What do you think?
Rate this book
Gigante
Edna Ferber parecÃa regodearse en la escritura de melodramas históricos. En "Gigante", decidió enfrentarse ella sola al Estado de Texas, y lo hizo haciendo uso de una narrativa envolvente, que todo lo alcanza, para describir el carácter de Texas en el periodo que va desde los años treinta hasta los cincuenta. Durante este tiempo, dicho estado pasó de tener una economÃa basada en la agricultura y la ganaderÃa, a una totalmente ligada al gran boom del petróleo. Los grandes personajes que aparecen en esta novela (de los cuales, según Ferber, está formada Texas) son inolvidables: Bick Benedict, el magnate del ganado, y su preciosa esposa Leslie, proveniente de la aristocracia de Virginia; Jett Rink, el joven irascible que acaba encontrando petróleo y se obsesiona con la venganza; Luz, hermana de Bick, y otros variopintos familiares, además de innumerables personajes menores, no por ello menos especiales. Gigante es la visión de Ferber de cómo Texas se convirtió en lo que es. Nos sumerge en la compleja vida del oeste de Texas, particularmente en "La Riata", el infinito rancho de Benedict. También tiene tiempo de tocar diversos temas sociales, ya que, desde su primer dÃa en el rancho, Leslie cuestiona el estilo de vida tejano. Finalmente consigue ver como crece en Bick algo de sentido común y sensibilidad hacia los problemas económicos y raciales de mucha de la gente con la que se topan a lo largo de veinticinco años en Texas.
290 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1952
545 people are currently reading
4,601 people want to read
About the author
Edna Ferber
200Ìýbooks264ÌýfollowersEdna Ferber was an American novelist, short story writer and playwright. Her novels were popular in her lifetime and included the Pulitzer Prize-winning So Big (1924), Show Boat (1926; made into the celebrated 1927 musical), Cimarron (1929; made into the 1931 film which won the Academy Award for Best Picture), and Giant (1952; made into the 1956 Hollywood movie).
Ferber was born August 15, 1885, in Kalamazoo, Michigan, to a Hungarian-born Jewish storekeeper, Jacob Charles Ferber, and his Milwaukee, Wisconsin-born wife, Julia (Neumann) Ferber. At the age of 12, after living in Chicago, Illinois and Ottumwa, Iowa, Ferber and her family moved to Appleton, Wisconsin, where she graduated from high school and briefly attended Lawrence University. She took newspaper jobs at the Appleton Daily Crescent and the Milwaukee Journal before publishing her first novel. She covered the 1920 Republican National Convention and 1920 Democratic National Convention for the United Press Association.
Ferber's novels generally featured strong female protagonists, along with a rich and diverse collection of supporting characters. She usually highlighted at least one strong secondary character who faced discrimination ethnically or for other reasons; through this technique, Ferber demonstrated her belief that people are people and that the not-so-pretty people have the best character.
Ferber was a member of the Algonquin Round Table, a group of wits who met for lunch every day at the Algonquin Hotel in New York.
Ferber was born August 15, 1885, in Kalamazoo, Michigan, to a Hungarian-born Jewish storekeeper, Jacob Charles Ferber, and his Milwaukee, Wisconsin-born wife, Julia (Neumann) Ferber. At the age of 12, after living in Chicago, Illinois and Ottumwa, Iowa, Ferber and her family moved to Appleton, Wisconsin, where she graduated from high school and briefly attended Lawrence University. She took newspaper jobs at the Appleton Daily Crescent and the Milwaukee Journal before publishing her first novel. She covered the 1920 Republican National Convention and 1920 Democratic National Convention for the United Press Association.
Ferber's novels generally featured strong female protagonists, along with a rich and diverse collection of supporting characters. She usually highlighted at least one strong secondary character who faced discrimination ethnically or for other reasons; through this technique, Ferber demonstrated her belief that people are people and that the not-so-pretty people have the best character.
Ferber was a member of the Algonquin Round Table, a group of wits who met for lunch every day at the Algonquin Hotel in New York.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 400 reviews
April 3, 2016
When cattleman Jordan "Bick" Benedict travels to Virginia to purchase a horse, he returns home to Texas with a naive tart-tongued young bride as well. With sweltering heat, a husband that works like a cowhand, and an evil old-maid sister-in-law to contend with, Leslie enters a nightmare of a new lifestyle finding some shameful abuses to Mexican humanity, and a BBQ menu from hell (calf brains served in the head.....ewwwww!) and that's just the start.
This old western classic is a Giant of a good read with a powerful storyline! (movie is next)
Update: July 31, 2015
There are some wild and crazy good characters in this book and movie, but James Dean really stands out in the movie as a drunken ranch hand turned oil tycoon.....What A Performance! The movie begins differently than the book and has a much better ending. Must read more Edna Ferber!
Booker Prize Winner 1952.
November 2, 2022
Texas is different, all right. But you’ll have to get the hang of it.
As the name of the book suggests, this is a big tale about a BIG state - Texas. Edna Ferber published this in 1952 which caused a huge uproar in the state and Texans didn’t take her parody very lightly. She did her immense research which is obvious if you have read this. On just about every page there is something unique or considered special or just downright different about the place, its history, people, food, landscape, ideas, beliefs, way of talking, etc. It is one of the downfalls about the story, in my opinion, because even this transplant Texan got a bit bogged down with all of the telling about Texas. For instance, the feel of the novel exudes an “everything is bigger in Texas� and anything that’s not of Texas is considered foreign to a Texan and not important or interesting. It seemed from the beginning that Ferber was writing an uncompromising yet realistic satire of the Lone Star State’s culture but more specifically about its old (cattle ranch) and new (oil) monied families. There are some examples of stunning prose throughout, however, most of the time you get the feeling that Ferber is pounding you over the head with Texasisms (and she pretty much got it all right).
The giant kingdom that was the Reata Ranch lay dozing in the sun, its feet laved by the waters of the Gulf of Mexico many miles distant, its head in the cloud-wreathed mountains far far to the north, its gargantuan arms flung east and west in careless might.
The characters are just not likable. For me that can be a deal breaker when I’m trying to find a connection with someone, to find an inkling of a thread of likableness that I can grasp onto and run with. Bick Benedict, the unchanging and pompous cattle rancher of more than 2 million acres, pretty much views himself as royalty at Reata Ranch, the ruler of his empire which has been in the family for over 100 years. His inquisitive wife, Leslie, an intelligent woman from Virginia, is swept away to Texas with ideas of the place she has only read about in books and with no real idea about what her new life will be like once she steps foot into this world of Texas - a country in and of itself. She constantly asks Bick about everything she encounters and truly wants to learn and make this way of life as a rancher’s wife her own. She eventually becomes aware of the living conditions and poor medical care and low pay that the Mexican vaqueros working on the ranch receive. Through her experiences, we see Ferber’s critique of the founding of Texas and the treatment of Mexican-Americans.
As one who has lived in Texas for 17 years, I could understand Leslie’s newness and questioning and wanting to learn attitude. I’d never experienced any place quite like Texas when I first set foot here as a new bride like she did. But what is interesting for Leslie is that this particular time in Texas is when the cattle economy is giving way to new oil and those nouveau riche Texans are depicted as lewd and unpolished. We meet Jett Rink in the first four chapters and are instantly cringing at his disgusting and egocentric behaviors. You could say that Ferber has created very animated characters that border on resembling a funny paper sketch or a caricature of real Texans.
Here in Texas the cotton rich always snorted the cattle rich. And now if this oil keeps coming into Texas the old cattle crowd will look down their noses at the oil upstarts. You know, like the old New York De Peysters snooting the Vanderbilts and the Vanderbilts cutting the Astors.
I have not yet watched the movie, but have only read differing opinions on whether it was more successful than the book. I’ll have to wait to express my opinion on that. As for the book, I could see many truths within her critique as I’m certain her extensive research made that possible. But I would have much more enjoyed a story of a blended culture marriage and how they overcame obstacles. There were several major plot points could have been fleshed out so much better but weren’t because they didn’t play out in the satire, but they would have made for an excellent extension of the story. Overall, it’s a good book but I’d rather pick up a Western written by Elmer Kelton, a true Texan, and get lost in a cowboy story for a while. Oh, well, it looks like I’ll be getting my wish with coming up this month.
As the name of the book suggests, this is a big tale about a BIG state - Texas. Edna Ferber published this in 1952 which caused a huge uproar in the state and Texans didn’t take her parody very lightly. She did her immense research which is obvious if you have read this. On just about every page there is something unique or considered special or just downright different about the place, its history, people, food, landscape, ideas, beliefs, way of talking, etc. It is one of the downfalls about the story, in my opinion, because even this transplant Texan got a bit bogged down with all of the telling about Texas. For instance, the feel of the novel exudes an “everything is bigger in Texas� and anything that’s not of Texas is considered foreign to a Texan and not important or interesting. It seemed from the beginning that Ferber was writing an uncompromising yet realistic satire of the Lone Star State’s culture but more specifically about its old (cattle ranch) and new (oil) monied families. There are some examples of stunning prose throughout, however, most of the time you get the feeling that Ferber is pounding you over the head with Texasisms (and she pretty much got it all right).
The giant kingdom that was the Reata Ranch lay dozing in the sun, its feet laved by the waters of the Gulf of Mexico many miles distant, its head in the cloud-wreathed mountains far far to the north, its gargantuan arms flung east and west in careless might.
The characters are just not likable. For me that can be a deal breaker when I’m trying to find a connection with someone, to find an inkling of a thread of likableness that I can grasp onto and run with. Bick Benedict, the unchanging and pompous cattle rancher of more than 2 million acres, pretty much views himself as royalty at Reata Ranch, the ruler of his empire which has been in the family for over 100 years. His inquisitive wife, Leslie, an intelligent woman from Virginia, is swept away to Texas with ideas of the place she has only read about in books and with no real idea about what her new life will be like once she steps foot into this world of Texas - a country in and of itself. She constantly asks Bick about everything she encounters and truly wants to learn and make this way of life as a rancher’s wife her own. She eventually becomes aware of the living conditions and poor medical care and low pay that the Mexican vaqueros working on the ranch receive. Through her experiences, we see Ferber’s critique of the founding of Texas and the treatment of Mexican-Americans.
As one who has lived in Texas for 17 years, I could understand Leslie’s newness and questioning and wanting to learn attitude. I’d never experienced any place quite like Texas when I first set foot here as a new bride like she did. But what is interesting for Leslie is that this particular time in Texas is when the cattle economy is giving way to new oil and those nouveau riche Texans are depicted as lewd and unpolished. We meet Jett Rink in the first four chapters and are instantly cringing at his disgusting and egocentric behaviors. You could say that Ferber has created very animated characters that border on resembling a funny paper sketch or a caricature of real Texans.
Here in Texas the cotton rich always snorted the cattle rich. And now if this oil keeps coming into Texas the old cattle crowd will look down their noses at the oil upstarts. You know, like the old New York De Peysters snooting the Vanderbilts and the Vanderbilts cutting the Astors.
I have not yet watched the movie, but have only read differing opinions on whether it was more successful than the book. I’ll have to wait to express my opinion on that. As for the book, I could see many truths within her critique as I’m certain her extensive research made that possible. But I would have much more enjoyed a story of a blended culture marriage and how they overcame obstacles. There were several major plot points could have been fleshed out so much better but weren’t because they didn’t play out in the satire, but they would have made for an excellent extension of the story. Overall, it’s a good book but I’d rather pick up a Western written by Elmer Kelton, a true Texan, and get lost in a cowboy story for a while. Oh, well, it looks like I’ll be getting my wish with coming up this month.
February 10, 2017
I finished this sweeping novel of Texas while on an airplane, bound for my first visit to that great state. I had earlier sent a call out to my friends, asking what one should read before one's first trip to Texas, and when I saw that this suggestion was written by the author of So Big, a novel I loved, I knew I'd found a winner.
I was right.
Giant is absolutely a tale of Texas in the earlier part of this century, shortly after the Great War. It's a tale of ranches and cattle, dust and mesquite, Mexicans and Americans. We learn Texas history, geography and lore through the eyes of Leslie, a Virginian, the new bride of the famous rancher Bick Benedict. Leslie is a thinker, a talker, a reader - thirsty for knowledge and meaning, and constantly driving her husband crazy with her endless questioning.
I loved this book as a study of a marriage - East married to West, a thinking woman and a hard-working man and how they try to find a place of harmony in the land that he's crazy about and she's trying to fit herself into without loosing the woman that she is.
Ferber is a master at her art, the writing is of the kind that I read with a pen in hand, reading phrases and paragraphs twice to let the beauty of an idea or description really sink in. Sometimes it reminded me vaguely of Austen, some of the characters caricatures of the embittered old ranch madama, the rancher's daughter, the clucking hordes of unthinking cattle wives and the Stetson headed county commissioner. But, like in Austen, it rings true and gives and interesting offset and comparison to the main characters.
Okay, I'm gushing. I loved it. The beginning confused me a bit with lots of characters, but after a few chapters we go back in time to an earlier part of the story and I loved piecing it all together. If I wasn't already on my way to that state, I'd want to be.
I was right.
Giant is absolutely a tale of Texas in the earlier part of this century, shortly after the Great War. It's a tale of ranches and cattle, dust and mesquite, Mexicans and Americans. We learn Texas history, geography and lore through the eyes of Leslie, a Virginian, the new bride of the famous rancher Bick Benedict. Leslie is a thinker, a talker, a reader - thirsty for knowledge and meaning, and constantly driving her husband crazy with her endless questioning.
I loved this book as a study of a marriage - East married to West, a thinking woman and a hard-working man and how they try to find a place of harmony in the land that he's crazy about and she's trying to fit herself into without loosing the woman that she is.
Ferber is a master at her art, the writing is of the kind that I read with a pen in hand, reading phrases and paragraphs twice to let the beauty of an idea or description really sink in. Sometimes it reminded me vaguely of Austen, some of the characters caricatures of the embittered old ranch madama, the rancher's daughter, the clucking hordes of unthinking cattle wives and the Stetson headed county commissioner. But, like in Austen, it rings true and gives and interesting offset and comparison to the main characters.
Okay, I'm gushing. I loved it. The beginning confused me a bit with lots of characters, but after a few chapters we go back in time to an earlier part of the story and I loved piecing it all together. If I wasn't already on my way to that state, I'd want to be.
August 29, 2017
After finishing this novel I can definitely say that I prefer the movie adaptation more in comparison. I don't say that often at all, but honestly I think a lot of that relies on the charisma of the talented actors, particularly James Dean as Jett Rink. Once you make it through the first few chapters of the novel which hits you over the head with the magnitude of the state of Texas and everything in it, it certainly gets a little easier as we get to see the Leslie and Bick's relationship from the beginning. The story does attempt to tackle heavier themes and develop it's cast, but it mostly reads like an encyclopedia entry on the development of Texas in the twentieth century. I can't really recommend the novel, unless you want to discover the movie's source material, but the movie, although a little overlong, is much more accessible and worth your time.
May 12, 2023
I picked this book up on a recent visit to my local Half-Priced Books Store. I didn't really find anything that appealed to me and then I saw this book. I vaguely remember seeing the movie based on the book and knew the book was noteworthy so I bought it in hopes of filling more of the literary deficiencies of my education. Of course I didn't expect much from the book as my experiences with the classics has been rather hit and miss. I also have a lengthy history of being wrong with my assumptions. My streak of being wrong continues.
This book was a surprise. When I started reading it I was afraid it was going to turn out to be a soap opera that could have been the inspiration for the "Dallas" TV program of the 1970's. What it really is is a book about the inevitability of progress, change, and about the consequences of what happens when good people see injustice and evil and remain silent for the sake of keeping the peace. This is a book that should be given a new prominence on library and store bookshelves and especially in those places in this country where the desire to return to "the good old days" is a rallying cry.
So what is the book about? We have an enormously land rich young Texan named Jordan "Bick" Benedict III that goes to Virginia to buy a prize horse from a nationally prominent physician. The Texan meets the doctor's middle daughter, Leslie, and a whirlwind romance and wedding result. All of this is happening just after WWI and during the Coolidge presidency but the time span of the book goes into the early 1950's which is also when the book was published, 1952. Bick takes his young bride to Texas at a time when cattle ranching is overtaking the state economy from the fading cotton economy. For Leslie Texas is like visiting a foreign country and she does her best to learn her way around and fit in and be a good wife to the man that runs a 2.5 million acre ranch that is more like a medieval kingdom. During the course of this marriage the cultural history of Texas is laid bare both for the Leslie and the reader. One thing I read in this book that I have never read in any other is the treatment of real marital friction and tension between spouses and how it was realistically handled. Leslie is an outspoken Easterner that discovers things in Texas that she finds offensive, immoral, and plane wrong and she mentions it in mixed company. Bick is outraged by this habit of Leslie's because Texas wives aren't supposed to speak like this and especially not about the subjects she brings up. This happens a few times in the book and it's usually about how the Mexicans are treated and when this happens Bick responds by throwing the treatment of blacks in Virginia back at Leslie. How these marital arguments occur and how they are treated in the book was refreshingly realistic to this reader. However, the story progresses through the decades and the ugly side of life in Texas is illustrated by the contrast of the affluence of the white ranchers compared to abject poverty of the native Mexicans whose ancestry predates the presence of whites in Texas, a not so subtle parallel to Southern whites today whose black neighbors probably have ancestry predating most whites.
As the story continues the Benedicts' family grows and heirs to ranch are born but things don't go as Bick demands they go. Further, the cattle ranching business is confronted with an unexpected newcomer in the state's economy, oil. The oil industry requires access to land that has been dedicated to raising and grazing cattle for generations and the status quo is threatened and compromised by money and greed and the addiction of affluence and luxury. In this part of the story an interesting statement is made that I paraphrase as a man can choose to remain set in his ways but he can't choose to stop progress as progress is unstoppable and inevitable. This was a very good book and now I have a great desire to find that 1956 movie starring Rock Hudson, Elizabeth Taylor, and James Dean. "Giant" was Dean's last movie before his tragic death in an automobile accident. The 1950's was when the tragic death of movie stars was normally the result of alcohol and automobiles. Today such deaths are always due to drugs. Sad. Now I would like to see this old movie as I was far too young to understand it when I first saw it. Enjoy.
This book was a surprise. When I started reading it I was afraid it was going to turn out to be a soap opera that could have been the inspiration for the "Dallas" TV program of the 1970's. What it really is is a book about the inevitability of progress, change, and about the consequences of what happens when good people see injustice and evil and remain silent for the sake of keeping the peace. This is a book that should be given a new prominence on library and store bookshelves and especially in those places in this country where the desire to return to "the good old days" is a rallying cry.
So what is the book about? We have an enormously land rich young Texan named Jordan "Bick" Benedict III that goes to Virginia to buy a prize horse from a nationally prominent physician. The Texan meets the doctor's middle daughter, Leslie, and a whirlwind romance and wedding result. All of this is happening just after WWI and during the Coolidge presidency but the time span of the book goes into the early 1950's which is also when the book was published, 1952. Bick takes his young bride to Texas at a time when cattle ranching is overtaking the state economy from the fading cotton economy. For Leslie Texas is like visiting a foreign country and she does her best to learn her way around and fit in and be a good wife to the man that runs a 2.5 million acre ranch that is more like a medieval kingdom. During the course of this marriage the cultural history of Texas is laid bare both for the Leslie and the reader. One thing I read in this book that I have never read in any other is the treatment of real marital friction and tension between spouses and how it was realistically handled. Leslie is an outspoken Easterner that discovers things in Texas that she finds offensive, immoral, and plane wrong and she mentions it in mixed company. Bick is outraged by this habit of Leslie's because Texas wives aren't supposed to speak like this and especially not about the subjects she brings up. This happens a few times in the book and it's usually about how the Mexicans are treated and when this happens Bick responds by throwing the treatment of blacks in Virginia back at Leslie. How these marital arguments occur and how they are treated in the book was refreshingly realistic to this reader. However, the story progresses through the decades and the ugly side of life in Texas is illustrated by the contrast of the affluence of the white ranchers compared to abject poverty of the native Mexicans whose ancestry predates the presence of whites in Texas, a not so subtle parallel to Southern whites today whose black neighbors probably have ancestry predating most whites.
As the story continues the Benedicts' family grows and heirs to ranch are born but things don't go as Bick demands they go. Further, the cattle ranching business is confronted with an unexpected newcomer in the state's economy, oil. The oil industry requires access to land that has been dedicated to raising and grazing cattle for generations and the status quo is threatened and compromised by money and greed and the addiction of affluence and luxury. In this part of the story an interesting statement is made that I paraphrase as a man can choose to remain set in his ways but he can't choose to stop progress as progress is unstoppable and inevitable. This was a very good book and now I have a great desire to find that 1956 movie starring Rock Hudson, Elizabeth Taylor, and James Dean. "Giant" was Dean's last movie before his tragic death in an automobile accident. The 1950's was when the tragic death of movie stars was normally the result of alcohol and automobiles. Today such deaths are always due to drugs. Sad. Now I would like to see this old movie as I was far too young to understand it when I first saw it. Enjoy.
July 16, 2022
I loved this older novel that was one of our library book club reads. Written by a Pulitzer Prize winning author, it’s a sweeping, multi-generational story that begins with a rich Texas cattle baron falling in love with a genteel, yet educated and opinionated Virginia belle, when he visits their plantation to buy a race horse. Bringing his new bride home to Texas, she must not only get used to a new husband, but to a completely new way of living on the cattle ranch, and as the years pass, to the oil tycoons who threaten to change their way of life. As she settles into her new life, she becomes aware of how the Mexicans that work on the ranch are treated, with low pay, poor medical care and deplorable living conditions. Themes that are explored include wealth and privilege, prejudice, racism, family dynamics.
As a bonus, it was interesting to watch the companion Oscar winning movie, Giant, with screen legends Rock Hudson, Elizabeth Taylor, and James Dean, filmed in the late 1950’s. I also came across a recent documentary of the making of the movie, which was also quite interesting.
As a bonus, it was interesting to watch the companion Oscar winning movie, Giant, with screen legends Rock Hudson, Elizabeth Taylor, and James Dean, filmed in the late 1950’s. I also came across a recent documentary of the making of the movie, which was also quite interesting.
July 1, 2017
This supposedly Sweeping Texas Family Saga would actually be more accurately described as an anthropological look at the Lone Star State in the first half of the 20th century and the large changes wrought there by the gradual shift from an agriculturally-based economy to that of an oil-based one. (Yeah, I know - "Sweeping Family Saga" is much more bite-sized and digestible, isn't it.) The heroine is a free-thinking liberal from Virginia while her Texas born-and-raised rancher husband is at heart a good person but stubborn, myopic, conservative, and often kind of a dick. The Texas alpha male archetype is vividly (sickeningly) deconstructed by Ferber, who is a good writer - she does not shrink from criticizing how Texas came into being, and reminds us throughout the narrative of the continued oppression of Latin American people in the region. Ultimately however, I was expecting more of a story here - I like a good Sweeping Family Saga - and less of a study, and it took me several weeks to slog through this. I would be curious to re-watch the movie version starring Rock Hudson, Elizabeth Taylor and James Dean (in his last role) - I rented it in the late 90's and remember enjoying it.
November 12, 2022
At the core of the novel Giant is the story of Leslie Lynnton and Jordan “Bick� Benedict, Leslie from Virginia, and Bick from Texas. The two different worlds and settings converge when Leslie, after marrying Bick, comes to learn the Texas way of life.
I think that Ferber succeeds in creating a sweeping epic in some ways, as the book has the feeling of being generational and I suppose there is a grandness in how the story unfolds in present and past. This, as well as the many picturesque depictions of the setting in the prose were two of the plusses in reading this novel.
However, I just never could really connect to the characters very much nor cared much for how certain parts of the book were structured. We begin with a key event that we will come back to near the end of the novel, and then go through this long flashback to understand how Leslie and Bick met and married. There were points where the backstory stalled and dragged a little and there was not much to bring the characters to life. I also believe that one of the more distracting aspects to Giant is how the author beats us over the head with “well, this is how it is in Texas�, “Texas is a whole country in itself�, “we are Texas here� etc. Moreover, another downfall was a rather anticlimactic ending to the novel, which seemingly just ends, period.
I went back after reading and watched the lavish film adaptation with Rock Hudson, Elizabeth Taylor, James Dean, and Dennis Hopper and I think it handles the time sequences and structure better and gives more vitality to the characters. So, I guess this is one of the rare cases where I prefer film over book.
It seems Ferber has written quite a few classics turned into films, so I am still interested in checking out either Saratoga Trunk, Cimarron, or So Big.
I think that Ferber succeeds in creating a sweeping epic in some ways, as the book has the feeling of being generational and I suppose there is a grandness in how the story unfolds in present and past. This, as well as the many picturesque depictions of the setting in the prose were two of the plusses in reading this novel.
However, I just never could really connect to the characters very much nor cared much for how certain parts of the book were structured. We begin with a key event that we will come back to near the end of the novel, and then go through this long flashback to understand how Leslie and Bick met and married. There were points where the backstory stalled and dragged a little and there was not much to bring the characters to life. I also believe that one of the more distracting aspects to Giant is how the author beats us over the head with “well, this is how it is in Texas�, “Texas is a whole country in itself�, “we are Texas here� etc. Moreover, another downfall was a rather anticlimactic ending to the novel, which seemingly just ends, period.
I went back after reading and watched the lavish film adaptation with Rock Hudson, Elizabeth Taylor, James Dean, and Dennis Hopper and I think it handles the time sequences and structure better and gives more vitality to the characters. So, I guess this is one of the rare cases where I prefer film over book.
It seems Ferber has written quite a few classics turned into films, so I am still interested in checking out either Saratoga Trunk, Cimarron, or So Big.
June 2, 2017
4.75 Stars
I remember watching Giant with my mother some twenty or thirty years ago, and I loved, loved the movie. Rock Hudson as Jordan "Bick" Benedict, Elizabeth Taylor as Leslie Lynnton Benedict, and James Dean as Jett Rink; what an incredible cast. And despite 's descriptions of these characters, I could only see the actor's images as I read .
The novel does deviate somewhat from the movie: the beginning is the movie's ending and there is more to the Jett/Leslie angle, rather than the novel's stating that Jett had "a thing" for Leslie from the beginning. Ferber doesn't show this, so as a reader I really couldn't suspend my disbelief on that fact. Ferber didn't show me that relationship. And I deducted a quarter star from my rating because of it. Yes, Jett's motive for his revenge is crystal clear, and Jordan Benedict's hatred of Jett Rink is also clearly defined.
should be read a bit slow because Ferber fills her lovely prose with such detailed descriptions I could feel the winds, smell the mesquite, see the oasis-es on the highway, and so on. As with 's, is making a statement in as well as telling a wonderful story. Ferber hates the giant cattle ranches that are actually fiefdoms, with the Big Man controlling his "people." Instead of Tara's slaves, we have the Mexicans. They are paid rather substandard wages, live in horrid shanties, treated like children as well as made to walk. Walk! Only Mexicans walk."
Bick's Virginian bride has her own ideas.
I don’t think Texas is free at all. Free, the way you said it was. I’ve been here two days and every natural thing I’ve said and done has been forbidden. I’m not reproaching you. I’m just stating a fact that astonishes me. Speaking to the employees as if they were human beings like myself. Wanting to wear pretty clothes in my home. Not liking to eat out of skulls. There are—I’m warning you—certain things I’m going to do, Luz or no Luz.�
“Such as what?�
“I told you yesterday.�
Indeed, Leslie told Bick Benedict. And Texas, the Giant, is free unless you happen to be a Mexican. She helps Jordan Benedict to see them as people and some twenty-five years later, Bick realizes that owning 2 and 1/2 Million acres is obscene. But the discrimination never leaves and eventually touches the great Benedicts.
The book blurb only hints at this magnificent story.
This sweeping tale captures the essence of Texas on a staggering scale as it chronicles the life and times of cattleman Jordan "Bick" Benedict, his naive young society wife, Leslie, and three generations of land-rich sons. A sensational story of power, love, cattle barons, and oil tycoons.
I remember watching Giant with my mother some twenty or thirty years ago, and I loved, loved the movie. Rock Hudson as Jordan "Bick" Benedict, Elizabeth Taylor as Leslie Lynnton Benedict, and James Dean as Jett Rink; what an incredible cast. And despite 's descriptions of these characters, I could only see the actor's images as I read .
The novel does deviate somewhat from the movie: the beginning is the movie's ending and there is more to the Jett/Leslie angle, rather than the novel's stating that Jett had "a thing" for Leslie from the beginning. Ferber doesn't show this, so as a reader I really couldn't suspend my disbelief on that fact. Ferber didn't show me that relationship. And I deducted a quarter star from my rating because of it. Yes, Jett's motive for his revenge is crystal clear, and Jordan Benedict's hatred of Jett Rink is also clearly defined.
should be read a bit slow because Ferber fills her lovely prose with such detailed descriptions I could feel the winds, smell the mesquite, see the oasis-es on the highway, and so on. As with 's, is making a statement in as well as telling a wonderful story. Ferber hates the giant cattle ranches that are actually fiefdoms, with the Big Man controlling his "people." Instead of Tara's slaves, we have the Mexicans. They are paid rather substandard wages, live in horrid shanties, treated like children as well as made to walk. Walk! Only Mexicans walk."
Bick's Virginian bride has her own ideas.
I don’t think Texas is free at all. Free, the way you said it was. I’ve been here two days and every natural thing I’ve said and done has been forbidden. I’m not reproaching you. I’m just stating a fact that astonishes me. Speaking to the employees as if they were human beings like myself. Wanting to wear pretty clothes in my home. Not liking to eat out of skulls. There are—I’m warning you—certain things I’m going to do, Luz or no Luz.�
“Such as what?�
“I told you yesterday.�
Indeed, Leslie told Bick Benedict. And Texas, the Giant, is free unless you happen to be a Mexican. She helps Jordan Benedict to see them as people and some twenty-five years later, Bick realizes that owning 2 and 1/2 Million acres is obscene. But the discrimination never leaves and eventually touches the great Benedicts.
The book blurb only hints at this magnificent story.
This sweeping tale captures the essence of Texas on a staggering scale as it chronicles the life and times of cattleman Jordan "Bick" Benedict, his naive young society wife, Leslie, and three generations of land-rich sons. A sensational story of power, love, cattle barons, and oil tycoons.
October 20, 2021
The movie that is based on this book stars James Dean, One of My grandmother's favorite back in the day and I liked to imagine that she had watched it on cinema as she loved to do so much.
Anywho the book it self was very engaging and intriguing to read. Not the most action packed story but the characters where very intriguing to listen about and I was somehow always curious what was going to happen next
Anywho the book it self was very engaging and intriguing to read. Not the most action packed story but the characters where very intriguing to listen about and I was somehow always curious what was going to happen next
January 9, 2014
I've seen the movie several times on TV and read Cimarron years ago and liked it, so decided it was time to read Giant.
For me, this is one case where the movie is better than the book.
While it deals with some serious issues, racism being one, mostly it reads like a cross between an encyclopedia and a tour-guide book about Texas. There are pages and pages going on about the history of Texas, breeding cattle, Texas, Mexican workers, Texas, etc., then a few paragraphs where something actually happens, then back to the history lessons about Texas again! I confess I finally did a lot of skimming.
3.5 stars
For me, this is one case where the movie is better than the book.
While it deals with some serious issues, racism being one, mostly it reads like a cross between an encyclopedia and a tour-guide book about Texas. There are pages and pages going on about the history of Texas, breeding cattle, Texas, Mexican workers, Texas, etc., then a few paragraphs where something actually happens, then back to the history lessons about Texas again! I confess I finally did a lot of skimming.
3.5 stars
January 9, 2014
This story is about TEXAS. Everything is big in TEXAS. In TEXAS we do things differently, and it's like a whole other country. TEXANS are like no other people. People not from TEXAS couldn't possibly understand what it means to be from TEXAS. Did I mention TEXAS? Okay, I'm done now. I did feel like I was being beaten over the head with it, though. I would actually give this two and a half stars. I enjoyed the book more than I would have thought possible at the beginning. The first four chapters were excruciating. When the book takes us back to the start of Bick and Leslie's relationship, it gets much more interesting. There didn't really seem to be much of a resolution to the story, it just kind of ended, and I wasn't sure what I was supposed to make of it. Not bad, but not great. I'm mildly curious about the movie, but not sure I want to invest 3+ hours in it.
March 13, 2023
There's nothing I can say about this novel that hasn't been said better by others, all I can say is I LOVED it!.
September 23, 2022
Epic that made a much better movie than it did a novel. It's because there is SO much, too much of everything in the print form. Too much of a largest quantity of Texas sized geography, nature, animals, heat etc. etc. As Texas was, not is now. At all. This is a fair rendition for the first half of the 20th century Texas. Telling, telling, telling. At points it reads like an encyclopedia. SLOG.
I couldn't stick with this book. To me the style was so entirely dated that I couldn't stick. Or stay at all involved with what I was reading. And the personality quirks and width make the entire core- MUCH better in the visuals than this was in the word form. Very good actors made the movie at least 4 stars. It is a character-centric look at Texas which holds, for me, very poor dialogue form. Stereotypes mainly rule too, with all that copy on top of it- they are still basically generic.
To me, this was barely 3 stars and very hard to get into at all. Too big, too wide, too deep, too hot, too rich, too poor etc. Just not the type of family epic I might embed within easily at all (Exodus was one I COULD embed within of this writing's era). At times I thought the wife especially was almost cartoonish. I did not read this before 2022 either- but glad I didn't waste my time when young.
I couldn't stick with this book. To me the style was so entirely dated that I couldn't stick. Or stay at all involved with what I was reading. And the personality quirks and width make the entire core- MUCH better in the visuals than this was in the word form. Very good actors made the movie at least 4 stars. It is a character-centric look at Texas which holds, for me, very poor dialogue form. Stereotypes mainly rule too, with all that copy on top of it- they are still basically generic.
To me, this was barely 3 stars and very hard to get into at all. Too big, too wide, too deep, too hot, too rich, too poor etc. Just not the type of family epic I might embed within easily at all (Exodus was one I COULD embed within of this writing's era). At times I thought the wife especially was almost cartoonish. I did not read this before 2022 either- but glad I didn't waste my time when young.
April 23, 2020
The first half of this book, maybe even the first 5/6, was so strong and sweeping and lovely. The characters and setting are so very interesting, and I felt such strong identification with the main character. I don't think it was even intended to be a main theme in the book, but it gives the reader an excellent look at how time and marriage change a person across their lifespan. Edna Ferber has been dinged, despite being a Pulitzer winner, for not being a very highbrow author, that she was more mercenary, more of a trade author than a literary author. The Michael Crichton of 1920-1950's lady literature. I have struggled to evaluate that allegation, maybe because of the age of the book, but she does unquestionably understand how people think and interact, and was therefore able to create a very authentic cast. She makes a fatal flaw, inserts a foolish and amateurish plot detail, that cost the book a great deal of my high opinion, but I forgive it! I forgive it, because so much of it was so fantastic.
The last chunk--say, from the time the children start to grow up until the end--is very rushed and very weak, and there is no real climax or resolution or any kind of good ending. I'm kind of bewildered by her choices in that section, and wonder whether she was receiving deadline pressure or running over a maximum page allotment, because it is so poorly done compared to the rest. But again, just as with the terrible plot choice (which occurs right around the time when we switch from great book to mediocre, like a hinge), I walk away feeling like it was a fabulous book. This was almost a random pick-up, because I did not particularly love her Pulitzer winner, but I am so glad I grabbed this oldie-but-a-goody.
The last chunk--say, from the time the children start to grow up until the end--is very rushed and very weak, and there is no real climax or resolution or any kind of good ending. I'm kind of bewildered by her choices in that section, and wonder whether she was receiving deadline pressure or running over a maximum page allotment, because it is so poorly done compared to the rest. But again, just as with the terrible plot choice (which occurs right around the time when we switch from great book to mediocre, like a hinge), I walk away feeling like it was a fabulous book. This was almost a random pick-up, because I did not particularly love her Pulitzer winner, but I am so glad I grabbed this oldie-but-a-goody.
March 4, 2008
This classic is slow starting read. Part of that is the thought of Texas itself, and part is the character development, which develops only through actions of the characters throughout the book.
The story is told by the actions and curious run on sentences of the characters. The main character, Leslie, is a strong minded woman brought up by her Doctor father to think for herself and do the right thing. When she meets her future Texas big money husband, the sparks fly, and oddly they both seem to like it, and lo they are married.
The rest of the book is about how she, and therefore the reader, learns about how big money ranches in old Texas are run, the people that live on those ranches, and all the tangles two people who are so different and marry quickly can get into.
However, on a deeper level, somewhat disturbing and yet good for soul searching, we see the terrible ways people did and still do live, the sides they live on by birth or choice, and almost finish the book with a sense of dismay until we realize what Leslie is really saying at the end of the book.
I am sure my review leaves you wondering if you should read the book, and the only answer I can give is it depends on the genre of books you like. This was a gift, and though I would never of picked it up, after I finished it, I find I am glad I read it.
(This is my first review ever, so I am unsure what the expectations are. Do I tell you the whole plot or our impressions of the book?)
The story is told by the actions and curious run on sentences of the characters. The main character, Leslie, is a strong minded woman brought up by her Doctor father to think for herself and do the right thing. When she meets her future Texas big money husband, the sparks fly, and oddly they both seem to like it, and lo they are married.
The rest of the book is about how she, and therefore the reader, learns about how big money ranches in old Texas are run, the people that live on those ranches, and all the tangles two people who are so different and marry quickly can get into.
However, on a deeper level, somewhat disturbing and yet good for soul searching, we see the terrible ways people did and still do live, the sides they live on by birth or choice, and almost finish the book with a sense of dismay until we realize what Leslie is really saying at the end of the book.
I am sure my review leaves you wondering if you should read the book, and the only answer I can give is it depends on the genre of books you like. This was a gift, and though I would never of picked it up, after I finished it, I find I am glad I read it.
(This is my first review ever, so I am unsure what the expectations are. Do I tell you the whole plot or our impressions of the book?)
October 4, 2022
3.5 stars, not my favorite but I love Ferber’s story telling. I most certainly will read another. I liked the descriptions of Texas and it’s people for this period of time.
June 14, 2010
Outstanding. I have a feeling there will be a few packages from heading to my house, with Edna Ferber books inside.
The film version of Giant has been one of my favorite movies since high school, when I was in my James Dean phase/TBS frequently showed it of a Sunday afternoon. I think I even read the book back then, but reading a book in high school and reading it as an adult are two very different experiences.
Edna Ferber's writing is so different from what I've been reading lately. At first, I thought it was a little awkward; she doesn't use many commas, and likes to string several adjectives or nouns together. But as I kept reading, I fell more in love with her writing and the book. Describing the ostentatiousness of Jett Rink's hotel, in which everything is branded with his initials: "Downstairs and upstairs, inside and out, on awnings carpets couches chairs desks rugs; towels linen; metal cloth wood china glass, the brand JR was stamped etched embroidered embossed woven painted inlaid." It's hard to even type that, my hands want to put in the commas, but how much stronger it is when it's written that way. My favorite piece of writing comes toward the end of the book, when Ferber is describing the modern goods in the city store windows and refers to "the most acquisitive of vacuum cleaners." That's just gorgeous; I love that phrase.
If you've seen the movie, it is pretty faithful to the book, the biggest change being restoring the Jett Rink airport/hotel party to its chronologically correct place (it's at the beginning of the book). It's the story of a completely different way of life. We are meant to share Leslie's view as an outsider, and be confused, appalled, and enamored with the many aspects of Texas ranching life. The fantastic ballsy egos of the men and women who live there, and how those egos help them survive the tough conditions but blind them to any opposing viewpoints. It's also interesting to read this some 50 years later and realize how the once seemingly forward thinking ideas of Bob Dietz are what probably unintentionally led to the horrible factory farming and agri-business nightmare we have today. Back then, it just seemed like the romantic death of the romanticized "cowboy" way of life that Bick and his neighbors represent.
The ending does leave you wanting more. I fell asleep after finishing it by imagining what would happen to each of the characters. Ask me, and I'll tell you what I dreamed up.
The film version of Giant has been one of my favorite movies since high school, when I was in my James Dean phase/TBS frequently showed it of a Sunday afternoon. I think I even read the book back then, but reading a book in high school and reading it as an adult are two very different experiences.
Edna Ferber's writing is so different from what I've been reading lately. At first, I thought it was a little awkward; she doesn't use many commas, and likes to string several adjectives or nouns together. But as I kept reading, I fell more in love with her writing and the book. Describing the ostentatiousness of Jett Rink's hotel, in which everything is branded with his initials: "Downstairs and upstairs, inside and out, on awnings carpets couches chairs desks rugs; towels linen; metal cloth wood china glass, the brand JR was stamped etched embroidered embossed woven painted inlaid." It's hard to even type that, my hands want to put in the commas, but how much stronger it is when it's written that way. My favorite piece of writing comes toward the end of the book, when Ferber is describing the modern goods in the city store windows and refers to "the most acquisitive of vacuum cleaners." That's just gorgeous; I love that phrase.
If you've seen the movie, it is pretty faithful to the book, the biggest change being restoring the Jett Rink airport/hotel party to its chronologically correct place (it's at the beginning of the book). It's the story of a completely different way of life. We are meant to share Leslie's view as an outsider, and be confused, appalled, and enamored with the many aspects of Texas ranching life. The fantastic ballsy egos of the men and women who live there, and how those egos help them survive the tough conditions but blind them to any opposing viewpoints. It's also interesting to read this some 50 years later and realize how the once seemingly forward thinking ideas of Bob Dietz are what probably unintentionally led to the horrible factory farming and agri-business nightmare we have today. Back then, it just seemed like the romantic death of the romanticized "cowboy" way of life that Bick and his neighbors represent.
The ending does leave you wanting more. I fell asleep after finishing it by imagining what would happen to each of the characters. Ask me, and I'll tell you what I dreamed up.
August 8, 2010
I had seen the movie twice and really admired it the second time around--great performances, well-written, and the photography of the endless Texas prairie was breathtaking. It's plain to see from the first chapter that the movie was an excellent adaptation of Ferber's book, although I'm disappointed in her. She doesn't quite pace her storytelling very well here. She spends copious pages showing us the early marriage of Leslie and Bick Benedict, how his staunch Texas idealism clashes with her Virginia liberalism, and while that's all fun and well-done, Ferber rushes through more fascinating circumstances in their lives in the last 100 pages as if she just got tired of keeping up so much with these characters, but I wasn't tired of it! I would have liked to see Bick's reaction to Jordy's announcement that he had married Juana instead of catch back up with them all years after the fact. I wanted to see what ultimately happened with Jett Rink at the airport terminal opening and whether Leslie ever chooses to tell Bick about the discrimination they experienced at the lunch counter. Alas, Giant is all setup and no real climax or resolution. I don't ask for these things in every book I read, but this particular one was leading up to these elements and never gave them to us. Ferber's a great writer, however, and I look forward to reading her other books.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
December 7, 2016
This was a rip roaring all American novel worthy of its five star rating. It starts off with a big Texas party and then goes into the past when the main characters Jordan and Leslie meet.
Granted that it was written in the early 1950's it still has men and women in their stereotypical roles. There was no gender equality in this story and in certain parts it definately screams out. But aside from that, it is mostly a novel of Texas. And in Texas people do things bigger. At times Ferber's writing made me feel as though I was expirencing the ranch land first hand.
Another prickly issue in this story was about the Mexican people. I had a hard time with this part because part of my family is Mexican. This might be a bit spoilerish... It is the same issue that the Original People have dealt with all over the world. Different people come in and claim the land. And in doing so the Orignal People get treated badly and lose many of the wonderful things they once cherished.
But you have to look at the story this way, it was written in Mid Century America when many things were done differently. If it were written today it would have a completly different feel to it.
I am glad I took the time to read this one.
Granted that it was written in the early 1950's it still has men and women in their stereotypical roles. There was no gender equality in this story and in certain parts it definately screams out. But aside from that, it is mostly a novel of Texas. And in Texas people do things bigger. At times Ferber's writing made me feel as though I was expirencing the ranch land first hand.
Another prickly issue in this story was about the Mexican people. I had a hard time with this part because part of my family is Mexican. This might be a bit spoilerish... It is the same issue that the Original People have dealt with all over the world. Different people come in and claim the land. And in doing so the Orignal People get treated badly and lose many of the wonderful things they once cherished.
But you have to look at the story this way, it was written in Mid Century America when many things were done differently. If it were written today it would have a completly different feel to it.
I am glad I took the time to read this one.
August 5, 2016
Giant is full of conflicts and contrasting influences.
There is the eastern woman dropped into the radically different culture of
Texas. There is the contrast between rich white landowners and poor hispanic
laborers. There is the confrontation between oil and cattle, between Benedict
and Rink, between sister in law and wife.
With all these dramatic contrasts, I was somewhat disappointed in the lack
of resolution. It seems that Ferber, rather than laying out a plot with
conflicts, build-up, and resolution, is giving us a character study, a
portrait of so many interesting situations, but without evolution and
resolution.
Having seen the movie years ago, I was expecting to see a change in Bick's
character, a growth or change, but I did not see it. The book is rich, witty
and artistic in its portrayal of a larger than life early twentieth century
Texas, and I fully enjoyed that. At the end, though, it seemed to fall
apart without resoving the conflicts that had been established.
There is the eastern woman dropped into the radically different culture of
Texas. There is the contrast between rich white landowners and poor hispanic
laborers. There is the confrontation between oil and cattle, between Benedict
and Rink, between sister in law and wife.
With all these dramatic contrasts, I was somewhat disappointed in the lack
of resolution. It seems that Ferber, rather than laying out a plot with
conflicts, build-up, and resolution, is giving us a character study, a
portrait of so many interesting situations, but without evolution and
resolution.
Having seen the movie years ago, I was expecting to see a change in Bick's
character, a growth or change, but I did not see it. The book is rich, witty
and artistic in its portrayal of a larger than life early twentieth century
Texas, and I fully enjoyed that. At the end, though, it seemed to fall
apart without resoving the conflicts that had been established.
April 3, 2021
This book was amazing. Well probably I'm biased, but it had all the elements I love in a well told story. The characters wereÌý flawed, complex, likable and interesting to read about. The story lasted more that 25 years and it was interesting to see how people changed or some things stayed very constant. And next to amazing characters there was Texas so vast and unlike the rest of America. Of course I can't judge if that's true, but still. I loved this glimpse in Texas history, "traditions" and people mentality in that particular period of time so unlike compared to everything I have read about.
Simply amazing, interesting and well written story.
Simply amazing, interesting and well written story.
January 23, 2024
Despite the fact that I’m a native Texas - one of a long line of Texans - I had never read this “iconic� book. I had never even seen the film. But at the beginning of the year I was passing through Marfa, Texas, and my road-trip partner pointed out the Hotel Paisano - where Elizabeth Taylor, Rock Hudson, James Dean and various others stayed during the making of the film. To my delight, the hotel had a copy - and with the memory of the Trans-Pecos landscape fresh in my mind, I began reading it on the plane ride back to London from Austin.
The author, Edna Ferber, was a really interesting person: she was a career writer (first journalism, and then books and plays) - and she never married. She wrote another book called So Big that won the Pulitzer Prize, and it describes a woman who successfully runs a farm in Illinois. (I read it a few years ago with a Pulitzer Prize reading group, and it was one of the few novels that we unanimously loved.) Ferber’s work always has a feminist slant, but sometimes you have to look for it. In this case, the character of Leslie Lynnton - a Virginian who comes to Texas as a bride - is the outsider who draws attention to the underlying sexism and racism of the “great state of Texas.�
Giant was written in the early 1950s and they made the famous film of it only a few years after that. I’ve long been fascinated by the social history of the United States, and how the post-war 1950s became this culturally conservative era after several decades of women making all sorts of important advancements in terms of equality with men. This tension really plays out in the marriage between Leslie and Jordan “Bick� Benedict - who are the main characters. The novel is told from a third-person point of view, and yet it is Leslie’s experience and conscience which shapes it. The role of the “outsider� is absolutely crucial.
The book shows the ugliness of Texas while simultaneously playing to the exaggerated, mythic aspects of it. It doesn’t shy away from demonstrating how enormous fortunes, held by a relatively small number of people, were made by exploiting natural resources and people. Historically, it captures a moment of transition: it’s set in between the 1920s and 1950s, at the moment when the discovery of oil displaced the big cattle ranches.
As previously mentioned, Leslie is from Virginia - which is the “old world� to Texas’s frontier. Her father is an important doctor who is devoted to his work. Dr. Lynnton has only had daughters and he has encouraged them to be intelligent, well-informed and confident in holding their place in any conversation or debate. When Bick Benedict comes to Virginia to buy a horse, he becomes intrigued by Leslie - who is so unlike the Texas women he knows - and within a matter of days, he whisks her off to his enormous ranch in Texas. Leslie is fascinated by Texas, but from the beginning - from their first breakfast in Virginia - she and Bick argue about the state’s history. I suppose their “sparks fly� attraction is romantic, but for a more modern sensibility, It’s obvious that their relationship is based on nothing much more than sexual attraction and the fascination of opposites. From the very beginning, and throughout their marriage, Bick is nettled by Leslie’s curiosity, intelligence and social conscience. She is disgusted by the sexism and racism she encounters in Texas and is always trying to challenge that status quo. I hated the way that Bick is attracted to the way that Leslie is different from the Texas women he has known, (despite himself, you get the feeling), and then always holds it against her. At least the author Edna Ferber does get in some licks, though. In one of their big fights, Bick asks Leslie, “When are you going to settle down and behave like everyone else?� And she replies, emphatically: “Never!�
Bick was probably a more appealing romantic hero in the 1950s. He hasn’t aged well, particularly since his desire and need for absolute power and control is his defining personality characteristic. His obsession is cross-breeding cattle to achieve the “perfect� specimen for meat quality and animal health - in other words, he wants to both create new life and better what has previously existed. Nothing matters to him more than Reata, his enormous ranch, and he will go to any lengths to maintain its boundaries, its traditions and its power.
One of the things that really interested me about the book was the relationship between Texas and Mexico - and how porous the border has always been, both literally and culturally. The book touches upon various aspects of how these huge Texas ranches were created and then preserved. The white European “Americans� used all sorts of trickery to cheat the Spanish land grant owners, who arguably had their own dubious claims to all of this land. The storyline really does explore the relationship between the Mexican vaqueros on the ranch and the white owners - and there are all of these contradictions in terms of how their lives are intermingled and yet also kept rigidly separate. (Understandably, there is far more detail of this relationship in the book than in the film.)
There is an important moment in the book when Bick’s older uncle (“Uncle Bawley�) admits to Leslie that “the whole of Texas was built on the bent backs of Mexicans.� Of course that is not the line that her husband takes, and we are shown how the local ranch owners and powerful men make sure that their Mexican employees always vote in line with their employers.
Still, Ferber is hopeful enough about the state of Texas - and the United States - to write a story in which social attitudes and racial barriers begin to change in the next generation.
I don’t think this book is a masterpiece, by any means, but it did have some interesting insights into the past and present (circa 1950s) of Texas. It doesn’t have the depth of a book like East of Eden, but it was undeniably entertaining.
The author, Edna Ferber, was a really interesting person: she was a career writer (first journalism, and then books and plays) - and she never married. She wrote another book called So Big that won the Pulitzer Prize, and it describes a woman who successfully runs a farm in Illinois. (I read it a few years ago with a Pulitzer Prize reading group, and it was one of the few novels that we unanimously loved.) Ferber’s work always has a feminist slant, but sometimes you have to look for it. In this case, the character of Leslie Lynnton - a Virginian who comes to Texas as a bride - is the outsider who draws attention to the underlying sexism and racism of the “great state of Texas.�
Giant was written in the early 1950s and they made the famous film of it only a few years after that. I’ve long been fascinated by the social history of the United States, and how the post-war 1950s became this culturally conservative era after several decades of women making all sorts of important advancements in terms of equality with men. This tension really plays out in the marriage between Leslie and Jordan “Bick� Benedict - who are the main characters. The novel is told from a third-person point of view, and yet it is Leslie’s experience and conscience which shapes it. The role of the “outsider� is absolutely crucial.
The book shows the ugliness of Texas while simultaneously playing to the exaggerated, mythic aspects of it. It doesn’t shy away from demonstrating how enormous fortunes, held by a relatively small number of people, were made by exploiting natural resources and people. Historically, it captures a moment of transition: it’s set in between the 1920s and 1950s, at the moment when the discovery of oil displaced the big cattle ranches.
As previously mentioned, Leslie is from Virginia - which is the “old world� to Texas’s frontier. Her father is an important doctor who is devoted to his work. Dr. Lynnton has only had daughters and he has encouraged them to be intelligent, well-informed and confident in holding their place in any conversation or debate. When Bick Benedict comes to Virginia to buy a horse, he becomes intrigued by Leslie - who is so unlike the Texas women he knows - and within a matter of days, he whisks her off to his enormous ranch in Texas. Leslie is fascinated by Texas, but from the beginning - from their first breakfast in Virginia - she and Bick argue about the state’s history. I suppose their “sparks fly� attraction is romantic, but for a more modern sensibility, It’s obvious that their relationship is based on nothing much more than sexual attraction and the fascination of opposites. From the very beginning, and throughout their marriage, Bick is nettled by Leslie’s curiosity, intelligence and social conscience. She is disgusted by the sexism and racism she encounters in Texas and is always trying to challenge that status quo. I hated the way that Bick is attracted to the way that Leslie is different from the Texas women he has known, (despite himself, you get the feeling), and then always holds it against her. At least the author Edna Ferber does get in some licks, though. In one of their big fights, Bick asks Leslie, “When are you going to settle down and behave like everyone else?� And she replies, emphatically: “Never!�
Bick was probably a more appealing romantic hero in the 1950s. He hasn’t aged well, particularly since his desire and need for absolute power and control is his defining personality characteristic. His obsession is cross-breeding cattle to achieve the “perfect� specimen for meat quality and animal health - in other words, he wants to both create new life and better what has previously existed. Nothing matters to him more than Reata, his enormous ranch, and he will go to any lengths to maintain its boundaries, its traditions and its power.
One of the things that really interested me about the book was the relationship between Texas and Mexico - and how porous the border has always been, both literally and culturally. The book touches upon various aspects of how these huge Texas ranches were created and then preserved. The white European “Americans� used all sorts of trickery to cheat the Spanish land grant owners, who arguably had their own dubious claims to all of this land. The storyline really does explore the relationship between the Mexican vaqueros on the ranch and the white owners - and there are all of these contradictions in terms of how their lives are intermingled and yet also kept rigidly separate. (Understandably, there is far more detail of this relationship in the book than in the film.)
There is an important moment in the book when Bick’s older uncle (“Uncle Bawley�) admits to Leslie that “the whole of Texas was built on the bent backs of Mexicans.� Of course that is not the line that her husband takes, and we are shown how the local ranch owners and powerful men make sure that their Mexican employees always vote in line with their employers.
Still, Ferber is hopeful enough about the state of Texas - and the United States - to write a story in which social attitudes and racial barriers begin to change in the next generation.
I don’t think this book is a masterpiece, by any means, but it did have some interesting insights into the past and present (circa 1950s) of Texas. It doesn’t have the depth of a book like East of Eden, but it was undeniably entertaining.
February 15, 2025
Giant � based on the book by Edna Ferber
9 out of 10
Giant is a remarkable motion picture, one of only three that James Dean acted in, the legendary actor that starred in Rebel Without a Cause and has started with East of Eden where the glorious Montgomery Clift, by his absence, allowed a new star to be born, just like he did for Paul Newman, who has had his first chance with Somebody Up There Loves Me, and then Marlon Brando, who would light up the screen in On the Waterfront, three major motion pictures and a trio of superstars, in the real sense of the word.
We learn about this and much more from the fundamental Adventures in The Screen Trade written by William Goldman, who has won two Academy Awards, for the script for Butch Cassidy and The Sundance Kid and All The President’s Men, a wondrous author who explains in his quintessential work the movie business, from spicy details to why the ‘author film� is a myth…we find about Burt Lancaster, one of the magicians, and how he said that his knees would tremble in the presence of Montgomery Clift, such a great power he had.
Paul Newman and Clint Eastwood are the only two actors that Goldman knows to be above the need to hear hymns dedicated to them, actors are very needy, and they need to hear they are the best, the screenplay will only work if they are in the picture, in order to take on a project, their egos are so self-centered that we are astonished at what some can do (with the expectations mentioned) for instance, Dustin Hoffman on the set of Marathon Man, where the iconic Laurence Olivier had a supporting role, and Hoffman the leading one
The majestic Laurence Olivier had been very ill, and his health was precarious while participating in the production of Marathon Man only this did not prevent Dustin Hoffman from taking the British legend around, trying to show he has the leading role and to overcome the intimating feelings he must have had, when facing the giant, one was frivolous and petty, the other professional, august, grandiose, illustrious�
Evidently, Dustin Hoffman has some memorable performances, one such is in the splendid The Graduate a marvelous masterpiece that I need to watch again (and read the book, which is equally enchanting and captivating, superb) but with the Marathon Man, Hoffman had another annoying, rude behavior, as he was supposed to wake up in the night in his role, when his brother comes to his home, he would fuss over the scene, refusing to go along with the script that had him using a flashlight, and keeping the other actor and the crew waiting for a long time, because he would not want his fans to see him as less macho…in any case, a silly, senseless, preposterous attitude, one that is nonetheless common with stars.
From the same fabulous Adventures in the Screen Trade we find the flaws of the ‘author films�, there was a time (we are still there in some ways) when films by creators such as Alfred Hitchcock were worshipped, and William Goldman dismantles the notion, first of all, indicating that after Hitchcock had been sanctified for his magnum opera, he would start making lesser works, such as Birds and it takes a whole team to make a film, producers, writers, actors, and often other members of the crew are just as important�
Without the spectacular main theme by Vangelis, Chariots of Fire would not have been the tremendous success, just like Jaws, without the Special Effects would not have gained the box office fortune it had and the examples are man, in these times, special effects have gained so much weight that we could argue they make the motion pictures more substantial, especially the ones that I refuse to watch, the Marvel universe and the genre that invades screens, big and small, with notable exceptions, The Matrix would be one
Giant, to say a few words about the supposed subject of this note, has not just a quartet of actors that impress, from Elizabeth Taylor � I think the part that overwhelmed this cinephile most is that from Who’s Afraid of Virginia Wolf though she was also divine in Cat on A Hot Tin Roof, with Paul Newman as her partner � to Rock Hudson (who was gay and died of AIDS, in an age when his notoriety helped raise awareness of the deadly disease) James Dean and the upcoming Denis Hopper, who would become a phenomenal actor, but also a difficult fellow
Denis Hopper was instrumental, one of the creators of the landmark, historical Easy Rider made with Peter Fonda and launching the career of Jack Nicholson, notwithstanding the fact that Robert Evans claims to have been the one to discover the best actor in the world � this is what I believed, albeit I placed him on the same pedestal with our very own George Constantin, one that is unknown alas, but just as damn fantastic.
Robert Evans had started as an actor, then he would become a producer and head of Paramount Pictures, the one behind chefs d’oeuvre like The Godfather, Chinatown, Rosemary’s Baby and the very successful (though I do not like it at all) Love Story, who wrote his own Adventures in the Screen Trade, in the autobiographical The Kid Stays in The Picture telling you about the making of the aforementioned pictures, and others, his going to see Vladimir Nabokov, connections with Nicholson, Kissinger, Ali McGraw, Ryan O’Neill (something of a scoundrel), Sharon Stone and so many, many more, in an extraordinary book, which contains many exaggerations, surely�
Now for a question, and invitation � maybe you have a good idea on how we could make more than a million dollars with this � as it is, this is a unique technique, which we could promote, sell, open the Oscars show with or something and then make lots of money together, if you have the how, I have the product, I just do not know how to get the befits from it, other than the exercise per se
As for my role in the Revolution that killed Ceausescu, a smaller Mao, there it is
9 out of 10
Giant is a remarkable motion picture, one of only three that James Dean acted in, the legendary actor that starred in Rebel Without a Cause and has started with East of Eden where the glorious Montgomery Clift, by his absence, allowed a new star to be born, just like he did for Paul Newman, who has had his first chance with Somebody Up There Loves Me, and then Marlon Brando, who would light up the screen in On the Waterfront, three major motion pictures and a trio of superstars, in the real sense of the word.
We learn about this and much more from the fundamental Adventures in The Screen Trade written by William Goldman, who has won two Academy Awards, for the script for Butch Cassidy and The Sundance Kid and All The President’s Men, a wondrous author who explains in his quintessential work the movie business, from spicy details to why the ‘author film� is a myth…we find about Burt Lancaster, one of the magicians, and how he said that his knees would tremble in the presence of Montgomery Clift, such a great power he had.
Paul Newman and Clint Eastwood are the only two actors that Goldman knows to be above the need to hear hymns dedicated to them, actors are very needy, and they need to hear they are the best, the screenplay will only work if they are in the picture, in order to take on a project, their egos are so self-centered that we are astonished at what some can do (with the expectations mentioned) for instance, Dustin Hoffman on the set of Marathon Man, where the iconic Laurence Olivier had a supporting role, and Hoffman the leading one
The majestic Laurence Olivier had been very ill, and his health was precarious while participating in the production of Marathon Man only this did not prevent Dustin Hoffman from taking the British legend around, trying to show he has the leading role and to overcome the intimating feelings he must have had, when facing the giant, one was frivolous and petty, the other professional, august, grandiose, illustrious�
Evidently, Dustin Hoffman has some memorable performances, one such is in the splendid The Graduate a marvelous masterpiece that I need to watch again (and read the book, which is equally enchanting and captivating, superb) but with the Marathon Man, Hoffman had another annoying, rude behavior, as he was supposed to wake up in the night in his role, when his brother comes to his home, he would fuss over the scene, refusing to go along with the script that had him using a flashlight, and keeping the other actor and the crew waiting for a long time, because he would not want his fans to see him as less macho…in any case, a silly, senseless, preposterous attitude, one that is nonetheless common with stars.
From the same fabulous Adventures in the Screen Trade we find the flaws of the ‘author films�, there was a time (we are still there in some ways) when films by creators such as Alfred Hitchcock were worshipped, and William Goldman dismantles the notion, first of all, indicating that after Hitchcock had been sanctified for his magnum opera, he would start making lesser works, such as Birds and it takes a whole team to make a film, producers, writers, actors, and often other members of the crew are just as important�
Without the spectacular main theme by Vangelis, Chariots of Fire would not have been the tremendous success, just like Jaws, without the Special Effects would not have gained the box office fortune it had and the examples are man, in these times, special effects have gained so much weight that we could argue they make the motion pictures more substantial, especially the ones that I refuse to watch, the Marvel universe and the genre that invades screens, big and small, with notable exceptions, The Matrix would be one
Giant, to say a few words about the supposed subject of this note, has not just a quartet of actors that impress, from Elizabeth Taylor � I think the part that overwhelmed this cinephile most is that from Who’s Afraid of Virginia Wolf though she was also divine in Cat on A Hot Tin Roof, with Paul Newman as her partner � to Rock Hudson (who was gay and died of AIDS, in an age when his notoriety helped raise awareness of the deadly disease) James Dean and the upcoming Denis Hopper, who would become a phenomenal actor, but also a difficult fellow
Denis Hopper was instrumental, one of the creators of the landmark, historical Easy Rider made with Peter Fonda and launching the career of Jack Nicholson, notwithstanding the fact that Robert Evans claims to have been the one to discover the best actor in the world � this is what I believed, albeit I placed him on the same pedestal with our very own George Constantin, one that is unknown alas, but just as damn fantastic.
Robert Evans had started as an actor, then he would become a producer and head of Paramount Pictures, the one behind chefs d’oeuvre like The Godfather, Chinatown, Rosemary’s Baby and the very successful (though I do not like it at all) Love Story, who wrote his own Adventures in the Screen Trade, in the autobiographical The Kid Stays in The Picture telling you about the making of the aforementioned pictures, and others, his going to see Vladimir Nabokov, connections with Nicholson, Kissinger, Ali McGraw, Ryan O’Neill (something of a scoundrel), Sharon Stone and so many, many more, in an extraordinary book, which contains many exaggerations, surely�
Now for a question, and invitation � maybe you have a good idea on how we could make more than a million dollars with this � as it is, this is a unique technique, which we could promote, sell, open the Oscars show with or something and then make lots of money together, if you have the how, I have the product, I just do not know how to get the befits from it, other than the exercise per se
As for my role in the Revolution that killed Ceausescu, a smaller Mao, there it is
January 13, 2025
I enjoyed the setup, but the rest was a slog. Some entertaining moments scattered throughout, then it just kinda ends!
May 22, 2022
Really three and a half stars. Character-centric novel about a wealthy Texas cattle ranch family.
September 17, 2018
I'm going to the ACCC. I bought this novel expecting an "epic inter-generational family saga, sweeping across the vast Texan plains" as advertised. Instead I got a primer on the great state of Texas. The reader, personified by our delicate naïve Eastern bride Leslie asks the questions and her big bold Texian husband Bick, lord of the immense Reata ranch acreage answers:
“‘Get this, If you can understand anything that isn't Virgina and pink coats and hunt dinners and Washington tea parties. Just get this. I run Reata. I run Holgado. I run the damn wet Humedo Division and Los Gatos too and a lot you've never head of. Everything in them and on them is run by me. I run everything and everyone that has the Reata brand on it'"
Leslie when sightseeing:-
"Leslie bought a guidebook and a concise history of the city, modern and debunked. She walked about reading from these, one finger between the pages, her gaze going from book to object in approved tourist fashion.
"You can't do that!" the Texans protested, outraged.
'Mmm - San Antonio," mumbled Leslie. "Who named it San Antonio?"
The Texans stared at one another. "Uh-"
Her forefinger traced down the page. "Let's see...Don Domingo Teran de los Rios, with Father Damian Massanet and an escort of fifty soldiers...June 1691...came upon Rancheria of Payayas...What's a Payaya?"
"Indian tribe," Bick replied briskly."
Leslie is a bore. Bick is a bore. Texas is a bore. Nothing happens for the whole 384 pages. Only the beginning and end of the book (in which the one lively character, Jett Rink, is central) are of interest. The middle is a desert.
See my reviews here
“‘Get this, If you can understand anything that isn't Virgina and pink coats and hunt dinners and Washington tea parties. Just get this. I run Reata. I run Holgado. I run the damn wet Humedo Division and Los Gatos too and a lot you've never head of. Everything in them and on them is run by me. I run everything and everyone that has the Reata brand on it'"
Leslie when sightseeing:-
"Leslie bought a guidebook and a concise history of the city, modern and debunked. She walked about reading from these, one finger between the pages, her gaze going from book to object in approved tourist fashion.
"You can't do that!" the Texans protested, outraged.
'Mmm - San Antonio," mumbled Leslie. "Who named it San Antonio?"
The Texans stared at one another. "Uh-"
Her forefinger traced down the page. "Let's see...Don Domingo Teran de los Rios, with Father Damian Massanet and an escort of fifty soldiers...June 1691...came upon Rancheria of Payayas...What's a Payaya?"
"Indian tribe," Bick replied briskly."
Leslie is a bore. Bick is a bore. Texas is a bore. Nothing happens for the whole 384 pages. Only the beginning and end of the book (in which the one lively character, Jett Rink, is central) are of interest. The middle is a desert.
See my reviews here
February 15, 2016
Ferber is incredibly adept at observing relationships. In Giant, the marriage of larger-than-life Texas rancher Bick Benedict and Virginia socialite Leslie Lynnton is the central relationship, with their friends, families, children, and ranch workers spinning around them and intertwining. The novel begins building up to an incident when Bick and Leslie are middle-aged, then goes back to recount their meeting, whirlwind courtship and marriage, and disorienting first days in Texas. Bick and Leslie struggle with their relationship to each other and the ranch; this struggle is amplified in their children as Jordy and Luz grow up entrenched in a changing world. The novel's climactic end includes a few scenes from the week preceding the incident related at beginning of the book. Like in So Big, Ferber ends this novel abruptly with characters facing poignant questions.
Though dramatic at times, some of the middle of the novel moves slowly, and there are many details about the ranch, its work, and the Texan landscape.
This novel paints a vivid picture of a piece of American history, and explores themes of progress, of land, of marriage, of the parent-child relationship, of size, of success, of power, of right and wrong. The sense of place is strong, and the characters leap off the pages, many of them into the reader's heart. The questions Ferber asks are still relevant today, and this novel deserves to be read more widely.
.
Though dramatic at times, some of the middle of the novel moves slowly, and there are many details about the ranch, its work, and the Texan landscape.
This novel paints a vivid picture of a piece of American history, and explores themes of progress, of land, of marriage, of the parent-child relationship, of size, of success, of power, of right and wrong. The sense of place is strong, and the characters leap off the pages, many of them into the reader's heart. The questions Ferber asks are still relevant today, and this novel deserves to be read more widely.
.
February 10, 2025
DNF @ about 65%. Girl shut the fuck up about how big Texas is
The opening of this thing introduces you to 100 characters, which is kind of fun, and then you hit this enemies-to-lovers meet cute in Virginia that really rips along. But then the protagonist arrives in Texas and it just becomes corny, dusty REBECCA and loses all momentum.
It's funny -- Ferber's writing is pretty uniformly fabulous but for every iconic character she develops (Uncle Bawley I love you, Vashti I think you're neat but you're on thin ice) there are 4-5 dud male characters that popped up in every scene just to say something annoying. Pass!
The opening of this thing introduces you to 100 characters, which is kind of fun, and then you hit this enemies-to-lovers meet cute in Virginia that really rips along. But then the protagonist arrives in Texas and it just becomes corny, dusty REBECCA and loses all momentum.
It's funny -- Ferber's writing is pretty uniformly fabulous but for every iconic character she develops (Uncle Bawley I love you, Vashti I think you're neat but you're on thin ice) there are 4-5 dud male characters that popped up in every scene just to say something annoying. Pass!
June 18, 2021
I've watched the movie many times. It was fun to read it and get some background info the movie left out. I was surprised that the book takes a much more critical view of Texas than the movie.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 400 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.