3. anti-intellectualism
4. unreality
5. hierarchy
6. victimhood
7. law and order
8. sexual anxiety
9. appeals to the heartland
10. dismantling of public welfare and unity.

He then applies this model to various contemporary movements, including Republicans in the US, Poland, Hungary, Turkey, India. By showing that these elements are real and recurring, he forces us to see that there are real patterns which should be paid attention to. His chapter on the attempts at discrediting universities and the press using charges of corruption, Marxism, etc., is particularly good, as is his brief recounting of the treatment of African-Americans (although the latter isn't new or even unambiguously relevant). He also has some occasional ideas along the way which are remarkably insightful, eg: "corruption, to the fascist politician, is really about the corruption of purity rather than of law". He also points out rightly that a lot of Fascism is a response to dominant groups perceiving wrongly themselves as oppressed when their unjust power is taken away by the demand for equality.

All of this serve as a useful guide to identify and pay closer attention to right-wing activities constructing arbitrary and pernicious divisions between "us" and "them".


II. Depth

On the downside, although Stanley does a pretty good job of identifying Fascist strategies, he doesn't really explain why Fascism appeals to people, and therefore how it can be opposed. Why do people get disenchanted with liberal democracy, and instead fixate on narrow identity considerations? There are two aspects I think are important to consider.

a. Economics

Strikingly, the relationship between economic conditions and the rise of Fascism isn't given enough attention. And this is in large part because the entire book relies on an asymmetry - Fascism needs to be analyzed but the status quo doesn't. Given that the decades where liberal democracy in the US was taken to be the unquestioned ideology (at least in terms of principles) all while economic inequality skyrocketed and massive corporate hegemony took hold, shouldn't the legitimate grievances of the alienated and impoverished be considered part of the story? Stanley's stance seems to be an almost imperceptibly whispered "yes" at best. Consider him writing:

political theorists have known that democracy cannot flourish on soil poisoned by inequality. It is not merely that the resentments bred by such divisions are tempting targets for a demagogue. The more important point is that dramatic inequality poses a mortal danger to the shared reality required for a healthy liberal democracy.

In keeping with being an academic philosopher, he seems intent on thinking about inequality in terms of effects on ideas instead of as material conditions that cause dissatisfaction and destabilization of political arrangements themselves! Instead he tries to link it to a "danger to the shared reality"? Trump and Hillary get mentioned, but Bernie Sanders doesn't, showing that Stanley is trying to force political reality into two boxes of evil, small-minded fascists and good, accepting cosmopolitans. These descriptions aren't entirely wrong, but they seem inadequate for political analysis.

The point, of course, isn't that Fascism is rational, but that no one seems to have any real solution to capitalistic excesses, and so Fascism might understandably very well seem like the only way to go to many. As Sheri Berman , "fascism did not become powerful simply by appealing to citizens鈥� darkest instincts. Fascism also, crucially, spoke to the social and psychological needs of citizens to be protected from the ravages of capitalism at a time when other political actors were offering little help."

Also somewhat weirdly, Stanley also tries to link Fascists with the libertarian insistence on individualism and free market worship, but again as Berman points out, "The Nazis also supported an extensive welfare state (of course, for 鈥榚thnically pure鈥� Germans). It included free higher education, family and child support, pensions, health insurance and an array of publically supported entertainment and vacation options." Stanley 's categorization of Fascism seems historically wrong, and theoretically confused (how would a movement for unity also push for individualism without theoretical tensions all over the place?)

We then can't talk about the origins of Fascism without talking about why it suddenly seems particularly credible with a loss of faith in the economic system. So while everything Stanley says about how there's an erosion of trust in institutions, a disregard for truth and complexity, and purity politics on nitro, I don't think he's quite touched the engine driving Fascism entirely. At the end of his book he does talk about trade unions and how their presence correlates with equality because it promotes empathizing across divisions. True, but unions aren't a new idea, they were part of a political programme which was decimated by capital. And even if they could somehow be revived, they're hardly going to change the system as a whole, as much as soften the blow slightly. The truth, again, is that no one really knows what to do, with communism lacking credibility and democratic socialism too feeble, to provide serious theoretical/cultural opposition to capitalist excess and hence the resultant Fascistic politics.

b. Identity and Meaning

The deeper reason for my pessimism about liberal democracy's ability to counter Fascism can be understood from Richard Rorty's incredibly perceptive comment that

There are two principal ways in which reflective human beings try, by placing their lives in a larger context, to give sense to those lives. The first is by telling the Story of their contribution to a community. This community may be the actual historical one in which they live, or another actual one, distant in time or place, or a quite imaginary one, consisting perhaps of a dozen heroes and heroines selected from history or fiction or both, The second way is to describe themselves as standing in immediate relation to a nonhuman reality.

The latter might work for academics, but most people, Fascists and non-Fascists, need communities they see themselves as parts of to find meaning and take their bearings from. Now a political community built on abstract principles certainly isn't impossible, but I think it's becoming clear that it is particularly weak compared to more concrete and specific community narratives based on race, religion, etc. Unfortunately, liberalism with its insistence on perpetual openness to complex narratives is always going to be threatened because it cannot compete with the pull of easier Fascistic ones. As Orwell put it in his review of Mein Kampf,

Hitler, because in his own joyless mind he feels it with exceptional strength, knows that human beings don鈥檛 only want comfort, safety, short working-hours, hygiene, birth-control and, in general, common sense; they also, at least intermittently, want struggle and self-sacrifice, not to mention drums, flags and loyalty-parades. However they may be as economic theories, Fascism and Nazism are psychologically far sounder than any hedonistic conception of life.

Stanley seems completely insensitive to needs like the one Rorty talks about, because he keeps talking about the Fascist need to built themselves a mythology as though it were some unique evil tendency, rather than an all-too-human one. I would even speculate that Stanley is implicitly using his WEIRD identity (Western+educated+industrial+rich+democratic) as an obvious ethical given, instead of something of an anomaly. This leads him to completely miss the appeal of Fascism, making his analysis good at identifying certain patterns, but leaving readers completely unable to grapple with its origins or solutions.
Profile Image for Sharon Orlopp.
Author听1 book1,020 followers
May 7, 2025
was first published in September 2018. A new preface was written for the 2020 paperback version of the book. Jason Stanley, the author states that the focus of the book is on the fascist tactics that are used to achieve power.

I took many notes as I read this book. Some of the passages include:

* Conspiracy theories are the calling card of fascist politics.

* Education either poses a grave threat to fascism or becomes a pillar of support for the mythical nation.

* Fascist states focus on dismantling the rule of law, with the goal of replacing it with the dictates of individual rulers.

* When women attain positions of political power that are usually reserved for men, it is perceived as corruption.

* Fascist movements have been draining swamps for generations. Publicizing false charges of corruption while engaging in corrupt practices is typical of fascist policies.

* Fascist politics are threatened by growing gender equity and prefer patriarchal hierarchy.

* The attacks on expertise, science, and truth that are the life blood of fascist policies imperil much more than just our political system.

* Our Democratic culture is on life-support.

The book contains many historical and current examples. Unfortunately, history has a way of repeating itself. It clearly demonstrates how ultranationalism creates divisions of "us" versus "them" as well as a drumbeat to return to a mythical past.

This book is an eye-opener and a call to action. Stanley warns that complacency and normalization can transform the morally extraordinary into the ordinary.
Profile Image for Jean.
1,792 reviews786 followers
February 18, 2020
The author is the son of immigrants who fled Nazi Germany. He states that he is troubled that fascist politics is on the rise throughout the world again.

The book is well written and researched. Stanley analyzes the many strategies that fascist regimes employ: publicizing the idea of a mythic past, use of propaganda and conspiracy theories, anti-intellectualism, the replacement of reasoned debate with fear and anger, casting doubt on media, denial of equality, white male superiority, culture of victimhood, perpetuation of the Us and Them based on ethnic, religious and racial identities just to list a few the author discusses.
I felt the main message of the book was about his worry of complacency. He states his grandmother鈥檚 generation refused to acknowledge the Nazi threat until it was too late. He states that today the 鈥渘ormalization of extreme policies鈥� poses an urgent challenge. Stanley is calling on democracies to resist the insidious encroachment of fascism.

I read this as an audiobook downloaded from Audible. The book is five hours and forty-four minutes. MacLeod Andrews does a good job narrating the book. Andrews is an actor and audiobook narrator. He has won the Audie Award for 鈥淪teelheart鈥� and numerous EarPhone Awards.
Profile Image for The Geeky Bibliophile.
488 reviews94 followers
September 12, 2018
Outstanding--and chilling--book. Definitely an eye-opener.

Review:

In How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them, Jason Stanley explains fascist ideologies, how it spreads, and why democratic societies are vulnerable to it.

I've delayed this review for quite a while, because I didn't know how to go about writing it. I'm still not sure how to go about it, but I'll share some thoughts I had while reading

The book consists of ten chapters: The Mythic Past, Propaganda, Anti-Intellectual, Unreality, Hierarchy, Victimhood, Law and Order, Sexual Anxiety, Sodom and Gomorrah, and Arbeit Macht Frei (German, meaning "work shall make you free"). With each chapter, one feeling was consistent鈥攆amiliarity. Each fascist ideology discussed was all-too-familiar, because I've seen or heard it so many times before...

The mythic past: "Make America Great Again."
Propaganda: "Drain the swamp!""America First!"
Anti-Intellectual: "Intellectual elitism."
Unreality: False conspiracy theories, such as "Obama is Kenyan Muslim!"
Hierarchy: White supremacy.
Victimhood: "Christians are the most persecuted religion in America!"
Law and Order: Taking away the children of asylum seekers and putting them in cages.
Sexual anxiety: "Mexicans are rapists."
Sodom and Gomorrah: "Gay marriage is wrong!"
Arbeit Macht Frei/work shall make you free: "Poor people are lazy and I don't want MY tax dollars being used to support them!"

(These are simplistic examples, of course, but these are the types of things that came to mind as I read through the chapters.)

Overall, I consider this book to be a well-written, timely warning against the embrace and normalization of fascist ideologies. My review cannot begin to touch on all the things covered in this book, so I urge you to read it for yourself if you're interested in being informed about such things.

I received an advance reading copy of this book courtesy of via .
Profile Image for Joelendil.
815 reviews5 followers
September 14, 2018
This could have been such a helpful, insightful book. The word fascist听is hurled at political / ideological opponents so often that it has started to lose its meaning. I hoped that this book would provide a historical perspective on fascism by examining actual fascist governments and drawing some parallels to the more egregious / worrisome trends in US & European politics. The chapter titles in the table of contents were promising:

- The Mythic Past
- Propaganda
- Anti-Intellectual
- Unreality
- Hierarchy
- Victimhood
- Law & Order
- Sexual Anxiety
- Sodom & Gomorrah
- Arbeit Macht Frei

Ironically (given the book's subtitle) the author used his book divisively: to laud his left-wing political views and demonize virtually all distinctively right-wing views. He uses the term听liberal democracy听inconsistently throughout, disengenuously equivocating between the meaning of representative democracy as opposed to autocratic or oligarchic government (which most readers would agree is a good thing)听and American left-wing political views听(which he treats as equally self-evidently superior if you are a right-thinking person). Virtually all American right-wing political views are presented in straw-man form, defined in such a way that they fit his definition of听fascist politics.

I was expecting there to be a pretty heavy smear-job on President Trump and his cronies (much of it richly deserved...the man's demagoguery and autocratic tendencies are frightening), but for this to turn into "let's find a way to define virtually everything the Republicans are and do as听fascist politics" was massively disappointing. The absurdly biased portrayal of all things conservative and constant hymns of praise to all things and all people left-wing buried some good historical research and valid parallels under an avalanche of partisanism.

If you want a more historical, less partisan view of the rise of fascist politics, I would highly recommend听Darkness Over Germany听by E. Amy Buller. It was written during World War II (based on interviews with Germans before WWII), so you will have to draw your own contemporary parallels...but that's not necessarily a bad thing.
Profile Image for Michael Perkins.
Author听6 books453 followers
Read
June 5, 2022
Putin, the GOP, and memory laws....

/author_blog...

==============

Brand new, spot on interview with the author....



author's article on Buffalo shooting........

Profile Image for Randall Wallace.
656 reviews575 followers
December 25, 2018
How self-obsessed and fact-adverse are Trump supporters? 鈥�45% of Donald Trump鈥檚 supporters feel that whites are the most discriminated against racial group in America. 54% of Trump鈥檚 supporters believe that Christians are the most persecuted religious group in America.鈥� Look at the white nationalist websites, they claim racism against whites, but never any against blacks. Nixon told H.R. Haldeman, 鈥淵ou have to face the fact that the whole problem is really the blacks. The key is to devise a system that recognizes this while not appearing to.鈥� The Right attacks the right of free speech in universities because it is one of the few remaining places where free speech won鈥檛 get you in trouble. Fascist politics attack expertise by ridiculing it. Steve Bannon knows that 鈥渁nger and fear is what gets people to the polls.鈥� Reasoning does not attract, emotion does. 鈥淔ascist politics replaces the liberal ideal of equality with its opposite: hierarchy.鈥� Those atop the food chain are indoctrinated to only see the lower status of others as somehow their fault. Racial hierarchy today is still at the level of during Reconstruction where for every $100 a white has, a black has only $5. Another fascist trick is 鈥渟exualizing the threat of the other鈥� which relies on stoking patriarchy, anger and fear. The first female senator (1922) was also a women鈥檚 right鈥檚 advocate who had no problem saying, 鈥渋f it takes lynching to protect women鈥檚 dearest possession from drunken, ravening beasts, then I say lynch a thousand times a week.鈥� Ida Wells proved most lynchings had no connection with rape and was not believed. Fantasies of one鈥檚 ethnic group being raped by the other recently resurfaced in Myanmar with the ethnic cleansing of Rohingya being fueled by similar false rape stories.

We use a 鈥渓inguistic intergroup bias鈥� when talking about people we deem as 鈥渢he other鈥�. Research studies have shown people don鈥檛 like to remember bad things their group or country does (Motivated to Forget 鈥� 2013). Palestine/Israel today is 鈥渢he contradiction between a struggle for equal respect and a struggle for dominance.鈥� Watch how Fox News calls black unrest 鈥渞iots鈥� more often than 鈥減rotest鈥�, while CNN and MSNBC are better, but not by much. One reason the Right wants to incarcerate blacks is because, once released, former prisoners have far less civic participation rates, as well as far less employment opportunities (feeding the cycle of incarceration). DuBois鈥檚 Black Reconstruction shows how black lawmakers 鈥渂ent over backward to accommodate the fears of their white fellow citizens.鈥� Mussolini makes clear the fascist past is intentionally mythical, 鈥淲e have created our myth. The myth is a faith, a passion. It is not necessary for it to be a reality.鈥� In Germany, it is based on the patriarchal family and grew out of the German Volkish movement wanting a return to the German medieval past. Invented histories are common in the U.S. too: 鈥淐onfederate monuments arose well after the Civil War had ended.鈥�

鈥淔ascist politics impugns the liberal ideal of freedom.鈥� It also tries to minimize all thoughts of class struggle and so unions must be smashed. It鈥檚 rural America that gets its panties in a bunch about immigration, not urban America. Urban areas are much more multicultural and more tolerant historically by necessity. This is why the fascist message is crafted for rural ears and fears. The Nazis had a harder time getting to people protected in cities. Under fascism, worth is determined by productivity, and thus a big reason for fascists to always harp on 鈥渓aziness鈥�. 鈥淎rbeit macht frei鈥� is a symbol of fascism, it embodies the idea that people being targeted are lazy and thus the cure is work. Such targeting explains why Nazi鈥檚 exterminated disabled people. Removing social safety nets and job training further reinforces the dominant laziness myth. Fascism tells you to enjoy what little you are given because in return you get now a sadist鈥檚 front row seat for the mistreatment of some group that will get far less than you, or maybe nothing. In other words, fascism鈥檚 job is 鈥渢o normalize the unthinkable.鈥� Because charges of fascism will always seem extreme, this normalization means the goalposts are constantly moving. This was explained by James McGill Buchanan (in the book Democracy in Chains) who taught the Right that 鈥渢ransformations can be achieved by increments that few will notice, because most people have no patience for minutiae.鈥� And whatever today鈥檚 American Cletus wants to tell his beer swilling friends, 鈥渢he majority of those who benefit from welfare programs are white.鈥� Another great book by Jason.
Profile Image for Trey Malone.
171 reviews11 followers
December 18, 2020
In which Jason Stanley does very little research and instead chooses to list all the things he dislikes as 鈥渇ascist.鈥�
Profile Image for Leftbanker.
951 reviews445 followers
June 16, 2020
Fascism is not a word that I throw around carelessly. It has been watered down over the years when used to describe movements of feminism, conservation and ecology, fundamentalist Islam, and many other things the far-right likes to use to frighten its base. The march of nations down the historic path towards fascism has been very well documented at this point; the USA has been showing the symptoms of the disease for decades, because as the author points out, 鈥淔ascism is not a new threat, but rather a permanent temptation.鈥�

Written in clear and concise language, informative without ever being boring, this is a book that should be required reading for every concerned American citizen. It鈥檚 well past the time when people should take heed of the sinister nature of very powerful elements of our society with a ministry of propaganda working 24/7 to inculcate their narrow-minded constituency.

It鈥檚 a very short book and a quick read. Read it.
Profile Image for Michael Austin.
Author听138 books290 followers
September 9, 2018
How Fascism Works packs a lot into a relatively short space, but it doesn't really explain how fascism works. It does a good job explaining what fascism is, and it contains stark warnings for Americans and people in other nations that are currently sliding into fascism, or, at least, dealing with fascist politicians. His examples are good, but he occasionally overstates the case and defines normal conservative positions (i.e. opposition to affirmative action, same-sex marriage, or an extensive welfare state) as inherently fascist. While fascists can certainly oppose these things, there are legitimate, non-fascist arguments against them that he does not acknowledge.

Generally, though, Stanley defines fascism by the positions that it takes in ways that work equally well for the 20th century fascist movements and the current politics of the United States, Poland, Turkey, Russia, Hungary, and other nations facing fascist revivals. The hallmarks of fascism that he analyzes include:

--Devotion to a mythic past that asserts the heroic origins of a particular nation, religion, ethnicity, or other kind of in-group.

--Attacks on scientists, historians, academics, journalists, and other "elites"--with elites meaning something like "people who know stuff."

--An "us" vs "them" mentality that groups all of the "elites" into the "them" category and the members of the favored in-group into the "us" category.

--Strict hierarchies that include the assertion of the inherent superiority, or fitness, of specific races, genders, family types, etc.

--The assertion that the favored group has been victimized by other groups, even though the favored group has all of the power and money.

--Attacks on refugees and immigrants, who are presented as forces polluting the purity of the in-group.

--The portrayal of urban areas as pollutions of the purity of rural life.

--A constant desire to destabilize any objective measurement of truth and replace it with power--i.e., the truth is what the powerful person says it is, with everything else being "fake news."

These are all valid definitions of fascism, and Stanley does a good job of showing how they worked for Hitler and Mussolini (really his only go-to historical examples) as well as Donald Trump, Viktor Orb谩n, and Recep Erdo臒an. His indictments are powerful. He draws a difference between a fascist politician and a fascist state, so he is not quite calling the United States a fascist country. But I do not believe that there can be any reasonable doubt that Donald Trump is using the same electoral and governing strategies as the most well-known 20th and 21st century fascist politicians.

There is one set of assertions in the book, however, that I think that Stanley gets completely wrong, and in a way that (if he ends up convincing people) could produce exactly the opposite reaction that he wants it to have. It occurs on pp. 82-83, where he attacks Stephen Pinker for asking,"Do women, on average, have a different profile of aptitudes and emotions than men?" and "Are Ashkenazi Jews, on average, smarter than gentiles because their ancestors were selected for the shrewdness needed in money lending?" To these questions, Stanley responds,
The concern about this kind of writing is that it presents those who seek a natural source for inequality as brave truth-seekers, driven by reason to reject the heart's plea for equality. This research has proven to be suspect, at best. And yet, the search for the natural source of inequality . . . as fact somehow continues, grail-like.

Stanley is dangerously wrong here, not about the specific questions of women's aptitudes and Ashkenazi intelligence, but about the underlying assertion that variation is a form of inequality. The fact is that various populations of humans, and every other organism, have some natural variation. Males in some species are (on average) larger than females, or have more colorful tails. Turtles on one island are better at finding fish and turtles on other islands are better at evading predators.

I understand that Stanley is interested in preventing people from using physiological or cognitive variation as a way to validate inequality. But the way to do this is to assert that human equality has nothing to do with these variations. The fact that human males tend to be taller and heavier than human females does not make men superior to women. It does not make them more qualified for most positions, more worthy of love, or more capable of doing anything but a few occupations where size and strength are all that matters (such as, say, linebacker for a professional football team). Our error is to invest normal variation with moral significance.

Because variation is inevitable, trying to argue against it by equating it to inequality concedes exactly the point that people in liberal democracies should not be conceding.

This is a relatively minor point in Stanley's book, though, so I don't think that it ruins it or anything. But it is perhaps the clearest example of the way that he applies the epithet "fascism" to intellectual positions that are not fascist and that are much more defensible than he acknowledges. But he also applies the word to some very real and very important things that are happening in our country today that really are fascist. And that is reason enough to read the book.
Profile Image for ross williamson.
516 reviews71 followers
January 20, 2022
i have some miscellaneous notes that i may clean up and post later, but this is probably only a useful read if you know next to nothing about fascism鈥攊t鈥檚 got some very good data, but it鈥檚 all so wrapped up in convoluted semi-mccarthyist liberal vagueness that the thought of reading any more of it was just plain exhausting

[eta 9/9/19] the aforementioned notes:

this has a p good overview of the basic tenets of fascism and where it's most prevalent today, as well as its historical roots in america, but stanley acts like the current fascist move in american politics is a sort of corruption of what was previously a functional ("healthy") liberal democracy, as though that has no relation to fascist thought whatsoever. like. okay...?

stanley seems to agree with the far-right assertion that any and all Marxist & communist thought = evil which is just. Tiring. there's a bit at the beginning where he claims that marxists "weaponize class divisions," which is certainly one possible interpretation of marx, but not one that anybody who understands materialism at all would make. acting like liberalism is the political and ideological opposite of facism strikes me as sort of hopelessly naive, too. stanley kept discussing fascism in contrast to "healthy liberal democracy" which, as history shows us over and over, is itself often a genocidal institution. stanley says that liberalism cannot flourish on unequal soil, but doesn't acknowledge that the trend of modern liberalism has been to link itself inextricably with capitalism, which is an inherently unfree economic system. but then what can you expect from someone who thinks marxists weaponize class divisions, and liberals don't. apparently. or something. amazing

also the fact that stanley spends a lot of time "debunking" rt, which is afaik literally the only tv source of leftist news in america, itself seems a little... uh.......... okay... like i agree that giving voice to people on the far right is bad but i'm honestly just sort of exhausted by liberals who act like if you've heard of russia, you're a nazi

this is an ok intro work but it's definitely coming from an Extremely liberal perspective, in the sense that all "extremism" is considered Impolite and therefore invalid. very tired of liberals acting like my opinions only matter if i pretend not to give a shit about human suffering. i understand that liberals can't really conceive of any other political system beside neoliberal capitalism, but this repetition does, unfortunately, have the effect of making stanley sound like a total idiot. would love to read a book with the same like, goals by someone who's a bit less obtuse.

eta 190122: i鈥檝e changed my mind about rt after reading peter pomerantsev鈥檚 works but i still recommend starting with clara zetkin if you need a short comprehensible intro to fascism!
Profile Image for Laura Noggle.
695 reviews532 followers
May 30, 2024
Key takeaway鈥擭ations don't have to be fascist to suffer from fascist politics.

Equal parts sobering and alarming, Yale philosopher Jason Stanley lays out the ten pillars of fascist politics, analyzing the language and beliefs that divide 鈥渦s鈥� from 鈥渢hem.鈥� A timely, yet chilling read so close to the election.

Thought to Ponder:

"In book 8 of Plato鈥檚 Republic, Socrates argues that people are not naturally led to self-governance but rather seek a strong leader to follow. Democracy, by permitting freedom of speech, opens the door for a demagogue to exploit the people鈥檚 need for a strongman; the strongman will use this freedom to prey on the people's resentments and fears. Once the strongman seizes power, he will end democracy, replacing it with tyranny. In short, book 8 of The Republic argues that democracy is a self-undermining system whose very ideals lead to its own demise.

Fascists have always been well acquainted with this recipe for using democracy鈥檚 liberties against itself; Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels once declared, 鈥淭his will always remain one of the best jokes of democracy, that it gave its deadly enemies the means by which it was destroyed.鈥� Today is no different from the past. Again, we find the enemies of liberal democracy employing this strategy, pushing the freedom of speech to its limits and ultimately using it to subvert others鈥� speech.鈥�
Profile Image for Jigglypuff.
39 reviews
September 16, 2018
Almost 40 years after Gilbert Allardyce called for the concept of fascism to be "de-modeled, de-ideologized, de-mystified, and de-escalated," out comes a book that purports to lay out the tenets of the fascist ideology. Anyone working to establish a definition of fascism, though, would seem to be confronted with a paradox. A definition of fascism that is to be universally applicable must transcend the limits of specific bodies of historical evidence. Yet to claim that fascism existed in France and Spain and now in the U.S. is to detract from a general understanding or theory of fascism. Stanley tries to provide an Occam's razor for fascism since the term is mentioned with increasing frequency. Drawing upon his background as a philosopher, he attempts to construct an ideological-political understanding of the term that hovers above historical analysis. Fascism seems useful when discussing events in the interwar period, but I'm ultimately not persuaded that it is an inherently meaningful frame to discuss events beyond Mussolini's movement in Italy and in Germany.
Profile Image for David.
715 reviews344 followers
October 20, 2018
Even though this is a good book, it is not the book I wanted to read. This is not necessarily the author's fault. He (and his publisher) at no time promised the book I wanted.

The title is 鈥淗ow Fascism Works鈥�, and that's what it is about. The title of the book that I wanted to read would continue 鈥溾€�.and What to Do About It鈥�

This book says that the alarming turn of events which is currently going on here in the US fits into the Fascist model. It devotes a chapter to different aspects of this model including, but not limited to, appeal to a mythic past, anti-intellectualism, and law and order. Examples are not confined to the current-day USA, but also come from other unhappy places and times, both past and present.

Some questions that I would have liked answered, but weren't:

鈥� Why does this happen in some places and not others?
鈥� Is it possible to recognize movements like these in their nascent form?
鈥� What are the best tactics to combat Fascism?
鈥� Are there examples of places and times when Fascism has been dismantled without an orgy of bloodshed and mayhem?

I don't think why I wish to know these things is a big mystery.

I guess what I wanted was a cookbook, but what I got was a list of ingredients. To give due credit, the book is short, easy to read, and not overburdened with jargon or pointless displays of outrage.

I don't agree with everything that the author writes. For example, I think he covers labor unions with a rosy glow and treats labor union racism as an aberration rather than a sadly frequent occurrence, and does not address at all the long history of labor-union-related corruption and criminality.

But more frequently author seems to be on target. I thought Chapter 10 was especially well-explained, especially the part where he explains how fascist policy often works to make fascist mythology seem more life-like (in and around Kindle location 1735).

An interesting book, but I'm still trying to find some really smart person to tell me what to do now.

See a review published on the web site of the New York Times on September 11, 2018, .

I received a free electronic advance review copy of this book via and .
Profile Image for Dan.
490 reviews4 followers
July 23, 2020
Jason Stanley鈥檚 How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them is essential reading for all eager to understand declining western democracies. In simple and straightforward prose, Stanley unravels and lays bare the components of fascist politics: the creation and use of a mythic past, propaganda, anti-intellectualism, rejection of facts, victimhood, toxic patriarchy and hierarchy, and social anxiety among other themes. It鈥檚 a perfect exposition of praxis, with Stanley seamlessly moving back and forth between his theory of fascism and current and historical practical examples. How Fascism Works is remarkably accessible, well structured, and well written.
Profile Image for SQAGuru.
9 reviews
September 7, 2018
Yet another liberal intelligentsia effort to reshape the facts to characterize a large segment of a population of horrid goals -- without bothering to find out ANYTHING about the true nature of that segment of the population. If you are looking for more "evidence" of how evil your neighbors and co-workers are, then dive right in. If, on the other hand, you love your neighbors and your freedom, and you want to keep your blood pressure within the normal range, don't even think about reading or listening.
Profile Image for Wenting Gao.
26 reviews1 follower
March 29, 2021
My issue with the book lies in its dogmatic way of arguing. It seems to me that the author categorizes whatever that contradicts with his own interpretation of liberal values as Fascism. For topics as such, I personally prefer a tone with more neutrality, comprehensiveness, and readiness to be proven wrong.
Profile Image for Maricruz.
492 reviews70 followers
August 26, 2021
F谩cil de leer, planteado a un nivel introductorio, y sobre todo muy necesario. Quiz谩s no tanto para identificar c贸mo operan los fascistas, que tambi茅n, sino m谩s bien para advertir c贸mo, a resultas de la presi贸n que ejercen sobre el discurso p煤blico, podemos acabar normalizando opiniones y conductas que debieran ser inaceptables. Es decir, c贸mo dejar entrar al fascismo en nuestras vidas nos acaba volviendo a todos un poco fachas a pesar nuestro y casi sin darnos cuenta. Y luego puede ser ya demasiado tarde.
Profile Image for Shadin Pranto.
1,436 reviews490 followers
May 9, 2020
唳椸Γ唳むΘ唰嵿Δ唰嵿Π唰囙Π 唳涏Σ唰�, 唳夃Θ唰嵿Θ唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳班唰� 唳忇Μ唳� 唳溹唳む唳唳む唳唳︵唳� 唳⑧唰� 唳膏唳班唳唳多唳� 唳溹唳∴唰囙 唳唳唳膏唳溹Ξ唰囙Π 唳唳ㄠΠ唰佮Δ唰嵿Ε唳距Θ 唳樴唳涏啷� 唳溹唳膏Θ 唳膏唳熰唳唳ㄠΣ唳� 唳唳澿唳む 唳氞唳唰囙唰囙Θ 唳唳唳膏唳溹Ξ唰囙Π 唳唳多唳粪唳熰唳唰佮Σ唰� 唳曕唳唳 唳班唳粪唳熰唳班Μ唰嵿Ο唳Ω唰嵿Ε唳距唰� 唳椸唳班唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳涏Ζ唰嵿Ξ唳Θ唰嵿Ε唳距Ο唳监イ 唳唳曕唳むΠ唳距Ψ唰嵿唰嵿Π唰囙Π 唳膏Ξ唳曕唳侧唳� 唳班唳溹Θ唰€唳む唳� 唳唳班唳曕唳粪唳唰� 唳班唳苦Δ 唳灌Σ唰囙 唳唳班 唳唳ム唳唳� 唳班唳溹Θ唰堗Δ唳苦 唳呧唰嵿唳ㄠ唰� 唳膏唳Π唰嵿Χ 唳曕Π唳む 唳氞唳唰囙唰囙Θ 唳溹唳膏Θ 唳膏唳熰唳唳ㄠΣ唳苦イ 唳膏唳Σ唰嵿Ο 唳多Δ唳唳� 唳ㄠΟ唳�, 唳むΜ唰� 唳唳犩 唳Α唳监Σ唰� 唳忇唰囙Μ唳距Π唰� 唳灌Δ唳距Χ 唳灌Μ唰囙Θ 唳ㄠ啷�

唳唳唳膏唳溹Ξ 唳ㄠ唳 唳むΞ唳膏 唳犩唳� 唳曕唳� 唳曕唳� 唳氞唳班唳椸Σ唳� 唳︵唳唰� 唳忇唳苦Ο唳监 唳嗋Ω唰� 唳む 唳唳澿Δ唰� 唳ㄠ 唳唳班Σ唰� 唳唳唳膏唳溹Ξ 唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳嗋Σ唰嬥唳ㄠ 唳溹Ξ唳 唳ㄠ啷� 唳侧唳栢 唳忇 唳膏Δ唰嵿Ο 唳溹唳ㄠ唳ㄠイ 唳む唳� 唳灌唳熰Σ唳距Π唰囙Π 唳曕唳班唳唳侧唳唰� 唳唳む唳む 唳曕Π唰� 唳忇唳苦Ο唳监唳涏唳� 唳膏唳Θ唰囙イ 唳侧唳栢唳涏唳� 唳椸Γ唳む唳ㄠ唳む唳班唳� 唳唳Μ唳膏唳ム唳� 唳唳о唳Ξ唰囙 唳唳唳膏唳唳︵ 唳膏Π唳曕唳� 唳曕唳粪Ξ唳む唳� 唳む唰嵿Δ唰� 唳Ω唰囙イ 唳む唳班Κ唳� 唳む唳曕 唳唳唰� 唳Ω唰� 唳溹Θ唳む唳曕 唳ㄠ唳唳ㄠ唳む唳班Γ 唳曕Π唰� 唳嗋唰€唳Θ 唳ㄠ唳溹唳︵唳� 唳曕唳粪Ξ唳む唳 唳︵唳栢Μ唳距Π 唳唳膏Θ唳距イ 唳唳侧Δ 唳忇 唳唳膏Θ唳距唰� 唳唳班唳� 唳曕Π唳む唳� 唳む唳班 唳呧Δ唰€唳む唰� 唳唳Μ唳灌唳� 唳曕Π唰囙イ 唳唳班Μ唳距Π 唳溹Θ唳椸Γ唰囙Π 唳膏唳Θ唰� 唳唳班唳唳� 唳曕唳ㄠ 唳椸唳班Μ唰嬥唰嵿唰嵿Μ唳� 唳樴唳ㄠ唳曕 唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳嗋Ω唰囙Х 唳Θ唰� 唳曕Π唳苦Ο唳监 唳︵唳撪Ο唳监 唳灌Ο唳� 唳忇唳膏Ξ唳 唳む唳班 唳曕Δ 唳多唳班唳唳� 唳呧Η唳苦唳距Π唰€ 唳涏唳侧イ 唳唳唰嵿Δ唳苦唰� 唳樴唳班, 唳呧Δ唰€唳� 唳︵唳ㄠ唳� 唳曕唳ㄠ 唳樴唳ㄠ唳曕 唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳唳� 唳む唳班 唳曕Π唰� 唳溹Θ唳む唳� 唳唳溹Η唰嬥Σ唳距唳唰� 唳Θ唰嬥Ο唰嬥唰€ 唳灌Ο唳� 唳唳唳膏唳唳︵ 唳膏Π唳曕唳班イ 唳溹唳膏Θ 唳膏唳熰唳唳ㄠΣ唳� 唳侧唳栢唳涏唳�,

"Fascist politicians justify their ideas by breaking down a common sense of history in creating a mythic past to support their vision for the present. They rewrite the population鈥檚 shared understanding of reality by twisting the language of ideals through propaganda and promoting anti-intellectualism, attacking universities and educational systems that might challenge their ideas. Eventually, with these techniques, fascist politics creates a state of unreality, in which conspiracy theories and fake news replace reasoned debate."


唳唳唳膏唳溹Ξ唰囙Π 唳Ε唰� 唳唳о 唳灌Δ唰� 唳唳班 唳忇Ξ唳� 唳曕唳ㄠ 唳唳唰嵿Δ唳� 唳 唳唳班Δ唳苦Ψ唰嵿唳距Θ唳曕 唳膏唳む 唳唳班 唳拷锟� 唳唳唳膏唳唳︵ 唳膏Π唳曕唳班イ 唳唳ㄠ唳ㄠΞ唳む唳Σ唳唳 唳唳唰嵿Δ唳� 唳 唳唳班Δ唳苦Ψ唰嵿唳距Θ唳椸唳侧唳曕 唳唳唳ㄠ唳ㄠΝ唳距Μ唰� 唳多唳唰囙Ω唰嵿Δ唳� 唳曕Π唳距Π 唳膏唳唳� 唳栢唳佮唰� 唳唳唳膏唳唳︵唳班啷� 唳膏Π唳曕唳� 唳膏唳栢唳ㄠ 唳ㄠ唳溹Ω唰嵿Μ 唳唳ム唳� 唳膏Κ唳曕唳粪 唳唳班 唳班唳粪唳熰唳班Ο唳ㄠ唳む唳班唰� 唳唳Μ唳灌唳� 唳曕Π唰囙イ 唳溹唳む唳唳む唳唳︵唳� 唳熰唳唳� 唳侧唳椸唳ㄠ 唳唳唰嵿Δ唳� 唳曕唳傕Μ唳� 唳樴唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳� 唳膏唳� 唳唳膏唳侧唳ㄠ唳� 唳嗋Ξ唳� 唳ム唳曕唳� 唳唳唳膏唳唳︵唳︵唳� 唳唳ㄠ唳︵唳� 唳呧Ω唰嵿Δ唰嵿Π啷� 唳唳膏唳侧唳ㄠ 唳Σ唰囙唳苦Σ唰囙Θ,

"We have created our myth. The myth is a faith, a passion. It is not necessary for it to be a reality鈥�.Our myth is the nation, our myth is the greatness of the nation! And to this myth, this greatness, which we want to translate into a total reality, we subordinate everything."

"唳︵唳班唳ㄠ唳む" 唳唳唳膏唳唳︵唳� 唳嗋Π唰囙唳熰 唳灌唳む唳唳距Π啷� 唳忇Π唳� 唳︵唳班唳ㄠ唳む唳� 唳唳班唳︵唳о 唳溹唳灌唳� 唳樴唳粪Γ唳� 唳曕Π唰�, 唳曕Π唰� 唳ム唳曕啷� 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳︵唳ㄠΧ唰囙Ψ唰� 唳ㄠ唳溹唳班唳� 唳灌Ο唳� 唳︵唳班唳ㄠ唳む唳� 唳忇 唳ㄠΞ唰嵿Μ唳� 唳唳粪唳犩Κ唰嬥Ψ唳曕イ 唳溹唳膏Θ 唳膏唳熰唳唳ㄠΣ唳� 唳忇 唳Θ唰� 唳曕Π唳苦Ο唳监 唳︵唳唰囙唰囙Θ 唳忇Ν唳距Μ唰� -

" Masking corruption under the guise of anticorruption is a hallmark strategy in fascist propaganda."

唳︵Σ唰€唳 唳椸Γ唳唳о唳Ξ, 唳︵Σ唳︵唳� 唳唳︵唳о唳溹唳唳︵唳� 唳唳唳 唳嗋Θ唳距唰嬥Θ唳� 唳︵唳栢 唳唳 唳唳唳膏唳唳︵啷� 唳忇Π唳� 唳呧Δ唰嵿Ο唳ㄠ唳� 唳む唳Π唳む唳� 唳膏唰嵿唰� 唳む唳︵唳� 唳︵Σ唰囙Π 唳ㄠ唳む唳曕 唳唳距Ξ唳灌唳� 唳灌唳膏唳 唳溹Θ唳む唳� 唳膏唳Θ唰� 唳夃Κ唳膏唳ム唳Θ 唳曕Π唰囙イ 唳唳唳膏唳唳︵ 唳︵Σ唳椸唳侧唳� 唳ㄠ唳む唳︵唳� 唳嗋唰冟Δ唳�-唳唳班唰冟Δ唳� 唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳侧唳栢 唳Α唳� 唳唳班唳膏唰嵿唳苦 唳嗋Σ唰嬥唳ㄠ 唳曕Π唰囙唰囙Θ啷� 唳唳曕唳むΠ唳距Ψ唰嵿唰嵿Π唰囙Π 唳熰唳班唳唳�, 唳灌唳權唳椸唳班, 唳唳侧唳唳ㄠ唳�, 唳む唳班Ω唰嵿, 唳班唳多唳唳� 唳唳班Ν唰冟Δ唳� 唳︵唳多 唳唳唳膏唳唳︵Κ唳ㄠ唳ム 唳ㄠ唳む唳︵唳� 唳唳む唳むΞ 唳灌唳膏唳 唳溹Θ唳む唳� 唳曕唳涏 唳む唳侧 唳оΠ唳む 唳曕唳唳 唳椸Γ唳唳о唳Ξ 唳� 唳︵Σ唰€唳 唳唳︵唳о唳溹唳唳唳� 唳唳唳曕 唳班唳栢唳涏 唳む 唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳侧唳栢唰囙Π 唳Ο唳监唳� 唳唳侧 唳侧唳椸Μ唰囙イ

唳夃Ζ唳距Π唳む, 唳唳ㄠΜ唳む, 唳唳曕Ω唰嵿Μ唳距Η唰€唳ㄠΔ唳距Π 唳唳侧 唳嗋唳∴唳苦Ο唳监 唳曕唳粪Ξ唳む 唳唳撪Ο唳监 唳唳唳膏唳唳︵唳班 唳唳班Ε唳唳� 唳Π唳苦唳侧唳唳むΝ唳距Μ唰� 唳о唳唳膏唳� 唳膏唳︵唳о唳ㄠ唳� 唳ㄠ唳 唳膏唳囙Ω唳� 唳唳班Δ唳苦Ψ唰嵿唳距Θ唳曕 唳唳班 唳む唳︵唳� 唳曕唳粪Ξ唳む唳� 唳呧Κ唳唳Μ唳灌唳� 唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳唳班Χ唰嵿Θ 唳む唳侧Μ唰囙イ 唳忇Π唳� 唳樴唳` 唳涏Α唳监唳 唳唳ㄠ唳ㄠΞ唳む唳� 唳唳︵唳о唳溹唳唳︵唳� 唳唳班唳︵唳о, 唳︵Σ唳Θ唰嵿Ε唰€ 唳多唳曕唳粪唳唳Μ唳膏唳ム 唳む唳班 唳灌Ο唳� 唳忇Ζ唰囙Π 唳唳班Η唳距Θ 唳夃Ζ唰嵿Ζ唰囙Χ唰嵿Ο啷� 唳侧唳栢唰囙Π 唳唳粪唳,

"Fascist politics seeks to undermine public discourse by attacking and devaluing education, expertise, and language. Intelligent debate is impossible without an education with access to different perspectives, a respect for expertise when one鈥檚 own knowledge gives out, and a rich enough language to precisely describe reality. When education, expertise, and linguistic distinctions are undermined, there remains only power and tribal identity."

唳唳唳膏唳溹Ξ 唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳Α唳监唳多唳ㄠ唳� 唳氞Ξ唰庎唳距Π 唳忇唳熰 唳唳唳熰唳班唳唳距Σ 唳灌Δ唰� 唳唳班 唳溹唳膏Θ 唳膏唳熰唳唳ㄠΣ唳苦Π "How Fascism Works: Politics Of Us and Them". 唳忇 唳唳唰囙Π 唳Α唳� 唳膏唳唳Ζ唰嵿Η唳む 唳灌Σ唰� 唳膏唳熰唳唳ㄠΣ唳苦Π 唳唳班唳曕唳粪唳 唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳椸Α唳监Μ唳∴啷� 唳唳侧Δ 唳熰唳班唳唳Σ唰嵿Ο唳距Θ唰嵿Α 唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳侧唳栢 唳灌Σ唰囙 唳囙唳班唳唳� 唳夃唰嵿Π 唳溹唳む唳唳む唳唳�, 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唳距Θ唰嵿Η唳む, 唳Π唰嵿Γ唳唳︵唳� 唳唳∴唳距Μ唳距Α唳监 唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳嗋Σ唰嬥唳ㄠ 唳犩唳� 唳溹Ξ唰囙Θ唳苦イ 唳呧Π唰嵿Ε唳距 唳忇唳膏唳ム 唳忇Δ唳椸唳侧 唳唳粪Ο唳� 唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳忇唰佮Δ唰� 唳氞唳唰囙唰囙Θ 唳 唳曕唳ㄠ 唳忇唳� 唳唳粪Ο唳监 唳唳曕唳� 唳︵唳む 唳唳班唳ㄠΘ唳苦イ 唳む唳� 唳栢唳ㄠ唳曕唳� 唳栢唳唳距Α唳监 唳侧唳椸唳苦Σ啷� 唳嗋Π 唳侧唳栢唳� 唳椸Δ唳苦 唳多唳侧Ε啷�
Profile Image for Luis.
799 reviews189 followers
January 4, 2020
Las motivaciones del fascismo son bastante claras y responden a derivas totalitarias que no respetan la diversidad de la ciudadan铆a. Aniquilan la disidencia y la pluralidad de opiniones, haciendo que todos se arrodillen al gran l铆der. Los medios est谩n totalmente justificados: se permite tergiversar la realidad o invent谩rsela directamente si obedece al discurso. Lo que pretende Jason Stanley es identificar las pol铆ticas fascistas actuales y analizar su verdadero significado m谩s all谩 de los camuflajes de los cuales se sirven.

A la edici贸n espa帽ola le precede un pr贸logo del escritor Isaac Rosa, que realiza un resumen del contenido y lo traslada a la realidad espa帽ola con algunos ejemplos concretos. El libro se divide principalmente en diez cap铆tulos, cada uno centrado en un tema a identificar dentro de los discursos totalitarios (si bien varios de los an谩lisis se repiten a lo largo del libro, ya que no es f谩cil aislarlos unos de otros). Incluye al final un ep铆logo donde el autor comenta c贸mo sus familiares sufrieron el holocausto y, especialmente, refleja c贸mo su abuela vio que era casi imposible convencer a los propios jud铆os de que estaba a punto de ocurrir algo catastr贸fico - realizando un paralelismo con nuestra incredulidad actual - hasta que ya fue demasiado tarde.

El an谩lisis que realiza est谩 constantemente basado en ejemplos hist贸ricos o actuales, bien presentes en la bibliograf铆a. Son frecuentes las referencias al Mein Kampf de Hitler y declaraciones de otros dirigentes del partido nazi, as铆 como de otros genocidios; al mismo tiempo que se reflejan noticias pol铆ticas actuales de Estados Unidos, Hungr铆a o Turqu铆a. Tambi茅n se recurre a estudios de psicolog铆a o a fil贸sofas como Hannah Arendt. Los temas que pone sobre la mesa se centran en el racismo, las noticias falsas, los ataques al feminismo o el supuesto "pasado glorioso de la naci贸n", demostr谩ndonos con la hemeroteca que ninguno de ellos es un fen贸meno nuevo. El estilo es muy f谩cil de leer, aunque el autor es erudito, deja de lado toda sofisticaci贸n para expresarse sin equ铆vocos sobre asuntos muy familiares.

Dir铆a que es muy recomendable su lectura para replantearse discursos muy presentes en los medios y redes sociales, de manera que podamos entender su origen y su destino.

Algunas de las cosas interesantes que merecen ser apuntadas de la lectura son:
- Los sindicatos son una fuerza de oposici贸n al fascismo, porque reconcilian a los trabajadores de toda raza y religi贸n. Al luchar como iguales, se eliminan las diferencias y se suman fuerzas contra el enemigo com煤n.
- Al apelar a un momento pasado m铆tico de la naci贸n, a una 茅poca de victorias sobre el enemigo, se est谩 simplificando la historia en exceso, ya que ese pasado nunca fue exactamente as铆. Tambi茅n se corre el riesgo de dar uniformidad a un pueblo que no la tuvo ni la tiene hoy en d铆a.
- Es frecuente en sus discursos presentar al entorno rural como "lugar id铆lico y puro, donde predomina el esfuerzo" y a las ciudades como "el caos de la mezcla, de los marginados subvencionados". Normal que los votos rurales acaben representando su apoyo principal. Es reversible.
- Al tratar a alguien con inferioridad - m谩s a煤n si ese trato se publicita - ya se est谩 inoculando el fascismo. Cualquier identificaci贸n entre otros y nosotros, ya achaca al grupo externo cualidades negativas mientras que refuerza al grupo de referencia. Deber铆amos huir de alejar a las personas de nosotros y considerarnos todos en el mismo grupo.
- Muchas de las proclamas de las pol铆ticas fascistas se basan en exageraciones de la realidad, e incluso en irrealidades, que provocan escenarios posteriores muy peligrosos.
Profile Image for Carrie Leib.
139 reviews16 followers
November 11, 2024
鈥淧ratap Mehta wrote: The targeting of enemies鈥攎inorities, liberals, secularists, leftists, urban naxals, intellectuals, assorted protestors鈥攊s not driven by a calculus of ordinary politics鈥�.When you legitimize yourself entirely by inventing enemies, the truth ceases to matter, normal restraints of civilization and decency cease to matter, the checks and balances of normal politics cease to matter.鈥�
Profile Image for Ryan Bell.
61 reviews28 followers
October 30, 2018
Absolutely essential reading at this moment in time, especially. It鈥檚 not the most academic or thorough book about fascism but it鈥檚 readable, organized, and well-argues. I can鈥檛 recommend it highly enough. Follow this with The Anatomy of Fascism, by Robert Paxton.
Profile Image for Wick Welker.
Author听8 books625 followers
February 12, 2025
It's a standard play book.

Taking on such a heavy topic, Stanley does a good job in laying out the playbook of fascists politics that have been used for over a century including Myanmar, Rwanda, Nazi Germany and the buds of neofascistic politics that are currently circulating around the western world right now in Poland, Turkey, France and the United States. It's a pretty standard play book that has been followed for a long time and it's happening right now before our eyes.

The first thing a fascist politician needs to due is to fetishize the mythic past. Create a myth, usually weaved from a sense of divine nationalism, and then leverage that fraudulent nostalgia into a perceived cultural and economic loss to the dominant ethnic group of the population. The mythology is almost always created on a foundation of patriarchy and ethical purity. The best time to do this, and when a country is the most vulnerable, is during social and economic decline of that nation. This is precisely what happened in Weimar Germany as the Nazi parry began to consolidate its cultural influence. Conspiracy theories are a potent tool for a fascist. They aren't meant to convince people of the lies, that's only a secondary effect, they are meant to slander their political enemies. The normalization of lies is a big sign that fascist ideology is taking hold of mainstream thought and discourse.

Valorizing the countryside and pitting the hard working citizens against the lazy urban welfare state and professional elites is a key strategy. Setting up a dichotomy of hard workers and lazy people helps stoke the resentment and aids in setting up a double standard of state resources and a false dichotomy of the deserving and the undeserving. Anti labor is also key because unions unite classes across racial lines and the last thing a fascist wants is for the labor class to be united with an economic agenda. Fascism seeks to divide the masses and convince us that the natural state is a form of social Darwinism. The entire point of fascisms is to replace the "state" with a culturally homogenized "nation" that is lead by the appointed leader who will protect the "nation". Fascism, by the definitions I've outlined here, is almost always a right wing pro-corporate movement that always, always, casts socialists and liberals as nefarious agents that want to destroy the nation. It's like a weird merry-go-round of predictable, yet highly potent, politics.

Needless to say, this stuff is happening right now. Now it's not set in stone that we will have the same results of prior fascist movements. We do live in a unique age but I believe we are going down a treacherous path of fascistic policies that will last at least another decade. My hope is that the voice of the people is more potent today and there are still precious rights in place in most western society with the right to gather, protest and use speech.

This is an excellent and brief read and highly pertinent.
Profile Image for Andrew.
671 reviews234 followers
December 17, 2018
How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them by Jason Stanley, is a basic examination of some of the key rhetorical characteristics of fascism. The author examines the concepts of: myth, propaganda, anti-intellectualism, "unreality", hierarchy, victimhood, law and order, sexual anxiety, the corruption of urban influences, and hard work, all of which play into a fascist narrative. These concepts are often used as rhetorical messages to influence and gain support for fascist style movements. The author uses multiple examples, both from the past (Hitler, Mussolini etc.) and the present (Trump, La Pen, Putin, Erdogan etc.) to give examples of the use of these concepts in modern politics.

To begin, an opinionated aside. I will say I disagree with the author that many of the more modern examples of the use of Fascist concepts and rhetoric prove that the regimes and governments using them are fascist. Clearly, there is a difference between Poland PiS, Hungary's Orban, or America's Trump than the Hitler's and Mussolini's of the 20th century. Real fascist states are often defined by totalitarianism and absolute control over all structures of society, something each of the modern examples given in this text lack. Although these states may be utilizing more extreme right wing rhetoric as ways to gain popular (or even moderate) support, this does not mean they are wholly fascist. I believe the author uses this book as a warning about the increasingly fascist tendencies of certain states, which I believe is a good message. However, I believe it is wrong and disparaging to define any modern state as fascist at all - none of them have the characteristics of a fascist state, besides maybe using some of their propaganda techniques - something not uncommon from all walks of the political spectrum.

Even so, the examination of the concepts listed above is quite interesting, and the uses of these techniques do support a return of authoritarian and autocratic principles of governance which have not been seen, in the Western world for the most part, in a few decades. The era of populist governments is certainly affecting and changing the political spectrum and creating states that are utilizing rural discontent, and promoting social conservatism that favours the majority ethnic group, or ruling elite, over "others." This rhetoric is basically attacking and damaging others to gain favour with voters. Fascism's use of myth, blatant attacks on fact finding and academic institutions, use of propaganda, and disparaging of racial, religious and sexual minorities is a direct counterpoint to the ideals of progression- usually signified by inclusiveness and innovation. The fact that governments are using fascist ideals as tools to gain power in popular elections is disheartening, all the more so because many voters are supporting it. The use of, and popularity of, these techniques shows that the concepts and principles of fascism are alive and well, and indeed can exist in a healthy democracy to be utilized at will.

Stanely's book is interesting and timely. I found it to over exaggerate, a concept I am finding increasingly damaging in the ever polarized political sphere. Although fascist tendencies exist, they are not necessarily relegated to any one political sphere, and the concepts of exceptionalism present in, for example rural communities supporting a conservative populist against the corrupt urban elite, also exist in urban centres that decry the inability of rural centres to adapt to change, or lack of education etc. No one sphere is exceptional, all people deserve to be respected and have their political voices heard, and all people deserve safety, opportunity and respect. These should be the tenants that define a democratic state. Instead we are seeing the respect and tolerance that often defined democracies crumbling under the guises of misinformation, fear, and an increasingly competitive global sphere. Stanley's book is a good one to read during this age of uncertainty in politics, and the principles here are important.
Profile Image for Sepide.
26 reviews6 followers
November 19, 2022
亘乇丕蹖 賲賳蹖 讴賴 鬲丕亘丨丕賱 讴鬲丕亘 爻蹖丕爻蹖 賳禺賵賳丿賴 亘賵丿賲 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賮賵賯鈥屫з勜关ж� 噩匕丕亘 賵 诏蹖乇丕 亘賵丿 賵 鬲賵賳爻鬲 賲賮丕賴蹖賲 賲乇鬲亘胤 亘丕 爻蹖丕爻鬲 賮丕卮蹖爻賲 乇賵 亘丕 賲孬丕賱賴丕蹖 賲賱賲賵爻 亘蹖丕賳 亘讴賳賴.
丕蹖賳 乇賵 亘賴 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 丿賵爻鬲蹖 禺賵賳丿賲 讴賴 诏賮鬲賴 亘賵丿 : 丕賳诏丕乇 丨賵丕爻卮賵賳 賳亘賵丿賴 讴賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 丿丕乇賳 亘乇丕蹖 鬲禺乇蹖亘 亘賯蹖賴 丨讴賵賲鬲 賴丕 賲賳鬲卮乇 賲蹖讴賳賳 賵賱蹖 賲孬賱 鬲賮 爻乇亘丕賱丕 卮丿賴 賵 亘蹖卮鬲乇 丕夭 賴賲賴 亘乇丕蹖 禺賵丿卮賵賳 氐丿賯 賲蹖讴賳賴!
鬲賵 賴蹖趩 讴丿賵賲 丕夭 賲孬丕賱 賴丕蹖 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賳丕賲蹖 丕夭 丕蹖乇丕賳 亘乇丿賴 賳卮丿賴 賵 丕讴孬乇丕 亘賴 賴蹖鬲賱乇 貙 爻蹖丕爻鬲賴丕蹖 賱賴爻鬲丕賳 賵 賲噩丕乇爻鬲丕賳 賵 賳賴丕蹖鬲丕 丌賲乇蹖讴丕 丿乇 丿賵乇丕賳 鬲乇丕賲倬 丕卮丕乇賴 卮丿賴(讴鬲丕亘 賴賲 賲丕賱 賴賲賵賳 丿賵乇丕賳賴)
丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 胤蹖 丿賴 賮氐賱 鬲丕讴鬲蹖讴賴丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮蹖 讴賴 爻蹖丕爻鬲 賮丕卮蹖爻賲 亘賴鈥屭┴ж� 賲蹖亘乇賴 乇賵 鬲賵囟蹖丨 賲蹖丿賴 讴賴 賲蹖卮賴 賲孬丕賱 毓賱賳蹖卮 乇賵 鬲賵蹖 讴卮賵乇 禺賵丿賲賵賳 賲卮丕賴丿賴 讴賳蹖賲.
诏匕卮鬲賴 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屫й� 貙 鬲亘賱蹖睾丕鬲貙 乇賵卮賳賮讴乇 爻鬲蹖夭蹖貙賳丕賵丕賯毓蹖鬲貙爻賱爻賱賴 賲乇丕鬲亘貙賯乇亘丕賳蹖鈥屫簇屫屬嗀纲� 賵 賯丕賳賵賳 貙丿賱賴乇賴 噩賳爻蹖貙爻丿賵賲 賵 毓賲賵乇賴 賵 ARBEIT MACHT FREI 亘賴 鬲乇鬲蹖亘 賮氐賱 賴丕蹖 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賴爻鬲賳丿.
丕蹖賳賴丕 噩賲賱丕鬲蹖 丕夭 讴鬲丕亘 賴爻鬲賳丿 讴賴 亘賴鈥屬嗀肛辟� 賴乇 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 乇賵 丿乇亘丕夭賴 夭賲丕賳蹖 讴賳賵賳蹖 鬲卮賵蹖賯 亘賴 禺賵賳丿賳卮 賲蹖讴賳賳丿 .
芦賲讴丕賳蹖爻賲 爻蹖丕爻鬲賴丕蹖 賮丕卮蹖爻鬲蹖 亘乇乇賵蹖 蹖讴丿蹖诏乇 亘賳丕 卮丿賴 賵 賴乇讴丿丕賲 丿蹖诏乇蹖 乇丕 禺賲丕蹖鬲 賲蹖讴賳丿.丌賳賴丕 丕夭 鬲賲丕蹖夭 賲蹖丕賳 鈥溬呚р€� 賵 鈥溫①嗁囏р€� 丕爻胤賵乇賴鈥屫й� 爻乇賴賲 賲蹖讴賳賳丿 讴賴 禺丕氐賱 丕睾乇丕賯蹖 禺蹖丕賱蹖 丕夭 賵蹖跇诏蹖 賴丕蹖 鈥溬呚р€澵池� 賵 鈥溫①嗁囏р€澵必� 禺丕乇噩 丕夭 丌賳 賯乇丕乇 賲蹖 丿賴匕鬲丕 禺卮賲 賵 賳賮乇鬲 丕夭 賳禺亘诏丕賳 賮丕爻丿賱蹖亘乇丕賱 乇丕 鬲賵噩蹖賴 讴賳丿.讴丕乇 丕蹖賳 禺亘诏丕賳 趩蹖夭蹖 賳蹖爻鬲 噩夭 鬲賴丿蹖丿 爻賳鬲賴丕蹖 丕氐蹖賱 賲丕 賵 賴丿乇 丿丕丿賳 倬賵賱蹖 讴賴 亘賴 爻禺鬲蹖 亘乇丕蹖 丌賳 夭丨賲鬲 讴卮蹖丿蹖賲.鈥澵①嗁囏р€� 賲噩乇賲丕賳蹖 鬲賳亘賱 賴爻鬲賳丿 讴賴 丌夭丕丿蹖 亘乇丕蹖卮丕賳 賴蹖趩 孬賲乇蹖 賳丿丕乇丿(賵丕賱亘鬲賴 讴賴 爻夭丕賵丕乇 丌賳 賳蹖爻鬲賳丿)鈥澵①嗁囏р€� 丕賴丿丕賮 賲禺乇亘卮丕賳 乇丕 夭蹖乇賳賯丕亘 夭亘丕賳 賱蹖亘乇丕賱蹖 蹖丕 鈥溫关з勜� 丕噩鬲賲丕毓蹖鈥� 賲蹖鈥屬举堌簇з嗁嗀屫з呚� 丿賱卮丕賳 丿乇诏乇賵 賳丕亘賵丿蹖 賮乇賴賳诏 賵 爻賳鬲 丕爻鬲 鬲丕鈥澷呚р€� 乇丕 鬲囟毓蹖賮 讴賳賳丿.鈥澷呚р€� 賲乇丿賲丕賳蹖 賴爻鬲蹖賲 讴賵卮丕 賵 诏賵卮 亘賴 賮乇賲丕賳 賯丕賳賵賳 讴賴 丌夭丕丿蹖 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘丕 爻禺鬲鈥屭┵堌篡� 亘賴 丿爻鬲 丌賵乇丿蹖賲貙鈥澵①嗀з嗏€澵з呚� 讴丕賴賱 貙賲賳丨乇賮貙賮丕蹖丿 賵 賲賳丨胤 丕賳丿禄
芦丿賵賱鬲賴丕蹖 賯賵賲蹖貙賲匕賴亘蹖貙賳跇丕丿蹖 蹖丕 賴乇丿賵賱鬲蹖 讴賴 亘乇 賲亘賳丕蹖 爻鬲蹖夭 賲賱蹖 賲蹖丕賳 鈥溬呚р€澷堚€澵①嗁囏р€澵池� 亘賴 爻禺鬲蹖 賲蹖鬲賵丕賳丿 亘乇丕蹖 賲丿鬲 夭賲丕賳 胤賵賱丕賳蹖 倬丕蹖丿丕乇 亘賲丕賳丿.
** 亘賴鈥屫焚堌� 讴賱蹖 讴鬲丕亘 亘乇丕蹖 讴爻蹖 讴賴 鬲丕亘丨丕賱 讴鬲丕亘 爻蹖丕爻蹖 賳禺賵賳丿賴 賵 丕胤賱丕毓 趩賳丿丕賳蹖 賳丿丕乇賴 亘賴 賳馗乇 讴鬲丕亘 禺蹖賱蹖 禺賵亘蹖 賲蹖丕丿.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,591 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.