What do you think?
Rate this book
韦伪 魏伪位蠉蟿蔚蟻伪 蠂蟻蠈谓喂伪 蟿畏蟼 味蠅萎蟼 蟿畏蟼
螚 螝伪胃 魏喂 慰 危维喂 蔚委谓伪喂 魏慰位位畏蟿慰委 蠁委位慰喂. 韦蔚位蔚委蠅蟼 伪谓蟿委胃蔚蟿慰喂 蠂伪蟻伪魏蟿萎蟻蔚蟼, 蟺维谓蟿伪 渭伪味委 魏伪喂 维蟿蠀蠂慰喂 蟽蟿慰谓 苇蟻蠅蟿伪 魏伪喂 慰喂 未蠉慰. 螚 螝伪胃 蔚委谓伪喂 蟺伪位伪尾喂维蟻伪, 伪魏伪蟿维蟽蟿伪蟿畏 魏伪喂 魏伪蟿维 尾维胃慰蟼 魏位蔚喂蟽蟿蠈蟼 蠂伪蟻伪魏蟿萎蟻伪蟼 魏喂 慰 危维喂 蔚委谓伪喂 伪蠁蠈蟻畏蟿伪 蟿伪魏蟿喂魏蠈蟼, 纬魏蟻喂谓喂维蟻畏蟼 魏伪喂 伪谓伪味畏蟿维 伪蟺蔚纬谓蠅蟽渭苇谓伪 蟿慰谓 维谓蟿蟻伪 蟿畏蟼 味蠅萎蟼 蟿慰蠀. 螙慰蠀谓 蟽蟿慰 螖蠀蟿喂魏蠈 围维渭蟺蟽蟿蔚谓蟿, 魏慰谓蟿维 蟽蟿慰蠀蟼 维位位慰蠀蟼 蠁委位慰蠀蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼, 蟿慰谓 韦味慰蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏 螞慰蠉蟽蠀 - 蟺慰蠀 蔚委谓伪喂 蟺伪谓蟿蟻蔚渭苇谓慰喂 魏喂 苇蠂慰蠀谓 苇谓伪 未喂伪尾慰位维魏喂 慰谓蠈渭伪蟿喂 螠伪尉 魏伪喂 渭喂伪 蟿蟻慰渭伪魏蟿喂魏萎 危慰蠀畏未苇味伪 谓蟿伪谓蟿维, 蟿畏谓 螉纬魏蟻喂谓蟿. 螌蟿伪谓 蔚蟺喂蟽蟿蟻苇蠁蔚喂 蟽蟿畏 味蠅萎 蟿慰蠀蟼 畏 螤蠈蟻蟽伪 鈥撐� 蠅蟻伪委伪 螤蠈蟻蟽伪, 畏 伪未喂伪蠁喂位慰谓委魏畏蟿畏 尾伪蟽委位喂蟽蟽伪 蟿畏蟼 蟺伪蟻苇伪蟼 蟽蟿慰 蟺伪谓蔚蟺喂蟽蟿萎渭喂慰, 蟺慰蠀 苇谓伪 尾蟻维未蠀 蟿慰蠉蟼 蟺位萎纬蠅蟽蔚 魏喂 伪蠀蟿慰委 蟽喂纬维 蟽喂纬维, 伪胃蠈蟻蠀尾伪, 伪蟺慰渭伪魏蟻蠉谓胃畏魏伪谓 伪蟺蠈 魏慰谓蟿维 蟿畏蟼鈥�, 蟺蟻慰魏伪位蔚委蟿伪喂 渭喂伪 伪位蠀蟽委未伪 纬蔚纬慰谓蠈蟿蠅谓 蟺慰蠀 未慰魏喂渭维味慰蠀谓 蟽蟿慰 苇蟺伪魏蟻慰 蟿畏谓 螝伪胃 魏伪喂 蟿慰蠀蟼 蠁委位慰蠀蟼 蟿畏蟼. 螆蠂蔚喂 魏维蟺慰喂慰谓 蟺慰谓畏蟻蠈 蟽魏慰蟺蠈 畏 螤蠈蟻蟽伪 萎 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿喂魏维 胃苇位蔚喂 蟿慰 魏伪位蠈 蠈位蠅谓; 螌蟺慰喂伪 魏喂 伪谓 蔚委谓伪喂 畏 伪蟺维谓蟿畏蟽畏, 魏伪谓蔚委蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼 未蔚 胃伪 渭蟺慰蟻慰蠉蟽蔚 蟺慰蟿苇 谓伪 蟺蟻慰尾位苇蠄蔚喂 蟿慰 伪蟺慰蟿苇位蔚蟽渭伪...
447 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2000
403 people are currently reading
23644 people want to read
About the author
Jane Green
85听books8,629听followersJane Green's twenty first novel, Sister Stardust, is out April 5th 2022.
She is the author of eighteen previous New York Times Bestselling novels, and known as one of the world's leading authors in women's fiction, with over ten million books in print, and translations in over 25 languages.
Previous novels have included The Beach House, Second Chance, Jemima J, and Tempting Fate.
She joined the ABC News team to write their first enhanced digital book鈥� about the history of Royal marriages, then joined ABC News as a live correspondent covering Prince William鈥檚 wedding to Kate Middleton.
A former journalist in the UK, she has had her own radio show on BBC Radio London, and is a regular contributor on radio and TV, including as well as regularly appearing on television shows including Good Morning America, The Martha Stewart show, and The Today Show.
Together with writing books and blogs, she contributes to various publications, both online and print, including anthologies and novellas, and features for The Huffington Post, The Sunday Times, Cosmopolitan and Self. She has taught at writers conferences, and does regular keynote speaking, and has a weekly column in The Lady magazine, England鈥檚 longest running weekly magazine.
A graduate of the French Culinary Institute in New York, Green is bringing out her first cookbook: Good Taste , with Berkley in October 2016.
She is a storyteller for The Moth radio hour on NPR,
and lives in Westport, Connecticut with her husband and their blended family. When she is not writing, cooking, gardening, filling her house with friends and herding chickens, she is usually thanking the Lord for caffeine-filled energy drinks.
Jane's Facebook page:
Librarian Note: There is more than one author in the 欧宝娱乐 database with this name.
She is the author of eighteen previous New York Times Bestselling novels, and known as one of the world's leading authors in women's fiction, with over ten million books in print, and translations in over 25 languages.
Previous novels have included The Beach House, Second Chance, Jemima J, and Tempting Fate.
She joined the ABC News team to write their first enhanced digital book鈥� about the history of Royal marriages, then joined ABC News as a live correspondent covering Prince William鈥檚 wedding to Kate Middleton.
A former journalist in the UK, she has had her own radio show on BBC Radio London, and is a regular contributor on radio and TV, including as well as regularly appearing on television shows including Good Morning America, The Martha Stewart show, and The Today Show.
Together with writing books and blogs, she contributes to various publications, both online and print, including anthologies and novellas, and features for The Huffington Post, The Sunday Times, Cosmopolitan and Self. She has taught at writers conferences, and does regular keynote speaking, and has a weekly column in The Lady magazine, England鈥檚 longest running weekly magazine.
A graduate of the French Culinary Institute in New York, Green is bringing out her first cookbook: Good Taste , with Berkley in October 2016.
She is a storyteller for The Moth radio hour on NPR,
and lives in Westport, Connecticut with her husband and their blended family. When she is not writing, cooking, gardening, filling her house with friends and herding chickens, she is usually thanking the Lord for caffeine-filled energy drinks.
Jane's Facebook page:
Librarian Note: There is more than one author in the 欧宝娱乐 database with this name.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,077 reviews
October 2, 2022
Jane Green never disappoints when you're looking for that easy sunbed read and this book is no exception.
Five stars.
Five stars.
April 10, 2007
I jacked this book from my younger sister while vacationing in Seattle. The pink binding on this bad boy bought me some awkward stares, but that didn't stop me from reading Jane Green's tale of a slightly overweight and unattractive woman in her mid thirties who finally finds the perfect romance, and fullfills her lifelong dream of opening a bookshop. Essentially, this is a story about a British Caucasian woman who gets her 'groove' back. Something about Green's conversational writing style and her incorporation of curse words make the experience of reading this "Chick-Book" more like watching a "Chick-Flick." Despite the real tear-jerking paragraphs about her break ups and her homosexual friend's diagnosis with HIV, this novel is to say the very least, enjoyable. Interestingly, I first learned about CD4 counts in AIDS patients from reading 'Bookends' before learning about these prognostic indicators in Pathology or Medicine.
December 18, 2009
I like this author, but this was a forgettable book. In fact I was halfway through reading it when I realized I had actually read it before and forgotten.
The characters are sterotypes (resolutely single girl with gay best friend and happily married couple), the set up lengthy (lots of back story, some not ever relevant), the description of university days common (we dated, we drank, we went places).
The novel is dated too. This is set back when HIV was a new big thing- and people wouldn't touch those diagnosed. But it isn't a good enough book to give a historical glimpse.
I wrote the review, because then I won't pick it up again accidently. I'll read Jane Green's others, but pass on this.
The characters are sterotypes (resolutely single girl with gay best friend and happily married couple), the set up lengthy (lots of back story, some not ever relevant), the description of university days common (we dated, we drank, we went places).
The novel is dated too. This is set back when HIV was a new big thing- and people wouldn't touch those diagnosed. But it isn't a good enough book to give a historical glimpse.
I wrote the review, because then I won't pick it up again accidently. I'll read Jane Green's others, but pass on this.
July 10, 2018
I finished my re-read of this a few days ago, just didn't have the energy to post a review. I think the main issue I had was that the re-read was a bit of a bust. Probably because this wasn't as chick-lit as I was hoping. There are some serious issues here (discussion of HIV and AIDS) but also there is some mean-girling crap that goes on that just didn't fit the characters who were supposed to be adults in their 30s. The main character of Cath just reads as a doormat throughout this book and I just wanted her to be stronger and push back on people more. The ending was okayish, just not great.
"Bookends" has Cath and her best friend Si dealing with being unlucky in love. Living in London they seem to be going through the motions of things. Cath refuses to try her hand at love again after having her heart broken and Si is desperate to meet Mr. Right even though the men he is usually with are terrible.
Cath and Si have boring, but familiar get togethers with their college friends Josh and Lucy and things seem to be carrying along fine until a woman (Portia) from their college days pops up again.
Most of the book is Cath thinking about Portia and how Portia supposedly held them all together until she broke up their friend group. What gets me though is that when we readers finally get a glimpse of Portia, she's not all that Cath (or Green) makes her out to be. There is no there there, and I wanted there to be better development of her.
Cath stumbles upon a love interest that wasn't that interesting and Si ends up with a shocking new way of life after a betrayal. The book just ends up taking too many things on and not doing them well.
If the above isn't enough, we also have Cath trying to open a bookstore.
The writing is typical older Green (when she wrote her chick lit books taking place in London). This just doesn't read or feel like chick lit. The flow is okay, though going back to past and present was a bit much.
I guess I was just put out by the whole lesson to be learned about real friends that people who should be old enough should already know at this point.
"Bookends" has Cath and her best friend Si dealing with being unlucky in love. Living in London they seem to be going through the motions of things. Cath refuses to try her hand at love again after having her heart broken and Si is desperate to meet Mr. Right even though the men he is usually with are terrible.
Cath and Si have boring, but familiar get togethers with their college friends Josh and Lucy and things seem to be carrying along fine until a woman (Portia) from their college days pops up again.
Most of the book is Cath thinking about Portia and how Portia supposedly held them all together until she broke up their friend group. What gets me though is that when we readers finally get a glimpse of Portia, she's not all that Cath (or Green) makes her out to be. There is no there there, and I wanted there to be better development of her.
Cath stumbles upon a love interest that wasn't that interesting and Si ends up with a shocking new way of life after a betrayal. The book just ends up taking too many things on and not doing them well.
If the above isn't enough, we also have Cath trying to open a bookstore.
The writing is typical older Green (when she wrote her chick lit books taking place in London). This just doesn't read or feel like chick lit. The flow is okay, though going back to past and present was a bit much.
I guess I was just put out by the whole lesson to be learned about real friends that people who should be old enough should already know at this point.
April 9, 2009
I don't know where this book gets off saying "A Novel" on the cover. Bookends is chick lit, pure and simple.
What's the difference? Well, chick lit books are of course novels, in the sense that they're fiction, but novels aren't necessarily chick lit. Chick lit is very specific: it has a female protagonist; the purpose of the story is to hook her up with the guy who the author has, early on, chosen as the obvious perfect guy for her; it's narrated by the protagonist; and the protagonist has almost no personality, only a collection of fun facts you know about her.
I'll have to write elsewhere about Chick Lit Protagonist Syndrome, but suffice it to say that they're almost universally wildly codependent, with very little self-knowledge, compulsive emotional eating, no idea whether the guy really likes them even if he comes in with "I Really Like You, Protagonist" tattooed on his forehead, and deep shame about themselves and especially their bodies (which are always telegraphed as very very beautiful despite what the protagonist thinks). Oh, and every man in the book is either gay, married to a friend of the protagonist's, or a future love interest. There are no other options.
This one also can't tell a story. Jeeezus. The pacing of this book is rocky; it starts out with several chapters about the characters in their early twenties, then rockets forward to the 31-year-old present with no explanation for the early chapters, then much later on brings back the one character who left the group in those early chapters. It's obvious that she must be coming back, but only because it would be a terrible book if such a pivotal character were introduced and then totally dropped.
The story gets back on track with her return, only to drift off again toward the end as every plot thread has to get wrapped up, often off-camera. I can't tell you how many of the characters' experiences are just summarized for us by the narrator. There are times, in the last few chapters, where days and even weeks of intense character development are retold at a breathless pace. Like, she has the narrator tell us that her friend Si is telling us his friend Eva's life story, and we hear the whole ENTIRE thing third-hand, and then we get this:
"And she really is [fine:]," Si told me, in wonder, in awe, and then he said goodbye and put down the phone, because he had the rest of the night to think about what she'd said.
Come on: how would the narrator even know what he was going to think and do after he hung up? It ends up ringing false because (like any good codependent) the narrator has no boundaries. That is, Green is trying to write the story from the perspective of an omniscient narrator, but puts her in the body of a specific character who couldn't know all this stuff and isn't the right vehicle for it.
The problem here is that Jane Green has too many great characters with fascinating stories for one book - the way that she chose to tell it. Si's story would have made a much better book. Or she could have told different chapters of Bookends from different perspectives, letting the overall story unfold as each character played their own part. That would have made an incredible book. Instead, the story is hamstrung by being forced through one rather passive woman's perspective.
There are also too many stories happening - the opening of this new bookstore, Bookends, which is co-owned by the protagonist and another main character, and even lends the book its name, takes up a lot of time but barely serves to advance the plot at all. It's a major undertaking, and a major success, and yet there's no emotional impact to it: we're told that it makes the other main character's life very busy, which puts stress on her marriage, but it causes so few problems for the protagonist that it seems pointless other than as occasional comic relief.
So: chick lit. Because of the boundary problems, the Chick Lit Protagonist Syndrome, and the slapdash writing. I'm not saying that chick lit can't be well-written, but this particular kind of slapdash fast-paced gallop through a storyline, with little pause for real emotional depth, is characteristic of the genre. I enjoyed Bookends anyway, but I don't think I would read it again.
What's the difference? Well, chick lit books are of course novels, in the sense that they're fiction, but novels aren't necessarily chick lit. Chick lit is very specific: it has a female protagonist; the purpose of the story is to hook her up with the guy who the author has, early on, chosen as the obvious perfect guy for her; it's narrated by the protagonist; and the protagonist has almost no personality, only a collection of fun facts you know about her.
I'll have to write elsewhere about Chick Lit Protagonist Syndrome, but suffice it to say that they're almost universally wildly codependent, with very little self-knowledge, compulsive emotional eating, no idea whether the guy really likes them even if he comes in with "I Really Like You, Protagonist" tattooed on his forehead, and deep shame about themselves and especially their bodies (which are always telegraphed as very very beautiful despite what the protagonist thinks). Oh, and every man in the book is either gay, married to a friend of the protagonist's, or a future love interest. There are no other options.
This one also can't tell a story. Jeeezus. The pacing of this book is rocky; it starts out with several chapters about the characters in their early twenties, then rockets forward to the 31-year-old present with no explanation for the early chapters, then much later on brings back the one character who left the group in those early chapters. It's obvious that she must be coming back, but only because it would be a terrible book if such a pivotal character were introduced and then totally dropped.
The story gets back on track with her return, only to drift off again toward the end as every plot thread has to get wrapped up, often off-camera. I can't tell you how many of the characters' experiences are just summarized for us by the narrator. There are times, in the last few chapters, where days and even weeks of intense character development are retold at a breathless pace. Like, she has the narrator tell us that her friend Si is telling us his friend Eva's life story, and we hear the whole ENTIRE thing third-hand, and then we get this:
"And she really is [fine:]," Si told me, in wonder, in awe, and then he said goodbye and put down the phone, because he had the rest of the night to think about what she'd said.
Come on: how would the narrator even know what he was going to think and do after he hung up? It ends up ringing false because (like any good codependent) the narrator has no boundaries. That is, Green is trying to write the story from the perspective of an omniscient narrator, but puts her in the body of a specific character who couldn't know all this stuff and isn't the right vehicle for it.
The problem here is that Jane Green has too many great characters with fascinating stories for one book - the way that she chose to tell it. Si's story would have made a much better book. Or she could have told different chapters of Bookends from different perspectives, letting the overall story unfold as each character played their own part. That would have made an incredible book. Instead, the story is hamstrung by being forced through one rather passive woman's perspective.
There are also too many stories happening - the opening of this new bookstore, Bookends, which is co-owned by the protagonist and another main character, and even lends the book its name, takes up a lot of time but barely serves to advance the plot at all. It's a major undertaking, and a major success, and yet there's no emotional impact to it: we're told that it makes the other main character's life very busy, which puts stress on her marriage, but it causes so few problems for the protagonist that it seems pointless other than as occasional comic relief.
So: chick lit. Because of the boundary problems, the Chick Lit Protagonist Syndrome, and the slapdash writing. I'm not saying that chick lit can't be well-written, but this particular kind of slapdash fast-paced gallop through a storyline, with little pause for real emotional depth, is characteristic of the genre. I enjoyed Bookends anyway, but I don't think I would read it again.
June 12, 2020
The only positive about this book was that it was well-written鈥� in the most technical sense of the word. The pacing was okay (imo), the events kept coming one after the other to keep the plot flowing, and the writing style was engaging enough to keep me going to the end.
Where it fails is characterisation. To begin with, all the characters currently having a job have childhood dream jobs (mysterious high finance, television writing, something to do with films, formerly in advertising and now a bookshop, real estate agent). Where are the accountants, dentists' assistants, engineers, and blue-collar jobs? I'm not criticising them for pursuing social mobility, but when every character has a "glamorous" job, I'm calling amateur hour.
That impression is only reinforced by the only two gay men in the book: one is textbook camp and the straight white lead's best friend, and the other is an abusive asshole. Neither of these stereotypes is offset by more nuanced (or even varied!) gay characters, so when the book ends with a conversation about HIV, I was close to crying with frustration.
Most dislikeable of all was the main character. Cath's a size 14! With a lovely bit of sleight of hand, we're told she was a size 12 post-college, and she's put on weight and grey hairs with age. A real honest-to-god woman, the kind you might see in real life. I was fully prepared to follow the Real Exploits of a Three-Dimensional character before I realised this wasn't going to be that kind of book.
The first thing that smacked me in the face was her slut-shaming Ingrid, her friends' young, slim, haughty au pair who dresses up for a party and is seen leaving with James, the Designated Love Interest. Cath assumes that James was drooling over Ingrid and that the pair had sex because (I forget the exact phrasing but it was definitely similar to) Ingrid was asking for it. Cath's opinion is not criticised, but validated and shared by her friends. this is treated as okay. This was the point at which I should have closed the ebook, deleted it and scrubbed it clean off my computer.
Cath gets better, of course: she's a complete doormat. Her insecure best friend, Si of the Textbook Campiness, is in a destructive relationship with Will the Wanker, a villain so obvious that he ignores his boyfriend at parties and actively insults said boyfriend's friends. Cath finds out very early on that Will is universally disliked, and that he used to seriously harass and intimidate one of his juniors at work. CATH NEVER REVEALS THIS TO SI, OR TO ANYONE ELSE. She continues to let her (supposed) best friend, who is textbook prey for a textbook moustache-twirler, become emotionally dependent on this creep.
Cath has bigger problems: getting furious at her other friend, the lovely homey Lucy, for not chivvying her love life along. The sense of entitlement this woman has makes me furious: the Designated Love Interest has made his interest in Cath clear. When the ball is in her court, she ignores him, gets petty when he literally only just walks a girl out the door, expects him to meet her halfway when she has shown no reciprocal interest, and is angry because she got dressed up expecting to see him at a dinner but Lucy forgot to invite him. When the stupidly besotted James reaches out to her despite being rebuffed, Cath debates whether or not to respond. Her objections to dating anyone is that she's burned by her last relationship (which was a mostly sexual affair with a married older colleague) and that dating is exhausting. She admits that her friends all approve of James and he clearly likes her a lot鈥� undercutting two of her own biggest objections. She STILL dithers about dating this sod because this isn't chick lit if the main couple gets together far too easily. Let's create artificial obstacles that make no fucking sense!
And James. Oh dear god. The formula of chick lit is quirky girl + compelling hunky heroic male lead + girl's cast of best friends. Dear Jamie had literally nothing to recommend himself; a more milquetoast man has never lived and pretended to be alluring and irresistible. And! He agents realty while painting on the side, and OF COURSE his art is as good as Monet's!
WHAT I LIKED ABOUT THIS BOOK:
鈥� Absolutely everything else, if you can believe it. The side cast of best friends were excellent. Lucy, as the sensible, maternal, plump, confident Housewife With a Bookshop stereotype, was absolutely not stereotypical at all. Her ability to handle people from the supercilious, not particularly respectful Ingrid to the worldly, successful "sexpot" Portia was so subtle. She stays on good terms with everyone, while sticking up for herself and refusing to be intimidated, and it's written so smoothly that I wished Lucy, not Catty Cowardly Cathy, was the protagonist. Le sigh. She gets oddly upset by Cath's noxious state of singled, but one can't have everything.
鈥� INGRID. OH MAN, INGRID. Although she should have been fired on the spot for being weirdly bossy with her employers, it's made clear that she's adored by her charge, the bratty Max, whom she patronises. Everything she does, everything she says, every subtle instance that she's good at her job, made me cheer. Pure gold, this one.
Where it fails is characterisation. To begin with, all the characters currently having a job have childhood dream jobs (mysterious high finance, television writing, something to do with films, formerly in advertising and now a bookshop, real estate agent). Where are the accountants, dentists' assistants, engineers, and blue-collar jobs? I'm not criticising them for pursuing social mobility, but when every character has a "glamorous" job, I'm calling amateur hour.
That impression is only reinforced by the only two gay men in the book: one is textbook camp and the straight white lead's best friend, and the other is an abusive asshole. Neither of these stereotypes is offset by more nuanced (or even varied!) gay characters, so when the book ends with a conversation about HIV, I was close to crying with frustration.
Most dislikeable of all was the main character. Cath's a size 14! With a lovely bit of sleight of hand, we're told she was a size 12 post-college, and she's put on weight and grey hairs with age. A real honest-to-god woman, the kind you might see in real life. I was fully prepared to follow the Real Exploits of a Three-Dimensional character before I realised this wasn't going to be that kind of book.
The first thing that smacked me in the face was her slut-shaming Ingrid, her friends' young, slim, haughty au pair who dresses up for a party and is seen leaving with James, the Designated Love Interest. Cath assumes that James was drooling over Ingrid and that the pair had sex because (I forget the exact phrasing but it was definitely similar to) Ingrid was asking for it. Cath's opinion is not criticised, but validated and shared by her friends. this is treated as okay. This was the point at which I should have closed the ebook, deleted it and scrubbed it clean off my computer.
Cath gets better, of course: she's a complete doormat. Her insecure best friend, Si of the Textbook Campiness, is in a destructive relationship with Will the Wanker, a villain so obvious that he ignores his boyfriend at parties and actively insults said boyfriend's friends. Cath finds out very early on that Will is universally disliked, and that he used to seriously harass and intimidate one of his juniors at work. CATH NEVER REVEALS THIS TO SI, OR TO ANYONE ELSE. She continues to let her (supposed) best friend, who is textbook prey for a textbook moustache-twirler, become emotionally dependent on this creep.
Cath has bigger problems: getting furious at her other friend, the lovely homey Lucy, for not chivvying her love life along. The sense of entitlement this woman has makes me furious: the Designated Love Interest has made his interest in Cath clear. When the ball is in her court, she ignores him, gets petty when he literally only just walks a girl out the door, expects him to meet her halfway when she has shown no reciprocal interest, and is angry because she got dressed up expecting to see him at a dinner but Lucy forgot to invite him. When the stupidly besotted James reaches out to her despite being rebuffed, Cath debates whether or not to respond. Her objections to dating anyone is that she's burned by her last relationship (which was a mostly sexual affair with a married older colleague) and that dating is exhausting. She admits that her friends all approve of James and he clearly likes her a lot鈥� undercutting two of her own biggest objections. She STILL dithers about dating this sod because this isn't chick lit if the main couple gets together far too easily. Let's create artificial obstacles that make no fucking sense!
And James. Oh dear god. The formula of chick lit is quirky girl + compelling hunky heroic male lead + girl's cast of best friends. Dear Jamie had literally nothing to recommend himself; a more milquetoast man has never lived and pretended to be alluring and irresistible. And! He agents realty while painting on the side, and OF COURSE his art is as good as Monet's!
WHAT I LIKED ABOUT THIS BOOK:
鈥� Absolutely everything else, if you can believe it. The side cast of best friends were excellent. Lucy, as the sensible, maternal, plump, confident Housewife With a Bookshop stereotype, was absolutely not stereotypical at all. Her ability to handle people from the supercilious, not particularly respectful Ingrid to the worldly, successful "sexpot" Portia was so subtle. She stays on good terms with everyone, while sticking up for herself and refusing to be intimidated, and it's written so smoothly that I wished Lucy, not Catty Cowardly Cathy, was the protagonist. Le sigh. She gets oddly upset by Cath's noxious state of singled, but one can't have everything.
鈥� INGRID. OH MAN, INGRID. Although she should have been fired on the spot for being weirdly bossy with her employers, it's made clear that she's adored by her charge, the bratty Max, whom she patronises. Everything she does, everything she says, every subtle instance that she's good at her job, made me cheer. Pure gold, this one.
July 23, 2021
El libro ha estado bien, me ha entretenido pero no es un chik lit como el que me esperaba leer. Quer铆a leer algo ligero, que no me hiciera pensar, algo as铆.
Un grupo de amigos de la universidad que siguen con su relaci贸n 10 a帽os despu茅s. Todos excepto una persona. Cuenta la relaci贸n entre ellos, sus sue帽os, sus vivencias y su reencuentro con la persona en discordia. Y luego hacia el final del libro, da un giro que hace que se vuelva un poco m谩s profundo. No s茅, me ha faltado un poco de humor...
Un grupo de amigos de la universidad que siguen con su relaci贸n 10 a帽os despu茅s. Todos excepto una persona. Cuenta la relaci贸n entre ellos, sus sue帽os, sus vivencias y su reencuentro con la persona en discordia. Y luego hacia el final del libro, da un giro que hace que se vuelva un poco m谩s profundo. No s茅, me ha faltado un poco de humor...
February 13, 2013
I can't believe I read the whole thing. Usually, a book this bad, I've abandoned before I reach the half-way point. But somehow I stuck with this until the bitter end.
The first third is awkward and clunky. I'm a big believer in writing that shows the emotions and dynamics of relationships rather than telling the reader, "He felt sad." etc. In this book Jane Green is all about the telling.
The author wants desperately to convey the past history of a group of friends from when they met during their university days. But rather than using an effective prologue or flash-back, she tells the reader about the personalities and relationships of the characters. She gets a bit better with showing characterization as the book progresses, but she doesn't seem to trust her ability to convey fully characters feelings, so she tells us too, so the narrative quickly becomes repetitious and boring.
Admittedly, my final problem with the book is not the fault of the author, but with the fact that I read the book 13 years after it was published. The big dramatic moment in the middle book is much less dramatic given changing technologies and attitudes regarding certain diseases. But even trying to overlook the dated feel could just not get me to like the book.
The first third is awkward and clunky. I'm a big believer in writing that shows the emotions and dynamics of relationships rather than telling the reader, "He felt sad." etc. In this book Jane Green is all about the telling.
The author wants desperately to convey the past history of a group of friends from when they met during their university days. But rather than using an effective prologue or flash-back, she tells the reader about the personalities and relationships of the characters. She gets a bit better with showing characterization as the book progresses, but she doesn't seem to trust her ability to convey fully characters feelings, so she tells us too, so the narrative quickly becomes repetitious and boring.
Admittedly, my final problem with the book is not the fault of the author, but with the fact that I read the book 13 years after it was published. The big dramatic moment in the middle book is much less dramatic given changing technologies and attitudes regarding certain diseases. But even trying to overlook the dated feel could just not get me to like the book.
May 10, 2010
Um, rating 2 stars. I know, they've all been getting 2's lately but, I think, for entirely different reasons. I was pretty excited with this one. Thought I found a new author to read, being the author of many best sellers. To me the story and writing were just a bit off, for lack of a better word. The writing bounced around too much. One minute the story is in the present, then the past, then the main character (Cath, short for Catherine) is talking to the reader. Very inconsistent. Too sitcom-y (which the author actually admits to as part of the plot has the characters lives potrayed in a sitcom). Too unbelievable. I read in 2 days, but I had to actually force myself to read. I wanted it done and I wanted to have read a book on vacation. I actually found myself watching "How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days" for the 10th time, instead of reading. Probably won't read another Jane Green unless it falls into my lap for free.
February 9, 2013
Okay. I stayed up to finish this book because towards the middle I reaaaaaallly fell in love with it. I loved it! I became so emotionally attached to Si and Cath, and it is truly a well written story. It starts off slow and it's one of those books that can be easily forgotten, but when given a chance you realize there is a great story being told.
I would recommend this book to anyone. It is a tear jerker, I definitely shed a few tears in the end. The ending is absolutely perfect. Not at all predictable. I don't read books twice, but I kind of have this urge to start from the beginning and read it all over.
For those who think my review is too kind. Let me be clear, you have to appreciate the storytelling of Jane Green, I love her writing style. Although the book starts off slow and isn't immediately interesting, the characters are and you fall in love with the ongoings of their lives til the very end.
I would recommend this book to anyone. It is a tear jerker, I definitely shed a few tears in the end. The ending is absolutely perfect. Not at all predictable. I don't read books twice, but I kind of have this urge to start from the beginning and read it all over.
For those who think my review is too kind. Let me be clear, you have to appreciate the storytelling of Jane Green, I love her writing style. Although the book starts off slow and isn't immediately interesting, the characters are and you fall in love with the ongoings of their lives til the very end.
May 2, 2018
It's supposed to be a 'rollicking' tale of old university friends, old loves, old jealousies. It doesn't deliver. My take on it: too many storylines, too repetitive; too predictable; much too long.
It's mostly fluff but the author tries to make it more 'meaty' by introducing heavier topics: having a character get an HIV diagnosis; having another involved in an extra marital affair (supposedly); and having another who just can't commit to a loving relationship because she might get hurt (eye roll here). It just doesn't work for me. I guessed the HIV diagnosis way before it came up in the story; I guessed the bi-sexual bent of another character early on, and I got bored with the juvenile angst of Cath. Nevertheless, I doggedly read to the predictable, anti-climatic end - a waste of valuable time.
It's mostly fluff but the author tries to make it more 'meaty' by introducing heavier topics: having a character get an HIV diagnosis; having another involved in an extra marital affair (supposedly); and having another who just can't commit to a loving relationship because she might get hurt (eye roll here). It just doesn't work for me. I guessed the HIV diagnosis way before it came up in the story; I guessed the bi-sexual bent of another character early on, and I got bored with the juvenile angst of Cath. Nevertheless, I doggedly read to the predictable, anti-climatic end - a waste of valuable time.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
August 26, 2019
"Cualquier otro d铆a le hubiera dicho que se fuera a la porra, porque salir tan tarde con semejante fr铆o es lo 煤ltimo que me apetece, sobre todo despu茅s de haberme comido el pastel entero, pero ahora tengo que demostar de qu茅 pasta est谩n hechos los amigos, as铆 que me pongo las botas y me dirijo hacia la puerta."
December 14, 2017
Este ha sido un libro que apenas he disfrutado. Las primeras cien paginas se me hicieron eternas y el resto del libro, aunque cogio ritmo, no termino de convencerme.
July 5, 2012
By the time I recognized Jane Green's books, I have been wanting to get my hands on this book SO bad, it's almost frustrating. Now that I found it and loved it I feel happy.
Basically, this book got it all. Even though it's told from Catherine's POV but the sub-plots of the others were as engaging as the main story. I felt emotionally attached to this book til the very end. The relationships in Bookends are so amazingly written. I felt jealous of them(yeah! my life's that pathetic). I also liked the writing. It isn't overly focused on a single situation or character. Many things are happening which made it even harder to put down.
What I liked more particularly is Catherine. I felt a certain degree of fondness for her. She was caring and emotionally stable without overdoing it. I found myself really enjoying her story more than I thought I would.
Basically, this book got it all. Even though it's told from Catherine's POV but the sub-plots of the others were as engaging as the main story. I felt emotionally attached to this book til the very end. The relationships in Bookends are so amazingly written. I felt jealous of them
What I liked more particularly is Catherine. I felt a certain degree of fondness for her. She was caring and emotionally stable without overdoing it. I found myself really enjoying her story more than I thought I would.
December 27, 2018
Thought about two stars - 1.75, maybe. But considering that two stars on GR is three stars on Amazon - well, no. The ending was weird. I mean just weird. And unsatisfying. Maybe you shouldn't see an ending coming, but also you ought to feel that it makes an intuitive sense. This didn't.
March 23, 2021
Easy to read, with a little more depth to the characters than is often the case with this sort of novel. But overall nothing special, and quite forgettable.
November 17, 2020
Good, overall.
The NYPL recommended this as a book about books. Two of the main characters open a book store, circa 2001 (wouldn鈥檛 all of us readers have wanted to do that?!). But one of the very few books mentioned was Angela鈥檚 Ashes, which, indeed, everyone was reading back then, and it seemed a little trite to bring up just that one book.
But the story line flowed smoothly, and the reader was always pulling for the (mostly likable) main characters. Then, rather abruptly, the story took a rather unexpected and dark turn, which I won鈥檛 divulge here.
The overarching theme was that friends always matter, a Good Thing.
The NYPL recommended this as a book about books. Two of the main characters open a book store, circa 2001 (wouldn鈥檛 all of us readers have wanted to do that?!). But one of the very few books mentioned was Angela鈥檚 Ashes, which, indeed, everyone was reading back then, and it seemed a little trite to bring up just that one book.
But the story line flowed smoothly, and the reader was always pulling for the (mostly likable) main characters. Then, rather abruptly, the story took a rather unexpected and dark turn, which I won鈥檛 divulge here.
The overarching theme was that friends always matter, a Good Thing.
March 16, 2021
Bookends is like watching a series of Friends!听 From the very beginning, you feel like you are part of their group.听 I listened to the story on Audio Book which meant that the narrator had different voices for each character which also brought each one of them to life.
听
This story is about friendship, dating, opening a book shop, as well as covering some bigger, more serious, issues.
听
It was an entertaining book, with a big shock ending.
听
听
This story is about friendship, dating, opening a book shop, as well as covering some bigger, more serious, issues.
听
It was an entertaining book, with a big shock ending.
听
January 30, 2022
I really want to give this 3.75 stars. It鈥檚 not a great piece of literature but at times I couldn鈥檛 put it down. The characters are very well done and I appreciate that they change in logical ways and not dramatically and uncharacteristically.
The writing is very clean and it鈥檚 nice to read something in the pre-mobile phone era.
The writing is very clean and it鈥檚 nice to read something in the pre-mobile phone era.
February 20, 2018
This is what a good Chick Lit book should be like. Humorous, Dramatic and with some Romance thrown in as well.
The book starts out with Cath in college making a new group of friends. At the center of the group is Portia. A beautiful girl with flawless style, a wicked sense of humor that subtlety commands the attention of everyone around her. Portia is Cath's best friend among the group, the rest are boys, she actually is more like a sister, a soul mate if you will. Cath is not the most beautiful of women so she was pretty flattered that Portia choose her as a BFF. But everything changes when Portia upsets the dynamic of their circle by hurting another in the group because of her insecurities. As college ends Cath remains friends with Josh and Si as they all turn their back on Portia.
It is now 10 years later and Cath is still friends with Josh and Si. Her life revolves around work and her college pals. She is a bit more jaded after being burned in love so she has decided alone works for her. She is not unhappy, in fact she loves her guy pals and Josh's wife Lucy. She enjoys their lazy Sunday's and dinners together. She doesn't want to change a thing.
But life does change and pretty drastically after Cath and Si meet one of Lucy's fellow classmates. To start with Lucy talks Cath into opening her dream shop of a Book Shop/Cafe which they name Bookends. This is a huge leap for Cath, she leaves a lucrative job in advertising to take a huge leap of faith into this dream job not really sure they can make it a stable long standing business. And then because of Lucy's classmate the group is able to get in touch with Portia again. It is a nice reunion until there are signs that Portia has more on her agenda then just a college reunion and things really go off the rails.
This book is just what I needed to pull me out of a book slump. It was very entertaining, I had loads of laughs especially where Si was involved and there is a bit of heartache as well where I just started blubbering like a baby. I look forward to reading more amusing stories by Jane Green.
The book starts out with Cath in college making a new group of friends. At the center of the group is Portia. A beautiful girl with flawless style, a wicked sense of humor that subtlety commands the attention of everyone around her. Portia is Cath's best friend among the group, the rest are boys, she actually is more like a sister, a soul mate if you will. Cath is not the most beautiful of women so she was pretty flattered that Portia choose her as a BFF. But everything changes when Portia upsets the dynamic of their circle by hurting another in the group because of her insecurities. As college ends Cath remains friends with Josh and Si as they all turn their back on Portia.
It is now 10 years later and Cath is still friends with Josh and Si. Her life revolves around work and her college pals. She is a bit more jaded after being burned in love so she has decided alone works for her. She is not unhappy, in fact she loves her guy pals and Josh's wife Lucy. She enjoys their lazy Sunday's and dinners together. She doesn't want to change a thing.
But life does change and pretty drastically after Cath and Si meet one of Lucy's fellow classmates. To start with Lucy talks Cath into opening her dream shop of a Book Shop/Cafe which they name Bookends. This is a huge leap for Cath, she leaves a lucrative job in advertising to take a huge leap of faith into this dream job not really sure they can make it a stable long standing business. And then because of Lucy's classmate the group is able to get in touch with Portia again. It is a nice reunion until there are signs that Portia has more on her agenda then just a college reunion and things really go off the rails.
This book is just what I needed to pull me out of a book slump. It was very entertaining, I had loads of laughs especially where Si was involved and there is a bit of heartache as well where I just started blubbering like a baby. I look forward to reading more amusing stories by Jane Green.
September 28, 2020
2.5猸�
About: the story revolves around Cath and Si who are best friend. Their group also includes Josh and Lucy who are married. And of course Portia....
It takes place from their uni years to their early thirties.
It talks about various issues like friendship, marriage, relationships, job and life.
Overall okay read. Wasn't invested in characters. Could have been more interesting.
About: the story revolves around Cath and Si who are best friend. Their group also includes Josh and Lucy who are married. And of course Portia....
It takes place from their uni years to their early thirties.
It talks about various issues like friendship, marriage, relationships, job and life.
Overall okay read. Wasn't invested in characters. Could have been more interesting.
July 16, 2016
HATS OFF TO JANE GREEN FOR WRITING BOOKENDS, LOVED IT! Its richly detailed and very very very well written. I enjoy Jane Green鈥檚 brand of British Chick Lit. Bookends is a story of friendship. Catherine Warner has great friends; Simon and the happily married Josh and Lucy. While Simon and Cath are both on the lookout for the perfect man, Josh and Lucy seem to have the perfect marriage until a long lost college friend, the beautiful Portia arrives back in their lives. Soon Cath suspects Josh may be having an affair with Portia and then later suspects josh having an affair with their au pair. Cath has a new love interest in her life at the same time, James the estate agent slash artist. I enjoyed this book and the complicated web of friendship and love.
April 23, 2008
I know plausibility is not a characteristic most seek in chick-lit, but I do expect some identifiable relation to recognizable human motivations in my fairy tale reading, and this had none. Why we're to believe a wealthy stud falls for a bookish and frumpy introvert, I have no clue. Sure, it happens, but I want to know *why*. Give me something real to hold onto as you lead me into happily-ever-after, please!
November 28, 2015
I have always loved books about books and bookstores. Bookends however was a disappointment for me. The flashback alone took up the first 5-10 chapters and story was a smorgasbord of everything, life, love, friends, family, business... It felt like a whole season of Friends in a novel.
On hindsight, hence the 1 star, growing old with college friends can be amazing. A family by choice, friends who knew you when you were a nobody can keep you grounded. :)
On hindsight, hence the 1 star, growing old with college friends can be amazing. A family by choice, friends who knew you when you were a nobody can keep you grounded. :)
June 2, 2022
Fantastic story! I loved all of the characters; thought they were multi-dimensional and I really cared about what happened to them. I would have liked more closure at the end with Si and Cath and James. You get the impression all ends well, but I would have liked to have been told definitely how it ended instead of assuming.
Not many surprises but definitely worth reading!
Not many surprises but definitely worth reading!
March 11, 2012
people who like fluffy chick lit that isn't too badly written with decent characters, not amazing, but decent, would like this book.
January 24, 2016
Fun to read with a tear at the end! But nothing special :)
December 27, 2017
This...story...was...so...slow! Several times I found myself questioning, where are we going with this.
September 23, 2021
Synopsis:-
Cath and Si are best friends. Total opposites, always together, and both unlucky in love.Cath is scatty,messy and emotionally closed. Si is impossibly tidy, bitchy and desperate for a man of his own. When Portia steps back into their lives,her reappearance sets of a chain of events that tests them to the limit. Does Portia have a hidden agenda, or is she just looking for happy endings all round ? Whatever the answers, none of them could ever predict the outcome 鈥�.
Review:-
I went back to reading this one as it鈥檚 one of my favourites and I felt like I was in a slump, as always I loved it, It has given me the feeling of wanting to curl up with a good book again.
We begin with a group of university friends Si,Cath, Josh, Portia and Eddie and we get a chunk of how it was between them back where it all began until Portia does something that ruins the group dynamic and that鈥檚 it, the end of the groups friendship. Fast forward a few years and we are in the group with Cath,Si, Josh and his wife Lucy. Cath is a single career girl, Si the gay best friend and Josh and Lucy, wife,husband and parents.
Cath and Lucy decide to open up a bookshop/cafe named Bookends. After opening, the groups friendship is tested to the max when Portia arrives back into their lives. Can their lives remain the same with Portia back in the fold ? Has things changed so much that they can鈥檛 go back ?
Jane Green is one of my favourite authors, I enjoy curling up with one of her books and I cannot wait to see if there will be anything new from her soon.
Cath and Si are best friends. Total opposites, always together, and both unlucky in love.Cath is scatty,messy and emotionally closed. Si is impossibly tidy, bitchy and desperate for a man of his own. When Portia steps back into their lives,her reappearance sets of a chain of events that tests them to the limit. Does Portia have a hidden agenda, or is she just looking for happy endings all round ? Whatever the answers, none of them could ever predict the outcome 鈥�.
Review:-
I went back to reading this one as it鈥檚 one of my favourites and I felt like I was in a slump, as always I loved it, It has given me the feeling of wanting to curl up with a good book again.
We begin with a group of university friends Si,Cath, Josh, Portia and Eddie and we get a chunk of how it was between them back where it all began until Portia does something that ruins the group dynamic and that鈥檚 it, the end of the groups friendship. Fast forward a few years and we are in the group with Cath,Si, Josh and his wife Lucy. Cath is a single career girl, Si the gay best friend and Josh and Lucy, wife,husband and parents.
Cath and Lucy decide to open up a bookshop/cafe named Bookends. After opening, the groups friendship is tested to the max when Portia arrives back into their lives. Can their lives remain the same with Portia back in the fold ? Has things changed so much that they can鈥檛 go back ?
Jane Green is one of my favourite authors, I enjoy curling up with one of her books and I cannot wait to see if there will be anything new from her soon.
April 17, 2020
螣 位蠈纬慰蟼 蟺慰蠀 纬蟻维蠁蠅 蟿畏 纬谓蠋渭畏 渭慰蠀 纬喂伪 蟿慰 蟽蠀纬魏蔚魏蟻喂渭苇谓慰 尾喂尾位委慰 蔚委谓伪喂 蟺蠅蟼 未蔚 尾蟻萎魏伪 魏伪渭喂维 维位位畏 蟽蟿伪 螘位位畏谓喂魏维. 螒谓 魏 蔚尉伪谓蟿位畏渭苇谓慰, 蠀蟺维蟻蠂蔚喂 蟺蔚蟻委蟺蟿蠅蟽畏 谓伪 蟿慰 尾蟻蔚委蟿蔚 伪蔚 魏维蟺慰喂伪 螔喂尾位喂慰胃萎魏畏 萎 蟽蟿慰 蟽蟺委蟿喂 魏维蟺慰喂慰蠀 蠁委位慰蠀. 螠畏谓 蟿慰 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺蔚蟻维蟽蟿蔚! 螆蠂蠅 未喂伪尾维蟽蔚喂 蟺蟻喂谓 蟺慰位位维 蠂蟻蠈谓喂伪 慰位伪 蟿伪 渭蔚蟿伪蠁蟻伪蟽渭苇谓伪 蟽蟿伪 螘位位畏谓喂魏维 尾喂尾位委伪 蟿畏蟼:蟿蟻喂维谓蟿伪 魏 魏维蟿喂, 螚 维位位畏 纬蠀谓伪委魏伪, 苇谓伪蟼 蟽蠉味蠀纬慰蟼 纬喂伪 蟿畏 位委渭蟺蠀. 螆蟿蟽喂 魏 伪蠀蟿蠈, 韦慰 蔚委蠂伪 伪纬慰蟻维蟽蔚喂 蟺蟻喂谓 魏伪渭喂维 未蔚魏伪蔚蟿委伪, 螌渭蠅蟼 蟿慰 蔚委蠂伪 蟽蟿伪 伪未喂伪尾伪蟽蟿伪. 螘蠀魏伪喂蟻委伪蟼 未慰胃蔚委蟽畏蟼 (蟿畏蟼 魏伪蟻伪谓蟿喂谓伪蟼 ) 蔚委蟺伪 谓伪 蟿慰 尉蔚魏喂谓萎蟽蠅. 螘委谓伪喂 伪蟺蠈 蟿伪 蟺蟻蠋蟿伪 蟿畏蟼,伪谓 蟽魏蔚蠁蟿蔚委 魏伪谓蔚委蟼 蠈蟿喂 蠈蟿伪谓 蟿慰 苇纬蟻伪蠄蔚 蔚委蠂蔚 渭喂伪 渭喂魏蟻萎 魏慰蟻慰蠉位伪, 畏 慰蟺慰委伪 蟿蠋蟻伪 蔚委谓伪喂 20 蠂蟻蠈谓蠅谓! 螠慰蠀 维蟻蔚蟽蔚 位慰喂蟺蠈谓 蟺维蟻伪 蟺慰位蠉 蟿慰 尾喂尾位委慰, 委蟽蠅蟼 纬喂伪蟿委 渭慰蠉 胃蠉渭喂蟽蔚 蠈位伪 蔚魏蔚委谓伪 蟿伪 蠅蟻伪委伪, 伪谓苇渭蔚位伪 伪纬纬位喂魏维 尾喂尾位委伪 蟺慰蠀 位伪蟿蟻蔚蠉蠅 :渭喂伪 蟺伪蟻苇伪 蠁委位蠅谓, 蟺慰蠀 渭蔚纬伪位蠋谓蔚喂, 蔚尉蔚位委蟽蟽蔚蟿伪喂 蔚蟺伪纬纬蔚位渭伪蟿喂魏维 魏 螤蟻慰蟽蠅蟺喂魏维. 危蠀味畏蟿维蔚喂 蟿伪 蟺蟻慰尾位萎渭伪蟿伪 蟺维谓蠅 伪蟺蠈 蟺慰位位维 蟺慰蟿萎蟻喂伪 魏蟻伪蟽喂慰蠉 魏 魏维谓蔚喂 蠂伪位伪蟻苇蟼 魏慰蠀尾苇谓蟿蔚蟼 蟽蔚 螠喂魏蟻维 魏伪蠁苇. 螔苇尾伪喂伪, 蟺维谓蟿伪 蟺蟻慰魏蠉蟺蟿慰蠀谓 味畏蟿萎渭伪蟿伪 胃位喂尾蔚蟻维, 蠈渭蠅蟼 蟿慰 蟿苇位慰蟼 蔚委谓伪喂 蟺伪蟻畏纬慰蟻畏蟿喂魏慰. 违蟺维蟻蠂蔚喂 魏 蟿慰 happy end! 螣喂 伪蟽蟿蔚委蔚蟼 蟺蔚蟻喂纬蟻伪蠁苇蟼 魏 蟿伪 蔚蟺蔚喂蟽蠈未喂伪 谓慰渭委味蠅 蠈蟿喂 蔚蟺畏蟻苇伪蟽伪谓 伪蟻纬蠈蟿蔚蟻伪 蟺慰位位苇蟼 伪纬纬位喂未蔚蟼 paper back writters.螒谓 蟽伪蟼 伪蟻苇蟽蔚喂 伪蠀蟿蠈 蟿慰 蟽蟿蠀位 尾喂尾位委蠅谓, 螛伪 蟿慰 蔚蠀蠂伪蟻喂蟽蟿畏胃蔚委蟿蔚 蟺慰位蠉!
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,077 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.