What do you think?
Rate this book
毓丕賱賲 乇丕卅毓 噩丿賷丿
鬲毓鬲亘乇 賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賲賳 兀丿亘 " 丕賱禺賷丕賱 丕賱毓賱賲賷 " 賵 賲毓 匕賱賰 賮賴賷 鬲毓鬲亘乇 兀賷囟丕 賲賳 "丕賱兀丿亘 丕賱爻丕禺乇" 丨賷孬 賷丿賵乇 賲賵囟賵毓賴丕 丨賵賱 " 賳賯丿 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓" 賵 丕賱爻禺乇賷丞 亘丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 賷爻賷胤乇 毓賱賷賴丕 丕賱毓賱賲 丕噩丕賮 丕丕賱禺丕賷 賲賳 鬲賯丿賷乇 丕賱賲卮丕毓乇 賵 丕賱毓賵丕胤賮 丕丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷丞 .. 賰賲丕 賷丨匕乇賳丕 丕賱賲丐賱賮 賲賳 丕賳 賴匕丕 丕賱爻亘賷賱 賯丿 賷丐丿賷 賮賷 丕賱賳賴丕賷丞 廿賱賶 兀賳 賷賮賯丿 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 廿賳爻丕賳賷鬲賴 賵 丨乇賷鬲賴
280 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1932
50.9k people are currently reading
1m people want to read
About the author
Aldous Huxley
1,120听books13.2k听followersAldous Leonard Huxley was an English writer and philosopher. His bibliography spans nearly 50 books, including non-fiction works, as well as essays, narratives, and poems.
Born into the prominent Huxley family, he graduated from Balliol College, Oxford, with a degree in English literature. Early in his career, he published short stories and poetry and edited the literary magazine Oxford Poetry, before going on to publish travel writing, satire, and screenplays. He spent the latter part of his life in the United States, living in Los Angeles from 1937 until his death. By the end of his life, Huxley was widely acknowledged as one of the foremost intellectuals of his time. He was nominated for the Nobel Prize in Literature nine times, and was elected Companion of Literature by the Royal Society of Literature in 1962.
Huxley was a pacifist. He grew interested in philosophical mysticism, as well as universalism, addressing these subjects in his works such as The Perennial Philosophy (1945), which illustrates commonalities between Western and Eastern mysticism, and The Doors of Perception (1954), which interprets his own psychedelic experience with mescaline. In his most famous novel Brave New World (1932) and his final novel Island (1962), he presented his visions of dystopia and utopia, respectively.
Born into the prominent Huxley family, he graduated from Balliol College, Oxford, with a degree in English literature. Early in his career, he published short stories and poetry and edited the literary magazine Oxford Poetry, before going on to publish travel writing, satire, and screenplays. He spent the latter part of his life in the United States, living in Los Angeles from 1937 until his death. By the end of his life, Huxley was widely acknowledged as one of the foremost intellectuals of his time. He was nominated for the Nobel Prize in Literature nine times, and was elected Companion of Literature by the Royal Society of Literature in 1962.
Huxley was a pacifist. He grew interested in philosophical mysticism, as well as universalism, addressing these subjects in his works such as The Perennial Philosophy (1945), which illustrates commonalities between Western and Eastern mysticism, and The Doors of Perception (1954), which interprets his own psychedelic experience with mescaline. In his most famous novel Brave New World (1932) and his final novel Island (1962), he presented his visions of dystopia and utopia, respectively.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 55,693 reviews
March 11, 2012
I need to parse my rating of this book into the good (or great), the bad and the very fugly because I thought aspects of it were inspired genius and parts of it were dreggy, boring and living near the border of awful. In the end, the wowness and importance of the novel's ideas as well as the segments that I thoroughly enjoyed carried the book to a strong 3.5 star rating.
THE REALLY GOOD/EXCELLENT - I loved the first third of the book in which the basic outline of the "Brave New World" and its devalued, conveyer belt morality is set forth. The narrative device employed by Huxley of having the Director of Hatchery and Conditioning provide a walking tour to students around the facility as a way to knowledge up the reader on the societal basics was perfect. We learn of the cloning/birthing process, the caste system and the fundamental tenets upon which the society is organized.
This was as good a use of infodumping exposition as I had come across in some time and I was impressed both with the content and delivery method. The reader gets a crash course in world and its history in a way that fit nicely into the flow of the narrative without ever feeling forced. This was easily the best part of the novel for me, and Huxley's mass production-based society of enforced hedonism and anti-emotion was very compelling. Sort of like...
Now, long jumping to the end of the novel...
I also thought the final "debate" near the story's climax between John (the "savage") and Mustapha Mond, the World Controller, was exceptional. This last chapter/ending of the book, while abrupt, was masterful and struck the proper chord with the overall theme of the book.
Thus, a superior 4.5 to 5.0 stars for this portion of the book.
THE BAD/AWFUL - I thought the middle of the book including both the trip to the "reservation" and John's initial return to London was a sleeping pill and felt disconnected from the rest of the narrative. Throughout this entire portion of the book, all I kept thinking was...
The only purpose of this long, long.....LONG section seems to be to allow the reader to see Bernard Marx do a complete 180 in his views on the society once he finds himself in the role of celebrity by virtue of his relationship with John the savage. Sorry, this just did not strike me as a big enough payoff for this dry, plodding section. It was a test of endurance to get through this portion of the book, so I'm being generous when I give it a weak 2.0 to 2.5 stars. I could just have easily summed it up by just saying...
Bottom-line, I think this is a book that should be read. It's important book and there is much brilliance here. Plus, it is short enough that the stale boring segments aren't too tortuous to get through. However, as far as the triumvirate of classic dystopian science fiction goes...1984 is still the undisputed champ.
3.0 Stars. Recommended.
February 18, 2016
Warning! The following review contains humor. If you read it and actually think that I'm being critical of Huxley, try reading it again. (Here's a hint. Look for the irony of the italicized parts when compared to the previous statements.) If you post a comment that asserts that I'm wrong/ stupid/ crazy for this and/or try to lecture me on all the points you think I missed then I'm going to assume that you read it literally, missed the joke, didn't read the other comments where I've already answered this about a dozen times, and I will delete your post.
I have to apologize for this review. The concept of this book was so outlandish that I think it made my mind wander, and you may find some odd random thoughts scattered in it.
Anyhow, this book was so silly and unrealistic. Like any of this could happen. In the far future the babies are genetically engineered and designed for certain stations in life with a large workforce bred to be happy with menial jobs that don鈥檛 stress them physically or mentally. I really should look into getting that data entry position I saw in the job postings. It鈥檇 be a lot less stressful than what I鈥榤 doing now.
In addition to all the genetic modifications, the children are raised by the state, and words like 鈥檉ather鈥� and 鈥檓other鈥� are considered obscenities. Subliminal messaging through infancy and childhood also condition people to repeat idiotic platitudes as if they are genuine wisdom. I鈥檝e been in a bad mood today. I need to turn that frown upside down. And since the world economy depends on constant consumption by the highest classes, they鈥檙e encouraged to be wasteful The collars on a couple of my shirts are a little frayed. I should go buy some new ones and throw the old ones out. and to engage in activities that demand spending and resource use. Should I get a new set of golf clubs? I lost my old ones when we moved, but I hadn鈥檛 played in a long time. But would I play more if I got new clubs? There鈥榮 that really nice looking course right down the street. I don鈥榯 know how they keep the grass that green in this heat. The population even gets to zip around in their own private helicopters rather than cars. Man, when are they going to come out with jet packs for everyone. It鈥檚 2011 and I鈥檓 still driving around in a car like a chump. I want my jet pack!
Casual sex is actively encouraged. Wow. These condom commercials on TV have gotten really racy. The population is also programmed to be constantly partaking of some form of entertainment and to never just sit quietly and think I鈥檓 bored. Writing is boring. or to be alone Let鈥檚 check Facebook and see what all my friends are doing.
One of the sillier ideas is that the foundation of this society is Henry Ford鈥檚 assembly lines and that Ford has become the most revered figure in history. Like a businessman could ever become that popular. Is Steve Jobs making any announcements this week? I get itchy when there鈥榮 no new Apple products.
While everyone seeks to be constantly entertained, all of the entertainment panders to the lowest common denominator. Hey, Jersey Shore is on! and the emphasis is on presenting it with gimmicks to engage the audience like 鈥檛he feelies鈥�, movies that the audience can also smell and feel the sensation from. I wonder if they鈥檒l re-release Avatar at the movies so I can see it in 3D again like James Cameron intended? At one point, a character complains about the feelies, 鈥淏ut they鈥檙e told by an idiot鈥�.works of art out of practically nothing but pure sensation.鈥� I should go see that new Michael Bay Transformers movie.
Perhaps the most far fetched idea in this is that the population has been trained to sedate themselves with a drug called soma that relives any potential anxieties and keeps people from thinking about anything upsetting. I want a beer.
I guess this Huxley guy might have gotten lucky and predicted a few things, but he was way off base about where society was going.
I have to apologize for this review. The concept of this book was so outlandish that I think it made my mind wander, and you may find some odd random thoughts scattered in it.
Anyhow, this book was so silly and unrealistic. Like any of this could happen. In the far future the babies are genetically engineered and designed for certain stations in life with a large workforce bred to be happy with menial jobs that don鈥檛 stress them physically or mentally. I really should look into getting that data entry position I saw in the job postings. It鈥檇 be a lot less stressful than what I鈥榤 doing now.
In addition to all the genetic modifications, the children are raised by the state, and words like 鈥檉ather鈥� and 鈥檓other鈥� are considered obscenities. Subliminal messaging through infancy and childhood also condition people to repeat idiotic platitudes as if they are genuine wisdom. I鈥檝e been in a bad mood today. I need to turn that frown upside down. And since the world economy depends on constant consumption by the highest classes, they鈥檙e encouraged to be wasteful The collars on a couple of my shirts are a little frayed. I should go buy some new ones and throw the old ones out. and to engage in activities that demand spending and resource use. Should I get a new set of golf clubs? I lost my old ones when we moved, but I hadn鈥檛 played in a long time. But would I play more if I got new clubs? There鈥榮 that really nice looking course right down the street. I don鈥榯 know how they keep the grass that green in this heat. The population even gets to zip around in their own private helicopters rather than cars. Man, when are they going to come out with jet packs for everyone. It鈥檚 2011 and I鈥檓 still driving around in a car like a chump. I want my jet pack!
Casual sex is actively encouraged. Wow. These condom commercials on TV have gotten really racy. The population is also programmed to be constantly partaking of some form of entertainment and to never just sit quietly and think I鈥檓 bored. Writing is boring. or to be alone Let鈥檚 check Facebook and see what all my friends are doing.
One of the sillier ideas is that the foundation of this society is Henry Ford鈥檚 assembly lines and that Ford has become the most revered figure in history. Like a businessman could ever become that popular. Is Steve Jobs making any announcements this week? I get itchy when there鈥榮 no new Apple products.
While everyone seeks to be constantly entertained, all of the entertainment panders to the lowest common denominator. Hey, Jersey Shore is on! and the emphasis is on presenting it with gimmicks to engage the audience like 鈥檛he feelies鈥�, movies that the audience can also smell and feel the sensation from. I wonder if they鈥檒l re-release Avatar at the movies so I can see it in 3D again like James Cameron intended? At one point, a character complains about the feelies, 鈥淏ut they鈥檙e told by an idiot鈥�.works of art out of practically nothing but pure sensation.鈥� I should go see that new Michael Bay Transformers movie.
Perhaps the most far fetched idea in this is that the population has been trained to sedate themselves with a drug called soma that relives any potential anxieties and keeps people from thinking about anything upsetting. I want a beer.
I guess this Huxley guy might have gotten lucky and predicted a few things, but he was way off base about where society was going.
September 9, 2023
鈥淏ut I don't want comfort. I want God, I want poetry, I want real danger, I want freedom, I want goodness. I want sin.鈥�
These are words uttered in the face of tyranny and complete oppression, though they are very rare words to be spoken or even thought of in this world because every human passion and sense of creativity is repressed and eradicated through a long and complex process of conditioning.
And that鈥檚 what makes this novel so powerful; it鈥檚 not unbelievable. Like Orwell鈥檚 1984 and Atwood鈥檚 The Handmaid鈥檚 Tale, there鈥檚 just enough truth within Brave New World for it to be real. It鈥檚 a cruel mirroring of our own existence, should we follow a certain path too strongly. And that's the wonder of speculative fiction, though unlike the other two books, there鈥檚 no violence involved in Huxley鈥檚 world. It鈥檚 just as controlling and scary, but it鈥檚 done in a more indirect way.
Sex is on tap, everybody should be happy.
People don鈥檛 go missing in the night nor are they stoned to death by a group of their peers, but they have just as little freedom (even if they don鈥檛 realise it.) In this dystopia they are trained from birth to think and feel in a certain way, and, for whatever reason, should they ever deviate from their ordained path, they are fed drugs that induce happiness and serenity; thus, the populace is kept within their desired space, and persist with the tasks they were born to do. Very few of them even consider that this is wrong; this is all they have known. And to make things even more maniacally clever, all physical and sexual needs are fulfilled completely as everybody belongs to everybody else in every sense with the ultimate goal of people never developing desire. All desire should be fulfilled, nobody wants for anything else.
People are machines and houses are factories. They are mass produced and designed to be one thing and one thing only. All values are inverted. The idea of showing any emotion is horrific and repulsive. Love is unknown and alien. Death is associated with sweetness and relief. Children are fed candy when they are thought about death, so they associate the two together, so when as adults they see death they think of treats rather than the loss of someone they have known and worked beside for years.
In Brave New World people are husks, empty and detached, without ever realising it.
-John, the savage, as he enters the new world
I can only admire and praise Huxley鈥檚 genius through the writing. Like all effective dystopian societies, reading and information plays an exceedingly important role. As with Ray Bradbury'sFahrenheit 451, all books have been destroyed and made inaccessible. John, one of the few characters who was born away from the new world, stumbles across a volume of Shakespeare and it changes his life. He can only think and feel in Shakespearean language and begins to view the world through a semi-romantic lens and only finds depravity when he walks into the new world.
It鈥檚 everything he hates. He has been termed the savage, though he knows and understands the real meaning of the term even if those who call him such do not. Naturally, he becomes depressed and isolated in this new space, a space that he cannot be a part of or accepted in (not that he would want to be.) And I found him by far the most interesting and compelling character within the story because he is the only one to really look beyond the boundaries of his own experience and to find it wanting.
So this is a terribly important novel and I can鈥檛 believe I have only just read it. If you haven鈥檛 read it already, you know what you have to do. This isn鈥檛 something to be missed. It鈥檚 a novel that made me think and imagine in a way a book hasn鈥檛 done in quite some time.
___________________________________
You can connect with me on social media via .
__________________________________
These are words uttered in the face of tyranny and complete oppression, though they are very rare words to be spoken or even thought of in this world because every human passion and sense of creativity is repressed and eradicated through a long and complex process of conditioning.
And that鈥檚 what makes this novel so powerful; it鈥檚 not unbelievable. Like Orwell鈥檚 1984 and Atwood鈥檚 The Handmaid鈥檚 Tale, there鈥檚 just enough truth within Brave New World for it to be real. It鈥檚 a cruel mirroring of our own existence, should we follow a certain path too strongly. And that's the wonder of speculative fiction, though unlike the other two books, there鈥檚 no violence involved in Huxley鈥檚 world. It鈥檚 just as controlling and scary, but it鈥檚 done in a more indirect way.
Sex is on tap, everybody should be happy.
People don鈥檛 go missing in the night nor are they stoned to death by a group of their peers, but they have just as little freedom (even if they don鈥檛 realise it.) In this dystopia they are trained from birth to think and feel in a certain way, and, for whatever reason, should they ever deviate from their ordained path, they are fed drugs that induce happiness and serenity; thus, the populace is kept within their desired space, and persist with the tasks they were born to do. Very few of them even consider that this is wrong; this is all they have known. And to make things even more maniacally clever, all physical and sexual needs are fulfilled completely as everybody belongs to everybody else in every sense with the ultimate goal of people never developing desire. All desire should be fulfilled, nobody wants for anything else.
People are machines and houses are factories. They are mass produced and designed to be one thing and one thing only. All values are inverted. The idea of showing any emotion is horrific and repulsive. Love is unknown and alien. Death is associated with sweetness and relief. Children are fed candy when they are thought about death, so they associate the two together, so when as adults they see death they think of treats rather than the loss of someone they have known and worked beside for years.
In Brave New World people are husks, empty and detached, without ever realising it.
-John, the savage, as he enters the new world
I can only admire and praise Huxley鈥檚 genius through the writing. Like all effective dystopian societies, reading and information plays an exceedingly important role. As with Ray Bradbury'sFahrenheit 451, all books have been destroyed and made inaccessible. John, one of the few characters who was born away from the new world, stumbles across a volume of Shakespeare and it changes his life. He can only think and feel in Shakespearean language and begins to view the world through a semi-romantic lens and only finds depravity when he walks into the new world.
It鈥檚 everything he hates. He has been termed the savage, though he knows and understands the real meaning of the term even if those who call him such do not. Naturally, he becomes depressed and isolated in this new space, a space that he cannot be a part of or accepted in (not that he would want to be.) And I found him by far the most interesting and compelling character within the story because he is the only one to really look beyond the boundaries of his own experience and to find it wanting.
So this is a terribly important novel and I can鈥檛 believe I have only just read it. If you haven鈥檛 read it already, you know what you have to do. This isn鈥檛 something to be missed. It鈥檚 a novel that made me think and imagine in a way a book hasn鈥檛 done in quite some time.
___________________________________
You can connect with me on social media via .
__________________________________
February 8, 2010
Aldous Huxley wrote Brave New World in 1932. That's almost eighty years ago, but the book reads like it could have been written yesterday. (especially interesting to me was how Huxley was able to predict the future of both genetic engineering and the action blockbuster. Damn.)
I think I liked this one better than 1984, the book traditionally considered to be this one's counterpart. Not really sure why this is, but it's probably because this one has a clearer outsider character (the Savage) who can view the world Huxley created through his separate perspective.
In this light, I will give the last word to Neil Postman, who discussed the differences between Orwell and Huxley's views of the future:
"What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one.
Orwell feared those who would deprive us information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy.
As Huxley remarked in 'Brave New World revisited,' the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny 'failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions.'
In 'Nineteen Eighty-Four' people are controlled by inflicting pain. In 'Brave New World' people are controlled by inflicting pleasure.
In short, Orwell feared that what we hate will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we love will ruin us."
I think I liked this one better than 1984, the book traditionally considered to be this one's counterpart. Not really sure why this is, but it's probably because this one has a clearer outsider character (the Savage) who can view the world Huxley created through his separate perspective.
In this light, I will give the last word to Neil Postman, who discussed the differences between Orwell and Huxley's views of the future:
"What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one.
Orwell feared those who would deprive us information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy.
As Huxley remarked in 'Brave New World revisited,' the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny 'failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions.'
In 'Nineteen Eighty-Four' people are controlled by inflicting pain. In 'Brave New World' people are controlled by inflicting pleasure.
In short, Orwell feared that what we hate will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we love will ruin us."
May 9, 2018
Wow, the anger over this rating! My first post for this book was a quote and a gif of Dean from Supernatural rolling his eyes and passing out. And people were pissed. How dare I?
Lol. I'm honestly just so tired of all the dumb comments demanding that I (all caps) "ELABORATE". It's been going on for SIX YEARS now. So I will: This is still one of the most boring emotionless books I have ever read. It seemed like a natural choice after I loved Orwell and Atwood but, my god, Huxley is a dry, dull writer.
Another reviewer called this book a "sleeping pill" and that is a fantastic description. After all the hullabaloo with my original post, I borrowed from my local library with the intention of reading it again to give a more detailed review for those freaking out in the comments. And I returned it after suffering through only a few pages. A few years later I got the ebook, thinking I would eventually make it through somehow. But I haven't. It's so mind-numbingly dull. I don't want to do it to myself. was more enjoyable than this book.
Lol. I'm honestly just so tired of all the dumb comments demanding that I (all caps) "ELABORATE". It's been going on for SIX YEARS now. So I will: This is still one of the most boring emotionless books I have ever read. It seemed like a natural choice after I loved Orwell and Atwood but, my god, Huxley is a dry, dull writer.
Another reviewer called this book a "sleeping pill" and that is a fantastic description. After all the hullabaloo with my original post, I borrowed from my local library with the intention of reading it again to give a more detailed review for those freaking out in the comments. And I returned it after suffering through only a few pages. A few years later I got the ebook, thinking I would eventually make it through somehow. But I haven't. It's so mind-numbingly dull. I don't want to do it to myself. was more enjoyable than this book.
May 25, 2008
This book presents a futuristic dystopia of an unusual kind. Unlike in Orwell's 1984, Huxley's dystopia is one in which everyone is happy. However, they are happy in only the most trivial sense: they lead lives of simple pleasures, but lives without science, art, philosophy or religion. In short, lives without deeper meaning. Although people are expected to work hard and efficiently during working hours, during off hours people live in an infantile way, never engaging their minds, and satisfying themselves with sex and drugs.
The premise of the book I find quite interesting. However, the execution is lacking. The characters are not particularly endearing, and indeed they are quite flat. Worse, Huxley fails to explain why this future of controlled contentment is wrong. The reader will intuit that the this indeed a dystopia posing as a utopia, but Huxley's reliance on this feeling is a philosophical failure. It is the burden of the author to present us not with an account of something we know is bad, but to explain the source of the knowledge.
Huxley attempts something akin to an explanation in the second-to-last chapter, a discussion between "the Savage" who grew up outside civilization and Mustalpha Mond, a World Controller. However, the attempt falls short, as Mond has concise answers to all of the Savage's questions, and the Savage lacks the education and/or intellectual power to find reason behind his feelings.
During the conversation, Mond refers to philosopher Francis Bradley and credits him with the idea that philosophy is "the finding of bad reason for what one believes by instinct." Perhaps this inclusion is intended to convey that Huxley agrees and will make no attempt to manufacture a "bad reason" why the world he created is evil. However, I find this deeply unsatisfying. Why write a book to tell people what they already know? Moreover, a single reference to Bradley is not sufficient to convince me that this definition of philosophy is correct. If Huxley's novel relies heavily on this idea, he should have supported it with more than a solitary statement of Mond. Indeed, Mond promptly refutes the statement by denying instinct as separate from conditioning, and as the civilized population of the world seems to be controlled largely by conditioning, it would seem that in Huxley's world, Mond is correct!
In summary, Huxley crafts an interesting future world where people are blithely content without knowing passion or pain. Unfortunately, he fails both to craft an interesting story to set in this world and to write a strong philosophical argument why such a world would be harmful for mankind. He relies on the obvious faults of the world and the intuitive reaction of the reader, and thus provides no deeper insights.
As a social message, as a novel, and as a statement on the way in which mankind should behave, I find Brave New World inferior in almost every way to 1984. The one word of praise I will give to Huxley's novel is that his dystopia is more unusual and more intriguing than Orwell's. If only he had dome something more with it.
The premise of the book I find quite interesting. However, the execution is lacking. The characters are not particularly endearing, and indeed they are quite flat. Worse, Huxley fails to explain why this future of controlled contentment is wrong. The reader will intuit that the this indeed a dystopia posing as a utopia, but Huxley's reliance on this feeling is a philosophical failure. It is the burden of the author to present us not with an account of something we know is bad, but to explain the source of the knowledge.
Huxley attempts something akin to an explanation in the second-to-last chapter, a discussion between "the Savage" who grew up outside civilization and Mustalpha Mond, a World Controller. However, the attempt falls short, as Mond has concise answers to all of the Savage's questions, and the Savage lacks the education and/or intellectual power to find reason behind his feelings.
During the conversation, Mond refers to philosopher Francis Bradley and credits him with the idea that philosophy is "the finding of bad reason for what one believes by instinct." Perhaps this inclusion is intended to convey that Huxley agrees and will make no attempt to manufacture a "bad reason" why the world he created is evil. However, I find this deeply unsatisfying. Why write a book to tell people what they already know? Moreover, a single reference to Bradley is not sufficient to convince me that this definition of philosophy is correct. If Huxley's novel relies heavily on this idea, he should have supported it with more than a solitary statement of Mond. Indeed, Mond promptly refutes the statement by denying instinct as separate from conditioning, and as the civilized population of the world seems to be controlled largely by conditioning, it would seem that in Huxley's world, Mond is correct!
In summary, Huxley crafts an interesting future world where people are blithely content without knowing passion or pain. Unfortunately, he fails both to craft an interesting story to set in this world and to write a strong philosophical argument why such a world would be harmful for mankind. He relies on the obvious faults of the world and the intuitive reaction of the reader, and thus provides no deeper insights.
As a social message, as a novel, and as a statement on the way in which mankind should behave, I find Brave New World inferior in almost every way to 1984. The one word of praise I will give to Huxley's novel is that his dystopia is more unusual and more intriguing than Orwell's. If only he had dome something more with it.
Read
February 29, 2008remember that last semester of english class, senior year, where every class seemed painfully long and excrutiatingly pointless? when everybody sat around secretly thinking of cute and witty things to put in other people's yearbooks? when the teachers realized we were already braindead from filling out three dozen student loan applications and college housing forms? that's when honors english started getting a little lazy.
not that i minded. everybody got a book list. then everybody got split up into groups. you were responsible for reading all the books on your own, but one in particular was chosen for your group to present at the end of the semester. you know--- as a refresher for the rest of the class. because of course EVERYONE was gonna read EVERY book.
i can't remember what i did instead of reading "brave new world", but it was probably fun and involved copious amounts of sweet tea and a gigantic paper mache cow. fortunately it didn't matter because the only group to take their presentation seriously was the "brave new world" group, and the way they presented stuck with me long enough to compel me to read the book later.
maybe it was the weird music they had playing during their presentation, maybe it was the fact that super hot chris mayns had to sit in my group (the alphas) but i was seriously attracted to the world this group created in our classroom. we drew cards randomly to determine our class, then sat accordingly and wore cute little colored wristbands. everybody got pez (soma!) and *gasp* a birth control belt. throughout the presentation people were moved next to someone and lost a packet on their belt (listen, this is scandalous for a bible belt high school, ok? by the way, i did NOT get to sit next to chris, which is probably good because i would have been mortified and choked on a pez)
anyway, the presentation was fun, but i didn't get around to reading my (now ex) boyfriends copy until a year ago. and i started getting a small, evil thought exactly the same as i had in class so many years ago... maybe some people would actually like this system. maybe some people would actually BENEFIT from this system. people don't have to think? they aren't expected to do much, go to college, become something bigger than what they actually are? they're rewarded with good feeling drugs? they are proud to have accomplished what they have? and they... DON'T HAVE TO THINK FOR THEMSELVES!?
I know i'm going to get slammed for saying this later, especially because i never do actual reviews or completely delve into what i'm thinking (so shoot me) but haven't you ever been roaming the world wide inter-web and found a little troller you thought "well, this person is a poor use of a human brain?" yes, you have. admit it.
just think, a little test tube tweaking and that person wouldn't mind manning the cash register at piggly wiggly for the rest of his life, saving the rest of humanity from noxious online rants about the hotness of avril lavinge and the brilliance of starcraft (apparently its a video game thats KOOLER THAN U!!!!1#)
you're tempted, i can tell...
not that i minded. everybody got a book list. then everybody got split up into groups. you were responsible for reading all the books on your own, but one in particular was chosen for your group to present at the end of the semester. you know--- as a refresher for the rest of the class. because of course EVERYONE was gonna read EVERY book.
i can't remember what i did instead of reading "brave new world", but it was probably fun and involved copious amounts of sweet tea and a gigantic paper mache cow. fortunately it didn't matter because the only group to take their presentation seriously was the "brave new world" group, and the way they presented stuck with me long enough to compel me to read the book later.
maybe it was the weird music they had playing during their presentation, maybe it was the fact that super hot chris mayns had to sit in my group (the alphas) but i was seriously attracted to the world this group created in our classroom. we drew cards randomly to determine our class, then sat accordingly and wore cute little colored wristbands. everybody got pez (soma!) and *gasp* a birth control belt. throughout the presentation people were moved next to someone and lost a packet on their belt (listen, this is scandalous for a bible belt high school, ok? by the way, i did NOT get to sit next to chris, which is probably good because i would have been mortified and choked on a pez)
anyway, the presentation was fun, but i didn't get around to reading my (now ex) boyfriends copy until a year ago. and i started getting a small, evil thought exactly the same as i had in class so many years ago... maybe some people would actually like this system. maybe some people would actually BENEFIT from this system. people don't have to think? they aren't expected to do much, go to college, become something bigger than what they actually are? they're rewarded with good feeling drugs? they are proud to have accomplished what they have? and they... DON'T HAVE TO THINK FOR THEMSELVES!?
I know i'm going to get slammed for saying this later, especially because i never do actual reviews or completely delve into what i'm thinking (so shoot me) but haven't you ever been roaming the world wide inter-web and found a little troller you thought "well, this person is a poor use of a human brain?" yes, you have. admit it.
just think, a little test tube tweaking and that person wouldn't mind manning the cash register at piggly wiggly for the rest of his life, saving the rest of humanity from noxious online rants about the hotness of avril lavinge and the brilliance of starcraft (apparently its a video game thats KOOLER THAN U!!!!1#)
you're tempted, i can tell...
April 23, 2024
Ford and Freud鈥� Machinery and sexuality鈥� These cosmic signs rule the world鈥� Consumers and conformists constitute an ideal society鈥�
No more childbirths鈥� Human beings are cloned in batches鈥� Population is strictly divided into castes鈥� Sexual promiscuity flourishes but love is unknown鈥�
鈥淥h, wonder! How many goodly creatures are there here! How beauteous mankind is! O brave new world, that has such people in 鈥榯!鈥� William Shakespeare 鈥� The Tempest
One fine day, from the Mexican Reservation straight into the brave new world, the Savage is brought鈥� In the total isolation, among the uncivilized natives, he thoroughly scrutinized The Complete Works of William Shakespeare and now, infected with the unhealthy poetic ideas, he falls in love鈥� However, the old fiction turns out to be incongruous with the new reality.
Consumerism and conformity鈥� It feels so much like today.
Like aphides and ants, the leaf-green Gamma girls, the black Semi-Morons swarmed round the entrances, or stood in queues to take their places in the monorail tram-cars. Mulberry-coloured Beta-Minuses came and went among the crowd. The roof of the main building was alive with the alighting and departure of helicopters.
No more childbirths鈥� Human beings are cloned in batches鈥� Population is strictly divided into castes鈥� Sexual promiscuity flourishes but love is unknown鈥�
鈥淥h, wonder! How many goodly creatures are there here! How beauteous mankind is! O brave new world, that has such people in 鈥榯!鈥� William Shakespeare 鈥� The Tempest
One fine day, from the Mexican Reservation straight into the brave new world, the Savage is brought鈥� In the total isolation, among the uncivilized natives, he thoroughly scrutinized The Complete Works of William Shakespeare and now, infected with the unhealthy poetic ideas, he falls in love鈥� However, the old fiction turns out to be incongruous with the new reality.
Consumerism and conformity鈥� It feels so much like today.
April 2, 2025
I finally managed to finish the dystopian classics triangle - 1984, Fahrenheit 451 and Brave new World. For me the winner is Brave New World. Although I find the world imagined is less realistic than the other two it is equally tragic.
I finally got that somewhat lost feeling of total happiness when reading a book, that tingle in the pleasure receptors when you find a great book. Even though I recently read many books that I loved I seem to have lost that feeling of satisfaction when being face to face with an IT book. I thought the reason was that I started to read more, a lot more. Before 欧宝娱乐 I used to read 10-15 book/year max so I had more time to enjoy a book, to get lost in it. Although I was happy that I read more and that I managed to finish books that I wanted to read for a long time the intensity of the feelings that reading stir in me had diminished. I am so elated that I can still get immersed in a book with all my being. I am so happy that I realized the problem is not how many books I read but what I read and the relationship I build with that book/author. I鈥檒l keep reading when/what/how much I want to knowing that from time to time (probably once-twice/year) I will find that book that will make me remember why I read.
When I started BNW I thought that it was going to be another one of those books that you know they are a work of art an appreciate them but in the same time are not very pleasant to read. Something like the Hunger by Hamsun or The Stranger by Camus. The beginning was really uncomfortable, especially the descriptions of the embryos and the erotic child games. Brrr. My hair stood up reading that. However, I quickly got absorbed and loved every second spent reading.
I finally got that somewhat lost feeling of total happiness when reading a book, that tingle in the pleasure receptors when you find a great book. Even though I recently read many books that I loved I seem to have lost that feeling of satisfaction when being face to face with an IT book. I thought the reason was that I started to read more, a lot more. Before 欧宝娱乐 I used to read 10-15 book/year max so I had more time to enjoy a book, to get lost in it. Although I was happy that I read more and that I managed to finish books that I wanted to read for a long time the intensity of the feelings that reading stir in me had diminished. I am so elated that I can still get immersed in a book with all my being. I am so happy that I realized the problem is not how many books I read but what I read and the relationship I build with that book/author. I鈥檒l keep reading when/what/how much I want to knowing that from time to time (probably once-twice/year) I will find that book that will make me remember why I read.
When I started BNW I thought that it was going to be another one of those books that you know they are a work of art an appreciate them but in the same time are not very pleasant to read. Something like the Hunger by Hamsun or The Stranger by Camus. The beginning was really uncomfortable, especially the descriptions of the embryos and the erotic child games. Brrr. My hair stood up reading that. However, I quickly got absorbed and loved every second spent reading.
March 16, 2022
I first read Brave New World many years (decades) ago in high school, and I remember thinking it was really interesting at the time. Well, I must have been a doofus back then because this reread just didn't live up to expectations. To be honest, my impression now is that it's all a bit of a mess.
First, who exactly are the main characters here? We start following a few people, but end up focusing on someone else entirely. None of the characters are particularly sympathetic, not even the supposedly enlightened "savage" man from outside this world. And this savage man, even though he had a bit of homeschooling in the middle of nowhere, can converse on a superior level with the Controller of Western Europe upon meeting him. (Cue eye-rolling.)
The story relies heavily on Shakespeare quotes to make its point, often devolving into random ramblings for pages at a time. In a whole chapter devoted to discussions on religion, it clearly implies that turning one's back on religion causes a society to melt down into dystopia. (More eye-rolling.)
And on top of that, the part that annoys me the most is its treatment of the female main character. The "savage" calls her a whore every time he feels attracted to her and goes so far as to physically attack her, since it's obviously her fault for tempting him. I know this was written in the 1930s, so maybe this sort of rape-culture thinking was the norm back then, but it doesn't make reading it now any less offensive.
I'll be generous and give it 3 stars for being a classic with some interesting ideas about dystopian society. But if I were to rank it against books out there today, it's not worth more than 2 stars. Womp womp.
First, who exactly are the main characters here? We start following a few people, but end up focusing on someone else entirely. None of the characters are particularly sympathetic, not even the supposedly enlightened "savage" man from outside this world. And this savage man, even though he had a bit of homeschooling in the middle of nowhere, can converse on a superior level with the Controller of Western Europe upon meeting him. (Cue eye-rolling.)
The story relies heavily on Shakespeare quotes to make its point, often devolving into random ramblings for pages at a time. In a whole chapter devoted to discussions on religion, it clearly implies that turning one's back on religion causes a society to melt down into dystopia. (More eye-rolling.)
And on top of that, the part that annoys me the most is its treatment of the female main character. The "savage" calls her a whore every time he feels attracted to her and goes so far as to physically attack her, since it's obviously her fault for tempting him. I know this was written in the 1930s, so maybe this sort of rape-culture thinking was the norm back then, but it doesn't make reading it now any less offensive.
I'll be generous and give it 3 stars for being a classic with some interesting ideas about dystopian society. But if I were to rank it against books out there today, it's not worth more than 2 stars. Womp womp.
March 10, 2025
Brave New World says as much about Aldous Huxley as it does about our modern world.
Maybe more.
***
When he wrote it, Huxley was in the process of losing his inner child. Darling of the Jet Set, he was the literary version of their current idol, Cole Porter.
And in the end, the sophisticated public鈥檚 jaundiced taste for quick, fun and outr茅 reads made him disposable - to us all.
And worst of all, to his own deep, dreaming subconscious!
Shy, lanky, shortsighted polymath Huxley was born to a family of Eminent Victorians, and was given ample leisure time to read any book he could get his hands on - which was them all.
They would call him a nerd nowadays.
But his reading and shyness disassociated him from the rough-and-tumble world. He had no fixed anchor.
Like so many of us, he had lost his centre of gravity, or had never had one.
But entre-deux-guerres Europe loved him, and adopted him as one of its own. The darling of the Smart Young Things - as the Catholic Waugh tartly put it - he was witty, caustic and irreverent.
He could do no wrong - except in the eyes of social activists, on one side, and believers on the other.
So it was at the midpoint of his career that he took up his pen against the future in Brave New World. If he couldn鈥檛 be serious, he could nevertheless shock.
Problem is, he half-loved his own Utopia. And in later life he moved to the U.S.A. and became an early advocate of the Southern California Lifestyle with its casual gurus and myriad conveniences.
When his beloved wife Maria died of cancer, disconsolate and without moorings, he turned to her much younger caregiver for love - a quality conspicuous by the rarity of its occurrence in his hyper-intellectual heart.
They were married at a no-frills marriage boutique in Nevada. They explored Eastern religions through Vedanta, then a current fad. They attended s茅ances and summoned the ghost of his late wife. But all was not well.
His doctor told him some disturbing news: he was going blind. Losing his sight would be losing his most precious pleasure: reading. So his doctor advised him to frequently rest his eyes, by closing them and then applying light pressure from his palms, gently circling them in a counterclockwise motion.
He was very much a faddish man without roots, and much akin in his casual though refined nature to the citizens of the Brave New World. He Needed to read and write. He was a sensual man who needed his pleasures.
But with the approach of the sixties, he received another grim diagnosis. Cancer of the mouth. He started to compare notes with his friend Stravinsky about their planned abstinence from cigarettes:
The weeds that killed him in the end.
***
Carl Jung used to say that our Shadow will visit us in our dreams if we ignore it in our daily lives...
Huxley bought into the mainstream Freudian POV that the asceticism of the great mystics was mere dumb sexual repression (witness his Late anti-Christian rant entitled The Devils of Loudon - now made newly available on Kindle).
And late in life, close to the time of his own death, Huxley dreamt he was floating in a vast orb containing a marvellous city.
But outside the bubble, brutish crowds were howling with derisive laughter at him - yes, him - the untouchable visionary who penned the great Brave New World!
It鈥檚 like that late photo of him at his misunderstood California friend Stravinsky鈥檚 recording sessions for his own new severely serial and segmented short compositions.
Huxley marvelled at the capacious mind of the composer of the Sacre, but his small-souled trivial brain had no clue of the older man鈥檚 unimpeachable moral integrity.
A wannabe mystic, he was a no-show at the starting gate of Heaven because he could never focus his thoughts long enough to shore up enough justifications for a undying Faith.
He awoke from that dream in a panic.
Poor, dear lost soul that he was, there were times when even Soma wouldn't help...
And in his quest for new utopias, he had left the rough and tumble Faith of ordinary poor workaday, believing sods out of his equation.
For his advanced calculations noisily and brusquely precluded the one and only possible healing panacea for his soul - the Simplicity of the Holy Spirit.
For that鈥檚 ALL he had ever needed, had he understood Stravinsky and the common folk well.
Maybe more.
***
When he wrote it, Huxley was in the process of losing his inner child. Darling of the Jet Set, he was the literary version of their current idol, Cole Porter.
And in the end, the sophisticated public鈥檚 jaundiced taste for quick, fun and outr茅 reads made him disposable - to us all.
And worst of all, to his own deep, dreaming subconscious!
Shy, lanky, shortsighted polymath Huxley was born to a family of Eminent Victorians, and was given ample leisure time to read any book he could get his hands on - which was them all.
They would call him a nerd nowadays.
But his reading and shyness disassociated him from the rough-and-tumble world. He had no fixed anchor.
Like so many of us, he had lost his centre of gravity, or had never had one.
But entre-deux-guerres Europe loved him, and adopted him as one of its own. The darling of the Smart Young Things - as the Catholic Waugh tartly put it - he was witty, caustic and irreverent.
He could do no wrong - except in the eyes of social activists, on one side, and believers on the other.
So it was at the midpoint of his career that he took up his pen against the future in Brave New World. If he couldn鈥檛 be serious, he could nevertheless shock.
Problem is, he half-loved his own Utopia. And in later life he moved to the U.S.A. and became an early advocate of the Southern California Lifestyle with its casual gurus and myriad conveniences.
When his beloved wife Maria died of cancer, disconsolate and without moorings, he turned to her much younger caregiver for love - a quality conspicuous by the rarity of its occurrence in his hyper-intellectual heart.
They were married at a no-frills marriage boutique in Nevada. They explored Eastern religions through Vedanta, then a current fad. They attended s茅ances and summoned the ghost of his late wife. But all was not well.
His doctor told him some disturbing news: he was going blind. Losing his sight would be losing his most precious pleasure: reading. So his doctor advised him to frequently rest his eyes, by closing them and then applying light pressure from his palms, gently circling them in a counterclockwise motion.
He was very much a faddish man without roots, and much akin in his casual though refined nature to the citizens of the Brave New World. He Needed to read and write. He was a sensual man who needed his pleasures.
But with the approach of the sixties, he received another grim diagnosis. Cancer of the mouth. He started to compare notes with his friend Stravinsky about their planned abstinence from cigarettes:
The weeds that killed him in the end.
***
Carl Jung used to say that our Shadow will visit us in our dreams if we ignore it in our daily lives...
Huxley bought into the mainstream Freudian POV that the asceticism of the great mystics was mere dumb sexual repression (witness his Late anti-Christian rant entitled The Devils of Loudon - now made newly available on Kindle).
And late in life, close to the time of his own death, Huxley dreamt he was floating in a vast orb containing a marvellous city.
But outside the bubble, brutish crowds were howling with derisive laughter at him - yes, him - the untouchable visionary who penned the great Brave New World!
It鈥檚 like that late photo of him at his misunderstood California friend Stravinsky鈥檚 recording sessions for his own new severely serial and segmented short compositions.
Huxley marvelled at the capacious mind of the composer of the Sacre, but his small-souled trivial brain had no clue of the older man鈥檚 unimpeachable moral integrity.
A wannabe mystic, he was a no-show at the starting gate of Heaven because he could never focus his thoughts long enough to shore up enough justifications for a undying Faith.
He awoke from that dream in a panic.
Poor, dear lost soul that he was, there were times when even Soma wouldn't help...
And in his quest for new utopias, he had left the rough and tumble Faith of ordinary poor workaday, believing sods out of his equation.
For his advanced calculations noisily and brusquely precluded the one and only possible healing panacea for his soul - the Simplicity of the Holy Spirit.
For that鈥檚 ALL he had ever needed, had he understood Stravinsky and the common folk well.
July 29, 2021
(Book 649 From 1001 Books) - Brave New World, Aldous Huxley
Brave New World is a dystopian novel by English author Aldous Huxley. Published in 1932.
The novel opens in the World State city of London in AF (After Ford) 632 (AD 2540 in the Gregorian calendar), where citizens are engineered through artificial wombs and childhood indoctrination programmes into predetermined classes (or castes) based on intelligence and labor.
Lenina Crowne, a hatchery worker, is popular and sexually desirable, but Bernard Marx, a psychologist, is not.
He is shorter in stature than the average member of his high caste, which gives him an inferiority complex.
His work with sleep-learning allows him to understand, and disapprove of, his society's methods of keeping its citizens peaceful, which includes their constant consumption of a soothing, happiness-producing drug called Soma.
Courting disaster, Bernard is vocal and arrogant about his criticisms, and his boss contemplates exiling him to Iceland because of his nonconformity. His only friend is Helmholtz Watson, a gifted writer who finds it difficult to use his talents creatively in their pain-free society. ...
毓賳賵丕賳賴丕蹖 趩丕倬 卮丿賴 丿乇 丕蹖乇丕賳: 芦丿賳蹖丕蹖 賯卮賳诏 賳賵禄貨 芦丿賳蹖丕蹖 卮诏賮鬲 丕賳诏蹖夭 賳賵禄貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 丌賱丿賵爻 賴丕讴爻賱蹖貨 (倬蹖丕賲 貙 賳蹖賱賵賮乇) 丕丿亘蹖丕鬲貨 鬲丕乇蹖禺 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 禺賵丕賳卮 乇賵夭 爻賵賲 賲丕賴 丌賵乇蹖賱 爻丕賱 2000賲蹖賱丕丿蹖
毓賳賵丕賳: 丿賳蹖丕蹖 賯卮賳诏 賳賵貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 丌賱丿賵爻 賴丕讴爻賱蹖貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 爻毓蹖丿 丨賲蹖丿蹖丕賳貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 倬蹖丕賲貙 1352貨 丿乇 268氐貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇: 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賳卮乇 賵丕跇賴貙 1368貙 丿乇 267氐貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賳蹖賱賵賮乇貙 1378貙 丿乇 295氐貨 卮丕亘讴: 9644480686貨 賲賵囟賵毓: 丿丕爻鬲丕賳賴丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 丕賳诏賱蹖爻蹖 - 爻丿賴 蹖 20賲
毓賳賵丕賳: 丿賳蹖丕蹖 卮诏賮鬲 丕賳诏蹖夭 賳賵貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 丌賱丿賵爻 賴丕讴爻賱蹖貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 丨卮賲鬲 丕賱賱賴 氐亘丕睾蹖貨 丨爻賳 讴丕賵蹖丕乇貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 讴丕乇诏丕賴 賴賳乇貙 1366貨 丿乇 281氐貨
毓賳賵丕賳: 丿賳蹖丕蹖 卮诏賮鬲 丕賳诏蹖夭 賳賵貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 丌賱丿賵爻 賴丕讴爻賱蹖貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 乇囟丕 賮丕胤賲蹖貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 爻賲蹖乇貙 1390貨 丿乇 312氐貨
乇賲丕賳蹖 毓賱賲蹖 鬲禺蹖賱蹖賽 丕爻鬲貙 讴賴 丿乇 爻丕賱 1932賲蹖賱丕丿蹖貙 亘賴 賯賱賲 芦丌賱丿賵爻 賴丕讴爻賱蹖禄貙 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 芦丕賳诏賱蹖爻蹖禄 賲賳鬲卮乇 卮丿賴鈥屫� 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 禺蹖丕賱蹖貙 丿乇亘丕乇賴 蹖 丕蹖賳讴賴 丿乇 爻丕賱 2540賲蹖賱丕丿蹖貙 丕賳爻丕賳賴丕 乇丕 讴丕乇禺丕賳賴 賴丕 鬲賵賱蹖丿貙 賵 丕賵囟丕毓 丿賳蹖丕 孬丕亘鬲 丕爻鬲貙 賵 賲乇丿賲丕賳 禺賵卮亘禺鬲 賴爻鬲賳丿貙 丕夭 倬蹖乇蹖 禺亘乇蹖 賳蹖爻鬲貙 ...貙 賵 丿乇 亘禺卮賴丕蹖 倬丕蹖丕賳蹖貙 芦賴丕讴爻賱蹖禄 亘丕 丿蹖丕賱賵诏賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丕夭 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 賴丕蹖 芦卮讴爻倬蹖乇禄貙 亘丕夭賳诏丕乇蹖 讴乇丿賴 (毓賳賵丕賳 乇賲丕賳 乇丕 賳蹖夭 丕夭 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 芦胤賵賮丕賳禄 丕孬乇 芦賵蹖賱蹖丕賲 卮讴爻倬蹖乇禄 亘乇诏乇賮鬲賴)貙 賵 ...貨 丕賳诏丕乇 賴賳賵夭 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丕丿丕賲賴 丿丕乇丿.貨
賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 亘丕 卮蹖賵賴鈥� 丕蹖 爻乇卮丕乇 丕夭 胤賳夭貙 賵 丌賮乇蹖賳卮賴丕蹖 丕丿亘蹖貙 爻蹖乇 鬲賲丿賳貙 賵 賮乇賴賳诏 賲睾乇亘 夭賲蹖賳 乇丕貙 亘賴 亘丕丿 賳賯丿 賲蹖鈥屭屫辟嗀� 賵 噩賴丕鬲 賲賳賮蹖 賵 夭蹖丕賳賲賳丿 丌賳 乇丕 亘乇丕蹖 噩丕賲毓賴 亘卮乇蹖貙 賵 讴乇丕賲鬲 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 亘丕 賵丕跇賴 賴丕蹖 禺賵蹖卮 賲蹖鈥屫⒇必й屬嗀� 芦賴丕讴爻賱蹖禄 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 乇丕 丿乇 馗乇賮 夭賲丕賳蹖 趩賳丿 氐丿 爻丕賱 倬爻 丕夭 丕賲乇賵夭 丿乇 禺蹖丕賱 禺賵蹖卮 賲蹖鈥屬矩辟堌必� 鬲丕 噩賳亘賴 蹖 倬蹖卮鈥屭堐屰屫� 丿乇 亘丕亘 爻乇卮鬲貙 賵 爻乇賳賵卮鬲 丕賳爻丕賳 丌蹖賳丿賴 乇丕貙 亘賴 禺賵丿 诏蹖乇丿貨 趩賳丕賳讴賴 賲亘丿丕 鬲丕乇蹖禺 乇丕 賳蹖夭 丕夭 乇丕賴 胤賳夭 芦亘.賮 = 亘毓丿 丕夭 賮賵乇丿禄 亘乇賲蹖诏夭蹖賳賳丿貙 夭蹖乇丕貙 丿乇 噩丕賲毓賴 蹖 賲賵乇丿 丕卮丕乇賴 蹖 丕蹖卮丕賳貙 賴賲賴 趩蹖夭 亘乇 賲丿丕乇 讴跇乇丕賴賴 蹖 毓賱賲鈥屫藏屫� 賵 爻賱胤賴 蹖 賲丕卮蹖賳 賯乇丕乇 丿丕乇丿貙 賵 亘蹖鈥屫必屫� 丿乇 趩賳丕賳 噩丕賲毓賴鈥� 丕蹖貙 賳賯卮 倬蹖卮诏丕賲丕賳 乇丕賴 爻毓丕丿鬲 賵 乇爻鬲诏丕乇蹖 亘卮乇貙 丿乇 乇鬲亘賴 蹖 讴爻丕賳蹖 賴賲趩賵賳 芦賴賳乇蹖 賮賵乇丿禄 丌乇賮蹖賳卮诏乇 丕鬲賵賲賵亘蹖賱貙 賮乇賵 讴丕爻鬲賴 卮丿賴貙 賵 丕賳爻丕賳鈥屬囏� 賳蹖夭 亘丕 賴賲賴 蹖 亘夭乇诏賵丕乇蹖鈥屬囏й� 禺賵蹖卮貙 亘賴 丌丿賲讴鈥屬囏й屰� 亘丿賱 賲蹖鈥屭必嗀� 賵 丿乇 趩賳丿 诏乇賵賴 芦丌賱賮丕禄貙 芦亘鬲丕禄貙 芦诏丕賲丕禄 賵 芦丕倬爻蹖賱賵賳禄 亘乇 丨爻亘 賵蹖跇诏蹖鈥屬囏й� 爻丕夭賲丕賳蹖 賵 賳賵毓 丕爻鬲賮丕丿賴鈥� 丕蹖 讴賴 丕夭 賴乇 诏乇賵賴 丕賳鬲馗丕乇 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌� 賴爻鬲賳丿貨 丿乇 賳馗丕賲蹖 丕夭 丕蹖賳 丿爻鬲貙 亘賴鈥� 乇睾賲 丕蹖賳讴賴 賴賲诏蹖 丌丿賲讴鈥屬囏ж� 丿乇 丨賯丕乇鬲 丕卮鬲乇丕讴 丿丕乇賳丿貙 诏乇賵賴 賴丕蹖 诏賵賳丕诏賵賳貙 亘乇 丕爻丕爻 賯賵丕賳蹖賳 爻禺鬲鈥屭屫必з嗁囏� 賵 鬲睾蹖蹖乇賳丕倬匕蹖乇貙 丕夭 賴賲 噩丿丕 诏卮鬲賴貙 賵 亘丕 賳诏乇卮 胤亘賯丕鬲蹖 卮丿蹖丿貙 亘賴 氐賵乇鬲 芦讴丕爻鬲禄 賵 芦丌倬丕乇鬲丕蹖丿禄 丕丿丕乇賴 賲蹖鈥屫促堎嗀� 鬲睾匕蹖賴 蹖 丌賳丕賳 丕夭 乇丕賴 诏賵卮貙 賵 亘賴 蹖丕乇蹖 丿爻鬲诏丕賴鈥屬囏й屰� 氐賵鬲蹖 丕爻鬲貙 讴賴 丕夭 賴賲丕賳 丕亘鬲丿丕蹖 鬲賵賱蹖丿貙 賵 丿乇 卮蹖乇禺賵丕乇诏丕賴貙 亘乇 乇賵蹖 亘丕賱卮 鬲毓亘蹖賴 卮丿賴貙 鬲丕 丿乇 夭賲丕賳 禺賵丕亘貙 鬲賱賯蹖賳丕鬲 亘夭乇诏丕賳 乇丕貙 丿乇 诏賵卮卮丕賳 賮乇賵 禺賵丕賳丿貙 賵 趩賳丕賳 賲賱讴賴 蹖 匕賴賳 丌賳丕賳 卮賵丿貙 讴賴 丌賳 丌賲賵夭賴鈥屬囏� 乇丕貙 賴賲趩賵賳 丿爻鬲诏丕賴 倬禺卮 氐賵鬲貙 亘蹖鈥屫ж必ж� 亘丕夭诏賵 讴賳賳丿貨 丿乇 蹖讴 趩賳蹖賳 噩丕賲毓賴鈥� 丕蹖貙 丕賳爻丕賳 胤亘蹖毓蹖貙 賵 亘乇禺賵乇丿丕乇 丕夭 賲讴丕乇賲 亘卮乇蹖貙 賵 丕賳诏蹖夭賴鈥屬囏й� 胤亘蹖毓蹖貙 賲丨讴賵賲 亘賴 賮賳丕爻鬲貨 賲賳鬲賯丿丕賳 亘乇丌賳賳丿貙 讴賴 芦賴丕讴爻賱蹖禄 亘丕 胤賳夭 鬲賱禺貙 賵 亘丿亘蹖賳丕賳賴 蹖 禺賵蹖卮貙 賴賲 賳馗丕賲鈥屬囏й� 爻乇賲丕蹖賴鈥� 丿丕乇蹖貙 賵 賴賲 丨讴賵賲鬲鈥屬囏й� 芦讴賲賵賳蹖爻鬲蹖禄貙 賵 亘賴 胤賵乇 讴賱蹖 賳馗丕賲鈥屬囏й� 鬲賵鬲丕賱蹖鬲乇 乇丕貙 蹖讴噩丕 丌賲丕噩 丕賳鬲賯丕丿 禺賵蹖卮 賯乇丕乇 丿丕丿賴 丕賳丿貨
鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴賳诏丕賲 乇爻丕賳蹖 24/05/1399賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 06/05/1400賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
Brave New World is a dystopian novel by English author Aldous Huxley. Published in 1932.
The novel opens in the World State city of London in AF (After Ford) 632 (AD 2540 in the Gregorian calendar), where citizens are engineered through artificial wombs and childhood indoctrination programmes into predetermined classes (or castes) based on intelligence and labor.
Lenina Crowne, a hatchery worker, is popular and sexually desirable, but Bernard Marx, a psychologist, is not.
He is shorter in stature than the average member of his high caste, which gives him an inferiority complex.
His work with sleep-learning allows him to understand, and disapprove of, his society's methods of keeping its citizens peaceful, which includes their constant consumption of a soothing, happiness-producing drug called Soma.
Courting disaster, Bernard is vocal and arrogant about his criticisms, and his boss contemplates exiling him to Iceland because of his nonconformity. His only friend is Helmholtz Watson, a gifted writer who finds it difficult to use his talents creatively in their pain-free society. ...
毓賳賵丕賳賴丕蹖 趩丕倬 卮丿賴 丿乇 丕蹖乇丕賳: 芦丿賳蹖丕蹖 賯卮賳诏 賳賵禄貨 芦丿賳蹖丕蹖 卮诏賮鬲 丕賳诏蹖夭 賳賵禄貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 丌賱丿賵爻 賴丕讴爻賱蹖貨 (倬蹖丕賲 貙 賳蹖賱賵賮乇) 丕丿亘蹖丕鬲貨 鬲丕乇蹖禺 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 禺賵丕賳卮 乇賵夭 爻賵賲 賲丕賴 丌賵乇蹖賱 爻丕賱 2000賲蹖賱丕丿蹖
毓賳賵丕賳: 丿賳蹖丕蹖 賯卮賳诏 賳賵貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 丌賱丿賵爻 賴丕讴爻賱蹖貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 爻毓蹖丿 丨賲蹖丿蹖丕賳貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 倬蹖丕賲貙 1352貨 丿乇 268氐貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇: 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賳卮乇 賵丕跇賴貙 1368貙 丿乇 267氐貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賳蹖賱賵賮乇貙 1378貙 丿乇 295氐貨 卮丕亘讴: 9644480686貨 賲賵囟賵毓: 丿丕爻鬲丕賳賴丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 丕賳诏賱蹖爻蹖 - 爻丿賴 蹖 20賲
毓賳賵丕賳: 丿賳蹖丕蹖 卮诏賮鬲 丕賳诏蹖夭 賳賵貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 丌賱丿賵爻 賴丕讴爻賱蹖貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 丨卮賲鬲 丕賱賱賴 氐亘丕睾蹖貨 丨爻賳 讴丕賵蹖丕乇貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 讴丕乇诏丕賴 賴賳乇貙 1366貨 丿乇 281氐貨
毓賳賵丕賳: 丿賳蹖丕蹖 卮诏賮鬲 丕賳诏蹖夭 賳賵貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 丌賱丿賵爻 賴丕讴爻賱蹖貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 乇囟丕 賮丕胤賲蹖貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 爻賲蹖乇貙 1390貨 丿乇 312氐貨
乇賲丕賳蹖 毓賱賲蹖 鬲禺蹖賱蹖賽 丕爻鬲貙 讴賴 丿乇 爻丕賱 1932賲蹖賱丕丿蹖貙 亘賴 賯賱賲 芦丌賱丿賵爻 賴丕讴爻賱蹖禄貙 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 芦丕賳诏賱蹖爻蹖禄 賲賳鬲卮乇 卮丿賴鈥屫� 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 禺蹖丕賱蹖貙 丿乇亘丕乇賴 蹖 丕蹖賳讴賴 丿乇 爻丕賱 2540賲蹖賱丕丿蹖貙 丕賳爻丕賳賴丕 乇丕 讴丕乇禺丕賳賴 賴丕 鬲賵賱蹖丿貙 賵 丕賵囟丕毓 丿賳蹖丕 孬丕亘鬲 丕爻鬲貙 賵 賲乇丿賲丕賳 禺賵卮亘禺鬲 賴爻鬲賳丿貙 丕夭 倬蹖乇蹖 禺亘乇蹖 賳蹖爻鬲貙 ...貙 賵 丿乇 亘禺卮賴丕蹖 倬丕蹖丕賳蹖貙 芦賴丕讴爻賱蹖禄 亘丕 丿蹖丕賱賵诏賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丕夭 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 賴丕蹖 芦卮讴爻倬蹖乇禄貙 亘丕夭賳诏丕乇蹖 讴乇丿賴 (毓賳賵丕賳 乇賲丕賳 乇丕 賳蹖夭 丕夭 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 芦胤賵賮丕賳禄 丕孬乇 芦賵蹖賱蹖丕賲 卮讴爻倬蹖乇禄 亘乇诏乇賮鬲賴)貙 賵 ...貨 丕賳诏丕乇 賴賳賵夭 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丕丿丕賲賴 丿丕乇丿.貨
賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 亘丕 卮蹖賵賴鈥� 丕蹖 爻乇卮丕乇 丕夭 胤賳夭貙 賵 丌賮乇蹖賳卮賴丕蹖 丕丿亘蹖貙 爻蹖乇 鬲賲丿賳貙 賵 賮乇賴賳诏 賲睾乇亘 夭賲蹖賳 乇丕貙 亘賴 亘丕丿 賳賯丿 賲蹖鈥屭屫辟嗀� 賵 噩賴丕鬲 賲賳賮蹖 賵 夭蹖丕賳賲賳丿 丌賳 乇丕 亘乇丕蹖 噩丕賲毓賴 亘卮乇蹖貙 賵 讴乇丕賲鬲 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 亘丕 賵丕跇賴 賴丕蹖 禺賵蹖卮 賲蹖鈥屫⒇必й屬嗀� 芦賴丕讴爻賱蹖禄 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 乇丕 丿乇 馗乇賮 夭賲丕賳蹖 趩賳丿 氐丿 爻丕賱 倬爻 丕夭 丕賲乇賵夭 丿乇 禺蹖丕賱 禺賵蹖卮 賲蹖鈥屬矩辟堌必� 鬲丕 噩賳亘賴 蹖 倬蹖卮鈥屭堐屰屫� 丿乇 亘丕亘 爻乇卮鬲貙 賵 爻乇賳賵卮鬲 丕賳爻丕賳 丌蹖賳丿賴 乇丕貙 亘賴 禺賵丿 诏蹖乇丿貨 趩賳丕賳讴賴 賲亘丿丕 鬲丕乇蹖禺 乇丕 賳蹖夭 丕夭 乇丕賴 胤賳夭 芦亘.賮 = 亘毓丿 丕夭 賮賵乇丿禄 亘乇賲蹖诏夭蹖賳賳丿貙 夭蹖乇丕貙 丿乇 噩丕賲毓賴 蹖 賲賵乇丿 丕卮丕乇賴 蹖 丕蹖卮丕賳貙 賴賲賴 趩蹖夭 亘乇 賲丿丕乇 讴跇乇丕賴賴 蹖 毓賱賲鈥屫藏屫� 賵 爻賱胤賴 蹖 賲丕卮蹖賳 賯乇丕乇 丿丕乇丿貙 賵 亘蹖鈥屫必屫� 丿乇 趩賳丕賳 噩丕賲毓賴鈥� 丕蹖貙 賳賯卮 倬蹖卮诏丕賲丕賳 乇丕賴 爻毓丕丿鬲 賵 乇爻鬲诏丕乇蹖 亘卮乇貙 丿乇 乇鬲亘賴 蹖 讴爻丕賳蹖 賴賲趩賵賳 芦賴賳乇蹖 賮賵乇丿禄 丌乇賮蹖賳卮诏乇 丕鬲賵賲賵亘蹖賱貙 賮乇賵 讴丕爻鬲賴 卮丿賴貙 賵 丕賳爻丕賳鈥屬囏� 賳蹖夭 亘丕 賴賲賴 蹖 亘夭乇诏賵丕乇蹖鈥屬囏й� 禺賵蹖卮貙 亘賴 丌丿賲讴鈥屬囏й屰� 亘丿賱 賲蹖鈥屭必嗀� 賵 丿乇 趩賳丿 诏乇賵賴 芦丌賱賮丕禄貙 芦亘鬲丕禄貙 芦诏丕賲丕禄 賵 芦丕倬爻蹖賱賵賳禄 亘乇 丨爻亘 賵蹖跇诏蹖鈥屬囏й� 爻丕夭賲丕賳蹖 賵 賳賵毓 丕爻鬲賮丕丿賴鈥� 丕蹖 讴賴 丕夭 賴乇 诏乇賵賴 丕賳鬲馗丕乇 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌� 賴爻鬲賳丿貨 丿乇 賳馗丕賲蹖 丕夭 丕蹖賳 丿爻鬲貙 亘賴鈥� 乇睾賲 丕蹖賳讴賴 賴賲诏蹖 丌丿賲讴鈥屬囏ж� 丿乇 丨賯丕乇鬲 丕卮鬲乇丕讴 丿丕乇賳丿貙 诏乇賵賴 賴丕蹖 诏賵賳丕诏賵賳貙 亘乇 丕爻丕爻 賯賵丕賳蹖賳 爻禺鬲鈥屭屫必з嗁囏� 賵 鬲睾蹖蹖乇賳丕倬匕蹖乇貙 丕夭 賴賲 噩丿丕 诏卮鬲賴貙 賵 亘丕 賳诏乇卮 胤亘賯丕鬲蹖 卮丿蹖丿貙 亘賴 氐賵乇鬲 芦讴丕爻鬲禄 賵 芦丌倬丕乇鬲丕蹖丿禄 丕丿丕乇賴 賲蹖鈥屫促堎嗀� 鬲睾匕蹖賴 蹖 丌賳丕賳 丕夭 乇丕賴 诏賵卮貙 賵 亘賴 蹖丕乇蹖 丿爻鬲诏丕賴鈥屬囏й屰� 氐賵鬲蹖 丕爻鬲貙 讴賴 丕夭 賴賲丕賳 丕亘鬲丿丕蹖 鬲賵賱蹖丿貙 賵 丿乇 卮蹖乇禺賵丕乇诏丕賴貙 亘乇 乇賵蹖 亘丕賱卮 鬲毓亘蹖賴 卮丿賴貙 鬲丕 丿乇 夭賲丕賳 禺賵丕亘貙 鬲賱賯蹖賳丕鬲 亘夭乇诏丕賳 乇丕貙 丿乇 诏賵卮卮丕賳 賮乇賵 禺賵丕賳丿貙 賵 趩賳丕賳 賲賱讴賴 蹖 匕賴賳 丌賳丕賳 卮賵丿貙 讴賴 丌賳 丌賲賵夭賴鈥屬囏� 乇丕貙 賴賲趩賵賳 丿爻鬲诏丕賴 倬禺卮 氐賵鬲貙 亘蹖鈥屫ж必ж� 亘丕夭诏賵 讴賳賳丿貨 丿乇 蹖讴 趩賳蹖賳 噩丕賲毓賴鈥� 丕蹖貙 丕賳爻丕賳 胤亘蹖毓蹖貙 賵 亘乇禺賵乇丿丕乇 丕夭 賲讴丕乇賲 亘卮乇蹖貙 賵 丕賳诏蹖夭賴鈥屬囏й� 胤亘蹖毓蹖貙 賲丨讴賵賲 亘賴 賮賳丕爻鬲貨 賲賳鬲賯丿丕賳 亘乇丌賳賳丿貙 讴賴 芦賴丕讴爻賱蹖禄 亘丕 胤賳夭 鬲賱禺貙 賵 亘丿亘蹖賳丕賳賴 蹖 禺賵蹖卮貙 賴賲 賳馗丕賲鈥屬囏й� 爻乇賲丕蹖賴鈥� 丿丕乇蹖貙 賵 賴賲 丨讴賵賲鬲鈥屬囏й� 芦讴賲賵賳蹖爻鬲蹖禄貙 賵 亘賴 胤賵乇 讴賱蹖 賳馗丕賲鈥屬囏й� 鬲賵鬲丕賱蹖鬲乇 乇丕貙 蹖讴噩丕 丌賲丕噩 丕賳鬲賯丕丿 禺賵蹖卮 賯乇丕乇 丿丕丿賴 丕賳丿貨
鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴賳诏丕賲 乇爻丕賳蹖 24/05/1399賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 06/05/1400賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
October 3, 2024
Brave New World is the sort of book about which you have to speak for hours or hardly speak at all. It is jolting, disturbing, and fiercely dislocating. I didn鈥檛 want to read it half the time and was almost limp with relief when it was over. Yet, I suspect this is not a story one can ever completely shake loose.
Huxley鈥檚 vision of the future in Brave New World is far from optimistic. The novel imagines us forward into a world that has brutally stamped out all challenges to the domineering processes of capitalism and oppression. A world not unlike our world, but rather, is the extreme of its logic.
The future as Huxley imagines it spells an essential and cataclysmic rupture in the fundament of community and intimacy, determined as it is by a ruthless will to mute the suffering of others and fix them into inferiority and helplessness. It is a future so completely dehumanized that it corrodes freedom, so uncaring that it literally breaks us down, breaks our families apart, breaks our minds and bodies apart.
This is a book so uncannily tuned to the present moment that it made me ill with fear at the thought of it. Huxley鈥檚 clarity of vision crosses more than ninety years to beg us to change the way we understand the world and treat each other. In Brave New World, Huxley engages a critical stance towards the very idea of 鈥減rogress鈥� and the destructive lies that lurk within its dominant discourses. Progress, the novel demonstrates, is never without human consequences. The history of progress, in fact, is one of specific and contextualized human destruction. Huxley鈥檚 engagement with the dangers attached to our dismissal of progress鈥檚 twin potential for hope and horror crystallizes the terrible danger hanging over our own world, distorted and dazzled by the forces of capitalism and white supremacy.
Yet, the novel isn鈥檛 interested in tediously moralizing about the wrongs we do to each other and to the world. Instead, it is invested in something much deeper, much harder to parse. There is a strong sense, throughout Brave New World, of moral critique and intellectual complexity. The questions as raised by the novel may be put in this way: What happens when we disconnect ourselves from a past that still informs our present terrors鈥攁nd obliterate history? What happens when we stop caring about the world and about each other? Huxley refines these questions鈥攁bout the nature of history and life and being human鈥攁nd makes knives of them.
It is hard for many of us, I think, to understand and imagine beyond forms of being-in-the-world that are not completely encompassed by the narrative of 鈥減rogress.鈥� We are constantly pushed to shed the past and disregard history, to seek a surplus of comfort and be suspicious of the unknowable. But our biggest mistake, the novel tells us, has been accepting to be addressed only in this impoverished idiom, and to suffer quietly the resulting atrophy of the imagination. Brave New World begs us to struggle for alternative ways of life. In challenging our understanding of history and the past, it emboldens us to think more deeply about the deep-seated dialectic between progress and racism, between progress and the patriarchy, about the oppression of the individual through language, and the tenacity of the role of culture in social domination. In disturbing us, it reminds us of all we are in danger of losing: recognition and community and our very humanity.
Through all the layers of large and small violences in Brave New World emerges a voice that testifies to the power of art, literature, and the imagination as defenses against the psychic costs of oppression and despair; emerges a kind of mutiny, a grasping at 鈥淕od鈥� poetry鈥� real danger鈥� freedom鈥� goodness鈥� sin鈥� which is, at bottom, a grasping at our lives.
Huxley鈥檚 vision of the future in Brave New World is far from optimistic. The novel imagines us forward into a world that has brutally stamped out all challenges to the domineering processes of capitalism and oppression. A world not unlike our world, but rather, is the extreme of its logic.
The future as Huxley imagines it spells an essential and cataclysmic rupture in the fundament of community and intimacy, determined as it is by a ruthless will to mute the suffering of others and fix them into inferiority and helplessness. It is a future so completely dehumanized that it corrodes freedom, so uncaring that it literally breaks us down, breaks our families apart, breaks our minds and bodies apart.
This is a book so uncannily tuned to the present moment that it made me ill with fear at the thought of it. Huxley鈥檚 clarity of vision crosses more than ninety years to beg us to change the way we understand the world and treat each other. In Brave New World, Huxley engages a critical stance towards the very idea of 鈥減rogress鈥� and the destructive lies that lurk within its dominant discourses. Progress, the novel demonstrates, is never without human consequences. The history of progress, in fact, is one of specific and contextualized human destruction. Huxley鈥檚 engagement with the dangers attached to our dismissal of progress鈥檚 twin potential for hope and horror crystallizes the terrible danger hanging over our own world, distorted and dazzled by the forces of capitalism and white supremacy.
Yet, the novel isn鈥檛 interested in tediously moralizing about the wrongs we do to each other and to the world. Instead, it is invested in something much deeper, much harder to parse. There is a strong sense, throughout Brave New World, of moral critique and intellectual complexity. The questions as raised by the novel may be put in this way: What happens when we disconnect ourselves from a past that still informs our present terrors鈥攁nd obliterate history? What happens when we stop caring about the world and about each other? Huxley refines these questions鈥攁bout the nature of history and life and being human鈥攁nd makes knives of them.
It is hard for many of us, I think, to understand and imagine beyond forms of being-in-the-world that are not completely encompassed by the narrative of 鈥減rogress.鈥� We are constantly pushed to shed the past and disregard history, to seek a surplus of comfort and be suspicious of the unknowable. But our biggest mistake, the novel tells us, has been accepting to be addressed only in this impoverished idiom, and to suffer quietly the resulting atrophy of the imagination. Brave New World begs us to struggle for alternative ways of life. In challenging our understanding of history and the past, it emboldens us to think more deeply about the deep-seated dialectic between progress and racism, between progress and the patriarchy, about the oppression of the individual through language, and the tenacity of the role of culture in social domination. In disturbing us, it reminds us of all we are in danger of losing: recognition and community and our very humanity.
Through all the layers of large and small violences in Brave New World emerges a voice that testifies to the power of art, literature, and the imagination as defenses against the psychic costs of oppression and despair; emerges a kind of mutiny, a grasping at 鈥淕od鈥� poetry鈥� real danger鈥� freedom鈥� goodness鈥� sin鈥� which is, at bottom, a grasping at our lives.
鈥淏ut I don't want comfort. I want God, I want poetry, I want real danger, I want freedom, I want goodness. I want sin.鈥�
January 30, 2020
This set the stage about what a dystopian story should be or not be.
鈥淏ut I don't want comfort. I want God, I want poetry, I want real danger, I want freedom, I want goodness. I want sin.鈥�
First published in 1932, this is timeless and is as relevant today as when it was first written. Sixteen years before Orwell's but eleven years after by , this is a high water mark for the genre, many of its themes could be told today. Truth be said, this could be published today and would be just as good, it rises to the challenge and then towers above it.
鈥淚f one's different, one's bound to be lonely.鈥�
Everyday life makes me think of this book all the time. Huxley does more than describe a bleak and cynical post-apocalyptic or dystopian world, he looks a dystopian resident in the eye and puts before him a mirror to flesh out what is real and unreal. Further, Huxley has turned that same mirror on the reader and we see in his far future fantasy a reality that could be today. Huxley reveals that the seeds of Mustafa Mond and his ilk have fertile ground in our culture and in our souls.
鈥淣o social stability without individual stability.鈥�
Finally, Huxely provides a glimpse behind the curtain, we see the false wizard in his machinations. The world that has been crafted for the denizens of Huxley's nightmare landscape is explained fully and matter-of-factly by Mond. Huxley's sermon is delivered as stoically and deterministically as Jonathon Edwards "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God".
"You all remember, I suppose, that beautiful and inspired saying of Our Ford's: History is bunk."
A must read.
*** 2020 Re-read:
Reading this brilliant work after a few years only just reminded me of not only what an exceptional book it is, but of also how important it is in literature.
鈥淚n 1999, the Modern Library ranked Brave New World as #5 on its list of the 100 best English-language novels of the 20th century. In 2003, Robert McCrum, writing for The Observer, included Brave New World chronologically at #53 in "the top 100 greatest novels of all time", and the novel was listed at #87 on The Big Read survey by the BBC.鈥�
- Wikipedia
Huxley was greatly affected and influenced by economic events in the England of the 1920s and of the need for stability, but at what cost? A trip to America and an exploration of Henry Ford鈥檚 autobiography My Life and Work further led him towards the centralized and industrialized world that he created in BNW.
Huxley, perhaps more so than Orwell, has crafted a domain wherein the individual has succumbed to the will of the state. But Huxley鈥檚 vision is more subtle and therefore more insidious 鈥� the citizens of Huxley鈥檚 dystopia are brainwashed and seem genuinely happy. The dehumanizing automation of births and families as well as the somnambulist / hypnotic effects of Soma further create a scenario where out traditional attitudes of right and wring have been displaced.
Most of all in this reading is the characterization of John and of his juxtaposition with him as a product of the savage reservation and of his alienation in the London of the brave new world. In John, Huxley has created a shadow of Miranda from The Tempest, and the civilization he finds is one that he ultimately rejects in favor of the most extreme form of individual choice.
Timeless and important.
鈥淏ut I don't want comfort. I want God, I want poetry, I want real danger, I want freedom, I want goodness. I want sin.鈥�
First published in 1932, this is timeless and is as relevant today as when it was first written. Sixteen years before Orwell's but eleven years after by , this is a high water mark for the genre, many of its themes could be told today. Truth be said, this could be published today and would be just as good, it rises to the challenge and then towers above it.
鈥淚f one's different, one's bound to be lonely.鈥�
Everyday life makes me think of this book all the time. Huxley does more than describe a bleak and cynical post-apocalyptic or dystopian world, he looks a dystopian resident in the eye and puts before him a mirror to flesh out what is real and unreal. Further, Huxley has turned that same mirror on the reader and we see in his far future fantasy a reality that could be today. Huxley reveals that the seeds of Mustafa Mond and his ilk have fertile ground in our culture and in our souls.
鈥淣o social stability without individual stability.鈥�
Finally, Huxely provides a glimpse behind the curtain, we see the false wizard in his machinations. The world that has been crafted for the denizens of Huxley's nightmare landscape is explained fully and matter-of-factly by Mond. Huxley's sermon is delivered as stoically and deterministically as Jonathon Edwards "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God".
"You all remember, I suppose, that beautiful and inspired saying of Our Ford's: History is bunk."
A must read.
*** 2020 Re-read:
Reading this brilliant work after a few years only just reminded me of not only what an exceptional book it is, but of also how important it is in literature.
鈥淚n 1999, the Modern Library ranked Brave New World as #5 on its list of the 100 best English-language novels of the 20th century. In 2003, Robert McCrum, writing for The Observer, included Brave New World chronologically at #53 in "the top 100 greatest novels of all time", and the novel was listed at #87 on The Big Read survey by the BBC.鈥�
- Wikipedia
Huxley was greatly affected and influenced by economic events in the England of the 1920s and of the need for stability, but at what cost? A trip to America and an exploration of Henry Ford鈥檚 autobiography My Life and Work further led him towards the centralized and industrialized world that he created in BNW.
Huxley, perhaps more so than Orwell, has crafted a domain wherein the individual has succumbed to the will of the state. But Huxley鈥檚 vision is more subtle and therefore more insidious 鈥� the citizens of Huxley鈥檚 dystopia are brainwashed and seem genuinely happy. The dehumanizing automation of births and families as well as the somnambulist / hypnotic effects of Soma further create a scenario where out traditional attitudes of right and wring have been displaced.
Most of all in this reading is the characterization of John and of his juxtaposition with him as a product of the savage reservation and of his alienation in the London of the brave new world. In John, Huxley has created a shadow of Miranda from The Tempest, and the civilization he finds is one that he ultimately rejects in favor of the most extreme form of individual choice.
Timeless and important.
February 6, 2022
Now that麓s how good fordshipping alphas, betas, and the unimportant, stupid, but still necessary other lower castes, like to roll.
It don麓t always have to be annoying secret police death squads kicking ones麓 door at 3 am to usher one into torture prisons and detention, reeducation, and extermination camps, it can be much more subtle and less bloody too. Like in real, nowadays Western democracies for instance.
Drugs
Soma could be seen as a metaphor for everything, all the free and prescription drugs everyone from kid to grandpa is boosted with, or as all the coincidental side effects of all the chemicals and poisons food and environment provide for the modern human.
Sex
What麓s better than getting horny high as hell
so the government wants their citizens as fu**ed up as possible to let them better deal with life in general and absolutely not care about who is ruling over them. Best combined with flaming monogamy to stigmatize possible, alternative ways of finding happiness like love or a great, deep relationship with friends and family.
Media
All propaganda and forced into line, controlled by conglomerates and the military industrial complex with their sockpuppet politicians driveling manufacturing consent. But I began thinking about the fact that streaming and the incredible world of 4K and 8K old school media and VR is just the beginning and one can imagine how this might look in 100 or multi k years. People who are still free to choose will prefer the perfect, forever, simulated utopia to reality and many won麓t even have the chance to realize that they麓re manipulated or living in a kind of simulation, because the perfection of how the system is run leaves no room for bugs and glitches that could make them suspicious. That was a bit off topic, back to the show.
Good upbringing
To make sure that nobody avoids the first 3, special prenatal, baby, and child treatment methods are implemented to get what麓s needed for the right purpose of breeding cheerful idiots. Not more or less of something that麓s essential for the perfect functioning of the world government that once was a single state. Nice innuendo so socioeconomic status defining the worth of everyone and the lovely side effects of eugenics implemented, without biotech, but much medtech.
Drugs, sex, media, and good upbringing together make good sheeps
All together leads to the happy slave tragedy, that people are completely satisfied with their life and not even noticing what麓s really going on. The perfect, forever dictatorship, one could also call it the end of history with, totally realistic, endless, exponential, economic growth in liberal democracies.
Similar stuff
I麓ll add this to my somewhen, procrastination caused postponed, review of 1984 too. If you麓re a time traveler, you might have already seen it.
Besides Brave new world, Karel Capeks麓
/book/show/8...
dark, disturbing masterpiece is possibly one of the best dystopian terror pieces. It麓s focusing on the role of big money and industry, of innocence turned into the same evil it suffers, was written in 1936 and satirizes Germans, Japanese, Russians, societies, ideologies, and economy in general and is a timeless memorial against political and economic terrorism and extremism of any kind.
Aldous Huxley, duh, was Orwells麓 college professor and they definitively inspired and mentally inseminated another to form these brave new worlds.
Zamyatin Yevgenys麓 We is another, historical extremely interesting piece, although just not as famous and fancy as the others, kind of the same problem as with the underappreciated Capek.
/book/show/7...
An extremely difficult to read one is Stand on Zanzibar by John Brunner
/book/show/4...
which comes very close to Huxleys麓 ideas, but is much darker.
Some more dark and/ or satiric tones:
/book/show/3...
/book/show/4...
A similar idea by the master of philosophical, satirical sci-fi, the great, unique Lem:
/book/show/7...
There have been so many deep, detailed thoughts about how to install the best dictatorship ever, and give aspiring god emperors some tips on the way to total world domination, that don麓t get appreciated enough because Huxley and Orwell are ruling the dystopic genre. How ironic.
Tropes show how literature is conceptualized and created and which mixture of elements makes works and genres unique:
It don麓t always have to be annoying secret police death squads kicking ones麓 door at 3 am to usher one into torture prisons and detention, reeducation, and extermination camps, it can be much more subtle and less bloody too. Like in real, nowadays Western democracies for instance.
Drugs
Soma could be seen as a metaphor for everything, all the free and prescription drugs everyone from kid to grandpa is boosted with, or as all the coincidental side effects of all the chemicals and poisons food and environment provide for the modern human.
Sex
What麓s better than getting horny high as hell
so the government wants their citizens as fu**ed up as possible to let them better deal with life in general and absolutely not care about who is ruling over them. Best combined with flaming monogamy to stigmatize possible, alternative ways of finding happiness like love or a great, deep relationship with friends and family.
Media
All propaganda and forced into line, controlled by conglomerates and the military industrial complex with their sockpuppet politicians driveling manufacturing consent. But I began thinking about the fact that streaming and the incredible world of 4K and 8K old school media and VR is just the beginning and one can imagine how this might look in 100 or multi k years. People who are still free to choose will prefer the perfect, forever, simulated utopia to reality and many won麓t even have the chance to realize that they麓re manipulated or living in a kind of simulation, because the perfection of how the system is run leaves no room for bugs and glitches that could make them suspicious. That was a bit off topic, back to the show.
Good upbringing
To make sure that nobody avoids the first 3, special prenatal, baby, and child treatment methods are implemented to get what麓s needed for the right purpose of breeding cheerful idiots. Not more or less of something that麓s essential for the perfect functioning of the world government that once was a single state. Nice innuendo so socioeconomic status defining the worth of everyone and the lovely side effects of eugenics implemented, without biotech, but much medtech.
Drugs, sex, media, and good upbringing together make good sheeps
All together leads to the happy slave tragedy, that people are completely satisfied with their life and not even noticing what麓s really going on. The perfect, forever dictatorship, one could also call it the end of history with, totally realistic, endless, exponential, economic growth in liberal democracies.
Similar stuff
I麓ll add this to my somewhen, procrastination caused postponed, review of 1984 too. If you麓re a time traveler, you might have already seen it.
Besides Brave new world, Karel Capeks麓
/book/show/8...
dark, disturbing masterpiece is possibly one of the best dystopian terror pieces. It麓s focusing on the role of big money and industry, of innocence turned into the same evil it suffers, was written in 1936 and satirizes Germans, Japanese, Russians, societies, ideologies, and economy in general and is a timeless memorial against political and economic terrorism and extremism of any kind.
Aldous Huxley, duh, was Orwells麓 college professor and they definitively inspired and mentally inseminated another to form these brave new worlds.
Zamyatin Yevgenys麓 We is another, historical extremely interesting piece, although just not as famous and fancy as the others, kind of the same problem as with the underappreciated Capek.
/book/show/7...
An extremely difficult to read one is Stand on Zanzibar by John Brunner
/book/show/4...
which comes very close to Huxleys麓 ideas, but is much darker.
Some more dark and/ or satiric tones:
/book/show/3...
/book/show/4...
A similar idea by the master of philosophical, satirical sci-fi, the great, unique Lem:
/book/show/7...
There have been so many deep, detailed thoughts about how to install the best dictatorship ever, and give aspiring god emperors some tips on the way to total world domination, that don麓t get appreciated enough because Huxley and Orwell are ruling the dystopic genre. How ironic.
Tropes show how literature is conceptualized and created and which mixture of elements makes works and genres unique:
February 1, 2021
Brave New World is a young man's novel, written in the interwar years. Huxley was then living in a collapsing world: a world where the optimist 19th-century dreams of progress, of improved humanity, of a new and superior man, had been shattered in the trench warfare of World War I and were about to be burned amidst the horrors of the concentration camps.
Huxley seems to be sensing that grave danger is looming on the horizon, and he imagines a utopia where a single superstate is ruling the whole planet. The dream of a 鈥渟uperior humanity鈥� has eventually come true, thanks to the extensive use of eugenics and mass cloning (babies in bottles). Not all people get the best genetic formula, however: some of these manufactured humans are reduced to imbecility, perform the lowest functions, and are nonetheless content with their lot. Children, of course, are all brainwashed and conditioned with hypnotic techniques (sleep teaching). There are no families anymore, and sexual promiscuity is pervasive. Adults get a further supply of silly entertainment (Feelies) and drugs (Soma) that renders them docile, keeps them young, and make them love their voluntary servitude. People have lost interest in art and science, and religion has been replaced by Henry Ford鈥檚 cult (i.e. assembly line applied to human beings) and occasional orgiastic ceremonies (orgy-porgies). In short, humanity has achieved happiness and reached the End of History.
To some extent, Huxley鈥檚 prophecies have become a reality, less than a century later: rational, hierarchical, hyper-efficient and optimised capitalism and cheery consumerism have conquered most of the world. The sexual revolution has indeed taken place 鈥� although full sexual libertarianism is still a pipe dream. Pharmacopoeia, narcotics, antidepressants, tranquillisers and rejuvenating treatments are broadly available; as well as irrelevant and mind-numbing 3D entertainment, peppered with commercial slogans. Genetic engineering and biotechnology are everywhere (although not used to select humans as yet).
Brave New World is a novel structured around a set of (rather crude) characters and plots; there is, however, no clear protagonist. Huxley has a witty tongue-in-cheek sense of humour throughout. Some passages even have a purely poetic or musical quality: particularly through the use of 鈥檚 lines for the character of John Savage, or the cross-cutting technique employed in chapter 3. But by and large, the book feels like a philosophical essay or social satire, in the style of Voltaire鈥檚 or Swift鈥檚 . Obviously, Huxley had Plato鈥檚 in mind, when designing his Alpha / B锚ta / Gamma / Delta / Epsilon caste system (he was probably also referring to the school grades: A+ to F, already in use when he was a pupil at Eton College, or even to the caste system in India). Certainly, he remembered Nietzsche鈥檚 鈥�Letzte Mensch鈥� from 鈥檚 prologue: a human type that has indeed invented happiness, comfort and social stability, but ultimately a petty and lethargic sort of humankind. A type of humanity that might well be appealing to us right now, who knows鈥�
Brave New World is obviously a fascinating political statement that spoke to the European crisis of the 1930s. But its visionary impact and influence on speculative fiction cannot be overstated, from Orwell鈥檚 to Bradbury鈥檚 , to Atwood's , and to Houellebecq鈥檚 .
See also my review of Brave New World Revisited.
Edit: Watched Universal鈥檚 2020 . It is by and large faithful to the novel鈥檚 plot and characters, but ends up taking more and more liberties as the episodes go by. It鈥檚 also focusing way more on the entertainment potential of the book (especially the erotica aspects of the orgy-porgies) than on the political debate around the problem of happiness vs freedom. All references to Shakespeare have been removed as well, although the romance is a central part of the show (not so much in the book). Ultimately, Huxley鈥檚 philosophical novel serves as the rib cage of the series, but its heart is more like Black Mirror, Westworld, The Matrix or even Fritz Lang鈥檚 Metropolis. Nonetheless, a pleasant 鈥渇eely鈥� with some nice eye candy!
Huxley seems to be sensing that grave danger is looming on the horizon, and he imagines a utopia where a single superstate is ruling the whole planet. The dream of a 鈥渟uperior humanity鈥� has eventually come true, thanks to the extensive use of eugenics and mass cloning (babies in bottles). Not all people get the best genetic formula, however: some of these manufactured humans are reduced to imbecility, perform the lowest functions, and are nonetheless content with their lot. Children, of course, are all brainwashed and conditioned with hypnotic techniques (sleep teaching). There are no families anymore, and sexual promiscuity is pervasive. Adults get a further supply of silly entertainment (Feelies) and drugs (Soma) that renders them docile, keeps them young, and make them love their voluntary servitude. People have lost interest in art and science, and religion has been replaced by Henry Ford鈥檚 cult (i.e. assembly line applied to human beings) and occasional orgiastic ceremonies (orgy-porgies). In short, humanity has achieved happiness and reached the End of History.
To some extent, Huxley鈥檚 prophecies have become a reality, less than a century later: rational, hierarchical, hyper-efficient and optimised capitalism and cheery consumerism have conquered most of the world. The sexual revolution has indeed taken place 鈥� although full sexual libertarianism is still a pipe dream. Pharmacopoeia, narcotics, antidepressants, tranquillisers and rejuvenating treatments are broadly available; as well as irrelevant and mind-numbing 3D entertainment, peppered with commercial slogans. Genetic engineering and biotechnology are everywhere (although not used to select humans as yet).
Brave New World is a novel structured around a set of (rather crude) characters and plots; there is, however, no clear protagonist. Huxley has a witty tongue-in-cheek sense of humour throughout. Some passages even have a purely poetic or musical quality: particularly through the use of 鈥檚 lines for the character of John Savage, or the cross-cutting technique employed in chapter 3. But by and large, the book feels like a philosophical essay or social satire, in the style of Voltaire鈥檚 or Swift鈥檚 . Obviously, Huxley had Plato鈥檚 in mind, when designing his Alpha / B锚ta / Gamma / Delta / Epsilon caste system (he was probably also referring to the school grades: A+ to F, already in use when he was a pupil at Eton College, or even to the caste system in India). Certainly, he remembered Nietzsche鈥檚 鈥�Letzte Mensch鈥� from 鈥檚 prologue: a human type that has indeed invented happiness, comfort and social stability, but ultimately a petty and lethargic sort of humankind. A type of humanity that might well be appealing to us right now, who knows鈥�
Brave New World is obviously a fascinating political statement that spoke to the European crisis of the 1930s. But its visionary impact and influence on speculative fiction cannot be overstated, from Orwell鈥檚 to Bradbury鈥檚 , to Atwood's , and to Houellebecq鈥檚 .
See also my review of Brave New World Revisited.
Edit: Watched Universal鈥檚 2020 . It is by and large faithful to the novel鈥檚 plot and characters, but ends up taking more and more liberties as the episodes go by. It鈥檚 also focusing way more on the entertainment potential of the book (especially the erotica aspects of the orgy-porgies) than on the political debate around the problem of happiness vs freedom. All references to Shakespeare have been removed as well, although the romance is a central part of the show (not so much in the book). Ultimately, Huxley鈥檚 philosophical novel serves as the rib cage of the series, but its heart is more like Black Mirror, Westworld, The Matrix or even Fritz Lang鈥檚 Metropolis. Nonetheless, a pleasant 鈥渇eely鈥� with some nice eye candy!
March 14, 2023
I would like to be an intellectual.
In an ideal world, I wear a monocle, and I have a pocket watch on a chain, and all of my sweaters have elbow patches. In this world, I consume exclusively classics at a very slow pace (so as to examine every word), but somehow simultaneously I have read everything that's ever been called worth reading by any person who's ever been called pretentious.
But that is not this world.
To be fair, I AM trying. I read literary fiction the most of any genre. I used to have a quest where I would have to read at least one classic every month, but I retired it because I typically read more than that. (Last year, for example, I read 46. And granted I have a loose definition of "classic," but still.) I tend to rate books from those two categories higher than others.
But still, we find ourselves here.
I didn't like this book. I can say there are a lot of reasons, and I can even tell the truth: I can say that the depiction of women in this was so offensive it turned around and became funny and absurd, or that this dystopian world is not nearly as prescient as 1984's, or the Handmaid's Tale's, or even goddamn The Hunger Games', and both of those would be fairly respectable criticisms that I do have.
But that isn't completely accurate.
I didn't like this because it felt silly and boring.
That's really all.
Bottom line: I'll try to be smart next time.
------------------
pre-review
either i did not care for this or i was being intellectually stimulated.
i'll figure it out later.
review to come / 2.5 stars
------------------
tbr review
personally being very brave by adding classics to my to read list
clear ur sh*t book 49
quest 22: free space
In an ideal world, I wear a monocle, and I have a pocket watch on a chain, and all of my sweaters have elbow patches. In this world, I consume exclusively classics at a very slow pace (so as to examine every word), but somehow simultaneously I have read everything that's ever been called worth reading by any person who's ever been called pretentious.
But that is not this world.
To be fair, I AM trying. I read literary fiction the most of any genre. I used to have a quest where I would have to read at least one classic every month, but I retired it because I typically read more than that. (Last year, for example, I read 46. And granted I have a loose definition of "classic," but still.) I tend to rate books from those two categories higher than others.
But still, we find ourselves here.
I didn't like this book. I can say there are a lot of reasons, and I can even tell the truth: I can say that the depiction of women in this was so offensive it turned around and became funny and absurd, or that this dystopian world is not nearly as prescient as 1984's, or the Handmaid's Tale's, or even goddamn The Hunger Games', and both of those would be fairly respectable criticisms that I do have.
But that isn't completely accurate.
I didn't like this because it felt silly and boring.
That's really all.
Bottom line: I'll try to be smart next time.
------------------
pre-review
either i did not care for this or i was being intellectually stimulated.
i'll figure it out later.
review to come / 2.5 stars
------------------
tbr review
personally being very brave by adding classics to my to read list
clear ur sh*t book 49
quest 22: free space
July 4, 2007
As a teenager I went through a period of reading a vast number of distopian novels - probably all the teenage angst. This is the one that has continued to haunt me however, long after the my youthful cynicism has died it's death. It's basically a book about the utopian ideal - everyone's happy, everyone has what they want and EVERYTHING is based on logical principles. However, there is something very rotten at the heart. It's about how what we want isn't always what we should get. It looks at how state sponsered "happiness" can entirely miss the point. Perhaps, most importantly, it makes the case for individual freedom rather than authoritarian diktat. It should be read hand in hand with Mill's Utilitarianism to get a good idea of the philosophy that inspired it.
Incidentally, I gave this book to my boyfriend as a present for his 18th birthday ( a rather depressing gift I know). At the time he wasn't particularly freaked out by it and said that it didn't hold the same level of dread as say, 1984 or "The Handmaid's Tale". As he's got older however, he's found the idea more and more frightening. Six years later it has more of a sting in the tail for him. I don't know why this should be but I'll hazard a guess that as you get older you're idea of "happiness" becomes perhaps more complex, making the ideal of "Brave New World" even more disturbing.
Incidentally, I gave this book to my boyfriend as a present for his 18th birthday ( a rather depressing gift I know). At the time he wasn't particularly freaked out by it and said that it didn't hold the same level of dread as say, 1984 or "The Handmaid's Tale". As he's got older however, he's found the idea more and more frightening. Six years later it has more of a sting in the tail for him. I don't know why this should be but I'll hazard a guess that as you get older you're idea of "happiness" becomes perhaps more complex, making the ideal of "Brave New World" even more disturbing.
March 21, 2025
I think I read it wrong.
Because my first thought upon finishing this was this:
Where the hell do I sign up for this Brave New World?
Basically, this society is missing religion, shame, sin, misery, fear, disease, and classic books.
Now, that's not to say life is perfect in this utopia.
Nobody gets married and has kids anymore. I know, a lot of you are thinking that isn't quite the downside that the book thinks it is. No more monogamy? Gasp. Whatever would we do?
The new people are grown in test tubes. There are the dumb ones who do the menial shit, the average ones who do the office stuff, and the smarter ones who run the show. After being conditioned genetically, everyone is raised in state-run lab/home/school facilities, brainwashed in their sleep, and given a teeny bit of shock therapy in the toddler years to ensure that folks are content with their lot in life.
Can you imagine if people were actually set up to be in charge by nothing more than a coincidence of birth?
Gosh. That's some crazy sci-fi caste shenanigans right there.
So what we have here is job security, free drugs that don't have side effects and make you feel good, non-judgemental sex, no conflict, no health issues till you die, and no barky religious folks knocking on your door at 9 am on a Saturday.
And what are you missing out on, pray tell? Shakespeare.
I've read his stuff, and I can say without a doubt that I could skip it and make do with a Micheal Bay movie. Fair warning, no one has ever accused me of being someone they aspire to emulate.
Even the evil overlord in charge of it all wasn't that bad of a dude. When these guys met him and confronted him with their doubts as to how well they actually enjoyed their place in society, he just sent them to an island full of like-minded individuals so they could do what they wanted without disrupting the flow of things. He was kind of like, yeah, this isn't for everyone and sent them off with a wave of his chill hand.
For the entire book, I kept waiting for the Soylent Green is People moment, but it never really came. To me, that world did not appear worse than ours in any significant way. The only weird thing was that being a mother or father was shameful and no one was monogamous. That's not exactly the most horrifying thing I've ever heard happening in a dystopian novel.
Especially if the other option is to be like John, who flogged himself every time he got a boner over cute little Lenina. On a related note, the part where he kept yelling STRUMPET! STRUMPET! STRUUUUMPET! had me laughing until the tears rolled down my face. I kept waiting for some sort of redemption arc for this savage wherein he stopped being a complete asshat, but that also didn't happen. He was creepy as fuck right up till the end.
And what an ending it was.
If you drew random scenarios out of a hat and put them down on paper in no particular order, you seriously could not have come up with a more bananas conclusion to this book.
I'm still not sure what the moral of the story is here. Now, admittedly, I like the sound of the drugs and sex and fun holidays. I will say I think it was a bit of overkill to taze babies.
Then again, sacrifices must be made for the greater good.
I'm kidding! Don't zap toddlers, you idiot.
Ok. At the end of the day, I didn't really care for this book. I personally thought it was sort of boring. Not much happened plotwise and I never really felt invested in any of the characters. It seemed (to me) a bit of a daffy book that had a lot of fuckwit ideas of what would happen if we ignore the strict moral codes about sex found in most religions.
I know this is a beloved novel and I don't think you're stupid if you enjoyed it. Different strokes for different folks and all that.
Michael York was the narrator of the audiobook I listened to, and I thought he did a fantastic job.
Because my first thought upon finishing this was this:
Where the hell do I sign up for this Brave New World?
Basically, this society is missing religion, shame, sin, misery, fear, disease, and classic books.
Now, that's not to say life is perfect in this utopia.
Nobody gets married and has kids anymore. I know, a lot of you are thinking that isn't quite the downside that the book thinks it is. No more monogamy? Gasp. Whatever would we do?
The new people are grown in test tubes. There are the dumb ones who do the menial shit, the average ones who do the office stuff, and the smarter ones who run the show. After being conditioned genetically, everyone is raised in state-run lab/home/school facilities, brainwashed in their sleep, and given a teeny bit of shock therapy in the toddler years to ensure that folks are content with their lot in life.
Can you imagine if people were actually set up to be in charge by nothing more than a coincidence of birth?
Gosh. That's some crazy sci-fi caste shenanigans right there.
So what we have here is job security, free drugs that don't have side effects and make you feel good, non-judgemental sex, no conflict, no health issues till you die, and no barky religious folks knocking on your door at 9 am on a Saturday.
And what are you missing out on, pray tell? Shakespeare.
I've read his stuff, and I can say without a doubt that I could skip it and make do with a Micheal Bay movie. Fair warning, no one has ever accused me of being someone they aspire to emulate.
Even the evil overlord in charge of it all wasn't that bad of a dude. When these guys met him and confronted him with their doubts as to how well they actually enjoyed their place in society, he just sent them to an island full of like-minded individuals so they could do what they wanted without disrupting the flow of things. He was kind of like, yeah, this isn't for everyone and sent them off with a wave of his chill hand.
For the entire book, I kept waiting for the Soylent Green is People moment, but it never really came. To me, that world did not appear worse than ours in any significant way. The only weird thing was that being a mother or father was shameful and no one was monogamous. That's not exactly the most horrifying thing I've ever heard happening in a dystopian novel.
Especially if the other option is to be like John, who flogged himself every time he got a boner over cute little Lenina. On a related note, the part where he kept yelling STRUMPET! STRUMPET! STRUUUUMPET! had me laughing until the tears rolled down my face. I kept waiting for some sort of redemption arc for this savage wherein he stopped being a complete asshat, but that also didn't happen. He was creepy as fuck right up till the end.
And what an ending it was.
If you drew random scenarios out of a hat and put them down on paper in no particular order, you seriously could not have come up with a more bananas conclusion to this book.
I'm still not sure what the moral of the story is here. Now, admittedly, I like the sound of the drugs and sex and fun holidays. I will say I think it was a bit of overkill to taze babies.
Then again, sacrifices must be made for the greater good.
I'm kidding! Don't zap toddlers, you idiot.
Ok. At the end of the day, I didn't really care for this book. I personally thought it was sort of boring. Not much happened plotwise and I never really felt invested in any of the characters. It seemed (to me) a bit of a daffy book that had a lot of fuckwit ideas of what would happen if we ignore the strict moral codes about sex found in most religions.
I know this is a beloved novel and I don't think you're stupid if you enjoyed it. Different strokes for different folks and all that.
Michael York was the narrator of the audiobook I listened to, and I thought he did a fantastic job.
April 25, 2022
鈥�I am I, and I wish I weren't.
廿賳 賰丕賳 乇丕賷 亘乇丕丿亘賵乇賷 賮賷 乇賵丕賷鬲賴 丕賱兀卮賴乇
賯丿 丕禺鬲乇毓 毓丕賱賲丕 鬲購丨乇賯 賮賷賴 丕賱賰鬲亘
賮賴爻賰賱賷 賯亘賱賴 亘爻賳賵丕鬲 胤賵賷賱丞
鬲賵氐賱 廿賱賶 賮賰乇丞 兀卮丿 卮賳丕毓丞
賮賮賷 毓丕賱賲賴 丕賱賳丕爻 賱丕 鬲購賲賳毓 賲賳 丕賱賯乇丕亍丞 鈥�
賮賴賲 兀氐賱丕 賱丕 賷乇睾亘賵丕 賮賷賴丕
鈥� 賵賱丕 賷毓乇賮賵丕 賱賴丕 賯賷賲丞 兀賵 賲毓賳賶 鈥�
:::::::::::::::
鬲禺賷賱 賳賮爻賰 鬲毓賷卮 賴賳丕 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱毓丕賱賲鈥忊€�
毓丕賱賲 丕賱爻毓丕丿丞 丕賱夭丕卅賮丞 .. 爻毓丕丿丞 丕賱毓賯丕賯賷乇
毓丕賱賲 賷亘鬲爻賲 賮賷賴 丕賱噩賲賷毓 鈥�
毓丕賱賲 兀賱賲賴 賲禺丿乇 賵毓賯賱賴 賲睾賷亘鈥�
毓丕賱賲 亘賱丕 賲卮丕毓乇 兀賵 毓賱丕賯丕鬲 廿賳爻丕賳賷丞鈥�
毓丕賱賲 賷賯賵賲 毓賱賶 丕賱鬲賯爻賷賲 丕賱胤亘賯賷 丕賱亘丨孬 鈥�
毓丕賱賲 禺丕賱 賲賳 丕賱毓丕胤賮丞 賵丕賱噩賲丕賱鈥�
鬲氐賵乇 兀賳賳丕 氐乇賳丕 兀噩賳丞 賲乇氐賵氐賷賳 賮賷 丕賱賯賵丕乇賷乇鈥�
賳賳鬲馗乇 鬲乇鬲賷亘賳丕 廿賱賶 賵丕丨丿丞 賲賳 丕賱胤亘賯丕鬲 丕賱禺賲爻
賵丕賱鬲賷 賷丨丿丿賵賴丕 賱賳丕 賲賳 賯亘賱 丨鬲賶 兀賳 賳賳卮兀 鈥�
賱丕 禺賷丕乇 賱賰 賮賷 兀賳 鬲賰賵賳 賵丕丨丿 賲賳 丕賱禺賲爻丞 丕賱鬲丕賱賷賷賳
鈥�*丕賱賮丕 孬賲 亘賷鬲丕
賵丕賱匕賷賳 賴賲丕 丕賱兀毓賱賶 賲爻鬲賵賶 丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷丕 賵賮賰乇賷丕 鈥�
賮賲賳 兀賱賮丕 賷兀鬲賷 賯丕丿丞 丕賱毓丕賱賲 賵兀毓囟丕亍 丕賱丨賰賵賲丞
鈥�*孬賲 噩丕賲丕
賵賴賵 賲賳 賷賯賵賲賵賳 亘丕賱兀毓賲丕賱 丕賱賲賰鬲亘賷丞 賵丕賱廿丿丕乇賷丞
鈥�*孬賲 丿賱鬲丕
賵賴賲 賲賳 賷賯賵賲賵賳 亘丕賱兀毓賲丕賱 丕賱賷丿賵賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 賱丕 鬲鬲胤賱亘 賲噩賴賵丿丕 鈥徺佡冐辟娯�
鈥�*賵兀禺賷乇丕 廿亘爻賷賱賵賳鈥� 鈥�
丕賱兀睾亘賶 賵丕賱兀丿賳賶 賲乇鬲亘丞 鈥撠官呚з� 賳馗丕賮丞 賵賲丕 卮丕亘賴
賵賴賲 賷卮賰賱賵賳 兀睾賱亘賷丞 丕賱卮毓亘
賱丕 鬲丨丕賵賱 兀賳 鬲禺鬲丕乇
賱賷爻 賱丿賷賰 賴匕丕 丕賱丨賯 兀氐賱丕
!
:::::::::::::::
廿賳賴 毓丕賱賲 賷賳卮丿 爻毓丕丿丞 丌賱賷丞 鈥�
賴賲爻鬲 亘賴丕 兀夭丕乇 廿賱賰鬲乇賵賳賷丞 賮賷 兀匕賳賷賴 賲賳匕 賲賵賱丿賴
賮亘丕鬲 賱丕 賷毓賱賲 毓賳 卮賷亍 爻賵丕賴丕
賱丕 賮賳 賱丕 丿賷賳 賱丕 兀丿亘 賱丕 丨亘 賱丕 兀爻乇丞
賵兀賷囟丕 賱丕 丨夭賳 賱丕 兀賱賲 賱丕 賲毓丕賳丕丞 賱丕 賮賯乇
賴匕賴 兀卮賷丕亍 賱丕 賷賮賴賲 賱賴丕 賲毓賳賶
:::::::::::::::
賵毓賱賶 丕賱噩丕賳亘 丕賱丌禺乇
賴賳丕賰 賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱賴賲噩 丕賱賲賳亘賵匕
丕賱匕賷 賷鬲賰丕孬乇 亘胤乇賷賯丞 鈥徹坟ㄙ娯官娯�
賵賷毓乇賮 毓賳 賲毓賳賶 丕賱賱賴 賵丕賱兀爻乇丞 賵丕賱丨亘 賵丕賱禺賵賮
賵丕賱匕賷 賲賳賴 賷胤賱 兀賲賱 賷丕卅爻
賮賱乇亘賲丕 鬲鬲睾賷乇 丕賱兀賵囟丕毓 賷賵賲丕
兀賵 鬲丨丿孬 孬賵乇丞 賲賳 賳賵毓 賲丕
毓賱賶 丕賱兀賯賱 賴匕丕 賲丕 賷丿賵乇 賮賷 匕賴賳賰 兀孬賳丕亍 丕賱賯乇丕亍丞
賵賱賰賳 兀賲賱賰 賷禺賷亘 賲毓 賳馗乇丞 賴賰爻賱賷 丕賱賷丕卅爻丞
賵鬲賳鬲賴賷 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 亘賳賴丕賷丞 兀賰孬乇 亘丐爻丕 賲賳 兀丨丿丕孬 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞
:::::::::::::::
鈥� 賮丕賱賲丿賷賳丞 丕賱賮丕囟賱丞 丕賱禺丕賱賷丞 賲賳 丕賱乇賵丨
丕賱賲睾乇賯丞 賮賷 丕賱賲丕丿丞 賱丕 鬲夭丕賱 賴賳丕
賲亘鬲爻賲丞 賮賷 爻禺乇賷丞 賵賴賷 鬲乇賲賯 噩孬丞 噩賵賳 丕賱賲卮賳賵賯丞
賵丕賱卮毓亘 賱丕 賷夭丕賱 賷亘鬲爻賲
賮丨亘賵亘 丕賱爻毓丕丿丞 鬲賰賮賷 賱廿賱賴丕卅賴賲 毓賳 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞
廿賳賴 卮毓亘 賱丕 賷丨鬲丕噩 賯賵丞 賱賷購丨賰賲 鈥�
賱賯丿 鬲賲 鬲賰賷賷賮賴賲 賲賳匕 丕賱亘丿丕賷丞 毓賱賶 丕賱丕爻鬲爻賱丕賲鈥�
賵賱賰賳 丕賱亘丕亘 賱賲 賷睾賱賯 亘毓丿
毓賱賰 鬲乇賷丿 丕賱賴乇賵亘 賲賳 賴匕賴 丕賱丌賱丞 丕賱賰亘乇賶
毓賱賰 鬲乇賷丿 丕賱毓賵丿丞 廿賱賶 賰賱 賲丕 賴賵 丨丕乇 賵丨賯賷賯賷 賵賲丐賱
毓賱賾賰 .. 賵廿賳 賰丕賳 丕賱孬賲賳 賲賵鬲賰
鈥�
鈥�------------------鈥�
毓賱賶 丕賱賴丕賲卮
鈥�#1鈥�
鈥�=賷爻鬲賲丿 丕賱賲丐賱賮 毓賳賵丕賳賴 賲賳 兀亘賷丕鬲 卮賰爻亘賷乇 賮賷 丕賱毓丕氐賮丞
How many goodly creatures are there here
How beauteous mankind is!
O brave new world
That has such people in 't!
鈥�#2鈥�
賮賷 毓丕賲 1958
賰鬲亘 賴賰爻賱賷 賰鬲丕亘賴
Brave New World Revisited 鈥�
賲亘丿賷丕 賮賷賴 賮賷 毓丿丞 賲賯丕賱丕鬲 兀乇丕丐賴 丕賱鬲賷 兀賵丿毓賴丕 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 丕賱爻丕亘賯丞
廿賳 兀丨亘 兀丨丿賰賲 丕賱賲夭賷丿 賲賳 丕賱廿胤賱丕毓
鈥�#3鈥忊赌�
鈥� 丕賱賲乇丞 丕賱兀賵賱賶 丕賱鬲賷 賯乇兀鬲購 賮賷賴丕 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賰賳鬲 賮賷 賳丨賵 丕賱爻丕丿爻丞 毓卮乇
賰丕賳 賰鬲賷亘 賲禺鬲氐乇 囟賲賳 爻賱爻賱丞 賲賰鬲亘丞 丕賱兀爻乇丞 賱賱賳丕卮卅賷賳
鬲丨鬲 毓賳賵丕賳 毓丕賱賲 乇丕卅毓 噩丿賷丿
賵賴賷 賲鬲乇噩賲丞 兀賷囟丕 亘毓賳賵丕賳 丕賱毓丕賱賲 丕賱胤乇賷賮 鈥撠ж� 丕賱賲丿賶
賰丕賲賱丞 丿賵賳 丕禺鬲氐丕乇 鈥�
賵賱賰賳賷 賱賲 兀賯乇丐賴丕 賵賱丕 兀毓乇賮 賴賱 鬲乇噩賲鬲賴丕 胤賷亘丞 丕賲 賱丕
廿賳 賰丕賳 乇丕賷 亘乇丕丿亘賵乇賷 賮賷 乇賵丕賷鬲賴 丕賱兀卮賴乇
賯丿 丕禺鬲乇毓 毓丕賱賲丕 鬲購丨乇賯 賮賷賴 丕賱賰鬲亘
賮賴爻賰賱賷 賯亘賱賴 亘爻賳賵丕鬲 胤賵賷賱丞
鬲賵氐賱 廿賱賶 賮賰乇丞 兀卮丿 卮賳丕毓丞
賮賮賷 毓丕賱賲賴 丕賱賳丕爻 賱丕 鬲購賲賳毓 賲賳 丕賱賯乇丕亍丞 鈥�
賮賴賲 兀氐賱丕 賱丕 賷乇睾亘賵丕 賮賷賴丕
鈥� 賵賱丕 賷毓乇賮賵丕 賱賴丕 賯賷賲丞 兀賵 賲毓賳賶 鈥�
:::::::::::::::
鬲禺賷賱 賳賮爻賰 鬲毓賷卮 賴賳丕 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱毓丕賱賲鈥忊€�
毓丕賱賲 丕賱爻毓丕丿丞 丕賱夭丕卅賮丞 .. 爻毓丕丿丞 丕賱毓賯丕賯賷乇
毓丕賱賲 賷亘鬲爻賲 賮賷賴 丕賱噩賲賷毓 鈥�
毓丕賱賲 兀賱賲賴 賲禺丿乇 賵毓賯賱賴 賲睾賷亘鈥�
毓丕賱賲 亘賱丕 賲卮丕毓乇 兀賵 毓賱丕賯丕鬲 廿賳爻丕賳賷丞鈥�
毓丕賱賲 賷賯賵賲 毓賱賶 丕賱鬲賯爻賷賲 丕賱胤亘賯賷 丕賱亘丨孬 鈥�
毓丕賱賲 禺丕賱 賲賳 丕賱毓丕胤賮丞 賵丕賱噩賲丕賱鈥�
鬲氐賵乇 兀賳賳丕 氐乇賳丕 兀噩賳丞 賲乇氐賵氐賷賳 賮賷 丕賱賯賵丕乇賷乇鈥�
賳賳鬲馗乇 鬲乇鬲賷亘賳丕 廿賱賶 賵丕丨丿丞 賲賳 丕賱胤亘賯丕鬲 丕賱禺賲爻
賵丕賱鬲賷 賷丨丿丿賵賴丕 賱賳丕 賲賳 賯亘賱 丨鬲賶 兀賳 賳賳卮兀 鈥�
賱丕 禺賷丕乇 賱賰 賮賷 兀賳 鬲賰賵賳 賵丕丨丿 賲賳 丕賱禺賲爻丞 丕賱鬲丕賱賷賷賳
鈥�*丕賱賮丕 孬賲 亘賷鬲丕
賵丕賱匕賷賳 賴賲丕 丕賱兀毓賱賶 賲爻鬲賵賶 丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷丕 賵賮賰乇賷丕 鈥�
賮賲賳 兀賱賮丕 賷兀鬲賷 賯丕丿丞 丕賱毓丕賱賲 賵兀毓囟丕亍 丕賱丨賰賵賲丞
鈥�*孬賲 噩丕賲丕
賵賴賵 賲賳 賷賯賵賲賵賳 亘丕賱兀毓賲丕賱 丕賱賲賰鬲亘賷丞 賵丕賱廿丿丕乇賷丞
鈥�*孬賲 丿賱鬲丕
賵賴賲 賲賳 賷賯賵賲賵賳 亘丕賱兀毓賲丕賱 丕賱賷丿賵賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 賱丕 鬲鬲胤賱亘 賲噩賴賵丿丕 鈥徺佡冐辟娯�
鈥�*賵兀禺賷乇丕 廿亘爻賷賱賵賳鈥� 鈥�
丕賱兀睾亘賶 賵丕賱兀丿賳賶 賲乇鬲亘丞 鈥撠官呚з� 賳馗丕賮丞 賵賲丕 卮丕亘賴
賵賴賲 賷卮賰賱賵賳 兀睾賱亘賷丞 丕賱卮毓亘
賱丕 鬲丨丕賵賱 兀賳 鬲禺鬲丕乇
賱賷爻 賱丿賷賰 賴匕丕 丕賱丨賯 兀氐賱丕
!
:::::::::::::::
鈥�" 賵賱賰賳賳賷 賱丕 兀乇賷丿 丕賱乇丕丨丞..鈥�
兀賳丕 兀乇賷丿 丕賱乇亘..兀乇賷丿 丕賱卮賽毓乇..兀乇賷丿 禺胤乇丕 丨賯賷賯賷丕..兀乇賷丿 丕賱丨乇賷丞
兀乇賷丿 丕賱禺賷乇..兀乇賷丿 丕賱禺胤賷卅丞" !鈥�
廿賳賴 毓丕賱賲 賷賳卮丿 爻毓丕丿丞 丌賱賷丞 鈥�
賴賲爻鬲 亘賴丕 兀夭丕乇 廿賱賰鬲乇賵賳賷丞 賮賷 兀匕賳賷賴 賲賳匕 賲賵賱丿賴
賮亘丕鬲 賱丕 賷毓賱賲 毓賳 卮賷亍 爻賵丕賴丕
賱丕 賮賳 賱丕 丿賷賳 賱丕 兀丿亘 賱丕 丨亘 賱丕 兀爻乇丞
賵兀賷囟丕 賱丕 丨夭賳 賱丕 兀賱賲 賱丕 賲毓丕賳丕丞 賱丕 賮賯乇
賴匕賴 兀卮賷丕亍 賱丕 賷賮賴賲 賱賴丕 賲毓賳賶
:::::::::::::::
賵毓賱賶 丕賱噩丕賳亘 丕賱丌禺乇
賴賳丕賰 賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱賴賲噩 丕賱賲賳亘賵匕
丕賱匕賷 賷鬲賰丕孬乇 亘胤乇賷賯丞 鈥徹坟ㄙ娯官娯�
賵賷毓乇賮 毓賳 賲毓賳賶 丕賱賱賴 賵丕賱兀爻乇丞 賵丕賱丨亘 賵丕賱禺賵賮
賵丕賱匕賷 賲賳賴 賷胤賱 兀賲賱 賷丕卅爻
賮賱乇亘賲丕 鬲鬲睾賷乇 丕賱兀賵囟丕毓 賷賵賲丕
兀賵 鬲丨丿孬 孬賵乇丞 賲賳 賳賵毓 賲丕
毓賱賶 丕賱兀賯賱 賴匕丕 賲丕 賷丿賵乇 賮賷 匕賴賳賰 兀孬賳丕亍 丕賱賯乇丕亍丞
賵賱賰賳 兀賲賱賰 賷禺賷亘 賲毓 賳馗乇丞 賴賰爻賱賷 丕賱賷丕卅爻丞
賵鬲賳鬲賴賷 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 亘賳賴丕賷丞 兀賰孬乇 亘丐爻丕 賲賳 兀丨丿丕孬 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞
:::::::::::::::
鈥� 賮丕賱賲丿賷賳丞 丕賱賮丕囟賱丞 丕賱禺丕賱賷丞 賲賳 丕賱乇賵丨
丕賱賲睾乇賯丞 賮賷 丕賱賲丕丿丞 賱丕 鬲夭丕賱 賴賳丕
賲亘鬲爻賲丞 賮賷 爻禺乇賷丞 賵賴賷 鬲乇賲賯 噩孬丞 噩賵賳 丕賱賲卮賳賵賯丞
賵丕賱卮毓亘 賱丕 賷夭丕賱 賷亘鬲爻賲
賮丨亘賵亘 丕賱爻毓丕丿丞 鬲賰賮賷 賱廿賱賴丕卅賴賲 毓賳 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞
廿賳賴 卮毓亘 賱丕 賷丨鬲丕噩 賯賵丞 賱賷購丨賰賲 鈥�
賱賯丿 鬲賲 鬲賰賷賷賮賴賲 賲賳匕 丕賱亘丿丕賷丞 毓賱賶 丕賱丕爻鬲爻賱丕賲鈥�
賵賱賰賳 丕賱亘丕亘 賱賲 賷睾賱賯 亘毓丿
毓賱賰 鬲乇賷丿 丕賱賴乇賵亘 賲賳 賴匕賴 丕賱丌賱丞 丕賱賰亘乇賶
毓賱賰 鬲乇賷丿 丕賱毓賵丿丞 廿賱賶 賰賱 賲丕 賴賵 丨丕乇 賵丨賯賷賯賷 賵賲丐賱
毓賱賾賰 .. 賵廿賳 賰丕賳 丕賱孬賲賳 賲賵鬲賰
鈥�
鈥�------------------鈥�
毓賱賶 丕賱賴丕賲卮
鈥�#1鈥�
鈥�=賷爻鬲賲丿 丕賱賲丐賱賮 毓賳賵丕賳賴 賲賳 兀亘賷丕鬲 卮賰爻亘賷乇 賮賷 丕賱毓丕氐賮丞
How many goodly creatures are there here
How beauteous mankind is!
O brave new world
That has such people in 't!
鈥�#2鈥�
賮賷 毓丕賲 1958
賰鬲亘 賴賰爻賱賷 賰鬲丕亘賴
Brave New World Revisited 鈥�
賲亘丿賷丕 賮賷賴 賮賷 毓丿丞 賲賯丕賱丕鬲 兀乇丕丐賴 丕賱鬲賷 兀賵丿毓賴丕 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 丕賱爻丕亘賯丞
廿賳 兀丨亘 兀丨丿賰賲 丕賱賲夭賷丿 賲賳 丕賱廿胤賱丕毓
鈥�#3鈥忊赌�
鈥� 丕賱賲乇丞 丕賱兀賵賱賶 丕賱鬲賷 賯乇兀鬲購 賮賷賴丕 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賰賳鬲 賮賷 賳丨賵 丕賱爻丕丿爻丞 毓卮乇
賰丕賳 賰鬲賷亘 賲禺鬲氐乇 囟賲賳 爻賱爻賱丞 賲賰鬲亘丞 丕賱兀爻乇丞 賱賱賳丕卮卅賷賳
鬲丨鬲 毓賳賵丕賳 毓丕賱賲 乇丕卅毓 噩丿賷丿
賵賴賷 賲鬲乇噩賲丞 兀賷囟丕 亘毓賳賵丕賳 丕賱毓丕賱賲 丕賱胤乇賷賮 鈥撠ж� 丕賱賲丿賶
賰丕賲賱丞 丿賵賳 丕禺鬲氐丕乇 鈥�
賵賱賰賳賷 賱賲 兀賯乇丐賴丕 賵賱丕 兀毓乇賮 賴賱 鬲乇噩賲鬲賴丕 胤賷亘丞 丕賲 賱丕
June 1, 2021
Libros as铆 valen la pena leerlos mil veces. La mejor distop铆a de todas.
隆Magn铆fico libro, ha sido una gran sorpresa! Personalmente, pienso que Un mundo feliz es un libro que supera en todos los aspectos posibles a cualquier distop铆a publicada hasta el d铆a de hoy, incluyendo al famos铆simo 1984 de George Orwell. S铆, decir este tipo de declaraciones puede tomarse como una gran imprudencia de mi parte, pero, despu茅s de analizar cada aspecto de este libro he llegado a esa conclusi贸n y estoy completamente seguro de lo que digo.
En Un mundo feliz, Aldoux Huxley, nos presenta un hipot茅tico futuro en el que pr谩cticamente todo lo que conocemos ha sido alterado de una forma muy radical. No hay religiones, familias, nacimientos, emociones, amor, silencio, soledad, se desconoce el pasado, la ciencia ha sido eliminada, el conocimiento ya no es importante, etc.; pero tambi茅n es un mundo donde no existe el sufrimiento, ni la pobreza, ni el hambre, ni las guerras, y en el cual las personas tienen mejor salud 鈥攊ncluso viven muchos a帽os m谩s鈥�, no le temen a la muerte, etc. Esas caracter铆sticas convierten este libro en una distop铆a y utop铆a a la vez, por lo que por momentos sentiremos que es un futuro horrible el que nos presenta Aldoux, pero tambi茅n observaremos que vivir en un mundo en el que no existe la miseria tampoco es tan malo como parece. Por lo tanto, la premisa que nos ofrece el autor es muy interesante porque nos hace preguntarnos: 驴Preferir铆as vivir en un mundo con ciencia y conocimiento pero atiborrado de guerras, muerte y tragedia, o preferir铆as vivir en un mundo pac铆fico y estable, pero totalitario y lleno de ignorancia? Como pueden notar, elegir cualquier opci贸n nos brindar铆a muy buenos privilegios pero asimismo grandes desventajas. Y no, no se puede erradicar todo lo negativo de un futuro porque se necesita un equilibrio, por lo que por ejemplo para que existan los milagros se necesita que exista el sufrimiento, o la presencia de la ciencia llevar铆a irremediablemente a la desconfianza, miedo, guerras y autodestrucci贸n: Es algo inevitable.
En cuanto a los personajes, son seres que est谩n completamente trastornados pero que viven pl谩cidamente en esa 茅poca. Esto ocurre porque todos sus pensamientos y comportamientos son manipulados desde antes de ser creados, por lo que son como un estilo de 芦m谩quinas programadas禄 que fueron hechas para pensar y actuar de una manera espec铆fica: Son personajes muy bien dise帽ados a pesar de su excentricidad y anormalidad. Naturalmente no me encari帽茅 con ninguno pero tampoco los aborrec铆 porque es comprensible su forma de vivir. Puede que para nosotros ese estilo de vida pueda ser contraproducente, pero cada generaci贸n de seres humanos ha crecido bajo un entorno, vocabulario, cultura, profesiones y sue帽os diferentes, por lo que es natural ese rechazo hacia un estilo de vida contrario al que llevamos. Es por esta raz贸n por la que nuestros abuelos se quejan de nuestro mundo actual, pero a la vez subrayan las virtudes de la 茅poca en que nacieron, y de esa misma forma nosotros actuaremos en el futuro cuando tengamos m谩s de cincuenta a帽os. La humanidad nunca dejar谩 de cambiar por lo que seguramente para cada generaci贸n Un mundo feliz ser谩 diferente. Los personajes de este libro viven en Un mundo feliz, los piratas vivieron felices en el mar, quienes creen en Dios viven felices orando, los reyes vivieron felices con sus comodidades y su poder, los campesinos no cambiar铆an el campo por nada del mundo, los guerreros sin una espada ser铆an desdichados, etc. Por ello, el nombre del libro me parece s煤per correcto porque presenta justamente lo que anuncia: Un mundo feliz.
Algo curioso de este libro es que la trama principal pasa a un segundo plano. Es tan atrapante conocer m谩s y m谩s detalles sobre el lugar donde viven los personajes, que en realidad el destino de ellos importa muy poco. El argumento es simple y predecible, y quiz谩s podr铆a ser el punto m谩s bajo de esta n贸vela, pero en una distop铆a/utop铆a eso es algo normal porque en este tipo de libros lo verdaderamente interesante es la visi贸n futurista que nos presenta el autor. En este caso, esa visi贸n futurista el autor la realiza de manera magistral, y lo mejor, es que el autor no escribe con odio. 隆Eso me encant贸! Recuerdo que cuando le铆 1984 el libro me pareci贸 muy interesante, pero el autor escribi贸 con tanto odio hacia la sociedad, que irremediablemente asocie esas similitudes con tantas protestas e inconformidad que se vive actualmente en la mayor parte del planeta; pero aqu铆, Aldoux presenta un libro sin una pizca de rencor u odio, a pesar de reconocer en el pr贸logo que est谩 completamente en contra del totalitarismo. Y ya que menciono el pr贸logo, tengo que reconocer que esa parte del libro es excelente. En esa secci贸n el autor realiza una gran explicaci贸n sobre la creaci贸n de su historia, errores, personajes, etc., pero contiene spoilers por lo que recomiendo que lo lean al finalizar el libro y no antes.
La prosa tambi茅n ha sido adecuada lo que permite que esta novela se lea rapid铆simo; aunque, el inicio fue un poco lento y confuso debido a la terminolog铆a relacionada a los genes que personalmente me pareci贸 muy dif铆cil de asimilar: La gen茅tica no es mi especialidad. Aun as铆, Aldoux ha sabido jugar muy bien con el estilo de la obra y me ha gustado mucho la forma como lo ha hecho. Mi parte favorita de la prosa fue una secci贸n donde se presentan tres conversaciones simult谩neas y tan solo separ谩ndolas por p谩rrafos, logra un efecto de adrenalina y un ritmo fren茅tico que puede dar a entender que efectivamente si nos repiten excesivamente una informaci贸n, puede que empecemos a usar esas ideas como si fueran nuestras, a pesar de que solo las han implantado en nuestra mente. Asimismo, la parte final ha sido espectacular porque nos da una c谩tedra sobre la sociedad impresionante. Pr谩cticamente cada una de las frases usadas all铆 son dignas de destacar porque son muy profundas, sencillas de entender y pueden convertirse en una informaci贸n muy importante para cada uno de los individuos de una sociedad, es decir, para todos nosotros. Entre esa informaci贸n, se destaca la necesidad de que exista en una sociedad las clases sociales, ya que sin ellas lo 煤nico que ocurrir铆a ser铆a un caos total. Hay much铆simas frases para destacar, pero solo har茅 menci贸n de dos porque descubrir esas frases hace parte del premio de quien se anima a leer esta obra:
El p谩rrafo anterior no hace referencia a conformarnos con la vida que nos toc贸, sino hace referencia a que cada individuo en una sociedad es igual de importante, y todos seremos felices cuando encontremos nuestro verdadero lugar en ella. Los seres humanos somos sociables por naturaleza, y aunque nos duela aceptarlo, somos m谩s felices cuando encontramos personas con quien hablar sobre nuestros gustos, sue帽os, etc. De la misma forma como una construcci贸n necesita de buenas columnas, bases y muros estables, una sociedad necesita de todas las clases sociales para que exista un equilibrio, pero para que exista ese equilibrio se necesita que el pueblo se sienta satisfecho constantemente para que no afecte la estabilidad de la naci贸n. No es bueno tener muchos l铆deres, pero tampoco es positivo no tenerlos.
Al iniciar el libro cre铆 que ser铆a una obra recomendada para que los adictos a las drogas dejaran de consumir esas porquer铆as, pero despu茅s de avanzar entend铆 que ser铆a mal铆simo que una persona adicta leyera este libro porque justamente se sentir铆a orgulloso de su proceder. Por lo tanto, si tienen un familiar o amigo que en este momento tiene problemas de ese tipo, por nada del mundo les mencionen este libro porque podr铆an terminar de corromperse.
En resumen, un libro corto pero muy profundo e interesante sobre el comportamiento humano, la sociedad, las clases sociales y la religi贸n, que seguramente no olvidar谩n nunca y querr谩n repetir varias veces porque sinceramente es una obra maestra en todo el sentido de la palabra. Es una novela que me ha encantado en todo momento, la volver茅 a leer en el futuro, quiero seguir analiz谩ndola, e incluso siento el deseo de realizar un podcast sobre este libro 鈥攁 pesar de que nunca he hecho uno鈥� para seguir profundizando y hablando sobre esta obra, que me ha parecido bastante, pero bastante interesante. Libro s煤per recomendado, excepto si tienes una adicci贸n y quieres superarla, en ese caso, l茅elo en otro momento.
隆Magn铆fico libro, ha sido una gran sorpresa! Personalmente, pienso que Un mundo feliz es un libro que supera en todos los aspectos posibles a cualquier distop铆a publicada hasta el d铆a de hoy, incluyendo al famos铆simo 1984 de George Orwell. S铆, decir este tipo de declaraciones puede tomarse como una gran imprudencia de mi parte, pero, despu茅s de analizar cada aspecto de este libro he llegado a esa conclusi贸n y estoy completamente seguro de lo que digo.
En Un mundo feliz, Aldoux Huxley, nos presenta un hipot茅tico futuro en el que pr谩cticamente todo lo que conocemos ha sido alterado de una forma muy radical. No hay religiones, familias, nacimientos, emociones, amor, silencio, soledad, se desconoce el pasado, la ciencia ha sido eliminada, el conocimiento ya no es importante, etc.; pero tambi茅n es un mundo donde no existe el sufrimiento, ni la pobreza, ni el hambre, ni las guerras, y en el cual las personas tienen mejor salud 鈥攊ncluso viven muchos a帽os m谩s鈥�, no le temen a la muerte, etc. Esas caracter铆sticas convierten este libro en una distop铆a y utop铆a a la vez, por lo que por momentos sentiremos que es un futuro horrible el que nos presenta Aldoux, pero tambi茅n observaremos que vivir en un mundo en el que no existe la miseria tampoco es tan malo como parece. Por lo tanto, la premisa que nos ofrece el autor es muy interesante porque nos hace preguntarnos: 驴Preferir铆as vivir en un mundo con ciencia y conocimiento pero atiborrado de guerras, muerte y tragedia, o preferir铆as vivir en un mundo pac铆fico y estable, pero totalitario y lleno de ignorancia? Como pueden notar, elegir cualquier opci贸n nos brindar铆a muy buenos privilegios pero asimismo grandes desventajas. Y no, no se puede erradicar todo lo negativo de un futuro porque se necesita un equilibrio, por lo que por ejemplo para que existan los milagros se necesita que exista el sufrimiento, o la presencia de la ciencia llevar铆a irremediablemente a la desconfianza, miedo, guerras y autodestrucci贸n: Es algo inevitable.
En cuanto a los personajes, son seres que est谩n completamente trastornados pero que viven pl谩cidamente en esa 茅poca. Esto ocurre porque todos sus pensamientos y comportamientos son manipulados desde antes de ser creados, por lo que son como un estilo de 芦m谩quinas programadas禄 que fueron hechas para pensar y actuar de una manera espec铆fica: Son personajes muy bien dise帽ados a pesar de su excentricidad y anormalidad. Naturalmente no me encari帽茅 con ninguno pero tampoco los aborrec铆 porque es comprensible su forma de vivir. Puede que para nosotros ese estilo de vida pueda ser contraproducente, pero cada generaci贸n de seres humanos ha crecido bajo un entorno, vocabulario, cultura, profesiones y sue帽os diferentes, por lo que es natural ese rechazo hacia un estilo de vida contrario al que llevamos. Es por esta raz贸n por la que nuestros abuelos se quejan de nuestro mundo actual, pero a la vez subrayan las virtudes de la 茅poca en que nacieron, y de esa misma forma nosotros actuaremos en el futuro cuando tengamos m谩s de cincuenta a帽os. La humanidad nunca dejar谩 de cambiar por lo que seguramente para cada generaci贸n Un mundo feliz ser谩 diferente. Los personajes de este libro viven en Un mundo feliz, los piratas vivieron felices en el mar, quienes creen en Dios viven felices orando, los reyes vivieron felices con sus comodidades y su poder, los campesinos no cambiar铆an el campo por nada del mundo, los guerreros sin una espada ser铆an desdichados, etc. Por ello, el nombre del libro me parece s煤per correcto porque presenta justamente lo que anuncia: Un mundo feliz.
Algo curioso de este libro es que la trama principal pasa a un segundo plano. Es tan atrapante conocer m谩s y m谩s detalles sobre el lugar donde viven los personajes, que en realidad el destino de ellos importa muy poco. El argumento es simple y predecible, y quiz谩s podr铆a ser el punto m谩s bajo de esta n贸vela, pero en una distop铆a/utop铆a eso es algo normal porque en este tipo de libros lo verdaderamente interesante es la visi贸n futurista que nos presenta el autor. En este caso, esa visi贸n futurista el autor la realiza de manera magistral, y lo mejor, es que el autor no escribe con odio. 隆Eso me encant贸! Recuerdo que cuando le铆 1984 el libro me pareci贸 muy interesante, pero el autor escribi贸 con tanto odio hacia la sociedad, que irremediablemente asocie esas similitudes con tantas protestas e inconformidad que se vive actualmente en la mayor parte del planeta; pero aqu铆, Aldoux presenta un libro sin una pizca de rencor u odio, a pesar de reconocer en el pr贸logo que est谩 completamente en contra del totalitarismo. Y ya que menciono el pr贸logo, tengo que reconocer que esa parte del libro es excelente. En esa secci贸n el autor realiza una gran explicaci贸n sobre la creaci贸n de su historia, errores, personajes, etc., pero contiene spoilers por lo que recomiendo que lo lean al finalizar el libro y no antes.
La prosa tambi茅n ha sido adecuada lo que permite que esta novela se lea rapid铆simo; aunque, el inicio fue un poco lento y confuso debido a la terminolog铆a relacionada a los genes que personalmente me pareci贸 muy dif铆cil de asimilar: La gen茅tica no es mi especialidad. Aun as铆, Aldoux ha sabido jugar muy bien con el estilo de la obra y me ha gustado mucho la forma como lo ha hecho. Mi parte favorita de la prosa fue una secci贸n donde se presentan tres conversaciones simult谩neas y tan solo separ谩ndolas por p谩rrafos, logra un efecto de adrenalina y un ritmo fren茅tico que puede dar a entender que efectivamente si nos repiten excesivamente una informaci贸n, puede que empecemos a usar esas ideas como si fueran nuestras, a pesar de que solo las han implantado en nuestra mente. Asimismo, la parte final ha sido espectacular porque nos da una c谩tedra sobre la sociedad impresionante. Pr谩cticamente cada una de las frases usadas all铆 son dignas de destacar porque son muy profundas, sencillas de entender y pueden convertirse en una informaci贸n muy importante para cada uno de los individuos de una sociedad, es decir, para todos nosotros. Entre esa informaci贸n, se destaca la necesidad de que exista en una sociedad las clases sociales, ya que sin ellas lo 煤nico que ocurrir铆a ser铆a un caos total. Hay much铆simas frases para destacar, pero solo har茅 menci贸n de dos porque descubrir esas frases hace parte del premio de quien se anima a leer esta obra:
芦Bueno, si usted quiere, puede llamarlo un experimento de reenvasado. Se inici贸 en el a帽o 73 d.F. Los Interventores limpiaron la isla de Chipre de todos sus habitantes anteriores y la colonizaron de nuevo con una hornada especialmente preparada de veintid贸s mil Alfas. Se les otorg贸 toda clase de utillaje agr铆cola e industrial y se les dej贸 que se las arreglaran por s铆 mismo. El resultado cumpli贸 exactamente todas las previsiones te贸ricas. La tierra no fue trabajada como se deb铆a; hab铆a huelgas en las f谩bricas, las leyes no se cumpl铆an, las 贸rdenes no se obedec铆an; las personas destinadas a trabajos inferiores intrigaban constantemente por conseguir altos empleos, y las que ocupaban estos cargos intrigaban a su vez para mantenerse en ellos a toda costa. Al cabo de seis a帽os se enzarzaron en una aut茅ntica guerra civil. Cuando ya hab铆an muerto diecinueve mil de los veintid贸s mil habitantes, los supervivientes, un谩nimemente, pidieron a los Interventores Mundiales que volvieran a asumir el gobierno de la isla, cosa que 茅stos hicieron. Y as铆 acab贸 la 煤nica sociedad de Alfas que ha existido en el mundo.禄
El p谩rrafo anterior no hace referencia a conformarnos con la vida que nos toc贸, sino hace referencia a que cada individuo en una sociedad es igual de importante, y todos seremos felices cuando encontremos nuestro verdadero lugar en ella. Los seres humanos somos sociables por naturaleza, y aunque nos duela aceptarlo, somos m谩s felices cuando encontramos personas con quien hablar sobre nuestros gustos, sue帽os, etc. De la misma forma como una construcci贸n necesita de buenas columnas, bases y muros estables, una sociedad necesita de todas las clases sociales para que exista un equilibrio, pero para que exista ese equilibrio se necesita que el pueblo se sienta satisfecho constantemente para que no afecte la estabilidad de la naci贸n. No es bueno tener muchos l铆deres, pero tampoco es positivo no tenerlos.
芦Actualmente el mundo es estable. La gente es feliz; tiene lo que desea, y nunca desea lo que no puede obtener. Est谩 a gusto; est谩 a salvo; nunca est谩 enferma; no teme a la muerte; ignora la pasi贸n y la vejez; no hay padres ni madres que estorben; no hay esposas, ni hijos, ni amores excesivamente fuertes. Nuestros hombres est谩n condicionados de modo que apenas pueden obrar de otro modo que como deben obrar. Y si algo marcha mal, siempre queda el soma. El soma que usted arroja por la ventana en nombre de la libertad.禄
Al iniciar el libro cre铆 que ser铆a una obra recomendada para que los adictos a las drogas dejaran de consumir esas porquer铆as, pero despu茅s de avanzar entend铆 que ser铆a mal铆simo que una persona adicta leyera este libro porque justamente se sentir铆a orgulloso de su proceder. Por lo tanto, si tienen un familiar o amigo que en este momento tiene problemas de ese tipo, por nada del mundo les mencionen este libro porque podr铆an terminar de corromperse.
En resumen, un libro corto pero muy profundo e interesante sobre el comportamiento humano, la sociedad, las clases sociales y la religi贸n, que seguramente no olvidar谩n nunca y querr谩n repetir varias veces porque sinceramente es una obra maestra en todo el sentido de la palabra. Es una novela que me ha encantado en todo momento, la volver茅 a leer en el futuro, quiero seguir analiz谩ndola, e incluso siento el deseo de realizar un podcast sobre este libro 鈥攁 pesar de que nunca he hecho uno鈥� para seguir profundizando y hablando sobre esta obra, que me ha parecido bastante, pero bastante interesante. Libro s煤per recomendado, excepto si tienes una adicci贸n y quieres superarla, en ese caso, l茅elo en otro momento.
December 9, 2018
丌蹖丕 丿賳蹖丕蹖 賲丕 亘蹖卮鬲乇 卮亘蹖賴 1984 噩賵乇噩 丕賵乇賵賱 丕爻鬲貙 蹖丕 丿賳蹖丕蹖 賯卮賳诏 賳賵蹖 丌賱丿賵爻 賴丕讴爻賱蹖責
丕賵乇賵賱 丕夭 丌丿賲 賴丕蹖蹖 賲蹖 鬲乇爻蹖丿 讴賴 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕 乇丕 賲賲賳賵毓 賲蹖 讴賳賳丿.
丕賲丕 賴丕讴爻賱蹖 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賲蹖 鬲乇爻蹖丿 讴賴 丿賱蹖賱蹖 亘乇丕蹖 賲賲賳賵毓 讴乇丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 賵噩賵丿 賳丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮丿貙 趩賵賳 丕氐賱丕賸 讴爻蹖 禺賵丿卮 賳禺賵丕賴丿 讴賴 亘禺賵丕賳丿.
丕賵乇賵賱 丕夭 讴爻丕賳蹖 賲蹖 鬲乇爻蹖丿 讴賴 賲丕 乇丕 丕夭 丿爻鬲乇爻蹖 亘賴 丕胤賱丕毓丕鬲 賲丨乇賵賲 讴賳賳丿.
丕賲丕 賴丕讴爻賱蹖 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賲蹖 鬲乇爻蹖丿 讴賴 讴爻丕賳蹖 丌賳 賯丿乇 賲丕 乇丕 睾乇賯 丿乇 丕胤賱丕毓丕鬲 讴賳賳丿 讴賴 匕賴賳 賲丕 賲氐乇賮 讴賳賳丿踿 睾蹖乇賮毓賾丕賱 丕胤賱丕毓丕鬲 卮賵丿貙 蹖丕 鬲亘丿蹖賱 亘賴 丌丿賲 賴丕蹖 爻胤丨蹖 禺賵丿卮蹖賮鬲賴 卮賵蹖賲.
丕賵乇賵賱 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賲蹖 鬲乇爻蹖丿 讴賴 丨賯蹖賯鬲 丕夭 賲丕 倬賳賴丕賳 卮賵丿.
賴丕讴爻賱蹖 賴乇丕爻 丿丕卮鬲 讴賴 丨賯蹖賯鬲 丿乇 丕賳亘賵賴蹖 丕夭 丕禺亘丕乇 亘蹖 丕賴賲蹖鬲 丿蹖诏乇 倬賳賴丕賳 卮賵丿.
丕賵乇賵賱 賲蹖 鬲乇爻蹖丿 讴賴 賲賱鬲 賴丕 丕爻蹖乇 賵 丿乇亘賳丿 卮賵賳丿.
丕賲丕 賴丕讴爻賱蹖 丕夭 賲亘鬲匕賱 卮丿賳 賵 讴賲 賲丕蹖賴 卮丿賳 賮乇賴賳诏 賴丕 賲蹖 鬲乇爻蹖丿貙 丕夭 丕蹖賳 讴賴 毓賵丕胤賮 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 禺賵丿 乇丕 丕夭 丿爻鬲 亘丿賴蹖賲 賵 讴賲 丕乇夭卮 鬲乇蹖賳 賲丨鬲賵丕賴丕蹖 賮乇賴賳诏蹖 乇丕 賲氐乇賮 讴賳蹖賲.
丿乇 1984 賲乇丿賲 亘丕 夭賵乇 讴賳鬲乇賱 賲蹖 卮丿賳丿.
丿乇 丿賳蹖丕蹖 賯卮賳诏 賳賵 賲乇丿賲 亘丕 鬲乇賮賳丿賽 丿丕丿賳賽 賱匕鬲 賴丕蹖 禺賵卮丕蹖賳丿 爻胤丨蹖 讴賳鬲乇賱 賲蹖 卮丿賳丿.
丕賵乇賵賱 賴乇丕爻 丿丕卮鬲 讴賴 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丕夭 丌賳 賴丕 賲鬲賳賮乇 賴爻鬲蹖賲 賳丕亘賵丿賲丕賳 讴賳賳丿.
賴丕讴爻賱蹖 賲蹖 鬲乇爻蹖丿 讴賴 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丿賵爻鬲卮丕賳 丿丕乇蹖賲 亘丕毓孬 鬲亘丕賴蹖 賲丕 卮賵賳丿.
毓讴爻 亘丿 亘丕夭 賲蹖 卮丿貙 賳丕趩丕乇 賱蹖賳讴卮 乇賵 诏匕丕卮鬲賲!
賲鬲賳 乇蹖賵蹖賵 賲丕賱 賲賳 賳蹖爻鬲 賵 賲丕賱 丕賵賳 毓讴爻賴 賵 毓讴爻 丕夭 賲賳 賳蹖爻鬲. 賮讴乇 讴賳賲 丕夭 讴丕賳丕賱 氐丿丕賳鬲貙 蹖丕 讴丕賳丕賱 賲卮丕亘賴 丿蹖诏賴 诏乇賮鬲賲卮. 蹖丕丿賲 賳蹖爻鬲 丨賯蹖賯鬲卮!
丕賵乇賵賱 丕夭 丌丿賲 賴丕蹖蹖 賲蹖 鬲乇爻蹖丿 讴賴 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕 乇丕 賲賲賳賵毓 賲蹖 讴賳賳丿.
丕賲丕 賴丕讴爻賱蹖 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賲蹖 鬲乇爻蹖丿 讴賴 丿賱蹖賱蹖 亘乇丕蹖 賲賲賳賵毓 讴乇丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 賵噩賵丿 賳丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮丿貙 趩賵賳 丕氐賱丕賸 讴爻蹖 禺賵丿卮 賳禺賵丕賴丿 讴賴 亘禺賵丕賳丿.
丕賵乇賵賱 丕夭 讴爻丕賳蹖 賲蹖 鬲乇爻蹖丿 讴賴 賲丕 乇丕 丕夭 丿爻鬲乇爻蹖 亘賴 丕胤賱丕毓丕鬲 賲丨乇賵賲 讴賳賳丿.
丕賲丕 賴丕讴爻賱蹖 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賲蹖 鬲乇爻蹖丿 讴賴 讴爻丕賳蹖 丌賳 賯丿乇 賲丕 乇丕 睾乇賯 丿乇 丕胤賱丕毓丕鬲 讴賳賳丿 讴賴 匕賴賳 賲丕 賲氐乇賮 讴賳賳丿踿 睾蹖乇賮毓賾丕賱 丕胤賱丕毓丕鬲 卮賵丿貙 蹖丕 鬲亘丿蹖賱 亘賴 丌丿賲 賴丕蹖 爻胤丨蹖 禺賵丿卮蹖賮鬲賴 卮賵蹖賲.
丕賵乇賵賱 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賲蹖 鬲乇爻蹖丿 讴賴 丨賯蹖賯鬲 丕夭 賲丕 倬賳賴丕賳 卮賵丿.
賴丕讴爻賱蹖 賴乇丕爻 丿丕卮鬲 讴賴 丨賯蹖賯鬲 丿乇 丕賳亘賵賴蹖 丕夭 丕禺亘丕乇 亘蹖 丕賴賲蹖鬲 丿蹖诏乇 倬賳賴丕賳 卮賵丿.
丕賵乇賵賱 賲蹖 鬲乇爻蹖丿 讴賴 賲賱鬲 賴丕 丕爻蹖乇 賵 丿乇亘賳丿 卮賵賳丿.
丕賲丕 賴丕讴爻賱蹖 丕夭 賲亘鬲匕賱 卮丿賳 賵 讴賲 賲丕蹖賴 卮丿賳 賮乇賴賳诏 賴丕 賲蹖 鬲乇爻蹖丿貙 丕夭 丕蹖賳 讴賴 毓賵丕胤賮 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 禺賵丿 乇丕 丕夭 丿爻鬲 亘丿賴蹖賲 賵 讴賲 丕乇夭卮 鬲乇蹖賳 賲丨鬲賵丕賴丕蹖 賮乇賴賳诏蹖 乇丕 賲氐乇賮 讴賳蹖賲.
丿乇 1984 賲乇丿賲 亘丕 夭賵乇 讴賳鬲乇賱 賲蹖 卮丿賳丿.
丿乇 丿賳蹖丕蹖 賯卮賳诏 賳賵 賲乇丿賲 亘丕 鬲乇賮賳丿賽 丿丕丿賳賽 賱匕鬲 賴丕蹖 禺賵卮丕蹖賳丿 爻胤丨蹖 讴賳鬲乇賱 賲蹖 卮丿賳丿.
丕賵乇賵賱 賴乇丕爻 丿丕卮鬲 讴賴 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丕夭 丌賳 賴丕 賲鬲賳賮乇 賴爻鬲蹖賲 賳丕亘賵丿賲丕賳 讴賳賳丿.
賴丕讴爻賱蹖 賲蹖 鬲乇爻蹖丿 讴賴 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丿賵爻鬲卮丕賳 丿丕乇蹖賲 亘丕毓孬 鬲亘丕賴蹖 賲丕 卮賵賳丿.
毓讴爻 亘丿 亘丕夭 賲蹖 卮丿貙 賳丕趩丕乇 賱蹖賳讴卮 乇賵 诏匕丕卮鬲賲!
賲鬲賳 乇蹖賵蹖賵 賲丕賱 賲賳 賳蹖爻鬲 賵 賲丕賱 丕賵賳 毓讴爻賴 賵 毓讴爻 丕夭 賲賳 賳蹖爻鬲. 賮讴乇 讴賳賲 丕夭 讴丕賳丕賱 氐丿丕賳鬲貙 蹖丕 讴丕賳丕賱 賲卮丕亘賴 丿蹖诏賴 诏乇賮鬲賲卮. 蹖丕丿賲 賳蹖爻鬲 丨賯蹖賯鬲卮!
March 12, 2012
Brave New World is a classic written to make its readers uncomfortable. It accomplishes its point well. Still, it is only getting 3 stars from me, as I rate books based on my personal level of enjoyment rather than literary value.
The characters of this book were not meant to be likeable - I am fine with that concept. The first few chapters made me want to curl up in the corner and cry - that's how repulsive the design of this universe was (mission accomplished, Mr. Huxley). But as we plunge into the depths of the neverending moral message of the story (basically the entire last third of the book), I felt my patience stretching thin. I get the message, no need to beat me over the head with it.
I did chuckle at the ridiculous consumerism of this world (inspired by America of the turn of the century) in which, unexpectedly, most characters have distinct socialist names - Lenina, Trotsky, Marx, Bernard (as in G.B.Shaw). I just think it's funny how both of the enemies of Huxley's ideal world - the competing ideologies of socialism and rampant consumerism - were dealt with in one blow. Good try - but come on!
I liked the description of the effects of soma drug on the mind. No wonder, as this was written by the author of about mescaline effects on the mind - an interesting read, by the way.
Of the classic trio of dystopian books (this one, Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four and Zamyatin's We) this one is my least favorite (We is the best, in my opinion, and may have actually inspired this one). Brave New World succeeds at portraying dystopia at its worst and making the reader think, but stilted language and moral heavy-handedness take away from the enjoyment. Yet it's a classic, and should be read, even if not for fun. 3 stars.
The characters of this book were not meant to be likeable - I am fine with that concept. The first few chapters made me want to curl up in the corner and cry - that's how repulsive the design of this universe was (mission accomplished, Mr. Huxley). But as we plunge into the depths of the neverending moral message of the story (basically the entire last third of the book), I felt my patience stretching thin. I get the message, no need to beat me over the head with it.
I did chuckle at the ridiculous consumerism of this world (inspired by America of the turn of the century) in which, unexpectedly, most characters have distinct socialist names - Lenina, Trotsky, Marx, Bernard (as in G.B.Shaw). I just think it's funny how both of the enemies of Huxley's ideal world - the competing ideologies of socialism and rampant consumerism - were dealt with in one blow. Good try - but come on!
I liked the description of the effects of soma drug on the mind. No wonder, as this was written by the author of about mescaline effects on the mind - an interesting read, by the way.
Of the classic trio of dystopian books (this one, Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four and Zamyatin's We) this one is my least favorite (We is the best, in my opinion, and may have actually inspired this one). Brave New World succeeds at portraying dystopia at its worst and making the reader think, but stilted language and moral heavy-handedness take away from the enjoyment. Yet it's a classic, and should be read, even if not for fun. 3 stars.
May 20, 2024
I would give it a 4.5 star rating.
"Brave New World" was definitely worth listening to!
It was an interesting dystopian classic with themes that one can still ponder today.
One entertaining aspect of listening to this novel on audio is to picture what other commuters or walkers might think when they overhear a few of the weird social norms of Huxley's book. What would they think if they heard "soma" and "feelies" in the same sentence on the bus or train with you?
Perhaps the idea of a society set up where people are kept under control through pleasure and conditioning is rather unsettling but at the same time intriguing. The narrator of this audiobook added to the story with the creepy, and just downright weird, feeling of potential dystopia it gave the listener.
This is one audiobook that will stay with you for days, even weeks, after listening. If you have not yet listened to Brave New World, I strongly recommend that you do so immediately. Social commentary, ethical dilemmas, and profoundly dysfunctional characters all combine to create nothing less than a masterpiece. I promise that you won't be disappointed.
"Brave New World" was definitely worth listening to!
It was an interesting dystopian classic with themes that one can still ponder today.
One entertaining aspect of listening to this novel on audio is to picture what other commuters or walkers might think when they overhear a few of the weird social norms of Huxley's book. What would they think if they heard "soma" and "feelies" in the same sentence on the bus or train with you?
Perhaps the idea of a society set up where people are kept under control through pleasure and conditioning is rather unsettling but at the same time intriguing. The narrator of this audiobook added to the story with the creepy, and just downright weird, feeling of potential dystopia it gave the listener.
This is one audiobook that will stay with you for days, even weeks, after listening. If you have not yet listened to Brave New World, I strongly recommend that you do so immediately. Social commentary, ethical dilemmas, and profoundly dysfunctional characters all combine to create nothing less than a masterpiece. I promise that you won't be disappointed.
December 2, 2024
Hallucinogenic Drugs, Virtual Sex, Alienated People. Brave New World is a futuristic novel traced by Aldous Huxley, considered one of the greatest prophetic writers of the 20th century. Aldous, who wrote about the effect of LSD and acids, brought from his experimental sessions ideas that were at the very least intriguing, so much so that some renowned scientists then chose him for research into the effect of hallucinogens on humans.
In Brave New World, Aldous describes a perfect society, possibly located in Europe, dominated by a single ruler, where the state distributed a drug called SOMA to the citizens. All had a very calm life, without stress, which helped discipline all inhabitants. In addition to this collective doping strategy, the state provided cinemas where the audience connected to the sensory terminals. It accompanied the films, directly knowing sensations, taste, and smell from the screen. The sex is divided into two parts, one for pleasure and another for prosecution. The latter depended on state authorization. The first was free since there was no sensual coition, i.e., no direct contact between people, which eliminated the carnal intercourse of relationships, connecting to individual terminals, conveying the sensations of sex through the mind and not of the sensual body.
Several children were born in a test tube, adapting them to future situations and raising those working in the basement from a fetus in a dark room. Others who would be soldiers were taught by electroshocks not to appreciate nature, flowers, and wild animals.
Beyond context, the fascination of this literature is that Aldous described all this writing around 1913, when the world was still preparing for the first great world war, trench warfare, without any technology. No one dared to think, much less talk about test-tube children, and sensory terminals were unimaginable; humanity had barely gotten used to the telephone. There was no television; cinema was recently released by the genius Chaplin, still in black and white and mute.
In the book, Aldous mentions a region that would protect from the state's power, where wholly savage people lived, preserving customs of food, sex, and freedom unrelated to the present stage. This charming place, described by Huxley in that fiction written in the moments of his hallucination, was Brazil, with its forests and people.
In Brave New World, Aldous describes a perfect society, possibly located in Europe, dominated by a single ruler, where the state distributed a drug called SOMA to the citizens. All had a very calm life, without stress, which helped discipline all inhabitants. In addition to this collective doping strategy, the state provided cinemas where the audience connected to the sensory terminals. It accompanied the films, directly knowing sensations, taste, and smell from the screen. The sex is divided into two parts, one for pleasure and another for prosecution. The latter depended on state authorization. The first was free since there was no sensual coition, i.e., no direct contact between people, which eliminated the carnal intercourse of relationships, connecting to individual terminals, conveying the sensations of sex through the mind and not of the sensual body.
Several children were born in a test tube, adapting them to future situations and raising those working in the basement from a fetus in a dark room. Others who would be soldiers were taught by electroshocks not to appreciate nature, flowers, and wild animals.
Beyond context, the fascination of this literature is that Aldous described all this writing around 1913, when the world was still preparing for the first great world war, trench warfare, without any technology. No one dared to think, much less talk about test-tube children, and sensory terminals were unimaginable; humanity had barely gotten used to the telephone. There was no television; cinema was recently released by the genius Chaplin, still in black and white and mute.
In the book, Aldous mentions a region that would protect from the state's power, where wholly savage people lived, preserving customs of food, sex, and freedom unrelated to the present stage. This charming place, described by Huxley in that fiction written in the moments of his hallucination, was Brazil, with its forests and people.
March 31, 2018
DNF @ 50%
I know, I know. I'm a peabrain pleb and this is truly a classic and how dare I?
I understand what it's trying to do. I understand the over-enthusiasm for science and the depersonalization. I understand how showing a thriving world devoid of relationships and emotions feels counterintuitive and wrong. ('That's the point!' I understand that's the part that's supposed to 'make you think!') I understand how the conditioning and predestination of this "utopia" sacrifices individuality for compliance and just whoaaaa
I even understand that the frickin orgies and the special drug ("Soma") are representative of the way the people shed their own identities and continue to live a unified existence.
I understand how ground-breaking this was. I understand it raises all sorts of questions and opens discussions about free will, societal control, the role of government and what humanity is.
But it's not for me. This is incredibly dense as the entire first half has been dedicated to showing the science and structure of this 'brave new world.' There's not really a plot and there's not really even characters? (I mean kinda?) It all feels dedicated to driving the same few points home.
I understand. But I'm bored. And I'm tired of the shock-factor of orgies and children engaging in "erotic play"
(This really could have been a short-story and it would have accomplished the same things)
I know, I know. I'm a peabrain pleb and this is truly a classic and how dare I?
I understand what it's trying to do. I understand the over-enthusiasm for science and the depersonalization. I understand how showing a thriving world devoid of relationships and emotions feels counterintuitive and wrong. ('That's the point!' I understand that's the part that's supposed to 'make you think!') I understand how the conditioning and predestination of this "utopia" sacrifices individuality for compliance and just whoaaaa
I even understand that the frickin orgies and the special drug ("Soma") are representative of the way the people shed their own identities and continue to live a unified existence.
I understand how ground-breaking this was. I understand it raises all sorts of questions and opens discussions about free will, societal control, the role of government and what humanity is.
But it's not for me. This is incredibly dense as the entire first half has been dedicated to showing the science and structure of this 'brave new world.' There's not really a plot and there's not really even characters? (I mean kinda?) It all feels dedicated to driving the same few points home.
I understand. But I'm bored. And I'm tired of the shock-factor of orgies and children engaging in "erotic play"
(This really could have been a short-story and it would have accomplished the same things)
December 9, 2020
鈥滻 feel I could do something much more important. Yes, and more intense, more violent. But what? What is there more important to say? And how can one be violent about the sort of things one鈥檚 expected to write about? Words can be like X-rays, if you use them properly--they鈥檒l go through anything. You read and you鈥檙e pierced.鈥�
Aldous Huxley was prompted to write this book in the early 1930s because he feared the direction society was heading. The worship of material goods, the embracement of capitalism, the promiscuity, the growing ambivalence towards books, the self-medication to escape reality, and the overall vacuousness of people, in general.
The book begins rather awkwardly in the lab where people are being created. A massive, industrial, test tube baby factory with very little variety, after all, they have determined the very best specimens so why create anything else? Note to self: rewatch the movie Gattaca. We do meet Lenina in the lab, an uncommonly pretty woman, who feels a pat on a fanny by her supervisor is a reassurance that all is well. Note to self: #metoo movement needs a time machine.
Huxley read a book on Henry Ford, who was certainly the poster child for industry and capitalism. In this book, he has become a deity of sorts. 鈥漁h for Ford鈥檚 Sake!鈥� a character thunders. Note to self: Start using Ford for Fuck and see if anyone has a clue where such a use of the word came from.
鈥漌e don鈥檛 want people attracted by old things. We want them to like the new ones.鈥� Rampant consumerism is the only way to keep the merry-go-round turning. Fortunately, by using brainwashing techniques while everyone sleeps, they can implant the proper desires and prejudices that will make for a united and happy society.
Lenina has become hung up on a guy by the name of Henry Foster. She hasn鈥檛 been with another man for four months. She is dangerously close to being accused of monogamy. Her friend is appalled and reminds her that 鈥漞veryone belongs to everyone else.鈥� A woman being 鈥渁llowed鈥� and even encouraged to be promiscuous would seem like evolution, but when it becomes an obligation to be promiscuous, it feels like just another form of oppression. Sex has become a plaything to keep the masses happy.
They also have soma, which is the ultimate happy pill. Anytime things become too real, they pop a tab of soma or three. 鈥滳hristianity without tears--that鈥檚 what soma is.鈥� It bleeds all meaning out of life, leaving the user complacent and happy and completely oblivious to whatever had been bothering them in the first place. It feels more than a bit like the opioid epidemic that we are struggling with currently; only soma is made readily available to all who need it and seems to have been carefully manufactured to avoid overdoses. Overdoses would definitely be a downer that would create some of that much feared unhappiness. #opiodcrisis
What kind of life would it be to feel nothing?
Bernard Marx has been trying to get Lenina to do something with him for some time. He is a bit of an odd duck among these carefully designed people. A Danny Devito among a herd of Arnold Schwarzeneggers. Note to self: Rewatch Twins, just because it is such a hoot. There is much speculation that something went wrong in the lab, a bit too much of this or too little of that leaked into his test tube. Needless to say, he is testy about it. After all, why does he look like this while his siblings look like that? He finally convinces Lenina to go with him to an Indian reservation in America, where they meet the natives who have been untouched by technology. They get old. They get sick. They die young. They give birth. This is a #povertyporn trip similar to white westerns driving through African villages so they can point and say things like...can you believe people live like this? Bernard is there really to feel something. Lenina is there to become overcome by all the squalor and unfamiliar feelings of discomfort, but she is glad she came because she is going to rock her #Facebook page when she gets back.
Bernard decides to bring a white Savage back with him. He is the product of a lustful coupling by Bernard鈥檚 boss, and believe me Bernard needs all the leverage he can get with his boss. The Savage is reading, not only reading, but reading Shakespeare. Can you imagine a person learning to read from Shakesepeare being integrated into an uneducated society such as this? Note to self: Read Othello. The Savage is primitive and a thinker, and this will prove to be a dangerous combination. He will see the absurdity in everything. He will protest violently...how dare he?
鈥漁 Brave New World!鈥�
Can one man bring truth to the masses? It will be a nearly impossible task, given that the masses don鈥檛 even know they need saving.
I had forgotten about all the humor in the book. Huxley is poking fun at nearly everything we hold sacred. Satire is the perfect vehicle for modern comedians like John Oliver, Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, Samantha Bee, and Bill Maher to make their political points and make their audience laugh as well. We seem to need our truths given to us with a dose of sugar. Even in this futuristic utopia, Huxley called it a negative utopia, the population still needs healthy doses of soma to keep up the pretense that everything is fine. The people who rebel are those who find integration to be a problem or, like Bernard, feel disadvantages from the very beginning of their life. One size does not fit all, even when everyone is manufactured to be the same. A society will always be judged by the tolerance it shows for those different than the majority.
If you wish to see more of my most recent book and movie reviews, visit
I also have a Facebook blogger page at: and an Instagram account
Aldous Huxley was prompted to write this book in the early 1930s because he feared the direction society was heading. The worship of material goods, the embracement of capitalism, the promiscuity, the growing ambivalence towards books, the self-medication to escape reality, and the overall vacuousness of people, in general.
The book begins rather awkwardly in the lab where people are being created. A massive, industrial, test tube baby factory with very little variety, after all, they have determined the very best specimens so why create anything else? Note to self: rewatch the movie Gattaca. We do meet Lenina in the lab, an uncommonly pretty woman, who feels a pat on a fanny by her supervisor is a reassurance that all is well. Note to self: #metoo movement needs a time machine.
Huxley read a book on Henry Ford, who was certainly the poster child for industry and capitalism. In this book, he has become a deity of sorts. 鈥漁h for Ford鈥檚 Sake!鈥� a character thunders. Note to self: Start using Ford for Fuck and see if anyone has a clue where such a use of the word came from.
鈥漌e don鈥檛 want people attracted by old things. We want them to like the new ones.鈥� Rampant consumerism is the only way to keep the merry-go-round turning. Fortunately, by using brainwashing techniques while everyone sleeps, they can implant the proper desires and prejudices that will make for a united and happy society.
Lenina has become hung up on a guy by the name of Henry Foster. She hasn鈥檛 been with another man for four months. She is dangerously close to being accused of monogamy. Her friend is appalled and reminds her that 鈥漞veryone belongs to everyone else.鈥� A woman being 鈥渁llowed鈥� and even encouraged to be promiscuous would seem like evolution, but when it becomes an obligation to be promiscuous, it feels like just another form of oppression. Sex has become a plaything to keep the masses happy.
They also have soma, which is the ultimate happy pill. Anytime things become too real, they pop a tab of soma or three. 鈥滳hristianity without tears--that鈥檚 what soma is.鈥� It bleeds all meaning out of life, leaving the user complacent and happy and completely oblivious to whatever had been bothering them in the first place. It feels more than a bit like the opioid epidemic that we are struggling with currently; only soma is made readily available to all who need it and seems to have been carefully manufactured to avoid overdoses. Overdoses would definitely be a downer that would create some of that much feared unhappiness. #opiodcrisis
What kind of life would it be to feel nothing?
Bernard Marx has been trying to get Lenina to do something with him for some time. He is a bit of an odd duck among these carefully designed people. A Danny Devito among a herd of Arnold Schwarzeneggers. Note to self: Rewatch Twins, just because it is such a hoot. There is much speculation that something went wrong in the lab, a bit too much of this or too little of that leaked into his test tube. Needless to say, he is testy about it. After all, why does he look like this while his siblings look like that? He finally convinces Lenina to go with him to an Indian reservation in America, where they meet the natives who have been untouched by technology. They get old. They get sick. They die young. They give birth. This is a #povertyporn trip similar to white westerns driving through African villages so they can point and say things like...can you believe people live like this? Bernard is there really to feel something. Lenina is there to become overcome by all the squalor and unfamiliar feelings of discomfort, but she is glad she came because she is going to rock her #Facebook page when she gets back.
Bernard decides to bring a white Savage back with him. He is the product of a lustful coupling by Bernard鈥檚 boss, and believe me Bernard needs all the leverage he can get with his boss. The Savage is reading, not only reading, but reading Shakespeare. Can you imagine a person learning to read from Shakesepeare being integrated into an uneducated society such as this? Note to self: Read Othello. The Savage is primitive and a thinker, and this will prove to be a dangerous combination. He will see the absurdity in everything. He will protest violently...how dare he?
鈥漁 Brave New World!鈥�
Can one man bring truth to the masses? It will be a nearly impossible task, given that the masses don鈥檛 even know they need saving.
I had forgotten about all the humor in the book. Huxley is poking fun at nearly everything we hold sacred. Satire is the perfect vehicle for modern comedians like John Oliver, Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, Samantha Bee, and Bill Maher to make their political points and make their audience laugh as well. We seem to need our truths given to us with a dose of sugar. Even in this futuristic utopia, Huxley called it a negative utopia, the population still needs healthy doses of soma to keep up the pretense that everything is fine. The people who rebel are those who find integration to be a problem or, like Bernard, feel disadvantages from the very beginning of their life. One size does not fit all, even when everyone is manufactured to be the same. A society will always be judged by the tolerance it shows for those different than the majority.
If you wish to see more of my most recent book and movie reviews, visit
I also have a Facebook blogger page at: and an Instagram account
August 12, 2024
For fans of 1984鈥�..
Brave New World is a dystopian novel published in 1932. Reproduction occurs in a lab. The government conditions children to hate books and flowers while the government promotes certain products (like sports that require a lot of equipment). Everyone looks the same and has similar names.
The government conditions people through a program of predestiny, and instead of saying 鈥淥ur Lord,鈥� the people say, 鈥淥ur Ford.鈥�
The book itself is a bit rough at times, particularly in the beginning which is too focused on statistics and numbers.
However, there is a lot to think about in this book. Although I don鈥檛 know the exact social mores of the 1930鈥檚, many of the ideas expressed in Brave New World are accurate today.
Consumerism is still a founding principle in the United States where consumer debt is at an all-time high between mortgages, credit cards, student loans, and auto loans. The idea is that one always needs more, more, more.
Now, let鈥檚 talk about predestiny. If you just work hard, you can be anything, right?
You could be the next Bill Gates, right?
Let鈥檚 look at the education of some of the wealthiest people in the world.
Bill Gates: He went to a private school, Lakeside prep. According to the Lakeside School website, the tuition for the 2023-2024 school year is $42,000. That isn鈥檛 for college. This is for high school.
Mark Zuckerberg: He attended a private school as well, Phillips Exeter Academy. According to its website, tuition for the 2023-2024 school year is $50,604.
Jeff Bezos: He attended Miami Palmetto High School and even worked at McDonald鈥檚. However, he also participated in the Student Science Training Program at the University of Florida. According to the website, this is a 鈥渞igorous and fast paced program for academically talented and motivated students.鈥� The program costs $5,200 plus a $50 application fee.
We talk about predestiny. It seems like we, as a society, need to invest more in education.
2025 Reading Schedule
Jan A Town Like Alice
Feb Birdsong
Mar Captain Corelli's Mandolin - Louis De Berniere
Apr War and Peace
May The Woman in White
Jun Atonement
Jul The Shadow of the Wind
Aug Jude the Obscure
Sep Ulysses
Oct Vanity Fair
Nov A Fine Balance
Dec Germinal
Connect With Me!
Brave New World is a dystopian novel published in 1932. Reproduction occurs in a lab. The government conditions children to hate books and flowers while the government promotes certain products (like sports that require a lot of equipment). Everyone looks the same and has similar names.
The government conditions people through a program of predestiny, and instead of saying 鈥淥ur Lord,鈥� the people say, 鈥淥ur Ford.鈥�
The book itself is a bit rough at times, particularly in the beginning which is too focused on statistics and numbers.
However, there is a lot to think about in this book. Although I don鈥檛 know the exact social mores of the 1930鈥檚, many of the ideas expressed in Brave New World are accurate today.
Consumerism is still a founding principle in the United States where consumer debt is at an all-time high between mortgages, credit cards, student loans, and auto loans. The idea is that one always needs more, more, more.
Now, let鈥檚 talk about predestiny. If you just work hard, you can be anything, right?
You could be the next Bill Gates, right?
Let鈥檚 look at the education of some of the wealthiest people in the world.
Bill Gates: He went to a private school, Lakeside prep. According to the Lakeside School website, the tuition for the 2023-2024 school year is $42,000. That isn鈥檛 for college. This is for high school.
Mark Zuckerberg: He attended a private school as well, Phillips Exeter Academy. According to its website, tuition for the 2023-2024 school year is $50,604.
Jeff Bezos: He attended Miami Palmetto High School and even worked at McDonald鈥檚. However, he also participated in the Student Science Training Program at the University of Florida. According to the website, this is a 鈥渞igorous and fast paced program for academically talented and motivated students.鈥� The program costs $5,200 plus a $50 application fee.
We talk about predestiny. It seems like we, as a society, need to invest more in education.
2025 Reading Schedule
Jan A Town Like Alice
Feb Birdsong
Mar Captain Corelli's Mandolin - Louis De Berniere
Apr War and Peace
May The Woman in White
Jun Atonement
Jul The Shadow of the Wind
Aug Jude the Obscure
Sep Ulysses
Oct Vanity Fair
Nov A Fine Balance
Dec Germinal
Connect With Me!
July 11, 2020
Back in high school, one of the teachers brought a little sample from this book, and I found it totally captivating. Terrifying but at the same captivating.
So, I went back to it.
鈥淥ne believes things because one has been conditioned to believe them.鈥�
The beginning is totally the strongest part of this book, as it progresses, it goes a bit down. But at the same time, I think that the beginning is the hardest to get over. The world is being introduced to us in a rather raw way which definitely has the potential to make people uneasy. And while it was hard to read but it was also fascinating in a way. You do not like what you see, but you cannot look away.
However, the book gave me chills; it's definitely not a "summer-read", it's quite a bit to unpack and get over what's happening.
Side note, I just hope that no one ever looks at this book and thinks that it's a great idea. THAT would be terrifying.
So, I went back to it.
鈥淥ne believes things because one has been conditioned to believe them.鈥�
The beginning is totally the strongest part of this book, as it progresses, it goes a bit down. But at the same time, I think that the beginning is the hardest to get over. The world is being introduced to us in a rather raw way which definitely has the potential to make people uneasy. And while it was hard to read but it was also fascinating in a way. You do not like what you see, but you cannot look away.
However, the book gave me chills; it's definitely not a "summer-read", it's quite a bit to unpack and get over what's happening.
Side note, I just hope that no one ever looks at this book and thinks that it's a great idea. THAT would be terrifying.
September 27, 2017
Given that dystopian books are generally not my first choice 鈥榬un-to-books-to-read鈥�.... and I鈥檓 sure I didn鈥檛 understand the full depths of this book - which was written 21 years before I was born....even I can see Aldous Huxley had a brilliant mind.
I was trying to wrap my thinking around the conspiracies that it looked liked the author was trying to warn us were happening in the world 鈥旓拷trying to visualize the already futuristic setting 鈥�( was he thinking of 2017?)....and follow the story itself, trying to get inside the heads of the created characters.
See... I鈥檓 not very good at this. This type of reading is challenging for me. It hurts my brain!!!!
But.....here are a few things I think I got from this book:
.....thousands of little babies got born from one cell.....but not from a mothers womb....and these were the SORRY SUCKERS...( too bad for you Johnny - you鈥檙e pretty much a worthless bean- and you get to have all the shitty underpaid jobs in the world).
.....embryos were incubated in bottles in laboratories.
.....there were no traditional 鈥楲eave It To Beaver鈥� families in this society - there were no families at all - no sexual reproduction at all!
.....there is a REASON for all this. Embryos were divided by their social status. There were five castes: alpha, beta, (THE LUCKY SUCKERS).....and delta, gamma, and epsilon.....(the SORRY SUCKERS)......
Oh but wait the SORRY SUCKERS won鈥檛 feel sorry for themselves because this is utopia....where everybody is made to be happy - as all personal identity has vanished. DRUGS ARE COOL.... even encouraged! Everybody must get stoned.
So? How am I doing? Am I understanding this book somewhat?
...that what Aldous Huxley was saying is that the FUTURE LOOKS SCARY?/!....
It looked scary in 1931.... and it still looks scary in 2017.
One of Huxley鈥檚 predictions was spot on: Bombastic- pretentious -pompous RIDICULOUS senatorial entertainment! ( Huxley was more kind and didn鈥檛 use all those adjectives)....but he might have if he knew how right he鈥檇 really be!
Lots more in this slim-jim novel - we get enlightened on history - religion - consumerism- emotions ( not to worry - you won鈥檛 need to worry - it鈥檚 a no worry society).... we鈥檝e become deadbeats!
PLEASE read other reviews- I have NO idea if I read this book right.
However ...seems like I shouldn鈥檛 worry about it all according to the brilliant man himself...Aldous Huxley! VERY WORTH READING! ( even for a girl who understands nothin)
Whew.... now I can start my day.... as all is well in the world. 馃審
I was trying to wrap my thinking around the conspiracies that it looked liked the author was trying to warn us were happening in the world 鈥旓拷trying to visualize the already futuristic setting 鈥�( was he thinking of 2017?)....and follow the story itself, trying to get inside the heads of the created characters.
See... I鈥檓 not very good at this. This type of reading is challenging for me. It hurts my brain!!!!
But.....here are a few things I think I got from this book:
.....thousands of little babies got born from one cell.....but not from a mothers womb....and these were the SORRY SUCKERS...( too bad for you Johnny - you鈥檙e pretty much a worthless bean- and you get to have all the shitty underpaid jobs in the world).
.....embryos were incubated in bottles in laboratories.
.....there were no traditional 鈥楲eave It To Beaver鈥� families in this society - there were no families at all - no sexual reproduction at all!
.....there is a REASON for all this. Embryos were divided by their social status. There were five castes: alpha, beta, (THE LUCKY SUCKERS).....and delta, gamma, and epsilon.....(the SORRY SUCKERS)......
Oh but wait the SORRY SUCKERS won鈥檛 feel sorry for themselves because this is utopia....where everybody is made to be happy - as all personal identity has vanished. DRUGS ARE COOL.... even encouraged! Everybody must get stoned.
So? How am I doing? Am I understanding this book somewhat?
...that what Aldous Huxley was saying is that the FUTURE LOOKS SCARY?/!....
It looked scary in 1931.... and it still looks scary in 2017.
One of Huxley鈥檚 predictions was spot on: Bombastic- pretentious -pompous RIDICULOUS senatorial entertainment! ( Huxley was more kind and didn鈥檛 use all those adjectives)....but he might have if he knew how right he鈥檇 really be!
Lots more in this slim-jim novel - we get enlightened on history - religion - consumerism- emotions ( not to worry - you won鈥檛 need to worry - it鈥檚 a no worry society).... we鈥檝e become deadbeats!
PLEASE read other reviews- I have NO idea if I read this book right.
However ...seems like I shouldn鈥檛 worry about it all according to the brilliant man himself...Aldous Huxley! VERY WORTH READING! ( even for a girl who understands nothin)
Whew.... now I can start my day.... as all is well in the world. 馃審
Displaying 1 - 30 of 55,693 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.