What do you think?
Rate this book
Buried: An alternative history of the first millennium in Britain
Not yet published
Expected 29 Apr 25A SUNDAY TIMES BESTSELLER
‘Tender, fascinating � Lucid and illuminating’Robert Macfarlane
Funerary rituals show us what people thought about mortality; how they felt about loss; what they believed came next. From Roman cremations and graveside feasts, to deviant burials with heads rearranged, from richly furnished Anglo Saxon graves to the first Christian burial grounds in Wales,Buriedprovides an alternative history of the first millennium in Britain. As she did with her pre-history of Britain inAncestors, Professor Alice Roberts combines archaeological finds with cutting-edge DNA research and written history to shed fresh light on how people lived: by examining the stories of the dead.
‘Tender, fascinating � Lucid and illuminating’Robert Macfarlane
Funerary rituals show us what people thought about mortality; how they felt about loss; what they believed came next. From Roman cremations and graveside feasts, to deviant burials with heads rearranged, from richly furnished Anglo Saxon graves to the first Christian burial grounds in Wales,Buriedprovides an alternative history of the first millennium in Britain. As she did with her pre-history of Britain inAncestors, Professor Alice Roberts combines archaeological finds with cutting-edge DNA research and written history to shed fresh light on how people lived: by examining the stories of the dead.
352 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2022
212 people are currently reading
2,529 people want to read
About the author
Alice Roberts
36books692followersAlice May Roberts is an English anatomist, osteoarchaeologist, physical anthropologist, palaeopathologist, television presenter and author.
Roberts studied medicine and anatomy at Cardiff University, qualifying in 1997 as a physician with a Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery (MB BCh) degree, having gained an intercalated Bachelor of Science degree in anatomy. She earned a PhD in paleopathology in 2008 from the University of Bristol.
Librarian Note: There is more than one author in the ŷ database with this name.
Roberts studied medicine and anatomy at Cardiff University, qualifying in 1997 as a physician with a Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery (MB BCh) degree, having gained an intercalated Bachelor of Science degree in anatomy. She earned a PhD in paleopathology in 2008 from the University of Bristol.
Librarian Note: There is more than one author in the ŷ database with this name.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 153 reviews
February 6, 2023
This was very informative and I loved reading and learning. Will probably not remember much of it but an great non fiction. Hope I got more of Alice Robert's books to read on my book app.
July 16, 2024
Professor Alice Roberts is a biological anthropologist meaning she specialises ‘in drawing out information from old bones�. The kind of information she is referring to is gender, age at time of death and ‘details about some of the illnesses and injuries they suffered during their lives�. Now the technology is such that the information they analyse can show where a person lived and what their diet was like. Now they are able to ‘to extract DNA from ancient bones and sequence entire genomes�.
She says ‘…there’s no denying that the historical record for the fifth to eighth centuries is patchy at best. Archaeology is crucially important to understanding what was really happening in those shadowy centuries after Roman rule in Britain ended. And burials have important tales to tell�.
She actually starts at the Roman invasion of Britain. She looks at a second century burial which has a lead pipe sticking out the top of it and went up to the open air where blood or wine was poured down. ‘It was done with the expectation that the bereaved would continue communing with the dead�. Fantastically interesting stuff as she delves into burials where food and drink are offered. She goes on to look at the bones.
Each chapter is similar to this. Analysing the bones and the burial techniques and telling the stories of that time. It could be anything from infant mortality in Roman times (a third of babies died before the age of 1) to burials where individuals had been decapitated to double burials to the grave goods and accessories the dead were buried with.
Looking into burials now gives even more insight into their lives at the time in a funny sort of way. As there was not much written down this is as good a way as any of obtaining that information. Each chapter backs this up. Of course, the theorising continues but now there is hard data even in those crumbly bones.
Like Ancestors the last chapter strays away from what was good about this book. It all becomes a little preachy.
She says ‘…there’s no denying that the historical record for the fifth to eighth centuries is patchy at best. Archaeology is crucially important to understanding what was really happening in those shadowy centuries after Roman rule in Britain ended. And burials have important tales to tell�.
She actually starts at the Roman invasion of Britain. She looks at a second century burial which has a lead pipe sticking out the top of it and went up to the open air where blood or wine was poured down. ‘It was done with the expectation that the bereaved would continue communing with the dead�. Fantastically interesting stuff as she delves into burials where food and drink are offered. She goes on to look at the bones.
Each chapter is similar to this. Analysing the bones and the burial techniques and telling the stories of that time. It could be anything from infant mortality in Roman times (a third of babies died before the age of 1) to burials where individuals had been decapitated to double burials to the grave goods and accessories the dead were buried with.
Looking into burials now gives even more insight into their lives at the time in a funny sort of way. As there was not much written down this is as good a way as any of obtaining that information. Each chapter backs this up. Of course, the theorising continues but now there is hard data even in those crumbly bones.
Like Ancestors the last chapter strays away from what was good about this book. It all becomes a little preachy.
January 23, 2023
Buried by Alice Roberts was just brilliant and captivating. A carefully produced book. Buried is a renewal of ancient burials, weaving together stories of the dead. Romans, Vikings, Children🏺
Roberts� journey as an esteemed archaeologist takes us into the vivid world of bones and grave goods: an indication of people’s wealth, status and religious beliefs. Roberts explores various excavations which have unearthed the dark ages and before that, Roman Britain. From plagues to ancient artefacts left behind by migrating people. More and more we are moving ever closer to our past and heritage, rather than moving further from it.
Though it is grisly work uncovering death, I have loved learning about ancient artefacts throughout the book and how these can be traced back to their origin. Anything from brooches and buckles, Byzantine buckets to beaver teeth associated with a � cunning woman� whose remains had been uncovered ( ( early 14c., conning, "learned, skillful, possessing knowledge�). Alice Roberts is the most down to earth, honest and compassionate historian/archaeologist I have come across.
Roberts� journey as an esteemed archaeologist takes us into the vivid world of bones and grave goods: an indication of people’s wealth, status and religious beliefs. Roberts explores various excavations which have unearthed the dark ages and before that, Roman Britain. From plagues to ancient artefacts left behind by migrating people. More and more we are moving ever closer to our past and heritage, rather than moving further from it.
Though it is grisly work uncovering death, I have loved learning about ancient artefacts throughout the book and how these can be traced back to their origin. Anything from brooches and buckles, Byzantine buckets to beaver teeth associated with a � cunning woman� whose remains had been uncovered ( ( early 14c., conning, "learned, skillful, possessing knowledge�). Alice Roberts is the most down to earth, honest and compassionate historian/archaeologist I have come across.
September 7, 2023
Roberts discusses what can be determined of the first millennium British history, culture and migration from bones; grave goods; ancient DNA, isotope studies and other archaeological findings. She includes such fascinating examples as: the man whose cremated remains were placed in a lead canister with a pipe so he could join in drinking on feast days; the graveyards with infants which hint at infanticide, obstetric interventions, and the possible location of brothels; the "deviant" burials with heads rearranged so that revenants cannot bother the living; the grave yard with buckets; the shallow grave with what appears to be the disposal of raiders; and the graves with cross-marked stones. I found the chapter on infant mortality particularly interesting. Roberts concludes the book by examining British archaeological findings within a greater historical context and wider region (i.e. main land Europe and the Mediterranean). This book includes a colour photo insert, but a map of the sites would have been interesting.
January 7, 2023
Buried is the follow-up to Ancestors. I was so excited to read this given how much I enjoyed Ancestors that I bought the hard copy immediately - lesson learned - because I was very disappointed. This book focuses on the Roman/Anglo-Saxon burials in Britian but it didn't seem to have a cohesive narrative - it felt rambling and repetitive and I skimmed the last third of the book :-(
August 30, 2022
Dr. Alice Roberts describes several sites of the Dark Ages. She tells the facts they reveal and the mysteries and questions they bring up.
April 21, 2022
Me? Remembering to update my goodreads??
Anyway yes, I finished this one a while ago. Jumped on the proof, dropped everything to read it, regret nothing. I love reading Alice Roberts' books - she's so full of joy and enthusiasm and compassion, it really rings archaeology to life. But she's so thoughtful and considered too, I always feel like I go away not just with renewed energy, but food for thought.
This could be seen as a direct sequel to 'Ancestors' - it picks up, time-wise, where Ancestors left off, taking us from the prehistoric and iron age burials that were the focus of that into the romano-british landscape and into the early middle ages. As always, I've come away with a new understanding of history, and a plethora of fun and unusual facts to fling at my colleagues.
The one waring is that the entire first chapter is about baby burials. It's fully signposted and very sensiitvely done, but it's very much worth knowing that the opening is about child mortality.
Anyway yes, I finished this one a while ago. Jumped on the proof, dropped everything to read it, regret nothing. I love reading Alice Roberts' books - she's so full of joy and enthusiasm and compassion, it really rings archaeology to life. But she's so thoughtful and considered too, I always feel like I go away not just with renewed energy, but food for thought.
This could be seen as a direct sequel to 'Ancestors' - it picks up, time-wise, where Ancestors left off, taking us from the prehistoric and iron age burials that were the focus of that into the romano-british landscape and into the early middle ages. As always, I've come away with a new understanding of history, and a plethora of fun and unusual facts to fling at my colleagues.
The one waring is that the entire first chapter is about baby burials. It's fully signposted and very sensiitvely done, but it's very much worth knowing that the opening is about child mortality.
April 23, 2024
quality non fiction, well written but some use of colloquialisms that came off very awkward because i listened to the audiobook. i thought it was interesting but i didn’t quite gel with the organisational decisions.
August 16, 2022
Another excellent book from Alice Roberts, who reexamines 1000 years of British history, using archaeology and genetic research.
Highly recommended for anyone with an interest in archaeology or history.
Highly recommended for anyone with an interest in archaeology or history.
July 6, 2022
Let me summarise the book to save everyone hundreds of pages of waffle. They found large collections of babies graves who died very soon after birth - they don’t know why. They found quite a few graves including those of children with their heads chopped off mostly after death - they don’t know why. They found a large collection of what they believe to be men buried with weapons - they don’t know why. They found a load of women buried with handbags and lots of things inside - they don’t know why. A random group of people was found by a wall and no one knows where they came from. In the sixth century church yards became popular. And finally we have no idea exactly when anything occurred because there are no/extremely bias records. The pictures at the back are interesting though so maybe skip to that bit 😅
Honestly this entire book could have been summarised into about 50 pages - what they found, where they found it and potential theories. Not repeating the same one or two theories over and over and over again. If the theories were in any way interesting at least it would take some of the repetition away but honestly it was so dull by the end I couldn’t care if it was a ritual performed by aliens. Absolute agony. I wish I had quit it after the first 2 chapters but with so many positive reviews I had to continue but I wish I hadn’t bothered.
Honestly this entire book could have been summarised into about 50 pages - what they found, where they found it and potential theories. Not repeating the same one or two theories over and over and over again. If the theories were in any way interesting at least it would take some of the repetition away but honestly it was so dull by the end I couldn’t care if it was a ritual performed by aliens. Absolute agony. I wish I had quit it after the first 2 chapters but with so many positive reviews I had to continue but I wish I hadn’t bothered.
November 20, 2024
A brilliant new insight to the first millennium CE in Britain, and the identity and funerary rights of the people who lived here.
It really gave me a lot to think about as regards to my "British" identity and what that really means. Especially with regards to anything "Anglo-Saxon" (a term I must admit, I did not realise was problematic over the pond) and what does "Anglo Saxon" even mean anyway?
For anyone interested in British history, archaeology or genealogy this is worth a read. If you've been a fan of books/shows like "The Last Kingdom" I'd also recommend checking this out. It really has made me think about Roman Britain, those aforementioned Anglo Saxons, and the Vikings in very different ways. But in a way, typical of Prof Alice Roberts, that makes them real and makes them as human as anyone you will meet today. Afterall every body talked about in this book was somebody at some point, and one day we will too be nothing more than bodies, skeletons, ashes... Dust to dust... But our lives are worth as much or as little as those who were buried over a thousand years before we were even born.
It really gave me a lot to think about as regards to my "British" identity and what that really means. Especially with regards to anything "Anglo-Saxon" (a term I must admit, I did not realise was problematic over the pond) and what does "Anglo Saxon" even mean anyway?
For anyone interested in British history, archaeology or genealogy this is worth a read. If you've been a fan of books/shows like "The Last Kingdom" I'd also recommend checking this out. It really has made me think about Roman Britain, those aforementioned Anglo Saxons, and the Vikings in very different ways. But in a way, typical of Prof Alice Roberts, that makes them real and makes them as human as anyone you will meet today. Afterall every body talked about in this book was somebody at some point, and one day we will too be nothing more than bodies, skeletons, ashes... Dust to dust... But our lives are worth as much or as little as those who were buried over a thousand years before we were even born.
September 2, 2022
Beginning chapters with a particular archaeological find, Roberts gently provides the historical context in an easily accessible narrative style. This is a series of archaeological “snapshots� from Britain in the first millennium. Well written and showing wide knowledge of the period, I didn’t find this as engaging as her previous book, .
We start in Roman Britain, with the cremated remains in a rectangular lead canister with a “pipe� to the surface in a stone-lined chamber at Caerleon. The remains were discovered in the 1920’s, but Roberts re-examines them telling the story of the probable funerary rites.
We then move to Yewden Roman Villa and the potentially upsetting discovery of evidence of obstetric surgery for an obstructed labour (or perhaps abortion) on a 36-37 week old foetus. Roberts discusses increased infant mortality in non-modern, first world locations and different burial practices for infants.
This is followed by discussion of decapitated burials, starting with an example of seventeen decapitated Roman period burials at Great Whelnetham cemetery, near Bury St Edmunds, which distinguishes between victims of beheadings and post-mortem decapitations. Roberts emphasises that there can be no ‘one size fits all� approach to the post-mortem decapitations, discussing possible fear of revenants, the ‘evil dead�, but also considering the idea that that some may be slaves.
Although this may all sound very “dry� and academic, Roberts is able to make me empathise with the possible fates of the individuals of whom all that remains are these bones, and tentatively suggest the non-aristocratic lives they may represent. The lack of evidence always means that there are no simple answers, just a number of hypotheses, or believable stories.
A metal detectorist located a beautifully designed Byzantine brass bucket at Breamore, Hampshire, and a Time Team archaeological dig then found the remains of an early Anglo-Saxon cemetery. Roberts looks at whether the findings from the site might indicate a warriors� burial ground, a (Justinian) plague cemetery or perhaps a cemetery from a battle.
Chapter 5 starts with a description of the Staffordshire Hoard buried in the mid-seventh century - “there's about 4 kilograms of gold in the hoard, 1.7 kilograms of silver and thousands of garnets. It's the largest hoard in Europe, let alone Britain.�
However, Roberts makes the point that whilst rich in artefacts, hoards have no archaeological context, so she goes on to discuss the review of artefacts found at a large Anglo-Saxon cemetery at the Meads, northwest of Sittingbourne in Kent amongst other sites.
Chapter 6 discusses skeletons found in a ditch at Llanbedrgoch on Anglesey, were they Welsh defenders of the site, captured Viking raiders, or slaves. Again there are no definitive answers, just possibilities that may make greater sense given the other material finds at the site.
Chapter 7 discusses the “Birth of Churchyards�:
Churchyards in the popular imagination seem like obvious, natural places to find graves, but they only start to appear in Britain from the sixth century as part of the culture of Christianity. None of the Roman or early Anglo-Saxon burials we've paused to look at on this journey through the first millennium took place inside settlements (apart from those infant burials). And yet, by the ninth century, pretty much everyone living in what had once been the Roman Empire - and where the Roman religion had taken root was buried in a church graveyard. The preceding centuries saw a gradual transformation of burial practices, as former out-of-town cemeteries fell into disuse, and churchyards became the final destination of choice.
Chapter 8 looks at how archaeological DNA analysis (aDNA) is allowing archaeologists to ask and sometimes answer questions that couldn’t previously have been answered with such certainty:
This is the archaeological culture war: in one corner, culture-history, massive migrations and population replacement; in the other, cultural diffusion, a dissemination of ideas while the population stays put. Like any culture war, it's much too polarised and too clearly defined. History - people - are much messier than that. The answers are much more likely to lie somewhere in the middle. They sure as hell won't be simple - and each 'event' would also have been different and unique. And we're only just starting to get the data we need to understand these transitions.
Roberts discusses these ideas, but doesn’t yet have genomic results to help push the discussion further with empirical data, so that although interesting, this chapter rehashed ideas that I have read about in other recent books about this period.
In the first chapter Roberts includes some thoughts about belief systems and burial rites relevant to the cremated bones of a Roman burial, but she pushes her personal views just a little too much in my opinion for what is otherwise a relatively objective analysis, which I felt was a disappointment, although I don’t personally disagree with the views she expresses.
We start in Roman Britain, with the cremated remains in a rectangular lead canister with a “pipe� to the surface in a stone-lined chamber at Caerleon. The remains were discovered in the 1920’s, but Roberts re-examines them telling the story of the probable funerary rites.
We then move to Yewden Roman Villa and the potentially upsetting discovery of evidence of obstetric surgery for an obstructed labour (or perhaps abortion) on a 36-37 week old foetus. Roberts discusses increased infant mortality in non-modern, first world locations and different burial practices for infants.
This is followed by discussion of decapitated burials, starting with an example of seventeen decapitated Roman period burials at Great Whelnetham cemetery, near Bury St Edmunds, which distinguishes between victims of beheadings and post-mortem decapitations. Roberts emphasises that there can be no ‘one size fits all� approach to the post-mortem decapitations, discussing possible fear of revenants, the ‘evil dead�, but also considering the idea that that some may be slaves.
Although this may all sound very “dry� and academic, Roberts is able to make me empathise with the possible fates of the individuals of whom all that remains are these bones, and tentatively suggest the non-aristocratic lives they may represent. The lack of evidence always means that there are no simple answers, just a number of hypotheses, or believable stories.
A metal detectorist located a beautifully designed Byzantine brass bucket at Breamore, Hampshire, and a Time Team archaeological dig then found the remains of an early Anglo-Saxon cemetery. Roberts looks at whether the findings from the site might indicate a warriors� burial ground, a (Justinian) plague cemetery or perhaps a cemetery from a battle.
Chapter 5 starts with a description of the Staffordshire Hoard buried in the mid-seventh century - “there's about 4 kilograms of gold in the hoard, 1.7 kilograms of silver and thousands of garnets. It's the largest hoard in Europe, let alone Britain.�
However, Roberts makes the point that whilst rich in artefacts, hoards have no archaeological context, so she goes on to discuss the review of artefacts found at a large Anglo-Saxon cemetery at the Meads, northwest of Sittingbourne in Kent amongst other sites.
Chapter 6 discusses skeletons found in a ditch at Llanbedrgoch on Anglesey, were they Welsh defenders of the site, captured Viking raiders, or slaves. Again there are no definitive answers, just possibilities that may make greater sense given the other material finds at the site.
Chapter 7 discusses the “Birth of Churchyards�:
Churchyards in the popular imagination seem like obvious, natural places to find graves, but they only start to appear in Britain from the sixth century as part of the culture of Christianity. None of the Roman or early Anglo-Saxon burials we've paused to look at on this journey through the first millennium took place inside settlements (apart from those infant burials). And yet, by the ninth century, pretty much everyone living in what had once been the Roman Empire - and where the Roman religion had taken root was buried in a church graveyard. The preceding centuries saw a gradual transformation of burial practices, as former out-of-town cemeteries fell into disuse, and churchyards became the final destination of choice.
Chapter 8 looks at how archaeological DNA analysis (aDNA) is allowing archaeologists to ask and sometimes answer questions that couldn’t previously have been answered with such certainty:
This is the archaeological culture war: in one corner, culture-history, massive migrations and population replacement; in the other, cultural diffusion, a dissemination of ideas while the population stays put. Like any culture war, it's much too polarised and too clearly defined. History - people - are much messier than that. The answers are much more likely to lie somewhere in the middle. They sure as hell won't be simple - and each 'event' would also have been different and unique. And we're only just starting to get the data we need to understand these transitions.
Roberts discusses these ideas, but doesn’t yet have genomic results to help push the discussion further with empirical data, so that although interesting, this chapter rehashed ideas that I have read about in other recent books about this period.
In the first chapter Roberts includes some thoughts about belief systems and burial rites relevant to the cremated bones of a Roman burial, but she pushes her personal views just a little too much in my opinion for what is otherwise a relatively objective analysis, which I felt was a disappointment, although I don’t personally disagree with the views she expresses.
July 27, 2022
In this follow-up to Ancestors, Roberts looks at various funerary and death rites in Britain's prehistory. I find archaeology fascinating and love how sometimes a small discovery can tell us so much about how people in the past lived and died. Roberts writes in such a way that brings the past closer and makes everything so intriguing.
March 16, 2024
I saw Alice R speak live and it was impressive and entertaining in equal measure. Book was interesting however probably just too many burials for me.
April 8, 2023
Another fascinating volume from the ubiquitous Prof Roberts. The epilogue was a bit preachy.
January 1, 2023
I love Alice Roberts, her enthusiasm, the depth and breadth of her knowledge and expertise, and the gift she has for bringing the past to life. It's fascinating how modern analysis techniques have transformed archaeology. Old bones and artefacts can now tell us far more about our ancestors and the way they lived (and died) than ever our very recent predecessors would have thought was possible.
This felt quite a long book, but I think it was because every page was packed with interesting and fascinating details. I did find the final chapter, which was more about people and their movement, rather than the artefacts they left behind, rather slow going and more academic. I may possibly have skipped a few sections in that chapter. :-)
Although not a central topic of this book, she traces how the adoption of Christianity as an organised religion shaped the way our ancestors lived and died, and how our ancestors shaped Christianity to meet their own aspirations and political ends, when the Anglo-Saxons, like the Romans before them, began to realise the exceptional potential of institutionalised religion.
Interestingly, people only started to be buried in churchyards from the sixth century CE - again, a consequence of the development of Christian doctrine. Prior to that, almost all burials took place outside settlements.
If you're interested in how our ancestors lived, the evidence they left, and the scientific methods used to decode the evidence, then this book is highly recommended.
This felt quite a long book, but I think it was because every page was packed with interesting and fascinating details. I did find the final chapter, which was more about people and their movement, rather than the artefacts they left behind, rather slow going and more academic. I may possibly have skipped a few sections in that chapter. :-)
Although not a central topic of this book, she traces how the adoption of Christianity as an organised religion shaped the way our ancestors lived and died, and how our ancestors shaped Christianity to meet their own aspirations and political ends, when the Anglo-Saxons, like the Romans before them, began to realise the exceptional potential of institutionalised religion.
Interestingly, people only started to be buried in churchyards from the sixth century CE - again, a consequence of the development of Christian doctrine. Prior to that, almost all burials took place outside settlements.
If you're interested in how our ancestors lived, the evidence they left, and the scientific methods used to decode the evidence, then this book is highly recommended.
November 22, 2022
I really enjoyed this. It is absolutely astounding what we can find out from graves/burial sites of our forebears about who they were and how they lived. And the information we can gain is increasing rather than decreasing - not just isotope scans of bone enamel but now genetics to look at the heredity of people. Time and history has always been seen as discrete era; one group of people were replace by another but, quite logically, that probably isn't the case. What good, sound, first hand historical documents do we have? Relatively few. What about grave goods. Does that really prove anything about people? Can we make assumptions? What about their genes though; can they lie? As a scientist I'll accept the science but the interpretation of that is enhanced by grave goods, the bones, how they were buried. An amazingly interesting read (and, yes, spoiler alert, I'm an orthopaedic surgeon so have a particular interest in bones!!!)
January 2, 2023
Loved this book - i found the exploration of burial sites a bit more engaging here than in Ancestors, but the overall message was a bit overstated. The final 70 or so pages are a reiteration of the central ideas of genealogy and migration, which are better utilised during the examples of grave sites. Other than that another great book from this author
March 17, 2023
Buried tells the story of the first millennium in Britain from the perspective of funeral archaeology, showcasing the variety in burial practices and ideas about the afterlife present on the British Isles (though with a heavy bias towards England) from the Roman to the Norman Conquest. The core of the book, however, is really an exploration of past identity, emotion, culture and migration. A key aspect is a discussion of the Anglo-Saxons: who were the people we call the Anglo-Saxons, where did they come from, and how does archaeology and genetics compare to written history? Buried is written in a similar style to Ancestors, but I actually found this book more enjoyable than its predecessor, perhaps because it sticks more closely to a clearly defined time period or perhaps because it's a bit better organised, presenting each case study in roughly chronological order. That said, some chapters are better than others. While an exploration of infant skeletons at a Roman villa leads to a very impactful discussion of infant mortality and the evidence for infanticide in the archaeological and historical record, another chapter, which starts with some buckets, prompts a much broader and less coherent discussion of the relationship between material culture and identity - a classic subject within archaeology, but also a subject broad enough to fill a whole book on its own. All in all, though, Buried is an enjoyable book, and one I would recommend to anyone with an interest in archaeology or British history.
March 27, 2025
I used to not particularly enjoy history as a subject in school. Turns out that the textbooks may have been just a little too dry.
I liked this more than "Crypt" which suprised me - the latter had a blurb which aligned with my interests a lot better. However, "Buried" managed to captivate my attention a lot better - partly due to the fact that I discovered a lot of knowledge that I might have not otherwise been opened to. I do wish that Dr Roberts had kept more subtle with the parallels to the Brexit (and current right-leaning rethoric) - I felt like the parallels were strong enough without having to be stated into the open and having the narration derail mid-paragraph.
I still massively enjoyed the scientific and historic aspects of this. It just took me out of the narration is all (as a disclaimer here - I mean, I am absolutely on the same page as Dr Roberts, I am just used to being more subtle and elegant).
I liked this more than "Crypt" which suprised me - the latter had a blurb which aligned with my interests a lot better. However, "Buried" managed to captivate my attention a lot better - partly due to the fact that I discovered a lot of knowledge that I might have not otherwise been opened to. I do wish that Dr Roberts had kept more subtle with the parallels to the Brexit (and current right-leaning rethoric) - I felt like the parallels were strong enough without having to be stated into the open and having the narration derail mid-paragraph.
I still massively enjoyed the scientific and historic aspects of this. It just took me out of the narration is all (as a disclaimer here - I mean, I am absolutely on the same page as Dr Roberts, I am just used to being more subtle and elegant).
April 5, 2025
I was a big fan of Ancestors which was the predecessor to this book and it’s clear to me now that Alice Roberts is a phenomenal writer. Whilst the history and archeology is fascinating in their own rights, the way Roberts can utilise the information to discuss modern day theological and philosophical questions is masterful.
That said, I didn’t love the last chapter as such and did find myself very ready for it to end, which is a shame and did take away from my overall enjoyment of the book.
3.5* / 5* (rounded up to 4*)
That said, I didn’t love the last chapter as such and did find myself very ready for it to end, which is a shame and did take away from my overall enjoyment of the book.
3.5* / 5* (rounded up to 4*)
January 25, 2023
A very interesting discussion of burials and how they help us understand the past. Useful discussion about terms to describe specific groups of people. There are graphic, but appropriate descriptions of violence.
March 21, 2024
Fascinating discussion of seven (ish) burials from the UK (well, England and Wales) from the arrival of the Romans to c. 1066. Roberts writes with clarity, she's a great communicator and she does know a lot about bones. She discusses the cultural implications of various styles of burial and what grave goods and skeletons can tell us about the people buried, and the people who buried them. This leads to a wider exploration of migration and identity in the (very) early medieval period.
(I bought this as a gift for my dad and borrowed it back.)
(I bought this as a gift for my dad and borrowed it back.)
November 30, 2022
I love Prof Alice Roberts tv programs but this audiobook mostly was like listening to someone read a dissertation - full of passion, but hard to wade through.
The early chapters were good. I especially appreciated the discussion of gendering remains (of interest to like minded Queers and hence the shelf tag).
Otherwise, I mostly used this as an ASMR.
The early chapters were good. I especially appreciated the discussion of gendering remains (of interest to like minded Queers and hence the shelf tag).
Otherwise, I mostly used this as an ASMR.
January 22, 2025
Did I understand most of it? No. Did I like the overarching points and period of history? YES. Highly recommend audiobook format on Spotify.
June 4, 2022
Really interesting read and view of 1000 years of British history
October 4, 2022
This and Ancestors are both so morbidly fascinating. Roberts discusses funerary and death rites in the Roman, Dark Ages and Anglo-Saxon eras of Britain, using a selection of archaeological finds to lay out history and educated guesses. These books are readable and informative, and cover a multitude of supposed genders, ages and cultures.
June 6, 2023
A favorite remark of my esteemed mother is that a book would have been a better book at half the length. I don't think that this book would have been a better book at half the length, but I do think it would have been substantially improved by twice the content. It sprawled. It sprawled and meandered and said the same thing multiple times, took ten pages or half a chapter to make a point that could have easily been made in a page--or even a few sentences--and I got quite impatient before we reached the end of it.
For example: in the chapter on Vikings, Roberts takes five pages to meander through some thoughts she's had about linguistic similarities between English and Scandinavian languages that strike her as too extreme to be explained by Viking raids. She can read a menu in a restaurant in Norway! She has lots of thoughts about this ground-breaking discovery, that maybe the cultural and linguistic exchange between Norse and Old English might have been more extensive than previously thought. Previously thought? Previously thought by whom? Here I am, a PhD in linguistics, jumping up and down and screaming, we know this already! She does, eventually, get around to saying, 'I then thought to ask some linguists and it turns out that they know about this already'--thank heavens for that, at least, but why did we have to spend five pages in her extremely uninformed head meandering through Norwegian restaurants if she always planned to tell us what is actually known about language contact? She is not a linguist. I don't want five pages of her feeling smug about having knocked down a straw-man misconception by the uninformed public. I want the actual information from the actual specialists. Chop the five pages of personal speculation, or at least interweave the personal observations in the context of telling us what linguists and actual specialists know about the history of Norse-English language contact!
It really feels as if Roberts had a contract that specified 'x pages of content, to be published by y date', and she wasn't ready to meet either clause. The key giveaway, as I see it, is the repeated, incessant, unending hype about the potential of archaeogenomics to answer all the open questions about migration and diffusion and whether populations displaced each other, or simply mixed around and in the process it was the cultural practices, rather than the people themselves, who gave way to the newcomers. Much of the book discusses these two ideas. At great length. Repeatedly. And always, always, she'll talk about how Dr So-and-So is doing ground-breaking exciting research into archaeogenomics that can shed new light on these old debates! Just wait! I can't wait! Archaeogenomics! Rah rah rah! Only a little while longer!
Except she did this in her previous book, too--archaeogenomics is very exciting! Much potential! Such answers! Wow! The first time she brought it up in this book I got excited, thinking that now we were finally going to get some of those results that she'd teased in her previous book. But no. Still coming! So ground-breaking! Much soonly! Very answers!
So: Roberts wanted, I think, to write a book in which much of the content was about archaeogenomics. But the results were not in by the time her contract specified she needed to turn in the manuscript, and so she had to fill up the required page count with something. And so we get unending blather that really feels like she got drunk and just rambled on to her bartender about her thoughts and feelings regarding burials in Roman and early Medieval Britain.
'Have you ever really thought about a sunset?' she might ask a long-suffering bartender, whose name, we'll say, is George. 'So many people have watched the sun set, just the way we do! Moments and moments, repeating themselves. We're the latest inheritors, but each one of us will see a final sunset too.' George nods and pours her some water. She has a book deadline, he knows, and she's very frustrated that the archaeogenomics data isn't available yet, and she's trying to make wordcount. Might as well spare her tomorrow morning's hangover. She ignores the water, though, and demands another Tennant's. She continues, 'What makes life meaningful, anyway? The finite span of a human life is what creates its meaning; we have limited time her, and that prompts us to reflect on how best to use this precious time, and what legacies we'd like to leave. I'd like to leave behind some books, but goddamn Colin over at Exeter just won't publish his fucking archeogenomics data and my editor is breathing down my ass, and I've still got fifty pages to write before the end of the month! What legacy will I leave if I don't get this done? I want to leave behind something--something--' she hiccups--'something tangible. Maybe that's my mistake. Should I be thinking in material terms? Some of us think in material terms. But is that how I want to be remembered? How do you want to be remembered, George? Maybe it's not about material things. Maybe it's about the connections that each of us forms during our lives. All those points of contact with other human beings. Our close relatives--I haven't called mum in ages--our friends and acquaintances--hah, Colin's probably filtering my emails straight to junk--and with strangers, too. But you're not a stranger, are you George? We're friends, aren't we? Have you called your mum recently?'
Later, when she gets home, she realizes that she left her phone on 'Record', and in listening back to her conversation with George, she discovers that here was some good stuff in it, and as we've established, she was desperate to make wordcount, so she just lifted the good bits and plopped it in to pad out the end of Chapter 8 (pg 293, if you want to check it out).
Anyway. Her first book was better.
For example: in the chapter on Vikings, Roberts takes five pages to meander through some thoughts she's had about linguistic similarities between English and Scandinavian languages that strike her as too extreme to be explained by Viking raids. She can read a menu in a restaurant in Norway! She has lots of thoughts about this ground-breaking discovery, that maybe the cultural and linguistic exchange between Norse and Old English might have been more extensive than previously thought. Previously thought? Previously thought by whom? Here I am, a PhD in linguistics, jumping up and down and screaming, we know this already! She does, eventually, get around to saying, 'I then thought to ask some linguists and it turns out that they know about this already'--thank heavens for that, at least, but why did we have to spend five pages in her extremely uninformed head meandering through Norwegian restaurants if she always planned to tell us what is actually known about language contact? She is not a linguist. I don't want five pages of her feeling smug about having knocked down a straw-man misconception by the uninformed public. I want the actual information from the actual specialists. Chop the five pages of personal speculation, or at least interweave the personal observations in the context of telling us what linguists and actual specialists know about the history of Norse-English language contact!
It really feels as if Roberts had a contract that specified 'x pages of content, to be published by y date', and she wasn't ready to meet either clause. The key giveaway, as I see it, is the repeated, incessant, unending hype about the potential of archaeogenomics to answer all the open questions about migration and diffusion and whether populations displaced each other, or simply mixed around and in the process it was the cultural practices, rather than the people themselves, who gave way to the newcomers. Much of the book discusses these two ideas. At great length. Repeatedly. And always, always, she'll talk about how Dr So-and-So is doing ground-breaking exciting research into archaeogenomics that can shed new light on these old debates! Just wait! I can't wait! Archaeogenomics! Rah rah rah! Only a little while longer!
Except she did this in her previous book, too--archaeogenomics is very exciting! Much potential! Such answers! Wow! The first time she brought it up in this book I got excited, thinking that now we were finally going to get some of those results that she'd teased in her previous book. But no. Still coming! So ground-breaking! Much soonly! Very answers!
So: Roberts wanted, I think, to write a book in which much of the content was about archaeogenomics. But the results were not in by the time her contract specified she needed to turn in the manuscript, and so she had to fill up the required page count with something. And so we get unending blather that really feels like she got drunk and just rambled on to her bartender about her thoughts and feelings regarding burials in Roman and early Medieval Britain.
'Have you ever really thought about a sunset?' she might ask a long-suffering bartender, whose name, we'll say, is George. 'So many people have watched the sun set, just the way we do! Moments and moments, repeating themselves. We're the latest inheritors, but each one of us will see a final sunset too.' George nods and pours her some water. She has a book deadline, he knows, and she's very frustrated that the archaeogenomics data isn't available yet, and she's trying to make wordcount. Might as well spare her tomorrow morning's hangover. She ignores the water, though, and demands another Tennant's. She continues, 'What makes life meaningful, anyway? The finite span of a human life is what creates its meaning; we have limited time her, and that prompts us to reflect on how best to use this precious time, and what legacies we'd like to leave. I'd like to leave behind some books, but goddamn Colin over at Exeter just won't publish his fucking archeogenomics data and my editor is breathing down my ass, and I've still got fifty pages to write before the end of the month! What legacy will I leave if I don't get this done? I want to leave behind something--something--' she hiccups--'something tangible. Maybe that's my mistake. Should I be thinking in material terms? Some of us think in material terms. But is that how I want to be remembered? How do you want to be remembered, George? Maybe it's not about material things. Maybe it's about the connections that each of us forms during our lives. All those points of contact with other human beings. Our close relatives--I haven't called mum in ages--our friends and acquaintances--hah, Colin's probably filtering my emails straight to junk--and with strangers, too. But you're not a stranger, are you George? We're friends, aren't we? Have you called your mum recently?'
Later, when she gets home, she realizes that she left her phone on 'Record', and in listening back to her conversation with George, she discovers that here was some good stuff in it, and as we've established, she was desperate to make wordcount, so she just lifted the good bits and plopped it in to pad out the end of Chapter 8 (pg 293, if you want to check it out).
Anyway. Her first book was better.
August 13, 2022
I love Roberts books. However this got a little preachy in parts.
April 15, 2024
This took me so long. Think I’m not a fan of archeology
Displaying 1 - 30 of 153 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.