Steve's bookshelf: all en-US Thu, 14 Nov 2024 20:37:33 -0800 60 Steve's bookshelf: all 144 41 /images/layout/goodreads_logo_144.jpg The Count of Monte Cristo 522110
Set against the turbulent years of the Napoleonicera, Alexandre Dumas's thrilling adventure storyis one of the most widely read romantic novels ofall time. In it the dashing young hero, EdmondDantès, is betrayed by his enemies and throwninto a secret dungeon in the Chateau d'If -- doomedto spend his life in a dank prison cell. The storyof his long, intolerable years in captivity, hismiraculous escape, and his carefully wroughtrevenge creates a dramatic tale of mystery and intrigueand paints a vision of France -- a dazzling,dueling, exuberant France -- that has become immortal.]]>
531 Alexandre Dumas 0553213504 Steve 4
Tragedy struck at a young age when villainous men took all that was dear to him. As he grew older, he drew strength from his vow to get even with those who had caused this death and despair. With a focus and will beyond all human proportion, he readied himself for revenge. His immense wealth gave him the means and the influence needed to carry out his plans. He was physically strong and a master of weapons, with nary a trace of fear. At the same time, he was a man of impeccable honor. His sense of justice, though inordinate, was never less than fair. By disguising his true identity, motivations from his other life remained hidden. With his shrewdness and stealth, perps rarely saw rectitude coming their way. I suppose it's as we’d expect in a tale such as his that good would be pure good and evil pure evil. Good may have had moments of doubt, but any inner turmoil would give way to the real conflicts: vanquishing bad guys.

So, can you guess who it is? Turns out it’s The Dark Knight himself, Gotham’s own Caped Crusader. For any of you misled into thinking it was the Count of Monte Cristo, I suppose that’s understandable.

I’m rating this somewhere in the 4 to 5 range. It’s a great story with lots going on to keep the pages turning. There were recognizable human traits on display, too, even if they did veer towards the noble and sublime at one extreme or the no-good and slimy at the other. It may not be fair for me to downgrade it on literary merit or lack of roundedness since the transcription I read was abridged. But hey, at least it wasn’t the Classic Comic Book version. Nor was it the one Bob Kane did for DC Comics, though my view may have been colored by his like-minded hero.
]]>
4.36 1846 The Count of Monte Cristo
author: Alexandre Dumas
name: Steve
average rating: 4.36
book published: 1846
rating: 4
read at:
date added: 2024/11/14
shelves:
review:
I’m thinking of a famous fictional hero. See if you can guess who it is from the clues.

Tragedy struck at a young age when villainous men took all that was dear to him. As he grew older, he drew strength from his vow to get even with those who had caused this death and despair. With a focus and will beyond all human proportion, he readied himself for revenge. His immense wealth gave him the means and the influence needed to carry out his plans. He was physically strong and a master of weapons, with nary a trace of fear. At the same time, he was a man of impeccable honor. His sense of justice, though inordinate, was never less than fair. By disguising his true identity, motivations from his other life remained hidden. With his shrewdness and stealth, perps rarely saw rectitude coming their way. I suppose it's as we’d expect in a tale such as his that good would be pure good and evil pure evil. Good may have had moments of doubt, but any inner turmoil would give way to the real conflicts: vanquishing bad guys.

So, can you guess who it is? Turns out it’s The Dark Knight himself, Gotham’s own Caped Crusader. For any of you misled into thinking it was the Count of Monte Cristo, I suppose that’s understandable.

I’m rating this somewhere in the 4 to 5 range. It’s a great story with lots going on to keep the pages turning. There were recognizable human traits on display, too, even if they did veer towards the noble and sublime at one extreme or the no-good and slimy at the other. It may not be fair for me to downgrade it on literary merit or lack of roundedness since the transcription I read was abridged. But hey, at least it wasn’t the Classic Comic Book version. Nor was it the one Bob Kane did for DC Comics, though my view may have been colored by his like-minded hero.

]]>
<![CDATA[Death in Venice and Other Tales]]> 53064 384 Thomas Mann 0141181737 Steve 4 3.92 1911 Death in Venice and Other Tales
author: Thomas Mann
name: Steve
average rating: 3.92
book published: 1911
rating: 4
read at:
date added: 2024/08/07
shelves:
review:

]]>
The Firm (The Firm, #1) 452235 --jgrisham.com]]> 501 John Grisham 044021145X Steve 3 4.26 1991 The Firm (The Firm, #1)
author: John Grisham
name: Steve
average rating: 4.26
book published: 1991
rating: 3
read at:
date added: 2024/04/25
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Tell Me Everything (Amgash, #5)]]> 204811915 People) of a novel about new friendships, old loves, and the very human desire to leave a mark on the world.

With her remarkable insight into the human condition and silences that contain multitudes, Elizabeth Strout returns to the town of Crosby, Maine, and to her beloved cast of characters—Lucy Barton, Olive Kitteridge, Bob Burgess, and more—as they deal with a shocking crime in their midst, fall in love and yet choose to be apart, and grapple with the question, as Lucy Barton puts it, “What does anyone’s life mean?�

It’s autumn in Maine, and the town lawyer Bob Burgess has become enmeshed in an unfolding murder investigation, defending a lonely, isolated man accused of killing his mother. He has also fallen into a deep and abiding friendship with the acclaimed writer Lucy Barton, who lives down the road in a house by the sea with her ex-husband, William. Together, Lucy and Bob go on walks and talk about their lives, their fears and regrets, and what might have been. Lucy, meanwhile, is finally introduced to the iconic Olive Kitteridge, now living in a retirement community on the edge of town. They spend afternoons together in Olive’s apartment, telling each other stories. Stories about people they have known—“unrecorded lives,� Olive calls them—reanimating them, and, in the process, imbuing their lives with meaning.

Brimming with empathy and pathos, Tell Me Everything is Elizabeth Strout operating at the height of her powers, illuminating the ways in which our relationships keep us afloat. As Lucy says, “Love comes in so many different forms, but it is always love.”]]>
326 Elizabeth Strout 0593446097 Steve 0 to-read 4.00 2024 Tell Me Everything (Amgash, #5)
author: Elizabeth Strout
name: Steve
average rating: 4.00
book published: 2024
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2024/04/23
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
Demon Copperhead 60194162 "Anyone will tell you the born of this world are marked from the get-out, win or lose."

Set in the mountains of southern Appalachia, this is the story of a boy born to a teenaged single mother in a single-wide trailer, with no assets beyond his dead father's good looks and copper-colored hair, a caustic wit, and a fierce talent for survival. In a plot that never pauses for breath, relayed in his own unsparing voice, he braves the modern perils of foster care, child labor, derelict schools, athletic success, addiction, disastrous loves, and crushing losses. Through all of it, he reckons with his own invisibility in a popular culture where even the superheroes have abandoned rural people in favor of cities.

Many generations ago, Charles Dickens wrote David Copperfield from his experience as a survivor of institutional poverty and its damages to children in his society. Those problems have yet to be solved in ours. Dickens is not a prerequisite for readers of this novel, but he provided its inspiration. In transposing a Victorian epic novel to the contemporary American South, Barbara Kingsolver enlists Dickens' anger and compassion, and above all, his faith in the transformative powers of a good story. Demon Copperhead speaks for a new generation of lost boys, and all those born into beautiful, cursed places they can't imagine leaving behind.]]>
560 Barbara Kingsolver 0063251922 Steve 0 to-read 4.46 2022 Demon Copperhead
author: Barbara Kingsolver
name: Steve
average rating: 4.46
book published: 2022
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2023/11/12
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Beyond Weird: Why Everything You Thought You Knew about Quantum Physics Is Different]]> 41832814 “Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood it.�



Since Niels Bohr said this many years ago, quantum mechanics has only been getting more shocking. We now realize that it’s not really telling us that “weird� things happen out of sight, on the tiniest level, in the atomic world: rather, everything is quantum. But if quantum mechanics is correct, what seems obvious and right in our everyday world is built on foundations that don’t seemobvious or right at all—or even possible.



An exhilarating tour of the contemporary quantum landscape,Beyond Weirdis a book about what quantum physics really means—and what it doesn’t. Science writer Philip Ball offers an up-to-date, accessible account of the quest to come to grips with the most fundamental theory of physical reality, and to explain how its counterintuitive principles underpin the world we experience. Over the past decade it has become clear that quantum physics is less a theory about particles and waves, uncertainty and fuzziness, than a theory about information and knowledge—about what can be known, and how we can know it. Discoveries and experiments over the past few decades have called into question the meanings and limits of space and time, cause and effect, and, ultimately, of knowledge itself. The quantum world Ball shows us isn’t a different world. It is our world, and if anything deserves to be called “weird,� it’s us.]]>
370 Philip Ball Steve 3 4.14 2018 Beyond Weird: Why Everything You Thought You Knew about Quantum Physics Is Different
author: Philip Ball
name: Steve
average rating: 4.14
book published: 2018
rating: 3
read at: 2023/07/29
date added: 2023/07/29
shelves:
review:

]]>
The Interestings 17226463
The kind of creativity that is rewarded at age fifteen is not always enough to propel someone through life at age thirty; not everyone can sustain, in adulthood, what seemed so special in adolescence. Jules Jacobson, an aspiring comic actress, eventually resigns herself to a more practical occupation and lifestyle. Her friend Jonah, a gifted musician, stops playing the guitar and becomes an engineer. But Ethan and Ash, Jules’s now-married best friends, become shockingly successful—true to their initial artistic dreams, with the wealth and access that allow those dreams to keep expanding. The friendships endure and even prosper, but also underscore the differences in their fates, in what their talents have become and the shapes their lives have taken.

Wide in scope, ambitious, and populated by complex characters who come together and apart in a changing New York City, The Interestings explores the meaning of talent; the nature of envy; the roles of class, art, money, and power; and how all of it can shift and tilt precipitously over the course of a friendship and a life.]]>
480 Meg Wolitzer 1101602031 Steve 4 3.72 2013 The Interestings
author: Meg Wolitzer
name: Steve
average rating: 3.72
book published: 2013
rating: 4
read at: 2023/07/10
date added: 2023/07/10
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Life: A User's Manual (Verba Mundi International Literature Series)]]> 53533403
But the novel is more than just an extraordinary range of fictions; it is a closely observed account of life and experience. The apartment block’s one hundred rooms are arranged in a magic square, and the book as a whole is peppered with a staggering range of literary puzzles and allusions, acrostics, problems of chess and logic, crosswords, and mathematical formula. All are there for the reader to solve in the best tradition of the detective novel.]]>
604 Georges Perec Steve 0 currently-reading 4.21 1978 Life: A User's Manual (Verba Mundi International Literature Series)
author: Georges Perec
name: Steve
average rating: 4.21
book published: 1978
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2023/06/11
shelves: currently-reading
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[The Way the World Ends (Warmer, #1)]]> 41945326
For three strangers whose paths will cross, the storm hasn’t even reached its peak. Two of them are the kind of climate scientists no one ever listens to in disaster movies. The third, against even icier opposition, has just moved to the Magnolia State to come out. Soon they’ll all be pushed closer to the edge, where the bracing winds of cataclysmic change can be so wildly liberating.

Jess Walter’s The Way the World Ends is part of Warmer, a collection of seven visions of a conceivable tomorrow by today’s most thought-provoking authors. Alarming, inventive, intimate, and frightening, each story can be read, or listened to, in a single breathtaking sitting.]]>
42 Jess Walter 1542042321 Steve 3 3.56 2018 The Way the World Ends (Warmer, #1)
author: Jess Walter
name: Steve
average rating: 3.56
book published: 2018
rating: 3
read at: 2023/06/11
date added: 2023/06/11
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[The Destiny Thief: Essays on Writing, Writers and Life]]> 39129979
In these nine essays, Richard Russo provides insight into his life as a writer, teacher, friend, and reader. From a commencement speech he gave at Colby College, to the story of how an oddly placed toilet made him reevaluate the purpose of humor in art and life, to a comprehensive analysis of Mark Twain's value, to his harrowing journey accompanying a dear friend as she pursued gender-reassignment surgery, The Destiny Thief reflects the broad interests and experiences of one of America's most beloved authors. Warm, funny, wise, and poignant, the essays included here traverse Russo's writing life, expanding our understanding of who he is and how his singular, incredibly generous mind works. An utter joy to read, they give deep insight into the creative process from the prospective of one of our greatest writers.]]>
216 Richard Russo 1524733520 Steve 4 3.99 2018 The Destiny Thief: Essays on Writing, Writers and Life
author: Richard Russo
name: Steve
average rating: 3.99
book published: 2018
rating: 4
read at: 2023/06/08
date added: 2023/06/08
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[The Cold Cold Ground (Detective Sean Duffy #1)]]> 46218517 The Cold Cold Ground is a brilliant depiction of Belfast at the height of the Troubles—and of a cop treading a thin, thin line.

McKinty’s previous book, Falling Glass, was an Audible.com Best Thriller of 2011


]]>
322 Adrian McKinty Steve 0 currently-reading 4.13 2012 The Cold Cold Ground (Detective Sean Duffy #1)
author: Adrian McKinty
name: Steve
average rating: 4.13
book published: 2012
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2023/05/15
shelves: currently-reading
review:

]]>
The Bartender's Tale 18867430 Tom Harry has a streak of frost in his black pompadour and a venerable bar called The Medicine Lodge, the chief watering hole and last refuge of the town of Gros Ventre, in northern Montana. Tom also has a son named Rusty, an “accident between the sheets� whose mother deserted them both years ago.The pair make an odd kind of family, with the bar their true home, but they manage just fine.
Until the summer of 1960, that is, when Rusty turns twelve. Change arrives with gale force, in the person of Proxy, a taxi dancer Tom knew back when, and her beatnik daughter, Francine. Is Francine, as Proxy claims, the unsuspected legacy of her and Tom’s past? Without a doubt she is an unsettling gust of the future, upending every certainty in Rusty’s life and generating a mist of passion and pretense that seems to obscure everyone’s vision but his own. As Rusty struggles to decipher the oddities of adult behavior and the mysteries build toward a reckoning, Ivan Doig wonderfully captures how the world becomes bigger and the past becomes more complex in the last moments of childhood.]]>
434 Ivan Doig 110159683X Steve 5 4.34 2012 The Bartender's Tale
author: Ivan Doig
name: Steve
average rating: 4.34
book published: 2012
rating: 5
read at: 2023/05/15
date added: 2023/05/15
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Slow Horses (Slough House, #1)]]> 59336841
London, England: Slough House is where the washed-up MI5 spies go to while away what's left of their failed careers. The "slow horses," as they’re called, have all disgraced themselves in some way to get relegated here. Maybe they messed up an op badly and can't be trusted anymore. Maybe they got in the way of an ambitious colleague and had the rug yanked out from under them. Maybe they just got too dependent on the bottle—not unusual in this line of work. One thing they all have in common, though, is they all want to be back in the action. And most of them would do anything to get there─even if it means having to collaborate with one another.

River Cartwright, one such “slow horse,� is bitter about his failure and about his tedious assignment transcribing cell phone conversations. When a young man is abducted and his kidnappers threaten to broadcast his beheading live on the Internet, River sees an opportunity to redeem himself. But is the victim who he first appears to be? And what’s the kidnappers� connection with a disgraced journalist? As the clock ticks on the execution, River finds that everyone has his own agenda.]]>
336 Mick Herron Steve 5 4.29 2010 Slow Horses (Slough House, #1)
author: Mick Herron
name: Steve
average rating: 4.29
book published: 2010
rating: 5
read at: 2023/04/25
date added: 2023/04/25
shelves:
review:

]]>
The Great Gatsby 396094 This is an alternative cover edition for ISBN 9780141182636

Young, handsome and fabulously rich, Jay Gatsby is the bright star of the Jazz Age, but as writer Nick Carraway is drawn into the decadent orbit of his Long Island mansion, where the party never seems to end, he finds himself faced by the mystery of Gatsby's origins and desires. Beneath the shimmering surface of his life, Gatsby is hiding a secret: a silent longing that can never be fulfilled. And soon, this destructive obsession will force his world to unravel.

In The Great Gatsby, Fitzgerald brilliantly captures both the disillusionment of post-war America and the moral failure of a society obsessed with wealth and status. But he does more than render the essence of a particular time and place, for in chronicling Gatsby's tragic pursuit of his dream, Fitzgerald re-creates the universal conflict between illusion and reality.]]>
177 F. Scott Fitzgerald Steve 4 A symbol of Jazz Age decay.
And just as Scott held a
Fixation for Zelda,
Jay’s Daisy dream sure made him pay!
]]>
3.88 1925 The Great Gatsby
author: F. Scott Fitzgerald
name: Steve
average rating: 3.88
book published: 1925
rating: 4
read at: 1979/01/01
date added: 2022/09/01
shelves:
review:
There once was a man they called Jay,
A symbol of Jazz Age decay.
And just as Scott held a
Fixation for Zelda,
Jay’s Daisy dream sure made him pay!

]]>
<![CDATA[Old Filth (Old Filth Trilogy #1)]]> 38473488
Borrowing from biography and history, Jane Gardam has written a literary masterpiece reminiscent of Rudyard Kipling’s “Baa Baa, Black Sheep� that retraces much of the twentieth century’s torrid and momentous history.

]]>
287 Jane Gardam 1609450175 Steve 4 4.19 2004 Old Filth (Old Filth Trilogy #1)
author: Jane Gardam
name: Steve
average rating: 4.19
book published: 2004
rating: 4
read at: 2021/07/28
date added: 2021/07/28
shelves:
review:

]]>
Oh William! (Amgash, #3) 56294820
So Lucy is both surprised and not surprised when William asks her to join him on a trip to investigate a recently uncovered family secret—one of those secrets that rearrange everything we think we know about the people closest to us. What happens next is nothing less than another example of what Hilary Mantel has called Elizabeth Strout’s “perfect attunement to the human condition.� There are fears and insecurities, simple joys and acts of tenderness, and revelations about affairs and other spouses, parents and their children. On every page of this exquisite novel we learn more about the quiet forces that hold us together—even after we’ve grown apart.

At the heart of this story is the indomitable voice of Lucy Barton, who offers a profound, lasting reflection on the very nature of existence. “This is the way of life,� Lucy says: “the many things we do not know until it is too late.”]]>
240 Elizabeth Strout 0812989430 Steve 0 to-read 3.79 2021 Oh William! (Amgash, #3)
author: Elizabeth Strout
name: Steve
average rating: 3.79
book published: 2021
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2021/07/22
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
Pride and Prejudice 208735
Vivien Jones, in her new introduction to this Penguin Classics edition, shows how their romance is inseparable from the important and social political debates of Austen's time, and describes Pride and Prejudice as 'One of the most perfect, most pleasurable and most subtle - and therefore, perhaps, most dangerously persuasive - of romantic love stories.'
--back cover]]>
336 Jane Austen Steve 5
OK, so P&P may not need my help. The word is likely already out. What that means is that I can scurry around the periphery of the story itself, make a few small points, and move on with near certitude that Miss Austen will have an audience regardless.

It had been quite a while since I’d read anything written so long ago. Of course, the language was very different, and for me that was part of the appeal. The musicality of it must owe to the baroque style of the time as well as to the skills of the writer. Her words were precise and descriptors well-chosen. This passage about the piano-playing abilities of the lightly regarded middle sister is but one of many examples:

"Mary had neither genius nor taste; and though vanity had given her application, it had given her likewise a pedantic air and conceited manner, which would have injured a higher degree of excellence than she had reached."


This example is also one of many instances where an "air" or "manner" was defined, or a "countenance", "bearing" or "nature". Much was read into facial expressions, too. Remember, this came from a time before “show, don’t tell.�

As an older vintage depiction, there were also big differences in the social norms of the day -- the mores and the protocols. It’s a cliché to point out that Austen’s books are about manners, but it’s true nonetheless. Courtships, for instance, had rigid rules that are almost laughable to our modern ways of thinking. And the language was so stylized and indirect. Subtitles would make for a good skit, like in Annie Hall where Alvy is talking to Annie early on about some abstract artsy thing while his real train of thought was, shall we say, less chaste. Monetary details, class, and family reputation were important determinants in the matches of the day, too. Books like this give us great historical insight into the social contracts and conventions.

There’s no need for me to repeat in any detail what most people already know or could discover somewhere else better than this. Elizabeth Bennet is great. Mr. Darcy emerges. Jane and Bingley are charming, though nearly victims of a misunderstanding. Mr. Collins is an obsequious toad. Mr. Bennet is a bit too laissez-faire with a daughter or two who needed tighter reins. Mrs. Bennet is a woman “of weak understanding and illiberal mind.� (I should have been using Miss Austen’s wording throughout. It’s not like I could improve upon it.) Lydia is heedless and Wickham is evil. Of these latter two it was said, “how little of permanent happiness could belong to a couple who were only brought together because their passions were stronger than their virtue.� The whole story is essentially how these characters play off of one another and sort out their relationships and their lives. Yes, and it’s told really well. It’s more than just the costume drama enthusiasts with their immoderate taste for romanticism that sustain this as a classic.

I’ll close this hodgepodge hash of a review by introducing a fun new parlor game involving a mishmash of P&P characters. Pish posh you say? Well hear me out. First of all, if you haven’t already done so, read the book and learn the traits and idiosyncrasies of the characters. They range widely over multiple dimensions. Then take turns mapping these characters to the other players in the game. Composites are encouraged. For instance, my lovely bride of 30 years is 0.872 Elizabeth for her perception, quick wit, and probity; 0.127 Jane for her beauty and good nature; and 0.001 Mrs. Bennet for having watched on more than one occasion that show where bridezillas rate other bridezillas� weddings, critically and cattily. Then look to see which participants turn red with embarrassment, or even redder with anger.

Note: This is my review from a few years ago and may seem like a float. However, a GR technical glitch made the book reappear with a blank review box that I'm now filling with this old review. Sorry if anyone rereads this expecting new content.]]>
4.40 1813 Pride and Prejudice
author: Jane Austen
name: Steve
average rating: 4.40
book published: 1813
rating: 5
read at:
date added: 2021/04/05
shelves:
review:
It is a truth universally acknowledged, that an author possessing immense talent and a good story to tell, must be in want of a reader like me to bestow upon it the laurels it merits. How else will anyone hear of it?

OK, so P&P may not need my help. The word is likely already out. What that means is that I can scurry around the periphery of the story itself, make a few small points, and move on with near certitude that Miss Austen will have an audience regardless.

It had been quite a while since I’d read anything written so long ago. Of course, the language was very different, and for me that was part of the appeal. The musicality of it must owe to the baroque style of the time as well as to the skills of the writer. Her words were precise and descriptors well-chosen. This passage about the piano-playing abilities of the lightly regarded middle sister is but one of many examples:

"Mary had neither genius nor taste; and though vanity had given her application, it had given her likewise a pedantic air and conceited manner, which would have injured a higher degree of excellence than she had reached."


This example is also one of many instances where an "air" or "manner" was defined, or a "countenance", "bearing" or "nature". Much was read into facial expressions, too. Remember, this came from a time before “show, don’t tell.�

As an older vintage depiction, there were also big differences in the social norms of the day -- the mores and the protocols. It’s a cliché to point out that Austen’s books are about manners, but it’s true nonetheless. Courtships, for instance, had rigid rules that are almost laughable to our modern ways of thinking. And the language was so stylized and indirect. Subtitles would make for a good skit, like in Annie Hall where Alvy is talking to Annie early on about some abstract artsy thing while his real train of thought was, shall we say, less chaste. Monetary details, class, and family reputation were important determinants in the matches of the day, too. Books like this give us great historical insight into the social contracts and conventions.

There’s no need for me to repeat in any detail what most people already know or could discover somewhere else better than this. Elizabeth Bennet is great. Mr. Darcy emerges. Jane and Bingley are charming, though nearly victims of a misunderstanding. Mr. Collins is an obsequious toad. Mr. Bennet is a bit too laissez-faire with a daughter or two who needed tighter reins. Mrs. Bennet is a woman “of weak understanding and illiberal mind.� (I should have been using Miss Austen’s wording throughout. It’s not like I could improve upon it.) Lydia is heedless and Wickham is evil. Of these latter two it was said, “how little of permanent happiness could belong to a couple who were only brought together because their passions were stronger than their virtue.� The whole story is essentially how these characters play off of one another and sort out their relationships and their lives. Yes, and it’s told really well. It’s more than just the costume drama enthusiasts with their immoderate taste for romanticism that sustain this as a classic.

I’ll close this hodgepodge hash of a review by introducing a fun new parlor game involving a mishmash of P&P characters. Pish posh you say? Well hear me out. First of all, if you haven’t already done so, read the book and learn the traits and idiosyncrasies of the characters. They range widely over multiple dimensions. Then take turns mapping these characters to the other players in the game. Composites are encouraged. For instance, my lovely bride of 30 years is 0.872 Elizabeth for her perception, quick wit, and probity; 0.127 Jane for her beauty and good nature; and 0.001 Mrs. Bennet for having watched on more than one occasion that show where bridezillas rate other bridezillas� weddings, critically and cattily. Then look to see which participants turn red with embarrassment, or even redder with anger.

Note: This is my review from a few years ago and may seem like a float. However, a GR technical glitch made the book reappear with a blank review box that I'm now filling with this old review. Sorry if anyone rereads this expecting new content.
]]>
Pride and Prejudice 84979 Another cover edition for this ISBN

Since its immediate success in 1813, Pride and Prejudice has remained one of the most popular novels in the English language. Jane Austen called this brilliant work "her own darling child" and its vivacious heroine, Elizabeth Bennet, "as delightful a creature as ever appeared in print." The romantic clash between the opinionated Elizabeth and her proud beau, Mr. Darcy, is a splendid performance of civilized sparring. And Jane Austen's radiant wit sparkles as her characters dance a delicate quadrille of flirtation and intrigue, making this book the most superb comedy of manners of Regency England.]]>
334 Jane Austen 0553213105 Steve 0 4.36 1813 Pride and Prejudice
author: Jane Austen
name: Steve
average rating: 4.36
book published: 1813
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2021/02/28
shelves:
review:

]]>
Shuggie Bain 55504502 Shuggie Bain is the unforgettable story of young Hugh "Shuggie" Bain, a sweet and lonely boy who spends his 1980s childhood in run-down public housing in Glasgow, Scotland.

Thatcher's policies have put husbands and sons out of work, and the city's notorious drugs epidemic is waiting in the wings. Shuggie's mother Agnes walks a wayward path: she is Shuggie's guiding light but a burden for him and his siblings. She dreams of a house with its own front door while she flicks through the pages of the Freemans catalogue, ordering a little happiness on credit, anything to brighten up her grey life.

Married to a philandering taxi-driver husband, Agnes keeps her pride by looking good--her beehive, make-up, and pearly-white false teeth offer a glamourous image of a Glaswegian Elizabeth Taylor. But under the surface, Agnes finds increasing solace in drink, and she drains away the lion's share of each week's benefits--all the family has to live on--on cans of extra-strong lager hidden in handbags and poured into tea mugs.

Agnes's older children find their own ways to get a safe distance from their mother, abandoning Shuggie to care for her as she swings between alcoholic binges and sobriety. Shuggie is meanwhile struggling to somehow become the normal boy he desperately longs to be, but everyone has realized that he is "no right," a boy with a secret that all but him can see. Agnes is supportive of her son, but her addiction has the power to eclipse everyone close to her--even her beloved Shuggie.

A heartbreaking story of addiction, sexuality, and love, Shuggie Bain is an epic portrayal of a working-class family that is rarely seen in fiction. Recalling the work of douard Louis, Alan Hollinghurst, Frank McCourt, and Hanya Yanagihara, it is a blistering debut by a brilliant novelist who has a powerful and important story to tell.]]>
430 Douglas Stuart 0802148506 Steve 0 to-read 4.21 2020 Shuggie Bain
author: Douglas Stuart
name: Steve
average rating: 4.21
book published: 2020
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2020/12/01
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Hockey Abstract Presents... Stat Shot: The Ultimate Guide to Hockey Analytics]]> 30839022 Making advanced stats simple, practical, and fun for hockey fans


Advanced stats give hockey’s powerbrokers an edge, and now fans can get in on the action. Stat Shot is a fun and informative guide hockey fans can use to understand and enjoy what analytics says about team building, a player’s junior numbers, measuring faceoff success, recording save percentage, the most one-sided trades in history, and everything you ever wanted to know about shot-based metrics. Acting as an invaluable supplement to traditional analysis, Stat Shot can be used to test the validity of conventional wisdom, and to gain insight into what teams are doing behind the scenes � or maybe what they should be doing.


Whether looking for a reference for leading-edge research and hard-to-find statistical data, or for passionate and engaging storytelling, Stat Shot belongs on every serious hockey fan’s bookshelf.

]]>
349 Rob Vollman 1770909257 Steve 0 currently-reading 4.07 Hockey Abstract Presents... Stat Shot: The Ultimate Guide to Hockey Analytics
author: Rob Vollman
name: Steve
average rating: 4.07
book published:
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2020/08/23
shelves: currently-reading
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[A Fearsome Doubt (Inspector Ian Rutledge, #6)]]> 8266796
A Fearsome Doubt

In 1912 Ian Rutledge watched as a man was condemned to hang for the murders of elderly women. Rutledge helped gather the evidence that sent Ben Shaw to the gallows. And when justice was done, Rutledge closed the door on the case. But Shaw was not easily forgotten.

Now, seven years later, that grim trial returns in the form of Ben Shaw’s widow Nell, bringing Rutledge evidence she is convinced will prove her husband’s innocence. It’s a belief fraught with peril, threatening both Rutledge’s professional stature and his faith in his judgment. But there is a darker reason for Rutledge’s reluctance. Murder brings him back to Kent where, days earlier, he’d glimpsed an all-too-familiar face beyond the leaping flames of a bonfire. Soon an unexpected encounter revives the end of his own war, as the country prepares for a somber commemoration on the anniversary of the Armistice. To battle the unsettled past and the haunted present at the same time is an appalling mandate.

And the people around him? among them the attractive widow of a friend, a remarkable woman who survived the Great Indian Mutiny; a bitter, dying barrister; and a man whose name he never knew—unwittingly compete with the grieving Nell Shaw. They’ll demand more than Rutledge can give, unaware that he is already carrying the burden of shell shock? and the voice of Hamish MacLeod, the soldier he was forced to execute in the war. The killer in Marling is surprisingly adept at escaping detection. And Ben Shaw’s past is a tangle of unsettling secrets that may or may not be true. Rutledge must walk a tortuous line between two murderers...one reaching out to ruin him, the other driven to destroy him.


From the Hardcover edition.]]>
384 Charles Todd Steve 0 currently-reading 4.25 2002 A Fearsome Doubt (Inspector Ian Rutledge, #6)
author: Charles Todd
name: Steve
average rating: 4.25
book published: 2002
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2020/08/23
shelves: currently-reading
review:

]]>
The Berlin Stories 16810 The Last of Mr. Norris and Goodbye to Berlin, which make up The Berlin Stories are recognized today as classics of modern fiction.

A charming city of avenues and cafés, a grotesque city of night-people and fantasts, a dangerous city of vice and intrigue, a powerful city of millionaires and mobs - all this was Berlin in 1931, the period when Hitler was beginning his move to power.

Here are Mr. Norris, the improbable old debauchee mysteriously caught in the struggle between Nazis and Communists; plump Fräulein Schroeder, who thinks an operation to reduce the scale of her üٱ might relieve her heart palpitations; the Landauers, a distinguished and doomed Jewish family; Sally Bowles, whose misadventures in the demimonde were popularized on the American stage and screen by Julie Harris in "I Am a Camera" and by Liza Minelli in "Cabaret."]]>
401 Christopher Isherwood 0811200701 Steve 4 4.04 1945 The Berlin Stories
author: Christopher Isherwood
name: Steve
average rating: 4.04
book published: 1945
rating: 4
read at: 2019/01/01
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
Thirteen Ways of Looking 25229229 Let the Great World Spin and TransAtlantic comes an eponymous novella and three stories that range fluidly across time, tenderly exploring the act of writing and the moment of creation when characters come alive on the page; the lifetime consequences that can come from a simple act; and the way our lives play across the world, marking language, image and each other.

Thirteen Ways of Looking is framed by two author’s notes, each dealing with the brutal attack the author suffered last year and strikes at the heart of contemporary issues at home and in Ireland, the author’s birth place.

Brilliant in its clarity and deftness, this collection reminds us, again, why Colum McCann is considered among the very best contemporary writers.]]>
256 Colum McCann 1443446254 Steve 4 3.94 2015 Thirteen Ways of Looking
author: Colum McCann
name: Steve
average rating: 3.94
book published: 2015
rating: 4
read at: 2019/12/01
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Runner's World Run Less, Run Faster: Become a Faster, Stronger Runner with the Revolutionary FIRST Training Program]]> 705694
Hailed by the Wall Street Journal and featured twice in six months in cover stories in Runner's World magazine, FIRST's unique training philosophy makes running easier and more accessible, limits overtraining and burnout, and substantially cuts the risk of injury, while producing faster race times.

The key feature is the "3 plus 2" program, which each week consists of:

-3 quality runs, including track repeats, the tempo run, and the long run, which are designed to work together to improve endurance, lactate-threshold running pace, and leg speed

-2 aerobic cross-training workouts, such as swimming, rowing, or pedaling a stationary bike, which are designed to improve endurance while helping to avoid burnout

With detailed training plans for 5K, 10K, half marathon, and marathon, plus tips for goal-setting, rest, recovery, injury rehab and prevention, strength training, and nutrition, this program will change the way runners think about and train for competitive races.

Amby Burfoot, Runner's World executive editor and Boston Marathon winner, calls the FIRST training program "the most detailed, well-organized, and scientific training program for runners that I have ever seen."]]>
304 Bill Pierce 159486649X Steve 3 3.94 2007 Runner's World Run Less, Run Faster: Become a Faster, Stronger Runner with the Revolutionary FIRST Training Program
author: Bill Pierce
name: Steve
average rating: 3.94
book published: 2007
rating: 3
read at: 2019/12/01
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
Spies 287022 234 Michael Frayn 0571212964 Steve 4 3.54 2002 Spies
author: Michael Frayn
name: Steve
average rating: 3.54
book published: 2002
rating: 4
read at: 2019/12/01
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
The Conformist (Italia) 67146 The Conformist, a book which made Alberto Moravia one of the world's most read postwar writers. Clerici is a man with everything under control - a wife who loves him, colleagues who respect him, the hidden power that comes with his secret work for the Italian political police during the Mussolini years. But then he is assigned to kill his former professor, now exiled in France, to demonstrate his loyalty to the Fascist state, and falls in love with a strange, compelling woman; his life is torn open - and with it the corrupt heart of Fascism. Moravia equates the rise of Italian Fascism with the psychological needs of his protagonist for whom conformity becomes an obsession in a life that has included parental neglect, an oddly self-conscious desire to engage in cruel acts, and a type of male beauty which, to Clerici's great distress, other men find attractive.]]> 323 Alberto Moravia 1883642655 Steve 3 4.01 1951 The Conformist (Italia)
author: Alberto Moravia
name: Steve
average rating: 4.01
book published: 1951
rating: 3
read at: 2019/12/01
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
This Boy's Life 11466 304 Tobias Wolff 0802136680 Steve 5 3.97 1989 This Boy's Life
author: Tobias Wolff
name: Steve
average rating: 3.97
book published: 1989
rating: 5
read at: 2019/11/01
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
The Memory Chalet 9413960 The Memory Chalet is a memoir unlike any you have ever read before. Each essay charts some experience or remembrance of the past through the sieve of Tony Judt s prodigious mind. His youthful love of a particular London bus route evolves into a reflection on public civility and interwar urban planning. Memories of the 1968 student riots of Paris meander through the divergent sex politics of Europe, before concluding that his generation was a revolutionary generation, but missed the revolution. A series of road trips across America lead not just to an appreciation of American history, but to an eventual acquisition of citizenship. Foods and trains and long-lost smells all compete for Judt s attention; but for us, he has forged his reflections into an elegant arc of analysis. All as simply and beautifully arranged as a Swiss chalet—a reassuring refuge deep in the mountains of memory.]]> 226 Tony Judt 1594202893 Steve 4 4.13 2010 The Memory Chalet
author: Tony Judt
name: Steve
average rating: 4.13
book published: 2010
rating: 4
read at: 2019/11/01
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
Just Kids 341879 Just Kids, Patti Smith's first book of prose, the legendary American artist offers a never-before-seen glimpse of her remarkable relationship with photographer Robert Mapplethorpe in the epochal days of New York City and the Chelsea Hotel in the late sixties and seventies. An honest and moving story of youth and friendship, Smith brings the same unique, lyrical quality to Just Kids as she has to the rest of her formidable body of work--from her influential 1975 album Horses to her visual art and poetry.]]> 304 Patti Smith Steve 4 4.19 2010 Just Kids
author: Patti Smith
name: Steve
average rating: 4.19
book published: 2010
rating: 4
read at: 2019/11/01
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[The Boys in the Boat: Nine Americans and Their Epic Quest for Gold at the 1936 Berlin Olympics]]> 16158542
It was an unlikely quest from the start. With a team composed of the sons of loggers, shipyard workers, and farmers, the University of Washington’s eight-oar crew team was never expected to defeat the elite teams of the East Coast and Great Britain, yet they did, going on to shock the world by defeating the German team rowing for Adolf Hitler. The emotional heart of the tale lies with Joe Rantz, a teenager without family or prospects, who rows not only to regain his shattered self-regard but also to find a real place for himself in the world. Drawing on the boys� own journals and vivid memories of a once-in-a-lifetime shared dream, Brown has created an unforgettable portrait of an era, a celebration of a remarkable achievement, and a chronicle of one extraordinary young man’s personal quest.]]>
404 Daniel James Brown 067002581X Steve 5 4.37 2013 The Boys in the Boat: Nine Americans and Their Epic Quest for Gold at the 1936 Berlin Olympics
author: Daniel James Brown
name: Steve
average rating: 4.37
book published: 2013
rating: 5
read at: 2019/10/01
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Case Histories (Jackson Brodie, #1)]]> 16243 1 A little girl disappears in the night.
2 A beautiful young office worker falls to a maniac's attack.
3 A new mother is overwhelmed by demands from her baby and husband - until a fit of rage creates a grisly, bloody escape.
Result : Startling connections and discoveries emerge. . . .]]>
389 Kate Atkinson 0316010707 Steve 4 3.79 2004 Case Histories (Jackson Brodie, #1)
author: Kate Atkinson
name: Steve
average rating: 3.79
book published: 2004
rating: 4
read at: 2019/10/01
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
Kitchens of the Great Midwest 23398625
Each chapter in J. Ryan Stradal's startlingly original debut tells the story of a single dish and character, at once capturing the zeitgeist of the Midwest, the rise of foodie culture, and delving into the ways food creates community and a sense of identity. By turns quirky, hilarious, and vividly sensory, Kitchens of the Great Midwest is an unexpected mother-daughter story about the bittersweet nature of life--its missed opportunities and its joyful surprises. It marks the entry of a brilliant new talent.]]>
310 J. Ryan Stradal 052542914X Steve 4 3.80 2015 Kitchens of the Great Midwest
author: J. Ryan Stradal
name: Steve
average rating: 3.80
book published: 2015
rating: 4
read at: 2019/09/01
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
Chances Are... 44037144
One beautiful September day, three sixty-six-year-old men convene on Martha's Vineyard, friends ever since meeting in college circa the sixties. They couldn't have been more different then, or even today--Lincoln's a commercial real estate broker, Teddy a tiny-press publisher, and Mickey a musician beyond his rockin' age. But each man holds his own secrets, in addition to the monumental mystery that none of them has ever stopped puzzling over since a Memorial Day weekend right here on the Vineyard in 1971. Now, forty-four years later, as this new weekend unfolds, three lives and that of a significant other are displayed in their entirety while the distant past confounds the present like a relentless squall of surprise and discovery. Shot through with Russo's trademark comedy and humanity, Chances Are . . . also introduces a new level of suspense and menace that will quicken the reader's heartbeat throughout this absorbing saga of how friendship's bonds are every bit as constricting and rewarding as those of family or any other community.
For both longtime fans and lucky newcomers, Chances Are . . . is a stunning demonstration of a highly acclaimed author deepening and expanding his remarkable achievement.]]>
320 Richard Russo 1101947748 Steve 4 3.70 2017 Chances Are...
author: Richard Russo
name: Steve
average rating: 3.70
book published: 2017
rating: 4
read at: 2019/08/01
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
The Bookshop 41015154 In 1959 Florence Green, a kindhearted widow with a small inheritance, risks everything to open a bookshop - the only bookshop - in the seaside town of Hardborough. By making a success of a business so impractical, she invites the hostility of the town's less prosperous shopkeepers. By daring to enlarge her neighbors' lives, she crosses Mrs. Gamart, the local arts doyenne. Florence's warehouse leaks, her cellar seeps, and the shop is apparently haunted. Only too late does she begin to suspect the truth: a town that lacks a bookshop isn't always a town that wants one.]]> 163 Penelope Fitzgerald 0547524773 Steve 3 3.21 1978 The Bookshop
author: Penelope Fitzgerald
name: Steve
average rating: 3.21
book published: 1978
rating: 3
read at: 2019/08/01
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind]]> 23692271 512 Yuval Noah Harari Steve 4 4.34 2011 Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind
author: Yuval Noah Harari
name: Steve
average rating: 4.34
book published: 2011
rating: 4
read at: 2019/08/01
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
LaRose 26116430 The Round Houseand the Pulitzer PrizeԴdzԱThe Plague of Doveswields her breathtaking narrative magic in an emotionally haunting contemporary tale of a tragic accident, a demand for justice, and a profound act of atonement with ancient roots in Native American culture.

North Dakota, late summer, 1999. Landreaux Iron stalks a deer along the edge of the property bordering his own. He shoots with easy confidence—but when the buck springs away, Landreaux realizes he’s hit something else, a blur he saw as he squeezed the trigger. When he staggers closer, he realizes he has killed his neighbor’s five-year-old son, Dusty Ravich.

The youngest child of his friend and neighbor, Peter Ravich, Dusty was best friends with Landreaux’s five-year-old son, LaRose. The two families have always been close, sharing food, clothing, and rides into town; their children played together despite going to different schools; and Landreaux’s wife, Emmaline, is half sister to Dusty’s mother, Nola. Horrified at what he’s done, the recovered alcoholic turns to an Ojibwe tribe tradition—the sweat lodge—for guidance, and finds a way forward. Following an ancient means of retribution, he and Emmaline will give LaRose to the grieving Peter and Nola. “Our son will be your son now,� they tell them.

LaRose is quickly absorbed into his new family. Plagued by thoughts of suicide, Nola dotes on him, keeping her darkness at bay. His fierce, rebellious new “sister,� Maggie, welcomes him as a coconspirator who can ease her volatile mother’s terrifying moods. Gradually he’s allowed shared visits with his birth family, whose sorrow mirrors the Raviches� own. As the years pass, LaRose becomes the linchpin linking the Irons and the Raviches, and eventually their mutual pain begins to heal.

But when a vengeful man with a long-standing grudge against Landreaux begins raising trouble, hurling accusations of a cover-up the day Dusty died, he threatens the tenuous peace that has kept these two fragile families whole.

Inspiring and affecting,LaRoseis a powerful exploration of loss, justice, and the reparation of the human heart, and an unforgettable, dazzling tour de force from one of America’s most distinguished literary masters.]]>
372 Louise Erdrich 0062277022 Steve 4 3.89 2016 LaRose
author: Louise Erdrich
name: Steve
average rating: 3.89
book published: 2016
rating: 4
read at: 2019/07/01
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
The River Why 23196 293 David James Duncan 0553344862 Steve 4 4.23 1983 The River Why
author: David James Duncan
name: Steve
average rating: 4.23
book published: 1983
rating: 4
read at: 2019/07/01
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
A Gentleman in Moscow 29430012 He can't leave. You won't want to.

With his breakout novel Rules of Civility, Amor Towles established himself as a master of absorbing, sophisticated fiction, bringing late-1930s Manhattan to life with splendid atmosphere and a flawless command of style. A Gentleman in Moscow immerses us in another elegantly drawn era with the story of Count Alexander Rostov.

When, in 1922, the thirty-year-old Count is deemed an unrepentant aristocrat by a Bolshevik tribunal, he is sentenced to house arrest in the Metropol, a grand hotel across the street from the Kremlin. An indomitable man of erudition and wit, Rostov must now live in an attic room while some of the most tumultuous decades in Russian history are unfolding outside the hotel’s doors.

Unexpectedly, the Count's reduced circumstances provide him entry to a much larger world of emotional discovery as he forges friendships with the hotel's other denizens, including a willful actress, a shrewd Kremlinite, a gregarious American, and a temperamental chef. But when fate suddenly puts the life of a young girl in his hands, he must draw on all his ingenuity to protect the future she so deserves.

Brimming with humor, a glittering cast of characters, and one beautifully rendered scene after another, this singular novel casts a spell as it relates the Count’s endeavor to gain a deeper understanding of what it means to be a man of purpose.]]>
462 Amor Towles Steve 5 4.33 2016 A Gentleman in Moscow
author: Amor Towles
name: Steve
average rating: 4.33
book published: 2016
rating: 5
read at: 2019/06/01
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Field of Blood (Paddy Meehan, #1)]]> 94180
The vicious murder of a young child provides rookie journalist Paddy Meehan with her first big break when the suspect turns out to be her fiance's 11-year old cousin. Launching her own investigation into the horrific crime, Paddy uncovers lines of deception deep in Glasgow's past, with more horrific crimes in the future if she fails to solve the mystery.

Infused with Mina's unique blend of dark humor, personal insights and social injustice, the story grips the reader while challenging our perceptions of childhood innocence, crime and punishment, and right or wrong.]]>
456 Denise Mina 031615458X Steve 4 3.82 2005 Field of Blood (Paddy Meehan, #1)
author: Denise Mina
name: Steve
average rating: 3.82
book published: 2005
rating: 4
read at: 2019/05/01
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
The Italian Teacher 31937362 A sparkling, propulsive new novel from the bestselling author of The Imperfectionists.

Rome, 1955. The artists gather for a picture at a party in an ancient villa. Bear Bavinsky, creator of vast canvases, larger than life, is at the centre of the picture. His wife, Natalie, edges out of the shot.

From the side of the room watches little Pinch—their son. At five years old he loves Bear almost as much as he fears him. After Bear abandons their family, Pinch will still worship him, striving to live up to the Bavinsky name; while Natalie, a ceramicist, cannot hope to be more than a forgotten muse. Trying to burn brightly in his father's shadow, Pinch's attempts flicker and die. Yet by the end of a career of twists and compromises, Pinch will enact an unexpected rebellion that will leave forever his mark upon the Bear Bavinsky legacy.

A masterful, original examination of love, duty, art and fame, The Italian Teacher cements Tom Rachman as among this generation's most exciting literary voices.]]>
340 Tom Rachman 1786482576 Steve 4 3.59 2018 The Italian Teacher
author: Tom Rachman
name: Steve
average rating: 3.59
book published: 2018
rating: 4
read at: 2019/05/01
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
There There 36692478 Alternate cover edition of ISBN 9780525520375.

Tommy Orange's wondrous and shattering novel follows twelve characters from Native communities: all traveling to the Big Oakland Powwow, all connected to one another in ways they may not yet realize.

Among them is Jacquie Red Feather, newly sober and trying to make it back to the family she left behind. Dene Oxendene, pulling his life together after his uncle's death and working at the powwow to honor his memory. Fourteen-year-old Orvil, coming to perform traditional dance for the very first time. Together, this chorus of voices tells of the plight of the urban Native American--grappling with a complex and painful history, with an inheritance of beauty and spirituality, with communion and sacrifice and heroism.

Hailed as an instant classic, There There is at once poignant and unflinching, utterly contemporary and truly unforgettable.]]>
294 Tommy Orange Steve 4 3.98 2018 There There
author: Tommy Orange
name: Steve
average rating: 3.98
book published: 2018
rating: 4
read at: 2019/05/01
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
My Sister, the Serial Killer 38819868
My Sister, the Serial Killer is a blackly comic novel about how blood is thicker - and more difficult to get out of the carpet - than water...]]>
226 Oyinkan Braithwaite 0385544235 Steve 4 3.65 2018 My Sister, the Serial Killer
author: Oyinkan Braithwaite
name: Steve
average rating: 3.65
book published: 2018
rating: 4
read at: 2019/04/01
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Where I Live Now: Stories: 1993�1998]]> 34706224 189 Lucia Berlin 1574232312 Steve 5 4.52 1999 Where I Live Now: Stories: 1993–1998
author: Lucia Berlin
name: Steve
average rating: 4.52
book published: 1999
rating: 5
read at: 2019/04/17
date added: 2019/12/21
shelves:
review:

]]>
The City & the City 4703581
Borlú must travel from the decaying Beszel to the only metropolis on Earth as strange as his own. This is a border crossing like no other, a journey as psychic as it is physical, a shift in perception, a seeing of the unseen. His destination is Beszel’s equal, rival, and intimate neighbor, the rich and vibrant city of Ul Qoma. With Ul Qoman detective Qussim Dhatt, and struggling with his own transition, Borlú is enmeshed in a sordid underworld of rabid nationalists intent on destroying their neighboring city, and unificationists who dream of dissolving the two into one. As the detectives uncover the dead woman’s secrets, they begin to suspect a truth that could cost them and those they care about more than their lives.

What stands against them are murderous powers in Beszel and in Ul Qoma: and, most terrifying of all, that which lies between these two cities.

Casting shades of Kafka and Philip K. Dick, Raymond Chandler and 1984, The City & the City is a murder mystery taken to dazzling metaphysical and artistic heights.]]>
312 China Miéville 0345497511 Steve 0 to-read 3.90 2009 The City & the City
author: China Miéville
name: Steve
average rating: 3.90
book published: 2009
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2019/07/18
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
Not Forgetting the Whale 22919293
Intimate, funny and deeply moving, NOT FORGETTING THE WHALE is the story of a man on a journey to find a place he can call home.]]>
369 John Ironmonger 0297872036 Steve 0 to-read 4.03 2015 Not Forgetting the Whale
author: John Ironmonger
name: Steve
average rating: 4.03
book published: 2015
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2019/06/25
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[Olive, Again (Olive Kitteridge, #2)]]> 43984883 San Francisco Chronicle).TheNew Yorkerhas said that Elizabeth Strout “animates the ordinary with an astonishing force,� and she has never done so more clearly than in these pages, where the iconic Olive struggles to understand not only herself and her own life but the lives of those around her in the town of Crosby, Maine. Whether with a teenager coming to terms with the loss of her father, a young woman about to give birth during a hilariously inopportune moment, a nurse who confesses a secret high school crush, or a lawyer who struggles with an inheritance she does not want to accept, the unforgettable Olive will continue to startle us, to move us, and to inspireus—in Strout’s words—“to bear the burden of the mystery with as much grace as we can.”]]> 289 Elizabeth Strout 0812996542 Steve 0 to-read 4.06 2019 Olive, Again (Olive Kitteridge, #2)
author: Elizabeth Strout
name: Steve
average rating: 4.06
book published: 2019
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2019/05/21
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
The House of Broken Angels 40603634 The definitive Mexican-American immigrant story, a sprawling and deeply felt portrait of a Mexican-American family occasioned by the impending loss of its patriarch, from one of the country's most beloved authors.

Prizewinning and bestselling writer Luis Urrea has written his Mexican coming-to-America story and his masterpiece. Destined to sit alongside other classic immigrant novels, The House of Broken Angels is a sprawling and epic family saga helmed by patriarch Big Angel. The novel gathers together the entire De La Cruz clan, as they meet for the final birthday party Big Angel is throwing for himself, at home in San Diego, as he nears the end of his struggle with cancer and reflects on his long and full life.

But when Big Angel's mother, Mama America, approaching one hundred, dies herself as the party nears, he must plan her funeral as well. There will be two family affairs in one weekend: a farewell double-header. Among the attendants is his half-brother and namesake, Little Angel, who comes face to face with the siblings with whom he shared a father but not, as the weekend proceeds to remind him, a life.

This story of the De La Cruzes is the story of what it means to be a Mexican in America, to have lived two lives across one border. It is a tale of the ravaging power of death to shore up the bits of life you have forgotten, whether by choice or not. Above all, this finely wrought portrait of a deeply complex family and the America they have come to call home is Urrea at his purest and best. Teeming with brilliance and humor, authentic at every turn, The House of Broken Angels cements his reputation as a storyteller of the first rank.]]>
336 Luis Alberto Urrea Steve 4 The House of Broken Angels, right?

Anyway, someone had convinced Big Angel that he should keep a notebook to jot down the enjoyable things in his life. It didn’t take much space in the narrative � his entries clustered in sets of three or four and were typically only a line each � but I liked the device. He could pass this down to his family to let them know how he felt, and it tended to keep him more positive and focused on meaning. Darker family tensions came out in other ways. I thought for the rest of this review I could use a similar set of bullets for the things I liked about the book. I’ll also sneak in a few less likeable aspects and denote them with a (-) rather than a (+).

The emphasis was always on family. (+)

Families don’t always agree; but they can stay close despite this. (+)

Big Angel’s wife and daughter were devoted and sweet. (+)

When a family tie is compromised, there’s often a feeling of real hurt. (+)

Generational conflicts are the younger one’s fault (well, maybe not always). This line says something about that: “They thought he was stupid, as parents often do. Well, he was stupid, as children often are.� (+)

Machismo, stereotypical as it may seem, is addressed: “His father had taught him to be stoic. Pain was how a man measured his worth.� (+)

The Mexican food descriptions were mouth-watering. (+)

The cast of characters was so large, you’ll wish you had ancestry.com to keep track of them all. (-)

Yes, the family gathering was huge, but this made the dynamics feel real, with all types represented. (+)

Off to the side a bit, there was a modern-day prodigal son story. No fatted calf, though; more like KFC. (+)

Another quote said, “Every man dies with secrets. Big Angel was certain a happy man was a man who died with the worst things safely hidden.� But it seemed like a lot of Big Angel’s secrets were revealed. And maybe that wasn’t so bad. (+)

Emotional wounds, once the greasy, slapdash bandages are removed can be cleaned, and healing can begin. (+)

“[…] rocks remember when they were mountains.� And Big Angel remembered when he was Don Corleone, James Bond, and Don Juan all rolled into one. (+)

The Spanish in the book was not always basic, and you often weren’t given the context to figure it out. I even had trouble finding translations when I took the time to look. (-)

The cultural education, in general, was good, though it occasionally dealt in clichés. (+)

A trick someone described for dealing with a smelly situation was to stick Vicks VapoRub in your nose. A day after I read this, an article in the Trib was talking about how it’s a tradition in Latin American culture overuse the stuff. (Now see if the coincidence happens to you. These things are contagious, you know.) (+)

Urrea said in an interview that he started writing this book as a way to discuss border politics and dreamer narratives in the Age of Trump, but it became more and more about families (including a fair amount about his own). (+)

An important, almost cinematic scene at the end seemed risky to include, but Urrea pulled it off. I felt a little catch in my breath reading it. (+)

Some books are said to be all head, no heart. This one was closer to the opposite. I can go either way with books of that sort, but this one seemed honest, so it’s a net (+).

The writing wasn’t what you’d call facile, but it was OK for its purpose. (+/-)

As you can see, in aggregate, there were a lot more pluses than minuses—good for 4 stars.]]>
3.87 2018 The House of Broken Angels
author: Luis Alberto Urrea
name: Steve
average rating: 3.87
book published: 2018
rating: 4
read at: 2019/04/04
date added: 2019/04/12
shelves:
review:
Miguel Angel de La Cruz (Big Angel) relishes what time he has left as the partriarch of a large family now concentrated on the California side of the border. The main story takes place during a particularly dramatic window starting with his mother’s funeral, followed the next day by what he knew would be his last birthday. Cancer would see to that. The family gathered for both events. There were countless POV characters, and plenty of back-stories to fill in. One character, a half-brother their father had named Gabriel Angel (Little Angel) had a gringa mother and wasn’t raised with his siblings. Conflict was always going to be part of that story. It’s The House of Broken Angels, right?

Anyway, someone had convinced Big Angel that he should keep a notebook to jot down the enjoyable things in his life. It didn’t take much space in the narrative � his entries clustered in sets of three or four and were typically only a line each � but I liked the device. He could pass this down to his family to let them know how he felt, and it tended to keep him more positive and focused on meaning. Darker family tensions came out in other ways. I thought for the rest of this review I could use a similar set of bullets for the things I liked about the book. I’ll also sneak in a few less likeable aspects and denote them with a (-) rather than a (+).

The emphasis was always on family. (+)

Families don’t always agree; but they can stay close despite this. (+)

Big Angel’s wife and daughter were devoted and sweet. (+)

When a family tie is compromised, there’s often a feeling of real hurt. (+)

Generational conflicts are the younger one’s fault (well, maybe not always). This line says something about that: “They thought he was stupid, as parents often do. Well, he was stupid, as children often are.� (+)

Machismo, stereotypical as it may seem, is addressed: “His father had taught him to be stoic. Pain was how a man measured his worth.� (+)

The Mexican food descriptions were mouth-watering. (+)

The cast of characters was so large, you’ll wish you had ancestry.com to keep track of them all. (-)

Yes, the family gathering was huge, but this made the dynamics feel real, with all types represented. (+)

Off to the side a bit, there was a modern-day prodigal son story. No fatted calf, though; more like KFC. (+)

Another quote said, “Every man dies with secrets. Big Angel was certain a happy man was a man who died with the worst things safely hidden.� But it seemed like a lot of Big Angel’s secrets were revealed. And maybe that wasn’t so bad. (+)

Emotional wounds, once the greasy, slapdash bandages are removed can be cleaned, and healing can begin. (+)

“[…] rocks remember when they were mountains.� And Big Angel remembered when he was Don Corleone, James Bond, and Don Juan all rolled into one. (+)

The Spanish in the book was not always basic, and you often weren’t given the context to figure it out. I even had trouble finding translations when I took the time to look. (-)

The cultural education, in general, was good, though it occasionally dealt in clichés. (+)

A trick someone described for dealing with a smelly situation was to stick Vicks VapoRub in your nose. A day after I read this, an article in the Trib was talking about how it’s a tradition in Latin American culture overuse the stuff. (Now see if the coincidence happens to you. These things are contagious, you know.) (+)

Urrea said in an interview that he started writing this book as a way to discuss border politics and dreamer narratives in the Age of Trump, but it became more and more about families (including a fair amount about his own). (+)

An important, almost cinematic scene at the end seemed risky to include, but Urrea pulled it off. I felt a little catch in my breath reading it. (+)

Some books are said to be all head, no heart. This one was closer to the opposite. I can go either way with books of that sort, but this one seemed honest, so it’s a net (+).

The writing wasn’t what you’d call facile, but it was OK for its purpose. (+/-)

As you can see, in aggregate, there were a lot more pluses than minuses—good for 4 stars.
]]>
War and Peace 656
War and Peace broadly focuses on Napoleon’s invasion of Russia in 1812 and follows three of the most well-known characters in literature: Pierre Bezukhov, the illegitimate son of a count who is fighting for his inheritance and yearning for spiritual fulfillment; Prince Andrei Bolkonsky, who leaves his family behind to fight in the war against Napoleon; and Natasha Rostov, the beautiful young daughter of a nobleman who intrigues both men.

As Napoleon’s army invades, Tolstoy brilliantly follows characters from diverse backgrounds—peasants and nobility, civilians and soldiers—as they struggle with the problems unique to their era, their history, and their culture. And as the novel progresses, these characters transcend their specificity, becoming some of the most moving—and human—figures in world literature.


Tolstoy gave his personal approval to this translation, published here in a new single volume edition, which includes an introduction by Henry Gifford, and Tolstoy's important essay `Some Words about War and Peace'.]]>
1392 Leo Tolstoy 0192833987 Steve 4 As masterworks go this one checks
All the boxes a lit prof expects.
But a colt seeking brio
Might've wished author Leo
Had condensed one called War, Peace, and Sex.

I once submitted a limerick to Poetry Magazine, and got a letter back saying I'm Bard for Life (only they used what must have been an Old English spelling: "barred").

All kidding aside, I really did read this back in my student days. I may have skimmed 100 pages of battle scenes, but felt at the time at least, that I could count it as done. My overall impression was that it probably deserved its exalted status. Some classics seem stodgy to a 20-year-old, but this one somehow resonated for reasons I no longer recall. Hence the frivolous non-review. ]]>
4.14 1869 War and Peace
author: Leo Tolstoy
name: Steve
average rating: 4.14
book published: 1869
rating: 4
read at: 1978/01/01
date added: 2019/04/12
shelves:
review:
As masterworks go this one checks
All the boxes a lit prof expects.
But a colt seeking brio
Might've wished author Leo
Had condensed one called
War, Peace, and Sex.

I once submitted a limerick to Poetry Magazine, and got a letter back saying I'm Bard for Life (only they used what must have been an Old English spelling: "barred").

All kidding aside, I really did read this back in my student days. I may have skimmed 100 pages of battle scenes, but felt at the time at least, that I could count it as done. My overall impression was that it probably deserved its exalted status. Some classics seem stodgy to a 20-year-old, but this one somehow resonated for reasons I no longer recall. Hence the frivolous non-review.
]]>
Sharp Objects 18045891
Librarian's Note: this is an alternate cover edition - ISBN 10: 0307341550 (ISBN 13: 9780307341556)]]>
254 Gillian Flynn 0297851535 Steve 4
Like so many other Goodreaders seduced by the buzz, I read and enjoyed every sharp bend of Gone Girl. It proved to be something of an archetype, too, with books like The Girl on the Train and The Woman in the Window cashing in on similar threats and thrills. If you’re looking for even better correlation, though, go backwards in Flynn’s own oeuvre to this one. (Please allow me a quick aside to express an unreasonable but intense dislike for that word—oeuvre. When I try to sound it out in my head, that trailing “re� throws me, like Brett Favre’s name did to the people in Something About Mary. Plus, when I try to Frenchify that opening diphthong, my internal ear hates how affected it sounds. Sorry, I guess I needed to get that off my chest.)

Anyway, Sharp Objects has the same kind of feel to it as her famous bestseller. There are vivid descriptions, enough interior life written into the characters that you imagine you know them, and a screenwriter’s gift for how to set a scene. This one pulls a few surprises, too. (With some people, you come to expect the unexpected, right?) It also gives you a proper fear of Wind Gap, Missouri, where investigative journalist Camille Preaker grew up. She was working in Chicago but then returned to Wind Gap to uncover whatever she could about two girls, one murdered and the other missing. She and a police detective / love interest gathered details about the crimes which were pretty intriguing by themselves. But it was the human interest angles that gave it real life. We get a surfeit of dysfunction with this one: boozing, self-mutilation, and a rather exotic psychological syndrome.

As it turns out, I had a brief encounter with Ms. Flynn’s dark side in real life about two years ago. I came away thinking her characters come by their edginess honestly. It happened when we were living in Chicago. I’d taken to looking up semi-famous residents on the internet and then jogging by their addresses, mostly just to see what their places were like, but also on the off-chance of spotting them in person. I knew where the Blackhawks� Jonathan Toews lived, John Cusack’s building was an easy trot away, and I could locate plenty of others from business, politics, sports and the arts. Anyway, it was a cool evening in Flynn’s Lincoln Park neighborhood. I’d been by her place before—very nicely kept, tucked away behind lots of trees and a fence. In the leafless part of the year you could get a view of the house itself. That night I saw a light on and heard music, so even though I knew I probably shouldn’t, I decided to stop for a closer look. I had my hands on the iron rails of her fence, peeking in, when all of the sudden from out of nowhere something grabbed hard at my loose sleeve. It was a large, no-nonsense dog that looked to be somewhere on the Doberman - Rottweiler spectrum. Of course I pulled back right away, but he’d gotten his teeth stuck in the cloth and wasn’t about to let go. I kept yanking to no avail. My heart rate, already elevated from the run, must have doubled again. The dog, meanwhile, was growling loudly enough that Flynn came out to investigate. I wished she would have called the brute off right away, but instead she said with imposing authority, “What the hell are you doing here?�

“Nothing,� I said. (Quick thinker, me.)

“Well, this is private property.�

“I wasn’t trying to do anything. I was just out for a run,� I said.

“Seems like you’re stalking me. Do you know who I am?� I wasn’t sure if it was daggers or machetes she was staring at me. Something sharp in any case. Also she was wearing a low-cut sweater showcasing a necklace with a razor blade pendant.

“Yeah,� I said, “you’re Gillian Flynn, right? The writer?� Only I messed up her name and pronounced it with a J sound.

“You don’t know me well, obviously. It’s Gillian,� she said, hitting the “guh� sound hard, as in Gone Girl.

“Oh, right, I should have known.� Then I thought there was a remote chance I could turn this around. “But hey, I really liked your book.�

By this time Satan’s Little Helper or whatever the dog's name was had relaxed his clench so I could take back my sleeve.

“OK, so you are some kind of celebrity stalker,� she said. “Pathetic. And a fool to boot. You need to get the fuck outta my yard.�

With that she marched back inside. Then her dog looked over as if to say, “Take it from me, buddy, you do NOT want to get on her bad side.�

I never did run by that house again. I’ll tell you what I did do, though, if you’re curious. [spoilers removed]]]>
4.05 2006 Sharp Objects
author: Gillian Flynn
name: Steve
average rating: 4.05
book published: 2006
rating: 4
read at:
date added: 2019/04/01
shelves:
review:
The next two paragraphs give my review of this book, but if the only reason you’d be tempted to read on is to hear about the time I “met� Gillian Flynn, you can scroll past them.

Like so many other Goodreaders seduced by the buzz, I read and enjoyed every sharp bend of Gone Girl. It proved to be something of an archetype, too, with books like The Girl on the Train and The Woman in the Window cashing in on similar threats and thrills. If you’re looking for even better correlation, though, go backwards in Flynn’s own oeuvre to this one. (Please allow me a quick aside to express an unreasonable but intense dislike for that word—oeuvre. When I try to sound it out in my head, that trailing “re� throws me, like Brett Favre’s name did to the people in Something About Mary. Plus, when I try to Frenchify that opening diphthong, my internal ear hates how affected it sounds. Sorry, I guess I needed to get that off my chest.)

Anyway, Sharp Objects has the same kind of feel to it as her famous bestseller. There are vivid descriptions, enough interior life written into the characters that you imagine you know them, and a screenwriter’s gift for how to set a scene. This one pulls a few surprises, too. (With some people, you come to expect the unexpected, right?) It also gives you a proper fear of Wind Gap, Missouri, where investigative journalist Camille Preaker grew up. She was working in Chicago but then returned to Wind Gap to uncover whatever she could about two girls, one murdered and the other missing. She and a police detective / love interest gathered details about the crimes which were pretty intriguing by themselves. But it was the human interest angles that gave it real life. We get a surfeit of dysfunction with this one: boozing, self-mutilation, and a rather exotic psychological syndrome.

As it turns out, I had a brief encounter with Ms. Flynn’s dark side in real life about two years ago. I came away thinking her characters come by their edginess honestly. It happened when we were living in Chicago. I’d taken to looking up semi-famous residents on the internet and then jogging by their addresses, mostly just to see what their places were like, but also on the off-chance of spotting them in person. I knew where the Blackhawks� Jonathan Toews lived, John Cusack’s building was an easy trot away, and I could locate plenty of others from business, politics, sports and the arts. Anyway, it was a cool evening in Flynn’s Lincoln Park neighborhood. I’d been by her place before—very nicely kept, tucked away behind lots of trees and a fence. In the leafless part of the year you could get a view of the house itself. That night I saw a light on and heard music, so even though I knew I probably shouldn’t, I decided to stop for a closer look. I had my hands on the iron rails of her fence, peeking in, when all of the sudden from out of nowhere something grabbed hard at my loose sleeve. It was a large, no-nonsense dog that looked to be somewhere on the Doberman - Rottweiler spectrum. Of course I pulled back right away, but he’d gotten his teeth stuck in the cloth and wasn’t about to let go. I kept yanking to no avail. My heart rate, already elevated from the run, must have doubled again. The dog, meanwhile, was growling loudly enough that Flynn came out to investigate. I wished she would have called the brute off right away, but instead she said with imposing authority, “What the hell are you doing here?�

“Nothing,� I said. (Quick thinker, me.)

“Well, this is private property.�

“I wasn’t trying to do anything. I was just out for a run,� I said.

“Seems like you’re stalking me. Do you know who I am?� I wasn’t sure if it was daggers or machetes she was staring at me. Something sharp in any case. Also she was wearing a low-cut sweater showcasing a necklace with a razor blade pendant.

“Yeah,� I said, “you’re Gillian Flynn, right? The writer?� Only I messed up her name and pronounced it with a J sound.

“You don’t know me well, obviously. It’s Gillian,� she said, hitting the “guh� sound hard, as in Gone Girl.

“Oh, right, I should have known.� Then I thought there was a remote chance I could turn this around. “But hey, I really liked your book.�

By this time Satan’s Little Helper or whatever the dog's name was had relaxed his clench so I could take back my sleeve.

“OK, so you are some kind of celebrity stalker,� she said. “Pathetic. And a fool to boot. You need to get the fuck outta my yard.�

With that she marched back inside. Then her dog looked over as if to say, “Take it from me, buddy, you do NOT want to get on her bad side.�

I never did run by that house again. I’ll tell you what I did do, though, if you’re curious. [spoilers removed]
]]>
AM/PM 6123353 120 Amelia Gray 0977199274 Steve 4 Examples from Lucifer’s Lexicon of Book Review Adjectives*

I decided to consult this new, now indispensable reference (written, no doubt, with a nod to Ambrose Bierce) for words I could use in a review of Amelia Gray’s notable first book. Her collection of stories, snippets really, was short but full of creativity, and a lot of adjectives apply. Here are the ones I’ll be using (sometimes as antitheses) along with Lucifer’s definitions:

Awesome - formerly, capable of producing awe; now come to mean far less due to grade inflation and overuse

Claustrophobic - had Haruki Murakami and Margaret Atwood ever produced a child, and that child wrote a Franz Kafka knock-off about a shackled body and soul, this would be the top word on the list to describe it

é - a description of work characterized by hackneyed expressions or concepts that the reviewer has recently stopped repeating and now considers tiresome

Discerning - in full agreement with the reviewer

Labyrinthine - containing one turn too many for the reviewer to follow

Laugh-out-loud funny - typically used to describe a very overt form of humor, often the kind we should be embarrassed by, like anything involving scrotums, painful falls, or stooges

Masterful - having a self-perceived talent that the reviewer hopes to reinforce through recognition of the same, but legitimate, talent in others

Metaphorical - prone to a writing device whereby inherently boring topics or descriptions are jazzed up like wings drenched in hot sauce or, uh, what’s an analogy for an analogy?

Nuanced - adjective to use when encountering complexity that's probably insightful but the reviewer can only pretend to understand

ٰܳé - an intelligent sounding word when the reviewer isn’t sure whether something’s weird for the sake of being weird or weird for a higher purpose

Philosophical - as Bierce himself said, this is a quality “of many roads, leading from nowhere to nothing�

Poignant - just about any emotion except joy, raised to the fourth power

Purple - (as applied to prose) label describing a writing style that in the eyes of some beholders should be attached to anything wordier than Hemingway and to other beholders that which applies only when a seemingly endless proliferation of modifiers enters injudiciously, gracelessly, and gratuitously

Sappy - prone to sweetness or sentimentalism (to be used sparingly since to serious, literary writers this is the kiss of death)

Spare - a self-descriptive substitute for the word “short�, opposite in every way to “interminably elongated and ponderous�

Trenchant - sarcasm trained towards proper targets (in contrast to sarcasm trained towards the reviewer’s pet causes which would instead be described as uncouth, impertinent, or sociopathic)

Wise - compared to synonyms "smart" and "clever", this is often applied prejudicially to older writers or those with an owlish countenance

Though this spare bit of writing may be short on words, it’s long on nuanced insight and pleasure. Some label this work flash fiction. Whatever it is, I think it’s masterfully written� never é, never sappy. Her fragments of text were not typically LOL funny, but there were quite a few instances of knowing winks and subtle observational humor. Here’s one example:
Just because you made it warm doesn't make it yours. A lesson for felines.
Feline Posits: What if one makes it warm for a long time?
A Response: I will still put it on the towel rack, because it is still a towel.

Her writing is often described as poetic, but unlike some of her literary peers, her prose/poetry never crossed into the purple end of the spectrum. She was also adept with her similes:
June was the kind of woman who not only talked to her cats, but consulted them seriously about world affairs and life changes. Mr. Pickles, she would say in that adorable voice women reserve for their cats and when they want a large favor performed. [...] Mr. Pickles, what is your opinion of the recent World Bank shake-up? The cat would look up at her, thinking for one wild moment that the tendrils of hair around her face were lizard tails.

And much of her writing could be called metaphorical. She was discerning about what to include, never getting bogged down with philosophical issues (in an academic sense), but still having plenty to say in her reflections:
One day, everyone stopped over-thinking. We started thinking just as much as we should, and not any more than necessary. There were no more misunderstandings whatsoever. Minor disagreements were forgotten, not turned into proof of larger things. Trivial errors of speech or judgment were just as important as items on the breakfast menu: you chose waffles and I chose eggs and it was a god damn miracle.

Characters in one short piece would often show up in later pieces, not in a labyrinthine, nonlinear narrative, but because it fit their personalities. Often her little slices of life had poignant aspects; resonant and clear. Others were trenchant, sometimes claustrophobic, or perhaps a little dzٰܳé and harder to decipher. Almost all make you think, though, which leads me to believe that Gray is very clever (I might have said wise, but Lucifer advises against such usage for her youthful demographic).

I’m putting this in the 4+ category. Not quite awesome awe-inspiring since not every one of her entries spoke to me, but still awfully good. [Now I need to check back with Lucifer to get his take on “awful�.]

*I had originally thought to call this Steve's Book of..., then thought The Cynic's Guide to... for the anonymity, but finally settled on Lucifer's Lexicon for the alliteration and the closer correspondence to Bierce's immensely fun Devil's Dictionary.]]>
3.92 2009 AM/PM
author: Amelia Gray
name: Steve
average rating: 3.92
book published: 2009
rating: 4
read at: 2018/01/01
date added: 2019/03/30
shelves:
review:
Examples from Lucifer’s Lexicon of Book Review Adjectives*

I decided to consult this new, now indispensable reference (written, no doubt, with a nod to Ambrose Bierce) for words I could use in a review of Amelia Gray’s notable first book. Her collection of stories, snippets really, was short but full of creativity, and a lot of adjectives apply. Here are the ones I’ll be using (sometimes as antitheses) along with Lucifer’s definitions:

Awesome - formerly, capable of producing awe; now come to mean far less due to grade inflation and overuse

Claustrophobic - had Haruki Murakami and Margaret Atwood ever produced a child, and that child wrote a Franz Kafka knock-off about a shackled body and soul, this would be the top word on the list to describe it

é - a description of work characterized by hackneyed expressions or concepts that the reviewer has recently stopped repeating and now considers tiresome

Discerning - in full agreement with the reviewer

Labyrinthine - containing one turn too many for the reviewer to follow

Laugh-out-loud funny - typically used to describe a very overt form of humor, often the kind we should be embarrassed by, like anything involving scrotums, painful falls, or stooges

Masterful - having a self-perceived talent that the reviewer hopes to reinforce through recognition of the same, but legitimate, talent in others

Metaphorical - prone to a writing device whereby inherently boring topics or descriptions are jazzed up like wings drenched in hot sauce or, uh, what’s an analogy for an analogy?

Nuanced - adjective to use when encountering complexity that's probably insightful but the reviewer can only pretend to understand

ٰܳé - an intelligent sounding word when the reviewer isn’t sure whether something’s weird for the sake of being weird or weird for a higher purpose

Philosophical - as Bierce himself said, this is a quality “of many roads, leading from nowhere to nothing�

Poignant - just about any emotion except joy, raised to the fourth power

Purple - (as applied to prose) label describing a writing style that in the eyes of some beholders should be attached to anything wordier than Hemingway and to other beholders that which applies only when a seemingly endless proliferation of modifiers enters injudiciously, gracelessly, and gratuitously

Sappy - prone to sweetness or sentimentalism (to be used sparingly since to serious, literary writers this is the kiss of death)

Spare - a self-descriptive substitute for the word “short�, opposite in every way to “interminably elongated and ponderous�

Trenchant - sarcasm trained towards proper targets (in contrast to sarcasm trained towards the reviewer’s pet causes which would instead be described as uncouth, impertinent, or sociopathic)

Wise - compared to synonyms "smart" and "clever", this is often applied prejudicially to older writers or those with an owlish countenance

Though this spare bit of writing may be short on words, it’s long on nuanced insight and pleasure. Some label this work flash fiction. Whatever it is, I think it’s masterfully written� never é, never sappy. Her fragments of text were not typically LOL funny, but there were quite a few instances of knowing winks and subtle observational humor. Here’s one example:
Just because you made it warm doesn't make it yours. A lesson for felines.
Feline Posits: What if one makes it warm for a long time?
A Response: I will still put it on the towel rack, because it is still a towel.

Her writing is often described as poetic, but unlike some of her literary peers, her prose/poetry never crossed into the purple end of the spectrum. She was also adept with her similes:
June was the kind of woman who not only talked to her cats, but consulted them seriously about world affairs and life changes. Mr. Pickles, she would say in that adorable voice women reserve for their cats and when they want a large favor performed. [...] Mr. Pickles, what is your opinion of the recent World Bank shake-up? The cat would look up at her, thinking for one wild moment that the tendrils of hair around her face were lizard tails.

And much of her writing could be called metaphorical. She was discerning about what to include, never getting bogged down with philosophical issues (in an academic sense), but still having plenty to say in her reflections:
One day, everyone stopped over-thinking. We started thinking just as much as we should, and not any more than necessary. There were no more misunderstandings whatsoever. Minor disagreements were forgotten, not turned into proof of larger things. Trivial errors of speech or judgment were just as important as items on the breakfast menu: you chose waffles and I chose eggs and it was a god damn miracle.

Characters in one short piece would often show up in later pieces, not in a labyrinthine, nonlinear narrative, but because it fit their personalities. Often her little slices of life had poignant aspects; resonant and clear. Others were trenchant, sometimes claustrophobic, or perhaps a little dzٰܳé and harder to decipher. Almost all make you think, though, which leads me to believe that Gray is very clever (I might have said wise, but Lucifer advises against such usage for her youthful demographic).

I’m putting this in the 4+ category. Not quite awesome awe-inspiring since not every one of her entries spoke to me, but still awfully good. [Now I need to check back with Lucifer to get his take on “awful�.]

*I had originally thought to call this Steve's Book of..., then thought The Cynic's Guide to... for the anonymity, but finally settled on Lucifer's Lexicon for the alliteration and the closer correspondence to Bierce's immensely fun Devil's Dictionary.
]]>
<![CDATA[Olive Kitteridge (Olive Kitteridge, #1)]]> 1736739
At times stern, at other times patient, at times perceptive, at other times in sad denial, Olive Kitteridge, a retired schoolteacher, deplores the changes in her little town of Crosby, Maine, and in the world at large, but she doesn’t always recognize the changes in those around her: a lounge musician haunted by a past romance; a former student who has lost the will to live; Olive’s own adult child, who feels tyrannized by her irrational sensitivities; and her husband, Henry, who finds his loyalty to his marriage both a blessing and a curse.

As the townspeople grapple with their problems, mild and dire, Olive is brought to a deeper understanding of herself and her life � sometimes painfully, but always with ruthless honesty.]]>
270 Elizabeth Strout Steve 5 Olive Kitteridge. Thinking of Olive the person, to say she’s multidimensional doesn’t go far enough. I need a new word—hyperdimensional, maybe. And she’s often at the extremes, in ways that may be positive, negative, paradoxical, or shifting. She’s the central figure in every other one of the 13 separate stories, and in the ones that focus on others she’s a secondary reference point (though hardly a fixed one). We certainly get a chance to know her many sides.

Olive had taught seventh grade math at the local school in Crosby, Maine, and was well-known if not uniformly well-liked around town. People did consistently think well of her husband Henry, the friendly pharmacist and church regular, which sometimes grated on her nerves.
"Never trust folks," Olive's mother told her years ago, after someone left a basket of cow flaps by their front door. Henry got irritated by that way of thinking. But Henry was pretty irritating himself, with his steadfast way of remaining naive, as though life were just what a Sears catalogue told you it was: everyone standing around smiling.

We get a sense early on that Olive is forthright in her opinions. You could even lose the euphemism and call her blunt or abrasive:
She said: "You're the one who can't stand these Hail-Mary Catholics! Your mother taught you that! Pauline was the only real Christian in the world, as far as Pauline was concerned. And her good boy, Henry."

Then at other times she came across as kind. In one story, she met an anorexic girl who quite unexpectedly brought Olive to tears. Her empathy seemed to grow with her own later-in-life self-awareness.
Sometimes, like now, Olive had a sense of just how desperately hard every person in the world was working to get what they needed. For most, it was a sense of safety, in the sea of terror that life increasingly became. People thought love would do it, and maybe it did. But […] it was never enough, was it?

Olive was a fascinating character with traits that occasionally seemed at odds with one another. This, from the book, speaks to that: “She didn't like being alone. Even more, she didn't like being with people.� She was also stoic while vulnerable, unapologetic while sensitive, and perceptive about plights while blind to her own role in causing them. I could go on a lot longer identifying her quirks, but that would be very un-Strout-like of me do so. We get our impressions of each person with a wonderful economy of words.

With all of Olive’s attributes I’ve mentioned, the other characters bring that many more. One thing they share is something Strout talked about afterwards:
In order to imagine what it feels like to be another person I have to use my own experiences and responses to the world. I have to pay attention to what I have felt and observed, then push these responses to an extreme while keeping the story within the realm of being psychologically and emotionally true.

The feeling that her characters were human and real came through on every page. And like actual people we know, their lives can’t be captured by a single tile of a mosaic. I came to really appreciate the structure of the book that had so many perspectives and viewing angles. Half an hour into the book I told my wife this seemed like a 3.5 to 4 star book—pretty good, but with a main character I thought was unidimensionally unlikeable. Half an hour later, with more tiles in place, I told her it was a 4.5 to 5 stars, and it only went up from there.

It’s not a long book, but it presents its themes well. Family dynamics feature prominently. Olive and Henry’s son was an interesting result of Olive’s variability, not always a happy one. I’ve mentioned very little of the stories focusing on other people in town, but they had plenty of heft too. Grief, loneliness, love, infidelity, aging, thoughts of ending it all, and the simple challenges of everyday life—it’s all addressed with writing that’s both artful and clear. And as Olive and the others come to learn more of themselves, we may learn more of ourselves as well.]]>
3.85 2008 Olive Kitteridge (Olive Kitteridge, #1)
author: Elizabeth Strout
name: Steve
average rating: 3.85
book published: 2008
rating: 5
read at: 2019/03/25
date added: 2019/03/28
shelves:
review:
You don’t have to love Olive Kitteridge to love Olive Kitteridge. Thinking of Olive the person, to say she’s multidimensional doesn’t go far enough. I need a new word—hyperdimensional, maybe. And she’s often at the extremes, in ways that may be positive, negative, paradoxical, or shifting. She’s the central figure in every other one of the 13 separate stories, and in the ones that focus on others she’s a secondary reference point (though hardly a fixed one). We certainly get a chance to know her many sides.

Olive had taught seventh grade math at the local school in Crosby, Maine, and was well-known if not uniformly well-liked around town. People did consistently think well of her husband Henry, the friendly pharmacist and church regular, which sometimes grated on her nerves.
"Never trust folks," Olive's mother told her years ago, after someone left a basket of cow flaps by their front door. Henry got irritated by that way of thinking. But Henry was pretty irritating himself, with his steadfast way of remaining naive, as though life were just what a Sears catalogue told you it was: everyone standing around smiling.

We get a sense early on that Olive is forthright in her opinions. You could even lose the euphemism and call her blunt or abrasive:
She said: "You're the one who can't stand these Hail-Mary Catholics! Your mother taught you that! Pauline was the only real Christian in the world, as far as Pauline was concerned. And her good boy, Henry."

Then at other times she came across as kind. In one story, she met an anorexic girl who quite unexpectedly brought Olive to tears. Her empathy seemed to grow with her own later-in-life self-awareness.
Sometimes, like now, Olive had a sense of just how desperately hard every person in the world was working to get what they needed. For most, it was a sense of safety, in the sea of terror that life increasingly became. People thought love would do it, and maybe it did. But […] it was never enough, was it?

Olive was a fascinating character with traits that occasionally seemed at odds with one another. This, from the book, speaks to that: “She didn't like being alone. Even more, she didn't like being with people.� She was also stoic while vulnerable, unapologetic while sensitive, and perceptive about plights while blind to her own role in causing them. I could go on a lot longer identifying her quirks, but that would be very un-Strout-like of me do so. We get our impressions of each person with a wonderful economy of words.

With all of Olive’s attributes I’ve mentioned, the other characters bring that many more. One thing they share is something Strout talked about afterwards:
In order to imagine what it feels like to be another person I have to use my own experiences and responses to the world. I have to pay attention to what I have felt and observed, then push these responses to an extreme while keeping the story within the realm of being psychologically and emotionally true.

The feeling that her characters were human and real came through on every page. And like actual people we know, their lives can’t be captured by a single tile of a mosaic. I came to really appreciate the structure of the book that had so many perspectives and viewing angles. Half an hour into the book I told my wife this seemed like a 3.5 to 4 star book—pretty good, but with a main character I thought was unidimensionally unlikeable. Half an hour later, with more tiles in place, I told her it was a 4.5 to 5 stars, and it only went up from there.

It’s not a long book, but it presents its themes well. Family dynamics feature prominently. Olive and Henry’s son was an interesting result of Olive’s variability, not always a happy one. I’ve mentioned very little of the stories focusing on other people in town, but they had plenty of heft too. Grief, loneliness, love, infidelity, aging, thoughts of ending it all, and the simple challenges of everyday life—it’s all addressed with writing that’s both artful and clear. And as Olive and the others come to learn more of themselves, we may learn more of ourselves as well.
]]>
Collected Stories 10804
The traveler --
Buglesong --
Beyond the glass mountain --
The berry patch --
The women on the wall --
Balance his, swing yours --
Saw gang --
Goin' to town --
The view from the balcony --
Volcano --
Two rivers --
Hostage --
In the twilight --
Butcher bird --
The double corner --
The colt --
The Chink --
Chip off the old block --
The sweetness of the twisted apples --
The blue-winged teal --
Pop goes the alley cat --
Maiden in a tower --
Impasse --
The volunteer --
A field guide to the western birds --
Something spurious from the Mindanao Deep --
Genesis --
The wolfer --
Carrion spring --
He who spits at the sky --
The city of the living.]]>
525 Wallace Stegner 0143039792 Steve 5
📖 � 😢

📖 � 😂 😊 😔 😏 🙈 😕 😬 😟 👍 💔 💞

I thought my symbolic shorthand could say everything I wanted about these brilliant stories, cataloging the feelings they bring on as you read them. I was wrong. I need some words too, like how his writing is so effortless and at the same time so wise, or how he often saves one key insight ‘til the very end that ties everything together. With certain of our favorite stories, we can point to “ah ha� moments where a 100 watt bulb suddenly turns on. There were a couple in this collection that, for me, flashed even brighter than that. They were like the first alley-oop play that a hoops fan ever witnessed, or the pop chocolate and caramel get from a few flakes of salt. It’s genius you don’t see coming, and you want to tell the world. So here’s me:

]]>
4.24 1990 Collected Stories
author: Wallace Stegner
name: Steve
average rating: 4.24
book published: 1990
rating: 5
read at: 2018/01/01
date added: 2019/03/21
shelves:
review:
📖 � 😆

📖 � 😢

📖 � 😂 😊 😔 😏 🙈 😕 😬 😟 👍 💔 💞

I thought my symbolic shorthand could say everything I wanted about these brilliant stories, cataloging the feelings they bring on as you read them. I was wrong. I need some words too, like how his writing is so effortless and at the same time so wise, or how he often saves one key insight ‘til the very end that ties everything together. With certain of our favorite stories, we can point to “ah ha� moments where a 100 watt bulb suddenly turns on. There were a couple in this collection that, for me, flashed even brighter than that. They were like the first alley-oop play that a hoops fan ever witnessed, or the pop chocolate and caramel get from a few flakes of salt. It’s genius you don’t see coming, and you want to tell the world. So here’s me:


]]>
Galveston 7203669 272 Nic Pizzolatto 1439166641 Steve 4 True Detective, the stellar* HBO series that he created and wrote, you’d expect that.

This is neo-noir at its finest. Underbelly settings, violence you can’t escape, sex, drugs, and cancer if not manslaughter—it’s all there, presented with more poetry than you might expect. Roy Cady, a debt collector for a New Orleans mobster, discovers in quick succession that his boss has it in for him and that his doctor has bad news about his lungs. He escapes to Texas in the company of a hard luck teenage hooker named Rocky.
A lot of people her age expected to live forever and saw life as a kind of birthright to endless good times. I never did see things that way, and I knew that she hadn't either.

It’s easy to see how a plot could move propulsively from there. And it does. Along the way, we get large dollops of that Weltschmerz I mentioned.
I've found that all weak people share a basic obsession--they fixate on the idea of satisfaction. Anywhere you go men and women are like crows drawn by shiny objects. For some folks, the shiny objects are other people, and you'd be better off developing a drug habit.

But can a 4.5 star book leave it at just that? Somewhere along the way Pizzolatto discovered that a noir sentiment could be made more poignant by leapfrogging the pure nihilism and infusing it with something else. But what? Well now, you’ll just need to read it to find out. And remember, hearts can vary widely: Hallmark-like at one extreme and hard as Hell at the other. Great writers know how to calibrate to suit the story they tell.

*Well, seasons 1 and 3, at least.]]>
3.70 2010 Galveston
author: Nic Pizzolatto
name: Steve
average rating: 3.70
book published: 2010
rating: 4
read at: 2017/01/01
date added: 2019/03/19
shelves:
review:
Weltschmerz. It's not a word that anyone in this book would use, but they sure did feel it. The world weariness applied universally. Nobody’s fools. If you’ve come to know Nic Pizzolatto from True Detective, the stellar* HBO series that he created and wrote, you’d expect that.

This is neo-noir at its finest. Underbelly settings, violence you can’t escape, sex, drugs, and cancer if not manslaughter—it’s all there, presented with more poetry than you might expect. Roy Cady, a debt collector for a New Orleans mobster, discovers in quick succession that his boss has it in for him and that his doctor has bad news about his lungs. He escapes to Texas in the company of a hard luck teenage hooker named Rocky.
A lot of people her age expected to live forever and saw life as a kind of birthright to endless good times. I never did see things that way, and I knew that she hadn't either.

It’s easy to see how a plot could move propulsively from there. And it does. Along the way, we get large dollops of that Weltschmerz I mentioned.
I've found that all weak people share a basic obsession--they fixate on the idea of satisfaction. Anywhere you go men and women are like crows drawn by shiny objects. For some folks, the shiny objects are other people, and you'd be better off developing a drug habit.

But can a 4.5 star book leave it at just that? Somewhere along the way Pizzolatto discovered that a noir sentiment could be made more poignant by leapfrogging the pure nihilism and infusing it with something else. But what? Well now, you’ll just need to read it to find out. And remember, hearts can vary widely: Hallmark-like at one extreme and hard as Hell at the other. Great writers know how to calibrate to suit the story they tell.

*Well, seasons 1 and 3, at least.
]]>
The Tennis Partner 187117 New York Times bestselling author of Cutting for Stone.

When Abraham Verghese, a physician whose marriage is unraveling, relocates to El Paso, Texas, he hopes to make a fresh start as a staff member at the county hospital. There he meets David Smith, a medical student recovering from drug addiction, and the two men begin a tennis ritual that allows them to shed their inhibitions and find security in the sport they love and with each other. This friendship between doctor and intern grows increasingly rich and complex, more intimate than two men usually allow. Just when it seems nothing can go wrong, the dark beast from David’s past emerges once again—and almost everything Verghese has come to trust and believe in is threatened as David spirals out of control.]]>
345 Abraham Verghese 0060931132 Steve 4 Cutting for Stone. It has 314,679 ŷ ratings, 51% of which were five stars. Many fewer (5,100) have rated this earlier Verghese book. That's unfortunate. (Not the popularity of Cutting for Stone, rather the fact this fascinating memoir remains largely undiscovered). Yes, it does feature tennis, but in the same way that M*A*S*H features surgery. The principals connect through it, but you don’t have to appreciate its finer points to enjoy the story (most of which is unrelated to rackets and nets). Even so, you’d probably like the book even more if you know what a backhand is, or if you’ve heard of Arthur Ashe.

The focus was squarely on the relationship between two men. One was the author, of course, an Indian doctor brought up in Ethiopia who at the time of the book was the Head of Internal Medicine at Texas Tech’s teaching hospital in El Paso. The other was one of his students, an Aussie named David. Their initial bond was a shared passion for tennis. David was the better player, and actually toured briefly as a professional. The two related to each other as foreigners, too, who had to work extra hard for their school placements. There was a symmetry to them where Verghese was the brilliant, affable teacher at the hospital and David was the talented, easy-going teacher on the court.

Once their friendship was on solid footing with mutual favors and mutual respect, they began to confide in each other. Verghese talked about his marital problems and what this meant for his two young sons. David then confessed to being a recovering cocaine addict. A med student who would dare shoot up, you might ask? They’d know the devastating physical effects better than anyone, right? Well, evidently, it happens. Verghese felt that doctors, who as a rule may be more emotionally remote, more often left to their own devices to fight demons, and better able to function in denial, have their own special brand of addiction problems.

Clearly, there was no shortage of conflict to drive the narrative. The most interesting parts to me, though, were Verghese’s powers of observation. A related trait that allowed him to diagnose a wide variety of illnesses from peeks and prods at the bedside made him a skilled writer with extraordinary insight into what makes people (himself included) tick. I like that he didn’t always paint himself as the hero, copping to pettiness, thin skin, and a lack of attentiveness to his wife. At one point he described himself as “willing to be fascinated equally by the genius, the fool, and the misanthrope,� then saying his wife was “more careful, cautious, level headed.� If he ever vilified her, it was too subtle for me to notice. I thought he was particularly good, too, at describing David’s behavior, without claiming that he understood the root causes. (The “show, don’t tell� lesson was not lost on him.)

David, despite his charm and casual grace, was a man with baggage. His landlady and AA friend called him a helpless womanizer, which may have gone hand-in-hand with his drug problem. Promising relationships fell apart due to self-destructive behavior. One of the key questions Verghese asked himself was how responsible he should feel for David’s well-being. Could he be diverted away from his problems? Should he be given special dispensation? Is his condition simply another disease to be treated? How much is a function of will? Another aspect of Verghese’s honesty that I appreciated was how he viewed events first as they affected himself. The subsequent empathy for his friend rang truer that way.

Something fans of Cutting for Stone already know is that Verghese is one heck of a good writer. That’s true at a sentence level (an MFA from the Iowa Writers Workshop after his medical degree must have seen to that) and also in the human understanding he shows. At one point, an addict named Gato offered to show him the ropes.
Men like Gato made you feel that your manhood was being tested. There was nothing about his life--the hard time he did, the drug use, the manslaughter--that you envied, and yet when he flashed that arrogant grin, it was as if he dismissed everything you had done in your life as being sissy, joto. It tempted you to take some foolish risk just to prove him wrong, to show him you were one the boys.

I liked his analogies too. One time he saw David with another woman.
I've been meaning to tell you about her," he said, shaking his head, as if she were a weather pattern that had blown into his life, a phenomenon over which he had no control. Something that had just happened.

He’s good with medical science as well, rarely going into detail just to show off. Here he was talking about how Emergency Medicine would be a bad specialty for David.
EM was an adrenaline-driven field--the difference between cocaine and adrenaline a matter of a few carbon atoms.

I’m giving this 4.5 stars and rounding down reluctantly to 4. My only real complaint is that towards the end when I expected the most powerful emotional wallop, it seemed a bit clinical instead. But I’d hate to leave you with that as the final impression. This is a very engaging read, with an author you can trust pointing out complicated human dealings: control in the face of addiction, promiscuity when people can get hurt, and friendship when the going gets tough. I put this one in play. It’s in your court now.]]>
3.95 1998 The Tennis Partner
author: Abraham Verghese
name: Steve
average rating: 3.95
book published: 1998
rating: 4
read at: 2019/03/11
date added: 2019/03/15
shelves:
review:
A whole lot of people have read and loved Cutting for Stone. It has 314,679 ŷ ratings, 51% of which were five stars. Many fewer (5,100) have rated this earlier Verghese book. That's unfortunate. (Not the popularity of Cutting for Stone, rather the fact this fascinating memoir remains largely undiscovered). Yes, it does feature tennis, but in the same way that M*A*S*H features surgery. The principals connect through it, but you don’t have to appreciate its finer points to enjoy the story (most of which is unrelated to rackets and nets). Even so, you’d probably like the book even more if you know what a backhand is, or if you’ve heard of Arthur Ashe.

The focus was squarely on the relationship between two men. One was the author, of course, an Indian doctor brought up in Ethiopia who at the time of the book was the Head of Internal Medicine at Texas Tech’s teaching hospital in El Paso. The other was one of his students, an Aussie named David. Their initial bond was a shared passion for tennis. David was the better player, and actually toured briefly as a professional. The two related to each other as foreigners, too, who had to work extra hard for their school placements. There was a symmetry to them where Verghese was the brilliant, affable teacher at the hospital and David was the talented, easy-going teacher on the court.

Once their friendship was on solid footing with mutual favors and mutual respect, they began to confide in each other. Verghese talked about his marital problems and what this meant for his two young sons. David then confessed to being a recovering cocaine addict. A med student who would dare shoot up, you might ask? They’d know the devastating physical effects better than anyone, right? Well, evidently, it happens. Verghese felt that doctors, who as a rule may be more emotionally remote, more often left to their own devices to fight demons, and better able to function in denial, have their own special brand of addiction problems.

Clearly, there was no shortage of conflict to drive the narrative. The most interesting parts to me, though, were Verghese’s powers of observation. A related trait that allowed him to diagnose a wide variety of illnesses from peeks and prods at the bedside made him a skilled writer with extraordinary insight into what makes people (himself included) tick. I like that he didn’t always paint himself as the hero, copping to pettiness, thin skin, and a lack of attentiveness to his wife. At one point he described himself as “willing to be fascinated equally by the genius, the fool, and the misanthrope,� then saying his wife was “more careful, cautious, level headed.� If he ever vilified her, it was too subtle for me to notice. I thought he was particularly good, too, at describing David’s behavior, without claiming that he understood the root causes. (The “show, don’t tell� lesson was not lost on him.)

David, despite his charm and casual grace, was a man with baggage. His landlady and AA friend called him a helpless womanizer, which may have gone hand-in-hand with his drug problem. Promising relationships fell apart due to self-destructive behavior. One of the key questions Verghese asked himself was how responsible he should feel for David’s well-being. Could he be diverted away from his problems? Should he be given special dispensation? Is his condition simply another disease to be treated? How much is a function of will? Another aspect of Verghese’s honesty that I appreciated was how he viewed events first as they affected himself. The subsequent empathy for his friend rang truer that way.

Something fans of Cutting for Stone already know is that Verghese is one heck of a good writer. That’s true at a sentence level (an MFA from the Iowa Writers Workshop after his medical degree must have seen to that) and also in the human understanding he shows. At one point, an addict named Gato offered to show him the ropes.
Men like Gato made you feel that your manhood was being tested. There was nothing about his life--the hard time he did, the drug use, the manslaughter--that you envied, and yet when he flashed that arrogant grin, it was as if he dismissed everything you had done in your life as being sissy, joto. It tempted you to take some foolish risk just to prove him wrong, to show him you were one the boys.

I liked his analogies too. One time he saw David with another woman.
I've been meaning to tell you about her," he said, shaking his head, as if she were a weather pattern that had blown into his life, a phenomenon over which he had no control. Something that had just happened.

He’s good with medical science as well, rarely going into detail just to show off. Here he was talking about how Emergency Medicine would be a bad specialty for David.
EM was an adrenaline-driven field--the difference between cocaine and adrenaline a matter of a few carbon atoms.

I’m giving this 4.5 stars and rounding down reluctantly to 4. My only real complaint is that towards the end when I expected the most powerful emotional wallop, it seemed a bit clinical instead. But I’d hate to leave you with that as the final impression. This is a very engaging read, with an author you can trust pointing out complicated human dealings: control in the face of addiction, promiscuity when people can get hurt, and friendship when the going gets tough. I put this one in play. It’s in your court now.
]]>
<![CDATA[Lonesome Dove (Lonesome Dove, #1)]]> 256008 Lonesome Dove, the third book in the Lonesome Dove tetralogy, is the grandest novel ever written about the last defiant wilderness of America.

Journey to the dusty little Texas town of Lonesome Dove and meet an unforgettable assortment of heroes and outlaws, whores and ladies, Indians and settlers. Richly authentic, beautifully written, always dramatic, Lonesome Dove is a book to make us laugh, weep, dream, and remember.]]>
960 Larry McMurtry 067168390X Steve 5 Lonesome Dove continues to hold a spot in my top ten. I’m thinking as a tribute to this longstanding favorite that I should do something different. So this will not be a run-of-the-mill review; it’ll be a meta-review instead. I’ll be distilling the wisdom of the crowd in a kind of ensemble piece, finding repeated observations from the book’s top ten ŷ reviews to emphasize its best qualities even more.

Before I get to the content itself, let me first mention that this sample was biased to the upside, with an average rating of 4.9. As “like� dispensers, we’re attracted to enthusiasm, and in my mind this book warrants every bit of that. Goodreaders like colorfully worded diatribes, too, but that’s irrelevant here. Hardly anyone rated this book below 4 stars. The other thing I’ve noticed about some books is that positions at the top of their scroll often reflect the overall popularity of the reviewers themselves, which may or may not speak to the content of the reviews. Several of those on a par with John Lennon (who in 1966, by his own informal polling, had surpassed Jesus Christ) may simply attach a gif, write a catch phrase or two, and call it a day. I saw nothing like that for this one. I figure that’s a sign that the substance of this book matters—it’s worth a full discussion. So here are the common elements that I gleaned.

You’ll fall in love with the characters

Six of the ten reviews mentioned this explicitly. For good reason, I say. McMurtry gives us plenty of time to walk in their boots. It’s not just with the two main characters either, former Texas Rangers Augustus “Gus� McCrae and Woodrow Call. As one reviewer noted, the secondary characters were rounded out too. Deets, Pea Eye, and young Newt were unforgettable members of the Hat Creek Cattle Company. Gus, the loquacious tale-teller and true-blue friend, along with Call, the taciturn leader and man of principle, were clearly the stars, though.

What a journey!

Five reviewers made a point of mentioning how arduous a task it was to drive cattle from Texas all the way up to Montana. The many hardships along the way were a big reason for the next common theme that the top reviewers mentioned:

It’s long

The Pocket Books edition I read (a misnomer unless your pockets are really big) weighed in at 945 pages. A large percentage of it covered the drive, with perils abounding. The weather, the land, and a nasty piece of work called Blue Duck all contributed to their travails. Three of the five who mentioned the length, though, also pointed out that it was paced well. The dialog, the entertaining anecdotes, and changes in perspective all helped keep the pages turning. Only one person said they thought it could have been improved with more stringent editing.

Great story

Four reviewers provided a plot summary and mentioned how engrossing it was. The adventure began when fellow ex-Ranger Jake Spoon was talking up the largely unsettled land up in Montana where an ambitious bunch could do well for themselves as ranchers. Call took the bait. Gus, the dutiful friend, had an ulterior motive for going named Clara, a love interest in Nebraska. Another woman, the young and attractive Lorena, was the central figure in several side stories. Other subplots involving frontier justice, pigheadedness, and random bad luck were worth telling too.

I laughed, I cried, I ____

Those weren’t the exact words that four of the reviewers used, but that was the gist. As for the blanks, one said “got pissed off,� another said something to the effect of “soiled myself,� and yet another said “felt their indecisiveness.� I might have said “prayed to the God of Western tropes for a little mercy.� But let’s not lose sight of the laughing and the crying. A great writer like McMurtry knows how to make us do both.

Gus gushings

Three reviewers stated explicitly that they loved Gus. I can see why. He was a rare combination of wise and impetuous, hedonistic and dependable, and he was a straight shooter in every sense. You couldn’t imagine a truer cowboy philosopher king.

Prize winner

This won a Pulitzer in 1986 as was noted in three of the reviews.

Led to a great mini-series

Three more reviews mentioned the popular and critically acclaimed mini-series that stemmed from the book. This was one of the best adaptations at a time before screenwriters had really mastered the art. It helped to have such a great cast: Robert Duvall as Gus, Tommy Lee Jones as Call, Danny Glover as Deets, Diane Lane as Lorena, Anjelica Huston as Clara, and plenty of other name brand actors. It ended up winning seven Emmy Awards.

You don’t have to like Westerns to like this

Had this been a standard format review, I’d have been tempted to lead with this. Two of the top ten did mention it, so I’m glad this important point has been made. It’s not that the book tries to distance itself from its Western roots. (You still taste dust and you still care about who's wearing the white hats, the black hats, and ones that are varying shades of gray.) It’s more that it expands upon the genre and executes it all to perfection.

Picture from the mini-series

I was a little surprised to see that only one review, and it was a good one, included a movie still. I suspect in a lot of minds now, the thought of Gus and Call are intrinsically linked to Robert Duvall and Tommy Lee Jones. Maybe this goes with what I was saying before, though, that a classic like this lends itself to words more than images to express the deeper impact it has as a book.

Special thanks to Melissa � Dog/Wolf Lover � Martin, Aaron, Brina, Bill Kerwin, Kemper, Matthew, Arah-Lynda, Joe Valdez, Em Lost In Books, and Fabian for participating (unwittingly) in this review. Their commentary formed the basis for what I’ve written. As such, they share in the blame if it fails to be convincing. No, seriously, I hope if any of you are sitting on the fence with this one that their sage words in promoting it push you over the edge. We’ll keep you clear of the cow patties, I swear.]]>
4.53 1985 Lonesome Dove (Lonesome Dove, #1)
author: Larry McMurtry
name: Steve
average rating: 4.53
book published: 1985
rating: 5
read at:
date added: 2019/03/06
shelves:
review:
It was quite a few years ago that I read this epic tale, and I’ve read a lot of great books since then. Even so, Lonesome Dove continues to hold a spot in my top ten. I’m thinking as a tribute to this longstanding favorite that I should do something different. So this will not be a run-of-the-mill review; it’ll be a meta-review instead. I’ll be distilling the wisdom of the crowd in a kind of ensemble piece, finding repeated observations from the book’s top ten ŷ reviews to emphasize its best qualities even more.

Before I get to the content itself, let me first mention that this sample was biased to the upside, with an average rating of 4.9. As “like� dispensers, we’re attracted to enthusiasm, and in my mind this book warrants every bit of that. Goodreaders like colorfully worded diatribes, too, but that’s irrelevant here. Hardly anyone rated this book below 4 stars. The other thing I’ve noticed about some books is that positions at the top of their scroll often reflect the overall popularity of the reviewers themselves, which may or may not speak to the content of the reviews. Several of those on a par with John Lennon (who in 1966, by his own informal polling, had surpassed Jesus Christ) may simply attach a gif, write a catch phrase or two, and call it a day. I saw nothing like that for this one. I figure that’s a sign that the substance of this book matters—it’s worth a full discussion. So here are the common elements that I gleaned.

You’ll fall in love with the characters

Six of the ten reviews mentioned this explicitly. For good reason, I say. McMurtry gives us plenty of time to walk in their boots. It’s not just with the two main characters either, former Texas Rangers Augustus “Gus� McCrae and Woodrow Call. As one reviewer noted, the secondary characters were rounded out too. Deets, Pea Eye, and young Newt were unforgettable members of the Hat Creek Cattle Company. Gus, the loquacious tale-teller and true-blue friend, along with Call, the taciturn leader and man of principle, were clearly the stars, though.

What a journey!

Five reviewers made a point of mentioning how arduous a task it was to drive cattle from Texas all the way up to Montana. The many hardships along the way were a big reason for the next common theme that the top reviewers mentioned:

It’s long

The Pocket Books edition I read (a misnomer unless your pockets are really big) weighed in at 945 pages. A large percentage of it covered the drive, with perils abounding. The weather, the land, and a nasty piece of work called Blue Duck all contributed to their travails. Three of the five who mentioned the length, though, also pointed out that it was paced well. The dialog, the entertaining anecdotes, and changes in perspective all helped keep the pages turning. Only one person said they thought it could have been improved with more stringent editing.

Great story

Four reviewers provided a plot summary and mentioned how engrossing it was. The adventure began when fellow ex-Ranger Jake Spoon was talking up the largely unsettled land up in Montana where an ambitious bunch could do well for themselves as ranchers. Call took the bait. Gus, the dutiful friend, had an ulterior motive for going named Clara, a love interest in Nebraska. Another woman, the young and attractive Lorena, was the central figure in several side stories. Other subplots involving frontier justice, pigheadedness, and random bad luck were worth telling too.

I laughed, I cried, I ____

Those weren’t the exact words that four of the reviewers used, but that was the gist. As for the blanks, one said “got pissed off,� another said something to the effect of “soiled myself,� and yet another said “felt their indecisiveness.� I might have said “prayed to the God of Western tropes for a little mercy.� But let’s not lose sight of the laughing and the crying. A great writer like McMurtry knows how to make us do both.

Gus gushings

Three reviewers stated explicitly that they loved Gus. I can see why. He was a rare combination of wise and impetuous, hedonistic and dependable, and he was a straight shooter in every sense. You couldn’t imagine a truer cowboy philosopher king.

Prize winner

This won a Pulitzer in 1986 as was noted in three of the reviews.

Led to a great mini-series

Three more reviews mentioned the popular and critically acclaimed mini-series that stemmed from the book. This was one of the best adaptations at a time before screenwriters had really mastered the art. It helped to have such a great cast: Robert Duvall as Gus, Tommy Lee Jones as Call, Danny Glover as Deets, Diane Lane as Lorena, Anjelica Huston as Clara, and plenty of other name brand actors. It ended up winning seven Emmy Awards.

You don’t have to like Westerns to like this

Had this been a standard format review, I’d have been tempted to lead with this. Two of the top ten did mention it, so I’m glad this important point has been made. It’s not that the book tries to distance itself from its Western roots. (You still taste dust and you still care about who's wearing the white hats, the black hats, and ones that are varying shades of gray.) It’s more that it expands upon the genre and executes it all to perfection.

Picture from the mini-series

I was a little surprised to see that only one review, and it was a good one, included a movie still. I suspect in a lot of minds now, the thought of Gus and Call are intrinsically linked to Robert Duvall and Tommy Lee Jones. Maybe this goes with what I was saying before, though, that a classic like this lends itself to words more than images to express the deeper impact it has as a book.

Special thanks to Melissa � Dog/Wolf Lover � Martin, Aaron, Brina, Bill Kerwin, Kemper, Matthew, Arah-Lynda, Joe Valdez, Em Lost In Books, and Fabian for participating (unwittingly) in this review. Their commentary formed the basis for what I’ve written. As such, they share in the blame if it fails to be convincing. No, seriously, I hope if any of you are sitting on the fence with this one that their sage words in promoting it push you over the edge. We’ll keep you clear of the cow patties, I swear.
]]>
English Passengers 14257
Meanwhile, an aboriginal in Tasmania named Peevay recounts his people’s struggles against the invading British, a story that begins in 1824, moves into the present with approach of the English passengers in 1857, and extends into the future in 1870. These characters and many others come together in a storm of voices that vividly bring a past age to life.]]>
446 Matthew Kneale 038549744X Steve 4 sans textbook aridity. Much of the story is set in Tasmania in the 1800s where the native Aborigines were underfoot and too many British imperialists were wearing heavy boots. A character named Peevay is one of the principal narrators, offering a unique perspective as the son of an English father and a resistant, indigenous mother. The other storyline was a seafaring adventure. The captain and crew were Manxmen and as such had a different language and culture that added color to the mix. They had failed in their attempts at smuggling and had no other recourse than to take a small but paying set of passengers from England to Tasmania. Yet another goal of the book was to expose some of the day’s more egregious notions related to colonialism, evangelism, racism, and class.

Somebody counted the number of narrators in this book to be 19. Only a handful were major, though, with repeated chances to tell their side of things. The first was Captain Illiam Quillian Kewley who had a plan to run brandy and tobacco from the Isle of Man to England for a quick profit. Customs officials had other ideas, of course, forcing Kewley and his crew to scramble to pay their fine. They chartered out their ship, ironically named Sincerity, to Reverend Wilson, who had convinced himself with God’s presumed guidance that the Garden of Eden was actually in Tasmania, and Dr. Potter, who wanted to collect evidence supporting his wrong-headed theories about race and ethnicity. There were some humorous moments when Wilson’s cluelessness was on full display. My astute ŷ friend, Helle, likened him in her review to Mr. Collins in Pride and Prejudice. The following gives you an idea of what we mean:
I began my ministry with some zeal, endeavouring to improve the lives of my flock by launching a little campaign to have the alehouse open only three days in the week instead of seven, and offering--as a nobler recompense--two extra church services. Sadly this little initiative was answered, in certain quarters, with something like hostility.

Potter was vile in his own way, but at least he served as a pain in the pious Reverend’s rear end. They were joined by a third Englishman, a young botanist who was lazy and self-centered, but a possible candidate for redemption. The interplay among the passengers and the crew shed plenty of light on the vast sea of moral philosophy. Conflict was easy to come by, especially in close quarters.

Peevay, his defiant mother, and their dwindling tribe faced conflict of a different sort: sickness, murder, and oppression. Their spears were no match for the firearms and bad intent directed their way. Even putatively good intentions often worked against them. Peevay’s narrative began decades before Գٲ’s arrival, but ultimately caught up. The convergence of these two storylines brought about even more folly and hypocrisy. And let’s not forget atrocities. The book definitely did not turn a blind eye to them.

The multifold narration, in my view, mostly worked. As a rule, it kept the stories from growing stale. The subtle humor helped, too, where the butts of the jokes invariably had it coming. I also consider the language a strength—varied and slightly archaic. My only real criticism is that it seemed to drag in places, and a few of the characters seemed superfluous. In the end, though, the four stars I’m giving it should tell you that the pleasures and education I gained outweighed the tedium. The Booker committee evidently agreed, and in fact, saw their own scales tipping even more to that side.]]>
4.08 2000 English Passengers
author: Matthew Kneale
name: Steve
average rating: 4.08
book published: 2000
rating: 4
read at: 2019/02/23
date added: 2019/02/28
shelves:
review:
Kneale’s book tries and largely succeeds in being multiple things. First of all, it’s good historical fiction—the kind where the education comes sans textbook aridity. Much of the story is set in Tasmania in the 1800s where the native Aborigines were underfoot and too many British imperialists were wearing heavy boots. A character named Peevay is one of the principal narrators, offering a unique perspective as the son of an English father and a resistant, indigenous mother. The other storyline was a seafaring adventure. The captain and crew were Manxmen and as such had a different language and culture that added color to the mix. They had failed in their attempts at smuggling and had no other recourse than to take a small but paying set of passengers from England to Tasmania. Yet another goal of the book was to expose some of the day’s more egregious notions related to colonialism, evangelism, racism, and class.

Somebody counted the number of narrators in this book to be 19. Only a handful were major, though, with repeated chances to tell their side of things. The first was Captain Illiam Quillian Kewley who had a plan to run brandy and tobacco from the Isle of Man to England for a quick profit. Customs officials had other ideas, of course, forcing Kewley and his crew to scramble to pay their fine. They chartered out their ship, ironically named Sincerity, to Reverend Wilson, who had convinced himself with God’s presumed guidance that the Garden of Eden was actually in Tasmania, and Dr. Potter, who wanted to collect evidence supporting his wrong-headed theories about race and ethnicity. There were some humorous moments when Wilson’s cluelessness was on full display. My astute ŷ friend, Helle, likened him in her review to Mr. Collins in Pride and Prejudice. The following gives you an idea of what we mean:
I began my ministry with some zeal, endeavouring to improve the lives of my flock by launching a little campaign to have the alehouse open only three days in the week instead of seven, and offering--as a nobler recompense--two extra church services. Sadly this little initiative was answered, in certain quarters, with something like hostility.

Potter was vile in his own way, but at least he served as a pain in the pious Reverend’s rear end. They were joined by a third Englishman, a young botanist who was lazy and self-centered, but a possible candidate for redemption. The interplay among the passengers and the crew shed plenty of light on the vast sea of moral philosophy. Conflict was easy to come by, especially in close quarters.

Peevay, his defiant mother, and their dwindling tribe faced conflict of a different sort: sickness, murder, and oppression. Their spears were no match for the firearms and bad intent directed their way. Even putatively good intentions often worked against them. Peevay’s narrative began decades before Գٲ’s arrival, but ultimately caught up. The convergence of these two storylines brought about even more folly and hypocrisy. And let’s not forget atrocities. The book definitely did not turn a blind eye to them.

The multifold narration, in my view, mostly worked. As a rule, it kept the stories from growing stale. The subtle humor helped, too, where the butts of the jokes invariably had it coming. I also consider the language a strength—varied and slightly archaic. My only real criticism is that it seemed to drag in places, and a few of the characters seemed superfluous. In the end, though, the four stars I’m giving it should tell you that the pleasures and education I gained outweighed the tedium. The Booker committee evidently agreed, and in fact, saw their own scales tipping even more to that side.
]]>
<![CDATA[My Brilliant Friend (Neapolitan Novels, #1)]]> 35036409 My Brilliant Friend is a rich, intense and generous-hearted story about two friends, Elena and Lila. Ferrante’s inimitable style lends itself perfectly to a meticulous portrait of these two women that is also the story of a nation and a touching meditation on the nature of friendship. Through the lives of these two women, Ferrante tells the story of a neighbourhood, a city and a country as it is transformed in ways that, in turn, also transform the relationship between her two protagonists.]]> 331 Elena Ferrante Steve 5 Reading Hacks for La Dolce Vita

Goodreaders, as self-selected members of this elite club, already know about “The Good Life� with books. My purpose here is to push for more of the same but with a bit of Italian panache. The list starts generically with tips for increasing the quality and quantity of your Italian reading adventures, then turns specifically towards Elena Ferrante’s celebrated Neapolitan Novels.

1. Book in one hand, cannoli in the other.

This takes the “dolce� part of the phrase literally. Actually, a scoop of gelato would work well, too, as long as you don’t let it drip out of the cone.

2. Bite of cheese, sip of wine, page of book. Bite of cheese, sip of wine, page of book.

Looking to decompress after a long day at work? Feeling a little peckish? This formula, or variations on it, can work well. For instance, you can alter the pace to make it a bite, a sip, and half a page. I would say, however, that if it’s a big chunk of cheese, three swigs of wine, and a sentence of the book, that we'd no longer consider this reading. As a side note, asiago cheese with one of those super Tuscans are hard to beat.

3. For fans of Italian football, use the door-bolt wisely.

Italian teams have been known for decades for their stout defending. They’re the masters of the 1-0 victory. And as soon as one side gets the 1, they bolt the door shut (Catenaccio, as they translate it) with a packed-in defense. Use this time to either read or switch to an English Premier League match.

4. Got a favorite pasta sauce recipe? Try Bertolli’s instead.

Even Nonna might forgive you if the half an hour of prep time you save goes towards a book series this good. I’m pushing hard to convince you this one is worth the compromise.

5. The literary equivalent of a layover at the Aeroporto di Napoli doesn’t count.

Full immersion into the culture and characters of Elena Ferrante’s tetralogy does. It’s important to note that Naples itself is a character, much like Guernsey is for The Book of Ebenezer Le Page or upstate New York is in those great Richard Russo novels. In fact, after an hour of reading Ferrante you may be surprised to look up and find that you’re not in a loud, dusty, sun-drenched piazza.

6. Tired of stick figures? Ferrante’s are damn near Rubenesque.

I’m speaking figuratively here, of course. The two central characters, Lenu (the narrator) and Lila (her brilliant friend) are remarkably well-drawn, with all the complexity and nuance that we love as we study the human animal. We’re treated to an epic sweep of changes, too, as we track the two of them from childhood to old age. Lenu was always the second smartest and most conscientious student in their early school days. Lila was the truly gifted one. She was the quickest at math, the one who could pick up languages with ease (including proper Italian, which was not their native tongue), and had a flair for art and writing. It’s fair to say she was wicked smart. By that I mean both “wicked� as in “very� (the Bostonian modifier) and “wicked� as in not always nice. It took me long time to figure out that those with a keen intellect don’t necessarily choose smooth paths for themselves or live lives worth emulating. Lila was often hard to figure. She was principled in her own way, but fiercely independent and confident in her ability to get out of the trouble she found; sometimes overconfident. Lenu was always more controlled, but could also be seduced by her friend’s phrenic brightness and behavioral darkness. Like I said, it’s all deliciously complicated.

7. Dolci by themselves do not make a meal.

If you wonder at times if the authors you read once wrote for Hallmark, you may be lacking conflict. This series may be just what you need. The part of Naples where the girls grew up was backward, poor, and violent. Family dynamics were often messy, friends weren’t always true, and the politics were, as a matter of course, contentious. Class warfare was de rigueur. Navigating such waters took real skill, and maybe a few lucky gusts.

8. Before MeToo they had FYou.

Battles between the sexes featured prominently. As a young teen, Lila once stood up to the son of a local strong-armed money-lender who was hitting on her and Lenu. Her threat � a knife to the throat � was completely credible. And the guy became smitten. (Go figure.) Lila wanted nothing to do with him, but then entered some ill-advised relationships with other young men. Lenu was not always lucky in love either. Duplicity, power struggles, bad communication � there was plenty to fuel the fires. We find, too, that the women were accomplished combatants.

9. Head vs. Heart vs. Habitat.

At any given time, each influence could hold sway in varying degrees. It was fascinating to read these stories with such admixtures in mind. Any attitude or act could have any combination of causes that can vary in us all. These books bring this out better than most. BTW, turning the same attribution analysis on ourselves can be a pretty interesting exercise, too.

10. Embrace the unknown.

As you may have heard, it’s still a mystery who the pseudonymous Elena Ferrante really is. She’s never made a personal appearance, has never allowed a photograph, and has only ever given the sketchiest of details about her life. She said she was born in Naples in 1943. That’s about all amateur sleuths have to go on. That doesn’t preclude the gathering of real estate records and matching them against royalty checks, or computer analysis of writing styles, or listing those with a similar knowledge of modern Italian politics in attempts to figure her true identity. One analysis even said she was a man, but I seriously doubt that. Ferrante herself, in a response published in Vanity Fair, disabused us of that notion, taking offense that “questions about her gender are rooted in a presumed ‘weakness� of female writers.� I'll take weak like Ferrante any day!

For this list, I’m stopping at ten. That should suffice, shouldn’t it? This isn’t a review of Spinal Tap, after all. If, after following these tips, your life isn’t technically more “dolce�, the hope is that you’ll at least think it’s more edified. It’s a good bet you’ll feel a greater savvy about people and their entanglements. (I was going to say “spaghetti-like entanglements,� but then figured that with Italian references, like grappa, there’s a tipping point.)]]>
4.08 2011 My Brilliant Friend (Neapolitan Novels, #1)
author: Elena Ferrante
name: Steve
average rating: 4.08
book published: 2011
rating: 5
read at: 2017/01/01
date added: 2019/02/15
shelves:
review:
Reading Hacks for La Dolce Vita

Goodreaders, as self-selected members of this elite club, already know about “The Good Life� with books. My purpose here is to push for more of the same but with a bit of Italian panache. The list starts generically with tips for increasing the quality and quantity of your Italian reading adventures, then turns specifically towards Elena Ferrante’s celebrated Neapolitan Novels.

1. Book in one hand, cannoli in the other.

This takes the “dolce� part of the phrase literally. Actually, a scoop of gelato would work well, too, as long as you don’t let it drip out of the cone.

2. Bite of cheese, sip of wine, page of book. Bite of cheese, sip of wine, page of book.

Looking to decompress after a long day at work? Feeling a little peckish? This formula, or variations on it, can work well. For instance, you can alter the pace to make it a bite, a sip, and half a page. I would say, however, that if it’s a big chunk of cheese, three swigs of wine, and a sentence of the book, that we'd no longer consider this reading. As a side note, asiago cheese with one of those super Tuscans are hard to beat.

3. For fans of Italian football, use the door-bolt wisely.

Italian teams have been known for decades for their stout defending. They’re the masters of the 1-0 victory. And as soon as one side gets the 1, they bolt the door shut (Catenaccio, as they translate it) with a packed-in defense. Use this time to either read or switch to an English Premier League match.

4. Got a favorite pasta sauce recipe? Try Bertolli’s instead.

Even Nonna might forgive you if the half an hour of prep time you save goes towards a book series this good. I’m pushing hard to convince you this one is worth the compromise.

5. The literary equivalent of a layover at the Aeroporto di Napoli doesn’t count.

Full immersion into the culture and characters of Elena Ferrante’s tetralogy does. It’s important to note that Naples itself is a character, much like Guernsey is for The Book of Ebenezer Le Page or upstate New York is in those great Richard Russo novels. In fact, after an hour of reading Ferrante you may be surprised to look up and find that you’re not in a loud, dusty, sun-drenched piazza.

6. Tired of stick figures? Ferrante’s are damn near Rubenesque.

I’m speaking figuratively here, of course. The two central characters, Lenu (the narrator) and Lila (her brilliant friend) are remarkably well-drawn, with all the complexity and nuance that we love as we study the human animal. We’re treated to an epic sweep of changes, too, as we track the two of them from childhood to old age. Lenu was always the second smartest and most conscientious student in their early school days. Lila was the truly gifted one. She was the quickest at math, the one who could pick up languages with ease (including proper Italian, which was not their native tongue), and had a flair for art and writing. It’s fair to say she was wicked smart. By that I mean both “wicked� as in “very� (the Bostonian modifier) and “wicked� as in not always nice. It took me long time to figure out that those with a keen intellect don’t necessarily choose smooth paths for themselves or live lives worth emulating. Lila was often hard to figure. She was principled in her own way, but fiercely independent and confident in her ability to get out of the trouble she found; sometimes overconfident. Lenu was always more controlled, but could also be seduced by her friend’s phrenic brightness and behavioral darkness. Like I said, it’s all deliciously complicated.

7. Dolci by themselves do not make a meal.

If you wonder at times if the authors you read once wrote for Hallmark, you may be lacking conflict. This series may be just what you need. The part of Naples where the girls grew up was backward, poor, and violent. Family dynamics were often messy, friends weren’t always true, and the politics were, as a matter of course, contentious. Class warfare was de rigueur. Navigating such waters took real skill, and maybe a few lucky gusts.

8. Before MeToo they had FYou.

Battles between the sexes featured prominently. As a young teen, Lila once stood up to the son of a local strong-armed money-lender who was hitting on her and Lenu. Her threat � a knife to the throat � was completely credible. And the guy became smitten. (Go figure.) Lila wanted nothing to do with him, but then entered some ill-advised relationships with other young men. Lenu was not always lucky in love either. Duplicity, power struggles, bad communication � there was plenty to fuel the fires. We find, too, that the women were accomplished combatants.

9. Head vs. Heart vs. Habitat.

At any given time, each influence could hold sway in varying degrees. It was fascinating to read these stories with such admixtures in mind. Any attitude or act could have any combination of causes that can vary in us all. These books bring this out better than most. BTW, turning the same attribution analysis on ourselves can be a pretty interesting exercise, too.

10. Embrace the unknown.

As you may have heard, it’s still a mystery who the pseudonymous Elena Ferrante really is. She’s never made a personal appearance, has never allowed a photograph, and has only ever given the sketchiest of details about her life. She said she was born in Naples in 1943. That’s about all amateur sleuths have to go on. That doesn’t preclude the gathering of real estate records and matching them against royalty checks, or computer analysis of writing styles, or listing those with a similar knowledge of modern Italian politics in attempts to figure her true identity. One analysis even said she was a man, but I seriously doubt that. Ferrante herself, in a response published in Vanity Fair, disabused us of that notion, taking offense that “questions about her gender are rooted in a presumed ‘weakness� of female writers.� I'll take weak like Ferrante any day!

For this list, I’m stopping at ten. That should suffice, shouldn’t it? This isn’t a review of Spinal Tap, after all. If, after following these tips, your life isn’t technically more “dolce�, the hope is that you’ll at least think it’s more edified. It’s a good bet you’ll feel a greater savvy about people and their entanglements. (I was going to say “spaghetti-like entanglements,� but then figured that with Italian references, like grappa, there’s a tipping point.)
]]>
<![CDATA[Always Look on the Bright Side of Life: A Sortabiography]]> 39022876 Flying Circus to The Meaning of Life. Now, Eric Idle reflects on the meaning of his own life in this entertaining memoir that takes us on an unforgettable journey from his childhood in an austere boarding school through his successful career in comedy, television, theater, and film. Coming of age as a writer and comedian during the Sixties and Seventies, Eric stumbled into the crossroads of the cultural revolution and found himself rubbing shoulders with the likes of George Harrison, David Bowie, and Robin Williams, all of whom became dear lifelong friends. With anecdotes sprinkled throughout involving other close friends and luminaries such as Mike Nichols, Mick Jagger, Steve Martin, Paul Simon, Lorne Michaels, and many more, as well as the Pythons themselves, Eric captures a time of tremendous creative output with equal parts hilarity and heart. In Always Look on the Bright Side of Life, named for the song he wrote for Life of Brian (the film which he originally gave the irreverent title Jesus Christ: Lust for Glory) and that has since become the number one song played at funerals in the UK, he shares the highlights of his life and career with the kind of offbeat humor that has delighted audiences for five decades. The year 2019 marks the fiftieth anniversary of The Pythons, and Eric is marking the occasion with this hilarious memoir chock full of behind-the-scenes stories from a high-flying life featuring everyone from Princess Leia to Queen Elizabeth.]]> 290 Eric Idle 1984822586 Steve 4
Have a reason to write one

The first, and only truly difficult step, is to become famous. I’m not talking about the é 15 minutes of fame here. That may be good for couch time on Good Morning America, but not a full length book. I think the bar for celebrity renown probably needs to be set high enough to appear on Saturday Night Live. Short of that, sales would be meager. Note that I’m excluding politicians and other infamous figures in this analysis since their memoirs are of a different sort. Of course, Eric Idle is a pretty recognizable name, at least among those old enough to know Monty Python. And he did host SNL several times.

Establish humble beginnings and hardships to overcome

Idle had little trouble painting a dire picture of his early life. His father beat the odds as a tail gunner in the Royal Air Force only to die in an accident hitchhiking home for Christmas in �45. Eric was two. Then his student years were spent in boarding school � evidently a glum affair even for a clever and popular lad.

Belabor successes and justifications for them

Combine wit and Oxbridge sensibilities with mod England's penchant for sketch comedy, then mix in a bit of serendipity and out pops Monty Python. It was entertaining to hear about the formative years, though the details may have gone too far at times for my taste. Even so, this was a meaty part of the book for good reason. The original show and the many offshoots that followed (Life of Brian, Monty Python and the Holy Grail, The Meaning of Life, Spamalot, and countless others) really did amount to a lot.

Drop names

In Idle’s case, he dropped plenty. Among them: Robert Altman, Dan Aykroyd, Hank Azaria, Jeff Beck, Ed Begley, David Bowie, Russell Brand, Mel Brooks, Pierce Brosnan, Prince Charles, Chevy Chase, Eric Clapton, Robbie Coltrane, Billy Connolly, Steve Coogan, Peter Cook, Alice Cooper, Tim Curry, Judi Dench, Shelly Duvall, Bob Dylan, Queen Elizabeth, Marty Feldman, Carrie Fisher, Harrison Ford, Michael J. Fox, David Frost, Stephen Fry, Art Garfunkel, Jerry Hall, Tom Hanks, George Harrison, Stephen Hawking, Christopher Hitchens, Angelica Huston, Billy Idol, Iman, Eddie Izzard, Bianca Jagger, Mick Jagger, Elton John, Andy Kaufman, John Lennon, Gary Lineker, Linda McCartney, Paul McCartney, Steve Martin, Lorne Michaels, Keith Moon, Mike Nichols, Yoko Ono, David Hyde Pierce, Gilda Radner, Smokey Robinson, Linda Ronstadt, Salman Rushdie, Peter Sellers, Garry Shandling, Paul Simon, Ringo Starr, Tracey Ullman, Andy Warhol, Roger Waters, Robin Williams, and Catherine Zeta-Jones.

Had he studied Economics rather than English at Cambridge he would have known about the Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility. To be fair, a few of the mini-bios were pretty fascinating. Idle was actually quite good friends (to a point of shared vacations) with Bowie, George Harrison, Mick Jagger, Steve Martin, Mike Nichols, Paul Simon, and Robin Williams. The details he described were often fun and affecting. I hadn’t realized that George single-handedly financed Life of Brian or that he was attacked and nearly killed at his estate in England. On the unsurprising end of the spectrum was the confirmation that Robin Williams was as manic and brilliant in real life as he was as a performer.

Titillate

I don’t know if a publisher’s mantra of “sex sells� was on auto-replay or if Eric felt a need to advertise his prowess as a committed heterosexual, but for whatever reason much of the first half was spent cataloging his conquests. As one advantage of being English, words of his like “shag� and “bum� seem playful to my American ears. Still, enough is enough. He confessed to serial cheating throughout his first marriage. By the time of his second, however, he’d settled into a more monogamous rhythm. He spoke very highly of wife #2’s character, but was also sure to include a photo of the Playboy cover that featured her backside in short shorts.

Blow your own horn with manufactured modesty

I suppose it’s only fair that someone with so many awards and accomplishments should be allowed to brag a little about them. But when he presented them repeatedly to say I’m-just-a-schlub-but-I’m-apparently-adored-by-the-entire-free-world, it became too transparent. He included many an instance where one of the dropped names was made to laugh uproariously for hours on end, or a perfect bon mot brought the house down. I chuckled often myself, but sometimes wished I could save him from his own excesses.

Settle scores; conclude neatly

Most of the people mentioned were treated to generous descriptions. Given the collective talent among the names I listed, why wouldn’t they be? There were a few cases where some agent or promoter tried to bilk him and deserved to be chastised, but those instances didn’t dominate. He also had a few choice words about the sitting US president. Even Brits are entitled to their opinions about our political landscape (as long as they’re the right ones). ;-)

The ending included a few lines about the ending we all face. I think I can sum it up like this:
When chewing on life’s gristle, don’t grumble, give a whistle. And always look on the bright side of death.

I got my copy of this at a book-signing in my hometown. It was a big event by local standards, billed as a conversation between Idle and Naperville’s own Bob Odenkirk (of Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul fame). It was quite an enjoyable evening. Idle, who is now 75 years old, is still razor sharp and can still deliver the laughs. I’ll remember that next time I’m chewing on life’s gristle.

3.5 stars]]>
3.87 2018 Always Look on the Bright Side of Life: A Sortabiography
author: Eric Idle
name: Steve
average rating: 3.87
book published: 2018
rating: 4
read at: 2019/01/21
date added: 2019/02/11
shelves:
review:
I don’t read many celebrity memoirs, but it only takes a few to recognize patterns. Please see if my observations match your own experiences. I’ll use Eric Idle’s recent book to drive the points home.

Have a reason to write one

The first, and only truly difficult step, is to become famous. I’m not talking about the é 15 minutes of fame here. That may be good for couch time on Good Morning America, but not a full length book. I think the bar for celebrity renown probably needs to be set high enough to appear on Saturday Night Live. Short of that, sales would be meager. Note that I’m excluding politicians and other infamous figures in this analysis since their memoirs are of a different sort. Of course, Eric Idle is a pretty recognizable name, at least among those old enough to know Monty Python. And he did host SNL several times.

Establish humble beginnings and hardships to overcome

Idle had little trouble painting a dire picture of his early life. His father beat the odds as a tail gunner in the Royal Air Force only to die in an accident hitchhiking home for Christmas in �45. Eric was two. Then his student years were spent in boarding school � evidently a glum affair even for a clever and popular lad.

Belabor successes and justifications for them

Combine wit and Oxbridge sensibilities with mod England's penchant for sketch comedy, then mix in a bit of serendipity and out pops Monty Python. It was entertaining to hear about the formative years, though the details may have gone too far at times for my taste. Even so, this was a meaty part of the book for good reason. The original show and the many offshoots that followed (Life of Brian, Monty Python and the Holy Grail, The Meaning of Life, Spamalot, and countless others) really did amount to a lot.

Drop names

In Idle’s case, he dropped plenty. Among them: Robert Altman, Dan Aykroyd, Hank Azaria, Jeff Beck, Ed Begley, David Bowie, Russell Brand, Mel Brooks, Pierce Brosnan, Prince Charles, Chevy Chase, Eric Clapton, Robbie Coltrane, Billy Connolly, Steve Coogan, Peter Cook, Alice Cooper, Tim Curry, Judi Dench, Shelly Duvall, Bob Dylan, Queen Elizabeth, Marty Feldman, Carrie Fisher, Harrison Ford, Michael J. Fox, David Frost, Stephen Fry, Art Garfunkel, Jerry Hall, Tom Hanks, George Harrison, Stephen Hawking, Christopher Hitchens, Angelica Huston, Billy Idol, Iman, Eddie Izzard, Bianca Jagger, Mick Jagger, Elton John, Andy Kaufman, John Lennon, Gary Lineker, Linda McCartney, Paul McCartney, Steve Martin, Lorne Michaels, Keith Moon, Mike Nichols, Yoko Ono, David Hyde Pierce, Gilda Radner, Smokey Robinson, Linda Ronstadt, Salman Rushdie, Peter Sellers, Garry Shandling, Paul Simon, Ringo Starr, Tracey Ullman, Andy Warhol, Roger Waters, Robin Williams, and Catherine Zeta-Jones.

Had he studied Economics rather than English at Cambridge he would have known about the Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility. To be fair, a few of the mini-bios were pretty fascinating. Idle was actually quite good friends (to a point of shared vacations) with Bowie, George Harrison, Mick Jagger, Steve Martin, Mike Nichols, Paul Simon, and Robin Williams. The details he described were often fun and affecting. I hadn’t realized that George single-handedly financed Life of Brian or that he was attacked and nearly killed at his estate in England. On the unsurprising end of the spectrum was the confirmation that Robin Williams was as manic and brilliant in real life as he was as a performer.

Titillate

I don’t know if a publisher’s mantra of “sex sells� was on auto-replay or if Eric felt a need to advertise his prowess as a committed heterosexual, but for whatever reason much of the first half was spent cataloging his conquests. As one advantage of being English, words of his like “shag� and “bum� seem playful to my American ears. Still, enough is enough. He confessed to serial cheating throughout his first marriage. By the time of his second, however, he’d settled into a more monogamous rhythm. He spoke very highly of wife #2’s character, but was also sure to include a photo of the Playboy cover that featured her backside in short shorts.

Blow your own horn with manufactured modesty

I suppose it’s only fair that someone with so many awards and accomplishments should be allowed to brag a little about them. But when he presented them repeatedly to say I’m-just-a-schlub-but-I’m-apparently-adored-by-the-entire-free-world, it became too transparent. He included many an instance where one of the dropped names was made to laugh uproariously for hours on end, or a perfect bon mot brought the house down. I chuckled often myself, but sometimes wished I could save him from his own excesses.

Settle scores; conclude neatly

Most of the people mentioned were treated to generous descriptions. Given the collective talent among the names I listed, why wouldn’t they be? There were a few cases where some agent or promoter tried to bilk him and deserved to be chastised, but those instances didn’t dominate. He also had a few choice words about the sitting US president. Even Brits are entitled to their opinions about our political landscape (as long as they’re the right ones). ;-)

The ending included a few lines about the ending we all face. I think I can sum it up like this:
When chewing on life’s gristle, don’t grumble, give a whistle. And always look on the bright side of death.

I got my copy of this at a book-signing in my hometown. It was a big event by local standards, billed as a conversation between Idle and Naperville’s own Bob Odenkirk (of Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul fame). It was quite an enjoyable evening. Idle, who is now 75 years old, is still razor sharp and can still deliver the laughs. I’ll remember that next time I’m chewing on life’s gristle.

3.5 stars
]]>
Asymmetry 35297339 A singularly inventive and unforgettable debut novel about love, luck, and the inextricability of life and art, from 2017 Whiting Award winner Lisa Halliday.

Told in three distinct and uniquely compelling sections, Asymmetry explores the imbalances that spark and sustain many of our most dramatic human relations: inequities in age, power, talent, wealth, fame, geography, and justice. The first section, Folly tells the story of Alice, a young American editor, and her relationship with the famous and much older writer Ezra Blazer. A tender and exquisite account of an unexpected romance that takes place in New York during the early years of the Iraq War, Folly also suggests an aspiring novelist’s coming-of-age. By contrast, Madness is narrated by Amar, an Iraqi-American man who, on his way to visit his brother in Kurdistan, is detained by immigration officers and spends the last weekend of 2008 in a holding room in Heathrow. These two seemingly disparate stories gain resonance as their perspectives interact and overlap, with yet new implications for their relationship revealed in an unexpected coda.

A stunning debut from a rising literary star, Asymmetry is an urgent, important, and truly original work that will captivate any reader while also posing arresting questions about the very nature of fiction itself.]]>
277 Lisa Halliday 150116676X Steve 5
The final asymmetry would be spoiled by mentioning it. The first is not. In part one, young Alice, a junior editor in New York, has an affair with Ezra, who has just enough charm, wit, and wisdom not to seem creepy in the role of older inamorato. Halliday must have taken the “write what you know� advice to heart since she had had a relationship in her own youth with Phillip Roth. She didn’t follow this counsel throughout, though, since the second part of the book was narrated by an Iraqi-American student of economics. But I’m getting ahead of myself. Back to Alice. I thought she came off initially as kind of a ditz. For example, despite her job at a literary publishing house, she didn’t know that “Camus� ended with a cow sound. She seemed unfocused as well. Was this Alice a bit incautious plunging down the rabbit hole? Regardless, she grew on me. For one thing, I can relate to anyone who can be plied by books, baseball, and dessert. She was brighter than I had given her credit for, too, with eyes open wide enough as she peered into the looking glass. More importantly, she turned out to be one of those cherished empathy engines that great fiction can provide.

Part 2 presented asymmetries of a different kind. The cultural influences in Los Angeles, where the narrator, Amar, was a doctoral student, and those in Iraq, his native land, don't exactly bring symmetry to mind. His Muslim faith put him further out of step with his American peers who were Christians or atheists. Amar was detained by immigration officials at Heathrow on his way to see his brother in Kurdistan. The story of Amar, his family, and friends (including girlfriends) was back-filled skillfully from there. A post-9/11 mindset comes into play, naturally, but other conflicts feature as well.

One of the things I thought the book did particularly well was to examine certain of these asymmetries to see how their imbalances can be reconciled or at least comprehended. Greater harmony could take place at an individual level or a societal one. Here’s a quote from the book that speaks to that:
And one must take into account a definite cushioning effect exercised both by the law, and by the moral sense which constitutes a self-imposed law; for a country is considered the more civilized the more the wisdom and efficiency of its laws hinder a weak man from becoming too weak or a powerful one too powerful.

This line from Amar’s journalist friend gets at asymmetries in a different way, by saying how wrong we may be to judge or prescribe without understanding how complicated the issues often are:
There’s an old saying, he said, about how the foreign journalist who travels to the Middle East and stays a week goes home to write a book in which he presents a pat solution to all of its problems. If he stays a month, he writes a magazine or a newspaper article filled with ‘ifs,� ‘buts,� and ‘on the other hands.� If he stays a year, he writes nothing at all.

Even metaphysical asymmetries can be distilled to a point where the distinctions are not great. Take this exchange between Amar, the believer, and an agnostic counterpart:
But religion, our guest insisted with impressive confidence, allows you to ask only so many questions before you get to: Just because.

You have to have faith. Well, I said. Your problem with religion is virtually every faithless person’s problem with religion: that it offers irreducible answers. But some questions in the end simply aren’t empirically verifiable.

The whole point of faith is that irreducible answers don’t bother the faithful. The faithful take comfort and even pride in the knowledge that they have the strength to make the irreducible answers sincerely their own, as difficult as that is to do. Everyone—irreligious people included—relies on irreducible answers every day. All religion really does is to be honest about this, by giving the reliance a specific name: faith.

If we define God in very abstract terms as the causal singularity explaining the universe, the bringer of the Big Bang, that’s a lot like the non-believer’s unnamed and unknowable reason we have existence rather than nothingness. Of course, believers tend to add specifics to their brand of Godliness that do more to separate than to find common ground. Halliday didn’t have as much to say about those more detailed aspects of faith.

The third part where Ezra talked about his musical preferences was engaging at several levels. First of all, it made me wish I had access to BBC radio for actual broadcasts of Desert Island Discs. It seems like a great format, where a celebrity like Ezra (only real) gives reasons for his choices and then they play the songs. This imagined scene gave Halliday another chance to show Ezra as sophisticated, funny, and somewhat sympathetic (with one OTT exception involving the host). Finally, at a structural level, it allowed her to tie everything together with a very nice bow.

I think what impressed me most about this debut effort was the intelligence of her insights and the respect she showed for her characters. The writing was solid, too -- literary without trying too hard, modern in a way that didn't feel contrived. It’s also fair to say that titles rarely make you think as much as this one does about the reasons they apply. I’d have said the same thing had she called the book Perspectives. I go for the broad ones like hers.]]>
3.43 2018 Asymmetry
author: Lisa Halliday
name: Steve
average rating: 3.43
book published: 2018
rating: 5
read at:
date added: 2019/02/08
shelves:
review:
Lisa Halliday is one clever writer � clever in different ways, including a sneaky one. I ended up liking this quite a lot. My full appreciation came in the short, final section of its three-part narrative where Ezra, the mature, award-winning writer was being interviewed on a radio show talking about his top ten desert island song list. He mentioned something that shed light on both the preceding parts and gave new meaning to the title.

The final asymmetry would be spoiled by mentioning it. The first is not. In part one, young Alice, a junior editor in New York, has an affair with Ezra, who has just enough charm, wit, and wisdom not to seem creepy in the role of older inamorato. Halliday must have taken the “write what you know� advice to heart since she had had a relationship in her own youth with Phillip Roth. She didn’t follow this counsel throughout, though, since the second part of the book was narrated by an Iraqi-American student of economics. But I’m getting ahead of myself. Back to Alice. I thought she came off initially as kind of a ditz. For example, despite her job at a literary publishing house, she didn’t know that “Camus� ended with a cow sound. She seemed unfocused as well. Was this Alice a bit incautious plunging down the rabbit hole? Regardless, she grew on me. For one thing, I can relate to anyone who can be plied by books, baseball, and dessert. She was brighter than I had given her credit for, too, with eyes open wide enough as she peered into the looking glass. More importantly, she turned out to be one of those cherished empathy engines that great fiction can provide.

Part 2 presented asymmetries of a different kind. The cultural influences in Los Angeles, where the narrator, Amar, was a doctoral student, and those in Iraq, his native land, don't exactly bring symmetry to mind. His Muslim faith put him further out of step with his American peers who were Christians or atheists. Amar was detained by immigration officials at Heathrow on his way to see his brother in Kurdistan. The story of Amar, his family, and friends (including girlfriends) was back-filled skillfully from there. A post-9/11 mindset comes into play, naturally, but other conflicts feature as well.

One of the things I thought the book did particularly well was to examine certain of these asymmetries to see how their imbalances can be reconciled or at least comprehended. Greater harmony could take place at an individual level or a societal one. Here’s a quote from the book that speaks to that:
And one must take into account a definite cushioning effect exercised both by the law, and by the moral sense which constitutes a self-imposed law; for a country is considered the more civilized the more the wisdom and efficiency of its laws hinder a weak man from becoming too weak or a powerful one too powerful.

This line from Amar’s journalist friend gets at asymmetries in a different way, by saying how wrong we may be to judge or prescribe without understanding how complicated the issues often are:
There’s an old saying, he said, about how the foreign journalist who travels to the Middle East and stays a week goes home to write a book in which he presents a pat solution to all of its problems. If he stays a month, he writes a magazine or a newspaper article filled with ‘ifs,� ‘buts,� and ‘on the other hands.� If he stays a year, he writes nothing at all.

Even metaphysical asymmetries can be distilled to a point where the distinctions are not great. Take this exchange between Amar, the believer, and an agnostic counterpart:
But religion, our guest insisted with impressive confidence, allows you to ask only so many questions before you get to: Just because.

You have to have faith. Well, I said. Your problem with religion is virtually every faithless person’s problem with religion: that it offers irreducible answers. But some questions in the end simply aren’t empirically verifiable.

The whole point of faith is that irreducible answers don’t bother the faithful. The faithful take comfort and even pride in the knowledge that they have the strength to make the irreducible answers sincerely their own, as difficult as that is to do. Everyone—irreligious people included—relies on irreducible answers every day. All religion really does is to be honest about this, by giving the reliance a specific name: faith.

If we define God in very abstract terms as the causal singularity explaining the universe, the bringer of the Big Bang, that’s a lot like the non-believer’s unnamed and unknowable reason we have existence rather than nothingness. Of course, believers tend to add specifics to their brand of Godliness that do more to separate than to find common ground. Halliday didn’t have as much to say about those more detailed aspects of faith.

The third part where Ezra talked about his musical preferences was engaging at several levels. First of all, it made me wish I had access to BBC radio for actual broadcasts of Desert Island Discs. It seems like a great format, where a celebrity like Ezra (only real) gives reasons for his choices and then they play the songs. This imagined scene gave Halliday another chance to show Ezra as sophisticated, funny, and somewhat sympathetic (with one OTT exception involving the host). Finally, at a structural level, it allowed her to tie everything together with a very nice bow.

I think what impressed me most about this debut effort was the intelligence of her insights and the respect she showed for her characters. The writing was solid, too -- literary without trying too hard, modern in a way that didn't feel contrived. It’s also fair to say that titles rarely make you think as much as this one does about the reasons they apply. I’d have said the same thing had she called the book Perspectives. I go for the broad ones like hers.
]]>
Adverbs 79129
"Adverbs" is a novel about love -- a bunch of different people, in and out of different kinds of love. At the start of the novel, Andrea is in love with David -- or maybe it's Joe -- who instead falls in love with Peter in a taxi. At the end of the novel, it's Joe who's in the taxi, falling in love with Andrea, although it might not be Andrea, or in any case it might not be the same Andrea, as Andrea is a very common name. So is Allison, who is married to Adrian in the middle of the novel, although in the middle of the ocean she considers a fling with Keith and also with Steve, whom she meets in an automobile, unless it's not the same Allison who meets the Snow Queen in a casino, or the same Steve who meets Eddie in the middle of the forest. . . .

It might sound confusing, but that's love, and as the author -- me -- says, "It is not the nouns. The miracle is the adverbs, the way things are done." This novel is about people trying to find love in the ways it is done before the volcano erupts and the miracle ends. Yes, there's a volcano in the novel. In my opinion a volcano automatically makes a story more interesting.]]>
288 Daniel Handler 0060724412 Steve 3 Perhaps you're a reader who'll have better luck.
In contrast to me, you won't find yourself stuck
When plotlines confuse you and run all amok,
And all you can think is to ask WTF??

Befuddled? Bemused? Yes I was, but I don’t feel embarrassed to say it. I’m pretty sure that was Handler’s intent. You see the verb to which each chapter-identifying adverb applies is “love.� How can any of us, the author included, generalize in any definitive way about that? I think it’s fair to say that there are as many facets to love as there are those who give and receive it. Maybe the point is to cover some of the different ways it can be amassed or abated, misconstrued or mishandled, and then to realize the impossibility of filling in every blank.

I’ve been told by the woman I love (completely and uncomplicatedly) that feelings resist analysis. She never lets me forget that math types are just hammers out to construe the whole world as nails. But what if the result of my analysis is that the book is intentionally defying analysis? Surely I’m allowed to be as meta-analytical as the book is metafictional. To elaborate, the chapters feature recurring themes, symbols, and characters, but the characters� names seem to switch and recycle � it’s not always clear. Then about two-thirds of the way in, the “real� narrator (whoever that is) levels with us about the device and gives us some sort of map. But to me it was like seeing where Route 53 intersects Maple Avenue without knowing whether it was in Naperville or Natchez. Every little love story, as imperfect as the love was within it, would end essentially saying, “and that’s what love is.� The implied nod to the universal can’t be anything but ironic, though. The disparate and typically dysfunctional cases in point spoke more to the infinite variety of human relations. We’re not built to understand the immeasurable. How fitting, then, or so I suppose, that we’re not meant to make full sense of this book. I thought briefly of an interpretation tying in Kurt Gödel’s impossibility theorems, but I can imagine my wife saying I’ve gone too far down the math path already.

The more I read, and the more I saw the device for what it was (or at least thought it was), the more I liked it. The late appreciation then had me wanting to return to page one to see how it looped back on itself. Yes, it’s confusing, abstract, unreliable, and gimmicky, but it does make its points. As the recursively modified characters long to connect, only to see their romanticized ideals dissipate, it may help to remember some astute words from the book: “You can’t mind these things, you just can’t, for to dislike what makes a person human is to dislike all humans.�

It’s written well and gets at fundamental problems of how we relate, but it’s distracting at times trying to figure who’s who in these disjointed, often surreal stories. A closer reading may have made more patterns pop out, but it wasn’t clear to me that the pay-off would be worth the effort. I’m giving it 3.5 stars, then picking petals off a daisy to see how to round. I like it more, I like it less, I like it more, I like it less, …]]>
3.42 2006 Adverbs
author: Daniel Handler
name: Steve
average rating: 3.42
book published: 2006
rating: 3
read at: 2019/01/29
date added: 2019/02/01
shelves:
review:
Perhaps you're a reader who'll have better luck.
In contrast to me, you won't find yourself stuck
When plotlines confuse you and run all amok,
And all you can think is to ask WTF??

Befuddled? Bemused? Yes I was, but I don’t feel embarrassed to say it. I’m pretty sure that was Handler’s intent. You see the verb to which each chapter-identifying adverb applies is “love.� How can any of us, the author included, generalize in any definitive way about that? I think it’s fair to say that there are as many facets to love as there are those who give and receive it. Maybe the point is to cover some of the different ways it can be amassed or abated, misconstrued or mishandled, and then to realize the impossibility of filling in every blank.

I’ve been told by the woman I love (completely and uncomplicatedly) that feelings resist analysis. She never lets me forget that math types are just hammers out to construe the whole world as nails. But what if the result of my analysis is that the book is intentionally defying analysis? Surely I’m allowed to be as meta-analytical as the book is metafictional. To elaborate, the chapters feature recurring themes, symbols, and characters, but the characters� names seem to switch and recycle � it’s not always clear. Then about two-thirds of the way in, the “real� narrator (whoever that is) levels with us about the device and gives us some sort of map. But to me it was like seeing where Route 53 intersects Maple Avenue without knowing whether it was in Naperville or Natchez. Every little love story, as imperfect as the love was within it, would end essentially saying, “and that’s what love is.� The implied nod to the universal can’t be anything but ironic, though. The disparate and typically dysfunctional cases in point spoke more to the infinite variety of human relations. We’re not built to understand the immeasurable. How fitting, then, or so I suppose, that we’re not meant to make full sense of this book. I thought briefly of an interpretation tying in Kurt Gödel’s impossibility theorems, but I can imagine my wife saying I’ve gone too far down the math path already.

The more I read, and the more I saw the device for what it was (or at least thought it was), the more I liked it. The late appreciation then had me wanting to return to page one to see how it looped back on itself. Yes, it’s confusing, abstract, unreliable, and gimmicky, but it does make its points. As the recursively modified characters long to connect, only to see their romanticized ideals dissipate, it may help to remember some astute words from the book: “You can’t mind these things, you just can’t, for to dislike what makes a person human is to dislike all humans.�

It’s written well and gets at fundamental problems of how we relate, but it’s distracting at times trying to figure who’s who in these disjointed, often surreal stories. A closer reading may have made more patterns pop out, but it wasn’t clear to me that the pay-off would be worth the effort. I’m giving it 3.5 stars, then picking petals off a daisy to see how to round. I like it more, I like it less, I like it more, I like it less, �
]]>
Impossible Owls: Essays 37941900 A globe-spanning, ambitious book of essays from one of the most enthralling storytellers in narrative nonfiction

In his highly anticipated debut essay collection, Impossible Owls, Brian Phillips demonstrates why he's one of the most iconoclastic journalists of the digital age, beloved for his ambitious, off-kilter, meticulously reported essays that read like novels.

The eight essays assembled here--five from Phillips's Grantland and MTV days, and three new pieces--go beyond simply chronicling some of the modern world's most uncanny, unbelievable, and spectacular oddities (though they do that, too). Researched for months and even years on end, they explore the interconnectedness of the globalized world, the consequences of history, the power of myth, and the ways people attempt to find meaning. He searches for tigers in India, and uncovers a multigenerational mystery involving an oil tycoon and his niece turned stepdaughter turned wife in the Oklahoma town where he grew up. Through each adventure, Phillips's remarkable voice becomes a character itself--full of verve, rich with offhanded humor, and revealing unexpected vulnerability.

Dogged, self-aware, and radiating a contagious enthusiasm for his subjects, Phillips is an exhilarating guide to the confusion and wonder of the world today. If John Jeremiah Sullivan's Pulphead was the last great collection of New Journalism from the print era, Impossible Owls is the first of the digital age.]]>
352 Brian Phillips 0374175330 Steve 5
Literary nonfiction, the type you might find in The New Yorker or Harper's Magazine, can showcase both great writing and unexpected topics. Some of my favorite practitioners of the art (and their works I’ve read) are David Foster Wallace (A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again and Consider the Lobster), John Jeremiah Sullivan (Pulphead), and Joan Didion (Slouching Towards Bethlehem). In the Trait Triangles below, I indicate how I assess each one of them by various criteria. The further out the bold red lines extend, the higher I rate the writer’s abilities in those dimensions.

The points on the first set of triangles are for the quality of writing, the abundance of insight, and the coolness quotient of chosen topics. As you can see, all four writers have substantial red areas. These writers are favorites for a reason, after all. But the takeaway point is the clear visual proof that Phillips more than holds his own.

Impossible Owls shows what an artful writer Phillips is, with lush sentences and word-perfect phrasing. He draws analogies well, describes people memorably, and offers slightly off-kilter points of view that, after a moment’s consideration, you recognize as so right. Here are a few examples of his style that I hope illustrate.

Describing a bush pilot in Alaska that helped him follow the Iditarod:
Jay was a Vermont kid, raised in a small town, and there was a mordant New England pluck in the way he gazed into the abyss and said, "I see what you're trying to do there, abyss."

Two examples describing others he met in Alaska:
Colin had a fascinatingly odd way of maintaining intense eye contact while simultaneously all but squirming with agony over the fact that he was being noticed--the way, say, your fifteen-year-old goth cousin might do. This was something I noticed time and again in the inhabitants of remote Alaska, this total, helpless acuteness in the presence of a stranger. It was as if isolation had kept them from numbing themselves to the fact of other people.

I met Dick Newton [...]. He introduced himself to me in the dining hall. "Introduced" is a strong word. He walked up to me and said, "Well, who are you?" Not in an unfriendly way. Just in a way that said he was eighty-two and still handled deep Alaska wilderness on a daily basis and maybe shouldn't have to smile extra just because he met some kid who knew how to order pizza with an app.

At the UFO Museum in Roswell:
[...] the aliens start talking to the crowd. What they say is--I'm paraphrasing--"bzzzzrrg bzzzzoom ppozz bzrg pzow." Imagine Donald Duck trying to mimic a dial-up modem; it's like that.

And finally, from a piece covering the social impacts of certain fiction:
One of the reasons J. K. Rowling's books exerted magnetic power over every sentient creature on earth is that they resolved, indeed fused, a cultural contradiction. She took the aesthetic of old-fashioned English boarding-school life and placed it at the center of a narrative about political inclusiveness. You get to keep the scarves, the medieval dining hall, the verdant lawns, the sense of privilege (you're a wizard, Harry), while not only losing the snobbery and racism but actually casting them as the villains of the series.

As for topics, Phillips gave us an appetizing variety. They include the sustained madness of the Iditarod, the inside world of sumo wrestling, tiger-sighting in India, the other-worldliness of Roswell, a renowned Russian animator who has been working for decades on a masterpiece, the personal lives of British royals, and a story set in the Oklahoma town where Phillips grew up of an oil tycoon and his niece turned adopted daughter turned wife turned kind of crazy woman.

In the second set of triangles (necessitated by my lack of an all-inclusive hexagon), I list a few more dimensions I appreciate in essays. The bottom left trait is Empathy—how much humanity and understanding the writer exhibits. On the bottom right I put Education, which might include fun facts from history, how things work, or descriptions of the sort found in great travelogues. The top is labeled Personalization. By that I mean how much first person narration is involved, which when done well, puts an added element of emotion into the piece. There are no “right� answers to any of these new dimensions. Plenty of great essays exclude these elements entirely. I’m just awarding bonus points when an author does especially well pushing any of those boundaries.

Phillips showed a heightened sense of people awareness on quite few occasions. One example was a bit about Kate Middleton which probably shouldn’t be viewed as out-and-out support for a monarchy, but is sensitive to the unreal and dutiful life. I felt like Phillips included quite a few interesting facts as well, so his Education marks are also sky-high. Plaudits, too, for the entertaining way he draws you into these different worlds and makes you want to learn more.

Phillips didn’t always insert himself into these essays, but when he did it was very effective. His personal experiences in Alaska made me shiver. And the last piece about the oil tycoon and his wife included a segment about Phillips� own boyhood as well as a poignant side story about his grandparents. He said that he likes his hometown and many of its people, but knew early on that it wasn’t where he belonged. I think that may be code that Harvard grads use euphemistically when they talk about anywhere but Cambridge.

Every page had some reminder that Phillips himself is a very smart guy. He writes beautifully and observes keenly, but never comes across as someone as arrogant as he has a right to be. My only complaint is likely my own deficiency. When I’m reading along and see ABC FGH KLM and think I’m following the pattern, he might throw in something like φ§θ to put me in my place. Even so, I was consistently delighted with everything that I did pick up from this superb collection.]]>
4.19 2018 Impossible Owls: Essays
author: Brian Phillips
name: Steve
average rating: 4.19
book published: 2018
rating: 5
read at: 2019/01/09
date added: 2019/01/25
shelves:
review:
Now that Brian Phillips has had a book of his entertaining and informative essays published, the rest of the reading world has a ready way to find out what fans of his online work have known for some time: this guy is a major talent. As a writer, he ticks so many boxes. Actually, for the purposes of this review, let’s say instead that he rates at the graphical extremes of multiple favorable traits. I don’t know what these charts below are called. Nate Silver and the stats gurus at FiveThirtyEight use pentagons, nice colors, and real data to produce theirs. My staff of one, paid the same as a TSA employee (in day 26 of the government shutdown), uses the only polygon his software offers (the lowly triangle), and plots falsely precise looking data based purely on his own opinion. But I hope it makes the point about how well Phillips stacks up alongside some of his celebrated essay-writing peers.

Literary nonfiction, the type you might find in The New Yorker or Harper's Magazine, can showcase both great writing and unexpected topics. Some of my favorite practitioners of the art (and their works I’ve read) are David Foster Wallace (A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again and Consider the Lobster), John Jeremiah Sullivan (Pulphead), and Joan Didion (Slouching Towards Bethlehem). In the Trait Triangles below, I indicate how I assess each one of them by various criteria. The further out the bold red lines extend, the higher I rate the writer’s abilities in those dimensions.

The points on the first set of triangles are for the quality of writing, the abundance of insight, and the coolness quotient of chosen topics. As you can see, all four writers have substantial red areas. These writers are favorites for a reason, after all. But the takeaway point is the clear visual proof that Phillips more than holds his own.

Impossible Owls shows what an artful writer Phillips is, with lush sentences and word-perfect phrasing. He draws analogies well, describes people memorably, and offers slightly off-kilter points of view that, after a moment’s consideration, you recognize as so right. Here are a few examples of his style that I hope illustrate.

Describing a bush pilot in Alaska that helped him follow the Iditarod:
Jay was a Vermont kid, raised in a small town, and there was a mordant New England pluck in the way he gazed into the abyss and said, "I see what you're trying to do there, abyss."

Two examples describing others he met in Alaska:
Colin had a fascinatingly odd way of maintaining intense eye contact while simultaneously all but squirming with agony over the fact that he was being noticed--the way, say, your fifteen-year-old goth cousin might do. This was something I noticed time and again in the inhabitants of remote Alaska, this total, helpless acuteness in the presence of a stranger. It was as if isolation had kept them from numbing themselves to the fact of other people.

I met Dick Newton [...]. He introduced himself to me in the dining hall. "Introduced" is a strong word. He walked up to me and said, "Well, who are you?" Not in an unfriendly way. Just in a way that said he was eighty-two and still handled deep Alaska wilderness on a daily basis and maybe shouldn't have to smile extra just because he met some kid who knew how to order pizza with an app.

At the UFO Museum in Roswell:
[...] the aliens start talking to the crowd. What they say is--I'm paraphrasing--"bzzzzrrg bzzzzoom ppozz bzrg pzow." Imagine Donald Duck trying to mimic a dial-up modem; it's like that.

And finally, from a piece covering the social impacts of certain fiction:
One of the reasons J. K. Rowling's books exerted magnetic power over every sentient creature on earth is that they resolved, indeed fused, a cultural contradiction. She took the aesthetic of old-fashioned English boarding-school life and placed it at the center of a narrative about political inclusiveness. You get to keep the scarves, the medieval dining hall, the verdant lawns, the sense of privilege (you're a wizard, Harry), while not only losing the snobbery and racism but actually casting them as the villains of the series.

As for topics, Phillips gave us an appetizing variety. They include the sustained madness of the Iditarod, the inside world of sumo wrestling, tiger-sighting in India, the other-worldliness of Roswell, a renowned Russian animator who has been working for decades on a masterpiece, the personal lives of British royals, and a story set in the Oklahoma town where Phillips grew up of an oil tycoon and his niece turned adopted daughter turned wife turned kind of crazy woman.

In the second set of triangles (necessitated by my lack of an all-inclusive hexagon), I list a few more dimensions I appreciate in essays. The bottom left trait is Empathy—how much humanity and understanding the writer exhibits. On the bottom right I put Education, which might include fun facts from history, how things work, or descriptions of the sort found in great travelogues. The top is labeled Personalization. By that I mean how much first person narration is involved, which when done well, puts an added element of emotion into the piece. There are no “right� answers to any of these new dimensions. Plenty of great essays exclude these elements entirely. I’m just awarding bonus points when an author does especially well pushing any of those boundaries.

Phillips showed a heightened sense of people awareness on quite few occasions. One example was a bit about Kate Middleton which probably shouldn’t be viewed as out-and-out support for a monarchy, but is sensitive to the unreal and dutiful life. I felt like Phillips included quite a few interesting facts as well, so his Education marks are also sky-high. Plaudits, too, for the entertaining way he draws you into these different worlds and makes you want to learn more.

Phillips didn’t always insert himself into these essays, but when he did it was very effective. His personal experiences in Alaska made me shiver. And the last piece about the oil tycoon and his wife included a segment about Phillips� own boyhood as well as a poignant side story about his grandparents. He said that he likes his hometown and many of its people, but knew early on that it wasn’t where he belonged. I think that may be code that Harvard grads use euphemistically when they talk about anywhere but Cambridge.

Every page had some reminder that Phillips himself is a very smart guy. He writes beautifully and observes keenly, but never comes across as someone as arrogant as he has a right to be. My only complaint is likely my own deficiency. When I’m reading along and see ABC FGH KLM and think I’m following the pattern, he might throw in something like φ§θ to put me in my place. Even so, I was consistently delighted with everything that I did pick up from this superb collection.
]]>
Asymmetry 36453992 A TIME and NEW YORK TIMES TOP 10 BOOK of the YEAR * New York Times Notable Book and Times Critic’s Top Book of 2018

NAMED ONE OF THE BEST BOOKS OF 2018 BY * Elle * Bustle * Kirkus Reviews * Lit Hub* NPR * O, The Oprah Magazine * Shelf Awareness

The bestselling and critically acclaimed debut novel by Lisa Halliday, hailed as “extraordinary� by The New York Times, “a brilliant and complex examination of power dynamics in love and war� by The Wall Street Journal, and “a literary phenomenon� by The New Yorker.

Told in three distinct and uniquely compelling sections, Asymmetry explores the imbalances that spark and sustain many of our most dramatic human inequities in age, power, talent, wealth, fame, geography, and justice. The first section, “Folly,� tells the story of Alice, a young American editor, and her relationship with the famous and much older writer Ezra Blazer. A tender and exquisite account of an unexpected romance that takes place in New York during the early years of the Iraq War, “Folly� also suggests an aspiring novelist’s coming-of-age. By contrast, “Madness� is narrated by Amar, an Iraqi-American man who, on his way to visit his brother in Kurdistan, is detained by immigration officers and spends the last weekend of 2008 in a holding room in Heathrow. These two seemingly disparate stories gain resonance as their perspectives interact and overlap, with yet new implications for their relationship revealed in an unexpected coda.

A stunning debut from a rising literary star, Asymmetry is “a transgressive roman a clef, a novel of ideas, and a politically engaged work of metafiction� (The New York Times Book Review), and a “masterpiece� in the original sense of the word� (The Atlantic). Lisa Halliday’s novel will captivate any reader with while also posing arresting questions about the very nature of fiction itself.]]>
303 Lisa Halliday 1501166778 Steve 5 3.61 2018 Asymmetry
author: Lisa Halliday
name: Steve
average rating: 3.61
book published: 2018
rating: 5
read at: 2019/01/17
date added: 2019/01/17
shelves:
review:

]]>
<![CDATA[The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail-but Some Don't]]> 16077741
Drawing on his own groundbreaking work, Silver examines the world of prediction, investigating how we can distinguish a true signal from a universe of noisy data. Most predictions fail, often at great cost to society, because most of us have a poor understanding of probability and uncertainty. Both experts and laypeople mistake more confident predictions for more accurate ones. But overconfidence is often the reason for failure. If our appreciation of uncertainty improves, our predictions can get better too. This is the "prediction paradox": The more humility we have about our ability to make predictions, the more successful we can be in planning for the future.

In keeping with his own aim to seek truth from data, Silver visits the most successful forecasters in a range of areas, from hurricanes to baseball, from the poker table to the stock market, from Capitol Hill to the NBA. He explains and evaluates how these forecasters think and what bonds they share. What lies behind their success? Are they good-or just lucky? What patterns have they unraveled? And are their forecasts really right? He explores unanticipated commonalities and exposes unexpected juxtapositions. And sometimes, it is not so much how good a prediction is in an absolute sense that matters but how good it is relative to the competition. In other cases, prediction is still a very rudimentary-and dangerous-science.

Silver observes that the most accurate forecasters tend to have a superior command of probability, and they tend to be both humble and hardworking. They distinguish the predictable from the unpredictable, and they notice a thousand little details that lead them closer to the truth. Because of their appreciation of probability, they can distinguish the signal from the noise.]]>
545 Nate Silver 1101595957 Steve 0 currently-reading 4.10 2012 The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail-but Some Don't
author: Nate Silver
name: Steve
average rating: 4.10
book published: 2012
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2018/12/26
shelves: currently-reading
review:

]]>
Breakfast of Champions 2017580 Breakfast of Champions, one of Kurt Vonnegut’s most beloved characters, the aging writer Kilgore Trout, finds to his horror that a Midwest car dealer is taking his fiction as truth. What follows is murderously funny satire, as Vonnegut looks at war, sex, racism, success, politics, and pollution in America and reminds us how to see the truth.]]> 296 Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Steve 3
Vonnegut, I know from other works, is a smart guy. He’s a clear writer, keen observer, and incisive social critic. With this one, though, all I kept thinking was what a funny little time capsule it was, filled with countercultural hip-think circa 1973. The Man, of course, was the heavy. And if only we could wake up to a more liberated, tolerant, free attitude, everything would be cool. It may be slightly ironic that those meant to be more enlightened were automatons, too, though at least they were programmed using the fresh, new algorithm of the day. I suppose it’s also unoriginal of me to point out how unoriginal certain trendy archetypes are when they stake their claim to individuality en masse.
]]>
4.01 1973 Breakfast of Champions
author: Kurt Vonnegut Jr.
name: Steve
average rating: 4.01
book published: 1973
rating: 3
read at:
date added: 2018/12/05
shelves:
review:
This was a popular seller back in the days of peace, love, and dope. I recently read a yellowed copy a few paragraphs at a time between sets at the home gym, so the lack of flow I ascribe to it may be due, in part, to that. Actually, with all his inserted drawings and the bullet-point structure, it seemed like Vonnegut was more interested in piecing together Dunkin� Munchkin-like observations on American society than in any kind of narrative flow. The plot was very much beside the point.

Vonnegut, I know from other works, is a smart guy. He’s a clear writer, keen observer, and incisive social critic. With this one, though, all I kept thinking was what a funny little time capsule it was, filled with countercultural hip-think circa 1973. The Man, of course, was the heavy. And if only we could wake up to a more liberated, tolerant, free attitude, everything would be cool. It may be slightly ironic that those meant to be more enlightened were automatons, too, though at least they were programmed using the fresh, new algorithm of the day. I suppose it’s also unoriginal of me to point out how unoriginal certain trendy archetypes are when they stake their claim to individuality en masse.

]]>
<![CDATA[Gould's Book of Fish: A Novel in Twelve Fish]]> 14236 404 Richard Flanagan 1843540703 Steve 4
The story begins in modern times where an “antique� dealer in Hobart, specializing in furniture he distresses himself to seem authentically old, stumbles onto an eye-catching book of fish illustrations and marginalia by a certain William Gould. The story that’s handwritten in differing inks (including blood) is Gould’s account of his life as a forger, an apprentice painter who learned from John Audubon, and a prisoner shipped to Sarah Island. The original book gets wet and soon disintegrates. The book we get instead in the 400 or so pages that followed is what the dealer could remember of the story, reproducing it from his notes. If you think this metafiction smacks of postmodernism, you’d be right. I’ll have more to say about that in a minute.

Gould had a rather luckless start in life, and would never have thought to sell himself as a model of virtue. Even so, it was a false accusation that landed him in prison. Once there, he encountered a whole host of grotesque characters. Several were actually useful in that their benefits from his art meant that he got out of the worst prison duties. The dishonest commandant made a lot of money from the phony Constables Gould created. And the pompous, fleshy prison surgeon had Gould illustrate Australian fish, the taxonomy of which he hoped would gain him entry into the Royal Society of Science. An Aborigines woman there to cater to the commandant’s lecherous demands had more kindly relations with Gould. Even with our narrator’s reprieves and moments of love, life was not easy. His words describing the abject horror of prison life were indelible, more so than some might prefer. One particularly vivid example was an instrument of torture called the cockchafer.

Literary scholars would have a field day discussing whether this book transcends its postmodern tendencies. As I mentioned, it does feature metafiction, but it’s not presented as artifice. Another nod to postmodernism � Gould’s unreliable narration � succeeds too. It did not feel é. The book also featured an element of transmogrification, a trope I felt it came by honestly. In fact, I viewed any fish/human interchange (which was always pretty tacit) as part of the appeal. I liked how it reminded me of the friend who turned me on to this great book. He goes by the name Gregsamsa (who, despite the allusion to Kafka, I’ve never seen metamorphosize into anything bad). What really sets this book apart from its more run-of-the-mill pomo brethren, though, is how it showcases genuine human emotion. You can’t help but empathize.

The language in this is another strength. Gould, as a narrator, has a distinctive voice as a man’s man and a man of his time. The sentences may be long and immoderately spiced, but for the most part are a pleasure to read.

What interested me most, though, was the message itself. I shouldn’t go too far into this because readers should form their own opinions, but it seemed obvious that one of the major themes was the Truth with a capital T � its presence, its absence, and its indeterminacy. Of course, it’s almost impossible to view an issue like this through anything other than a lens of our time, but I’ll try not to be too obvious about it. Anyway, the first quote that’s relevant is by the initial narrator, the antique dealer, who said, “Swindling requires not delivering lies but confirming preconceptions.� I guess by analogy, the most convincing fake news requires playing to biases. A bit later, someone told Gould that “definitions belong to the definer, not the defined.� These are consistent with a Nietzschean world view that says there is no truth, only interpretations. Later still, Gould wondered whether the truth even mattered. It was easy to be cynical. He had seen prison records at one point that were complete fabrications meant to make officials look humane and effective. To his credit, though, Gould reasoned that the truth does matter to those who can be hurt by the lack of it.

Then there was the inherent difficulty in rendering truth:
I no longer even cared whether my paintings were accurate or right in the way that the Surgeon & his Linnaean books of scientifick description wished paintings of fish to be accurate or right. I just wanted to tell a story of love & it was about fish & it was about me & it was about everything. But because I could not paint everything, because I could only paint fish & my love & because I could not even do that very well, you may not think it much of a story.

This leads to a somewhat related theme � the insufficiency of words to tell a story as big and true and encompassing as a man like Gould, aching to find meaning, would like. That didn’t stop him from trying:
I smelt the breath of my fellows. I tasted the sour stench of their rotten lives. I was the stinking cockroach. I was the filthy lice that didn’t stop itching. I was Australia. I was dying before I was born. I was a rat eating its young. I was Mary Magdalene. I was Jesus. I was sinner. I was saint. I was flesh & flesh’s appetite & flesh’s union & death & love were all equally rank & all equally beautiful in my eyes. I cradled their broken bodies dying. I kissed their suppurating boils. I washed their skinny shanks filled with ulcers, rotting craters of pus; I was that pus & I was spirit & I was God & I was untranslatable & unknowable even to myself.

The themes loom large, but there’s a subtle artistry to this book as well. It’s creatively structured, beautifully written (pus & poo notwithstanding), and good at making you think. For me it was four stars bordering on five. I couldn’t quite give it that last one because I sometimes felt slightly adrift. The sentences were loaded with commas, the characters were legion, and timelines were occasionally disordered (though trackable once you identify Gould’s then-current oppressor). It’s a big one to reel in, but well worth the effort for those who enjoy literary game fish.]]>
3.73 1997 Gould's Book of Fish: A Novel in Twelve Fish
author: Richard Flanagan
name: Steve
average rating: 3.73
book published: 1997
rating: 4
read at:
date added: 2018/12/04
shelves:
review:
A book this big offers an entire sea of woe and wonder (as well as aquatic metaphors). It’s about life, love, and death as well as the importance of truth and how slippery (like a fish) it can be. It’s a fascinating history of Sarah Island, home of a notorious 19th century penal colony in Van Diemen’s Land (now Tasmania). And it features as much blood, sweat, tears, pus and poo as you could ever imagine.

The story begins in modern times where an “antique� dealer in Hobart, specializing in furniture he distresses himself to seem authentically old, stumbles onto an eye-catching book of fish illustrations and marginalia by a certain William Gould. The story that’s handwritten in differing inks (including blood) is Gould’s account of his life as a forger, an apprentice painter who learned from John Audubon, and a prisoner shipped to Sarah Island. The original book gets wet and soon disintegrates. The book we get instead in the 400 or so pages that followed is what the dealer could remember of the story, reproducing it from his notes. If you think this metafiction smacks of postmodernism, you’d be right. I’ll have more to say about that in a minute.

Gould had a rather luckless start in life, and would never have thought to sell himself as a model of virtue. Even so, it was a false accusation that landed him in prison. Once there, he encountered a whole host of grotesque characters. Several were actually useful in that their benefits from his art meant that he got out of the worst prison duties. The dishonest commandant made a lot of money from the phony Constables Gould created. And the pompous, fleshy prison surgeon had Gould illustrate Australian fish, the taxonomy of which he hoped would gain him entry into the Royal Society of Science. An Aborigines woman there to cater to the commandant’s lecherous demands had more kindly relations with Gould. Even with our narrator’s reprieves and moments of love, life was not easy. His words describing the abject horror of prison life were indelible, more so than some might prefer. One particularly vivid example was an instrument of torture called the cockchafer.

Literary scholars would have a field day discussing whether this book transcends its postmodern tendencies. As I mentioned, it does feature metafiction, but it’s not presented as artifice. Another nod to postmodernism � Gould’s unreliable narration � succeeds too. It did not feel é. The book also featured an element of transmogrification, a trope I felt it came by honestly. In fact, I viewed any fish/human interchange (which was always pretty tacit) as part of the appeal. I liked how it reminded me of the friend who turned me on to this great book. He goes by the name Gregsamsa (who, despite the allusion to Kafka, I’ve never seen metamorphosize into anything bad). What really sets this book apart from its more run-of-the-mill pomo brethren, though, is how it showcases genuine human emotion. You can’t help but empathize.

The language in this is another strength. Gould, as a narrator, has a distinctive voice as a man’s man and a man of his time. The sentences may be long and immoderately spiced, but for the most part are a pleasure to read.

What interested me most, though, was the message itself. I shouldn’t go too far into this because readers should form their own opinions, but it seemed obvious that one of the major themes was the Truth with a capital T � its presence, its absence, and its indeterminacy. Of course, it’s almost impossible to view an issue like this through anything other than a lens of our time, but I’ll try not to be too obvious about it. Anyway, the first quote that’s relevant is by the initial narrator, the antique dealer, who said, “Swindling requires not delivering lies but confirming preconceptions.� I guess by analogy, the most convincing fake news requires playing to biases. A bit later, someone told Gould that “definitions belong to the definer, not the defined.� These are consistent with a Nietzschean world view that says there is no truth, only interpretations. Later still, Gould wondered whether the truth even mattered. It was easy to be cynical. He had seen prison records at one point that were complete fabrications meant to make officials look humane and effective. To his credit, though, Gould reasoned that the truth does matter to those who can be hurt by the lack of it.

Then there was the inherent difficulty in rendering truth:
I no longer even cared whether my paintings were accurate or right in the way that the Surgeon & his Linnaean books of scientifick description wished paintings of fish to be accurate or right. I just wanted to tell a story of love & it was about fish & it was about me & it was about everything. But because I could not paint everything, because I could only paint fish & my love & because I could not even do that very well, you may not think it much of a story.

This leads to a somewhat related theme � the insufficiency of words to tell a story as big and true and encompassing as a man like Gould, aching to find meaning, would like. That didn’t stop him from trying:
I smelt the breath of my fellows. I tasted the sour stench of their rotten lives. I was the stinking cockroach. I was the filthy lice that didn’t stop itching. I was Australia. I was dying before I was born. I was a rat eating its young. I was Mary Magdalene. I was Jesus. I was sinner. I was saint. I was flesh & flesh’s appetite & flesh’s union & death & love were all equally rank & all equally beautiful in my eyes. I cradled their broken bodies dying. I kissed their suppurating boils. I washed their skinny shanks filled with ulcers, rotting craters of pus; I was that pus & I was spirit & I was God & I was untranslatable & unknowable even to myself.

The themes loom large, but there’s a subtle artistry to this book as well. It’s creatively structured, beautifully written (pus & poo notwithstanding), and good at making you think. For me it was four stars bordering on five. I couldn’t quite give it that last one because I sometimes felt slightly adrift. The sentences were loaded with commas, the characters were legion, and timelines were occasionally disordered (though trackable once you identify Gould’s then-current oppressor). It’s a big one to reel in, but well worth the effort for those who enjoy literary game fish.
]]>
The Heart's Invisible Furies 40004880 real Avery or at least that’s what his adoptive parents tell him. And he never will be. But if he isn’t a real Avery, then who is he?

Born out of wedlock to a teenage girl cast out from her rural Irish community and adopted by a well-to-do if eccentric Dublin couple via the intervention of a hunchbacked Redemptorist nun, Cyril is adrift in the world, anchored only tenuously by his heartfelt friendship with the infinitely more glamourous and dangerous Julian Woodbead.

At the mercy of fortune and coincidence, he will spend a lifetime coming to know himself and where he came from � and over his three score years and ten, will struggle to discover an identity, a home, a country and much more.

In this, Boyne's most transcendent work to date, we are shown the story of Ireland from the 1940s to today through the eyes of one ordinary man. The Heart's Invisible Furies is a novel to make you laugh and cry while reminding us all of the redemptive power of the human spirit.]]>
567 John Boyne Steve 0 4.42 2017 The Heart's Invisible Furies
author: John Boyne
name: Steve
average rating: 4.42
book published: 2017
rating: 0
read at: 2018/11/23
date added: 2018/11/23
shelves:
review:

]]>
The Idiot 35535660 A New York Times Book Review Notable Book

Finalist for the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction

Longlisted for the Women's Prize for Fiction

"An addictive, sprawling epic; I wolfed it down."
--Miranda July, author of The First Bad Man and It Chooses You

"Easily the funniest book I've read this year."
-- GQ

A portrait of the artist as a young woman. A novel about not just discovering but inventing oneself.

The year is 1995, and email is new. Selin, the daughter of Turkish immigrants, arrives for her freshman year at Harvard. She signs up for classes in subjects she has never heard of, befriends her charismatic and worldly Serbian classmate, Svetlana, and, almost by accident, begins corresponding with Ivan, an older mathematics student from Hungary. Selin may have barely spoken to Ivan, but with each email they exchange, the act of writing seems to take on new and increasingly mysterious meanings.

At the end of the school year, Ivan goes to Budapest for the summer, and Selin heads to the Hungarian countryside, to teach English in a program run by one of Ivan's friends. On the way, she spends two weeks visiting Paris with Svetlana. Selin's summer in Europe does not resonate with anything she has previously heard about the typical experiences of American college students, or indeed of any other kinds of people. For Selin, this is a journey further inside herself: a coming to grips with the ineffable and exhilarating confusion of first love, and with the growing consciousness that she is doomed to become a writer.

With superlative emotional and intellectual sensitivity, mordant wit, and pitch-perfect style, Batuman dramatizes the uncertainty of life on the cusp of adulthood. Her prose is a rare and inimitable combination of tenderness and wisdom; its logic as natural and inscrutable as that of memory itself. The Idiot is a heroic yet self-effacing reckoning with the terror and joy of becoming a person in a world that is as intoxicating as it is disquieting. Batuman's fiction is unguarded against both life's affronts and its beauty--and has at its command the complete range of thinking and feeling which they entail.

Named one the best books of the year by Refinery29 - Mashable One - Elle Magazine - The New York Times - Bookpage - Vogue - NPR - Buzzfeed -The Millions]]>
432 Elif Batuman 014311106X Steve 0 to-read 3.72 2017 The Idiot
author: Elif Batuman
name: Steve
average rating: 3.72
book published: 2017
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2018/10/21
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
The Echo Maker 19794
Set against the Platte River’s massive spring migrations � one of the greatest spectacles in nature � The Echo Maker is a gripping mystery that explores the improvised human self and the even more precarious brain that splits us from and joins us to the rest of creation.]]>
451 Richard Powers 0374146357 Steve 5
Mark: A child who, out of pity, always picked the worst players for his team. An adult who called only when weepy drunk.

The bathroom was a science-fair project in full bloom.

Nothing had the power to hurt her except for what power she gave it. Every barrier she'd ever chafed against was no more than a Chinese finger lock that opened the instant when she stopped pulling.

That's the thing about dogs. There isn't a human being in the world worthy of any dog's welcome.

She reddened again. Her skin was instant litmus.

Mark marveled at Weber's professional patter. "Man! If I could talk like you, I'd be getting laid on a daily basis." He launched into imitative psychobabble, almost convincing enough to earn him a comfortable wage somewhere on the West Coast.

The two of them ended up at a restaurant back in Kearney, one of those chains drawn up in Minneapolis or Atlanta and faxed around the nation.

Karin called Bonnie... She got the infectious answering machine -- I wish I was here to talk to you for real -- in that cheerful treble that sounded like the horn of a Ford Focus on mood elevators.

My brain, all those split parts, trying to convince each other. Dozens of lost Scouts waving crappy flashlights in the woods at night. Where's me?


I don’t know this for a fact, but my guess is that the instructor would have given him an A on any “show, don’t tell� assignment he submitted.

Powers, as I’ve opined elsewhere, is a bona fide genius. He merges science, language, arts, and humanity as seamlessly as anyone out there. This particular book delves into an interesting mental disorder, and features an Oliver Sacks-type character to diagnose/treat/exploit it. The plot is a good one and his characters are well-drawn. Metaphors abound. And his bigger points are touching and wise. But rather than “telling� you to read this gem of a book, I’ll rely on the examples above to “show� you glimpses of the phrenic delights you’d be missing if you don’t.]]>
3.42 2006 The Echo Maker
author: Richard Powers
name: Steve
average rating: 3.42
book published: 2006
rating: 5
read at:
date added: 2018/10/16
shelves:
review:
My wife is such a sweetie. She saw that my job had me knee-deep in numbers and thought maybe I’d appreciate more words in my life for ballast. With that in mind, she arranged for me to take an online writing class. We just started Week 2 � Show, don’t tell. One of the discussion prompts was to cite examples of a writer who “shows� particularly well. Turns out, I have a ready supply of quotable passages from books I’ve been meaning (for too long) to review. The set I had for this one just about ran my highlighter dry. So here were the examples I posted:

Mark: A child who, out of pity, always picked the worst players for his team. An adult who called only when weepy drunk.

The bathroom was a science-fair project in full bloom.

Nothing had the power to hurt her except for what power she gave it. Every barrier she'd ever chafed against was no more than a Chinese finger lock that opened the instant when she stopped pulling.

That's the thing about dogs. There isn't a human being in the world worthy of any dog's welcome.

She reddened again. Her skin was instant litmus.

Mark marveled at Weber's professional patter. "Man! If I could talk like you, I'd be getting laid on a daily basis." He launched into imitative psychobabble, almost convincing enough to earn him a comfortable wage somewhere on the West Coast.

The two of them ended up at a restaurant back in Kearney, one of those chains drawn up in Minneapolis or Atlanta and faxed around the nation.

Karin called Bonnie... She got the infectious answering machine -- I wish I was here to talk to you for real -- in that cheerful treble that sounded like the horn of a Ford Focus on mood elevators.

My brain, all those split parts, trying to convince each other. Dozens of lost Scouts waving crappy flashlights in the woods at night. Where's me?


I don’t know this for a fact, but my guess is that the instructor would have given him an A on any “show, don’t tell� assignment he submitted.

Powers, as I’ve opined elsewhere, is a bona fide genius. He merges science, language, arts, and humanity as seamlessly as anyone out there. This particular book delves into an interesting mental disorder, and features an Oliver Sacks-type character to diagnose/treat/exploit it. The plot is a good one and his characters are well-drawn. Metaphors abound. And his bigger points are touching and wise. But rather than “telling� you to read this gem of a book, I’ll rely on the examples above to “show� you glimpses of the phrenic delights you’d be missing if you don’t.
]]>
Wonder Boys 38213392 Mordant but humane, Wonder Boys features characters as loveably flawed as any in American fiction.This ebook features a biography of the author.]]> 388 Michael Chabon Steve 0 3.95 1995 Wonder Boys
author: Michael Chabon
name: Steve
average rating: 3.95
book published: 1995
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2018/03/17
shelves:
review:

]]>
Mrs. Bridge 8262059 Alternate-cover edition for ISBN 0865470561 / 9780865470569 can be found here

The wife of a successful lawyer in 1930s Kansas City, India Bridge, tries to cope with her dissatisfaction with an easy, though empty, life.

Before Betty Friedan wrote The Feminine Mystique there was Mrs. Bridge, an inspired novel set in the years around World War II that testified to the sapping ennui of an unexamined suburban life. India Bridge, the title character, has three children and a meticulous workaholic husband. She defends her dainty, untouched guest towels from son Douglas, who has the gall to dry his hands on one, and earnestly attempts to control her daughters with pronouncements such as "Now see here, young lady ... in the morning one doesn't wear earrings that dangle." Though her life is increasingly filled with leisure and plenty, she can't shuffle off vague feelings of dissatisfaction, confusion, and futility. Evan S. Connell, who also wrote the twinned novel Mr. Bridge, builds a world with tiny brushstrokes and short, telling vignettes.]]>
246 Evan S. Connell Steve 5
Mrs. Bridge and her husband, a successful lawyer who worked long hours at the office, lived in Kansas City with their two daughters and younger son. The time period covered the twenties up to WWII. During much of this time, of course, the country was in The Great Depression, but you wouldn’t know it by them. Her Lincoln, laundry, kitchen and home were well-tended. At first I viewed her as a kind of numeraire -- a God-fearing Midwestern middlebrow against whom the differing attitudes of the day and quirks of other characters could be measured. Then, as more tiles in the mosaic were put in place (117 short chapters), I found that her own nuanced profile had emerged. It wasn’t always one we could admire, but it was one we could understand. She was a recognizable product of human nature and the times.

There are so many examples of Connell’s brilliant character bites that it’s difficult to come up with a representative few that can illustrate. These tidbits did not constitute a plot, but they were interesting enough in their own right to keep the narrative lively. Characters other than Mrs. Bridge were profiled, too, including her family, servants and friends. We’re reminded of the state of race relations (“knowing one’s place� in essence) and the role of many housewives in the pre-feminist era (deferring to the husband in most every way). Mrs. Bridge was the most fully drawn, of course. (Mr. Bridge got his chance in a follow-up book Connell published 10 years later.) She was
» not one to speak her mind if it could be construed as poor manners to do so

» a careful student of appearances

» innately suspicious of change

» friends with a woman who liked arts and books, but could never seem to follow through with her own self-improvements (Spanish lessons curtailed after chapter 1, her short-lived political awareness campaign yielded the way to Mr. Bridge’s pronouncements, and books were often abandoned)

» progressively less successful imparting her old values to the new generation of Bridges

While it was not always easy to like Mrs. Bridge, it was no leap at all to feel sorry for her. As her children grew independent, she had very little to do. Companionship from her husband was minimal. And the purposelessness she felt really stung. To sum it all up, Connell’s last short chapter presented the perfect ending: [spoilers removed]

Character profiles usually hinge on how well they're crafted. On that count, this one gets top marks. It's subtle, observant and well-written without so much as a whisper to say that upper-class ennui might be boring or twee. 4.5 stars rounded to 5.
]]>
4.21 1959 Mrs. Bridge
author: Evan S. Connell
name: Steve
average rating: 4.21
book published: 1959
rating: 5
read at:
date added: 2018/03/07
shelves:
review:
If you’re like me, there may be certain privileged disenchanted types you feel like telling, “Get a real problem!� I thought for a while Mrs. Bridge would qualify for that kind of reproach. She had a comfortable life at a time when many did not, she had few responsibilities, and the status quo, such as she perceived it, suited her fine. Whence the angst, then? Reading on, we see from where very clearly. I was no longer tempted to say her problems weren’t real. Thanks to Connell’s many revealing vignettes, everything about her rang true.

Mrs. Bridge and her husband, a successful lawyer who worked long hours at the office, lived in Kansas City with their two daughters and younger son. The time period covered the twenties up to WWII. During much of this time, of course, the country was in The Great Depression, but you wouldn’t know it by them. Her Lincoln, laundry, kitchen and home were well-tended. At first I viewed her as a kind of numeraire -- a God-fearing Midwestern middlebrow against whom the differing attitudes of the day and quirks of other characters could be measured. Then, as more tiles in the mosaic were put in place (117 short chapters), I found that her own nuanced profile had emerged. It wasn’t always one we could admire, but it was one we could understand. She was a recognizable product of human nature and the times.

There are so many examples of Connell’s brilliant character bites that it’s difficult to come up with a representative few that can illustrate. These tidbits did not constitute a plot, but they were interesting enough in their own right to keep the narrative lively. Characters other than Mrs. Bridge were profiled, too, including her family, servants and friends. We’re reminded of the state of race relations (“knowing one’s place� in essence) and the role of many housewives in the pre-feminist era (deferring to the husband in most every way). Mrs. Bridge was the most fully drawn, of course. (Mr. Bridge got his chance in a follow-up book Connell published 10 years later.) She was
» not one to speak her mind if it could be construed as poor manners to do so

» a careful student of appearances

» innately suspicious of change

» friends with a woman who liked arts and books, but could never seem to follow through with her own self-improvements (Spanish lessons curtailed after chapter 1, her short-lived political awareness campaign yielded the way to Mr. Bridge’s pronouncements, and books were often abandoned)

» progressively less successful imparting her old values to the new generation of Bridges

While it was not always easy to like Mrs. Bridge, it was no leap at all to feel sorry for her. As her children grew independent, she had very little to do. Companionship from her husband was minimal. And the purposelessness she felt really stung. To sum it all up, Connell’s last short chapter presented the perfect ending: [spoilers removed]

Character profiles usually hinge on how well they're crafted. On that count, this one gets top marks. It's subtle, observant and well-written without so much as a whisper to say that upper-class ennui might be boring or twee. 4.5 stars rounded to 5.

]]>
Ill Will 33915955 NATIONAL BESTSELLER - Two sensational unsolved crimes--one in the past, another in the present--are linked by one man's memory and self-deception in this chilling novel of literary suspense from National Book Award finalist Dan Chaon.

Includes an exclusive conversation between Dan Chaon and Lynda Barry

NAMED ONE OF THE BEST BOOKS OF THE YEAR BY
The Wall Street Journal - NPR - The New York Times - Los Angeles Times - The Washington Post - Kirkus Reviews - Publishers Weekly

"We are always telling a story to ourselves, about ourselves." This is one of the little mantras Dustin Tillman likes to share with his patients, and it's meant to be reassuring. But what if that story is a lie?

A psychologist in suburban Cleveland, Dustin is drifting through his forties when he hears the news: His adopted brother, Rusty, is being released from prison. Thirty years ago, Rusty received a life sentence for the massacre of Dustin's parents, aunt, and uncle. The trial came to epitomize the 1980s hysteria over Satanic cults; despite the lack of physical evidence, the jury believed the outlandish accusations Dustin and his cousin made against Rusty. Now, after DNA analysis has overturned the conviction, Dustin braces for a reckoning.

Meanwhile, one of Dustin's patients has been plying him with stories of the drowning deaths of a string of drunk college boys. At first Dustin dismisses his patient's suggestions that a serial killer is at work as paranoid thinking, but as the two embark on an amateur investigation, Dustin starts to believe that there's more to the deaths than coincidence. Soon he becomes obsessed, crossing all professional boundaries--and putting his own family in harm's way.

From one of today's most renowned practitioners of literary suspense, Ill Will is an intimate thriller about the failures of memory and the perils of self-deception. In Dan Chaon's nimble, chilling prose, the past looms over the present, turning each into a haunted place.

"In his haunting, strikingly original new novel, [Dan] Chaon takes formidable risks, dismantling his timeline like a film editor."--The New York Times Book Review

"The scariest novel of the year . . . ingenious . . . Chaon's novel walks along a garrote stretched taut between Edgar Allan Poe and Alfred Hitchcock."--The Washington Post]]>
461 Dan Chaon 0345476050 Steve 0 to-read 3.34 2017 Ill Will
author: Dan Chaon
name: Steve
average rating: 3.34
book published: 2017
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2018/01/30
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
Dark Matter 27833670 A mindbending, relentlessly surprising thriller from the author of the bestselling Wayward Pines trilogy.

Jason Dessen is walking home through the chilly Chicago streets one night, looking forward to a quiet evening in front of the fireplace with his wife, Daniela, and their son, Charlie—when his reality shatters.

"Are you happy with your life?"

Those are the last words Jason Dessen hears before the masked abductor knocks him unconscious.

Before he awakens to find himself strapped to a gurney, surrounded by strangers in hazmat suits.

Before a man Jason's never met smiles down at him and says, "Welcome back, my friend."

In this world he's woken up to, Jason's life is not the one he knows. His wife is not his wife. His son was never born. And Jason is not an ordinary college physics professor, but a celebrated genius who has achieved something remarkable. Something impossible.

Is it this world or the other that's the dream?

And even if the home he remembers is real, how can Jason possibly make it back to the family he loves? The answers lie in a journey more wondrous and horrifying than anything he could've imagined—one that will force him to confront the darkest parts of himself even as he battles a terrifying, seemingly unbeatable foe.

Dark Matter is a brilliantly plotted tale that is at once sweeping and intimate, mind-bendingly strange and profoundly human--a relentlessly surprising science-fiction thriller about choices, paths not taken, and how far we'll go to claim the lives we dream of.]]>
342 Blake Crouch 1101904224 Steve 4
What if?

Life in the real world moves awfully fast, and when considering the near-infinite set of causes and effects, it’s impossible to disentangle. That doesn’t stop us from trying, though. We love devising rewrites. What if Arsenal’s fluky long-range shot off the United defender’s back had not snuck into the goal? What if Rhett and Scarlett had had couples counseling? What if instead of Dark Matter Julia and Tomas had given me Dark Matter Heart (Cor Griffin Bloodsuckers, #1)? We all know from chaos theory that it doesn’t take a very big butterfly to make a profound difference in Naperville, Illinois's weather.

Decades ago academics decided they wanted in on the fun. They called their “what-ifs� counterfactuals whereby two states of the world would be compared: one where an intervention occurred (like some policy change or the advent of railroads or the internet) and one where it didn’t. Studies like this can be speculative and over-reaching. The lack of rigor means they can be argued to the point where no one will agree. It’s best to think of these things as creative exercises only. I’m more willing to listen to what Clarence says a world without George Bailey would be like than to what some economist pictures as the competitive landscape had the Glass-Steagall Act not been rescinded.

Blake Crouch asks “what if� quite a lot. And he does it creatively. I’m happy to report that the three reviews I’ve read of this book were able to resist blabbing about the premise. I won’t spoil the how of the what-ifs either. In fact, I may just turn this whole review into a series of my own what-ifs, with only vague references to the book.

What if a reader like me who naturally questions the scientific plausibility of science fiction so much that he’s often driven to distraction finds one where the story and its philosophical implications are interesting enough that disbelief is cheerfully suspended?

What if quantum physics allowed bizarre interpretations of superposition such that random subatomic events could lead to states that are simultaneously on and off, or dead and alive, or acted upon and not, until such time as the states are observed? (See Schrödinger’s cat.)

What if a professor of physics in Chicago with a wife and teenage son he loves finds himself suddenly pitched in a battle of wits against an opponent as brainy as he is?

What if the physicist turned out to be a good problem solver with a romantic streak as well?

What if at no point did a what-if book consider going back in time to kill Hitler? (It’s virtually unprecedented, but conceivable.)

What if the character development in a book seems pretty meager, but is deemed forgivable because the story moves well without it?

What if in some bleak, dystopian version of Chicago the Cubs World Series glory was somehow erased? (Any such book would be given one star � that’s what!)

What if in the process of reading a what-if book, you began thinking of your own identity, the mutability of it, the life-shaping decisions you almost didn’t make, and the metaphysics of what might be?

What if you were excited to tell people about some page-turner, but there’s so little you feel you can say about it that you have to resort to yet another silly device to say anything at all?

What if we all met for deep dish pizza after you’ve read this to discuss the premise more openly?]]>
4.13 2016 Dark Matter
author: Blake Crouch
name: Steve
average rating: 4.13
book published: 2016
rating: 4
read at: 2017/05/01
date added: 2017/07/23
shelves:
review:
Few words, if any, can launch an imagination better than these:
What if?

Life in the real world moves awfully fast, and when considering the near-infinite set of causes and effects, it’s impossible to disentangle. That doesn’t stop us from trying, though. We love devising rewrites. What if Arsenal’s fluky long-range shot off the United defender’s back had not snuck into the goal? What if Rhett and Scarlett had had couples counseling? What if instead of Dark Matter Julia and Tomas had given me Dark Matter Heart (Cor Griffin Bloodsuckers, #1)? We all know from chaos theory that it doesn’t take a very big butterfly to make a profound difference in Naperville, Illinois's weather.

Decades ago academics decided they wanted in on the fun. They called their “what-ifs� counterfactuals whereby two states of the world would be compared: one where an intervention occurred (like some policy change or the advent of railroads or the internet) and one where it didn’t. Studies like this can be speculative and over-reaching. The lack of rigor means they can be argued to the point where no one will agree. It’s best to think of these things as creative exercises only. I’m more willing to listen to what Clarence says a world without George Bailey would be like than to what some economist pictures as the competitive landscape had the Glass-Steagall Act not been rescinded.

Blake Crouch asks “what if� quite a lot. And he does it creatively. I’m happy to report that the three reviews I’ve read of this book were able to resist blabbing about the premise. I won’t spoil the how of the what-ifs either. In fact, I may just turn this whole review into a series of my own what-ifs, with only vague references to the book.

What if a reader like me who naturally questions the scientific plausibility of science fiction so much that he’s often driven to distraction finds one where the story and its philosophical implications are interesting enough that disbelief is cheerfully suspended?

What if quantum physics allowed bizarre interpretations of superposition such that random subatomic events could lead to states that are simultaneously on and off, or dead and alive, or acted upon and not, until such time as the states are observed? (See Schrödinger’s cat.)

What if a professor of physics in Chicago with a wife and teenage son he loves finds himself suddenly pitched in a battle of wits against an opponent as brainy as he is?

What if the physicist turned out to be a good problem solver with a romantic streak as well?

What if at no point did a what-if book consider going back in time to kill Hitler? (It’s virtually unprecedented, but conceivable.)

What if the character development in a book seems pretty meager, but is deemed forgivable because the story moves well without it?

What if in some bleak, dystopian version of Chicago the Cubs World Series glory was somehow erased? (Any such book would be given one star � that’s what!)

What if in the process of reading a what-if book, you began thinking of your own identity, the mutability of it, the life-shaping decisions you almost didn’t make, and the metaphysics of what might be?

What if you were excited to tell people about some page-turner, but there’s so little you feel you can say about it that you have to resort to yet another silly device to say anything at all?

What if we all met for deep dish pizza after you’ve read this to discuss the premise more openly?
]]>
The Big Rock Candy Mountain 10801 563 Wallace Stegner 0140139397 Steve 5
"I suppose," he wrote, "that the understanding of any person is an exercise in genealogy. A man is not a static organism to be taken apart and analyzed and classified. A man is movement, motion, a continuum. There is no beginning to him. He runs through his ancestors, and the only beginning is the primal beginning of the single cell in the slime."

Nevertheless, the book did track back to figure out what it could. In the process, Stegner said, he managed to offload some deep-seeded resentments. I’m reluctant to go into any detail, because Stegner should be given the chance to reveal important plot points his own way. Let me just say he’s good at it. Each vignette draws you in completely, magnified and made grand by his sense of time and place. And every character profile has human dimensions that only a genuinely talented, observant writer can convey.

OK then. [Taking a deep breath before attempting the tightrope walk that keeps me from over-sharing while at the same time justifies why the book deserves all 5 stars.] One genealogical precursor in this story was the father’s father who lost an arm and any sense of humor he might have had as a prisoner in the Civil War. Another was the mother’s Norwegian heritage and farm upbringing that made her hearty and resilient. Each member of the immediate family gets POV treatment which helps the long story move at a more spritely pace.

Bo, the dad, was testosterone personified. He was broad-shouldered, good with his hands, quick with his temper, energetic, charming (at times), respected by ruffians, good with guns, and for the most part loving towards his wife Elsa. He chased dreams of the big score, the easy money, or in metaphorical terms, the Big Rock Candy Mountain that’s surely just past the next rise. (BTW, the book shares its apt title with a that was featured in the movie O Brother, Where Art Thou. “And the bulldogs all have rubber teeth� being my favorite line.) Bo pushed boundaries, was confident (or maybe “delusional� is the better word), and liked signaling “big man� status when he could. In one case he paid more for the diamond stud in his tie than I do for 3 years-worth of clothes and accessories even before adjusting for inflation. (Hmm� I’m not sure if that says more about him or me.)

Elsa was more practical, but rarely held sway. She was also, in contrast, consistently kind. The only knock against her is that she might have done more to protect the little birds in her nest. The older brother, Chet, was in many ways like his father. If Bo could be called a man’s man, Chet could be labelled a boy’s boy � physical, a ring-leader, adventurous, and at least half-full of mischief. Bruce was more of a mama’s boy. He did share one trait with his father, though: an intense willfulness. When the two were together, Bo’s manly standards and own intransigence made harmony as scarce as big money. Bruce’s reflections later in the book were powerful and wise (overlapping 99% with Stegner’s own). Father-son relationships often teeter lopsidedly between pride and disappointment depending on how the two generations reflect on each other and how reconciled they are to their differences.

Stegner once said this was a book about motion. The family certainly moved a lot, with that B.R.C.M. always beckoning. There was movement of a different sort, too. Young Bruce, who was wise beyond his years, noted that people weren’t fixed points so much as lines, always changing a little from what they were “like the wiggly line on a machine used to measure earthquake shocks. […a man] moved along a line dictated by his heritage and his environment, but he was subject to every sort of variation within the narrow limits of his capabilities.� With Stegner drawing the plots, every wiggle was worth noting.

The book was published in 1943 when Stegner was 34 years old, teaching at Harvard. The three other Stegner novels I read were written decades later. It was interesting to me to sample the young Wallace Stegner before the line of his life brought him to celebrated works like Angle of Repose and Crossing to Safety. In younger years he seemed to write with more raw power, hurt, and emotion. As he aged he became more refined and maybe more quotable. He was never less than great, though � marked by mature insights even as a young man and brimming with intelligence throughout.

I’m giving this book 4.5 stars and rounding up to 5. The small demerit comes from descriptive passages that I sometimes felt could have been shorter. I also think that as Bruce/Wallace exorcised demons, there wasn’t enough elapsed time or self-awareness yet to say what would fill the void. A quote by Bruce near the end, though, hints at how both the protagonist and the writer thought the blanks should be filled.
Perhaps it took several generations to make a man, perhaps it took several combinations and re-creations of his mother's gentleness and resilience, his father's enormous energy and appetite for the new, a subtle blending of masculine and feminine, selfish and selfless, stubborn and yielding, before a proper man could be fashioned.

Knowing what I know of the writer to come, he iterated his way to that goal quite well, surpassing those candy mountains along the way.]]>
4.17 1943 The Big Rock Candy Mountain
author: Wallace Stegner
name: Steve
average rating: 4.17
book published: 1943
rating: 5
read at: 2017/06/01
date added: 2017/06/12
shelves:
review:
Towards the end of this epic story, Bruce Mason, who was a first year law student barely 20 years old (having skipped a few grades), began keeping a journal. It was not a log of his activities or thoughts on the issues of the day, but rather an attempt to understand a complicated family dynamic with a flawed father driving it. He said the journal was like author’s notes -- another of the many parallels between Bruce and Stegner himself. Both had a saintly mother, a combustible father, an athletic older brother who unlike Wally and Bruce did not skip grades, and a nomadic upbringing that included time in Saskatchewan, Montana, and Salt Lake City. Here’s Bruce, though, reflecting on how impossible it is to truly understand any such thing:
"I suppose," he wrote, "that the understanding of any person is an exercise in genealogy. A man is not a static organism to be taken apart and analyzed and classified. A man is movement, motion, a continuum. There is no beginning to him. He runs through his ancestors, and the only beginning is the primal beginning of the single cell in the slime."

Nevertheless, the book did track back to figure out what it could. In the process, Stegner said, he managed to offload some deep-seeded resentments. I’m reluctant to go into any detail, because Stegner should be given the chance to reveal important plot points his own way. Let me just say he’s good at it. Each vignette draws you in completely, magnified and made grand by his sense of time and place. And every character profile has human dimensions that only a genuinely talented, observant writer can convey.

OK then. [Taking a deep breath before attempting the tightrope walk that keeps me from over-sharing while at the same time justifies why the book deserves all 5 stars.] One genealogical precursor in this story was the father’s father who lost an arm and any sense of humor he might have had as a prisoner in the Civil War. Another was the mother’s Norwegian heritage and farm upbringing that made her hearty and resilient. Each member of the immediate family gets POV treatment which helps the long story move at a more spritely pace.

Bo, the dad, was testosterone personified. He was broad-shouldered, good with his hands, quick with his temper, energetic, charming (at times), respected by ruffians, good with guns, and for the most part loving towards his wife Elsa. He chased dreams of the big score, the easy money, or in metaphorical terms, the Big Rock Candy Mountain that’s surely just past the next rise. (BTW, the book shares its apt title with a that was featured in the movie O Brother, Where Art Thou. “And the bulldogs all have rubber teeth� being my favorite line.) Bo pushed boundaries, was confident (or maybe “delusional� is the better word), and liked signaling “big man� status when he could. In one case he paid more for the diamond stud in his tie than I do for 3 years-worth of clothes and accessories even before adjusting for inflation. (Hmm� I’m not sure if that says more about him or me.)

Elsa was more practical, but rarely held sway. She was also, in contrast, consistently kind. The only knock against her is that she might have done more to protect the little birds in her nest. The older brother, Chet, was in many ways like his father. If Bo could be called a man’s man, Chet could be labelled a boy’s boy � physical, a ring-leader, adventurous, and at least half-full of mischief. Bruce was more of a mama’s boy. He did share one trait with his father, though: an intense willfulness. When the two were together, Bo’s manly standards and own intransigence made harmony as scarce as big money. Bruce’s reflections later in the book were powerful and wise (overlapping 99% with Stegner’s own). Father-son relationships often teeter lopsidedly between pride and disappointment depending on how the two generations reflect on each other and how reconciled they are to their differences.

Stegner once said this was a book about motion. The family certainly moved a lot, with that B.R.C.M. always beckoning. There was movement of a different sort, too. Young Bruce, who was wise beyond his years, noted that people weren’t fixed points so much as lines, always changing a little from what they were “like the wiggly line on a machine used to measure earthquake shocks. […a man] moved along a line dictated by his heritage and his environment, but he was subject to every sort of variation within the narrow limits of his capabilities.� With Stegner drawing the plots, every wiggle was worth noting.

The book was published in 1943 when Stegner was 34 years old, teaching at Harvard. The three other Stegner novels I read were written decades later. It was interesting to me to sample the young Wallace Stegner before the line of his life brought him to celebrated works like Angle of Repose and Crossing to Safety. In younger years he seemed to write with more raw power, hurt, and emotion. As he aged he became more refined and maybe more quotable. He was never less than great, though � marked by mature insights even as a young man and brimming with intelligence throughout.

I’m giving this book 4.5 stars and rounding up to 5. The small demerit comes from descriptive passages that I sometimes felt could have been shorter. I also think that as Bruce/Wallace exorcised demons, there wasn’t enough elapsed time or self-awareness yet to say what would fill the void. A quote by Bruce near the end, though, hints at how both the protagonist and the writer thought the blanks should be filled.
Perhaps it took several generations to make a man, perhaps it took several combinations and re-creations of his mother's gentleness and resilience, his father's enormous energy and appetite for the new, a subtle blending of masculine and feminine, selfish and selfless, stubborn and yielding, before a proper man could be fashioned.

Knowing what I know of the writer to come, he iterated his way to that goal quite well, surpassing those candy mountains along the way.
]]>
<![CDATA[Little Victories: Perfect Rules for Imperfect Living]]> 22889772
� The book you hold in your hand is a rule book. There have been rule books before—stacks upon stacks of them—but this book is unlike any other rule book you have ever read. It will not make you rich in twenty-four hours, or even seventy-two hours. It will not cause you to lose eighty pounds in a week. This book has no abdominal exercises. I have been doing abdominal exercises for most of my adult life, and my abdomen looks like it’s always looked. It looks like flan. Syrupy flan. So we can just limit those expectations. This book does not offer a crash diet or a plan for maximizing your best self. I don’t know a thing about your best self. It may be embarrassing. Your best self might be sprinkling peanut M&M’s onto rest-stop pizza as we speak. I cannot promise that this book is a road map to success. And we should probably set aside the goal of total happiness. There’s no such thing.

I would, however, like for it to make you laugh. Maybe think. I believe it is possible to find, at any age, a new appreciation for what you have—and what you don’t have—as well as for the people closest to you. There’s a way to experience life that does not involve a phone, a tablet, a television screen. There’s also a way to experience life that does not involve eating seafood at the airport, because you should really never eat seafood at the airport.

Like the title says, I want us all to achieve little victories. I believe that happiness is derived less from a significant single accomplishment than it is from a series of successful daily maneuvers. Maybe it’s the way you feel when you walk out the door after drinking six cups of coffee, or surviving a family vacation, or playing the rowdy family Thanksgiving touch football game, or just learning to embrace that music at the gym. Accomplishments do not have to be large to be meaningful. I think little victories are the most important ones in life.�

—From the Introduction]]>
224 Jason Gay 0385539460 Steve 4 Little Victories could be called a self-help book in the same way Caddyshack could be called a golf instruction video. Jason Gay’s light-hearted little book is nominally meant to give advice and rules of thumb for navigating the modern world, but we all know it’s just a format for making jokes. It’s not entirely airy, though. He adds ballast with topics like his bout with testicular cancer and his father’s failing health. And every once in a while we’re led to think. But for the most part it’s all about the humor.

Gay’s current job is as a WSJ sports columnist. He’s also written for Rolling Stone, GQ, and Vogue. With everything of his I ever read, I end up cracking a smile. His humor is droll, observational, and self-effacing. He’s slightly edgier than Dave Barry, not as big into anecdotes as David Sedaris, and less of a suburban housewife than Erma Bombeck, but he correlates with them all. His likability index is high, too, which always helps.

I realized only after I was most of the way done that the best way to sell this book to friends would be with examples. Since I was too lazy to backtrack, I hoped that whatever I underlined from then on would be enough. Here are a few I came up with. You be the judge.

Asking a survey question to discern how smart phone-dependent you might be:
Are you reading this copy of Little Victories as “an actual hardcover book, with printed pages, by candlelight, in a hayloft, above sleeping livestock, as people used to do in the 1990s?�

Talking about how orderly an aunt’s place is where they regularly visit in the summer:
My house, by contrast, feels as if a tribe of orangutans has gotten loose and opened up a case of Heinekens.

Describing advice from an older sibling on parenthood:
My brother, whose daughter is on the verge of her teens, treats me like I'm still in the first season of Breaking Bad. Wait until Season 4, he says, when it takes your kid two hours to dress before school.

On curbing the time kids spend with digital devices:
[…] if you hand a child a phone in a public setting, people look at you like you’ve just given your kid a sack of enriched uranium. You are lazy, you are ceding parenthood to the machines, you are not actively building organic fun. The parenting magazines and blogs tell you to set limits, and this is useful advice, but I am not setting limits on, say, an airplane. If it means a peaceful cross-country flight without dirty stares from every other passenger, I will let a two-year-old watch Scarface.

The book contains wise words about the value of friends, the joys of a good marriage, the excesses of youth sports and the importance of little things that should be appreciated for how they cumulate, even if imperfectly, into a life. At his best, he mixes earnest good intent with some chuckles. The only thing that didn’t wear well was a tendency to exaggerate with numbers. For example, he said, “I am so afraid of poisoning you that I will leave that chicken on the grill until 2042.� Or, once in a job he made �21 billion cheese sandwiches.� There must have been more than 16 thousand such instances and they ultimately made me cringe.

If you’re looking for a little palate cleanser between courses, and you want it light but still flavorful, this is one to consider. My laugh tally was somewhere north of 63 million substantial.]]>
3.70 2015 Little Victories: Perfect Rules for Imperfect Living
author: Jason Gay
name: Steve
average rating: 3.70
book published: 2015
rating: 4
read at: 2017/05/01
date added: 2017/05/23
shelves:
review:
Little Victories could be called a self-help book in the same way Caddyshack could be called a golf instruction video. Jason Gay’s light-hearted little book is nominally meant to give advice and rules of thumb for navigating the modern world, but we all know it’s just a format for making jokes. It’s not entirely airy, though. He adds ballast with topics like his bout with testicular cancer and his father’s failing health. And every once in a while we’re led to think. But for the most part it’s all about the humor.

Gay’s current job is as a WSJ sports columnist. He’s also written for Rolling Stone, GQ, and Vogue. With everything of his I ever read, I end up cracking a smile. His humor is droll, observational, and self-effacing. He’s slightly edgier than Dave Barry, not as big into anecdotes as David Sedaris, and less of a suburban housewife than Erma Bombeck, but he correlates with them all. His likability index is high, too, which always helps.

I realized only after I was most of the way done that the best way to sell this book to friends would be with examples. Since I was too lazy to backtrack, I hoped that whatever I underlined from then on would be enough. Here are a few I came up with. You be the judge.

Asking a survey question to discern how smart phone-dependent you might be:
Are you reading this copy of Little Victories as “an actual hardcover book, with printed pages, by candlelight, in a hayloft, above sleeping livestock, as people used to do in the 1990s?�

Talking about how orderly an aunt’s place is where they regularly visit in the summer:
My house, by contrast, feels as if a tribe of orangutans has gotten loose and opened up a case of Heinekens.

Describing advice from an older sibling on parenthood:
My brother, whose daughter is on the verge of her teens, treats me like I'm still in the first season of Breaking Bad. Wait until Season 4, he says, when it takes your kid two hours to dress before school.

On curbing the time kids spend with digital devices:
[…] if you hand a child a phone in a public setting, people look at you like you’ve just given your kid a sack of enriched uranium. You are lazy, you are ceding parenthood to the machines, you are not actively building organic fun. The parenting magazines and blogs tell you to set limits, and this is useful advice, but I am not setting limits on, say, an airplane. If it means a peaceful cross-country flight without dirty stares from every other passenger, I will let a two-year-old watch Scarface.

The book contains wise words about the value of friends, the joys of a good marriage, the excesses of youth sports and the importance of little things that should be appreciated for how they cumulate, even if imperfectly, into a life. At his best, he mixes earnest good intent with some chuckles. The only thing that didn’t wear well was a tendency to exaggerate with numbers. For example, he said, “I am so afraid of poisoning you that I will leave that chicken on the grill until 2042.� Or, once in a job he made �21 billion cheese sandwiches.� There must have been more than 16 thousand such instances and they ultimately made me cringe.

If you’re looking for a little palate cleanser between courses, and you want it light but still flavorful, this is one to consider. My laugh tally was somewhere north of 63 million substantial.
]]>
Lincoln in the Bardo 29906980 Lincoln in the Bardo is a literary experience unlike any other—for no one but Saunders could conceive it.

February 1862. The Civil War is less than one year old. The fighting has begun in earnest, and the nation has begun to realize it is in for a long, bloody struggle. Meanwhile, President Lincoln's beloved eleven-year-old son, Willie, lies upstairs in the White House, gravely ill. In a matter of days, despite predictions of a recovery, Willie dies and is laid to rest in a Georgetown cemetery. "My poor boy, he was too good for this earth," the president says at the time. "God has called him home." Newspapers report that a grief-stricken Lincoln returned to the crypt several times alone to hold his boy's body.

From that seed of historical truth, George Saunders spins an unforgettable story of familial love and loss that breaks free of its realistic, historical framework into a thrilling, supernatural realm both hilarious and terrifying. Willie Lincoln finds himself in a strange purgatory, where ghosts mingle, gripe, commiserate, quarrel, and enact bizarre acts of penance. Within this transitional state—called, in the Tibetan tradition, the bardo—a monumental struggle erupts over young Willie's soul.

Lincoln in the Bardo is an astonishing feat of imagination and a bold step forward from one of the most important and influential writers of his generation. Formally daring, generous in spirit, deeply concerned with matters of the heart, it is a testament to fiction's ability to speak honestly and powerfully to the things that really matter to us. Saunders has invented a thrilling new form that deploys a kaleidoscopic, theatrical panorama of voices—living and dead, historical and invented—to ask a timeless, profound question: How do we live and love when we know that everything we love must end?]]>
368 George Saunders 0812995341 Steve 3 Silicon Valley - so, warily, I began preparing slides in my head that might interest them. As soon as the REM sleep kicked in, I guess I conflated my two goals. I came up with mathematical breakdowns of Lincoln in the Bardo instead. Of course, the first drops of water from the shower should have told me to abandon such thoughts, but I was hard up for an angle as it was, which is a long introduction for what you’re about to see. [Note to self: Don’t mention ŷ reviews in stats preso.]

I might as well start with the star rating. The input variables in this case, all ranging from 0 (lowest) to 1 (highest) were:
Quality of writing = 0.88
Creativity in structuring = 0.93
Depth of probes into character = 0.48
Exploration of themes = 0.85
Achievement versus expectations = 0.27

Applying equal additive weights to each variable we get:
Rating = 0.88 + 0.93 + 0.48 + 0.85 + 0.27 = 3.41

I’d read several rave reviews which enticed me. And the premise (Lincoln’s visits to the cemetery after his dear son Willie died at which time and place the transitioning souls there in the bardo encountered him) sounded interesting, too, even if a tad gimmicky. The multiplicity of stories and situations were a chance to place all of humankind on a platter for Lincoln (and us) to ingest. The bardo is a Buddhist concept pertaining to the state of being between death and rebirth � presumably a time of reflection and atonement. As Saunders envisioned it, the cross-section of inhabitants was a wide and noisy one. Still, a more enlightened understanding of one another’s ways was possible. Empathy and acceptance were the apparent goals. I give Saunders plenty of credit for highlighting these themes. (I give him even more credit for this commencement speech he gave a few years ago, making a related case for kindness.) My only disappointment was that the individual stories seemed too diffuse and too thin to really permeate.

The book touched briefly on what life must have been like for Lincoln at that point. For someone who was said to be unusually kindhearted and sympathetic to begin with, the grief of Willie’s death along with the weight of the war were almost more than he could bear. Even so, as his country’s leader he knew he couldn’t wallow. Instead, he had to remind himself of the moral math (though he might not have thought of it in quite those terms) of suffering. His time in the cemetery reminded him that everyone has hardships of some kind at some time, some far worse than others. His job was to make decisions to minimize the cumulative sum of it. So, which is the smaller amount?
Cumulative suffering given war = Σ Misery[i, t | war] (summed across all individuals i, and future episodes t)

or
Cumulative suffering given no war = Σ Misery[i, t | no war] (summed across all individuals i, and future episodes t)

The misery of slavery was given a suitably high weight, of course. In fact, Lincoln’s empathy for all was given a representational boost when certain of the souls discovered they could inhabit him and cross-absorb experiences � literally (for purposes of the story) walking a mile in his shoes. A former slave was notably included.

Ancillary mathematical discussion: Certain traits seem to combine additively to produce a given effect. Others are multiplicative. In the example that comes to mind regarding Lincoln (hagiography alert), I’m positing an exponential relationship.
Power ^ Empathy = Greatness

One of the thornier issues we face as we endeavor to empathize is the amount of dispensation to assign. It’s easy to say that some higher moral authority has that job, but I still think the old “free will vs. determinism� debate is a good one. Several in the bardo argued that they may have done bad things, but were compelled by their natures and circumstances to do so. Expressing it in an equation, we might get something like this:
Actions and Attitudes = function(Genetics, Brain chemistry, Upbringing, Outside influences like friends or books, Physical needs) + Residual

The residual in this model is the part of our actions and attitudes that cannot be explained by the drivers. It’s what I’m imagining free will to be. So the question is, what portion, if any, is to be labeled a choice, superseding what the assigned factors would otherwise dictate? Is that what we’re to be judged by?

I was coached once, when putting together a presentation, to go easy on the equations. Eyes for another half your audience will glaze over for each additional one you include. I guess he was saying:
Remaining interest = Original interest * (0.5 ^ # of equations)

How many of you does that leave? I’m not even sure I can include myself, having mentally checked out while summing the miseries of those potentially reading this review of a sort.]]>
3.75 2017 Lincoln in the Bardo
author: George Saunders
name: Steve
average rating: 3.75
book published: 2017
rating: 3
read at: 2017/04/01
date added: 2017/04/24
shelves:
review:
You know those half-awake, half-asleep dreams where you’re working through your problems of the day? The first wakeful moments in the shower usually let you know that any solutions you thought might apply were pure nonsense. Even more often you realize the things you were thinking about weren’t really problems anyway � it was all just anxiety for the hell of it. Anyway, last night I went to bed thinking about what I might say about this celebrated new Saunders book I just read. Even as I was falling asleep, I knew in the light of day this would end up being one of those non-problems. But then I started thinking about a request I got at work to give a presentation about statistical modeling to the 50 or so technologists in our firm. These are clever people � the types who could write episodes of Silicon Valley - so, warily, I began preparing slides in my head that might interest them. As soon as the REM sleep kicked in, I guess I conflated my two goals. I came up with mathematical breakdowns of Lincoln in the Bardo instead. Of course, the first drops of water from the shower should have told me to abandon such thoughts, but I was hard up for an angle as it was, which is a long introduction for what you’re about to see. [Note to self: Don’t mention ŷ reviews in stats preso.]

I might as well start with the star rating. The input variables in this case, all ranging from 0 (lowest) to 1 (highest) were:
Quality of writing = 0.88
Creativity in structuring = 0.93
Depth of probes into character = 0.48
Exploration of themes = 0.85
Achievement versus expectations = 0.27

Applying equal additive weights to each variable we get:
Rating = 0.88 + 0.93 + 0.48 + 0.85 + 0.27 = 3.41

I’d read several rave reviews which enticed me. And the premise (Lincoln’s visits to the cemetery after his dear son Willie died at which time and place the transitioning souls there in the bardo encountered him) sounded interesting, too, even if a tad gimmicky. The multiplicity of stories and situations were a chance to place all of humankind on a platter for Lincoln (and us) to ingest. The bardo is a Buddhist concept pertaining to the state of being between death and rebirth � presumably a time of reflection and atonement. As Saunders envisioned it, the cross-section of inhabitants was a wide and noisy one. Still, a more enlightened understanding of one another’s ways was possible. Empathy and acceptance were the apparent goals. I give Saunders plenty of credit for highlighting these themes. (I give him even more credit for this commencement speech he gave a few years ago, making a related case for kindness.) My only disappointment was that the individual stories seemed too diffuse and too thin to really permeate.

The book touched briefly on what life must have been like for Lincoln at that point. For someone who was said to be unusually kindhearted and sympathetic to begin with, the grief of Willie’s death along with the weight of the war were almost more than he could bear. Even so, as his country’s leader he knew he couldn’t wallow. Instead, he had to remind himself of the moral math (though he might not have thought of it in quite those terms) of suffering. His time in the cemetery reminded him that everyone has hardships of some kind at some time, some far worse than others. His job was to make decisions to minimize the cumulative sum of it. So, which is the smaller amount?
Cumulative suffering given war = Σ Misery[i, t | war] (summed across all individuals i, and future episodes t)

or
Cumulative suffering given no war = Σ Misery[i, t | no war] (summed across all individuals i, and future episodes t)

The misery of slavery was given a suitably high weight, of course. In fact, Lincoln’s empathy for all was given a representational boost when certain of the souls discovered they could inhabit him and cross-absorb experiences � literally (for purposes of the story) walking a mile in his shoes. A former slave was notably included.

Ancillary mathematical discussion: Certain traits seem to combine additively to produce a given effect. Others are multiplicative. In the example that comes to mind regarding Lincoln (hagiography alert), I’m positing an exponential relationship.
Power ^ Empathy = Greatness

One of the thornier issues we face as we endeavor to empathize is the amount of dispensation to assign. It’s easy to say that some higher moral authority has that job, but I still think the old “free will vs. determinism� debate is a good one. Several in the bardo argued that they may have done bad things, but were compelled by their natures and circumstances to do so. Expressing it in an equation, we might get something like this:
Actions and Attitudes = function(Genetics, Brain chemistry, Upbringing, Outside influences like friends or books, Physical needs) + Residual

The residual in this model is the part of our actions and attitudes that cannot be explained by the drivers. It’s what I’m imagining free will to be. So the question is, what portion, if any, is to be labeled a choice, superseding what the assigned factors would otherwise dictate? Is that what we’re to be judged by?

I was coached once, when putting together a presentation, to go easy on the equations. Eyes for another half your audience will glaze over for each additional one you include. I guess he was saying:
Remaining interest = Original interest * (0.5 ^ # of equations)

How many of you does that leave? I’m not even sure I can include myself, having mentally checked out while summing the miseries of those potentially reading this review of a sort.
]]>
Homegoing 27071490 An alternate cover edition can be found here.

A novel of breathtaking sweep and emotional power that traces three hundred years in Ghana and along the way also becomes a truly great American novel. Extraordinary for its exquisite language, its implacable sorrow, its soaring beauty, and for its monumental portrait of the forces that shape families and nations, Homegoing heralds the arrival of a major new voice in contemporary fiction.

Two half-sisters, Effia and Esi, are born into different villages in eighteenth-century Ghana. Effia is married off to an Englishman and lives in comfort in the palatial rooms of Cape Coast Castle. Unbeknownst to Effia, her sister, Esi, is imprisoned beneath her in the castle's dungeons, sold with thousands of others into the Gold Coast's booming slave trade, and shipped off to America, where her children and grandchildren will be raised in slavery. One thread of Homegoing follows Effia's descendants through centuries of warfare in Ghana, as the Fante and Asante nations wrestle with the slave trade and British colonization. The other thread follows Esi and her children into America. From the plantations of the South to the Civil War and the Great Migration, from the coal mines of Pratt City, Alabama, to the jazz clubs and dope houses of twentieth-century Harlem, right up through the present day, Homegoing makes history visceral, and captures, with singular and stunning immediacy, how the memory of captivity came to be inscribed in the soul of a nation.

Generation after generation, Yaa Gyasi's magisterial first novel sets the fate of the individual against the obliterating movements of time, delivering unforgettable characters whose lives were shaped by historical forces beyond their control. Homegoing is a tremendous reading experience, not to be missed, by an astonishingly gifted young writer.]]>
305 Yaa Gyasi Steve 4
» Young, debut author born in Ghana, brought up in Alabama writes a brilliant novel spanning multiple generations, putting faces on the African and African-American experience.

» The story begins with Effia (the beauty) who seemed destined to become a tribal big man’s wife who instead is married off profitably to a British officer there for the slave trade. Esi, a half-sister Effia knew nothing about, is captured in a neighboring village, brought to the horrific dungeon (with worse conditions than a caged chicken’s) at the Cape Coast Castle where Effia lived, and is ultimately shipped off to America.

» The book proceeds to tell the stories of characters in each subsequent generation, alternating between Effia’s line in Africa and Esi’s in the states.

» Projecting into slavery and racism in the abstract is bad enough, but when it’s personalized through characters we come to know and admire, it sucks even worse.

» Life in Africa wasn’t always great either with raids on villages, battles against the Brits, my-way-or-the-highway missionaries, and complicity among the Asante in the slave trade.

» Character profiles allowed Gyasi to hit on many endemic hardships. Among the most affecting were: difficulties in being mixed race, severe pain and scarring from the lash, trumped up charges forcing labor in the coal mines, the lure of an artificial escape (narcotics), and racism that may attenuate over time, yet still persists.

» The only real criticism I’ve heard is that the characters can seem underdeveloped. With only twenty or so pages for each one, we don’t get to know them all that well. Reviewers who dock a star invariably cite this as the reason.

» Nobody I’ve seen docks more than one star � for any reason.

Hmm� did I really commit to saying something new? Let’s see [scratching head, looking simultaneously sheepish and stupid]� Uh, well, there’s this:

» Skin tones of different characters were often mentioned, almost always as some combination of a caffeinated beverage and dairy, with proportions varying.

» At times, other properties of flesh (e.g., fullness, jiggliness) were detailed as well. Looks were emphasized quite a lot.

» This isn’t so much a new thought as it is an amplification on a previous one. With the brief time spent with each character, Gyasi does an impressive job of highlighting personal experiences that may well have applied to many at the time. Each had idiosyncrasies, too. But if I’m honest, generations are already fading from my memory, and I’m only a week removed from them. Too many faces come in too short a time to keep track.

» Related to the previous point, the character vignettes often ended abruptly. After seeing this pattern repeated, it felt like a device. And it kind of broke the spell.

» Again commenting on the brief stints with each character, individual dramas had little time to build. I appreciate that Gyasi could bring forth an epic feel in 300 pages, but certain characters deserved more, I felt, to really permeate.

Like I said, it’s hard to find anything new to say since ŷ reviewers have already covered the relevant ground so well. As further evidence, I’m not the first to highlight the quote below. But it came from one of my favorite characters, a teacher in Ghana disfigured by fire, so I have to include it.
[…]when you study history, you must always ask yourself, whose story am I missing? Whose voice was suppressed so that this voice [from the one in power] could come forth? Once you have figured that out, you must find that story too. From there, you begin to get a clearer, yet still imperfect, picture.

Nice take-away point, wouldn’t you say? Gyasi epitomized this view of history with her rousing historical fiction.]]>
4.48 2016 Homegoing
author: Yaa Gyasi
name: Steve
average rating: 4.48
book published: 2016
rating: 4
read at: 2017/04/01
date added: 2017/04/17
shelves:
review:
When a book is as popular and praiseworthy as this one, it’s easy to join the chorus justifying why. It’s much harder to come up with anything new to say. I’ll attempt the latter in a minute, but first here’s a recap of what others have already said:

» Young, debut author born in Ghana, brought up in Alabama writes a brilliant novel spanning multiple generations, putting faces on the African and African-American experience.

» The story begins with Effia (the beauty) who seemed destined to become a tribal big man’s wife who instead is married off profitably to a British officer there for the slave trade. Esi, a half-sister Effia knew nothing about, is captured in a neighboring village, brought to the horrific dungeon (with worse conditions than a caged chicken’s) at the Cape Coast Castle where Effia lived, and is ultimately shipped off to America.

» The book proceeds to tell the stories of characters in each subsequent generation, alternating between Effia’s line in Africa and Esi’s in the states.

» Projecting into slavery and racism in the abstract is bad enough, but when it’s personalized through characters we come to know and admire, it sucks even worse.

» Life in Africa wasn’t always great either with raids on villages, battles against the Brits, my-way-or-the-highway missionaries, and complicity among the Asante in the slave trade.

» Character profiles allowed Gyasi to hit on many endemic hardships. Among the most affecting were: difficulties in being mixed race, severe pain and scarring from the lash, trumped up charges forcing labor in the coal mines, the lure of an artificial escape (narcotics), and racism that may attenuate over time, yet still persists.

» The only real criticism I’ve heard is that the characters can seem underdeveloped. With only twenty or so pages for each one, we don’t get to know them all that well. Reviewers who dock a star invariably cite this as the reason.

» Nobody I’ve seen docks more than one star � for any reason.

Hmm� did I really commit to saying something new? Let’s see [scratching head, looking simultaneously sheepish and stupid]� Uh, well, there’s this:

» Skin tones of different characters were often mentioned, almost always as some combination of a caffeinated beverage and dairy, with proportions varying.

» At times, other properties of flesh (e.g., fullness, jiggliness) were detailed as well. Looks were emphasized quite a lot.

» This isn’t so much a new thought as it is an amplification on a previous one. With the brief time spent with each character, Gyasi does an impressive job of highlighting personal experiences that may well have applied to many at the time. Each had idiosyncrasies, too. But if I’m honest, generations are already fading from my memory, and I’m only a week removed from them. Too many faces come in too short a time to keep track.

» Related to the previous point, the character vignettes often ended abruptly. After seeing this pattern repeated, it felt like a device. And it kind of broke the spell.

» Again commenting on the brief stints with each character, individual dramas had little time to build. I appreciate that Gyasi could bring forth an epic feel in 300 pages, but certain characters deserved more, I felt, to really permeate.

Like I said, it’s hard to find anything new to say since ŷ reviewers have already covered the relevant ground so well. As further evidence, I’m not the first to highlight the quote below. But it came from one of my favorite characters, a teacher in Ghana disfigured by fire, so I have to include it.
[…]when you study history, you must always ask yourself, whose story am I missing? Whose voice was suppressed so that this voice [from the one in power] could come forth? Once you have figured that out, you must find that story too. From there, you begin to get a clearer, yet still imperfect, picture.

Nice take-away point, wouldn’t you say? Gyasi epitomized this view of history with her rousing historical fiction.
]]>
<![CDATA[The Housekeeper and the Professor]]> 3181564
She is an astute young Housekeeper, with a ten-year-old son, who is hired to care for him.

And every morning, as the Professor and the Housekeeper are introduced to each other anew, a strange and beautiful relationship blossoms between them. Though he cannot hold memories for long (his brain is like a tape that begins to erase itself every eighty minutes), the Professor’s mind is still alive with elegant equations from the past. And the numbers, in all of their articulate order, reveal a sheltering and poetic world to both the Housekeeper and her young son. The Professor is capable of discovering connections between the simplest of quantities--like the Housekeeper’s shoe size--and the universe at large, drawing their lives ever closer and more profoundly together, even as his memory slips away.

The Housekeeper and the Professor is an enchanting story about what it means to live in the present, and about the curious equations that can create a family.]]>
180 Yōko Ogawa 0312427808 Steve 0 to-read 4.04 2003 The Housekeeper and the Professor
author: Yōko Ogawa
name: Steve
average rating: 4.04
book published: 2003
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2017/04/12
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
Harpooning Donald Trump 34519499 124 Tom LeClair 0967313481 Steve 0 to-read For POTUS (Sonnet 45)

[with apologies to Elizabeth Barrett Browning, who might not have minded given the cause]

How do I loathe thee? Let me count the ways.
I loathe thy bravado and facts that aren’t real
Like how you would make us a much better deal
Walling the border, where Mexico pays.

So, Signore Duce, some questions for you,
Attempting to suss your unique point of view.
Are women who thwart you all liars and fat?
Is doubting earth’s warming like saying it’s flat?
Could props be bestowed on a non-plutocrat?
Has fate ever dealt you a Breitbart brickbat?

We know a lot more of what Mrs. Trump waxes
Than write-offs and dealings that went on your taxes.
And why don’t we sit for a few frank discussions
‘Bout Putin and hackers and who talked to Russians.
Your loose-cannon tweeting prompts many to say,
“We’ll fly Maple Leaf flags and start saying ‘eh’�.



Note: My politically astute friend Ian put me up to this. By his fine example, the more caustic the quill the better.

The call to arms (or, rather, pens) from Ian's post: /review/show...]]>
4.00 2017 Harpooning Donald Trump
author: Tom LeClair
name: Steve
average rating: 4.00
book published: 2017
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2017/04/07
shelves: to-read
review:
For POTUS (Sonnet 45)

[with apologies to Elizabeth Barrett Browning, who might not have minded given the cause]

How do I loathe thee? Let me count the ways.
I loathe thy bravado and facts that aren’t real
Like how you would make us a much better deal
Walling the border, where Mexico pays.

So, Signore Duce, some questions for you,
Attempting to suss your unique point of view.
Are women who thwart you all liars and fat?
Is doubting earth’s warming like saying it’s flat?
Could props be bestowed on a non-plutocrat?
Has fate ever dealt you a Breitbart brickbat?

We know a lot more of what Mrs. Trump waxes
Than write-offs and dealings that went on your taxes.
And why don’t we sit for a few frank discussions
‘Bout Putin and hackers and who talked to Russians.
Your loose-cannon tweeting prompts many to say,
“We’ll fly Maple Leaf flags and start saying ‘eh’�.



Note: My politically astute friend Ian put me up to this. By his fine example, the more caustic the quill the better.

The call to arms (or, rather, pens) from Ian's post: /review/show...
]]>
<![CDATA[My Name Is Lucy Barton (Amgash, #1)]]> 25893709 193 Elizabeth Strout 1400067693 Steve 4 do get from the tiles, followed by what we might ponder from the spaces.

Tile Topic: Remember, this is a picture. It’s not an animation. Very little qualifies as a plot beyond the fact that Lucy has mysterious complications from an appendectomy and ends up in a hospital bed for nine weeks. She’s a young mother at the time. Lucy’s own mother flies out from rural Illinois to visit Lucy in New York after years of not seeing her. The five-day visit is mostly filled with gossip about people from town.

Space Speculation: This is a “show, don’t tell� kind of book. Come to think of it, a corollary we might call “allude, don’t conclude� also applies. We sense that Lucy has something to forgive, but we’re not exactly sure what it may be. She’s careful to avoid making her mom feel bad, though, and in return, Lucy does seem comforted by the visit. Her mom does not express love in conventional ways, but might there be proxies (flawed though they may be) that Lucy seeks?

TT: The book proceeds with vignettes years before and years after her illness. The most affecting ones showed very clearly that poverty sucks. Growing up, Lucy and her family lived in the garage of her uncle’s house. They wore ratty clothes, ate bread with molasses for most meals, had no indoor plumbing beyond a sink with tepid water, and spent too much time feeling cold.

SS: Does that sense of being looked down upon ever dissipate? When, as a child, you see the looks on the faces of classmates on the bus hoping you’ll find a seat elsewhere ever fade away? Do the few acts of kindness you enjoy (e.g., a free Thanksgiving dinner offered with a smile, a teacher chastising certain fellow students� superior attitudes) tell readers how impactful even small gestures can be to those in need?

TT: Among family members, Lucy was the lucky one. She spent hours in the library (partly just to stay warm) where she discovered books as a way to fight loneliness. As a side benefit, she got top marks in school and escaped with a college scholarship. Her brother and sister did not fare as well. He was too repressed to ever be whole and she was too resentful. Lucy’s dad had a temper, a bad war experience, and jobs that would never last. Her mom had issues of her own and at times would lash out indiscriminately.

SS: Left unsaid was anything about a big event that capitalized the D in their family’s dysfunction. The shadow of a “thing� seemed to lurk, but what beyond general hardship might have cast it? Another dynamic we can only guess at is why Lucy and her siblings apparently preferred feeling ostracized in isolation rather than together as a team.

TT: Lucy ultimately became a writer. Her motivation was a noble one: to help readers like herself feel less alone. A story that rings true emotionally creates an empathetic reader/writer bond. Truth can sound like "a child crying with the deepest of desperation," (though I doubt Lucy would allow it to appear overwrought). A fellow writer who served a short while as a mentor told Lucy we all have one story to tell. Lucy was told by another friend that she needed to write ruthlessly.

SS: One question that occurred to me was whether “truth� is possible when there are lies of omission? It seems a relevant thing to ask in light of Lucy’s vague imputations. But then we may decide that reactions can feel real even when the causes are unknown. We may also wonder whether the “one story to tell� line suggests something the mentor may have had in common with Lucy � some sort of life-shaping trauma or sorrow. (One small tile showed how both Lucy and her instructor jumped out of their seats when a cat suddenly entered the room.) A clear-sighted vision of whatever this thing may be could inform an entire world view as well as the story one tells to represent it. And when that truth is an ugly one, a writer has to be ruthless to be honest. Coupled with that honesty, though � and this might just be the crux of it all for our protagonist, Lucy � is acceptance.

TT: Thinking of this review as a kind of mosaic itself, it seems I’m working with even fewer tiles than Strout was. 1) I look at her themes and profiles and applaud the pixelation. 2) I like the greater truths that spring from fiction even when their roots are unknown. And 3), I argue that her book inspires in subtle, less clamorous ways.

SS: OK, so maybe meta-mosaics don’t really work. Plus, I’ll admit that flogging a metaphor is one thing; but it’s quite another to maim it.]]>
3.56 2016 My Name Is Lucy Barton (Amgash, #1)
author: Elizabeth Strout
name: Steve
average rating: 3.56
book published: 2016
rating: 4
read at: 2017/03/01
date added: 2017/04/05
shelves:
review:
A book like this that’s short on words, but rich in meaning begs for a metaphor to describe it. As one I know I can flog, think of Strout’s profile here as an artful little mosaic. She doesn’t use many tiles, but the ones she does display are carefully colored and placed. With enough distance, a picture does emerge. While it may be true that not every reader likes having the space between tiles, for me, squinting and mulling were part of the pleasure. Had the book fully revealed the miseries of Lucy’s early life and her complicated relationships as an adult, I might have found it too familiar or, heaven forfend, sentimental. What follows is a sample of what we do get from the tiles, followed by what we might ponder from the spaces.

Tile Topic: Remember, this is a picture. It’s not an animation. Very little qualifies as a plot beyond the fact that Lucy has mysterious complications from an appendectomy and ends up in a hospital bed for nine weeks. She’s a young mother at the time. Lucy’s own mother flies out from rural Illinois to visit Lucy in New York after years of not seeing her. The five-day visit is mostly filled with gossip about people from town.

Space Speculation: This is a “show, don’t tell� kind of book. Come to think of it, a corollary we might call “allude, don’t conclude� also applies. We sense that Lucy has something to forgive, but we’re not exactly sure what it may be. She’s careful to avoid making her mom feel bad, though, and in return, Lucy does seem comforted by the visit. Her mom does not express love in conventional ways, but might there be proxies (flawed though they may be) that Lucy seeks?

TT: The book proceeds with vignettes years before and years after her illness. The most affecting ones showed very clearly that poverty sucks. Growing up, Lucy and her family lived in the garage of her uncle’s house. They wore ratty clothes, ate bread with molasses for most meals, had no indoor plumbing beyond a sink with tepid water, and spent too much time feeling cold.

SS: Does that sense of being looked down upon ever dissipate? When, as a child, you see the looks on the faces of classmates on the bus hoping you’ll find a seat elsewhere ever fade away? Do the few acts of kindness you enjoy (e.g., a free Thanksgiving dinner offered with a smile, a teacher chastising certain fellow students� superior attitudes) tell readers how impactful even small gestures can be to those in need?

TT: Among family members, Lucy was the lucky one. She spent hours in the library (partly just to stay warm) where she discovered books as a way to fight loneliness. As a side benefit, she got top marks in school and escaped with a college scholarship. Her brother and sister did not fare as well. He was too repressed to ever be whole and she was too resentful. Lucy’s dad had a temper, a bad war experience, and jobs that would never last. Her mom had issues of her own and at times would lash out indiscriminately.

SS: Left unsaid was anything about a big event that capitalized the D in their family’s dysfunction. The shadow of a “thing� seemed to lurk, but what beyond general hardship might have cast it? Another dynamic we can only guess at is why Lucy and her siblings apparently preferred feeling ostracized in isolation rather than together as a team.

TT: Lucy ultimately became a writer. Her motivation was a noble one: to help readers like herself feel less alone. A story that rings true emotionally creates an empathetic reader/writer bond. Truth can sound like "a child crying with the deepest of desperation," (though I doubt Lucy would allow it to appear overwrought). A fellow writer who served a short while as a mentor told Lucy we all have one story to tell. Lucy was told by another friend that she needed to write ruthlessly.

SS: One question that occurred to me was whether “truth� is possible when there are lies of omission? It seems a relevant thing to ask in light of Lucy’s vague imputations. But then we may decide that reactions can feel real even when the causes are unknown. We may also wonder whether the “one story to tell� line suggests something the mentor may have had in common with Lucy � some sort of life-shaping trauma or sorrow. (One small tile showed how both Lucy and her instructor jumped out of their seats when a cat suddenly entered the room.) A clear-sighted vision of whatever this thing may be could inform an entire world view as well as the story one tells to represent it. And when that truth is an ugly one, a writer has to be ruthless to be honest. Coupled with that honesty, though � and this might just be the crux of it all for our protagonist, Lucy � is acceptance.

TT: Thinking of this review as a kind of mosaic itself, it seems I’m working with even fewer tiles than Strout was. 1) I look at her themes and profiles and applaud the pixelation. 2) I like the greater truths that spring from fiction even when their roots are unknown. And 3), I argue that her book inspires in subtle, less clamorous ways.

SS: OK, so maybe meta-mosaics don’t really work. Plus, I’ll admit that flogging a metaphor is one thing; but it’s quite another to maim it.
]]>
The Nix 28251002
To save her, Samuel will have to embark on his own journey, uncovering long-buried secrets about the woman he thought he knew, secrets that stretch across generations and have their origin all the way back in Norway, home of the mysterious Nix. As he does so, Samuel will confront not only Faye’s losses but also his own lost love, and will relearn everything he thought he knew about his mother, and himself.]]>
625 Nathan Hill 110194661X Steve 4
The plot is hard to summarize so I’ll just touch on the highlights. Samuel Andresen-Anderson is a failed writer in his 30s teaching English at a liberal arts school near Chicago. He’s getting more disenchanted by the year. His solace is an online role-playing game called World of Elfscape, though as solaces go, it’s a hollow one. Much of his angst stemmed from childhood when his mother abandoned him. A more immediate problem is a student he caught plagiarizing � one talented at working the system, meaning more trouble for him than for her. (My wife who used to be in academics got a jolt of déjà vu from this section.) Then there’s news of his mom. National news. She had been arrested for throwing gravel (or rocks, depending on who’s reporting it), at some reactionary, nut-job politician. Faye (his mom) was suddenly back in his life. The news teams were quick to find photos of Faye among the protesters in Chicago in �68, all unbeknownst to Samuel. He had thought she’d lived a quiet life in Iowa, marrying her high school sweetheart soon after graduating. Now she needs help that he’s wary of giving.

That’s the launching pad. The plot shoots off in multiple directions from there, much of it backwards in time. Among other things, you get a boyhood friend into war games, the friends� twin sister (a violin virtuoso and object of Samuel’s devotion), Faye’s undeserved miseries growing up, her father’s story dating back to his youth in Norway, Samuel’s gaming friend with an online addiction that’s plausible and scary, and Samuel’s literary agent who has his finger on the pulse of a nation replete with schlock, cynicism, and sanctimony. Oh, and I almost forgot. You get the Nix. This is a kind of house spirit that means different things to different people. I thought of it as combination of folklore and conscience, prejudicially deciding whether you deserved a pat on the back or a boot in the pants. Young Faye’s was quick to accuse and slow to let go.

It’s a big, multi-themed book that some have labelled a mess. But in my mind the ambition paid off. For a while, I’ll admit, I felt like certain sentences could have been honed. For instance, when you read that “she was accommodating, docile, self-effacing, compliant, easy to get along with,� does it feel like the thesaurus was overworked, drained, exhausted, worn out? That feeling of excess soon went away, though. I’d lost myself in the story and thought not a whit about style.

I’m sure I’m not the first person to notice a recent reviewing phenomenon where any societal ill that a book tackles is interpreted with orange-colored glasses. That Trumpian tincture now shades everything, it seems. We may well expect to hear how frightening and dire the darkness to come will be in Goodnight Moon given the looming shadows of the current administration. Even so, I feel like the applicability in this case is worth mentioning. Hill finished writing The Nix in 2014, a time when real estate and reality TV were enough to sustain Trump’s ego. While it may not seem as remarkable as Sinclair Lewis’s It Can’t Happen Here, Hill’s preconceptions do seem uncanny. His Republican presidential hopeful was an anti-elitist, anti-immigration demagogue, not above "callously milking this minor distraction (Faye’s gravel) for all it's worth." (Or was he "bravely continuing his campaign despite tremendous personal risk?" It depended on the cable news personality doing the reporting.) And how about this quote by Samuel’s agent for describing a balky electorate? "...it's way easier to ignore all data that doesn't fit your preconceptions and believe all data that does. I believe what I believe, and you believe what you believe, and we'll agree to disagree. It's liberal tolerance meets dark ages denialism. It's very hip right now."

As for the assortment of other themes, Hill had plenty of thoughts covering those, too. Samuel’s aforementioned agent was entertaining as he attempted to justify commercialism in the arts. Selling out is honest when your stated goal is financial success (or something to that effect). Then there was a mini-motif on the vacuity of social media. The plagiarizing student had an app that allowed her to state which among a predefined set of emotions she was feeling. Friends could then respond accordingly with a feeling of their own, presumably something like “glad you’re happy� or “sorry you’re sad.� For convenience, there was an auto-response mode where the app would choose reactions for you. I’m sure I’m not the only one who would want an option for feeling cynical. Samuel’s gaming buddy, Pwnage, gave Hill a chance to expand on yet another theme: the perils of online addiction. (Hill said he had once been a World of Warcraft junkie, enough so to know the type.) The alternate realities can impinge on the primary ones pretty easily when you like your avatar better than yourself.

Pwnage did offer Samuel some useful advice from his gaming experience. He would approach each problem as either a trap, an obstacle, or a puzzle. Applying this to people, Samuel figured “if you see people as enemies or obstacles or traps, you will be at constant war with them and with yourself. Whereas if you choose to see people as puzzles, and if you see yourself as a puzzle, then you will be constantly delighted, because eventually, if you dig deep enough into anybody, if you really look under the hood of someone's life, you will find something familiar.� This homage to empathy reverberated. In fact, had this willingness to dig into each character been Hill’s only accomplishment, it still would have been quite a book. On top of that, though, we get top-notch storytelling, some strong commentary, a bit of fun and entertainment, and maybe enough hope for the future that even those wearing orange-colored glasses may feel encouraged.

I’m giving this a very solid 4.5 stars. Evidently J.J. Abrams really liked it, too, since he now has the TV rights to produce it. What’s more, Meryl Streep has signed on to play Faye. But hey, Goodreading friends, do read the book first.]]>
4.08 2016 The Nix
author: Nathan Hill
name: Steve
average rating: 4.08
book published: 2016
rating: 4
read at: 2017/03/17
date added: 2017/04/04
shelves:
review:
First off, a confession. I took a quick look at Nathan Hill’s photo and immediately thought: young guy, kind of a bro, probably pretty full of himself. And when I learned this was his first novel � a long one at that � I figured on narrative sprawl and other excesses. Would he be judicious enough to drop weaker scenes? Could he bear eliminating superfluous modifiers? Would every perceived insight seem indispensable? But the book was producing a buzz, one Santa figured would suit me. I’m glad. It was clear early on that Hill would breathe real life into his characters. He’d be thorough, but not boring. He’d span quite a few years, mostly 1968, 1988, and 2011, doing enough homework to get the details of each setting right. I was especially impressed by his account of Daley cops thumping heads in �68. And those insights I was afraid he might overvalue? They turned out to be genuine, even vital.

The plot is hard to summarize so I’ll just touch on the highlights. Samuel Andresen-Anderson is a failed writer in his 30s teaching English at a liberal arts school near Chicago. He’s getting more disenchanted by the year. His solace is an online role-playing game called World of Elfscape, though as solaces go, it’s a hollow one. Much of his angst stemmed from childhood when his mother abandoned him. A more immediate problem is a student he caught plagiarizing � one talented at working the system, meaning more trouble for him than for her. (My wife who used to be in academics got a jolt of déjà vu from this section.) Then there’s news of his mom. National news. She had been arrested for throwing gravel (or rocks, depending on who’s reporting it), at some reactionary, nut-job politician. Faye (his mom) was suddenly back in his life. The news teams were quick to find photos of Faye among the protesters in Chicago in �68, all unbeknownst to Samuel. He had thought she’d lived a quiet life in Iowa, marrying her high school sweetheart soon after graduating. Now she needs help that he’s wary of giving.

That’s the launching pad. The plot shoots off in multiple directions from there, much of it backwards in time. Among other things, you get a boyhood friend into war games, the friends� twin sister (a violin virtuoso and object of Samuel’s devotion), Faye’s undeserved miseries growing up, her father’s story dating back to his youth in Norway, Samuel’s gaming friend with an online addiction that’s plausible and scary, and Samuel’s literary agent who has his finger on the pulse of a nation replete with schlock, cynicism, and sanctimony. Oh, and I almost forgot. You get the Nix. This is a kind of house spirit that means different things to different people. I thought of it as combination of folklore and conscience, prejudicially deciding whether you deserved a pat on the back or a boot in the pants. Young Faye’s was quick to accuse and slow to let go.

It’s a big, multi-themed book that some have labelled a mess. But in my mind the ambition paid off. For a while, I’ll admit, I felt like certain sentences could have been honed. For instance, when you read that “she was accommodating, docile, self-effacing, compliant, easy to get along with,� does it feel like the thesaurus was overworked, drained, exhausted, worn out? That feeling of excess soon went away, though. I’d lost myself in the story and thought not a whit about style.

I’m sure I’m not the first person to notice a recent reviewing phenomenon where any societal ill that a book tackles is interpreted with orange-colored glasses. That Trumpian tincture now shades everything, it seems. We may well expect to hear how frightening and dire the darkness to come will be in Goodnight Moon given the looming shadows of the current administration. Even so, I feel like the applicability in this case is worth mentioning. Hill finished writing The Nix in 2014, a time when real estate and reality TV were enough to sustain Trump’s ego. While it may not seem as remarkable as Sinclair Lewis’s It Can’t Happen Here, Hill’s preconceptions do seem uncanny. His Republican presidential hopeful was an anti-elitist, anti-immigration demagogue, not above "callously milking this minor distraction (Faye’s gravel) for all it's worth." (Or was he "bravely continuing his campaign despite tremendous personal risk?" It depended on the cable news personality doing the reporting.) And how about this quote by Samuel’s agent for describing a balky electorate? "...it's way easier to ignore all data that doesn't fit your preconceptions and believe all data that does. I believe what I believe, and you believe what you believe, and we'll agree to disagree. It's liberal tolerance meets dark ages denialism. It's very hip right now."

As for the assortment of other themes, Hill had plenty of thoughts covering those, too. Samuel’s aforementioned agent was entertaining as he attempted to justify commercialism in the arts. Selling out is honest when your stated goal is financial success (or something to that effect). Then there was a mini-motif on the vacuity of social media. The plagiarizing student had an app that allowed her to state which among a predefined set of emotions she was feeling. Friends could then respond accordingly with a feeling of their own, presumably something like “glad you’re happy� or “sorry you’re sad.� For convenience, there was an auto-response mode where the app would choose reactions for you. I’m sure I’m not the only one who would want an option for feeling cynical. Samuel’s gaming buddy, Pwnage, gave Hill a chance to expand on yet another theme: the perils of online addiction. (Hill said he had once been a World of Warcraft junkie, enough so to know the type.) The alternate realities can impinge on the primary ones pretty easily when you like your avatar better than yourself.

Pwnage did offer Samuel some useful advice from his gaming experience. He would approach each problem as either a trap, an obstacle, or a puzzle. Applying this to people, Samuel figured “if you see people as enemies or obstacles or traps, you will be at constant war with them and with yourself. Whereas if you choose to see people as puzzles, and if you see yourself as a puzzle, then you will be constantly delighted, because eventually, if you dig deep enough into anybody, if you really look under the hood of someone's life, you will find something familiar.� This homage to empathy reverberated. In fact, had this willingness to dig into each character been Hill’s only accomplishment, it still would have been quite a book. On top of that, though, we get top-notch storytelling, some strong commentary, a bit of fun and entertainment, and maybe enough hope for the future that even those wearing orange-colored glasses may feel encouraged.

I’m giving this a very solid 4.5 stars. Evidently J.J. Abrams really liked it, too, since he now has the TV rights to produce it. What’s more, Meryl Streep has signed on to play Faye. But hey, Goodreading friends, do read the book first.
]]>
Alice in Wonderland 13023 This is an adaptation. For the editions of the original book, see here .

Alice's Adventures in Wonderland (commonly shortened to Alice in Wonderland) is an 1865 novel written by English mathematician Charles Lutwidge Dodgson under the pseudonym Lewis Carroll. It tells of a girl named Alice falling through a rabbit hole into a fantasy world populated by peculiar, anthropomorphic creatures. The tale plays with logic, giving the story lasting popularity with adults as well as with children. It is considered to be one of the best examples of the literary nonsense genre. Its narrative course and structure, characters and imagery have been enormously influential in both popular culture and literature, especially in the fantasy genre.]]>
96 Jane Carruth 0517223627 Steve 5
 photo 14716441_816384468504456_2699647104590020608_n.jpg

I don't know how common this is, but am pretty sure I'm not the only one who had regrets afterwards. It wasn't so much the semi-permanent nature of the marking itself, it was the fact that I was somehow signalling that some stupid team whose success I almost nothing to do with (aside from a few extra bucks in ticket and t-shirt revenues) was more important than my sweetie. There was an obvious remedy for that. It was only a few days later that I got this one.

 photo cornish-news-susan 2.jpg

Tattoos, I suspect, are a lot like cats. Once you get a few of them, more seem to find their way to you. The next one I wanted to think about. As someone who considers himself the office book nerd (most of my colleagues are more numerically inclined), I thought maybe I could pay tribute to an influential book of my youth. I must have connected to this mathematically inclined author and his funny logic (akin to an all-white Rubik's cube perhaps?). Plus, the almost surreal times we live in suggest a certain kind of statement, too. Anyway, here's what I decided on:

 photo rehost2F20162F92F282F1e01ad25-59e2-4498-bc57-84f2af3af3ee.jpg

 photo rehost2F20162F92F282Fde289fec-d98a-4fcd-97b1-df63f718cba1.jpg

At this point, with the floodgates of ink now open, my dear wife thinks I should get one more. This is one that, in her mind, sets me apart. It marks this rather odd proclivity of mine to go to extreme lengths just to say, "April Fools!"

 photo 12912687_447105275498985_1347521785_n.jpg

My arms, legs, back and buttocks remain unadorned, but I'm now thinking some of these do look pretty cool.]]>
4.03 1865 Alice in Wonderland
author: Jane Carruth
name: Steve
average rating: 4.03
book published: 1865
rating: 5
read at:
date added: 2017/04/01
shelves:
review:
People knocking on the door of their seventh decade don't typically get their first of these things at this point in their lives. But then the Cubs had never won the World Series any other year of my life. I got caught up in the moment. And as is often the case, supply created its own demand. When a smiling Kris Bryant threw the runner out at first to complete the impossible dream, we high-tailed it to Wrigleyville to join the celebration. An enterprising artist took advantage of the mood -- delirious, incautious and anesthetized -- and offered what seemed like a great souvenir of the season. Anyway, this is me with my ice breaking ink.:

 photo 14716441_816384468504456_2699647104590020608_n.jpg

I don't know how common this is, but am pretty sure I'm not the only one who had regrets afterwards. It wasn't so much the semi-permanent nature of the marking itself, it was the fact that I was somehow signalling that some stupid team whose success I almost nothing to do with (aside from a few extra bucks in ticket and t-shirt revenues) was more important than my sweetie. There was an obvious remedy for that. It was only a few days later that I got this one.

 photo cornish-news-susan 2.jpg

Tattoos, I suspect, are a lot like cats. Once you get a few of them, more seem to find their way to you. The next one I wanted to think about. As someone who considers himself the office book nerd (most of my colleagues are more numerically inclined), I thought maybe I could pay tribute to an influential book of my youth. I must have connected to this mathematically inclined author and his funny logic (akin to an all-white Rubik's cube perhaps?). Plus, the almost surreal times we live in suggest a certain kind of statement, too. Anyway, here's what I decided on:

 photo rehost2F20162F92F282F1e01ad25-59e2-4498-bc57-84f2af3af3ee.jpg

 photo rehost2F20162F92F282Fde289fec-d98a-4fcd-97b1-df63f718cba1.jpg

At this point, with the floodgates of ink now open, my dear wife thinks I should get one more. This is one that, in her mind, sets me apart. It marks this rather odd proclivity of mine to go to extreme lengths just to say, "April Fools!"

 photo 12912687_447105275498985_1347521785_n.jpg

My arms, legs, back and buttocks remain unadorned, but I'm now thinking some of these do look pretty cool.
]]>
Ship of Fools 410760 512 Katherine Anne Porter 0316713902 Steve 4 ]]> 3.64 1962 Ship of Fools
author: Katherine Anne Porter
name: Steve
average rating: 3.64
book published: 1962
rating: 4
read at:
date added: 2017/04/01
shelves:
review:
 photo 12912687_447105275498985_1347521785_n.jpg
]]>
<![CDATA[A Constellation of Vital Phenomena]]> 18428067
In the final days of December 2004, in a small rural village in Chechnya, eight-year-old Havaa hides in the woods when her father is abducted by Russian forces. Fearing for her life, she flees with their neighbor Akhmed—a failed physician—to the bombed-out hospital, where Sonja, the one remaining doctor, treats a steady stream of wounded rebels and refugees and mourns her missing sister. Over the course of five dramatic days, Akhmed and Sonja reach back into their pasts to unravel the intricate mystery of coincidence, betrayal, and forgiveness that unexpectedly binds them and decides their fate.

With The English Patient's dramatic sweep and The Tiger's Wife's expert sense of place, Marra gives us a searing debut about the transcendent power of love in wartime, and how it can cause us to become greater than we ever thought possible.]]>
416 Anthony Marra 0770436420 Steve 4
Three main characters filled the pages. The story began as eight-year-old Havaa watched her house burn down from the relative safety of the forest she was told to hide in when the Russian soldiers arrived. She became far safer when neighbor Akhmed, a kindly but inept doctor, walked her to a hospital where there was one remaining doctor, a Russian named Sonja. His best hope for Havaa was that the brusque but talented Sonja would take the girl in. Havaa was precocious, and was maybe one of the few people in Sonja’s league intellectually, so that helped her odds. But these things have to develop at novel-length pace, right? The cumulative conflict along the way has to reach a tipping point.

A secondary set of characters got POV spotlights as well, including Akhmed’s physically and mentally compromised wife, Havaa’s loving father who had just been taken away, Sonja’s beautiful (better liked, now missing) sister, and an old villager named Khassan who had written a massive history of the Chechen people. Khassan’s son, a pariah for informing on his neighbors, had a story, too � a sad, multi-sided one.

The title came from an old medical textbook Sonja owned. “Only one entry supplied an adequate definition, and she circled it with red ink, and referred to it nightly. Life: a constellation of vital phenomena--organization, irritability, movement, growth, reproduction, adaptation.� Marra no doubt wanted this to apply more widely to his entire book, with life intensified by perils of death.

Did he succeed? Well� I’ve been trying to sort that out. It’s safe to say that he’s a young man with promise. And I give him plenty of points for ambition. The parts I’d criticize are really a matter of taste. I know, too, given all the stars this one gets from discerning friends that my own view is not the popular one, but I did find it a tad overdone. This may seem odd coming from a guy whose catch-phrase is “Nothing exceeds like excess,� but at times I felt that A Constellation of Vital Phenomena was an entanglement of florid descriptors or maybe an agglomeration of symphonious hyperbole. More than once I got a sense of him in a creative writing class, vying for teacher’s pet status. The structuring was fine, with the to-and-fro in time generally adding interest. He did have this quirk, though, were he’d randomly fast-forward the life of some insignificant character, telling us for no apparent reason that, say, twenty-eight years after the war a nameless sentry we just met retired from his career as a teacher. It was a device that called attention to itself, and risked breaking the spell. Better to crawl deeper into the skin of someone we’re meant to care about.

I’m giving this 3.5 stars and rounding to 4. The vitality is there, as is the poignancy. The fact that I debated my own feelings about it meant that he made me think, which I should count as a good thing. I’ll be interested to see what a few years of ripening will do to Marra as a writer. It's a good bet his book of short stories, The Tsar of Love and Techno, will influence my eventual view.]]>
4.10 2013 A Constellation of Vital Phenomena
author: Anthony Marra
name: Steve
average rating: 4.10
book published: 2013
rating: 4
read at: 2017/02/01
date added: 2017/02/15
shelves:
review:
We all know, as William Tecumseh Sherman once noted, that “War is Hell!� Later, Jean-Paul Sartre concluded that “Hell is other people.� It therefore stands to reason that war is other people. Good thing for me that it's about others because what Marra described in this book sounded awful. We got chopped off fingers, burned down houses, torture-induced ratting, and a whole host of other atrocities. It was set in Chechnya in 2004 with much of the story backfilled from the prior decade of war. Russian politics and regional dynamics were deemphasized, though, so it was somewhat generically about any oppressed, occupied state. The focus was clearly on the human side.

Three main characters filled the pages. The story began as eight-year-old Havaa watched her house burn down from the relative safety of the forest she was told to hide in when the Russian soldiers arrived. She became far safer when neighbor Akhmed, a kindly but inept doctor, walked her to a hospital where there was one remaining doctor, a Russian named Sonja. His best hope for Havaa was that the brusque but talented Sonja would take the girl in. Havaa was precocious, and was maybe one of the few people in Sonja’s league intellectually, so that helped her odds. But these things have to develop at novel-length pace, right? The cumulative conflict along the way has to reach a tipping point.

A secondary set of characters got POV spotlights as well, including Akhmed’s physically and mentally compromised wife, Havaa’s loving father who had just been taken away, Sonja’s beautiful (better liked, now missing) sister, and an old villager named Khassan who had written a massive history of the Chechen people. Khassan’s son, a pariah for informing on his neighbors, had a story, too � a sad, multi-sided one.

The title came from an old medical textbook Sonja owned. “Only one entry supplied an adequate definition, and she circled it with red ink, and referred to it nightly. Life: a constellation of vital phenomena--organization, irritability, movement, growth, reproduction, adaptation.� Marra no doubt wanted this to apply more widely to his entire book, with life intensified by perils of death.

Did he succeed? Well� I’ve been trying to sort that out. It’s safe to say that he’s a young man with promise. And I give him plenty of points for ambition. The parts I’d criticize are really a matter of taste. I know, too, given all the stars this one gets from discerning friends that my own view is not the popular one, but I did find it a tad overdone. This may seem odd coming from a guy whose catch-phrase is “Nothing exceeds like excess,� but at times I felt that A Constellation of Vital Phenomena was an entanglement of florid descriptors or maybe an agglomeration of symphonious hyperbole. More than once I got a sense of him in a creative writing class, vying for teacher’s pet status. The structuring was fine, with the to-and-fro in time generally adding interest. He did have this quirk, though, were he’d randomly fast-forward the life of some insignificant character, telling us for no apparent reason that, say, twenty-eight years after the war a nameless sentry we just met retired from his career as a teacher. It was a device that called attention to itself, and risked breaking the spell. Better to crawl deeper into the skin of someone we’re meant to care about.

I’m giving this 3.5 stars and rounding to 4. The vitality is there, as is the poignancy. The fact that I debated my own feelings about it meant that he made me think, which I should count as a good thing. I’ll be interested to see what a few years of ripening will do to Marra as a writer. It's a good bet his book of short stories, The Tsar of Love and Techno, will influence my eventual view.
]]>
Disgrace 6192 220 J.M. Coetzee 0143036378 Steve 4
Dishonor-Inducing Sex & Glaring Racial Antipathy Corroding Emotions

David Lurie, a white South African professor in his fifties, had taught communications and poetry in Cape Town. An ill-advised affair with a student spoiled all that. David sought refuge with his daughter Lucy who experienced some conflicts of her own living in the country’s interior. With its setting in post-apartheid South Africa, a race angle was virtually inevitable. I have to say, the emotions packed a real punch, including some you don’t see coming. As far as I know, Disney had no role in producing the movie version of this raw and hard-edged book. Despite the lack of uplift, I did appreciate the writing and the plausibility of the angst. Evidently, the Booker committee did, too, since they gave this one their fiction prize in 1999.

This has been another entry in the KISS series -- Keep It Short, Steve. Note that “Steve� itself is an acronym:

Severely Testing Every Vٴǰ’s Equanimity]]>
3.86 1999 Disgrace
author: J.M. Coetzee
name: Steve
average rating: 3.86
book published: 1999
rating: 4
read at: 2015/01/01
date added: 2017/02/06
shelves:
review:
It’s a little-known fact (where “fact� is understood in the contemporary, alternative sense) that the title of this book was originally an acronym that Coetzee used as a guide for writing it:

Dishonor-Inducing Sex & Glaring Racial Antipathy Corroding Emotions

David Lurie, a white South African professor in his fifties, had taught communications and poetry in Cape Town. An ill-advised affair with a student spoiled all that. David sought refuge with his daughter Lucy who experienced some conflicts of her own living in the country’s interior. With its setting in post-apartheid South Africa, a race angle was virtually inevitable. I have to say, the emotions packed a real punch, including some you don’t see coming. As far as I know, Disney had no role in producing the movie version of this raw and hard-edged book. Despite the lack of uplift, I did appreciate the writing and the plausibility of the angst. Evidently, the Booker committee did, too, since they gave this one their fiction prize in 1999.

This has been another entry in the KISS series -- Keep It Short, Steve. Note that “Steve� itself is an acronym:

Severely Testing Every Vٴǰ’s Equanimity
]]>
Catch-22 168668
Set in Italy during World War II, this is the story of the incomparable, malingering bombardier, Yossarian, a hero who is furious because thousands of people he has never met are trying to kill him. But his real problem is not the enemy—it is his own army, which keeps increasing the number of missions the men must fly to complete their service. Yet if Yossarian makes any attempt to excuse himself from the perilous missions he’s assigned, he’ll be in violation of Catch-22, a hilariously sinister bureaucratic rule: a man is considered insane if he willingly continues to fly dangerous combat missions, but if he makes a formal request to be removed from duty, he is proven sane and therefore ineligible to be relieved.

This fiftieth-anniversary edition commemorates Joseph Heller’s masterpiece with a new introduction by Christopher Buckley; a wealth of critical essays and reviews by Norman Mailer, Alfred Kazin, Anthony Burgess, and others; rare papers and photos from Joseph Heller’s personal archive; and much more. Here, at last, is the definitive edition of a classic of world literature.]]>
453 Joseph Heller 0684833395 Steve 4
As a teen I wrote a follow-up to Kurt Vonnegut’s classic that I called Slaughterhouse-Six. It was set in a mirror image world where war was devastating the planet Tralfamadore. Fortunately, the protagonist, Libby Mirglip, survived the bombs and lived a varied if not full life after the conflict. She was aided by alien visitors from planet Earth who showed her, through their own less enlightened example, what not to do.

I’d prefer not to go into the details of one my more recent works, Fifty-two Shades of Grey. If it’s ever published, it’ll be under an assumed name, or maybe names � I’m toying with the idea of S. and M. John. BTW, I saw that some other joker stole my basic idea and technically beat me to the preferred number fifty-one.

This brings us to my latest, Catch-23. Since I’ve already done an absurdist post-war account of tragedy/comedy with Slaughterhouse-Six, I wanted to steer clear of such a heavy/humorous theme this time. Instead, Catch-23 is the story of a local seafood restaurant on 23 S. Washington St. in Naperton, Illinois. They became famous for their Shrimp Yossarian. Then a new executive chef upped the number of times customers would fly through the doors by offering Skate Wing Schnitzel a la Scheisskopf, Major Major Mahi Mahi, and Stuffed Oysters Orr-style. Naperton’s whore gave the story some much needed spice. (As with any fan fiction, references will only be appreciated by those who know the original.)

Oh, and hey, there is a catch here. Against your better judgment, you continued reading each ridiculous example in this exercise of “one more." Making it this far means you’ve read “one more� paragraph all the way to the end. The catch is that you must be crazy enough to perceive this as a payoff.]]>
3.99 1961 Catch-22
author: Joseph Heller
name: Steve
average rating: 3.99
book published: 1961
rating: 4
read at: 1979/01/01
date added: 2017/01/31
shelves:
review:
I’m not sure if it’s a talent or an affliction, but I’ve been blessed or cursed with a penchant for taking someone else’s creative work and extrapolating it to skewed extremes. That explains my yet-to-be-published collection of fan fiction, unauthorized sequels, and twists in perspective. I first discovered this talent/affliction as a boy when I imagined a fourth little pig who leveraged himself to the hilt, built a luxury skyscraper, and, with YUGE block letters at its base, labelled it Pig Tower. The Big Bad Wolf, as a professional courtesy (and quite possibly with the promise of kickbacks), agreed to a huff and puff waiver.

As a teen I wrote a follow-up to Kurt Vonnegut’s classic that I called Slaughterhouse-Six. It was set in a mirror image world where war was devastating the planet Tralfamadore. Fortunately, the protagonist, Libby Mirglip, survived the bombs and lived a varied if not full life after the conflict. She was aided by alien visitors from planet Earth who showed her, through their own less enlightened example, what not to do.

I’d prefer not to go into the details of one my more recent works, Fifty-two Shades of Grey. If it’s ever published, it’ll be under an assumed name, or maybe names � I’m toying with the idea of S. and M. John. BTW, I saw that some other joker stole my basic idea and technically beat me to the preferred number fifty-one.

This brings us to my latest, Catch-23. Since I’ve already done an absurdist post-war account of tragedy/comedy with Slaughterhouse-Six, I wanted to steer clear of such a heavy/humorous theme this time. Instead, Catch-23 is the story of a local seafood restaurant on 23 S. Washington St. in Naperton, Illinois. They became famous for their Shrimp Yossarian. Then a new executive chef upped the number of times customers would fly through the doors by offering Skate Wing Schnitzel a la Scheisskopf, Major Major Mahi Mahi, and Stuffed Oysters Orr-style. Naperton’s whore gave the story some much needed spice. (As with any fan fiction, references will only be appreciated by those who know the original.)

Oh, and hey, there is a catch here. Against your better judgment, you continued reading each ridiculous example in this exercise of “one more." Making it this far means you’ve read “one more� paragraph all the way to the end. The catch is that you must be crazy enough to perceive this as a payoff.
]]>
That Old Cape Magic 6413210 Bridge of Sighs—a national best seller hailed by The Boston Globe as “an astounding achievement� and “a masterpiece”—Richard Russo gives us the story of a marriage, and of all the other ties that bind, from parents and in-laws to children and the promises of youth.

Griffin has been tooling around for nearly a year with his father’s ashes in the trunk, but his mother is very much alive and not shy about calling on his cell phone. She does so as he drives down to Cape Cod, where he and his wife, Joy, will celebrate the marriage of their daughter Laura’s best friend. For Griffin this is akin to driving into the past, since he took his childhood summer vacations here, his parents� respite from the hated Midwest. And the Cape is where he and Joy honeymooned, in the course of which they drafted the Great Truro Accord, a plan for their lives together that’s now thirty years old and has largely come true. He’d left screenwriting and Los Angeles behind for the sort of New England college his snobby academic parents had always aspired to in vain; they’d moved into an old house full of character; and they’d started a family. Check, check and check.

But be careful what you pray for, especially if you manage to achieve it. By the end of this perfectly lovely weekend, the past has so thoroughly swamped the present that the future suddenly hangs in the balance. And when, a year later, a far more important wedding takes place, their beloved Laura’s, on the coast of Maine, Griffin’s chauffeuring two urns of ashes as he contends once more with Joy and her large, unruly family, and both he and she have brought dates along. How in the world could this have happened?

That Old Cape Magic is a novel of deep introspection and every family feeling imaginable, with a middle-aged man confronting his parents and their failed marriage, his own troubled one, his daughter’s new life and, finally, what it was he thought he wanted and what in fact he has. The storytelling is flawless throughout, moments of great comedy and even hilarity alternating with others of rueful understanding and heart-stopping sadness, and its ending is at once surprising, uplifting and unlike anything this Pulitzer Prize winner has ever written.]]>
261 Richard Russo 0375414967 Steve 4
Griffin is a 55-year-old academic, a former screenwriter, a husband, and a son, but doesn’t seem fully engaged in any of his roles. With parents like his, pulling away was understandable. They were academics themselves, Ivy-leaguers appointed beneath their station in the Mid-effing-west, with a haughty disdain for their intellectual inferiors which to them included pretty much everyone. At times they were laughably bad (one of the book’s great strengths). Griffin disengaged from them, but not as much as he wanted to believe. This was a major theme, even as they became ashes in urns. Troubles in his marriage were harder to figure. His wife was not the problem, though; that much we surmise.

Russo is usually so good at developing characters. This time, too, he gets into heads and tells revealing stories about Griffin and the gang, but � (you knew there’d be a but) at times he makes Griffin out to be borderline obtuse. If Griffin, in one instance, can write so knowingly about people, as he did in a very good story within the story about a boyhood friend at the Cape, how can he be, at other times, so heedless, turning even allies against him? Russo characters are often flawed, but rarely lacking in people smarts or self-awareness as Griffin seemed to be. Then again, maybe that was just part of the dark humor that ran throughout. Irony is another guess, what with the writer/professor falling short in the insight department, unable to read people.

Despite the brevity, many of the secondary characters were memorable. Griffin’s daughter, who was getting married in Act III of the book, was honest and kind�-more like her mother, Joy. Joy’s family stood out, too. Her knuckleheaded brothers, twin Marine MP’s, were a hoot. I was also interested in a character named Sunny Kim, a Korean immigrant and friend of Griffin’s daughter since childhood. He was smart, respectful, and repressed, but Russo went beyond stereotypes to give us a glimpse into a rich inner life, too. (Mr. Russo, since you’re likely to stop by soliciting feedback from reviewers like me, please consider a follow-up story focusing on Sunny. I have a similar suggestion involving Rub from Nobody’s Fool.)

When it’s all said and done, this is a very satisfying read. I might have a few quibbles about Griffin and his plight, but in the end it’s recognizably Russovian, which is always a good thing.
]]>
3.37 2009 That Old Cape Magic
author: Richard Russo
name: Steve
average rating: 3.37
book published: 2009
rating: 4
read at:
date added: 2017/01/30
shelves:
review:
Russo said in an interview that he’d originally intended for this to be a short story. Then he wrote a scene where Jack Griffin, his main character, was on the side of the road talking to his shrew of a mother on the phone when a seagull flew by and dropped a calling card on his head. At that point any tidy resolutions to Griffin’s problems weren’t going to work � further development was going to be needed. But at 261 pages, we could have used more. To be honest, it felt a little thin. I say this at the same time I claim Russo as a personal favorite; I’m grateful for dollops of any size. Had this been my first of his books, I’d have nary a critical word. But fans know the heights he can scale.

Griffin is a 55-year-old academic, a former screenwriter, a husband, and a son, but doesn’t seem fully engaged in any of his roles. With parents like his, pulling away was understandable. They were academics themselves, Ivy-leaguers appointed beneath their station in the Mid-effing-west, with a haughty disdain for their intellectual inferiors which to them included pretty much everyone. At times they were laughably bad (one of the book’s great strengths). Griffin disengaged from them, but not as much as he wanted to believe. This was a major theme, even as they became ashes in urns. Troubles in his marriage were harder to figure. His wife was not the problem, though; that much we surmise.

Russo is usually so good at developing characters. This time, too, he gets into heads and tells revealing stories about Griffin and the gang, but � (you knew there’d be a but) at times he makes Griffin out to be borderline obtuse. If Griffin, in one instance, can write so knowingly about people, as he did in a very good story within the story about a boyhood friend at the Cape, how can he be, at other times, so heedless, turning even allies against him? Russo characters are often flawed, but rarely lacking in people smarts or self-awareness as Griffin seemed to be. Then again, maybe that was just part of the dark humor that ran throughout. Irony is another guess, what with the writer/professor falling short in the insight department, unable to read people.

Despite the brevity, many of the secondary characters were memorable. Griffin’s daughter, who was getting married in Act III of the book, was honest and kind�-more like her mother, Joy. Joy’s family stood out, too. Her knuckleheaded brothers, twin Marine MP’s, were a hoot. I was also interested in a character named Sunny Kim, a Korean immigrant and friend of Griffin’s daughter since childhood. He was smart, respectful, and repressed, but Russo went beyond stereotypes to give us a glimpse into a rich inner life, too. (Mr. Russo, since you’re likely to stop by soliciting feedback from reviewers like me, please consider a follow-up story focusing on Sunny. I have a similar suggestion involving Rub from Nobody’s Fool.)

When it’s all said and done, this is a very satisfying read. I might have a few quibbles about Griffin and his plight, but in the end it’s recognizably Russovian, which is always a good thing.

]]>
<![CDATA[Angela’s Ashes (Frank McCourt, #1)]]> 252577
"When I look back on my childhood I wonder how I managed to survive at all. It was, of course, a miserable childhood: the happy childhood is hardly worth your while. Worse than the ordinary miserable childhood is the miserable Irish childhood, and worse yet is the miserable Irish Catholic childhood."

So begins the Pulitzer Prize winning memoir of Frank McCourt, born in Depression-era Brooklyn to recent Irish immigrants and raised in the slums of Limerick, Ireland. Frank's mother, Angela, has no money to feed the children since Frank's father, Malachy, rarely works, and when he does he drinks his wages. Yet Malachy—exasperating, irresponsible and beguiling—does nurture in Frank an appetite for the one thing he can provide: a story. Frank lives for his father's tales of Cuchulain, who saved Ireland, and of the Angel on the Seventh Step, who brings his mother babies.

Perhaps it is story that accounts for Frank's survival. Wearing rags for diapers, begging a pig's head for Christmas dinner and gathering coal from the roadside to light a fire, Frank endures poverty, near-starvation and the casual cruelty of relatives and neighbors—yet lives to tell his tale with eloquence, exuberance and remarkable forgiveness.

Angela's Ashes, imbued on every page with Frank McCourt's astounding humor and compassion, is a glorious book that bears all the marks of a classic.]]>
452 Frank McCourt 0007205236 Steve 4 Quite literally without a bone to pick.
His da used scant earnings
To slake liquid yearnings;
In American parlance � a dick.

To get past a father who drank
In a place that was dismal and dank,
He wrote not in rhymes,
But of those shite times
A memoir that filled up his bank.
]]>
4.15 1996 Angela’s Ashes (Frank McCourt, #1)
author: Frank McCourt
name: Steve
average rating: 4.15
book published: 1996
rating: 4
read at: 1998/01/01
date added: 2017/01/24
shelves:
review:
There once was a lad reared in Limerick,
Quite literally without a bone to pick.
His da used scant earnings
To slake liquid yearnings;
In American parlance � a dick.

To get past a father who drank
In a place that was dismal and dank,
He wrote not in rhymes,
But of those shite times
A memoir that filled up his bank.

]]>
Cat’s Cradle 135479 Told with deadpan humour and bitter irony, Kurt Vonnegut's cult tale of global destruction preys on our deepest fears of witnessing Armageddon and, worse still, surviving it ...

Dr Felix Hoenikker, one of the founding 'fathers' of the atomic bomb, has left a deadly legacy to the world. For he's the inventor of 'ice-nine', a lethal chemical capable of freezing the entire planet. The search for its whereabouts leads to Hoenikker's three ecentric children, to a crazed dictator in the Caribbean, to madness. Felix Hoenikker's Death Wish comes true when his last, fatal gift to humankind brings about the end, that for all of us, is nigh...]]>
306 Kurt Vonnegut Jr. Steve 4
In Anne Fadiman’s superb book about books called Ex Libris, she divides readers into two categories: those who keep their books in pristine condition (courtly lovers) and those who delight in marginalia (carnal lovers). I started out as one of the former (conditioned, no doubt, by fear of library fines), but became one of the latter. Cat’s Cradle was my first prurient experience, dating back to high school. Part of the reason was that I snagged my copy at a garage sale for a dime � cheap even then. But the real motivation was to highlight this great little rhyme:
Tiger got to hunt, bird got to fly;
Man got to sit and wonder 'why, why, why?'
Tiger got to sleep, bird got to land;
Man got to tell himself he understand.

That one deserved stars, a yellow marker, and the granddaddy of all desecrations � a dog-ear. I liked how it was framed as such a natural conclusion to the activity of thinking. We tell ourselves that our efforts to understand have paid off.

If I’m honest, I don’t recall much of the book’s premise. I remember thinking Vonnegut was one of those cool, sort of counter-cultural writers who wielded his satirical axe well. He may have been a bit darker than Tom Robbins, and less playful with his words, but he was similarly entertaining, incisive and free-wheeling. The book tracks the unusual offspring of the man who invented the A-bomb. They possess a substance called ice-nine that can make water freeze at room temperatures. And you can imagine what might happen if it fell into the wrong hands. The Russians and Americans procured some as did the dictator of a secluded Caribbean island where a religion called Bokononism is practiced despite being illegal and, according to Bokonon himself, based on lies. Still, anything that sells “living by the harmless untruths that make you brave and kind and healthy and happy� will have its appeal.

Vonnegut would poke fun at religion, politics, and just about any other human institution where our base natures hide in some gussied up form. And he may well have had a point. If I remember this cautionary tale correctly, a follow-up poem of my own might apply:
Monkey got to play, fish got to swim;
Man got to risk his life to some psycho’s whim.
Monkey got to doze, fish got to coast;
Man got to rest assured he won’t become a ghost.

And it may give us pause.
]]>
4.17 1963 Cat’s Cradle
author: Kurt Vonnegut Jr.
name: Steve
average rating: 4.17
book published: 1963
rating: 4
read at: 1974/01/01
date added: 2017/01/17
shelves:
review:
Another review in the KISS series (Keep It Short, Steve)

In Anne Fadiman’s superb book about books called Ex Libris, she divides readers into two categories: those who keep their books in pristine condition (courtly lovers) and those who delight in marginalia (carnal lovers). I started out as one of the former (conditioned, no doubt, by fear of library fines), but became one of the latter. Cat’s Cradle was my first prurient experience, dating back to high school. Part of the reason was that I snagged my copy at a garage sale for a dime � cheap even then. But the real motivation was to highlight this great little rhyme:
Tiger got to hunt, bird got to fly;
Man got to sit and wonder 'why, why, why?'
Tiger got to sleep, bird got to land;
Man got to tell himself he understand.

That one deserved stars, a yellow marker, and the granddaddy of all desecrations � a dog-ear. I liked how it was framed as such a natural conclusion to the activity of thinking. We tell ourselves that our efforts to understand have paid off.

If I’m honest, I don’t recall much of the book’s premise. I remember thinking Vonnegut was one of those cool, sort of counter-cultural writers who wielded his satirical axe well. He may have been a bit darker than Tom Robbins, and less playful with his words, but he was similarly entertaining, incisive and free-wheeling. The book tracks the unusual offspring of the man who invented the A-bomb. They possess a substance called ice-nine that can make water freeze at room temperatures. And you can imagine what might happen if it fell into the wrong hands. The Russians and Americans procured some as did the dictator of a secluded Caribbean island where a religion called Bokononism is practiced despite being illegal and, according to Bokonon himself, based on lies. Still, anything that sells “living by the harmless untruths that make you brave and kind and healthy and happy� will have its appeal.

Vonnegut would poke fun at religion, politics, and just about any other human institution where our base natures hide in some gussied up form. And he may well have had a point. If I remember this cautionary tale correctly, a follow-up poem of my own might apply:
Monkey got to play, fish got to swim;
Man got to risk his life to some psycho’s whim.
Monkey got to doze, fish got to coast;
Man got to rest assured he won’t become a ghost.

And it may give us pause.

]]>
Cutting for Stone 6930014
Moving from Addis Ababa to New York City and back again, Cutting for Stone is an unforgettable story of love and betrayal, medicine and ordinary miracles—and two brothers whose fates are forever intertwined. --back cover]]>
670 Abraham Verghese Steve 5 Middlesex, one of my favorites. It was only a week later that I saw a copy at the annual book fair in Chicago. The vendor was a worse-for-the-wear guy from downstate with bad teeth and scraggly hair. He seemed to know a lot about every book he had including the Orhan Pamuk my wife picked up. Approval of my choice from the guy more dedicated to books than personal hygiene sealed the deal. And I’m glad.

It’s a great story and an even greater education. The bulk of the action is set in a mission hospital in Ethiopia where we learn a lot about medicine (underfunded though it may be) as well as the culture and history of the Selassie-led nation. The book focuses on identical twin boys, Shiva and Marion. They had been joined at the head at birth and were lucky to have survived the separation. Their upbringing was lucky in another way. When in the first hour after birth your mother, a nurse and devout nun from India, dies, and your father from the secret union, a brilliant English surgeon but the one who botched the operation, bolts, you need all the luck you can get. This came in the form of fellow doctors at the mission who adopted them. Hema and Ghosh, the adopting parents, also took in a young girl named Genet along with her servant mother. It was all one big happy family for a while but conflict was inevitable. It came in political, sexual, and moral forms. The narrative sweep extends into adulthood, through armed conflicts, a stint in New York, and medical traumas. These different stories matter to us more because the characters are so well-developed. You’ll be pleased to know that emotional investments here earn returns rarely seen in assets these days.

Verghese himself is a doctor so his book about doctors might easily have been didactic or hagiographic. I never got that sense, though. The technical details of surgery were integrated well within the story. They never seemed gratuitous. Both Marion, who narrates, and Shiva were also doctors. It was good to have a narrator who was three-dimensional and imperfect (especially when it came to Genet, his fleshly idée fixe). And he puffed less than he might have about his profession. I never thought of the book as preachy either, despite its moral elements. The only real flaws I perceived were 1) the first person account that occasionally became too omniscient, and, 2) a case of coincidence near the end that felt like an odd polyhedral peg somehow winding up at the exact hole to fit through. The feeling of contrivance broke the spell, but it was cast again soon enough. The later tightening in my throat was testament to that.

Verghese is also a very self-assured writer. In combination, knowing how to save lives, teaching at Stanford, and attending the Iowa Writers� Workshop must translate to confidence on the page. I certainly won’t hold his writing education against him (though I might have preferred hearing that his talent was purely a function of genius, not, in part, programmed). In any case, it was that unobtrusive style of writing that calls very little attention to itself. The pacing was good, the nonlinearities were effective (never confusing), and the sense of foreshadowing was masterful. Who cares if it was just good coaching � it worked.

I’ve been vacillating between 4 and 5 stars. It’s Friday today and my spirit is more generous. So 5 it is. Besides, when I think back on what made me like this book so much, it comes down to its genuine appeal to our better angels. It was more than just platitudes. Faith and doctrine were trumped by real compassion and attention to those who suffer. It made me want to be a better person. Read it and see if you agree. Then we’ll meet for injera bread and spicy wot and talk about Ghosh (so caring and wise), Hema (the talented obstetrician and protective mom), Matron (the brave and pragmatic head of the mission), and ShivaMarion (the twinned entity who continued to sleep head-to-head throughout childhood, had an almost psychic connection despite many differences, and were fascinating to observe in how their shared empathy and antipathy played out).
]]>
4.26 2009 Cutting for Stone
author: Abraham Verghese
name: Steve
average rating: 4.26
book published: 2009
rating: 5
read at:
date added: 2017/01/14
shelves:
review:
I hope it’s not too self-indulgent to start with a personal history here. The first I ever heard of this was when Amazon sent me one of those “since you liked x, we recommend y� mails. So right off the bat I was predisposed against it. Who wants some algorithm deciding things for them? [Insert wink that’s more than a little ironic given that I’m in the algo biz myself.] My second time hearing of it was when a nice older lady at a charity book sale was telling me how much she enjoyed it. While I don’t automatically dismiss what we might imagine is the Doily and Crumpet Club’s book of the month, I do resist seeing the correlation climb too high. Then came the turning point. My friend, the ever-popular Jason, gave it enthusiastic thumbs up . He even likened it to Middlesex, one of my favorites. It was only a week later that I saw a copy at the annual book fair in Chicago. The vendor was a worse-for-the-wear guy from downstate with bad teeth and scraggly hair. He seemed to know a lot about every book he had including the Orhan Pamuk my wife picked up. Approval of my choice from the guy more dedicated to books than personal hygiene sealed the deal. And I’m glad.

It’s a great story and an even greater education. The bulk of the action is set in a mission hospital in Ethiopia where we learn a lot about medicine (underfunded though it may be) as well as the culture and history of the Selassie-led nation. The book focuses on identical twin boys, Shiva and Marion. They had been joined at the head at birth and were lucky to have survived the separation. Their upbringing was lucky in another way. When in the first hour after birth your mother, a nurse and devout nun from India, dies, and your father from the secret union, a brilliant English surgeon but the one who botched the operation, bolts, you need all the luck you can get. This came in the form of fellow doctors at the mission who adopted them. Hema and Ghosh, the adopting parents, also took in a young girl named Genet along with her servant mother. It was all one big happy family for a while but conflict was inevitable. It came in political, sexual, and moral forms. The narrative sweep extends into adulthood, through armed conflicts, a stint in New York, and medical traumas. These different stories matter to us more because the characters are so well-developed. You’ll be pleased to know that emotional investments here earn returns rarely seen in assets these days.

Verghese himself is a doctor so his book about doctors might easily have been didactic or hagiographic. I never got that sense, though. The technical details of surgery were integrated well within the story. They never seemed gratuitous. Both Marion, who narrates, and Shiva were also doctors. It was good to have a narrator who was three-dimensional and imperfect (especially when it came to Genet, his fleshly idée fixe). And he puffed less than he might have about his profession. I never thought of the book as preachy either, despite its moral elements. The only real flaws I perceived were 1) the first person account that occasionally became too omniscient, and, 2) a case of coincidence near the end that felt like an odd polyhedral peg somehow winding up at the exact hole to fit through. The feeling of contrivance broke the spell, but it was cast again soon enough. The later tightening in my throat was testament to that.

Verghese is also a very self-assured writer. In combination, knowing how to save lives, teaching at Stanford, and attending the Iowa Writers� Workshop must translate to confidence on the page. I certainly won’t hold his writing education against him (though I might have preferred hearing that his talent was purely a function of genius, not, in part, programmed). In any case, it was that unobtrusive style of writing that calls very little attention to itself. The pacing was good, the nonlinearities were effective (never confusing), and the sense of foreshadowing was masterful. Who cares if it was just good coaching � it worked.

I’ve been vacillating between 4 and 5 stars. It’s Friday today and my spirit is more generous. So 5 it is. Besides, when I think back on what made me like this book so much, it comes down to its genuine appeal to our better angels. It was more than just platitudes. Faith and doctrine were trumped by real compassion and attention to those who suffer. It made me want to be a better person. Read it and see if you agree. Then we’ll meet for injera bread and spicy wot and talk about Ghosh (so caring and wise), Hema (the talented obstetrician and protective mom), Matron (the brave and pragmatic head of the mission), and ShivaMarion (the twinned entity who continued to sleep head-to-head throughout childhood, had an almost psychic connection despite many differences, and were fascinating to observe in how their shared empathy and antipathy played out).

]]>
Elsewhere 13533732
Anyone familiar with Richard Russo's acclaimed novels will recognize Gloversville once famous for producing that eponymous product and anything else made of leather. This is where the author grew up, the only son of an aspirant mother and a charming, feckless father who were born into this close-knit community. But by the time of his childhood in the 1950s, prosperity was inexorably being replaced by poverty and illness (often tannery-related), with everyone barely scraping by under a very low horizon.

A world elsewhere was the dream his mother instilled in Rick, and strived for herself, and their subsequent adventures and tribulations in achieving that goal—beautifully recounted here—were to prove lifelong, as would Gloversville's fearsome grasp on them both. Fraught with the timelessdynamic of going home again, encompassing hopes and fears and the relentless tides of familial and individual complications, thisstory is arresting, comic, heartbreaking, and truly beautiful, an immediate classic.]]>
256 Richard Russo 0307959538 Steve 3
Richard Russo is a great writer. His stories are fast-moving, his characters are recognizable, and his words entice without adornments. In fact, I like him so much I read this to become a completist. You might imagine that a memoir by a writer of his caliber would be a crowning achievement, and you’d be right for parts. But he chose a fairly narrow focus that in my mind weakened the whole. While I don’t doubt that his main subject � mother Jean � was a profound influence, I found myself wishing that the other drivers shaping him weren’t crowded out by her dominance.

Jean had a “nervous condition� that impacted young Rick more than anyone else. Rick’s dad, a gambler with little tolerance for the home situation, had run off early on. Jean, while supportive in a collusive sort of way, learned to manipulate her son well enough to pull his strings even into adulthood. Russo’s wife must have been a saint to put up with all the different do-overs they provided for Jean. Her condition, a severe inability to cope, was undiagnosed during her life, but was later discovered to have been OCD. It certainly gave young Rick a writer’s feel for emotional hardship and conflict. After reading this, I concluded that Russo comes by his empathy honestly. And he’s constitutionally incapable of a bad sentence, though he can write a redundant one. The number of times Jean would buck herself up saying, “I’ll just have to give myself a good talking to,� was well into double figures.

As big a fan as I am of Russo, I was hoping for more. There was so little of anything other than these difficult interactions that would count as character-shaping. An interesting exception was when he described his hometown in upstate New York. Gloversville, known in better days for its tannery and ladies� gloves, was the kind of place he has written about so convincingly in Mohawk, The Risk Pool, and Nobody’s Fool among others.

Conclusion: great writing, limited purview, should have been Part 1 of a better rounded memoir.
]]>
3.74 2012 Elsewhere
author: Richard Russo
name: Steve
average rating: 3.74
book published: 2012
rating: 3
read at: 2015/01/01
date added: 2017/01/11
shelves:
review:
[Reminder to self: KISS � Keep It Short, Steve.]

Richard Russo is a great writer. His stories are fast-moving, his characters are recognizable, and his words entice without adornments. In fact, I like him so much I read this to become a completist. You might imagine that a memoir by a writer of his caliber would be a crowning achievement, and you’d be right for parts. But he chose a fairly narrow focus that in my mind weakened the whole. While I don’t doubt that his main subject � mother Jean � was a profound influence, I found myself wishing that the other drivers shaping him weren’t crowded out by her dominance.

Jean had a “nervous condition� that impacted young Rick more than anyone else. Rick’s dad, a gambler with little tolerance for the home situation, had run off early on. Jean, while supportive in a collusive sort of way, learned to manipulate her son well enough to pull his strings even into adulthood. Russo’s wife must have been a saint to put up with all the different do-overs they provided for Jean. Her condition, a severe inability to cope, was undiagnosed during her life, but was later discovered to have been OCD. It certainly gave young Rick a writer’s feel for emotional hardship and conflict. After reading this, I concluded that Russo comes by his empathy honestly. And he’s constitutionally incapable of a bad sentence, though he can write a redundant one. The number of times Jean would buck herself up saying, “I’ll just have to give myself a good talking to,� was well into double figures.

As big a fan as I am of Russo, I was hoping for more. There was so little of anything other than these difficult interactions that would count as character-shaping. An interesting exception was when he described his hometown in upstate New York. Gloversville, known in better days for its tannery and ladies� gloves, was the kind of place he has written about so convincingly in Mohawk, The Risk Pool, and Nobody’s Fool among others.

Conclusion: great writing, limited purview, should have been Part 1 of a better rounded memoir.

]]>
Spurious 9578031
Before it completely swallows his house, the narrator feels compelled to solve some major philosophical questions (such as "Why?") and the meaning of his urge to write, as well as the source of the fungus ... before it is too late. Or, he has to move.]]>
188 Lars Iyer 193555428X Steve 3 Keep It Short, Steve. (My original version was KISSSSSSSS for “Keep It Short, Spiel-Spewing Soapbox-Spouting Stupor-Stretching Stupidass,� but that would be silly and self-controverting.) Anyway, I hope to start clearing the backlog from my to-be-reviewed list with a few abbreviated remarks.

Spurious is easy to summarize. You know the expression about the excitement of watching paint dry? Well, this one was a variation where the narrator, Lars, watched mold grow on the walls of his flat. That, and he’d philosophize (though not deeply or well) with his academic friend and rival known as W. They’d go on at length about the nature of their own idiocy, and how meaningful insights would be theirs if only a proper (absurd) set of conditions would prevail. It was a kind of running joke about academia and the over- examined life.

I smiled more often than you might think. The put-downs were often clever since Lars and W. knew their shared vulnerabilities well. Here is but one of the countless examples:
W., as usual, is reading about God. God and mathematics, that's all he's interested in. Somehow everything has to do with God, in whom W.'s not capable of believing, and mathematics, which W. is not capable of doing. And he's reading about God and mathematics in German, W. says, which means he doesn't really understand what he doesn't understand.

Other reviewers have likened this to Waiting for Godot, and I can see that. There’s meant to be something beyond the inactivity. I can’t be sure, but I think the “something� is a sort of meta-existentialism. (I also can’t be sure if I’m joking here or not.) It’s a slim, seemingly insubstantial book, but anything fueled by heavy drinking and references to Kafka has got to have abstract, fuzzy, and metaphorical foundations, right?

I opted for three stars, though at times thought it warranted four. In the end it seemed like whatever the point was, it was belabored. I remember thinking of those more experimental Saturday Night Live skits late in the show that would go to senseless extremes flogging the same basic joke. At least Iyer’s target was a fun one: his own chosen profession. He’s a philosophy prof at the university in Newcastle.
]]>
3.58 2011 Spurious
author: Lars Iyer
name: Steve
average rating: 3.58
book published: 2011
rating: 3
read at: 2015/01/01
date added: 2017/01/11
shelves:
review:
I’m a big fan of bringing the new year in with a kiss. It’s a tradition I’ve enjoyed with my dear wife, family and friends (with my old neighbor, Mrs. Sundquist, as the exception after she’d been hitting the pickled eel jar). I can also make KISS a mnemonic to apply here � a reminder to Keep It Short, Steve. (My original version was KISSSSSSSS for “Keep It Short, Spiel-Spewing Soapbox-Spouting Stupor-Stretching Stupidass,� but that would be silly and self-controverting.) Anyway, I hope to start clearing the backlog from my to-be-reviewed list with a few abbreviated remarks.

Spurious is easy to summarize. You know the expression about the excitement of watching paint dry? Well, this one was a variation where the narrator, Lars, watched mold grow on the walls of his flat. That, and he’d philosophize (though not deeply or well) with his academic friend and rival known as W. They’d go on at length about the nature of their own idiocy, and how meaningful insights would be theirs if only a proper (absurd) set of conditions would prevail. It was a kind of running joke about academia and the over- examined life.

I smiled more often than you might think. The put-downs were often clever since Lars and W. knew their shared vulnerabilities well. Here is but one of the countless examples:
W., as usual, is reading about God. God and mathematics, that's all he's interested in. Somehow everything has to do with God, in whom W.'s not capable of believing, and mathematics, which W. is not capable of doing. And he's reading about God and mathematics in German, W. says, which means he doesn't really understand what he doesn't understand.

Other reviewers have likened this to Waiting for Godot, and I can see that. There’s meant to be something beyond the inactivity. I can’t be sure, but I think the “something� is a sort of meta-existentialism. (I also can’t be sure if I’m joking here or not.) It’s a slim, seemingly insubstantial book, but anything fueled by heavy drinking and references to Kafka has got to have abstract, fuzzy, and metaphorical foundations, right?

I opted for three stars, though at times thought it warranted four. In the end it seemed like whatever the point was, it was belabored. I remember thinking of those more experimental Saturday Night Live skits late in the show that would go to senseless extremes flogging the same basic joke. At least Iyer’s target was a fun one: his own chosen profession. He’s a philosophy prof at the university in Newcastle.

]]>
<![CDATA[Stories of Your Life and Others]]> 223380 ]]> 281 Ted Chiang 0330426648 Steve 0 to-read 4.28 2002 Stories of Your Life and Others
author: Ted Chiang
name: Steve
average rating: 4.28
book published: 2002
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2017/01/04
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
2016 on ŷ 33232571 2016 on ŷ should make an interesting and varied catalogue of books to inspire other readers in 2017.

For those of you who don't like to add titles you haven't actually 'read', you can place 2016 on ŷ on an 'exclusive' shelf. Exclusive shelves don't have to be listed under 'to read', 'currently reading' or 'read'. To create one, go to 'edit bookshelves' on your 'My Books' page, create a shelf name such as 'review-of-the year' and tick the 'exclusive' box. Your previous and future 'reviews of the year' can be collected together on this dedicated shelf.

Concept created by Fionnuala Lirsdottir.
Cover choice and graphics by Kalliope and Matt.
Cover painting by Cézanne.]]>
Various Steve 3 review of 2015 I enlisted the services of a highly regarded polling agency. They surveyed a wide cross-section of people to provide unbiased reactions to my reading list. I figured their feedback would be more honest than what I’d hear from my kind friends on ŷ who might be reflexively and/or uncritically supportive. Well, imagine my surprise when I learned that this same polling agency no longer exists. When I visited their website it basically said, “Blank you and the white, non-urban, non-college-educated horse you rode in on.�

So my format has to be different this time. I’ve been busier and more backlogged than usual this year and haven’t reviewed many books. What I’d like to do, then, is to use Fionnuala’s inspired vehicle for sharing to provide capsule reviews of the handful of books I didn’t get around to writing about previously.

2016 by George Orstradamus � This famous dystopian allegory written in 1984 tells the story of how pigs became the ruling class of a society in decline. An orange-tinted pig with unusually small trotters emerged as the leader. Many females, regardless of species, were castigated (ironically) as sows. Despite valid environmental concerns within the sty, foul odors were denied. The protagonist was an official within the Dept. of Post-Truth Politics responsible for news releases that may not have been in all cases wholly factual. A consistent theme seems to have been the thirst for power entirely for its own sake � well, that and maybe a little profit. The book also featured dogs who would respond in a Pavlovian way to various tones coming from small devices that had become their primary source of communication and entertainment. The rest of the book was just as far-fetched.

How Not to Downsize by Susan Ho � This was quite a timely read for me and my wife. We moved from our family-sized house in the suburbs to a high-rise apartment in the city last spring, and needed advice on how not to do it. Then we pretty much did exactly what Ho said not to do. The first what-not-to-do tip was not to make it a fast and furious affair. By the time you’re to the fourth box in the fifth closet, the “does it give you joy� criterion goes out the window, because there’s precious little joy to be had at that point. We were also told to dispose of old tax returns and financial statements with care. Contravening her wisdom, the flames of the fire I built with them were licking the fireplace mantel. Ho also mentioned that a dog in a high-rise is not the same as a dog with a fenced backyard. The biggest difference, though, was in reading advice as opposed to following it.

The Goat, Bound and Gagged by Theo Epstein and Joe Maddon, with forward by Steve Bartman � In case you hadn’t heard, the Cubs finally won a World Series. It had been 108 years of futility and occasional near-misses. Oh, and that damned . This riveting account came out two days after the deciding game. It may seem surprising that they were able to piece the book together so quickly, but drama like this (a seven game series, decided in extra innings of the final game with a fateful rain delay allowing the Cubs to collect themselves after blowing a big lead) writes itself. Even so, I’m still impressed by their timeliness. Champagne hangovers are some of the worst.

Monkey Fixiones by Collectively Anonymous � The Jorge Luis Borges Society decided to follow up the great master’s thoughts concerning infinite time, infinite libraries, and infinite turns in the labyrinths of life with a bold experiment. It’s actually a rather é speculation: that a sufficiently large number of monkeys typing away over a sufficiently long period of time would eventually reproduce Shakespeare. Monkey Fixiones is attempt number 5,288,314,159,654, and was deemed to be the closest one yet. My favorite line was one Goodreaders should appreciate: “To thine own shelf be true.� If I’m honest, though, most of the rest was just gibberish.

Pemberley’s Groom by Elinor Bennington � As proliferated as the space of Jane Austen fan fiction now is, I was surprised to find that the P&P perspective from the stables had not yet been covered. Miss Bennington has remedied that, with the verbal aplomb of a Regency Period parlor. I leave it to the reader to discover whether the horse whispering at the end was an incandescently happy encounter or not.

Slight of the Invisible Hand by Adam Schmeichel � According to the author, modern financial markets are now entirely synthesized by a cloud computing network in New York, a giant data warehouse in Silicon Valley, a small cabal of rogue traders in Chicago, and an algorithm written by an autistic French physicist co-located on servers in Tokyo and London. And anyone who isn’t connected in to this is bound to be a chump.

Fillmore by Ron Manuel Mirandow � For those of you who are not as familiar with opera, Mirandow is the librettist who put the Millard Fillmore story to song. The drama crescendos when Zachary Taylor dies and Fillmore becomes lucky President number 13. Be sure to find the version with the accompanying CD of the opera itself. The famous aria highlighting the endorsement the Know Nothing Party gave him in 1856 is not to be missed.

Hunch: Thinking With Your Gut When Your Gut Has Mush for Brains by Malachi Tidwell � The basic premise of this book is that much of human progress comes from trials that are mostly errors. A sort of decision-making Darwinism plays out whereby the people who are bad at playing their hunches (the majority) become less likely to have many options left, meaning that the less faulty minority will make a greater number of the important calls. Books like this succeed or fail based on the examples they give. Fortunately for Tidwell, he hit the mother lode with reality TV. In the end, though, I couldn’t help thinking of the book’s implications for my own life. Having read it puts me on what’s sure to be a less consequential decision-making path.

And now I’m second-guessing my decision to hit “Save.� Oh, what the hell. It’s been that kind of year.
]]>
4.23 2016 2016 on ŷ
author: Various
name: Steve
average rating: 4.23
book published: 2016
rating: 3
read at:
date added: 2016/12/20
shelves:
review:
Some of you may recall that for my year-end review of 2015 I enlisted the services of a highly regarded polling agency. They surveyed a wide cross-section of people to provide unbiased reactions to my reading list. I figured their feedback would be more honest than what I’d hear from my kind friends on ŷ who might be reflexively and/or uncritically supportive. Well, imagine my surprise when I learned that this same polling agency no longer exists. When I visited their website it basically said, “Blank you and the white, non-urban, non-college-educated horse you rode in on.�

So my format has to be different this time. I’ve been busier and more backlogged than usual this year and haven’t reviewed many books. What I’d like to do, then, is to use Fionnuala’s inspired vehicle for sharing to provide capsule reviews of the handful of books I didn’t get around to writing about previously.

2016 by George Orstradamus � This famous dystopian allegory written in 1984 tells the story of how pigs became the ruling class of a society in decline. An orange-tinted pig with unusually small trotters emerged as the leader. Many females, regardless of species, were castigated (ironically) as sows. Despite valid environmental concerns within the sty, foul odors were denied. The protagonist was an official within the Dept. of Post-Truth Politics responsible for news releases that may not have been in all cases wholly factual. A consistent theme seems to have been the thirst for power entirely for its own sake � well, that and maybe a little profit. The book also featured dogs who would respond in a Pavlovian way to various tones coming from small devices that had become their primary source of communication and entertainment. The rest of the book was just as far-fetched.

How Not to Downsize by Susan Ho � This was quite a timely read for me and my wife. We moved from our family-sized house in the suburbs to a high-rise apartment in the city last spring, and needed advice on how not to do it. Then we pretty much did exactly what Ho said not to do. The first what-not-to-do tip was not to make it a fast and furious affair. By the time you’re to the fourth box in the fifth closet, the “does it give you joy� criterion goes out the window, because there’s precious little joy to be had at that point. We were also told to dispose of old tax returns and financial statements with care. Contravening her wisdom, the flames of the fire I built with them were licking the fireplace mantel. Ho also mentioned that a dog in a high-rise is not the same as a dog with a fenced backyard. The biggest difference, though, was in reading advice as opposed to following it.

The Goat, Bound and Gagged by Theo Epstein and Joe Maddon, with forward by Steve Bartman � In case you hadn’t heard, the Cubs finally won a World Series. It had been 108 years of futility and occasional near-misses. Oh, and that damned . This riveting account came out two days after the deciding game. It may seem surprising that they were able to piece the book together so quickly, but drama like this (a seven game series, decided in extra innings of the final game with a fateful rain delay allowing the Cubs to collect themselves after blowing a big lead) writes itself. Even so, I’m still impressed by their timeliness. Champagne hangovers are some of the worst.

Monkey Fixiones by Collectively Anonymous � The Jorge Luis Borges Society decided to follow up the great master’s thoughts concerning infinite time, infinite libraries, and infinite turns in the labyrinths of life with a bold experiment. It’s actually a rather é speculation: that a sufficiently large number of monkeys typing away over a sufficiently long period of time would eventually reproduce Shakespeare. Monkey Fixiones is attempt number 5,288,314,159,654, and was deemed to be the closest one yet. My favorite line was one Goodreaders should appreciate: “To thine own shelf be true.� If I’m honest, though, most of the rest was just gibberish.

Pemberley’s Groom by Elinor Bennington � As proliferated as the space of Jane Austen fan fiction now is, I was surprised to find that the P&P perspective from the stables had not yet been covered. Miss Bennington has remedied that, with the verbal aplomb of a Regency Period parlor. I leave it to the reader to discover whether the horse whispering at the end was an incandescently happy encounter or not.

Slight of the Invisible Hand by Adam Schmeichel � According to the author, modern financial markets are now entirely synthesized by a cloud computing network in New York, a giant data warehouse in Silicon Valley, a small cabal of rogue traders in Chicago, and an algorithm written by an autistic French physicist co-located on servers in Tokyo and London. And anyone who isn’t connected in to this is bound to be a chump.

Fillmore by Ron Manuel Mirandow � For those of you who are not as familiar with opera, Mirandow is the librettist who put the Millard Fillmore story to song. The drama crescendos when Zachary Taylor dies and Fillmore becomes lucky President number 13. Be sure to find the version with the accompanying CD of the opera itself. The famous aria highlighting the endorsement the Know Nothing Party gave him in 1856 is not to be missed.

Hunch: Thinking With Your Gut When Your Gut Has Mush for Brains by Malachi Tidwell � The basic premise of this book is that much of human progress comes from trials that are mostly errors. A sort of decision-making Darwinism plays out whereby the people who are bad at playing their hunches (the majority) become less likely to have many options left, meaning that the less faulty minority will make a greater number of the important calls. Books like this succeed or fail based on the examples they give. Fortunately for Tidwell, he hit the mother lode with reality TV. In the end, though, I couldn’t help thinking of the book’s implications for my own life. Having read it puts me on what’s sure to be a less consequential decision-making path.

And now I’m second-guessing my decision to hit “Save.� Oh, what the hell. It’s been that kind of year.

]]>
The Sellout 22237161
Born in the "agrarian ghetto" of Dickens―on the southern outskirts of Los Angeles―the narrator of The Sellout resigns himself to the fate of lower-middle-class Californians: "I'd die in the same bedroom I'd grown up in, looking up at the cracks in the stucco ceiling that've been there since '68 quake." Raised by a single father, a controversial sociologist, he spent his childhood as the subject in racially charged psychological studies. He is led to believe that his father's pioneering work will result in a memoir that will solve his family's financial woes. But when his father is killed in a police shoot-out, he realizes there never was a memoir. All that's left is the bill for a drive-thru funeral.

Fueled by this deceit and the general disrepair of his hometown, the narrator sets out to right another wrong: Dickens has literally been removed from the map to save California from further embarrassment. Enlisting the help of the town's most famous resident―the last surviving Little Rascal, Hominy Jenkins―he initiates the most outrageous action conceivable: reinstating slavery and segregating the local high school, which lands him in the Supreme Court.]]>
289 Paul Beatty 0374260508 Steve 4
Satires, to me, are like hoppy craft beers. The natural skew to the bitter side should be balanced out for optimal flavor. Paul Beatty’s deft touch with a joke made the astringency you’d expect from charges of racism something other than a straight diatribe. Smiles open more minds than they close.

The premise of the book is actually sort of absurd. Bonbon, the narrator, farms the land in the “agrarian ghetto� neighborhood of LA called Dickens. His father was a sociologist who performed half-crazy, race-centric experiments on him when he was young that never amounted to meaningful research, but did mess with his mind a bit. When his father died (shot in a police snafu), the son inherited the farm, a funeral bill, and a legacy of racial awareness. Then, since it was an embarrassment to the city of LA, Dickens just disappeared from the map. At that point our narrator mounts an informal campaign to bring Dickens back. He makes signs announcing that a driver is entering, draws lines surrounding the area, then hits on the idea of segregating it to really stand out. He had an accomplice named Hominy Jenkins, a celebrity of sorts, known for being the last surviving cast member from The Little Rascals. Hominy, like the more famous Buckwheat, was a "pickaninny" who could “black it up� with bug eyes and electrified hair on cue. Somehow Hominy had it in his increasingly senile head that race had more meaning to him then and that a way to recapture this feeling was to offer himself up as a slave doing light labor (he was old) on the farm. The book opens out of order, with this voluntary slavery case being heard by the Supreme Court. Like I said, it’s kind of ridiculous, but it does allow a very full discussion of race � the stereotypes, the archetypes, and a panoply of attitudes from subtle to extreme.

What the book lacked in plausibility it made up for in presentation. It’s like a serious essay on black consciousness as presented by Dave Chappelle at his edgy, observational best. Let my try to convince you by way of example.

§ As Bonbon’s court case was making its way up the judicial ladder, he said: “In neighborhoods like the one I grew up in, places that are poor in praxis but rich in rhetoric, the homies have a saying -- I'd rather be judged by twelve than carried by six. [...] I'm not all that streetwise, but to my knowledge there's no appellate court corollary. I've never heard a corner store roughneck take a sip of malt liquor and say, ‘I'd rather be reviewed by nine than arbitrated by one.�"

§ He wondered why a certain successful type would mostly “talk black,� dropping g’s in their gerunds, but when it came to their public television appearances, they’d sound like “Kelsey Grammer with a stick up his ass.�

§ Opining about another black intellectual: “Come on, he cares about black people like a seven-footer cares about basketball. He has to care because what else would he be good at.�

§ Foy Cheshire was a prominent archetype who hosted a dying cable show focusing on black issues, had become successful stealing ideas from the narrator’s father, and had no original thoughts of his own. Foy was the one who had dubbed Bonbon ‘the sellout� for not buying into a very particular brand of racial animosity. Someone speculated that “If he (Foy) was indeed an ‘autodidact,� there's no doubt he had the world's shittiest teacher.�

§ In one of the few non-race-related comments, Bonbon said: “I've always liked rote. The formulaic repetitiveness of filing and stuffing envelopes appeals to me in some fundamental life-affirming way. I would've made a good factory worker, supply-room clerk, or Hollywood scriptwriter.�

§ Hominy was actually pretty lucid for someone who sought beatings and servitude. One example: “You know, massa, Bugs Bunny wasn't nothing but Br'er Rabbit with a better agent.�

§ Here’s a great rejoinder to all who suggest, “You'd rather be here than in Africa. The trump card all narrow-minded nativists play. [...] I seriously doubt that some slave ship ancestor, in those idle moments between being raped and beaten, was standing knee-deep in their own feces rationalizing that, in the end, the generations of murder, unbearable pain and suffering, mental anguish, and rampant disease will all be worth it because someday my great-great-great-great-grandson will have Wi-Fi.�

§ I also liked the name that Bonbon imagined for the white-only school in his planned segregation � Wheaton Academy. In contrast, nonwhites had Chaff Middle School. The Wheaton/Chaff distinction was a big one.

I laughed every time I picked this book up. And I’m certainly sympathetic to the essential plight, despite the anaesthetizing humor. In addition, though I didn’t catch every reference, my street smart IQ is now at least a little closer to triple digits. Plus, its recognition in winning the National Book Critics Circle award for fiction as well as the Booker Prize speaks to the quality of the writing. Beatty’s background in poetry comes through with great word choices and cadences.

Even so, I had to dock one star. While it’s easy enough to see the satirical poke at wrong-headedness, it was harder to figure the purpose of Bonbon’s ironic prescription. I wouldn’t presume that the segregation was meant to provide more motivation for Blacks and Latinos, though the Chaff School’s rising performance numbers were cited as though they were a consequence of having been separated. (The fact is, though, there weren’t any white kids there to begin with.) Was it more like the arguments you sometimes hear about the advantages of an education at a traditionally black university? I couldn’t say. Nor do I think the counterintuitive premise was meant just for a laugh. My best guess is that the extreme actions � slavery and segregation orchestrated by a black man � were meant to draw attention to the still existing, more subtle forms of racism. There was a line in the book about how it’s illegal to shout fire in a crowded theater. Bonbon went on to say that he whispered ‘Racism� in a post-racial world. Beatty himself, in interviews, is tight-lipped when asked what he thinks it all means. Maybe the discussions the book inspires are what matter most.
]]>
3.75 2015 The Sellout
author: Paul Beatty
name: Steve
average rating: 3.75
book published: 2015
rating: 4
read at: 2016/12/01
date added: 2016/12/12
shelves:
review:
As an urban commuter I felt that pulling a book out with lawn jockeys on the cover should come with a disclaimer. Hey everybody, it’s meant to be � you know � ironic. It’s written by a black guy; it’s satire. And just so you know, my iPhone doesn’t have one word of Breitbart News on it.

Satires, to me, are like hoppy craft beers. The natural skew to the bitter side should be balanced out for optimal flavor. Paul Beatty’s deft touch with a joke made the astringency you’d expect from charges of racism something other than a straight diatribe. Smiles open more minds than they close.

The premise of the book is actually sort of absurd. Bonbon, the narrator, farms the land in the “agrarian ghetto� neighborhood of LA called Dickens. His father was a sociologist who performed half-crazy, race-centric experiments on him when he was young that never amounted to meaningful research, but did mess with his mind a bit. When his father died (shot in a police snafu), the son inherited the farm, a funeral bill, and a legacy of racial awareness. Then, since it was an embarrassment to the city of LA, Dickens just disappeared from the map. At that point our narrator mounts an informal campaign to bring Dickens back. He makes signs announcing that a driver is entering, draws lines surrounding the area, then hits on the idea of segregating it to really stand out. He had an accomplice named Hominy Jenkins, a celebrity of sorts, known for being the last surviving cast member from The Little Rascals. Hominy, like the more famous Buckwheat, was a "pickaninny" who could “black it up� with bug eyes and electrified hair on cue. Somehow Hominy had it in his increasingly senile head that race had more meaning to him then and that a way to recapture this feeling was to offer himself up as a slave doing light labor (he was old) on the farm. The book opens out of order, with this voluntary slavery case being heard by the Supreme Court. Like I said, it’s kind of ridiculous, but it does allow a very full discussion of race � the stereotypes, the archetypes, and a panoply of attitudes from subtle to extreme.

What the book lacked in plausibility it made up for in presentation. It’s like a serious essay on black consciousness as presented by Dave Chappelle at his edgy, observational best. Let my try to convince you by way of example.

§ As Bonbon’s court case was making its way up the judicial ladder, he said: “In neighborhoods like the one I grew up in, places that are poor in praxis but rich in rhetoric, the homies have a saying -- I'd rather be judged by twelve than carried by six. [...] I'm not all that streetwise, but to my knowledge there's no appellate court corollary. I've never heard a corner store roughneck take a sip of malt liquor and say, ‘I'd rather be reviewed by nine than arbitrated by one.�"

§ He wondered why a certain successful type would mostly “talk black,� dropping g’s in their gerunds, but when it came to their public television appearances, they’d sound like “Kelsey Grammer with a stick up his ass.�

§ Opining about another black intellectual: “Come on, he cares about black people like a seven-footer cares about basketball. He has to care because what else would he be good at.�

§ Foy Cheshire was a prominent archetype who hosted a dying cable show focusing on black issues, had become successful stealing ideas from the narrator’s father, and had no original thoughts of his own. Foy was the one who had dubbed Bonbon ‘the sellout� for not buying into a very particular brand of racial animosity. Someone speculated that “If he (Foy) was indeed an ‘autodidact,� there's no doubt he had the world's shittiest teacher.�

§ In one of the few non-race-related comments, Bonbon said: “I've always liked rote. The formulaic repetitiveness of filing and stuffing envelopes appeals to me in some fundamental life-affirming way. I would've made a good factory worker, supply-room clerk, or Hollywood scriptwriter.�

§ Hominy was actually pretty lucid for someone who sought beatings and servitude. One example: “You know, massa, Bugs Bunny wasn't nothing but Br'er Rabbit with a better agent.�

§ Here’s a great rejoinder to all who suggest, “You'd rather be here than in Africa. The trump card all narrow-minded nativists play. [...] I seriously doubt that some slave ship ancestor, in those idle moments between being raped and beaten, was standing knee-deep in their own feces rationalizing that, in the end, the generations of murder, unbearable pain and suffering, mental anguish, and rampant disease will all be worth it because someday my great-great-great-great-grandson will have Wi-Fi.�

§ I also liked the name that Bonbon imagined for the white-only school in his planned segregation � Wheaton Academy. In contrast, nonwhites had Chaff Middle School. The Wheaton/Chaff distinction was a big one.

I laughed every time I picked this book up. And I’m certainly sympathetic to the essential plight, despite the anaesthetizing humor. In addition, though I didn’t catch every reference, my street smart IQ is now at least a little closer to triple digits. Plus, its recognition in winning the National Book Critics Circle award for fiction as well as the Booker Prize speaks to the quality of the writing. Beatty’s background in poetry comes through with great word choices and cadences.

Even so, I had to dock one star. While it’s easy enough to see the satirical poke at wrong-headedness, it was harder to figure the purpose of Bonbon’s ironic prescription. I wouldn’t presume that the segregation was meant to provide more motivation for Blacks and Latinos, though the Chaff School’s rising performance numbers were cited as though they were a consequence of having been separated. (The fact is, though, there weren’t any white kids there to begin with.) Was it more like the arguments you sometimes hear about the advantages of an education at a traditionally black university? I couldn’t say. Nor do I think the counterintuitive premise was meant just for a laugh. My best guess is that the extreme actions � slavery and segregation orchestrated by a black man � were meant to draw attention to the still existing, more subtle forms of racism. There was a line in the book about how it’s illegal to shout fire in a crowded theater. Bonbon went on to say that he whispered ‘Racism� in a post-racial world. Beatty himself, in interviews, is tight-lipped when asked what he thinks it all means. Maybe the discussions the book inspires are what matter most.

]]>
Shantaram 33600
So begins this epic, mesmerizing first novel set in the underworld of contemporary Bombay. Shantaram is narrated by Lin, an escaped convict with a false passport who flees maximum security prison in Australia for the teeming streets of a city where he can disappear.

Accompanied by his guide and faithful friend, Prabaker, the two enter Bombay's hidden society of beggars and gangsters, prostitutes and holy men, soldiers and actors, and Indians and exiles from other countries, who seek in this remarkable place what they cannot find elsewhere.

As a hunted man without a home, family, or identity, Lin searches for love and meaning while running a clinic in one of the city's poorest slums, and serving his apprenticeship in the dark arts of the Bombay mafia. The search leads him to war, prison torture, murder, and a series of enigmatic and bloody betrayals. The keys to unlock the mysteries and intrigues that bind Lin are held by two people. The first is Khader Khan: mafia godfather, criminal-philosopher-saint, and mentor to Lin in the underworld of the Golden City. The second is Karla: elusive, dangerous, and beautiful, whose passions are driven by secrets that torment her and yet give her a terrible power.

Burning slums and five-star hotels, romantic love and prison agonies, criminal wars and Bollywood films, spiritual gurus and mujaheddin guerrillas—this huge novel has the world of human experience in its reach, and a passionate love for India at its heart. Based on the life of the author, it is by any measure the debut of an extraordinary voice in literature.]]>
936 Gregory David Roberts 192076920X Steve 0 to-read 4.27 2003 Shantaram
author: Gregory David Roberts
name: Steve
average rating: 4.27
book published: 2003
rating: 0
read at:
date added: 2016/12/06
shelves: to-read
review:

]]>
The Spectator Bird 11045
Joe Allston is a cantankerous, retired literary agent who is, in his own words, "just killing time until time gets around to killing me". His parents and his only son are long dead, leaving him with neither ancestors nor descendants, tradition nor ties. His job, trafficking the talent of others, has not been his choice. He has passed through life as a spectator, before retreating to the woods of California in the 1970s with only his wife, Ruth, by his side.

When an unexpected postcard from a long-lost friend arrives, Allston returns to the journals of a trip he has taken years before, a journey to his mother's birthplace where he once sought a link with his past. Uncovering this history floods Allston with memories, both grotesque and poignant, and finally vindicates him of his past and lays bare that Joe Allston has never been quite spectator enough.]]>
214 Wallace Stegner 0140139400 Steve 4
I’ve told you about the malaise. I might as well mention a big reason for it (as long as I’m careful not to reveal more than the back cover does). Joe Allston, a crusty 69-year-old former literary agent, and his kindhearted wife Ruth live a rather isolated life in northern California. They had lost their son tragically in surf-boarding accident 20 some years prior. To make matters worse, Joe felt there had been unresolved father-son issues when it happened.

The story begins as a postcard arrives from an old friend from a trip Joe and Ruth had taken to Denmark. The extended stay there was, in part, meant as therapy to take their minds off their then-fresh and constant grief. It also allowed Joe to explore the small town where his mother had lived before shipping off to the states and having him. As chance would have it, they stayed with a Danish countess whose diminished circumstances required her to take in boarders. Astrid (the countess) was the one who sent the postcard. This sparked memories of the trip that Joe pursued even more by breaking out a journal he kept at the time. Ruth asked that he read it aloud so that she, too, could take the trip back in time.

The first entries in the journal were set on the boat ride over. They had met an older couple, which prompted Joe to write descriptively about their ilk, and about censorious people in general.
They sit in lace-curtained parlors and tsk-tsk on an indrawn breath, they know every unwanted pregnancy in town sooner than the girl does, they want English teachers in Augustana College fired for assigning A Farewell to Arms, they wrote the Volstead Act.

Once they arrived, the focus of the journal shifts to the countess. They learn that despite her elegance and good breeding, she was getting the cold shoulder from society types. Her estranged husband, unbeknownst to her when they’d been together, had been a Nazi sympathizer. Later into their stay they learn something else that explains the perceptions of her peers, but it would be a spoiler to say any more. I will say that you may or may not buy into this revelation. I decided that for me it was just a side issue, and that the far more important part of the book was Joe’s exploration of self.

This self under the scope was very thoroughly studied. Joe’s observational skills as a “spectator�, passively taking things in, were keen enough to recognize himself as a spectator, passively taking things in. This quote was telling:
I was reminded of a remark of Willa Cather's, that you can't paint sunlight, you can only paint what it does with shadows on a wall. If you examine a life, as Socrates has been so tediously advising us to do for so many centuries, do you really examine the life, or do you examine the shadows it casts on other lives? Entity or relationships? Objective reality or the vanishing point of a multiple perspective exercise? Prism or the rainbows it refracts? And what if you're the wall? What if you never cast a shadow or rainbow of your own, but have only caught those cast by others?

Relatedly, Joe seemed to regret his apparent detachment:
That is the way the modern temper would read me. Babbitt, the man who in all his life never did one thing he really wanted to. One of those Blake was scornful of, who controlled their passions because their passions are feeble enough to be controlled. One of those Genteel Tradition characters whose whole pale ethos is subsumed in an act of renunciation.

But might there have been times, thinking of what the journal hinted at but omitted, when passions were less tepid? And might actions or inactions in the face of these be even more defining in his life? See, I know the answers to these questions, and the only way you will is to read this masterful book.

While I don’t rate this one quite as high as Angle of Repose or Crossing to Safety, that’s a standard few, if any, can surpass. Stegner was just about Joe’s age when he wrote it, and advancing years were a theme. As sour as old Vin de Joe had become, I’d have preferred a cheerier example to live by. Beyond that, lines like this are beginning to hit home:
[...] I felt an uneasy adolescent peeking from behind my old-age make-up, as if I were a sixteen-year-old playing Uncle Vanya in the high school play [...]

Hey, but at least I wouldn’t call my face a “spiderweb with eyes.� Not yet, anyway.

Quibbles aside, here’s the bottom line: Wallace Stegner is the real deal. With him, it’s insight and great writing on every page. I hope you all do yourselves the favor of his wisdom and art.
]]>
3.98 1976 The Spectator Bird
author: Wallace Stegner
name: Steve
average rating: 3.98
book published: 1976
rating: 4
read at: 2016/10/01
date added: 2016/12/01
shelves:
review:
Ever notice how, on rare occasions, certain writers really stand out for their ability to capture the subtle and complex ways of folks? It’s usually a reason to celebrate since these insights are there for us to imbibe. But it may be a source of distress if what’s revealed is a difficult truth. For me, Wallace Stegner is that sort of author, and this book is one I celebra-hate. Actually, hate is too strong a word, even when it’s combined with a good thing. I should say I felt twinges of disappointment when recognizably human elements in the main character’s make-up prevented a greater happiness. Don’t get me wrong. I’m not looking for slants a la Hallmark. I just feel sad about opportunities missed, especially when those doing the missing are characters whose innermost thoughts I’ve been absorbing with interest.

I’ve told you about the malaise. I might as well mention a big reason for it (as long as I’m careful not to reveal more than the back cover does). Joe Allston, a crusty 69-year-old former literary agent, and his kindhearted wife Ruth live a rather isolated life in northern California. They had lost their son tragically in surf-boarding accident 20 some years prior. To make matters worse, Joe felt there had been unresolved father-son issues when it happened.

The story begins as a postcard arrives from an old friend from a trip Joe and Ruth had taken to Denmark. The extended stay there was, in part, meant as therapy to take their minds off their then-fresh and constant grief. It also allowed Joe to explore the small town where his mother had lived before shipping off to the states and having him. As chance would have it, they stayed with a Danish countess whose diminished circumstances required her to take in boarders. Astrid (the countess) was the one who sent the postcard. This sparked memories of the trip that Joe pursued even more by breaking out a journal he kept at the time. Ruth asked that he read it aloud so that she, too, could take the trip back in time.

The first entries in the journal were set on the boat ride over. They had met an older couple, which prompted Joe to write descriptively about their ilk, and about censorious people in general.
They sit in lace-curtained parlors and tsk-tsk on an indrawn breath, they know every unwanted pregnancy in town sooner than the girl does, they want English teachers in Augustana College fired for assigning A Farewell to Arms, they wrote the Volstead Act.

Once they arrived, the focus of the journal shifts to the countess. They learn that despite her elegance and good breeding, she was getting the cold shoulder from society types. Her estranged husband, unbeknownst to her when they’d been together, had been a Nazi sympathizer. Later into their stay they learn something else that explains the perceptions of her peers, but it would be a spoiler to say any more. I will say that you may or may not buy into this revelation. I decided that for me it was just a side issue, and that the far more important part of the book was Joe’s exploration of self.

This self under the scope was very thoroughly studied. Joe’s observational skills as a “spectator�, passively taking things in, were keen enough to recognize himself as a spectator, passively taking things in. This quote was telling:
I was reminded of a remark of Willa Cather's, that you can't paint sunlight, you can only paint what it does with shadows on a wall. If you examine a life, as Socrates has been so tediously advising us to do for so many centuries, do you really examine the life, or do you examine the shadows it casts on other lives? Entity or relationships? Objective reality or the vanishing point of a multiple perspective exercise? Prism or the rainbows it refracts? And what if you're the wall? What if you never cast a shadow or rainbow of your own, but have only caught those cast by others?

Relatedly, Joe seemed to regret his apparent detachment:
That is the way the modern temper would read me. Babbitt, the man who in all his life never did one thing he really wanted to. One of those Blake was scornful of, who controlled their passions because their passions are feeble enough to be controlled. One of those Genteel Tradition characters whose whole pale ethos is subsumed in an act of renunciation.

But might there have been times, thinking of what the journal hinted at but omitted, when passions were less tepid? And might actions or inactions in the face of these be even more defining in his life? See, I know the answers to these questions, and the only way you will is to read this masterful book.

While I don’t rate this one quite as high as Angle of Repose or Crossing to Safety, that’s a standard few, if any, can surpass. Stegner was just about Joe’s age when he wrote it, and advancing years were a theme. As sour as old Vin de Joe had become, I’d have preferred a cheerier example to live by. Beyond that, lines like this are beginning to hit home:
[...] I felt an uneasy adolescent peeking from behind my old-age make-up, as if I were a sixteen-year-old playing Uncle Vanya in the high school play [...]

Hey, but at least I wouldn’t call my face a “spiderweb with eyes.� Not yet, anyway.

Quibbles aside, here’s the bottom line: Wallace Stegner is the real deal. With him, it’s insight and great writing on every page. I hope you all do yourselves the favor of his wisdom and art.

]]>
<![CDATA[How Life Imitates the World Series]]> 613291 304 Thomas Boswell 0140064699 Steve 4 do recall was that it was well-written and packed with great stories. But that's beside the point.

I'm afraid my motives for writing this pseudo-quasi-non-review are all too transparent. It has little to do with the book itself aside from the title. You see, as I sit here hours away from the all-important 7th game, it's with more hope than a Cubs fan is usually allotted that the events on the field will bode well for my team and, by extension, for my life! ]]>
4.13 1982 How Life Imitates the World Series
author: Thomas Boswell
name: Steve
average rating: 4.13
book published: 1982
rating: 4
read at:
date added: 2016/11/02
shelves:
review:
I read this too long ago to remember the details. What I do recall was that it was well-written and packed with great stories. But that's beside the point.

I'm afraid my motives for writing this pseudo-quasi-non-review are all too transparent. It has little to do with the book itself aside from the title. You see, as I sit here hours away from the all-important 7th game, it's with more hope than a Cubs fan is usually allotted that the events on the field will bode well for my team and, by extension, for my life!
]]>
Everybody's Fool (Sully, #2) 27068575
The irresistible Sully, who in the intervening years has come by some unexpected good fortune, is staring down a VA cardiologist's estimate that he has only a year or two left, and it's hard work trying to keep this news from the most important people in his life: Ruth, the married woman he carried on with for years ... the ultra-hapless Rub Squeers, who worries that he and Sully aren't still best friends ... Sully's son and grandson, for whom he was mostly an absentee figure (and now a regretful one). We also enjoy the company of Doug Raymer, the chief of police who's obsessing primarily over the identity of the man his wife might've been about to run off with, before dying in a freak accident ... Bath's mayor, the former academic Gus Moynihan, whose wife problems are, if anything, even more pressing ... and then there's Carl Roebuck, whose lifelong run of failing upward might now come to ruin. And finally, there's Charice Bond - a light at the end of the tunnel that is Chief Raymer's office - as well as her brother, Jerome, who might well be the train barreling into the station.

Everybody's Fool is filled with humor, heart, hard times and people you can't help but love, possibly because their various faults make them so stridently human.]]>
477 Richard Russo 0307270645 Steve 4 do?� I’m not proud of my snobbery, but cop to it because I also know how to counter it. The antidote, as I’m sure you’ve all figured, is Richard Russo. His latest, a return to North Bath in upstate New York, offers a ready answer: they have lives. We who are high on our horses may look down and not see it, but these people have conflicts, interactions, feelings, flaws, and wisdom � pretty much the same as everyone else. Their economic engines may sputter at times, but they get by.

Everybody’s Fool follows Nobody’s Fool, one I rate near the top of all time. The earlier book was all about Sully, a man of apparent contradictions. He’s a bit rough around the edges, but with an obvious charm; he makes poor decisions, but is quick-witted and bright; and he’s an authority-flouting scofflaw with a strong moral sense. Paul Newman played him to perfection in the movie version, which I also recommend unreservedly.

I went into this book fearing sequelitis. What if it was like the movie version of Gilligan’s Island, where a perfectly brilliant sit com morphed into cheesy, chaotic nonsense? (OK, so maybe that’s not the best example given how little morphing was required to achieve such a state.) More to the point, what if it became an exercise in redundancy � character stasis, setting stagnation, and ennui as the action unfolds? But no, ten years hence it was like visiting old friends you haven’t seen in a while. They’re still recognizable, but with interesting differences. The book introduced new characters, too. I only occasionally got the sense that Russo was cashing in on his earlier successes.

Sully himself was largely unchanged, despite altered circumstances. He’d come into some money, thanks in part to his religiously played trifecta finally coming in. But then he got counterpunched with worrisome news from his doctor. As Sully’s friends could tell you, though, he’s the type to take everything in his stride. Sully’s sad sack friend Rub, is still as simple as ever, with his happiness driven entirely by time spent with Sully � well, that and cheeseburgers and beer. An old flame, Ruth, had become more just a friend, as wise to the ways of the world as Sully. Ruth’s husband played an expanded role just as his junk emporium expanded beyond the walls of their home. Their daughter had been married to a misogynist who was bad even by the standards of certain politicians. In fact, one of the major plot points involved this guy’s hateful nature. Sully and Ruth were especially skeptical about his having found God under a newly turned leaf.

A fairly minor character in Nobody’s Fool was way more fleshed out in this one. It was the hapless police officer, Douglas Raymer, who we grow to appreciate far more when we see how he came by his self-loathing. He was dealing with a lot: an idée fixe involving an affair he suspected his wife was having right before she died, his competence as chief of police, and confusing (flirtatious?) interactions with the smart, sassy woman at department headquarters named Charice. In the movie Nobody’s Fool, Raymer was played by Philip Seymour Hoffman. It was a bit part, but had this book been included as well, it would have been a role more worthy of the late, great actor.

I suppose as character-driven as Russo novels typically are, it doesn’t hurt to list even more of the cast. There was a reprise for Carl Roebuck, the would-be player whose construction company “had about one swirl around the drain left, after which he'd be officially wiped out.� Carl had some of the funnier lines if you’re at all partial to gallows humor. To wit:
"We've come this far."
At this Carl snorted.
"What? Sully said.
"Nothing," Carl said. "I was just thinking about Napoleon invading Russia."
Both Sully and Raymer blinked at this.
"Also the Crusades and the Spanish Inquisition and the Vietnam War," Carl continued. "Not one of those clusterf*cks could truly commence until somebody said, What the hell. We've come this far."

The mayor, a former academic with good intentions, and his half-deranged wife, who was only really at home in an imaginary world on the phone with imaginary friends, also had parts to play. Charice’s twin brother, the urbane but unstable Jerome, was another concern in Raymer’s world. There were small roles for Sully’s son and grandson, too. Son Peter was often on his guard, though, as the following would suggest: “Any youthful enthusiasm he expressed for how his grandfather navigated the world Peter considered his duty to temper, lest the romance of the tool belt and barstool take root.� Miss Beryl, the kindly former teacher and Sully’s landlady in the first book, was no longer alive, but she did have a great line in one of the flashbacks: "We don't forgive people because they deserve it," she said. "We forgive them because we deserve it." The fact that no one understands this, she said, doesn’t make it less true.

But the biggest other character was [cliché alert] the town of North Bath. Russo makes us physically present in Ruth’s diner with burgers on the grill, in the low-rent housing where misadventures were sure to take place, and in the lesser of the two taverns that smelled of “stale beer and overmatched urinal cakes.� Russo was also clever to create a rival town, Schuyler Springs, which attracted the nice restaurants, which did not suddenly have funky smells seeping in with the muck, and, going back in time, did not have its spring waters run dry like North Bath did. The contrast was palpable.

I enjoyed this book thoroughly. It might not have been quite as fresh as its precursor, but it still had plenty of humor, action, and humanity to recommend it. And with books like this, I’m a lot less likely to encounter a Sully, or even a Rub, and think how small their lives must be.
]]>
4.06 2016 Everybody's Fool (Sully, #2)
author: Richard Russo
name: Steve
average rating: 4.06
book published: 2016
rating: 4
read at: 2016/10/01
date added: 2016/10/27
shelves:
review:
I doubt I’m the only one who’s ever driven through small town America and wondered, “What do these people do?� I’m not proud of my snobbery, but cop to it because I also know how to counter it. The antidote, as I’m sure you’ve all figured, is Richard Russo. His latest, a return to North Bath in upstate New York, offers a ready answer: they have lives. We who are high on our horses may look down and not see it, but these people have conflicts, interactions, feelings, flaws, and wisdom � pretty much the same as everyone else. Their economic engines may sputter at times, but they get by.

Everybody’s Fool follows Nobody’s Fool, one I rate near the top of all time. The earlier book was all about Sully, a man of apparent contradictions. He’s a bit rough around the edges, but with an obvious charm; he makes poor decisions, but is quick-witted and bright; and he’s an authority-flouting scofflaw with a strong moral sense. Paul Newman played him to perfection in the movie version, which I also recommend unreservedly.

I went into this book fearing sequelitis. What if it was like the movie version of Gilligan’s Island, where a perfectly brilliant sit com morphed into cheesy, chaotic nonsense? (OK, so maybe that’s not the best example given how little morphing was required to achieve such a state.) More to the point, what if it became an exercise in redundancy � character stasis, setting stagnation, and ennui as the action unfolds? But no, ten years hence it was like visiting old friends you haven’t seen in a while. They’re still recognizable, but with interesting differences. The book introduced new characters, too. I only occasionally got the sense that Russo was cashing in on his earlier successes.

Sully himself was largely unchanged, despite altered circumstances. He’d come into some money, thanks in part to his religiously played trifecta finally coming in. But then he got counterpunched with worrisome news from his doctor. As Sully’s friends could tell you, though, he’s the type to take everything in his stride. Sully’s sad sack friend Rub, is still as simple as ever, with his happiness driven entirely by time spent with Sully � well, that and cheeseburgers and beer. An old flame, Ruth, had become more just a friend, as wise to the ways of the world as Sully. Ruth’s husband played an expanded role just as his junk emporium expanded beyond the walls of their home. Their daughter had been married to a misogynist who was bad even by the standards of certain politicians. In fact, one of the major plot points involved this guy’s hateful nature. Sully and Ruth were especially skeptical about his having found God under a newly turned leaf.

A fairly minor character in Nobody’s Fool was way more fleshed out in this one. It was the hapless police officer, Douglas Raymer, who we grow to appreciate far more when we see how he came by his self-loathing. He was dealing with a lot: an idée fixe involving an affair he suspected his wife was having right before she died, his competence as chief of police, and confusing (flirtatious?) interactions with the smart, sassy woman at department headquarters named Charice. In the movie Nobody’s Fool, Raymer was played by Philip Seymour Hoffman. It was a bit part, but had this book been included as well, it would have been a role more worthy of the late, great actor.

I suppose as character-driven as Russo novels typically are, it doesn’t hurt to list even more of the cast. There was a reprise for Carl Roebuck, the would-be player whose construction company “had about one swirl around the drain left, after which he'd be officially wiped out.� Carl had some of the funnier lines if you’re at all partial to gallows humor. To wit:
"We've come this far."
At this Carl snorted.
"What? Sully said.
"Nothing," Carl said. "I was just thinking about Napoleon invading Russia."
Both Sully and Raymer blinked at this.
"Also the Crusades and the Spanish Inquisition and the Vietnam War," Carl continued. "Not one of those clusterf*cks could truly commence until somebody said, What the hell. We've come this far."

The mayor, a former academic with good intentions, and his half-deranged wife, who was only really at home in an imaginary world on the phone with imaginary friends, also had parts to play. Charice’s twin brother, the urbane but unstable Jerome, was another concern in Raymer’s world. There were small roles for Sully’s son and grandson, too. Son Peter was often on his guard, though, as the following would suggest: “Any youthful enthusiasm he expressed for how his grandfather navigated the world Peter considered his duty to temper, lest the romance of the tool belt and barstool take root.� Miss Beryl, the kindly former teacher and Sully’s landlady in the first book, was no longer alive, but she did have a great line in one of the flashbacks: "We don't forgive people because they deserve it," she said. "We forgive them because we deserve it." The fact that no one understands this, she said, doesn’t make it less true.

But the biggest other character was [cliché alert] the town of North Bath. Russo makes us physically present in Ruth’s diner with burgers on the grill, in the low-rent housing where misadventures were sure to take place, and in the lesser of the two taverns that smelled of “stale beer and overmatched urinal cakes.� Russo was also clever to create a rival town, Schuyler Springs, which attracted the nice restaurants, which did not suddenly have funky smells seeping in with the muck, and, going back in time, did not have its spring waters run dry like North Bath did. The contrast was palpable.

I enjoyed this book thoroughly. It might not have been quite as fresh as its precursor, but it still had plenty of humor, action, and humanity to recommend it. And with books like this, I’m a lot less likely to encounter a Sully, or even a Rub, and think how small their lives must be.

]]>
<![CDATA[Farewell, My Lovely (Philip Marlowe, #2)]]> 2050 Alternative cover edition of ISBN 9780394758275

Marlowe's about to give up on a completely routine case when he finds himself in the wrong place at the right time to get caught up in a murder that leads to a ring of jewel thieves, another murder, a fortune-teller, a couple more murders, and more corruption than your average graveyard.]]>
292 Raymond Chandler Steve 3 Excerpts from a dinner honoring the 2016 winner of the Otis Chandler Award for Literary Criticism

Audience Question: You’re known for your essay on the Kantian aesthetic of disinterested judgment as seen in the works of James Joyce, William Gaddis, and Dan Brown. Are there other authors or titles that come to mind, perhaps even more focused on the primacy of style?

Steve: Well, let’s see� Maybe the first book I read where a certain shadowy deportment really popped as a pure statement of style was Raymond Chandler’s Farewell, My Lovely. The book itself was a cannibalization of three earlier short stories of his. Whereas the stories were neatly contained as standalones, the edits in piecing them together were more slapdash, sacrificing both congruency and clarity in the process. Chandler responded saying, "My whole career is based on the idea that the formula doesn't matter, the thing that counts is what you do with the formula; that is to say, it is a matter of style.� And of course that hard-boiled, noir feel of his is prevalent to this day.

Audience Question: I may be taking you further afield, but is this visual, visceral style brought on by Chandler one that necessarily de-emphasizes plot?

Steve: I don’t think so. Style is not everything. (Nor is image, much as Andre Agassi would have us believe on Canon's behalf.) Furthermore, �

Audience Question: [interrupting what would surely have been an insightful elaboration on the topic of substance v. style] But think back to the movies. When you picture Bogie and Bacall in The Big Sleep, do you remember the on-screen chemistry and the wise guy patter, or is it a plot detail, something like the perp who stole the falcon, that stuck with you?

Steve: Actually, wasn’t that Dashiell�

Audience member: [blurting out] For me, it’s Bogie and Bacall. Even in black and white they sizzle.

Steve: Admittedly, HumpBac, as I like to call them (retrofitting a nickname) were iconic, but�

Another audience member: Those couple combo names have kind of run their course, don’t you think? Who’s even together at this point? Certainly not Brangelina. TomKat? � no. Zanessa? � no.

Yet another voice from the audience: What about Bennifer? Are they? It’s hard to keep track.

And another: I don’t think so. I suppose Lizard (that is, Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton) were the first of the on-again, off-again power couples.

Host: I’m afraid we may be veering off course as litterateurs, my friends. This isn’t an episode of I Love Lucy, after all. Should we redirect ourselves? Steve?

Steve: Actually, that’s often how it works with me � seemingly on point for brief spurts before devolving into flapdoodle. Besides, I just thought of another one: Lucille Ball + Desi Arnaz. They’d be Ba, Bu, bu, b�

Susan (Steve's lovely): You’re mumbling in your sleep again.

Steve: Huh?

Susan: Must be another pizza dream.

Steve: Yeah, [shaking cobwebs from his head] that and the bibimbap I had for lunch. With extra hot sauce.

Susan: So what were you dreaming?

Steve: Ha, I think I was getting some kind of award and spouting complete nonsense, like in one of my ŷ reviews where I have nothing to say but say it anyway. The only thing I remember from it is groping for a certain word.

Susan: Do you remember what it is?

Steve: Yeah. Ballsy.

Steve: [continuing, somewhat incredulous] I know, it doesn’t make any sense to me either.

Susan: Hmm. Definitely a pizza dream.
]]>
4.12 1940 Farewell, My Lovely (Philip Marlowe, #2)
author: Raymond Chandler
name: Steve
average rating: 4.12
book published: 1940
rating: 3
read at: 1993/01/01
date added: 2016/09/29
shelves:
review:
Excerpts from a dinner honoring the 2016 winner of the Otis Chandler Award for Literary Criticism

Audience Question: You’re known for your essay on the Kantian aesthetic of disinterested judgment as seen in the works of James Joyce, William Gaddis, and Dan Brown. Are there other authors or titles that come to mind, perhaps even more focused on the primacy of style?

Steve: Well, let’s see� Maybe the first book I read where a certain shadowy deportment really popped as a pure statement of style was Raymond Chandler’s Farewell, My Lovely. The book itself was a cannibalization of three earlier short stories of his. Whereas the stories were neatly contained as standalones, the edits in piecing them together were more slapdash, sacrificing both congruency and clarity in the process. Chandler responded saying, "My whole career is based on the idea that the formula doesn't matter, the thing that counts is what you do with the formula; that is to say, it is a matter of style.� And of course that hard-boiled, noir feel of his is prevalent to this day.

Audience Question: I may be taking you further afield, but is this visual, visceral style brought on by Chandler one that necessarily de-emphasizes plot?

Steve: I don’t think so. Style is not everything. (Nor is image, much as Andre Agassi would have us believe on Canon's behalf.) Furthermore, �

Audience Question: [interrupting what would surely have been an insightful elaboration on the topic of substance v. style] But think back to the movies. When you picture Bogie and Bacall in The Big Sleep, do you remember the on-screen chemistry and the wise guy patter, or is it a plot detail, something like the perp who stole the falcon, that stuck with you?

Steve: Actually, wasn’t that Dashiell�

Audience member: [blurting out] For me, it’s Bogie and Bacall. Even in black and white they sizzle.

Steve: Admittedly, HumpBac, as I like to call them (retrofitting a nickname) were iconic, but�

Another audience member: Those couple combo names have kind of run their course, don’t you think? Who’s even together at this point? Certainly not Brangelina. TomKat? � no. Zanessa? � no.

Yet another voice from the audience: What about Bennifer? Are they? It’s hard to keep track.

And another: I don’t think so. I suppose Lizard (that is, Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton) were the first of the on-again, off-again power couples.

Host: I’m afraid we may be veering off course as litterateurs, my friends. This isn’t an episode of I Love Lucy, after all. Should we redirect ourselves? Steve?

Steve: Actually, that’s often how it works with me � seemingly on point for brief spurts before devolving into flapdoodle. Besides, I just thought of another one: Lucille Ball + Desi Arnaz. They’d be Ba, Bu, bu, b�

Susan (Steve's lovely): You’re mumbling in your sleep again.

Steve: Huh?

Susan: Must be another pizza dream.

Steve: Yeah, [shaking cobwebs from his head] that and the bibimbap I had for lunch. With extra hot sauce.

Susan: So what were you dreaming?

Steve: Ha, I think I was getting some kind of award and spouting complete nonsense, like in one of my ŷ reviews where I have nothing to say but say it anyway. The only thing I remember from it is groping for a certain word.

Susan: Do you remember what it is?

Steve: Yeah. Ballsy.

Steve: [continuing, somewhat incredulous] I know, it doesn’t make any sense to me either.

Susan: Hmm. Definitely a pizza dream.

]]>
Ragtime 175675 Ragtime changed our very concept of what a novel could be. An extraordinary tapestry, Ragtime captures the spirit of America in the era between the turn of the century & the First World War. The story opens in 1906 in New Rochelle, NY, at the home of an affluent American family. One lazy Sunday afternoon, the famous escape artist Harry Houdini swerves his car into a telephone pole outside their house. Almost magically, the line between fantasy & historical fact, between real & imaginary characters, disappears. Henry Ford, Emma Goldman, J.P. Morgan, Evelyn Nesbit, Sigmund Freud & Emiliano Zapata slip in & out of the tale, crossing paths with Doctorow's imagined family & other fictional characters, including an immigrant peddler & a ragtime musician from Harlem whose insistence on a point of justice drives him to revolutionary violence.]]> 320 E.L. Doctorow 0812978188 Steve 4 Ragtime, we get to peek inside the heads of Houdini, Freud, J.P. Morgan, Emma Goldman, Henry Ford and others. In the process, we learn the issues of the day and get an authentic feel for the setting. We can appreciate the context and connections that animate his stories.

Ragtime is set in the decade leading up to WWI. There was a lot going on in those days, especially in a place like New York. It was a period of social unrest, brought on, no doubt, by the great divide between the haves and the have-nots. An upper middle-class family in New Rochelle was one focal point of the book, and a Jewish immigrant and his young daughter were another. Their changing fortunes were charted in revealing ways. A ragtime pianist also featured prominently � as articulate and clean as a President (sorry, Joe Biden has always seemed blunderously funny to me) until racist stupidity on the part of a fire chief pushed his buttons. Doctorow, as usual, weaved the stories together well. He was long on conflict, too, which kept the pages turning.

World’s Fair and Billy Bathgate were very good in a similar way, that is, in mixing real people and events with those of his own creation. At the same time, I’ve also noticed some common threads that have begun to put me off just a tad. For one, the men and even the young boys are often � how should I put it � carnally preoccupied. (Some might say it’s almost to the extreme of actuality.) Another repeated theme seems to be how much more fully evolved the Jewish soul is compared to the Gentile one. Again, some may say it’s a representative depiction of the true demographic, but it seems a little too overt when virtually all the Jews are wise (both in the book sense and the street sense), morally superior, and rife with character for having been so downtrodden. Doctorow grew up in the Bronx, of Russian Jewish parentage, so I suppose he comes by any biases honestly. It’s not like any of that particularly bothered me. It was just something I noticed. What seemed more provocative, though, was the favorable light he seemed to shine on the anarchists he profiled. Anytime killing people is part of your agenda, I like to believe you’re inviting an “Extremist� label to your cause, but I didn’t get the feeling from the book that E.L. agreed.

I’m still a big Doctorow fan, but I don’t necessarily look to him as a guide across history’s rockier political landscapes. When he’s just telling his stories, I think he’s great; as an essayist on morality, maybe less so.
]]>
3.88 1975 Ragtime
author: E.L. Doctorow
name: Steve
average rating: 3.88
book published: 1975
rating: 4
read at: 2016/09/22
date added: 2016/09/22
shelves:
review:
Sometime early in his career E.L. Doctorow figured out a great formula for historical fiction. He takes real life iconic figures from whatever era he’s covering and has them interact in believable ways with his fictional characters. It makes for a “show, don’t tell� scenario that brings history alive. With Ragtime, we get to peek inside the heads of Houdini, Freud, J.P. Morgan, Emma Goldman, Henry Ford and others. In the process, we learn the issues of the day and get an authentic feel for the setting. We can appreciate the context and connections that animate his stories.

Ragtime is set in the decade leading up to WWI. There was a lot going on in those days, especially in a place like New York. It was a period of social unrest, brought on, no doubt, by the great divide between the haves and the have-nots. An upper middle-class family in New Rochelle was one focal point of the book, and a Jewish immigrant and his young daughter were another. Their changing fortunes were charted in revealing ways. A ragtime pianist also featured prominently � as articulate and clean as a President (sorry, Joe Biden has always seemed blunderously funny to me) until racist stupidity on the part of a fire chief pushed his buttons. Doctorow, as usual, weaved the stories together well. He was long on conflict, too, which kept the pages turning.

World’s Fair and Billy Bathgate were very good in a similar way, that is, in mixing real people and events with those of his own creation. At the same time, I’ve also noticed some common threads that have begun to put me off just a tad. For one, the men and even the young boys are often � how should I put it � carnally preoccupied. (Some might say it’s almost to the extreme of actuality.) Another repeated theme seems to be how much more fully evolved the Jewish soul is compared to the Gentile one. Again, some may say it’s a representative depiction of the true demographic, but it seems a little too overt when virtually all the Jews are wise (both in the book sense and the street sense), morally superior, and rife with character for having been so downtrodden. Doctorow grew up in the Bronx, of Russian Jewish parentage, so I suppose he comes by any biases honestly. It’s not like any of that particularly bothered me. It was just something I noticed. What seemed more provocative, though, was the favorable light he seemed to shine on the anarchists he profiled. Anytime killing people is part of your agenda, I like to believe you’re inviting an “Extremist� label to your cause, but I didn’t get the feeling from the book that E.L. agreed.

I’m still a big Doctorow fan, but I don’t necessarily look to him as a guide across history’s rockier political landscapes. When he’s just telling his stories, I think he’s great; as an essayist on morality, maybe less so.

]]>