What do you think?
Rate this book
丌賮丕賯 兀丿亘 丕賱禺賷丕賱 丕賱毓賱賲賷
兀丿亘 丕賱禺賷丕賱 丕賱毓賱賲賷 賴賵 兀賴賲 丕賱兀噩賳丕爻 丕賱兀丿亘賷丞 丕賱賲毓丕氐乇丞 卮兀賳丕貙 賵兀賵孬賯賴丕 丕乇鬲亘丕胤丕 亘丨賷丕丞 丕賱亘卮乇貙 亘鬲賵賯毓丕鬲賴 亘賳賵毓賷丞 丕賱丨賷丕丞 賮賶 丕賱賲爻鬲賯亘賱 賳鬲賷噩丞 賱賱鬲賯丿賲丕鬲 丕賱毓賱賲賷丞 賵丕賱鬲賰賳賵賱賵噩賷丞 丕賱賴丕卅賱丞. 賵賯丿 丕丨鬲賱 丕賱丌賳 賲賰丕賳鬲賴 丕賱賱丕卅賯丞 亘賴貙 賵賱賲 賷毓丿 賷賳馗乇 廿賱賷賴 亘毓丿 毓賱賶 兀賳賴 噩賳爻 兀丿亘賷 賯賵丕賲賴 賲賱丕亘爻 乇賵丕丿 丕賱賮囟丕亍 丕賱睾乇賷亘丞 丕賱亘乇丕賯丞貙 賵賲爻丿爻丕鬲 兀卮毓丞 丕賱賱賷夭乇貙 亘賱 廿賱賶 兀賮丕賯 丕賴鬲賲丕賲賴 亘賲氐賷乇 丕賱噩賳爻 丕賱亘卮乇賶貙 賵廿賱賶 丕賱丿賵乇 丕賱匕賷 賷賯賵賲 亘賴 賰賳匕賷乇 亘賲丕 賮賶 鬲賯丿賲丕鬲 丕賱毓賱賲 賵丕賱鬲賰賳賵賱賵噩賷丕 賲賳 兀禺胤丕乇 鬲賴丿丿 賲爻鬲賯亘賱 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷丞貙 賵賲丕 賮賷賴丕 賲賳 禺賷乇 毓賱賶 丕賱賲丿賶 丕賱賯乇賷亘 兀賵 丕賱亘毓賷丿.
賵賱丕 卮賰 賮賶 兀賳 兀賴賲賷丞 兀丿亘 丕賱禺賷丕賱 丕賱毓賱賲賷 賯丿 丕夭丿丕丿鬲貙 賵丿丕卅乇丞 丕賳鬲卮丕乇賴 賯丿 丕鬲爻毓鬲貙 賵毓丿丿 賰鬲丕亘賴 賵噩賲丕賴賷乇 賯乇丕卅賴 賯丿 賰孬乇 賮賶 丕賱毓丕賱賲 兀噩賲毓貙 賵賳丨賳 毓賱賶 賲卮丕乇賮 丕賱賯乇賳 丕賱丨丕丿賷 賵丕賱毓卮乇賷賳. 賵賯丿 睾夭鬲 賯氐氐 賵乇賵丕賷丕鬲貙 亘賱 兀卮毓丕乇 賵賲爻乇丨賷丕鬲 兀丿亘 丕賱禺賷丕賱 丕賱毓賱賲賷 賲毓馗賲 丕賱爻丕丨丕鬲 丕賱兀丿亘賷丞 賵丕賱賮賳賷丞 賮賷 毓賯賵丿 丕賱爻賳賷賳 丕賱兀禺賷乇丞. 賵兀賮爻丨鬲 賱賴丕 氐賮丨丕鬲 兀卮賴乇 丕賱氐丨賮 賵丕賱賲噩賱丕鬲 丕賱毓丕賱賲賷丞貙 賵丕賯鬲丨賲鬲 毓丕賱賲 丕賱爻賷賳賲丕 賮賷 兀賲乇賷賰丕 賵丕賱毓丕賱賲 丕賱睾乇亘賷 賵爻丕卅乇 亘賱丿丕賳 丕賱毓丕賱賲 亘丿乇噩丕鬲 賲鬲賮丕賵鬲丞貙 賵賱丕賯鬲 賳噩丕丨丕 爻丕丨賯丕.
賵賷毓乇囟 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 丕賱賲卮賴丿 丕賱氐丕丿賯 賱丌賮丕賯 賴匕丕 丕賱噩賳爻 丕賱兀丿亘賷貙 賵賮賷賴 鬲毓乇賷賮 賵丕賮 亘噩匕賵乇賴貙 賵賲爻賷乇丞 鬲胤賵乇賴貙 賵毓氐乇賴 丕賱匕賴亘賷貙 賵丕乇鬲亘丕胤賴 亘丕賱賲爻鬲賯亘賱貙 賵鬲丨賵賷賱賴 賱賱匕賵賯 丕賱兀丿亘賷貙 賵噩賲丕賱賷丕鬲賴 丕賱鬲賷 鬲亘賷賳 兀氐賵賱 賳賯丿賴.
賵賱丕 卮賰 賮賶 兀賳 兀賴賲賷丞 兀丿亘 丕賱禺賷丕賱 丕賱毓賱賲賷 賯丿 丕夭丿丕丿鬲貙 賵丿丕卅乇丞 丕賳鬲卮丕乇賴 賯丿 丕鬲爻毓鬲貙 賵毓丿丿 賰鬲丕亘賴 賵噩賲丕賴賷乇 賯乇丕卅賴 賯丿 賰孬乇 賮賶 丕賱毓丕賱賲 兀噩賲毓貙 賵賳丨賳 毓賱賶 賲卮丕乇賮 丕賱賯乇賳 丕賱丨丕丿賷 賵丕賱毓卮乇賷賳. 賵賯丿 睾夭鬲 賯氐氐 賵乇賵丕賷丕鬲貙 亘賱 兀卮毓丕乇 賵賲爻乇丨賷丕鬲 兀丿亘 丕賱禺賷丕賱 丕賱毓賱賲賷 賲毓馗賲 丕賱爻丕丨丕鬲 丕賱兀丿亘賷丞 賵丕賱賮賳賷丞 賮賷 毓賯賵丿 丕賱爻賳賷賳 丕賱兀禺賷乇丞. 賵兀賮爻丨鬲 賱賴丕 氐賮丨丕鬲 兀卮賴乇 丕賱氐丨賮 賵丕賱賲噩賱丕鬲 丕賱毓丕賱賲賷丞貙 賵丕賯鬲丨賲鬲 毓丕賱賲 丕賱爻賷賳賲丕 賮賷 兀賲乇賷賰丕 賵丕賱毓丕賱賲 丕賱睾乇亘賷 賵爻丕卅乇 亘賱丿丕賳 丕賱毓丕賱賲 亘丿乇噩丕鬲 賲鬲賮丕賵鬲丞貙 賵賱丕賯鬲 賳噩丕丨丕 爻丕丨賯丕.
賵賷毓乇囟 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 丕賱賲卮賴丿 丕賱氐丕丿賯 賱丌賮丕賯 賴匕丕 丕賱噩賳爻 丕賱兀丿亘賷貙 賵賮賷賴 鬲毓乇賷賮 賵丕賮 亘噩匕賵乇賴貙 賵賲爻賷乇丞 鬲胤賵乇賴貙 賵毓氐乇賴 丕賱匕賴亘賷貙 賵丕乇鬲亘丕胤賴 亘丕賱賲爻鬲賯亘賱貙 賵鬲丨賵賷賱賴 賱賱匕賵賯 丕賱兀丿亘賷貙 賵噩賲丕賱賷丕鬲賴 丕賱鬲賷 鬲亘賷賳 兀氐賵賱 賳賯丿賴.
160 pages, Paperback
First published May 19, 1977
3 people are currently reading
79 people want to read
About the author
Robert Scholes
74听books16听followersRobert E. Scholes was an American literary critic and theorist. He is known for his ideas on fabulation and metafiction.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
May 21, 2014
As the subtitle suggests, this book is divided into three parts. First, and comprising about half of the book, is a history of science fiction, up to the publication date of 1977. This focuses primarily on literature, but also spends some time on SF movies, TV, and comics. As is often the case when people who care deeply about a field undertake to write a history of that field, the authors' opinions are far more entertaining than the recitation of names, dates, and plot synopses. Some examples:
On A.E.van Vogt:
"He is a careless and forgetful writer, who plunges on with the story, hoping to drag the careless and forgetful reader along with him. [...] Given sufficient room, van Vogt destroys the basis of his own story, and is forced to provide increasingly preposterous explanations for increasingly absurd behavior. This is not fiction for adults."
On Isaac Asimov:
"In some ways his work fits the stereotype of science fiction in the minds of the 'literati' -- in that his robots are as interesting as his people, and the depths of human feeling are closed to him."
On Theodore Sturgeon:
"Sturgeon, of course, made one other contribution that helped to gild the Golden Age. He made language itself important. He made style count. [...]This kind of care for the patterning of language itself was new to science fiction when Sturgeon began to practise it."
On Ray Bradbury:
"He specializes in ordinary landscapes, especially those of the Norman Rockwell, Saturday Evening Post Midwest -- which change into sites of nameless horror. He has borrowed the externals of science fiction to disguise and make more convincing his magical preoccupations. Though much acclaimed, his books have worn less well than others [...]. The sentimentality, the too easy liberal moralizing, have been overtaken by events."
The middle section of the book, which discusses science as it relates to SF, is by far the weakest part. Not only is the material largely out of date (unsurprising in a 1977 book), but it's rife with errors that were errors even by the knowledge of 1977. Only rarely does this section have anything to say that's interesting or enlightening.
The final section of the book, "Visions," is further divided into two parts, "Forms and Themes" and "Ten Representative Novels." The first of these looks at some of the recurring themes of SF, and is reasonably interesting. But it's in the final section that the book really shines. The commentary and analysis of ten classic novels of SF included some of the best, most interesting, and most insightful writing on those novels I've seen anywhere. The "Ten Representative Novels" includes Frankenstein, The Time Machine, Yevgeny Zamyatin's We, Stapledon's Star Maker, A Canticle for Leibowitz, and The Left Hand of Darkness. Again and again as I read this section I was struck by the depth and sensitivity of Scholes' and Rabkin's critical comments. Even when I disagreed with some of their interpretations, I felt enriched by the reading.
On A.E.van Vogt:
"He is a careless and forgetful writer, who plunges on with the story, hoping to drag the careless and forgetful reader along with him. [...] Given sufficient room, van Vogt destroys the basis of his own story, and is forced to provide increasingly preposterous explanations for increasingly absurd behavior. This is not fiction for adults."
On Isaac Asimov:
"In some ways his work fits the stereotype of science fiction in the minds of the 'literati' -- in that his robots are as interesting as his people, and the depths of human feeling are closed to him."
On Theodore Sturgeon:
"Sturgeon, of course, made one other contribution that helped to gild the Golden Age. He made language itself important. He made style count. [...]This kind of care for the patterning of language itself was new to science fiction when Sturgeon began to practise it."
On Ray Bradbury:
"He specializes in ordinary landscapes, especially those of the Norman Rockwell, Saturday Evening Post Midwest -- which change into sites of nameless horror. He has borrowed the externals of science fiction to disguise and make more convincing his magical preoccupations. Though much acclaimed, his books have worn less well than others [...]. The sentimentality, the too easy liberal moralizing, have been overtaken by events."
The middle section of the book, which discusses science as it relates to SF, is by far the weakest part. Not only is the material largely out of date (unsurprising in a 1977 book), but it's rife with errors that were errors even by the knowledge of 1977. Only rarely does this section have anything to say that's interesting or enlightening.
The final section of the book, "Visions," is further divided into two parts, "Forms and Themes" and "Ten Representative Novels." The first of these looks at some of the recurring themes of SF, and is reasonably interesting. But it's in the final section that the book really shines. The commentary and analysis of ten classic novels of SF included some of the best, most interesting, and most insightful writing on those novels I've seen anywhere. The "Ten Representative Novels" includes Frankenstein, The Time Machine, Yevgeny Zamyatin's We, Stapledon's Star Maker, A Canticle for Leibowitz, and The Left Hand of Darkness. Again and again as I read this section I was struck by the depth and sensitivity of Scholes' and Rabkin's critical comments. Even when I disagreed with some of their interpretations, I felt enriched by the reading.
April 6, 2018
A genuinely interesting read.
March 23, 2020
Un llibre imprescindible per a qualsevol aficionat de la ci猫ncia-ficci贸. Explica la hist貌ria i les tem脿tiques de forma did脿ctica i instructiva. Els 煤nics per貌 茅s que potser de vegades fa massa judicis de valor (que tamb茅 est脿 b茅, perqu猫 et permet veure els autors de manera cr铆tica) i que 茅s un llibre antic que nom茅s arriba fins als anys 70.
Read
March 13, 2022Read for dissertation
Read
November 5, 2017丕卮鬲乇賷鬲賴 兀孬賳丕亍 賵噩賵丿賷 亘賲丨丕賮馗丞 丕賱兀賯氐乇貙 毓賳丿賲丕 賰賳鬲 兀毓賲賱 賴賳丕賰 賱賲丿丞 毓丕賲.
賷鬲賲賷夭 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 亘兀賳賴 賷囟賲 賲賯丕賱丕鬲 毓賱賶 賱爻丕賳 賲鬲禺氐氐賷賳 賮賷 丕賱禺賷丕賱 丕賱毓賱賲賷貙 毓丕卮賵丕 賮賷 丕賱賳氐賮 丕賱孬丕賳賷 賲賳 丕賱賯乇賳 丕賱毓卮乇賷賳.
鬲丨賲賱 賴匕賴 丕賱賳賯胤丞 賲賷夭丞 賵毓賷亘賸丕.
丕賱賲賷夭丞貙 兀賳賰 鬲爻賲毓 兀乇丕亍 毓賳 鬲賱賰 丕賱丨賯亘丞貙 亘氐賵鬲 賲鬲禺氐氐賷賳 賷毓賷卮賵賳 賮賷賴丕貙 賵賱丕 賷夭丕賱賵丕 賲毓噩賵賳賵賳 亘賭 "鬲賯賱亘 丨丕賱丕鬲賴丕".
丕賱毓賷亘: 兀賳賴丕 賱丕 鬲賯丕乇賳 亘卮賲賵賱賷丞 賰鬲丕亘丕鬲 丕賱賲丐賱賮賷賳 丕賱匕賷賳 鬲亘毓賵賴賲貙 丨賷孬 鬲氐賷乇 賲賴賲丞 丕賱賱丕丨賯賷賳 兀爻賴賱 丿丕卅賲賸丕 賮賷 丕賱鬲兀乇賷禺貙 亘丨賰賲 兀賳賴賲 賷乇賵丕 丕賱賲丕囟賷 亘賳馗乇丞 兀賵爻毓貙 賲賳 丕賱兀毓賱賶貙 亘毓丿 兀賳 賷賴丿兀 丕賱睾亘丕乇.
丕賱賲卮賰賱丞 丕賱兀賰亘乇 賱賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘貙 兀賳賳賷 賯乇兀鬲賴 -賲亘丕卮乇丞- 亘毓丿 (丿賱賷賱 賰丕賲亘乇賷丿噩 賱賱禺賷丕賱 丕賱毓賱賲賷).
亘丕賱鬲丕賱賷.. 賮乇囟鬲 丕賱賲賯丕乇賳丞 丕賱馗丕賱賲丞 賳賮爻賴丕.
賷鬲賲賷夭 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 亘兀賳賴 賷囟賲 賲賯丕賱丕鬲 毓賱賶 賱爻丕賳 賲鬲禺氐氐賷賳 賮賷 丕賱禺賷丕賱 丕賱毓賱賲賷貙 毓丕卮賵丕 賮賷 丕賱賳氐賮 丕賱孬丕賳賷 賲賳 丕賱賯乇賳 丕賱毓卮乇賷賳.
鬲丨賲賱 賴匕賴 丕賱賳賯胤丞 賲賷夭丞 賵毓賷亘賸丕.
丕賱賲賷夭丞貙 兀賳賰 鬲爻賲毓 兀乇丕亍 毓賳 鬲賱賰 丕賱丨賯亘丞貙 亘氐賵鬲 賲鬲禺氐氐賷賳 賷毓賷卮賵賳 賮賷賴丕貙 賵賱丕 賷夭丕賱賵丕 賲毓噩賵賳賵賳 亘賭 "鬲賯賱亘 丨丕賱丕鬲賴丕".
丕賱毓賷亘: 兀賳賴丕 賱丕 鬲賯丕乇賳 亘卮賲賵賱賷丞 賰鬲丕亘丕鬲 丕賱賲丐賱賮賷賳 丕賱匕賷賳 鬲亘毓賵賴賲貙 丨賷孬 鬲氐賷乇 賲賴賲丞 丕賱賱丕丨賯賷賳 兀爻賴賱 丿丕卅賲賸丕 賮賷 丕賱鬲兀乇賷禺貙 亘丨賰賲 兀賳賴賲 賷乇賵丕 丕賱賲丕囟賷 亘賳馗乇丞 兀賵爻毓貙 賲賳 丕賱兀毓賱賶貙 亘毓丿 兀賳 賷賴丿兀 丕賱睾亘丕乇.
丕賱賲卮賰賱丞 丕賱兀賰亘乇 賱賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘貙 兀賳賳賷 賯乇兀鬲賴 -賲亘丕卮乇丞- 亘毓丿 (丿賱賷賱 賰丕賲亘乇賷丿噩 賱賱禺賷丕賱 丕賱毓賱賲賷).
亘丕賱鬲丕賱賷.. 賮乇囟鬲 丕賱賲賯丕乇賳丞 丕賱馗丕賱賲丞 賳賮爻賴丕.
May 16, 2014
9: Great lecture series about the history of science-fiction.
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.