What do you think?
Rate this book
賲賳 兀賷賳 鬲兀鬲賷 丕賱兀賮賰丕乇 丕賱噩賷丿丞: 丕賱鬲丕乇賷禺 丕賱胤亘賷毓賷 賱賱廿亘丿丕毓
噩賵賱丞 賮賶 毓丕賱賲 丕賱睾賲賵囟 丕賱爻丨乇賷 賱鬲丕乇賷禺 賵賴賳丿爻丞 丕賱廿亘丿丕毓.
255 pages, Paperback
First published October 1, 2010
1,572 people are currently reading
43.4k people want to read
About the author
Steven Johnson
109听books1,918听followersSteven Johnson is the bestselling author of twelve books, including Enemy of All Mankind, Farsighted, Wonderland, How We Got to Now, Where Good Ideas Come From, The Invention of Air, The Ghost Map, and Everything Bad Is Good for You.
He's the host of the podcast American Innovations, and the host and co-creator of the PBS and BBC series How We Got to Now. Johnson lives in Marin County, California, and Brooklyn, New York, with his wife and three sons.
He's the host of the podcast American Innovations, and the host and co-creator of the PBS and BBC series How We Got to Now. Johnson lives in Marin County, California, and Brooklyn, New York, with his wife and three sons.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,109 reviews
July 5, 2013
Book operates around 5 major concepts:
1. The Adjacent Possible- contrary to popular belief innovation seldom changes the game completely by creating something incredibly advanced. More often, innovation unlocks a realm of the adjacent possible (That which can be achieved given the components that are already in existence). Ex: in the primordial soup of Earth pre-life, amino acids could be formed spontaneously through random collisions of atoms and functional groups. It would've been impossible for a functional cell to be formed then because the number of fortuitous collisions would've been staggering. Cells could be formed once their simpler components were present in the environment. Innovation takes simple components and makes slightly more complex products in a continuous cycle.
2. Liquid Networks- Because the adjacent possible is unlocked through random collissions in components, it makes sense that innovation would thrive in so-called "liquid environments" in which component ideas are able to flow freely. Cities are such liquid environments. The internet is the ultimate liquid environment. Offices are trying to become more liquid environments thorugh encouraging collaboration.
3. Slow Hunch- The narrative of the "Eureka moment" is seldom accurate. More often than not innovation occurs once a slow hunch has reached maturity. Slow hunches can reach maturity by colliding with other ideas. hus, keeping one's slow hunches alive is advisable to promote innovation. Keeping a commonplace book is an excellent way to cultivate and keep alive a slow hunch. Innovation is also promoted by cross-polination between different fields. Many famous scientists and thinkers have switched what they are spending their time on every couple of days. This puts the original thought in one's sub conscious.
4. Serendipity is obviously important to innovation because with increased serendipity comes increased collisions between slow hunches. Information overflow encourages creativity. The internet promotes the ultimate information overflow.
5. Error- "Being right keeps you in place. Being wrong forces you to explore." Sometimes the noise is the signal, humans have a natural tendency to dismiss error. Our body maintains some error in DNA replication to continue the evolutionary drive (whether this is by evolutionary design or by the inability for a perfect system is unknown).
6. Exaptation- Taking an idea or thing from one field and applying it to another field. Gutenberg with the screw press. In dense urban centers exaptations are more likely. Weak-tie expatation. Utilizing the weak-tie of Connectors to exapt ideas. Apple development cycle is more like a coffehouse than an assembly line; Everyone plans it all together instead of designers followed by other people. In the latter method there is a tendrency for the thing to be whittled down.
7. Platforms - Ecosystem engineers. Generative platforms come in stacks. Platforms encourage and amplify hunches. Twitter's open-source software allows different people to run twitter machines which increases popularity. Hashtags and @ also came from early twitter users because of the platform. API=open platform in software
8. The Fourth Quadrant (non-market, networked) has provided a proportionally high amount of innovation.The problem with Quadrant One(market, networked) is that it encourages us to build artificial walls (patents etc.) around information. When information flows free everyone benefits.
1. The Adjacent Possible- contrary to popular belief innovation seldom changes the game completely by creating something incredibly advanced. More often, innovation unlocks a realm of the adjacent possible (That which can be achieved given the components that are already in existence). Ex: in the primordial soup of Earth pre-life, amino acids could be formed spontaneously through random collisions of atoms and functional groups. It would've been impossible for a functional cell to be formed then because the number of fortuitous collisions would've been staggering. Cells could be formed once their simpler components were present in the environment. Innovation takes simple components and makes slightly more complex products in a continuous cycle.
2. Liquid Networks- Because the adjacent possible is unlocked through random collissions in components, it makes sense that innovation would thrive in so-called "liquid environments" in which component ideas are able to flow freely. Cities are such liquid environments. The internet is the ultimate liquid environment. Offices are trying to become more liquid environments thorugh encouraging collaboration.
3. Slow Hunch- The narrative of the "Eureka moment" is seldom accurate. More often than not innovation occurs once a slow hunch has reached maturity. Slow hunches can reach maturity by colliding with other ideas. hus, keeping one's slow hunches alive is advisable to promote innovation. Keeping a commonplace book is an excellent way to cultivate and keep alive a slow hunch. Innovation is also promoted by cross-polination between different fields. Many famous scientists and thinkers have switched what they are spending their time on every couple of days. This puts the original thought in one's sub conscious.
4. Serendipity is obviously important to innovation because with increased serendipity comes increased collisions between slow hunches. Information overflow encourages creativity. The internet promotes the ultimate information overflow.
5. Error- "Being right keeps you in place. Being wrong forces you to explore." Sometimes the noise is the signal, humans have a natural tendency to dismiss error. Our body maintains some error in DNA replication to continue the evolutionary drive (whether this is by evolutionary design or by the inability for a perfect system is unknown).
6. Exaptation- Taking an idea or thing from one field and applying it to another field. Gutenberg with the screw press. In dense urban centers exaptations are more likely. Weak-tie expatation. Utilizing the weak-tie of Connectors to exapt ideas. Apple development cycle is more like a coffehouse than an assembly line; Everyone plans it all together instead of designers followed by other people. In the latter method there is a tendrency for the thing to be whittled down.
7. Platforms - Ecosystem engineers. Generative platforms come in stacks. Platforms encourage and amplify hunches. Twitter's open-source software allows different people to run twitter machines which increases popularity. Hashtags and @ also came from early twitter users because of the platform. API=open platform in software
8. The Fourth Quadrant (non-market, networked) has provided a proportionally high amount of innovation.The problem with Quadrant One(market, networked) is that it encourages us to build artificial walls (patents etc.) around information. When information flows free everyone benefits.
May 18, 2011
Hmm, here we go again. Another 'popular / best selling' author with a 'great' book full of 'new' insights.
Johnson describes where good ideas come from (hence the title) by breaking it down into 7 patterns: the adjacent possible, liquid networks, the slow hunch, serendipity, error, exaptation, platforms. Each chapter describes a pattern by starting out with an anecdote of some inventor x in city y in year z. Then the pattern is defined / described and finally a bit elaborated upon with possibly more anecdotes. It's nice to read an anecdote now and then but after three chapters it gets really annoying. And whereas the idea of breaking down 'idea generation' into seven patterns is a nice, and the patterns in itself are interesting enough subjects, the way Johnson treats the patterns and elaborates on the patterns is really disappointing. There is no real deep original insight or new thought from the side of the author.
And where the first three chapter could keep my attention and approval, from the fourth chapter (serendipity) Johnson really misses the point, in my opinion. He describes serendipity well enough but in his apologia of the critique that the Internet prevents serendipity, he is blabbering sheer nonsense. He states that since we can use Google and wikipedia, we can much easier deepen and extent our serendipitous encounters and hunches. But that is a posteriori, the serendipitous event has already taken place when I start searching Google for 'The process church of holy judgement' after seeing, the never heard of before Sabbath Assembly, opening up for Earth, realising they base their music on the same cult from the sixties where Cleveland's Integrity built their 'Church of holy terror' thinking on.
In the final chapters there is some inexplicable flirting with Darwinian evolutionary ideas which are interesting in themselves but I didn't really see the analogy or their role as argument in the point he is trying to make.
The final, conclusive chapter is actually quite nice but nothing more than paraphrasing Kevin Kelly's ideas from 'New rules for a new economy'.
I was doubting between 2 and 3 stars but since I did enjoy most of the read I give it 3 stars. On the other hand, I wouldn't recommend this book, go read Kevin Kelly instead.
UPDATE: I just subtracted one star. I forgot to mention that it increasingly annoys me that these so called 'popular science' books tend to have pages and pages of useless appendices, bibliographies, indices etc. All are defendable in some way but to me it seems that they are just there to make the book look thicker or more voluminous. This book for example has about 40 pages (which is almost 20% of the number of pages of the actual story) with a 'Chronology of key innovations 1400-2000' ???????. There is absolutely no single bit of new information in there. What's next? Including a list of most used words in the book? 'Translation of the most important concepts into three forgotten languages'? Please include a link to a web page or something. Besides that the total number of pages is 326 of which about 245 are story.
Johnson describes where good ideas come from (hence the title) by breaking it down into 7 patterns: the adjacent possible, liquid networks, the slow hunch, serendipity, error, exaptation, platforms. Each chapter describes a pattern by starting out with an anecdote of some inventor x in city y in year z. Then the pattern is defined / described and finally a bit elaborated upon with possibly more anecdotes. It's nice to read an anecdote now and then but after three chapters it gets really annoying. And whereas the idea of breaking down 'idea generation' into seven patterns is a nice, and the patterns in itself are interesting enough subjects, the way Johnson treats the patterns and elaborates on the patterns is really disappointing. There is no real deep original insight or new thought from the side of the author.
And where the first three chapter could keep my attention and approval, from the fourth chapter (serendipity) Johnson really misses the point, in my opinion. He describes serendipity well enough but in his apologia of the critique that the Internet prevents serendipity, he is blabbering sheer nonsense. He states that since we can use Google and wikipedia, we can much easier deepen and extent our serendipitous encounters and hunches. But that is a posteriori, the serendipitous event has already taken place when I start searching Google for 'The process church of holy judgement' after seeing, the never heard of before Sabbath Assembly, opening up for Earth, realising they base their music on the same cult from the sixties where Cleveland's Integrity built their 'Church of holy terror' thinking on.
In the final chapters there is some inexplicable flirting with Darwinian evolutionary ideas which are interesting in themselves but I didn't really see the analogy or their role as argument in the point he is trying to make.
The final, conclusive chapter is actually quite nice but nothing more than paraphrasing Kevin Kelly's ideas from 'New rules for a new economy'.
I was doubting between 2 and 3 stars but since I did enjoy most of the read I give it 3 stars. On the other hand, I wouldn't recommend this book, go read Kevin Kelly instead.
UPDATE: I just subtracted one star. I forgot to mention that it increasingly annoys me that these so called 'popular science' books tend to have pages and pages of useless appendices, bibliographies, indices etc. All are defendable in some way but to me it seems that they are just there to make the book look thicker or more voluminous. This book for example has about 40 pages (which is almost 20% of the number of pages of the actual story) with a 'Chronology of key innovations 1400-2000' ???????. There is absolutely no single bit of new information in there. What's next? Including a list of most used words in the book? 'Translation of the most important concepts into three forgotten languages'? Please include a link to a web page or something. Besides that the total number of pages is 326 of which about 245 are story.
December 17, 2010
I first became acquainted with Where Good Ideas Come From through Steven Johnson's , which I highly recommend if you've got a spare 17 minutes. In that talk -- and the book -- Johnson argues that most people are wrong when they imagine where new, innovative ideas come from. Many people have in their mind a lone scientist working in his lab, suddenly arriving at a "Eureka" moment, perhaps with a proverbial light bulb over their head. It's the apple falling on Isaac Newton, or Darwin developing the idea of the survival of the fittest while reading Malthus.
The only problem is that it's wrong.
Through this book, Johnson points out that most innovative ideas come not from the brilliant lightbulb moment of a lone genius but rather through slow hunches cultivated for months, years, or decades over liquid networks. One of the reasons why big cities are so much more innovative than small towns is that you have more diversity, more "spillover" of ideas, and more chance for the ideas to mingle around together. Ideas don't appear whole-cloth, but often develop slowly, as the scientist or inventor keeps them on the back burner while pursuing other interests. One day, perhaps, he encounters someone else with another "slow hunch," and they click and complete each other. Johnson points to other features that tend to nurture innovation, like making lots of mistakes and stealing ideas from other domains (the Gutenberg printing press relied on Rhineland wine-press technology).
If you like, you can read through this book as a guide to making your own life or your company more innovative. There are even a few guidelines: take lots of walks (to expose yourself to different stimuli), write everything down, expose yourself to different ideas and disciplines as much as you can, having diverse hobbies, let other people build upon your ideas. But even if you do none of these things, Where Good Ideas Come From is a fascinating look at how we got where we are, and is well worth the read.
The only problem is that it's wrong.
Through this book, Johnson points out that most innovative ideas come not from the brilliant lightbulb moment of a lone genius but rather through slow hunches cultivated for months, years, or decades over liquid networks. One of the reasons why big cities are so much more innovative than small towns is that you have more diversity, more "spillover" of ideas, and more chance for the ideas to mingle around together. Ideas don't appear whole-cloth, but often develop slowly, as the scientist or inventor keeps them on the back burner while pursuing other interests. One day, perhaps, he encounters someone else with another "slow hunch," and they click and complete each other. Johnson points to other features that tend to nurture innovation, like making lots of mistakes and stealing ideas from other domains (the Gutenberg printing press relied on Rhineland wine-press technology).
If you like, you can read through this book as a guide to making your own life or your company more innovative. There are even a few guidelines: take lots of walks (to expose yourself to different stimuli), write everything down, expose yourself to different ideas and disciplines as much as you can, having diverse hobbies, let other people build upon your ideas. But even if you do none of these things, Where Good Ideas Come From is a fascinating look at how we got where we are, and is well worth the read.
January 24, 2011
I tend to avoid reading this kind of book. The Cluetrain Manifesto, The Tipping Point, Freakonomics, The Black Swan. They all hit the web, and they all pass me by in a largely undifferentiated wash of bold typography, sentence-length sub-titles and (too) easily summarised central points.
I'm not sure now why I ordered 'Where good ideas come from' at the library, but having done so, I dutifully picked it up and settled in to read it over the long weekend. The double line spacing immediately gave me the sense that I was reading an extended blog post, and by and large, reaching the end of the book hasn't much changed my first reaction.
Johnson identifies seven key situations or characteristics and one key context that foster innovation. The introduction defines that context: the city. In the same way that a coral reef nurtures a vast biodiversity compared to the same square meterage of empty sea, closely packed urban environments nurture in one discipline are more likely to come into contact with ideas from another. From here we tumble through the seven situations/contexts:
The adjacent possible The phrase comes from scientist Stuart Kauffman, and describes the situation in which life originated on Earth. At one time, Earth was awash with a small number of simple molecules. Each of these could combine with the others in a finite number of ways, given certain catalysts, and then go on recombining and catalysing. This handful of simple molecules couldn't transform over night into a dandelion or an ostrich, because a whole bunch of innovations have to happen before then (like respiration). But surrounding each instance of each molecule was the adjacent possible - a slightly hazy boundary of what might happen. With each combination and transformation, the boundaries of the adjacent possible become bigger. Innovation fuels innovation.
Liquid networks Information and ideas travel best in liquid networks. Scientific breakthroughs occur not just in the lab setting - perhaps not even most often in the lab setting - but in discussion groups and cafeterias, where different perspectives can be brought to bear on a set of findings, or the 'error' in an experiment can be revised into proof for another concept. From here we move into modular office design, blah blah blah.
The slow hunch Ideas brew over time. Evidence is slowly gathered. Hunches work when they're connected to other bits of experience and evidence: this is why the Phoenix memo about 'suspicious persons' enrolling at American flight schools in mid 2001 didn't trigger any alerts that might have prevented 9/11 :it was filed into the FBI electronic black box, which is structured to prevent pieces of information from rubbing up against each other
Serendipity The chapter heading pretty much sums it up, although Johnson does a nice job of rebutting the argument that the web, and in particular being able to search for information, has driven serendipity out of our lives. Also - stop working, go for a walk, it might help you process information better than labouring over it.
Error Some inventions are the outcome of wrong outcome after wrong outcome after wrong outcome. The guy who invented vacuum tubes did so without ever figuring out how they actually worked. Xrays and daguerreotypes were both accidental discoveries. You get the picture.
ExaptationThis is where Johnson draws heavily on the evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould. Exaptation is when an adaptation is further utlised for another end. Feathers were originally evolved to provide insulation: down feathers continue to perform this function, whereas flight feathers act as airfoils. An idea or finding from one field can be adapted into another. It's like the notion of weak ties ("popularised by Malcolm Gladwell") but somehow better
Platforms Stacked platforms don't just help information move; they recycle and amplify it. Coral reefs, beavers' dams, satellites and APIs. Government as platform. Twitter twitter twitter. You know the drill (or you don't, in which case this chapter might be a real eye-opener for you: the kind of thing you make your dumb-ass Web Strategy Advisory Group read so they'll go hey, yeah, go ahead, API everything!)
In the final chapter, 'The Fourth Quandrant', Johnson proposes two ways of investigating and visualising the history and conditions of innovation. One is the deep drill-down into a single case-study, where you hope the reader will take the points you're making and extrapolate them out. His book on Joseph Priestly and the 'invention' of oxygen is such an example. The second is to go wide, and try to categorise millennia or centuries of innovation and look for trends (as Johnson does here, looking at the speeding up of innovation before and after the establishment of cities, and looking at the last 500 years of invention in terms of individual vs. collaborative/distributed invention, and market vs. open contexts).
The book is subtitled 'The natural history of innovation', and Johnson like to reach down into the primordial soup* of neurons and evolution to draw parallels to human innovation. Darwin is his key motif; his musing on coral atolls open the book, and he is returned to frequently, on topics like slow hunches, serendipity and error. The thing is, I know my Gould. I've got a bit of a grip on Darwin. And recently, Nick Lane has thoroughly schooled me on evolution. While it's always a satisfying feeling to play 'snap' with an author (ah hah! I know that reference. I see your observation, and raise you this contradictory hypothesis!), I felt like all this bolstering was (a) a bit of a stretch - are neuron networks really like well-planned open offices? and (b) light weight compared to the reams and reams and reams of information that are out there - Johnson's few pages on the advantages of sexual reproduction compared to Lane's chapter, for example.
As a result, a lot of the book felt familiar, and often a little thin compared to richer examples of many of the topics that I've read elsewhere. Perhaps ironically then, the one theme I wish Johnson had focused on in more depth - perhaps even written about exclusively - was that of the commonplace book, the tradition of writers and thinkers keeping notebooks full of passages and quotations, mixed in with observations and recordings of their own. The commonplace book lay somewhere between self-help book, memory tool, encyclopedia, and meditative device. (Montaigne kept one, naturally, and also had his favourite passages inscribed on the rafters of his library.)
The English philosopher and physician John Locke started his first commonplace book in 1652, during his first year at Oxford. Over time he developed a method for indexing these books, a method he felt sufficiently important to warrant writing up as an appendix to his major work, 'An Essay Concerning Human Understanding'. Working within the limits of two pages in each commonplace book being reserved for the index, which had to swell to encompass whatever he transcribed into it, he structured his index in this way:
Even I recognise the 'if X, then Y' pattern of storing and retrieving data going on here. The commonplace book both stores information and allows one to retrieve it, and in the process of doing so, revisit and enrich the ideas once has already had.
From Locke, Joseph Priestly, and Erasmus Darwin, Johnson steps through to 'Enquire Within Upon Everything', a hugely popular Victorian how-to guide for everything from making flowers in wax to burying relatives. Tim Berners Lee named the first iteration of what would the world wide web 'Enquire' after a copy of this manual he remembered from his childhood.
Johnson himself uses DevonThink, an app that allows him to store and search texts, which has a search algorithm that forges relationships between them. It's interesting to see him recounting using Devon Think as a writing tool:
[Apropos this, I found a lovely article over summer called , about libraries as more than data storage, you should totally read it.]
So all up: I think this might be one of those reviews that means you don't need to read the book yourself, unless you having a burning desire to do so. Instead, go out and read Nick Lane, and Steven Jay Gould, and all sorts of other people writing about all sorts of other good things - that's where the good ideas come from.
*I read an essay recently by Michael Chabon where he talked about how he'll get obsessed with a word, and for days on end he'll have to fit the words 'monkeys' or 'washer' into conversation over and over again. He said this slipped into his published writing - an unusual word, say 'shrivelled', will appear twenty times in a single book, and occasionally get picked up by readers. Someone needed to go through 'Where good ideas come from' and edit out every second instance of the phrase 'primordial soup'.
I'm not sure now why I ordered 'Where good ideas come from' at the library, but having done so, I dutifully picked it up and settled in to read it over the long weekend. The double line spacing immediately gave me the sense that I was reading an extended blog post, and by and large, reaching the end of the book hasn't much changed my first reaction.
Johnson identifies seven key situations or characteristics and one key context that foster innovation. The introduction defines that context: the city. In the same way that a coral reef nurtures a vast biodiversity compared to the same square meterage of empty sea, closely packed urban environments nurture in one discipline are more likely to come into contact with ideas from another. From here we tumble through the seven situations/contexts:
The adjacent possible The phrase comes from scientist Stuart Kauffman, and describes the situation in which life originated on Earth. At one time, Earth was awash with a small number of simple molecules. Each of these could combine with the others in a finite number of ways, given certain catalysts, and then go on recombining and catalysing. This handful of simple molecules couldn't transform over night into a dandelion or an ostrich, because a whole bunch of innovations have to happen before then (like respiration). But surrounding each instance of each molecule was the adjacent possible - a slightly hazy boundary of what might happen. With each combination and transformation, the boundaries of the adjacent possible become bigger. Innovation fuels innovation.
Liquid networks Information and ideas travel best in liquid networks. Scientific breakthroughs occur not just in the lab setting - perhaps not even most often in the lab setting - but in discussion groups and cafeterias, where different perspectives can be brought to bear on a set of findings, or the 'error' in an experiment can be revised into proof for another concept. From here we move into modular office design, blah blah blah.
The slow hunch Ideas brew over time. Evidence is slowly gathered. Hunches work when they're connected to other bits of experience and evidence: this is why the Phoenix memo about 'suspicious persons' enrolling at American flight schools in mid 2001 didn't trigger any alerts that might have prevented 9/11 :it was filed into the FBI electronic black box, which is structured to prevent pieces of information from rubbing up against each other
Serendipity The chapter heading pretty much sums it up, although Johnson does a nice job of rebutting the argument that the web, and in particular being able to search for information, has driven serendipity out of our lives. Also - stop working, go for a walk, it might help you process information better than labouring over it.
Error Some inventions are the outcome of wrong outcome after wrong outcome after wrong outcome. The guy who invented vacuum tubes did so without ever figuring out how they actually worked. Xrays and daguerreotypes were both accidental discoveries. You get the picture.
ExaptationThis is where Johnson draws heavily on the evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould. Exaptation is when an adaptation is further utlised for another end. Feathers were originally evolved to provide insulation: down feathers continue to perform this function, whereas flight feathers act as airfoils. An idea or finding from one field can be adapted into another. It's like the notion of weak ties ("popularised by Malcolm Gladwell") but somehow better
Platforms Stacked platforms don't just help information move; they recycle and amplify it. Coral reefs, beavers' dams, satellites and APIs. Government as platform. Twitter twitter twitter. You know the drill (or you don't, in which case this chapter might be a real eye-opener for you: the kind of thing you make your dumb-ass Web Strategy Advisory Group read so they'll go hey, yeah, go ahead, API everything!)
In the final chapter, 'The Fourth Quandrant', Johnson proposes two ways of investigating and visualising the history and conditions of innovation. One is the deep drill-down into a single case-study, where you hope the reader will take the points you're making and extrapolate them out. His book on Joseph Priestly and the 'invention' of oxygen is such an example. The second is to go wide, and try to categorise millennia or centuries of innovation and look for trends (as Johnson does here, looking at the speeding up of innovation before and after the establishment of cities, and looking at the last 500 years of invention in terms of individual vs. collaborative/distributed invention, and market vs. open contexts).
The book is subtitled 'The natural history of innovation', and Johnson like to reach down into the primordial soup* of neurons and evolution to draw parallels to human innovation. Darwin is his key motif; his musing on coral atolls open the book, and he is returned to frequently, on topics like slow hunches, serendipity and error. The thing is, I know my Gould. I've got a bit of a grip on Darwin. And recently, Nick Lane has thoroughly schooled me on evolution. While it's always a satisfying feeling to play 'snap' with an author (ah hah! I know that reference. I see your observation, and raise you this contradictory hypothesis!), I felt like all this bolstering was (a) a bit of a stretch - are neuron networks really like well-planned open offices? and (b) light weight compared to the reams and reams and reams of information that are out there - Johnson's few pages on the advantages of sexual reproduction compared to Lane's chapter, for example.
As a result, a lot of the book felt familiar, and often a little thin compared to richer examples of many of the topics that I've read elsewhere. Perhaps ironically then, the one theme I wish Johnson had focused on in more depth - perhaps even written about exclusively - was that of the commonplace book, the tradition of writers and thinkers keeping notebooks full of passages and quotations, mixed in with observations and recordings of their own. The commonplace book lay somewhere between self-help book, memory tool, encyclopedia, and meditative device. (Montaigne kept one, naturally, and also had his favourite passages inscribed on the rafters of his library.)
The English philosopher and physician John Locke started his first commonplace book in 1652, during his first year at Oxford. Over time he developed a method for indexing these books, a method he felt sufficiently important to warrant writing up as an appendix to his major work, 'An Essay Concerning Human Understanding'. Working within the limits of two pages in each commonplace book being reserved for the index, which had to swell to encompass whatever he transcribed into it, he structured his index in this way:
When I meet with any thing, that I think fit to out into my common place book, I first find a proper head. Suppose for example that the head be EPISTOLA, I ook unto the index for the first letter and the following vowel which in this instance are E.i. if in the space marked E.i. there is any number that directs me to the page designed for words that begin with an E and whose first vowel after the initial letter is I, I must then write under the word Epistola in that page what I have to remark.
Even I recognise the 'if X, then Y' pattern of storing and retrieving data going on here. The commonplace book both stores information and allows one to retrieve it, and in the process of doing so, revisit and enrich the ideas once has already had.
From Locke, Joseph Priestly, and Erasmus Darwin, Johnson steps through to 'Enquire Within Upon Everything', a hugely popular Victorian how-to guide for everything from making flowers in wax to burying relatives. Tim Berners Lee named the first iteration of what would the world wide web 'Enquire' after a copy of this manual he remembered from his childhood.
Johnson himself uses DevonThink, an app that allows him to store and search texts, which has a search algorithm that forges relationships between them. It's interesting to see him recounting using Devon Think as a writing tool:
I write a paragraph about something - let's say about the human brain's remarkable facility for interpreting facial expressions. I then plug that paragraph into the software, and ask DevonThink to find other passages in my archive that are similar. Instantly, a list of quotes appears on my screen ... Invariably, one or two of these triggers a new association in my head ... and so I select that quote, and ask the software to find a new batch of passages similar to it. Before long, a larger idea takes shape in my head, built upon the trail of association the machine has assembled for me.
[Apropos this, I found a lovely article over summer called , about libraries as more than data storage, you should totally read it.]
So all up: I think this might be one of those reviews that means you don't need to read the book yourself, unless you having a burning desire to do so. Instead, go out and read Nick Lane, and Steven Jay Gould, and all sorts of other people writing about all sorts of other good things - that's where the good ideas come from.
*I read an essay recently by Michael Chabon where he talked about how he'll get obsessed with a word, and for days on end he'll have to fit the words 'monkeys' or 'washer' into conversation over and over again. He said this slipped into his published writing - an unusual word, say 'shrivelled', will appear twenty times in a single book, and occasionally get picked up by readers. Someone needed to go through 'Where good ideas come from' and edit out every second instance of the phrase 'primordial soup'.
February 18, 2012
This book can be summarized as - where good ideas die. I expected to book to serve as a guide as how inventions evolved into new inventions. Instead the book turned out to be a cross between something like a business book "how to foster new ideas" and a self-help one "how to be more inventive". The fact that it's written by a yuppie Silicon Valley entrepreneur makes it that much more difficult to stomach - the book raves about twitter as a platform and plugs some data-mining wares the author is peddling.
All of the above would lead to a one-star review (I'm so disappointed in The Economist for recommending this) if it were not for the discussion of "adjacent possible". I recommend that people read "Chapter 1: The Adjacent Possible" and skip the rest of the book. In this chapter the author convincingly argues that the pop culture notion of a genius inventor is bullshit. As proof the author presents numerous important inventions that were invented by multiple people around the same time. There is a follow up chapter on how ideas usually don't strike like lighting, they often take decades to develop.
The book itself is very short, the last quarter of the book is padding consisting of author's notes, listing important inventions, etc. The list of inventions is somewhat random. Invention descriptions are overly brief and unsatisfying. The following notes section is evidence that the author is good at research and sucks at turning that into prose.
All of the above would lead to a one-star review (I'm so disappointed in The Economist for recommending this) if it were not for the discussion of "adjacent possible". I recommend that people read "Chapter 1: The Adjacent Possible" and skip the rest of the book. In this chapter the author convincingly argues that the pop culture notion of a genius inventor is bullshit. As proof the author presents numerous important inventions that were invented by multiple people around the same time. There is a follow up chapter on how ideas usually don't strike like lighting, they often take decades to develop.
The book itself is very short, the last quarter of the book is padding consisting of author's notes, listing important inventions, etc. The list of inventions is somewhat random. Invention descriptions are overly brief and unsatisfying. The following notes section is evidence that the author is good at research and sucks at turning that into prose.
November 30, 2015
There are really only two core ideas in this book: 1. That innovations are best modeled as ideas having sex, in the sense that they don't pop into existence but instead each idea is formed by the process of mixing elements from previous ideas (recombination), or slightly improving on an aspect of the idea (mutation). This view makes all of our innovations look similar to intellectual animals, with their own family trees. And 2. That these innovations don't happen in sudden eureka moments inside the mind of one person, but instead happen over time through "slow hunches" that incubate inside an obsessed mind, while that mind is engaged in liquid networks of other minds.
These two core tenants are supported with several briefly-discussed fun historical examples. However, I think the book could have been slightly shorter, it rambles a bit and stretches some assertions a bit, but overall it gives some food for thought. 3/5.
These two core tenants are supported with several briefly-discussed fun historical examples. However, I think the book could have been slightly shorter, it rambles a bit and stretches some assertions a bit, but overall it gives some food for thought. 3/5.
January 27, 2020
Have you ever heard with half an ear how Leibniz and Newton discovered calculus around the same time? That the same happened for Oxygen? The light bulb? The telephone? Jet engine? Even the transistor? Imagine a place where each door leads to a room with more doors. That's scientific exploration. Movable type, paper, ink, and the wine press had each opened doors, and Gutenberg found himself in a place to invent the printing press. If he hadn't done it, someone else would. Throughout history, this has . Johnson, quoting Kauffman, calls the space of what's possible given the doors we now have opened the 'adjacent possible.' This can be a simultaneous encouraging and depressing thought... is everything then inevitable?
The adjacent possible gives us a nice way to think about timing. Something that's "too early" is something that's leaping too many generations into the adjacent possible (there's also an aspect of maturity involved). Bell invented the picture-phone in the 70s, but it was just not worth it to have a phone-booth size thing in your home. Many attempted massive multi-player online games in the 90s, but home bandwidth, latency, etc. wasn't ready. Of course, it's possible to push through many generations of the adjacent possible rapidly: Manhatten Project, Apollo, Micro-processors, etc.
This by far was the most interesting aspect of the book to me, but it's riddled with good observations by someone who's clearly devoured many pages on scientific history, leaned back, and written this book as a discourse on the big picture. The adjacent possible is just one chapter I've chosen to highlight of many on other patterns in the history of innovation.
The adjacent possible gives us a nice way to think about timing. Something that's "too early" is something that's leaping too many generations into the adjacent possible (there's also an aspect of maturity involved). Bell invented the picture-phone in the 70s, but it was just not worth it to have a phone-booth size thing in your home. Many attempted massive multi-player online games in the 90s, but home bandwidth, latency, etc. wasn't ready. Of course, it's possible to push through many generations of the adjacent possible rapidly: Manhatten Project, Apollo, Micro-processors, etc.
This by far was the most interesting aspect of the book to me, but it's riddled with good observations by someone who's clearly devoured many pages on scientific history, leaned back, and written this book as a discourse on the big picture. The adjacent possible is just one chapter I've chosen to highlight of many on other patterns in the history of innovation.
October 3, 2019
This is a very insightful survey of the elements that make innovation possible. The ideas are all taken from a variety of other sources, but Steven Johnson organizes them into a nice framework. There are seven chapters with titles such as 'The Slow Hunch', 'Serendipity', 'Error', etc., but most of them get at the same thing: new ideas flourish best when they are allowed to flow through a network and come in contact with each other. Most of the author's arguments seem self-evident, but he really backs them up nicely with real-life case studies and adds some nuanced insights.
I鈥檝e read his earlier book, , and in my review of that book, I complained that the author grasps too desperately at a grand philosophical point instead of just telling a good story. After reading this book, I understand where he was coming from and what motivates his thinking. I'm especially sympathetic because his outlook very closely aligns with mine, and his stated motivation for writing those books is exactly why I like to read them. He likes to do a 'deep dive' into a specific invention as a way to extrapolate an understanding of how ideas develop in general. This book really explains what he was trying to get at with his earlier books. The author says as much explicitly in the acknowledgements - he sees it as a sort of concluding volume in a trilogy that includes and . After this book, I'd really like to complete the 'trilogy' and read 'The Invention of Air'.
A weakness of the book, which is probably the publisher鈥檚 fault, is that it smacks too much of the glib business advice you find in many bestselling management books; for example, the ideal office layout to cultivate innovative thinking in a company. Boring. I have a feeling he was forced to include that by his publisher, so they can market it as a business book and boost sales.
However, the biggest weakness by far of the entire book was the final chapter entitled 'The Fourth Quadrant'. He tries to prove that market forces are not a particularly strong element in encouraging innovation. To prove it, he makes a list of what he considers 'good ideas': 'Washing Machine', 'Absolute zero', 'Accelerating expansion of the universe', 'Pencil', 'Piano', 'E=mc2', etc. and counts how many of them fall into each of one of four quadrants: 'Market/Individual', 'Market/Networked', 'Non-market/Individual', and 'Non-market/Networked'. He then goes to show that most good ideas fall into what he calls the 'Fourth Quarter': Non-market/Networked.
The resulting study is sheer stupidity. For starters, he doesn't clearly define his criteria for classifying ideas as market/non-market or individual/networked. Does 'market' mean motivated by profit while non-market means motivated by the greater good? For example, he classifies the piano as non-market/individual. Why? The Appendix offers a clue: because the inventor was employed by the Medici court. That's a weak argument. The inventor clearly indented to get paid. Another example: the light bulb is market/networked. Why is it not 'individual' which the author defines as 鈥榓 small co-ordinated team'? Because it was simultaneously invented by multiple other inventors? That doesn't make sense - many inventions are like this and he includes them in other quadrants. Plus, as the rest of the book makes clear, the key insight of many of these good ideas was to apply it in a novel way. All inventions are networked by this definition. And then, the author mixes scientific discoveries - like the accelerating expansion of the universe, or E=mc2 together with technological inventions, which doesn鈥檛 make sense. Science is often done outside the corporate system. Then there's also the issue that many of these inventions were accidents but subsequently commercialized to great success. Does that make them 'non-market'? This also severely overestimates scientific ideas, because a single technological invention relies on numerous individual scientific components.
In short, this last chapter ends up being a confusing mess, and completely silly. I think what the author is trying to get at (as the end of the chapter makes clear) is that patents don't encourage innovation; they stifle it. That would have been a much more interesting discussion. Patents is an interesting topic. Instead, the author conflates that discussion with 'the market' and gets completely side-tracked due to his weak understanding of that 鈥榯he market鈥� is. A much more insightful analysis of 'the market' comes from the author himself, in chapter 2 (Liquid Networks) in his discussion of the invention of double-entry accounting (page 57):
As good as an argument against central planning and in defence of a distributed market economy (i.e. capitalism) as any. These ideas are very similar to what talks about in his books and talks. Johnson draws on Ridley a little in this book, but mostly from his book on sex. Johnson would do well to read Ridley鈥檚 work and incorporate those ideas into his thinking.
Despite those weaknesses, the merits of the earlier chapters are overwhelming and this book is packed with many good ideas for such a small book.
I鈥檝e read his earlier book, , and in my review of that book, I complained that the author grasps too desperately at a grand philosophical point instead of just telling a good story. After reading this book, I understand where he was coming from and what motivates his thinking. I'm especially sympathetic because his outlook very closely aligns with mine, and his stated motivation for writing those books is exactly why I like to read them. He likes to do a 'deep dive' into a specific invention as a way to extrapolate an understanding of how ideas develop in general. This book really explains what he was trying to get at with his earlier books. The author says as much explicitly in the acknowledgements - he sees it as a sort of concluding volume in a trilogy that includes and . After this book, I'd really like to complete the 'trilogy' and read 'The Invention of Air'.
A weakness of the book, which is probably the publisher鈥檚 fault, is that it smacks too much of the glib business advice you find in many bestselling management books; for example, the ideal office layout to cultivate innovative thinking in a company. Boring. I have a feeling he was forced to include that by his publisher, so they can market it as a business book and boost sales.
However, the biggest weakness by far of the entire book was the final chapter entitled 'The Fourth Quadrant'. He tries to prove that market forces are not a particularly strong element in encouraging innovation. To prove it, he makes a list of what he considers 'good ideas': 'Washing Machine', 'Absolute zero', 'Accelerating expansion of the universe', 'Pencil', 'Piano', 'E=mc2', etc. and counts how many of them fall into each of one of four quadrants: 'Market/Individual', 'Market/Networked', 'Non-market/Individual', and 'Non-market/Networked'. He then goes to show that most good ideas fall into what he calls the 'Fourth Quarter': Non-market/Networked.
The resulting study is sheer stupidity. For starters, he doesn't clearly define his criteria for classifying ideas as market/non-market or individual/networked. Does 'market' mean motivated by profit while non-market means motivated by the greater good? For example, he classifies the piano as non-market/individual. Why? The Appendix offers a clue: because the inventor was employed by the Medici court. That's a weak argument. The inventor clearly indented to get paid. Another example: the light bulb is market/networked. Why is it not 'individual' which the author defines as 鈥榓 small co-ordinated team'? Because it was simultaneously invented by multiple other inventors? That doesn't make sense - many inventions are like this and he includes them in other quadrants. Plus, as the rest of the book makes clear, the key insight of many of these good ideas was to apply it in a novel way. All inventions are networked by this definition. And then, the author mixes scientific discoveries - like the accelerating expansion of the universe, or E=mc2 together with technological inventions, which doesn鈥檛 make sense. Science is often done outside the corporate system. Then there's also the issue that many of these inventions were accidents but subsequently commercialized to great success. Does that make them 'non-market'? This also severely overestimates scientific ideas, because a single technological invention relies on numerous individual scientific components.
In short, this last chapter ends up being a confusing mess, and completely silly. I think what the author is trying to get at (as the end of the chapter makes clear) is that patents don't encourage innovation; they stifle it. That would have been a much more interesting discussion. Patents is an interesting topic. Instead, the author conflates that discussion with 'the market' and gets completely side-tracked due to his weak understanding of that 鈥榯he market鈥� is. A much more insightful analysis of 'the market' comes from the author himself, in chapter 2 (Liquid Networks) in his discussion of the invention of double-entry accounting (page 57):
"...when economic systems shift from feudal structures to the nascent forms of modern capitalism, they become less hierarchical and more networked. A society organized around marketplaces, instead of castles or cloisters, distributes decision-making authority across a much larger network of individual minds. The innovation power of the marketplace derives, in part, from this most elemental math: no matter how smart the "authorities" may be, if they are outnumbered a thousand to one by the marketplace, there will be more good ideas lurking in the market than in the feudal castle. Cities and markets recruit more minds into the collective project of exploring the adjacent possible..."
As good as an argument against central planning and in defence of a distributed market economy (i.e. capitalism) as any. These ideas are very similar to what talks about in his books and talks. Johnson draws on Ridley a little in this book, but mostly from his book on sex. Johnson would do well to read Ridley鈥檚 work and incorporate those ideas into his thinking.
Despite those weaknesses, the merits of the earlier chapters are overwhelming and this book is packed with many good ideas for such a small book.
August 21, 2022
夭賳丿诏蹖 丕賳爻丕賳 丕夭 夭賲丕賳 倬蹖丿丕蹖卮 鬲丕 讴賳賵賳 丿趩丕乇 鬲丨賵賱丕鬲 賵 倬蹖卮乇賮鬲鈥屬囏й� 夭蹖丕丿蹖 卮丿賴鈥屫ж池�. 鬲讴鈥屫� 丕禺鬲乇丕毓丕鬲 賵 倬蹖卮乇賮鬲鈥屬囏й屰� 讴賴 丕賳爻丕賳 丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 禺賵丿 丿丕卮鬲賴鈥屫ж池� (丕夭 丕亘丿丕毓 夭亘丕賳 賵 丕賱賮亘丕 鬲丕 倬蹖卮乇賮鬲賴鈥屫臂屬� 丕禺鬲乇丕毓丕鬲 賵 賳賵丌賵乇蹖鈥屬囏й屰� 讴賴 賴乇乇賵夭 卮丕賴丿 丌賳 賴爻鬲蹖賲) 丕夭 蹖讴 丕蹖丿賴 禺賱丕賯丕賳賴 賳卮丕鬲 诏乇賮鬲賴鈥屫з嗀�.
胤亘賯 鬲毓乇蹖賮 丕爻鬲蹖賵賳 噩丕賳爻賵賳貙 讴丕乇丌賮乇蹖賳 賵 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘貙 蹖讴 丕蹖丿賴貙 丨丕氐賱 乇賵卮賳丕蹖蹖 賳丕诏賴丕賳蹖 蹖讴 趩乇丕睾 賳蹖爻鬲 亘賱讴賴 丨丕氐賱 乇賵卮賳丕蹖蹖 鬲丿乇蹖噩蹖 卮亘讴賴鈥屫й� 丕夭 趩乇丕睾鈥屬囏� 丕爻鬲.
噩丕賳爻賵賳 丿乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘貙 亘丕 亘乇乇爻蹖 鬲丨賵賱 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘卮乇蹖 賵 鬲丕乇蹖禺趩賴 毓賱賲貙 亘賴 鬲賵囟蹖丨 毓賵丕賲賱 丕蹖噩丕丿 爻蹖乇 鬲讴丕賲賱蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕賳爻丕賳 賵 丕蹖丿賴鈥屬囏й� 亘賳蹖丕丿蹖 丿乇胤賵賱 夭賲丕賳 賲蹖鈥屬矩必ж藏�. 賴賲趩賳蹖賳 亘賴 賲禺丕胤亘丕賳 禺賵丿 賲蹖鈥屫①呝堌藏� 鬲丕 趩诏賵賳賴 丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 卮禺氐蹖 賵 丨乇賮賴鈥屫й� 禺賵丿 禺賱丕賯鈥屫� 亘丕卮賳丿.
胤亘賯 鬲毓乇蹖賮 丕爻鬲蹖賵賳 噩丕賳爻賵賳貙 讴丕乇丌賮乇蹖賳 賵 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘貙 蹖讴 丕蹖丿賴貙 丨丕氐賱 乇賵卮賳丕蹖蹖 賳丕诏賴丕賳蹖 蹖讴 趩乇丕睾 賳蹖爻鬲 亘賱讴賴 丨丕氐賱 乇賵卮賳丕蹖蹖 鬲丿乇蹖噩蹖 卮亘讴賴鈥屫й� 丕夭 趩乇丕睾鈥屬囏� 丕爻鬲.
噩丕賳爻賵賳 丿乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘貙 亘丕 亘乇乇爻蹖 鬲丨賵賱 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘卮乇蹖 賵 鬲丕乇蹖禺趩賴 毓賱賲貙 亘賴 鬲賵囟蹖丨 毓賵丕賲賱 丕蹖噩丕丿 爻蹖乇 鬲讴丕賲賱蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕賳爻丕賳 賵 丕蹖丿賴鈥屬囏й� 亘賳蹖丕丿蹖 丿乇胤賵賱 夭賲丕賳 賲蹖鈥屬矩必ж藏�. 賴賲趩賳蹖賳 亘賴 賲禺丕胤亘丕賳 禺賵丿 賲蹖鈥屫①呝堌藏� 鬲丕 趩诏賵賳賴 丿乇 夭賳丿诏蹖 卮禺氐蹖 賵 丨乇賮賴鈥屫й� 禺賵丿 禺賱丕賯鈥屫� 亘丕卮賳丿.
July 24, 2023
I love origin stories. I especially love the ones that are about some familiar product or invention that I know and use, but if there鈥檚 a good story behind something I don't use 鈥� like that the glass eye was invented by a doll maker whose grandchild lost an eye in an accident 鈥� I鈥檓 interested. So I鈥檝e read quite a few books on innovation over the years, but this one was something unique. Those others have more anecdotes and 鈥減op鈥� appeal. This one had more hard science. That made it both more scholarly and a more challenging read.
A warning to my religious friends: this author is a Darwinist. He opens up with Darwin鈥檚 observations on the variety of life forms to be found in a coral reef and extrapolates the analogy to human environments where ideas can thrive and grow, like cities and the World Wide Web. He uses other analogies from the theory of evolution throughout the book, namely, 鈥渢he lucky accident鈥� as opposed to the 鈥渁rgument from design.鈥�
Now, I welcome the idea of embracing error as part of progress. The testing culture of our schools makes us way too afraid of being wrong, and not only does it inhibit creativity, it doesn鈥檛 reflect the real world. Nobody makes progress without trial and error. But I find it very hard to believe that dinosaurs evolved feathers for warmth, even though feathers just happen to be perfectly structured for flight, and the dinosaurs discovered this by experimental movements. Yes, the discovery of penicillin was one lucky accident. But the feather thing is pushing it.
Even still, I can鈥檛 give the book less than a five even though some parts went right over my head. My favorite part was learning about the 鈥渃ommonplace notebooks鈥� or journals the Enlightenment thinkers used to keep of their reading. It sounded just like 欧宝娱乐, and it got me to write in my hand journal again for the first time in months. But the coolest part was that someone who read one of those notebooks as a child was instrumental in designing the web as we know it. (That was in the chapter called 鈥淭he Slow Hunch.鈥� From a seemingly unrelated train of thoughts, brilliant connections can arise if you wait long enough.)
My other favorite part was the Appendix at the end in which the author gives short chronological summaries of inventions and discoveries from the Middle Ages to the present. He credited Charles Townes and not Gordon Gould for the invention of the laser, but fine, no author can be perfect. So Darwinism aside, I probably will read more from Steven Johnson. He鈥檚 got plenty to teach.
A warning to my religious friends: this author is a Darwinist. He opens up with Darwin鈥檚 observations on the variety of life forms to be found in a coral reef and extrapolates the analogy to human environments where ideas can thrive and grow, like cities and the World Wide Web. He uses other analogies from the theory of evolution throughout the book, namely, 鈥渢he lucky accident鈥� as opposed to the 鈥渁rgument from design.鈥�
Now, I welcome the idea of embracing error as part of progress. The testing culture of our schools makes us way too afraid of being wrong, and not only does it inhibit creativity, it doesn鈥檛 reflect the real world. Nobody makes progress without trial and error. But I find it very hard to believe that dinosaurs evolved feathers for warmth, even though feathers just happen to be perfectly structured for flight, and the dinosaurs discovered this by experimental movements. Yes, the discovery of penicillin was one lucky accident. But the feather thing is pushing it.
Even still, I can鈥檛 give the book less than a five even though some parts went right over my head. My favorite part was learning about the 鈥渃ommonplace notebooks鈥� or journals the Enlightenment thinkers used to keep of their reading. It sounded just like 欧宝娱乐, and it got me to write in my hand journal again for the first time in months. But the coolest part was that someone who read one of those notebooks as a child was instrumental in designing the web as we know it. (That was in the chapter called 鈥淭he Slow Hunch.鈥� From a seemingly unrelated train of thoughts, brilliant connections can arise if you wait long enough.)
My other favorite part was the Appendix at the end in which the author gives short chronological summaries of inventions and discoveries from the Middle Ages to the present. He credited Charles Townes and not Gordon Gould for the invention of the laser, but fine, no author can be perfect. So Darwinism aside, I probably will read more from Steven Johnson. He鈥檚 got plenty to teach.
January 6, 2021
Published in 2010 by Steven Johnson, popular science author of 12 books and media theorist that writes regularly for The NY Times, The Wall Street Journal, Wired, The Financial Times and a few others. He also hosts the podcast "American Innovations".
For people who are creators or interested in what drives creativity.
Very skillful explanations with good examples of how good ideas came to be formed in the past and the supportive material that was a precursor. Good emphasis that not good ideas are equal, that all ideas are unique, and that good ideas may happen at any moment irrespective of time, place and person or people who are conceiving them. That they take time to be formed as they require a background of knowledge and work.
I liked the blend of science and example and I find that the author reached his goal with the book. Many great observations that make you think.
For people who are creators or interested in what drives creativity.
Very skillful explanations with good examples of how good ideas came to be formed in the past and the supportive material that was a precursor. Good emphasis that not good ideas are equal, that all ideas are unique, and that good ideas may happen at any moment irrespective of time, place and person or people who are conceiving them. That they take time to be formed as they require a background of knowledge and work.
I liked the blend of science and example and I find that the author reached his goal with the book. Many great observations that make you think.
April 28, 2013
This book shows that 鈥済ood ideas鈥� (or key innovations) are generally products of prior discoveries, experimentation, and collaboration, not the Eureka moments of isolated geniuses. I found the historical anecdotes interesting and the lessons somewhat insightful, but overall the book wasn鈥檛 especially fascinating. I also felt that Johnson鈥檚 repeated comparisons of human ingenuity to evolutionary ecology were stretching the metaphor and didn鈥檛 contribute to his points. My favorite chapter was The Fourth Quadrant, which explores innovation in market-based (profit-seeking) and non-market-based environments.
The book鈥檚 last paragraph gives advice on having good ideas, which is a concise summary of the book: 鈥淕o for a walk; cultivate hunches; write everything down, but keep your folders messy; embrace serendipity; make generative mistakes; take on multiple hobbies; frequent coffeehouses and other liquid networks; follow the links; let others build on your ideas; borrow, recycle, reinvent.鈥�
The appendix contains an interesting chronology of key innovations from 1400-2000 AD, which shows that many innovations were discovered independently by separate innovators, and that many were based on years of research built on previous ideas.
I read this because it was listed in . The list has since been updated, and no longer includes it.
The Adjacent Possible
鈥� Good ideas are constrained by the 鈥減arts鈥� (physical or conceptual materials) and skills that surround them.
鈥� Ideas are limited by the 鈥渁djacent possible鈥�; the realm of options made reachable by previous ideas.
鈥� The best environments for creating good ideas are those that help people expose the adjacent possible, by exposing a diverse sample of mechanical or conceptual parts, and encouraging novel ways of recombining them.
鈥� Bad environments punish experimentation, obscure branches of possibility, and make the current state so satisfying that no one explores.
鈥� To have good ideas, don鈥檛 sit in isolation and think big thoughts; get more 鈥減arts鈥� on the table.
Liquid Networks
It鈥檚 not the wisdom of the crowd, but the wisdom of someone in the crowd. Individuals get smarter because they鈥檙e connected to a social network.
The Slow Hunch
Hunches need space and time to evolve.
Serendipity
How to trigger serendipitous thoughts: go for a walk, take a shower or bath, read, get away from work and tasks.
Errors
Errors force us to rethink our biases and contemplate alternatives, spurring innovation.
Exaptation
Great innovators have many hobbies, and ideas from different projects make connections that lead to insights.
The Fourth Quadrant
鈥� 鈥淢arket-based competition has no monopoly on innovation. Competition and the profit motive do indeed motivate us to turn good ideas into shipping products, but more often than not, the ideas themselves come from somewhere else.鈥�
鈥� From the 1800s on, innovation has increasingly taken place in collaborative groups (鈥渃ollective invention鈥�), inside and outside the market.
鈥� Why do some good ideas flourish without economic incentives? Non-market environments are more efficient because they鈥檙e more open than market environments, which have barriers like copyright, patents, and trade secrets. People can focus on creating new ideas rather than spend time and money protecting old ones.
The book鈥檚 last paragraph gives advice on having good ideas, which is a concise summary of the book: 鈥淕o for a walk; cultivate hunches; write everything down, but keep your folders messy; embrace serendipity; make generative mistakes; take on multiple hobbies; frequent coffeehouses and other liquid networks; follow the links; let others build on your ideas; borrow, recycle, reinvent.鈥�
The appendix contains an interesting chronology of key innovations from 1400-2000 AD, which shows that many innovations were discovered independently by separate innovators, and that many were based on years of research built on previous ideas.
I read this because it was listed in . The list has since been updated, and no longer includes it.
The Adjacent Possible
鈥� Good ideas are constrained by the 鈥減arts鈥� (physical or conceptual materials) and skills that surround them.
鈥� Ideas are limited by the 鈥渁djacent possible鈥�; the realm of options made reachable by previous ideas.
鈥� The best environments for creating good ideas are those that help people expose the adjacent possible, by exposing a diverse sample of mechanical or conceptual parts, and encouraging novel ways of recombining them.
鈥� Bad environments punish experimentation, obscure branches of possibility, and make the current state so satisfying that no one explores.
鈥� To have good ideas, don鈥檛 sit in isolation and think big thoughts; get more 鈥減arts鈥� on the table.
Liquid Networks
It鈥檚 not the wisdom of the crowd, but the wisdom of someone in the crowd. Individuals get smarter because they鈥檙e connected to a social network.
The Slow Hunch
Hunches need space and time to evolve.
Serendipity
How to trigger serendipitous thoughts: go for a walk, take a shower or bath, read, get away from work and tasks.
Errors
Errors force us to rethink our biases and contemplate alternatives, spurring innovation.
Exaptation
Great innovators have many hobbies, and ideas from different projects make connections that lead to insights.
The Fourth Quadrant
鈥� 鈥淢arket-based competition has no monopoly on innovation. Competition and the profit motive do indeed motivate us to turn good ideas into shipping products, but more often than not, the ideas themselves come from somewhere else.鈥�
鈥� From the 1800s on, innovation has increasingly taken place in collaborative groups (鈥渃ollective invention鈥�), inside and outside the market.
鈥� Why do some good ideas flourish without economic incentives? Non-market environments are more efficient because they鈥檙e more open than market environments, which have barriers like copyright, patents, and trade secrets. People can focus on creating new ideas rather than spend time and money protecting old ones.
February 25, 2011
The first few chapters especially are just incredible. Amazing concepts clearly presented. Johnson is an entertaining polymath with a highly compelling view of why things work the way they do.
His use of the word "ideas" in the title implies a more narrow focus than what is presented. By "ideas" he means something bigger than what we're associating it with, particularly human ideas. The idea of evolution, of the formation of life, of why cities are more productive than rural areas per capita. The ideas and concepts that quietly govern our surroundings and environments with or without our knowledge.
Highly recommend.
His use of the word "ideas" in the title implies a more narrow focus than what is presented. By "ideas" he means something bigger than what we're associating it with, particularly human ideas. The idea of evolution, of the formation of life, of why cities are more productive than rural areas per capita. The ideas and concepts that quietly govern our surroundings and environments with or without our knowledge.
Highly recommend.
April 21, 2011
I picked up this book after hearing Steven Johnson's interview on CBC's Spark. His arguments are compelling, and the book is chock full of invention origin stories - a very interesting read!
July 2, 2023
I had a Good Idea: catch up on my 欧宝娱乐 2023 reading challenge.
Where did this idea come from, you may ask? It was revealed to me in a dream.
This book reveals many ideas that came to many people in many dreams (the natural history of innovation). Not a joke!
To this day I don't understand the Jack Dorsey, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, etc. worship. Certainly a major motif in self-help literature. I will never do what they do, and I will be happy.
This book also directly jogged my memory and made me think of lots of cool stuff.
Good book, learned lots, three stars.
Where did this idea come from, you may ask? It was revealed to me in a dream.
This book reveals many ideas that came to many people in many dreams (the natural history of innovation). Not a joke!
To this day I don't understand the Jack Dorsey, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, etc. worship. Certainly a major motif in self-help literature. I will never do what they do, and I will be happy.
This book also directly jogged my memory and made me think of lots of cool stuff.
Good book, learned lots, three stars.
September 29, 2010
I won this book from 欧宝娱乐. This is a fascinating book I would recommend to anyone even remotely interested in creativity and the history of the ideas that changed our world and the way we interact with it. He tackles the similarities in how ideas form, from Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection to the internet and twitter. Johnson's writing is tight and engaging--his ideas scream for contemplation and incorporation into one's intellectual life, yet I found it difficult to pull myself away. Definitely a book I'll be re-reading--and don't even ask to borrow my copy.
As a scientists especially, I appreciated his treatment of the collaborative nature of ideas and innovations especially. May of the best, most innovative ideas in science come out of collaborations, not from the apocryphal lone scientist toiling away in a secluded lab. Certainly, a breakthrough can happen to someone working alone, but he makes a compelling argument that interaction with others, or at the very least broad exposure to ideas, fertilizes the mind, priming it for creativity. Johnson presents the best justification for conference attendance ever.
I only had a couple of criticisms that pulled this down from a five star to a four star. He mentions the importance of the commonplace book--essentially a diary for ideas--and then essentially advertises his own favorite version of a digital commonplace book (from DEVONthink) for the remainder of the chapter. While I'm sure the DEVONthink product is a good one, and I'm glad to know such products exist (since I'd never have thought to even look for one on my own) I'm sure there are other systems out there for taking notes and organizing ideas that would be equally good.
That minor quibble aside, I really enjoyed this book!
As a scientists especially, I appreciated his treatment of the collaborative nature of ideas and innovations especially. May of the best, most innovative ideas in science come out of collaborations, not from the apocryphal lone scientist toiling away in a secluded lab. Certainly, a breakthrough can happen to someone working alone, but he makes a compelling argument that interaction with others, or at the very least broad exposure to ideas, fertilizes the mind, priming it for creativity. Johnson presents the best justification for conference attendance ever.
I only had a couple of criticisms that pulled this down from a five star to a four star. He mentions the importance of the commonplace book--essentially a diary for ideas--and then essentially advertises his own favorite version of a digital commonplace book (from DEVONthink) for the remainder of the chapter. While I'm sure the DEVONthink product is a good one, and I'm glad to know such products exist (since I'd never have thought to even look for one on my own) I'm sure there are other systems out there for taking notes and organizing ideas that would be equally good.
That minor quibble aside, I really enjoyed this book!
October 8, 2012
One of the better books on innovation, Steven Johnson makes connections between biological and technological patterns in how to create innovative environments. The illustrations are vivid and memorable, which help me remember the difference components of an innovative ecosystem. This is definitely the kind of book that I like to have on hand and lend to people.
1. Adjacent Possible - Good ideas are built from a collection of existing parts, the following six patterns assemble a wider variety of spare parts
2. Platforms - Creating a generative environment where different kinds of thought can productively collide and recombine
3. Liquid Networks - To create a good idea, the environment needs to be densely populated with ideas but capable of adopting new configurations
4. The Slow Hunch - Good ideas are a series of small hunches that come together over a long time
5. Serendipity - Hunches require environments where surprising new connections can be forged over time
6. Error - Innovations often come from unexpected results because error creates a path out of your comfortable assumptions
7. Exaptation - Taking on one evolution of an idea for another purpose: recombining, often through diverse, horizontal social networks where you act as a bridge between tight clusters
1. Adjacent Possible - Good ideas are built from a collection of existing parts, the following six patterns assemble a wider variety of spare parts
2. Platforms - Creating a generative environment where different kinds of thought can productively collide and recombine
3. Liquid Networks - To create a good idea, the environment needs to be densely populated with ideas but capable of adopting new configurations
4. The Slow Hunch - Good ideas are a series of small hunches that come together over a long time
5. Serendipity - Hunches require environments where surprising new connections can be forged over time
6. Error - Innovations often come from unexpected results because error creates a path out of your comfortable assumptions
7. Exaptation - Taking on one evolution of an idea for another purpose: recombining, often through diverse, horizontal social networks where you act as a bridge between tight clusters
April 19, 2012
Within the first 20 pages, I was hooked with this book. For anyone with an entrepreneurial bent or fiendish desire to understand the workings of innovation and creativity, this is the book for you. Johnson elegantly and eloquently debunks the so-called myth of the lone genius innovating in a vacuum. Instead, he asserts that several underlying principles --of serendipity, error, liquid networks, and adjacent possibilities--help to propel new inventions. Some of the inspirational thoughts that came to mind when I read his book are: open-source communities can have profound effects on technological, educational, and social aspects of our lives, if properly leveraged; we can make ourselves more interconnected to various diverse networks (be they intellectual, social, cultural, or otherwise) to become more creative and inventive; deep dive reading sabbaticals are not just for socially sanctioned geniuses like Bill Gates, but for people like me who want to creatively catalyze their thinking and productivity.
March 17, 2013
Johnson's books are just plain good. This one is no exception. So much great information. This is a must read for anyone wanting to increase serendipity, innovation or creativity in their organization or community.
May 5, 2016
3 蟹胁械蟹写懈 蟹邪褉邪写懈 褍斜懈泄褋褌胁械薪芯 褋泻褍褔薪懈褟 褋褌懈谢 薪邪 锌懈褋邪薪械 懈 芯蟹邪写邪褔邪胁邪褖懈褟 薪邪 屑芯屑械薪褌懈 锌褉械胁芯写.
"懈薪褌械褉薪械褌械薪 胁械褋褌薪懈泻", "袗锌褗谢" - 褋懈褉懈褗褋谢懈?!
袠薪邪褔械 泻薪懈谐邪褌邪 褋褗写褗褉卸邪 懈薪褌械褉械褋薪懈 褎邪泻褌懈, 褌械芯褉懈懈 懈 薪邪褍褔薪懈 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌懈, 薪芯 褌褉褟斜胁邪 写邪 褋懈 褋 卸械谢械蟹薪懈 薪械褉胁懈, 蟹邪 写邪 芯褌褋械械褕 蟹褗褉薪芯褌芯 芯褌 锌谢褟胁邪褌邪. 袛芯斜褉械 褔械 褋褗屑 谢懈褌械褉邪褌褍褉械薪 屑邪蟹芯褏懈褋褌 :)
"懈薪褌械褉薪械褌械薪 胁械褋褌薪懈泻", "袗锌褗谢" - 褋懈褉懈褗褋谢懈?!
袠薪邪褔械 泻薪懈谐邪褌邪 褋褗写褗褉卸邪 懈薪褌械褉械褋薪懈 褎邪泻褌懈, 褌械芯褉懈懈 懈 薪邪褍褔薪懈 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌懈, 薪芯 褌褉褟斜胁邪 写邪 褋懈 褋 卸械谢械蟹薪懈 薪械褉胁懈, 蟹邪 写邪 芯褌褋械械褕 蟹褗褉薪芯褌芯 芯褌 锌谢褟胁邪褌邪. 袛芯斜褉械 褔械 褋褗屑 谢懈褌械褉邪褌褍褉械薪 屑邪蟹芯褏懈褋褌 :)
December 11, 2024
Positive feedback loops from clustering, emergent plot forms, repositories, intellectual bricolage, modern research university as the antithesis of markets, liquid networks (dense and plastic) leading to information spillover, accretive development, the characterization of scientific paradigms as not overturning old ideas but building upon them, the failure of Kleiber's law as applied to urban spaces, networked collective distributed processes, exaptation, Moretti's distant reading approach, Ray Oldenburg's 'third place' (a connective environment distinct from the more insular world of home and office), networks of enterprise.
"A new technology developed in one idea-space can migrate over to another idea space through these long distance connections; in that new environment, the technology may turn out to have unanticipated properties, or may trigger a connection that leads to a new breakthrough. The value of the weak tie lies not just in the speed with which it transmits information across a network; it also promotes the exaptation of those ideas."
"Our thought shapes the spaces we inhabit, and our spaces return the favor. The argument of this book is that a series of shared properties and patterns recur again and again in unusually fertile environments."
"Patterns of innovation and creativity are fractal: they reappear in recognizable form as you zoom in and out, from molecule to neuron to pixel to sidewalk...when life gets creative, it has a tendency to gravitate toward certain recurring patterns, whether those patterns are emergent and self-organizing, or whether they are deliberately crafted by human agents."
"In The Act of Creation, Arthur Koestler argued that 'all decisive events in the history of scientific thought can be described in terms of mental cross-fertilization between different disciplines.'"
"Good ideas may not want to be free, but they want to connect, fuse, recombine. They want to reinvent themselves by crossing conceptual borders. They want to complete each other as much as they want to compete."
"The strange and beautiful truth about the adjacent possible is that its boundaries grow as you explore those boundaries. Each new combination ushers new combinations into the adjacent possible."
"The psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi proposed the concept of 'flow' to describe the internal state of energized focus that characterizes the mind at its most productive."
"Imposing too much order runs the risk of orphaning a promising hunch in a larger that has died, and it makes it difficult for those ideas to mingle and breed when you revisit them. You need a system for capturing hunches, not necessarily categorizing them, because categories can build barriers between disparate ideas, restrict them to their own conceptual islands. This is one way in which the human history of innovation deviates from the natural history. New ideas do not thrive on archipelagos."
[Information spillover] "captures the essential liquidity of information in dense settlements."
"Dreams are the mind's primordial soup: the medium that facilitates the serendipitous collisions of creative insight."
"Go for a walk, cultivate hunches; write everything down, but keep your folders messy; embrace serendipity; make generative mistakes; take on multiple hobbies; frequent coffeehouses and other liquid networks; follow the links; let others build on your ideas; borrow, recycle, reinvent. Build a tangled bank."
"A new technology developed in one idea-space can migrate over to another idea space through these long distance connections; in that new environment, the technology may turn out to have unanticipated properties, or may trigger a connection that leads to a new breakthrough. The value of the weak tie lies not just in the speed with which it transmits information across a network; it also promotes the exaptation of those ideas."
"Our thought shapes the spaces we inhabit, and our spaces return the favor. The argument of this book is that a series of shared properties and patterns recur again and again in unusually fertile environments."
"Patterns of innovation and creativity are fractal: they reappear in recognizable form as you zoom in and out, from molecule to neuron to pixel to sidewalk...when life gets creative, it has a tendency to gravitate toward certain recurring patterns, whether those patterns are emergent and self-organizing, or whether they are deliberately crafted by human agents."
"In The Act of Creation, Arthur Koestler argued that 'all decisive events in the history of scientific thought can be described in terms of mental cross-fertilization between different disciplines.'"
"Good ideas may not want to be free, but they want to connect, fuse, recombine. They want to reinvent themselves by crossing conceptual borders. They want to complete each other as much as they want to compete."
"The strange and beautiful truth about the adjacent possible is that its boundaries grow as you explore those boundaries. Each new combination ushers new combinations into the adjacent possible."
"The psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi proposed the concept of 'flow' to describe the internal state of energized focus that characterizes the mind at its most productive."
"Imposing too much order runs the risk of orphaning a promising hunch in a larger that has died, and it makes it difficult for those ideas to mingle and breed when you revisit them. You need a system for capturing hunches, not necessarily categorizing them, because categories can build barriers between disparate ideas, restrict them to their own conceptual islands. This is one way in which the human history of innovation deviates from the natural history. New ideas do not thrive on archipelagos."
[Information spillover] "captures the essential liquidity of information in dense settlements."
"Dreams are the mind's primordial soup: the medium that facilitates the serendipitous collisions of creative insight."
"Go for a walk, cultivate hunches; write everything down, but keep your folders messy; embrace serendipity; make generative mistakes; take on multiple hobbies; frequent coffeehouses and other liquid networks; follow the links; let others build on your ideas; borrow, recycle, reinvent. Build a tangled bank."
February 14, 2015
Un libro molto interessante, scritto molto bene, che entra nei meccanismi con cui le idee nascono, evolvono, proliferano. Con un approccio multidisciplinare Johnson costruisce una storia in cui ci racconta come la favola del genio che crea nel buio della sua stanzetta sia appunto una favola. L鈥檌nnovazione nasce dall鈥檌nterazione, 猫 un processo che per sua natura si nutre di connessioni casuali, di intuizioni lente, di errori. L鈥檌nnovazione si muove nell鈥檃mbito del 鈥減ossibile adiacente鈥� ovvero solo per crescita progressiva e non per balzi, si alimenta di 鈥渢rasferimenti鈥� da un campo della conoscenza all鈥檃ltro, necessita di 鈥減iattaforme鈥� di sapere comune in cui ogni innovatore si appoggia su quanto altri hanno fatto prima di lui. La conclusione, molto equilibrata ma anche molto netta, riguarda la valutazione sugli ambienti che sempre pi霉 spesso favoriranno l鈥檌nnovazione: le reti collaborative, capaci di interconnettere esperienze diverse, e gli ambienti scarsamente formalizzati e dotati di poche barriere alla diffusione delle idee (segreti industriali, brevetti etc.). Aziende, persone e istituzioni stanno comprendendo che la protezione della propriet脿 intellettuale 鈥� nata per dare valore economico all鈥檌dea e favorire quindi gli investimenti - finisce in realt脿 per ridurne le potenzialit脿, e limitarne quindi la crescita di valore. Il modello vincente sar脿 quello dei 鈥渘etwork liquidi鈥�, con regole ridotte al minimo, dove lo scambio 猫 pi霉 importante dello sfruttamento immediato dell鈥檌dea a fini commerciali. Una evoluzione naturale che tende a superare la contrapposizione tra capitale privato e potere dello Stato, tra modello capitalistico e modello socialistico, verso qualcosa che ancora non abbiamo compreso bene, ma che 猫 gi脿 realt脿.
September 20, 2010
A very impressive book that examines the validity of the lone genius story throughout modern history. Johnson takes a diverse number of subjects and shows the parallels between them, drawing strong comparisons between human engineered systems and naturally evolved systems, particularly their generative power. Written in a conversational lecture mode, the topics covered in this book are understandable for anyone from high school on up.
The best part of the book is the conclusion. Although it was a bit long, Johnson drew some interesting conclusions and tied all the themes together in a very satisfying way. The reason it stands out for me, however, is that he starts with a story that seems to disprove his point and then carefully shows that his conclusions, while good, are not the only method of good innovation. This is a book that seeks to elucidate and enlighten, not spout doctrine.
In the end, I cannot recommend this highly enough for a wide range of people: engineers, managers, scientists, sociologists, and all those who are just curious about the world around them.
Disclaimer: I won this book for free through FirstReads.
The best part of the book is the conclusion. Although it was a bit long, Johnson drew some interesting conclusions and tied all the themes together in a very satisfying way. The reason it stands out for me, however, is that he starts with a story that seems to disprove his point and then carefully shows that his conclusions, while good, are not the only method of good innovation. This is a book that seeks to elucidate and enlighten, not spout doctrine.
In the end, I cannot recommend this highly enough for a wide range of people: engineers, managers, scientists, sociologists, and all those who are just curious about the world around them.
Disclaimer: I won this book for free through FirstReads.
October 31, 2010
Regardless of its origin, sometimes a good idea forms the entire basis of a non-fiction book. Often this idea is capable of being summed up in a single pithy sentence which serves as the title--maybe "The Tipping Point," or "The Long Tail,"--and after the concept is explained in the first few paragraphs, chapters full of anecdotes flesh out the work to book length, business publications praise it, and the author can command some serious speaking fees at conferences and corporate events.
Where Good Ideas Come From looks a lot like that kind of book, but I'm happy to say it isn't. It's a short book, especially if you don't count a long appendix, but Johnson makes about six or seven really solid points that are each interesting and worth thinking about. Of course, there are plenty of anecdotes for illustration, but a majority were unfamiliar to me and well told.
I'm not sure this book is a classic or anything, but it's definitely an entertaining read, and could certainly provide a spark to a creative person who is having trouble conceptualizing the process of having an idea. I certainly enjoyed it, and will probably apply the good ideas Johnson discussed to my own thinking.
Where Good Ideas Come From looks a lot like that kind of book, but I'm happy to say it isn't. It's a short book, especially if you don't count a long appendix, but Johnson makes about six or seven really solid points that are each interesting and worth thinking about. Of course, there are plenty of anecdotes for illustration, but a majority were unfamiliar to me and well told.
I'm not sure this book is a classic or anything, but it's definitely an entertaining read, and could certainly provide a spark to a creative person who is having trouble conceptualizing the process of having an idea. I certainly enjoyed it, and will probably apply the good ideas Johnson discussed to my own thinking.
April 19, 2011
Fantastic! The single most important book for anyone looking for an accurate and comprehensive description of the creative process that they have heretofore been unable to verbalize. Johnson breaks creativity down to 7 basic underlying principles: the adjacent possible, liquid networks, slow hunch, serendipity, error, exaptation, and platforms. In doing so, he not only allows readers to become more conscious of the patterns that creativity follows, but he also provides inspiring examples of the principles in action. Cases like the invention of the Internet (the ultimate liquid network, and the preeminent platform), the exaptation of car parts into incubators that third world citizens understand how to maintain (adjacent possible), and the FBI's pre-9/11 antiterrorist unit (slow hunches that failed to materialize because of frozen, nonliquid networks) will inspire your creativity in ways you may not even consciously know are possible. If you need any kind of creative inspiration (business, art, etc.), read this book! This book will hopefully be the inspiration of my own successful business venture, and could be for yours. This is perhaps one of the best books I've ever read.
August 10, 2020
亘賱丕 卮賰貙 亘毓丿 賯乇丕亍丞 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 爻鬲鬲賰賵賳 賱丿賷賰 賮賰乇丞 賵丕爻毓丞 賲賳 丕賷賳 鬲兀鬲賷 丕賱兀賮賰丕乇貙 丨賷孬 賷鬲賳丕賵賱 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 爻鬲賷賮 噩賵賳爻賵賳 亘胤乇賷賯丞 賯氐氐賷 賲毓 兀賲孬賱丞 毓丿賷丿丞 卮丕乇丨賸丕 賱賳丕 賰賷賮 鬲兀鬲賷 丕賱兀賮賰丕乇 丕賱賰亘賷乇丞 賵丕賱毓馗賷賲丞 毓賱賶 亘丕賱 賲禺鬲乇毓賷賴丕. 賵賴賵 賲賵囟賵毓 賲孬賷乇 賱賱丕賴鬲賲丕賲 丨賯丕賸貙 賵賷賱賮鬲 丕賱賳馗乇 丕賱賶 丕賴賲賷丞 丕賱亘賷卅丞 賵丕賱丕丨鬲賲丕賱賷丞貙 賵丕賱鬲賵丕氐賱 禺丕氐丞 賮賷 丕賱賲賯丕賴賷 賵丕賱鬲賷 賮賷 乇丕賷賴 賴賷 丕丨丿 丕賴賲 卮乇丕乇丕鬲 毓氐乇 丕賱賳賴囟丞 賮賷 亘乇賷胤丕賳賷丕. 丕賳 丕賱丕賮賰丕乇 鬲亘賳賶貙 賵丕賱丕賮賰丕乇 丕賱賰亘賷乇丞 睾丕賱亘丕 賲丕鬲賰賵賳 賳鬲丕噩 丕賮賰丕乇 賵丕賰鬲卮丕賮丕鬲 爻亘賯鬲賴丕貙 丕賷 丕賳 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 賰賱賴丕 賴賷 賳鬲丕噩 賲毓乇賮賷 賲鬲乇丕賰賲貙 賵丕賱丕賮賰丕乇 丕賱賰亘賷乇丞 賳丕丿乇丕 賲丕鬲賰賵賳 賮乇丿賷丞 賵睾賷乇 賲乇鬲亘胤丞 亘丕賮賰丕乇 爻丕亘賯丞 丕賵 賰賲丕 賳爻賲賷賴丕 毓丕丿丞 丕賱卮乇丕乇丞.
丕丐賷丿 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 賮賷 賳賯胤丞 賵賴賷貙 丕賳 噩賲賷毓 丕賱丕亘鬲賰丕乇鬲 賴賷丞 丕賲賵乇 丨鬲賲賷丞 賮賷 鬲丕乇賷禺 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞貙 賵丕賳 丕賱丕亘丿丕毓 賵丕賱丕亘鬲賰丕乇 賱丕亘丿 賱賴 賲賳 亘賷卅丞 丕丨鬲賲丕賱丕鬲 賲賳丕爻亘丞 賮賷賴丕 丕賱鬲毓丕賵賳 丕賱賲胤賱賵亘. 賵丕禺賷乇丕貙 賲賳 丕噩賱 丕賱丕亘丿丕毓 賵丕賱丕亘鬲賰丕乇貙 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 丕毓胤丕賳丕 賴匕賴 丕賱賲賮丕鬲賷丨 賰丕賱鬲丕賱賷貙 丕匕賴亘 賱賱賲卮賷貨 丕爻鬲禺丿賲 丨丿爻賰貨 丕賰鬲亘 賰賱 卮賷亍貨 丕毓胤賷 丕賴賲賷丞 賱賱賮賵囟賶 丕賱禺賱丕賯丞 賵丕賱氐丿賮丞貨 丕乇鬲賰亘 兀禺胤丕亍 賲賮賷丿丞貨 丕匕賴亘 丕賱賶 丕賱賲賯丕賴賷 亘卮賰賱 賲鬲賰乇乇 賵丕亘賳賷 毓丕丿丕鬲 賲鬲毓丿丿丞 賴賵丕賷丕鬲 賲鬲毓丿丿丞貨 丕胤賱亘 丕賱賲爻丕毓丿丞 賵丿毓 丕賱丌禺乇賷賳 賷亘賳賵賳 毓賱賶 兀賮賰丕乇賰貨 丕賯鬲乇囟 賵毓丿 鬲丿賵賷乇 丕賱丕賮賰丕乇 賲賳 丕賱胤亘賷毓丞 賵丕賱孬賯丕賮丞 賲賳 丨賵賱賰.
賰鬲丕亘 賯氐氐賷 爻賴賱 賵賲賲鬲毓 丕賳氐丨 亘賴 賰賱 賲賳 賷乇賷丿 賮賴賲 丕賱賷丞 丕賱丕亘鬲賰丕乇
丕丐賷丿 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 賮賷 賳賯胤丞 賵賴賷貙 丕賳 噩賲賷毓 丕賱丕亘鬲賰丕乇鬲 賴賷丞 丕賲賵乇 丨鬲賲賷丞 賮賷 鬲丕乇賷禺 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞貙 賵丕賳 丕賱丕亘丿丕毓 賵丕賱丕亘鬲賰丕乇 賱丕亘丿 賱賴 賲賳 亘賷卅丞 丕丨鬲賲丕賱丕鬲 賲賳丕爻亘丞 賮賷賴丕 丕賱鬲毓丕賵賳 丕賱賲胤賱賵亘. 賵丕禺賷乇丕貙 賲賳 丕噩賱 丕賱丕亘丿丕毓 賵丕賱丕亘鬲賰丕乇貙 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 丕毓胤丕賳丕 賴匕賴 丕賱賲賮丕鬲賷丨 賰丕賱鬲丕賱賷貙 丕匕賴亘 賱賱賲卮賷貨 丕爻鬲禺丿賲 丨丿爻賰貨 丕賰鬲亘 賰賱 卮賷亍貨 丕毓胤賷 丕賴賲賷丞 賱賱賮賵囟賶 丕賱禺賱丕賯丞 賵丕賱氐丿賮丞貨 丕乇鬲賰亘 兀禺胤丕亍 賲賮賷丿丞貨 丕匕賴亘 丕賱賶 丕賱賲賯丕賴賷 亘卮賰賱 賲鬲賰乇乇 賵丕亘賳賷 毓丕丿丕鬲 賲鬲毓丿丿丞 賴賵丕賷丕鬲 賲鬲毓丿丿丞貨 丕胤賱亘 丕賱賲爻丕毓丿丞 賵丿毓 丕賱丌禺乇賷賳 賷亘賳賵賳 毓賱賶 兀賮賰丕乇賰貨 丕賯鬲乇囟 賵毓丿 鬲丿賵賷乇 丕賱丕賮賰丕乇 賲賳 丕賱胤亘賷毓丞 賵丕賱孬賯丕賮丞 賲賳 丨賵賱賰.
賰鬲丕亘 賯氐氐賷 爻賴賱 賵賲賲鬲毓 丕賳氐丨 亘賴 賰賱 賲賳 賷乇賷丿 賮賴賲 丕賱賷丞 丕賱丕亘鬲賰丕乇
November 2, 2021
賷賯丿賲 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賲賯丕乇亘丞 匕賰賷丞 賱賱廿亘丿丕毓 丕賱亘卮乇賷 毓亘乇 丿乇丕爻丞 丌賱賷丕鬲 廿亘丿丕毓 丕賱丕賳鬲賯丕亍 丕賱胤亘賷毓賷 亘鬲胤賵乇 丕賱賰丕卅賳丕鬲 丕賱丨賷丞貙 毓賲賱賷丞 賳爻禺 丕賱dna丕賱鬲賷 賷丨丿孬 賮賷賴丕 兀禺胤丕亍 賵胤賮乇丕鬲 賵鬲賰賷賮丕鬲 賲毓 丕賱亘賷卅丞 鬲丐丿賷 廿賱賶 馗賴賵乇 氐賮丕鬲 噩丿賷丿丞 丕賵 賯賮夭丕鬲 賳賵毓賷丞貙 亘丕爻鬲禺丿丕賲 丕賱賲賲賰賳 丕賱賲噩丕賵乇貙 兀賵 亘丕賱丕爻鬲賮丕丿丞 賲賳 丕賱卮亘賰丕鬲 丕賱賲丕卅毓丞貙 兀賵 毓賳 胤乇賷賯 丕賱丨丿爻 丕賱亘胤賷亍 丕賵 丕賱賲氐丕丿賮丞 丕賱爻毓賷丿丞 丕賵 丨鬲賶 丕賱禺胤兀貙 賵丕賴賲賴丕 賴賷 丕賱鬲丨賵乇 丕賱賵馗賷賮賷 (馗賴賵乇 賵馗賷賮丞 噩丿賷丿丞 賱卮賷亍 賲賵噩賵丿 丕氐賱丕)..
丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賲亘賳賷 毓賱賶 丿乇丕爻丞 賲賵爻毓丞 賱賱賲卮賴丿 丕賱廿亘丿丕毓賷貙 賯丿 賷爻賯胤 賲賳賴丕 亘毓囟 丕賱鬲賮丕氐賷賱
丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賲亘賳賷 毓賱賶 丿乇丕爻丞 賲賵爻毓丞 賱賱賲卮賴丿 丕賱廿亘丿丕毓賷貙 賯丿 賷爻賯胤 賲賳賴丕 亘毓囟 丕賱鬲賮丕氐賷賱
May 14, 2018
丕蹖賳 丕賵賱蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 丕夭 賲噩賲賵毓賴 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕蹖蹖 賴爻鬲 讴賴 亘趩賴 賴丕蹖 禺賵亘 倬丕丿讴爻鬲 丕爻鬲乇蹖賳诏 亘賵讴爻鈥� 賴乇 賮氐賱卮賵 乇賵 禺賱丕氐賴 讴乇丿賳 賵 亘賴 氐賵乇鬲 倬丕丿讴爻鬲 賲賳鬲卮乇 讴乇丿賳. 賲賳 賴賲 丕夭 乇賵蹖 賴賲賵賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 丿賳亘丕賱 讴乇丿賲 讴賴 卮丕賲賱 賳賴 賯爻賲鬲 爻賴 鬲丕 賴賮鬲 丿賯蹖賯賴 賴爻鬲. 丕夭 丕爻賲 讴鬲丕亘 賲賵囟賵毓 讴鬲丕亘 賲卮禺氐 賴爻鬲 :)) 賵 賲賳 趩蹖夭蹖 賳蹖爻鬲 讴賴 亘鬲賵賳賲 丕囟丕賮賴 讴賳賲. 鬲賵氐蹖賴 賲蹖讴賳賲 讴賴 亘賴 讴丕賳丕賱 鬲賱诏乇丕賲 丕爻鬲乇蹖賳诏 亘賵讴爻 亘乇蹖丿 蹖丕 丕夭 胤乇蹖賯 丕倬賱蹖讴蹖卮賳 賴丕蹖 倬丕丿讴爻鬲 丿賳亘丕賱卮賵賳 讴賳蹖賳
t.me/stringbooks
t.me/stringbooks
April 20, 2015
Riddled with errors and pseudo-profundity. The numerous errors in conjunction with its praise of error as a source of discovery may mark this as a post-modern art project.
I agree with the central theses; right but trite.
I agree with the central theses; right but trite.
September 17, 2016
This fascinating study of ideas disproves the notion that ideas come quickly and to a few chosen geniuses. Instead, most of our best ideas come through years of hunches, open sharing of information and working together. It's a great read if you're a creative person.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,109 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.