What do you think?
Rate this book
袪邪蟹谐芯胁芯褉 褋芯 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪
Prizing ideas above all else, radical thinker Baruch Spinoza left little behind in the way of personal facts and furnishings. But what of the tug of necessity, the urgings of the flesh, to which this genius philosopher (and grinder of lenses) might have been no more immune than the next man-or the next character, as Baruch Spinoza becomes in this intriguing novel by the remarkable young Macedonian author Goce Smilevski.
Smilevski's novel brings the thinker Spinoza, all inner life, into conversation with the outer, all-too-real facts of his life and his day--from his connection to the Jewish community of Amsterdam, his excommunication in 1656, and the emergence of his philosophical system to his troubling feelings for his fourteen-year-old Latin teacher Clara Maria van den Enden and later his disciple Johannes Casearius. From this conversation there emerges a compelling and complex portrait of the life of an idea--and of a man who tries to live that idea.
Smilevski's novel brings the thinker Spinoza, all inner life, into conversation with the outer, all-too-real facts of his life and his day--from his connection to the Jewish community of Amsterdam, his excommunication in 1656, and the emergence of his philosophical system to his troubling feelings for his fourteen-year-old Latin teacher Clara Maria van den Enden and later his disciple Johannes Casearius. From this conversation there emerges a compelling and complex portrait of the life of an idea--and of a man who tries to live that idea.
169 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 2002
12 people are currently reading
440 people want to read
About the author
Goce Smilevski
8听books4听followersGoce Smilevski (b.1975) was born in Skopje, Macedonia. He was educated at the Sts Kiril and Metodij University in Skopje, at Charles University in Prague and at the Central European University in Budapest. He is the author of the novels The Planet of Inexperience, Conversation with Spinoza and Sigmund Freud鈥檚 Sister. He won Macedonian Novel of the Year Award in 2003 for Conversation with Spinoza. In 2006, he was also awarded the Central European Initiative Fellowship for young European authors.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 34 reviews
March 24, 2021
袗褍 泻邪泻胁邪 泻薪懈谐邪 懈 薪械 屑懈 褋械 胁械褉褍胁邪 写械泻邪 薪械 褋褍屑 褬邪 锌褉芯褔懈褌邪谢邪 写芯褋械谐邪!
袩褉械泻褉邪褋薪邪 泻薪懈谐邪, 锌褉械泻褉邪褋薪邪. 袨写 薪邪褔懈薪芯褌 薪邪 泻芯褬褕褌芯 械 薪邪锌懈褕邪薪邪, 写芯 褌械屑懈褌械 泻芯懈 褋械 芯锌褎邪褌械薪懈, 写芯 褋邪屑懈芯褌 锌芯写胁懈谐 写邪 褋械 胁谢械蟹械 胁芯 褍屑芯褌 薪邪 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪, 屑邪泻邪褉 懈 蟹邪屑懈褋谢械薪芯.
袣芯谢泻褍 锌褉械泻褉邪褋薪懈 泻芯薪褑械锌褌懈 蟹邪 卸懈胁芯褌芯褌, 芯写薪芯褋懈褌械 褋芯 写褉褍谐懈褌械 谢褍褤械, 斜芯褉斜邪褌邪 锌芯屑械褤褍 褉邪蟹褍屑芯褌 懈 褋褉褑械褌芯, 芯写薪芯褋薪芯 褋械褌懈谢邪褌邪. 袨褋邪屑械薪芯褋褌邪, 薪芯 懈 胁芯 谐芯谢械屑 写械谢 芯写斜褉邪薪斜械薪懈褌械 屑械褏邪薪懈蟹屑懈 泻芯懈 谐懈 褋芯蟹写邪胁邪屑械 蟹邪 写邪 褋械 蟹邪褕褌懈褌懈屑械, 邪 褌懈械 褋邪屑芯 薪猫 芯褌褍褤褍胁邪邪褌. 袩芯褋谢械写薪芯胁芯 屑芯卸械斜懈 薪械 械 褌芯谢泻褍 写懈褉械泻褌薪芯 薪邪锌懈褕邪薪芯, 薪芯 褬邪褋 写芯斜懈胁 褌邪泻胁芯 褔褍胁褋褌胁芯.
袩褉械泻褉邪褋薪邪 泻薪懈谐邪. 袛褍褉懈 懈 写邪 薪械 褋褌械 谐芯谢械屑 褭褍斜懈褌械谢 薪邪 褎懈谢芯蟹芯褎懈褬邪, 写械褎懈薪懈褌懈胁薪芯 褌褉械斜邪 写邪 褬邪 锌褉芯褔懈褌邪褌械 泻薪懈谐邪胁邪!
袩褉械泻褉邪褋薪邪 泻薪懈谐邪, 锌褉械泻褉邪褋薪邪. 袨写 薪邪褔懈薪芯褌 薪邪 泻芯褬褕褌芯 械 薪邪锌懈褕邪薪邪, 写芯 褌械屑懈褌械 泻芯懈 褋械 芯锌褎邪褌械薪懈, 写芯 褋邪屑懈芯褌 锌芯写胁懈谐 写邪 褋械 胁谢械蟹械 胁芯 褍屑芯褌 薪邪 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪, 屑邪泻邪褉 懈 蟹邪屑懈褋谢械薪芯.
袣芯谢泻褍 锌褉械泻褉邪褋薪懈 泻芯薪褑械锌褌懈 蟹邪 卸懈胁芯褌芯褌, 芯写薪芯褋懈褌械 褋芯 写褉褍谐懈褌械 谢褍褤械, 斜芯褉斜邪褌邪 锌芯屑械褤褍 褉邪蟹褍屑芯褌 懈 褋褉褑械褌芯, 芯写薪芯褋薪芯 褋械褌懈谢邪褌邪. 袨褋邪屑械薪芯褋褌邪, 薪芯 懈 胁芯 谐芯谢械屑 写械谢 芯写斜褉邪薪斜械薪懈褌械 屑械褏邪薪懈蟹屑懈 泻芯懈 谐懈 褋芯蟹写邪胁邪屑械 蟹邪 写邪 褋械 蟹邪褕褌懈褌懈屑械, 邪 褌懈械 褋邪屑芯 薪猫 芯褌褍褤褍胁邪邪褌. 袩芯褋谢械写薪芯胁芯 屑芯卸械斜懈 薪械 械 褌芯谢泻褍 写懈褉械泻褌薪芯 薪邪锌懈褕邪薪芯, 薪芯 褬邪褋 写芯斜懈胁 褌邪泻胁芯 褔褍胁褋褌胁芯.
袩褉械泻褉邪褋薪邪 泻薪懈谐邪. 袛褍褉懈 懈 写邪 薪械 褋褌械 谐芯谢械屑 褭褍斜懈褌械谢 薪邪 褎懈谢芯蟹芯褎懈褬邪, 写械褎懈薪懈褌懈胁薪芯 褌褉械斜邪 写邪 褬邪 锌褉芯褔懈褌邪褌械 泻薪懈谐邪胁邪!
February 26, 2023
Upliv u nepoznato 膷esto zna da bude pra膰en razo膷aranjima, sa moje ta膷ke gledi拧ta i kroz pre膽a拧nja iskustva, daleko vi拧e nego odu拧evljenjima. Iz te perspektive Goce Smilevski predstavlja i upliv u nepoznati knji啪evni svet, ali istovremeno i jedno veoma pozitivno iznena膽enje, bar kada je re膷 o knjizi Razgovor sa Spinozom.
Knjiga je zami拧ljena veoma intimno, kada je u pitanju sam 膷italac, zato 拧to je autor zamislio da razgovar sa Spinozom vodi upravo osoba koja 膷ita. To je postignuto na taj na膷in 拧to je ostavljeno prazno mesto gde mo啪e da se upi拧e ime, s mo啪e i da se zamisli da pi拧e vlastito ime 膷itaoca (kao 拧to sam i sam uradio, naprosto mi je bilo 啪ao da pi拧em po knjizi 馃檪) tako da se Spinoza obra膰a Miroslavu, Marku, Ivani ili bilo kome ko 膷ita delo. Na taj na膷in malo podse膰a na Pavi膰a, ali opet druga膷iji je stil pisanja, kao i tematika kojom se autor bavi.
Delo je kombinacija filozofije (koja nije optere膰uju膰a, 拧ablonskog copy paste formata, ve膰 u duhu toka radnje), biografije, religioznog promi拧ljanja, rekao bih i samog autora i laganog ljubavnog dela. Neobi膷no i veoma interesantno.
"Zar je to va啪no, Spinoza, zar je va啪no 拧to su te radnje prolazne: za拧to da se sopstvena prolaznost provede u razmi拧ljanju o ve膷nim stvarima (koje su i tako ve膷ne), a u propu拧tanju prolaznih stvari, onih za koje je potrebna krajnja pa啪nja da bi bile prime膰ene, budu膰i da se ra膽aju i umiru iz trenutka u trenutak, (...) za拧to da se uzalud ustremljuje拧 ka ve膷nom i beskona膷nom, kada bi mogao, iako to traje samo trenutak, da do啪ivi拧 pulsiranje onoga ograni膷enog i prolaznog?"
Kroz odnos Spinoze i Klare Marije pro啪imaju se i ideali o ve膷nim idejama i metafizici, sa prolazno拧膰u i ograni膷enim elementima misli i 膷ove膷ijeg 啪ivota. Koja je razlika izme膽u tela i misli odnosno 膷ove膷ijeg duha? Da li se kroz duh kao metafizi膷ki i beskona膷an element 膷oveka nastavlja i nadogra膽uje misao samog 膷oveka, da li dolazi do napretka ili je i 啪ivot misli ograni膷en jedino na ono 拧to je putem teksta ostavljeno generacijama? Kroz ideale Spinozine misli autor nas lagano vodi kroz njegovu biografiju, ali i na zanimljiv na膷in opisanu Evropu 17. veka. Lepo su opisani obi膷aji tog doba, kultura, prisutne slobode, inkvizicija, zabrane i zablude. Fiktivno je opisan i mogu膰i razlog za ekskomunikaciju Spinoze iz hebrejske zajednice, koji u istoriji nigde ne mo啪e da sigurno拧膰u da se prona膽e. Dakle ovo je kombinacija i fikcije i istorije povezane sa biografijom slavnog filozofa. A samo膰a kojoj Spinoza te啪i predstavlja samog autora, odnosno predstavlja izvor koji autoru dariva re膷i, koji ga 膷ini piscem.
Veoma zanimljivo delo, napisano avangardno, ali istovremeno i u skladu sa utvr膽enim knji啪evnim pravilima uz obilje elemenata za saznavanje i neizmerno u啪ivanje. Nadam se da od Gocea dolazi jo拧 ovakvih tekstova.
"...osam dana nakon ro膽enja dobio sam ime Bento, a kasnije su me zvali i Baruh i Benediktus, a sva tri imena imala su isto zna膷enje- blagosloven, iako bi mom 啪ivotu mo啪da vi拧e odgovaralo moje prezime, koje je dolazilo od portugalske re膷i espinosa- trn. Biti blagosloven trn, ili blagosloven me膽u trnjem, blagosloviti trnje ili, pak, blagoslovenog baciti u trnje."
Knjiga je zami拧ljena veoma intimno, kada je u pitanju sam 膷italac, zato 拧to je autor zamislio da razgovar sa Spinozom vodi upravo osoba koja 膷ita. To je postignuto na taj na膷in 拧to je ostavljeno prazno mesto gde mo啪e da se upi拧e ime, s mo啪e i da se zamisli da pi拧e vlastito ime 膷itaoca (kao 拧to sam i sam uradio, naprosto mi je bilo 啪ao da pi拧em po knjizi 馃檪) tako da se Spinoza obra膰a Miroslavu, Marku, Ivani ili bilo kome ko 膷ita delo. Na taj na膷in malo podse膰a na Pavi膰a, ali opet druga膷iji je stil pisanja, kao i tematika kojom se autor bavi.
Delo je kombinacija filozofije (koja nije optere膰uju膰a, 拧ablonskog copy paste formata, ve膰 u duhu toka radnje), biografije, religioznog promi拧ljanja, rekao bih i samog autora i laganog ljubavnog dela. Neobi膷no i veoma interesantno.
"Zar je to va啪no, Spinoza, zar je va啪no 拧to su te radnje prolazne: za拧to da se sopstvena prolaznost provede u razmi拧ljanju o ve膷nim stvarima (koje su i tako ve膷ne), a u propu拧tanju prolaznih stvari, onih za koje je potrebna krajnja pa啪nja da bi bile prime膰ene, budu膰i da se ra膽aju i umiru iz trenutka u trenutak, (...) za拧to da se uzalud ustremljuje拧 ka ve膷nom i beskona膷nom, kada bi mogao, iako to traje samo trenutak, da do啪ivi拧 pulsiranje onoga ograni膷enog i prolaznog?"
Kroz odnos Spinoze i Klare Marije pro啪imaju se i ideali o ve膷nim idejama i metafizici, sa prolazno拧膰u i ograni膷enim elementima misli i 膷ove膷ijeg 啪ivota. Koja je razlika izme膽u tela i misli odnosno 膷ove膷ijeg duha? Da li se kroz duh kao metafizi膷ki i beskona膷an element 膷oveka nastavlja i nadogra膽uje misao samog 膷oveka, da li dolazi do napretka ili je i 啪ivot misli ograni膷en jedino na ono 拧to je putem teksta ostavljeno generacijama? Kroz ideale Spinozine misli autor nas lagano vodi kroz njegovu biografiju, ali i na zanimljiv na膷in opisanu Evropu 17. veka. Lepo su opisani obi膷aji tog doba, kultura, prisutne slobode, inkvizicija, zabrane i zablude. Fiktivno je opisan i mogu膰i razlog za ekskomunikaciju Spinoze iz hebrejske zajednice, koji u istoriji nigde ne mo啪e da sigurno拧膰u da se prona膽e. Dakle ovo je kombinacija i fikcije i istorije povezane sa biografijom slavnog filozofa. A samo膰a kojoj Spinoza te啪i predstavlja samog autora, odnosno predstavlja izvor koji autoru dariva re膷i, koji ga 膷ini piscem.
Veoma zanimljivo delo, napisano avangardno, ali istovremeno i u skladu sa utvr膽enim knji啪evnim pravilima uz obilje elemenata za saznavanje i neizmerno u啪ivanje. Nadam se da od Gocea dolazi jo拧 ovakvih tekstova.
"...osam dana nakon ro膽enja dobio sam ime Bento, a kasnije su me zvali i Baruh i Benediktus, a sva tri imena imala su isto zna膷enje- blagosloven, iako bi mom 啪ivotu mo啪da vi拧e odgovaralo moje prezime, koje je dolazilo od portugalske re膷i espinosa- trn. Biti blagosloven trn, ili blagosloven me膽u trnjem, blagosloviti trnje ili, pak, blagoslovenog baciti u trnje."
February 17, 2018
袠 锌芯 胁褌芯褉 锌邪褌, 屑邪械褋褌褉邪谢薪芯 锌邪褌褍胁邪褮械. 楔褌芯 写邪 泻邪卸邪屑 懈蟹谢懈褕薪芯 械.
February 11, 2018
袚械薪懈褬邪谢薪芯. 袪械屑械泻 写械谢芯.
July 25, 2014
袠褋褌懈薪褋泻芯 锌褉械写懈蟹胁懈泻邪褌械谢褋褌胁芯 褋懈 械 褉芯屑邪薪褗褌-锌邪褟卸懈薪邪 薪邪 袚芯褑械 小屑懈谢械胁褋泻懈. 小锌芯褉械写 锌懈褋邪褌械谢褟 锌邪褟卸懈薪邪褌邪 褋械 芯褌谢懈褔邪胁邪 芯褌 谢邪斜懈褉懈薪褌邪 锌芯 褌芯胁邪, 褔械 锌褉懈 薪械褟 芯褌泻褗写械褌芯 懈 写邪 褌褉褗谐薪械褕, 屑芯卸械 写邪 写芯褋褌懈谐薪械褕 写芯 胁褋褟泻褗写械. 孝褍泻 褌褉褍写薪芯 褖械 薪邪屑械褉懈褌械 褌褉邪写懈褑懈芯薪薪邪褌邪 褋褌褉褍泻褌褍褉邪 薪邪 械写薪芯 褏褍写芯卸械褋褌胁械薪芯 锌褉芯懈蟹胁械写械薪懈褟 鈥� 械泻褋锌芯蟹懈褑懈褟, 蟹邪胁褉褗蟹泻邪, 泻褍谢屑懈薪邪褑懈褟 懈 褉邪蟹胁褉褗蟹泻邪. 袠 邪泻芯 胁褋械 锌邪泻 芯褌泻褉懈械褌械 褌械褏薪懈 械谢械屑械薪褌懈, 褖械 褋械 懈蟹薪械薪邪写邪褌械 泻邪褌芯 谐懈 褋褉械褖薪械褌械 写胁邪 锌褗褌懈. 小谢械写胁邪泄泻懈 褉邪蟹胁懈褌懈械褌芯 薪邪 褎懈谢芯褋芯褎褋泻懈褌械 胁褗蟹谐谢械写懈 薪邪 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪, 褉芯屑邪薪褗褌 锌褉械褋褗蟹写邪胁邪 卸懈胁芯褌邪 屑褍 写胁邪 锌褗褌懈. 袨褌薪邪褔邪谢芯 锌褗褉胁芯谢懈褔薪芯 芯褌 屑谢邪写懈褟 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪 泻邪褌芯 锌褉械写褋褌邪胁懈褌械谢 薪邪 homo intellectialis, 锌芯-泻褗褋薪芯 芯褌 胁褗蟹褉邪褋褌薪懈褟 胁械褔械 homo sentimentalis.
袟邪锌芯屑薪褟褖懈 褋械 褍褋械褖邪薪懈褟, 褏邪褉屑芯薪懈褉邪褖懈 褋 褉邪蟹胁懈褌懈械褌芯 薪邪 褎懈谢芯褋芯褎褋泻懈褌械 懈写械懈 薪邪 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪, 褌懈褏芯褌芯, 薪械薪邪褌褉邪锌胁邪褖芯 褋械 锌褉械泻谢芯薪械薪懈械 薪邪 邪胁褌芯褉邪 锌褉械写 卸懈胁芯褌邪 懈 褋邪屑芯褌邪褌邪 屑褍.
袝褌芯 褌邪泻邪 褋械 芯锌谢械褌芯褏 胁 锌邪褟卸懈薪邪褌邪 薪邪 褌芯蟹懈 褉芯屑邪薪.
鈥炐曆傂� 蟹邪褌芯胁邪 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪.鈥� 鈥� 褖械 芯褌谐芯胁芯褉懈, 邪泻芯 谐芯 锌芯锌懈褌邪褌械, 锌懈褋邪褌械谢褟褌.
袩褉芯褔械褌懈 锌芯胁械褔械:
袟邪锌芯屑薪褟褖懈 褋械 褍褋械褖邪薪懈褟, 褏邪褉屑芯薪懈褉邪褖懈 褋 褉邪蟹胁懈褌懈械褌芯 薪邪 褎懈谢芯褋芯褎褋泻懈褌械 懈写械懈 薪邪 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪, 褌懈褏芯褌芯, 薪械薪邪褌褉邪锌胁邪褖芯 褋械 锌褉械泻谢芯薪械薪懈械 薪邪 邪胁褌芯褉邪 锌褉械写 卸懈胁芯褌邪 懈 褋邪屑芯褌邪褌邪 屑褍.
袝褌芯 褌邪泻邪 褋械 芯锌谢械褌芯褏 胁 锌邪褟卸懈薪邪褌邪 薪邪 褌芯蟹懈 褉芯屑邪薪.
鈥炐曆傂� 蟹邪褌芯胁邪 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪.鈥� 鈥� 褖械 芯褌谐芯胁芯褉懈, 邪泻芯 谐芯 锌芯锌懈褌邪褌械, 锌懈褋邪褌械谢褟褌.
袩褉芯褔械褌懈 锌芯胁械褔械:
October 16, 2017
Jak na pierwszy kontakt z literatur膮 macedo艅sk膮 - rewelacja!
Bardzo dobra ksi膮偶ka. GS od偶egnuje si臋 od postmodernizmu, staraj膮c si臋 dowie艣膰, 偶e napisa艂 powie艣膰 'romantyczn膮'... To czemu dorzuca "smaczki", jakich nie powstydzi艂by si臋 jakikolwiek pisarz oklejony 艂atk膮 "POST"? Ale nie zamierzam komukolwiek psu膰 lektury - spojler贸w nie b臋dzie!
U艂omno艣ci (nieliczne) nikn膮 wobec bardzo sp贸jnej narracji i niezwykle ciekawej fabu艂y.
Ciekawa i m膮dra opowie艣膰.
Bardzo dobra ksi膮偶ka. GS od偶egnuje si臋 od postmodernizmu, staraj膮c si臋 dowie艣膰, 偶e napisa艂 powie艣膰 'romantyczn膮'... To czemu dorzuca "smaczki", jakich nie powstydzi艂by si臋 jakikolwiek pisarz oklejony 艂atk膮 "POST"? Ale nie zamierzam komukolwiek psu膰 lektury - spojler贸w nie b臋dzie!
U艂omno艣ci (nieliczne) nikn膮 wobec bardzo sp贸jnej narracji i niezwykle ciekawej fabu艂y.
Ciekawa i m膮dra opowie艣膰.
September 5, 2021
陌臒ren莽, sa莽ma, s谋k谋c谋, ba艧ka kitaplardan al谋nt谋 bir hikaye
June 11, 2021
Felsefesini ve panteist evren/do臒a-tanr谋 g枚r眉艧眉n眉 kendime yak谋n buldu臒um Spinoza'n谋n hayat谋n谋n, duygular谋n谋n ve felsefesinin d眉艧眉nsel (homo intellectualis) ve duygusal (homo sentimentalis) olmak 眉zere farkl谋 bak谋艧 a莽谋lar谋 ile iki k谋s谋mda yarat谋c谋 bir 眉莽l眉 sohbet 艧eklinde kurgulanm谋艧 biyografik bir roman olan, gen莽 yetenek Smilevski'nin bu eserini be臒eni ile alt谋n谋 莽izerek okudum.
Kitaba ba艧lad谋ktan k谋sa s眉re sonra y谋llar 枚nce okumu艧 oldu臒um Spinoza'n谋n Etika's谋n谋 raftan indirip tekrar g枚zden ge莽irmenin yararl谋 olaca臒谋n谋 d眉艧眉nd眉m ve bu tekrar okuman谋n fazlas谋yla yarar谋n谋 g枚rd眉m.
De臒erlendirmemi be艧 y谋ld谋z olarak yapmama ra臒men yazar谋n, Spinoza'n谋n bu konularda hakk谋nda 莽ok 艧ey bilinmeyen ve kesinli臒i olmayan biseks眉el ve nekrofilik duygular ta艧谋d谋臒谋n谋 枚ne 莽谋karmas谋n谋 pek ho艧 ve adil bulmad谋臒谋m谋 da belirtmeliyim. Bunu yazar谋n, kitab谋n sonundaki "Sonu莽 Yerine: Neden Spinoza" b枚l眉m眉nde ifade etti臒i 眉zere kendi bak谋艧 a莽谋s谋na ve bir bak谋ma ilgiyi art谋rmak ama莽l谋 oyun oynama 枚zg眉rl眉臒眉ne veriyor ve puan k谋rm谋yorum ;)
Kitaba ba艧lad谋ktan k谋sa s眉re sonra y谋llar 枚nce okumu艧 oldu臒um Spinoza'n谋n Etika's谋n谋 raftan indirip tekrar g枚zden ge莽irmenin yararl谋 olaca臒谋n谋 d眉艧眉nd眉m ve bu tekrar okuman谋n fazlas谋yla yarar谋n谋 g枚rd眉m.
De臒erlendirmemi be艧 y谋ld谋z olarak yapmama ra臒men yazar谋n, Spinoza'n谋n bu konularda hakk谋nda 莽ok 艧ey bilinmeyen ve kesinli臒i olmayan biseks眉el ve nekrofilik duygular ta艧谋d谋臒谋n谋 枚ne 莽谋karmas谋n谋 pek ho艧 ve adil bulmad谋臒谋m谋 da belirtmeliyim. Bunu yazar谋n, kitab谋n sonundaki "Sonu莽 Yerine: Neden Spinoza" b枚l眉m眉nde ifade etti臒i 眉zere kendi bak谋艧 a莽谋s谋na ve bir bak谋ma ilgiyi art谋rmak ama莽l谋 oyun oynama 枚zg眉rl眉臒眉ne veriyor ve puan k谋rm谋yorum ;)
February 13, 2014
"袪邪蟹谐芯胁芯褉 褋褗褋 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪:
鈥溞犘靶沸承拘残狙€ 褋褗褋 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪鈥� 械 锌芯褋褌屑芯写械褉械薪 褉芯屑邪薪-锌邪褟卸懈薪邪, 泻芯泄褌芯 芯锌谢懈褌邪 褔懈褌邪褌械谢褟 芯褌 锌褗褉胁邪褌邪 写芯 锌芯褋谢械写薪邪褌邪 褋褌褉邪薪懈褑邪. 袚褉邪薪懈褑邪褌邪 屑械卸写褍 谐械褉芯褟, 泻芯泄褌芯 褉邪蟹谐芯胁邪褉褟 褋褗褋 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪, 懈 褔懈褌邪褌械谢褟 械 褉邪蟹屑懈褌邪. 小屑懈谢械胁褋泻懈 褌懈 锌芯蟹胁芯谢褟胁邪 写邪 褋械 胁泻谢褞褔懈褕 胁 褉邪蟹谐芯胁芯褉邪 鈥� 褌邪屑, 泻褗写械褌芯 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪 褋械 芯斜褉褗褖邪 泻褗屑 谐械褉芯褟 锌芯 懈屑械, 懈屑邪 锌褉邪蟹薪懈 褌芯褔泻懈. 袦褟褋褌芯褌芯 蟹邪 褌胁芯械褌芯 懈屑械. 袠 褌邪泻邪 褉芯屑邪薪褗褌 薪械 械 薪邪锌懈褋邪薪 胁械写薪褗卸 鈥� 芯褌 袚芯褑械 小屑懈谢械胁褋泻懈. 孝芯泄 褋械 褋褗蟹写邪胁邪, 锌褉芯屑械薪褟 懈 褉邪蟹胁懈胁邪 胁褋械泻懈 锌褗褌, 泻芯谐邪褌芯 芯褖械 械写懈薪 褔懈褌邪褌械谢 褋械 芯锌谢懈褌邪 胁 屑褉械卸懈褌械 屑褍.
袧邪 锌褉褗胁 锌芯谐谢械写 懈写械褟褌邪 械 锌褉芯褋褌懈褔泻邪 鈥� 写邪 褋械 锌褉芯褋谢械写懈 斜懈芯谐褉邪褎懈褟褌邪 薪邪 懈蟹胁械褋褌薪懈褟 褎懈谢芯褋芯褎 袘邪褉褍褏 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪. 袙 锌褗褉胁邪褌邪 锌芯谢芯胁懈薪邪 薪邪 褉芯屑邪薪邪 小屑懈谢械胁褋泻懈 褉懈褋褍胁邪 褋械褉懈芯蟹薪懈褟 懈 褉邪褑懈芯薪邪谢械薪 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪. 肖懈谢芯褋芯褎褗褌 锌褉械卸懈胁褟胁邪 褉械写懈褑邪 泻邪褌邪泻谢懈蟹屑懈: 屑邪泄泻邪 屑褍 懈 斜褉邪褌 屑褍 褍屑懈褉邪褌, 芯褌谢褗褔械薪 械 芯褌 械胁褉械泄褋泻邪褌邪 芯斜褖薪芯褋褌, 薪邪锌褍褋泻邪 屑谢邪写邪褌邪 袣谢邪褉邪 袦邪褉懈褟 懈 谐芯薪懈 褍褔械薪懈泻邪 褋懈 袡芯邪薪 袣邪蟹械邪褉懈褍褋, 蟹邪 写邪 褋械 芯褌褌褗褉褋懈 芯褌 褔褍胁褋褌胁邪褌邪, 泻芯懈褌芯 屑芯谐邪褌 写邪 锌芯锌褉械褔邪褌 薪邪 褉邪蟹胁懈褌懈械褌芯 薪邪 褎懈谢芯褋芯褎懈褟褌邪 屑褍. 袠 薪褟泻邪泻 褋懈 懈蟹谐谢械卸写邪, 褔械 薪懈褖芯 芯褌 褌芯胁邪 薪械 屑褍 锌芯胁谢懈褟胁邪. 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪 褉邪蟹泻邪蟹胁邪 蟹邪 褌械蟹懈 褋褗斜懈褌懈褟 斜械蟹 械屑芯褑懈褟 懈 斜械蟹 褔褍胁褋褌胁芯 褋褟泻邪褕 褋邪 褋械 褋谢褍褔懈谢懈 写褉褍谐懈屑褍.
袙褌芯褉邪褌邪 锌芯谢芯胁懈薪邪 薪邪 褉芯屑邪薪邪 械 褋褗胁褋械屑 褉邪蟹谢懈褔薪邪. 袛芯泻邪褌芯 胁 锌褗褉胁邪褌邪 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪 屑懈褋谢懈, 胁褗胁 胁褌芯褉邪褌邪 褌芯泄 褔褍胁褋褌胁邪. 小屑褗褉褌褌邪 薪邪 屑邪泄泻邪 屑褍 芯褋褌邪胁褟 褋械褉懈芯蟹械薪 斜械谢械谐 胁褗褉褏褍 锌芯-薪邪褌邪褌褗褕薪懈褟 屑褍 卸懈胁芯褌. 袨褌谢褗褔胁邪薪械褌芯 屑褍 芯褌 械胁褉械泄褋泻邪褌邪 芯斜褖薪芯褋褌 谐芯 写芯胁械卸写邪 写芯 锌褗谢薪邪 懈蟹芯谢邪褑懈褟 懈 斜芯谢械蟹薪械薪邪 褋邪屑芯褌邪. 袩褉懈胁褗褉蟹邪薪芯褋褌褌邪 屑褍 泻褗屑 袣谢邪褉邪 袦邪褉懈褟 懈 袡芯邪薪 袣邪蟹械邪褉懈褍褋 谐芯 泻邪褉邪褌 写邪 褋械 褋褗屑薪褟胁邪 胁 褉邪褑懈芯薪邪谢薪芯褌芯 褋懈 褉械褕械薪懈械 写邪 褋械 芯褌泻邪卸械 芯褌 褋邪薪褌懈屑械薪褌邪谢薪芯褋褌褌邪 胁 懈屑械褌芯 薪邪 褉邪蟹褍屑邪:
袩褉芯褔械褌懈 锌芯胁械褔械:
鈥溞犘靶沸承拘残狙€ 褋褗褋 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪鈥� 械 锌芯褋褌屑芯写械褉械薪 褉芯屑邪薪-锌邪褟卸懈薪邪, 泻芯泄褌芯 芯锌谢懈褌邪 褔懈褌邪褌械谢褟 芯褌 锌褗褉胁邪褌邪 写芯 锌芯褋谢械写薪邪褌邪 褋褌褉邪薪懈褑邪. 袚褉邪薪懈褑邪褌邪 屑械卸写褍 谐械褉芯褟, 泻芯泄褌芯 褉邪蟹谐芯胁邪褉褟 褋褗褋 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪, 懈 褔懈褌邪褌械谢褟 械 褉邪蟹屑懈褌邪. 小屑懈谢械胁褋泻懈 褌懈 锌芯蟹胁芯谢褟胁邪 写邪 褋械 胁泻谢褞褔懈褕 胁 褉邪蟹谐芯胁芯褉邪 鈥� 褌邪屑, 泻褗写械褌芯 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪 褋械 芯斜褉褗褖邪 泻褗屑 谐械褉芯褟 锌芯 懈屑械, 懈屑邪 锌褉邪蟹薪懈 褌芯褔泻懈. 袦褟褋褌芯褌芯 蟹邪 褌胁芯械褌芯 懈屑械. 袠 褌邪泻邪 褉芯屑邪薪褗褌 薪械 械 薪邪锌懈褋邪薪 胁械写薪褗卸 鈥� 芯褌 袚芯褑械 小屑懈谢械胁褋泻懈. 孝芯泄 褋械 褋褗蟹写邪胁邪, 锌褉芯屑械薪褟 懈 褉邪蟹胁懈胁邪 胁褋械泻懈 锌褗褌, 泻芯谐邪褌芯 芯褖械 械写懈薪 褔懈褌邪褌械谢 褋械 芯锌谢懈褌邪 胁 屑褉械卸懈褌械 屑褍.
袧邪 锌褉褗胁 锌芯谐谢械写 懈写械褟褌邪 械 锌褉芯褋褌懈褔泻邪 鈥� 写邪 褋械 锌褉芯褋谢械写懈 斜懈芯谐褉邪褎懈褟褌邪 薪邪 懈蟹胁械褋褌薪懈褟 褎懈谢芯褋芯褎 袘邪褉褍褏 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪. 袙 锌褗褉胁邪褌邪 锌芯谢芯胁懈薪邪 薪邪 褉芯屑邪薪邪 小屑懈谢械胁褋泻懈 褉懈褋褍胁邪 褋械褉懈芯蟹薪懈褟 懈 褉邪褑懈芯薪邪谢械薪 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪. 肖懈谢芯褋芯褎褗褌 锌褉械卸懈胁褟胁邪 褉械写懈褑邪 泻邪褌邪泻谢懈蟹屑懈: 屑邪泄泻邪 屑褍 懈 斜褉邪褌 屑褍 褍屑懈褉邪褌, 芯褌谢褗褔械薪 械 芯褌 械胁褉械泄褋泻邪褌邪 芯斜褖薪芯褋褌, 薪邪锌褍褋泻邪 屑谢邪写邪褌邪 袣谢邪褉邪 袦邪褉懈褟 懈 谐芯薪懈 褍褔械薪懈泻邪 褋懈 袡芯邪薪 袣邪蟹械邪褉懈褍褋, 蟹邪 写邪 褋械 芯褌褌褗褉褋懈 芯褌 褔褍胁褋褌胁邪褌邪, 泻芯懈褌芯 屑芯谐邪褌 写邪 锌芯锌褉械褔邪褌 薪邪 褉邪蟹胁懈褌懈械褌芯 薪邪 褎懈谢芯褋芯褎懈褟褌邪 屑褍. 袠 薪褟泻邪泻 褋懈 懈蟹谐谢械卸写邪, 褔械 薪懈褖芯 芯褌 褌芯胁邪 薪械 屑褍 锌芯胁谢懈褟胁邪. 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪 褉邪蟹泻邪蟹胁邪 蟹邪 褌械蟹懈 褋褗斜懈褌懈褟 斜械蟹 械屑芯褑懈褟 懈 斜械蟹 褔褍胁褋褌胁芯 褋褟泻邪褕 褋邪 褋械 褋谢褍褔懈谢懈 写褉褍谐懈屑褍.
袙褌芯褉邪褌邪 锌芯谢芯胁懈薪邪 薪邪 褉芯屑邪薪邪 械 褋褗胁褋械屑 褉邪蟹谢懈褔薪邪. 袛芯泻邪褌芯 胁 锌褗褉胁邪褌邪 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪 屑懈褋谢懈, 胁褗胁 胁褌芯褉邪褌邪 褌芯泄 褔褍胁褋褌胁邪. 小屑褗褉褌褌邪 薪邪 屑邪泄泻邪 屑褍 芯褋褌邪胁褟 褋械褉懈芯蟹械薪 斜械谢械谐 胁褗褉褏褍 锌芯-薪邪褌邪褌褗褕薪懈褟 屑褍 卸懈胁芯褌. 袨褌谢褗褔胁邪薪械褌芯 屑褍 芯褌 械胁褉械泄褋泻邪褌邪 芯斜褖薪芯褋褌 谐芯 写芯胁械卸写邪 写芯 锌褗谢薪邪 懈蟹芯谢邪褑懈褟 懈 斜芯谢械蟹薪械薪邪 褋邪屑芯褌邪. 袩褉懈胁褗褉蟹邪薪芯褋褌褌邪 屑褍 泻褗屑 袣谢邪褉邪 袦邪褉懈褟 懈 袡芯邪薪 袣邪蟹械邪褉懈褍褋 谐芯 泻邪褉邪褌 写邪 褋械 褋褗屑薪褟胁邪 胁 褉邪褑懈芯薪邪谢薪芯褌芯 褋懈 褉械褕械薪懈械 写邪 褋械 芯褌泻邪卸械 芯褌 褋邪薪褌懈屑械薪褌邪谢薪芯褋褌褌邪 胁 懈屑械褌芯 薪邪 褉邪蟹褍屑邪:
袩褉芯褔械褌懈 锌芯胁械褔械:
March 8, 2015
The last part of the novel, that actually isn't the novel, just a postscriptum where the author explains why he chose Spinoza as main character of his novel pretty much compensated the bland first part and the less bland and more poetic second part.
Call me a prude, but I'm not a fan when a writer oversexualizes a character's life (especially if s/he is/was REAL) - here Smilevski turns poor Spinoza into a necrophiliac (gross!) and into a latent gay (in my opinion, a bit over the top). Yes, I know, when not much is known about a person, one can imagine millions of lives of him/her, but still...the oversexualization, I just can't.
Also, I didn't like how Smilevski incorporated parts of Spinoza's philosophy into the dialogues - it felt so dull and lazy, as if he just took the original text of Spinoza's Ethics and put it into the philosopher's mouth every time he opened it.
Still, despite these totally subjective remarks of mine, I think the novel is technically very original - Smilevski structured it as a conversation between the reader and Spinoza (you could write in your name on a line intended for the reader's name).
So I guess if it weren't for his technical innovation, I would give the book 2 stars.
Call me a prude, but I'm not a fan when a writer oversexualizes a character's life (especially if s/he is/was REAL) - here Smilevski turns poor Spinoza into a necrophiliac (gross!) and into a latent gay (in my opinion, a bit over the top). Yes, I know, when not much is known about a person, one can imagine millions of lives of him/her, but still...the oversexualization, I just can't.
Also, I didn't like how Smilevski incorporated parts of Spinoza's philosophy into the dialogues - it felt so dull and lazy, as if he just took the original text of Spinoza's Ethics and put it into the philosopher's mouth every time he opened it.
Still, despite these totally subjective remarks of mine, I think the novel is technically very original - Smilevski structured it as a conversation between the reader and Spinoza (you could write in your name on a line intended for the reader's name).
So I guess if it weren't for his technical innovation, I would give the book 2 stars.
May 20, 2022
Un libro coraggioso e sperimentale per certi versi.
Coraggioso perch茅 tratta di un personaggio quasi mitico della filosofia e del pensiero occidentale ricostruendo con la fantasia i tratti della sua personalit脿 da alcuni eventi della sua vita. Per alcuni potrebbe sembrare un'operazione quasi sacrilega, per altri liberatoria e foriera di libert脿 innanzitutto intellettuali. E si tratta di una libert脿 di cui abbiamo estremamente bisogno nel mondo omologato sin nel pensiero che le previsioni algiritmiche del mercato ci dipingono davanti agli occhi.
Sperimentale (almeno in parte) perch茅 sceglie come espediente narrativo quello del dialogo tra il personaggio e lo scrittore in un rimando immaginario tra passato e presente o in una dimensione senza tempo che chiede sin dal principio del romanzo una forte immersione nella finzione poetica.
Un romanzo molto pensato e costruito, la cui costruzione in alcuni momenti pare emergere al di sotto della narrazione e svelare il meccanismo della messa on scena rendendola pi霉 rigida e meno naturale.
Coraggioso perch茅 tratta di un personaggio quasi mitico della filosofia e del pensiero occidentale ricostruendo con la fantasia i tratti della sua personalit脿 da alcuni eventi della sua vita. Per alcuni potrebbe sembrare un'operazione quasi sacrilega, per altri liberatoria e foriera di libert脿 innanzitutto intellettuali. E si tratta di una libert脿 di cui abbiamo estremamente bisogno nel mondo omologato sin nel pensiero che le previsioni algiritmiche del mercato ci dipingono davanti agli occhi.
Sperimentale (almeno in parte) perch茅 sceglie come espediente narrativo quello del dialogo tra il personaggio e lo scrittore in un rimando immaginario tra passato e presente o in una dimensione senza tempo che chiede sin dal principio del romanzo una forte immersione nella finzione poetica.
Un romanzo molto pensato e costruito, la cui costruzione in alcuni momenti pare emergere al di sotto della narrazione e svelare il meccanismo della messa on scena rendendola pi霉 rigida e meno naturale.
June 17, 2023
Premesse buone, intenzioni discrete, svolgimento altalenante e conclusione confusa. Non 猫 semplice cercare di tradurre le algide dimostrazioni more geometrico in un linguaggio da romanzo; qualche volta l'operazione 猫 riuscita, come quando ci si chiede insistentemente cosa si possa conoscere con i sensi; altre volte il tentativo risulta artificioso.
Poi mi sembra fuori luogo la ripetizione costante di improbabili immagini sessuali, addirittura uno Spinoza che sogna di avere un rapporto con un suo allievo...Non ci siamo! 3 stelle e non di meno solo per rispetto di Spinoza
Poi mi sembra fuori luogo la ripetizione costante di improbabili immagini sessuali, addirittura uno Spinoza che sogna di avere un rapporto con un suo allievo...Non ci siamo! 3 stelle e non di meno solo per rispetto di Spinoza
June 29, 2021
"...胁芯 写械谢芯褌芯 薪械屑邪 懈褉芯薪懈褬邪, 写懈褋褌邪薪褑邪 懈 褑懈薪懈蟹邪屑, 褌褉懈 谐谢邪胁薪懈 褌芯褔泻懈, 锌褉芯锌芯胁械写邪薪懈 芯写 褌芯谢泻褍胁邪褔懈褌械 薪邪 屑芯写械褉薪邪褌邪, 薪邪 泻芯褬邪 芯胁邪 写械谢芯 褋械泻邪泻芯 薪械 懈 锌褉懈锌邪褤邪. 袨胁邪 械 薪邪褬蟹邪写芯褑薪械褌芯褌芯 写械谢芯 薪邪, 芯写 薪邪褕械胁芯 褍屑薪芯 胁褉械屑械, 锌褉械蟹褉械薪懈芯褌 褉芯屑邪薪褌懈蟹邪屑. 袨胁写械 褋械薪褌懈屑械薪褌邪谢薪芯褋褌邪 懈 械 褋锌褉芯褌懈胁褋褌邪胁械薪邪 薪邪 褉邪褑懈芯薪邪谢薪芯褋褌邪. " - 芯写 锌芯谐芯胁芯褉芯褌 薪邪 小屑懈谢械胁褋泻懈.
January 4, 2018
Reading the world in books: Macedonia.
May 30, 2018
袦芯卸械谢芯 懈 褌邪泻邪.
March 11, 2019
U skadu sa narativom, ovaj roman izbacuje iz tela dok se 膷ita.
March 22, 2020
Uitstekende inleiding in leven en werk van Spinoza.
December 17, 2020
袩褉械泻褉邪褋薪邪 泻薪懈谐邪, 芯写谢懈褔械薪 褋锌芯褬 薪邪 泻薪懈卸械胁薪邪 褌械褏薪懈泻邪 褋芯 褎懈谢芯蟹芯褎褋泻芯 褉邪蟹斜懈褉邪褮械.
November 16, 2022
Kirja, jonka haluaisin lukea uudestaan.
October 25, 2023
Country: North Macedonia
December 21, 2024
This book is a dive into a psychological discussion about life and death filled with a thoughtful examples of Spinosa鈥檚 observations of life.
October 10, 2020
Prikaz ovde:
March 8, 2025
械写薪邪 芯写 锌芯薪械薪芯褉屑邪谢薪懈褌械 泻薪懈谐懈 薪邪锌懈褕邪薪懈 薪邪 屑邪泻械写芯薪褋泻懈 褬邪蟹懈泻!
褋械泻芯褬邪 褋褌褉邪薪邪, 褋械泻芯褬 蟹斜芯褉, 褋械泻芯褬 屑芯屑械薪褌 械 锌械褉褎械泻褑懈褬邪 胁芯 泻薪懈谐邪胁邪!
褋械泻芯褬邪 褋褌褉邪薪邪, 褋械泻芯褬 蟹斜芯褉, 褋械泻芯褬 屑芯屑械薪褌 械 锌械褉褎械泻褑懈褬邪 胁芯 泻薪懈谐邪胁邪!
June 16, 2014
袣薪懈谐邪褌邪 械 薪邪褉械褔械薪邪 芯褌 邪胁褌芯褉邪 褉芯屑邪薪鈥撔啃把徯缎感叫� 懈 械 褋褌褉褍泻褌芯褉懈褉邪薪邪 锌芯 写芯褋褌邪 褋褌褉邪薪械薪 薪邪褔懈薪. 孝芯胁邪 薪邪懈褋褌懈薪邪 械 械写懈薪 褉邪蟹谐芯胁芯褉 褋褗褋 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪, 薪芯 薪械 屑械卸写褍 邪胁褌芯褉邪 懈 褎懈谢芯褋芯褎邪, 邪 屑械卸写褍 褔懈褌邪褌械谢褟 懈 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪, 谐芯胁芯褉懈褌械 褋懈, 袚芯褑械 褌懈 械 懈蟹斜褉邪谢 褉械锌谢懈泻懈褌械 懈 褌械 胁泻邪褉胁邪 胁 泻薪懈谐邪褌邪. 袠薪褌械褉械褋械薪 械 褌芯蟹懈 薪邪褔懈薪 薪邪 锌懈褋邪薪械 懈 薪邪 褔械褌械薪械 褉邪蟹斜懈褉邪 褋械, 胁懈写薪芯 械 褔械 邪胁褌芯褉a 懈屑邪 褋械褉懈芯蟹薪懈 锌芯蟹薪邪薪懈褟 锌芯 褌械屑邪褌邪 懈 薪械 械 锌芯写褏芯写懈谢 谢械泻芯胁邪褌芯 泻褗屑 薪械褖邪褌邪, 邪 胁懈薪邪谐懈 械 锌褉懈褟褌薪o 泻芯谐邪褌芯 褔械褌械褕 薪械褖芯 芯褌 懈薪褌械谢懈谐械薪褌械薪 锌懈褋邪褌械谢. 袙 褉芯屑邪薪邪 褋械 蟹邪锌芯蟹薪邪胁邪屑械 褋 褔芯胁械泻邪 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪, 胁谢懈蟹邪屑械 胁 薪邪泄鈥撔恍秆囆叫狙傂� 屑褍 锌褉芯褋褌褉邪薪褋褌胁芯 懈 懈蟹卸懈胁褟胁邪屑械 蟹邪械写薪芯 褋 薪械谐芯 褋邪屑芯褌邪褌邪 懈 褌褗谐邪褌邪, 泻芯懈褌芯 谐芯 褋谐褉邪斜褔胁邪褌 芯褖械 褋邪屑芯 薪邪 6 谐芯写懈薪懈 懈 薪械 谐芯 薪邪锌褍褋泻邪褌 写芯 泻褉邪褟 薪邪 卸懈胁芯褌邪 屑褍...
January 26, 2015
Rede en hartstocht. Zo zou je 'Het web van Spinoza' kunnen samenvatten. Naar analogie met de dualiteit in Spinoza's 'Ethica'. Maar een web telt meer draden. Het zijn in dit geval de kleine draadjes die het verhaal iets bijzonders meegeven. Fijne details die je pas achteraf ontdekt. Nadat Smilevski heeft verteld waarom hij een boek over Spinoza schrijft. Jammer misschien. Of net niet. Ik weet het niet, maar soms bleken de draden van het web plots te breken. En verloor ik even de leeslust. Een andere keer bleef het web aan me kleven. Dan wilde ik de draad eindeloos volgen. Hmm, rede en hartstocht. Ik vermoed dat Smilevski hier een vernuftig spel met me heeft gespeeld...
February 5, 2017
Conversation with Spinoza contains the original narrative. Portions of the text are interspersed between the three POVs: narrator-observer who reported the events as a spectator; narrator-interlocutor, who turns directly to Spinoza; and the narrator-Spinoza, who replies to the reader. Smilevski the intended to write "beautiful book"; a tribute to the philosopher. It came, how it came out. The book is mostly melancholic and difficult to understand for someone who has not studied the philosophy of Spinoza. Perhaps because the author has posted afterword, explaining both the design "Conversations with Spinoza", as the content of the book.
January 7, 2021
校褕褌械 薪邪 锌褉胁芯褌芯 褔懈褌邪褮械 褬邪 锌褉芯谐谢邪褋懈胁 蟹邪 械写薪邪 芯写 芯屑懈谢械薪懈褌械 泻薪懈谐懈, 褋芯 胁褌芯褉芯胁芯 褔懈褌邪褮械 褋邪屑芯 褋懈 褬邪 锌芯褌胁褉写懈胁 芯写谢褍泻邪褌邪. 袦邪械褋褌褉邪谢薪芯褋褌邪 薪邪 写械谢芯胁芯 械 胁芯 褌芯邪 褕褌芯 薪械 屑芯褉邪 写邪 褬邪 褉邪蟹斜懈褉邪褕 褎懈谢芯蟹芯褎懈褬邪褌邪 薪邪 小锌懈薪芯蟹邪 蟹邪 写邪 褬邪 褉邪蟹斜械褉械褕 薪械谐芯胁邪褌邪 芯褋邪屑械薪芯褋褌 懈 写邪 褍卸懈胁邪褕 胁芯 锌褉懈泻邪蟹薪邪褌邪.
September 13, 2016
Kuvitettu arvostelu Goce Smilevskin Keskustelu Spinozan kanssa on luettavissa blogistani osoitteesta:
April 22, 2013
5.8 Alex G. Bell words
Want to read
November 4, 2010Liked his short story in Best European Fiction 2010
Displaying 1 - 30 of 34 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.