Arabic version: 丕亘賳 乇卮丿 Commentaries of well known Arab philosopher, jurist, and physician 础惫别谤谤辞毛蝉 or 础惫别谤谤丑辞毛蝉, also ibn Rushd, of Spain on Aristotle exerted a strong influence on medieval Christian theology.
Abu'l-Walid Ibn Rushd, better as Averroes, stands as a towering figure in the history of Islamic as that of west European thought. In the Islamic world, he played a decisive role in the defense of Greeks against the onslaughts of the Ash'arite (Mutakallimun), led by Abu Hamid al-Ghazali, and in the rehabilitation.
A common theme throughout his writings properly understood religion with no incompatibility. His contributions took many forms, ranging from his detailed, his defense against the attacks of those who condemned it as contrary to Islam and his construction of a form, cleansed as far as possible at the time of Neoplatonism.
After centuries of nearly total oblivion in west Europe, world recognition as early as the 13th century contributed to the rediscovery of the master. That instrumental discovery launched Scholasticism in Latin and the Renaissance of the 15th-century Europe in due course. Since the publication of [title:Averroes et l'averroisme] of Ernest Renan in 1852, notwithstanding very little attention to work of Averroes in English, French showed greater interest.
Two volumes bound as One. Also has over 200 pages of notes! This title, btw, means, The Incoherence of the 'Incoherence'. The "Incoherence" referred to is, of course, "Incoherence of the Philosophers" (Tahafut al-falasifa) by al-Ghazali. This is Averroes' extremely detailed refutation of Ghazali's extremely detailed refutation of Philosophy.
陌bn R眉艧d, d眉艧眉ncesine temelden kar艧谋 oldu臒u Gazali'nin in艧a etti臒i her kat谋 ayr谋 ayr谋 y谋kmaya 莽al谋艧谋yor. Burada 艧枚yle bir sorun var; Gazali kendi i莽inde tutarl谋 olma kayg谋s谋yla hareket etmeden katlar谋 pat k眉t 莽谋km谋艧t谋, ama 陌bn R眉艧d rasyonel olma kayg谋s谋yla (en az谋ndan Gazali'den daha fazla) onun 莽谋kt谋臒谋 katlar谋 tek tek y谋kmak isteyince kitap ilerledik莽e ad谋m ad谋m anlams谋zla艧谋yor. Bazen 艧枚yle durumlar oluyor; 5 sayfa Gazali okuyoruz, 5 sayfa 陌bn R眉艧d bir 艧eyler anlat谋yor sonra "bunu zaten ispat etmi艧tik" ya da "bu zaten sa莽mayd谋" diyerek b枚l眉m bitebiliyor. Bence tek tek cevap vermek yerine Gazali'nin temel arg眉man谋na cevap veren bir metin yazsa da olurmu艧. Asl谋nda kitap 艧unu diyor: Filozoflar (枚zellikle 陌bn Sina) yan谋lm谋锟斤拷 olabilir ama bu do臒ruyu ak谋lla bulamayaca臒谋m谋z谋 g枚stermez (bkz. Aristoteles).
T眉m 陌slam filozoflar谋 gibi 陌bn R眉艧d de 艦eriat i莽inde ya艧ayan bir mant谋k kurmaya 莽al谋艧t谋臒谋 i莽in 莽ok da tutarl谋 olam谋yor. Yani bu kitaba da bir tutars谋zl谋k cevab谋 pekala verilebilir: Tutars谋zl谋臒谋n Tutars谋zl谋臒谋n谋n Tutars谋zl谋臒谋. Yaln谋z bu "tutars谋zl谋kception" y枚ntemini 陌bn R眉艧d gibi uygularsan谋z bir "plagiarism" sorunu da beraberinde gelir. Yani 陌bn R眉艧d resmen Gazali'nin kitab谋n谋n %80'ini oldu臒u gibi koymu艧. B枚ylece bu kitab谋 al谋rken ayn谋 zamanda Gazali'nin kitab谋n谋 da alm谋艧 oluyorsunuz. Asl谋nda 陌bn R眉艧d cevap vereyim derken Gazali'nin kitab谋n谋 pazarl谋yor olabilir mi? :P
脟eviride bir s谋k谋nt谋 g枚rmedim. Bol bol TDK T眉rk莽esi var. Hatta "laikle艧tirilmi艧" bir 莽eviri bile diyebilirim. "Allah" yerine "Y眉ce Tanr谋", "Gayb" yerine "Duyularla alg谋lanabilen d眉zlemin 枚tesi" gibi ifadeler biraz garip gelse de belli 枚nyarg谋lardan s谋yr谋l谋p metne felsefi bir metin olarak bakmay谋 kolayla艧t谋r谋yor. Belki yayg谋n bir tercihtir bilmiyorum ama ben ilk kez kar艧谋la艧t谋m.
脰zetle; 陌bn R眉艧d vurmu艧 ama gol olmam谋艧, 莽眉nk眉 ma莽 zaten bitmi艧.
Menyadari polemik ghazali dan aviceros yang begitu menggurita, seperti menikmati peperangan di sentral antara dua distrik yang bermusuhan. Peperangan yang menyenangkan