What do you think?
Rate this book
乇賲丕賳鬲蹖爻賲 丌賱賲丕賳蹖
讴鬲丕亘 乇賲丕賳鬲蹖爻賲 丌賱賲丕賳蹖 賲卮鬲賲賱 亘乇 丿賴 噩購爻鬲丕乇 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賴乇 蹖讴 亘賴 卮乇丨 賵 亘爻胤 夭賵丕蹖丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮蹖 丕夭 賲乇丨賱踿 賳禺爻鬲 鬲讴賵蹖賳 乇賲丕賳鬲蹖爻賲 丌賱賲丕賳蹖 賵 乇丕亘胤踿 倬蹖趩蹖丿踿 丌賳 亘丕 噩賳亘卮鈥屬囏й屰� 趩賵賳 芦乇賵卮賳诏乇蹖禄 賵 芦胤賵賮丕賳 賵 鬲賱丕胤賲禄 賲蹖鈥屬矩必ж藏�.
賴丿賮 丕氐賱蹖 讴鬲丕亘 丨丕囟乇 丕蹖賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 亘丕 賳賯丿 乇賵蹖讴乇丿賴丕蹖 賲鬲丿丕賵賱 丿乇 鬲賮爻蹖乇 乇賲丕賳鬲蹖爻賲 丌賱賲丕賳蹖貙 亘賴鈥屫蒂堌� 乇賵蹖讴乇丿賴丕蹖 倬爻鬲鈥屬呚辟嗃屫池屫� 讴賴 睾丕賱亘丕賸 乇賲丕賳鬲蹖爻賲 乇丕 亘賴 噩賳亘賴鈥屬囏й�
丕丿亘蹖 賵 夭蹖亘丕蹖蹖鈥屫促嗀ж� 丌賳 賲丨丿賵丿 讴乇丿賴鈥屫з嗀� 賵 丌賳 乇丕 囟丿乇賵卮賳诏乇蹖貙 囟丿毓賯賱鈥屫ㄘз堌臂� 賵 睾蹖乇爻蹖丕爻蹖 丿丕賳爻鬲賴鈥屫з嗀� 丕夭 丕蹖賳 鬲賮爻蹖乇 亘丿蹖賱 丿賮丕毓 讴賳丿 讴賴 乇賲丕賳鬲蹖爻賲 丌賱賲丕賳蹖 賳賴鈥屬佡傌� 囟丿乇賵卮賳诏乇蹖貙 囟丿毓賯賱鈥屫ㄘз堌臂� 賵 囟丿爻蹖丕爻蹖 賳亘賵丿賴 丕爻鬲貙 亘賱讴賴 噩賳亘賴鈥屬囏й� 丕丿亘蹖 賵 夭蹖亘丕蹖蹖鈥屫促嗀ж� 丕蹖賳 噩賳亘卮 丕爻丕爻丕賸 丕爻亘丕亘蹖 丿乇 禺丿賲鬲 鬲丨賯賯 丕賴丿丕賮 賲鬲丕賮蹖夭蹖讴蹖貙 丕禺賱丕賯蹖 賵 爻蹖丕爻蹖鈥� 丌賳 亘賵丿賴鈥屫з嗀�.
趩賳蹖賳 鬲賮爻蹖乇蹖 賲丕 乇丕 鬲乇睾蹖亘 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 亘倬匕蹖乇蹖賲 讴賴 毓賱蹖鈥屫必嘿� 賴賲踿 鬲亘賱蹖睾丕鬲 賱蹖亘乇丕賱鈥屬囏� 賵 賲丕乇讴爻蹖爻鬲鈥屬囏� 毓賱蹖賴 乇賲丕賳鬲蹖爻賲 __ 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屫堌з� 丌賳 乇丕 賲丕鬲乇讴 丿賵乇丕賳 噩賳诏鈥屬囏й� 噩賴丕賳蹖
丿丕賳爻鬲 __貙 乇賲丕賳鬲蹖讴鈥屬囏� 丕賳丿蹖卮賲賳丿丕賳蹖 丕氐蹖賱 亘賵丿賴鈥屫з嗀� 賵 亘賴 賲爻丕卅賱蹖 丕賳丿蹖卮蹖丿賴鈥屫з嗀� 讴賴 賴賲趩賳丕賳 賲丨賱 鬲賵噩賴 賮蹖賱爻賵賮丕賳 賲毓丕氐乇賳丿 賵 亘乇丕蹖 丕賳丿蹖卮蹖丿賳 亘賴 毓丕賱賲 讴賳賵賳蹖 賲蹖鈥屫堌з� 丿乇爻鈥屬囏й� 丕乇夭卮賲賳丿蹖 丕夭 丌賳丕賳 丌賲賵禺鬲.
賴丿賮 丕氐賱蹖 讴鬲丕亘 丨丕囟乇 丕蹖賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 亘丕 賳賯丿 乇賵蹖讴乇丿賴丕蹖 賲鬲丿丕賵賱 丿乇 鬲賮爻蹖乇 乇賲丕賳鬲蹖爻賲 丌賱賲丕賳蹖貙 亘賴鈥屫蒂堌� 乇賵蹖讴乇丿賴丕蹖 倬爻鬲鈥屬呚辟嗃屫池屫� 讴賴 睾丕賱亘丕賸 乇賲丕賳鬲蹖爻賲 乇丕 亘賴 噩賳亘賴鈥屬囏й�
丕丿亘蹖 賵 夭蹖亘丕蹖蹖鈥屫促嗀ж� 丌賳 賲丨丿賵丿 讴乇丿賴鈥屫з嗀� 賵 丌賳 乇丕 囟丿乇賵卮賳诏乇蹖貙 囟丿毓賯賱鈥屫ㄘз堌臂� 賵 睾蹖乇爻蹖丕爻蹖 丿丕賳爻鬲賴鈥屫з嗀� 丕夭 丕蹖賳 鬲賮爻蹖乇 亘丿蹖賱 丿賮丕毓 讴賳丿 讴賴 乇賲丕賳鬲蹖爻賲 丌賱賲丕賳蹖 賳賴鈥屬佡傌� 囟丿乇賵卮賳诏乇蹖貙 囟丿毓賯賱鈥屫ㄘз堌臂� 賵 囟丿爻蹖丕爻蹖 賳亘賵丿賴 丕爻鬲貙 亘賱讴賴 噩賳亘賴鈥屬囏й� 丕丿亘蹖 賵 夭蹖亘丕蹖蹖鈥屫促嗀ж� 丕蹖賳 噩賳亘卮 丕爻丕爻丕賸 丕爻亘丕亘蹖 丿乇 禺丿賲鬲 鬲丨賯賯 丕賴丿丕賮 賲鬲丕賮蹖夭蹖讴蹖貙 丕禺賱丕賯蹖 賵 爻蹖丕爻蹖鈥� 丌賳 亘賵丿賴鈥屫з嗀�.
趩賳蹖賳 鬲賮爻蹖乇蹖 賲丕 乇丕 鬲乇睾蹖亘 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 亘倬匕蹖乇蹖賲 讴賴 毓賱蹖鈥屫必嘿� 賴賲踿 鬲亘賱蹖睾丕鬲 賱蹖亘乇丕賱鈥屬囏� 賵 賲丕乇讴爻蹖爻鬲鈥屬囏� 毓賱蹖賴 乇賲丕賳鬲蹖爻賲 __ 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屫堌з� 丌賳 乇丕 賲丕鬲乇讴 丿賵乇丕賳 噩賳诏鈥屬囏й� 噩賴丕賳蹖
丿丕賳爻鬲 __貙 乇賲丕賳鬲蹖讴鈥屬囏� 丕賳丿蹖卮賲賳丿丕賳蹖 丕氐蹖賱 亘賵丿賴鈥屫з嗀� 賵 亘賴 賲爻丕卅賱蹖 丕賳丿蹖卮蹖丿賴鈥屫з嗀� 讴賴 賴賲趩賳丕賳 賲丨賱 鬲賵噩賴 賮蹖賱爻賵賮丕賳 賲毓丕氐乇賳丿 賵 亘乇丕蹖 丕賳丿蹖卮蹖丿賳 亘賴 毓丕賱賲 讴賳賵賳蹖 賲蹖鈥屫堌з� 丿乇爻鈥屬囏й� 丕乇夭卮賲賳丿蹖 丕夭 丌賳丕賳 丌賲賵禺鬲.
360 pages, Paperback
First published January 22, 2004
14 people are currently reading
292 people want to read
About the author
Frederick C. Beiser
31听books95听followersFrederick C. Beiser, one of the leading scholars of German Idealism, is a Professor of Philosophy at Syracuse University. Prior to joining Syracuse, he was a member of the faculty at Indiana University, Bloomington where he received a 1999-2000 NEH Faculty Fellowship. He has also taught at the University of Colorado at Boulder, Harvard and Yale University. Beiser earned his DPhil. degree from Oxford University under the direction of Charles Taylor and Isaiah Berlin.
Beiser's first book, The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte (Harvard, 1987) was widely influential in revising the commonly held, but notorious accounts of German Idealism. In this book, Beiser sought to reconstruct the background of German Idealism through the narration of the story of the Spinoza or Pantheism controversy. Consequently, a great many figures, whose importance was hardly recognized by the English speaking philosophers, were given their proper due.
Beiser has also written on the German Romantics and 19th century British philosophy.
Beiser's first book, The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte (Harvard, 1987) was widely influential in revising the commonly held, but notorious accounts of German Idealism. In this book, Beiser sought to reconstruct the background of German Idealism through the narration of the story of the Spinoza or Pantheism controversy. Consequently, a great many figures, whose importance was hardly recognized by the English speaking philosophers, were given their proper due.
Beiser has also written on the German Romantics and 19th century British philosophy.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
August 31, 2024
This book wasn't really for me - I don't mean it was a bad book. My grade reflects its usefulness to me, rather than is a general review, which I do not think I am qualified to give.
I think it was pretty good, just it was not what I was after. I wanted an introduction to romanticism and was lent this by a friend who is a philosophy professor. It's really not an introduction, although to be fair it does not claim to be. However, given this long caveat, I did get something from the book and did learn a fair bit about romanticism.
This volume focuses on the very early days of romanticism and really only a few years from about 1797 to 1804 (from memory, the exact dates are in the book introduction). It is a collection of essays by the author, on the same topic, but not originally written as a book, so there is some degree of repetition. The bits I learnt from were clear, but I would imagine hard for anyone without any formal philosophical background. Occasionally, it went over my head, but that points back to my opening point that I am not really the intended reader of this book.
The only annoying thing is that the author uses frequently German language phrases and words without explaining them. Perhaps, they would be clear to anyone who was familiar with romanticism, but I felt it would have been easier with more explanation as some of the terms were critical to understanding the book.
I think it was pretty good, just it was not what I was after. I wanted an introduction to romanticism and was lent this by a friend who is a philosophy professor. It's really not an introduction, although to be fair it does not claim to be. However, given this long caveat, I did get something from the book and did learn a fair bit about romanticism.
This volume focuses on the very early days of romanticism and really only a few years from about 1797 to 1804 (from memory, the exact dates are in the book introduction). It is a collection of essays by the author, on the same topic, but not originally written as a book, so there is some degree of repetition. The bits I learnt from were clear, but I would imagine hard for anyone without any formal philosophical background. Occasionally, it went over my head, but that points back to my opening point that I am not really the intended reader of this book.
The only annoying thing is that the author uses frequently German language phrases and words without explaining them. Perhaps, they would be clear to anyone who was familiar with romanticism, but I felt it would have been easier with more explanation as some of the terms were critical to understanding the book.
January 11, 2011
Wondeful, but difficult. If you can get through this you'll have a good foundation for really understanding German Idealism, which makes it a gift that keeps on giving. It helps to have a background in reading Kant to understand it, though.
April 18, 2023
賵 趩賯丿乇 賮賴賲 賮乇賵蹖丿 亘丕 禺賵丕賳卮 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 丌爻丕賳 鬲乇 卮丿. 诏丕賴蹖 丕夭 賲乇丿蹖 讴賴 賲蹖 禺賵丕賴丿 賴賲賴 趩蹖夭 乇丕 毓賱賲蹖 讴賳丿貙 爻禺賳丕賳蹖 丿乇 亘丕亘 毓卮賯 賵 胤亘蹖毓鬲 賵 乇丕賳賴 賲蹖禺賵丕賳蹖 讴賴 丕夭 禺賵丿 賲蹖 倬乇爻蹖: 丕蹖賳 丕夭 讴噩丕 丕賵賲丿責! 賵 丨丕賱 賮賴賲蹖丿賲 乇賲丕賳鬲蹖爻賲! 丨丿丕賯賱 亘禺卮蹖 丕夭 丕蹖丿賴 賴丕蹖卮 賵丕賲丿丕乇 亘賴 趩賳蹖賳 賲讴鬲亘 賮讴乇蹖-賮賱爻賮蹖鈥屫池�. 賵 丕賲丕 禺賵丿 讴鬲丕亘 亘爻蹖丕乇 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕卮鬲賳蹖鈥屫池�. 鬲乇噩賲賴 蹖 乇賵丕賳蹖 丿丕乇丿貙 丕亘丿丕毓丕鬲 賲鬲乇噩賲 亘乇丕蹖 亘賴鬲乇 賮賴賲蹖丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘爻蹖丕乇 讴賲讴 讴賳賳丿賴 賵 賯丕亘賱 爻鬲丕蹖卮 丕爻鬲. 賲丐賱賮 丿乇 鬲賱丕卮 亘賵丿賴 丿蹖丿 賲賳氐賮丕賳賴 丕蹖 丕乇丕卅賴 讴賳丿 賵 賲賳丕賯卮丕鬲 賵 丕亘賴丕賲丕鬲 讴賱蹖 賲賵噩賵丿 丿乇 亘丕亘 丕蹖賳 賲讴鬲亘 乇丕 鬲丕 丨丿 丕賲讴丕賳貙 亘乇 丕爻丕爻 丌乇丕 禺賵丿 賮蹖賱爻賵賮丕賳 丕蹖賳 賲讴鬲亘貙 乇賮毓 讴賳丿. 丿乇 讴賱 亘爻蹖丕乇 丿賵爻鬲卮 丿丕卮鬲賲 賵 讴賲讴 卮丕蹖丕賳蹖 亘賴 賮賴賲 亘禺卮蹖 丕夭 鬲丕乇蹖禺 賮賱爻賮賴 賵 賳诏乇卮 賲賵噩賵丿 丿乇 丌賳 丨蹖胤賴 蹖 噩睾乇丕賮蹖丕蹖蹖 賵 夭賲丕賳賴 讴乇丿.
April 21, 2025
Thrilling stuff from Beiser as usual. I particularly enjoyed Beiser's account of how, rather than Jacobi's Briefe , it was Herder's Gott, Einige Gespr盲ch that influenced Schlegel, Schelling and von Hardenberg's idiosyncratic reinterpretation of Spinoza. This then leads to an interesting discussion around internal and external teleology.
December 18, 2024
Frederick C. Beiser鈥檚 The Romantic Imperative: The Concept of Early German Romanticism (2003) offers a lucid and rigorous examination of the philosophical foundations of early German Romanticism, an intellectual movement often overshadowed by its artistic and literary dimensions. Beiser鈥檚 work succeeds in rehabilitating Romanticism as a coherent and systematic philosophical project, challenging the reductive view that it is merely a reactionary retreat into emotion or an aestheticized form of irrationalism.
Beiser situates early German Romanticism within its historical and philosophical context, particularly its relationship to German Idealism and its reaction to the perceived limitations of Kantian philosophy. The Romantics鈥攆igures such as Friedrich Schlegel, Novalis, and H枚lderlin鈥攕ought to address the dichotomy between reason and imagination, as well as the tension between systematization and individuality. Beiser argues that Romanticism is better understood as a continuation of the Enlightenment鈥檚 project of reason, albeit through a broader and more holistic lens. For the Romantics, the ultimate aim was a synthesis of art, science, and philosophy鈥攁 goal they referred to as 鈥減rogressive universal poetry鈥� (progressive Universalpoesie).
One of Beiser鈥檚 most valuable contributions is his emphasis on the philosophical depth of Romanticism, which he contrasts with the prevailing tendency to conflate Romanticism with sentimentality or subjective idealism. Beiser dismantles these misconceptions by highlighting the movement鈥檚 intellectual rigor and its engagement with key philosophical issues, such as the nature of self-consciousness, the relationship between freedom and necessity, and the role of art in achieving human self-realization. Central to this project is the Romantic concept of irony, which Beiser interprets not as mere playfulness but as a dynamic and self-critical mode of thought that reflects the incompleteness of human understanding.
Beiser also demonstrates how early German Romanticism was deeply influenced by Spinoza, Fichte, and Schelling, among others. He portrays Romanticism as a critical response to Fichtean subjectivism and its potential solipsism, proposing instead a more relational view of the self and its connection to the world. The Romantic emphasis on Bildung (self-cultivation) and Streben (striving) reflects this relational ethos, with the human quest for knowledge and unity framed as an infinite and open-ended process.
Structurally, the book is concise yet comprehensive, balancing historical analysis with philosophical exposition. Beiser鈥檚 prose is clear and accessible, though it demands familiarity with the intellectual currents of late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century German thought. His erudition is evident in his ability to synthesize a wide range of primary and secondary sources, and his engagement with contemporary scholarship enriches the text.
However, one limitation of the book is its relative brevity, which occasionally leaves certain topics underexplored. For example, while Beiser adeptly examines the philosophical core of Romanticism, his treatment of its broader cultural and political implications could have been expanded. The book also assumes a level of prior knowledge that may render it less accessible to readers unfamiliar with German Idealism or Romantic aesthetics.
Despite these minor shortcomings, The Romantic Imperative is an indispensable resource for scholars and students of German philosophy, Romanticism, and intellectual history. Beiser succeeds not only in clarifying the philosophical ambitions of early German Romanticism but also in demonstrating its relevance to enduring debates about reason, creativity, and human flourishing. In doing so, he affirms the movement鈥檚 significance as a critical juncture in the history of Western thought.
In sum, Beiser鈥檚 The Romantic Imperative is a masterful work that reclaims early German Romanticism as a serious and sophisticated philosophical enterprise. Its nuanced exploration of Romantic thought challenges readers to reconsider the movement鈥檚 legacy and to appreciate its contributions to the development of modern philosophy.
GPT
Beiser situates early German Romanticism within its historical and philosophical context, particularly its relationship to German Idealism and its reaction to the perceived limitations of Kantian philosophy. The Romantics鈥攆igures such as Friedrich Schlegel, Novalis, and H枚lderlin鈥攕ought to address the dichotomy between reason and imagination, as well as the tension between systematization and individuality. Beiser argues that Romanticism is better understood as a continuation of the Enlightenment鈥檚 project of reason, albeit through a broader and more holistic lens. For the Romantics, the ultimate aim was a synthesis of art, science, and philosophy鈥攁 goal they referred to as 鈥減rogressive universal poetry鈥� (progressive Universalpoesie).
One of Beiser鈥檚 most valuable contributions is his emphasis on the philosophical depth of Romanticism, which he contrasts with the prevailing tendency to conflate Romanticism with sentimentality or subjective idealism. Beiser dismantles these misconceptions by highlighting the movement鈥檚 intellectual rigor and its engagement with key philosophical issues, such as the nature of self-consciousness, the relationship between freedom and necessity, and the role of art in achieving human self-realization. Central to this project is the Romantic concept of irony, which Beiser interprets not as mere playfulness but as a dynamic and self-critical mode of thought that reflects the incompleteness of human understanding.
Beiser also demonstrates how early German Romanticism was deeply influenced by Spinoza, Fichte, and Schelling, among others. He portrays Romanticism as a critical response to Fichtean subjectivism and its potential solipsism, proposing instead a more relational view of the self and its connection to the world. The Romantic emphasis on Bildung (self-cultivation) and Streben (striving) reflects this relational ethos, with the human quest for knowledge and unity framed as an infinite and open-ended process.
Structurally, the book is concise yet comprehensive, balancing historical analysis with philosophical exposition. Beiser鈥檚 prose is clear and accessible, though it demands familiarity with the intellectual currents of late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century German thought. His erudition is evident in his ability to synthesize a wide range of primary and secondary sources, and his engagement with contemporary scholarship enriches the text.
However, one limitation of the book is its relative brevity, which occasionally leaves certain topics underexplored. For example, while Beiser adeptly examines the philosophical core of Romanticism, his treatment of its broader cultural and political implications could have been expanded. The book also assumes a level of prior knowledge that may render it less accessible to readers unfamiliar with German Idealism or Romantic aesthetics.
Despite these minor shortcomings, The Romantic Imperative is an indispensable resource for scholars and students of German philosophy, Romanticism, and intellectual history. Beiser succeeds not only in clarifying the philosophical ambitions of early German Romanticism but also in demonstrating its relevance to enduring debates about reason, creativity, and human flourishing. In doing so, he affirms the movement鈥檚 significance as a critical juncture in the history of Western thought.
In sum, Beiser鈥檚 The Romantic Imperative is a masterful work that reclaims early German Romanticism as a serious and sophisticated philosophical enterprise. Its nuanced exploration of Romantic thought challenges readers to reconsider the movement鈥檚 legacy and to appreciate its contributions to the development of modern philosophy.
GPT
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.