Em's Updates en-US Thu, 01 May 2025 19:04:25 -0700 60 Em's Updates 144 41 /images/layout/goodreads_logo_144.jpg Rating853228724 Thu, 01 May 2025 19:04:25 -0700 <![CDATA[Em M liked a review]]> /
The Borders of Infinity by Lois McMaster Bujold
]]>
Rating852522670 Tue, 29 Apr 2025 17:44:03 -0700 <![CDATA[Em M liked a review]]> /
Blood Over Bright Haven by M.L. Wang
"This book was so overhyped that I’m having a hard time with it. The magic system is interesting but the story is a bit of a mess and Renthorn was CARTOONISH in his villainy. Idk yall. "
]]>
Rating852522417 Tue, 29 Apr 2025 17:43:07 -0700 <![CDATA[Em M liked a review]]> /
The Maid by Nita Prose
"The only good part of this book is when Molly gets a text asking her to “meet at the OG� and another character says “at the Original Gangster?� And Molly says, like she’s got the Miami Vice theme playing behind her, “No. The Olive Garden.� "
]]>
Rating851156348 Fri, 25 Apr 2025 17:34:24 -0700 <![CDATA[Em M liked a review]]> /
The Friend Zone Experiment by Zen Cho
"2.5 rounded up for general harmlessness although it could just as easily have been rounded down because the package is so so unbelievably awful. the cover is apparently not ai even though it looks like that? and HWAT is with the title. 'experiment' implies a deliberate, contrived, romcom-plot intention, "i am going to friendzone x for narrative purposes of y" (also 'friendzone' is extremely negative and manosphere-y in a way that is offputting on its own). that's not the case! it's just two people who are deeply in childhood-first-love love pretending they're regular friends!

the people: they are so sensible and levelheaded that it makes a fairly high-stakes plot feel rote. this pulls a lot from kdrama—it's in the acknowledgements and everything—in its combination of romance/corporate succession plot/a backstory where someone was, probably, MURDERED!, but the fun of a good kdrama is the melodrama—either high theater or sweeping sincerity. it's very funny to see a kdrama plot met with a "hmm. ok. noted" from both of its characters. the few moments of high emotions are painstakingly realistic and grounded: yes, it's true, even a nice adult can have a panic attack.

i know we're just calling contemporary romance "romcom" now because the former has dated genre connotations but it's funny to put that designation on a largely unfunny book. i'm not saying it's full of clunkers, rather that it doesn't bother at all—it doesn't have the lighthearted, affected winkiness of say an emily henry that establishes a world where anyone might pratfall into anyone's arms at any moment (whether or not that is 'humor' per se is immaterial to it being a genre signifier, and i'm digressing). this is a sensible shoe. this is a story told by a coworker that you basically like but kind of wish she would wrap up so you can go home. as a member of the o.g. gossip girl generation i am a very generous reader for setting via pointed brand invocation but i kept having to take breaks to prevent medium-fancy-though-not-trendy-real-london-restaurant namedrop fatigue. it's not satirical and it's also not particularly aspirational. you can literally go to yauatcha.

i mentioned that 'contemporary romance' is looked on as dated but the tone here is much more similar to early-00s women's fiction, the era of 'chick lit'. if there's really no place for that in the present market, that i suppose accounts for the wildly inarticulate positioning here. i DO think punting this into the present romance market is a huge awful setup for the author, especially given the air of abject misery every time she has to get herself to the other side of a sex scene. i don't want that for zen cho! i loved black water sister and her reams of very good short fiction! why is the romance imprint of a sff publisher putting her in the 'spice, queen? 👀' saw trap! everyone involved here, her included, should have gently asked themselves "what are we doing here? like what do we want out of this?" and then, and this is the most important part, they should have come up with an answer."
]]>
Review7463007806 Fri, 18 Apr 2025 09:09:20 -0700 <![CDATA[Em added 'A Fate Inked in Blood']]> /review/show/7463007806 A Fate Inked in Blood by Danielle L. Jensen Em gave 3 stars to A Fate Inked in Blood (Saga of the Unfated, #1) by Danielle L. Jensen
(⁠╯⁠°⁠□⁠°⁠)⁠╯⁠︵⁠ ⁠┻⁠━⁠� why are books like this now!!!!!!!!!!!

there is a nugget of a good book in here, but it falls prey to every single "no one has an editor anymore romantasy blah blah" that booktok has enabled over the past few years. I don't really want to list them all but like. It's so frustrating. And the ending wasn't an ending! Extremely "this is one book we split into two" vibes.

I really wish this had been good. ]]>
Comment289127934 Fri, 04 Apr 2025 17:45:47 -0700 <![CDATA[Em commented on Em's review of The Tomb of Dragons]]> /review/show/7399857165 Em's review of The Tomb of Dragons (The Cemeteries of Amalo, #3)
by Katherine Addison

SJ wrote: "I’m so baffled by this book—where were Addison’s editors in all this?? It felt like post book 2 she realized she wanted to write a completely different series and decided to she had to do it IMMEDI..."

Exactly! Who throws away two books of build up like this?? ]]>
ReadStatus9271801831 Fri, 04 Apr 2025 17:44:25 -0700 <![CDATA[Em is currently reading 'A Fate Inked in Blood']]> /review/show/7463007806 A Fate Inked in Blood by Danielle L. Jensen Em is currently reading A Fate Inked in Blood by Danielle L. Jensen
]]>
Review7399857165 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 18:47:51 -0700 <![CDATA[Em added 'The Tomb of Dragons']]> /review/show/7399857165 The Tomb of Dragons by Katherine Addison Em gave 2 stars to The Tomb of Dragons (The Cemeteries of Amalo, #3) by Katherine Addison
The authorial choices in this book were so baffling that I am retroactively questioning if books 1 and 2, which I have read multiple times each, were actually any good either.

Like the first two books, there are a number of different threads and mysteries. Unlike the first two books, none of what happens feels worth it. But I could have forgiven this if the author hadn't made two absolutely disastrous decisions.

[spoilers removed]

What a disappointment. ]]>
ReadStatus9197140906 Mon, 17 Mar 2025 05:53:11 -0700 <![CDATA[Em wants to read 'Pagans']]> /review/show/7410601788 Pagans by James Alistair Henry Em wants to read Pagans by James Alistair Henry
]]>
ReadStatus9181689811 Thu, 13 Mar 2025 07:18:32 -0700 <![CDATA[Em is currently reading 'The Tomb of Dragons']]> /review/show/7399857165 The Tomb of Dragons by Katherine Addison Em is currently reading The Tomb of Dragons by Katherine Addison
]]>