Erik's Updates en-US Tue, 20 Aug 2024 06:39:19 -0700 60 Erik's Updates 144 41 /images/layout/goodreads_logo_144.jpg Review6775366773 Tue, 20 Aug 2024 06:39:19 -0700 <![CDATA[Erik added 'The Naked Sun']]> /review/show/6775366773 The Naked Sun by Isaac Asimov Erik gave 5 stars to The Naked Sun (Robot, #2) by Isaac Asimov
bookshelves: detailed-review, scififantasy
So I love Albert Einstein. He was one of those rare scientists who understood that philosophy and science are two sides of the same coin, and that you cannot achieve apex understanding of either without studying both. Famously, he credited Mach (also a scientist/philosopher) and even David Hume for inspiring him to create relativity - one of humankind’s greatest accomplishments.

Point is, in pursuit of these dual interests, Einstein once wrote an essay ‘Why Socialism?� which contains one of those passages that struck me to my core and has since taken up permanent residence in my thought processes:
I have now reached the point where I may indicate briefly what to me constitutes the essence of the crisis of our time. It concerns the relationship of the individual to society. The individual has become more conscious than ever of his dependence upon society. But he does not experience this dependence as a positive asset, as an organic tie, as a protective force, but rather as a threat to his natural rights, or even to his economic existence. Moreover, his position in society is such that the egotistical drives of his make-up are constantly being accentuated, while his social drives, which are by nature weaker, progressively deteriorate. All human beings, whatever their position in society, are suffering from this process of deterioration. Unknowingly prisoners of their own egotism, they feel insecure, lonely, and deprived of the naive, simple, and unsophisticated enjoyment of life. Man can find meaning in life, short and perilous as it is, only through devoting himself to society.

I’ve bolded the salient portion (which I’ll return to momentarily), which leads me into The Naked Sun.

It’s a beautiful, wondrous, amazing book that, rarely, succeeds on both layers: it is simultaneously entertaining and thought-provoking. In fact, it reminded me of the works of Raymond Chandler:

On the surface, we have our regular down-to-earth ‘plainsclothesman C-7� Detective Baley, who would fulfill Chandler’s criteria of a good detective. Baley has been called to a distant Spacer Colony to investigate a murder who has one and only one suspect� but who also couldn’t have possibly committed the murder. The characters intrigue. The drama compels. The tragedy evokes. A healthy dose of noir gives it a pleasant spiciness.

But this tasty dish is no mere spaghetti and meatballs. It has complex undertones and aftertastes - much material for ponderance. The Naked Sun is set on Solaria, a post-scarcity, post-labor society of a mere 20,000 people, in which every person lives either alone or with a house on a huge estate, whose every need is attended by a horde of robots, as much as 200,000,000 - or TEN THOUSAND robots per human.

This state of affairs has led to a society in which people are no longer even comfortable ‘seeing� (i.e. physically being in the same location) as other humans. Instead, they merely ‘view� one another through holographic/virtual calls. They procreate only with the greatest reluctance and don’t even raise their own children, who are brought up in a single facility, run by one or two humans and a bunch of robot nannies.

And now, at last, I return to Einstein and that quote which has infiltrated my psyche. Solaria is the end-state of this view of community / society not as a positive force but as a threat. A state that appears to have only accelerated since Einstein’s time. Just as one datum, it is now quite common for my students to have a daily average of 10+ hours screen-time. That is, our children now prefer to ‘view� one another, rather than to ‘see.�

As a person who is quite sympathetic to that specific view and the broader notion of societal dependence as a negative, I feel quite certain that such a society has no future. For a little bit, sure. But in the long run, no. We’re already seeing, in our politics across the world, that authoritarianism and dictatorship rise like some malodorous steam from such cracks in community.

As Bailey says,
The Solarians have given up something mankind has had for a million years; something worth more than atomic power, cities, agriculture, tools, fire, everything; because it’s something that made everything else possible. � The tribe, sir. Cooperation between individuals. Solaria has given it up entirely � It is a world of isolated individuals � Without the interplay of human against human, the chief interest in life is gone; most of the intellectual values are gone; most of the reason for living is gone.

Which, yeesh, bit dark. But I don’t want to end on such doom and gloom. I don’t believe it. And, after all, The Naked Sun is so-titled for Bailey’s own insistence in overcoming his Earthman fear of open spaces, to face the ‘Naked Sun.� Probably the single most triumphant scene in the book is when he does so not “out of professional necessity� but “to face the open for the open’s own sake; for its attraction and its promise of freedom.�

Every day, I struggle with that eternal war between pessimism and optimism, between all the evidence of humanity’s selfishness and its natural desire for fellowship and community, between my own evil apathy and my desire to make the world around me a better place. And, somehow, I’m not quite drowned, somehow the spark within me manages to burn another day, to evoke a kind word, a neighborly gesture, a choice to put the community’s needs before my own.

I know I am not alone in this. Or as Detective Baley concludes: “there must be millions on Earth who would feel that same urge, if the open were only brought to their attention, if they could be made to take the first step.� ]]>
Review6737444687 Wed, 07 Aug 2024 06:06:47 -0700 <![CDATA[Erik added 'The Caves of Steel']]> /review/show/6737444687 The Caves of Steel by Isaac Asimov Erik gave 4 stars to The Caves of Steel (Robot, #1) by Isaac Asimov
bookshelves: scififantasy
My review in its entirety is this excerpt about a character otherwise never mentioned again:
Baley could sense the vague aroma of Yeast-town growing stronger, more pervasive. He did not find it as unpleasant as some did; Jessie, for instance. He even liked it, rather. It had pleasant connotations.

Every time he smelled raw yeast, the alchemy of sense perception threw him more than three decades into the past. He was a ten-year-old again, visiting his Uncle Boris, who was a yeast farmer. Uncle Boris always had a little supply of yeast delectables: small cookies, chocolaty things filled with sweet liquid, hard confections in the shape of cats and dogs. Young as he was, he knew that Uncle Boris shouldn't really have had them to give away and he always ate them very quietly, sitting in a corner with his back to the center of the room. He would eat them quickly for fear of being caught.

They tasted all the better for that.

Poor Uncle Boris! He had an accident and died. They never told him exactly how, and he had cried bitterly because he thought Uncle Boris had been arrested for smuggling yeast out of the plant. He expected to be arrested and executed himself. Years later, he poked carefully through police files and found the truth. Uncle Boris had fallen beneath the treads of a transport. It was a disillusioning ending to a romantic myth.

Yet the myth would always arise in his mind, at least momentarily, at the whiff of raw yeast.

That's it. ]]>
UserStatus857266829 Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:15:16 -0700 <![CDATA[ Erik added a status update ]]> 1639329 Erik added a status update.
Erik wrote: For all you goodreads enjoyers who are also good dog enjoyers, I just launched my dog-focused social media (and, more importantly, dog play-date scheduler) website: . Join, look at cute pictures and videos of dogs, share your own. No ads, no monetization, no bizarro data collection, no FOMO or other social media shennanigans. Cute dogs. ]]>
Review1532497042 Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:11:51 -0700 <![CDATA[Erik added 'Signal to Noise']]> /review/show/1532497042 Signal to Noise by Silvia Moreno-Garcia Erik gave 2 stars to Signal to Noise (Paperback) by Silvia Moreno-Garcia
bookshelves: detailed-review, young-adult
Signal to Noise is flatter than a pancake, and not nearly as tasty even if you drizzle the book in maple syrup. WHICH I DEFINITELY DIDN'T TRY, OKAY? I mean where would I even GET maple syrup? The grocery store? Uh yeah you realize I live on a tropical island don't you? Haha just kidding. I don't live ON a tropical island. IN me lives the tropical island.

But where was I?

Ah yes. Tropical islands. They say, "No man is an Island." I say, "He is also not a volcano, an isthmus, or a hedge maze." No wait, that's not where I was. Not tropical islands. Pancakes. Book review. Jeez, self. Focus.

Signal to Noise is a magical realist literary YA set in Mexico City, both in 1988 and in 2009. It follows unlikeable protagonist Meche as she navigates high school as an awkward, unattractive teenage girl � not a barrel of fun I can imagine - alongside her equally awkward best friends Sebastian and Daniela. These chapters are juxtaposed with Meche returning twenty years later to deal with her father's BLAH BLAH BLAH. Read the Amazon summary, I'm here to talk pancakes.

This book was so flat. There weren’t enough changes in elevation, so to speak, to even hate it. It was ho-hum dol-drum. It was a straight shot stroll through the rather unremarkable landscape of a standard coming-of-age family drama. Peaceful, perhaps, but I demand greater ambition in my literature. This one says nothing new about relationships, family, teenage angst, etc that I haven’t read many times before. Unfortunately, there is nothing beyond that either. Its explorations of magic, music, and Mexican culture are minimal, to the say the, uh, minimum. If you had changed a couple proper nouns, you could have easily set this in Detroit. It offers the standard music-as-escape and music-as-connection trope, but shows no awareness of the paradoxical nature of those tropes. The “magic� is pure plot element, instead of any sort of sorcerous shennanigans.

Even beyond these thematic concerns, I didn’t find the book particularly well-constructed at the surface level either.

Un momento. *puts on professor hat*

I have this litmus test for literature that I’m going to call the “desire test.� While the occasional story is the exploration of a milieu, most literature focuses on humans. Even if the characters are cowardly dinosaurs or gourmet rats or what have you, they embody human traits and values. Now, a human life is composed of three movements: desire, routine, and fear. Routine maintains, desire attracts, and fear repels.

Literature is no more or less than a set of characters attempting to change their routine by navigating a maze of desire and fear. And the degree to which we empathize with these characters is really just a measurement of how well we understand their desires and fears. It’s impossible for us to root for a character if we don’t know what that character wants. It’d be like a watching a game of Laser Eyegouge Tongue-twist Necro-Ball. What even is that? You don't know the rules, you don't know the players, you don't know the stakes. And therefore you don't care.

Well my “desire test� goes something like this: as I’m reading, I ask myself, “What do these characters want? What do they fear? Do routine, fear, and desire come into conflict? How long does it take for their first major clash to occur?�

Okay. Literature lesson over.

*removes professor hat*

In the case of Signal to Noise, we haven't the slightest clue what the 2009 Meche fears and desires. And this isn't a good mystery. It's not a Christmas present mystery, where you suspect you're going to get that miniaturized dog-sized elephant you always wanted. It's a different type of mystery. A bad mystery. Like when you open the fridge to discover someone - or something - has relocated every single scissor and knife in your entire house into your fridge's produce drawer. Which happened to me once.

My guess is that the author intended the 1988 Meche to highlight the 2009’s desires and fears, and that’s sorta what happens (but too late to make the chapters fun to read). And it’s a terrible writing strategy anyway, as it means that, in twenty years, Meche manages zero growth or change. Yikes!

The 1988 Meche fares little better. Signal to Noise is a romance in which the main characters pursue people they’re not even that interested in. They like em cause they’re popular and pretty, and yeah, I get it. That happens. But it’s incredibly dull. And yet that is the surface action. The plot is ultimately about other things, but Meche and Sebastian’s pursuit of their crushes provides the actual movement. Again, yikes! And then BIG YIKES when they engage in love spells, which is the fantasy equivalent of RAPE.

As for the final prong of my "desire test," the first skirmish between fear, desire, and routine occurs on page 149. That’s right. You haven't suffered a micro-stroke and lost the ability to count (probably). Half the book is over before the first truly interesting thing happens, which is a kiss, and then Meche’s fear of rejection conflicts with her desire for companionship and appreciation, thereby causing one of the book’s rare peaks of emotion. And then, in a stunning maneuver, it’s more or less promptly forgotten. Insanely poor writing. Meche and company go RIGHT back to pursuing their crushes on people they don't even like. Yeah, okay, whatever.

This lack of desire becomes even more problematic because Meche is an unlikeable protagonist. Which is fine. But she’s unlikeable in the worst sort of way. Hell, DALEKS from Dr. Who are more likeable than Meche, the reason being that their pursuit of EXTERMINATION is almost childlike in its intensity and purity and we can jive with that intensity, even if we (hopefully) don’t agree with the notion that all lifeforms should be EXTERMINATED.

So that’s how you make an unpleasant character likeable: You give them an improper desire and make them GOOD at pursuing it � as with the Daleks � OR you give them a noble desire and make them BAD at pursuing it, as with Severus Snape’s protection of Harry. But Meche falls under neither of these categories. She has no noble desire (until the very end and SURPRISE it’s another of the few moments the book achieves an emotional peak/valley) and she’s not good at pursuing her improper desire of her crush, Constantine. Instead, Meche comes across as mean-spirited. She represents one of the worst sort of people in the world. Someone with no real ambition or desire, who constantly craps on those of others.

In short, the characterization is a mess, the pacing is glacial, and the thematic underpinnings as mundane as they come. An easy skip - spend your precious time elsewhere. ]]>
UserQuote88383597 Wed, 18 Oct 2023 13:32:16 -0700 <![CDATA[Erik Rollwage liked a quote by Neal Stephenson]]> /quotes/261294
Erik liked a quote
2845024. sx98
� Nothing is more important than that you see and love the beauty that is right in front of you, or else you will have no defense against the ugliness that will hem you in and come at you in so many ways. � � Neal Stephenson
]]>
Review5795879045 Fri, 25 Aug 2023 15:12:02 -0700 <![CDATA[Erik added 'Dark Matter']]> /review/show/5795879045 Dark Matter by Blake Crouch Erik gave 4 stars to Dark Matter (Hardcover) by Blake Crouch
bookshelves: detailed-review, scififantasy
Are you happy?

So ask the characters of each other and themselves at key moments throughout the story. And while the story has a sci-fi wrapping, it’s this eternal, human question that serves as the story’s heart. So let’s talk about it!

I’m not going to pretend I have THE definition of happiness, but I have A definition of happiness that I think is pretty good:

That, at the present moment, you have something in your life more precious than anything else you could even imagine. For most people, this will be the relationship with their children or other loved ones, but there’s no reason it couldn’t be an object - a dream house, say - or even an experience - a religious conversion that could not have been more profound.

Now, combine this precious with at least an implicit understanding of chaos theory, the butterfly effect, and/or quantum mechanics - that is, the realization that even the most apparently minute change in the past could have resulted in drastic changes in the present. And now you know happiness:

Because you will have no regrets. You will have total acceptance. Because no matter what horrible things happened to you or the world in the past, no matter how suboptimal the choices and outcomes of your life up to this present moment, you wouldn’t risk a single change because you understand that to do so would risk the existence of your precious. That is happiness, that is contentment, the Gollum-reference notwithstanding.

But here’s the rub: happiness can only ever be fragile because that precious thing can be so easily taken from you, either by your own mistake or cruel reality. The child can die. The wonderful spouse can divorce you. The house can be destroyed by a hurricane because you built it too close to the beach. The religious conversion can be poisoned when you discover that your church has aided and abetted pedophile priests.

I myself once knew such happiness, and not even that long ago. I rescued a dog that meant the world to me. Hey, look, you can even see a picture of us in my profile and his silhouette is in my dev studio’s logo. I knew the happiness of waking up every day, being perfectly content with all the decisions of my life because any change, even the smallest change, would have meant that Atlas and I were not together. I had to be dating the woman who had to say, “We’re adopting a dog or else.� COVID had to happen to isolate us enough that she issued that ultimatum. I HAD to go to the animal shelter on that ONE day, at that EXACT moment, to get Atlas. He was only there for a day or two, he wasn’t even officially registered yet. It had to be then. So literally any change in my life - and there’s been some bad mojo in my life, let me tell you - was unacceptable.

My dog Atlas died in an accident at a young age - and so total acceptance has become total regret.

But getting to Dark Matter finally: That whole arc is basically the arc of Dark Matter, except this ‘butterfly effect� discussion is made concrete by the inclusion of the Many-World Interpretation of quantum mechanics, which is the notion that waveform collapse represents the branching of the universe into a multi-verse. All that COULD happen DOES happen…a giant tree, Yggdrasill if you will, of all the permutations of reality. Our universe is but a single branch of that. But what if you could explore the other branches�?

The sci-fi here is really just a means to an end. It doesn’t get much more advanced than the paragraph I just wrote. So if you’re interested in a deeper sci-fi exploration of MWI, I would point you towards Greg Egan’s Permutation City, which compared to this book (in terms of the sci-fi elements) is like a Claude Monet painting versus a kindergartener’s crayon drawing.

But that isn’t a criticism of Dark Matter, which ultimately doesn’t particularly care about the science-fiction elements. They really are just the means to an end, that end being the aforementioned question: Are you happy? and the related question: Do you ponder much the ‘paths not taken� and regret not choosing the other fork? Specifically in Dark Matter, it’s the character of Jason Dessen, a man who MIGHT have become an acclaimed physicist but instead chose to have a family, who explores this question.

It’s a good story. I read it in a single evening. Your preferences may vary but when I read novels, I need a good story first and foremost. Without a good story, without a character or two I can root for (or against), a novel is just a worse version of some other type of text. It’s a worse version of a non-fiction exploration of interpretations of quantum mechanics. It’s a worse version of a philosophical text exploring the meaning of life.

As I said, however, the book does center first and foremost on telling this story of Jason Dressen, and all the other sci-fi gooey is just extra filling to add spice and flavor. I don’t think a book will ever be anyone’s precious, I don’t think it alone can constitute that bulwark against regret, but this is still one of the good ones and a worthy read. ]]>
Review5731193592 Sun, 30 Jul 2023 13:06:05 -0700 <![CDATA[Erik added 'Hardwired by Walter Jon Williams']]> /review/show/5731193592 Hardwired by Walter Jon Williams by Walter Jon Williams Erik gave 4 stars to Hardwired by Walter Jon Williams (1989-07-06) by Walter Jon Williams
bookshelves: scififantasy, detailed-review
So Covid led me to an interesting epiphany, what I call the Scalar Edge (or others call the ‘Tyranny of Scales problem�) because I like fancy-sounding names: That there exists a fundamental conflict between the macroscopic ‘freedom� and microscopic ‘freedom� within a given system. Which� read the intro to my Leviathan Falls review.

Well, after recently reading a cyberpunk pairing - the rather lackluster Shockwave Rider and this much more excellent fare - I had a related epiphany, which is that the Scalar Edge lies at the heart of cyberpunk. Some form of authority - governmental or, more usually, corporate - seeks to maximize the macroscopic ‘freedom� of society by repressing the microscopic ‘freedom� of the individual. To the corpo-suits, this is progress and a requisite for achieving maximal economic and technological progress and control. The cyberpunk, then, is a libertarian hero who wishes the opposite.

Viewed thusly, Hardwired is a prototypical cyberpunk novel. In space around the Earth exist the Orbitals, powerful corporations who have beaten Earth and its denizens into the dust. Those on the surface, the poor bastards, the dregs of humanity are ever looking upward and seeking to join the Orbitals in their space heaven.

Hardwired follows two protagonists: Cowboy, a smuggler who once used jets (‘deltas�) to smuggle goods across a fractured States of America and now uses high-speed tanks (‘panzers�) to do the same. Which he does by directly interfacing (‘facing�) with the vehicle’s control and sensor systems using cybernetic implants. His sections reminded me heavily of the anime film (which if you’ve never seen, you really should because it is gloriously absurd). Cowboy is pretty cool�

…but it’s the other protagonist Sarah - who has a cybernetic snake-weapon coiled down her throat - that I would consider the true cyberpunk hero. Cowboy ain’t a punk. He’s too wealthy and too buoyant for that. Sarah, though� she has clawed her way out of the gutter and carries that reality as a badge of both pride and shame in her every thought and every gesture. In fact, that’s the major conflict between Sarah and Cowboy, in that Sarah is a realist and Cowboy is an idealist. This book’s journey is really that of Sarah, who, by the end, has learned to look to the sky not with bitter envy but with something akin to� let’s not say hope, for I am uncertain that such a word exists in the cyberpunk lexicon but rather� an ambition to vengeance. By book’s end, she understands that though the greed and corruption of mankind can never truly be overthrown, it can on occasion be curtailed - and the opportunity to do such is enough to consider one’s life well-lived. ]]>
Review5724073467 Thu, 27 Jul 2023 07:08:35 -0700 <![CDATA[Erik added 'The Shockwave Rider']]> /review/show/5724073467 The Shockwave Rider by John Brunner Erik gave 2 stars to The Shockwave Rider (Mass Market Paperback) by John Brunner
bookshelves: bottom-shelf, detailed-review, scififantasy
So� a bit dumb.

One of my biggest pet-peeves � which I’ve heard at least once a week for the past decade of my life - is when someone draws the wrong conclusion and says, “Oh I really overthought that one.� You� overthought it? You made a mistake because you thought too deeply about it?

Unless your name is David Foster Wallace or Socrates, it seems unlikely. So here’s what actually happened: You thought poorly, and that is why you were mistaken.

Well, the Shockwave Rider is the book equivalent of “I overthought that one.� It is the novelization of the Dunning-Kruger effect. It thinks it is incredibly smart. It is, in fact, quite dumb.

Here’s what happens: There’s this guy who is INCREDIBLY SMART, which we know because the book tells us so. Often. Well this super incredibly smart person gets recruited into a secret school for training super smart people to become future leaders. He gets upset when he realizes that people are mostly amoral bobble-heads and goes rogue. Which involves him running around playing an extended game of charades, using a super secret internet code that lets him alter his identity as needed. So he’s a weird cult leader one moment, then a super-star programmer the next.

However, he encounters a MANIC PIXIE DREAM GIRL! Yes indeedy we have an MPDG and not in the self-aware ironic deconstructive sense. So, of course inspired by our good little MPDG, the protagonist realizes the emptiness of his life and decides to do something MEANINGFUL. This aspiration reaches its apex point when he encounters a LIBERTARIAN UTOPIA, whose primary service to society is a form of non-responsive therapy!

But alas the Evil Government catches up to him (note: no spoiler here, the whole book’s framing is that our protagonist is being interrogated in a government prison). And the Evil Government decides it hates that libertarian utopia and wants to destroy it! Because the Evil Government just cannot stand not having control over everything. But then computer virus! Happy the end.

There’s a lot of jibber jabber in this book on academic topics like intelligence vs wisdom or the means of proper governance or the sociological effects of the erosion of community, but there’s practically zero reference, either explicit or implicit, to any of humanity’s works on the matter. Like you’d THINK that maybe there’d be some reference to the many theories of intelligence that the psychological community has created. But nope. Nothing. The result is not particularly enlightening or interesting to read.

It’s like� you know when someone who knows nothing about a particular problem drastically underestimates its complexity and offers facile solutions? Like someone who says, “Well you can solve homelessness by building more houses, right? There you go, problem solved.� Or, “Oh our education system has a lot of troubles. Let’s just privatize it and the market will sort it out.�

That’s what the whole book feels like. Every discussion, every discursion, is sophomoric � and there’s A LOT of them. Such digressions from the narrative really are the meat of the book.

So there’s that.

Which would be more palatable if the book had any sort of style to it. But despite ostensibly being a ‘cyberpunk� novel, it is about as far from punk as I can imagine. Better to call it a ‘cryptobro� novel: a frat boy who thinks he’s a geek and wants to be a geek but is not a geek and does not, in fact, actually want to be a geek. Replace geek with ‘cyberpunk� in that sentence and you have a decent summary of The Shockwave Rider. ]]>
Comment263231337 Mon, 10 Jul 2023 05:53:36 -0700 <![CDATA[Erik commented on Erik's review of The Fisherman]]> /review/show/3803363082 Erik's review of The Fisherman
by John Langan

For sure. I understand WHY the author went with a frame narrative, which harkens back to the original eldritch horror writer H.P. Lovecraft, who almost exclusively used frame narratives.

But - for my tastes at least - that's like a modern director making a black-and-white silent film. Unless it's done for a very specific reason such that the film wouldn't make sense without it (e.g. The Artist), it's just outdated. ]]>
Comment263231214 Mon, 10 Jul 2023 05:48:59 -0700 <![CDATA[Erik commented on Erik's review of The Stranger]]> /review/show/597307345 Erik's review of The Stranger
by Albert Camus

You're welcome Beverly!

I've definitely softened a bit from when I wrote this review... 10 years ago!! (jeez). In the sense that I'd be less critical, given that some people found some meaning in it, which is better than the mindless 'fugue state' that some modern media strives to induce.

But I'd still question the quality of any 'meaning' one can derive from this tome. ]]>