"An unrelentingly tedious book that can be summed up as follows. We are irrationally prone to jump to conclusions based on rule-of-thumb shortcuts to actual reasoning, and in reliance on bad evidence, even though we have the capacity to think our way to better conclusions. But we're lazy, so we don't. We don't understand statistics, and if we did, we'd be more cautious in our judgments, and less prone to think highly of our own skill at judging probabilities and outcomes. Life not only is uncertain, we cannot understand it systemically, and luck has just as much to do with what happens to us -- maybe even more -- than we care to admit. When in doubt, rely on an algorithm, because it's more accurate than your best guess or some expert's opinion. Above all, determine the baseline before you come to any decisions.

If you like endless -- and I mean endless -- algebraic word problems and circuitous anecdotes about everything from the author's dead friend Amos to his stint with the Israeli Air Defense Force, if you like slow-paced, rambling explanations that rarely summarize a conclusion, if your idea of a hot date is to talk Bayesian theory with a clinical psychologist or an economist, then this book is for you, who are likely a highly specialized academically-inclined person. Perhaps you are even a blast at parties, I don't know.

But if you're like me and you prefer authors to cut to the chase, make their point, and then leave you with a whopping big appendix if you're interested in the regression analysis of how many freshmen would watch a guy choke to death because they think someone else will come to the rescue, then this book is not for you.

If you want to take the Reader's Digest pass through the book, then Chapter 1 and Section 3 are probably the most accessible and can be read in less than an hour, and still leave you with a fair understanding of the author's thesis."

"fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck"

&±ç³Ü´Ç³Ù;✨P´Ç±ô²¹°ù¾±³ú¾±²Ô²µâœ�

I have so much to say, and yet words escape me.

I feel like I have to write up a whole treatise of my own political views to even convince people that it’s bad. Let’s just keep it simple. I’m a moderate. But, I’m also probably more conservative than Stuckey on abortion. With that said:

Here’s the deal. This book wants you to believe that something called “toxic empathy� exists. What is this “toxic empathy�? Well, it’s having a heart moved to compassion for “progressive� positions. It’s really simple. Stuckey wants you to believe that if someone has empathy for the wrong thing, it must be the empathy that is the problem. But, empathy is *not* the problem.

This book is about conforming to a political agenda. Let’s be real. This isn’t a Christian book, it’s a political book. Want to villainize the other side AND distrust empathy? Then read this book."