.Writer and software developer and graphic designer .Born in Cairo in 1983 .He studied Computer Science and Information Systems .He received several international certificates in the field of software development . Released his first book (Baat Man) in March 2012
I really hopped to give this book a better rating, and to be honest I loved its idea at the begining. As a fan of Batman, I loved the idea of him coming to aid the Egyptian revolution, and this plot could have had a huge potential for a much, much better story. another thing that attracted me to the book was the difference in the conversation style between Batman and Soka (his Egyptian guardian throughout the book). Batman mostly used traditional arabic while Soka used the slang. and this was entertaining and hilarious till the point when the slang degraded to the point of being disgusting and dirty. and that is my first take against book the second criticism has to do with the ending. it seems the author wanned to send a message that we don't need the help of the west (America) to advance and they should just leave us alone and we'd become a developed country then. however sending this message to Batman and asking him to go back where he came from because we don't need the aid of Americans and we are better able to advance on our own is wrong. Batman is a symbol of justice and fighting criminals. He is not a president or a government that wants to influence people and change it in the way it wants, he is the opposite of that and projecting this message on him was completely wrong. Honestly, I hated the ending by all means. almost all of the Egyptian characters presented were either, thugs, conmen, aggressive or simply stupid! there wasn't a single Egyptian hero or even just a simple good Egyptian man (or woman, for that matter). Even Soka, was a stupid conmen; who just out of no where decided to help Batman. This is an extremely negative portray of the Egyptian people that I strongly refuse, and I still can't realize how did Batman say in the last chapter that Egypt has heros that would protect it! where are those heros? I haven't seen a single one of them in the novel! when I read that line, I honestly started to think that Batman has gone stupid the final criticism is how the author tried to give an excuse for the bad behavior of thugs. He claimed that all of them are bad for a reason, they were forced to become who they are now and they had no other choice but killing and terrorizing people to live, and it is the west that should be blamed for turning those people bad and thus they should leave us alone now. I again refuse this notion! not all of the thugs are thugs because they had no other choice, and we can never blame the west for turning them bad! and even if they became thugs because of whatever tragedy happened in their past, that doesn't mean that we as a society shouldn't punish them for their bad behavior!. And speaking of how past experience can turn you into an evil person, Batman himself had a trauma in his past yet he got over it! Batman's own history proves that past traumas are not an excuse and defeats the excuses the author gave to thugs. the book had a great potential to be a nice combination of fun and seriousness, portraying the revolution and the Egyptian society, but the author didn't do a good job. he actually gave a bad impression of the Egyptian society The book was somehow funny, the ending was terrible, and it really was disappointing