What do you think?
Rate this book
Betrayal
Betrayal by Pinter, Harold
138 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 1978
86 people are currently reading
4,838 people want to read
About the author
Harold Pinter
346books762followersHarold Pinter was a British playwright, screenwriter, director and actor. A Nobel Prize winner, Pinter was one of the most influential modern British dramatists with a writing career that spanned more than 50 years. His best-known plays include The Birthday Party (1957), The Homecoming (1964) and Betrayal (1978), each of which he adapted for the screen. His screenplay adaptations of others' works include The Servant (1963), The Go-Between (1971), The French Lieutenant's Woman (1981), The Trial (1993) and Sleuth (2007). He also directed or acted in radio, stage, television and film productions of his own and others' works.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 511 reviews
June 24, 2021
Betrayal, Harold Pinter
Betrayal integrates different permutations of betrayal relating to a seven-year affair involving a married couple, Emma and Robert, and Robert's "close friend" Jerry, who is also married, to a woman named Judith.
For five years Jerry and Emma carry on their affair without Robert's knowledge, both cuckolding Robert and betraying Judith, until Emma, without telling Jerry she has done so, admits her infidelity to Robert (in effect, betraying Jerry), although she continues their affair.
In 1977, four years after exposing the affair (in 1973) and two years after their subsequent break up (in 1975), Emma meets Jerry to tell him that her marriage to Robert is over.
She then lies to Jerry in telling him that, "last night", she had to reveal the truth to Robert and that he now knows of the affair. The truth however, is that Robert has known about the affair for the past four years.
تاریخ نخستین خوانش روز بیست و سوم ماه ژوئن سال 2018میلادی
عنوان: خیانت و دو نمایشنام� دیگر؛ نویسنده: هارولد پینتر؛ برگردان شعله آذر؛ تهران: نیلا� 1386؛ در 127ص؛ شابک 9789648573008؛ موضوع نمایشنام های نویسندگان بریتانیا - سده - 20م
عنوان: ضیافت و چند نمایشنام� ی دیگر؛ نویسنده: هرولد پینتر؛ مترجم غلامرضا صراف؛ تهران، مانیا هنر، 1396؛ در 132ص؛شابک9786009803972؛
عنوان اصلی
Plays: Four (Old Time, No Man's Land, Betrayal, Monologue, Family Voices, A Kind of Alaska, One for the Road, Mountain Language)
عنوان: خیانت؛ اثر هارولد پینتر؛ برگردان نگار جواهریان، تینوش نظم‌جو� با همکاری مهشاد مخبری، آزاده پارسا؛ تهران: نشر نی� 1388؛ شابک9789643129453؛
عنوان: خیانت؛ نویسنده: هارولد پینتئر؛ ترجومه: خیاله مممدووا؛ حاضیرلایان: احد ناصری؛ بستان آباد: انتشارات سونا، 1398؛ در 113ص؛ شابک9786229650875؛ به زبان ترکی آذری؛
نمایشنام ای که «هارولد پینتر» در سال 1978میلادی آن را نوشتند؛ «پینتر» از برترین نمایشنام نویسان درام انگلیسی هستند، و در این اثر، به سراغ دیالوگ‌ها� ساده، عواطف مخفی شخصیت‌ها� انگیزه‌ها� پنهانی، رقابت‌ها� خودخواهانه، حفظ آبرو، دروغ و فریب رفته� است
این نمایشنام الهام گرفته از موقعیت دراماتیک، و مشکلات احساسی «انگلستان» در سال 1978میلادی است؛ «پینتر» با الهام از رابطه ی خود با مجری «بی�.بی�.سی»، «جوان بیکول» که از سال 1962میلادی تا سال 1969میلادی به درازا کشید، آن را نگاشته است؛ در این اثر، جایگشت‌ها� گوناگون خیانت در هم ادغام می‌شود� که در ارتباط با رابطه ی پنهانی هفت ساله است؛ ماجرای زن و مردی به نام «اما» و «رابرت» و دوست صمیمی «رابرت» به نام «جری» است؛ «جری» و «اما» به مدت پنجسال بدون آگاهی «رابرت» با هم رابطه دارند، تا اینکه «اما» بدون اطلاع «جری»، پیش «رابرت» به خیانتش اعتراف می‌کن� (در نتیجه، به «جری» هم خیانت می‌کن�)؛ در سال 1977میلادی، یعنی چهار سال پس از افشای رابطه (در سال 1973میلادی) و دو سال پس از پایان خیانت (در سال 1975میلادی)، «اما» با «جری» دیدار می‌کن� و به او می‌گوی� ازدواج او با «رابرت» به پایان رسیده� است؛ سپس به دروغ به «جری» می‌گوی� که «دیشب» حقیقت را به «رابرت» گفته� است؛ اما حقیقت این است که «رابرت» در چهار سال گذشته، از آن خیانت باخبر بوده� است
نویسند «هارولد پینتر» برای ساختاربندی اثر خود، از گاه‌شناس� وارونه سود برده� اند، که کاری ابتکاری است؛ صحنه نخست پس از پایان خیانت و در سال 1977میلادی رخ می‌دهد� صحنه ی پایانی با آغاز خیانت و در سال 1968میلادی پایان می‌یابد� در این میان نیز، به ماجراهای سال‌ها� دیگر پرداخته می‌شود� «راجر ایبرت» در سال 1983میلادی، نقدی بر فیلم اقتباس شده از این اثر نگاشتند: «خیانت تمام ساختارهای معمول را کنار می‌زند� این نمایش با سنگدلی نشان می‌ده� که خودِ ظرفیت عشق، نه تنها بر عدم خیانت به عزیزان، بلکه به عدم خیانت به خودمان نیز، مبتنی است.»؛
تاریخ بهنگام رسانی 02/04/1400هجری خورشیدی؛ ا. شربیانی
Betrayal integrates different permutations of betrayal relating to a seven-year affair involving a married couple, Emma and Robert, and Robert's "close friend" Jerry, who is also married, to a woman named Judith.
For five years Jerry and Emma carry on their affair without Robert's knowledge, both cuckolding Robert and betraying Judith, until Emma, without telling Jerry she has done so, admits her infidelity to Robert (in effect, betraying Jerry), although she continues their affair.
In 1977, four years after exposing the affair (in 1973) and two years after their subsequent break up (in 1975), Emma meets Jerry to tell him that her marriage to Robert is over.
She then lies to Jerry in telling him that, "last night", she had to reveal the truth to Robert and that he now knows of the affair. The truth however, is that Robert has known about the affair for the past four years.
تاریخ نخستین خوانش روز بیست و سوم ماه ژوئن سال 2018میلادی
عنوان: خیانت و دو نمایشنام� دیگر؛ نویسنده: هارولد پینتر؛ برگردان شعله آذر؛ تهران: نیلا� 1386؛ در 127ص؛ شابک 9789648573008؛ موضوع نمایشنام های نویسندگان بریتانیا - سده - 20م
عنوان: ضیافت و چند نمایشنام� ی دیگر؛ نویسنده: هرولد پینتر؛ مترجم غلامرضا صراف؛ تهران، مانیا هنر، 1396؛ در 132ص؛شابک9786009803972؛
عنوان اصلی
Plays: Four (Old Time, No Man's Land, Betrayal, Monologue, Family Voices, A Kind of Alaska, One for the Road, Mountain Language)
عنوان: خیانت؛ اثر هارولد پینتر؛ برگردان نگار جواهریان، تینوش نظم‌جو� با همکاری مهشاد مخبری، آزاده پارسا؛ تهران: نشر نی� 1388؛ شابک9789643129453؛
عنوان: خیانت؛ نویسنده: هارولد پینتئر؛ ترجومه: خیاله مممدووا؛ حاضیرلایان: احد ناصری؛ بستان آباد: انتشارات سونا، 1398؛ در 113ص؛ شابک9786229650875؛ به زبان ترکی آذری؛
نمایشنام ای که «هارولد پینتر» در سال 1978میلادی آن را نوشتند؛ «پینتر» از برترین نمایشنام نویسان درام انگلیسی هستند، و در این اثر، به سراغ دیالوگ‌ها� ساده، عواطف مخفی شخصیت‌ها� انگیزه‌ها� پنهانی، رقابت‌ها� خودخواهانه، حفظ آبرو، دروغ و فریب رفته� است
این نمایشنام الهام گرفته از موقعیت دراماتیک، و مشکلات احساسی «انگلستان» در سال 1978میلادی است؛ «پینتر» با الهام از رابطه ی خود با مجری «بی�.بی�.سی»، «جوان بیکول» که از سال 1962میلادی تا سال 1969میلادی به درازا کشید، آن را نگاشته است؛ در این اثر، جایگشت‌ها� گوناگون خیانت در هم ادغام می‌شود� که در ارتباط با رابطه ی پنهانی هفت ساله است؛ ماجرای زن و مردی به نام «اما» و «رابرت» و دوست صمیمی «رابرت» به نام «جری» است؛ «جری» و «اما» به مدت پنجسال بدون آگاهی «رابرت» با هم رابطه دارند، تا اینکه «اما» بدون اطلاع «جری»، پیش «رابرت» به خیانتش اعتراف می‌کن� (در نتیجه، به «جری» هم خیانت می‌کن�)؛ در سال 1977میلادی، یعنی چهار سال پس از افشای رابطه (در سال 1973میلادی) و دو سال پس از پایان خیانت (در سال 1975میلادی)، «اما» با «جری» دیدار می‌کن� و به او می‌گوی� ازدواج او با «رابرت» به پایان رسیده� است؛ سپس به دروغ به «جری» می‌گوی� که «دیشب» حقیقت را به «رابرت» گفته� است؛ اما حقیقت این است که «رابرت» در چهار سال گذشته، از آن خیانت باخبر بوده� است
نویسند «هارولد پینتر» برای ساختاربندی اثر خود، از گاه‌شناس� وارونه سود برده� اند، که کاری ابتکاری است؛ صحنه نخست پس از پایان خیانت و در سال 1977میلادی رخ می‌دهد� صحنه ی پایانی با آغاز خیانت و در سال 1968میلادی پایان می‌یابد� در این میان نیز، به ماجراهای سال‌ها� دیگر پرداخته می‌شود� «راجر ایبرت» در سال 1983میلادی، نقدی بر فیلم اقتباس شده از این اثر نگاشتند: «خیانت تمام ساختارهای معمول را کنار می‌زند� این نمایش با سنگدلی نشان می‌ده� که خودِ ظرفیت عشق، نه تنها بر عدم خیانت به عزیزان، بلکه به عدم خیانت به خودمان نیز، مبتنی است.»؛
تاریخ بهنگام رسانی 02/04/1400هجری خورشیدی؛ ا. شربیانی
October 6, 2017
خیلی دوست داشتم و خوشحالم بعد از چند سال که دوست داشتم بخونمش بالاخره موقعیتش رو پیدا کردم!
July 9, 2019
Seeing Tom Hiddleston play the part of Robert while I was in London was one of the highlights of my Europe trip. This was a great play and a reminder to self that I should watch and read more plays.
July 13, 2014
This probably works better on the stage than it does on the page. Frankly, I was disappointed.
True to its title, Betrayal is a story about betrayal and deception. The play is centered on three people: Emma, Robert, and Jerry. Emma, who is married to Robert, has had a long-term affair with Robert's best friend Jerry. The opening scene is of Emma and Jerry meeting for a drink two years after their affair has ended. The play then works its way chronologically backwards in time, feeding us more details of their tangled relationships with each new scene.
The play provides a perspective into the way in which we might betray and deceive others, as well as the way in which we might betray and deceive ourselves. I thought it was an interesting look at the attempt to hold onto relationships even though they might not fulfill us or make us happy. Fear of change? Habit? Routine? Boredom? It was interesting watching the characters stumble through their relationships, sometimes as if on automatic pilot.
The best aspect of the play was in how it was structured: in reverse order from the end of the affair to the very beginning. I thought that was truly well done. In fact, what I found so interesting was how the characterizations were developed. By providing you with the ending first, the author allows you to make judgments about these characters, then challenges those judgments by providing more and more insight into their past.
Still, despite these interesting elements, I thought that overall the story was unremarkable.
Final Rating: 3 stars
True to its title, Betrayal is a story about betrayal and deception. The play is centered on three people: Emma, Robert, and Jerry. Emma, who is married to Robert, has had a long-term affair with Robert's best friend Jerry. The opening scene is of Emma and Jerry meeting for a drink two years after their affair has ended. The play then works its way chronologically backwards in time, feeding us more details of their tangled relationships with each new scene.
The play provides a perspective into the way in which we might betray and deceive others, as well as the way in which we might betray and deceive ourselves. I thought it was an interesting look at the attempt to hold onto relationships even though they might not fulfill us or make us happy. Fear of change? Habit? Routine? Boredom? It was interesting watching the characters stumble through their relationships, sometimes as if on automatic pilot.
The best aspect of the play was in how it was structured: in reverse order from the end of the affair to the very beginning. I thought that was truly well done. In fact, what I found so interesting was how the characterizations were developed. By providing you with the ending first, the author allows you to make judgments about these characters, then challenges those judgments by providing more and more insight into their past.
Still, despite these interesting elements, I thought that overall the story was unremarkable.
Final Rating: 3 stars
October 27, 2020
When I heard that Betrayal was going to be the first socially distanced play at the Theatre Royal, I dug out the book to remind myself why it remains one of Harold Pinter's most beloved and performed plays.
Sure, not having a packed auditorium just isn't the same, but with excellent Covid-safe measures put into place, I'm just pleased to see the theatre open again. The cast was great, especially Nancy Carroll.
Sure, not having a packed auditorium just isn't the same, but with excellent Covid-safe measures put into place, I'm just pleased to see the theatre open again. The cast was great, especially Nancy Carroll.
September 6, 2017
اولين اثر از اين نويسنده بود كه داشتم ميخوندم
و بينهايت دوسش داشتم
داستان زيبايي داشت
عكس العمل هاي شخصيت ها موقع شنيدن خيانت برام خيلي جالب بود
كاش جهان ما هم كمي تغيير ميكرد
كاش اين و درك كنيم كه همه آزاديم چه زن ،چه مرد!!
و بينهايت دوسش داشتم
داستان زيبايي داشت
عكس العمل هاي شخصيت ها موقع شنيدن خيانت برام خيلي جالب بود
كاش جهان ما هم كمي تغيير ميكرد
كاش اين و درك كنيم كه همه آزاديم چه زن ،چه مرد!!
August 25, 2017
Well, it’s nice, sometimes, to think back. Isn’t it?
December 12, 2022
The ripple effect of infidelity on two families is masterfully examined in this taut play. Emma and Robert start their affair by finding ways to meet during the day; they are both married and must be home by evening. Eventually they get a flat where they are able to spend time alone - afternoons spent in a dreamy world that will never be. Harold Pinter traces the arc of their affair; from the beginning to the end. The line between 'wanting' and 'desire' is explored in a very non linear way that allows the audience (reader) to be the proverbial 'fly on the wall' as they both realize the true cost of their affair. In the end there is a Prufrockian acceptance of the way things are - and the cost that choice always forces us to pay.
September 17, 2020
وقتی توی غلتک نمایشنام� خوندن میفتی، انگار ذره ذره اعتیادت به این چرخش بیشتر میشه و دلت میخواد بیشتر بخونی.
خیلی خیلی خوب بود. از قشنگی های نمایشنام� ی خوب خوندن، کشش داستانه؛ اینکه یک‌با� کتاب رو دستت میگیری، و فقط با پایانش میتونی زمین بگذاریش�... و به نظرم برای یه کتاب‌خون� این اتفاق از دلچسب ترین هاست.
خیانت، روایت جذابی از خیانت بود.
از عشقی که شعله ور میشه و شاید منطق و عقل رو در خودش می‌بلع�. میدونی؟ هرچقدر هم بگیم و تکرار کنیم خودت باید خودت رو دوست داشته باشی مهم نیست، ما محتاجیم به عشق... ما محتاجیم به اینکه یک نفر زیبایی های کوچیک شخصیتمون رو ببینه و برجسته شون کنه، ما محتاجیم به دوست داشتن و دوست داشته شدن...
به وقت بیست و ششم شهریور نود و نه
خیلی خیلی خوب بود. از قشنگی های نمایشنام� ی خوب خوندن، کشش داستانه؛ اینکه یک‌با� کتاب رو دستت میگیری، و فقط با پایانش میتونی زمین بگذاریش�... و به نظرم برای یه کتاب‌خون� این اتفاق از دلچسب ترین هاست.
خیانت، روایت جذابی از خیانت بود.
از عشقی که شعله ور میشه و شاید منطق و عقل رو در خودش می‌بلع�. میدونی؟ هرچقدر هم بگیم و تکرار کنیم خودت باید خودت رو دوست داشته باشی مهم نیست، ما محتاجیم به عشق... ما محتاجیم به اینکه یک نفر زیبایی های کوچیک شخصیتمون رو ببینه و برجسته شون کنه، ما محتاجیم به دوست داشتن و دوست داشته شدن...
به وقت بیست و ششم شهریور نود و نه
April 29, 2020
داستان بسیار جذاب و پرکششی داشت که رو به گذشته و از انتها به ابتدا تعریف شد. یک‌سر� خوندمش و لذت بردم.
April 3, 2025
The characters in The Betrayal display a detached, almost resigned attitude toward their own betrayals. This cool, understated tension makes the play unsettling. Instead of explosive confrontations, there’s silence, subtext, and a passive acceptance of infidelity and dishonesty. Their actions—or inaction—do the talking.
This emotional restraint can feel unnatural; in real life, affairs usually lead to anger, guilt, or at least a serious conversation. But it also eerily reflects how some people handle betrayal—by pretending it doesn’t matter or refusing to acknowledge the pain. The Betrayal isn’t aiming for realism in that sense. Instead, it suggests that deception is everywhere, emotions are often hidden, and sometimes betrayal lingers unspoken, filling the spaces between people.
Pinter’s style leaves much unsaid, making it unclear whether Emma truly loved Jerry or if he was simply an escape from her marriage. She may have cared for both men in different ways, or the affair may have been her attempt to assert autonomy in a world where her role as wife and mother was predefined.
From a woman’s perspective, I interpreted The Betrayal as more than a love triangle. It��s about how women navigate relationships in a world where power is quietly held by men. Emma is neither victim nor villain; she is someone searching for happiness in a system designed to limit her choices—and failing to find it.
In some ways, I wanted more—more of everything!
The Betrayal leaves much open to interpretation, and I would love to see it performed—especially the production starring Tom Hiddleston.
This emotional restraint can feel unnatural; in real life, affairs usually lead to anger, guilt, or at least a serious conversation. But it also eerily reflects how some people handle betrayal—by pretending it doesn’t matter or refusing to acknowledge the pain. The Betrayal isn’t aiming for realism in that sense. Instead, it suggests that deception is everywhere, emotions are often hidden, and sometimes betrayal lingers unspoken, filling the spaces between people.
Pinter’s style leaves much unsaid, making it unclear whether Emma truly loved Jerry or if he was simply an escape from her marriage. She may have cared for both men in different ways, or the affair may have been her attempt to assert autonomy in a world where her role as wife and mother was predefined.
From a woman’s perspective, I interpreted The Betrayal as more than a love triangle. It��s about how women navigate relationships in a world where power is quietly held by men. Emma is neither victim nor villain; she is someone searching for happiness in a system designed to limit her choices—and failing to find it.
In some ways, I wanted more—more of everything!
The Betrayal leaves much open to interpretation, and I would love to see it performed—especially the production starring Tom Hiddleston.
August 14, 2024
I have boyfriend-in-my head Tom Hiddleston (and Charlie Cox) to thank for reading this play. RTC.
Plot summary: Robert is married to Emma, and they have 2 children. Jerry is Robert’s best friend. Jerry and Emma have been having an affair for 7 years. Jerry is also married to a woman named Judith and they have 2 children. MESSY.
The play opens with Jerry and Emma meeting up a couple of years after they’ve ended their affair. Jerry later finds out that Robert had known about the affair for FOUR years. Then, the play goes backwards: we see Robert and Emma's marriage, Jerry and Robert's friendship and Emma and Jerry's "entanglement" with it ending with Jerry and Emma’s first kiss.
With the exception of Judith, everyone in this play was horrible but it’s so well written and darkly hilarious that it didn’t even bother me that much. Also, when you pick up a play that’s titled “Betrayal� you know what you’re in for 😂
Some funny moments AKA Jerry having THEE audacity for 138 pages straight (again, most of the characters in this book are horrible but he is really SOMETHING)
1. Jerry being hilariously offended that Robert knew about his and Emma's affair for 4 years and never told him. Robert, Emma and Jerry were still hanging out as if Robert had no idea.
2. Jerry telling Emma (his mistress) that he thinks that his wife Judith might be cheating on him.... this conversation takes place in his and Emma's love nest by the way.
3. Jerry being sulky that Emma still sleeps with her husband and that he got her pregnant.
Plot summary: Robert is married to Emma, and they have 2 children. Jerry is Robert’s best friend. Jerry and Emma have been having an affair for 7 years. Jerry is also married to a woman named Judith and they have 2 children. MESSY.
The play opens with Jerry and Emma meeting up a couple of years after they’ve ended their affair. Jerry later finds out that Robert had known about the affair for FOUR years. Then, the play goes backwards: we see Robert and Emma's marriage, Jerry and Robert's friendship and Emma and Jerry's "entanglement" with it ending with Jerry and Emma’s first kiss.
With the exception of Judith, everyone in this play was horrible but it’s so well written and darkly hilarious that it didn’t even bother me that much. Also, when you pick up a play that’s titled “Betrayal� you know what you’re in for 😂
Some funny moments AKA Jerry having THEE audacity for 138 pages straight (again, most of the characters in this book are horrible but he is really SOMETHING)
1. Jerry being hilariously offended that Robert knew about his and Emma's affair for 4 years and never told him. Robert, Emma and Jerry were still hanging out as if Robert had no idea.
2. Jerry telling Emma (his mistress) that he thinks that his wife Judith might be cheating on him.... this conversation takes place in his and Emma's love nest by the way.
3. Jerry being sulky that Emma still sleeps with her husband and that he got her pregnant.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
May 23, 2018
ماجرای خیانت روندی معکوس را طی میکند و در آخر به شب اول خیانت برمی گردد. 《خیانت》تنش� است که تمام داستان را به ارتعاش در می آورد. بنظرم پینتر سعی کرده جزئیات و احساسات درونی نقش ها را بیان کند تا خواننده در مقام قاضی قرار گیرد و با تجزیه تحلیلی که میکند، خوب و بد را خود، تشخیص دهد. در کل تجربه اول خوبی از این نویسنده بود.
November 23, 2017
From theconversation.com:
The word ruling this play is “when�. When did Jerry know that Emma had told Robert, her husband, of their affair? When did Emma know that Robert knew, and decide not to tell Jerry, but continue it? When did Jerry decide he would not leave Judith, his wife, and was this the catalyst for Emma to say, while pregnant with her son, Ned, that Robert was the father, not Jerry?
When was the moment of real betrayal? When Jerry drunkenly declared undying love to his best friend’s wife behind his best friend’s back? When Emma responded? When they slept together for the first time? When they carried on sleeping with their marriage partners?
Scene four: drinks at Robert and Emma’s; Emma offstage, with Ned, Jerry and Robert onstage, talking. What we don’t see, but will see later, is that Robert knows about the affair, and Emma knows he knows. What we don’t see, and will never see, is what this means exactly, because she has not given him up, and Robert tolerates this, and so does she � Robert knowing, Jerry not knowing he knows.
Casually Jerry says he will be taking a trip to America. He has not told Emma, and when he leaves it is clear this is devastating news for her. She then turns to Robert for � what? Punishment? Pity? Comfort? Is it possible � that a wife would turn to her husband for solace when her lover casts her off
And:
And a betrayal to the self. For admiting i dont love u anymore is much harder. Even when Emma is giving Jerry the news of her pregnancy she is yearning for a new start but cant say it out loud. And can Robert be also betraying his insticts when he says i preferred to be in a relationship with Jerry myself? And Judith? Living a secret life?
The word ruling this play is “when�. When did Jerry know that Emma had told Robert, her husband, of their affair? When did Emma know that Robert knew, and decide not to tell Jerry, but continue it? When did Jerry decide he would not leave Judith, his wife, and was this the catalyst for Emma to say, while pregnant with her son, Ned, that Robert was the father, not Jerry?
When was the moment of real betrayal? When Jerry drunkenly declared undying love to his best friend’s wife behind his best friend’s back? When Emma responded? When they slept together for the first time? When they carried on sleeping with their marriage partners?
Scene four: drinks at Robert and Emma’s; Emma offstage, with Ned, Jerry and Robert onstage, talking. What we don’t see, but will see later, is that Robert knows about the affair, and Emma knows he knows. What we don’t see, and will never see, is what this means exactly, because she has not given him up, and Robert tolerates this, and so does she � Robert knowing, Jerry not knowing he knows.
Casually Jerry says he will be taking a trip to America. He has not told Emma, and when he leaves it is clear this is devastating news for her. She then turns to Robert for � what? Punishment? Pity? Comfort? Is it possible � that a wife would turn to her husband for solace when her lover casts her off
And:
And a betrayal to the self. For admiting i dont love u anymore is much harder. Even when Emma is giving Jerry the news of her pregnancy she is yearning for a new start but cant say it out loud. And can Robert be also betraying his insticts when he says i preferred to be in a relationship with Jerry myself? And Judith? Living a secret life?
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
December 4, 2024
Another great play by Pinter. I've read a handful of his plays and enjoyed them all. Homecoming and the lover being my personal favourites. 4.2/5
April 20, 2021
Luga par 50% sastāv no "Kā tev iet?" "Normāli. Kā tev?" "Jā. Atceries toreiz?..." "Ko?" "Nu." "Ā. Jā."
Un vienalga ir interesanti, ar labi uzturētu spriedzi.
Un vienalga ir interesanti, ar labi uzturētu spriedzi.
January 26, 2020
ایده جالبی برای توصیف خیانت داشت.
نمایشنام درواقع از آخر به اول میره. از لحظه تموم شدن یک رابطه عاشقانه اما خیانت بار شروع میشه و تا لحظه اولین خیانت تو چند سال قبل تموم میشه.
خیلی زود خوندمش. لذت بردم.
نمایشنام درواقع از آخر به اول میره. از لحظه تموم شدن یک رابطه عاشقانه اما خیانت بار شروع میشه و تا لحظه اولین خیانت تو چند سال قبل تموم میشه.
خیلی زود خوندمش. لذت بردم.
December 18, 2014
I actually listened to this as a BBC Radio Drama () that starred Olivia Colman and Andrew Scott. I'd heard he'd won the BBC Audio Drama, Best Actor Award for it, and I liked him from BBC Sherlock so I thought it would be worth listening to.
This is a very interesting and thought provoking play. First of all, it's presented chronologically backwards... We meet the two people who have had an affair after their affair is over, as they are having a discussion over lunch. The woman reveals she has told her husband that she'd cheated on him with the ex-lover, who is his best friend. He's angry because she didn't consult him first, and then we hear his conversation with his friend...
It proceeds from there, slowly revealing various lies the friends/spouses/lovers have told each other over the years and highlights their reactions to the various "betrayals".
It is very thought provoking. I think my favourite moment of the play was when Andrew Scott's character, Jerry,
It was really a great moment, well acted... In a play full of moments worth listening to. Makes you think about all the different lies and different kinds of betrayals we have in daily life.
(Evidently the play was based on the author's real life affair with a famous female BBC broadcaster.)
Edited on December 17th, 2014 on rereading, after realizing I really should have spoiler warnings in several spots. At the time I originally posted I didn't know how to insert them- CRM
This is a very interesting and thought provoking play. First of all, it's presented chronologically backwards... We meet the two people who have had an affair after their affair is over, as they are having a discussion over lunch. The woman reveals she has told her husband that she'd cheated on him with the ex-lover, who is his best friend. He's angry because she didn't consult him first, and then we hear his conversation with his friend...
It proceeds from there, slowly revealing various lies the friends/spouses/lovers have told each other over the years and highlights their reactions to the various "betrayals".
It is very thought provoking. I think my favourite moment of the play was when Andrew Scott's character, Jerry,
It was really a great moment, well acted... In a play full of moments worth listening to. Makes you think about all the different lies and different kinds of betrayals we have in daily life.
(Evidently the play was based on the author's real life affair with a famous female BBC broadcaster.)
Edited on December 17th, 2014 on rereading, after realizing I really should have spoiler warnings in several spots. At the time I originally posted I didn't know how to insert them- CRM
September 14, 2018
بی کم و کاست! اولین و تنها نمایشنام‌ا� که از پینتر خوندم و فقط می‌تون� بگم بی‌نظی� بود! فرم کلی نمایشنام شگفت‌زده� کرد. داستان از لحاظ زمانی به صورت ریورس اتفاق میفته و حتی در همین حال هم پیوند داره و اگر به تاریخ‌ه� دقت نکنید اصلا متوجهش نمی‌شی�.
December 6, 2019
I'm going to be honest with ya'll, i didn't get it. Didn't understand the significance and in general what would someone write this.
If i have to look at it in a Brechtian way, yeah it was as pointless as waiting for godot. But if not, i don't even know what it was.
If i have to look at it in a Brechtian way, yeah it was as pointless as waiting for godot. But if not, i don't even know what it was.
November 13, 2020
کشش خوبی داشت. نحوهٔ روایت از حال به گذشته هم جالب بود برام. و به نظرم خیلی انسانی و طبیعی بود دیالوگ‌ه�.
June 9, 2013
"خیانت" خیلی ساده شروع می شود. به قول خود پینتر در مصاحبه ی پایانی کتاب (این که مصاحبه و توضیح های مربوط به کتاب در سری نمایشنام های «دور تا دور دنیا» در پایان کتاب می آید، نکته ی مهمی است. چه این که به نظر من روش درست خواندن یک اثر آن است که اول خود اثر را بخوانیم و بعد نکته های پیرامونی آن را. تا نکته های پیرامونی روی خود اثر، تاثیر اولیه نگذارند) «یک زن و یک مرد در یک بار انگلیسی پس از مدت ها هم دیگر را می دیدند» تصویری بوده است که بدون دانستن ادامه ی آن و این که دو نفر با هم چه کاری دارند در ذهن پینتر نقش می بندد و او کم کم خودش کشف می کند که این دو چه ماجرایی با هم داشته اند.
این روش داستان نویسی، من را یاد حرفی از نادر ابراهیمی می اندازد که گفته بود داستانی را که آخرش را می دانی در سطل آشغال بینداز. آن هم نه سطلی در نزدیکی خودت. سطلی دور که هیچ وقت نتوانی برگردی و چنین داستانی را دوباره برداری! به نظر من روش مناسب داستان نویسی هم همین است. گرچه شاید در برخی شرایط نتوان این جوری نوشت. (یا بعضی ها نتوانند)
به هر حال در طول داستان با همین موضوع «خیانت» سر و کار داریم. هر چه پیش تر می رویم، این موضوع گسترده تر و عمیق تر می شود. اما جالب این جاست که داستان «پیش تر» نمی رود! ما داریم به گذشته بر می گردیم. و تا پایان هم «فلاش فوروارد» نداریم. همان ابتدای کار می دانیم چه اتفاقی افتاده اما جزئیات اتفاق را نمی دانیم. موضوع به خودی خود کنجکاوی برانگیز است. با این حال، هنر نویسنده در به تصویر کشیدن جزئیات اتفاق هایی است که ما از کلیت آن باخبریم. این جزئیات است که باعث می شود هر چه داستان بیش تر در گذشته فرو می رود ما چیزهای بیش تری کشف کنیم. و این کشف حتا بیرون از داستان هم ادامه می یابد! چرا که نویسنده فضایی را به تصویر می کشد که «خیانت» در جزء جزء آن دیده می شود. ومسلمن خیانت های بسیار دیگری هم هست که نویسنده نیازی به بیان آن ها ندیده است.
صحنه ای را از نمایشنام خیلی دوست داشتم که دو تا از شخصیت ها با هم حرف می زنند و یکی سعی دارد غیرمستقیم نفرت خود را نسبت به دیگری (که در ظاهر دوست اوست) نشان دهد. جوری که دوستی آن ها پابرجا می ماند اما این نفرت هم به شکل جالبی منتقل می شود!
مصاحبه ی پایانی هم خوب و تامل برانگیز بود. به ویژه در موردش روش نمایشنام نویسی پینتر.
از «» (یکی از مترجمان کتاب) پیش از این، «» را خوانده بودم. از پینتر مطمئن نیستم. فکر می کنم «»ش را خوانده باشم. یعنی مطمئن نیستم آن چیزی که با این موضوع در ذهن دارم، همین نمایشنام ی پینتر بوده یا نه.
چند نکته در مورد کتاب:
1- نام «نگار جواهریان» به عنوان یکی از مترجمان روی جلد، جلب توجه می کند. این، همان نگار جواهریان معروف است! متولد سال 1360
2- ابتدای کتاب، شعری از «ویلیام باتلر ییتس» آورده شده است. نام این شاعر در طول کتاب «ییتز» ترجمه شده.
3- قطع کتاب (در کل قطع این سری کتاب ها) برای در مسیر خواندن مناسب است.
این روش داستان نویسی، من را یاد حرفی از نادر ابراهیمی می اندازد که گفته بود داستانی را که آخرش را می دانی در سطل آشغال بینداز. آن هم نه سطلی در نزدیکی خودت. سطلی دور که هیچ وقت نتوانی برگردی و چنین داستانی را دوباره برداری! به نظر من روش مناسب داستان نویسی هم همین است. گرچه شاید در برخی شرایط نتوان این جوری نوشت. (یا بعضی ها نتوانند)
به هر حال در طول داستان با همین موضوع «خیانت» سر و کار داریم. هر چه پیش تر می رویم، این موضوع گسترده تر و عمیق تر می شود. اما جالب این جاست که داستان «پیش تر» نمی رود! ما داریم به گذشته بر می گردیم. و تا پایان هم «فلاش فوروارد» نداریم. همان ابتدای کار می دانیم چه اتفاقی افتاده اما جزئیات اتفاق را نمی دانیم. موضوع به خودی خود کنجکاوی برانگیز است. با این حال، هنر نویسنده در به تصویر کشیدن جزئیات اتفاق هایی است که ما از کلیت آن باخبریم. این جزئیات است که باعث می شود هر چه داستان بیش تر در گذشته فرو می رود ما چیزهای بیش تری کشف کنیم. و این کشف حتا بیرون از داستان هم ادامه می یابد! چرا که نویسنده فضایی را به تصویر می کشد که «خیانت» در جزء جزء آن دیده می شود. ومسلمن خیانت های بسیار دیگری هم هست که نویسنده نیازی به بیان آن ها ندیده است.
صحنه ای را از نمایشنام خیلی دوست داشتم که دو تا از شخصیت ها با هم حرف می زنند و یکی سعی دارد غیرمستقیم نفرت خود را نسبت به دیگری (که در ظاهر دوست اوست) نشان دهد. جوری که دوستی آن ها پابرجا می ماند اما این نفرت هم به شکل جالبی منتقل می شود!
مصاحبه ی پایانی هم خوب و تامل برانگیز بود. به ویژه در موردش روش نمایشنام نویسی پینتر.
از «» (یکی از مترجمان کتاب) پیش از این، «» را خوانده بودم. از پینتر مطمئن نیستم. فکر می کنم «»ش را خوانده باشم. یعنی مطمئن نیستم آن چیزی که با این موضوع در ذهن دارم، همین نمایشنام ی پینتر بوده یا نه.
چند نکته در مورد کتاب:
1- نام «نگار جواهریان» به عنوان یکی از مترجمان روی جلد، جلب توجه می کند. این، همان نگار جواهریان معروف است! متولد سال 1360
2- ابتدای کتاب، شعری از «ویلیام باتلر ییتس» آورده شده است. نام این شاعر در طول کتاب «ییتز» ترجمه شده.
3- قطع کتاب (در کل قطع این سری کتاب ها) برای در مسیر خواندن مناسب است.
July 30, 2021
"Jesus. I'm not trying to say anything. I've said precisely what I wanted to say."
This particular dialogue captures the very essence of this play. Words can be interpreted in so many different ways and they can mean thousand different things. But that is not for the writer/speaker to explain. They said what they wanted to say. It is the reader/listener who makes it more through their experiences, insecurities, dreams, doubts, aspirations, and guilts. It is upon us to bring a meaning out of it.
Naturally, this is a play about betrayal. What happens when your wife, mother of your two children betrays? Betrays with your best friend? What happens when you trust people with loving you and they toss that trust into a gutter as if it was nothing? Well, we don't know. 'Cause Pinter never shows us that. Rather he takes us into the affair, tells us a story of it in backward. We start with the end of the relationship and end with the beginning.
And in all its glory it shows us a tale that leaves us to decide what is right, who is the wrong one here.
I hope one day, somewhere, someplace I can see it on stage. One day!
May 3, 2020
Betrayal, or I prefer to say “Betrayals� is written on the same theme and subject as the name suggests. In this play, people are not just betraying their lovers and beloveds or even friends; they are at the same time betraying themselves, creating a deceptive reality. It is not easy to say who is the victim in this play. Firstly, we should find who is guilty, and the answer is that everybody is to an extent guilty, so that makes everybody victims, as well. The feeling of lack is the motivation behind all these betrayals and deceptions, so all the characters hide themselves behind masks and play this game of betrayal. Emma lacks the love of her husband, or maybe she is not satisfied with it, so she turns to Jerry being once again disillusioned, and she starts another relationship with Casey. We cannot blame Robert for Emma’s feeling of incompleteness, but we should blame him for putting up with the affair and living along with it, betraying himself, his wife, and his friend by being indifferent (not to mention that he was also having an affair). This play is full of ambiguities and unanswered questions and the audience is not presented with the dramatic irony, so it is difficult to judge the characters without putting one’s self in their shoes and playing along. For me, Jerry’s motivation for starting the relationship is of the same vagueness. It can be both lust and jealousy, or fear of losing a dear friend since Emma has appeared as the wife of Robert. Jerry is also committing the same mistake of Robert; indifference to his wife, and it is funny that he cares for his reputation regarding Robert, not his wife, so this may illustrate that he cares more for his friendship than his wife (his wife is also seeing someone). Judith is also guilty. She is not physically present in the scenes, and she is always busy, doing her profession which may show her lack of importance in Jimmy’s life; she is not really trying to communicate with Jerry. Gaps exist in real life and one cannot completely fill them. According to Jacques Lacan, we are in search of the “objet petit a(s)�, but this quest is futile, we never can feel complete the moment we are detached from our mother (Jerry and Robert also refer to the detachment from the womb), so everybody is trapped in this game of wild goose chase to play the culprit and the victim. There is no winning in this game of life. The best way may be accepting these shortcomings and dealing with them. However, the characters in this play are running from reality and denying the truth.
May 9, 2016
Really good stuff! The scenes are told in reverse chronology with the theme being an affair - where Jerry is Robert's best friend, and he has an affair with Robert's wife, Emma. It's not just the plot that makes it, or the subliminal tension of each scene, but the combination of that with the structure and returning motifs throughout the play that really take it to the next level.
August 22, 2018
3.5 כוכבים.
חביב. ריאלי להכאיב. כמו אור פלורסנט לבן שמאיר על ניתוח פתולוגי.
חביב. ריאלי להכאיב. כמו אור פלורסנט לבן שמאיר על ניתוח פתולוגי.
February 10, 2025
Yess I loved this. So simple but so interesting. Going down a Harold Pinter rabbit hole now.
February 11, 2022
i fucking stink at reading plays
April 27, 2023
به دور از ادبیات و انسانیت....
November 20, 2018
There are different kinds of betrayal in this play. The betrayal of friendship,of love,of time, of memory and self-betrayal. There is also adultery and guilt.
Through the play we see Jerry and Emma have embarked on a 7 affair, but the action starts on a date two years after their relationship is over and ends at the party where the spark was first ignited. Emma and Jerry are both married with kids- in fact Jerry was best Man at Emma's wedding-but they are hopelessly drawn to each other,although time is not a good companion to lovers.
Everybody keeps appearances and wears mask. There is a coldness to the play as the characters are icemen/woman. They are not particularly likeable constantly hiding emotions, manking them with intelectual pseudo narcissistic dialogues and making everything uncomfortable around them. I like more reading between the lines, deciphering their silences, what lies beneath their stone-like skins.
I'm not usually into Mr Pinter, but I got curious after some feedback and now I'm eager to watch Jeremy Iron's performance in the 80's movie. It will sure improve my Rating.
Through the play we see Jerry and Emma have embarked on a 7 affair, but the action starts on a date two years after their relationship is over and ends at the party where the spark was first ignited. Emma and Jerry are both married with kids- in fact Jerry was best Man at Emma's wedding-but they are hopelessly drawn to each other,although time is not a good companion to lovers.
Everybody keeps appearances and wears mask. There is a coldness to the play as the characters are icemen/woman. They are not particularly likeable constantly hiding emotions, manking them with intelectual pseudo narcissistic dialogues and making everything uncomfortable around them. I like more reading between the lines, deciphering their silences, what lies beneath their stone-like skins.
I'm not usually into Mr Pinter, but I got curious after some feedback and now I'm eager to watch Jeremy Iron's performance in the 80's movie. It will sure improve my Rating.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 511 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.