What do you think?
Rate this book
A History of Modern Criticism, 1750-1950 #3
鬲丕乇賷禺 丕賱賳賯丿 丕賱兀丿亘賷 丕賱丨丿賷孬: 毓氐乇 丕賱鬲丨賵賱 - 丕賱噩夭亍 丕賱孬丕賱孬
賷賯毓 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賮賷 孬賲丕賳賷丞 賲噩賱丿丕鬲 賷鬲丕亘毓 乇丨賱丞 丕賱賳賯丿 丕賱兀丿亘賷 賮賷 鬲卮丕亘賰丕鬲賴 賲毓 毓丕賱賲 丕賱噩賲丕賱 賵丕賱賮賱爻賮丞貙 亘丨孬賸丕 毓賳 丕賱賳馗乇賷丞 丕賱兀丿亘賷丞貙 丕賱噩夭亍 丕賱兀賵賱 賷鬲賳丕賵賱 兀賵丕禺乇 丕賱賯乇賳 丕賱孬丕賲賳 毓卮乇貙 賵丕賱噩夭亍 丕賱孬丕賳賷 亘毓賳賵丕賳 丕賱毓氐乇 丕賱乇賵賲丕賳爻賷貙 兀賲丕 丕賱噩夭亍 丕賱孬丕賱孬 賮賴賵 亘毓賳賵丕賳 毓氐乇 丕賱鬲丨賵賱. 賮賲賳匕 兀賵丕禺乇 丕賱賯乇賳 ( 19 賲) 丕胤賱賯 毓賱賷賴 賮賷 賮乇賳爻丕 丕賱毓氐乇 丕賱匕賴亘賷 賱賱賳賯丿 丕賱兀丿亘賷 賲鬲賲孬賱丕賸 賮賷 " 爻丕賳鬲 亘賷賮 " 賵" 賴賷亘賵賱賷鬲 " - 賵賮賷 乇賵爻賷丕 " 亘賱賳爻賰賷 " 賵賮賷 丕賷胤丕賱賷丕 " 丿賷 爻賳噩鬲賷爻 "貙 賵丕賳噩賱鬲乇丕 " 賲丕鬲賷賵 兀乇賳賵賱丿 " .
- GenresNonfictionLiterature
576 pages
First published December 1, 1965
1 person is currently reading
67 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
September 19, 2015
Wellek's third volume of his massive History of Modern Criticism is more interesting to the current reader than the previous entries, as it tackles some problems which are relevant to this date in literary criticism and theory of art. I really enjoyed the chapter on the Hegelians as well as on Sainte-Beuve. However - and this is not necessarily a bad thing - the book is turning out as more of a history of ideas than of the personal positions adopted by each critic and I specially feel a lack of analysis of the critical works per se.
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.