What do you think?
Rate this book
賮蹖賱賲賳丕賲賴 賳賵蹖爻蹖: 亘乇丕賳诏蹖禺鬲賳 丕丨爻丕爻 鬲讴賳蹖讴 賴丕蹖 丿乇丕賲丕鬲蹖讴 倬蹖卮乇賮鬲賴 亘乇丕蹖 賲丨爻賵乇 讴乇丿賳 賲禺丕胤亘
亘丕 禺賵丕賳丿賳 賴乇 賮蹖賱賲賳丕賲賴貙 爻賴 丨丕賱鬲 賲賲讴賳 丕爻鬲 亘賴 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 丿爻鬲 丿賴丿: 賲賱丕賱貙 毓賱丕賯賴貙 芦賵噩丿!禄. 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 賮蹖賱賲賳丕賲賴 賳賵蹖爻貙 亘丕蹖丿 丿乇 丕讴孬乇 氐賮丨丕鬲 丨丕賱鬲 賵噩丿 丕蹖噩丕丿 讴賳蹖丿. 丕乇鬲亘丕胤 丕丨爻丕爻蹖 亘丕 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 鬲賳賴丕 乇丕賴讴丕乇 亘乇丕蹖 丿爻鬲蹖丕亘蹖 亘賴 賲賵賮賯蹖鬲 丕爻鬲.
丕诏乇 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕蹖 賮蹖賱賲賳丕賲賴 賳賵蹖爻蹖 乇丕 禺賵丕賳丿賴 丕蹖丿 賵 亘賴 丕氐賵賱 賵 賯賵丕賳蹖賳 鬲爻賱胤 蹖丕賮鬲賴 丕蹖丿貙 鬲丕夭賴 丿乇 賳蹖賲賴 乇丕賴 賯乇丕乇 丿丕乇蹖丿. 丿乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 蹖丕丿 賲蹖 诏蹖乇蹖丿 讴賴 趩胤賵乇 丕丨爻丕爻 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 乇丕 亘乇丕賳诏蹖夭蹖丿.
丕诏乇 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕蹖 賮蹖賱賲賳丕賲賴 賳賵蹖爻蹖 乇丕 禺賵丕賳丿賴 丕蹖丿 賵 亘賴 丕氐賵賱 賵 賯賵丕賳蹖賳 鬲爻賱胤 蹖丕賮鬲賴 丕蹖丿貙 鬲丕夭賴 丿乇 賳蹖賲賴 乇丕賴 賯乇丕乇 丿丕乇蹖丿. 丿乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 蹖丕丿 賲蹖 诏蹖乇蹖丿 讴賴 趩胤賵乇 丕丨爻丕爻 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 乇丕 亘乇丕賳诏蹖夭蹖丿.
412 pages, Paperback
First published September 1, 2005
243 people are currently reading
1583 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 81 reviews
April 3, 2018
I'm still reading it, but I'm already giving it 5* because it's just so great. To the point, well written and full of concrete advice and analysis.
I see my books very much like movies, so this is just what I needed.
ETA: Very useful, inspiring, made me rethink some writing theory
I see my books very much like movies, so this is just what I needed.
ETA: Very useful, inspiring, made me rethink some writing theory
February 19, 2014
If I were stranded on a desert island with a typewriter and paper, this is the book I'd want to help me in my writing. This book is for screenwriting, but I found most of it applied to writing novels as well.
Iglesias takes the challenge of making you a better writer head on. He starts out with that promise and delivers. His intent is to help you write scene by scene, paragraph by paragraph in such a way that no one could set your book down. He shows you how to ensure the reader cares about your characters and feels the character's emotions. He also points out how to make sure the reader has a takeaway that will make them talk about your story to other people.
He shows how to build tension, write snappy dialog, and deliver emotional scenes. He does this by examining movies like case studies, and does it in a way that really hooks you. There are other books that examine movie plots and dialog, but this book is an order of magnitude better than the rest.
This is the most influential book on writing I can think of. I re-wrote my manuscript after reading this book. If you get mired down in chapter one, skip it, but this book is a must read.
For any writer out there, I RECOMMEND THIS BOOK ABOVE ALL OTHERS on the subject of writing.
Do I know the Author? No. Did I get the book for free? No. Is this an impartial review? Yes. This book will full on make you a better writer, and I look forward to world filled with more intriguing, engrossing books!
Iglesias takes the challenge of making you a better writer head on. He starts out with that promise and delivers. His intent is to help you write scene by scene, paragraph by paragraph in such a way that no one could set your book down. He shows you how to ensure the reader cares about your characters and feels the character's emotions. He also points out how to make sure the reader has a takeaway that will make them talk about your story to other people.
He shows how to build tension, write snappy dialog, and deliver emotional scenes. He does this by examining movies like case studies, and does it in a way that really hooks you. There are other books that examine movie plots and dialog, but this book is an order of magnitude better than the rest.
This is the most influential book on writing I can think of. I re-wrote my manuscript after reading this book. If you get mired down in chapter one, skip it, but this book is a must read.
For any writer out there, I RECOMMEND THIS BOOK ABOVE ALL OTHERS on the subject of writing.
Do I know the Author? No. Did I get the book for free? No. Is this an impartial review? Yes. This book will full on make you a better writer, and I look forward to world filled with more intriguing, engrossing books!
Read
March 7, 2025So informative and helpful!
July 4, 2021
While this book isn't without it's flaws, it's so useful it's now one of my favorite writing craft books.
He has a lot of lists, which is nice for readability but also got repetitive (he uses many of the same bullet points in multiple sections) and at times the points were obvious enough that they didn't need a paragraph of explanation.
There is so much important information in the book though! I found the sections on tension and suspense really useful and the section on scenes. It's one that I will go back to again and again for reference and to learn more (there's so much, there's no way to get it all in one read).
High recommend to any writer.
He has a lot of lists, which is nice for readability but also got repetitive (he uses many of the same bullet points in multiple sections) and at times the points were obvious enough that they didn't need a paragraph of explanation.
There is so much important information in the book though! I found the sections on tension and suspense really useful and the section on scenes. It's one that I will go back to again and again for reference and to learn more (there's so much, there's no way to get it all in one read).
High recommend to any writer.
May 6, 2016
There's some solid advice for writers. Much of it wasn't necessarily new, but presented in new ways. I particularly enjoyed the piece about subtext. The author's explanation and examples really showed me how subtext can make the difference between good and great dialogue.
October 7, 2023
"Find what gave you emotion, what the action was that gave you excitement, then write it down, making it clear so that the reader can see it too."
- E. Hemingway
4.5*
E拧te aj dnes je ve木a 木ud铆, ktor铆 si myslia, 啪e nap铆sa钮 "bestseller" je hra膷ka. 膶o m么啪e by钮 predsa n谩ro膷n茅 na skladan铆 slov do viet a tie do komplexn茅ho pr铆behu? Ni膷 钮a啪k茅, to predsa d谩 ka啪d媒, ve膹 ich 啪ivot je jeden 煤啪asn媒, chodiaci pr铆beh, ktor媒 by sa pred谩val na mraky!
Dovo木te mi nes煤hlasi钮. Alebo aspo艌 nie tak 煤plne.
Ka啪d茅 dielo by malo ma钮 svoju 拧trukt煤ru. Pozn谩me 煤vod, jadro, z谩ver, plus delenie t媒chto jednotliv媒ch 膷ast铆. Aby sme zaujali 膷itate木a, potrebujeme vytvori钮 catchy 煤vod, aby na拧u knihu nechcel pusti钮 z r煤k. Samozrejme, mus铆me udr啪a钮 jeho pozornos钮 do prv媒ch z谩pletiek a, v ide谩lnom pr铆pade, a啪 do konca. Ako sa ale vyhn煤钮 hluch媒m miestam? Ako nap铆sa钮 pr铆beh, ktor媒 by si 木udia zamilovali a pre膷铆tali aj na posedenie?
Kone膷ne sa dost谩vame k obsahu tejto knihy.
Writing for emotional impact je kniha ur膷en谩 prim谩rne scen谩ristom, aby svojimi scen谩rmi zaujali 拧irok茅 publikum. Na拧钮astie, ve木a z nej m么啪u vy钮a啪i钮 aj spisovatelia, preto啪e sa v nej rozober谩 aj samotn媒 koncept diela, t茅ma, postavy 膷i r么zne z谩pletky.
Na trhu je ve木a kn铆h, ktor茅 sa sna啪ia preda钮 autorom svoje "know how", ale je len m谩lo tak媒ch, v ktor媒ch nen谩jdete zbyto膷n茅 om谩膷ky a fr谩zy, ktor茅 v拧etci pozn谩me. Pri 膷铆tan铆 tohto som ale kone膷ne mala pocit, 啪e niekto pri拧iel s "n谩vodom" ako na to, doslova aj pre debila. 膷o v 啪ivote ne膷铆tal a nep铆sal.
Autor sa opiera o z谩kladn茅 fakty, vyu啪铆va v knihe uk谩啪ky zo zn谩mych filmov ako je Pulp fiction, Ml膷anie jahniat 膷i podobn茅 kultovky. Kladie autorom ot谩zky o ich dielach, n煤ti ich zamyslie钮 sa nad jednotliv媒mi 膷as钮ami rukopisu a hlavne... sna啪铆 sa uk谩za钮, 啪e nez谩le啪铆 na tom, ko木ko draftov rukopis bude ma钮, d么le啪it茅 je, aby to rozc铆tilo a zauj铆malo samotn茅ho autora.
"Plot is more than a pattern of events, it is the ordering of emotions."
Osobne som ve木mi rada za kapitoly, v ktor媒ch autor pribl铆啪il st谩vky a mo啪n茅 vyvrcholenia, preto啪e som sa v膹aka tomu lep拧ie zamyslela nad vlastn媒mi rukopismi, a pri niektor媒ch som dokonca pri拧la s nov媒mi n谩padmi, preto啪e nie je ni膷, 膷omu sa chce autor vyvarova钮 v盲膷拧mi ne啪 slabej 膷i neexistuj煤cej z谩pletke.
March 5, 2022
Good as far as advice on the craftsmanship of screenwriting goes. Very interesting to learn what readers and execs look for when prompted with spec scripts. The author clearly has a knowledge for the industry and truly has some great tips.
I was a little turned off by the fact that he mostly only mentioned male writers at the end of each chapter for who to check out despite referencing several female written stories throughout the book. He uses Thelma & Louise and When Harry Met Sally (both written by women) constantly but then doesn鈥檛 give the writers individual shoutouts like William Goldman and Paddy Chayefsky. This book was written 20 years ago almost, so some will say women weren鈥檛 given the same opportunities, which is true, but there were still masterful storytellers who made movies and are worthy of mentioning individually: Jane Campion, Emma Thompson, Callie Khouri, Lisa Cholodenko, Nora Ephron, Nancy Meyers, and Fran Walsh, just to name a few. Their exclusion, whether purposeful or ignorant, made me pigeonhole the writer as being just another straight guy whose taste starts with The Godfather and ends with Breaking Bad.
I was a little turned off by the fact that he mostly only mentioned male writers at the end of each chapter for who to check out despite referencing several female written stories throughout the book. He uses Thelma & Louise and When Harry Met Sally (both written by women) constantly but then doesn鈥檛 give the writers individual shoutouts like William Goldman and Paddy Chayefsky. This book was written 20 years ago almost, so some will say women weren鈥檛 given the same opportunities, which is true, but there were still masterful storytellers who made movies and are worthy of mentioning individually: Jane Campion, Emma Thompson, Callie Khouri, Lisa Cholodenko, Nora Ephron, Nancy Meyers, and Fran Walsh, just to name a few. Their exclusion, whether purposeful or ignorant, made me pigeonhole the writer as being just another straight guy whose taste starts with The Godfather and ends with Breaking Bad.
February 19, 2020
Lists of (mostly dialogue) techniques with examples of use.
I guess I was hoping for more structural advice about psychological triggers, but the book isn't that deep.
I guess I was hoping for more structural advice about psychological triggers, but the book isn't that deep.
October 31, 2023
爻賴 鬲丕 丕夭 賮氐賱賴丕蹖 讴鬲丕亘 讴賴 丿乇亘丕乇賴鈥屰� 丕蹖丿賴貙 丿乇賵賳鈥屬呚й屬� 賵 卮禺氐蹖鬲 倬乇丿丕夭蹖 亘賵丿貙 禺蹖賱蹖 亘乇丕蹖 賲賳 賲賮蹖丿 亘賵丿. 亘賯蹖賴鈥屰� 亘禺卮鈥屬囏й� 讴鬲丕亘 蹖丕 趩蹖夭 噩丿蹖丿蹖 亘乇丕蹖賲 賳丿丕卮鬲 蹖丕 禺蹖賱蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 乇賵丿賴 丿乇丕夭蹖 讴乇丿賴 亘賵丿. 丿乇 讴賱 禺賵丕賳丿賳卮 乇丕 亘賴 賮蹖賱賲賳丕賲賴鈥屬嗁堐屫池з� 鬲賵氐蹖賴 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�
July 11, 2024
The best book about screenwriting I've read 鈥� out of at least a dozen.
January 13, 2015
I would give this book 3 stars but am adding an additional star mainly because I am not the target audience and then am giving some benefit of the doubt.
I am a fiction writer and this book is aimed at screenplay writers but I thought I'd give it a whirl.
The book promises to not talk about basics and only more advanced topics. What I found was that most of the lessons seemed very obvious to me, so I am wondering what about them is not basic. There are a few gems mixed in, however, and I particularly liked the chapter on dialog.
The biggest problem with the book is the endless repetitive lists that are used as "examples". Occasionally, there is a well thought out and thoroughly presented example, but those are the exception. In general a statement is made then a reference is given to a character or scene in a movie with little or no explanation to the specifics of why or how it works. For example, create a bittersweet ending like Thelma and Louise, talk to the camera like Ferris Bueller, the leitmotif of Chinatown.
I guess the assumption is that the reader has seen and studied these endless lists of movies and can identify the scenes in them. Even if that were true, I would still have liked to see a more detailed explanation on exactly how the technique is employed and why it works.
Since reading the book, I have watched a few movies and interestingly I find myself deconstructing scenes and seeing why and how some of the things were done. That was neat. But as far as my fiction writing, I think the book was of little help to me.
I am a fiction writer and this book is aimed at screenplay writers but I thought I'd give it a whirl.
The book promises to not talk about basics and only more advanced topics. What I found was that most of the lessons seemed very obvious to me, so I am wondering what about them is not basic. There are a few gems mixed in, however, and I particularly liked the chapter on dialog.
The biggest problem with the book is the endless repetitive lists that are used as "examples". Occasionally, there is a well thought out and thoroughly presented example, but those are the exception. In general a statement is made then a reference is given to a character or scene in a movie with little or no explanation to the specifics of why or how it works. For example, create a bittersweet ending like Thelma and Louise, talk to the camera like Ferris Bueller, the leitmotif of Chinatown.
I guess the assumption is that the reader has seen and studied these endless lists of movies and can identify the scenes in them. Even if that were true, I would still have liked to see a more detailed explanation on exactly how the technique is employed and why it works.
Since reading the book, I have watched a few movies and interestingly I find myself deconstructing scenes and seeing why and how some of the things were done. That was neat. But as far as my fiction writing, I think the book was of little help to me.
September 18, 2021
Useful but limited, Don't bother with the audiobook!
I'm going to be the outlier in this sea of high ratings, because the audiobook just SUCKS!!!
In simple terms this isn't actually an audiobook let alone an audiobook of the text-based book it pertains to be. Because these are the badly formatted, meandering and rambling recordings of the lectures that were supposed to be, only the ISPIRATION for the actual book!
So what we have here is a a bunch of lectures that, while interesting in their subject and undoubtedly are of some use to some people. They are however unstructured and without much cohesion from lecture to lecture, jumping form random topic to random topic while Iglesias endlessly spouts praise for the movies he likes.
As for the content itself. well it is a bit underwhelming. Most of it is basic advise to the point of: learn from the masters and Practice, Practice, Practice....... Yeah shocking! No one has ever though of those pieces of advice. Add to that that all of this advice is tailored to the narrow field of Hollywood Script Writing. If you write anything ells, about half of this book would be useless to you
So...... Overall you've got a non-book, badly "written" with useful information to only a narrow field, and a narrator who rambles on and on. And then in the end, he doesn't add all that much that other books haven't done better. Not a good showing
Ps.
Author please stop referring to everything to do with writing as 'The Craft' it sound incredible pretentious.
I'm going to be the outlier in this sea of high ratings, because the audiobook just SUCKS!!!
In simple terms this isn't actually an audiobook let alone an audiobook of the text-based book it pertains to be. Because these are the badly formatted, meandering and rambling recordings of the lectures that were supposed to be, only the ISPIRATION for the actual book!
So what we have here is a a bunch of lectures that, while interesting in their subject and undoubtedly are of some use to some people. They are however unstructured and without much cohesion from lecture to lecture, jumping form random topic to random topic while Iglesias endlessly spouts praise for the movies he likes.
As for the content itself. well it is a bit underwhelming. Most of it is basic advise to the point of: learn from the masters and Practice, Practice, Practice....... Yeah shocking! No one has ever though of those pieces of advice. Add to that that all of this advice is tailored to the narrow field of Hollywood Script Writing. If you write anything ells, about half of this book would be useless to you
So...... Overall you've got a non-book, badly "written" with useful information to only a narrow field, and a narrator who rambles on and on. And then in the end, he doesn't add all that much that other books haven't done better. Not a good showing
Ps.
Author please stop referring to everything to do with writing as 'The Craft' it sound incredible pretentious.
December 8, 2011
Although this book is aimed at screenwriters, most of the advice also applies to novelists. I read this while working on a first draft and can see that it will be very useful later during editing. At only 110 pages, screenplays have to be tight. Every scene has to count, each line of dialogue must be informative, and reader suspense/curiosity should be maximized. All this is definitely applicable to producing an engaging and well-paced novel.
In explaining how these things are accomplished in successful scripts, some chapters have a bit of a laundry list feeling to them. Again, probably more useful in editing if you're brainstorming ways to make your characters more sympathetic, for example. I enjoyed the wrap-up sections, however. He dissects sections of scripts and shows how the screenwriter has manipulated us at every turn. (Obviously this means there are a lot of movie spoilers in here, though if you're a movie buff at all, you've probably seen them anyway.)
Where it fell flat for me, ironically, is in the author's tone. I felt no emotional connection. Although I have moved away from the inspirational self-help "anybody can write!" sorts of writing books that I used to love, I still like for the author to be encouraging and make me feel as though I'm being mentored. With this book, it's more like, "Try not to suck." So, don't go looking for that kind of inspiration here. I suppose Hollywood isn't meant for the thin-skinned that need coddling anyway.
In explaining how these things are accomplished in successful scripts, some chapters have a bit of a laundry list feeling to them. Again, probably more useful in editing if you're brainstorming ways to make your characters more sympathetic, for example. I enjoyed the wrap-up sections, however. He dissects sections of scripts and shows how the screenwriter has manipulated us at every turn. (Obviously this means there are a lot of movie spoilers in here, though if you're a movie buff at all, you've probably seen them anyway.)
Where it fell flat for me, ironically, is in the author's tone. I felt no emotional connection. Although I have moved away from the inspirational self-help "anybody can write!" sorts of writing books that I used to love, I still like for the author to be encouraging and make me feel as though I'm being mentored. With this book, it's more like, "Try not to suck." So, don't go looking for that kind of inspiration here. I suppose Hollywood isn't meant for the thin-skinned that need coddling anyway.
July 8, 2022
Enjoyed it so much I purchased a physical copy as well.
Obviously as a reader I want to "feel things" and as a writer, that's my goal too. What's the point of a story if you aren't affected by it in some way? Includes lot of practical tips and both advanced and introductory advice and techniques.
---
If you liked this! And want more! I HIGHLY recommend the Film Courage podcast. It's FREE! They have stuff on YouTube, and Spotify, and probably other platforms I don't know about. Tons of expert advice from people who have made their careers in the story industry. I can't praise it enough.
Ironically, I'd recommend Film Courage over the Bulletproof Screenwriting podcast, because, while similar in concept, the Film Courage interviewer allows her guests to speak in full without interrupting them. Alex Ferrari has interesting guests, but I stress out listening to them fight to get a word in edgewise sometimes. Maybe that's just me. I stress out easily.
There is an interview between Bulletproof Screenwriting's Alex Ferrari and Karl Iglesias at the end of the audio, and I enjoyed it a lot less than the rest of the production. But again, this may be a matter of personal taste.
---
Overall, I'd probably recommend the physical copy over the audio version, as the audio quality varies and certain concepts seemed to require, or at least be improved by, visual accompaniment.
Obviously as a reader I want to "feel things" and as a writer, that's my goal too. What's the point of a story if you aren't affected by it in some way? Includes lot of practical tips and both advanced and introductory advice and techniques.
---
If you liked this! And want more! I HIGHLY recommend the Film Courage podcast. It's FREE! They have stuff on YouTube, and Spotify, and probably other platforms I don't know about. Tons of expert advice from people who have made their careers in the story industry. I can't praise it enough.
Ironically, I'd recommend Film Courage over the Bulletproof Screenwriting podcast, because, while similar in concept, the Film Courage interviewer allows her guests to speak in full without interrupting them. Alex Ferrari has interesting guests, but I stress out listening to them fight to get a word in edgewise sometimes. Maybe that's just me. I stress out easily.
There is an interview between Bulletproof Screenwriting's Alex Ferrari and Karl Iglesias at the end of the audio, and I enjoyed it a lot less than the rest of the production. But again, this may be a matter of personal taste.
---
Overall, I'd probably recommend the physical copy over the audio version, as the audio quality varies and certain concepts seemed to require, or at least be improved by, visual accompaniment.
October 19, 2012
Our job is to seduce the reader, keep him hanging and longing for more, and then reward him beyond expectation. Our biggest promise to him when we create a story, is that it will be an unforgettable and unmitigated experience. Only when we accomplish that, are we accomplished as writers.
"Writing For Emotional Impact" is bristling with incredibly useful and superbly explained advice, that will change the way you see the impact great fiction has on readers. It's almost as if Karl Iglesias reveals how some of the greatest magic tricks work -- and once you realize how it's done, and with a bit of practice, you can achieve mastery of emotional impact that feels like magic.
An absolute must read for screenwriters and novelists alike!
"Writing For Emotional Impact" is bristling with incredibly useful and superbly explained advice, that will change the way you see the impact great fiction has on readers. It's almost as if Karl Iglesias reveals how some of the greatest magic tricks work -- and once you realize how it's done, and with a bit of practice, you can achieve mastery of emotional impact that feels like magic.
An absolute must read for screenwriters and novelists alike!
May 31, 2020
Possibly the most indispensable book in a large collection. If you have any desire to understand the relationship between writer and reader/viewer and the industry know-how that makes that relationship a strong and fruitful one, then get Karl Iglesias Writing for Emotional Impact.
He's pretty bold about the journey you'll go on - expect to have the veil stripped from your eyes as far as ever just enjoying a good film or book without fully appreciating how and why you've enjoyed it. It goes deep. It answers questions such as, why do we like characters? why do we root for them solving their problems? And it provides long lists of examples and evidence throughout.
If you only buy one book on your own quest to understand how stories work on an emotional level, buy this one.
He's pretty bold about the journey you'll go on - expect to have the veil stripped from your eyes as far as ever just enjoying a good film or book without fully appreciating how and why you've enjoyed it. It goes deep. It answers questions such as, why do we like characters? why do we root for them solving their problems? And it provides long lists of examples and evidence throughout.
If you only buy one book on your own quest to understand how stories work on an emotional level, buy this one.
Read
August 29, 2019DNF - For me, the issue is that I'm not a screenwriter. The techniques in the book are certainly workable for an author of novels as well, but to get to them, you have to swim through scads of screenwriting anecdotes and terminology and maxims which it's assumed you know and understand already.
If you're a screenwriter, absolutely check this out. If you're hoping to borrow techniques to write your novels...your mileage may vary.
If you're a screenwriter, absolutely check this out. If you're hoping to borrow techniques to write your novels...your mileage may vary.
January 9, 2015
Re-read a few chapters of this today. Yes, it's designed for screen-writing, but so much of what makes for dramatic scenes can apply to novel writing too!
I loved this tip for learning how to Show (not tell) emotion, and I'm going to try it: Watch silent movies. How do the scenes work to portray the emotion without ever stating it outright?
Mimic in own writing.
I loved this tip for learning how to Show (not tell) emotion, and I'm going to try it: Watch silent movies. How do the scenes work to portray the emotion without ever stating it outright?
Mimic in own writing.
March 30, 2013
鈥淚 hear and I forget; I see and I remember; I do and I understand".
Posed as advanced book on writing it's surely Powerful, Inspiring and immensely helpful. But its worth is more proved only when the techniques and tools prescribed in it are put to use in our own scripts.
4/5. Detailed review to follow.
Posed as advanced book on writing it's surely Powerful, Inspiring and immensely helpful. But its worth is more proved only when the techniques and tools prescribed in it are put to use in our own scripts.
4/5. Detailed review to follow.
May 16, 2017
Good, solid advice.
My editor assigned me this book when my first and second drafts were flat. Using some of these tips dramatically improved drafts 3 and 4, and isn't that the true measure of a how-to book on writing?
My editor assigned me this book when my first and second drafts were flat. Using some of these tips dramatically improved drafts 3 and 4, and isn't that the true measure of a how-to book on writing?
January 2, 2018
There's a reason this book is so highly reviewed. While it doesn't cover things like structure, it goes into depth on more advanced topics and techniques that can add more impact to characters/scenes/plots/etc. It'll be a great reference going forward.
December 22, 2018
This was recommended to me by a friend. If you鈥檝e read very many other craft books, this one has nothing new. I found it very simple, especially if you鈥檙e a novelist reading it. Most of it is already things you鈥檝e heard, or read about.
There are better craft books out there!
There are better craft books out there!
April 23, 2021
Best book on screenplay writing. Must read, must learn and must practice. Karl Iglesias explains everything simply straightforward, clearly and warmly. No lies, no nonsense, saves your time and motivates to write.
November 27, 2022
Fantastic! Fantastic! Magnificent book!
Ah, I'm not a screenwriter but a fiction writer and this book has helped me in many ways than one. I initially bought it on Kindle but now I'm off to get the hard copy to re-read and underline.
Ah, I'm not a screenwriter but a fiction writer and this book has helped me in many ways than one. I initially bought it on Kindle but now I'm off to get the hard copy to re-read and underline.
February 23, 2017
Excellent guide for fiction authors as well as screenwriters.
February 24, 2020
As I write a new manuscript, I'm reading this again!
September 26, 2021
Great for honing the craft of writing but very advanced! Highly recommended if you've read a lot of books on writing/structure already!
May 9, 2024
The Hollywood dickriding in this one is wild
April 12, 2023
Keep your reader engaged. So admonishes Karl Iglesias in this book derived from a course he runs. To which, I say this: I have some silica gel packs that are jealous as to how dry the writing is within these pages. A mere 20 minutes' reading was pretty much assured to put me to sleep.
Iglesias also claims that this is the only book on writing that addresses how to address readers emotions; all the others rake over the same well-trod path of structure. To which: poppycock! Pretty much every book on writing, whether for screen or novel, addresses reader emotional engagement. Indeed, most do a much better job of it.
The problems with this book are too many to address.
A prime example would be the proposition that all people feel the same range of emotions, in the same way. Anyone who understands anything about emotions 鈥� and we could reasonably expect someone teaching on the subject of eliciting emotion to be amongst that cohort 鈥� knows that emotions are entirely individual. Emotional concepts may be common within cultures, but every instance of emotion is distinct, because emotions derive from the intersection of current situation and one's life-experience context. As such, to play to emotions, even within the vague categorisation of what might be elicitable within a known audience, depends entirely on that audience's cultural sensibilities.
Then, there is the section on naming a script. Iglesias makes an absurd claim that specific titles elicit certain questions in the reader. I can attest that not a single example provided 鈥� and all were films of good repute 鈥� raised the questsion he suggested. And in those cases where there was an association, it derived from either a memory of the poster artwork that accompanied the release of said film, or from a memory of the film's storyline.
And therein, perhaps, the underlying error in the entire book: Iglesias completely ignores that emotional impact derives from the context the audience brings to the table. The author can only elicit emotion if they can create resonance with that other context, about which they cannot know; only make generalised assumptions.
All that said, there are a few hints at structuring techniques that, if worked over and mapped to something visual, rather than Iglesias' parched prose, might be useful. If those could be extracted before one falls asleep. Again.
Iglesias also claims that this is the only book on writing that addresses how to address readers emotions; all the others rake over the same well-trod path of structure. To which: poppycock! Pretty much every book on writing, whether for screen or novel, addresses reader emotional engagement. Indeed, most do a much better job of it.
The problems with this book are too many to address.
A prime example would be the proposition that all people feel the same range of emotions, in the same way. Anyone who understands anything about emotions 鈥� and we could reasonably expect someone teaching on the subject of eliciting emotion to be amongst that cohort 鈥� knows that emotions are entirely individual. Emotional concepts may be common within cultures, but every instance of emotion is distinct, because emotions derive from the intersection of current situation and one's life-experience context. As such, to play to emotions, even within the vague categorisation of what might be elicitable within a known audience, depends entirely on that audience's cultural sensibilities.
Then, there is the section on naming a script. Iglesias makes an absurd claim that specific titles elicit certain questions in the reader. I can attest that not a single example provided 鈥� and all were films of good repute 鈥� raised the questsion he suggested. And in those cases where there was an association, it derived from either a memory of the poster artwork that accompanied the release of said film, or from a memory of the film's storyline.
And therein, perhaps, the underlying error in the entire book: Iglesias completely ignores that emotional impact derives from the context the audience brings to the table. The author can only elicit emotion if they can create resonance with that other context, about which they cannot know; only make generalised assumptions.
All that said, there are a few hints at structuring techniques that, if worked over and mapped to something visual, rather than Iglesias' parched prose, might be useful. If those could be extracted before one falls asleep. Again.
March 14, 2022
Hvis du gerne vil skrive, uanset i hvilket henseende, og du kun m氓 l忙se en bog om det, s氓 vil jeg anbefale denne. Der findes utallige b酶ger om de forskellige aspekter af skrivning, og man skulle tro, at en bog specifikt om at skrive manuskripter ikke ville l酶be med titlen som den bedste. men det g酶r den nu alligevel, fordi den taler ind i alle former for skrivning 鈥� manuskripter, sk酶nlitteratur, men ogs氓 faglig eller s氓gar hverdagens formidling. P氓 mystisk vis form氓r Karl Iglesias nemlig at koge alle disse ting ned til en simpel pointe: Det handler om f酶lelsesm忙ssig indflydelse.
Jeg er p氓 en gang forbl酶ffet og imponeret over, at det er s氓 simpelt 鈥� uanset om du skal overbevise nogle i en mail eller skrive den n忙ste bestseller. Men forfatteren form氓r igennem bogen at vise, at alle skriver氓d og omr氓der inden for dem faktisk kan koge ned til det. Han gennemg氓r helt konkrete tips til alt fra dialog til plotstruktur, og selvom den favner s氓 bredt og bliver et genialt opslagsv忙rk til senere brug, vil det hele kunne udledes af hovedpointen. Derfor blev det for mig nogle gange eksemplificeret eller gentaget lige rigeligt. Der er talrige eksempler fra filmmanuskripter, hvor man ser det omtalte i action 鈥� men for mig, som ikke har set en eneste af filmen, var det lidt af en forstyrrelse af l忙seflowet. Jeg beskylder alts氓 dem for, at det har taget mig over et halvt 氓r at komme gennem den ellers givende bog.
Opsummeret er denne bog alts氓 et oplagt opslagsv忙rk, som tillader plads til, at man selv kan v忙lge, hvilket middel, man vil bruge til at opn氓 det altid samme m氓l: at p氓virke andres f酶lelser.
鈥淚 can鈥檛 tell you how to write. No one can. But I鈥檓 a strong believer in tools, not rules.鈥�
Jeg er p氓 en gang forbl酶ffet og imponeret over, at det er s氓 simpelt 鈥� uanset om du skal overbevise nogle i en mail eller skrive den n忙ste bestseller. Men forfatteren form氓r igennem bogen at vise, at alle skriver氓d og omr氓der inden for dem faktisk kan koge ned til det. Han gennemg氓r helt konkrete tips til alt fra dialog til plotstruktur, og selvom den favner s氓 bredt og bliver et genialt opslagsv忙rk til senere brug, vil det hele kunne udledes af hovedpointen. Derfor blev det for mig nogle gange eksemplificeret eller gentaget lige rigeligt. Der er talrige eksempler fra filmmanuskripter, hvor man ser det omtalte i action 鈥� men for mig, som ikke har set en eneste af filmen, var det lidt af en forstyrrelse af l忙seflowet. Jeg beskylder alts氓 dem for, at det har taget mig over et halvt 氓r at komme gennem den ellers givende bog.
Opsummeret er denne bog alts氓 et oplagt opslagsv忙rk, som tillader plads til, at man selv kan v忙lge, hvilket middel, man vil bruge til at opn氓 det altid samme m氓l: at p氓virke andres f酶lelser.
鈥淚 can鈥檛 tell you how to write. No one can. But I鈥檓 a strong believer in tools, not rules.鈥�
Displaying 1 - 30 of 81 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.