What do you think?
Rate this book
American Gods #2
袦芯屑褔械褌邪褌邪 薪邪 袗薪邪薪褋懈
袘袨袚 袝 袦歇袪孝歇袙, 袟袗袩袨袟袧袗袡孝袝 小袝 小 袛袝笑袗孝袗
袛械斜械谢懈褟 效邪褉谢懈 袧邪薪褋懈 懈屑邪 谢芯褕邪 褋械写屑懈褑邪. 袘邪褖邪 屑褍, 褋 泻芯谐芯褌芯 芯褌写邪胁薪邪 薪械 褋械 锌芯谐邪卸写邪褌, 械 锌芯褔懈薪邪谢 薪邪 褋褑械薪邪褌邪 胁 泻邪褉邪芯泻械 斜邪褉, 褋 泻芯械褌芯 蟹邪 锌芯褉械写械薪 锌褗褌 械 蟹邪褋褉邪屑懈谢 写芯 褋屑褗褉褌 褋懈薪邪 褋懈. 袧芯 褌芯胁邪 写邪谢械褔 薪械 械 泻褉邪褟褌. 袟邪褖芯褌芯, 泻邪泻褌芯 效邪褉谢懈 褋泻芯褉芯 褖械 芯褌泻褉懈械, 斜邪褖邪 屑褍 薪械 械 斜懈谢 泻邪泻褗胁 写邪 械 斜邪褖邪. 袧械, 褌芯泄 械 斜懈谢 锌邪泻芯褋褌谢懈胁懈褟褌 斜芯谐 袗薪邪薪褋懈. 袗薪邪薪褋懈 械 斜褍薪褌芯胁械薪 写褍褏, 泻芯泄褌芯 屑芯卸械 写邪 褏褗褉蟹褍谢薪械 芯斜褖芯锌褉懈械褌懈褟 褉械写, 写邪 薪邪锌褉邪胁懈 泻褍锌 锌邪褉懈 芯褌 薪懈褖芯褌芯 懈 写邪 褋邪褖懈褋邪 写褟胁芯谢邪 写芯褉懈. 袧懈褖芯 褔褍写薪芯, 褔械 卸懈胁芯褌褗褌 薪邪 袛械斜械谢懈褟 效邪褉谢懈 械 薪邪 锌褗褌 写邪 褋械 芯斜褗褉薪械 褋 泻褉邪泻邪褌邪 薪邪谐芯褉械.
袠蟹谢褟蟹谢邪 懈蟹锌芯写 锌械褉芯褌芯 薪邪 械写懈薪 芯褌 薪邪泄-芯褉懈谐懈薪邪谢薪懈褌械 褌邪谢邪薪褌懈 胁 卸邪薪褉邪, 鈥炐溞拘佳囆笛傂把傂� 薪邪 袗薪邪薪褋懈鈥� 械 褖褍褉芯 锌褗褌械褕械褋褌胁懈械 胁 写械斜褉懈褌械 薪邪 屑懈褌芯谢芯谐懈褔薪芯褌芯, 锌褗褌械褕械褋褌胁懈械 械写薪芯胁褉械屑械薪薪芯 褋褌褉褟褋泻邪褖芯, 褍卸邪褋褟胁邪褖芯, 胁褗谢薪褍胁邪褖芯 懈 褋屑械褕薪芯 写芯 褋褗谢蟹懈.
鈥炐愋叫靶窖佇� 械 褌芯褔薪芯 褌芯谢泻芯胁邪 褔邪褉芯胁械薪 懈 芯锌邪褋械薪, 泻芯谢泻芯褌芯 褌褉褟斜胁邪 写邪 斜褗写械鈥� 袦薪芯谐芯锌谢邪褋褌芯胁 褉芯屑邪薪 褋褗褋 褋胁芯褟 褋芯斜褋褌胁械薪邪 邪褌屑芯褋褎械褉邪.鈥� 鈥� 鈥炐⑿靶剐佳佲€�
鈥炐樞沸盒谎幯囆秆傂敌恍叫� 蟹邪斜邪胁薪邪 泻薪懈谐邪鈥� 袣芯屑斜懈薪懈褉邪 邪薪邪褉褏懈褟褌邪 薪邪 袛褗谐谢邪褋 袗写邪屑褋 褋 芯薪邪蟹懈 芯褋芯斜械薪邪 褖械写褉芯褋褌 薪邪 写褍褏邪, 泻芯褟褌芯 薪邪屑懈褉邪屑械 胁 褉芯屑邪薪懈褌械 薪邪 校写褏邪褍褋.鈥� 鈥� 小褍蟹邪薪邪 袣谢邪褉泻
鈥炐捬娦恍窖冃残把壭� 懈 褋褌褉邪褏芯胁懈褌邪.鈥� 鈥� 鈥炐樞叫葱感啃敌叫囱娦窖傗€�
鈥炐澬感剐� 袚械泄屑褗薪 械 褋褌褉邪褏芯褌械薪 锌懈褋邪褌械谢, 邪 鈥炐溞拘佳囆笛傂把傂� 薪邪 袗薪邪薪褋懈鈥� 械 蟹邪斜邪胁薪邪 锌褉懈泻邪蟹泻邪, 褋 泻芯褟褌芯 写邪 褋械 锌芯褋屑械械褕 锌褉械写懈 谢褟谐邪薪械.鈥� 鈥� 鈥炐斝敌剐恍� 孝械谢械谐褉邪褎鈥�
袛械斜械谢懈褟 效邪褉谢懈 袧邪薪褋懈 懈屑邪 谢芯褕邪 褋械写屑懈褑邪. 袘邪褖邪 屑褍, 褋 泻芯谐芯褌芯 芯褌写邪胁薪邪 薪械 褋械 锌芯谐邪卸写邪褌, 械 锌芯褔懈薪邪谢 薪邪 褋褑械薪邪褌邪 胁 泻邪褉邪芯泻械 斜邪褉, 褋 泻芯械褌芯 蟹邪 锌芯褉械写械薪 锌褗褌 械 蟹邪褋褉邪屑懈谢 写芯 褋屑褗褉褌 褋懈薪邪 褋懈. 袧芯 褌芯胁邪 写邪谢械褔 薪械 械 泻褉邪褟褌. 袟邪褖芯褌芯, 泻邪泻褌芯 效邪褉谢懈 褋泻芯褉芯 褖械 芯褌泻褉懈械, 斜邪褖邪 屑褍 薪械 械 斜懈谢 泻邪泻褗胁 写邪 械 斜邪褖邪. 袧械, 褌芯泄 械 斜懈谢 锌邪泻芯褋褌谢懈胁懈褟褌 斜芯谐 袗薪邪薪褋懈. 袗薪邪薪褋懈 械 斜褍薪褌芯胁械薪 写褍褏, 泻芯泄褌芯 屑芯卸械 写邪 褏褗褉蟹褍谢薪械 芯斜褖芯锌褉懈械褌懈褟 褉械写, 写邪 薪邪锌褉邪胁懈 泻褍锌 锌邪褉懈 芯褌 薪懈褖芯褌芯 懈 写邪 褋邪褖懈褋邪 写褟胁芯谢邪 写芯褉懈. 袧懈褖芯 褔褍写薪芯, 褔械 卸懈胁芯褌褗褌 薪邪 袛械斜械谢懈褟 效邪褉谢懈 械 薪邪 锌褗褌 写邪 褋械 芯斜褗褉薪械 褋 泻褉邪泻邪褌邪 薪邪谐芯褉械.
袠蟹谢褟蟹谢邪 懈蟹锌芯写 锌械褉芯褌芯 薪邪 械写懈薪 芯褌 薪邪泄-芯褉懈谐懈薪邪谢薪懈褌械 褌邪谢邪薪褌懈 胁 卸邪薪褉邪, 鈥炐溞拘佳囆笛傂把傂� 薪邪 袗薪邪薪褋懈鈥� 械 褖褍褉芯 锌褗褌械褕械褋褌胁懈械 胁 写械斜褉懈褌械 薪邪 屑懈褌芯谢芯谐懈褔薪芯褌芯, 锌褗褌械褕械褋褌胁懈械 械写薪芯胁褉械屑械薪薪芯 褋褌褉褟褋泻邪褖芯, 褍卸邪褋褟胁邪褖芯, 胁褗谢薪褍胁邪褖芯 懈 褋屑械褕薪芯 写芯 褋褗谢蟹懈.
鈥炐愋叫靶窖佇� 械 褌芯褔薪芯 褌芯谢泻芯胁邪 褔邪褉芯胁械薪 懈 芯锌邪褋械薪, 泻芯谢泻芯褌芯 褌褉褟斜胁邪 写邪 斜褗写械鈥� 袦薪芯谐芯锌谢邪褋褌芯胁 褉芯屑邪薪 褋褗褋 褋胁芯褟 褋芯斜褋褌胁械薪邪 邪褌屑芯褋褎械褉邪.鈥� 鈥� 鈥炐⑿靶剐佳佲€�
鈥炐樞沸盒谎幯囆秆傂敌恍叫� 蟹邪斜邪胁薪邪 泻薪懈谐邪鈥� 袣芯屑斜懈薪懈褉邪 邪薪邪褉褏懈褟褌邪 薪邪 袛褗谐谢邪褋 袗写邪屑褋 褋 芯薪邪蟹懈 芯褋芯斜械薪邪 褖械写褉芯褋褌 薪邪 写褍褏邪, 泻芯褟褌芯 薪邪屑懈褉邪屑械 胁 褉芯屑邪薪懈褌械 薪邪 校写褏邪褍褋.鈥� 鈥� 小褍蟹邪薪邪 袣谢邪褉泻
鈥炐捬娦恍窖冃残把壭� 懈 褋褌褉邪褏芯胁懈褌邪.鈥� 鈥� 鈥炐樞叫葱感啃敌叫囱娦窖傗€�
鈥炐澬感剐� 袚械泄屑褗薪 械 褋褌褉邪褏芯褌械薪 锌懈褋邪褌械谢, 邪 鈥炐溞拘佳囆笛傂把傂� 薪邪 袗薪邪薪褋懈鈥� 械 蟹邪斜邪胁薪邪 锌褉懈泻邪蟹泻邪, 褋 泻芯褟褌芯 写邪 褋械 锌芯褋屑械械褕 锌褉械写懈 谢褟谐邪薪械.鈥� 鈥� 鈥炐斝敌剐恍� 孝械谢械谐褉邪褎鈥�
438 pages, 屑邪谢褗泻 褎芯褉屑邪褌, 屑械泻懈 泻芯褉懈褑懈
First published September 20, 2005
7088 people are currently reading
124453 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 12,152 reviews
October 19, 2021
(B+) 76% | Good
Notes: Little transition between its real-world first half and its magical second half. Its story gets all wishy-washy at the end.
Notes: Little transition between its real-world first half and its magical second half. Its story gets all wishy-washy at the end.
July 24, 2016
I agree with many of the reviewers who praise this fun and inventive novel, but I am especially fascinated by how Gaiman represents race in Anansi Boys. He chooses not to explicitly identify that his globe-trotting main characters are black until at least p. 32 (if I'm mistaken, somebody please let me know) and only then as a point-of-fact that is secondary to their status as gods. It is true that anyone who has read American Gods or heard traditional African folktales will have met Anansi before, but even here the story emphasizes the cultural distinctiveness of the Caribbean island where this Anansi lives without employing heavy racial signifiers. (This isn't the same as being "race-neutral" - whatever that means! - and the white characters are identified as such.) At first I thought it was odd, then really interesting and a thoughtful way to put Anansi and his fellow gods on equal footing with other cultural myths and legends. experiments with this in "Recitatif" and Paradise, but it is nice to see the technique employed in unexpected places. The story is also influenced by Zora Neale Hurston's work, which is cool. While I still like American Gods better, this is a great read. It's also hilarious - see one of the quotes I saved below.
April 14, 2008
I laughed out loud. While reading. In a Japanese rice bowl joint. Okay, so maybe it was more of a chortle, but it was definitely out loud. And more than just the once. Patrons quietly minding their own business while slogging through their Number Three Specials With Extra Tokyo Beef would be startled into wakefulness to see me - chopsticks in one hand, book in the other - as my grizzled maw broke forth with guffaws and irrepressible smiles.
Really, Anansi Boys may be the first thing I've read from that I liked. I never got into Sandman (though I'm told I should have persevered). I never finished American Gods (though I'm told I should have persevered). I never finished 1602 (despite guessing that I should have persevered).
Still, not only did I like it but I loved it. Enough that I gave my copy to someone else to read and purchased a second copy for another friend. And I'm certain they'll want to do similar things with the book.
Anansi Boys is at all times funny, adventurous, and charming. And several other over-used adjectives. In fact, Anansi Boys may be the prototype from which overused adjectives should have come - before they were overused. I'm not sure that Anansi Boys is great literature and I'm not sure that it isn't. What I am certain of beyond any shadow of doubtfulness is that Anansi Boys may be the most fun I have ever had reading a novel.
There may be others that I enjoyed more but my experience of this book was such that it pushed (if even momentarily) all other books from my mind. Someone on the back suggests that the book will make you love and be grateful for spiders. Critics and the things they say, huh? Well, I don't love spiders, but dang was this book good.
The end.
p.s. Anyone thinking of reading Blue like Jazz or Against Christianity or something by should definitely read this first. 'Cuz I mean what if you died after finishing the next book on your queue? It would be an all time tragedy to have wasted hours reading when there is something like Anansi Boys out there. Plus, it's just as spiritual.
Really, Anansi Boys may be the first thing I've read from that I liked. I never got into Sandman (though I'm told I should have persevered). I never finished American Gods (though I'm told I should have persevered). I never finished 1602 (despite guessing that I should have persevered).
Still, not only did I like it but I loved it. Enough that I gave my copy to someone else to read and purchased a second copy for another friend. And I'm certain they'll want to do similar things with the book.
Anansi Boys is at all times funny, adventurous, and charming. And several other over-used adjectives. In fact, Anansi Boys may be the prototype from which overused adjectives should have come - before they were overused. I'm not sure that Anansi Boys is great literature and I'm not sure that it isn't. What I am certain of beyond any shadow of doubtfulness is that Anansi Boys may be the most fun I have ever had reading a novel.
There may be others that I enjoyed more but my experience of this book was such that it pushed (if even momentarily) all other books from my mind. Someone on the back suggests that the book will make you love and be grateful for spiders. Critics and the things they say, huh? Well, I don't love spiders, but dang was this book good.
The end.
p.s. Anyone thinking of reading Blue like Jazz or Against Christianity or something by should definitely read this first. 'Cuz I mean what if you died after finishing the next book on your queue? It would be an all time tragedy to have wasted hours reading when there is something like Anansi Boys out there. Plus, it's just as spiritual.
January 31, 2021
A cool spidey alternative, not just special tinkling senses while silking and scuttling around, but doing some nasty stuff with his abilities and I don麓t mean the bondage your dirty mind might imagine at the moment. Wait,鈥� damn self irony.
There are 2 kinds of second parts, the one in series that usually get better because the exposition, and thereby dangerous lengths, infodumps, and losing the reader麓s interest, are already behind the writer and she/he can now fully focus on pure entertainment.
And then there are the ones that are not lifting off, I麓ve hardly seen this in one of Gaiman麓s usually ingenious books, but this one seemed somewhat constructed, put together afterward, didn麓t have the usual logic and inner stability, but that麓s criticism at a very high level, it麓s still a good work.
Anti heroes, such as Loki, in this case the not so well known Anansi, are always fun to read, because their enjoyable evilness opens up dynamic, fun, and vast lands of putting their deadly, crippling, and humiliating jokes into a modern or future setting. Often, there was even some educational purpose in the originals, something mostly getting lost in modern adaptations, where it麓s mostly about using them for thrill, action, and fast paced cuts and jumps from character to setting. I麓ve read some mythologies and they are, duh, kind of boring too, because creative writing courses weren麓t that hip and fancy these days hundreds and thousands of years ago.
Because there is so much mythology and clever, hidden easter eggs and philosophy hidden in this one, it would be interesting to take a deeper look when reading or rereading it, because Gaiman didn麓t just include a ton of classical motives, origin myths, and moralizing examples of how ancient cultures used to brainwash and indoctrinate their people by hiding secret commandos in their folklore, but some underlying, deeper meaning too. Or I just want to see them, whatever.
What is really strange, kind of prophetic, is that the potentially endless concept of creating new gods out of technology, epigenetic, and cultural change, didn麓t work out as well as possible both as series and as book. Just thinking about what might be possible, not just in general, but specifically with the mythology and current state of affairs around the world, is immense. All fantasy elements of traditional tales could be continued in
a science fantasy comedy setting, filling it with innuendos and connotations to past, present, and possible futures, making it an extremely inspiring read.
I have to repeat and emphasize, that this is criticism at a very high level, the curse of all outstanding prodigy writers, that the fangirls and -boys immediately notice weaknesses that would be accepted in works of all the good, but not great, authors, and that it麓s still an amazing, funny, mindblowing work. Just not as good as his others.
I am totally looking forward to an author who makes this dynamic the driving force of her/his series, using
and creating a never seen, mind blowing, crossover, letting genre conventions implode, 眉ber hybrid. Ahem, Mister Sanderson, may you please take over?
Tropes show how literature is conceptualized and created and which mixture of elements makes works and genres unique:
There are 2 kinds of second parts, the one in series that usually get better because the exposition, and thereby dangerous lengths, infodumps, and losing the reader麓s interest, are already behind the writer and she/he can now fully focus on pure entertainment.
And then there are the ones that are not lifting off, I麓ve hardly seen this in one of Gaiman麓s usually ingenious books, but this one seemed somewhat constructed, put together afterward, didn麓t have the usual logic and inner stability, but that麓s criticism at a very high level, it麓s still a good work.
Anti heroes, such as Loki, in this case the not so well known Anansi, are always fun to read, because their enjoyable evilness opens up dynamic, fun, and vast lands of putting their deadly, crippling, and humiliating jokes into a modern or future setting. Often, there was even some educational purpose in the originals, something mostly getting lost in modern adaptations, where it麓s mostly about using them for thrill, action, and fast paced cuts and jumps from character to setting. I麓ve read some mythologies and they are, duh, kind of boring too, because creative writing courses weren麓t that hip and fancy these days hundreds and thousands of years ago.
Because there is so much mythology and clever, hidden easter eggs and philosophy hidden in this one, it would be interesting to take a deeper look when reading or rereading it, because Gaiman didn麓t just include a ton of classical motives, origin myths, and moralizing examples of how ancient cultures used to brainwash and indoctrinate their people by hiding secret commandos in their folklore, but some underlying, deeper meaning too. Or I just want to see them, whatever.
What is really strange, kind of prophetic, is that the potentially endless concept of creating new gods out of technology, epigenetic, and cultural change, didn麓t work out as well as possible both as series and as book. Just thinking about what might be possible, not just in general, but specifically with the mythology and current state of affairs around the world, is immense. All fantasy elements of traditional tales could be continued in
a science fantasy comedy setting, filling it with innuendos and connotations to past, present, and possible futures, making it an extremely inspiring read.
I have to repeat and emphasize, that this is criticism at a very high level, the curse of all outstanding prodigy writers, that the fangirls and -boys immediately notice weaknesses that would be accepted in works of all the good, but not great, authors, and that it麓s still an amazing, funny, mindblowing work. Just not as good as his others.
I am totally looking forward to an author who makes this dynamic the driving force of her/his series, using
and creating a never seen, mind blowing, crossover, letting genre conventions implode, 眉ber hybrid. Ahem, Mister Sanderson, may you please take over?
Tropes show how literature is conceptualized and created and which mixture of elements makes works and genres unique:
November 4, 2023
(B+) 76% | Good
Notes: Gets too diffuse (it's focus-loose), a lot of story-slacking, a waggish work if over-quirked, it鈥檚 fun but magic's lacking.
*Check out progress updates for detailed commentary:
Notes: Gets too diffuse (it's focus-loose), a lot of story-slacking, a waggish work if over-quirked, it鈥檚 fun but magic's lacking.
*Check out progress updates for detailed commentary:
April 22, 2010
One of the few Gaiman books that I only gush mildly about, as opposed to gushing enthusiastically.
It's a solid book, and it does all the things that makes Gaiman's books great. It's got humor, myth, gravitas, cleverness.... But it simply didn't impress me as much as Neverwhere, Stardust, American Gods, or Coriline.
I'm willing to admit that the only reason I don't rank this book as 5 stars is because I'm comparing it to his other books, which are profound and perfect. That's probably unfair of me, but I never claimed to be completely fair.
It's a solid book, and it does all the things that makes Gaiman's books great. It's got humor, myth, gravitas, cleverness.... But it simply didn't impress me as much as Neverwhere, Stardust, American Gods, or Coriline.
I'm willing to admit that the only reason I don't rank this book as 5 stars is because I'm comparing it to his other books, which are profound and perfect. That's probably unfair of me, but I never claimed to be completely fair.
October 5, 2019
Anansi Boys by Neil Gaiman blends the best attributes of Gaiman鈥檚 extraordinary talent: excellent writing, original storytelling, mythic elements, and confidence.
A central theme in the narrative is about confidence and that is also how Gaiman tells the tale, his writing exudes confidence, he writes with a virtuoso鈥檚 swagger. Not really taking off where left off, but neither does it depart from Gaiman鈥檚 myth and legends foundations, Anansi Boys sings the song of Fat Charlie, Mr. Nancy鈥檚 somewhat estranged son and how he gets his groove back.
Someone should make a list of all the stories about trickster gods and I think that would make a great collection - maybe even a story about all the trickster gods, like a convention! Loki, Coyote, Anansi, etc. Hey Neil!
Very entertaining.
A central theme in the narrative is about confidence and that is also how Gaiman tells the tale, his writing exudes confidence, he writes with a virtuoso鈥檚 swagger. Not really taking off where left off, but neither does it depart from Gaiman鈥檚 myth and legends foundations, Anansi Boys sings the song of Fat Charlie, Mr. Nancy鈥檚 somewhat estranged son and how he gets his groove back.
Someone should make a list of all the stories about trickster gods and I think that would make a great collection - maybe even a story about all the trickster gods, like a convention! Loki, Coyote, Anansi, etc. Hey Neil!
Very entertaining.
August 27, 2016
I've come to recognize that one of the main reasons I enjoyed this book so much was that I listened to the audiobook, performed by comedian Lenny Henry, whose background as a Brit of Caribbean descent made him the perfect choice to bring the characters to life. A lot of audiobooks aren't very good, but this one way great, and really brings out the fact that Anansi stories are meant to be heard.
It's recognizable Gaiman stuff, with the fish-out-of-water narrator in a modern fantasy world, with the author sxploring the history and the form of the mythic story, but there's a level of deprecating humor in this book that is lacking in other works by Gaiman.
One can catch snips of wit in any of his books. Any good book must include some humor: an author might as futilely try to excise pain or desire from life as humor. Gaiman has never placed any such artificial limits on his work; indeed, the only limits on his books are those he, himself cannot overcome.
Previously, his humor was only an occasional element, but there was apparently something in the writing of this particular book which finally allowed him to unleash his sense of the comic as a whole entity. The text swims and bobs with the ridiculous, the unfortunate, and the clever.
After reading 'Good Omens', written by Gaiman and Prachett, I was told that without Prachett, it would have retained none of the humor. I now begin to wonder whether if Pratchett added anything at all. Indeed, this work of Gaiman's overshadows that earlier work in both degrees and shades of the insightful and entertaining.
With the focus on Anansi and stories, the book provides an amusing analysis of storytelling itself, so that anyone who studies the nature and classification of tales will find certain asides and references particularly amusing. It is rare these days that an author will write a piece of fiction which explores on a subtextual level a concept or idea fundamental to the work itself. I have come to wish that more authors could gain the audacity that Gaiman found here.
There is a degree to which this story matches Gaiman's usual monomythic progression from naive outsider to coy insider, which at the outset was my greatest difficulty with the work. The inevitability and redundancy of this trope makes me wish for Gaiman's more eccentric and perverse moments. However, I found in the clever and skilled text a story worth experiencing, and one which matches or exceeds Gaiman's other attempts in the modern fantasy genre.
The story is not as epic or dire as Gaiman's tend to be, and without that there is a loss of urgency in the story. This is not really a deficiency, however, as the playful humor could not cohabitate comfortably with an ever-steepening plot curve.
The work fits into Gaiman's usual mode, exploring the myths and psychologies that most interest him. It may lose some of his fans in that it is less dark and brooding, less hopeless, but this could hardly be counted a loss. Any reader who wants more of the same can re-read his old works. the rest of us may appreciate seeing a master storyteller exploring his form in a new and engaging way.
It's recognizable Gaiman stuff, with the fish-out-of-water narrator in a modern fantasy world, with the author sxploring the history and the form of the mythic story, but there's a level of deprecating humor in this book that is lacking in other works by Gaiman.
One can catch snips of wit in any of his books. Any good book must include some humor: an author might as futilely try to excise pain or desire from life as humor. Gaiman has never placed any such artificial limits on his work; indeed, the only limits on his books are those he, himself cannot overcome.
Previously, his humor was only an occasional element, but there was apparently something in the writing of this particular book which finally allowed him to unleash his sense of the comic as a whole entity. The text swims and bobs with the ridiculous, the unfortunate, and the clever.
After reading 'Good Omens', written by Gaiman and Prachett, I was told that without Prachett, it would have retained none of the humor. I now begin to wonder whether if Pratchett added anything at all. Indeed, this work of Gaiman's overshadows that earlier work in both degrees and shades of the insightful and entertaining.
With the focus on Anansi and stories, the book provides an amusing analysis of storytelling itself, so that anyone who studies the nature and classification of tales will find certain asides and references particularly amusing. It is rare these days that an author will write a piece of fiction which explores on a subtextual level a concept or idea fundamental to the work itself. I have come to wish that more authors could gain the audacity that Gaiman found here.
There is a degree to which this story matches Gaiman's usual monomythic progression from naive outsider to coy insider, which at the outset was my greatest difficulty with the work. The inevitability and redundancy of this trope makes me wish for Gaiman's more eccentric and perverse moments. However, I found in the clever and skilled text a story worth experiencing, and one which matches or exceeds Gaiman's other attempts in the modern fantasy genre.
The story is not as epic or dire as Gaiman's tend to be, and without that there is a loss of urgency in the story. This is not really a deficiency, however, as the playful humor could not cohabitate comfortably with an ever-steepening plot curve.
The work fits into Gaiman's usual mode, exploring the myths and psychologies that most interest him. It may lose some of his fans in that it is less dark and brooding, less hopeless, but this could hardly be counted a loss. Any reader who wants more of the same can re-read his old works. the rest of us may appreciate seeing a master storyteller exploring his form in a new and engaging way.
June 18, 2021
Fat Charlie (his dad gave him the nickname (it's a sore spot)) spent his entire life absolutely mortified by his dad.
Then his dad does the unthinkable - he had the nerve to die. Now Fat Charlie has to go back to America for the first time in years and midway through the funeral - he discovers something wholly unexpected and almost equally embarrassing - his dad was a God.
We follow Fat Charlie (Anansi's son) as he becomes immersed into the world of the Gods - from discovering primitive magic to his secret brother. His life is thrown into chaos - his fiancee leaves him, his brother swoops her up and Fat Charlie is set up to take the fall for a very terrible person. All the while, he has to deal with the fallout from his dad's embarrassing death.
While this book takes place in the same world as American Gods - there is hardly any overlap. This could be read this one as a standalone. I was disappointed that my favorite characters (Shadow and the new gods) don't make an appearance. The plot progressed at a glacial pace but once it started ramping up, I was hooked - there were so many side plots that were masterfully interwoven.
I did enjoy that Fat Charlie had more personality that Shadow (from the first novel) but I still preferred Shadow. Much of the charm and magical realism from the first book didn't have as much of an impact as it did before - perhaps because of the limited characters. My absolute fave character? Fat Charlie's fiance's mother - she was such a bitter, shriveled prune (I loved it!).
The Finer Books Reading Challenge - 2018 Reading Challenge: A book that switches perspectives
| | | | | Snapchat @miranda_reads
Of course, everyone's parents are embarrassing. It goes with the territory. The nature of parents is to embarrass merely by existing, just as it is the nature of children of a certain age to cringe with embarrassment
Then his dad does the unthinkable - he had the nerve to die. Now Fat Charlie has to go back to America for the first time in years and midway through the funeral - he discovers something wholly unexpected and almost equally embarrassing - his dad was a God.
Everybody going to be dead one day, just give them time.
We follow Fat Charlie (Anansi's son) as he becomes immersed into the world of the Gods - from discovering primitive magic to his secret brother. His life is thrown into chaos - his fiancee leaves him, his brother swoops her up and Fat Charlie is set up to take the fall for a very terrible person. All the while, he has to deal with the fallout from his dad's embarrassing death.
While this book takes place in the same world as American Gods - there is hardly any overlap. This could be read this one as a standalone. I was disappointed that my favorite characters (Shadow and the new gods) don't make an appearance. The plot progressed at a glacial pace but once it started ramping up, I was hooked - there were so many side plots that were masterfully interwoven.
I did enjoy that Fat Charlie had more personality that Shadow (from the first novel) but I still preferred Shadow. Much of the charm and magical realism from the first book didn't have as much of an impact as it did before - perhaps because of the limited characters. My absolute fave character? Fat Charlie's fiance's mother - she was such a bitter, shriveled prune (I loved it!).
The Finer Books Reading Challenge - 2018 Reading Challenge: A book that switches perspectives
| | | | | Snapchat @miranda_reads
June 11, 2013
A Digression and a Review:
When I was a child who was much too prone to being serious for her own good, there was a catalpa tree in our backyard. Now, if you don't know what a catalpa tree is, it's worth a Google. Catalpas are beautiful and exotic, with giant leaves we used as "plates" to have fairy-like meals of mulberry and honeysuckle (with mimosa blossoms as a bit of garnish), giant bean pods that hung down like sylvan fingers ready to ensnare an unsuspecting child, white orchid-like flowers that would shower down while we swung on the tire swing below. In its boughs, I could pretend to be Pocahontas, a female Mowgli, or Jana of the Jungle. I would climb up and look down to the ground so far below, filled with delicious terror at how impossibly high I was. This tree seemed massive--big enough to hold all of my dreams and wildest flights of fancy. It, to paraphrase Zora Neale Hurston, seemed to hold dawn and doom in its branches.
As an adult, however, this tree that looms so gargantuan in my imaginary landscape seems small and shrunken, like a wizened grandparent, its limbs not so big, and I realize that, while I felt like I was climbing to the top of a skyscraper, I was barely 10 feet off the ground.
I bring this up because this is the closest approximation I can make to the difference between reading as a child and reading as an adult. As a child, there was a magic in stories, and I'm not talking about pixie dust and wands (although there was certainly some of that). There was a magic in not knowing (or caring) where a story was going. A magic to realizing why, hey, that main character is kind of like me. A magic to finding that you could read the same story over and over and over again and it would never get old and would never be the same story twice, not really. The colors were brighter. The emotions were palpable. There was nothing but possibility. And, yes, there's certainly still magic in the stories I read as an adult, but it's never quite the same, is it? I'm a little more jaded in that, as soon as I can predict where the story is going, I lose a little interest. There's a little more cynicism, a little more impatience with an "I've been here before" narrative, and a little more sadness in knowing that I can never immerse myself in adult stories with the same abandon as that 10 year old reading under the catalpa tree.
Now, I bring this up to explain that this is why I love Neil Gaiman. Gaiman can, more so than any other author, create that childlike awe of story within the adult me without telling a children's story. It's a peculiar and wonderful literary alchemy, this ability to take the adult world, the "real" world, and transform it into a place where one can find the same charm, humor, unpredictability, and enchantment found in the best children's narratives. And Anansi Boys is such a book.
A companion book to American Gods, Anansi Boys, follows the story of Fat Charlie, son of Mr. Nancy, a rascal of a man with a wicked sense of humor, an eye for the ladies, and a knack for purposely embarrassing his introverted, sensitive son. When Mr. Nancy dies, the now grown-up, soon to be married, and tenuously employed Fat Charlie is relieved that his father can never humiliate him again; however he soon finds out that life is not going to settle into a mundane, predictable pattern for him. He learns that his father was Anansi, the trickster spider god of African folklore, and he learns that he has a brother, Spider, who inherited his father's mischievous spirit and magical abilities. It's not long before the reunion between the two brothers breaks out into a serious (and frequently hilarious) case of sibling rivalry, with Spider usurping Fat Charlie's apartment, girlfriend, and life, and Fat Charlie going to extreme lengths to rid himself of his demigod brother.
Anansi Boys lacks the darkness of American Gods and is a much more whimsical, comedic read. Initially, this did cause a bit of a disconnect for me until I gave in to the story without trying to connect it with or hold it up to my expectations of American Gods. While following the adventures of Fat Charlie, I found myself laughing aloud and relishing each twist and turn in the story (as well as looking forward to the humorous "in which" chapter titles). Gaiman's love of story is evident and, as we learn through his depiction of Anansi folktales, the stories we tell and the stories we live are important not just for entertainment, but for creating the world as it should be. And the world as it should be is something as close as possible to a catalpa tree as seen through the eyes of a child--a place where anything and everything is possible, because that's where real magic resides.
Cross posted at
When I was a child who was much too prone to being serious for her own good, there was a catalpa tree in our backyard. Now, if you don't know what a catalpa tree is, it's worth a Google. Catalpas are beautiful and exotic, with giant leaves we used as "plates" to have fairy-like meals of mulberry and honeysuckle (with mimosa blossoms as a bit of garnish), giant bean pods that hung down like sylvan fingers ready to ensnare an unsuspecting child, white orchid-like flowers that would shower down while we swung on the tire swing below. In its boughs, I could pretend to be Pocahontas, a female Mowgli, or Jana of the Jungle. I would climb up and look down to the ground so far below, filled with delicious terror at how impossibly high I was. This tree seemed massive--big enough to hold all of my dreams and wildest flights of fancy. It, to paraphrase Zora Neale Hurston, seemed to hold dawn and doom in its branches.
As an adult, however, this tree that looms so gargantuan in my imaginary landscape seems small and shrunken, like a wizened grandparent, its limbs not so big, and I realize that, while I felt like I was climbing to the top of a skyscraper, I was barely 10 feet off the ground.
I bring this up because this is the closest approximation I can make to the difference between reading as a child and reading as an adult. As a child, there was a magic in stories, and I'm not talking about pixie dust and wands (although there was certainly some of that). There was a magic in not knowing (or caring) where a story was going. A magic to realizing why, hey, that main character is kind of like me. A magic to finding that you could read the same story over and over and over again and it would never get old and would never be the same story twice, not really. The colors were brighter. The emotions were palpable. There was nothing but possibility. And, yes, there's certainly still magic in the stories I read as an adult, but it's never quite the same, is it? I'm a little more jaded in that, as soon as I can predict where the story is going, I lose a little interest. There's a little more cynicism, a little more impatience with an "I've been here before" narrative, and a little more sadness in knowing that I can never immerse myself in adult stories with the same abandon as that 10 year old reading under the catalpa tree.
Now, I bring this up to explain that this is why I love Neil Gaiman. Gaiman can, more so than any other author, create that childlike awe of story within the adult me without telling a children's story. It's a peculiar and wonderful literary alchemy, this ability to take the adult world, the "real" world, and transform it into a place where one can find the same charm, humor, unpredictability, and enchantment found in the best children's narratives. And Anansi Boys is such a book.
A companion book to American Gods, Anansi Boys, follows the story of Fat Charlie, son of Mr. Nancy, a rascal of a man with a wicked sense of humor, an eye for the ladies, and a knack for purposely embarrassing his introverted, sensitive son. When Mr. Nancy dies, the now grown-up, soon to be married, and tenuously employed Fat Charlie is relieved that his father can never humiliate him again; however he soon finds out that life is not going to settle into a mundane, predictable pattern for him. He learns that his father was Anansi, the trickster spider god of African folklore, and he learns that he has a brother, Spider, who inherited his father's mischievous spirit and magical abilities. It's not long before the reunion between the two brothers breaks out into a serious (and frequently hilarious) case of sibling rivalry, with Spider usurping Fat Charlie's apartment, girlfriend, and life, and Fat Charlie going to extreme lengths to rid himself of his demigod brother.
Anansi Boys lacks the darkness of American Gods and is a much more whimsical, comedic read. Initially, this did cause a bit of a disconnect for me until I gave in to the story without trying to connect it with or hold it up to my expectations of American Gods. While following the adventures of Fat Charlie, I found myself laughing aloud and relishing each twist and turn in the story (as well as looking forward to the humorous "in which" chapter titles). Gaiman's love of story is evident and, as we learn through his depiction of Anansi folktales, the stories we tell and the stories we live are important not just for entertainment, but for creating the world as it should be. And the world as it should be is something as close as possible to a catalpa tree as seen through the eyes of a child--a place where anything and everything is possible, because that's where real magic resides.
Cross posted at
May 7, 2024
My review of Anansi Boys is published at .
I stumbled upon a signed, limited-edition copy of Anansi Boys by Neil Gaiman during lunch at a caf茅/used bookstore a few months ago. I wish I could say I found the book, but I think the book found me.
Anansi Boys is the American Gods spinoff I didn鈥檛 know I needed. Although it鈥檚 been many years since I read American Gods, Neil Gaiman immediately caught me in this web of a tale, a contemporary low fantasy steeped in West African folklore:
鈥淪tories are webs, interconnected strand to strand, and you follow each story to the center, because the center is the end. Each person is a strand of story.鈥�
Why are there so many trickster gods? Whether it鈥檚 the Norse god Loki, the Greek goddess Eris, or the Monkey King from Chinese mythology, it seems like every pantheon has a resident trickster. While I鈥檝e personally grown weary of this trope, Neil Gaiman successfully converted this unbelieving arachnophobe into a fan of Anansi, the West African spider god of mischief.
We already met Anansi as 鈥淢r. Nancy鈥� in American Gods. Unfortunately for Mr. Nancy, he expires quite quickly in Anansi Boys, and in a rather embarrassing fashion, leaving behind two sons who never knew each other:
鈥淥f course, everyone鈥檚 parents are embarrassing. It goes with the territory. The nature of parents is to embarrass merely by existing, just as it is the nature of children of a certain age to cringe with embarrassment, shame, and mortification should their parents so much as speak to them on the street.鈥�
Charles Nancy, dubbed 鈥淔at Charlie鈥� by his father, didn鈥檛 inherit any of his dad鈥檚 divine powers. He works at a boring job in a shady investment firm in London and is preparing, rather unenthusiastically, to be married to his girlfriend Rosie.
But Charlie鈥檚 life is shaken up when his brother, Spider, enters his life. Spider shares his father鈥檚 mischievous nature and magical powers. He assumes Charlie鈥檚 identity鈥攋ust for fun鈥攊nadvertently ruining his job and stealing his girlfriend in the process.
Charlie must seek supernatural help to fight back against Spider and reclaim his life. However, the help he receives may be more than he bargained for, as a spider鈥檚 natural enemy threatens even his own life.
Neil Gaiman proves once again to be a master storyteller with Anansi Boys, a delightfully dark tale that is also full of heart. My only regret is that the story took this long to find me.
I stumbled upon a signed, limited-edition copy of Anansi Boys by Neil Gaiman during lunch at a caf茅/used bookstore a few months ago. I wish I could say I found the book, but I think the book found me.
Anansi Boys is the American Gods spinoff I didn鈥檛 know I needed. Although it鈥檚 been many years since I read American Gods, Neil Gaiman immediately caught me in this web of a tale, a contemporary low fantasy steeped in West African folklore:
鈥淪tories are webs, interconnected strand to strand, and you follow each story to the center, because the center is the end. Each person is a strand of story.鈥�
Why are there so many trickster gods? Whether it鈥檚 the Norse god Loki, the Greek goddess Eris, or the Monkey King from Chinese mythology, it seems like every pantheon has a resident trickster. While I鈥檝e personally grown weary of this trope, Neil Gaiman successfully converted this unbelieving arachnophobe into a fan of Anansi, the West African spider god of mischief.
We already met Anansi as 鈥淢r. Nancy鈥� in American Gods. Unfortunately for Mr. Nancy, he expires quite quickly in Anansi Boys, and in a rather embarrassing fashion, leaving behind two sons who never knew each other:
鈥淥f course, everyone鈥檚 parents are embarrassing. It goes with the territory. The nature of parents is to embarrass merely by existing, just as it is the nature of children of a certain age to cringe with embarrassment, shame, and mortification should their parents so much as speak to them on the street.鈥�
Charles Nancy, dubbed 鈥淔at Charlie鈥� by his father, didn鈥檛 inherit any of his dad鈥檚 divine powers. He works at a boring job in a shady investment firm in London and is preparing, rather unenthusiastically, to be married to his girlfriend Rosie.
But Charlie鈥檚 life is shaken up when his brother, Spider, enters his life. Spider shares his father鈥檚 mischievous nature and magical powers. He assumes Charlie鈥檚 identity鈥攋ust for fun鈥攊nadvertently ruining his job and stealing his girlfriend in the process.
Charlie must seek supernatural help to fight back against Spider and reclaim his life. However, the help he receives may be more than he bargained for, as a spider鈥檚 natural enemy threatens even his own life.
Neil Gaiman proves once again to be a master storyteller with Anansi Boys, a delightfully dark tale that is also full of heart. My only regret is that the story took this long to find me.
June 12, 2017
Previously 欧宝娱乐 listed this book as 鈥�Anansi Boys (American Gods #2)鈥�, this has since been fixed by Raven the ace GR librarian. Anyway, Anansi Boys is not American Gods #2, the character Anansi does, however, appears in (as Mr. Nancy) so the two books are related but there is no need to read one to follow the other.
Anansi Boys is about Anansi鈥檚 two sons, the absence of an apostrophe-S after Anansi鈥檚 name notwithstanding. The first one we are introduced to is Charles Nancy, usually called 鈥淔at Charlie鈥� in spite of not being fat. The other is called Spider who is a god and can do magic. When Spider enters Fat Charlie鈥檚 life he promptly turns it upside down because that is the sort of guy he is:
鈥淗e would not have recognized guilt if he had an illustrated guide to it with all the component parts clearly labeled. It was not that he was feckless, more that he had simply not been around the day they handed out feck.鈥�
Basically, Spider moves into Charlie鈥檚 apartment, steals his fianc茅, unintentionally gets him in trouble with the law and causing him to lose his job. He does all this by impersonating Charlie without even bothering to look like him; he is just amazingly persuasive. Charlie鈥檚 attempt to get rid of him backfires and exponentially exacerbates the situation. It leads to a bird goddess sending massive flocks of multi-species birds after them, and a tiger-god coming after their blood for the alleged sins of their father.
Anansi from the American Gods TV series
Anansi Boys is a tremendously fun wild ride. It is not as complex or nuanced as but, for my money, it is more fun. As always, Gaiman is overflowing with ideas and his prose tend to have a light, whimsical touch that often made me laugh (out loud even). He is a dab hand at characterization, the book鈥檚 main antagonist Graham Coats is absatively particularly vivid and hilarious but also very dangerous. Anansi himself is based on a popular West African folklore character, a fun-loving trickster god who loves to steal other gods鈥� stories and make them his own; hence Gaiman鈥檚 theme of the power of storytelling, which he connects to the theme of storytelling through music. I love the musical references in this book, after I read a certain chapter I suddenly had an irresistible urge to listen to , which I have not heard for years, what a lovely, evocative song (even though I鈥檝e never been under one). The prose style of this book is generally lighthearted and humorous but Gaiman switches into a fable or folklore style when the narrative is told from a god鈥檚 point of view.
Anansi Boys is not objectively better than , which is indeed great, but I personally enjoy it more and it is my favorite Gaiman book.
Notes:
鈥� that Anansi Boys is not a sequel to American Gods. Thank you Raven for the link.
鈥� Besides being inspired by African Folklore Gaiman also seems to have been inspired by Terry Pratchett鈥檚 witches books. There are several comical witches in this book.
鈥� There was a radio play adaptation of Anansi Boys in 2005 which Gaiman hated as it was abridged into a one hour play! This led him to write his own movie screenplay. Hopefully there will be a movie one day.
Anansi Boys is not objectively better than , which is indeed great, but I personally enjoy it more and it is my favorite Gaiman book.
Quotes:
鈥淒aisy looked up at him with the kind of expression that Jesus might have given someone who had just explained that he was probably allergic to bread and fishes, so could He possibly do him a quick chicken salad: there was pity in that expression, along with almost infinite compassion.鈥�
鈥淪ome hats can only be worn if you鈥檙e willing to be jaunty, to set them at an angle and to walk beneath them with a spring in your stride as if you鈥檙e only a step away from dancing. They demand a lot of you.鈥�
鈥淗e had arrived , at the age of ten , with an American accent , which he had been relentlessly teased about , and had worked very hard to lose , finally extirpating the last of the soft consonants and rich Rs while learning the correct use and placement of the word innit . He had finally succeeded in losing his American accent for good as he had turned sixteen , just as his schoolfriends discovered that they needed very badly to sound like they came from the 鈥� hood .鈥�
鈥淥f course , everyone鈥檚 parents are embarrassing . It goes with the territory . The nature of parents is to embarrass merely by existing , just as it is the nature of children of a certain age to cringe with embarrassment , shame , and mortification should their parents so much as speak to them on the street .鈥�
Fat Charlie and Spider
Anansi Boys is about Anansi鈥檚 two sons, the absence of an apostrophe-S after Anansi鈥檚 name notwithstanding. The first one we are introduced to is Charles Nancy, usually called 鈥淔at Charlie鈥� in spite of not being fat. The other is called Spider who is a god and can do magic. When Spider enters Fat Charlie鈥檚 life he promptly turns it upside down because that is the sort of guy he is:
鈥淗e would not have recognized guilt if he had an illustrated guide to it with all the component parts clearly labeled. It was not that he was feckless, more that he had simply not been around the day they handed out feck.鈥�
Basically, Spider moves into Charlie鈥檚 apartment, steals his fianc茅, unintentionally gets him in trouble with the law and causing him to lose his job. He does all this by impersonating Charlie without even bothering to look like him; he is just amazingly persuasive. Charlie鈥檚 attempt to get rid of him backfires and exponentially exacerbates the situation. It leads to a bird goddess sending massive flocks of multi-species birds after them, and a tiger-god coming after their blood for the alleged sins of their father.
Anansi from the American Gods TV series
Anansi Boys is a tremendously fun wild ride. It is not as complex or nuanced as but, for my money, it is more fun. As always, Gaiman is overflowing with ideas and his prose tend to have a light, whimsical touch that often made me laugh (out loud even). He is a dab hand at characterization, the book鈥檚 main antagonist Graham Coats is absatively particularly vivid and hilarious but also very dangerous. Anansi himself is based on a popular West African folklore character, a fun-loving trickster god who loves to steal other gods鈥� stories and make them his own; hence Gaiman鈥檚 theme of the power of storytelling, which he connects to the theme of storytelling through music. I love the musical references in this book, after I read a certain chapter I suddenly had an irresistible urge to listen to , which I have not heard for years, what a lovely, evocative song (even though I鈥檝e never been under one). The prose style of this book is generally lighthearted and humorous but Gaiman switches into a fable or folklore style when the narrative is told from a god鈥檚 point of view.
Anansi Boys is not objectively better than , which is indeed great, but I personally enjoy it more and it is my favorite Gaiman book.
Notes:
鈥� that Anansi Boys is not a sequel to American Gods. Thank you Raven for the link.
鈥� Besides being inspired by African Folklore Gaiman also seems to have been inspired by Terry Pratchett鈥檚 witches books. There are several comical witches in this book.
鈥� There was a radio play adaptation of Anansi Boys in 2005 which Gaiman hated as it was abridged into a one hour play! This led him to write his own movie screenplay. Hopefully there will be a movie one day.
Anansi Boys is not objectively better than , which is indeed great, but I personally enjoy it more and it is my favorite Gaiman book.
Quotes:
鈥淒aisy looked up at him with the kind of expression that Jesus might have given someone who had just explained that he was probably allergic to bread and fishes, so could He possibly do him a quick chicken salad: there was pity in that expression, along with almost infinite compassion.鈥�
鈥淪ome hats can only be worn if you鈥檙e willing to be jaunty, to set them at an angle and to walk beneath them with a spring in your stride as if you鈥檙e only a step away from dancing. They demand a lot of you.鈥�
鈥淗e had arrived , at the age of ten , with an American accent , which he had been relentlessly teased about , and had worked very hard to lose , finally extirpating the last of the soft consonants and rich Rs while learning the correct use and placement of the word innit . He had finally succeeded in losing his American accent for good as he had turned sixteen , just as his schoolfriends discovered that they needed very badly to sound like they came from the 鈥� hood .鈥�
鈥淥f course , everyone鈥檚 parents are embarrassing . It goes with the territory . The nature of parents is to embarrass merely by existing , just as it is the nature of children of a certain age to cringe with embarrassment , shame , and mortification should their parents so much as speak to them on the street .鈥�
Fat Charlie and Spider
January 19, 2020
A delight (& the first of Gaiman's books that I've read to get the full from me)! It's got that outrageous "Freaky Friday"/Prince & the Pauper narrative; Britishisms a-la Evelyn Waugh; and a peck of Douglas Adams's brand of whimsy (this is infinitely better than Hitchhiker's Guide, & much better than the author's own Stardust AND Neverwhere). It's adorably Beetlejuician! What's not to like, huh?
September 11, 2018
Well, this felt a bit like a spider getting drunk while reading a history of literary genres, and then spinning a thread and getting all tangled up in the different genres himself while trying to make sense of the pattern he created.
The web is a fable posing as a detective story posing as an embarrassing coming of age and heartbreak story mixed with fantasy and crime, put in a treasure chest and shipped off to the pirates of the Caribbean, where it decides to change shape and take a chapter's break in the realm of spooky ghost stories, before wrapping up as a social satire on the nature of love and happiness.
To be fair, the author added the most accurate and funny description of a monstrous hangover I have ever read, and while letting the reader look like a question mark most of the time, he also makes several of the reader's days by creating laughing-out-loud moments of nonsensical, witty humour in the middle of a comedy which could have the subtitle "the tragedy of the human condition".
Bowing to Sartre's existentialism, he also creates a mini-hell of his preferred definition: "l'enfer, c'est les autres", and instead of eternally grilling humans in their frustrating interaction in the closed-off hell-cave, he lets a dark and mean and dumb-as-a-brick brutal god go bonkers whenever a tiny ex-human says something annoyingly irritating. Killing it off is a meaningless feat, of course, as it plays the honorable part of Prometheus' liver in this firework of storytelling:
"Stories are like spiders, with all they long legs, and stories are like spiderwebs, which man gets himself all tangled up in but which look pretty when you see them under a leaf in the morning dew, and in the elegant way that they connect to one another, each to each."
That is a wisdom I will cherish from now on, but even deeper layers of learning were reached in the important science of how to wear a demanding hat and how not to blame a lime for the pickle you're in!
Neil Gaiman is the god of storytellers - which might well be a curse in his universe, as gods are constantly in trouble for having too much imagination and too little impulse control. They're a perfect mirror of their creators, obviously.
Wonderful, spidery, funny, - beyond the realm of descriptive adjectives!
The web is a fable posing as a detective story posing as an embarrassing coming of age and heartbreak story mixed with fantasy and crime, put in a treasure chest and shipped off to the pirates of the Caribbean, where it decides to change shape and take a chapter's break in the realm of spooky ghost stories, before wrapping up as a social satire on the nature of love and happiness.
To be fair, the author added the most accurate and funny description of a monstrous hangover I have ever read, and while letting the reader look like a question mark most of the time, he also makes several of the reader's days by creating laughing-out-loud moments of nonsensical, witty humour in the middle of a comedy which could have the subtitle "the tragedy of the human condition".
Bowing to Sartre's existentialism, he also creates a mini-hell of his preferred definition: "l'enfer, c'est les autres", and instead of eternally grilling humans in their frustrating interaction in the closed-off hell-cave, he lets a dark and mean and dumb-as-a-brick brutal god go bonkers whenever a tiny ex-human says something annoyingly irritating. Killing it off is a meaningless feat, of course, as it plays the honorable part of Prometheus' liver in this firework of storytelling:
"Stories are like spiders, with all they long legs, and stories are like spiderwebs, which man gets himself all tangled up in but which look pretty when you see them under a leaf in the morning dew, and in the elegant way that they connect to one another, each to each."
That is a wisdom I will cherish from now on, but even deeper layers of learning were reached in the important science of how to wear a demanding hat and how not to blame a lime for the pickle you're in!
Neil Gaiman is the god of storytellers - which might well be a curse in his universe, as gods are constantly in trouble for having too much imagination and too little impulse control. They're a perfect mirror of their creators, obviously.
Wonderful, spidery, funny, - beyond the realm of descriptive adjectives!
April 2, 2012
Anansi Boys is like a rollercoaster without the loops, very few twists and one that keeps the speed to a minimum. You strap yourself in, ready for excitement that never materializes. My god, I've never felt more luke warm towards a book in my life.
The mildly interesting story is of a somewhat relatable modern day slacker coming to grips with his father's and brother's overwhelming personalities as well as a fantasy world he didn't know existed. I'm tired of stories with modern day slackers bringing their pessimistic cynicisms to a world filled with fantastical lore. It's a fourth wall breaker and it's been done to death. I won't say Gaiman has taken the myth, mystery and intrigue completely out of this Caribbean mythology. He has however married it with a modern sensibility that claps a ball and chain about its ankle. At least with other books of his he can be given the credit of imaginary inventiveness. Anansi Boys doesn't even have that going for it.
The mildly interesting story is of a somewhat relatable modern day slacker coming to grips with his father's and brother's overwhelming personalities as well as a fantasy world he didn't know existed. I'm tired of stories with modern day slackers bringing their pessimistic cynicisms to a world filled with fantastical lore. It's a fourth wall breaker and it's been done to death. I won't say Gaiman has taken the myth, mystery and intrigue completely out of this Caribbean mythology. He has however married it with a modern sensibility that claps a ball and chain about its ankle. At least with other books of his he can be given the credit of imaginary inventiveness. Anansi Boys doesn't even have that going for it.
June 24, 2011
Mr. Gaiman has the same problem as Terry Pratchet. He can present the material, but he can't make me care. It's not a good sign when you're halfway through a book and you realize that if you put down the book and walked away right then and there, and never found out how the book ended, you wouldn't care. I don't care whether things work out between him and Rosie. I don't care if his dad is still alive or not. I don't care if he and his brother ever make up. I wouldn't care if the author ended the book with 'then a bomb exploded and they all died the end'. I am unable to get interested in any of the characters or the plot. And the book was supposed to be funny, but most of the jokes just made it seem like he was trying way too hard. I've had this problem with all of Gaiman's books. I guess it just not my thing.
December 8, 2019
ANANSI BOYS (hereinafter AB) is the archetype tale of the hero's quest but in place of the typical warrior hero is a fool, and, oh, it happens to take place in our days and there is the wonder of something magical yet not totally seen.
Our fool of a hero is Fat Charlie. He used to be chubby as a kid but now he's in good enough shape yet everyone remembers him as Fat Charlie so the name sticks, much to his chagrin, and, it's all the fault of his father.
Wait, did I tell you his father is a trickster African God?
That makes it even harder on Fat Charlie because he's not dealing just with a mortal father but a father who is an African God and who can usually persuade people to do almost anything and make them usually laugh over it. At one point, back in the day, when Fat Charlie was a kid, his father tricked him into dressing like President Taft on President's Day and told him everyone else would be dressed that way, too.
Well, they were not and Fat Charlie was belittled to tears by the other kids and his father thought it was all amusing.
Now, don't start thinking Fat Charlie's father is overly cruel because there are other stories that favor him doing kind things for his son.
Did I mention this father, known as Anansi, by the way, has two sons? Fat Charlie is the mortal one and this other son, known as Spider, is the one with all the powers.
After Anansi appears to bite it while singing karaoke (something Fat Charlie could never do) there's a big funeral and a series of steps in the story lead to the two brothers linking up for the first time.
Spider finally meets Fat Charlie, who lives in London but who grew up in Florida, and Spider decides he wants to live with Fat Charlie for a while.
But . . .
It turns out that Spider likes Fat Charlie's lifestyle so much that he steals his fiance and takes over his job while Fat Charlie goes off to talk to some witches (four old ladies living in a suburb) to have Spider banished. In doing so, he goes to another dimension where life first began and makes a deal with Bird Woman who has a grudge against Fat Charlie's family.
What then takes place is a situation where a mortal and his demigod brother are attacked from several different fronts by this immortal, godlike Bird Woman.
Oh, and Fat Charlie gets it for another girl but has to rescue his old fiance and her mother from another superpower in the Bahamas where he learns what it means to be a hero, even if he is truly the archetype fool.
Overall, a superb urban fantasy with overlapping themes of coming of age, Pandora's Box, the twists and turns of life and
how we all have family members we really want to get away from. Heh.
And, on a far deeper level, one could also say this is about being human, even around the face immortal Gods.
CHARACTERS/DIALOGUE: A minus; STORY/PLOTTING/EDITING: B to B plus; THEMES/LEGENDS: B; OVERALL GRADE: B plus.
Our fool of a hero is Fat Charlie. He used to be chubby as a kid but now he's in good enough shape yet everyone remembers him as Fat Charlie so the name sticks, much to his chagrin, and, it's all the fault of his father.
Wait, did I tell you his father is a trickster African God?
That makes it even harder on Fat Charlie because he's not dealing just with a mortal father but a father who is an African God and who can usually persuade people to do almost anything and make them usually laugh over it. At one point, back in the day, when Fat Charlie was a kid, his father tricked him into dressing like President Taft on President's Day and told him everyone else would be dressed that way, too.
Well, they were not and Fat Charlie was belittled to tears by the other kids and his father thought it was all amusing.
Now, don't start thinking Fat Charlie's father is overly cruel because there are other stories that favor him doing kind things for his son.
Did I mention this father, known as Anansi, by the way, has two sons? Fat Charlie is the mortal one and this other son, known as Spider, is the one with all the powers.
After Anansi appears to bite it while singing karaoke (something Fat Charlie could never do) there's a big funeral and a series of steps in the story lead to the two brothers linking up for the first time.
Spider finally meets Fat Charlie, who lives in London but who grew up in Florida, and Spider decides he wants to live with Fat Charlie for a while.
But . . .
It turns out that Spider likes Fat Charlie's lifestyle so much that he steals his fiance and takes over his job while Fat Charlie goes off to talk to some witches (four old ladies living in a suburb) to have Spider banished. In doing so, he goes to another dimension where life first began and makes a deal with Bird Woman who has a grudge against Fat Charlie's family.
What then takes place is a situation where a mortal and his demigod brother are attacked from several different fronts by this immortal, godlike Bird Woman.
Oh, and Fat Charlie gets it for another girl but has to rescue his old fiance and her mother from another superpower in the Bahamas where he learns what it means to be a hero, even if he is truly the archetype fool.
Overall, a superb urban fantasy with overlapping themes of coming of age, Pandora's Box, the twists and turns of life and
how we all have family members we really want to get away from. Heh.
And, on a far deeper level, one could also say this is about being human, even around the face immortal Gods.
CHARACTERS/DIALOGUE: A minus; STORY/PLOTTING/EDITING: B to B plus; THEMES/LEGENDS: B; OVERALL GRADE: B plus.
September 28, 2010
I love 's so much that I am desperate to love the rest of his work, but I can't do much more than like it because it's mostly only okay.
He deals with all the stuff I love -- mythology, the occult, death, dreams, the urban fantastic -- but he's too tongue-in-cheek. When I read one of his novels, I feel like I'm reading the of fantasy. Too clever, too hip and too cool for his own good.
It's not that I don't like his prose work. I do. And I even love some of it (like , if that counts, and ), but when I get to what should be the meat of his oeuvre, and its sequel, i can't help feeling let down.
It's not that I don't like his characters. Mr. Nancy, Spider and Fat Charlie are pretty groovy; the book reads fast and is entertaining; I even dig the ending, but somehow none of that is enough. I want more from Neil. I want to be dazzled, and he teases me with bedazzlement constantly, but I've only been dazzled by Dreams -- nothing else has come close.
And maybe that's my problem right there: having found Gaiman through Sandman, everything that's followed pales in comparison. I am always looking for greatness, and all I get is pretty good.
So if you read this review, Neil, just know that I love you, and I will always read you, and I am constantly looking for that drug-like hit I had the first time I bought a Sandman comic (and yes I am that old) and was blown away by your storytelling. You are a victim of your own best work.
Please, please, please blow me away again.
He deals with all the stuff I love -- mythology, the occult, death, dreams, the urban fantastic -- but he's too tongue-in-cheek. When I read one of his novels, I feel like I'm reading the of fantasy. Too clever, too hip and too cool for his own good.
It's not that I don't like his prose work. I do. And I even love some of it (like , if that counts, and ), but when I get to what should be the meat of his oeuvre, and its sequel, i can't help feeling let down.
It's not that I don't like his characters. Mr. Nancy, Spider and Fat Charlie are pretty groovy; the book reads fast and is entertaining; I even dig the ending, but somehow none of that is enough. I want more from Neil. I want to be dazzled, and he teases me with bedazzlement constantly, but I've only been dazzled by Dreams -- nothing else has come close.
And maybe that's my problem right there: having found Gaiman through Sandman, everything that's followed pales in comparison. I am always looking for greatness, and all I get is pretty good.
So if you read this review, Neil, just know that I love you, and I will always read you, and I am constantly looking for that drug-like hit I had the first time I bought a Sandman comic (and yes I am that old) and was blown away by your storytelling. You are a victim of your own best work.
Please, please, please blow me away again.
July 21, 2017
螡伪喂, 慰 Gaiman 渭伪蟼 渭蔚蟿伪蠁苇蟻蔚喂 魏伪喂 蟺维位喂 蟽蟿慰谓 魏蠈蟽渭慰 蟿慰蠀 American Gods 蠈渭蠅蟼 蔚未蠋 蟽蟿伪渭伪蟿慰蠉谓 慰喂 慰渭慰喂蠈蟿畏蟿蔚蟼 蟽蟿伪 未蠉慰 尾喂尾位委伪.
螌蟽慰 魏喂 伪谓 渭慰蠀 维蟻蔚蟽蔚 蟿慰 American Gods, 蟿慰 Anansi Boys 魏苇蟻未喂蟽蔚 蟽蟿伪 蟽畏渭蔚委伪. 螘委谓伪喂 伪蟺委蟽蟿蔚蠀蟿伪 伪谓维位伪蠁蟻慰 魏伪喂 魏蔚蠁维蟿慰 尾喂尾位委慰, 蟿慰 慰蟺慰委慰 魏蠀位维蔚喂 谓蔚蟻维魏喂.
螚 蠀蟺蠈胃蔚蟽畏 渭慰蠀 维蟻蔚蟽蔚 蟺慰位蠉, 蔚委谓伪喂 苇尉蠀蟺谓畏, 蟽蟺伪蟻蟿伪蟻喂蟽蟿萎 渭蔚 蟺位慰魏萎 纬蟻萎纬慰蟻畏 魏伪喂 苇尉蠀蟺谓蔚蟼 伪谓伪蟿蟻慰蟺苇蟼. 螣 萎蟻蠅伪蟼 蔚委谓伪喂 蟽魏苇蟿慰蟼 goofy 魏伪喂 伪尉喂慰位维蟿蟻蔚蠀蟿慰蟼. 螘蟺委蟽畏蟼 谓伪喂, 苇蠂蔚喂 魏伪喂 蠁伪谓蟿维蟽渭伪蟿伪 蟿伪 慰蟺慰委伪 位伪蟿蟻蔚蠉蠅 蟽蟿喂蟼 喂蟽蟿慰蟻委蔚蟼. 螌蟺慰喂慰蟼 未喂维尾伪蟽蔚 蟿慰 螒merican gods 魏伪喂 未蔚谓 蟿慰蠀 维蟻蔚蟽蔚, 伪蟼 渭畏谓 尾喂伪蟽蟿蔚委 谓伪 伪蟺慰蟻蟻委蠄蔚喂 蟿慰 Anansi boys, 蔚委谓伪喂 伪蟺蠈 蟿伪 尾喂尾位委伪 蟺慰蠀 未蔚谓 伪蠁萎谓蔚喂蟼 蔚蠉魏慰位伪 伪蟺蠈 蟿伪 蠂苇蟻喂伪 蟽慰蠀.
螌蟽慰 魏喂 伪谓 渭慰蠀 维蟻蔚蟽蔚 蟿慰 American Gods, 蟿慰 Anansi Boys 魏苇蟻未喂蟽蔚 蟽蟿伪 蟽畏渭蔚委伪. 螘委谓伪喂 伪蟺委蟽蟿蔚蠀蟿伪 伪谓维位伪蠁蟻慰 魏伪喂 魏蔚蠁维蟿慰 尾喂尾位委慰, 蟿慰 慰蟺慰委慰 魏蠀位维蔚喂 谓蔚蟻维魏喂.
螚 蠀蟺蠈胃蔚蟽畏 渭慰蠀 维蟻蔚蟽蔚 蟺慰位蠉, 蔚委谓伪喂 苇尉蠀蟺谓畏, 蟽蟺伪蟻蟿伪蟻喂蟽蟿萎 渭蔚 蟺位慰魏萎 纬蟻萎纬慰蟻畏 魏伪喂 苇尉蠀蟺谓蔚蟼 伪谓伪蟿蟻慰蟺苇蟼. 螣 萎蟻蠅伪蟼 蔚委谓伪喂 蟽魏苇蟿慰蟼 goofy 魏伪喂 伪尉喂慰位维蟿蟻蔚蠀蟿慰蟼. 螘蟺委蟽畏蟼 谓伪喂, 苇蠂蔚喂 魏伪喂 蠁伪谓蟿维蟽渭伪蟿伪 蟿伪 慰蟺慰委伪 位伪蟿蟻蔚蠉蠅 蟽蟿喂蟼 喂蟽蟿慰蟻委蔚蟼. 螌蟺慰喂慰蟼 未喂维尾伪蟽蔚 蟿慰 螒merican gods 魏伪喂 未蔚谓 蟿慰蠀 维蟻蔚蟽蔚, 伪蟼 渭畏谓 尾喂伪蟽蟿蔚委 谓伪 伪蟺慰蟻蟻委蠄蔚喂 蟿慰 Anansi boys, 蔚委谓伪喂 伪蟺蠈 蟿伪 尾喂尾位委伪 蟺慰蠀 未蔚谓 伪蠁萎谓蔚喂蟼 蔚蠉魏慰位伪 伪蟺蠈 蟿伪 蠂苇蟻喂伪 蟽慰蠀.
October 19, 2017
惟蟻伪委慰 尾喂尾位委慰, 伪蟺委蟽蟿蔚蠀蟿伪 伪蟽蟿蔚委慰 魏伪喂 伪谓维位伪蠁蟻慰. 螞委纬蔚蟼 慰喂 蟽蔚位委未蔚蟼 蟿慰蠀, 蟺慰蠀 未喂伪尾维味慰谓蟿伪喂 蔚蠉魏慰位伪 蟽蔚 苇谓伪 伪蟺蠈纬蔚蠀渭伪.
December 20, 2010
It's remarkable, really, how long I was permitted to exist without reading Neil Gaiman. In retrospect, I suppose it's a good thing that I didn't read any of his books until college - had I been exposed to his work in high school, the result would have been a near-obsession filled with pages of awful fanfiction and an emotional meltdown when I learned that Mr. Gaiman is happily married.
But this didn't happen, thankfully. My first Neil Gaiman book was , and when my roommate (a much more dedicated fan than me) recommended it, she added that although the book was good, Anansi Boys was better. I started reading this one with some trepidation, as I was convinced that nothing could ever be as good as American Gods, but to my delight, I was proven wrong.
Sometimes, you read a book and know you're going to love it by the end of the first chapter. Sometimes you know after the first paragraph. With Anansi Boys, I knew at the dedication. It goes like this:
"You know how it is. You pick up a book, flip to the dedication, and find that, once again, the author has dedicated the book to someone else and not to you.
Not this time.
Because we haven't yet met/have only a glancing acquaintance/are just crazy about each other/haven't seen each other in much too long/are in some way related/will never meet, but will, I trust, despite that, always think fondly of each other...
This one's for you.
With you know what, and you probably know why."
Someone fetch me a fainting couch and some smelling salts, I need to swoon for a moment.
Ok, I'm back. Anyway, what I really liked about this book was it just focused on a small group of people. American Gods, this book's predecessor-but-not-exactly-prequel, was a sprawling epic with tons of characters and rules and the fate of the entire world and then some depended on the ending coming off right. Anansi Boys takes that same world, one in which the gods are still alive and living among us, and zeroes in on just a couple of characters: the trickster god Anansi's two adult sons, one of whom has grown up knowing his father is a god, the other who is unaware of this. The stakes are still high, of course, and battles must be fought before the end, but the scope of the novel wasn't as expansive and exhausting as American Gods. You don't necessarily have to read one before the other, but it certainly couldn't hurt.
I forgot to mark the good passages in my copy, so here are three random excerpts from the pages I remember off the top of my head:
"Like all sentient beings, Fat Charlie had a weirdness quotient. For some days the needle had been over in the red, occasionally banging jerkily against the pin. Now the meter broke. From this moment on, he suspected, nothing would surprise him. He could no longer be outweirded. He was done.
He was wrong, of course."
"Fat Charlie tried to remember what people did in prison to pass the time, but all he could come up with was keeping secret diaries and hiding things in their bottoms. He had nothing to write on, and felt that a definite measure of how well one was getting on in life was not having to hide things in one's bottom.
Nothing happened. Nothing continued to happen. More Nothing. The Return of Nothing. Son of Nothing. Nothing Rides Again. Nothing and Abbott and Costello meet the Wolfman."
"Maybe Anansi's just some guy from a story, made up back in Africa in the dawn days of the world by some boy with blackfly on his leg, pushing his crutch in the dirt, making up some goofy story about a man made of tar. Does that change anything? People respond to the stories. They tell them themselves. The stories spread, and as people tell them, the stories change the tellers. Because now the folks who never had any thought in their head but how to run from lions and keep far enough away from rivers that the crocodiles don't get an easy meal, now they're starting to dream about a whole new place to live. The world may be the same, but the wallpaper's changed."
But this didn't happen, thankfully. My first Neil Gaiman book was , and when my roommate (a much more dedicated fan than me) recommended it, she added that although the book was good, Anansi Boys was better. I started reading this one with some trepidation, as I was convinced that nothing could ever be as good as American Gods, but to my delight, I was proven wrong.
Sometimes, you read a book and know you're going to love it by the end of the first chapter. Sometimes you know after the first paragraph. With Anansi Boys, I knew at the dedication. It goes like this:
"You know how it is. You pick up a book, flip to the dedication, and find that, once again, the author has dedicated the book to someone else and not to you.
Not this time.
Because we haven't yet met/have only a glancing acquaintance/are just crazy about each other/haven't seen each other in much too long/are in some way related/will never meet, but will, I trust, despite that, always think fondly of each other...
This one's for you.
With you know what, and you probably know why."
Someone fetch me a fainting couch and some smelling salts, I need to swoon for a moment.
Ok, I'm back. Anyway, what I really liked about this book was it just focused on a small group of people. American Gods, this book's predecessor-but-not-exactly-prequel, was a sprawling epic with tons of characters and rules and the fate of the entire world and then some depended on the ending coming off right. Anansi Boys takes that same world, one in which the gods are still alive and living among us, and zeroes in on just a couple of characters: the trickster god Anansi's two adult sons, one of whom has grown up knowing his father is a god, the other who is unaware of this. The stakes are still high, of course, and battles must be fought before the end, but the scope of the novel wasn't as expansive and exhausting as American Gods. You don't necessarily have to read one before the other, but it certainly couldn't hurt.
I forgot to mark the good passages in my copy, so here are three random excerpts from the pages I remember off the top of my head:
"Like all sentient beings, Fat Charlie had a weirdness quotient. For some days the needle had been over in the red, occasionally banging jerkily against the pin. Now the meter broke. From this moment on, he suspected, nothing would surprise him. He could no longer be outweirded. He was done.
He was wrong, of course."
"Fat Charlie tried to remember what people did in prison to pass the time, but all he could come up with was keeping secret diaries and hiding things in their bottoms. He had nothing to write on, and felt that a definite measure of how well one was getting on in life was not having to hide things in one's bottom.
Nothing happened. Nothing continued to happen. More Nothing. The Return of Nothing. Son of Nothing. Nothing Rides Again. Nothing and Abbott and Costello meet the Wolfman."
"Maybe Anansi's just some guy from a story, made up back in Africa in the dawn days of the world by some boy with blackfly on his leg, pushing his crutch in the dirt, making up some goofy story about a man made of tar. Does that change anything? People respond to the stories. They tell them themselves. The stories spread, and as people tell them, the stories change the tellers. Because now the folks who never had any thought in their head but how to run from lions and keep far enough away from rivers that the crocodiles don't get an easy meal, now they're starting to dream about a whole new place to live. The world may be the same, but the wallpaper's changed."
August 21, 2022
Despite having read Gaiman's American Gods multiple times, this was the first time I've read this spin-off or whatever you want to call it.
Mr. Nancy is different here. He's fallen in love with a mortal woman and has a son with her, Charlie. Charlie is quite shy and awkward. He's also gonna get married soon, though the wedding preparations look less than enthusiastic to me.
We get to know that he basically grew up without a father, but when Charlie hears about Mr. Nancy's passing, he nevertheless goes to his funeral.
From there, it's a jorney of (self-)discovery once a neighbor tells him that Mr. Nancy is no other that Anansi, the African spider god. Carlie also finds out that he supposedly has a brother who has inherited their father's divine powers.
Once Charlie and his brother meet, the world will never be the same again. Yes, I know how lame that sounds but if I told you about how but that he instead or that in truth , I'd spoil all the fun. ;P
Personally, I LOVE stories about the power of storytelling. And I LOVE American Gods. It's therefore no surprise that I wanted to read more about the arachnid deity known for shaping reality and connecting humans through stories. What are lives, after all, but stories?!
Nevertheless, this is definitely not Gaiman's strongest. I mean, it's still top notch or I wouldn't rate it this highly, but after reading so many of the author's others, this felt too ... different (in a slightly less impactful kinda way).
However, Gaiman is still fantastic on his worst day and almost godlike himself on his best day so I thoroughly enjoyed getting to know the cluster of neighbors (especially Mrs. Higgler who was just a hoot) while I cringed about Charlie's awkwardness and flat-out growled at Rosie. The gods, once we encounter some, were a wonderfully colourful array of old and familiar tales that were (re-)presented in just the right light that combined the old with a bit of a modern twist.
On a personal note, having seen over 25 sparrows descend on my garden today and having seen Hitchcock's The Birds, I get why Bird Woman poses such a threat. *lol*
A nice little side quest / adventure that couldn't quite capture me as much as Shadow's but which was still highly entertaining.
Mr. Nancy is different here. He's fallen in love with a mortal woman and has a son with her, Charlie. Charlie is quite shy and awkward. He's also gonna get married soon, though the wedding preparations look less than enthusiastic to me.
We get to know that he basically grew up without a father, but when Charlie hears about Mr. Nancy's passing, he nevertheless goes to his funeral.
From there, it's a jorney of (self-)discovery once a neighbor tells him that Mr. Nancy is no other that Anansi, the African spider god. Carlie also finds out that he supposedly has a brother who has inherited their father's divine powers.
Once Charlie and his brother meet, the world will never be the same again. Yes, I know how lame that sounds but if I told you about how but that he instead or that in truth , I'd spoil all the fun. ;P
Personally, I LOVE stories about the power of storytelling. And I LOVE American Gods. It's therefore no surprise that I wanted to read more about the arachnid deity known for shaping reality and connecting humans through stories. What are lives, after all, but stories?!
Nevertheless, this is definitely not Gaiman's strongest. I mean, it's still top notch or I wouldn't rate it this highly, but after reading so many of the author's others, this felt too ... different (in a slightly less impactful kinda way).
However, Gaiman is still fantastic on his worst day and almost godlike himself on his best day so I thoroughly enjoyed getting to know the cluster of neighbors (especially Mrs. Higgler who was just a hoot) while I cringed about Charlie's awkwardness and flat-out growled at Rosie. The gods, once we encounter some, were a wonderfully colourful array of old and familiar tales that were (re-)presented in just the right light that combined the old with a bit of a modern twist.
On a personal note, having seen over 25 sparrows descend on my garden today and having seen Hitchcock's The Birds, I get why Bird Woman poses such a threat. *lol*
A nice little side quest / adventure that couldn't quite capture me as much as Shadow's but which was still highly entertaining.
November 5, 2018
"Stories are like spiders, with all their long legs, and stories are like spiderwebs, which man gets himself all tangled up in but which look so pretty when you see the under a leaf in the morning dew, and in the elegant way that they connect to one another, each to each."
My friend Kelly is one of those wonderful, eccentric people who is perfectly happy to be herself and doesn't care what anyone else thinks. I wouldn't call her weird, but I would definitely not call her normal. Her daughters rebelled against their mother's so-called weirdness by being some of the most charming, yet unrelentingly normal humans I've ever met. Normal hair, normal clothes, normal academic pursuits, normal jobs, normal boyfriends... Sometimes, Kelly isn't sure where they picked up that eerie normality...
I thought about them as I re-read "Anansi Boys"; Fat Charlie is exactly like Kelly's girls, cringing at his father's eccentricities and strangeness, and doing his very best to blend in as much as he can. He hasn't seen or spoken to his father in years, and that's just fine by him. He leads a perfectly ordinary life, with an ordinary job in bookkeeping and an ordinary fianc茅e - and he is fairly pleased with the placidity of it all. Until he learns that his father passed (in an appropriately embarrassing way) and attends the funeral only to learn that he has a mysterious brother he doesn't remember. And then that brother comes to pay him a visit...
This is an unusual Gaiman novel: it feels like a slightly different voice than the one regular readers might be used to. It is also much more deliberately funny than other Gaiman books: his weird and wonderful British humor always shines through in his work, but it usually feels more accidental. Here, he wants you to laugh, he's trying to set you up for a chuckle at every page. And that's part of my problem with this book: this attempt at being humorous feels strained. Neil doesn't need to try, he should really just let it happen on it's own...
The other element that makes this book not as stellar as other Gaiman books is the characters. I just didn't particularly enjoy any of them, and felt them all to be under-developed. Spider is a total dick, I simply don't get why Fat Charlie wants to marry a super-boring cold-fish like Rosie and Fat Charlie himself just takes so long to get his shit together... Even the bad guy lacks panache... I think I wanted more Anansi, more of his zaniness, more over-the-top; and the way the characters were drawn up just felt lukewarm.
Don't get me wrong: this is not a bad book. I don't think Neil Gaiman has it in him to write a bad book. But it definitely doesn't have the same caliber as some of his other works. 3 and a half stars.
My friend Kelly is one of those wonderful, eccentric people who is perfectly happy to be herself and doesn't care what anyone else thinks. I wouldn't call her weird, but I would definitely not call her normal. Her daughters rebelled against their mother's so-called weirdness by being some of the most charming, yet unrelentingly normal humans I've ever met. Normal hair, normal clothes, normal academic pursuits, normal jobs, normal boyfriends... Sometimes, Kelly isn't sure where they picked up that eerie normality...
I thought about them as I re-read "Anansi Boys"; Fat Charlie is exactly like Kelly's girls, cringing at his father's eccentricities and strangeness, and doing his very best to blend in as much as he can. He hasn't seen or spoken to his father in years, and that's just fine by him. He leads a perfectly ordinary life, with an ordinary job in bookkeeping and an ordinary fianc茅e - and he is fairly pleased with the placidity of it all. Until he learns that his father passed (in an appropriately embarrassing way) and attends the funeral only to learn that he has a mysterious brother he doesn't remember. And then that brother comes to pay him a visit...
This is an unusual Gaiman novel: it feels like a slightly different voice than the one regular readers might be used to. It is also much more deliberately funny than other Gaiman books: his weird and wonderful British humor always shines through in his work, but it usually feels more accidental. Here, he wants you to laugh, he's trying to set you up for a chuckle at every page. And that's part of my problem with this book: this attempt at being humorous feels strained. Neil doesn't need to try, he should really just let it happen on it's own...
The other element that makes this book not as stellar as other Gaiman books is the characters. I just didn't particularly enjoy any of them, and felt them all to be under-developed. Spider is a total dick, I simply don't get why Fat Charlie wants to marry a super-boring cold-fish like Rosie and Fat Charlie himself just takes so long to get his shit together... Even the bad guy lacks panache... I think I wanted more Anansi, more of his zaniness, more over-the-top; and the way the characters were drawn up just felt lukewarm.
Don't get me wrong: this is not a bad book. I don't think Neil Gaiman has it in him to write a bad book. But it definitely doesn't have the same caliber as some of his other works. 3 and a half stars.
December 12, 2019
I enjoyed this book WAY more my second time reading it. The first time I read it I went into it thinking it was a continuation of American Gods and it most definitely is not that so I was a little let down. But this time I knew what I was getting into and I was able to fully appreciate the spectacular story that Anansi Boys actually is! I thought the plot was incredibly interesting and I loved learning more about Anansi and his background. You get little glimpses in American Gods but this was so much more in depth! I also really loved Fat Charlie and Spider, their dynamic was so interesting and the trouble that Spider causes made cringe at times and laugh out loud at others. And after you find out the truth at the end, it kind of blows your mind! I definitely didn't see that coming and it literally made my jaw drop! I thought the ending was quite perfect, it didn't play out how I thought it would but after finishing it, I couldn't imagine a better ending.
August 22, 2022
As enjoyable as the first time.
That is to say, I fell head over heels in love with the idea of stories within stories taking over, of the god of stories, Anansi, passing on his gift of the gab -- a little joy, humor, and sexiness -- into the wide world.
For those of us who know America Gods, this is not a direct sequel even if it carries on a few characters. The real treat is in the story.
I was fooled the first time I read this. I was wondering just how Fat Charlie, a little ponce who gets walked all over, would come into his own. It was so grounded, so funny when he first discovered Spider, that I could very well have just ridden these interactions all the way to the end and would have been happy. A somewhat normal resolution.
Thankfully, the book spun us around and gave us some fully foreshadowed brilliant reveals that changed the entire nature of the book. I love it when this kind of thing gets pulled off. And it's Gaiman. So a little trust IS warranted.
I miss Gaiman's adult work. I've loved all of his adult work so much more than his YA, with a possible exception of Coraline. I loved Coraline very much. But it's the full adult wonkiness that I prefer, and this one kicked ass.
No, it's not American Gods. But it is its own beast, or arachnid, and that is way more than enough for me.
That is to say, I fell head over heels in love with the idea of stories within stories taking over, of the god of stories, Anansi, passing on his gift of the gab -- a little joy, humor, and sexiness -- into the wide world.
For those of us who know America Gods, this is not a direct sequel even if it carries on a few characters. The real treat is in the story.
I was fooled the first time I read this. I was wondering just how Fat Charlie, a little ponce who gets walked all over, would come into his own. It was so grounded, so funny when he first discovered Spider, that I could very well have just ridden these interactions all the way to the end and would have been happy. A somewhat normal resolution.
Thankfully, the book spun us around and gave us some fully foreshadowed brilliant reveals that changed the entire nature of the book. I love it when this kind of thing gets pulled off. And it's Gaiman. So a little trust IS warranted.
I miss Gaiman's adult work. I've loved all of his adult work so much more than his YA, with a possible exception of Coraline. I loved Coraline very much. But it's the full adult wonkiness that I prefer, and this one kicked ass.
No, it's not American Gods. But it is its own beast, or arachnid, and that is way more than enough for me.
April 24, 2017
鈥淭he important thing about songs is that they're just like stories. They don't mean a damn unless there's people listenin' to them.鈥�
鈥� Neil Gaiman, Anansi Boys
I spent the evening avoiding my nightly duties to my family while slowly pruning in the tub while reading this. Time to transfer back into my normal wrinkles and be a grown up.
The book was good. Not great. But it was playful. I can see how many of my friends would love it. Stop. Many of my friends DO love it. It is a song and dance about family, brothers, myths, stories. It just fell a bit flat with me. Perhaps, like someone who has grown too old to see fairies or see magic, I'm just through a certain veil where Gaiman's prose works, but I KNOW -- I'm not feeling him the same way some are. I hear the words. I just don't want to sing and dance.
Firmly in my forties, I feel almost obligated to keep reading Gaiman books even though they are past, for me, their expiration date. The magic is fading. But something still pulls me back in. They are the Lays Potato Chips of science fiction. Harsh? Perhaps, but perhaps it is just that I'm not directly Gaiman's fanbase anymore. He isn't writing exactly for me and I know it. I feel it. But still, every few seasons -- I unavoidably -- reach into the greasy Gaiman bag for another book. I miss the song. I miss the dance. So, periodically, I open his books and try and recreate those first few pages, the first few times. I try to put my youth and magic back into a bottle, but I don't have the focus or the patience.
鈥� Neil Gaiman, Anansi Boys
I spent the evening avoiding my nightly duties to my family while slowly pruning in the tub while reading this. Time to transfer back into my normal wrinkles and be a grown up.
The book was good. Not great. But it was playful. I can see how many of my friends would love it. Stop. Many of my friends DO love it. It is a song and dance about family, brothers, myths, stories. It just fell a bit flat with me. Perhaps, like someone who has grown too old to see fairies or see magic, I'm just through a certain veil where Gaiman's prose works, but I KNOW -- I'm not feeling him the same way some are. I hear the words. I just don't want to sing and dance.
Firmly in my forties, I feel almost obligated to keep reading Gaiman books even though they are past, for me, their expiration date. The magic is fading. But something still pulls me back in. They are the Lays Potato Chips of science fiction. Harsh? Perhaps, but perhaps it is just that I'm not directly Gaiman's fanbase anymore. He isn't writing exactly for me and I know it. I feel it. But still, every few seasons -- I unavoidably -- reach into the greasy Gaiman bag for another book. I miss the song. I miss the dance. So, periodically, I open his books and try and recreate those first few pages, the first few times. I try to put my youth and magic back into a bottle, but I don't have the focus or the patience.
June 23, 2010
4.0 to 4.5 stars. Another superb story by one of my favorite authors. While not a sequel to his superb , it shares the title character with that book along with some references to his adventures in that story. While those references add to the richness of the tale, there is no necessity of reading American God first (except for the obvious one that it is one of the best books ever).
Anyway, this story center around Charles "Fat Charlie" Nancy, a timid, passive man from London whose life is turned upside down when his very flamboyant father dies. Charlie soon discovers that his father was actually an incarnation of "Anansi" the West African trickster god (whose primary form is that of a spider). Things go from bad to worse when Charlie meets his previously unknown older brother, Spider. Spider proceeds to turn Charlie's previously dull existence upside down through a series of events that I won't spoil here except to say that, in typical Neil Gaiman fashion, they meet a plethora of incredibly unique and intersting characters during the course of the narrative.
Neil Gaiman is an incredible story teller and this book is another great one. Highly Recommended!!
Winner: British Fantasy Award for Best Novel (2006)
Winner: Locus Award for Best Fantasy Novel (2006)
Winner: Mythopoeic Fantasy Award for Best Novel (2006)
Winner: SFSite Reader's Poll for SF/Fantasy Novel (2006)
Anyway, this story center around Charles "Fat Charlie" Nancy, a timid, passive man from London whose life is turned upside down when his very flamboyant father dies. Charlie soon discovers that his father was actually an incarnation of "Anansi" the West African trickster god (whose primary form is that of a spider). Things go from bad to worse when Charlie meets his previously unknown older brother, Spider. Spider proceeds to turn Charlie's previously dull existence upside down through a series of events that I won't spoil here except to say that, in typical Neil Gaiman fashion, they meet a plethora of incredibly unique and intersting characters during the course of the narrative.
Neil Gaiman is an incredible story teller and this book is another great one. Highly Recommended!!
Winner: British Fantasy Award for Best Novel (2006)
Winner: Locus Award for Best Fantasy Novel (2006)
Winner: Mythopoeic Fantasy Award for Best Novel (2006)
Winner: SFSite Reader's Poll for SF/Fantasy Novel (2006)
August 28, 2022
A little disappointing after American Gods.
April 17, 2018
I really can鈥檛 decide if I like Neil Gaiman. So far I鈥檝e read a few of his books and they are missing something that I just can鈥檛 seem to put my finger on. I think what I鈥檝e come to discover is that this is one of the rare instances that I prefer an authors movies more than the books they write.
At one point around 80% in I almost just put the book down to wander off into something else never to return to it. But it seemed silly to read almost all of a book and not finish.
But I finished and while I did enjoy the beginning of the book (except for in one chapter I think it used the term Fat Charlie 607 times), I liked the end of the book even if it took awhile to pull it all together. What was muddled is some of the stuff in the middle. This is like a modern day folk tale but again I鈥檓 missing some connection that I鈥檓 supposed to have with the characters.
However, I did like learning how Anasi stories are like the ones that Disney told in Song of the South about a very clever rabbit that gets the better of those around him using trickery.
So far for Neil Gaimen I鈥檝e decided to wait for the movie.
At one point around 80% in I almost just put the book down to wander off into something else never to return to it. But it seemed silly to read almost all of a book and not finish.
But I finished and while I did enjoy the beginning of the book (except for in one chapter I think it used the term Fat Charlie 607 times), I liked the end of the book even if it took awhile to pull it all together. What was muddled is some of the stuff in the middle. This is like a modern day folk tale but again I鈥檓 missing some connection that I鈥檓 supposed to have with the characters.
However, I did like learning how Anasi stories are like the ones that Disney told in Song of the South about a very clever rabbit that gets the better of those around him using trickery.
So far for Neil Gaimen I鈥檝e decided to wait for the movie.
December 4, 2024
鈥炐溞拘佳囆笛傂把傂� 薪邪 袗薪邪薪褋懈鈥� 械 屑薪芯谐芯 褏褍斜邪胁邪 屑褉邪褔薪邪 锌褉懈泻邪蟹泻邪... 小锌芯褉械写 屑械薪, 褌褟 薪械 写芯褋褌懈谐邪 胁械谢懈泻芯谢械锌懈械褌芯 薪邪 鈥炐愋夹笛€懈泻邪薪褋泻懈 斜芯谐芯胁械鈥�, 薪芯 胁褋械 锌邪泻 懈屑邪 褋胁芯懈褌械 褋懈谢薪懈 屑芯屑械薪褌懈 懈 芯锌褉械写械谢械薪芯 褋懈 蟹邪褋谢褍卸邪胁邪 褔械褌械薪械褌芯. 袣薪懈谐邪褌邪 薪械 械 薪械泄薪芯 锌褉芯写褗谢卸械薪懈械, 芯斜邪褔械 写械泄褋褌胁懈械褌芯 褋械 褉邪蟹胁懈胁邪 胁 褋褗褖懈褟 屑懈褋褌懈褔械薪 褋胁褟褌 懈 邪褌屑芯褋褎械褉邪褌邪 芯褌薪芯胁芯 械 写芯褋褌邪 芯褔邪褉芯胁邪褌械谢薪邪. 袧懈泄谢 袚械泄屑褗薪 械 褉邪蟹泻邪蟹邪谢 谢褞斜芯锌懈褌薪邪褌邪 懈褋褌芯褉懈褟 薪邪 写械褑邪褌邪 薪邪 斜芯谐 袗薪邪薪褋懈 褋褗褋 褋褌褉邪褕薪芯 锌褉懈褟褌薪芯 褔褍胁褋褌胁芯 蟹邪 褏褍屑芯褉!
鈥炐熝€懈泻邪蟹泻懈褌械 褋邪 泻邪褌芯 锌邪褟褑懈 褋 屑薪芯谐芯 懈 写褗谢谐懈 泻褉邪褔泻邪, 锌褉懈泻邪蟹泻懈褌械 褋邪 泻邪褌芯 锌邪褟卸懈薪懈, 胁 泻芯懈褌芯 褔芯胁械泻 褋械 芯锌谢懈褌邪, 薪芯 泻芯懈褌芯 懈蟹谐谢械卸写邪褌 褌芯谢泻芯胁邪 泻褉邪褋懈胁懈, 泻芯谐邪褌芯 褍谢芯胁褟褌 锌芯谐谢械写邪 褌懈 锌芯写 薪褟泻芯械 谢懈褋褌芯, 芯斜泻懈褔械薪懈 褋 褍褌褉懈薪薪邪 褉芯褋邪 懈 褌邪泻邪 懈蟹褟褖薪芯 褋胁褗褉蟹邪薪懈 械写薪邪 褋 写褉褍谐邪.鈥�
鈥炐熝€懈泻邪蟹泻懈褌械 褋邪 泻邪褌芯 锌邪褟褑懈 褋 屑薪芯谐芯 懈 写褗谢谐懈 泻褉邪褔泻邪, 锌褉懈泻邪蟹泻懈褌械 褋邪 泻邪褌芯 锌邪褟卸懈薪懈, 胁 泻芯懈褌芯 褔芯胁械泻 褋械 芯锌谢懈褌邪, 薪芯 泻芯懈褌芯 懈蟹谐谢械卸写邪褌 褌芯谢泻芯胁邪 泻褉邪褋懈胁懈, 泻芯谐邪褌芯 褍谢芯胁褟褌 锌芯谐谢械写邪 褌懈 锌芯写 薪褟泻芯械 谢懈褋褌芯, 芯斜泻懈褔械薪懈 褋 褍褌褉懈薪薪邪 褉芯褋邪 懈 褌邪泻邪 懈蟹褟褖薪芯 褋胁褗褉蟹邪薪懈 械写薪邪 褋 写褉褍谐邪.鈥�
Displaying 1 - 30 of 12,152 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.