John Richard Gott III is a professor of astrophysical sciences at Princeton University. He is known for developing and advocating two cosmological theories with the flavour of science fiction: Time travel and the Doomsday argument.
I read this book and I need to re-read it again. This is one of those books that after you read it the first time, you are completely enlightened. You know you probably missed some important details so when you read it a second time, everything you missed pops out at you. For anybody really wanting to understand the different theories behind time travel, this book is for you. There were times when I just sat and pondered about what I just read for about an hour.
We instinctively know what time travel is, but how would you define it in physical terms? How is time travel to the past different from time travel to the future? And does it fit in our universe? If not, how can we know about the future? Author tries to answer these questions in a graphic way, and he succeeds! The book also takes a suprising turn towards the end, making it an extra satisfying read.
Fun book that tries to minimize the actual physics of time travel and provide explanations more at a conceptual level.
Time travel to the future is well established theoretically and author provides an accessible illustration of the concept.
Time travel to the past is contested - author describes some mechanisms by which it could work, namely traveling in circular paths around cosmic strings, wormholes and warpdrives.
Cosmic strings are apparently like the superstrings of string theory, except they have have a very small thickness (unlike the superstrings of zero thickness).
Yes, just nod your head along - there are probably only like 7 people in the world who understand string theory.
Wormholes and warpdrives are those tunnels through spacetime. So, instead of traveling through the "curvature of spacetime" - you take a shortcut. So, instead of going around the mountain you tunnel through it.
This concept makes a little more intuitive sense than multidimensional "strings" (whether cosmic or superstrings) but apparently requires some negative mass stuff whose existence is still not proven while cosmic strings require only positive mass stuff. (Not that cosmic or superstrings are proven either).
Also, while one can see intuitively how wormholes it would result in faster than light travel, the explantation of time traveling through it means moving them wormholes around which was a little less intuitive.
Then there is one of the foundational question of physics - what was there before the universe? Here, the author ties time travel to the origin of universe.
Apparently, the universe is its own mother curving back in time to form itself. Every event has a preceding event and there is no earliest event.
There's also a final digression onto the topic of predicting the period of existence of literally anything in the universe.
Not sure how it relates to time travel but the author calls it the "The 95 Percent Copernican Argument" and states that everything will exist for 1/39th to 39 times its existing life.
So humans, currently existing for around 200,000 years will exist for another 5100 to 7.8M years and thereby we should start colonizing Mars ASAP (though with 5100 years, I think we can chill for a bit).
Overall, the book was fun trying to bend (just like spacetime, eh?) my imagination to visualize how exactly it would work and coming short over and over again.
No book is without its charm although this one comes pretty close. Granted, diehard and gullible enthusiasts of space travel no doubt think differently but for the more skeptical they will find little worthwhile here except a gift for explaining the theory of relativity--both special and general relativity--with clarity and simplicity that few can and thus the latter part of the fourth chapter makes the book worthy of the purchase. For those seeking a book that will advocate the resumption of space travel to secure the longevity of the human race as this one does in the last chapter it can be imagined that more thoughtful explanations of the benefits of such exploration are to be found. Likewise, those who want to believe that time travel has any realistic basis will be sorely disappointed. Instead, one will find competitive Gott, cape crusader with his friend Li Xin Li (the former you can, to use an epithet, call batman and the latter Robin) writing a book to lay claim of some very speculative theories. There is one in which Gott, so eager to be the next Newton of time travel, deals with orbiting two cosmic strings that will lead one to the past--Gott himself wants full acclaim as the inventor of this idea. The other, his magnum opus which he shares with his counterpart Robin is figuring out the fact that there will be no explosion if one quickly accelerates in and out of the doors of Misner space, and thus one is now free to leap into time with this. Well I am busy today but I will definitely do it tomorrow. Oh yes, the cape crusaders shook hands with each other in their zeal at finding this an achievable goal. You can learn about their flourishing relationship in the content of this book. Yes the book does explore half a dozen other ways to go into the future and past such as the plausibility of engineering wormholes but frankly it is not worth ones time. The reality is that talk of time travel is an absurdity for a world that has done little that is remarkable beyond flight travel to the moon. We are in the stone ages and yet astrophysists are making mathematical formulas of scenarios that will be implausible even hundreds of years into the future at best and seeking acclaim for it. It has little sense.
I enjoyed this book about the physics of time travel, although at times I felt like the author was dealing with some pretty speculative stuff and presenting it pretty confidently as fact.
For instance, he describes a method of creating a "time machine" that would, in theory, allow a spaceship to reach a destination faster than light. To set up the process, you position two cosmic strings of infinite length near each other. Oh, is that all I need? Two cosmic strings of infinite length. Let me check in the basement for those. Meanwhile, I will continue with my money making plan of finding a magical goblin that craps Faberg茅 eggs.
In another section of the book, there is a lengthy discussion about predicting the duration of things (like lives, or civilizations, or planets) based on probability and the idea that we're not at some "special" point in time (like the Copernican view that Earth doesn't occupy a "special" place in the cosmos). This method allows the author to predict that, for example, the United States is likely to exist for a duration of somewhere between 5.7 years and 8736 years.
The ultimate point of describing this method of predicting the future is to exhort people to invest resources into the space program, with the goal in mind of colonizing space, in order to increase the likelihood of the survival of humanity. This point I tend to agree with, although the "Copernican" method of predicting the future seems kinda sketchy.
Generally, there is some good material here, particularly in the chapters related to how physics has evolved throughout history, and how our view of time has changed as a result.
Great book. Perfect starter book to anyone interested in time travel. It posits many of the theories and paradoxes of time travel while being quite informative. The book may be tough for some readers if not of a science background, but it has excellent metaphors that help the reader along.
traveling through time is just a technological problem .... after reading this book you will realize that there are way more methods to travel through time than you have ever thought ...
This is not a badly written book, and it has some good background material on Einstein's theories of relativity and how they could be used to achieve a sort of time travel to the future, namely by traveling into space a few light years and returning at close to the speed of light. The book title is misleading, however, because the majority of the time travel mechanisms in this book are based on more recent theories than Einstein's. Gott proposes time travel possibilities mostly using unproven fantasy land theories prevalent in today's physics like string theory, infinite parallel universes, cosmic strings, and other unproven phenomena. So Gott's theories to support time travel are relatively bizarre, requiring things like multiple unseen dimensions around us, wormholes between universes, self-creating universes, and other unobservable marvels. Current physics supports these theories because they seem to be mathematically possible, in lieu of any actual evidence. And the actual time machines Gott proposes are so impossibly large or complicated that even a super civilization would be challenged to build them. There is also a strange chapter on the Copernican principle which I am not sure how it relates to the rest of the book. And it is somewhat useless because of the large range of its predictions. Overall my impression of this book is it is similar to science fiction. Interesting concepts, but purely fantasy at this point in time.
This book is more than just another popular treatment of special and general relativity and quantum mechanics. Gott applies these theories to time travel in a 'not-wrong' fashion, i.e., consistently with we already know to be true. He discusses the theoretical possibility of time travel to the future and to the past (spoiler: both may be possible), and even describes the construction of time machines that do not violate the laws of physics as we now understand them (spoiler: you may need the energy of an entire galaxy). The book is entertaining and the exposition mostly clear. One could argue it's a must read for us fans of time travel fiction. Gott may take himself more seriously than you will, but it's a fun read.
This is a very good book on physics and time travel by somebody who has written a lot of influential papers on the subject. The beginning is very witty and frames the questions through the use of time travel in fiction and film but then it quickly delves into hard science. Early chapters will just be a review of Einstein for many people, but the later chapters are filled with interesting ideas that I wasn't really familiar with. I think the lst chapter, which is about predicting the future, really doesn't belong in this book, but otherwise I have very few criticisms.
This book is one of the best books that seriously explores time travel using actual (and somewhat possible applications of futuristic) physics. The author also digs deep into statistical data and explores the average lifespan of a species, warns never to take a maiden voyage on a ship or aircraft, and has an extensive notes section that was just as interesting as the main book itself. It helps too have some rudimentary knowledge of science, but there鈥檚 really no math and if you are willing to be patient, you will learn a lot of cool stuff!
Professor Gott starts with the familiar paradox of a time traveler going back and killing a grandparent, adds Einstein's general theory of relativity, and walks the reader through much of current physics theory while seeking ways time travel might be permitted. Along the way, he manages to use almost no mathematics through a set of simple, expressive diagrams. An excellent popular science book!
One of the two best non-fiction books I have ever read. Read it several years ago and it continues to influence my thinking. This book touched me not just intellectually, but surprisingly spiritually as well. It is one of two books I always recommend for anyone seeking a higher understanding and connection with the eternal. There truly can be a spiritual aspect to science.
Read this when I was 10. It鈥檚 a fun book that explores Einstein鈥檚 theories in concise and easy to understand ways. The author has a sense of humor too, so it鈥檚 a far cry from most dry nonfiction. A nice starter book for those interested in the subject- it is an enjoyable read while also having some substance regarding the depth and complexity of relativity.
Zamanda yolculuk olas谋l谋臒谋n谋n, kendisi de bir astrofizik莽i olan Richard Gott taraf谋ndan a莽谋klanmaya 莽al谋艧谋ld谋臒谋 bu kitapta; say谋n Gott' un bunu Einstein' 谋n kocaman bir foto臒raf谋 ve isminin oldu臒u bir kapakla sunmas谋na 莽ok da anlam veremedim. Konunun kendisi yeterince ho艧 ve ilgi 莽ekiciyken bunu Einstein' 谋 da ileri s眉rerek s眉slemeye 莽al谋艧mak yazar谋n hem kendisine hem de konuya bir nebze haks谋zl谋k etmesi gibi geldi bana. Olmasa da olurmu艧, olmasa da bu kitap yine zevkle okunurmu艧. Bu durumu anlaml谋 h芒le getirmek isteyen edit枚r眉n bir 莽abas谋 olarak, kitab谋n i莽eri臒inde, hemen ilk sayfalarda "Akl谋n Efendisi Einstein" ba艧l谋kl谋 bir b枚l眉mle kar艧谋la艧谋yoruz. Burada Einstein' 谋n ya艧am hikayesi, genel g枚relilik ve 枚zel g枚relilik hipotezleri, Newton, Marks ve Hubble' a da de臒inilerek k谋saca anlat谋lm谋艧. Edit枚r Prof. Dr. Cengiz Yal莽谋n' 谋 bu noktada ayr谋ca tebrik ediyorum. Kitab谋n as谋l i莽eri臒inde ise Zamanda Yolculuk R眉yas谋, evrenin boyutlar谋, ge莽mi艧 ve gelece臒e yolculuk olas谋l谋klar谋, evrenin ba艧lang谋c谋, zaman makinesi yapman谋n-莽al谋艧t谋rman谋n mant谋臒谋, kozmik 艧eritler, kuasarlar, satran莽 ve fizik yasalar谋 aras谋ndaki ili艧ki gibi merakl谋s谋 i莽in son derece ilgi 莽ekici konulara yer verilmi艧. T眉m bu bilgiler de g眉nl眉k hayattan benzetmeler, ilgin莽 metaforlar kullan谋larak anlat谋ld谋臒谋 i莽in anla艧谋lmalar谋 ger莽ekten kolayla艧t谋r谋lm谋艧. Yine de "kolay" demiyorum, "kolayla艧t谋r谋lm谋艧" diyorum. 脟眉nk眉 belli bir fizik ve biyoloji bilgisi birikimi olmadan anla艧谋lmas谋 yine de pek olas谋 g枚r眉nm眉yor. Hayat谋n farkl谋 evrelerinde yeniden okunmas谋n谋 da 艧iddetle tavsiye edebilece臒im bir kitap. Hem bilimsel bilgi birikiminizin artmas谋na hem de tecr眉be ve ya艧anm谋艧l谋kla do臒ru orant谋l谋 olarak artacak "hayata, ya艧ama ve canl谋l谋臒a farkl谋 g枚zden bakabilme" yetinize ba臒l谋 olarak baz谋 艧eyleri yeniden de臒erlendirebilece臒inizi, her seferinde ufkunuzu daha geni艧 tutabilece臒inizi d眉艧眉n眉yorum. Yazar ve bilim insan谋 J. Richard Gott genel itibariyle olduk莽a s谋k谋 莽al谋艧an bir astrofizik莽i ve kesinlikle ilgin莽 bir insan. Fakat "Gelecekten Rapor" b枚l眉m眉nde bahsetti臒i, n眉fus art谋艧谋yla ilgili b枚l眉m ve bu art谋艧谋n "herhangi bir 艧ekilde" durdurulmas谋n谋n 莽ok da k枚t眉 bir fikir olmayaca臒谋na dair s枚zleri pek i莽ime sinmedi. Kitapta yer alan bilgiye g枚re, bu, Nature' da bilimsel makaleleri yay谋mlanan bilim insan谋m谋z, ayn谋 zamanda 1969'da Kopernik 陌lkesi' nden yola 莽谋karak Berlin Duvar谋' n谋n ne zaman y谋k谋laca臒谋n谋 hesaplay谋p 枚ng枚rm眉艧 ve 枚ng枚r眉s眉 do臒ru 莽谋km谋艧. Enteresan olay! Yazara g枚re Kopernik 陌lkesi' nden hareketle gelece臒i 枚ng枚rebilmek olas谋 ve bilimsel...
陌nsan, evren ve zaman s谋rl谋 ve m眉phem. 陌nsan谋, evreni ve zaman谋 莽枚zmeye, anlamaya 莽al谋艧mak ise heyecanl谋 ve zevkli.
Even though reading this book was a chore for me, I wouldn't have rated it this low before reading the section about predictions for the future. In previous sections of the book, I was interested in what was being said and learned some new things about quantum theory. The section about the beginning of the universe (the second to last section) was the main reason this book was a chore to read. I will be the first to admit that maybe I should have just skipped this section - I am not so much of a science or math person, but I understood it just enough to try to get through it. (This was a mistake. I didn't have fun.) Even with this section, I would not have rated the book much lower. However, the last section was maddening. Gott provided estimates for the longevity of things, sure, but the estimates were so broad as to be completely obvious. Yes, there's a 95% chance the United States will not last until the year 10736. I could have told you as much without using a lick of math. If you make a broad enough range for how long something will last, of course you're bound to be right. I think you're better served by my pet theory that you're 100% likely to either die or not die tomorrow. Was this section put in entirely to annoy the hell out of me??
Kitap 眉nl眉 bir astrofizik莽i taraf谋ndan yaz谋lm谋艧. Zamanda yolculu臒u ve evrenin ba艧lang谋c谋n谋 tart谋艧谋yor. Konular谋n herkesin anlayabilece臒i seviyede basit anlat谋ld谋臒谋 s枚yleniyor ama bence en az orta seviye fizik bilgisi gerektiriyor. Kimya m眉hendisli臒i e臒itimi alm谋艧 bir ki艧i olarak ben ilk 150 sayfay谋 nispeten (%60-70 gibi) anlayabildim. Evrenin ba艧lang谋c谋 ile ilgili olan sonraki 40 sayfay谋 nerdeyse hi莽 anlamad谋m. Son b枚l眉m olan Gelecekten Rapor k谋sm谋n谋 莽ok kolay anlad谋m ve sevdim. 脰zellikle Kopernik ilkesi ilgimi 莽ekti. Bu ilkeye dayan谋larak yap谋lan hesaplamaya g枚re homo sapiens daha en az 5100 y谋l ya艧arm谋艧. (En 莽ok da 8 milyon y谋l)
Y谋ld谋z vererek de臒erlendiremedim bu kitab谋. Bunu yapmaya yetkin olmad谋臒谋m谋 d眉艧眉nd眉臒眉m i莽in.
I really enjoyed the fresh take on what can sometimes be a dull and dry subject. serves up humor, down to earth (for astrophysics) explanations and examples of what makes up not only the theories of time travel but what has been proven over the most recent decades about such. From Wells' to Igor Dmitriyevich Novikov's self-consistency principles, we see how the idea of going back and forth through time has not only captured our imagination but has held strong for centuries.
Will it ever be a reality? Maybe it already is... :)
Interesante y sencillo al principio, se va complicando hasta resultarme incomprensible en su parte central. F铆sica demasiado complicada para m铆 y supongo que para la mayor铆a. A煤n as铆, se puede leer. Pero llegar al final tiene un premio inesperado: el 5掳 cap铆tulo abandona la f铆sica y entra en la especulaci贸n estad铆stica o, mejor dicho, en la predicci贸n de la duraci贸n probable de cosas o eventos tan variados como el gobierno de un partido pol铆tico, el matrimonio de cada uno o la misma especie humana. Todo ello acompa帽ado de una serie de conjeturas y reflexiones que me han parecido maravillosas. Por este 煤ltimo cap铆tulo y las cosas que me ha hecho pensar le doy las cinco estrellas.
This was a good read. I am not a physicist, but I was able to understand Gott's arguments well, so in that respect it was a good book, but, there were a number of formatting and spelling errors that made the reading a bit tedious in parts. If you're interested in the physics of time, then it's worth the money.
I had a bit of a difficult time reading this book, as I had to concentrate way too much. Hey, I鈥檓 no Einstein. But I do love time travel, so I stuck with it to the end and was rewarded with lots of interesting bits how time travel may be possible, about the Big Bang, the creation of the universe and the Copernican principle. Science rocks!
A really nice quirky overview on the possibilities of time travel from a physicist's point of view and a little history of science thrown in as well. I found it engaging and fun and easy to read and wished it would have been more in some places and less in others. If you've read Kip Thorne's books on time travel (and black holes) and enjoyed them, you'll like this one, too.
Interesante libro donde de una manera lo m谩s cient铆fica posible se intenta demostrar gracias a las teor铆as de Einstein que el viaje en el tiempo es posible. Tiene conceptos curiosos y realmente da que pensar en que el viaje en el tiempo es posible.
I had thought the book would provide interesting insight into the possibilities of time travel, which it did in a sort, but seemed to get lost in a lot of detail that made it difficult to get through.
Great book on the possibility of time travel with extra fun facts thrown in. I enjoyed the bits on the reality of science fiction the most, and has great figures and not too much jargon to make it a worthwhile read.