Martin's Updates en-US Wed, 02 Apr 2025 08:15:04 -0700 60 Martin's Updates 144 41 /images/layout/goodreads_logo_144.jpg Comment289031648 Wed, 02 Apr 2025 08:15:04 -0700 <![CDATA[Martin commented on Naeem's review of Making Movies]]> /review/show/7434449679 Naeem's review of Making Movies
by Sidney Lumet

Lumet is a brilliant director. I may have to read this book now. ]]>
Rating842998831 Wed, 02 Apr 2025 08:14:46 -0700 <![CDATA[Martin Di Caro liked a review]]> /
Making Movies by Sidney Lumet
"What a fabulous book. Below, I have copied the table of contents because it is worth it for me to remember the kinds of detail Lumet provides.

If you watch the credits, it seems as if it takes an army to make a film. I had no idea that film making required hundreds of people. Every chapter provides insights that I had never considered. For example: that actors are often physically spent after their scenes; that lighting one set can take up to five hours; that the kind of lens used changes the meaning of a scene; how important clothes are; that sound and music require extraordinary amounts of attention; that the director's vision requires that the thousands of parts of the process all contain and move towards the whole; that these thousands of parts must be made to be invisible to the viewer; and that only the director knows how everything fits together. It is no wonder that films require millions of dollars to make.

I have already started paying attention to, for example, lighting, the angles and rhythms of shots, and the role of music. In a sense this is a pedagogical book. As my friend Chris Tolve points out, it is akin to A Swim in a Pond in the Rain: In Which Four Russians Give a Master Class on Writing, Reading, and Life. Both books reveal processes. The difference is that Saunder's book makes me feel like I could learn to become a better writer whereas Lumet's book makes clear that I could never make a film. However, I think I can become a better viewer of films. Although I am not sure this is Lumet's primary intent.

You could think that a book that reveals so much might decrease or destroy the magic of films. I had the opposite experience: it is a miracle that any film gets made, its vision articulated, and its inner experience conveyed.

Table of Contents:

The director: the best job in the world
The script: are writers necessary?
Style: the most misused word since love
Actor: can an actor really be shy?
The camera: your best friend
Art direction and clothes: does Faye Dunaway really have the skirt taken in in sixteen different places?
Shooting the movie: at last!
Rushes: the agony and the ecstasy
The cutting room: alone at last
The sound of music: the sound of sound
The mix: the only dull part of moviemaking
The answer print: here comes the baby
The studio: was it all for this?"
]]>
UserStatus1028815086 Mon, 17 Mar 2025 19:42:39 -0700 <![CDATA[ Martin is on page 100 of 432 of When the Clock Broke ]]> When the Clock Broke by John Ganz Martin is on page 100 of 432 of <a href="/book/show/195790601-when-the-clock-broke">When the Clock Broke</a>. ]]> ReadStatus9200045553 Mon, 17 Mar 2025 19:42:30 -0700 <![CDATA[Martin is currently reading 'When the Clock Broke: Con Men, Conspiracists, and How America Cracked Up in the Early 1990s']]> /review/show/7412658264 When the Clock Broke by John Ganz Martin is currently reading When the Clock Broke: Con Men, Conspiracists, and How America Cracked Up in the Early 1990s by John Ganz
]]>
ReadStatus9200043639 Mon, 17 Mar 2025 19:42:00 -0700 <![CDATA[Martin is currently reading 'The Nazi Mind: Twelve Warnings from History']]> /review/show/7412656917 The Nazi Mind by Laurence Rees Martin is currently reading The Nazi Mind: Twelve Warnings from History by Laurence Rees
]]>
Review7284962056 Wed, 19 Feb 2025 04:55:12 -0800 <![CDATA[Martin added 'No Country for Love']]> /review/show/7284962056 No Country for Love by Yaroslav Trofimov Martin gave 3 stars to No Country for Love (Hardcover) by Yaroslav Trofimov
bookshelves: books-read-in-2025
I don't read many novels. I am interviewing the author for my podcast, and will post more about the book and our conversation then. ]]>
Review7282877026 Sun, 16 Feb 2025 07:32:09 -0800 <![CDATA[Martin added 'The Russo-Ukrainian War: The Return of History']]> /review/show/7282877026 The Russo-Ukrainian War by Serhii Plokhy Martin gave 3 stars to The Russo-Ukrainian War: The Return of History (Paperback) by Serhii Plokhy
bookshelves: books-read-in-2025
A succinct overview of the historical origins of the war and its consequences for global order and geopolitics in the 21st century. I look forward to interviewing the author soon! ]]>
ReadStatus9017761477 Sun, 02 Feb 2025 19:23:55 -0800 <![CDATA[Martin is currently reading 'No Country for Love']]> /review/show/7284962056 No Country for Love by Yaroslav Trofimov Martin is currently reading No Country for Love by Yaroslav Trofimov
]]>
ReadStatus9014761940 Sun, 02 Feb 2025 08:33:11 -0800 <![CDATA[Martin is currently reading 'The Russo-Ukrainian War: The Return of History']]> /review/show/7282877026 The Russo-Ukrainian War by Serhii Plokhy Martin is currently reading The Russo-Ukrainian War: The Return of History by Serhii Plokhy
]]>
Review7082395994 Sun, 02 Feb 2025 08:31:24 -0800 <![CDATA[Martin added 'The Problems of Genocide']]> /review/show/7082395994 The Problems of Genocide by A. Dirk Moses Martin gave 4 stars to The Problems of Genocide (Human Rights in History) by A. Dirk Moses
bookshelves: books-read-in-2025
There is a tenuous cease-fire in Gaza but the quarreling among historians continues. At one end of the spectrum, some leftist and liberal historians argue the state of Israel is committing genocide. They point to statements by Israeli leaders that indicate intent to destroy, in whole or in part, Palestinians as such.

Other liberal historians condemn Israel’s destruction of Gaza in retaliation for the Hamas onslaught of Oct. 7, 2023, but they argue it does not meet the narrow definition of genocide. Further to the right along this spectrum, you will find Israel’s defenders who deny all wrongdoing and instead place the responsibility for Palestinian deaths on Hamas because it operates from civilian areas. Outside the lunatic fringes of the left, you won’t find many people who deny Hamas� criminality on Oct. 7.

In Tuesday’s episode of History As It Happens, historian Dirk Moses and I didn’t bicker over who among the scholars possesses the truth. Some listeners may bristle that we didn’t take sides (as far as the genocide charge goes), but I would point them to my consistent critique of Israel’s war and the Biden administration’s unconditional military assistance. Genocide or not, there is no doubt in my mind that all sides � namely Hamas, Hezbollah, and Israel � have committed war crimes or crimes against humanity.



Dirk Moses is the Anne and Bernard Spitzer Professor of International Relations at the City College of New York. He is an expert in genocide studies and international relations, and his 2019 book The Problems of Genocide framed our conversation. His work is important because the concept of genocide is as contested today as it was in the immediate years after the Second World War. In his view, the entry of the genocide concept into law has been detrimental to the pursuit of justice.

Contested origins and legalisms

In the podcast, Moses delves into the conceptual origins of this “crime of crimes� that has rarely been successfully prosecuted in the 79 years since Nuremberg. You might be surprised to learn that none of the initial Nazi defendants before the international tribunal in 1945-46 were charged with genocide as an independent crime. How to define the concept was taken up by the United Nations, whose member states depoliticized it. Neither political groups nor political motives would be included. Rather, genocide would be narrowly defined as a crime against nations or races.

This was no accident. Nation-states large and small wanted freedom of action to violently suppress internal rebellions or wage war against external security threats. Therefore, if in the process a state annihilates a racial or ethnic group, it can be justified in terms of security, not as an act of racial or national extermination. This sinister notion was present at Nuremberg.

As Moses points out, the SS Einsatzgruppe commander Otto Ohlendorf told his Allied interrogators that he had done nothing wrong. Murdering Jews, including children, had not been racially motivated; it had been a matter of establishing permanent security in occupied Soviet territory. Ohlendorf’s defense for rounding up and killing civilians who posed no military threat whatsoever was not convincing. He was hanged in 1951 for crimes against humanity and war crimes.

“It’s been an ongoing debate for 100 years. The issues that are on the table with Ukraine and Gaza today were played out during the negotiations for the genocide convention in 1947-48, and then in subsequent armed conflicts, particularly in the wake of decolonization. This vexed relationship between war and genocide comes up,� Moses says.

“Why is it that genocide is so vehemently contested? Why, on the other side, is genocide so vehemently asserted? Let’s not forget that six days after the seventh of October, there were already two articles by Raz Segal and Martin Shaw alleging that genocide was taking place, or at least genocidal rhetoric was motivating it� These were accompanied by many other protestations by Palestinians in the immediate aftermath of the seventh of October. So, why this recourse to genocide?� Moses continues.

The CUNY historian contends that because genocide now occupies the sole position atop the list of evil human acts, other appalling international crimes somehow seem less severe.

“Here we are quibbling over whether it’s genocide or not, rather than talking about the facts that are staring us in the face. Gaza is being laid waste. It is being utterly destroyed. It is easy to infer the intention to make life uninhabitable there so that there can be a permanent security solution for Israel,� Moses says.

“So why is it that genocide is being alleged and then vehemently contested? It’s because genocide is related to the Holocaust in the sense that the Holocaust is genocide’s archetype or ideal type. When people think of what a genocide looks like, they think of the Holocaust. That may not be how the lawyers reason, but that’s how popular imagination works. These archetypes are sedimented into our consciousness. They are deep down in the DNA of how we imagine what the ultimate evil looks like. Once you make the Holocaust the absolute evil, with a capital A for absolute, then [the concept of] genocide incorporates or borrows its stigmatic aura. No state wants to be accused of that.�

Moses says this is only a partial explanation. We must also consider the emotional sting caused by accusing the world’s only Jewish state of the same category of crime committed by the Nazis, who sought to exterminate all Jews because they were Jews. There is also the modern problem of excessive analogizing: the politicized use of the genocide label can cheapen history. There’s also the suspicion that antisemitism influences the allegations against Israel. Historians are invested in these aspects of the debate because historians are human like everyone else.

And as Moses discusses in the podcast, Holocaust memory has been to some degree politicized. He mentioned the work of historian Shira Klein, who quoted major historians and cultural studies scholars saying that the point of Holocaust memory is to protect Israel’s diplomatic reputation.

Listen to my conversation with Dirk Moses here at Apple Podcasts. ]]>