What do you think?
Rate this book
Cours particuliers de Luc Ferry (audio)
鬲毓賱賲 丕賱丨賷丕丞
芦爻兀乇賵賷 賱賰 鬲丕乇賷禺 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 (....) 爻兀賯胤毓 賱賰貙 賲賳匕 丕賱亘丿丕賷丞貙 賵毓丿丕賸:爻兀毓乇囟 賱賰 賰賱 賴匕賴 丕賱兀賮賰丕乇 亘胤乇賷賯丞 賵丕囟丨丞 鬲賲丕賲丕賸貙 亘丿賵賳 兀賷丞 賱睾丞 賲鬲禺氐氐丞貙 賵賱賰賳 爻兀匕賴亘 廿賱賶 賲丕 賴賵 兀爻丕爻賷 賵廿賱賶 賲丕 賮賷賴丕貙 賲賳 丕賱兀賰孬乇毓賲賯丕賸 賵賲賳 丕賱兀賰孬乇賯賵丞禄.
亘賲丕 兀賳 鬲毓賱賾賲 丕賱鬲賮賰賷乇 賷毓賳賷 鬲毓賱賾賲 丕賱丨賷丕丞 , 賷囟毓 賱賵賰 賮賷乇賷 賮賷 賲鬲賳丕賵賱 丕賱噩賲賷毓 賲賮丕鬲賷丨 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 賵賷毓胤賷賳丕 賰鬲丕亘丕賸 賲賲賷夭丕賸. 廿賳賴 賵丕丨丿 賲賳 丕賱賰鬲亘 丕賱賳丕丿乇丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲乇丕賮賯賰 賲丿賶 丕賱丨賷丕丞.
芦賷乇亘胤 賱賵賰 賮賷乇賷 賵賷賮賰貙 賰賲乇亘賺 賰亘賷乇貙 禺賷賵胤 鬲爻丕賲賷丕鬲 賲丐賰丿丞貙 囟丕卅毓丞 兀賵 賲賵噩賵丿丞禄.
賲噩賱丞 芦賱賵 亘賵丕賳禄
芦廿賳賴 賷爻賷乇 亘賳丕貙 賰兀爻鬲丕匕 賱丕賲毓貙 毓亘乇 丕賱賲丿丕乇爻 丕賱賮賱爻賮賷丞 丕賱賰亘賷乇丞禄.
賲噩賱丞 芦賱賵 亘丕乇賷夭賷丕賳禄
芦廿賳賴 賲丿禺賱 賮毓丕賱 賱鬲丕乇賷禺 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞禄 芦賱賵賳賵賮賷賱 丕賵亘爻乇賮丕鬲賵乇禄
賱賵賰 賮賷乇賷
廿賳 賱賵賰 賮賷乇賷貙 丕賱賵夭賷乇 丕賱爻丕亘賯 賱賱鬲乇亘賷丞 丕賱賵胤賳賷丞 賮賷 賮乇賳爻丕 賮賷賱爻賵賮. 兀毓賲丕賱賴 賲鬲乇噩賲丞 賮賷 兀賰孬乇 賲賳 禺賲爻丞 賵毓卮乇賷賳 亘賱丿丕賸.
亘賲丕 兀賳 鬲毓賱賾賲 丕賱鬲賮賰賷乇 賷毓賳賷 鬲毓賱賾賲 丕賱丨賷丕丞 , 賷囟毓 賱賵賰 賮賷乇賷 賮賷 賲鬲賳丕賵賱 丕賱噩賲賷毓 賲賮丕鬲賷丨 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 賵賷毓胤賷賳丕 賰鬲丕亘丕賸 賲賲賷夭丕賸. 廿賳賴 賵丕丨丿 賲賳 丕賱賰鬲亘 丕賱賳丕丿乇丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲乇丕賮賯賰 賲丿賶 丕賱丨賷丕丞.
芦賷乇亘胤 賱賵賰 賮賷乇賷 賵賷賮賰貙 賰賲乇亘賺 賰亘賷乇貙 禺賷賵胤 鬲爻丕賲賷丕鬲 賲丐賰丿丞貙 囟丕卅毓丞 兀賵 賲賵噩賵丿丞禄.
賲噩賱丞 芦賱賵 亘賵丕賳禄
芦廿賳賴 賷爻賷乇 亘賳丕貙 賰兀爻鬲丕匕 賱丕賲毓貙 毓亘乇 丕賱賲丿丕乇爻 丕賱賮賱爻賮賷丞 丕賱賰亘賷乇丞禄.
賲噩賱丞 芦賱賵 亘丕乇賷夭賷丕賳禄
芦廿賳賴 賲丿禺賱 賮毓丕賱 賱鬲丕乇賷禺 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞禄 芦賱賵賳賵賮賷賱 丕賵亘爻乇賮丕鬲賵乇禄
賱賵賰 賮賷乇賷
廿賳 賱賵賰 賮賷乇賷貙 丕賱賵夭賷乇 丕賱爻丕亘賯 賱賱鬲乇亘賷丞 丕賱賵胤賳賷丞 賮賷 賮乇賳爻丕 賮賷賱爻賵賮. 兀毓賲丕賱賴 賲鬲乇噩賲丞 賮賷 兀賰孬乇 賲賳 禺賲爻丞 賵毓卮乇賷賳 亘賱丿丕賸.
402 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1996
948 people are currently reading
8,605 people want to read
About the author
Luc Ferry
244听books256听followersLuc Ferry (born January 1, 1951) is a French philosopher and a notable proponent of Secular Humanism. He is a former member of the Saint-Simon Foundation think-tank.
He received an Agr茅gation de philosophie (1975), a Doctorat d鈥橢tat en science politique (1981), and an Agr茅gation de science politique (1982). As a Professor of political science and political philosophy, Luc Ferry taught at the Institut d'茅tudes politiques de Lyon (1982鈥�1988) 鈥� during which time he also taught and directed graduate research at the Pantheon-Sorbonne University 鈥�, at Caen University (1989鈥�96). He was a professor at Paris Diderot University (since 1996) but did not teach there.
From 2002 and until 2004 he served as the Minister of Education on the cabinet led by the conservative Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin. During his tenure, he was the minister in charge of the implementation of the French law on secularity and conspicuous religious symbols in schools. He received the award of Docteur honoris causa from the Universit茅 de Sherbrooke (Canada). He is the 2013 Telesio Galilei Academy of science Laureate for Philosophy. He was enthroned to Chevalier De La Dive Bouteille De Gaillac on the 20 march 2012 together with Max Karoubi and Francesco Fucilla.
Source:
He received an Agr茅gation de philosophie (1975), a Doctorat d鈥橢tat en science politique (1981), and an Agr茅gation de science politique (1982). As a Professor of political science and political philosophy, Luc Ferry taught at the Institut d'茅tudes politiques de Lyon (1982鈥�1988) 鈥� during which time he also taught and directed graduate research at the Pantheon-Sorbonne University 鈥�, at Caen University (1989鈥�96). He was a professor at Paris Diderot University (since 1996) but did not teach there.
From 2002 and until 2004 he served as the Minister of Education on the cabinet led by the conservative Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin. During his tenure, he was the minister in charge of the implementation of the French law on secularity and conspicuous religious symbols in schools. He received the award of Docteur honoris causa from the Universit茅 de Sherbrooke (Canada). He is the 2013 Telesio Galilei Academy of science Laureate for Philosophy. He was enthroned to Chevalier De La Dive Bouteille De Gaillac on the 20 march 2012 together with Max Karoubi and Francesco Fucilla.
Source:
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 488 reviews
Read
June 12, 2018賰鬲丕亘 賷賱禺氐 鬲丕乇賷禺 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱睾乇亘賷丞
賲賳 賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱賷賵賳丕賳 丕賱賯丿賷賲丞
賵氐賵賱賸丕 廿賱賶 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱賲毓丕氐乇丞
賷毓賳賷 鬲賯丿乇 鬲賯賵賱
丕賱賵噩賴 丕賱賲賳丕馗乇 賱毓丕賱賲 氐賵賮賷 -賲賵噩夭 鬲丕乇賷禺 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞
賵兀馗賳賴 爻賷賰賵賳 賲賳丕爻亘 賱兀賷 賲亘鬲丿賷亍 賮賷 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 賲賲賳 賱丕 賷丨亘 賯乇丕亍丞 丕賱乇賵丕賷丕鬲
January 20, 2025
讴鬲丕亘 丿丕乇丕蹖 卮卮 賮氐賱 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賮氐賱 丕賵賱 賲賵囟賵毓 丌賳 "賮賱爻賮賴 趩蹖爻鬲責" 丕爻鬲. 賮氐賱 丿賵賲 亘蹖卮鬲乇 亘賴 丌乇丕蹖 乇賵丕賯蹖丕賳 倬乇丿丕禺鬲賴 丕爻鬲. 賮氐賱 爻賵賲 丿乇亘丕乇賴 賲爻蹖丨蹖鬲 賲蹖鈥屫ㄘж簇�. 賮氐賱 趩賴丕乇賲 亘賴 乇賵爻賵貙 讴丕賳鬲 賵 丿讴丕乇鬲 倬乇丿丕禺鬲賴 丕爻鬲. 賮氐賱 倬賳噩賲 賲禺鬲氐 賳蹖趩賴 賵 賮氐賱 卮卮賲 亘賴 丌乇丕蹖 賴丕蹖丿诏乇 賲蹖鈥屬矩必ж藏�.
***
丕夭 丿蹖丿诏丕賴 賲鬲兀賱賴蹖賳 賲鬲毓氐亘貙 賮賱爻賮賴 夭丕丿賴鈥屰� 卮蹖胤丕賳 丕爻鬲貙 趩賵賳 亘丕 鬲丨乇蹖讴 丕賳爻丕賳 亘賴 倬卮鬲 讴乇丿賳 亘賴 丕蹖賲丕賳卮貙 賵 亘賴鈥� 讴丕乇 亘爻鬲賳 毓賯賱 禺賵丿 賵 倬乇 賵 亘丕賱 丿丕丿賳 亘賴 乇賵丨 倬乇爻卮诏乇 禺賵丿貙 丕賵 乇丕 亘賴鈥� 鬲丿乇蹖噩 亘賴 賵丕丿蹖 鬲乇丿蹖丿 賲蹖鈥屭┴簇з嗀� 讴賴 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 诏丕賲 禺乇賵噩 丕夭 丿丕蹖乇賴鈥屰� 賳馗丕乇鬲 丕賱賴蹖 丕爻鬲. 氐賮丨賴 鄄鄱 讴鬲丕亘
丨鬲蹖 丕诏乇 賴賲賴鈥屰� 丕賳爻丕賳鈥屬囏� 賮蹖賱爻賵賮 賳卮賵賳丿貙 賴賲賴鈥屰� 賲丕 乇賵夭蹖 丕夭 倬乇爻卮鈥屬囏й� 賮賱爻賮蹖 鬲兀孬蹖乇 賲蹖鈥屬矩佰屫臂屬�. 賴賲丕賳鈥� 胤賵乇 讴賴 诏賮鬲賲貙 賮賱爻賮賴 亘乇 禺賱丕賮 丕丿蹖丕賳 亘夭乇诏貙 賯賵賱 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 亘賴 賲丕 讴賲讴 讴賳丿 讴賴 禺賵丿 乇丕 賳賴 亘丕 鬲賵爻賱 亘賴 芦丿蹖诏乇蹖禄 蹖丕 禺丿丕貙 亘賱讴賴 亘丕 丕鬲讴丕 亘賴 賯丿乇鬲 禺賵丿 賵 亘賴乇賴鈥屭屫臂� 丕夭 毓賯賱 禺賵蹖卮鬲賳 芦賳噩丕鬲禄 丿賴蹖賲 賵 亘乇 鬲乇爻鈥屬囏й屬呚з� 睾賱亘賴 讴賳蹖賲. 氐賮丨賴 鄞鄹 讴鬲丕亘
芦禺丿丕蹖丕貙 禺賵卮丕 亘賴 丨丕賱 讴爻蹖 讴賴 亘賴 鬲賵 毓卮賯 賲蹖鈥屬堌必藏� 賵 亘賴 丿賵爻鬲蹖 讴賴 丿乇 鬲賵 賲蹖鈥屰屫жㄘ� 毓卮賯 賲蹖鈥屬堌必藏� 賵 亘賴 丿卮賲賳卮 賳蹖夭 亘乇丕蹖 鬲賵 毓卮賯 賲蹖鈥屬堌必藏�. 丕诏乇趩賴 鬲賳賴丕爻鬲貙 賴蹖趩 蹖讴 丕夭 毓夭蹖夭丕賳卮 乇丕 丕夭 丿爻鬲 賳賲蹖鈥屫囏� 趩賵賳 賴賲賴鈥屰� 毓夭蹖夭丕賳卮 丿乇 讴爻蹖 禺賱丕氐賴 卮丿賴鈥屫з嗀� 讴賴 丕夭 丿爻鬲 賳賲蹖鈥屫辟堌�. 丕蹖賳 讴蹖爻鬲 亘賴 噩夭 禺丿丕貙 禺丿丕蹖 賲丕鈥� 禺丿丕蹖 賲賳貙 賴蹖趩鈥� 讴爻 賳賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗀� 鬲賵 乇丕 丕夭 丿爻鬲 亘丿賴丿貙 賲诏乇 丕蹖賳鈥� 讴賴 丕夭 鬲賵 丿爻鬲 亘卮賵蹖丿.禄 (丌诏賵爻鬲蹖賳. 丕毓鬲乇丕賮丕鬲) . 氐賮丨賴 酃鄢 讴鬲丕亘
丕诏乇 丿丕賳爻鬲賳貙 毓卮賯 賵乇夭蹖丿賳 丕爻鬲貙 倬爻 丕蹖賳 賳蹖夭 丿乇爻鬲 丕爻鬲 讴賴 亘丕 诏爻鬲乇卮 丕賮賯鈥屬囏й� 禺賵丿 賵 亘賴亘賵丿 禺賵蹖卮鬲賳貙 賵丕乇丿 亘毓丿蹖 丕夭 丕賳爻丕賳蹖鬲 賲蹖鈥屫促堐屫� 讴賴 夭賳丿诏蹖 乇丕 芦鬲賵噩蹖賴禄 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賵 亘賴 丌賳 賲毓賳丕 賵 噩賴鬲 賲蹖鈥屫ㄘ簇�. 氐賮丨賴 郾鄞郯 讴鬲丕亘
倬乇爻卮鈥屬囏й� 賮賱爻賮蹖 亘夭乇诏貙 丿爻鬲鈥屭┵� 鬲丕 噩丕蹖蹖鈥� 讴賴 亘丕 噩丿蹖鬲 丕蹖賳 賲鬲禺氐氐丕賳 噩丿蹖丿 丕乇鬲亘丕胤 丿丕乇丿貙 賴賲趩賵賳 賮蹖賱賲鈥屬囏й� 丕丨爻丕爻蹖 丕蹖丕賲 诏匕卮鬲賴 亘賴鈥� 賳馗乇 賲蹖鈥屫必迟嗀�. 丿蹖诏乇 禺亘乇蹖 丕夭 亘丨孬 丿乇亘丕乇賴鈥屰� 賲毓賳丕貙 蹖丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 禺賵亘 夭蹖爻鬲賳 趩蹖爻鬲貙 蹖丕 爻乇卮鬲 丨讴賲鬲貙 蹖丕 (丨鬲蹖 讴賲鈥屫� 丕夭 丌賳) 乇爻鬲诏丕乇蹖 賳蹖爻鬲! 亘賴鈥� 賳馗乇 賲蹖鈥屫必池� 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 賴夭丕乇丕賳 爻丕賱 賲丕賴蹖鬲 賮賱爻賮賴 亘賵丿賴鈥屫з嗀� 賲丨賵 卮丿賴鈥屫з嗀� 賵 噩丕 乇丕 亘乇丕蹖 丿丕賳卮賵乇蹖貙 芦禺賵丿 丕賳丿蹖卮蹖禄 貙 賵 芦乇賵丨蹖賴 賳賯丕丿丕賳賴禄 亘丕夭 讴乇丿賴鈥屫з嗀�. 氐賮丨丕鬲 鄄郾鄄-鄄郾鄢 讴鬲丕亘
鈥嬠臂篡佰�/郾郾/郯郾
***
丕夭 丿蹖丿诏丕賴 賲鬲兀賱賴蹖賳 賲鬲毓氐亘貙 賮賱爻賮賴 夭丕丿賴鈥屰� 卮蹖胤丕賳 丕爻鬲貙 趩賵賳 亘丕 鬲丨乇蹖讴 丕賳爻丕賳 亘賴 倬卮鬲 讴乇丿賳 亘賴 丕蹖賲丕賳卮貙 賵 亘賴鈥� 讴丕乇 亘爻鬲賳 毓賯賱 禺賵丿 賵 倬乇 賵 亘丕賱 丿丕丿賳 亘賴 乇賵丨 倬乇爻卮诏乇 禺賵丿貙 丕賵 乇丕 亘賴鈥� 鬲丿乇蹖噩 亘賴 賵丕丿蹖 鬲乇丿蹖丿 賲蹖鈥屭┴簇з嗀� 讴賴 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 诏丕賲 禺乇賵噩 丕夭 丿丕蹖乇賴鈥屰� 賳馗丕乇鬲 丕賱賴蹖 丕爻鬲. 氐賮丨賴 鄄鄱 讴鬲丕亘
丨鬲蹖 丕诏乇 賴賲賴鈥屰� 丕賳爻丕賳鈥屬囏� 賮蹖賱爻賵賮 賳卮賵賳丿貙 賴賲賴鈥屰� 賲丕 乇賵夭蹖 丕夭 倬乇爻卮鈥屬囏й� 賮賱爻賮蹖 鬲兀孬蹖乇 賲蹖鈥屬矩佰屫臂屬�. 賴賲丕賳鈥� 胤賵乇 讴賴 诏賮鬲賲貙 賮賱爻賮賴 亘乇 禺賱丕賮 丕丿蹖丕賳 亘夭乇诏貙 賯賵賱 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 亘賴 賲丕 讴賲讴 讴賳丿 讴賴 禺賵丿 乇丕 賳賴 亘丕 鬲賵爻賱 亘賴 芦丿蹖诏乇蹖禄 蹖丕 禺丿丕貙 亘賱讴賴 亘丕 丕鬲讴丕 亘賴 賯丿乇鬲 禺賵丿 賵 亘賴乇賴鈥屭屫臂� 丕夭 毓賯賱 禺賵蹖卮鬲賳 芦賳噩丕鬲禄 丿賴蹖賲 賵 亘乇 鬲乇爻鈥屬囏й屬呚з� 睾賱亘賴 讴賳蹖賲. 氐賮丨賴 鄞鄹 讴鬲丕亘
芦禺丿丕蹖丕貙 禺賵卮丕 亘賴 丨丕賱 讴爻蹖 讴賴 亘賴 鬲賵 毓卮賯 賲蹖鈥屬堌必藏� 賵 亘賴 丿賵爻鬲蹖 讴賴 丿乇 鬲賵 賲蹖鈥屰屫жㄘ� 毓卮賯 賲蹖鈥屬堌必藏� 賵 亘賴 丿卮賲賳卮 賳蹖夭 亘乇丕蹖 鬲賵 毓卮賯 賲蹖鈥屬堌必藏�. 丕诏乇趩賴 鬲賳賴丕爻鬲貙 賴蹖趩 蹖讴 丕夭 毓夭蹖夭丕賳卮 乇丕 丕夭 丿爻鬲 賳賲蹖鈥屫囏� 趩賵賳 賴賲賴鈥屰� 毓夭蹖夭丕賳卮 丿乇 讴爻蹖 禺賱丕氐賴 卮丿賴鈥屫з嗀� 讴賴 丕夭 丿爻鬲 賳賲蹖鈥屫辟堌�. 丕蹖賳 讴蹖爻鬲 亘賴 噩夭 禺丿丕貙 禺丿丕蹖 賲丕鈥� 禺丿丕蹖 賲賳貙 賴蹖趩鈥� 讴爻 賳賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗀� 鬲賵 乇丕 丕夭 丿爻鬲 亘丿賴丿貙 賲诏乇 丕蹖賳鈥� 讴賴 丕夭 鬲賵 丿爻鬲 亘卮賵蹖丿.禄 (丌诏賵爻鬲蹖賳. 丕毓鬲乇丕賮丕鬲) . 氐賮丨賴 酃鄢 讴鬲丕亘
丕诏乇 丿丕賳爻鬲賳貙 毓卮賯 賵乇夭蹖丿賳 丕爻鬲貙 倬爻 丕蹖賳 賳蹖夭 丿乇爻鬲 丕爻鬲 讴賴 亘丕 诏爻鬲乇卮 丕賮賯鈥屬囏й� 禺賵丿 賵 亘賴亘賵丿 禺賵蹖卮鬲賳貙 賵丕乇丿 亘毓丿蹖 丕夭 丕賳爻丕賳蹖鬲 賲蹖鈥屫促堐屫� 讴賴 夭賳丿诏蹖 乇丕 芦鬲賵噩蹖賴禄 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賵 亘賴 丌賳 賲毓賳丕 賵 噩賴鬲 賲蹖鈥屫ㄘ簇�. 氐賮丨賴 郾鄞郯 讴鬲丕亘
倬乇爻卮鈥屬囏й� 賮賱爻賮蹖 亘夭乇诏貙 丿爻鬲鈥屭┵� 鬲丕 噩丕蹖蹖鈥� 讴賴 亘丕 噩丿蹖鬲 丕蹖賳 賲鬲禺氐氐丕賳 噩丿蹖丿 丕乇鬲亘丕胤 丿丕乇丿貙 賴賲趩賵賳 賮蹖賱賲鈥屬囏й� 丕丨爻丕爻蹖 丕蹖丕賲 诏匕卮鬲賴 亘賴鈥� 賳馗乇 賲蹖鈥屫必迟嗀�. 丿蹖诏乇 禺亘乇蹖 丕夭 亘丨孬 丿乇亘丕乇賴鈥屰� 賲毓賳丕貙 蹖丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 禺賵亘 夭蹖爻鬲賳 趩蹖爻鬲貙 蹖丕 爻乇卮鬲 丨讴賲鬲貙 蹖丕 (丨鬲蹖 讴賲鈥屫� 丕夭 丌賳) 乇爻鬲诏丕乇蹖 賳蹖爻鬲! 亘賴鈥� 賳馗乇 賲蹖鈥屫必池� 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 賴夭丕乇丕賳 爻丕賱 賲丕賴蹖鬲 賮賱爻賮賴 亘賵丿賴鈥屫з嗀� 賲丨賵 卮丿賴鈥屫з嗀� 賵 噩丕 乇丕 亘乇丕蹖 丿丕賳卮賵乇蹖貙 芦禺賵丿 丕賳丿蹖卮蹖禄 貙 賵 芦乇賵丨蹖賴 賳賯丕丿丕賳賴禄 亘丕夭 讴乇丿賴鈥屫з嗀�. 氐賮丨丕鬲 鄄郾鄄-鄄郾鄢 讴鬲丕亘
鈥嬠臂篡佰�/郾郾/郯郾
January 21, 2013
This book is one of the most engrossing books I have read in a long time. Luc Ferry knows philosophy, and it is clear he loves philosophy. But what sets this book apart - and what is rare with a book like this - is that Ferry clearly loves his reader. Also his prose (even translated?!) is a joy in itself.
I appreciated his generous posture toward "believers." Though he rejects revelation-based philosophies, he respects them. For instance, he wants the Christian doctrine of resurrection to be true - but cannot rest in it. Instead, he carries the reader along the history of thought, drawing out the dizzying reach and eventual limitations of humanistic philosophy through the ages. In the end, he commends a humanism - following Husserl - that embraces "transcendence within immanence." Ferry's outline of humanism stands in stark opposition to revealed Christianity. Yet in the end (with Ferry!) I found the resurrection beautiful in the way it meets our deepest problems. He resists, but I found my love and gratitude for this promise grow.
I appreciated his generous posture toward "believers." Though he rejects revelation-based philosophies, he respects them. For instance, he wants the Christian doctrine of resurrection to be true - but cannot rest in it. Instead, he carries the reader along the history of thought, drawing out the dizzying reach and eventual limitations of humanistic philosophy through the ages. In the end, he commends a humanism - following Husserl - that embraces "transcendence within immanence." Ferry's outline of humanism stands in stark opposition to revealed Christianity. Yet in the end (with Ferry!) I found the resurrection beautiful in the way it meets our deepest problems. He resists, but I found my love and gratitude for this promise grow.
August 21, 2019
賲賯丿賲踿 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 亘賴 丕賳丿丕夭踿 讴丕賮蹖 賳卮丕賳 丿賴賳丿踿 亘丿 亘賵丿賳卮 亘賵丿貙 丕賲丕 鬲丕 氐賮丨踿 50 丕丿丕賲賴 丿丕丿賲 賵 丕賲蹖丿賵丕乇 亘賵丿賲 亘賴 亘賴鬲乇 卮丿賳卮貨 亘乇丕蹖 卮乇賵毓 賮賱爻賮賴貙 倬丕蹖丕賳 賮賱爻賮賴貙 丕丿丕賲踿 賮賱爻賮賴 賵 讴賱丕 賴蹖趩 賴丿賮蹖 丿乇 賮賱爻賮賴 賲賳丕爻亘 賳蹖爻鬲! 丕氐賱丕 讴鬲丕亘 丿乇賲賵乇丿 賮賱爻賮賴 賳蹖爻鬲貙 賳賵卮鬲賴 丕蹖爻鬲 亘乇丕蹖 丌賳賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 賲蹖 禺賵丕賴賳丿 趩賴丕乇 賵丕跇踿 "丿賴賳 倬乇 讴賳" 丿乇 賮賱爻賮賴 亘丿丕賳賳丿 賵 丌賳賴丕 乇丕 賳賯賱 賲丨丕賮賱 讴賳賳丿貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 讴鬲丕亘卮 乇丕 賲賵鬲賵乇 噩爻鬲噩賵诏乇 诏賵诏賱 丿乇賳馗乇 诏乇賮鬲賴 讴賴 賴乇 讴賴 禺賵丕爻鬲 賳丕禺賳讴蹖 亘賴 賮賱爻賮賴 亘夭賳丿 亘賴 爻乇丕睾卮 乇賵丿! 亘丕 鬲賵囟蹖丨丕鬲蹖 丌夭丕乇丿賴賳丿賴貙 亘賴 诏賵賳賴 丕蹖 讴賴 亘丕蹖丿 亘爻蹖 鬲賱丕卮 賲蹖讴乇丿賲 鬲丕 亘鬲賵丕賳賲 鬲賲乇讴夭賲 乇丕 乇賵蹖 噩賲賱丕鬲 賳诏賴 丿丕乇賲.
August 18, 2023
丕賱噩賲丕賱 賮賷 丕賱賰鬲丕亘丞 賲丿乇賰 卮毓賵乇賷 丕賲鬲夭噩鬲 賮賷賴 孬賱丕孬丞 賲賮丕賴賷賲 賴賷
丕賱賵囟賵丨 賵丕賱賮賴賲 賵丕賱丕賯鬲乇丕亘 賲賳 丕賱賲鬲賱賯賷 賰兀賳 丕賱賲乇爻賱 賷噩丕賱爻賴 賵賷丨丿孬賴 亘卮賰賱 卮禺氐賷
賴匕丕 賲丕 賷鬲賵丕賮乇 賮賷 毓乇囟 賱賵賰 賮賷乇賷 賱兀卮噩丕乇 丕賱睾丕亘丕鬲 丕賱賮賰乇賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 賳爻鬲馗賱 亘賴丕
兀賵 賳爻鬲賳丿 廿賱賷賴丕 兀賵 賳鬲賵賴 賮賷 鬲卮丕亘賰賴丕
賱賵賰 賮賷乇賷 賱丕 賷鬲丨丿孬 毓賳 兀賮賰丕乇 賲噩乇丿丞 亘賲毓夭賱 毓賳 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳
賮賴賵 丨乇賷氐 毓賱賶 賵氐賱 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 亘丕賱亘卮乇
廿賳賳丕 賱丕 賳賳丨鬲 賵噩賵丿賳丕 丕賱乇賵丨賷 賮賷 噩亘丕賱 賲賳毓夭賱丞 毓賳 丕丨鬲賷丕噩丕鬲賳丕
賵廿賳賲丕 賳賱鬲賲爻 賮賷 丕賱爻毓賷 丕賱毓賯賱賷 胤乇賯丕 賳乇賶 賮賷賴丕
毓賱丕賲丕鬲 鬲爻丕毓丿賳丕 毓賱賶 丕賱鬲賯丿賾賲 賳丨賵 睾丕賷丕鬲 賮賷賴丕 賲賳 丕賱噩賲丕賱
賲丕 賷乇囟賷 賯賳丕毓丕鬲賳丕 丕賱毓丕亘乇丞 賱兀夭賲丕鬲 丕賱兀夭賲賳丞
丕賱賮賱丕爻賮丞 賮賷賴賲 兀氐丿賯丕亍 賷賲丿賵賳 兀賷丿賷賴賲 賱賱丨丕卅乇賷賳 賮賷 丕賱丿乇賵亘 丕賱丿丕賰賳丞
賵賱賴賲 乇賵丕丞 賷賳卮乇賵賳 賲毓賱賯丕鬲賴賲 丕賱賮賰乇賷丞 亘賲賵丿丞 丕賱賲丨亘
賰賲丕 賰丕賳 賷賮毓賱 丕賱禺賱賷賱丕賳 賲毓 丕賱卮丕毓乇 賵賴賵 賷噩賵亘 兀賵丿賷丞 丕賱兀丨賵丕賱
賵廿賷賯丕毓 丕賱亘丨賵乇 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賯胤毓賴丕 丕賱賯賵丕賮賱 賮賷 丕賱乇賲丕賱
丕賱賵囟賵丨 賵丕賱賮賴賲 賵丕賱丕賯鬲乇丕亘 賲賳 丕賱賲鬲賱賯賷 賰兀賳 丕賱賲乇爻賱 賷噩丕賱爻賴 賵賷丨丿孬賴 亘卮賰賱 卮禺氐賷
賴匕丕 賲丕 賷鬲賵丕賮乇 賮賷 毓乇囟 賱賵賰 賮賷乇賷 賱兀卮噩丕乇 丕賱睾丕亘丕鬲 丕賱賮賰乇賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 賳爻鬲馗賱 亘賴丕
兀賵 賳爻鬲賳丿 廿賱賷賴丕 兀賵 賳鬲賵賴 賮賷 鬲卮丕亘賰賴丕
賱賵賰 賮賷乇賷 賱丕 賷鬲丨丿孬 毓賳 兀賮賰丕乇 賲噩乇丿丞 亘賲毓夭賱 毓賳 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳
賮賴賵 丨乇賷氐 毓賱賶 賵氐賱 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 亘丕賱亘卮乇
廿賳賳丕 賱丕 賳賳丨鬲 賵噩賵丿賳丕 丕賱乇賵丨賷 賮賷 噩亘丕賱 賲賳毓夭賱丞 毓賳 丕丨鬲賷丕噩丕鬲賳丕
賵廿賳賲丕 賳賱鬲賲爻 賮賷 丕賱爻毓賷 丕賱毓賯賱賷 胤乇賯丕 賳乇賶 賮賷賴丕
毓賱丕賲丕鬲 鬲爻丕毓丿賳丕 毓賱賶 丕賱鬲賯丿賾賲 賳丨賵 睾丕賷丕鬲 賮賷賴丕 賲賳 丕賱噩賲丕賱
賲丕 賷乇囟賷 賯賳丕毓丕鬲賳丕 丕賱毓丕亘乇丞 賱兀夭賲丕鬲 丕賱兀夭賲賳丞
丕賱賮賱丕爻賮丞 賮賷賴賲 兀氐丿賯丕亍 賷賲丿賵賳 兀賷丿賷賴賲 賱賱丨丕卅乇賷賳 賮賷 丕賱丿乇賵亘 丕賱丿丕賰賳丞
賵賱賴賲 乇賵丕丞 賷賳卮乇賵賳 賲毓賱賯丕鬲賴賲 丕賱賮賰乇賷丞 亘賲賵丿丞 丕賱賲丨亘
賰賲丕 賰丕賳 賷賮毓賱 丕賱禺賱賷賱丕賳 賲毓 丕賱卮丕毓乇 賵賴賵 賷噩賵亘 兀賵丿賷丞 丕賱兀丨賵丕賱
賵廿賷賯丕毓 丕賱亘丨賵乇 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賯胤毓賴丕 丕賱賯賵丕賮賱 賮賷 丕賱乇賲丕賱
May 2, 2017
leila:
亘賴 賳馗乇 賲賳 讴鬲丕亘蹖 讴賴 賯乇丕乇賴 禺賵賳丿賴 亘卮賴貙 亘賴鬲乇賴 丿乇 丕亘鬲丿丕 賴丿賮 賲卮禺氐蹖 亘乇丕卮 鬲毓蹖蹖賳 亘卮賴 蹖丕 亘丕 蹖讴 爻賵丕賱 禺賵亘 卮乇賵毓 亘卮賴 鬲丕 爻乇丿乇诏賲蹖 賵 亘蹖 賳馗賲蹖 乇賵 丿乇 匕賴賳 亘賴 賵噩賵丿 賳蹖丕乇賴.賲賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘賴 禺丕胤乇 禺賵賳丿賳 鬲丕乇蹖禺 賮賱爻賮賴 诏乇賮鬲賲.讴鬲丕亘 賲禺鬲氐乇 賵 鬲賯乇蹖亘丕 爻亘讴 賲賳丕爻亘 卮乇賵毓 賮賱爻賮賴 禺賵賳丿賳. 賵賯鬲蹖 賲賯丿賲賴 丕卮 乇賵 禺賵賳丿賲 禺蹖賱蹖 鬲毓噩亘 讴乇丿賲貙 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 鬲賯乇蹖亘丕 噩賵丕亘 爻賵丕賱蹖 讴賴 鬲賵蹖 匕賴賳賲 賲蹖趩乇禺蹖丿 乇賵 丿丕卮鬲. 讴鬲丕亘 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 5 丿賵乇賴 賲禺鬲賱賮 丕夭 丌睾丕夭 賮賱爻賮賴 氐丨亘鬲 賲蹖讴賳賴 讴賴 亘蹖卮鬲乇蹖賳 鬲賲乇讴夭卮 乇賵 诏匕丕卮鬲賴 乇賵蹖 賲爻卅賱賴 賲乇诏 丌诏丕賴蹖 丿乇 丕賳爻丕賳.趩蹖夭蹖 讴賴 鬲賵 噩賴丕賳 賮賯胤 賲丕 丕賳爻丕賳 賴丕 丕夭卮 禺亘乇 丿丕乇蹖賲 賵 賲爻賱賲丕 丨蹖賵丕賳 賴丕 賵 蹖丕 爻丕蹖乇 賲賵噩賵丿丕鬲貙 賳賲蹖丿賵賳賳 讴賴 乇賵夭蹖 趩賴乇賴 賴丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮 賲乇诏 爻乇丕睾卮賵賳 禺賵丕賴丿 丌賲丿 賵 丨鬲蹖 鬲乇爻蹖 賳丿丕乇賳 賵 蹖丕 丕賮爻賵爻 賳賲蹖禺賵乇賳 賵 亘賴 倬賵趩蹖 賳賲蹖乇爻賳 讴賴 賳賲蹖鬲賵賳賳 賱丨馗賴 賴丕蹖 禺賵亘 夭賳丿诏蹖 賵 讴爻丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕乇賳 賵 蹖丕 丿乇 丌禺乇 噩爻賲卮賵賳 鬲丕 丕亘丿 賳诏賴 丿丕乇賳.丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘丕 蹖讴 丿蹖丿 讴賱蹖 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賲賵囟賵毓 賵 亘丕 鬲賵噩賴 亘賴 丿蹖丿诏丕賴 賲禺鬲賱賮 賲讴丕鬲亘 賮賱爻賮蹖 賲孬賱 乇賵丕賯蹖 诏乇蹖 賵 丕賳爻丕賳 诏乇丕蹖蹖 賵 賮賱爻賮賴 賲爻蹖丨蹖鬲 賵 倬爻丕賲丿乇賳蹖鬲賴 賵 倬爻丕 爻丕禺鬲丕乇诏乇丕蹖蹖 倬賱賴 倬賱賴 賲丕乇賵 丌卮賳丕 賲蹖讴賳賴 賵 卮丕蹖丿 蹖賴 乇丕賴 丨賱 賵 蹖丕 鬲賮讴乇 丕賳鬲賯丕丿蹖 乇賵 亘賴 賲丕 蹖丕丿 亘丿賴 賵 丕噩丕夭賴 亘丿賴 禺賵丿賲賵賳 鬲氐賲蹖賲 亘诏蹖乇蹖賲 讴賴 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕乇蹖賲 丿乇诏蹖乇 倬蹖趩蹖丿诏蹖 賳蹖趩賴 亘卮蹖賲 蹖丕 乇丕丨鬲蹖 賵 丌爻賵賳蹖 賮賱爻賮賴 賲爻蹖丨蹖鬲 賵 丿蹖賳 乇賵 丕賳鬲禺丕亘 讴賳蹖賲.賲賳 丕蹖賳 噩賲毓 亘賳丿蹖 讴賱蹖 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕卮鬲賲 賵 卮丕蹖丿 禺蹖賱蹖 丕夭 丨賮乇賴 賴丕蹖 匕賴賳賲 丕夭 丨丕賱鬲 禺丕賱蹖 亘賵丿賳 賲丨囟 亘蹖乇賵賳 丕賵賲丿 賵 亘丕毓孬 卮丿 亘蹖卮鬲乇 賳蹖丕夭 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮賲 賲讴丕鬲亘 賮賱爻賮蹖 乇賵 毓賲蹖賯 鬲乇 亘禺賵賳賲.賲賳賲 丕夭 趩賴乇賴 賴丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮 賲乇诏 賲蹖鬲乇爻賲貙 爻丕丿賴 鬲乇蹖賳卮 賲孬賱 丕賵噩 賱匕鬲 禺賵賳丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 賵 丿賵賳賴 丿賵賳賴 賴囟賲 讴乇丿賳 讴賱賲丕鬲卮 賵 賲乇诏 賵 鬲賲賵賲 卮丿賳 丕蹖賳 賱丨馗賴 賴丕.
亘賴 賳馗乇 賲賳 讴鬲丕亘蹖 讴賴 賯乇丕乇賴 禺賵賳丿賴 亘卮賴貙 亘賴鬲乇賴 丿乇 丕亘鬲丿丕 賴丿賮 賲卮禺氐蹖 亘乇丕卮 鬲毓蹖蹖賳 亘卮賴 蹖丕 亘丕 蹖讴 爻賵丕賱 禺賵亘 卮乇賵毓 亘卮賴 鬲丕 爻乇丿乇诏賲蹖 賵 亘蹖 賳馗賲蹖 乇賵 丿乇 匕賴賳 亘賴 賵噩賵丿 賳蹖丕乇賴.賲賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘賴 禺丕胤乇 禺賵賳丿賳 鬲丕乇蹖禺 賮賱爻賮賴 诏乇賮鬲賲.讴鬲丕亘 賲禺鬲氐乇 賵 鬲賯乇蹖亘丕 爻亘讴 賲賳丕爻亘 卮乇賵毓 賮賱爻賮賴 禺賵賳丿賳. 賵賯鬲蹖 賲賯丿賲賴 丕卮 乇賵 禺賵賳丿賲 禺蹖賱蹖 鬲毓噩亘 讴乇丿賲貙 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 鬲賯乇蹖亘丕 噩賵丕亘 爻賵丕賱蹖 讴賴 鬲賵蹖 匕賴賳賲 賲蹖趩乇禺蹖丿 乇賵 丿丕卮鬲. 讴鬲丕亘 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 5 丿賵乇賴 賲禺鬲賱賮 丕夭 丌睾丕夭 賮賱爻賮賴 氐丨亘鬲 賲蹖讴賳賴 讴賴 亘蹖卮鬲乇蹖賳 鬲賲乇讴夭卮 乇賵 诏匕丕卮鬲賴 乇賵蹖 賲爻卅賱賴 賲乇诏 丌诏丕賴蹖 丿乇 丕賳爻丕賳.趩蹖夭蹖 讴賴 鬲賵 噩賴丕賳 賮賯胤 賲丕 丕賳爻丕賳 賴丕 丕夭卮 禺亘乇 丿丕乇蹖賲 賵 賲爻賱賲丕 丨蹖賵丕賳 賴丕 賵 蹖丕 爻丕蹖乇 賲賵噩賵丿丕鬲貙 賳賲蹖丿賵賳賳 讴賴 乇賵夭蹖 趩賴乇賴 賴丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮 賲乇诏 爻乇丕睾卮賵賳 禺賵丕賴丿 丌賲丿 賵 丨鬲蹖 鬲乇爻蹖 賳丿丕乇賳 賵 蹖丕 丕賮爻賵爻 賳賲蹖禺賵乇賳 賵 亘賴 倬賵趩蹖 賳賲蹖乇爻賳 讴賴 賳賲蹖鬲賵賳賳 賱丨馗賴 賴丕蹖 禺賵亘 夭賳丿诏蹖 賵 讴爻丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕乇賳 賵 蹖丕 丿乇 丌禺乇 噩爻賲卮賵賳 鬲丕 丕亘丿 賳诏賴 丿丕乇賳.丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘丕 蹖讴 丿蹖丿 讴賱蹖 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賲賵囟賵毓 賵 亘丕 鬲賵噩賴 亘賴 丿蹖丿诏丕賴 賲禺鬲賱賮 賲讴丕鬲亘 賮賱爻賮蹖 賲孬賱 乇賵丕賯蹖 诏乇蹖 賵 丕賳爻丕賳 诏乇丕蹖蹖 賵 賮賱爻賮賴 賲爻蹖丨蹖鬲 賵 倬爻丕賲丿乇賳蹖鬲賴 賵 倬爻丕 爻丕禺鬲丕乇诏乇丕蹖蹖 倬賱賴 倬賱賴 賲丕乇賵 丌卮賳丕 賲蹖讴賳賴 賵 卮丕蹖丿 蹖賴 乇丕賴 丨賱 賵 蹖丕 鬲賮讴乇 丕賳鬲賯丕丿蹖 乇賵 亘賴 賲丕 蹖丕丿 亘丿賴 賵 丕噩丕夭賴 亘丿賴 禺賵丿賲賵賳 鬲氐賲蹖賲 亘诏蹖乇蹖賲 讴賴 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕乇蹖賲 丿乇诏蹖乇 倬蹖趩蹖丿诏蹖 賳蹖趩賴 亘卮蹖賲 蹖丕 乇丕丨鬲蹖 賵 丌爻賵賳蹖 賮賱爻賮賴 賲爻蹖丨蹖鬲 賵 丿蹖賳 乇賵 丕賳鬲禺丕亘 讴賳蹖賲.賲賳 丕蹖賳 噩賲毓 亘賳丿蹖 讴賱蹖 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕卮鬲賲 賵 卮丕蹖丿 禺蹖賱蹖 丕夭 丨賮乇賴 賴丕蹖 匕賴賳賲 丕夭 丨丕賱鬲 禺丕賱蹖 亘賵丿賳 賲丨囟 亘蹖乇賵賳 丕賵賲丿 賵 亘丕毓孬 卮丿 亘蹖卮鬲乇 賳蹖丕夭 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮賲 賲讴丕鬲亘 賮賱爻賮蹖 乇賵 毓賲蹖賯 鬲乇 亘禺賵賳賲.賲賳賲 丕夭 趩賴乇賴 賴丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮 賲乇诏 賲蹖鬲乇爻賲貙 爻丕丿賴 鬲乇蹖賳卮 賲孬賱 丕賵噩 賱匕鬲 禺賵賳丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 賵 丿賵賳賴 丿賵賳賴 賴囟賲 讴乇丿賳 讴賱賲丕鬲卮 賵 賲乇诏 賵 鬲賲賵賲 卮丿賳 丕蹖賳 賱丨馗賴 賴丕.
September 11, 2020
鈥淚f you read only one book on culture,鈥� Tim Keller said in 2012, 鈥渞ead this one.鈥� It is 鈥渁 terrific, fast way to get a handle on Western culture.鈥�
Ferry is an atheistic French philosopher who, in a way similar to someone like Jonathan Haidt, seems 鈥渘ot far from the kingdom.鈥� And this is indeed one of those rare paradigm-shaping books. As the title suggests, Ferry traces the development of big ideas and philosophical movements, exploring (and contrasting) each era鈥檚 account of three things: knowledge, morality, and 鈥渟alvation.鈥� The result is explanatory power of a kind that will serve any Christian interested in cultural apologetics.
John Calvin once commended the value of 鈥渓ucid brevity鈥濃€攏ot a thing for which philosophers, no offense, are known. I鈥檓 impressed, therefore, by how much Ferry packs into less than 300 pages. The book is sweeping in scope yet fluid in style. In that regard it reminded me of Joseph Ellis鈥檚 masterful book on the American revolutionary generation, 鈥淔ounding Brothers,鈥� which accomplishes the same feat.
鈥淎 Brief History of Thought鈥� is no breezy poolside read, to be sure, but Ferry simplifies and synthesizes complex ideas about as well as one could expect. As for Christianity, well, he admits that he finds it too good to be true. May God sovereignly bring him to faith in the Lord Jesus, 鈥渋n whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge鈥� (Col. 2:3).
Ferry is an atheistic French philosopher who, in a way similar to someone like Jonathan Haidt, seems 鈥渘ot far from the kingdom.鈥� And this is indeed one of those rare paradigm-shaping books. As the title suggests, Ferry traces the development of big ideas and philosophical movements, exploring (and contrasting) each era鈥檚 account of three things: knowledge, morality, and 鈥渟alvation.鈥� The result is explanatory power of a kind that will serve any Christian interested in cultural apologetics.
John Calvin once commended the value of 鈥渓ucid brevity鈥濃€攏ot a thing for which philosophers, no offense, are known. I鈥檓 impressed, therefore, by how much Ferry packs into less than 300 pages. The book is sweeping in scope yet fluid in style. In that regard it reminded me of Joseph Ellis鈥檚 masterful book on the American revolutionary generation, 鈥淔ounding Brothers,鈥� which accomplishes the same feat.
鈥淎 Brief History of Thought鈥� is no breezy poolside read, to be sure, but Ferry simplifies and synthesizes complex ideas about as well as one could expect. As for Christianity, well, he admits that he finds it too good to be true. May God sovereignly bring him to faith in the Lord Jesus, 鈥渋n whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge鈥� (Col. 2:3).
February 9, 2013
This is a fascinating book. First, it's refreshing to read an Atheist that isn't a New Atheist. Ferry is able to be both critical and appreciative of religion and of other atheist or non-religious systems that he rejects. Second, the title and subtitle could probably be reversed because the emphasis of the book is not on a history of thought or philosophy, but on philosophy as a guide to living. Ferry unfolds this theme with a narrow historical scetch of some Greek philosophical systems, then with Christianity, humanism, post-modernism, and then his view of our contemporary philosophical state. He ends by encouraging his own philosophy for living. The potential reader should be aware that this book is *not* a history of philosophy in the vain of Julian Marias or Bertrand Russell's works. It is Ferry's understanding of the philosophical task and he informs the reader of how that has roughly played out to the present day.
I have a lot more to say about the book. I found myself simultaneously agreeing and disagreeing with a lot of what he says, particularly about his understanding of Christianity, but I don't have time to explore that now. I'll try to come back and update this later.
I have a lot more to say about the book. I found myself simultaneously agreeing and disagreeing with a lot of what he says, particularly about his understanding of Christianity, but I don't have time to explore that now. I'll try to come back and update this later.
November 9, 2022
賴賲賵賳胤賵乇 讴賴 毓賳賵丕賳 讴鬲丕亘 诏賮鬲賴貙蹖賴 鬲丕乇蹖禺 賲禺鬲氐乇 丕夭 丕賳丿蹖卮賴.
禺賵賳丿賳卮 亘乇丕賲 賲孬賱 蹖賴 讴賱丕爻 丿乇爻 诏乇賲 鬲賵 蹖賴 乇賵夭 賳賵丕賲亘乇 亘丕乇賵賳蹖 亘丕 蹖賴 丕爻鬲丕丿 禺賽亘乇賴 亘賵丿.丕賲丕 賴乇趩蹖 亘賵丿 "乇丕賴賳賲丕蹖 夭蹖爻鬲賳" 賳亘賵丿貨趩賵賳 賳賴 鬲賳賴丕 丿賱 賵 乇賵丿賴鈥屰� 鬲賲丕賲 丿賵乇丕賳鈥屬囏й� 鬲賮讴乇 賮賱爻賮蹖 乇賵 亘蹖乇賵賳 賲蹖乇蹖夭賴 賵 亘丕 丕賵賳 賴賲賴 乇丕賴 亘乇丕蹖 夭蹖爻鬲賳 鬲賳賴丕鬲 賲蹖匕丕乇賴貙亘賱讴賴 丿乇 賳賴丕蹖鬲 賴賲賵賳胤賵乇 讴賴 丌禺乇 讴鬲丕亘 賳賵卮鬲賴 亘賵丿 丌丿賲 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賳鬲蹖噩賴 賲蹖乇爻賴 讴賴 丕诏乇 丕蹖賳 賴賲賴 丨賯蹖賯鬲 賵噩賵丿 丿丕乇賴 賵 賴蹖趩 丨賯蹖賯鬲蹖 賴賲 丕賵賳 蹖讴蹖 乇賵 賯亘賵賱 賳丿丕乇賴 倬爻 賮賱爻賮賴 亘蹖賴賵丿賴 丕爻鬲!
讴賴 丕賱亘鬲賴 丿乇爻鬲 賳蹖爻鬲 賵 丌丿賲 丕夭 丨乇氐卮 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賳鬲蹖噩賴 賲蹖乇爻賴.趩賵賳 賴賲賴 趩蹖夭 禺蹖賱蹖 賵爻蹖毓 賵 丿乇 毓蹖賳 丨丕賱 丿乇爻鬲 賵 丕卮鬲亘丕賴賴.卮丕蹖丿 賴賲 丿乇爻鬲 賵 丕卮鬲亘丕賴蹖 賵噩賵丿 賳丿丕乇賴鈥� 賵 丌丿賲 賮賯胤 亘丕蹖丿 鬲毓丕丿賱 賴賲賴 趩蹖夭賵 賳诏賴 丿丕乇賴.(丕賵賱 賵 丌禺乇 鬲賲丕賲 賲亘丕丨孬 賮賱爻賮蹖 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賳鬲蹖噩賴 賲蹖乇爻賲.)
丕賲丕 賮賱爻賮賴 賴賲蹖卮賴 丕诏乇 賴賲 丿乇賲丕賳 賳亘丕卮賴貙丿賱蹖賱 賵 丿睾丿睾賴 丕爻鬲.賵爻蹖賱賴 丕爻鬲貙丌乇賵賲 讴賳賳丿賴 賵 賲毓賳丕 丿賴賳丿爻.賲毓賳丕 亘賴 鬲賯賱丕賴丕 賵 丕賳丿蹖卮賴鈥屬囏й� 乇賵夭賲乇賴 賵 丕賱亘鬲賴 丕賵賳 丿蹖丿诏丕賴 讴賱蹖賽 夭蹖亘丕蹖蹖 讴賴 賲蹖亘禺卮賴 賵 賴賲賴 趩蹖夭 乇賵 讴賲蹖 賲賳胤賯蹖 鬲乇-賵 亘蹖 丕賴賲蹖鬲 鬲乇-噩賱賵賴 賲蹖丿賴.
亘毓囟蹖鈥屫з囏й� 讴鬲丕亘 賴賲 夭蹖丕丿蹖 鬲禺氐氐蹖/爻蹖丕爻蹖 賲蹖卮丿 賵 丕夭 丨賵氐賱賴 禺丕乇噩 賲蹖卮丿 賵 丌丿賲 乇卮鬲賴鈥屰� 讴賱丕賲 乇賵 诏賲 賲蹖讴乇丿.卮丕蹖丿 賴賲 丕夭 鬲乇噩賲爻 蹖丕 卮丕蹖丿 賴賲 賲賳 鬲賵 丿賵乇丕賳 鬲賯乇蹖亘丕 亘蹖鈥屫堌蒂勞屬� 禺賵賳丿賲卮 丕賲丕 賲蹖禺賵丕賲 亘诏賲 讴賴 賵丕爻賴 讴爻丕賳蹖 讴賴 鬲丕夭賴 卮乇賵毓 亘賴 賲胤丕賱毓賴鈥屰� 賮賱爻賮賴 讴乇丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 賲賳丕爻亘蹖 賳賲蹖鬲賵賳賴 亘丕卮賴.
禺賱丕氐賴 丕夭 丕賵賳 鬲丕蹖倬 讴鬲丕亘丕蹖 賮賱爻賮蹖鈥屫й� 賳亘賵丿 讴賴 禺蹖賱蹖 禺丕氐 亘丕卮賴 蹖丕 趩蹖夭 噩丿蹖丿蹖 乇賵 丕乇丕卅賴 讴賳賴 賵 鬲賴卮 丌丿賲 亘诏賴 "賵丕賵賵 毓噩亘 趩蹖夭蹖 亘賵丿" 賵 亘蹖卮鬲乇 噩賳亘賴鈥屰� 丌賲賵夭卮蹖 丿丕卮鬲 鬲丕 倬乇賵乇卮蹖貙賵賱蹖 丕蹖賳 趩蹖夭蹖 丕夭 丕乇夭卮賲賳丿亘賵丿賳 賵 賴賲趩賳蹖賳 賱匕鬲鈥屫ㄘ� 亘賵丿賳 丕蹖賳 賲賳亘毓賽 毓丕賱蹖 讴賲 賳賲蹖讴賳賴馃摐鉁�
禺賵賳丿賳卮 亘乇丕賲 賲孬賱 蹖賴 讴賱丕爻 丿乇爻 诏乇賲 鬲賵 蹖賴 乇賵夭 賳賵丕賲亘乇 亘丕乇賵賳蹖 亘丕 蹖賴 丕爻鬲丕丿 禺賽亘乇賴 亘賵丿.丕賲丕 賴乇趩蹖 亘賵丿 "乇丕賴賳賲丕蹖 夭蹖爻鬲賳" 賳亘賵丿貨趩賵賳 賳賴 鬲賳賴丕 丿賱 賵 乇賵丿賴鈥屰� 鬲賲丕賲 丿賵乇丕賳鈥屬囏й� 鬲賮讴乇 賮賱爻賮蹖 乇賵 亘蹖乇賵賳 賲蹖乇蹖夭賴 賵 亘丕 丕賵賳 賴賲賴 乇丕賴 亘乇丕蹖 夭蹖爻鬲賳 鬲賳賴丕鬲 賲蹖匕丕乇賴貙亘賱讴賴 丿乇 賳賴丕蹖鬲 賴賲賵賳胤賵乇 讴賴 丌禺乇 讴鬲丕亘 賳賵卮鬲賴 亘賵丿 丌丿賲 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賳鬲蹖噩賴 賲蹖乇爻賴 讴賴 丕诏乇 丕蹖賳 賴賲賴 丨賯蹖賯鬲 賵噩賵丿 丿丕乇賴 賵 賴蹖趩 丨賯蹖賯鬲蹖 賴賲 丕賵賳 蹖讴蹖 乇賵 賯亘賵賱 賳丿丕乇賴 倬爻 賮賱爻賮賴 亘蹖賴賵丿賴 丕爻鬲!
讴賴 丕賱亘鬲賴 丿乇爻鬲 賳蹖爻鬲 賵 丌丿賲 丕夭 丨乇氐卮 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賳鬲蹖噩賴 賲蹖乇爻賴.趩賵賳 賴賲賴 趩蹖夭 禺蹖賱蹖 賵爻蹖毓 賵 丿乇 毓蹖賳 丨丕賱 丿乇爻鬲 賵 丕卮鬲亘丕賴賴.卮丕蹖丿 賴賲 丿乇爻鬲 賵 丕卮鬲亘丕賴蹖 賵噩賵丿 賳丿丕乇賴鈥� 賵 丌丿賲 賮賯胤 亘丕蹖丿 鬲毓丕丿賱 賴賲賴 趩蹖夭賵 賳诏賴 丿丕乇賴.(丕賵賱 賵 丌禺乇 鬲賲丕賲 賲亘丕丨孬 賮賱爻賮蹖 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賳鬲蹖噩賴 賲蹖乇爻賲.)
丕賲丕 賮賱爻賮賴 賴賲蹖卮賴 丕诏乇 賴賲 丿乇賲丕賳 賳亘丕卮賴貙丿賱蹖賱 賵 丿睾丿睾賴 丕爻鬲.賵爻蹖賱賴 丕爻鬲貙丌乇賵賲 讴賳賳丿賴 賵 賲毓賳丕 丿賴賳丿爻.賲毓賳丕 亘賴 鬲賯賱丕賴丕 賵 丕賳丿蹖卮賴鈥屬囏й� 乇賵夭賲乇賴 賵 丕賱亘鬲賴 丕賵賳 丿蹖丿诏丕賴 讴賱蹖賽 夭蹖亘丕蹖蹖 讴賴 賲蹖亘禺卮賴 賵 賴賲賴 趩蹖夭 乇賵 讴賲蹖 賲賳胤賯蹖 鬲乇-賵 亘蹖 丕賴賲蹖鬲 鬲乇-噩賱賵賴 賲蹖丿賴.
亘毓囟蹖鈥屫з囏й� 讴鬲丕亘 賴賲 夭蹖丕丿蹖 鬲禺氐氐蹖/爻蹖丕爻蹖 賲蹖卮丿 賵 丕夭 丨賵氐賱賴 禺丕乇噩 賲蹖卮丿 賵 丌丿賲 乇卮鬲賴鈥屰� 讴賱丕賲 乇賵 诏賲 賲蹖讴乇丿.卮丕蹖丿 賴賲 丕夭 鬲乇噩賲爻 蹖丕 卮丕蹖丿 賴賲 賲賳 鬲賵 丿賵乇丕賳 鬲賯乇蹖亘丕 亘蹖鈥屫堌蒂勞屬� 禺賵賳丿賲卮 丕賲丕 賲蹖禺賵丕賲 亘诏賲 讴賴 賵丕爻賴 讴爻丕賳蹖 讴賴 鬲丕夭賴 卮乇賵毓 亘賴 賲胤丕賱毓賴鈥屰� 賮賱爻賮賴 讴乇丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 賲賳丕爻亘蹖 賳賲蹖鬲賵賳賴 亘丕卮賴.
禺賱丕氐賴 丕夭 丕賵賳 鬲丕蹖倬 讴鬲丕亘丕蹖 賮賱爻賮蹖鈥屫й� 賳亘賵丿 讴賴 禺蹖賱蹖 禺丕氐 亘丕卮賴 蹖丕 趩蹖夭 噩丿蹖丿蹖 乇賵 丕乇丕卅賴 讴賳賴 賵 鬲賴卮 丌丿賲 亘诏賴 "賵丕賵賵 毓噩亘 趩蹖夭蹖 亘賵丿" 賵 亘蹖卮鬲乇 噩賳亘賴鈥屰� 丌賲賵夭卮蹖 丿丕卮鬲 鬲丕 倬乇賵乇卮蹖貙賵賱蹖 丕蹖賳 趩蹖夭蹖 丕夭 丕乇夭卮賲賳丿亘賵丿賳 賵 賴賲趩賳蹖賳 賱匕鬲鈥屫ㄘ� 亘賵丿賳 丕蹖賳 賲賳亘毓賽 毓丕賱蹖 讴賲 賳賲蹖讴賳賴馃摐鉁�
March 9, 2015
This book will provide you with a smart intro to Philosophy!
Starting from the Greek Miracle, to Christianity's victory over Philosophy, followed by Humanism, then Nietzsche & Post-Modernity till we reached to Contemporary Philosophy.
As a beginner, I found this book very informative, the writer's style was flawless, I was reading, taking notes & contemplating over each topic separately. Then the writer's commentaries came as a great explanation to all that. Maybe I just wanted it to be a little more explained, a little more elaborated & not skipping parts or philosophical eras.
At times I felt irritated of the writer's unbelief (neither in Christianity nor any other religion likewise), but he gave his reader the freedom to read, compare & judge for himself, the way he emphasized all over his book & concluded below:
------------------------------
"Every great philosophical system epitomizes in the form of thought a fundamental human experience, just as every great work of art or literature translates human possibility into the most concrete and sensuous form.
Respect for the Other does not after all exclude personal choice. On the contrary, it is its primary condition. "
-------------------------------
A Highly recommended read!
Starting from the Greek Miracle, to Christianity's victory over Philosophy, followed by Humanism, then Nietzsche & Post-Modernity till we reached to Contemporary Philosophy.
As a beginner, I found this book very informative, the writer's style was flawless, I was reading, taking notes & contemplating over each topic separately. Then the writer's commentaries came as a great explanation to all that. Maybe I just wanted it to be a little more explained, a little more elaborated & not skipping parts or philosophical eras.
At times I felt irritated of the writer's unbelief (neither in Christianity nor any other religion likewise), but he gave his reader the freedom to read, compare & judge for himself, the way he emphasized all over his book & concluded below:
------------------------------
"Every great philosophical system epitomizes in the form of thought a fundamental human experience, just as every great work of art or literature translates human possibility into the most concrete and sensuous form.
Respect for the Other does not after all exclude personal choice. On the contrary, it is its primary condition. "
-------------------------------
A Highly recommended read!
April 27, 2025
丿賷 乇丕亘毓 賲賯丿賲丞 毓賳 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 賱賱賲亘鬲丿卅賷賳 賱賷丕 賮賷 兀禺乇 兀爻亘賵毓,
丕賱賰鬲丕亘 丿丕 賮毓賱丕 賲鬲賲賷夭 毓賳 丕賱賱賷 賯亘賱賴,
賵賲卮 賲亘丕賱睾丞 兀亘丿丕 賵賱丕 睾乇賵乇 賱賲丕 賯丕賱賰 "鬲毓賱賲 丕賱丨賷丕丞", 丕賱乇亘胤 亘賷賳 賲乇丕丨賱 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 毓馗賷賲 噩丿丕,
賳馗乇鬲賴 毓賳 毓賱丕賯丞 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 亘丕賱丿賷賳 鬲賯乇賷亘丕 賳賮爻 丕賱賱賷 兀賳丕 丕爻鬲賳鬲噩鬲賴丕 賲賳 丕賱賰鬲亘 丕賱兀賵賱賶, 賵丿丕 卮賷亍 賷乇囟賷 睾乇賵乇賷 噩丿丕 -兀賵 賷孬賷乇賴- .
丕賱賰鬲丕亘 丿丕 賮毓賱丕 賲鬲賲賷夭 毓賳 丕賱賱賷 賯亘賱賴,
賵賲卮 賲亘丕賱睾丞 兀亘丿丕 賵賱丕 睾乇賵乇 賱賲丕 賯丕賱賰 "鬲毓賱賲 丕賱丨賷丕丞", 丕賱乇亘胤 亘賷賳 賲乇丕丨賱 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 毓馗賷賲 噩丿丕,
賳馗乇鬲賴 毓賳 毓賱丕賯丞 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 亘丕賱丿賷賳 鬲賯乇賷亘丕 賳賮爻 丕賱賱賷 兀賳丕 丕爻鬲賳鬲噩鬲賴丕 賲賳 丕賱賰鬲亘 丕賱兀賵賱賶, 賵丿丕 卮賷亍 賷乇囟賷 睾乇賵乇賷 噩丿丕 -兀賵 賷孬賷乇賴- .
December 31, 2024
A couple of things I found very interesting about this book:
One is that the author was raised in a French philosophical tradition and in French schooling that had wholly given up even the description of Christian theology and Christian philosophy.
Another thing that I found so interesting was that he finds a theme of salvation to be a鈥攊f not the鈥攎ajor theme of all philosophy.
Also: he saw Friedrich Nietszche himself as upholding a morality and offering a salvation.
Something massive that I found very refreshing: I've come to expect from this genre of book mere description, but Ferry gave his own opinions throughout the book and especially at the end. That above-the-fray position I find to be very off-putting because fundamentally dishonest. No one who is smart enough to summarize so many philosophers can have failed to establish his or her own viewpoint on at least some of the major matters at issue. Writers win my trust when they do what Ferry did.
At the very end of the book he openly wishes Christianity were true. It has the best soteriology, in Ferry's opinion. This has to be why so many Christian readers have recommended the book to me.
One is that the author was raised in a French philosophical tradition and in French schooling that had wholly given up even the description of Christian theology and Christian philosophy.
Another thing that I found so interesting was that he finds a theme of salvation to be a鈥攊f not the鈥攎ajor theme of all philosophy.
Also: he saw Friedrich Nietszche himself as upholding a morality and offering a salvation.
Something massive that I found very refreshing: I've come to expect from this genre of book mere description, but Ferry gave his own opinions throughout the book and especially at the end. That above-the-fray position I find to be very off-putting because fundamentally dishonest. No one who is smart enough to summarize so many philosophers can have failed to establish his or her own viewpoint on at least some of the major matters at issue. Writers win my trust when they do what Ferry did.
At the very end of the book he openly wishes Christianity were true. It has the best soteriology, in Ferry's opinion. This has to be why so many Christian readers have recommended the book to me.
January 1, 2016
膼峄峜 cu峄憂 n脿y xong m岷 ng脿y r峄搃 m脿 v岷玭 c貌n th岷 d峄� v峄�, t峄沬 n峄梚 l岷璽 m岷 cu峄憂 tri岷縯 kh谩c ra m脿 膽峄峜 kh么ng v么 膽瓢峄. Cu峄憂 th矛 qu谩 h峄漣 h峄 kh么ng ph芒n t铆ch, ch峄� ra, khai m峄� 膽瓢峄 膽i峄乽 g矛, cu峄憂 th矛 l岷 s芒u s岷痗 qu谩 膽谩ng(媒 l脿 ki峄僽 tri岷縯 m矛nh kh么ng h峄� mu峄憂 h峄峜).
Xu岷 ph谩t t峄� s峄� nh岷璶 th峄ヽ v峄� t铆nh h峄痷 h岷 c峄 con ng瓢峄漣, tri岷縯 h峄峜 hi峄噉 ra nh瓢 m峄檛 s峄� c峄﹗ r峄梚, nh瓢ng l脿 s峄� c峄﹗ r峄梚 d峄盿 tr锚n ch铆nh m矛nh ch峄� kh么ng ph岷 b岷眓g m峄檛 膽岷g 峄� tr锚n v脿 b锚n ngo脿i(t么n gi谩o). S峄� c峄﹗ r峄梚 c峄 tri岷縯 h峄峜 膽瓢峄 膽岷穋 tr锚n ba ph瓢啤ng di峄噉 l脿 l媒 thuy岷縯-theoria( v峄沬 媒 ngh末a ban 膽岷 l脿 s峄� nh矛n ng岷痬-orao c谩i th岷 di峄噓 theon), t峄� 膽贸 x谩c l岷璸 m峄檛 th谩i 膽峄� s峄憂g 膽煤ng 膽岷痭 tr锚n ph瓢啤ng di峄噉 th峄眂 h脿nh(praxis) cu峄慽 c霉ng l脿 膽峄� 膽岷 膽瓢峄 s峄� minh tri岷縯(sophie). V峄沬 c谩ch nh矛n 膽贸, 么ng Luc Ferry xuy锚n qua 膽谩m m芒y m霉 tri岷縯 h峄峜 膽瓢峄 gi膬ng kh岷痯 chi峄乽 d脿i l峄媍h s峄� 2500 n膬m. B岷痶 膽岷 l脿 th峄漣 c峄� 膽岷 con ng瓢峄漣 膽岷穞 s峄� h脿i h貌a c峄 v农 tr峄�(cosmos) v脿o trung t芒m, t峄沬 phi锚n nh峄痭g Ki-t么 h峄痷 膽岷穞 Ch煤a c峄 h峄� v脿o thay th岷� tr瓢峄沜 khi b峄� ch铆nh con ng瓢峄漣 膽瓢峄 膽岷穞 v脿o v峄� tr铆 vinh quang n脿y. Nh瓢ng d瓢峄漬g nh瓢 t峄沬 th峄漣 膽岷 c峄 ch煤ng ta 膽ang s峄憂g, c谩i h岷璾-hi峄噉 膽岷 岷, tri岷縯 h峄峜 v岷玭 b岷� t岷痗, loay hay 膽i t矛m th峄� 膽峄� 膽岷穞 v脿o khi m峄峣 l媒 t瓢峄焠g, m峄峣 th岷 linh b峄� tri岷縯 h峄峜 duy v岷璽 v脿 gi岷-c岷 tr煤c 膽岷璸 v峄� tan t脿nh.
T峄� c谩ch 膽芒y 3 n膬m m矛nh 膽峄峜 Th岷� gi峄沬 c峄 Sophie, cu峄憂 s谩ch d岷玭 m矛nh 膽i v脿o tri岷縯 h峄峜 th矛 m峄沬 l岷 膽瓢峄 膽峄峜 m峄檛 cu峄憂 hay th岷� n脿y.
Xu岷 ph谩t t峄� s峄� nh岷璶 th峄ヽ v峄� t铆nh h峄痷 h岷 c峄 con ng瓢峄漣, tri岷縯 h峄峜 hi峄噉 ra nh瓢 m峄檛 s峄� c峄﹗ r峄梚, nh瓢ng l脿 s峄� c峄﹗ r峄梚 d峄盿 tr锚n ch铆nh m矛nh ch峄� kh么ng ph岷 b岷眓g m峄檛 膽岷g 峄� tr锚n v脿 b锚n ngo脿i(t么n gi谩o). S峄� c峄﹗ r峄梚 c峄 tri岷縯 h峄峜 膽瓢峄 膽岷穋 tr锚n ba ph瓢啤ng di峄噉 l脿 l媒 thuy岷縯-theoria( v峄沬 媒 ngh末a ban 膽岷 l脿 s峄� nh矛n ng岷痬-orao c谩i th岷 di峄噓 theon), t峄� 膽贸 x谩c l岷璸 m峄檛 th谩i 膽峄� s峄憂g 膽煤ng 膽岷痭 tr锚n ph瓢啤ng di峄噉 th峄眂 h脿nh(praxis) cu峄慽 c霉ng l脿 膽峄� 膽岷 膽瓢峄 s峄� minh tri岷縯(sophie). V峄沬 c谩ch nh矛n 膽贸, 么ng Luc Ferry xuy锚n qua 膽谩m m芒y m霉 tri岷縯 h峄峜 膽瓢峄 gi膬ng kh岷痯 chi峄乽 d脿i l峄媍h s峄� 2500 n膬m. B岷痶 膽岷 l脿 th峄漣 c峄� 膽岷 con ng瓢峄漣 膽岷穞 s峄� h脿i h貌a c峄 v农 tr峄�(cosmos) v脿o trung t芒m, t峄沬 phi锚n nh峄痭g Ki-t么 h峄痷 膽岷穞 Ch煤a c峄 h峄� v脿o thay th岷� tr瓢峄沜 khi b峄� ch铆nh con ng瓢峄漣 膽瓢峄 膽岷穞 v脿o v峄� tr铆 vinh quang n脿y. Nh瓢ng d瓢峄漬g nh瓢 t峄沬 th峄漣 膽岷 c峄 ch煤ng ta 膽ang s峄憂g, c谩i h岷璾-hi峄噉 膽岷 岷, tri岷縯 h峄峜 v岷玭 b岷� t岷痗, loay hay 膽i t矛m th峄� 膽峄� 膽岷穞 v脿o khi m峄峣 l媒 t瓢峄焠g, m峄峣 th岷 linh b峄� tri岷縯 h峄峜 duy v岷璽 v脿 gi岷-c岷 tr煤c 膽岷璸 v峄� tan t脿nh.
T峄� c谩ch 膽芒y 3 n膬m m矛nh 膽峄峜 Th岷� gi峄沬 c峄 Sophie, cu峄憂 s谩ch d岷玭 m矛nh 膽i v脿o tri岷縯 h峄峜 th矛 m峄沬 l岷 膽瓢峄 膽峄峜 m峄檛 cu峄憂 hay th岷� n脿y.
September 24, 2012
賷賯丿賲 丕賱賮賷賱爻賵賮 丕賱賮乇賳爻賷 賱賵賰 賮賷乇賷 爻乇丿丕賸 乇卮賷賯丕賸 賱鬲丕乇賷禺 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 賲賳 賲賳馗賵乇 睾乇亘賷 亘丿亍丕賸 亘丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱賷賵賳丕賳賷丞 賵丕賳鬲賴丕亍丕賸 亘丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱賲毓丕氐乇丞.
丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賵噩賴賴 丕賱賲丐賱賮 賱賱賳卮兀 丕賱賲亘鬲丿卅賷賳 賮賷 丕賱賯乇丕亍丞 毓賳 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 賮賷丨賲賱 兀丨賷丕賳丕 毓亘丕乇丕鬲 鬲賵噩賷賴賷丞 賲賲丕 賯丿 賷囟丕賷賯 賯丕乇卅丕賸 亘丕賱睾丕賸. 賱賰賳 鬲爻賱爻賱 丕賱爻乇丿 丕賱鬲丕乇賷禺賷 賵賰賲賷丞 丕賱賲毓賱賵賲丕鬲 丕賱賲賯丿賲丞 賲賳丕爻亘 噩丿丕賸 賱賱賲亘鬲丿卅 賮賷 丕賱賯乇丕亍丞 毓賳 鬲丕乇賷禺 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 亘睾囟 丕賱賳馗乇 毓賳 毓賲乇賴. 賵賮賷 丨賷賳 兀賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賲賳丕爻亘 賱賲亘鬲丿卅 賮賷 鬲丕乇賷禺 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 賮廿賳賴 睾賷乇 賲賳丕爻亘 賱賱賲亘鬲丿卅 賮賷 丕賱鬲賮賰賷乇 丕賱匕賷 賷賯亘賱 賰賱 賲丕 賷賯丿賲 賱賴 亘賱丕 賯丿乇丞 毓賱賶 賳賯丿賴 賮賳賻賮賻爻 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 賵賲賷賵賱賴 丕賱賮賰乇賷丞 亘丕丿賷丞 賮賷 爻乇丿賴.
兀噩賲賱 賲丕賮賷 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賴賵 胤乇賷賯丞 鬲賯丿賷賲賴 賱賰賱 賯賱爻賮丞 賲賳 禺賱丕賱 孬賱丕孬 賲丨丕賵乇: 丕賱賳馗乇賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賯丞賲 毓賱賷賴丕, 丕賱賯賷賲 丕賱兀禺賱丕賯賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲丿毓賵 賱賴丕, 賵鬲毓丕胤賷賴丕 賲毓 廿卮賰丕賱賷丞 賮賳丕亍 丕賱丕賳爻丕賳 賵賴賷 賮賷 賳馗乇 丕賱賲丐賱賮 丕賱賴丿賮 丕賱乇卅賷爻賷 賱賱賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱丕賳爻丕賳賷丞 廿匕 兀賳 丕賱禺賵賮 賲賳 丕賱賲賵鬲 賵賲丕 亘毓丿賴 賴賵 兀賰孬乇 賲丕 賷丐乇賯 丕賱丕賳爻丕賳
丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賵噩賴賴 丕賱賲丐賱賮 賱賱賳卮兀 丕賱賲亘鬲丿卅賷賳 賮賷 丕賱賯乇丕亍丞 毓賳 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 賮賷丨賲賱 兀丨賷丕賳丕 毓亘丕乇丕鬲 鬲賵噩賷賴賷丞 賲賲丕 賯丿 賷囟丕賷賯 賯丕乇卅丕賸 亘丕賱睾丕賸. 賱賰賳 鬲爻賱爻賱 丕賱爻乇丿 丕賱鬲丕乇賷禺賷 賵賰賲賷丞 丕賱賲毓賱賵賲丕鬲 丕賱賲賯丿賲丞 賲賳丕爻亘 噩丿丕賸 賱賱賲亘鬲丿卅 賮賷 丕賱賯乇丕亍丞 毓賳 鬲丕乇賷禺 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 亘睾囟 丕賱賳馗乇 毓賳 毓賲乇賴. 賵賮賷 丨賷賳 兀賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賲賳丕爻亘 賱賲亘鬲丿卅 賮賷 鬲丕乇賷禺 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 賮廿賳賴 睾賷乇 賲賳丕爻亘 賱賱賲亘鬲丿卅 賮賷 丕賱鬲賮賰賷乇 丕賱匕賷 賷賯亘賱 賰賱 賲丕 賷賯丿賲 賱賴 亘賱丕 賯丿乇丞 毓賱賶 賳賯丿賴 賮賳賻賮賻爻 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 賵賲賷賵賱賴 丕賱賮賰乇賷丞 亘丕丿賷丞 賮賷 爻乇丿賴.
兀噩賲賱 賲丕賮賷 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賴賵 胤乇賷賯丞 鬲賯丿賷賲賴 賱賰賱 賯賱爻賮丞 賲賳 禺賱丕賱 孬賱丕孬 賲丨丕賵乇: 丕賱賳馗乇賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賯丞賲 毓賱賷賴丕, 丕賱賯賷賲 丕賱兀禺賱丕賯賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲丿毓賵 賱賴丕, 賵鬲毓丕胤賷賴丕 賲毓 廿卮賰丕賱賷丞 賮賳丕亍 丕賱丕賳爻丕賳 賵賴賷 賮賷 賳馗乇 丕賱賲丐賱賮 丕賱賴丿賮 丕賱乇卅賷爻賷 賱賱賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱丕賳爻丕賳賷丞 廿匕 兀賳 丕賱禺賵賮 賲賳 丕賱賲賵鬲 賵賲丕 亘毓丿賴 賴賵 兀賰孬乇 賲丕 賷丐乇賯 丕賱丕賳爻丕賳
April 30, 2021
袣薪懈谐邪褌邪 屑懈 斜械褕械 屑薪芯谐芯 懈薪褌械褉械褋薪邪 懈 锌芯谢械蟹薪邪, 芯斜褏胁邪褖邪 胁褋懈褔泻懈 芯褋薪芯胁薪懈 锌械褉懈芯写懈 胁 褉邪蟹胁懈褌懈械褌芯 薪邪 褎懈谢芯褋芯褎懈褟褌邪. 袥褞泻 肖械褉懈 锌懈褕械 懈蟹泻谢褞褔懈褌械谢薪芯 褔械褌懈胁薪芯 懈 蟹邪褌芯胁邪 泻薪懈谐邪褌邪 械 芯褋芯斜械薪芯 锌芯写褏芯写褟褖邪 蟹邪 锌芯锌褗谢胁邪薪械 薪邪 锌褉芯锌褍褋泻懈. 袙 屑芯褟 褋谢褍褔邪泄 写芯褋褌邪 屑懈 锌芯屑芯谐薪邪 写邪 芯锌懈褌邪屑 写邪 胁薪懈泻薪邪 胁 芯褋薪芯胁薪懈褌械 懈写械懈 薪邪 袧懈褑褕械 薪邪锌褉懈屑械褉, 蟹邪褖芯褌芯 褋懈 锌褉懈蟹薪邪胁邪屑, 褔械 写芯褋械谐邪 褋褗屑 褋械 蟹邪褌褉褍写薪褟胁邪谢邪.
袝褌芯 褋褗胁褋械屑 褖褉懈褏懈褉邪薪芯 薪褟泻芯懈 芯褌 芯褋薪芯胁薪懈褌械 屑芯屑械薪褌懈 胁 泻薪懈谐邪褌邪.
1. 袗薪褌懈褔薪邪 褎懈谢芯褋芯褎懈褟
袨褋薪芯胁薪芯 锌芯薪褟褌懈械 cosmos - 褏邪褉屑芯薪懈褟, 泻褉邪褋芯褌邪, 褋懈屑械褌褉懈褟, 懈 logos - 褋褗胁褗褉褕械薪邪褌邪 褋褌褉褍泻褌褍褉邪 薪邪 胁褋械谢械薪邪褌邪.
袨褋薪芯胁薪懈 懈写械懈 薪邪 褋褌芯懈褑懈蟹屑邪 蟹邪 锌褉邪泻褌懈褔械褋泻邪 屑褗写褉芯褋褌:
- 写邪 褋械 芯褌褗褉胁械屑 芯褌 写胁械褌械 谐芯谢械屑懈 蟹谢懈薪懈: 斜褉械屑械褌芯 薪邪 屑懈薪邪谢芯褌芯 懈 屑懈褉邪卸懈褌械 薪邪 斜褗写械褖械褌芯
- 薪邪写褟胁邪泄 褋械 锌芯-屑邪谢泻芯, 芯斜懈褔邪泄 锌芯胁械褔械
- 写邪 褋械 芯褌泻邪卸械屑 芯褌 锌褉懈胁褗褉蟹胁邪薪械褌芯, 蟹邪褖芯褌芯 胁褋懈褔泻芯 械 锌褉械褏芯写薪芯
小褌芯懈褔械褋泻芯褌芯 褍褔械薪懈械 蟹邪 褋锌邪褋械薪懈械褌芯 械 邪薪芯薪懈屑薪芯. 袨斜械褖邪胁邪 薪懈 胁械褔薪芯褋褌 泻邪褌芯 褔邪褋褌 芯褌 泻芯褋屑芯褋邪.
2. 袩芯斜械写邪褌邪 薪邪 褏褉懈褋褌懈褟薪褋褌胁芯褌芯 薪邪写 谐褉褗褑泻邪褌邪 褎懈谢芯褋芯褎懈褟
袥芯谐芯褋褗褌 胁械褔械 褋械 胁褗蟹锌褉懈械屑邪 泻邪褌芯 锌褉械胁褗锌谢褗褖械薪懈械 薪邪 斜芯卸械褋褌胁械薪芯褌芯, 薪械 胁 泻芯褋屑懈褔械褋泻懈褟 褉械写, 邪 胁 谢懈褔薪芯褋褌褌邪 薪邪 啸褉懈褋褌芯褋.
袨褌 芯斜械褖邪薪懈械褌芯 蟹邪 邪薪芯薪懈屑薪芯 褋锌邪褋械薪懈械, 泻褗屑 芯斜械褖邪薪懈械 蟹邪 谢懈褔薪芯褋褌薪芯 褋锌邪褋械薪懈械.
肖懈谢芯褋芯褎懈褟褌邪 褋褌邪胁邪 褋褏芯谢邪褋褌懈褔薪邪 - 褖械 褌褗褉褋懈 谢芯谐懈褔械褋泻懈 邪褉谐褍屑械薪褌懈 蟹邪 芯斜褟褋薪械薪懈械 薪邪 斜芯卸械褋褌胁械薪芯褌芯, 蟹邪 褋褗褖械褋褌胁褍胁邪薪械褌芯 薪邪 袘芯谐芯褔芯胁械泻邪.
啸褉懈褋褌懈褟薪褋褌胁芯褌芯 泻邪褌芯 锌褗褉胁懈褟褌 褍薪懈胁械褉褋邪谢懈褋褌泻懈 屑芯褉邪谢 - 懈蟹褔械蟹胁邪 懈写械褟褌邪 薪邪 谐褗褉褑懈褌械 蟹邪 "胁邪褉胁邪褉懈薪邪" (褔褍卸写械薪械褑邪), 胁褋懈褔泻懈 褏芯褉邪 褋邪 褉邪胁薪懈 胁 屑芯褉邪谢薪芯 芯褌薪芯褕械薪懈械.
3. 啸褍屑邪薪懈蟹褗屑 懈 蟹邪褉邪卸写邪薪械褌芯 薪邪 屑芯写械褉薪邪褌邪 褎懈谢芯褋芯褎懈褟
袘械蟹锌褉械褑械写械薪褌薪邪 胁 懈褋褌芯褉懈褟褌邪 薪邪 褔芯胁械褔械褋褌胁芯褌芯 薪邪褍褔薪邪 褉械胁芯谢褞褑懈褟 (袣芯锌械褉薪懈泻, 袚邪谢懈谢械泄, 袧褞褌芯薪 懈 袛械泻邪褉褌)
袗薪褌褉芯锌芯褑械薪褌褉懈蟹褗屑 - 锌芯褋褌邪胁褟 褔芯胁械泻邪 薪邪 屑褟褋褌芯褌芯 薪邪 斜芯卸械褋褌胁械薪芯褌芯 懈 泻芯褋屑芯褋邪
- 袣邪薪褌芯胁懈褟褌 屑芯褉邪谢
袠褋褌懈薪褋泻懈 屑芯褉邪谢薪芯褌芯 写械泄褋褌胁懈械 械 褋锌芯褋芯斜薪芯褋褌褌邪 薪邪 褔芯胁械泻邪 写邪 褋械 芯褋胁芯斜芯卸写邪胁邪 芯褌 械褋褌械褋褌胁械薪懈褌械 褋懈 薪邪谐芯薪懈 懈 薪邪泻谢芯薪薪芯褋褌懈, 写邪 褍褋褌芯懈 薪邪 懈蟹泻褍褕械薪懈褟褌邪 薪邪 械谐芯懈蟹屑邪 ("写芯斜褉邪 胁芯谢褟")
袙褌芯褉芯褌芯 屑芯褉邪谢薪芯 蟹邪泻谢褞褔械薪懈械 械, 褔械 懈褋褌懈薪褋泻芯褌芯 写芯斜褉芯 械 褍薪懈胁械褉褋邪谢薪芯, 薪邪写褏胁褗褉谢褟 谢懈褔薪懈褟 懈薪褌械褉械褋
袛械泻邪褉褌 锌褉械蟹 17 胁. - 懈褋褌懈薪褋泻芯褌芯 薪邪褔邪谢芯 薪邪 屑芯写械褉薪邪褌邪 褎懈谢芯褋芯褎懈褟
"褔懈褋褌邪褌邪 写褗褋泻邪" 薪邪 懈褋褌芯褉懈褟褌邪
4. 袩芯褋褌屑芯写械褉薪懈褌械 胁褉械屑械薪邪. 袩褉芯斜谢械屑褗褌 薪邪 袧懈褑褕械.
袛械泻芯薪褋褌褉褍泻褑懈褟 薪邪 屑芯褉邪谢薪懈褌械 懈 锌芯谢懈褌懈褔械褋泻懈褌械 褍褌芯锌懈懈
"袙械谢懈泻懈褟褌 褋褌懈谢" 薪邪 卸懈胁械械薪械 芯斜械写懈薪褟胁邪 褉械邪泻褌懈胁薪懈褌械 褋懈谢懈 ("胁芯谢褟 蟹邪 懈褋褌懈薪邪", 褉邪蟹褍屑, 褋 褌褟褏 褋懈 褋谢褍卸懈 薪邪褍泻邪褌邪) 懈 邪泻褌懈胁薪懈褌械 褋懈谢懈 (褍褌胁褗褉卸写邪胁邪薪械 薪邪 褌械谢械褋薪芯褌芯 褔褉械蟹 懈蟹泻褍褋褌胁芯褌芯, 褔褍胁褋褌胁邪褌邪).
小屑懈褋褗谢褗褌 薪邪 "胁械褔薪芯褌芯 蟹邪胁褉褗褖邪薪械" - 蟹械屑薪芯 褋锌邪褋械薪懈械 斜械蟹 懈写芯谢懈 懈 袘芯谐
"袠褋泻邪屑 谢懈 写邪 薪邪锌褉邪胁褟 薪械褖芯 斜械蟹斜褉芯泄 锌褗褌懈?" - 薪芯胁懈褟褌 芯褑械薪褗褔械薪 泻褉懈褌械褉懈泄 蟹邪 锌褗谢薪芯褑械薪械薪 卸懈胁芯褌
Amor fati - 谢褞斜芯胁 泻褗屑 褋褗写斜邪褌邪, 泻褗屑 薪邪褋褌芯褟褖懈褟 屑芯屑械薪褌
5. 小谢械写 写械泻芯薪褋褌褉褍泻褑懈褟褌邪. 小褗胁褉械屑械薪薪邪褌邪 褎懈谢芯褋芯褎懈褟.
啸邪泄写械谐械褉 - 胁褗蟹褕械褋褌胁懈械褌芯 薪邪 "褋胁械褌邪 薪邪 褌械褏薪懈泻邪褌邪"
孝褗褉褋懈屑 薪芯胁邪 锌芯褋芯泻邪 蟹邪 锌褉械芯褋屑懈褋谢褟薪械 薪邪 褌褉邪薪褋褑械薪写械薪褌薪芯褌芯 芯褌胁褗写 写械泻芯薪褋褌褉褍泻褑懈褟褌邪
"褌褉邪薪褋褑械薪写械薪褌薪芯褋褌 胁 懈屑邪薪械薪褌薪芯褋褌褌邪" 锌芯 啸褍褋械褉谢
袩芯褋褌薪懈褑褕械邪薪褋泻懈 褏褍屑邪薪懈蟹褗屑 - 褋邪屑芯泻褉懈褌懈泻邪, 邪胁褌芯褉械褎谢械泻褋懈褟
小邪泻褉邪谢懈蟹邪褑懈褟 薪邪 写褉褍谐懈褟, 芯斜芯卸械褋褌胁褟胁邪薪械 薪邪 褔芯胁械褕泻芯褌芯, 薪械屑械褌邪褎懈蟹懈褔械薪 褏褍屑邪薪懈蟹褗屑
"袪邪蟹褕懈褉械薪邪 屑懈褋褗谢" - 褉邪蟹褕懈褉褟胁邪薪械 薪邪 谢懈褔薪懈褟 褏芯褉懈蟹锟斤拷薪褌 懈 屑褗写褉芯褋褌褌邪 薪邪 谢褞斜芯胁褌邪
袝褌芯 褋褗胁褋械屑 褖褉懈褏懈褉邪薪芯 薪褟泻芯懈 芯褌 芯褋薪芯胁薪懈褌械 屑芯屑械薪褌懈 胁 泻薪懈谐邪褌邪.
1. 袗薪褌懈褔薪邪 褎懈谢芯褋芯褎懈褟
袨褋薪芯胁薪芯 锌芯薪褟褌懈械 cosmos - 褏邪褉屑芯薪懈褟, 泻褉邪褋芯褌邪, 褋懈屑械褌褉懈褟, 懈 logos - 褋褗胁褗褉褕械薪邪褌邪 褋褌褉褍泻褌褍褉邪 薪邪 胁褋械谢械薪邪褌邪.
袨褋薪芯胁薪懈 懈写械懈 薪邪 褋褌芯懈褑懈蟹屑邪 蟹邪 锌褉邪泻褌懈褔械褋泻邪 屑褗写褉芯褋褌:
- 写邪 褋械 芯褌褗褉胁械屑 芯褌 写胁械褌械 谐芯谢械屑懈 蟹谢懈薪懈: 斜褉械屑械褌芯 薪邪 屑懈薪邪谢芯褌芯 懈 屑懈褉邪卸懈褌械 薪邪 斜褗写械褖械褌芯
- 薪邪写褟胁邪泄 褋械 锌芯-屑邪谢泻芯, 芯斜懈褔邪泄 锌芯胁械褔械
- 写邪 褋械 芯褌泻邪卸械屑 芯褌 锌褉懈胁褗褉蟹胁邪薪械褌芯, 蟹邪褖芯褌芯 胁褋懈褔泻芯 械 锌褉械褏芯写薪芯
小褌芯懈褔械褋泻芯褌芯 褍褔械薪懈械 蟹邪 褋锌邪褋械薪懈械褌芯 械 邪薪芯薪懈屑薪芯. 袨斜械褖邪胁邪 薪懈 胁械褔薪芯褋褌 泻邪褌芯 褔邪褋褌 芯褌 泻芯褋屑芯褋邪.
2. 袩芯斜械写邪褌邪 薪邪 褏褉懈褋褌懈褟薪褋褌胁芯褌芯 薪邪写 谐褉褗褑泻邪褌邪 褎懈谢芯褋芯褎懈褟
袥芯谐芯褋褗褌 胁械褔械 褋械 胁褗蟹锌褉懈械屑邪 泻邪褌芯 锌褉械胁褗锌谢褗褖械薪懈械 薪邪 斜芯卸械褋褌胁械薪芯褌芯, 薪械 胁 泻芯褋屑懈褔械褋泻懈褟 褉械写, 邪 胁 谢懈褔薪芯褋褌褌邪 薪邪 啸褉懈褋褌芯褋.
袨褌 芯斜械褖邪薪懈械褌芯 蟹邪 邪薪芯薪懈屑薪芯 褋锌邪褋械薪懈械, 泻褗屑 芯斜械褖邪薪懈械 蟹邪 谢懈褔薪芯褋褌薪芯 褋锌邪褋械薪懈械.
肖懈谢芯褋芯褎懈褟褌邪 褋褌邪胁邪 褋褏芯谢邪褋褌懈褔薪邪 - 褖械 褌褗褉褋懈 谢芯谐懈褔械褋泻懈 邪褉谐褍屑械薪褌懈 蟹邪 芯斜褟褋薪械薪懈械 薪邪 斜芯卸械褋褌胁械薪芯褌芯, 蟹邪 褋褗褖械褋褌胁褍胁邪薪械褌芯 薪邪 袘芯谐芯褔芯胁械泻邪.
啸褉懈褋褌懈褟薪褋褌胁芯褌芯 泻邪褌芯 锌褗褉胁懈褟褌 褍薪懈胁械褉褋邪谢懈褋褌泻懈 屑芯褉邪谢 - 懈蟹褔械蟹胁邪 懈写械褟褌邪 薪邪 谐褗褉褑懈褌械 蟹邪 "胁邪褉胁邪褉懈薪邪" (褔褍卸写械薪械褑邪), 胁褋懈褔泻懈 褏芯褉邪 褋邪 褉邪胁薪懈 胁 屑芯褉邪谢薪芯 芯褌薪芯褕械薪懈械.
3. 啸褍屑邪薪懈蟹褗屑 懈 蟹邪褉邪卸写邪薪械褌芯 薪邪 屑芯写械褉薪邪褌邪 褎懈谢芯褋芯褎懈褟
袘械蟹锌褉械褑械写械薪褌薪邪 胁 懈褋褌芯褉懈褟褌邪 薪邪 褔芯胁械褔械褋褌胁芯褌芯 薪邪褍褔薪邪 褉械胁芯谢褞褑懈褟 (袣芯锌械褉薪懈泻, 袚邪谢懈谢械泄, 袧褞褌芯薪 懈 袛械泻邪褉褌)
袗薪褌褉芯锌芯褑械薪褌褉懈蟹褗屑 - 锌芯褋褌邪胁褟 褔芯胁械泻邪 薪邪 屑褟褋褌芯褌芯 薪邪 斜芯卸械褋褌胁械薪芯褌芯 懈 泻芯褋屑芯褋邪
- 袣邪薪褌芯胁懈褟褌 屑芯褉邪谢
袠褋褌懈薪褋泻懈 屑芯褉邪谢薪芯褌芯 写械泄褋褌胁懈械 械 褋锌芯褋芯斜薪芯褋褌褌邪 薪邪 褔芯胁械泻邪 写邪 褋械 芯褋胁芯斜芯卸写邪胁邪 芯褌 械褋褌械褋褌胁械薪懈褌械 褋懈 薪邪谐芯薪懈 懈 薪邪泻谢芯薪薪芯褋褌懈, 写邪 褍褋褌芯懈 薪邪 懈蟹泻褍褕械薪懈褟褌邪 薪邪 械谐芯懈蟹屑邪 ("写芯斜褉邪 胁芯谢褟")
袙褌芯褉芯褌芯 屑芯褉邪谢薪芯 蟹邪泻谢褞褔械薪懈械 械, 褔械 懈褋褌懈薪褋泻芯褌芯 写芯斜褉芯 械 褍薪懈胁械褉褋邪谢薪芯, 薪邪写褏胁褗褉谢褟 谢懈褔薪懈褟 懈薪褌械褉械褋
袛械泻邪褉褌 锌褉械蟹 17 胁. - 懈褋褌懈薪褋泻芯褌芯 薪邪褔邪谢芯 薪邪 屑芯写械褉薪邪褌邪 褎懈谢芯褋芯褎懈褟
"褔懈褋褌邪褌邪 写褗褋泻邪" 薪邪 懈褋褌芯褉懈褟褌邪
4. 袩芯褋褌屑芯写械褉薪懈褌械 胁褉械屑械薪邪. 袩褉芯斜谢械屑褗褌 薪邪 袧懈褑褕械.
袛械泻芯薪褋褌褉褍泻褑懈褟 薪邪 屑芯褉邪谢薪懈褌械 懈 锌芯谢懈褌懈褔械褋泻懈褌械 褍褌芯锌懈懈
"袙械谢懈泻懈褟褌 褋褌懈谢" 薪邪 卸懈胁械械薪械 芯斜械写懈薪褟胁邪 褉械邪泻褌懈胁薪懈褌械 褋懈谢懈 ("胁芯谢褟 蟹邪 懈褋褌懈薪邪", 褉邪蟹褍屑, 褋 褌褟褏 褋懈 褋谢褍卸懈 薪邪褍泻邪褌邪) 懈 邪泻褌懈胁薪懈褌械 褋懈谢懈 (褍褌胁褗褉卸写邪胁邪薪械 薪邪 褌械谢械褋薪芯褌芯 褔褉械蟹 懈蟹泻褍褋褌胁芯褌芯, 褔褍胁褋褌胁邪褌邪).
小屑懈褋褗谢褗褌 薪邪 "胁械褔薪芯褌芯 蟹邪胁褉褗褖邪薪械" - 蟹械屑薪芯 褋锌邪褋械薪懈械 斜械蟹 懈写芯谢懈 懈 袘芯谐
"袠褋泻邪屑 谢懈 写邪 薪邪锌褉邪胁褟 薪械褖芯 斜械蟹斜褉芯泄 锌褗褌懈?" - 薪芯胁懈褟褌 芯褑械薪褗褔械薪 泻褉懈褌械褉懈泄 蟹邪 锌褗谢薪芯褑械薪械薪 卸懈胁芯褌
Amor fati - 谢褞斜芯胁 泻褗屑 褋褗写斜邪褌邪, 泻褗屑 薪邪褋褌芯褟褖懈褟 屑芯屑械薪褌
5. 小谢械写 写械泻芯薪褋褌褉褍泻褑懈褟褌邪. 小褗胁褉械屑械薪薪邪褌邪 褎懈谢芯褋芯褎懈褟.
啸邪泄写械谐械褉 - 胁褗蟹褕械褋褌胁懈械褌芯 薪邪 "褋胁械褌邪 薪邪 褌械褏薪懈泻邪褌邪"
孝褗褉褋懈屑 薪芯胁邪 锌芯褋芯泻邪 蟹邪 锌褉械芯褋屑懈褋谢褟薪械 薪邪 褌褉邪薪褋褑械薪写械薪褌薪芯褌芯 芯褌胁褗写 写械泻芯薪褋褌褉褍泻褑懈褟褌邪
"褌褉邪薪褋褑械薪写械薪褌薪芯褋褌 胁 懈屑邪薪械薪褌薪芯褋褌褌邪" 锌芯 啸褍褋械褉谢
袩芯褋褌薪懈褑褕械邪薪褋泻懈 褏褍屑邪薪懈蟹褗屑 - 褋邪屑芯泻褉懈褌懈泻邪, 邪胁褌芯褉械褎谢械泻褋懈褟
小邪泻褉邪谢懈蟹邪褑懈褟 薪邪 写褉褍谐懈褟, 芯斜芯卸械褋褌胁褟胁邪薪械 薪邪 褔芯胁械褕泻芯褌芯, 薪械屑械褌邪褎懈蟹懈褔械薪 褏褍屑邪薪懈蟹褗屑
"袪邪蟹褕懈褉械薪邪 屑懈褋褗谢" - 褉邪蟹褕懈褉褟胁邪薪械 薪邪 谢懈褔薪懈褟 褏芯褉懈蟹锟斤拷薪褌 懈 屑褗写褉芯褋褌褌邪 薪邪 谢褞斜芯胁褌邪
May 27, 2012
Excellent summary of philosophy throughout recorded history that hits all the major schools and explains them in a concise, digestible manner without dumbing things down excessively. This is exactly what I was hoping to get out of this book (a basic primer on all the different philosophies starting with the ancient Greeks and Stoicism), and feel much more knowledgeable about Stoicism, Secular Humanism, Kant, Nietzche, and Heidegger. Ferry is very readable and approaches all of the different schools of thought with a basic trinity: the theoria, or reasoning behind the philosophy, the morals or ethics of it and finally the salvation which explains how the philosophy will tackle coping with the fear of death that has to be faced (religions approach this by promoting an afterlife of some kind). A few of the reviews on amazon state that Ferry starts out strong with the Greeks and so forth but gets bogged down in his chapter on deconstruction/postmodernism and Nietzche and I can see that point but I did find the whole discussion very enlightening and rather crucial due to the amount of misunderstanding and confusion surrounding Nietzche (his name it seems cannot be invoked without strong reactions in a lot of circles). The other criticism which I somewhat agree with is the meandering nature of the final chapters post-Nietzche, but I didn't feel that the overall scope and goal of the book was compromised just that it wasn't quite as straight-forward as the beginning. This could easily be due to the amorphous nature of the subject, and so I didn't find it to be a major detractor. I would definitely highly recommend this book to someone curious about philosophy looking for more of an academic approach but not reading the direct source material which might require a more intense amount of research to comprehend and digest. I imagine I will be returning to and re-reading this book in the years to come as a reference, and will definitely seek out some more details about areas of interest.
August 21, 2022
丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 蹖讴 噩賲毓鈥屫ㄙ嗀� 賲禺鬲氐乇 賵 賲賮蹖丿 丕夭 賮賱爻賮賴 丿乇 亘爻鬲乇 鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴 賲賳 丕乇丕卅賴 丿丕丿. 賲胤丕賱亘 賮氐賱 丌禺乇貙 賮賱爻賮賴鈥屰� 賲毓丕氐乇貙 禺蹖賱蹖 亘乇丕賲 賯丕亘賱 倬匕蹖乇卮 賳亘賵丿. 丿乇 丕蹖賳 賮氐賱貙 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 鬲賱丕卮 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 賲賮賴賵賲 乇爻鬲诏丕乇蹖 乇賵 亘丕夭鬲毓乇蹖賮 讴賳賴 賵 亘賴 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 亘賯亘賵賱賵賳賴 讴賴 賴賲趩賳丕賳 賮賱爻賮賴 亘賴 丿賳亘丕賱 蹖丕賮鬲賳 倬丕爻禺 亘乇丕蹖 倬乇爻卮鈥屬囏й� 丕爻丕爻蹖 丕賳爻丕賳 賴爻鬲 賵 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲丿乇賳 丕夭 賲毓賳丕 禺丕賱蹖 賳卮丿賴. 丕夭 毓亘丕乇鬲 芦賲爻丨蹖鬲 睾蹖乇丿蹖賳蹖禄 丕爻鬲賮丕丿賴 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�. 賳賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁� 丕蹖賳 毓亘丕乇鬲 乇賵 禺賵丿卮 爻丕禺鬲賴 蹖丕 氐乇賮丕 丿丕乇賴 丕夭卮 丕爻鬲賮丕丿賴 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�. 賵賱蹖 亘賴 賳馗乇賲 丿丕乇賴 鬲賱丕卮 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 诏賵卮賴 讴賳丕乇 蹖賴 鬲蹖讴賴鈥屰� 亘蹖鈥屫必ㄘ� 丕夭 蹖賴 倬丕夭賱 亘蹖鈥屫必ㄘ� 乇賵 亘夭賳賴 賵 亘賴 夭賵乇 亘趩倬賵賳鬲卮 鬲賵蹖 倬丕夭賱 禺賵丿卮.
噩賲賱賴鈥屰� 丌禺乇 讴鬲丕亘 賴賲 亘乇丕賲 噩丕賱亘 亘賵丿:
丕丨鬲乇丕賲 亘賴 丿蹖诏乇丕賳貙 丕賳鬲禺丕亘 賮乇丿蹖 乇丕 丨匕賮 賳賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�. 亘賱讴賴 亘乇毓讴爻貙 卮乇胤 丕爻丕爻蹖 丌賳 丕爻鬲.
噩賲賱賴鈥屰� 丌禺乇 讴鬲丕亘 賴賲 亘乇丕賲 噩丕賱亘 亘賵丿:
丕丨鬲乇丕賲 亘賴 丿蹖诏乇丕賳貙 丕賳鬲禺丕亘 賮乇丿蹖 乇丕 丨匕賮 賳賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�. 亘賱讴賴 亘乇毓讴爻貙 卮乇胤 丕爻丕爻蹖 丌賳 丕爻鬲.
February 14, 2015
If you're looking for a broad overview of western philosophical thought, with an emphasis on how one system of thought came to displace preceding ones, leading all the way up to contemporary deconstruction, this is the book.
It's philosophy, so it's not always an easy read, but Ferry does an exceptional job of making concepts understandable and practical. And he always seeks to be fair and respectful to all views, even those he rejects.
Most impressive is that Ferry, though not a Christian or even a theist, and in stark contrast to the New Atheists, is actually sympathetic to the Christian worldview, and grants its legitimate place in the field of philosophy with a 37-page chapter. And even though he rejects Christianity (and yet does not really explain why), he has the integrity to admit that the Christian response to mortality is the "most effective of all responses," the only one that enables us "to beat death itself" (p. 90), and that Christianity is "infinitely more tempting" (p. 263) to him personally than Buddhism.
Christians should not worry that a book on philosophy like this will undermine their faith. For me, it was quite to the contrary. I came away with a more balanced respect for other worldviews, and with a deeper gratefulness for the riches of the Christian tradition, which offers the best answers for the longings of the human spirit.
It's philosophy, so it's not always an easy read, but Ferry does an exceptional job of making concepts understandable and practical. And he always seeks to be fair and respectful to all views, even those he rejects.
Most impressive is that Ferry, though not a Christian or even a theist, and in stark contrast to the New Atheists, is actually sympathetic to the Christian worldview, and grants its legitimate place in the field of philosophy with a 37-page chapter. And even though he rejects Christianity (and yet does not really explain why), he has the integrity to admit that the Christian response to mortality is the "most effective of all responses," the only one that enables us "to beat death itself" (p. 90), and that Christianity is "infinitely more tempting" (p. 263) to him personally than Buddhism.
Christians should not worry that a book on philosophy like this will undermine their faith. For me, it was quite to the contrary. I came away with a more balanced respect for other worldviews, and with a deeper gratefulness for the riches of the Christian tradition, which offers the best answers for the longings of the human spirit.
April 20, 2019
i really enjoyed this book; why doesn鈥檛 goodreads have half stars? it鈥檚 better than a 3, but i rounded down due to the lack of works cited. this was an intentional choice, as this is supposed to be an introduction to philosophy, so instead ferry opted for a 鈥榝urther reading鈥� section of 6 or 7 books. there are no notes. you basically have to take ferry鈥檚 word on everything, which was a problem for me when it started getting into ideas i was familiar with, and found i didn鈥檛 always agree with ferry, which then led me to wonder about the areas i didn鈥檛 know so much about, and how helpful ferry was being. but that鈥檚 always the case with these kind of books; i鈥檓 a big believer in going to the source, reading the text and drawing your own conclusions, but i鈥檇 still prefer books like this exist rather than not, and for my purposes they are fun to read as a sort of supplement. and that鈥檚 why i don鈥檛 agree with opting for a small further reading section (for fear of overwhelming someone new to philosophy) over conventional notes and bibliography; there were specific points in the books i鈥檇 have loved to know where ferry was drawing from, most notably the historical context he provided to shed light on why certain thought had come about (not just helping one to understand the ideas themselves). that was the highlight of the book for me, and i鈥檓 now just left wondering where to look.
a further example: ferry dedicates a large part of the book to nietzsche, and goes on to define nietzsche鈥檚 nihilism as devaluing life through a belief in the ideal, so as to say that Christians and the like are sort of like 鈥渟ecret nihilists鈥� because of this, and this is what nietzsche meant by the death of god. this is definitely an idea of nietzsche, and it鈥檚 not wrong, but it鈥檚 a rather peculiar way to define nihilism, and it鈥檚 the only context ferry provides. traditionally, nihilism is the conviction life is devoid of any meaning, that the universe is hostile to life even, and the death of god (meaning) meant nihilism may begin to sweep over the world. this was nietzsche鈥檚 prediction. to accept ferry鈥檚 definition is to have a biased and incomplete version of that monumental declaration by nietzsche, thus the importance of a more comprehensive bibliography, and main reason why one should be wary of books like this: you are not reading a brief history of thought, you are reading ferry鈥檚 interpretation of various notable philosophies.
that may all be obvious, but it鈥檚 so much the case here that i actually find the title misleading. ferry is tracing the history of thought to prepare readers for his own philosophy, his 鈥減ost-nietzschean humanism鈥�, which he spends most of the second half of the book on. it鈥檚 more a book of philosophy in its own right than a history. and it鈥檚 a more successful book when viewed this way. spending half your book tracing most of philosophy to show how it all logically progresses to your own is hard not to respect!
most of all i appreciate the clarity and lack of jargon ferry writes with. skepticism and bias aside, it鈥檚 obvious he does know what he鈥檚 talking about and is a very good teacher. look to his explanation of nietzsche鈥檚 takedown of socrates, the greeks concept of the cosmos, or how he deals a fatal blow to communism in a single sentence. he is able to sum up an incredibly complex line of thinking in a paragraph without significant compromise. overall, one is better off for reading this, either as a supplement to their own readings, or as an introduction.
a further example: ferry dedicates a large part of the book to nietzsche, and goes on to define nietzsche鈥檚 nihilism as devaluing life through a belief in the ideal, so as to say that Christians and the like are sort of like 鈥渟ecret nihilists鈥� because of this, and this is what nietzsche meant by the death of god. this is definitely an idea of nietzsche, and it鈥檚 not wrong, but it鈥檚 a rather peculiar way to define nihilism, and it鈥檚 the only context ferry provides. traditionally, nihilism is the conviction life is devoid of any meaning, that the universe is hostile to life even, and the death of god (meaning) meant nihilism may begin to sweep over the world. this was nietzsche鈥檚 prediction. to accept ferry鈥檚 definition is to have a biased and incomplete version of that monumental declaration by nietzsche, thus the importance of a more comprehensive bibliography, and main reason why one should be wary of books like this: you are not reading a brief history of thought, you are reading ferry鈥檚 interpretation of various notable philosophies.
that may all be obvious, but it鈥檚 so much the case here that i actually find the title misleading. ferry is tracing the history of thought to prepare readers for his own philosophy, his 鈥減ost-nietzschean humanism鈥�, which he spends most of the second half of the book on. it鈥檚 more a book of philosophy in its own right than a history. and it鈥檚 a more successful book when viewed this way. spending half your book tracing most of philosophy to show how it all logically progresses to your own is hard not to respect!
most of all i appreciate the clarity and lack of jargon ferry writes with. skepticism and bias aside, it鈥檚 obvious he does know what he鈥檚 talking about and is a very good teacher. look to his explanation of nietzsche鈥檚 takedown of socrates, the greeks concept of the cosmos, or how he deals a fatal blow to communism in a single sentence. he is able to sum up an incredibly complex line of thinking in a paragraph without significant compromise. overall, one is better off for reading this, either as a supplement to their own readings, or as an introduction.
September 19, 2012
"爻兀乇賵賷 賱賰 鬲丕乇賷禺 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞" 賴賰匕丕 賷亘丿兀 賮賷乇賷 賰鬲丕亘賴, 亘丕賱鬲夭丕賲 丕爻鬲乇丕鬲賷噩賷丞 賲禺鬲賱賮丞 鬲毓鬲賲丿 毓賱賶 胤乇賷賯鬲賴 丕賱鬲丨賱賷賱賷丞 賮賷 乇亘胤 丕賱兀賮賰丕乇 賵毓乇囟賴丕 亘賳丕亍丕賸 毓賱賶 乇兀賷賴 賴賵, 賵鬲乇噩賷丨賴 丕賱禺丕氐 賱賲丕 賷乇丕賴 囟乇賵乇賷, 亘毓賷丿丕賸 毓賳 丕賱鬲賵丕乇賷禺 兀賵 丕賱丕賯鬲亘丕爻丕鬲 兀賵 丕賱賲乇丕噩毓 丕賱賰亘賷乇丞, 亘毓賷丿丕賸 兀賷囟丕賸 毓賳 毓乇囟 賮賱丕爻賮丞 賰亘丕乇 賵鬲兀孬賷乇賴賲 賮賴賵 賷賳鬲賯賷 賮賱丕爻賮丞 賲毓賷賳賷賳 賵賷乇賰夭 毓賱賷賴賲, 賵賷亘賳賷 毓賱賶 匕賱賰 丌乇丕卅賴 .. 賴賱 賴匕賴 丕賱胤乇賷賯丞 噩賷丿丞 賵毓賱賲賷丞, 賱丕 兀毓乇賮.. 賲丕 兀毓乇賮賴 兀賳賳賷 賮賴賲鬲 兀卮賷丕亍 賰孬賷乇丞 賵賱賮鬲 賳馗乇賷 亘鬲丨賱賷賱賴 賵乇亘胤賴 ..
丿賷賰丕乇鬲, 賳賷鬲卮賴, 乇賵爻賵, 賴丕賷丿睾乇 .. 鬲毓乇賮鬲 毓賱賷賴賲 賴賳丕 兀賰孬乇 賲賳 兀賷 卮賷亍 丌禺乇 ..
賱賲 兀爻鬲胤毓 賮賷 賳賴丕賷丞 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 鬲賰賵賷賳 禺賱丕氐丞 賱賲丕 賯乇兀鬲賴 賵賮賴賲 賲丕 丨丕賵賱 廿賷氐丕賱賴 兀馗賳 兀賳 鬲亘爻賷胤賴 丕賱卮丿賷丿 兀爻丕亍 賱賮賰乇鬲賴 賵卮鬲鬲賳賷 ..
兀賷囟丕賸, 賱丕 兀爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賳 兀鬲睾丕囟賶 毓賳 賴匕丕 丕賱兀爻賱賵亘 丕賱匕賷 賷卮亘賴 丕賱賲丨丕囟乇丕鬲 丕賱廿賱賯丕卅賷丞 兀賰孬乇 賲賳賴 亘賰鬲丕亘 賷鬲賳丕賵賱 賲賵囟賵毓丕賸 噩丕丿丕賸, 噩賲賱 丕毓鬲乇丕囟賷丞 賰賱 爻胤乇賷賳, 賵丕爻鬲胤乇丕丿丕鬲 鬲禺賱 亘鬲爻賱爻賱 丕賱賳氐...廿賱禺 兀鬲毓亘鬲賳賷 賮賷 丕賱賯乇丕亍丞 賰孬賷乇丕賸.
毓賲賵賲丕賸 兀馗賳賴 賰鬲丕亘 噩賷賾丿 賱賲賳 賷賲賱賰 禺賱賮賷丞 賱丕亘兀爻 亘賴丕 毓賳 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丨鬲賶 賷爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賳 賷賯賷賾賲 賲丕 賷賯乇兀 .. 賵賱丕 賷氐賱丨 賰賲丿禺賱 賱賱賮賱爻賮丞.
丿賷賰丕乇鬲, 賳賷鬲卮賴, 乇賵爻賵, 賴丕賷丿睾乇 .. 鬲毓乇賮鬲 毓賱賷賴賲 賴賳丕 兀賰孬乇 賲賳 兀賷 卮賷亍 丌禺乇 ..
賱賲 兀爻鬲胤毓 賮賷 賳賴丕賷丞 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 鬲賰賵賷賳 禺賱丕氐丞 賱賲丕 賯乇兀鬲賴 賵賮賴賲 賲丕 丨丕賵賱 廿賷氐丕賱賴 兀馗賳 兀賳 鬲亘爻賷胤賴 丕賱卮丿賷丿 兀爻丕亍 賱賮賰乇鬲賴 賵卮鬲鬲賳賷 ..
兀賷囟丕賸, 賱丕 兀爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賳 兀鬲睾丕囟賶 毓賳 賴匕丕 丕賱兀爻賱賵亘 丕賱匕賷 賷卮亘賴 丕賱賲丨丕囟乇丕鬲 丕賱廿賱賯丕卅賷丞 兀賰孬乇 賲賳賴 亘賰鬲丕亘 賷鬲賳丕賵賱 賲賵囟賵毓丕賸 噩丕丿丕賸, 噩賲賱 丕毓鬲乇丕囟賷丞 賰賱 爻胤乇賷賳, 賵丕爻鬲胤乇丕丿丕鬲 鬲禺賱 亘鬲爻賱爻賱 丕賱賳氐...廿賱禺 兀鬲毓亘鬲賳賷 賮賷 丕賱賯乇丕亍丞 賰孬賷乇丕賸.
毓賲賵賲丕賸 兀馗賳賴 賰鬲丕亘 噩賷賾丿 賱賲賳 賷賲賱賰 禺賱賮賷丞 賱丕亘兀爻 亘賴丕 毓賳 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丨鬲賶 賷爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賳 賷賯賷賾賲 賲丕 賷賯乇兀 .. 賵賱丕 賷氐賱丨 賰賲丿禺賱 賱賱賮賱爻賮丞.
January 22, 2022
Bem interessante o apanhado geral que 茅 feito aqui contando como o conceito de "filosofia" foi se alterando com o tempo e como as religi玫es foram tendo um papel crucial nessas mudan莽as.
Para um ateu/agn贸stico, 茅 interessante perceber como a "doutrina da salva莽茫o" se tornou praticamente um "monop贸lio" das religi玫es, mas que nem sempre foi assim.
Provavelmente n茫o toque todo mundo da mesma maneira, fica mais como registro pessoal, mas o 煤ltimo cap铆tulo que fala sobre a "singularidade dos seres", "amor 脿s qualidades" etc confirmou algo que eu sempre tive como vis茫o, mas n茫o sabia que havia toda uma teoria sobre. Foi uma descoberta bem interessante.
Para um ateu/agn贸stico, 茅 interessante perceber como a "doutrina da salva莽茫o" se tornou praticamente um "monop贸lio" das religi玫es, mas que nem sempre foi assim.
Provavelmente n茫o toque todo mundo da mesma maneira, fica mais como registro pessoal, mas o 煤ltimo cap铆tulo que fala sobre a "singularidade dos seres", "amor 脿s qualidades" etc confirmou algo que eu sempre tive como vis茫o, mas n茫o sabia que havia toda uma teoria sobre. Foi uma descoberta bem interessante.
September 25, 2024
讴鬲丕亘 亘賴 丕丿毓丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 亘乇丕蹖 讴爻丕賳蹖 賳賵卮鬲賴 卮丿賴 讴賴 丿乇 丕亘鬲丿丕蹖 乇丕賴 賮賱爻賮賴 禺賵賳丿賳 賴爻鬲賳丿 賵 賯乇丕乇賴 亘賴卮賵賳 讴賲讴 讴賳賴 讴賴 亘丿賵賳 诏蹖噩 卮丿賳 丿乇 賲鬲賵賳 賵 讴賱賲丕鬲 爻賳诏蹖賳 賮賱爻賮蹖貙 丕乇鬲亘丕胤 亘蹖賳 賮賱爻賮賴 賵 夭賳丿诏蹖 毓丕丿蹖 乇賵 丿乇讴 讴賳賳丿. 丕賲丕 亘賴 賳馗乇 賲賳 丿賯蹖賯丕 毓讴爻 丕蹖賳 毓賲賱 賲蹖讴賳賴. 亘乇丕蹖 卮乇賵毓 賲賳丕爻亘 賳蹖爻鬲 趩賵賳 丕爻丕爻丕 賲鬲賳 噩匕丕亘蹖 賳丿丕乇賴 讴賴 亘禺賵丕丿 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 乇賵 亘蹖卮鬲乇 噩匕亘 賮賱爻賮賴 讴賳賴. 賲爻丕卅賱蹖 讴賴 賲胤乇丨 賲蹖讴賳賴 亘爻蹖丕乇 诏賱趩蹖賳 卮丿賴鈥屫池� 賵 丕夭 亘爻蹖丕乇蹖 賲胤丕賱亘 賲賴賲 丕氐賱丕 氐丨亘鬲蹖 亘賴 賲蹖賵賳 賳賲蹖丕乇賴 (丕丨鬲賲丕賱丕 趩賵賳 丕乇鬲亘丕胤蹖 亘蹖賳鈥屫促堎� 亘丕 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲丕 賳蹖爻鬲!!) 賵 丕鬲賮丕賯丕 賵丕跇诏丕賳 賵 賲賮丕賴蹖賲 孬賯蹖賱 賮賱爻賮蹖 丿乇 賲鬲賳 丕氐賱丕 讴賲 賳蹖爻鬲. 禺賱丕氐賴 讴賴 賳賴
March 21, 2018
賰賲毓馗賲 賲丿丕禺賱 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞貙 賷亘丿兀 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 亘鬲毓乇賷賮賳丕 亘丕賱賮賱爻賮丞貙 孬賲 賷亘丿兀 亘爻乇丿 鬲丕乇賷禺賴丕 賰丕賲賱丕賸貙 賱賰賳 賱賲丕匕丕 賵噩丿鬲 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賲禺鬲賱賮丕 賵 賱賲 兀鬲乇丿丿 賱賱丨馗丞 亘賲賳丨賴 丕賱禺賲爻 賳噩賵賲 賰丕賲賱丞責
丨爻賳丕賸貙 兀賵賱丕賸: 賱賯丿 賯乇兀鬲 丕賱賰孬賷乇 賲賳 丕賱賰鬲亘 丕賱賲賵噩賴丞 賱賱賲亘鬲丿卅賷賳 賮賷 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 賰賲丿禺賱 賲亘爻胤 賱賴丕 賵 賱鬲丕乇賷禺賴丕貙 賵 賴賷 賮賷 丕賱睾丕賱亘 鬲亘丿兀 亘鬲毓乇賷賮 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 賵 匕賰乇 賲噩丕賱丕鬲賴丕貙 孬賲 鬲爻乇丿 鬲丕乇賷禺賴丕 賲毓 丕禺鬲賱丕賮 丕賱兀爻賱賵亘 賲賳 賰丕鬲亘 賱丌禺乇 亘丕賱胤亘毓.
賱賯丿 爻丕毓丿鬲賳賷 賯乇丕亍丕鬲賷 丕賱爻丕亘賯丞 賮賷 賲毓乇賮丞 賯賷賲丞 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 亘丕賱匕丕鬲 賵 賲毓賳賶 兀賳 賷賰賵賳 賱賱賰丕鬲亘 兀爻賱賵亘 賲賲賷夭貙 賱賴 丕賱賯丿乇丞 毓賱賶 丕賱乇爻賵禺 亘丕賱匕丕賰乇丞 亘卮賰賱 毓噩賷亘. 亘丿兀 賮賷乇賷 亘鬲毓乇賷賮 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 賵 賯丿 賰丕賳 鬲毓乇賷賮賴 丕賱兀賰孬乇 賵囟賵丨丕賸 賵 噩賲丕賱丕賸 賲賳 噩賲賷毓 丕賱鬲毓乇賷賮丕鬲 丕賱爻丕亘賯丞 丕賱鬲賷 賯乇兀鬲.
賱賲 賷賯賲 亘爻乇丿 丕賱鬲丕乇賷禺 賰賲丕 賳乇賶 賮賷 丕賱睾丕賱亘貙 亘丿丕賷丞 賲賳 賮賱丕爻賮丞 丕賱廿睾乇賷賯 丕賱兀賵丕卅賱 孬賲 爻賯乇丕胤貙 賮兀賮賱丕胤賵賳 賵 兀乇爻胤賵 廿賱賶 丌禺乇賴 賲賳 丕賱賮賱丕爻賮丞 丕賱賲賲賷夭賷賳 賱賰賱 毓氐乇貙 亘賱 賯丕賲 亘鬲賯爻賷賲 鬲丕乇賷禺 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 廿賱賶 禺賲爻 丨賯亘丕鬲. 丕賱丨賯亘丞 丕賱兀賵賱賶 鬲鬲賲孬賱 賮賷 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱乇賵丕賯賷丞 賵 賴賷 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱鬲賷 賲孬賱鬲 賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱賷賵賳丕賳. 丕賱丨賯亘丞 丕賱孬丕賳賷丞 馗賴賵乇 丕賱賲爻賷丨賷丞 賵 鬲兀孬賷乇賴丕 毓賱賶 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱乇賵丕賯賷丞 賵 毓賱賶 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 亘卮賰賱 毓丕賲. 丕賱丨賯亘丞 丕賱孬丕賱孬丞 毓氐乇 丕賱賳賴囟丞 賵 賮賱爻賮丞 丿賷賰丕乇鬲 賵 乇賵爻賵 賵 賰丕賳胤. 丕賱丨賯亘丞 丕賱乇丕亘毓丞 賮賱爻賮丞 賳賷鬲卮賴 (賲丕 亘毓丿 丕賱丨丿丕孬丞). 丕賱丨賯亘丞 丕賱禺丕賲爻丞 賵 賴賷 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱賲毓丕氐乇丞.
乇亘胤 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 丕賱賮賱爻賮丕鬲 亘亘毓囟賴丕 賵 賯丕乇賳 亘賷賳賴丕 亘胤乇賷賯丞 乇丕卅毓丞 噩丿丕賸 貙 爻賴賱鬲 賮賴賲賴丕 賵爻丕毓丿鬲 毓賱賶 鬲賰賵賷賳 賮賰乇丞 卮丕賲賱丞 毓賳 賰賱 賲賳賴丕.
.
孬丕賳賷丕賸: 賮賴賲鬲 賳賷鬲卮賴 賷丕 噩賲丕毓丞 :D
賰丕賳 賱賮賱爻賮丞 賳賷鬲卮賴 丨氐丞 丕賱兀爻丿 賮賷 丕賱賰鬲丕亘貙 賵 賱賲 賷賰賳 匕賱賰 毓亘孬丕賸 亘丕賱胤亘毓貙 賮賯丿 賯丕賲 賳賷鬲卮賴 亘鬲賮賰賷賰 賰賱 賲丕 噩丕亍 賯亘賱賴 賲賳 賮賱爻賮丕鬲 賵 賰丕賳 賱賮賱爻賮鬲賴 丕賱鬲兀孬賷乇 丕賱兀爻丕爻賷 毓賱賶 丕賱賮賱爻賮丕鬲 丕賱鬲丕賱賷丞 賱賴丕貙 賱匕丕 賵噩亘 丕賱賵賯賵賮 毓賳丿賴丕 胤賵賷賱丕賸.
兀亘丿毓 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 賮賷 鬲亘爻賷胤 賮賱爻賮丞 賳賷鬲卮賴 賵 卮乇丨賴丕 卮乇丨丕賸 賵丕賮賷丕賸 賲毓 丕賱廿賱賲丕賲 亘賰丕賮丞 噩賵丕賳亘賴丕.
.
孬丕賱孬丕賸: 賱賲 賷賰鬲賮賽 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 亘爻乇丿 丕賱賮賱爻賮丕鬲貙 亘賱 賳賯丿 丕賱毓丿賷丿 賲賳賴丕 賵 賴賵 亘匕賱賰 賷毓賱賻賲 丕賱賯丕乇卅 丿乇爻丕賸 兀爻丕爻賷丕賸 賮賷 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞: 丕賱鬲賮賰賷乇 丕賱賳丕賯丿.
賱賲 賷亘丕賱睾 賱賵賰 賮賷乇賷 毓賳丿賲丕 爻賲賶 賰鬲丕亘賴 "鬲毓賱賲 丕賱丨賷丕丞" 賮賴賵 亘丕賱賮毓賱 賷毓賱賲賰 丕賱丨賷丕丞貙 賷毓賱賲賰 賰賷賮 鬲卮賰賱 丨賰賲賰 賵 賮賰乇賰 丕賱禺丕氐貙 賰賷賮 鬲鬲禺匕 丿賵乇 丕賱賳丕賯丿 賱賱丨賷丕丞 賵 賱賱丌禺乇賷賳 賵 賱賳賮爻賰 亘丕賱賲賯丕賲 丕賱兀賵賱 丨鬲賶 鬲氐亘丨 卮禺氐丕賸 兀賮囟賱.
.
兀禺賷乇丕賸: 賴賱 賷賵噩丿 兀噩賲賱 賲賳 丨賽賰賻賲 丕賱賮賱丕爻賮丞責 :D
丨爻賳丕賸貙 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賷夭禺乇 亘丕賱毓丿賷丿 賲賳賴丕貙 賵 賴賷 賮賷 丕賱睾丕賱亘 禺賱丕氐丞 賮賰乇 丕賱賮賱丕爻賮丞貙 賱兀賳賴 賲賳 賷賰賵賳 丕賱賮賷賱爻賵賮責 兀賱賷爻鬲 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丨乇賮賷丕賸 賴賷 丨亘 丕賱丨賰賲丞責 亘毓丿 乇丨賱丞 兀賷 賲賳丕 賮賷 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷賰賵賳 賴丿賮賴丕 丿丕卅賲丕賸 鬲賰賵賷賳 賳馗乇賷丞 丕賱賲毓乇賮丞 丕賱禺丕氐丞 亘賳丕貙 賵 丕賱賯賷賲 丕賱兀禺賱丕賯賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 爻賳賲卮賷 毓賱賷賴丕貙 賷兀鬲賷 丕賱賯爻賲 丕賱兀禺賷乇 賵 賴賵 丕賱丨賰賲丞 丕賱鬲賷 爻賳毓賷卮 亘賴丕 丨賷丕鬲賳丕 賵 毓賯賷丿丞 丕賱禺賱丕氐( 兀賷 賰賷賮 爻賳鬲氐乇賮 賲毓 廿卮賰丕賱賷丞 丕賱賮賳丕亍貙 廿匕 兀賱賷爻 兀賰孬乇 賲丕 賷丐乇賯賳丕 賴賵 丕賱禺賵賮 賲賳 丕賱賲賵鬲責).
賳毓賲貙 賴賰匕丕 亘丕賱囟亘胤 賯爻賲 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 丕賱賮賱爻賮丕鬲:
賳馗乇賷丞 丕賱賲毓乇賮丞貙 丕賱賲賳馗賵賲丞 丕賱兀禺賱丕賯賷丞貙 毓賯賷丿丞 丕賱禺賱丕氐. 賴賱 賷賵噩丿 兀亘爻胤 賲賳 匕賱賰責
丨爻賳丕賸貙 兀賵賱丕賸: 賱賯丿 賯乇兀鬲 丕賱賰孬賷乇 賲賳 丕賱賰鬲亘 丕賱賲賵噩賴丞 賱賱賲亘鬲丿卅賷賳 賮賷 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 賰賲丿禺賱 賲亘爻胤 賱賴丕 賵 賱鬲丕乇賷禺賴丕貙 賵 賴賷 賮賷 丕賱睾丕賱亘 鬲亘丿兀 亘鬲毓乇賷賮 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 賵 匕賰乇 賲噩丕賱丕鬲賴丕貙 孬賲 鬲爻乇丿 鬲丕乇賷禺賴丕 賲毓 丕禺鬲賱丕賮 丕賱兀爻賱賵亘 賲賳 賰丕鬲亘 賱丌禺乇 亘丕賱胤亘毓.
賱賯丿 爻丕毓丿鬲賳賷 賯乇丕亍丕鬲賷 丕賱爻丕亘賯丞 賮賷 賲毓乇賮丞 賯賷賲丞 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 亘丕賱匕丕鬲 賵 賲毓賳賶 兀賳 賷賰賵賳 賱賱賰丕鬲亘 兀爻賱賵亘 賲賲賷夭貙 賱賴 丕賱賯丿乇丞 毓賱賶 丕賱乇爻賵禺 亘丕賱匕丕賰乇丞 亘卮賰賱 毓噩賷亘. 亘丿兀 賮賷乇賷 亘鬲毓乇賷賮 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 賵 賯丿 賰丕賳 鬲毓乇賷賮賴 丕賱兀賰孬乇 賵囟賵丨丕賸 賵 噩賲丕賱丕賸 賲賳 噩賲賷毓 丕賱鬲毓乇賷賮丕鬲 丕賱爻丕亘賯丞 丕賱鬲賷 賯乇兀鬲.
賱賲 賷賯賲 亘爻乇丿 丕賱鬲丕乇賷禺 賰賲丕 賳乇賶 賮賷 丕賱睾丕賱亘貙 亘丿丕賷丞 賲賳 賮賱丕爻賮丞 丕賱廿睾乇賷賯 丕賱兀賵丕卅賱 孬賲 爻賯乇丕胤貙 賮兀賮賱丕胤賵賳 賵 兀乇爻胤賵 廿賱賶 丌禺乇賴 賲賳 丕賱賮賱丕爻賮丞 丕賱賲賲賷夭賷賳 賱賰賱 毓氐乇貙 亘賱 賯丕賲 亘鬲賯爻賷賲 鬲丕乇賷禺 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 廿賱賶 禺賲爻 丨賯亘丕鬲. 丕賱丨賯亘丞 丕賱兀賵賱賶 鬲鬲賲孬賱 賮賷 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱乇賵丕賯賷丞 賵 賴賷 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱鬲賷 賲孬賱鬲 賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱賷賵賳丕賳. 丕賱丨賯亘丞 丕賱孬丕賳賷丞 馗賴賵乇 丕賱賲爻賷丨賷丞 賵 鬲兀孬賷乇賴丕 毓賱賶 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱乇賵丕賯賷丞 賵 毓賱賶 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 亘卮賰賱 毓丕賲. 丕賱丨賯亘丞 丕賱孬丕賱孬丞 毓氐乇 丕賱賳賴囟丞 賵 賮賱爻賮丞 丿賷賰丕乇鬲 賵 乇賵爻賵 賵 賰丕賳胤. 丕賱丨賯亘丞 丕賱乇丕亘毓丞 賮賱爻賮丞 賳賷鬲卮賴 (賲丕 亘毓丿 丕賱丨丿丕孬丞). 丕賱丨賯亘丞 丕賱禺丕賲爻丞 賵 賴賷 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱賲毓丕氐乇丞.
乇亘胤 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 丕賱賮賱爻賮丕鬲 亘亘毓囟賴丕 賵 賯丕乇賳 亘賷賳賴丕 亘胤乇賷賯丞 乇丕卅毓丞 噩丿丕賸 貙 爻賴賱鬲 賮賴賲賴丕 賵爻丕毓丿鬲 毓賱賶 鬲賰賵賷賳 賮賰乇丞 卮丕賲賱丞 毓賳 賰賱 賲賳賴丕.
.
孬丕賳賷丕賸: 賮賴賲鬲 賳賷鬲卮賴 賷丕 噩賲丕毓丞 :D
賰丕賳 賱賮賱爻賮丞 賳賷鬲卮賴 丨氐丞 丕賱兀爻丿 賮賷 丕賱賰鬲丕亘貙 賵 賱賲 賷賰賳 匕賱賰 毓亘孬丕賸 亘丕賱胤亘毓貙 賮賯丿 賯丕賲 賳賷鬲卮賴 亘鬲賮賰賷賰 賰賱 賲丕 噩丕亍 賯亘賱賴 賲賳 賮賱爻賮丕鬲 賵 賰丕賳 賱賮賱爻賮鬲賴 丕賱鬲兀孬賷乇 丕賱兀爻丕爻賷 毓賱賶 丕賱賮賱爻賮丕鬲 丕賱鬲丕賱賷丞 賱賴丕貙 賱匕丕 賵噩亘 丕賱賵賯賵賮 毓賳丿賴丕 胤賵賷賱丕賸.
兀亘丿毓 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 賮賷 鬲亘爻賷胤 賮賱爻賮丞 賳賷鬲卮賴 賵 卮乇丨賴丕 卮乇丨丕賸 賵丕賮賷丕賸 賲毓 丕賱廿賱賲丕賲 亘賰丕賮丞 噩賵丕賳亘賴丕.
.
孬丕賱孬丕賸: 賱賲 賷賰鬲賮賽 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 亘爻乇丿 丕賱賮賱爻賮丕鬲貙 亘賱 賳賯丿 丕賱毓丿賷丿 賲賳賴丕 賵 賴賵 亘匕賱賰 賷毓賱賻賲 丕賱賯丕乇卅 丿乇爻丕賸 兀爻丕爻賷丕賸 賮賷 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞: 丕賱鬲賮賰賷乇 丕賱賳丕賯丿.
賱賲 賷亘丕賱睾 賱賵賰 賮賷乇賷 毓賳丿賲丕 爻賲賶 賰鬲丕亘賴 "鬲毓賱賲 丕賱丨賷丕丞" 賮賴賵 亘丕賱賮毓賱 賷毓賱賲賰 丕賱丨賷丕丞貙 賷毓賱賲賰 賰賷賮 鬲卮賰賱 丨賰賲賰 賵 賮賰乇賰 丕賱禺丕氐貙 賰賷賮 鬲鬲禺匕 丿賵乇 丕賱賳丕賯丿 賱賱丨賷丕丞 賵 賱賱丌禺乇賷賳 賵 賱賳賮爻賰 亘丕賱賲賯丕賲 丕賱兀賵賱 丨鬲賶 鬲氐亘丨 卮禺氐丕賸 兀賮囟賱.
.
兀禺賷乇丕賸: 賴賱 賷賵噩丿 兀噩賲賱 賲賳 丨賽賰賻賲 丕賱賮賱丕爻賮丞責 :D
丨爻賳丕賸貙 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賷夭禺乇 亘丕賱毓丿賷丿 賲賳賴丕貙 賵 賴賷 賮賷 丕賱睾丕賱亘 禺賱丕氐丞 賮賰乇 丕賱賮賱丕爻賮丞貙 賱兀賳賴 賲賳 賷賰賵賳 丕賱賮賷賱爻賵賮責 兀賱賷爻鬲 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丨乇賮賷丕賸 賴賷 丨亘 丕賱丨賰賲丞責 亘毓丿 乇丨賱丞 兀賷 賲賳丕 賮賷 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷賰賵賳 賴丿賮賴丕 丿丕卅賲丕賸 鬲賰賵賷賳 賳馗乇賷丞 丕賱賲毓乇賮丞 丕賱禺丕氐丞 亘賳丕貙 賵 丕賱賯賷賲 丕賱兀禺賱丕賯賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 爻賳賲卮賷 毓賱賷賴丕貙 賷兀鬲賷 丕賱賯爻賲 丕賱兀禺賷乇 賵 賴賵 丕賱丨賰賲丞 丕賱鬲賷 爻賳毓賷卮 亘賴丕 丨賷丕鬲賳丕 賵 毓賯賷丿丞 丕賱禺賱丕氐( 兀賷 賰賷賮 爻賳鬲氐乇賮 賲毓 廿卮賰丕賱賷丞 丕賱賮賳丕亍貙 廿匕 兀賱賷爻 兀賰孬乇 賲丕 賷丐乇賯賳丕 賴賵 丕賱禺賵賮 賲賳 丕賱賲賵鬲責).
賳毓賲貙 賴賰匕丕 亘丕賱囟亘胤 賯爻賲 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 丕賱賮賱爻賮丕鬲:
賳馗乇賷丞 丕賱賲毓乇賮丞貙 丕賱賲賳馗賵賲丞 丕賱兀禺賱丕賯賷丞貙 毓賯賷丿丞 丕賱禺賱丕氐. 賴賱 賷賵噩丿 兀亘爻胤 賲賳 匕賱賰責
August 1, 2017
It was all over the place. If it has a central theme then maybe the focus would of been easier to read and understand. The book was marketed as a small guide to the history of philosophy, but I think it missed quite a lot of it, especially for modern philosophy. It would be better to go by philosopher and philosopher or by period by period. Overall, the book needed better organization, which ultimately caused it to appear a pointless book with a few interesting sections.
October 4, 2021
亘乇丕賷 賲賳 賰賴 賴賷趩 趩賷夭 丕夭 賮賱爻賮賴 賳賲賷丿賵賳爻鬲賲 貙 賲禺鬲氐乇 賵 賲賮賷丿 亘賵丿 賵 賷賴 爻乇賷 賲賯丿賲丕鬲 賵 賰賱賷丕鬲 乇賵 賷丕丿 诏乇賮鬲賲 .
賳賲賷丿賵賳賲 賰鬲丕亘 賴丕賷 亘賴鬲乇賷 賴賲 亘乇丕賷 賲賯丿賲賴 賵 丌卮賳丕賷賷 亘丕 鬲丕乇賷禺 賮賱爻賮賴 賵 賰賱丕賸 賲丕賴賷鬲 賮賱爻賮賴 賴爻鬲賳丿 賷丕 賳賴 貙 丕賲丕 賲賷 鬲賵賳賲 丕賷賳 賰鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘賴 賰爻丕賳賷 賰賴 賮賰乇 賲賷賰賳賳丿 毓賱丕賯賴 賲賳丿 賴爻鬲賳 倬賷卮賳賴丕丿 亘丿賲.
賳賲賷丿賵賳賲 賰鬲丕亘 賴丕賷 亘賴鬲乇賷 賴賲 亘乇丕賷 賲賯丿賲賴 賵 丌卮賳丕賷賷 亘丕 鬲丕乇賷禺 賮賱爻賮賴 賵 賰賱丕賸 賲丕賴賷鬲 賮賱爻賮賴 賴爻鬲賳丿 賷丕 賳賴 貙 丕賲丕 賲賷 鬲賵賳賲 丕賷賳 賰鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘賴 賰爻丕賳賷 賰賴 賮賰乇 賲賷賰賳賳丿 毓賱丕賯賴 賲賳丿 賴爻鬲賳 倬賷卮賳賴丕丿 亘丿賲.
March 9, 2018
賰鬲丕亘 噩賷丿 賱賱賲亘鬲丿卅賷賳 .賱賷爻 爻乇丿賷 賰賰鬲亘 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱丕禺乇賷 亘賱 賴賵 亘丕賱丌丨乇賷 賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 賮賷 鬲丕乇賷禺 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 賵氐賷丕睾鬲賴丕 賮賷 賯丕賱亘 兀卮亘丞 亘賯氐丞 毓賳 胤乇賷賯 賲孬丕賱 賲賳 賮賱爻賮丞 賰賱 毓氐乇 .
賵賴匕丕 賱賴 賲賷夭丞 丕賲鬲丕毓 賵卮丿 丕賱賯丕乇卅 賮賷 丕賱丕賳鬲賯丕賱 賮賷 賯丕賱亘 賯氐氐賷 賲賳 丕賱乇賵丕賯賷丞 賱賱丕賴賵鬲 丕賱賲爻賷丨賷 孬賲 賱賰賵噩賷鬲賵 丿賷賰丕乇鬲 孬賲 丕賮賰丕乇 丕賱丨乇賷丞 毓賳丿 乇賵爻賵 賮賳馗乇賷丞 丕賱丕禺賱丕賯 賱賰丕賳鬲 孬賲 鬲賮賰賷賰 丕賱丨丿丕孬丞 賲賳 賳賷鬲卮丞 丕賱賷 賳賯丿 丕賱鬲賯賳賷丞 賱賴賷丿睾乇 ..賷鬲囟丨 賲丨丕賵賱丞 賱賮乇囟 賯丕賱亘 丿賷丕賱賰鬲賷賰賷 卮禺氐賷 賱賱賰丕鬲亘 毓賱賷 丕賱爻乇丿 .
賱賰賳 賱賴 毓賷亘 廿睾賮丕賱 兀乇丕亍 賮賱丕爻賮丞 丌禺乇賷賳 賲賴賲賷賳 賮賱賰 兀賳 鬲鬲禺賷賱 丕賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賱賲 賷賳丕賯卮 丕賮賰丕乇 (亘賷賰賵賳 _爻亘賷賳賵夭丕 _賴賷噩賱 _卮賵亘賳賴賵乇 賵睾賷乇賴賲 ) .
賱賰 丕賳 鬲鬲禺賷賱 賲孬賱丕 丕賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 鬲賰賱賲 毓賳 賮賱爻賮丞 賳賷鬲卮丞 賵(丕乇丕丿丞 丕賱賯賵丞 )賵賱賲 賷鬲賰賱賲 毓賳 丕氐賱賴丕 賮賷 (丕乇丕丿丞 丕賱丨賷丕丞 ) 賱卮賵亘賳賴賵乇 .賮賯胤 賲賳 丕噩賱 鬲賵馗賷賮丕鬲 賮賷 爻賷丕賯 兀乇丕丿賴 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 .
賱賰賳 賷馗賱 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賲丿禺賱 噩賷丿 賱賱賮賱爻賮丞 .
賵賴匕丕 賱賴 賲賷夭丞 丕賲鬲丕毓 賵卮丿 丕賱賯丕乇卅 賮賷 丕賱丕賳鬲賯丕賱 賮賷 賯丕賱亘 賯氐氐賷 賲賳 丕賱乇賵丕賯賷丞 賱賱丕賴賵鬲 丕賱賲爻賷丨賷 孬賲 賱賰賵噩賷鬲賵 丿賷賰丕乇鬲 孬賲 丕賮賰丕乇 丕賱丨乇賷丞 毓賳丿 乇賵爻賵 賮賳馗乇賷丞 丕賱丕禺賱丕賯 賱賰丕賳鬲 孬賲 鬲賮賰賷賰 丕賱丨丿丕孬丞 賲賳 賳賷鬲卮丞 丕賱賷 賳賯丿 丕賱鬲賯賳賷丞 賱賴賷丿睾乇 ..賷鬲囟丨 賲丨丕賵賱丞 賱賮乇囟 賯丕賱亘 丿賷丕賱賰鬲賷賰賷 卮禺氐賷 賱賱賰丕鬲亘 毓賱賷 丕賱爻乇丿 .
賱賰賳 賱賴 毓賷亘 廿睾賮丕賱 兀乇丕亍 賮賱丕爻賮丞 丌禺乇賷賳 賲賴賲賷賳 賮賱賰 兀賳 鬲鬲禺賷賱 丕賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賱賲 賷賳丕賯卮 丕賮賰丕乇 (亘賷賰賵賳 _爻亘賷賳賵夭丕 _賴賷噩賱 _卮賵亘賳賴賵乇 賵睾賷乇賴賲 ) .
賱賰 丕賳 鬲鬲禺賷賱 賲孬賱丕 丕賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 鬲賰賱賲 毓賳 賮賱爻賮丞 賳賷鬲卮丞 賵(丕乇丕丿丞 丕賱賯賵丞 )賵賱賲 賷鬲賰賱賲 毓賳 丕氐賱賴丕 賮賷 (丕乇丕丿丞 丕賱丨賷丕丞 ) 賱卮賵亘賳賴賵乇 .賮賯胤 賲賳 丕噩賱 鬲賵馗賷賮丕鬲 賮賷 爻賷丕賯 兀乇丕丿賴 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 .
賱賰賳 賷馗賱 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賲丿禺賱 噩賷丿 賱賱賮賱爻賮丞 .
June 6, 2024
2.5 stars - the concept of the book is better than the content. I鈥檓 not sure if it鈥檚 an issue with translation (the original text is french) but this book took me forever to get through. The author cannot make a point without going off into pages of verbose tangents. Like this paragraph, so wordy for no reason.
鈥淔or the deconstructionist, for the genealogist, there can be no 鈥榦bjective鈥� or 鈥榙isinterested鈥� value judgments 鈥� independent of the vital interests of the speaker 鈥� which devastates the classical conceptions of law and ethics 鈥� and there can be neither autonomous and disinterested judgments, nor objective and universally valid 鈥榝acts鈥�. All our judgments, all our utterances, all the sentences we employ, all our ideas, are expressions of our vital energies, emanations of our inner life and in no sense abstract entities, autonomous and independent of the forces within. The whole project of genealogy is to prove this new truth.鈥�
I鈥檓 not sure I learned much but I鈥檓 at least intrigued by the original texts he references. I also thought the author would unnecessarily inject his opinion on the philosophical era in what is supposedly just an overview. Also, not sure if this was disclaimed, but this book only mentions classic western philosophies and feels very euro centric.
鈥淔or the deconstructionist, for the genealogist, there can be no 鈥榦bjective鈥� or 鈥榙isinterested鈥� value judgments 鈥� independent of the vital interests of the speaker 鈥� which devastates the classical conceptions of law and ethics 鈥� and there can be neither autonomous and disinterested judgments, nor objective and universally valid 鈥榝acts鈥�. All our judgments, all our utterances, all the sentences we employ, all our ideas, are expressions of our vital energies, emanations of our inner life and in no sense abstract entities, autonomous and independent of the forces within. The whole project of genealogy is to prove this new truth.鈥�
I鈥檓 not sure I learned much but I鈥檓 at least intrigued by the original texts he references. I also thought the author would unnecessarily inject his opinion on the philosophical era in what is supposedly just an overview. Also, not sure if this was disclaimed, but this book only mentions classic western philosophies and feels very euro centric.
September 2, 2011
Zowel de titel als de opmaak van de kaft zijn niet enigszins misleidend, dan wel compleet. Dit is geen handleiding voor een of andere power-yuppie levensfilosofie. Ik vermoed dat de uitgever hier voor iets tussenzit.
Het boekje beschrijft in grote lijnen de evolutie van het Westerse denken, te beginnen bij de Grieken (natuurlijk) en afsluitend met een (persoonlijke) poging tot zingeving in de chaos die Nietzsche ons naliet na zijn genadeloze afbraak van de grote idealen (godsdienst, wetenschap, humanisme, rationaliteit,...). De schrijver vergelijkt de historische visies in de filosofie aan de hand van hun drie grote actieterreinen (theorie, ethiek en zingeving) waardoor je een duidelijk overzicht krijgt van hun onderlinge verschillen.
Ik kan niet zeggen dat ik veel heb bijgeleerd, maar ik heb mijn bestaande kennis in een zinvoller verband kunnen plaatsen (dat is ook bijleren, zeker?). Het laatste hoofdstuk vond ik wat aan de zwakke kant: een beetje te abstract naar mijn zin. Alain de Botton's 'Religie voor athe茂sten' was voor mij een handzamere leidraad in een zoektocht naar zingeving.
Een belangrijk idee dat ik zeker wil onthouden uit het boek is het verwijt dat Ferry maakt aan de hedendaagse filosofie dat ze zich vooral uitspreekt over 'externe' thema's, gaande van bioethiek tot logica of wetenschapsfilosofie, behalve over haar eigenlijke core-business (wijsheid/filo-sofia). Ze stelt zich volledig ten dienst van de 'technologische wereld' (cfr. Heidegger/Adorno) en het WTK-bestel en degradeert zichzelf als dusdanig tot een nieuwe vorm van scholastiek ('dienstmaagd van de technologie'). Zingeving en wijsheid zijn woorden waar de meeste filosofen vandaag neerbuigend de neus voor ophalen en dat is jammer, nee?
Ik ga in ieder geval, op aanraden van Ferry, mijn eerste werk van Nietzsche lezen: The Twilight of the Idols (zijn laatste werk). Benieuwd of ik er een jota van zal begrijpen. Maar ik heb het gevoel dat ik nu wel voldoende rond deze filosoof heb gecirkeld (via literatuur) om er effectief zelf eens van te proeven.
Het boekje beschrijft in grote lijnen de evolutie van het Westerse denken, te beginnen bij de Grieken (natuurlijk) en afsluitend met een (persoonlijke) poging tot zingeving in de chaos die Nietzsche ons naliet na zijn genadeloze afbraak van de grote idealen (godsdienst, wetenschap, humanisme, rationaliteit,...). De schrijver vergelijkt de historische visies in de filosofie aan de hand van hun drie grote actieterreinen (theorie, ethiek en zingeving) waardoor je een duidelijk overzicht krijgt van hun onderlinge verschillen.
Ik kan niet zeggen dat ik veel heb bijgeleerd, maar ik heb mijn bestaande kennis in een zinvoller verband kunnen plaatsen (dat is ook bijleren, zeker?). Het laatste hoofdstuk vond ik wat aan de zwakke kant: een beetje te abstract naar mijn zin. Alain de Botton's 'Religie voor athe茂sten' was voor mij een handzamere leidraad in een zoektocht naar zingeving.
Een belangrijk idee dat ik zeker wil onthouden uit het boek is het verwijt dat Ferry maakt aan de hedendaagse filosofie dat ze zich vooral uitspreekt over 'externe' thema's, gaande van bioethiek tot logica of wetenschapsfilosofie, behalve over haar eigenlijke core-business (wijsheid/filo-sofia). Ze stelt zich volledig ten dienst van de 'technologische wereld' (cfr. Heidegger/Adorno) en het WTK-bestel en degradeert zichzelf als dusdanig tot een nieuwe vorm van scholastiek ('dienstmaagd van de technologie'). Zingeving en wijsheid zijn woorden waar de meeste filosofen vandaag neerbuigend de neus voor ophalen en dat is jammer, nee?
Ik ga in ieder geval, op aanraden van Ferry, mijn eerste werk van Nietzsche lezen: The Twilight of the Idols (zijn laatste werk). Benieuwd of ik er een jota van zal begrijpen. Maar ik heb het gevoel dat ik nu wel voldoende rond deze filosoof heb gecirkeld (via literatuur) om er effectief zelf eens van te proeven.
October 17, 2017
The problem with life is that it ends, and we as humans are the only species aware of that. Pairing that understanding with the knowledge that those around me that I love will also stop living at some point I'm stuck with the question of how do I deal with impermanence?
This book will walk through many philosophical ideas starting with the Greeks --> Christianity --> Humanism -->Nietzsche --> Post Modernism --> Contemporary Philosophy. He explains how each idea made sense at the same as it was paired with the current understanding of the world. Before we try to make sense of the world we need to try to understand what we are experiencing... is the world a perfect cosmos as the Greeks thought, or intelligently designed like the theists, or are there universal morals that humans find through reason like the Kant believed, or are there no Ideals at all like Nietzsche believed and we should learn to love the present? From your starting point you can now decided how to move forward and think upon the questions of how do we make this life worth living. Am I a good person living a good life? How do I know? How do I deal with life when it isn't ideal?
Ferry does a great job describing these theories with enough simplicity to be a fairly easy read but seems to keep enough depth to be an useful read. (The chapter on Nietzsche was difficult though.) If anything it sparks my interest to read more in depth accounts of most of these thinkers and more.
This book will walk through many philosophical ideas starting with the Greeks --> Christianity --> Humanism -->Nietzsche --> Post Modernism --> Contemporary Philosophy. He explains how each idea made sense at the same as it was paired with the current understanding of the world. Before we try to make sense of the world we need to try to understand what we are experiencing... is the world a perfect cosmos as the Greeks thought, or intelligently designed like the theists, or are there universal morals that humans find through reason like the Kant believed, or are there no Ideals at all like Nietzsche believed and we should learn to love the present? From your starting point you can now decided how to move forward and think upon the questions of how do we make this life worth living. Am I a good person living a good life? How do I know? How do I deal with life when it isn't ideal?
Ferry does a great job describing these theories with enough simplicity to be a fairly easy read but seems to keep enough depth to be an useful read. (The chapter on Nietzsche was difficult though.) If anything it sparks my interest to read more in depth accounts of most of these thinkers and more.
January 10, 2013
I'd like to sit and read the writings of certain philosophers all day for a few weeks solid just to gauge how much more comfortable life might be on the other side of such an exercise. Seneca and Montaigne are the two that I've actually spent a fair amount of time with and I tend to believe that I could spend more without effort or regret. The discovery of which thinkers I was inclined to read required considerable trial and error, which would have been bypassed had I had access to books like this one.
This is a very well-written overview of the history of philosophical thought from the very beginning to post-modernism. It reminded me of why I'm a stoic, or at least why such an approach to life is so worthy of consideration, but more importantly relieved me of my general bias against most of post-modernist thought. While Nietzsche still strikes me as an inveterate whiner with an impossibly bushy mustache, the book shed more light on both the man and his facial hair. It's never too late to develop perspective on the people and ideas that have shaped history and this book is an ideal provider of such.
This is a very well-written overview of the history of philosophical thought from the very beginning to post-modernism. It reminded me of why I'm a stoic, or at least why such an approach to life is so worthy of consideration, but more importantly relieved me of my general bias against most of post-modernist thought. While Nietzsche still strikes me as an inveterate whiner with an impossibly bushy mustache, the book shed more light on both the man and his facial hair. It's never too late to develop perspective on the people and ideas that have shaped history and this book is an ideal provider of such.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 488 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.