What do you think?
Rate this book
118 pages, Paperback
First published February 21, 1980
賲丕 賷乇賮毓 賲賳 卮兀賳 丕賱氐賵乇丞 賴賵 丕賱丨亘 .. 丕賱丨亘 丕賱賲賮乇胤
________
賴賵 "兀賳丕 " 丕賱匕賶 賱丕 賷鬲胤丕亘賯 兀亘丿丕 賲毓 氐賵乇鬲賶
賱兀賳 丕賱氐賵乇丞 賴賷 丕賱鬲賷 鬲亘丿賵 孬賯賷賱丞..爻丕賰賳丞..毓賳賷丿丞
賵賴賵 "兀賳丕" 丕賱匕賶 兀亘丿賵 禺賮賷賮丕 賲賳賯爻賲丕 賲卮鬲鬲丕
賱丕 兀亘賯賶 爻丕賰賳丕
亘賱 賲賴鬲丕噩丕 賮賷 廿賳丕卅賷 賰毓賮乇賷鬲 丕賱毓賱亘丞
________
賯丿 賷丨丿孬 兀賳 兀賰賵賳 賲購乇丕賯亘丕 丿賵賳 兀賳 兀丿乇賷
賵賱賰賳賷 賮賷 兀丨賷丕賳 賰孬賷乇丞 賵亘賲卮賷卅鬲賷 賷鬲賲 鬲氐賵賷乇賷 毓賱賶 丿乇丕賷丞 賲賳賷
亘賷丿 兀賳賷 賲鬲賶 兀卮毓乇 兀賳賳賷 賲購乇丕賯賻亘 賲賳 賯亘賱 丕賱毓丿爻丞貙 丨鬲賶 賷鬲睾賷乇 賰賱賾 卮賷亍
兀鬲卮賰賾賱 賲賳卮睾賱丕 亘丕鬲禺丕匕 賵囟毓丕 兀賲丕賲 丕賱賰丕賲賷乇丕 貙 兀氐賳毓 賱賳賮爻賷 賮賷 丕賱丨丕賱 噩爻丿丕 丌禺乇
兀鬲丨賵賱 爻賱賮丕 廿賱賶 氐賵乇丞貙 賵兀卮毓乇 兀賳 丕賱氐賵乇丞 鬲賵噩賽丿 噩爻丿賷 賵鬲購賲賷鬲賴貙 賵賮賯丕 廿乇丕丿鬲賴丕 丕賱禺丕氐丞.
________
賵賱賰賳 賲丕 兀乇賷丿賴 兀賳 賷丿乇賰 賴賵 丕賱賳爻賷噩 丕賱賲毓賳賵賷 丕賱乇賯賷賯貙 賵賱賷爻鬲 丕賱賲丨丕賰丕丞
賮兀賳丕 賱丕 兀毓乇賮 賰賷賮 兀噩爻丿 賲丕 賷噩賷卮 賮賷 賳賮爻賷
兀賯乇乇 兀賳 兀丿毓 丕亘鬲爻丕賲丞 禺賮賷賮丞 鬲胤賮賵 毓賱賶 卮賮鬲賷 賵賮賷 毓賷賳賷 兀乇賷丿 賱賴丕 兀賳 鬲賰賵賳 睾丕賲囟丞
亘丨賷孬 兀毓亘乇 賮賷 丌賳 賵丕丨丿 毓賳 禺氐丕卅氐 胤亘賷毓鬲賷 賵丿乇丕賷鬲賷 丕賱爻丕禺乇丞 亘賰賱 胤賯賵爻 丕賱賮賵鬲賵睾乇丕賮賷丕
________
I had understood that henceforth I must interrogate the evidence of Photography, not from the viewpoint of pleasure, but in relation to what we romantically call love and death.
Of the countless movements of switching, inserting, pressing and the like, the 'snapping' of the photographer has had the greatest consequences. A touch of the finger now sufficed to fix an event for an unlimited period of time. The camera gave the moment a posthumous shock, as it were.
In front of the photograph of my mother as a child, I tell myself: she is going to die: I shudder, like Winnicott鈥檚 psychotic patient, over a catastrophe which has already occurred. Whether or not the subject is already dead, every photograph is this catastrophe.Every photo is a commingling of love and death, a realm of life lost and life left for losing. There is a beauty in life which is lost when it pinned down in art, art of any kind, but especially Photography. While literature, painting, drawing, music, all take life and attempt to pin it down, they also add something that life hadn't had before. In photography, nothing is added, it is frozen life, it is death, there is nothing which supports it, nothing which adorn it, we see nothing added, we are only reminded of what has been removed.
When we define the Photograph as a motionless image, this does not mean only that the figures it represents do not move; it means that they do not emerge, do not leave: they are anesthetized and fastened down, like butterflies.
When we awake each morning, we hold in our hands, usually weakly and loosely, but a few fringes of the tapestry of a lived life, as loomed for us by forgetting. However, with our purposeful activity and, even more, our purposive remembering each day unravels the web and the ornaments of forgetting.Our purposive remembering, our memories which we force-fit into words, into images, die - they are no longer what they were, they have been forced to change mediums, and something is lost: the beauty of life. The photograph only appears a representation of reality, it is only, rather, an expression of loss, of what can never be again. It is often in art that the afflatus of creation is to exorcise, to kill away, that which burns inside the artist, to cleanse the spirit of the past. But there is a danger in this, in the abundance of photography, that our memories will become extinct.
Ultimately 鈥� or at the limit 鈥� in order to see a photograph well, it is best to look away or close your eyes. 鈥楾he necessary condition for an image is sight,鈥� Janouch told Kafka; and Kafka smiled and replied: 鈥榃e photograph things in order to drive them out of our minds. My stories are a way of shutting my eyes.Photographs, unlike other arts, are too immediate, seem too real (though they are unreal): the kill memory forever. Photographs do not shut the eyes, but gouge them out: we become Oedipus fleeing reality as it is, in a vain blindness which forces us to remember only what we hoped to lose, and lose only what we hoped to remember.
Here is where the madness is, for until this day no representation could assure me of the past of a thing except by intermediaries; but with the Photograph, my certainty is immediate: no on in the world can undeceive me. The Photograph then becomes a bizarre medium, a new form of hallucination: false on the level of perception, true on the level of time: a temporal hallucination, so to speak, a modest, shared hallucination (on the one hand 鈥渋t is not there,鈥� on the other 鈥渂ut it has indeed been鈥�): a mad image, chafed by reality.