What do you think?
Rate this book
丿丕爻鬲丕賳鈥屬囏й� 诏乇蹖賲 亘乇丕蹖 倬蹖乇 賵 噩賵丕賳
丕夭 夭賲丕賳蹖 讴賴 亘乇丕丿乇丕賳 诏乇蹖賲 丕賵賱蹖賳 賳爻禺賴 丕夭 賯氐賴鈥屬囏й� 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘賴 趩丕倬 乇爻丕賳丿賳丿 亘蹖卮 丕夭 丿賵蹖爻鬲 爻丕賱 賲蹖鈥屭柏必� 賵 賲噩賲賵毓賴贁 賲匕讴賵乇 亘丕乇賴丕 賲賵乇丿 丨讴鈥屬堌ж蒂勜ж� 賵 丕賱亘鬲賴 丨匕賮 賵 賯蹖趩蹖 賯乇丕乇 诏乇賮鬲賴. 丿乇 夭賲丕賳賴鈥屫й� 讴賴 趩賳丿丕賳 亘丕 賯氐賴鈥屬囏й� 倬乇蹖丕賳 亘蹖诏丕賳賴 賳蹖爻鬲貙 賮蹖賱蹖倬 倬賵賱賲賳 亘丕 賯賱賲 噩匕丕亘 禺賵丿 倬賳噩丕賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丕夭 賲噩賲賵毓賴贁 賲匕讴賵乇 乇丕 丕賳鬲禺丕亘 讴乇丿賴 賵 亘賴 賳夭丿蹖讴鈥屫臂屬� 賳爻禺賴贁 賲賲讴賳 丕夭 賳爻禺賴贁 丕氐賱蹖 亘乇诏乇丿丕賳丿賴. 丕賲丕 鬲賲丕賲 噩匕丕亘蹖鬲 丕蹖賳 丕孬乇 亘賴 丕賳鬲禺丕亘 倬賵賱賲賳 蹖丕 亘賴 鬲丕夭诏蹖 賵 丿爻鬲鈥屬嗀堌必� 亘賵丿賳賽 亘乇禺蹖 丕夭 丿丕爻鬲丕賳鈥屬囏� 亘乇賳賲蹖鈥屭必� 亘賱讴賴 倬賵賱賲賳 丿乇 丕賳鬲賴丕蹖 賴乇 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丕胤賱丕毓丕鬲蹖 丕夭 胤亘賯賴鈥屫ㄙ嗀� 賵 丨賵丕卮蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丿乇 丕禺鬲蹖丕乇 禺賵丕賳賳丿诏丕賳 賲蹖鈥屭柏ж必� 讴賴 賳賴鈥屫嗁囏� 亘乇 噩匕丕亘蹖鬲 丿丕爻鬲丕賳鈥屬囏� 賲蹖鈥屫з佖藏й屫� 亘賱讴賴 乇丕賴 乇丕 亘乇丕蹖 丕賮乇丕丿 賲卮鬲丕賯 亘賴 鬲丨賯蹖賯 賳蹖夭 亘丕夭 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�. 賮蹖賱蹖倬 倬賵賱賲賳 (郾酃鄞鄱) 丿乇 賳賵乇蹖趩 丕賳诏賱爻鬲丕賳 賲鬲賵賱丿 卮丿. 丕賵 賮丕乇睾鈥屫з勜帝屬� 乇卮鬲賴贁 夭亘丕賳 丕賳诏賱蹖爻蹖 丕夭 丿丕賳卮诏丕賴 讴丕賱噩 丕讴爻鬲乇 丿乇 丌讴爻賮賵乇丿 丕爻鬲. 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏蹖 丨乇賮賴贁 丕氐賱蹖 丕賵爻鬲. 卮丕賴讴丕乇 丕賵貙 賲噩賲賵毓賴贁 芦賳蹖乇賵蹖 丕賴乇蹖賲賳蹖鈥屫ж绰回� 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 賲賴賲鈥屫臂屬� 丌孬丕乇 鬲丕乇蹖禺 丕丿亘蹖丕鬲 賮丕賳鬲夭蹖 賵 丕丿亘蹖丕鬲 噩賴丕賳 丕爻鬲.
439 pages, Paperback
First published September 27, 2012
1331 people are currently reading
31218 people want to read
About the author
Philip Pullman
200听books25.1k听followersSir Philip Nicholas Outram Pullman is an English writer. His books include the fantasy trilogy His Dark Materials and The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ, a fictionalised biography of Jesus. In 2008, The Times named Pullman one of the "50 greatest British writers since 1945". In a 2004 BBC poll, he was named the eleventh most influential person in British culture. He was knighted in the 2019 New Year Honours for services to literature.
Northern Lights, the first volume in His Dark Materials, won the 1995 Carnegie Medal of the Library Association as the year's outstanding English-language children's book. For the Carnegie's 70th anniversary, it was named in the top ten by a panel tasked with compiling a shortlist for a public vote for an all-time favourite. It won that public vote and was named all-time "Carnegie of Carnegies" in June 2007. It was filmed under the book's US title, The Golden Compass. In 2003, His Dark Materials trilogy ranked third in the BBC's The Big Read, a poll of 200 top novels voted by the British public.
Northern Lights, the first volume in His Dark Materials, won the 1995 Carnegie Medal of the Library Association as the year's outstanding English-language children's book. For the Carnegie's 70th anniversary, it was named in the top ten by a panel tasked with compiling a shortlist for a public vote for an all-time favourite. It won that public vote and was named all-time "Carnegie of Carnegies" in June 2007. It was filmed under the book's US title, The Golden Compass. In 2003, His Dark Materials trilogy ranked third in the BBC's The Big Read, a poll of 200 top novels voted by the British public.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,272 reviews
February 28, 2025
welcome to...FEBRUARY TALES FROM THE BROTHERS GRIMM.
this is another installment of my long classics project, which began as an approachable way to read classics by spacing out chapters over a month, and has devolved into an excuse for me to indulge my penguin clothbound addiction.
that's where this comes in. i'm trying this year not to buy books i haven't read yet, so i checked this book out from the library, whose edition has a different title and which has also been in my possession for about 3 months.
so i'm using this project to force myself to read it (in two stories a day installments) and return it.
hi, my name is emma, and i'm a fairytale addict.
THE FROG KING, OR IRON HEINRICH
you can tell i'm really excited about this book because i read the whole historical and etymological introduction. revoke my bookworm card if you must, but i'm not normally a preface kind of girl.
legendary one, of course. the golden ball is as memorable to me as any frog guy.
rating: 3.5
THE CAT AND THE MOUSE SET UP HOUSE
so far i would say that the style of the stories is nothing to write home about, but the little historical bit at the end explaining their origins and spinoffs is a real delight.
rating: 3.5
THE BOY WHO LEFT HOME TO FIND OUT ABOUT THE SHIVERS
always a personal favorite of mine. there's something about an old-timey haunted house.
rating: 4
FAITHFUL JOHANNES
all the edgy teens who are like "i do not dream of labor" when you ask them what they want to do when they grow up should put some respect on johannes' name. and the haunting portrait. and the ominous talking birds.
rating: 4
THE TWELVE BROTHERS
if i were an extremely beautiful princess whose 12 brothers had been exiled and disenfranchised so i could one day inherit everything in a huge feminist win before its time...i can't say i'm 100% sure i would move in with them in their forest cottage to clean all day without a second thought.
rating: 3.5
LITTLE BROTHER AND LITTLE SISTER
the inciting incident of this book is that little brother gets turned into a deer, and by the time happily ever after comes around, he is still a deer. must be a nice lifestyle.
rating: 3
RAPUNZEL
icon alert!!! disney hates to admit how much the original revolves around stealing lettuce.
rating: 4
THE THREE LITTLE MEN IN THE WOODS
i would never survive a fairytale. if three creepy little guys in the forest asked me to hang out in their house and do a bunch of chores i'd be like "no thanks."
rating: 3.5
HANSEL AND GRETEL
another point for my early death in any fairytale situation: i would have way too good of a tiem with an edible house.
rating: 4
THE THREE SNAKE LEAVES
i wish i cared as much about anything as fairytales care about the number three.
rating: 3.5
THE FISHERMAN AND HIS WIFE
this story is about how you're allowed to be as greedy as you want, up to demanding being the pope but not including becoming god.
rating: 3.5
THE BRAVE LITTLE TAILOR
is the brave little toaster a play on this? time to google.
rating: 3.5
CINDERELLA
most renditions of cinderella are pretty simple and lame (not you ella enchanted), but this was one of the good ones. i like the versions where her dresses are starlight / moonlight / sunlight.
rating: 3.5
THE RIDDLE
okay, a riddle can't just be "a hard question based on personal experience the questionee would have no concept of."
rating: 3
THE MOUSE, THE BIRD AND THE SAUSAGE
read this one out loud to my fianc茅 and we both laughed hysterically so no notes.
rating: 5
LITTLE RED RIDING HOOD
this one is soooo moralistic it makes a grandma-eating wolf with a sewn-up belly full of rocks seem like a snooze.
rating: 3.5
THE MUSICIANS OF BREMEN
more of those who dream of a career in music should be subverted. so for that alone i appreciate this story.
rating: 3.5
THE SINGING BONE
i have to be honest here. if your brother kills you to steal your boar and gets to marry a princess and live happily for many years, i don't think being made into a horn by a peasant and then sing-snitching what happened is very satisfying revenge.
rating: 3.5
THE DEVIL WITH THE THREE GOLDEN HAIRS
i gotta say, the devil's grandmother is the real hero of this story. the hero boy in question just kind of shows up and asks her to handle the hair-plucking situation.
rating: 4
THE GIRL WITH NO HANDS
this is bizarrely religious considering how weird it is. a beautiful girl whose dad chopped her at the wrists eating pears off royal trees and then being given silver prosthetics until god in his unknowing will makes her hands grow back? sure!
rating: 3.5
THE ELVES
this is the classic story of the shoemaker immediately followed by two weird and unrelated vignettes.
rating: 3
THE ROBBER BRIDEGROOM
if i walked in my new boyfriend's place and a bird immediately sang "get the hell out this is a murderer's house" at me, i would turn right the hell around. no follow-up questions from me, thanks!
rating: 3.5
GODFATHER DEATH
"he only said that because he didn't know God's purpose in being so kind to the rich and so cruel to the poor." well when you put it that way neither do i!
rating: 3.5
THE JUNIPER TREE
framing your daughter for decapitation...now that is nasty work.
rating: 4
BRIAR ROSE
well. never have i ever heard the menstruation metaphor reading of sleeping beauty.
rating: 4
SNOW WHITE
back to back heavy hitters!
it's awesome how much men don't matter in fairytales. it's just evil girls and hot girls and that's it.
rating: 3.5
RUMPELSTILTSKIN
the detail of this little freak tearing himself in half will never leave my mind.
rating: 4
THE GOLDEN BIRD
i could never be one of the faithful sidekicks in a fairytale. all these talking animals giving perfect advice that beautiful royals never listen to and still somehow get the credit for...it grinds my gears just to think of it.
rating: 3.5
FARMERKIN
i need to know which of the grimm brothers was betrayed by a priest. all these guys are ever doing in fairytales is creating mistresses.
i>rating: 4
THOUSANDFURS
this story begins with a princess having to run away from her dad because he becomes obsessed with her, but then that never comes up again. philip pullman counters this by writing a wildly creepy coraline-esque footnote alternate ending. that's the sort of thing you're missing by not reading this particular collection.
rating: 3.5
JORINDA AND JORINGEL
pausing so you can all add these to your baby name ideas note.
rating: 3.5
SIX WHO MADE THEIR WAY IN THE WORLD
this is just fairytale ocean's eleven. so...a dream.
rating: 4
GAMBLING HANS
rip gambling hans. you would have loved the proliferation of online sports betting.
rating: 3.5
THE SINGING, SPRINGING LARK
otherwise known as "beauty and the beast, but the better version with various curses and kidnappings."
rating: 4
THE GOOSE GIRL
this is now the second instance of a villain being asked how a villain should be punished and immediately outlining a grotesque lethal torture. just one time i'd like one of these guys to be like "with a tea party and petit-fours." have some self awareness.
rating: 3.5
BEARSKIN
so as it turns out the punishment for teasing your sister is instantaneous suicide when she gets married. bad news for me.
rating: 3.5
THE TWO TRAVELLING COMPANIONS
if you love god, listen to talking crows, and befriend animals, you too can become the king of tailors.
rating: 3.5
HANS-MY-HEDGEHOG
who among us hasn't lost our temper and immediately said "i will have a child, even if it's a hedgehog," unleashing a bizarre generational curse.
rating: 3.5
THE LITTLE SHROUD
this was like half a page and extremely religious. why didn't we save the best material for last, pullman! we have to close this out strong!
rating: 3
THE STOLEN PENNIES
see above note.
rating: 3
THE DONKEY CABBAGE
insert some sort of "my nickname in high school" joke here.
rating: 4
ONE EYE, TWO EYE AND THREE EYES
welcome to cinderella (goofy version). i love it.
rating: 4
THE SHOES THAT WERE DANCED TO PIECES
i was hoping this would just be a version of the 12 dancing princesses with a weird title, and that's exactly what it is.
rating: 3.5
IRON HANS
we have got to try a name besides hans one of these days.
rating: 3.5
MOUNT SIMELI
this is just worse ali baba. fairytales are so weird about cross-cultural sharing.
rating: 3.5
LAZY HEINZ
like the ketchup?
rating: 3
STRONG HANS
this is a long weird story followed by a paragraph in which philip pullman outlines all the many things wrong with it narratively. as a devoted hater, i have to admire that.
rating: 3.5
THE MOON
just so you guys know, if we start enjoying the moon too much, st. peter might take it away again.
rating: 3
THE GOOSE GIRL AT THE SPRING
okay this story has everything: pearl tears, the skin of an ugly person worn by a beautiful princess, a maybe witch, forest search parties, geese, an unreliable narrator, wonderful naps.
rating: 4
THE NIXIE OF THE MILLPOND
and what if i think a deal's a deal and the nixie deserved to lock down the huntsman...
rating: 3.5/i>
OVERALL
i love fairytales and i have all my life, so i've read most of these before. still, pullman's analysis and slight tweaks were refreshing enough that a lot of this felt new. i had a great time!
rating: 4
this is another installment of my long classics project, which began as an approachable way to read classics by spacing out chapters over a month, and has devolved into an excuse for me to indulge my penguin clothbound addiction.
that's where this comes in. i'm trying this year not to buy books i haven't read yet, so i checked this book out from the library, whose edition has a different title and which has also been in my possession for about 3 months.
so i'm using this project to force myself to read it (in two stories a day installments) and return it.
hi, my name is emma, and i'm a fairytale addict.
THE FROG KING, OR IRON HEINRICH
you can tell i'm really excited about this book because i read the whole historical and etymological introduction. revoke my bookworm card if you must, but i'm not normally a preface kind of girl.
legendary one, of course. the golden ball is as memorable to me as any frog guy.
rating: 3.5
THE CAT AND THE MOUSE SET UP HOUSE
so far i would say that the style of the stories is nothing to write home about, but the little historical bit at the end explaining their origins and spinoffs is a real delight.
rating: 3.5
THE BOY WHO LEFT HOME TO FIND OUT ABOUT THE SHIVERS
always a personal favorite of mine. there's something about an old-timey haunted house.
rating: 4
FAITHFUL JOHANNES
all the edgy teens who are like "i do not dream of labor" when you ask them what they want to do when they grow up should put some respect on johannes' name. and the haunting portrait. and the ominous talking birds.
rating: 4
THE TWELVE BROTHERS
if i were an extremely beautiful princess whose 12 brothers had been exiled and disenfranchised so i could one day inherit everything in a huge feminist win before its time...i can't say i'm 100% sure i would move in with them in their forest cottage to clean all day without a second thought.
rating: 3.5
LITTLE BROTHER AND LITTLE SISTER
the inciting incident of this book is that little brother gets turned into a deer, and by the time happily ever after comes around, he is still a deer. must be a nice lifestyle.
rating: 3
RAPUNZEL
icon alert!!! disney hates to admit how much the original revolves around stealing lettuce.
rating: 4
THE THREE LITTLE MEN IN THE WOODS
i would never survive a fairytale. if three creepy little guys in the forest asked me to hang out in their house and do a bunch of chores i'd be like "no thanks."
rating: 3.5
HANSEL AND GRETEL
another point for my early death in any fairytale situation: i would have way too good of a tiem with an edible house.
rating: 4
THE THREE SNAKE LEAVES
i wish i cared as much about anything as fairytales care about the number three.
rating: 3.5
THE FISHERMAN AND HIS WIFE
this story is about how you're allowed to be as greedy as you want, up to demanding being the pope but not including becoming god.
rating: 3.5
THE BRAVE LITTLE TAILOR
is the brave little toaster a play on this? time to google.
rating: 3.5
CINDERELLA
most renditions of cinderella are pretty simple and lame (not you ella enchanted), but this was one of the good ones. i like the versions where her dresses are starlight / moonlight / sunlight.
rating: 3.5
THE RIDDLE
okay, a riddle can't just be "a hard question based on personal experience the questionee would have no concept of."
rating: 3
THE MOUSE, THE BIRD AND THE SAUSAGE
read this one out loud to my fianc茅 and we both laughed hysterically so no notes.
rating: 5
LITTLE RED RIDING HOOD
this one is soooo moralistic it makes a grandma-eating wolf with a sewn-up belly full of rocks seem like a snooze.
rating: 3.5
THE MUSICIANS OF BREMEN
more of those who dream of a career in music should be subverted. so for that alone i appreciate this story.
rating: 3.5
THE SINGING BONE
i have to be honest here. if your brother kills you to steal your boar and gets to marry a princess and live happily for many years, i don't think being made into a horn by a peasant and then sing-snitching what happened is very satisfying revenge.
rating: 3.5
THE DEVIL WITH THE THREE GOLDEN HAIRS
i gotta say, the devil's grandmother is the real hero of this story. the hero boy in question just kind of shows up and asks her to handle the hair-plucking situation.
rating: 4
THE GIRL WITH NO HANDS
this is bizarrely religious considering how weird it is. a beautiful girl whose dad chopped her at the wrists eating pears off royal trees and then being given silver prosthetics until god in his unknowing will makes her hands grow back? sure!
rating: 3.5
THE ELVES
this is the classic story of the shoemaker immediately followed by two weird and unrelated vignettes.
rating: 3
THE ROBBER BRIDEGROOM
if i walked in my new boyfriend's place and a bird immediately sang "get the hell out this is a murderer's house" at me, i would turn right the hell around. no follow-up questions from me, thanks!
rating: 3.5
GODFATHER DEATH
"he only said that because he didn't know God's purpose in being so kind to the rich and so cruel to the poor." well when you put it that way neither do i!
rating: 3.5
THE JUNIPER TREE
framing your daughter for decapitation...now that is nasty work.
rating: 4
BRIAR ROSE
well. never have i ever heard the menstruation metaphor reading of sleeping beauty.
rating: 4
SNOW WHITE
back to back heavy hitters!
it's awesome how much men don't matter in fairytales. it's just evil girls and hot girls and that's it.
rating: 3.5
RUMPELSTILTSKIN
the detail of this little freak tearing himself in half will never leave my mind.
rating: 4
THE GOLDEN BIRD
i could never be one of the faithful sidekicks in a fairytale. all these talking animals giving perfect advice that beautiful royals never listen to and still somehow get the credit for...it grinds my gears just to think of it.
rating: 3.5
FARMERKIN
i need to know which of the grimm brothers was betrayed by a priest. all these guys are ever doing in fairytales is creating mistresses.
i>rating: 4
THOUSANDFURS
this story begins with a princess having to run away from her dad because he becomes obsessed with her, but then that never comes up again. philip pullman counters this by writing a wildly creepy coraline-esque footnote alternate ending. that's the sort of thing you're missing by not reading this particular collection.
rating: 3.5
JORINDA AND JORINGEL
pausing so you can all add these to your baby name ideas note.
rating: 3.5
SIX WHO MADE THEIR WAY IN THE WORLD
this is just fairytale ocean's eleven. so...a dream.
rating: 4
GAMBLING HANS
rip gambling hans. you would have loved the proliferation of online sports betting.
rating: 3.5
THE SINGING, SPRINGING LARK
otherwise known as "beauty and the beast, but the better version with various curses and kidnappings."
rating: 4
THE GOOSE GIRL
this is now the second instance of a villain being asked how a villain should be punished and immediately outlining a grotesque lethal torture. just one time i'd like one of these guys to be like "with a tea party and petit-fours." have some self awareness.
rating: 3.5
BEARSKIN
so as it turns out the punishment for teasing your sister is instantaneous suicide when she gets married. bad news for me.
rating: 3.5
THE TWO TRAVELLING COMPANIONS
if you love god, listen to talking crows, and befriend animals, you too can become the king of tailors.
rating: 3.5
HANS-MY-HEDGEHOG
who among us hasn't lost our temper and immediately said "i will have a child, even if it's a hedgehog," unleashing a bizarre generational curse.
rating: 3.5
THE LITTLE SHROUD
this was like half a page and extremely religious. why didn't we save the best material for last, pullman! we have to close this out strong!
rating: 3
THE STOLEN PENNIES
see above note.
rating: 3
THE DONKEY CABBAGE
insert some sort of "my nickname in high school" joke here.
rating: 4
ONE EYE, TWO EYE AND THREE EYES
welcome to cinderella (goofy version). i love it.
rating: 4
THE SHOES THAT WERE DANCED TO PIECES
i was hoping this would just be a version of the 12 dancing princesses with a weird title, and that's exactly what it is.
rating: 3.5
IRON HANS
we have got to try a name besides hans one of these days.
rating: 3.5
MOUNT SIMELI
this is just worse ali baba. fairytales are so weird about cross-cultural sharing.
rating: 3.5
LAZY HEINZ
like the ketchup?
rating: 3
STRONG HANS
this is a long weird story followed by a paragraph in which philip pullman outlines all the many things wrong with it narratively. as a devoted hater, i have to admire that.
rating: 3.5
THE MOON
just so you guys know, if we start enjoying the moon too much, st. peter might take it away again.
rating: 3
THE GOOSE GIRL AT THE SPRING
okay this story has everything: pearl tears, the skin of an ugly person worn by a beautiful princess, a maybe witch, forest search parties, geese, an unreliable narrator, wonderful naps.
rating: 4
THE NIXIE OF THE MILLPOND
and what if i think a deal's a deal and the nixie deserved to lock down the huntsman...
rating: 3.5/i>
OVERALL
i love fairytales and i have all my life, so i've read most of these before. still, pullman's analysis and slight tweaks were refreshing enough that a lot of this felt new. i had a great time!
rating: 4
October 13, 2021
The mountain and the valley never meet, but the children of men, both good and bad, met one another all the time.
-The Two Travelling Companions
I grew up with fairy tales: first my mom read them to me when I was still too little to do so myself, and then I took the big volumes in my own little hands and laboriously pored over each page, living among the princes and princesses, in worls where there were still giants and everybody paid attention to not mess up with witches, death itself walked the road, ponds were full of pixies and forests full of dangers and wonders. The whole world seemed to just wait to be explored, and adventure was just around the corner.
The devotion of the Brothers Grimm to collecting tales basically shaped the Western childhood: who is not aware of Cinderella, Hansel and Gretel or Rapunzel? Or Snow White, the great tale about envy which has been adapted by Walt Disney into his famous animated film? Surely everybody knows about the Little Red Riding Hood, whom Charles Dickens called his first love and said that if he could have married her he would have known perfect bliss.
Philip Pullman is a marvelous storyteller, known best for his fantasy trilogy His Dark Materials. He has also written delightful stories for children, such as , which is a delightful pastiche of Don Quixote about a scarecrow that comes to life after being struck by lightning, and embarks on adventure with a young village boy who he takes as his servant. His stories are delightful and intelligent, full of wit and charm and also respect for the intellect of children, which is something many fail to acknowledge.
In Fairy Tales from the Brothers Grimm: A New English Version, or if you prefer, Grimm Tales for Young and Old, Philip Pullman has selected 50 tales from the Grimm's wide catalogue and simply told them again, stripping them from their often anachronistic syntax and vocabulary, writing elegant prose and making the tales flow fluidly for the contemporary reader. He provides a short introductory essay, where he discusses the nature of the fairytale - it's frenetic pace which is achieved by most formulaic characterization and setting, both factors a significant drawback in most of contemporary fiction but not the fairytale, where they are more than welcome as they allow for the story to be adopted by various cultures and in various languages all across Europe, the continent which was once full of kings and queens, castles and forests, withches and fairies.
Pullman points out the oral nature of storytelling when it comes to fairytales: there is no need to venerate the text. As opposed to poetry, prose and drama, which originate as text and where the content is set in stone and the reader cannot change it in any way (that priviledge is reserved for the author alone), with fairytales there is no need to venerate the text - as there was no text in the first place
- the tale depended on its teller who was free to change the story in a way they think appropriate, developing it and passing it along. Think of it as a telephone game - only one which went down in history and reached us. After each tale Pullman provides a short afterword, listing the tale type according to the Aarne鈥揟hompson tale type index, lists the Grimm's source for the story and provides a list of similar fairytales in European folklore, naming the anthologies where they can be found. He writes a short note about each story, shedding light on their content with interesting commentary. These notes are brief but just as interesting as the stories, and in the case of Thousandfurs Pullman has presented his idea for a great alternative conclusion - but one much too dark for young children!
And what about the stories? These stories are the stories we know and know well, and which have raised generations. These tales taught children important lessons: that the stronger does not always intend to keep their side of the bargain, as the mouse learned from the cat: that the woods are lovely, but dark and deep, and one should pay attention to each step; that strangers should be approached with caution, and that one's life is very easy to lose. But with all their grimness, violence and bloshed - I forgot how violent these stories are; so many people die and so much blood is shed, it's almost campy - these stories have a very positive message: that some people will repay kindness with kindness, that the neglected and abused girl will get the prince, and that life if worth living because we never know what adventure awaits us. As Bilbo Baggins said, "It's a dangerous business, Frodo, going out your door. You step onto the road, and if you don't keep your feet, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to". And the road goes ever on.
It was a delight to read these stories again, and I will certainly return to them in the future. As Stephen King once wrote, it is the tale, not he who tells it - but this telling is very pleasant and I'm glad to have read it. However, I am amazed at the absolute lack of illustrations in this volume - not even one! This is a book which should contain at least one illustration for each tale - Pullman's other works for children are all illustrated, which adds even more charm to them. However, in this case the publisher completely missed out and chose to not include what I consider to be an important element of a book this type. It does not hurt the reading, but I would love to see these tales complimented by a good illustrator.
-The Two Travelling Companions
I grew up with fairy tales: first my mom read them to me when I was still too little to do so myself, and then I took the big volumes in my own little hands and laboriously pored over each page, living among the princes and princesses, in worls where there were still giants and everybody paid attention to not mess up with witches, death itself walked the road, ponds were full of pixies and forests full of dangers and wonders. The whole world seemed to just wait to be explored, and adventure was just around the corner.
The devotion of the Brothers Grimm to collecting tales basically shaped the Western childhood: who is not aware of Cinderella, Hansel and Gretel or Rapunzel? Or Snow White, the great tale about envy which has been adapted by Walt Disney into his famous animated film? Surely everybody knows about the Little Red Riding Hood, whom Charles Dickens called his first love and said that if he could have married her he would have known perfect bliss.
Philip Pullman is a marvelous storyteller, known best for his fantasy trilogy His Dark Materials. He has also written delightful stories for children, such as , which is a delightful pastiche of Don Quixote about a scarecrow that comes to life after being struck by lightning, and embarks on adventure with a young village boy who he takes as his servant. His stories are delightful and intelligent, full of wit and charm and also respect for the intellect of children, which is something many fail to acknowledge.
In Fairy Tales from the Brothers Grimm: A New English Version, or if you prefer, Grimm Tales for Young and Old, Philip Pullman has selected 50 tales from the Grimm's wide catalogue and simply told them again, stripping them from their often anachronistic syntax and vocabulary, writing elegant prose and making the tales flow fluidly for the contemporary reader. He provides a short introductory essay, where he discusses the nature of the fairytale - it's frenetic pace which is achieved by most formulaic characterization and setting, both factors a significant drawback in most of contemporary fiction but not the fairytale, where they are more than welcome as they allow for the story to be adopted by various cultures and in various languages all across Europe, the continent which was once full of kings and queens, castles and forests, withches and fairies.
Pullman points out the oral nature of storytelling when it comes to fairytales: there is no need to venerate the text. As opposed to poetry, prose and drama, which originate as text and where the content is set in stone and the reader cannot change it in any way (that priviledge is reserved for the author alone), with fairytales there is no need to venerate the text - as there was no text in the first place
- the tale depended on its teller who was free to change the story in a way they think appropriate, developing it and passing it along. Think of it as a telephone game - only one which went down in history and reached us. After each tale Pullman provides a short afterword, listing the tale type according to the Aarne鈥揟hompson tale type index, lists the Grimm's source for the story and provides a list of similar fairytales in European folklore, naming the anthologies where they can be found. He writes a short note about each story, shedding light on their content with interesting commentary. These notes are brief but just as interesting as the stories, and in the case of Thousandfurs Pullman has presented his idea for a great alternative conclusion - but one much too dark for young children!
And what about the stories? These stories are the stories we know and know well, and which have raised generations. These tales taught children important lessons: that the stronger does not always intend to keep their side of the bargain, as the mouse learned from the cat: that the woods are lovely, but dark and deep, and one should pay attention to each step; that strangers should be approached with caution, and that one's life is very easy to lose. But with all their grimness, violence and bloshed - I forgot how violent these stories are; so many people die and so much blood is shed, it's almost campy - these stories have a very positive message: that some people will repay kindness with kindness, that the neglected and abused girl will get the prince, and that life if worth living because we never know what adventure awaits us. As Bilbo Baggins said, "It's a dangerous business, Frodo, going out your door. You step onto the road, and if you don't keep your feet, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to". And the road goes ever on.
It was a delight to read these stories again, and I will certainly return to them in the future. As Stephen King once wrote, it is the tale, not he who tells it - but this telling is very pleasant and I'm glad to have read it. However, I am amazed at the absolute lack of illustrations in this volume - not even one! This is a book which should contain at least one illustration for each tale - Pullman's other works for children are all illustrated, which adds even more charm to them. However, in this case the publisher completely missed out and chose to not include what I consider to be an important element of a book this type. It does not hurt the reading, but I would love to see these tales complimented by a good illustrator.
May 16, 2018
Al fin despu茅s de meses y meses he terminado este libro. 馃挭馃徎
No me demor茅 tanto porque fuera aburrido,sino porque cada cuento lo fui intercalando con otras lecturas. Y eso que son casi 60!! 馃槺
Me ha gustado mucho, sobre todo porque est谩n narrados como fueron creados en un principio y no tienen los cambios que han ido sufriendo con el paso del tiempo.
Adem谩s el autor se ha tomado el trabajo de buscar el origen de cada uno, y ha citado al final de cada cuento una breve explicaci贸n. 馃憦馃徏
Mis preferidos fueron:
鉂わ笍Hermanito y hermanita
鉂わ笍搁补辫耻苍锄别濒
鉂わ笍Hansel y Gretel
鉂わ笍El pescador y su esposa
鉂わ笍El sastrecillo valiente
鉂わ笍颁别苍颈肠颈别苍迟补
鉂わ笍Los tres pelos de oro del diablo
鉂わ笍颁补辫别谤耻肠颈迟补
鉂わ笍Los duendes
鉂わ笍La bella durmiente
鉂わ笍叠濒补苍肠补苍颈别惫别蝉
鉂わ笍Piel de oro
鉂わ笍Los zapatos que se rompieron de tanto bailar
鉂わ笍El monte Simeli
Se lo recomiendo a todo aquel que quiera rememorar su infancia o conocer m谩s sobre aquellas historias que nos contaron de peque帽os.
No me demor茅 tanto porque fuera aburrido,sino porque cada cuento lo fui intercalando con otras lecturas. Y eso que son casi 60!! 馃槺
Me ha gustado mucho, sobre todo porque est谩n narrados como fueron creados en un principio y no tienen los cambios que han ido sufriendo con el paso del tiempo.
Adem谩s el autor se ha tomado el trabajo de buscar el origen de cada uno, y ha citado al final de cada cuento una breve explicaci贸n. 馃憦馃徏
Mis preferidos fueron:
鉂わ笍Hermanito y hermanita
鉂わ笍搁补辫耻苍锄别濒
鉂わ笍Hansel y Gretel
鉂わ笍El pescador y su esposa
鉂わ笍El sastrecillo valiente
鉂わ笍颁别苍颈肠颈别苍迟补
鉂わ笍Los tres pelos de oro del diablo
鉂わ笍颁补辫别谤耻肠颈迟补
鉂わ笍Los duendes
鉂わ笍La bella durmiente
鉂わ笍叠濒补苍肠补苍颈别惫别蝉
鉂わ笍Piel de oro
鉂わ笍Los zapatos que se rompieron de tanto bailar
鉂わ笍El monte Simeli
Se lo recomiendo a todo aquel que quiera rememorar su infancia o conocer m谩s sobre aquellas historias que nos contaron de peque帽os.
January 27, 2013
This is an odd one.
I love Philip Pullman yet I'm not a fan of any Grimm Tale I have read prior to this book. I give this a low rating mainly because it was painfully hard work to read this book at any great pace. Grimm tales are so formulaic, they sometimes don't feel like real stories. Every woman in every story is either so astonishingly beautiful that it could bring a statue to tears or is a witch/evil on epic proportions/monstrously ugly. There's a forest. There's always a fucking forest. Kings and princes are always 'just happening to be wandering around'. The good men are always very clearly good men. The bad men are always very clearly bad men. There is no room for debate. The good man always lives happily ever after and gets married at the end. The bad men/women always drown in a barrel of nails/have their balls and eyes ripped out at the end.
The problem is its hard work to read fifty short tales that ALWAYS follow this exact formula. Its more like writing a maths equation than a story. It's just, well...boring. There's no other word for it. I could never willingly read this book again.
The other problem with it (which is more my fault as I hadn't looked into the details of this release properly) is Pullman's contribution. When I asked for this book for Christmas it was because I expected Pullman's own versions of the Grimm Tales. There is surprisingly little input from Pullman though and I think this was the main disappointment I had with the book and what put me off it. The main input from him comes in the short commentaries that he writes after each tale. Some of them are quite funny and insightful. Most are just of mild interest though.
I've not given this one star though because it does have at least some redeeming features which kept me going. Every once in a while you do get a Grimm tale which is actually quite interesting. 'The Fisherman and his Wife' is an excellent little story. The tale (can't remember the name of it unfortunately) that features Death getting stuck up a tree for seven years really made me laugh because the ridiculous circumstances are told in such a casual manner. Also, 'Hans-My -Hedgehog' deserves praise for being a Grimm Tale which features a half-man/half-hedgehog that plays bagpipes up a tree for several years whilst looking after some pigs as its main character. More books should have characters like this one.
Conclusion: disappointing. I wish Pullman had not fannied about with this when he could be getting round to finally finishing The Book of Dust.
I love Philip Pullman yet I'm not a fan of any Grimm Tale I have read prior to this book. I give this a low rating mainly because it was painfully hard work to read this book at any great pace. Grimm tales are so formulaic, they sometimes don't feel like real stories. Every woman in every story is either so astonishingly beautiful that it could bring a statue to tears or is a witch/evil on epic proportions/monstrously ugly. There's a forest. There's always a fucking forest. Kings and princes are always 'just happening to be wandering around'. The good men are always very clearly good men. The bad men are always very clearly bad men. There is no room for debate. The good man always lives happily ever after and gets married at the end. The bad men/women always drown in a barrel of nails/have their balls and eyes ripped out at the end.
The problem is its hard work to read fifty short tales that ALWAYS follow this exact formula. Its more like writing a maths equation than a story. It's just, well...boring. There's no other word for it. I could never willingly read this book again.
The other problem with it (which is more my fault as I hadn't looked into the details of this release properly) is Pullman's contribution. When I asked for this book for Christmas it was because I expected Pullman's own versions of the Grimm Tales. There is surprisingly little input from Pullman though and I think this was the main disappointment I had with the book and what put me off it. The main input from him comes in the short commentaries that he writes after each tale. Some of them are quite funny and insightful. Most are just of mild interest though.
I've not given this one star though because it does have at least some redeeming features which kept me going. Every once in a while you do get a Grimm tale which is actually quite interesting. 'The Fisherman and his Wife' is an excellent little story. The tale (can't remember the name of it unfortunately) that features Death getting stuck up a tree for seven years really made me laugh because the ridiculous circumstances are told in such a casual manner. Also, 'Hans-My -Hedgehog' deserves praise for being a Grimm Tale which features a half-man/half-hedgehog that plays bagpipes up a tree for several years whilst looking after some pigs as its main character. More books should have characters like this one.
Conclusion: disappointing. I wish Pullman had not fannied about with this when he could be getting round to finally finishing The Book of Dust.
October 9, 2017
These two brothers are solely responsible for most of the world knowing a number of fairy tales. Their names: Jakob and Wilhelm Grimm, two Germans. They were neither the first nor the last to collect stories, slightly adapt and publish them as a collection. However, for some reason, their changes managed to enchant people and before long, theirs were THE Hausm盲rchen to have and know.
Philip Pullman is himself an accomplished author who has apparently been heavily influenced by classic fairy tales and seems delighted about their comeback that has taken place lately.
This collection, then, contains 53 fairy tales; the 53 fairy tales Philip Pullman supposedly loves the most, which have influenced him and his writing the most, and which he thought were most representative for certain styles and eras and messages to be conveyed.
A little bit of a recap first of all:
I grew up in a family where nobody reads. Thus, I was never told about children's classics or books that meant a lot to one relative or another. But I was lucky in that my great-grandmother often told me old tales of cursed princes and enchanted princesses, talking animals, wicked witches and cunning devils. At one point, my grandmother forbade it as it wasn't "proper" but the damage was done - magic had entered my life. My favourites, that I remember to this day, were The Goose Girl and Three Little Men In The Woods and The Golden Bird. There are others that left a lasting impression as well but there are so many that I cannot possibly talk about them all.
The same can be said about this collection: too many to name them all but they had the wonderful effect of bringing back my childhood. Not the Disney version either but the old and almost untamed versions of the fairy tales, as dark and bloody as they were. And they are a nice mixture of the typical and most famous ones and pretty unheard of ones as well. There is a certain atmosphere around them despite the fact that Pullman changed the fairy tales a little - according to the author, that is the way fairy tales were meant to be told anyway: each with a little personal bit of the teller thrown in (unlike stories from novels).
Naturally, many stories are quite silly what with people first doing all manner of things to get children but then treating them abominally; or people always being good-looking and therefore virtuous. Many of the tales also have similarities or even merged over time. Pullman often points out the interesting fact that many of the tales seem to be missing something structurally; making suggestions for how the stories should have been fleshed out. It's not a surprise that some stories seem to be missing some structure as these were originally told orally. Therefore, I especially like that after each tale, Pullman writes a note, explaining the origins of the respective tale, the way it is structured and other information.
I must say that the audio version really brought these stories to live. Probably because they were always meant to be passed on orally. The narrator is fantastic with different accents and has an impeccable sense for how to present them. However, the audio version does not have the aforementioned additional author's notes which is why I got the printed version as well.
This book offers a slightly more modern collection of some of the most influential and important fairy tales the Brothers Grimm brought to the world and despite me being a traditionalist when it comes to stories, I liked the changes Pullman had made as they were delicate and tasteful and I think this is a wonderful alternative to the classic collection (many don't have a copy of the Hausm盲rchen in the house anymore, saying they are too "old(fashioned)" so it's about time their printed version became more popular again).
January 12, 2016
Rese帽a completa aqu铆:
5 de 5 estrellas 鈾�
Este libro es una joya que efectivamente es para todas las edades; a pesar de todo lo crudos que puedan ser algunos cuentos, otros son perfectos para los m谩s peque帽os.
Ratifico que, de lejos, los cuentos fant谩sticos de los hermanos Grimm son mi universo literario favorito: los pr铆ncipes, brujas, maleficios, caballeros y princesas son mi debilidad.
Pullman nos da la posibilidad de no s贸lo disfrutar de la tradici贸n original de los cuentos, tambi茅n nos regala la oportunidad de entender nuevos aspectos de su recopilaci贸n.
Son m谩s de 40 cuentos fascinantes que releer茅 hastaque me muera.
Otro libro de la colecci贸n semilla del ministerio cultura que debo recomendar, hasta ahora voy muy bien con esta colecci贸n.
El 煤nico pero que le pongo al libro es que uno de mis cuentos favoritos no aparece :( de resto el libro ha sido una forma perfecta para empezar mi 2016.
5 de 5 estrellas 鈾�
Este libro es una joya que efectivamente es para todas las edades; a pesar de todo lo crudos que puedan ser algunos cuentos, otros son perfectos para los m谩s peque帽os.
Ratifico que, de lejos, los cuentos fant谩sticos de los hermanos Grimm son mi universo literario favorito: los pr铆ncipes, brujas, maleficios, caballeros y princesas son mi debilidad.
Pullman nos da la posibilidad de no s贸lo disfrutar de la tradici贸n original de los cuentos, tambi茅n nos regala la oportunidad de entender nuevos aspectos de su recopilaci贸n.
Son m谩s de 40 cuentos fascinantes que releer茅 hastaque me muera.
Otro libro de la colecci贸n semilla del ministerio cultura que debo recomendar, hasta ahora voy muy bien con esta colecci贸n.
El 煤nico pero que le pongo al libro es que uno de mis cuentos favoritos no aparece :( de resto el libro ha sido una forma perfecta para empezar mi 2016.
August 25, 2017
I came to this edition of Grimm purely as an accompaniment to Shaun Tan's a wonderful book of sculptures that illustrate these tales. I must admit to initially being more inspired by the illustrated history of Grimm fairy tales than the fairy tales themselves. However, Philip Pullman has done a nice job collating and "sprucing up" 50 of these stories.
I guess your position on his stylistic choices may depend on how much of a Grimm scholar you are. A brief comparison of several stories tells me that Pullman stays faithful to the original tales. These are not "retellings" or modernised versions but rather the best version of each tale selected from the many translations and regional variants and in some cases given a slight tweak to make them flow and clear up odd narrative loose ends. From my point of view this was successful as these tales bounced along and seemed quite lively. I enjoyed Pullmans often amusing analysis at the end of each tale, considering what worked and how he might have made further improvements. I also learnt there is such a thing as the Aarne-Thompson Tale Type Index. The book certainly gives you lots of suggestions for jumping off into further variants or more scholarly analysis if thats your thing.
I found I appreciated this book best by dipping in and out of it over a few months, a method I recommend to avoid fairy tale overload. Reading too many tales in a sitting it's easy to feel overwhelmed by all the poor woman cast as crones, beautiful marriageable princess's or evil stepmothers. You also quickly learn that collecting one magic golden bird or devils hair will not be enough as everything comes in sets of three.
In summary, a good introduction to original folk tales complete with gore and dark turns, narrative leaps and surprisingly funny and relatable moments from stories that are over 200 years old.
I guess your position on his stylistic choices may depend on how much of a Grimm scholar you are. A brief comparison of several stories tells me that Pullman stays faithful to the original tales. These are not "retellings" or modernised versions but rather the best version of each tale selected from the many translations and regional variants and in some cases given a slight tweak to make them flow and clear up odd narrative loose ends. From my point of view this was successful as these tales bounced along and seemed quite lively. I enjoyed Pullmans often amusing analysis at the end of each tale, considering what worked and how he might have made further improvements. I also learnt there is such a thing as the Aarne-Thompson Tale Type Index. The book certainly gives you lots of suggestions for jumping off into further variants or more scholarly analysis if thats your thing.
I found I appreciated this book best by dipping in and out of it over a few months, a method I recommend to avoid fairy tale overload. Reading too many tales in a sitting it's easy to feel overwhelmed by all the poor woman cast as crones, beautiful marriageable princess's or evil stepmothers. You also quickly learn that collecting one magic golden bird or devils hair will not be enough as everything comes in sets of three.
In summary, a good introduction to original folk tales complete with gore and dark turns, narrative leaps and surprisingly funny and relatable moments from stories that are over 200 years old.
March 3, 2025
Great stories never truly leave us. Once, we would believe in them effortlessly and unconditionally, because for children faith and hope come naturally.
We were told these stories by people who cared for us. We thought everything was possible, all dreams came true, and finding love and happily-ever-afters were a given. We can only have this blind faith when we're children, because children can鈥檛 understand fairy tales the way adults do. Kids read about the heroes being temporarily defeated and losing their friends to evil creatures, but they don't understand them on a personal level because they haven't experienced loss and defeat yet.
Fairy tales aren鈥檛 about telling children lies, they鈥檙e about filling children with hope so that they can find it when, once they鈥檝e grown up, they need it the most. As C. S. Lewis famously said: "Since it is so likely that children will meet cruel enemies, let them at least have heard of brave knights and heroic courage. Otherwise you are making their destiny not brighter but darker鈥�. We trust fairy tales will always end happily because that's the way they鈥檙e supposed to be, and reading about that in fiction gives us a little bit of hope that real life can be like that too, so when things get difficult we're strengthened with that hope. Fairy tales are there to give us hope that no matter how dire the circumstances, we鈥檒l always prevail and live happily with our family and friends in the end.
As kids, it鈥檚 easy to have faith and hope because our beliefs have never been challenged, it鈥檚 easy to believe that with a magic wand all of our problems will be solved, or that a prince or princess will come to save us. As an adult, it鈥檚 harder to believe because now we have to find courage in the darkest of times, to keep our faith in dreams coming true even after facing many obstacles, to believe in love after many heartbreaks, to believe in justice even knowing that in real life bad things can happen to the best of people and cruel people can get away with what they do.
It鈥檚 harder to believe, but it鈥檚 still possible, especially if you have a little bit of help, and that's where this book comes in. Fairy Tales from the Brothers Grimm: A New English Version reminds us of that time when life was less messy and complicated, when we saw our friends and family more frequently and when it was easier to be hopeful. Philip Pullman skillfully captures the magic and eeriness of the Grimm fairy tales (these aren't the sugarcoated versions) and offers interesting comments about the sources, the different versions of these stories and the possible meanings of certain characters or situations, filling us with nostalgia while giving us fresh insights and a wider perspective of how the tales we all know, such as "Cinderella", "The musicians of Bremen", "Rumpelstiltskin", "The goose girl", "Six who made their way in the world" and many more came to be.
鈥淎nd what exactly do you think fairy tales are? They are a reminder that our lives will get better if we just hold on to hope鈥�, they are also a reminder that 鈥渨e all have the capability to change and the future is not written by our past鈥�(*).
--------------------------------
(*)From the 鈥淥nce upon a time鈥� TV series
We were told these stories by people who cared for us. We thought everything was possible, all dreams came true, and finding love and happily-ever-afters were a given. We can only have this blind faith when we're children, because children can鈥檛 understand fairy tales the way adults do. Kids read about the heroes being temporarily defeated and losing their friends to evil creatures, but they don't understand them on a personal level because they haven't experienced loss and defeat yet.
Fairy tales aren鈥檛 about telling children lies, they鈥檙e about filling children with hope so that they can find it when, once they鈥檝e grown up, they need it the most. As C. S. Lewis famously said: "Since it is so likely that children will meet cruel enemies, let them at least have heard of brave knights and heroic courage. Otherwise you are making their destiny not brighter but darker鈥�. We trust fairy tales will always end happily because that's the way they鈥檙e supposed to be, and reading about that in fiction gives us a little bit of hope that real life can be like that too, so when things get difficult we're strengthened with that hope. Fairy tales are there to give us hope that no matter how dire the circumstances, we鈥檒l always prevail and live happily with our family and friends in the end.
As kids, it鈥檚 easy to have faith and hope because our beliefs have never been challenged, it鈥檚 easy to believe that with a magic wand all of our problems will be solved, or that a prince or princess will come to save us. As an adult, it鈥檚 harder to believe because now we have to find courage in the darkest of times, to keep our faith in dreams coming true even after facing many obstacles, to believe in love after many heartbreaks, to believe in justice even knowing that in real life bad things can happen to the best of people and cruel people can get away with what they do.
It鈥檚 harder to believe, but it鈥檚 still possible, especially if you have a little bit of help, and that's where this book comes in. Fairy Tales from the Brothers Grimm: A New English Version reminds us of that time when life was less messy and complicated, when we saw our friends and family more frequently and when it was easier to be hopeful. Philip Pullman skillfully captures the magic and eeriness of the Grimm fairy tales (these aren't the sugarcoated versions) and offers interesting comments about the sources, the different versions of these stories and the possible meanings of certain characters or situations, filling us with nostalgia while giving us fresh insights and a wider perspective of how the tales we all know, such as "Cinderella", "The musicians of Bremen", "Rumpelstiltskin", "The goose girl", "Six who made their way in the world" and many more came to be.
鈥淎nd what exactly do you think fairy tales are? They are a reminder that our lives will get better if we just hold on to hope鈥�, they are also a reminder that 鈥渨e all have the capability to change and the future is not written by our past鈥�(*).
--------------------------------
(*)From the 鈥淥nce upon a time鈥� TV series
September 19, 2012
I grew up loving fairy tales, especially those by the Brothers Grimm. I had them narrated on records, and I鈥檇 sit or lay on the carpet and just listen and let my imagination take me away. I took the stories at face value, and never questioned how odd they are, or why things happen in them the way they do. It was just how it was.
Now, as an adult, it鈥檚 wonderful to be able to get reacquainted with the stories, and to read some I鈥檇 never heard of before. In this new translation and version, Philip Pullman has selected 50 of the stories and presents them once again. He doesn鈥檛 embellish much, but tries to find the best version of each tale from the many editions the Grimm brothers published. At the end of each story, Pullman gives bibliographical references for similar stories that appear in sources like Mother Goose, Italo Calvino, and the Arabian Nights, among others. When available, Pullman also tells us where the brothers first heard the tale, and from whom. It鈥檚 a fantastic starting point for those looking for references to related sources.
As straightforward as the stories are, Pullman still gives us his own thoughts about them at the end, and choices he would make if he were to change them. For example, in his version of Rapunzel he has Rapunzel complain of her clothes being too tight, revealing to the witch that she is pregnant, rather than the alternative of Rapunzel stupidly asking the witch why she is heavier to pull up than the prince. Pullman argues that his way keeps Rapunzel completely innocent and worthy of her eventual redemption. Pullman also wrote a fantastic introduction to the volume, giving intelligent analysis of why and how fairy tales work.
This is a beautiful book of well-loved stories, and Pullman鈥檚 own writing makes it worthwhile to anyone who is interested in folklore, storytelling, and the sources of our common narrative standards.
Now, as an adult, it鈥檚 wonderful to be able to get reacquainted with the stories, and to read some I鈥檇 never heard of before. In this new translation and version, Philip Pullman has selected 50 of the stories and presents them once again. He doesn鈥檛 embellish much, but tries to find the best version of each tale from the many editions the Grimm brothers published. At the end of each story, Pullman gives bibliographical references for similar stories that appear in sources like Mother Goose, Italo Calvino, and the Arabian Nights, among others. When available, Pullman also tells us where the brothers first heard the tale, and from whom. It鈥檚 a fantastic starting point for those looking for references to related sources.
As straightforward as the stories are, Pullman still gives us his own thoughts about them at the end, and choices he would make if he were to change them. For example, in his version of Rapunzel he has Rapunzel complain of her clothes being too tight, revealing to the witch that she is pregnant, rather than the alternative of Rapunzel stupidly asking the witch why she is heavier to pull up than the prince. Pullman argues that his way keeps Rapunzel completely innocent and worthy of her eventual redemption. Pullman also wrote a fantastic introduction to the volume, giving intelligent analysis of why and how fairy tales work.
This is a beautiful book of well-loved stories, and Pullman鈥檚 own writing makes it worthwhile to anyone who is interested in folklore, storytelling, and the sources of our common narrative standards.
September 9, 2021
7.6/10
I knew that the original Grimms tales were a lot darker than the ones that we have been told as little kids... And boy,oh boy are they. These tales (some of them)are great if you are looking something spooky to read at night.
I must say that i do not recommend to read that to your child.
I knew that the original Grimms tales were a lot darker than the ones that we have been told as little kids... And boy,oh boy are they. These tales (some of them)are great if you are looking something spooky to read at night.
I must say that i do not recommend to read that to your child.
October 10, 2014
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
February 11, 2013
Started so strong I thought I'd burn through these but things fell off a bit a third into it, or maybe I just got too used to the transparent language, the patient anonymous tone, the ever-present series of threes, the same ol' motifs. Courage, bravery, goodness, cleverness are rewarded with gold, princesses, and living happily ever after. Greed and evil are often punished by decapitation! Loved it when ultraviolent and weird, or when birds and fish talked, but sometimes the words blended and kept me out and so I skimmed a few, particularly toward the end. Great also to read the pre-Disneyfied renditions of Cinderella, Snow White, and others (hey now Hansel and Gretel!). Pullman's post-story notes for each tale seemed casual (sometimes even sort of half-assed) but nevertheless mostly adequately informative and insightful. Worth reading and returning to ("The Juniper Tree," a story I've never read or heard before, is positioned as the centerpiece/masterpiece). Suggests how much there's to know about the foundational fairy and folk tales of the world.
September 23, 2012
Not Just So
I have my favourites just as I am sure you have yours, those tales, told in childhood, which have a lifelong resonance. My grandfather was a particularly good story-teller, both in fact and in fiction, meaning that he could tell true stories and tall stories with equal verve and conviction!
Those I liked best he told me time and time again. I loved them, so much so that I would not tolerate any deviation. Like Josephine, Rudyard Kipling鈥檚 lost daughter, for me the tales of a grandfather had to be 鈥榡ust so.鈥� He was my best beloved; they were my best beloved.
It was this 鈥榡ust so鈥� attitude that came increasingly to mind as I worked my way through Philip Pullman鈥檚 recently published Grimm Tales for Young and Old in a New English Version. I enjoyed it鈥p to a point, though I have to say more for his approach than for his telling. Hold on a moment or two. I promise to become a little less cryptic!
The Grimm Tales, which I also know from childhood, are likewise in the 鈥榡ust so鈥� category of narration. When I was learning German, getting to the stage just beyond the foothills of grammar and parsing, it was to the Grimm Brothers I turned, those beautiful, simple stories in beautiful and limpid prose, as clear as glass. Even in another language they were just as I remembered, though perhaps a little darker, a shade or two grimmer.
What I love about them most of all is their child-like simplicity, though these peasant folk tales were not devised for children. The point is, I think, that the outlook of an older, rural and less complicated world is not that far removed from the outlook of children. There are no shades of grey. Good is good and bad is bad. And the really bad are made to dance to death on red hot iron slippers. Quite right!
It鈥檚 a world of bright light and sinister shadows, of handsome princes and ugly witches, of forests and of towers, a wonderful, wonderful enchanted realm. The imagery is simple and stark, the psychology non-existent. Things are as they should be, as red as blood or as white as snow. It鈥檚 a pre-Christian world, a pagan world, a world where justice comes as retribution and revenge.
It needs no explanation; the tales contain their own morals and their own simple truths. There is no need for metaphysics and metatheory; all judgement, all adult preconceptions, have to be abandoned. The paradox here is that Pullman鈥檚 theory that is not a theory for me was the best part of the whole book!
Now I open my copy at his introduction. Here I see one passage, heavily underlined, an expression of my papal imprimatur. Pullman says he is not interested in the 鈥減onderous interpretations鈥� to which the tales have been subjected. He is not interested in the 鈥溾€reudian, Jungian, Christian, Marxist, structuralist, post-structuralist, feminist, post-modernist and every other kind of tendency.鈥�
Spot on! I have no time for all of this sub-Jungian twaddle either. The point is that this entire ponderous explanatory superstructure is not just so; this is just so much extraneous rubbish; this is the tendentious uses of enchantment school. Pullman believes that most of the interpretations offered are little more than seeing pleasant patterns in the sparks of a fire, doing no harm. Well, perhaps, though for me much of the over-intellectualising is little better than a verbal form of the Emperor鈥檚 new clothes. There is simply nothing there.
Pullman is interested in the stories as stories. Yes, yes; that is how it should be. He came to my bedside. I lie down, tucked-in, cosy and warm, under my duvet, waiting once again to be thrilled, charmed and beguiled. They are mostly there, the familiar like Cinderella and Little Red Riding Hood 鈥� a particular favourite -, along with the less familiar like Gambling Hans and Godfather Death.
But, please, hold on: this is not quite right; this is not just so. It鈥檚 clever, yes, but cleverness is not what I want. The author has taken the tales at face value, part of an oral tradition, subject to change, variation and retelling over time. The Grimms were guilty, if that is the word, of their own adaptations, which took a more gentrified form in their later collections. Now Pullman has his spin, his retelling.
But I want familiarity, I want to take the paths I remember; I do not want innovation, no matter how clever the story teller. I can鈥檛 say to Pullman, stop: I want it like this, not like that. I can鈥檛 say that鈥檚 not what happened. What works well for you does not work well for me. That is the biggest disappointment of this book 鈥� there is simply too much Pullman. The materials are beautifully dark enough without his over-voice and polish.
I have my favourites just as I am sure you have yours, those tales, told in childhood, which have a lifelong resonance. My grandfather was a particularly good story-teller, both in fact and in fiction, meaning that he could tell true stories and tall stories with equal verve and conviction!
Those I liked best he told me time and time again. I loved them, so much so that I would not tolerate any deviation. Like Josephine, Rudyard Kipling鈥檚 lost daughter, for me the tales of a grandfather had to be 鈥榡ust so.鈥� He was my best beloved; they were my best beloved.
It was this 鈥榡ust so鈥� attitude that came increasingly to mind as I worked my way through Philip Pullman鈥檚 recently published Grimm Tales for Young and Old in a New English Version. I enjoyed it鈥p to a point, though I have to say more for his approach than for his telling. Hold on a moment or two. I promise to become a little less cryptic!
The Grimm Tales, which I also know from childhood, are likewise in the 鈥榡ust so鈥� category of narration. When I was learning German, getting to the stage just beyond the foothills of grammar and parsing, it was to the Grimm Brothers I turned, those beautiful, simple stories in beautiful and limpid prose, as clear as glass. Even in another language they were just as I remembered, though perhaps a little darker, a shade or two grimmer.
What I love about them most of all is their child-like simplicity, though these peasant folk tales were not devised for children. The point is, I think, that the outlook of an older, rural and less complicated world is not that far removed from the outlook of children. There are no shades of grey. Good is good and bad is bad. And the really bad are made to dance to death on red hot iron slippers. Quite right!
It鈥檚 a world of bright light and sinister shadows, of handsome princes and ugly witches, of forests and of towers, a wonderful, wonderful enchanted realm. The imagery is simple and stark, the psychology non-existent. Things are as they should be, as red as blood or as white as snow. It鈥檚 a pre-Christian world, a pagan world, a world where justice comes as retribution and revenge.
It needs no explanation; the tales contain their own morals and their own simple truths. There is no need for metaphysics and metatheory; all judgement, all adult preconceptions, have to be abandoned. The paradox here is that Pullman鈥檚 theory that is not a theory for me was the best part of the whole book!
Now I open my copy at his introduction. Here I see one passage, heavily underlined, an expression of my papal imprimatur. Pullman says he is not interested in the 鈥減onderous interpretations鈥� to which the tales have been subjected. He is not interested in the 鈥溾€reudian, Jungian, Christian, Marxist, structuralist, post-structuralist, feminist, post-modernist and every other kind of tendency.鈥�
Spot on! I have no time for all of this sub-Jungian twaddle either. The point is that this entire ponderous explanatory superstructure is not just so; this is just so much extraneous rubbish; this is the tendentious uses of enchantment school. Pullman believes that most of the interpretations offered are little more than seeing pleasant patterns in the sparks of a fire, doing no harm. Well, perhaps, though for me much of the over-intellectualising is little better than a verbal form of the Emperor鈥檚 new clothes. There is simply nothing there.
Pullman is interested in the stories as stories. Yes, yes; that is how it should be. He came to my bedside. I lie down, tucked-in, cosy and warm, under my duvet, waiting once again to be thrilled, charmed and beguiled. They are mostly there, the familiar like Cinderella and Little Red Riding Hood 鈥� a particular favourite -, along with the less familiar like Gambling Hans and Godfather Death.
But, please, hold on: this is not quite right; this is not just so. It鈥檚 clever, yes, but cleverness is not what I want. The author has taken the tales at face value, part of an oral tradition, subject to change, variation and retelling over time. The Grimms were guilty, if that is the word, of their own adaptations, which took a more gentrified form in their later collections. Now Pullman has his spin, his retelling.
But I want familiarity, I want to take the paths I remember; I do not want innovation, no matter how clever the story teller. I can鈥檛 say to Pullman, stop: I want it like this, not like that. I can鈥檛 say that鈥檚 not what happened. What works well for you does not work well for me. That is the biggest disappointment of this book 鈥� there is simply too much Pullman. The materials are beautifully dark enough without his over-voice and polish.
December 31, 2012
3 1/2 stars.
I was so excited when I saw this. I love fairy tales (especially fairy tale retellings!!), and I am a fan of Philip Pullman's work, so I thought that this would be totally awesome.
As it is, these are not retellings of Grimms' fairy tales, they're just...tellings. He basically copy & pasted 50 Grimm tales and then added a couple paragraphs' commentary at the end of each. Occasionally he says something interesting, but mostly you could do without it. I recently recovered my edition of the fairy tales at my mom's house, so I had them side by side for comparison. Sometimes I like the handful of word changes that Pullman makes better, but often I liked the "original" just as much or better. Like in the bird, mouse & sausage one, my edition of the complete tales says that the bird is sad after the sausage is eaten, and Pullman's version doesn't. I think it's better with the sausage being sad.
It's getting the rating it does because these were advertised as "retellings," when they are really no such thing, and Pullman isn't really clear why he selected the ones he did. In my opinion his commentary didn't really add much, and in one case, it was just weird: he detailed a Jungian analysis of a fairy tale that sounded quite interesting, before dismissing it as "twaddle" and saying it's just a coincidence that this fairy tale fits a formula and it's better without thinking about all that stuff anyway. I was like, "O...kay?" I know hardly anything about Jung so I don't really feel fit to say if it's twaddle or not, but finding patterns and going through the psychology of things is, to me, actually fun. To dismiss psychological analysis or symbolic imagery of fairy tales because "they're fairy tales" seems like things are kind of being sold short.
If you're interested in this, you're probably just better off rereading the Grimms' collection itself, or getting some illustrated stories out of the library and enjoying the artwork, which would probably be more enjoyable than the author's commentary.
I was so excited when I saw this. I love fairy tales (especially fairy tale retellings!!), and I am a fan of Philip Pullman's work, so I thought that this would be totally awesome.
As it is, these are not retellings of Grimms' fairy tales, they're just...tellings. He basically copy & pasted 50 Grimm tales and then added a couple paragraphs' commentary at the end of each. Occasionally he says something interesting, but mostly you could do without it. I recently recovered my edition of the fairy tales at my mom's house, so I had them side by side for comparison. Sometimes I like the handful of word changes that Pullman makes better, but often I liked the "original" just as much or better. Like in the bird, mouse & sausage one, my edition of the complete tales says that the bird is sad after the sausage is eaten, and Pullman's version doesn't. I think it's better with the sausage being sad.
It's getting the rating it does because these were advertised as "retellings," when they are really no such thing, and Pullman isn't really clear why he selected the ones he did. In my opinion his commentary didn't really add much, and in one case, it was just weird: he detailed a Jungian analysis of a fairy tale that sounded quite interesting, before dismissing it as "twaddle" and saying it's just a coincidence that this fairy tale fits a formula and it's better without thinking about all that stuff anyway. I was like, "O...kay?" I know hardly anything about Jung so I don't really feel fit to say if it's twaddle or not, but finding patterns and going through the psychology of things is, to me, actually fun. To dismiss psychological analysis or symbolic imagery of fairy tales because "they're fairy tales" seems like things are kind of being sold short.
If you're interested in this, you're probably just better off rereading the Grimms' collection itself, or getting some illustrated stories out of the library and enjoying the artwork, which would probably be more enjoyable than the author's commentary.
October 9, 2013
Pullman strips the traditional fairytales right back to their core. This was a lovely read, and the little pieces at the end of each tale, where the author gives a little information about the original tale and any changes he may or may not have made, gives real context to the stories, making them even more interesting.
December 4, 2012
(Reprinted from the Chicago Center for Literature and Photography [cclapcenter.com]. I am the original author of this review, as well as the owner of CCLaP; it is not being reprinted illegally.)
So here was a quick read I couldn't pass up when randomly coming across it at my neighborhood library the other day -- a new compilation of around 50 classic Grimm Brothers fairytales (some famous but most obscure), done for the 200th anniversary of these tales' first publications, edited and sometimes slightly altered by popular "Narnia for atheists" children's author Philip Pullman. "But wait," I hear you saying. "The Grimm Brothers tales are only two hundred years old?" And that of course is part of the problem with supposed "objective" history, and why such new collections are always occasionally welcome; because although the folk tales being told date all the way back to Europe's Middle Ages, the Grimms themselves were modern businessmen who lived in the Victorian Age, and simply the first people who ever thought of actually collecting up all these oral stories and finally committing them to paper, who even just two hundred years later many of us mistakenly conflate with the fictional "Mother Goose" and believe to be the actual Medieval authors of the tales themselves. And as Pullman explains in his illuminating introduction, this is why he too felt free to change some of the details in these stories for this new anthology, because this is exactly what the Grimms did as well, slightly altering the tales from one edition of their massive compendium to the next over the decades in order to better fit the changing morality that occurred over the course of the 19th century; and in fact one of the most interesting things about this book is that Pullman not only compares the various Grimm editions in his smart notes ending each story, but also compares them to the other compilers of fairytales in non-English countries that were going on at the same time, showing that in reality these stories represent a pan-European outlook that influenced the entire continent equally from the years 1000 to 1500, when the invention of movable type finally started bringing definitive linguistic and thus cultural barriers to the geographic lines separating these countries. In fact, about the only "problem" with this book is simply that this research and Pullman's notes tend to be more interesting than the stories themselves -- this is no McGuiresque modern re-imagining of the fairytales, but simply a stripped-down retelling of them, so as such will contain no real surprises to those already familiar with the stories. But that said, for those who have never actually read them before, this makes for a great introduction to the subject, a quickly paced and always interesting volume that most people will be able to finish in full in just a day or two.
Out of 10: 8.5
So here was a quick read I couldn't pass up when randomly coming across it at my neighborhood library the other day -- a new compilation of around 50 classic Grimm Brothers fairytales (some famous but most obscure), done for the 200th anniversary of these tales' first publications, edited and sometimes slightly altered by popular "Narnia for atheists" children's author Philip Pullman. "But wait," I hear you saying. "The Grimm Brothers tales are only two hundred years old?" And that of course is part of the problem with supposed "objective" history, and why such new collections are always occasionally welcome; because although the folk tales being told date all the way back to Europe's Middle Ages, the Grimms themselves were modern businessmen who lived in the Victorian Age, and simply the first people who ever thought of actually collecting up all these oral stories and finally committing them to paper, who even just two hundred years later many of us mistakenly conflate with the fictional "Mother Goose" and believe to be the actual Medieval authors of the tales themselves. And as Pullman explains in his illuminating introduction, this is why he too felt free to change some of the details in these stories for this new anthology, because this is exactly what the Grimms did as well, slightly altering the tales from one edition of their massive compendium to the next over the decades in order to better fit the changing morality that occurred over the course of the 19th century; and in fact one of the most interesting things about this book is that Pullman not only compares the various Grimm editions in his smart notes ending each story, but also compares them to the other compilers of fairytales in non-English countries that were going on at the same time, showing that in reality these stories represent a pan-European outlook that influenced the entire continent equally from the years 1000 to 1500, when the invention of movable type finally started bringing definitive linguistic and thus cultural barriers to the geographic lines separating these countries. In fact, about the only "problem" with this book is simply that this research and Pullman's notes tend to be more interesting than the stories themselves -- this is no McGuiresque modern re-imagining of the fairytales, but simply a stripped-down retelling of them, so as such will contain no real surprises to those already familiar with the stories. But that said, for those who have never actually read them before, this makes for a great introduction to the subject, a quickly paced and always interesting volume that most people will be able to finish in full in just a day or two.
Out of 10: 8.5
December 4, 2012
I am a fairytale geek. I am crazy about them and have been since I was a wee child. I keep various anthologies on my shelf, including the complete Grimm, some Russian tales, and Jack Zipes' fantastic French fairy tale translations. When I heard Philip Pullman was coming out with a collection, I knew I needed it.
FAIRY TALES FROM THE BROTHERS GRIMM: A New English Version lives up to my expectations. The selected tales cover both the extremely popular ("Cinderella") and the obscure ("The Stolen Pennies"). Thus reading the anthology straight through is a mix of rediscovering old favorites and being surprised by stories you don't really remember (or have never read before). I will admit to skipping around rather than following Pullman's order, but I think FAIRY TALES FROM THE BROTHERS GRIMM works either way. And I was definitely keeping track of which stories would be best to read aloud to the niece and nephew.
Pullman doesn't pull back from the stories' gorier moments and doesn't cut earthier references, but he doesn't play them up either. People might be thrown in barrels full of nails and rolled into the sea, but there's no visceral descriptions of violence. The sexual references tend to be symbolic and nothing that will cause any kiddies to ask strange questions about the birds and the bees. Basically, I think these retellings will work for kids and adults, which is fitting for fairytales.
I loved the brief notes at the end of each story. He includes the attribution of the stories and rightfully adds to the Grimm brothers' praise of the talented Dorothea Viehmann. It's nice to see her contribution extensively praised in a major collection. Pullman explains in a few paragraphs why he chose to include certain episodes, or why he thought certain phrases were the best translation for the story. I generally feel like he accomplished the goal he laid out in the Introduction: to tell these fairy tales with a focus on story. The only time I was thrown out of a tale was when he used the phrase "weapon of mass destruction" which felt far too modern to me.
Fans of fairytales can safely flock to FAIRY TALES FROM THE BROTHERS GRIMM. Pullman is an incredible author who I usually think of as detailed and somewhat convoluted. But in this collection he restrains himself and tells the fairytales in a concise manner, keeping his language simple instead of overwhelming these familiar stories with his distinctive voice. But that isn't to say the tales are plain - Pullman has a knack for a memorable turn of phrase.
Basically, FAIRY TALES FROM THE BROTHERS GRIMM is everything I'd hoped it would be. It's difficult for me to be objective about fairytales, so I'd've been very disappointed if this collection wasn't any good. And I think it's terrific.
FAIRY TALES FROM THE BROTHERS GRIMM: A New English Version lives up to my expectations. The selected tales cover both the extremely popular ("Cinderella") and the obscure ("The Stolen Pennies"). Thus reading the anthology straight through is a mix of rediscovering old favorites and being surprised by stories you don't really remember (or have never read before). I will admit to skipping around rather than following Pullman's order, but I think FAIRY TALES FROM THE BROTHERS GRIMM works either way. And I was definitely keeping track of which stories would be best to read aloud to the niece and nephew.
Pullman doesn't pull back from the stories' gorier moments and doesn't cut earthier references, but he doesn't play them up either. People might be thrown in barrels full of nails and rolled into the sea, but there's no visceral descriptions of violence. The sexual references tend to be symbolic and nothing that will cause any kiddies to ask strange questions about the birds and the bees. Basically, I think these retellings will work for kids and adults, which is fitting for fairytales.
I loved the brief notes at the end of each story. He includes the attribution of the stories and rightfully adds to the Grimm brothers' praise of the talented Dorothea Viehmann. It's nice to see her contribution extensively praised in a major collection. Pullman explains in a few paragraphs why he chose to include certain episodes, or why he thought certain phrases were the best translation for the story. I generally feel like he accomplished the goal he laid out in the Introduction: to tell these fairy tales with a focus on story. The only time I was thrown out of a tale was when he used the phrase "weapon of mass destruction" which felt far too modern to me.
Fans of fairytales can safely flock to FAIRY TALES FROM THE BROTHERS GRIMM. Pullman is an incredible author who I usually think of as detailed and somewhat convoluted. But in this collection he restrains himself and tells the fairytales in a concise manner, keeping his language simple instead of overwhelming these familiar stories with his distinctive voice. But that isn't to say the tales are plain - Pullman has a knack for a memorable turn of phrase.
Basically, FAIRY TALES FROM THE BROTHERS GRIMM is everything I'd hoped it would be. It's difficult for me to be objective about fairytales, so I'd've been very disappointed if this collection wasn't any good. And I think it's terrific.
January 20, 2020
A lovely collection of Grimm fairy tales in their original and murdery glory. Not a huge amount to say about this book except that I enjoyed revisiting familiar tales and reading some new ones! An excellent collection.
March 6, 2013
Fine, but who is this book for?
Pullman's versions of some of the Grimms鈥� folk stories are well enough written and his little summaries at the end of each tale gives a bit of background to where each story originated and the different versions that have been told in the past. But from the moment I received the book and discovered that, to my amazement, there are no illustrations, I couldn't help but wonder - who exactly is this book for?
Pullman has updated the language but not the stories so we have dreadful clashes like princesses in castles talking about weapons of mass destruction or giants saying 'Respect!'. This kind of pantomime humour made me think the books must be aimed at a young audience but then where are those missing illustrations? I also couldn't help feeling that with language like this Pullman's versions will date much more quickly than those I read in my childhood. Also Pullman has deliberately gone back to the unbowdlerised versions of many of the stories and I'm not sure that I'd be happy to be reading some of these to my (mythical) young children. Rapunzel getting pregnant without really understanding what was happening to her? Houses described as being as filthy as 'pisspots'? Must be for a teenage or adult audience then? But if so, what do these versions add to the ones we all read when we were young? For me, the answer to that question was nothing much, I'm afraid.
In the end I came to the conclusion that the book is in fact aimed at a very specific target audience - Pullman fans. I doubt this will gain him many new ones, nor is it intriguing or different enough to draw in many fans of folk tales. Not a bad book, exactly, but I doubt it will challenge the classic versions of Grimms鈥� that are already out there.
An interesting note 鈥� when first published in the UK this book was titled 'Grimm Tales: For Young and Old'. I see that the title has been changed for the US version to 'Fairy Tales from the Brothers Grimm: A New English Version'. I wonder if that has been because of the somewhat lukewarm reception the lack of illustrations and unbowdlerised language caused this book to have amongst many reviewers in Britain? Or perhaps the US publishers actually read it before publishing...
NB This book was provided for review by Amazon Vine UK.
Pullman's versions of some of the Grimms鈥� folk stories are well enough written and his little summaries at the end of each tale gives a bit of background to where each story originated and the different versions that have been told in the past. But from the moment I received the book and discovered that, to my amazement, there are no illustrations, I couldn't help but wonder - who exactly is this book for?
Pullman has updated the language but not the stories so we have dreadful clashes like princesses in castles talking about weapons of mass destruction or giants saying 'Respect!'. This kind of pantomime humour made me think the books must be aimed at a young audience but then where are those missing illustrations? I also couldn't help feeling that with language like this Pullman's versions will date much more quickly than those I read in my childhood. Also Pullman has deliberately gone back to the unbowdlerised versions of many of the stories and I'm not sure that I'd be happy to be reading some of these to my (mythical) young children. Rapunzel getting pregnant without really understanding what was happening to her? Houses described as being as filthy as 'pisspots'? Must be for a teenage or adult audience then? But if so, what do these versions add to the ones we all read when we were young? For me, the answer to that question was nothing much, I'm afraid.
In the end I came to the conclusion that the book is in fact aimed at a very specific target audience - Pullman fans. I doubt this will gain him many new ones, nor is it intriguing or different enough to draw in many fans of folk tales. Not a bad book, exactly, but I doubt it will challenge the classic versions of Grimms鈥� that are already out there.
An interesting note 鈥� when first published in the UK this book was titled 'Grimm Tales: For Young and Old'. I see that the title has been changed for the US version to 'Fairy Tales from the Brothers Grimm: A New English Version'. I wonder if that has been because of the somewhat lukewarm reception the lack of illustrations and unbowdlerised language caused this book to have amongst many reviewers in Britain? Or perhaps the US publishers actually read it before publishing...
NB This book was provided for review by Amazon Vine UK.
June 16, 2021
A retelling of fifty fairy tales from the Grimm brothers by Philip Pullman. Some are famous some are not (Cinderella, Rapunzel, Snow White, Little Red Riding Hood鈥�)
It was alright but not very exciting, and I loved this tales when I was younger. I guess I found that the writing lacked a little bit of poetry as the retelling is extremely straight to the point and can seem a bit dull.
I wish there was more in-dept commentaries or anecdotes from Pullman as well ! Otherwise a quite complete collection to come back to.
It was alright but not very exciting, and I loved this tales when I was younger. I guess I found that the writing lacked a little bit of poetry as the retelling is extremely straight to the point and can seem a bit dull.
I wish there was more in-dept commentaries or anecdotes from Pullman as well ! Otherwise a quite complete collection to come back to.
November 13, 2012
Fairy tales remind me of that game telephone. The one where a person starts off saying something and as that phrase gets passed from person to person it changes until when the final person says it out loud it is nothing like the original. I feel that this happens quite often with fairy tales. There are so many variations for each tale with every author or storyteller throwing in their own twist.
Philip Pullman takes a slightly different approach. He has researched many of these tales from different sources and their origins. Then he retells them only changing small parts that he feels makes the story flow better. The one thing that is really interesting about this rendition is at the end of every tale there is information not only about the original source and other versions of the story, but Pullman himself adds notes after each tale about changes in the variations or other significant information. I think this added to the volume immensely. It gave me a different view on many of these tales and had me thinking past the story into it's elements. It was very entertaining and informational so note only did I enjoy the story I also felt like I was learning something.
Fairy tales themselves are far from unique, but at the same time there is something satisfying about reading a different version of them. I loved seeing how the tales I've grown up with (and had a great bias to thanks to Disney) have changed and transformed into a completely new tale with common features but enough differences to entice the readers. There were also many tales I had not heard before that were present in this volume giving a fresh perspective every now and again.
Fairy Tales from The Brothers Grimm was a very enjoyable read and one I see myself going back to often; not necessarily as a whole, but to pick and choose which stories I want to relive depending on my mood.
Philip Pullman takes a slightly different approach. He has researched many of these tales from different sources and their origins. Then he retells them only changing small parts that he feels makes the story flow better. The one thing that is really interesting about this rendition is at the end of every tale there is information not only about the original source and other versions of the story, but Pullman himself adds notes after each tale about changes in the variations or other significant information. I think this added to the volume immensely. It gave me a different view on many of these tales and had me thinking past the story into it's elements. It was very entertaining and informational so note only did I enjoy the story I also felt like I was learning something.
Fairy tales themselves are far from unique, but at the same time there is something satisfying about reading a different version of them. I loved seeing how the tales I've grown up with (and had a great bias to thanks to Disney) have changed and transformed into a completely new tale with common features but enough differences to entice the readers. There were also many tales I had not heard before that were present in this volume giving a fresh perspective every now and again.
Fairy Tales from The Brothers Grimm was a very enjoyable read and one I see myself going back to often; not necessarily as a whole, but to pick and choose which stories I want to relive depending on my mood.
August 19, 2020
mein gott!:
p310: At the bottom Hans found a door, and when he opened it the first thing that met his eyes was a maiden so lovely she seemed like a picture come alive. She was chained to the wall, and her expression was full of disgust and despair, because standing on a chair right next to her was the little man, leering and stroking her hair and her cheeks with his horny little fingers.
I like Gambling Hans best.
p310: At the bottom Hans found a door, and when he opened it the first thing that met his eyes was a maiden so lovely she seemed like a picture come alive. She was chained to the wall, and her expression was full of disgust and despair, because standing on a chair right next to her was the little man, leering and stroking her hair and her cheeks with his horny little fingers.
I like Gambling Hans best.
January 2, 2016
RETO 2016; 1
January 6, 2020
This was an enjoyable set of tales that Pullman had not only selected, but researched similar story versions from other European countries, particularly from their own folklore. This book is over 400 pages but extremely manageable due to the short nature of the stories. It is very infrequent that a single story will span more than 10-12 pages. This makes it a book that you can easily put down and pick back up again without having to worry about missing or forgetting any bits.
I don鈥檛 generally read introductions or afterwords (this book doesn鈥檛 have an afterword or author鈥檚 note), but I found that the introduction was informative in letting me know how and why this book came together, including a brief background of the Grimm Brothers themselves, and the environment they lived in that gave way to the creation of their book(s) of tales. In essence, Pullman took the tales from the Grimm brothers鈥� collections that he liked best, or fit a certain theme, and only added small bits (and in some cases even less) to the story to make them a bit clearer. But, as Pullman writes in his introduction, 鈥淪wiftness is a great virtue in the fairy tale. A good tale moves with a dreamlike speed from event to event, pausing only to say as much as is needed and no more.鈥� So you know for certain you will not be inundated with meaningless drivel in these stories, and anything which is added is merely to make the story more clear or to improve pacing.
Perhaps my most favourite part of this book, however, is that after the tales Pullman includes a categorical classification of the tale (not of interest to me, but interesting in and of itself because such a categorical system exists), a collection of similar tales found in other folklore, but, definitely my favourite part of all, is when Pullman adds his own thoughts on the story鈥� from commenting on the story, characters, and motives, to giving us peeks into his creative mind to see how we would turn a story a different way or how he would lengthen one of the stories into a novel, I was not sure what to expect from this book but it was a delight in so many ways!
I don鈥檛 generally read introductions or afterwords (this book doesn鈥檛 have an afterword or author鈥檚 note), but I found that the introduction was informative in letting me know how and why this book came together, including a brief background of the Grimm Brothers themselves, and the environment they lived in that gave way to the creation of their book(s) of tales. In essence, Pullman took the tales from the Grimm brothers鈥� collections that he liked best, or fit a certain theme, and only added small bits (and in some cases even less) to the story to make them a bit clearer. But, as Pullman writes in his introduction, 鈥淪wiftness is a great virtue in the fairy tale. A good tale moves with a dreamlike speed from event to event, pausing only to say as much as is needed and no more.鈥� So you know for certain you will not be inundated with meaningless drivel in these stories, and anything which is added is merely to make the story more clear or to improve pacing.
Perhaps my most favourite part of this book, however, is that after the tales Pullman includes a categorical classification of the tale (not of interest to me, but interesting in and of itself because such a categorical system exists), a collection of similar tales found in other folklore, but, definitely my favourite part of all, is when Pullman adds his own thoughts on the story鈥� from commenting on the story, characters, and motives, to giving us peeks into his creative mind to see how we would turn a story a different way or how he would lengthen one of the stories into a novel, I was not sure what to expect from this book but it was a delight in so many ways!
September 4, 2017
Everyone likes fairytales but in my case it was almost an obsession while growing up. I liked to search for books that had fairytales from different parts of the world and as a part of this scavange I was familiar with Grimm's fairytales from long ago. This book was more like a review of my previous knowledge with the inclusion of additional info.
What I liked about the book was that it has a separate section after each story (with a total of 50 stories) where the writer mentions the source of the stories, other variations, the names of the narrators and the different books they are found. This was very much informative.
The negative part was the length of the stories. Some were annoyingly long without any reason. Some were strangely short. Grimm's stories are usually short and I never really liked all the stories. But it seemed like some of the stories end even before the character development. Some stories were like moral stories,some were scary,some were knight/king marries the distressed girl/princess. Going through the book was a bit irksome because the stories were not that much interesting. The book was supposed to be for children I suppose but the addition information after each story made it for older readers. So,in the end,it became something in between boring and informative which you don't expect in a collection of fairytales.
What I liked about the book was that it has a separate section after each story (with a total of 50 stories) where the writer mentions the source of the stories, other variations, the names of the narrators and the different books they are found. This was very much informative.
The negative part was the length of the stories. Some were annoyingly long without any reason. Some were strangely short. Grimm's stories are usually short and I never really liked all the stories. But it seemed like some of the stories end even before the character development. Some stories were like moral stories,some were scary,some were knight/king marries the distressed girl/princess. Going through the book was a bit irksome because the stories were not that much interesting. The book was supposed to be for children I suppose but the addition information after each story made it for older readers. So,in the end,it became something in between boring and informative which you don't expect in a collection of fairytales.
July 13, 2023
3,5/5 猸�
December 2, 2012
Review originally posted
I requested this book from NetGalley early in October. 听Iknew thought I didn't have a chance at being accepted (because the bigger publishers usually reject me [this isn't me looking for sympathy, it's just that I get denied all the time]), but figured I'd try anyway for a few reasons.
1. 听It's Philip Effing Pullman.
2. 听It's faerie tales.
3. 听I am EXACTLY this book's target demographic.
Several weeks went by and I heard nothing, so I assumed that meant I was going to be rejected yet again. 听I had already resolved that I'd buy it as soon as it went on sale, though, because see the above 3 points.
THEN! 听I got the email. 听The email that said I was approved. 听And I had to read it three times to make sure that "approved" wasn't some new iteration of "denied" that I wasn't familiar with.
...and then there were issues with downloading on NetGalley, and various other issues and I thought I was NEVER GOING TO GET TO READ THE DAMN BOOK.
But I persevered and it was finally loaded on my reader, so I curled up and started reading.
Really, before sitting down with it, I'd assumed this book was going to be a bunch of faerie tales actually re-told by Pullman. 听Because, y'know - the blurb says this:
(emphasis mine)
It was clear to me within the first few pages of the introduction, though, that this was not to be the case.
Oh, okay then. 听So, he's not so much RETELLING them, as he is re-telling them. 听I know, that last sentence probably only makes sense in my own head, but if you were in my head with me, I can assure you that you'd be nodding in agreement.
"Well, why would I even want to read this, if it's just all the same stories I already know?"
Gosh, you guys ask so many questions in my imagination.
Listen, here's the clever bit with this book. 听It's not just the stories, which are kind of a combination of all the different tellings. 听It's the commentary. 听After each story, Pullman leaves us little notes, telling us which versions he's used, which each one follows (which I totally used to have memorized back in my teens when FAERIE TALES WERE LIFE) and what he would have done differently, were he actually re-telling the story.
An example: 听At the end of Hansel and Gretel, he expressed disappointment that the children returned home after outsmarting the witch only to find that the step-mother had already conveniently died, so their Happy Ever After was practically guaranteed at that point. 听Pullman said if he was re-writing it as a novel, they would have come home to find either that she was still "ruling the roost," or that he'd have the father kill her to be rid of her (sidenote: 听Mr Pullman, if you write this story, I will throw my money in your face and buy it immediately - no joke).
Now, if you're not really big on the original folk-stories in the first place, you might not dig this as much as I did. 听This is more of an annotated Grimm/Lang/Perrault, etc. than it is anything new. 听If, however, you fall intomy the camp that thinks something like this sounds holy freaking crap amazing, I think you should rush right out and buy it (but not until November 8 if you're in the US).
I know, I'm so mean - I'm talking about a book you'll have to wait OVER A WEEK FOR. 听If you're in the UK (or, um...anywhere served by the Penguin Classics based out of the UK), you can buy this now. 听It just has a different title and cover. 听You'll be looking for and I'll be cursing you under my breath because I totally want the cover that comes with your version of the book.
Thank you so much to Penguin/Viking for giving me a chance to read this early. 听I'll be buying myself a copy to put on my shelves next to the rest of my faerie tale collection.
I requested this book from NetGalley early in October. 听I
1. 听It's Philip Effing Pullman.
2. 听It's faerie tales.
3. 听I am EXACTLY this book's target demographic.
Several weeks went by and I heard nothing, so I assumed that meant I was going to be rejected yet again. 听I had already resolved that I'd buy it as soon as it went on sale, though, because see the above 3 points.
THEN! 听I got the email. 听The email that said I was approved. 听And I had to read it three times to make sure that "approved" wasn't some new iteration of "denied" that I wasn't familiar with.
...and then there were issues with downloading on NetGalley, and various other issues and I thought I was NEVER GOING TO GET TO READ THE DAMN BOOK.
But I persevered and it was finally loaded on my reader, so I curled up and started reading.
Really, before sitting down with it, I'd assumed this book was going to be a bunch of faerie tales actually re-told by Pullman. 听Because, y'know - the blurb says this:
Pullman retells his fifty favorites, paying homage to the tales that inspired his unique creative vision鈥攁nd that continue to cast their spell on the Western imagination.
(emphasis mine)
It was clear to me within the first few pages of the introduction, though, that this was not to be the case.
[...] my main interest has always been in how the tales worked as stories. All I set out to do in this book was tell the best and听most interesting of them, clearing out of the way anything that would prevent them from running freely. I didn鈥檛 want to put them in modern settings, or produce personal interpretations or compose poetic variations on the originals; I just wanted to produce a version that was as clear as water. My guiding question has been: 鈥楬ow would I tell this story myself, if I鈥檇 heard it told听by someone else and wanted to pass it on?鈥�
Oh, okay then. 听So, he's not so much RETELLING them, as he is re-telling them. 听I know, that last sentence probably only makes sense in my own head, but if you were in my head with me, I can assure you that you'd be nodding in agreement.
"Well, why would I even want to read this, if it's just all the same stories I already know?"
Gosh, you guys ask so many questions in my imagination.
Listen, here's the clever bit with this book. 听It's not just the stories, which are kind of a combination of all the different tellings. 听It's the commentary. 听After each story, Pullman leaves us little notes, telling us which versions he's used, which each one follows (which I totally used to have memorized back in my teens when FAERIE TALES WERE LIFE) and what he would have done differently, were he actually re-telling the story.
An example: 听At the end of Hansel and Gretel, he expressed disappointment that the children returned home after outsmarting the witch only to find that the step-mother had already conveniently died, so their Happy Ever After was practically guaranteed at that point. 听Pullman said if he was re-writing it as a novel, they would have come home to find either that she was still "ruling the roost," or that he'd have the father kill her to be rid of her (sidenote: 听Mr Pullman, if you write this story, I will throw my money in your face and buy it immediately - no joke).
Now, if you're not really big on the original folk-stories in the first place, you might not dig this as much as I did. 听This is more of an annotated Grimm/Lang/Perrault, etc. than it is anything new. 听If, however, you fall into
I know, I'm so mean - I'm talking about a book you'll have to wait OVER A WEEK FOR. 听If you're in the UK (or, um...anywhere served by the Penguin Classics based out of the UK), you can buy this now. 听It just has a different title and cover. 听You'll be looking for and I'll be cursing you under my breath because I totally want the cover that comes with your version of the book.
Thank you so much to Penguin/Viking for giving me a chance to read this early. 听I'll be buying myself a copy to put on my shelves next to the rest of my faerie tale collection.
February 15, 2017
L O V E D I T . This collection of fairy tales was fun and satisfying. Please go out and get it asap.
October 30, 2014
From BBC Radio 4 Extra:
A prince takes it into his head to travel the world with his faithful servant.
The two Grimm brothers published their first volume of stories, Children's and Household Tales, in 1812 although there were some who disputed their suitability for young minds. Wilhelm and Jacob Grimm devoted their lives to collecting these German folk tales. Inspired by the rise of Romanticism and interest in traditional national stories and lore, in the end they collected more than 200.
Philip Pullman reads the first of five of his re-workings of Grimm Tales, written to celebrate the 200th anniversary of their publication.
A prince takes it into his head to travel the world with his faithful servant.
The two Grimm brothers published their first volume of stories, Children's and Household Tales, in 1812 although there were some who disputed their suitability for young minds. Wilhelm and Jacob Grimm devoted their lives to collecting these German folk tales. Inspired by the rise of Romanticism and interest in traditional national stories and lore, in the end they collected more than 200.
Philip Pullman reads the first of five of his re-workings of Grimm Tales, written to celebrate the 200th anniversary of their publication.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,272 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.