What do you think?
Rate this book
协褎褎械泻褌 袥褞褑懈褎械褉邪. 袩芯褔械屑褍 褏芯褉芯褕懈械 谢褞写懈 锌褉械胁褉邪褖邪褞褌褋褟 胁 蟹谢芯写械械胁
袣薪懈谐邪 胁芯胁褋械 薪械 芯 斜芯褉褜斜械 写芯斜褉邪 褋芯 蟹谢芯屑. 袛芯斜褉邪 蟹写械褋褜, 泻 褋芯卸邪谢械薪懈褞, 薪邪屑薪芯谐芯 屑械薪褜褕械. 袟懈屑斜邪褉写芯 胁芯蟹胁褉邪褖邪械褌褋褟 泻 褋胁芯械屑褍 蟹薪邪屑械薪懈褌芯屑褍 小褌褝薪褎芯褉写褋泻芯屑褍 褌褞褉械屑薪芯屑褍 褝泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌褍, 芯褌泻褍写邪 斜械褉褍褌 薪邪褔邪谢芯 械谐芯 懈褋褋谢械写芯胁邪薪懈褟 锌褉懈褉芯写褘 褔械谢芯胁械褔械褋泻芯谐芯 蟹谢邪. 袩褉邪胁写邪, 胁 泻芯薪褑械 泻薪懈谐懈 械谐芯 锌褉芯谐褉邪屑屑邪 芯 褋芯锌褉芯褌懈胁谢械薪懈懈 薪械卸械谢邪褌械谢褜薪褘屑 胁谢懈褟薪懈褟屑 蟹胁褍褔懈褌 芯斜薪邪写械卸懈胁邪褞褖械 懈 胁锌芯谢薪械 褍胁械褉械薪薪芯.
740 pages, Hardcover
First published April 17, 2007
4212 people are currently reading
174160 people want to read
About the author
Philip G. Zimbardo
130听books896听followersPhilip George Zimbardo was an American psychologist and a professor emeritus at Stanford University. He became known for his 1971 Stanford prison experiment, which was later criticized severely for both ethical and scientific reasons. He authored various introductory psychology textbooks for college students, and other notable works, including The Lucifer Effect, The Time Paradox, and The Time Cure. He was also the initiator and president of the Heroic Imagination Project.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,451 reviews
September 3, 2008
Philip Zimbardo鈥檚 The Lucifer Effect is a difficult read, not because its premise is particularly startling, but because its examination of the psychology of evil shows it to be disturbingly simple. By placing each act of breathtaking cruelty beside a description of its perpetrator--invariably an ordinary, psychologically normal person--Zimbardo makes clear that we are just animals socialized into one behavior, and easily socialized into another. And though he never outright asks it, every page of his book prompts the impossible question: What kind of monster are you?
Zimbardo spends nearly 500 pages supporting an argument that鈥檚 convincing by page two: Situations entice people to commit heroic acts and unspeakable atrocities alike. With little provocation, formerly good people will discard their values entirely. Some of the examples were new to me, such as Pauline, a women鈥檚 empowerment lecturer in Rwanda who ordered the genocidaires under her charge, 鈥淏efore you kill the women, you need to rape them.鈥� Other examples are well known--millions of World War II-era Europeans turned on their Jewish neighbors, the horrifying Rape of Nanjing, and many more.
And while the author tries time and again to complicate his argument, to mitigate the bleakness of his premise, those attempts feel insufficient. He assures readers that--although social systems seize control of our ethics, elicit our worst selves, and punish those who refuse to comply--people can still be dissuaded from committing atrocities. We can learn to resist grotesque situational pressures by simply applying Zimbardo's handy maxims: 鈥淚 respect just authority but rebel against unjust authority,鈥� 鈥淚 want group acceptance, but value my independence,鈥� 鈥淚 will assert my unique identity,鈥� etc.
But, in fact, Zimbardo鈥檚 sociological studies and historical survey offer ample evidence that people who defy the demands of the societal machine are rare, and that they are mostly punished for their moral courage. American serviceman Hugh Thompson stopped the My Lai massacre by aiming machine guns at his superiors and ordered medical evacuations of wounded Vietnamese civilians--and as 鈥減unishment was required to fly the most dangerous helicopter missions again and again. He was shot down five times, breaking his backbone and suffering lasting psychological scars from his nightmare experience. It took thirty years before the military recognized his heroic deeds鈥� Paradoxically, Lieutenant Calley (an orchestrator of the massacre) was treated as a hero.鈥�
Certainly people are to blame for the moral crimes they commit, and yet it seems somehow flippant to assume that all people can avoid the blameworthy road, that all people are capable of risking hardship or death to resist descending into evil--especially when submitting to situational demands is the psychologically normal (and perhaps healthy) thing to do. The stronger and sadder argument, the one that Zimbardo tries to avoid making, is the one his own research supports: Most of us are available for total moral conquest by our bosses, parents, peers, and government, irredeemably adrift on currents much stronger than ourselves.
Zimbardo spends nearly 500 pages supporting an argument that鈥檚 convincing by page two: Situations entice people to commit heroic acts and unspeakable atrocities alike. With little provocation, formerly good people will discard their values entirely. Some of the examples were new to me, such as Pauline, a women鈥檚 empowerment lecturer in Rwanda who ordered the genocidaires under her charge, 鈥淏efore you kill the women, you need to rape them.鈥� Other examples are well known--millions of World War II-era Europeans turned on their Jewish neighbors, the horrifying Rape of Nanjing, and many more.
And while the author tries time and again to complicate his argument, to mitigate the bleakness of his premise, those attempts feel insufficient. He assures readers that--although social systems seize control of our ethics, elicit our worst selves, and punish those who refuse to comply--people can still be dissuaded from committing atrocities. We can learn to resist grotesque situational pressures by simply applying Zimbardo's handy maxims: 鈥淚 respect just authority but rebel against unjust authority,鈥� 鈥淚 want group acceptance, but value my independence,鈥� 鈥淚 will assert my unique identity,鈥� etc.
But, in fact, Zimbardo鈥檚 sociological studies and historical survey offer ample evidence that people who defy the demands of the societal machine are rare, and that they are mostly punished for their moral courage. American serviceman Hugh Thompson stopped the My Lai massacre by aiming machine guns at his superiors and ordered medical evacuations of wounded Vietnamese civilians--and as 鈥減unishment was required to fly the most dangerous helicopter missions again and again. He was shot down five times, breaking his backbone and suffering lasting psychological scars from his nightmare experience. It took thirty years before the military recognized his heroic deeds鈥� Paradoxically, Lieutenant Calley (an orchestrator of the massacre) was treated as a hero.鈥�
Certainly people are to blame for the moral crimes they commit, and yet it seems somehow flippant to assume that all people can avoid the blameworthy road, that all people are capable of risking hardship or death to resist descending into evil--especially when submitting to situational demands is the psychologically normal (and perhaps healthy) thing to do. The stronger and sadder argument, the one that Zimbardo tries to avoid making, is the one his own research supports: Most of us are available for total moral conquest by our bosses, parents, peers, and government, irredeemably adrift on currents much stronger than ourselves.
November 15, 2007
I was excited to read this, since I have a psychology background and had heard that it was a good look at the Stanford Prison Experiment, which I studied in college. I wasn't too impressed with this book though. It is at least 100 pages too long and bogged down by excessive detail, making it read like a numbing textbook. The breakdown is as follows: 200 pages on Zimbardo's Prison Experiment, 100 pages of analysis of the experiment, 75 pages on Abu Ghraib, 75 pages about the Bush administration's culpability, 50 pages on factors for improvement, 25 pages on heroism, and 50 pages of footnotes. The author did not attempt to eliminate his personal biases (even embracing them, calling himself a "bleeding heart liberal" at one point), which really bothered me, since the book was presented as an unbiased view of social behavior as it relates to situational forces. The subject WAS very interesting, but I'd recommend it to a limited audience - those who are schooled in social psychology and/or prison societies, who are comfortable diving into scientific literature, and who won't mind the liberal spin that Zimbardo includes.
October 28, 2017
Zimbardo fucked up, BIG TIME.
During the "Stanford Prison Experiment," an experiment he created, he was part of the actual testing and also became victim to the traps the other participants fell into.
The idea was to separate the participants into two groups, guards and prisoners with Zimbardo taking the role of prison overseer in a monitored environment. But things quickly went from weird to damn right unethical. Instead of simply playing the roles assigned to them, everybody involved actually became the roles. The guards became violent, the prisoners became unhinged and unstable and Zimbardo himself became rather tyrannical and uncaring. The experiment would have continued if his girlfriend, at the time, didn鈥檛 break through to him and show him how messed up things were.
It almost erupted
"The most apparent thing that I noticed was how most of the people in this study derive their sense of identity and well-being from their immediate surroundings rather than from within themselves, and that's why they broke down鈥攋ust couldn't stand the pressure鈥攖hey had nothing within them to hold up against all of this.鈥�
Zimbardo is rather embarrassed at his own part, understandably. But he still used the findings of the experiment to theorise why it actually happened and considered how normal people can become violent and evil so quickly. It鈥檚 all about situational factors and conformity. The men adapted to their roles all too quickly and the power given to the guards was theirs to exploit at their own will. The separation of men into two factions also helped to evoke as dangerous 鈥渦s鈥� and 鈥渢hem鈥� attitude allowing for an unsympathetic approach to others.
The Lucifer Effect discusses the psychology of roles we take on when forced into power struggles. It鈥檚 a strong piece of research, and Zimbardo theorises quite heavily. His assumptions on his own experiments are grounded, though he takes them much further afield and considers many violent prisons. As logical as some of his argument are, at this stage they are only arguments rather than findings. I much preferred the first section of the book, the part about his research, rather than his speculations on situations with seperate cultural and social factors.
What The Lucifer Effect shows us though is the dangers of conformity and where it can lead us. Social conditioning plays a huge part in our cognitive makeup, a part we鈥檙e not always aware of until it鈥檚 too late. I really appreciated the author鈥檚 honesty; it must have been hard to write a book about one鈥檚 own short comings.
During the "Stanford Prison Experiment," an experiment he created, he was part of the actual testing and also became victim to the traps the other participants fell into.
The idea was to separate the participants into two groups, guards and prisoners with Zimbardo taking the role of prison overseer in a monitored environment. But things quickly went from weird to damn right unethical. Instead of simply playing the roles assigned to them, everybody involved actually became the roles. The guards became violent, the prisoners became unhinged and unstable and Zimbardo himself became rather tyrannical and uncaring. The experiment would have continued if his girlfriend, at the time, didn鈥檛 break through to him and show him how messed up things were.
It almost erupted
"The most apparent thing that I noticed was how most of the people in this study derive their sense of identity and well-being from their immediate surroundings rather than from within themselves, and that's why they broke down鈥攋ust couldn't stand the pressure鈥攖hey had nothing within them to hold up against all of this.鈥�
Zimbardo is rather embarrassed at his own part, understandably. But he still used the findings of the experiment to theorise why it actually happened and considered how normal people can become violent and evil so quickly. It鈥檚 all about situational factors and conformity. The men adapted to their roles all too quickly and the power given to the guards was theirs to exploit at their own will. The separation of men into two factions also helped to evoke as dangerous 鈥渦s鈥� and 鈥渢hem鈥� attitude allowing for an unsympathetic approach to others.
The Lucifer Effect discusses the psychology of roles we take on when forced into power struggles. It鈥檚 a strong piece of research, and Zimbardo theorises quite heavily. His assumptions on his own experiments are grounded, though he takes them much further afield and considers many violent prisons. As logical as some of his argument are, at this stage they are only arguments rather than findings. I much preferred the first section of the book, the part about his research, rather than his speculations on situations with seperate cultural and social factors.
What The Lucifer Effect shows us though is the dangers of conformity and where it can lead us. Social conditioning plays a huge part in our cognitive makeup, a part we鈥檙e not always aware of until it鈥檚 too late. I really appreciated the author鈥檚 honesty; it must have been hard to write a book about one鈥檚 own short comings.
May 10, 2008
I, after a couple of weeks, have finally finished 鈥淭he Lucifer Effect.鈥� I normally don鈥檛 dog ear books because, well, that鈥檚 almost sacrilegious, but there were points that I knew I wanted to come back to. Like this one which really came out there unexpectedly, and had me laughing so hard.
After asking what his parents do, his religious background, and whether he goes to church regularly, Prescott is angered by the prisoner鈥檚 statement this his religion is 鈥渘ondenominational. He retorts, 鈥淵ou haven鈥檛 even decided about something as important as that either.鈥�
The guy was so angry that he then had to step out of the room and let the board continue the 鈥減arole hearing.鈥� Wow.
Then there was this little tidbit about the lessons learned when a normally powerless person is given power: this is the transformation.
Admire power, detest weakness. Dominate, don鈥檛 negotiate. Hit first when they turn the other cheek. The golden rule is for them, not for us. Authority rules, rules are authority.
The sum of the whole: Systems create these Situations that then once submerged into them; ordinary 鈥済ood鈥� people would do things that are categorically 鈥渆vil.鈥�
Once a person is put into a set 鈥渟ituation鈥� created by this 鈥渟ystem鈥� they emerge from it not able recognize who they are; they are not going to be the same person. This is why surprise, surprise the people, who committed those 鈥測ou can not believe they did that鈥� acts against prisoners at Abu Ghraib, while responsible for their actions, aren鈥檛 solely to blame.
The entire portion of the book accounting the Horrors of Abu Ghraib was unbelievably fascinating. It really gave you a complete view of what happened from the bottom up. Riveting read I must say.
The only down side, obviously this book is a bit wordy. There were times when I put the book down and didn鈥檛 bother with it for days on end. I know that some people just skipped to the "good stuff," but I stuck it out, having read the whole thing. I鈥檓 glad that I did, because of the social implications and discoveries that you get from these chapters of basic 鈥渟etup鈥� or 鈥減remise,鈥� it really gives you a more in depth understanding of what happens later in the book.
Very interesting read although a bit tough at times.
After asking what his parents do, his religious background, and whether he goes to church regularly, Prescott is angered by the prisoner鈥檚 statement this his religion is 鈥渘ondenominational. He retorts, 鈥淵ou haven鈥檛 even decided about something as important as that either.鈥�
The guy was so angry that he then had to step out of the room and let the board continue the 鈥減arole hearing.鈥� Wow.
Then there was this little tidbit about the lessons learned when a normally powerless person is given power: this is the transformation.
Admire power, detest weakness. Dominate, don鈥檛 negotiate. Hit first when they turn the other cheek. The golden rule is for them, not for us. Authority rules, rules are authority.
The sum of the whole: Systems create these Situations that then once submerged into them; ordinary 鈥済ood鈥� people would do things that are categorically 鈥渆vil.鈥�
Once a person is put into a set 鈥渟ituation鈥� created by this 鈥渟ystem鈥� they emerge from it not able recognize who they are; they are not going to be the same person. This is why surprise, surprise the people, who committed those 鈥測ou can not believe they did that鈥� acts against prisoners at Abu Ghraib, while responsible for their actions, aren鈥檛 solely to blame.
The entire portion of the book accounting the Horrors of Abu Ghraib was unbelievably fascinating. It really gave you a complete view of what happened from the bottom up. Riveting read I must say.
The only down side, obviously this book is a bit wordy. There were times when I put the book down and didn鈥檛 bother with it for days on end. I know that some people just skipped to the "good stuff," but I stuck it out, having read the whole thing. I鈥檓 glad that I did, because of the social implications and discoveries that you get from these chapters of basic 鈥渟etup鈥� or 鈥減remise,鈥� it really gives you a more in depth understanding of what happens later in the book.
Very interesting read although a bit tough at times.
December 17, 2007
Well, interesting title and interesting subject, but I highly doubt his hypothesis. This book was borne out of Philip Zimbardo's work with a U.S. army soldier, who was one of the prison guards at Abu Ghraib in Iraq. Zimbardo is also the one who ran the infamous Stanford Prison Experiment in the 1970s. Basically, his premise in this book is that circumstances shape the individual, and our actions can be molded by the circumstances that we are in. E.g., it was the duress and egregious circumstances suffered by the participants in the Stanford Prison Experiment and at Abu Ghraib that led them to commit such heinous acts. However, he leaves many questions unanswered. What is it within us that CAUSES us to respond to circumstances in that negative fashion, as opposed to the other way around? He attempts to explain evil with the circumstantial and phenomenological--utterly insufficient and unsophisticated at best. It's interesting, but naive. Forgettable really, even as a psychological resource. I heard him speak at the 2007 APA Convention in San Francisco--forgettable as well except for Hollywood-style theatrics to illustrate his point. As one who provides therapy to Iraq veterans myself, there is much more to the roots of human evil than, "My circumstances made me do it." Want a better resource? Read "The Problem of Pain" by C.S. Lewis. Much more worth your time.
December 26, 2013
This book should be called "The Stanford Prison Experiment and Other Things Regarding How Good People Turn Evil". The first 200 or so pages are about The Stanford Prison Experiment (1971 study involving the psychological effects of prisoners and prison guards). If you took Psychology 101 or 102 in college you more than likely read about it. Anyway, once I reached page 113 I was really wishing for a new topic, but no, it kept going and going--repeating the same subject matter and psychological findings of the Stanford study. Once I saw the light and new subject was finally presented (maybe around page 236) I was pretty burnt out and at that point, I didn't care anymore. I read the rest of the 300 or so pages, however I can't recall anything that I read and I don't care. Pros: Cool title, interesting topic, interesting experiment. Cons: 480 pages too long, not enough about Lucifer.
October 29, 2016
As a huge psych nerd I was really happy to stumble across this book in the local library. For those who don't know and/or have forgotten psyc101 Zimbardo is the professor behind the infamous Stanford Prison Experiment. The seminal experiment where (Spoiler alert I guess) where ordinary young men were put in a simulated prison situation (randomly assigned to prisoners and guards, mind) and the whole thing had to be shut down before the week ended due to inhumane abuse and practices.
The Lucifer Effect is the first time Zimbardo has opened up with a first hand account of the whole experiment which is equal parts intriguing and horrifying. The majority of the first part of the book (and the books as a whole) is devoted to the experiment, and while I found it enthralling I suspect anyone looking for more pop psychology would find the section very heavy given its a blow-by-blow analysis of the experiment. The most twisting thing about it is hearing how sucked into the role Zimbardo himself got and how far it all had to go before it stopped.
The central section covers broader literature on conformity, explaining how human beings can be heavily influenced to do evil by their situations, systems and roles. This section was really interesting and well presented, being quite short and sweet comparatively, reviewing studies such as what could be called the Prison study's sister experiment the Milgrim Shock experiments and Asch's original social conformity papers.
The penultimate section deals with Zimbardo's experience with the Abu Gharib prison. This section is by far the most horrifying and challenging to read, as Zimbardo describes and analyzes the military prison run in the heart of Iraq. I suspect many would find this section grueling and difficult to read but ultimately the lessons learned are important ones.
Finally Zimbardo concludes with advice on heroism and resisting systematic and situational pressure to do wrong. I found this section hit and miss. Providing advice for resisting situational pressure was invaluable, the sections theorizing on the make-up of heroes was a little idealistic and theoretical compared to the robustly conceptualized other sections.
In total Lucifer Effect is a scary but valuable read, at around 500 pages with heavy material it is not for the faint of heart, but I am really glad Dr Zimbardo shared his story and knowledge his insights and knowledge cannot be overvalued.
The Lucifer Effect is the first time Zimbardo has opened up with a first hand account of the whole experiment which is equal parts intriguing and horrifying. The majority of the first part of the book (and the books as a whole) is devoted to the experiment, and while I found it enthralling I suspect anyone looking for more pop psychology would find the section very heavy given its a blow-by-blow analysis of the experiment. The most twisting thing about it is hearing how sucked into the role Zimbardo himself got and how far it all had to go before it stopped.
The central section covers broader literature on conformity, explaining how human beings can be heavily influenced to do evil by their situations, systems and roles. This section was really interesting and well presented, being quite short and sweet comparatively, reviewing studies such as what could be called the Prison study's sister experiment the Milgrim Shock experiments and Asch's original social conformity papers.
The penultimate section deals with Zimbardo's experience with the Abu Gharib prison. This section is by far the most horrifying and challenging to read, as Zimbardo describes and analyzes the military prison run in the heart of Iraq. I suspect many would find this section grueling and difficult to read but ultimately the lessons learned are important ones.
Finally Zimbardo concludes with advice on heroism and resisting systematic and situational pressure to do wrong. I found this section hit and miss. Providing advice for resisting situational pressure was invaluable, the sections theorizing on the make-up of heroes was a little idealistic and theoretical compared to the robustly conceptualized other sections.
In total Lucifer Effect is a scary but valuable read, at around 500 pages with heavy material it is not for the faint of heart, but I am really glad Dr Zimbardo shared his story and knowledge his insights and knowledge cannot be overvalued.
February 16, 2010
Well, I need to state my prejudices upfront. I'm kind of a secret fan of Doctor Zimbardo. See, I guess at some point he put together some kind of massive 26-episode series of half-hour lectures on how the mind works for public TV. They would come on at some ungodly hour of the morning so that I used to catch them while scarfing down my nutritious Lucky Charms and locally squozen OJ before leaving for work. Doctor Z would introduce each episode with a kind of geekish seriousness of purpose that one totally had to respect. Plus he would always be wearing some seriously appalling fashion atrocity - most commonly a truly regrettable sports jacket or shirt. But some episodes he'd get those down only to spoil the effect with some kind of hypnotically iridescent tie whose width was at least a decade off the prevailing norm.
But the programs were not actually an insult to the intelligence, for the most part - the material was decently organized, lucidly presented, with a minimum of pomposity. If I'm not mistaken, in recent months Doctor Z has resurfaced on my public TV dial with a fresh, updated, completely revamped version of the lectures. One imagines lots of snazzy functional mRI s**t.
But of course that's not Doctor Z's only claim to fame. It's a safe bet the first few sentences of his obituary will define him in terms of the (infamous) "Stanford Prison study". In the early 1960s Stanley Milgram had shocked the scientific community with his series of "obedience experiments" that showed how an apparently strongly hardwired obedience to authority could lead people to commit barbaric acts of cruelty (). A decade later Zimbardo eliminated any possible doubt when a simulated "prison experiment" he was conducting on the Stanford campus had to be discontinued early for ethical reasons because the behavior of the participating students had degenerated into "Lord of the Flies" savagery within a period of only 4 days.
The first 200 pages of this book are given over to a description of the infamous Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE). The middle third covers lessons learned from SPE and summarizes other experimental work related to the problem of people behaving badly. The final 200 pages discusses events at the Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad, as well as other excesses of the Bush administration in terms of what has been learned about human behavior from the SPE and similar experiments.
To me, it's this final part of the book that is the most interesting. The initial material is readable enough, but seems way over-extended. I suspect that very few people (or the kind of people reading this book) are unaware of the SPE, so summarizing the main findings in 20-30 pages should have been possible, instead of the 200-page account which helps inflate "The Lucifer Effect" to a bloated 550 pages.
That said, I remain a fan of Doctor Zimbardo. Even if the book is a little too long, he is always clear. And though what he has to say can be depressing, it's clearly not wrong. Understanding our own weaknesses and the factors that can allow cruelty and evil to flourish seems more important than ever these days. This is a good book.
But the programs were not actually an insult to the intelligence, for the most part - the material was decently organized, lucidly presented, with a minimum of pomposity. If I'm not mistaken, in recent months Doctor Z has resurfaced on my public TV dial with a fresh, updated, completely revamped version of the lectures. One imagines lots of snazzy functional mRI s**t.
But of course that's not Doctor Z's only claim to fame. It's a safe bet the first few sentences of his obituary will define him in terms of the (infamous) "Stanford Prison study". In the early 1960s Stanley Milgram had shocked the scientific community with his series of "obedience experiments" that showed how an apparently strongly hardwired obedience to authority could lead people to commit barbaric acts of cruelty (). A decade later Zimbardo eliminated any possible doubt when a simulated "prison experiment" he was conducting on the Stanford campus had to be discontinued early for ethical reasons because the behavior of the participating students had degenerated into "Lord of the Flies" savagery within a period of only 4 days.
The first 200 pages of this book are given over to a description of the infamous Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE). The middle third covers lessons learned from SPE and summarizes other experimental work related to the problem of people behaving badly. The final 200 pages discusses events at the Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad, as well as other excesses of the Bush administration in terms of what has been learned about human behavior from the SPE and similar experiments.
To me, it's this final part of the book that is the most interesting. The initial material is readable enough, but seems way over-extended. I suspect that very few people (or the kind of people reading this book) are unaware of the SPE, so summarizing the main findings in 20-30 pages should have been possible, instead of the 200-page account which helps inflate "The Lucifer Effect" to a bloated 550 pages.
That said, I remain a fan of Doctor Zimbardo. Even if the book is a little too long, he is always clear. And though what he has to say can be depressing, it's clearly not wrong. Understanding our own weaknesses and the factors that can allow cruelty and evil to flourish seems more important than ever these days. This is a good book.
March 23, 2025
( 鬲亘丿兀 丕賱兀賮毓丕賱 丕賱卮乇賷乇丞 丕賱噩賻爻賷賲丞 亘禺胤賵丕鬲 氐睾賷乇丞貙 乇亘賲丕 亘丿鬲 鬲丕賮賴丞貙 賱賰賳 鬲匕賰乇 兀賳 丕賱卮乇 賲賳丨丿乇 夭賱賯貙 賲丕 廿賳 鬲鬲禺匕 賮賷賴 禺胤賵丕鬲賰 丕賱兀賵賱賶 丨鬲賶 鬲賴賵賷貙 賵鬲氐亘丨 賲丿丕禺賱 廿賱賶 爻賯胤丕鬲 兀禺賱丕賯賷丞 兀賰孬乇 禺胤賵乇丞 )
毓賳賵丕賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賯丿 賷購賵賴賲賰 兀賳賴 賷鬲丨丿孬 毓賳 丿賵乇 丕賱卮賷胤丕賳 丕賱廿睾賵丕卅賷 賰賲丕 賳賮賴賲賴 賮賷 孬賯丕賮鬲賳丕 丕賱廿爻賱丕賲賷丞貙 賵賱賰賳 毓賳賵丕賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 丕賱丕氐賱賷 " The Lucifer effect " 兀賷 鬲兀孬賷乇 賱賵爻賮賷乇貙 賵賴賵 賲氐胤賱丨 爻賰賾賴 丕賱賲丐賱賮 賱賷丿賱 毓賱賶 賳馗乇賷鬲賴 賮賷 鬲賮爻賷乇 丕賱鬲丨賵賱 賲賳 丕賱禺賷乇 廿賱賶 丕賱卮乇貙 賵賷丿賵乇 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 丨賵賱 賲賵囟賵毓賷賳:
鈻� 鬲噩乇亘丞 爻噩賳 爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿 毓丕賲 佟侃侑佟賲
鬲噩乇亘丞 賯丕賲 亘賴丕 丕賱賲丐賱賮 賮賷 賲胤賱毓 丕賱爻亘毓賷賳賷丕鬲貙 賵賴賷 鬲噩乇亘丞 賲丨丕賰丕丞 賱丿乇丕爻丞 鬲兀孬賷乇 丕賱爻噩賳 毓賱賶 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賵丕賱丨乇丕爻貙 賵賯丿 賯丕賲 丕賱賲丐賱賮 亘爻乇丿 丕賱鬲賮丕氐賷賱 丨賵賱 鬲噩乇亘鬲賴貙 賵丕賱丿乇賵爻 丕賱鬲賷 丕爻鬲禺賱丕氐賴丕 賲賳賴丕.
丕毓鬲賲丿 賮賷 鬲噩乇亘鬲賴 毓賱賶 賵囟毓 胤賱亘丞 噩丕賲毓賷賵賳貙 氐丕賱丨賵賳貙 賵兀氐丨丕亍 賮賷 賵囟毓 賮丕爻丿 賱賷乇賶 賱賲賳 爻鬲賰賵賳 丕賱睾賱亘丞.
賯爻賲 賴丐賱丕亍 丕賱胤賱亘丞 賱賲噩賲賵毓鬲賷賳 - 爻噩賳丕亍 賵丨乇丕爻 - 亘胤乇賷賯丞 毓卮賵丕卅賷丞 .. 賮賷 亘丿丕賷丞 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 賱賲 鬲賰賳 孬賲丞 賮賵丕乇賯 亘賷賳 丕賱賲噩賲賵毓鬲賷賳貙 賵亘毓丿 兀賯賱 賲賳 兀爻亘賵毓 賱賲 賷毓丿 孬賲丞 鬲卮丕亘賴 亘賷賳賴賲丕貙 鬲丨賵賱 亘毓囟 丕賱丨乇丕爻 廿賱賶 賲乇鬲賰亘賷賳 賱賱卮乇賵乇 賵丕賱亘毓囟 丕賱丌禺乇 兀氐亘丨 賲爻丕賴賲丕賸 爻賱亘賷丕賸 亘丕賱鬲賯丕毓氐 毓賳 廿賷賯丕賮 賲丕 賷丨丿孬貙 賵丕賳賴丕乇 賮鬲賷丞 賲賳 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍貙 亘賷賳賲丕 兀氐亘丨 丕賱亘丕賯賵賳 賮賷 睾丕賷丞 丕賱廿匕毓丕賳 賱賲胤丕賱亘 丕賱丨乇丕爻 鬲賲丕賲丕賸 賰丕賱夭賵賲亘賷 賮賷 丨乇賰丕鬲賴賲 賲爻賱賵亘丞 丕賱廿乇丕丿丞貙 賵賮賷 禺囟賵毓賴賲 賱賳夭賵丕鬲 丕賱丨乇丕爻 丕賱賲鬲爻賱胤賷賳 丕賱賲鬲夭丕賷丿丞貙 賵賱匕丕 賰丕賳 賲賳 丕賱賲賳胤賯賷 丕爻鬲賳鬲丕噩 兀賳 丕賱丕毓鬲賱丕賱丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 馗賴乇鬲 賰丕賳鬲 亘爻亘亘 賲噩賲賵毓丞 賲賳 丕賱賲丐孬乇丕鬲 丕賱馗乇賮賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 賰丕賳賵丕 毓賱賶 鬲賲丕爻 賲毓賴丕 亘卮賰賱 賲鬲賵丕氐賱 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賲賰丕賳 丕賱卮亘賷賴 亘丕賱爻噩賵賳.
賵亘賴匕賴 丕賱賳鬲賷噩丞 毓丕乇囟 丕賱亘丕丨孬 丕賱鬲丨賱賷賱丕鬲 丕賱鬲賯賱賷丿賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷賯丿賲賴丕 賲毓馗賲 丕賱賳丕爻貙 賵丕賱鬲賶 鬲乇賰夭 毓賱賶 丕賱賮丕毓賱 亘丕毓鬲亘丕乇 兀賳賴 丕賱毓丕賲賱 丕賱爻亘亘賷 丕賱賵丨賷丿貙 賵賷賯賱賱賵賳 賲賳 兀賵 賷鬲噩丕賴賱賵賳 鬲兀孬賷乇 丕賱賲鬲睾賷乇丕鬲 丕賱馗乇賮賷丞 賵丕賱賲丨丿丿丕鬲 丕賱賳馗丕賲賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲購卮賰賱 丕賱賲禺乇噩丕鬲 丕賱爻賱賵賰賷丞 賵鬲丿賮毓 廿賱賶 丕賱賵賯賵毓 賮賶 丕賱卮乇貙 賵禺賻賱氐 廿賱賶 兀賳 丕賱鬲兀孬賷乇 丕賱爻丕賲 丕賱賲丨鬲賲賱 賱賱兀賳馗賲丞 賵丕賱馗乇賵賮 丕賱爻賷卅丞 賯丿 賷噩毓賱 丕賱氐丕賱丨賷賳 賷鬲氐乇賮賵賳 毓賱賶 賳丨賵 賲賻乇賻囟賽賷 睾乇賷亘 毓賳 胤亘賷毓鬲賴賲.
鈻� 爻噩賳 兀亘賵 睾乇賷亘 亘丕賱毓乇丕賯 佗贍贍伽賲
賯丕賲 丕賱賲丐賱賮 亘鬲丨賱賷賱 丕賱丕毓鬲丿丕亍丕鬲 賵丕賱丕賳鬲賴丕賰丕鬲 囟丿 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 丕購乇鬲賰亘鬲 囟丿 丕賱賲毓鬲賯賱賷賳 丕賱毓乇丕賯賷賷賳 賮賷 爻噩賳 兀亘賵 睾乇賷亘貙 匕丕賰乇丕賸 賲丕 丕賳鬲賴鬲 廿賱賷賴 丕賱毓丿賷丿 賲賳 丕賱鬲丨賯賷賯丕鬲 丕賱賲爻鬲賯賱丞貙 賵賳丕賯卮 丕賱毓賵丕賲賱 丕賱賳夭賵毓賷丞 - 賵鬲毓賳賶 丕賱賳夭毓丞 丕賱丿丕禺賱賷丞 賱賱廿賳爻丕賳 兀賷 卮禺氐賷鬲賴 賵賲賷賵賱賴 賵賲毓鬲賯丿丕鬲賴 丕賱賲爻賷胤乇丞 毓賱賷賴 - 賵丕賱馗乇賮賷丞 - 丕賱馗乇賵賮 賵丕賱爻賷丕賯丕鬲 丕賱賲丨賷胤丞 亘丕賱賮乇丿 賵丕賱鬲賶 鬲丐孬乇 賮賷 爻賱賵賰賴 - 賵丕賱賳馗丕賲賷丞 -丕賱賳馗賲 丕賱爻賷丕爻賷丞 賵睾賷丕亘 丕賱乇賯丕亘丞 賵廿賴賲丕賱 丕賱乇丐爻丕亍 - 丕賱鬲賷 賯丕丿鬲 丕賱賶 賲丕 丨丿孬 賮賶 賲丨丕賵賱丞 賱賮賴賲 賵鬲賮爻賷乇 賴匕賴 丕賱噩乇丕卅賲貙 賵賰賷賮賷賴 丨丿賵孬賴丕 賲鬲禺匕賴丕 丿賱賷賱 毓賱賶 氐丿賯 丕爻鬲賳鬲丕噩賴 丕賱匕賶 賵氐賱 賱賴 賮賷 鬲噩乇亘丞 爻噩賳 爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿.
銆嬝必呚� 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 乇丕卅毓丞貙 賵丕賱賰鬲丕亘 噩賷丿 賮賷 丕賱胤乇丨 賵廿賳 賰丕賳 賷丐禺匕 毓賱賷賴 亘毓囟 丕賱鬲賰乇丕乇貙 賲丐賱賲 賵氐丕丿賲 賮賷 亘毓囟 兀噩夭丕卅賴貙 賷毓鬲亘乇 亘廿禺鬲氐丕乇 丿毓賵丞 賱賱丕爻鬲賷賯丕馗 賵丕賱鬲禺賱賷 毓賳 丕賱賲賮丕賴賷賲 丕賱爻胤丨賷丞 丨賵賱 丕賱匕丕鬲 丕賱氐丕賱丨丞 丕賱賯丕丿乇丞 毓賱賶 丕賱爻賷胤乇丞 毓賱賶 丕賱賲賵丕賯賮 丕賱賮丕爻丿丞.
毓賳賵丕賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賯丿 賷購賵賴賲賰 兀賳賴 賷鬲丨丿孬 毓賳 丿賵乇 丕賱卮賷胤丕賳 丕賱廿睾賵丕卅賷 賰賲丕 賳賮賴賲賴 賮賷 孬賯丕賮鬲賳丕 丕賱廿爻賱丕賲賷丞貙 賵賱賰賳 毓賳賵丕賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 丕賱丕氐賱賷 " The Lucifer effect " 兀賷 鬲兀孬賷乇 賱賵爻賮賷乇貙 賵賴賵 賲氐胤賱丨 爻賰賾賴 丕賱賲丐賱賮 賱賷丿賱 毓賱賶 賳馗乇賷鬲賴 賮賷 鬲賮爻賷乇 丕賱鬲丨賵賱 賲賳 丕賱禺賷乇 廿賱賶 丕賱卮乇貙 賵賷丿賵乇 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 丨賵賱 賲賵囟賵毓賷賳:
鈻� 鬲噩乇亘丞 爻噩賳 爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿 毓丕賲 佟侃侑佟賲
鬲噩乇亘丞 賯丕賲 亘賴丕 丕賱賲丐賱賮 賮賷 賲胤賱毓 丕賱爻亘毓賷賳賷丕鬲貙 賵賴賷 鬲噩乇亘丞 賲丨丕賰丕丞 賱丿乇丕爻丞 鬲兀孬賷乇 丕賱爻噩賳 毓賱賶 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賵丕賱丨乇丕爻貙 賵賯丿 賯丕賲 丕賱賲丐賱賮 亘爻乇丿 丕賱鬲賮丕氐賷賱 丨賵賱 鬲噩乇亘鬲賴貙 賵丕賱丿乇賵爻 丕賱鬲賷 丕爻鬲禺賱丕氐賴丕 賲賳賴丕.
丕毓鬲賲丿 賮賷 鬲噩乇亘鬲賴 毓賱賶 賵囟毓 胤賱亘丞 噩丕賲毓賷賵賳貙 氐丕賱丨賵賳貙 賵兀氐丨丕亍 賮賷 賵囟毓 賮丕爻丿 賱賷乇賶 賱賲賳 爻鬲賰賵賳 丕賱睾賱亘丞.
賯爻賲 賴丐賱丕亍 丕賱胤賱亘丞 賱賲噩賲賵毓鬲賷賳 - 爻噩賳丕亍 賵丨乇丕爻 - 亘胤乇賷賯丞 毓卮賵丕卅賷丞 .. 賮賷 亘丿丕賷丞 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 賱賲 鬲賰賳 孬賲丞 賮賵丕乇賯 亘賷賳 丕賱賲噩賲賵毓鬲賷賳貙 賵亘毓丿 兀賯賱 賲賳 兀爻亘賵毓 賱賲 賷毓丿 孬賲丞 鬲卮丕亘賴 亘賷賳賴賲丕貙 鬲丨賵賱 亘毓囟 丕賱丨乇丕爻 廿賱賶 賲乇鬲賰亘賷賳 賱賱卮乇賵乇 賵丕賱亘毓囟 丕賱丌禺乇 兀氐亘丨 賲爻丕賴賲丕賸 爻賱亘賷丕賸 亘丕賱鬲賯丕毓氐 毓賳 廿賷賯丕賮 賲丕 賷丨丿孬貙 賵丕賳賴丕乇 賮鬲賷丞 賲賳 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍貙 亘賷賳賲丕 兀氐亘丨 丕賱亘丕賯賵賳 賮賷 睾丕賷丞 丕賱廿匕毓丕賳 賱賲胤丕賱亘 丕賱丨乇丕爻 鬲賲丕賲丕賸 賰丕賱夭賵賲亘賷 賮賷 丨乇賰丕鬲賴賲 賲爻賱賵亘丞 丕賱廿乇丕丿丞貙 賵賮賷 禺囟賵毓賴賲 賱賳夭賵丕鬲 丕賱丨乇丕爻 丕賱賲鬲爻賱胤賷賳 丕賱賲鬲夭丕賷丿丞貙 賵賱匕丕 賰丕賳 賲賳 丕賱賲賳胤賯賷 丕爻鬲賳鬲丕噩 兀賳 丕賱丕毓鬲賱丕賱丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 馗賴乇鬲 賰丕賳鬲 亘爻亘亘 賲噩賲賵毓丞 賲賳 丕賱賲丐孬乇丕鬲 丕賱馗乇賮賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 賰丕賳賵丕 毓賱賶 鬲賲丕爻 賲毓賴丕 亘卮賰賱 賲鬲賵丕氐賱 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賲賰丕賳 丕賱卮亘賷賴 亘丕賱爻噩賵賳.
賵亘賴匕賴 丕賱賳鬲賷噩丞 毓丕乇囟 丕賱亘丕丨孬 丕賱鬲丨賱賷賱丕鬲 丕賱鬲賯賱賷丿賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷賯丿賲賴丕 賲毓馗賲 丕賱賳丕爻貙 賵丕賱鬲賶 鬲乇賰夭 毓賱賶 丕賱賮丕毓賱 亘丕毓鬲亘丕乇 兀賳賴 丕賱毓丕賲賱 丕賱爻亘亘賷 丕賱賵丨賷丿貙 賵賷賯賱賱賵賳 賲賳 兀賵 賷鬲噩丕賴賱賵賳 鬲兀孬賷乇 丕賱賲鬲睾賷乇丕鬲 丕賱馗乇賮賷丞 賵丕賱賲丨丿丿丕鬲 丕賱賳馗丕賲賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲購卮賰賱 丕賱賲禺乇噩丕鬲 丕賱爻賱賵賰賷丞 賵鬲丿賮毓 廿賱賶 丕賱賵賯賵毓 賮賶 丕賱卮乇貙 賵禺賻賱氐 廿賱賶 兀賳 丕賱鬲兀孬賷乇 丕賱爻丕賲 丕賱賲丨鬲賲賱 賱賱兀賳馗賲丞 賵丕賱馗乇賵賮 丕賱爻賷卅丞 賯丿 賷噩毓賱 丕賱氐丕賱丨賷賳 賷鬲氐乇賮賵賳 毓賱賶 賳丨賵 賲賻乇賻囟賽賷 睾乇賷亘 毓賳 胤亘賷毓鬲賴賲.
鈻� 爻噩賳 兀亘賵 睾乇賷亘 亘丕賱毓乇丕賯 佗贍贍伽賲
賯丕賲 丕賱賲丐賱賮 亘鬲丨賱賷賱 丕賱丕毓鬲丿丕亍丕鬲 賵丕賱丕賳鬲賴丕賰丕鬲 囟丿 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 丕購乇鬲賰亘鬲 囟丿 丕賱賲毓鬲賯賱賷賳 丕賱毓乇丕賯賷賷賳 賮賷 爻噩賳 兀亘賵 睾乇賷亘貙 匕丕賰乇丕賸 賲丕 丕賳鬲賴鬲 廿賱賷賴 丕賱毓丿賷丿 賲賳 丕賱鬲丨賯賷賯丕鬲 丕賱賲爻鬲賯賱丞貙 賵賳丕賯卮 丕賱毓賵丕賲賱 丕賱賳夭賵毓賷丞 - 賵鬲毓賳賶 丕賱賳夭毓丞 丕賱丿丕禺賱賷丞 賱賱廿賳爻丕賳 兀賷 卮禺氐賷鬲賴 賵賲賷賵賱賴 賵賲毓鬲賯丿丕鬲賴 丕賱賲爻賷胤乇丞 毓賱賷賴 - 賵丕賱馗乇賮賷丞 - 丕賱馗乇賵賮 賵丕賱爻賷丕賯丕鬲 丕賱賲丨賷胤丞 亘丕賱賮乇丿 賵丕賱鬲賶 鬲丐孬乇 賮賷 爻賱賵賰賴 - 賵丕賱賳馗丕賲賷丞 -丕賱賳馗賲 丕賱爻賷丕爻賷丞 賵睾賷丕亘 丕賱乇賯丕亘丞 賵廿賴賲丕賱 丕賱乇丐爻丕亍 - 丕賱鬲賷 賯丕丿鬲 丕賱賶 賲丕 丨丿孬 賮賶 賲丨丕賵賱丞 賱賮賴賲 賵鬲賮爻賷乇 賴匕賴 丕賱噩乇丕卅賲貙 賵賰賷賮賷賴 丨丿賵孬賴丕 賲鬲禺匕賴丕 丿賱賷賱 毓賱賶 氐丿賯 丕爻鬲賳鬲丕噩賴 丕賱匕賶 賵氐賱 賱賴 賮賷 鬲噩乇亘丞 爻噩賳 爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿.
銆嬝必呚� 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 乇丕卅毓丞貙 賵丕賱賰鬲丕亘 噩賷丿 賮賷 丕賱胤乇丨 賵廿賳 賰丕賳 賷丐禺匕 毓賱賷賴 亘毓囟 丕賱鬲賰乇丕乇貙 賲丐賱賲 賵氐丕丿賲 賮賷 亘毓囟 兀噩夭丕卅賴貙 賷毓鬲亘乇 亘廿禺鬲氐丕乇 丿毓賵丞 賱賱丕爻鬲賷賯丕馗 賵丕賱鬲禺賱賷 毓賳 丕賱賲賮丕賴賷賲 丕賱爻胤丨賷丞 丨賵賱 丕賱匕丕鬲 丕賱氐丕賱丨丞 丕賱賯丕丿乇丞 毓賱賶 丕賱爻賷胤乇丞 毓賱賶 丕賱賲賵丕賯賮 丕賱賮丕爻丿丞.
July 5, 2019
鈥淚 would rather die than to accept being treaded as less
than a human being.鈥� ~~an ex prisoner from a real penitentiary
I have heard of the Stanford Prison Experiment for years, and even just hearing about it was disheartening. Reading the book wass more than disheartening, it was depressing.
It is that I have always tried to understand evil, but I don鈥檛 think we really can in any meaningful way. Perhaps, it is just that it is part of our nature, and yet unlike animals, we appear to be the most vicious of all in the animal kingdom, but also the most loving.
I once thought that religion was the way to compassion, to goodness, but then I saw what it has done to others, how cruel it could be. I thought perhaps Buddhism, with its profession of compassion, was the way, and that meditation developed gooid traits. I was sadly mistaken. I gave up on all religion.
I began reading this book for answers. I found none. I tried reading the book 鈥淏ehave.鈥� It became boring and I couldn鈥檛 see reading more than 800 pages. Evil, it taught, was due to faulty wiring in the brain. Well, yes, for some it is. That has been proven. But what about perfectly good, decent people who are kind towards others until being put in a situation where you are told to be a guard over others? Well, all hell breaks loose. In this Stanford study even a Buddhist who tried to keep his cool, so to speak, broke down. At least he tried, and perhaps that is all we can do.
This study went on in the 70s at Stanford University. One of the psychology professors wanted to do this study and received permission. He found around 20 men who passed his mental health test as well as criminal background tests.
Then he divided them up as guards and prisoners and put them in a prison for the test. All he told the guards was to make the prisoners behave, but at the same time, do not physically harm them.
The experiment lasted 6 days, but it should have been stopped much earlier.
As the days went on the guards became more sadistic, and while there were those who didn鈥檛 wish to harm others, as they days went by, they were slwly giving in in, but in smaller ways.
As a result, the prisoners were dehumanized. Some were breaking down mentally and wanted out, but by then some had forgotten that they could leave anytime, just as those guards had forgotten how to treat others with dignity.
It was almost the same as what is happening at our borders with the men, women, and children in cages. The difference is, the camps at the border are far crueler, the dehumanizing is much worse. If prisoners in the Stanford study broke down after a few days, what is happening to those in the border camps? I have that answer in my mind鈥檚 eye: I see them being raped, beaten, and murdered.
What is happening at the border should be policed, stopped, but by a different group than those who are over them. But the harm is coming from our present government, from a president who says, 鈥淚f they don鈥檛 like how they are being treated, then they should quit coming here.鈥� Yet, the Hispanics have no where else to go. Five countries have been taking them in; they are swamped.
I think Ben Ference who was the prosecutor of the Nuremberg trials said it best, maybe:
鈥淲ar makes murderers out of otherwise decent people.鈥� Well, perhaps, it is more than that. Perhaps, putting a man over another human being while saying that that person is evil, makes murders out of anymore who has the power to kill, and it doesn鈥檛 have to be in a war situation.
This book is acquired reading in psychology classes, but it should be required reading in high school because it should be read by everyone.
March 12, 2019
鈥溬勜� 卮賰 兀賳 賰賱 賵丕丨丿 賲賳丕 賯丿 賷氐賷乇 賵丨卮賸丕貙 賵兀賳 賴匕賴 廿賲賰丕賳賷丞 賰丕賲賳丞鈥�
丕賱賰丕鬲亘 丕賱廿賷胤丕賱賷 亘乇賷賲賵 賱賷賮賷 鬲1987賲 賮賷 賵氐賷鬲賴 丕賱兀禺賷乇丞
鈥⑩赌�
鈥溫ベ� 丕賱噩乇賷賲丞 毓丿賷賲丞 丕賱禺胤乇 丕賱賲爻賲賵丨 亘賴丕貙 賵丕賱賲卮鬲乇賰丞 賲毓 丌禺乇賷賳 賰孬乇貙 賱丕 賷爻鬲胤賷毓 睾丕賱亘賷丞 丕賱亘卮乇 賲賯丕賵賲鬲賴丕鈥�
丕賱乇賵丕卅賷 丕賱兀賱賲丕賳賷 廿賱賷丕爻 賰丕賳鬲賷
鈥⑩赌⑩€�
賮賷 鬲賯丿賷賲 賮賱賷亘 夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵 賱賱胤亘毓丞 丕賱毓乇亘賷丞 賲賳 賰鬲丕亘賴 鈥溫Ｘ娯� 丕賱卮賷胤丕賳鈥� 賷賯賵賱:
芦廿賳 賵丕丨丿丞 賲賳 丕賱兀爻卅賱丞 丕賱鬲賷 賱胤丕賱賲丕 兀賵賯毓鬲賳賷 賮賷 丕賱丨賷乇丞 賲賳匕 胤賮賵賱鬲賷 賴賷 賰賷賮 兀賲賰賳 丨丿賵孬 丕賱賴賵賱賵賰賵爻鬲 賮賷 賲噩鬲賲毓 賲孬賯賮 賵賲鬲丨囟乇 賰賲丕 賰丕賳 毓賱賷賴 丕賱丨丕賱 賮賷 兀賱賲丕賳賷丕 賮賷 孬賱丕孬賷賳賷丕鬲 丕賱賯乇賳 丕賱賲丕囟賷責禄
賱賯丿 兀孬丕乇 丨丿賵孬 丕賱賴賵賱賵賰賵爻鬲/丕賱賲丨乇賯丞 兀爻卅賱丞 賰孬賷乇丞 賮賷 丕賱卮兀賳 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷 毓賲賵賲賸丕貙 賮賱賲 賷賰賳 賲賳 丕賱爻賴賱 毓賱賶 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 丕賱丨丿賷孬 鬲賯亘賱 賵賯賵毓 噩乇賷賲丞 亘賴匕賴 丕賱賮馗丕毓丞 賮賷 賵爻胤 鈥溬呚敦扁€� 賵賮賷 賲噩鬲賲毓 鈥溬呚傌呪€澵� 賵賱匕丕 賮賴賳丕賰 賲賷賵賱 賲爻鬲賲乇丞 賱鬲卮匕賷匕 賲乇鬲賰亘 丕賱噩乇賷賲丞 (噩毓賱賴 卮丕匕賸丕 毓賯賱賷賸丕 兀賵 賳賮爻賷賸丕)貙 賵丕毓鬲亘丕乇賴 禺丕乇噩賸丕 毓賳 丕賱賳爻賯 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷 丕賱爻賵賷賾貙 賵賱匕賱賰 丨賷賳 丕卮鬲賴乇鬲 馗丕賴乇丞 丕賱賯鬲賱丞 丕賱賲鬲爻賱爻賱賷賳 賮賷 丕賱賵賱丕賷丕鬲 丕賱賲鬲丨丿丞 賲賳匕 丕賱爻亘毓賷賳丕鬲 賵賲丕 亘毓丿賴丕 賰丕賳 丕賱乇毓亘 丕賱丨賯賷賯賷 賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱噩乇丕卅賲 賱賷爻 賳丕鬲噩賸丕 毓賳 丕賱賯鬲賱 賮賯胤貙 亘賱 賲丕 鬲賵氐賱鬲 賱賴 丕賱鬲丨賯賷賯丕鬲 賲賳 氐毓賵亘丞 鬲賲賷賷夭 丕賱賲噩乇賲 毓賳 睾賷乇賴 賲賳 丕賱兀爻賵賷丕亍貙 賵賮卮賱 丕賱毓丿賷丿 賲賳 丕賱賳賲丕匕噩 丕賱鬲丨賱賷賱賷丞 賵丕禺鬲亘丕乇丕鬲 丕賱兀噩賴夭丞 丕賱兀賲賳賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲丨丕賵賱 丕賱鬲賳亘丐 賵丕賱鬲賵賯毓 賱爻賱賵賰 丕賱賮丕毓賱 賵丕賰鬲卮丕賮 丕賱賲卮鬲亘賴 亘賴賲 兀孬賳丕亍 丕賱鬲丨賯賷賯丕鬲. 賵鬲鬲賰乇乇 賳賮爻 丕賱賲賷賵賱 毓賳丿 鬲賳丕賵賱 丨賵丕丿孬 丕賱丕睾鬲賷丕賱貙 兀賵 丕賱毓賲賱賷丕鬲 鈥溫з勜ヘ辟囏жㄙ娯┾€澵� 賵噩乇丕卅賲 丕賱丕睾鬲氐丕亘貙 賵賷鬲賮丕賯賲 丕賱兀賲乇 賱賷氐賱 廿賱賶 丨丿 鬲賮爻賷乇 毓賲賵賲 丕賱鬲氐乇賮丕鬲 睾賷乇 丕賱賲賯亘賵賱丞 丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷賸丕 亘丕毓鬲亘丕乇賴 丕囟胤乇丕亘丕鬲 賳賮爻賷丞 兀賵 賳丕鬲噩丞 毓賳 禺賱賱 毓賯賱賷 (丕賱胤亘賷亘 丕賱賳賮爻賷 丕賱兀賲乇賷賰賷 丌賱賳 賮乇丕賳爻賷爻 賷匕賰乇 鈥溫ж簇囏ж� 丕賱賲乇丕賴賯丕鬲 Hebephilia鈥� 賰賳賲賵匕噩 賱匕賱賰貙 賮亘毓丿 兀賳 賰丕賳 爻賳 丕賱亘賱賵睾 賴賵 丕賱毓賲乇 丕賱胤亘賷毓賷 賱賱夭賵丕噩 賮賷 賰賱 賲賰丕賳 賮賷 丕賱毓丕賱賲 鬲賯乇賷亘賸丕貙 兀氐亘丨 丕賱夭賵丕噩 賮賷 爻賳 丕賱亘賱賵睾 丕賱丌賳 噩乇賷賲丞 賮賷 丿賵賱 賰孬賷乇丞).
丕賱賳夭毓丞 賱廿禺囟丕毓 丕賱賵噩賵丿 賵丕賱兀卮賷丕亍 賱賱賳馗丕賲 賵丕賱囟亘胤 賵丕賱鬲丨賰賲 鈥撡堎囐� 賳夭毓丞 丨丿丕孬賷丞 毓賲賷賯丞 賵賲鬲噩匕乇丞- 賱丕 鬲賯亘賱 亘賭鈥澵з勜官嗁�/丕賱卮乇賾鈥� 丕賱胤亘賷毓賷貙 亘賱 鬲賮囟賾賱 禺乇丕賮丞 鈥溫з勜蒂佖� 丕賱亘賷囟丕亍鈥澵� 賮賰賱 廿賳爻丕賳 亘丨爻亘 賴匕賴 丕賱禺乇丕賮丞 丕賱卮丕卅毓丞 賷賵賱丿 賳賯賷賸丕 賳馗賷賮賸丕貙 賵毓賱賶 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 賵丕賱丿賵賱丞 賵丕賱賵丕賱丿賷賳 鬲乇亘賷鬲賴 賵賮賯賸丕 賱賲丕 賴賵 氐丕賱丨 賵賮丕囟賱貙 賵廿賳 賵賯毓鬲 賲賳賴 丕賳丨乇丕賮丕鬲 賮賴賷 鬲毓賵丿 亘丕賱兀爻丕爻 賱廿禺賮丕賯丕鬲 鬲乇亘賵賷丞貙 兀賵 賲卮丕賰賱 胤賮賵賱丞 賲毓賯丿丞貙 兀賵 丕囟胤乇丕亘丕鬲 賳賮爻賷丞 睾賷乇 賲賰鬲卮賮丞貙 兀賵 亘爻亘亘 兀噩賴夭丞 廿毓賱丕賲賷丞 賵兀賱毓丕亘 賮賷丿賷賵 賵兀噩賴夭丞 鬲賯賳賷丞 睾賷乇 禺丕囟毓丞 賱賱乇賯丕亘丞. 賵賴匕賴 丕賱丕爻鬲乇丕鬲賷噩賷丞 丕賱賲囟賲乇丞 賮賷 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱丨丿賷孬 (丕賱賴賵爻 亘丕賱廿丿丕乇丞 賵丕賱鬲丨賰賲) 賴賷 賲丕 賷噩毓賱 鈥溫簇百娯扳€� 丕賱賲噩乇賲 丕賱毓丕丿賷 兀爻賱賵亘賸丕 賲鬲賵賯毓賸丕貙 賱兀賳 賰賱 賴匕賴 丕賱鬲賮爻賷乇丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賳夭毓 丕賱賲爻丐賵賱賷丞 兀賵 鬲禺賮賮賴丕 毓賳 丕賱賮丕毓賱貙 賵鬲乇賮囟 丕賱丕毓鬲乇丕賮 亘毓賲賯 賳賵丕夭毓 丕賱卮乇 丕賱賮胤乇賷丞貙 鬲鬲爻賯 賵鬲賳爻噩賲 賲毓 丕賱鬲氐賵乇 丕賱丨丿丕孬賷 丕賱賷賵鬲賵亘賷 亘賯丕亘賱賷丞 丕賱噩乇賷賲丞 賱賱丕賳賯乇丕囟 廿匕丕 鬲賲賰賳 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 賲賳 鬲丨賯賷賯 丕賱賲夭賷丿 賲賳 丕賱囟亘胤 賵丕賱賳賲賵 賵鈥澵з勜傌呪€� 丕賱兀禺賱丕賯賷貙 兀賵 毓賱賶 丕賱兀賯賱 賯丕亘賱賷鬲賴丕 賱賱鬲丨賰賲 毓亘乇 鬲胤賵賷乇 丕賱丨丕賱丞 丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷丞 賵鬲賴匕賷亘賴丕.
丕賱賲丐乇禺 丕賱兀賱賲丕賳賷 賷賵乇噩 亘丕亘乇賵賮爻賰賷 -丕賱匕賷 毓賲賱 賱兀賰孬乇 賲賳 禺賲爻丞 毓卮乇 爻賳丞 賮賷 丿乇丕爻丞 丕賱爻賷丕爻丕鬲 賵丕賱賮馗丕卅毓 賵丕賱噩乇丕卅賲 丕賱爻鬲丕賱賷賳賷丞- 賷卮賷乇 廿賱賶 兀賳 賮丕毓賱 丕賱噩乇賷賲丞 丨賷賳 賷毓鬲乇賮 亘賴丕 毓賱賳賸丕 賷賯丿賲 丕賱兀爻亘丕亘 丕賱鬲賷 賱丕 鬲爻亘亘 丕賱亘賱亘賱丞 賱丿賶 賲噩鬲賲毓 賲鬲丨囟乇:
鈥溬佡勜� 兀丨丿 賷丨亘 兀賳 賷爻賲毓 兀賳 丕賱噩賳丕丞 毓匕亘賵丕 兀賵 賯鬲賱賵丕 亘丿丕賮毓 丕賱卮毓賵乇 亘丕賱爻毓丕丿丞 兀賵 丕賱賲賱賱 兀賵 賱兀賳賴賲 賱賲 賷鬲賲賰賳賵丕 賲賳 賲賯丕賵賲丞 囟睾胤 丕賱噩賲丕毓丞鈥� 賱丕 賵噩賵丿 賱賱噩賳丕丞 丿賵賳 賲爻丐賵賱賷丞 廿賱丕 賱兀賳 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱賲爻丕賱賲 賱丕 賷爻鬲胤賷毓 丕丨鬲賲丕賱 丕賱噩賳丕丞 丕賱賲爻丐賵賱賷賳 毓賳 兀賮毓丕賱賴賲鈥�.
賵賴匕賴 賴賷 丕賱丕爻鬲乇丕鬲賷噩賷丞 丕賱孬丕賳賷丞貙 賵賴賵 丿丕賮毓 丕賱卮毓賵乇 丕賱兀毓賲賯 亘丕賱兀賲丕賳 賵丕賱丕胤賲卅賳丕賳貙 賮丕賱兀賰孬乇 兀賲丕賳賸丕 兀賳 鬲噩毓賱 丕賱鬲賮噩賷乇 丕賱丕賳鬲丨丕乇賷 賲卮賰賱丞 賳賮爻賷丞貙 賵賱賷爻鬲 毓賲賱賷丞 賲賳馗賲丞 亘賴丿賮 爻賷丕爻賷 賲毓賯賵賱貙 賵兀賳 賲乇鬲賰亘 丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘 賴賵 賲噩乇丿 爻賷賰賵亘丕孬賷 賷毓丕賳賷 賲賳 禺賱賱 匕賴賳賷貙 賵賱賷爻 賰丕卅賳賸丕 毓丕賯賱賸丕 賵賲爻丐賵賱賸丕 賵賷毓鬲賯丿 亘賲卮乇賵毓賷丞 賴匕丕 丕賱毓賲賱 賵乇亘賲丕 賷鬲賮丕禺乇 亘賴貙 賵賱丕 賷禺鬲賱賮 賲賳 丕賱賳丕丨賷丞 丕賱賳賮爻賷丞 賵丕賱毓賯賱賷丞 毓賳 丕賱賰孬賷乇 賲賲賳 鬲毓乇賮賴賲. 賱丕 賷鬲爻丕賲丨 丕賱賳丕爻 -賱丕 爻賷賲丕 賮賷 丕賱亘賱丿丕賳 丕賱丌賲賳丞- 廿夭丕亍 賲賳 賷丨丕賵賱 夭毓夭毓丞 丕毓鬲賯丕丿賴賲 丕賱廿賷噩丕亘賷 毓賲賵賲賸丕 毓賳 賲毓賯賵賱賷丞 丕賱丌丿賲賷 賵毓丿丕賱丞 丕賱毓丕賱賲貙 賰賲丕 賷氐毓亘 毓賱賷賴賲 丕賱賲賵丕賮賯丞 毓賱賶 賰賵賳賴賲 賲毓乇囟賷賳 噩丿賸丕 賮賷 爻賷丕賯丕鬲 賵馗乇賵賮 賲毓賷賳丞 賱賱丕賳禺乇丕胤 賮賷 賮毓賱 丕賱噩乇賷賲丞貙 亘賱 賵丕乇鬲賰丕亘 丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘 丕賱賵丨卮賷 賵丕賱賯鬲賱!
鬲賰丕孬乇鬲 丕賱兀胤乇賵丨丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 鬲丨丕賵賱 鬲賮賳賷丿 賴匕丕 丕賱鬲氐賵乇 丕賱丨丕賱賲 毓賳 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳貙 賵兀毓丕丿鬲 賳馗乇賷丕鬲 賲鬲毓丿丿丞 賮賷 丕賱鬲丕乇賷禺 賵毓賱賵賲 丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓 賵丕賱賳賮爻 胤乇丨 丕賱毓賳賮/丕賱卮乇 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷 賲賳 夭賵丕賷丕 賲禺鬲賱賮丞 兀賰孬乇 鬲乇賰賷亘賸丕貙 賵睾賳賶貙 賵兀毓丕丿鬲 丕賱丕毓鬲亘丕乇 賱丿賵乇 丕賱爻賷丕賯 賵丕賱馗乇賵賮 賵丕賱兀賷丿賷賵賱賵噩賷丕 賵丕賱賳馗丕賲 賵丕賱賲丐爻爻丞 賮賷 丕賳禺乇丕胤 丕賱賮乇丿 賮賷 丕賱卮乇/丕賱毓賳賮. 賮賷 賰鬲丕亘賴丕 (丕賷禺賲丕賳 賮賷 丕賱賯丿爻) 丕賱匕賷 賷丨賰賷 賵賷丨賱賱 賲丨丕賰賲丞 丕丿賵賱賮 丕賷禺賲丕賳 賵賴賵 賲賵馗賮 兀賱賲丕賳賷 亘丕乇夭 卮丕乇賰 賮賷 毓賲賱賷丕鬲 廿亘丕丿丞貙 賵兀禺囟毓 賱賱賲丨丕賰賲丞 賮賷 賲丨賰賲丞 廿爻乇丕卅賷賱賷丞 賲胤賱毓 丕賱爻鬲賷賳丕鬲貙 鬲乇賶 丨賳丕 兀乇賳丿鬲 囟乇賵乇丞 丕賱鬲禺賱賷 毓賳 乇丐賷丞 丕賱兀賮乇丕丿 賲乇鬲賰亘賷 丕賱噩乇賷賲丞 亘丕毓鬲亘丕乇賴賲 丕爻鬲孬賳丕卅賷賷賳 兀賵 賵丨賵卮 賯丕爻賷丞 卮丕匕丞. 賵鬲卮賷乇 廿賱賶 兀賳 丕賷禺賲丕賳 亘丿丕 賮賷 丕賱賲丨丕賰賲丞 卮禺氐賸丕 胤亘賷毓賷賸賾丕 鬲賲丕賲賸丕 賵毓丕丿賷賸賾丕貙 鬲賯賵賱 兀乇賳丿鬲:
芦丨賵丕賱賷 爻鬲丞 毓賱賲丕亍 賳賮爻 兀噩丕夭賵賴 鈥溬冐簇� 胤亘賷毓賷鈥澷€ 鈥溫Ｙ冐� 胤亘賷毓賷丞 賲賳賷 兀賳丕 亘毓丿 兀賳 賮丨氐鬲賴鈥澵� 賯丕賱賴丕 兀丨丿賴賲 賲鬲毓噩亘賸丕貙 賮賷 丨賷賳 賵噩丿 丌禺乇 兀賳 賵囟毓賴 丕賱賳賮爻賷 丕賱毓丕賲貙 賵爻賱賵賰賴 鬲噩丕賴 夭賵噩鬲賴 賵兀胤賮丕賱賴 賵兀賲賴 賵兀亘賷賴 賵廿禺賵鬲賴 賵兀氐丿賯丕卅賴 賰丕賳 鈥溫坟ㄙ娯官娰嬞懾� 亘賱 賵賲乇睾賵亘賸丕鈥溌�.
賵賮賷 丿乇丕爻鬲賴丕 丕賱賴丕賲丞 鈥溫柏з冐必� 丕賱賯賴乇丞鈥� 鬲賯賵賱 丕賱賲禺鬲氐丞 丕賱賳賮爻賷丞 亘爻賲丞 毓亘丿丕賱毓夭賷夭: 芦鬲丐賰丿 丕賱丿乇丕爻丕鬲 兀賳 鬲賲賷賷夭 丕賱賯丕卅賲 亘丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘 毓賳 兀賷 卮禺氐 丌禺乇 兀孬賳丕亍 賲賯丕亘賱丞 毓丕丿賷丞 賱丕 賷亘丿賵 爻賴賱賸丕 兀賵 丨鬲賶 賲賲賰賳賸丕貙 賵賷丐賰丿 丕賱亘丕丨孬賵賳 兀賳 丕毓鬲賯丕丿丕鬲賳丕 鬲氐賵乇丕鬲賳丕 毓賳 丕賱噩賱丕丿 亘丕毓鬲亘丕乇賴 卮禺氐賸丕 賲禺賷賮賸丕 賷鬲爻賲 亘丕賱爻丕丿賷丞 賵丕賳毓丿丕賲 丕賱賲卮丕毓乇 賴賷 毓賱賲賷賸丕 賲丨囟 禺賷丕賱 賱丕 兀爻丕爻 賱賴 賲賳 丕賱氐丨丞貙 賵兀賳 兀賷 卮禺氐 賷亘丿賵 毓丕丿賷賸丕 亘賷賳賳丕 賵睾賷乇 賱丕賮鬲 賱賱賳馗乇 毓賱賶 丕賱廿胤賱丕賯貙 亘丕賱廿賲賰丕賳 兀賳 賷氐亘丨貙 兀賵 兀賳 賷賰賵賳 賮毓賱賷賸丕貙 囟丕賱毓賸丕 賮賷 鬲毓匕賷亘 丌禺乇賷賳禄.
賵鬲賵丕氐賱 亘丕賱賯賵賱:
芦賯丿 賷鬲賾爻賲 亘毓囟 丕賱賯丕卅賲賷賳 亘丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘 亘賰賵賳賴賲 兀賮乇丕丿賸丕 爻購賱胤賵賷賾賷賳貙 賷賰鬲賳賮賴賲 丕賱睾賲賵囟貙 賵賷賲鬲賱賰賵賳 匕賵丕賳賸丕 賲鬲囟禺賲丞貙 亘賱 賵賱丿賷賴賲 卮毓賵乇 夭丕卅丿 亘丕賱毓馗賲丞 賮賷 亘毓囟 丕賱兀丨賷丕賳貙 賱賰賳 丕賱爻賲丞 丕賱兀賰孬乇 鬲賰乇丕乇賸丕 賵孬亘丕鬲賸丕 賵廿孬丕乇丞賸 賱賱丿賴卮丞貙 賵丕賱鬲賷 賷兀鬲賷 匕賰乇賴丕 丿丕卅賲賸丕 賮賷 卮賴丕丿丕鬲 丕賱囟丨丕賷丕 賵賲賱丕丨馗丕鬲 毓賱賲丕亍 丕賱賳賮爻貙 賴賷 兀賳 賴丐賱丕亍 丕賱噩賱丕丿賷賳 賷亘丿賵賳 兀卮禺丕氐賸丕 胤亘賷毓賷賷賳 鬲賲丕賲賸丕貙 亘賱丕 丕賳丨乇丕賮丕鬲 賵丕囟丨丞 賵賱丕 爻賲丕鬲 賳賮爻賷丞 亘丕乇夭丞 鬲賱賮鬲 丕賱兀賳馗丕乇貙 亘賱 廿賳 丕賱賲賮丕賴賷賲 丕賱兀爻丕爻賷丞 丕賱賲購鬲丿丕賵賱丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷賯賵賲 毓賱賷賴丕 毓賱賲 丕賱賳賮爻 丕賱賲乇囟賷貙 鬲馗賴乇 賮卮賱賸丕 匕乇賷毓賸丕 賮賷 鬲毓乇賷賮賴賲 兀賵 鬲賲賷賷夭賴賲貙 兀賵 丨鬲賶 賮賴賲賴賲 亘賵囟賵丨禄.
兀爻鬲丕匕 毓賱賲 丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓 丕賱賲氐乇賷 丕賱賲毓乇賵賮 爻賷丿 毓賵賷爻 賷丨賰賷 賮賷 賲匕賰乇丕鬲賴 毓賳 賱賯丕卅賴 亘丕賱噩賱丕丿 丕賱卮賴賷乇 丨賲夭丞 亘爻賷賵賳賷貙 賵丕賱匕賷 丕卮鬲賴乇 亘賵丨卮賷鬲賴 丕賱賲賮乇胤丞 賮賷 爻噩賵賳 噩賲丕賱 毓亘丿丕賱賳丕氐乇貙 賵丕賱鬲賷 兀卮丕乇 賱亘毓囟賴丕 兀丨賲丿 乇丕卅賮 賮賷 賰鬲丕亘賴 鈥溫з勜ㄙ堌жㄘ� 丕賱爻賵丿丕亍鈥� 兀丨丿 賰賱丕爻賷賰賷丕鬲 兀丿亘 丕賱爻噩賵賳 丕賱毓乇亘賷丞貙 賵賯丿 賰丕賳鬲 賱爻賷丿 毓賵賷爻 毓賱丕賯丞 賯丿賷賲丞 亘丨賲夭丞 亘爻賷賵賳賷貙 賵賱賲丕 毓丕丿 毓賵賷爻 賲賳 丕賱丿乇丕爻丞 賮賷 丕賱賵賱丕賷丕鬲 丕賱賲鬲丨丿丞 丕賱鬲賯賶 亘賴貙 賷賯賵賱 丿.毓賵賷爻:
芦兀匕賰乇 兀賳賳賷 亘胤乇賷賯 丕賱氐丿賮丞 毓乇賮鬲 乇賯賲 丕賱鬲賱賷賮賵賳 丕賱禺丕氐 亘丨賲夭丞 亘爻賷賵賳賷貙 鈥� 賱賯丿 賯丕亘賱鬲 亘毓囟 賲賳 毓匕亘賴賲 賵賱賲 兀賰賳 兀丿賴卮 賮兀賳丕 兀毓乇賮 丕賱乇噩賱鈥� 丕鬲氐賱鬲 亘賴 賮毓賸賱丕 鬲賱賷賮賵賳賷賸丕貙 賵亘丿丕 馗乇賮賴 賵賴賵 賷鬲丨丿孬 賲毓賷 賵賵丕賮賯 毓賱賶 賲賯丕亘賱鬲賷 賮賷 丕賱爻噩賳 丕賱丨乇亘賷貙 賵丨丿丿賳丕 丕賱賲賵毓丿 賱賱賯丕亍貙 賵匕賴亘鬲 廿賱賶 丕賱賲賵毓丿 丕賱賲丨丿丿. 賰丕賳 丕賱丿丕賮毓 廿賱賶 賲賯丕亘賱鬲賴 兀賳 兀乇丕賴 賵兀賳 兀鬲丨丿孬 賲毓賴 賮賯胤貙 賵兀賳 兀匕賰賾乇賴 亘丕賱兀賷丕賲 丕賱賲丕囟賷丞 賱毓賱賷 兀賳 兀毓賱賲 毓賳 卮禺氐賷鬲賴 兀賰孬乇. 賵兀賳賳賷 丕賳鬲馗乇鬲 兀賲丕賲 亘丕亘 丕賱爻噩賳 丕賱丨乇亘賷 賯亘賱 兀賳 賷賮鬲丨 賰孬乇 賲賳 賳氐賮 爻丕毓丞. 賵賰丕賳鬲 丕賱卮賲爻 鬲鬲兀賴亘 賱賱睾乇賵亘. 賵賰丕賳 丕賱夭賲賳 禺乇賷賮丕賸 賮賷 毓丕賲 1960賲 亘毓丿 毓賵丿鬲賷 賲賳 丕賱賵賱丕賷丕鬲 丕賱賲鬲丨丿丞 亘爻賳賵丕鬲. 賵賮噩兀丞 賮鬲丨 丕賱亘丕亘 賵賯丕丿賳賷 兀丨丿 丕賱毓爻丕賰乇 廿賱賶 賲賰鬲亘 丨賲夭丞 丕賱亘爻賷賵賳賷貙 賵賵噩丿鬲賴 噩丕賱爻丕 毓賱賶 兀乇賷賰丞 賵賰丕賳鬲 噩孬鬲賴 賯丿 鬲囟禺賲鬲 賰孬賷乇賸丕貙 賵亘丿丕 賱賷 賵賰兀賳賴 兀丨丿 丕賱賯乇丕氐賳丞 賮賯丿 賰丕賳 賷睾賱賯 廿丨丿賶 毓賷賳賷賴 賵賷賮鬲丨 丕賱兀禺乇賶. 賵鬲兀賰丿鬲 賲匕 丕賱賱丨馗丞 丕賱鬲賷 賵賯賮鬲 賮賷賴丕 毓賱賶 亘丕亘 丕賱爻噩賳 兀賳賳賷 賰賳鬲 賲乇丕賯亘賸丕. 賵賯丕賲 賱賷爻賱賲 毓賱賷 賵胤賱亘 賱賷 賮賳噩丕賳丕賸 賲賳 丕賱卮丕賷. 賵毓賳丿賲丕 噩賱爻鬲 賵噩丿鬲賳賷 兀賳馗乇 廿賱賶 丨賵丕卅胤 丕賱丨噩乇丞 賮廿匕丕 毓賱賷賴丕 氐賵乇丞 噩賲丕賱 毓亘丿 丕賱賳丕氐乇 賵氐賵乇丞 毓亘丿 丕賱丨賰賷賲 毓丕賲乇 賵賱丕賮鬲丕鬲 賮賷賴丕 亘毓囟 丕賱毓亘丕乇丕鬲 丕賱卮丕卅毓丞. 賵賱賲 賷禺賱 丨丕卅胤 賲賳 賱丕賮鬲丞 賲賰鬲賵亘 毓賱賷賴丕 毓亘丕乇丞 賲孬賱 鈥溬娯ж必� 丕爻鬲乇鈥� 賵爻鬲乇賰 賷丕乇亘鈥� 賵 鈥溫з勜池� 賰乇賷賲鈥�. 賵賮賷 兀孬賳丕亍 鬲毓丕胤賷 丕賱卮丕賷 賵賯亘賱 匕賱賰 賰賳丕 賳鬲丨丿孬 賲毓丕賸. 賵賯丿 亘丿兀鬲 丕賱丨丿賷孬貙 兀賵賱丕賸 匕丕賰乇丕賸 賱賴 毓賳 兀丨賵丕賱賷 賵賲丕匕丕 兀毓賲賱 賮賷 丕賱賵賯鬲 丕賱丨丕囟乇. 賵賲丕匕丕 賰賳鬲 兀毓賲賱 賮賷 丕賱賮鬲乇丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲乇賰鬲 賮賷賴丕 賲氐乇賳丕 丕賱禺丕賱丿丞. 賵亘丿兀 賷鬲丨丿孬 丨賲夭丞 丕賱亘爻賷賵賳賷 毓賳丿賲丕 爻兀賱鬲賴 毓賳 夭賵丕噩賴 賲賳 丕賱爻賷丿丞 鈥溫з勝呚操堌┾€� 丕賱鬲賷 賰丕賳 賷乇睾亘 賮賷 夭賵丕噩賴丕 廿匕丕 賲丕 胤賱賯鬲. 賮賯丕賱 廿賳賴 鬲夭賵噩賴丕 賮毓賱丕賸 賵賱賰賳賴 亘毓丿 賮鬲乇丞 胤賱賯賴丕. 賵兀賰丿 賱賷 兀賳賴 賱丕 賷匕賴亘 廿賱賶 賲爻乇丨 賵賱丕 廿賱賶 爻賷賳賲丕. 賵氐乇丨 亘兀賳賴 賲孬賱 丕賱賲毓鬲賯賱賷賳 賮賷 丕賱爻噩賳 賮賴賵 -賮賷 丨賯賷賯丞 丕賱兀賲乇- 賲毓鬲賯賱 兀賷囟丕貙 賵兀乇丕賳賷 爻乇賷乇丕賸 賮賷 丨噩乇丞 噩丕賳亘賷丞 賵匕賰乇 兀賳賴 賱丕 賷亘乇丨 丕賱爻乇賷乇 廿賱丕 廿匕丕 賰丕賳 賴賳丕賰 毓賲賱 賷賯鬲囟賷 賵噩賵丿賴 賮賷 賲賰丕賳 丌禺乇. 賵賯丕賱 賲丐賰丿丕賸 廿賳 賲丕 賮毓賱賴 賱丕 賷賱丕賲 毓賱賷賴貨 賮廿賳賴 廿賳 賱賲 賷賰賳 賯丿 賮毓賱賴 賰丕賳 睾賷乇賴 亘丕賱囟乇賵乇丞 賯丿 賮毓賱賴. 賵爻乇毓丕賳 賲丕 賯賱鬲 賱賴: 廿匕賳 賮兀賳鬲 丕賱丌賳 鬲爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賳 鬲賳丕賲 丿賵賳賲丕 賯賱賯. 賮兀賰丿 毓賱賶 氐丨丞 賯賵賱賷. 賵賰丕賳 賴匕丕 丕賱鬲兀賰賷丿 賷丐賰丿 毓賱賶 兀賳賴 卮禺氐 匕賵 卮禺氐賷丞 爻賷賰賵亘丕鬲賷丞 賷亘乇乇 賰賱 鬲氐乇賮丕鬲賴 賵賱丕 賷賳丿賲 毓賱賶 兀賷 賲賳賴丕貨 賮丕賱賯賷賲 兀賷丞 賯賷賲 賱丕 鬲賯賮 丨丕卅賱丕賸 賮賷 爻亘賷賱 兀賷 毓賲賱 賷賯賵賲 亘賴 賵賱毓賱 賲賳 賷鬲丕丨 賱賴 丕賱丕胤賱丕毓 毓賱賶 賲賱賮 禺丿賲丞 賴匕丕 丕賱胤丕睾賷丞 兀賳 賷噩丿 丕賱賰孬賷乇 丕賱賰孬賷乇 賲賲丕 賷亘乇乇 賴匕丕 丕賱賵氐賮. 賵賴賵 賰卮禺氐 爻賷賰賵亘丕鬲賷 鬲乇丕賴 賰乇賷賲丕賸 匕丕 丕亘鬲爻丕賲丞 噩匕丕亘丞禄. 賵賴賳丕 鬲乇賶 亘賵囟賵丨 賰賷賮 賱賲 賷爻鬲胤毓 丿.毓賵賷爻 鈥撠ㄘ必嘿� 鬲兀賴賷賱賴 丕賱毓賱賲賷- 鬲噩丕賵夭 丕賱鬲賮爻賷乇 丕賱賳夭賵毓賷 賱賮毓賱 亘爻賷賵賳賷貙 賵鬲兀賰賷丿賴 賱賲賷賵賱賴 丕賱爻賷賰賵亘丕孬賷丞.
* * *
兀毓賵丿 亘毓丿 賴匕丕 丕賱丕爻鬲胤乇丕丿 丕賱胤賵賷賱貙 賱賰鬲丕亘 鈥溫Ｘ娯� 丕賱卮賷胤丕賳鈥�. 賷鬲丨丿孬 丕賱賲丐賱賮 賮賷 丕賱亘丿丕賷丞 毓賳 鬲賳賵毓 丕賱鬲賮爻賷乇丕鬲 丕賱賲胤乇賵丨丞 廿夭丕亍 賲卮賰賱丞 丕賱卮乇貙 賵賴賵 賷毓乇賮 丕賱卮乇 賮賷 兀胤乇賵丨鬲賴 亘兀賳賴鈥� 鬲毓賲丿 丕賱鬲氐乇賮 亘胤乇賯 鬲丐匕賷貙 兀賵 鬲毓鬲丿賷 毓賱賶貙 兀賵 鬲丨賯乇貙 兀賵 鬲爻賱亘 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷丞 毓賳 丕賱丌禺乇 丕賱亘乇賷亍 兀賵 鬲丿賲乇賴貙 賵賷賯賵賲 兀賷囟賸丕 毓賱賶 丕爻鬲睾賱丕賱 丕賱賮乇丿 賱氐賱丕丨賷丕鬲賴 賵爻賱胤丕鬲賴 丕賱賳馗丕賲賷丞 賮賷 鬲卮噩賷毓 丕賱丌禺乇賷賳 毓賱賶 匕賱賰 兀賵 賮賷 丕賱爻賲丕丨 賱賴賲 亘丕賱賯賷丕賲 亘賴 賳賷丕亘丞 毓賳賴鈥澵� 賵兀亘乇夭 鬲賱賰 丕賱鬲賮爻賷乇丕鬲:
1- 丕賱乇丐賷丞 丕賱鬲賯賱賷丿賷丞 (賵賴賷 丕賱卮丕卅毓丞 亘賷賳 賲賳 賳卮丐賵丕 賮賷 孬賯丕賮丕鬲 鬲購丐賰丿 毓賱賶 丕賱賮乇丿丕賳賷丞)貙 賵鬲毓鬲賲丿 毓賱賶 鬲丨丿賷丿 丕賱爻賲丕鬲 丕賱卮禺氐賷丞 丕賱賮胤乇賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賯賵丿 廿賱賶 丕賱賮毓賱貙 賲孬賱 丕賱亘賳賷丞 丕賱噩賷賳賷丞貙 賵丕賱爻賲丕鬲 丕賱卮禺氐賷丞貙 賵丕賱卮禺氐賷丞 匕丕鬲賴丕貙 賵丕賱廿乇丕丿丞 丕賱丨乇丞貙 賵亘毓囟 丕賱賳賵丕夭毓 丕賱兀禺乇賶貙 賮賷 丨丕賱丞 丕賱爻賱賵賰 丕賱毓賳賷賮 爻賳亘丨孬 毓賳 賲賷賵賱 爻丕丿賷賾丞貙 ..丕賱禺. 賵鬲爻賲賶 亘丕賱乇丐賷丞 鈥溫з勝嗀操堌官娯┾€� 兀賷 丕賱鬲賷 鬲毓鬲賲丿 毓賱賶 鬲丨賱賷賱 丕賱賳賵丕夭毓 丕賱丿丕禺賱賷丞 賱賱廿賳爻丕賳. 賵賷乇賶 丕賱賲丐賱賮 兀賳 丕賱胤亘賾 丕賱賳賮爻賷 丕賱丨丿賷孬 賳夭賵毓賷賾 丕賱鬲賵噩賴貙 賵賲孬賱賴 毓賱賲 丕賱賳賮爻 丕賱爻乇賷乇賷 賵毓賱賲 賳賮爻 丕賱卮禺氐賷丞 賵丕賱鬲賯賷賷賲. 賵鬲毓鬲賲丿 兀睾賱亘 丕賱賲丐爻爻丕鬲 丕賱睾乇亘賷丞 毓賱賶 賴匕賴 丕賱乇丐賷丞貙 賵賷卮賲賱 匕賱賰 賲丐爻爻丕鬲 丕賱賯丕賳賵賳 賵丕賱胤亘 賵丕賱丿賷賳.
2- 丕賱乇丐賷丞 丕賱馗乇賮賷丞/丕賱賲賵賯賮賷丞: 賵廿賱賷賴丕 賷賲賷賱 毓賱賲丕亍 丕賱賳賮爻 丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷賵賳 (賵毓賱賶 乇兀爻賴賲 丕賱賲丐賱賮) 賵賴賲 賷亘丨孬賵賳 鈥溫官� 丕賱賲丿賶 丕賱匕賷 賷賲賰賳 賲毓賴 廿乇噩丕毓 兀賮毓丕賱 丕賱賮乇丿 廿賱賶 毓賵丕賲賱 禺丕乇噩丞 毓賳賴 賲孬賱 丕賱賲鬲睾賷乇丕鬲 丕賱馗乇賮賷丞 賵丕賱毓賲賱賷丕鬲 丕賱亘賷卅賷丞 丕賱禺丕氐丞 亘賲丨賷胤 賲毓賷賳鈥�.
賵賱鬲賯乇賷亘 丕賱丕禺鬲賱丕賮 丕賱賳賵毓賷 亘賷賳 丕賱乇丐賷鬲賷賳 賷胤乇丨 丕賱賲丐賱賮 賴匕賴 丕賱賲賯丕乇賳丞:
鈥溫з勝呝傌ж辟嗀� 亘賷賳 丕賱賲賯丕乇亘丞 丕賱賳夭賵毓賷丞 賮賷 丕賱胤亘 丕賱賳賮爻賷 賵兀禺鬲賴丕 丕賱馗乇賮賷丞 賴賷 賰丕賱賲賯丕乇賳丞 亘賷賳 賳賲賵匕噩 丕賱乇毓丕賷丞 丕賱胤亘賷丞 賱賱賲乇囟賶 賵賳賲賵匕噩 丕賱氐丨丞 丕賱毓丕賲丞貙 賮賳賲賵匕噩 丕賱乇毓丕賷丞 丕賱胤亘賷丞 賷亘丨孬 毓賳 賲氐丿乇 丕賱賲乇囟 兀賵 丕賱廿毓丕賯丞 毓賳丿 丕賱卮禺氐 丕賱賲氐丕亘貙 亘賷賳賲丕 賷賮鬲乇囟 丕賱亘丕丨孬賵賳 賮賷 丕賱氐丨丞 丕賱毓丕賲丞 兀賳 丕賱亘賷卅丞 賴賷 丕賱鬲賷 鬲兀鬲賷 亘賳賵丕賯賱 丕賱賲乇囟貙 賴賷 丕賱鬲賷 鬲禺賱賯 丕賱馗乇賵賮/丕賱賲賵丕賯賮 丕賱鬲賷 鬲乇毓賶 丕賱賲乇囟. 賮賷 亘毓囟 丕賱兀丨賷丕賳 -賵亘睾囟 丕賱賳馗乇 毓賳 賲丨丕賵賱丕鬲 鬲丨爻賷賳 丕賱丨丕賱丞 丕賱氐丨賷丞 賱賱賮乇丿- 賷賰賵賳 丕賱賲乇賷囟 賴賵 丕賱賲賳鬲噩 丕賱賳賴丕卅賷 賱賲爻亘亘丕鬲 丕賱賲乇囟 丕賱賲賵噩賵丿丞 賮賷 丕賱亘賷卅丞貙 賵丕賱鬲賷 廿賳 賱賲 鬲購賵丕噩賴貨 爻鬲爻鬲賲乇 賮賷 丕賱廿囟乇丕乇 亘丌禺乇賷賳. 毓賱賶 爻亘賷賱 丕賱賲孬丕賱貙 賵賮賯 丕賱賲賯丕乇亘丞 丕賱賳夭賵毓賷丞 爻賳賯丿賾賲 賱賱胤賮賱 丕賱匕賷 賷馗賴乇 囟毓賮賸丕 賮賷 賯丿乇鬲賴 毓賱賶 丕賱鬲毓賱賲 毓賱丕噩丕鬲 胤亘賷丞 賵爻賱賵賰賷丞 賲禺鬲賱賮丞 賱賲爻丕毓丿鬲賴 毓賱賶 鬲噩丕賵夭 廿毓丕賯鬲賴貙 賮賷 丨賷賳 兀賳 爻亘亘 丕賱賲卮賰賱丞 賮賷 亘毓囟 丕賱丨丕賱丕鬲 賵禺丕氐丞 亘賷賳 丕賱賮賯乇丕亍 賴賵 丕爻鬲賳卮丕賯 丕賱乇氐丕氐 丕賱賲賵噩賵丿 賮賷 丕賱丿賴丕賳丕鬲 丕賱賲鬲賯卮乇丞 賲賳 丨賵丕卅胤 賲賳丕夭賱賴賲貙 賵賴賵 丕賱兀賲乇 丕賱匕賷 賷夭丿丕丿 爻賵亍賸丕 丨丕賱丞 丕賱賮賯乇 丕賱卮丿賷丿貙 賮賴賰匕丕 鬲賰賵賳 丕賱賲賯丕乇亘丞 丕賱馗乇賮賷丞. 賴匕賴 丕賱賲賳馗賵乇丕鬲 丕賱亘丿賷賱丞 賱賷爻鬲 賲噩乇丿 丕禺鬲賱丕賮丕鬲 賮賷 丕賱鬲丨賱賷賱丕鬲 丕賱鬲氐賵乇賷丞貙 賱賰賳賴丕 鬲丐丿賷 廿賱賶 胤乇賯 卮丿賷丿丞 丕賱丕禺鬲賱丕賮 賮賷 賲毓丕賱噩丞 丕賱賲卮賰賱丕鬲 丕賱卮禺氐賷丞 賵丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷丞鈥�.
賷賳卮睾賱 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 亘亘丨孬 丿賵乇 丕賱賲賰賵賳丕鬲 丕賱孬賱丕孬賷丞 (丕賱賮乇丿貙 丕賱賲賵賯賮/丕賱馗乇賮貙 丕賱賳馗丕賲/丕賱賲丐爻爻丞) 賮賷 爻賱賵賰 丕賱鬲丨賵賱 賳丨賵 丕賱卮乇貙 兀賵 丕賱毓賳賮貙 賵丕賱噩乇賷賲丞. 賲丕 賴賷 丕賱毓賵丕賲賱 丕賱爻賷丕賯賷丞 賵丕賱馗乇賮賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲噩毓賱 丕賱賮乇丿 丕賱爻賵賷 賷賳禺乇胤 賮賷 丕乇鬲賰丕亘 丕賱噩乇賷賲丞責 賲丕匕丕 毓賳 丿賵乇 丕賱賲丐爻爻丞 兀賵 丕賱賳馗丕賲 賮賷 匕賱賰責 賮賭鈥澵з勝呚へ必ж� 丕賱賳馗丕賲賷丞 賮賷 丕賱爻賱賵賰 賴賷 亘賲孬丕亘丞 丕賱賯賵丞 丕賱兀爻丕爻賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲氐賳毓 丕賱兀賵囟丕毓 丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷丞 賵鬲亘乇乇賴丕 賵鬲丨丕賮馗 毓賱賶 賵噩賵丿賴丕貙 廿賳賴丕 賳鬲丕噩 丕噩鬲賲丕毓 丕賱賯賵賶 丕賱爻賷丕爻賷丞 賵丕賱丿賷賳賷丞 賵丕賱賯丕賳賵賳賷丞 賱鬲氐賳毓 噩賲賷毓賴丕 賵毓丕亍賸 噩賷丿賸丕 兀賵 爻賷卅賸丕 鬲賵囟毓 賮賷賴 丕賱鬲賮丕丨丕鬲 亘卮賰賱 賲賳賮乇丿 賱鬲禺乇噩 賲賳賴 亘毓丿 匕賱賰 氐丕賱丨丞 兀賵 賮丕爻丿丞 亘丨爻亘 丕賱禺氐丕卅氐 丕賱馗乇賮賷丞 賱鬲賱賰 丕賱兀賵毓賷丞鈥�.
賷乇鬲賰夭 賰鬲丕亘 夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵 -賱賱亘乇賴賳丞 毓賱賶 賴匕賴 丕賱兀胤乇賵丨丞 丕賱賵丕爻毓丞- 毓賱賶 鬲噩乇亘丞 鈥溫池� 爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿鈥� 丕賱卮賴賷乇丞貙 賵賴賷 鬲噩乇亘丞 兀賯賷賲鬲 賮賷 賲胤賱毓 丕賱爻亘毓賷賳丕鬲 賱兀噩賱 丕賰鬲卮丕賮 鬲兀孬賷乇 丕賱爻噩賳 毓賱賶 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賵丕賱丨乇丕爻. 賮賯丿 胤賱亘 夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵 賲賳 賲噩賲賵毓丞 賲鬲胤賵毓賷賳 丕賱毓賲賱 賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞貙 賵賯亘賱賵丕 亘毓丿 賮丨氐賴賲 賱賱鬲兀賰丿 賲賳 爻賱丕賲鬲賴賲 丕賱賳賮爻賷丞 賵丕賱噩爻賲賷丞貙 孬賲 丕賳賯爻賲賵丕 毓卮賵丕卅賷賸丕 廿賱賶 丨乇丕爻 賵爻噩賳丕亍. 賵賱賰賷 鬲賰賵賳 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 兀賰孬乇 賵丕賯毓賷丞貙 亘丿兀鬲 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 亘丕毓鬲賯丕賱 卮亘賴 丨賯賷賯賷 賲賳 賯亘賱 卮乇胤丞 丕賱賵賱丕賷丞. 賵胤賵丕賱 鬲爻毓丞 賮氐賵賱 鬲卮賰賱 賳氐賮 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 鬲賯乇賷亘賸丕 賷爻乇丿 夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵 亘丕賱鬲賮氐賷賱 丕賱賰孬賷賮 賲丕 丨氐賱 胤賵丕賱 兀賷丕賲 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞貙 亘丕賱丕爻鬲賳丕丿 廿賱賶 兀乇卮賷賮 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 丕賱氐賵鬲賷 賵丕賱賲乇卅賷 賵賲匕賰乇丕鬲 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賵丕賱賱賯丕亍丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 兀噩乇賷鬲 賯亘賱 賵亘毓丿 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 賲毓 丕賱賲鬲胤賵毓賷賳. 賱賲 鬲爻鬲賰賲賱 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 亘賱 丕囟胤乇 丕賱賲丐賱賮 賵胤丕賯賲賴 丕賱亘丨孬賷 賱廿賷賯丕賮賴丕 亘毓丿 鬲丿賴賵乇 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 亘卮賰賱 丿乇丕賲賷貙 賵氐賮賴 丕賱賲丐賱賮 亘丿賯丞. 鬲亘丿賵 鬲噩乇亘丞 丕賱爻噩賳 卮丿賷丿丞 丕賱兀賴賲賷丞 賲賳 丕賱賳丕丨賷丞 丕賱鬲丨賱賷賱賷丞 賮賴賷 鬲卮乇丨 亘卮賰賱 賱丕賮鬲 賯丕亘賱賷丞 丕賱丕賳爻丕賳 丕賱毓丕丿賷 賱賱鬲賵丨卮貙 賵鬲亘丿賵 賱丨馗丞 丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘 亘賷賳 丕賱丨丕乇爻 賵丕賱賲毓鬲賯賱 賱丨馗丞 賰丕卮賮丞 (賮丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘 丕賱匕賷 賷賯氐丿 賱廿禺囟丕毓 丕賱胤乇賮 丕賱丌禺乇 噩爻丿賷賸丕 賵賳賮爻賷賸丕 賵毓賯賱賷賸丕 賴賵 噩賵賴乇 丕賱爻賷丕爻丞) 賮賯丿 兀孬亘鬲 夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵 兀賳 丕賱丨乇丕爻 丕賱匕賷 丕乇鬲賰亘賵丕 兀賮毓丕賱 賲禺賱丞 賵賲爻賷卅丞 賱賱爻噩賳丕亍 -兀丿鬲 亘亘毓囟賴賲 賱賱丕賳賴賷丕乇 賵毓丿賲 丕爻鬲賰賲丕賱 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞- 賰丕賳賵丕 兀爻賵賷丕亍 鬲賲丕賲賸丕 賲賳 丕賱賳丕丨賷丞 丕賱賳賮爻賷丞 賵丕賱毓賯賱賷丞.
亘毓丿 匕賱賰 禺氐氐 丕賱賲丐賱賮 賮氐賱賷賳 賱鬲丨賱賷賱 毓賳 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 賵丿賱丕賱丕鬲賴丕 亘丕爻鬲賮丕囟丞貙 賵鬲丨賵賱丕鬲 丕賱丨乇丕爻貙 賵賯賵丞 丕賱爻賷丕賯貙 賵丕賱馗乇賮 丕賱匕賷 賮乇囟 毓賱賶 丕賱噩賲賷毓 丕賱鬲氐乇賮 亘氐賵乇丞 賲乇賷毓丞貙 賵毓賳 鬲賯賲氐 丕賱兀丿賵丕乇貙 賵爻胤賵丞 丕賱賯亘賵賱 丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷貙 賵睾賷乇 匕賱賰 賲賳 丕賱丌賱賷丕鬲 丕賱丿丕禺賱賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賵賮乇 賲賳丕禺丕鬲 賷賳賲賵 賮賷賴丕 丕賱毓賳賮 丕賱賱丕廿賳爻丕賳賷. 賰賲丕 鬲丨丿孬 毓賳 兀禺賱丕賯賷丞 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞貙 賵丕賳毓賰丕爻丕鬲賴丕 毓賱賶 丕賱賲卮丕乇賰賷賳 噩賲賷毓賸丕 賵丕賱胤丕賯賲 丕賱亘丨孬賷.
賵賮賷 賮氐賵賱 賱丕丨賯丞 丕賳胤賱賯 夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵 賱鬲賵爻賷毓 賳胤丕賯 丕賱亘丨孬 賵丕爻鬲毓乇丕囟 丕賱亘丨賵孬 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賵氐賱鬲 廿賱賶 賳鬲丕卅噩 賲卮丕亘賴丞 賱賲丕 鬲賵氐賱鬲 廿賱賷賴 鬲噩乇亘丞 爻噩賳 爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿貙 賮賷卮賷乇 賱亘丨孬 爻賵賱賵賲賵賳 丌爻賰貙 賵鬲噩乇亘丞 賲賷賱睾乇丕賲 丕賱卮賴賷乇丞貙 賵睾賷乇賴丕 賲賳 丕賱丿乇丕爻丕鬲 丕賱氐丕丿賲丞 賵丕賱賲孬賷乇丞.
賵賮賷 賮氐賱 鬲丕賱 賷亘丿兀 丕賱賲丐賱賮 賮賷 乇丨賱丞 噩丿賷丿丞 賮賷 爻噩賳 兀亘賵 睾乇賷亘貙 賵賴賵 賷毓鬲賯丿 兀賳 賲丕 丨丿孬 賮賷 兀亘賵 睾乇賷亘 賲賳 丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘 賵睾賷乇賴 賷卮丕亘賴 -賲賳 賳賵丕丨 毓丿丞- 賲丕 丨丿孬 賮賷 鬲噩乇亘鬲賴 賮賷 爻噩賳 爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿 毓賱賶 賲爻鬲賵賶 丕賱丌賱賷丕鬲 丕賱賲賳鬲噩丞 賱賱毓賳賮 賵丕賱鬲丨賵賱 賱賮毓賱 丕賱噩乇賷賲丞貙 賵賲賳 禺賱丕賱 毓賱丕賯鬲賴 亘兀丨丿 賲乇鬲賰亘賷 噩乇丕卅賲 丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘 賮賷 丕賱爻噩賳 爻賷亍 丕賱匕賰乇 賷丐賰丿 -毓亘乇 鬲丨賱賷賱丕鬲 賲胤賵賱丞 賱胤亘賷毓丞 毓賲賱 噩賳賵丿 丕賱丕丨鬲賱丕賱 賵爻賷丕爻丕鬲 丕賱丕毓鬲賯丕賱 廿亘丕賳 亘丿丕賷丕鬲 丕賱丕丨鬲賱丕賱 丕賱兀賲乇賷賰賷 賱賱毓乇丕賯- 毓賲賯 兀孬乇 丕賱賲賵賯賮 賵丕賱馗乇賵賮 賵丕賱爻賷丕賯 賮賷 丿賮毓 丕賱賲噩賳丿賷賳 賱賱鬲毓匕賷亘 丕賱賵丨卮賷貙 賵鬲氐賵賷乇 噩乇丕卅賲賴賲 賵丕賱鬲賮丕禺乇 亘賴丕.
賵賷賵丕氐賱 鬲丨賱賷賱丕鬲賴 毓亘乇 賲鬲丕亘毓丞 賲賳馗賲丞 賵卮乇賵丨 賲賵爻毓丞 賱賱賵孬丕卅賯 賵丕賱賵賯丕卅毓 丕賱鬲賷 鬲丿賷賳 丕賱賲丐爻爻丞 丕賱爻賷丕爻賷丞 賵丕賱毓爻賰乇賷丞 丕賱兀賲乇賷賰賷丞 丕賱囟丕賱毓丞 賮賷 噩乇丕卅賲 賰孬賷乇丞 賮賷 丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘貙 丕賱兀賲乇 丕賱匕賷 丿賮毓賴 賱鬲丨賲賷賱 賲爻丐賵賱賷丞 噩乇賷賲丞 丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘 賱賯丕卅賲丞 胤賵賷賱丞 賮賷 丕賱賴賷賰賱賷丞 丕賱廿丿丕乇賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲爻賷乇 丕賱丕丨鬲賱丕賱 賰賰賱貙 亘丿亍丕賸 賲賳 廿丿丕乇丞 丕賱爻噩賳 賵丕賳鬲賴丕亍 亘丕賱乇卅賷爻 丕賱兀爻亘賯 亘賵卮 丕賱丕亘賳貙 賵賱亘賷丕賳 丿賵乇 丕賱賲丐爻爻丞 賮賷 鬲丨賵賱 丕賱賮乇丿 賱賱毓賳賮 賷賯賵賱 夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵:
鈥溫关ж┵� 賲丕 賷爻賲賶 丕賱爻賱賵賰 丕賱賲賳丨乇賮 睾賷乇 丕賱賯丕賳賵賳賷 兀賵 睾賷乇 丕賱兀禺賱丕賯賷 賱賱毓丕賲賱賷賳 賮賷 丕賱禺丿賲丞 丕賱毓丕賲丞 賲孬賱 乇噩丕賱 丕賱卮乇胤丞 兀賵 囟亘丕胤 丕賱賲丐爻爻丕鬲 丕賱廿氐賱丕丨賷丞 兀賵 丕賱噩賳賵丿 亘兀禺胤丕亍 芦賯賱丞 賲賳 丕賱鬲賮丕丨丕鬲 丕賱賮丕爻丿丞禄. 賵賴賵 賲丕 賷毓賳賷 囟賲賳賷賸丕 兀賳賴賲 丕爻鬲孬賳丕亍 賳丕丿乇 賷賳亘睾賷 賵囟毓賴 賮賷 兀丨丿 噩丕賳亘賷 丕賱丨丕噩夭 丕賱賲賳賷毓 丕賱賮丕氐賱 亘賷賳 丕賱禺賷乇 賵丕賱卮乇貨 賮賷 丨賷賳 鬲賯亘毓 丕賱兀睾賱亘賷丞 賲賳 丕賱鬲賮丕丨丕鬲 丕賱氐丕賱丨丞 賮賷 丕賱噩丕賳亘 丕賱丌禺乇貙 賱賰賳 賲賳 丕賱匕賷 賷賯賵賲 亘賴匕丕 丕賱賮氐賱責 賮賷 丕賱睾丕賱亘 丨賲丕丞 丕賱賳馗丕賲貙 兀賵賱卅賰 丕賱匕賷賳 賷乇賷丿賵賳 鬲丨賷賷丿 丕賱賲卮賰賱丞 亘睾賷丞 鬲卮鬲賷鬲 丕賱丕賳鬲亘丕賴 賵氐乇賮 丕賱賱賵賲 亘毓賷丿賸丕 毓賳 丕賱賲鬲乇亘毓賷賳 毓賱賶 賯賲丞 賴乇賲 丕賱爻賱胤丞貙 賵丕賱匕賷賳 乇亘賲丕 賰丕賳賵丕 丕賱賲鬲爻亘亘賷賳 賮賷 氐賳丕毓丞 馗乇賵賮 毓賲賱 賲鬲乇丿賷丞 兀賵 賮賷 睾賷丕亘 丕賱乇賯丕亘丞 賵丕賱廿卮乇丕賮. 賲噩丿丿賸丕 賮廿賳 賲賳胤賯 鈥溫з勜佖ж� 丕賱賮丕爻丿丞鈥� 丕賱賯丕卅賲 毓賱賶 丕賱賲賯丕乇亘丞 丕賱賳夭賵毓賷丞 賱賱賲賵賯賮 賷鬲噩丕賴賱 丕賱賵毓丕亍 丕賱賮丕爻丿 賵丕賱囟睾賵胤 丕賱馗乇賮賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷氐賳毓賴丕貙 賵丕賱鬲賷 賲賳 卮兀賳賴丕 兀賳 鬲賮爻丿 賲丕 亘丿丕禺賱賴貙 賷乇賰賾夭 鬲丨賱賷賱 丕賱兀賳馗賲丞 毓賱賶 氐購賳賾丕毓 丕賱賵毓丕亍貙 毓賱賶 兀賵賱卅賰 丕賱匕賷賳 賷賲賱賰賵賳 丕賱爻賱胤丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲購賲賰賾賳賴賲 賲賳 鬲氐賲賷賲賴.
賴賲 芦賳禺亘丞 丕賱爻賱胤丞禄貙 氐購賳賾丕毓 丕賱賵毓丕亍貙 賵丕賱毓丕賲賱賵賳 賲賳 禺賱賮 丕賱爻鬲丕乇貙 丕賱匕賷賳 賷氐賲賲賵賳 丕賱兀賵囟丕毓 丕賱賲毓賷卮賷丞 賱賱亘賯賷丞 丕賱賲噩亘乇賷賳 毓賱賶 賯囟丕亍 兀賵賯丕鬲賴賲 賮賷 丕賱亘賷卅丕鬲 丕賱賲丐爻爻賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 氐賳毓賴丕 賴丐賱丕亍. 兀賳丕乇 毓丕賱賲 丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓 鬲卮丕乇賱夭 乇丕賷鬲 賲賷賱夭 孬賯亘 丕賱爻賱胤丞 丕賱兀爻賵丿 賴匕丕:
芦鬲賯賵賲 賳禺亘丞 丕賱爻賱胤丞 毓賱賶 孬賱賾丞 賲賲賳 鬲爻賲丨 賱賴賲 賲賳丕氐亘賴賲 亘鬲噩丕賵夭 丕賱亘賷卅丞 丕賱丕毓鬲賷丕丿賷丞 賱賱乇噩丕賱 賵丕賱賳爻丕亍 丕賱毓丕丿賷賷賳貨 賴賲 賷卮睾賱賵賳 賲賵丕賯毓 丕鬲禺丕匕 賯乇丕乇丕鬲 禺胤賷乇丞 丕賱鬲亘毓丕鬲貙 賱賰賳 卮睾賱賴賲 賱賴匕賴 丕賱賲賳丕氐亘 丕賱賲丨賵乇賷丞 賷賮賵賯 賮賷 兀賴賲賷鬲賴 丕鬲禺丕匕賴賲 賱賴匕賴 丕賱賯乇丕乇丕鬲 賲賳 毓丿賲賴貙 賮賮卮賱賴賲 賮賷 丕賱賮毓賱 賵賮賷 氐賳毓 丕賱賯乇丕乇 兀賰孬乇 禺胤賵乇丞 賮賷 丨丿 匕丕鬲賴 賲賳 賳賵毓賷丞 丕賱賯乇丕乇丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 賷鬲禺匕賵賳賴丕貙 匕賱賰 賱兀賳賴賲 賮賷 賲賵囟毓 賯賷丕丿丞 丕賱鬲賳馗賷賲丕鬲 賵丕賱賲丐爻爻丕鬲 丕賱賰亘乇賶 賱賱賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱丨丿賷孬貙 賷丨賰賲賵賳 卮乇賰丕鬲 賰亘賷乇丞貙 賷丨乇賰賵賳 丌賱丞 丕賱丿賵賱丞 賵賷胤丕賱亘賵賳 亘丕賲鬲賷丕夭丕鬲賴丕貙 賷丿賷乇賵賳 丕賱賲丐爻爻丞 丕賱毓爻賰乇賷丞貙 賵賷卮睾賱賵賳 賲賵丕賯毓 賯賷丕丿丞 丕爻鬲乇丕鬲賷噩賷丞 賱賱亘賳賷丞 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲鬲乇賰夭 賮賷賴丕 丕賱丌賳 賵爻丕卅賱 丕賱賳賮賵匕 丕賱賲丐孬乇丞 賵丕賱孬乇賵丞 賵丕賱卮賴乇丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷鬲賲鬲毓賵賳 亘賴丕禄.
孬賲 賷禺鬲賲 丕賱賲丐賱賮 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱兀禺賷乇 亘丨丿賷孬 毓賳 兀爻丕賱賷亘 賵鬲賰鬲賷賰丕鬲 賲賯丕賵賲丞 丕賱賵賯賵毓 賮賷 丕賱卮乇/丕賱毓賳賮貙 賵賷賯丿賲 丕丨鬲賮丕亍賸 亘丕賱亘胤賵賱丞貙 毓亘乇 廿亘乇丕夭 毓丿丞 賳賲丕匕噩 丕爻鬲胤丕毓鬲 丕賱鬲睾賱亘 毓賱賶 丕賱賲賵賯賮 賵丕賱爻賷丕賯 賵丕賱賲丐爻爻丞 賵丕賳鬲賮囟鬲 囟丿 丕賱噩乇賷賲丞 賵賱賲 鬲禺囟毓 賱睾賵丕賷鬲賴丕.
* * *
賲丕匕丕 毓賳 鈥溫з勜簇扁€� 兀賵 丕賱毓賳賮 丕賱爻賱胤賵賷 賮賷 丕賱鬲氐賵乇 丕賱廿爻賱丕賲賷責 賷賲賰賳賳丕 賴賳丕 兀賳 賳卮賷乇 賱毓丿丞 賲卮丕賴丿:
兀賵賱賸丕: 丕賱賲卮賴丿 丕賱賲毓乇賮賷: 丕賱卮乇賷毓丞 鬲孬亘鬲 賵噩賵丿 丕賱卮乇 賮賷 丕賱賳賮賵爻 賷賯賵賱 鬲毓丕賱賶 鈥溬堎庂嗁庂佡捸迟� 賵賻賲賻丕 爻賻賵賻賾丕賴賻丕* 賮賻兀賻賱賿賴賻賲賻賴賻丕 賮購噩購賵乇賻賴賻丕 賵賻鬲賻賯賿賵賻丕賴賻丕鈥溫� 賮丕賱鬲賯賵賶 賵丕賱賮噩賵乇 賲賰賵賳丕賳 乇卅賷爻丕賳 賮賷 兀毓賲丕賯 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳貙 賵賯丿 賵氐賮賴 丕賱賱賴 亘兀賳賴 鈥溫纲庂勝徺堎呝嬝� 噩賻賴購賵賱賸丕鈥澵� 賵賯丕賱 鬲毓丕賱賶 (廿賳賻賾 丕賱賿廿賽賳賿爻賻丕賳賻 禺購賱賽賯賻 賴賻賱購賵毓丕賸 * 廿賽匕賻丕 賲賻爻賻賾賴購 丕賱卮賻賾乇購賾 噩賻夭購賵毓丕賸 * 賵賻廿賽匕賻丕 賲賻爻賻賾賴購 丕賱賿禺賻賷賿乇購 賲賻賳購賵毓丕賸)貙 毓賱賶 兀賳 賱賵噩賵丿 賴匕丕 丕賱卮乇 丨賰賲丞 賷毓賱賲賴丕 丕賱賱賴 鬲毓丕賱賶: 鈥溬堎嗀ㄙ勝堎冑� 亘丕賱卮乇 賵丕賱禺賷乇 賮鬲賳丞鈥澵� 廿賱丕 兀賳 賴匕丕 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 丕賱馗賱賵賲 丕賱噩賴賵賱 賲賴賷兀 賱賯亘賵賱 丕賱丨賯貙 賵賱賷爻 賮賷賴 賲丕賳毓 賷賲賳毓賴 賲賳 匕賱賰貙 賮賭鈥澷呝庁� 賲賽賳賿 賲賻賵賿賱購賵丿賺 廿賽賱丕賻賾 賷購賵賱賻丿購 毓賻賱賻賶 丕賱賿賮賽胤賿乇賻丞賽鈥澵� 孬賲 賴賵 廿賳 鬲賲爻賰 亘丕賱賲丿丿 丕賱廿賱賴賷貙 賵爻丕毓丿賴 丕賱鬲賵賮賷賯 賳噩賶 賲賳 丕賱卮乇賵乇貙 賵廿賳 鬲乇賰 賳賮爻賴 賵賴賵丕賴丕 乇賮毓 毓賳賴 丕賱丨賮馗 賵丕賱毓賵賳 賵丕乇鬲賰爻 賮賷 丕賱卮乇 賵睾賵賶. 賵丕賱鬲毓賵賷賱 賮賷 鬲丨氐賷賱 丕賱賰賮丕亍丞 丕賱兀禺賱丕賯賷丞 毓賱賶 賲噩乇丿 鈥溫ベ嗀池з嗁娯� 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳鈥� 亘賳丕亍 毓賱賶 丕賱胤賷賳貙 亘賱 丕賱丕賱鬲夭丕賲 賵丕賱丕賳囟亘丕胤 丕賱兀禺賱丕賯賷 賱丕 賷賰賵賳 毓賲賷賯賸丕 廿賱丕 丨賷賳 賷鬲兀爻爻 毓賱賶 乇賯丕亘丞 廿賷賲丕賳賷丞 丿丕禺賱賷丞 賯賵賷丞貙 賵丕毓鬲賯丕丿 亘丕賱丨爻丕亘貙 賵禺賵賮 賲賳 丕賱毓賯丕亘 丕賱兀禺乇賵賷.
孬丕賳賷賸丕: 丕賱賲卮賴丿 丕賱賳賮爻賷: 兀賯乇賾鬲 丕賱卮乇賷毓丞 亘鬲兀孬賷乇 丕賱鬲賱亘賾爻 亘丕賱爻賱胤丞 毓賱賶 爻賱賵賰賷丕鬲 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳貙 賵鬲噩丿 賴匕丕 丕賱賳賵毓 賲賳 丕賱鬲賳丕賵賱 賮賷 賲亘丕丨孬 胤賱亘 丕賱廿賲丕乇丞貙 賵丕賱鬲氐丿乇 賱賱賵賱丕賷丕鬲貙 賮賯丿 爻兀賱 丕賱賳亘賷 氐賱賶 丕賱賱賴 毓賱賷賴 賵爻賱賲 丕賱賲賯丿丕丿 亘賳 丕賱兀爻賵丿 乇囟賷 丕賱賱賴 毓賳賴 亘毓丿 兀賳 賵賱賾丕賴 賵賱丕賷丞 賵賯丕賱: 鈥溬冑娰� 賵噩丿鬲 丕賱廿賲丕乇丞責鈥� 賮賯丕賱:
鈥溬娯� 乇爻賵賱 丕賱賱賴: 賲丕 馗賳賳鬲 廿賱丕 兀賳 丕賱賳丕爻 賰賱賴賲 禺賻賵賻賱賹 鈥撠Ｙ� 禺丿賲賹- 賱賷貙 賵丕賱賱賴 賱丕 兀賱賷 毓賱賶 毓賲賱 賲丕 丿賲鬲 丨賷賸丕鈥澵� 賵賮賷 乇賵丕賷丞 鈥溬冑徺嗁捸� 兀購丨賿賲賻賱購 賵賻兀購賵囟賻毓購 丨賻鬲賻賾賶 乇賻兀賻賷賿鬲購 亘賽兀賻賳賻賾 賱賽賷 毓賻賱賻賶 丕賱賿賯賻賵賿賲賽 賮賻囟賿賱賸丕鈥�.
賮卮毓賵乇 丕爻鬲毓亘丕丿 丕賱賳丕爻 賲丐孬乇 賮賷 氐賱丕丨 氐丕丨亘 丕賱爻賱胤丞 賵賳噩丕鬲賴 賮賷 丕賱丌禺乇丞貨 賯丕賱 氐賱賶 丕賱賱賴 毓賱賷賴 賵爻賱賲: 鈥溫ベ嗁冑� 爻鬲丨乇氐賵賳 毓賱賶 丕賱廿賲丕乇丞貙 賵爻鬲賰賵賳 賳丿丕賲丞 賷賵賲 丕賱賯賷丕賲丞貨 賮賳毓賲 丕賱賲乇囟毓丞貙 賵亘卅爻鬲 丕賱賮丕胤賲丞鈥澵� 賵賮賷 鬲賱賲賾爻 賴匕丕 丕賱兀孬乇 丕賱賳賮爻賷 賷賯賵賱 丕亘賳 丨噩乇 賮賷 卮乇丨賴 賱賴匕丕 丕賱丨丿賷孬: 鈥溬嗁愗官呝� 丕賱賲乇囟毓丞貨 賱賲丕 賮賷賴丕 賲賳 丨氐賵賱 丕賱賲丕賱, 賵賳賮丕匕 丕賱賰賱賲丞貙 賵鬲丨氐賷賱 丕賱賱匕丕鬲 丕賱丨爻賷丞 賵丕賱賵賴賲賷丞 丨丕賱 丨氐賵賱賴丕鈥溫� 賵鬲兀賲賱 賯賵賱賴: 鈥溬嗁佖ж� 丕賱賰賱賲丞鈥� 孬賲 鈥溫з勝勜柏ж� 丕賱賵賴賲賷丞鈥� 兀賷 兀賳 賱賳賮丕匕 丕賱賰賱賲丞 毓賱賶 丕賱丌禺乇賷賳 賱匕丕卅匕 賯丿 鬲丨賵賱 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 毓賳 爻丕亘賯 毓賴丿賴 丕賱禺賷賾乇貙 賮丕毓鬲賱丕亍 丕賱爻賱胤丞 賲夭賱賯 賲禺賵賮 鈥溬勜Ｙ嗁囏� 鬲丨乇賾賰 丕賱氐賮丕鬲 [丕賱乇丿賷卅丞] 丕賱亘丕胤賳丞貙 賵鬲睾賱亘 毓賱賶 丕賱賳賮爻 丨亘 丕賱噩丕賴鈥� 賰賲丕 賷賯賵賱 丕賱賲賳丕賵賷 乇丨賲賴 丕賱賱賴貙 賮乇亘賲丕 賵賱丿鬲 丕賱丨爻丿 賵丕賱睾賷乇丞 賵丕賮囟鬲 亘氐丕丨亘賴丕 廿賱賶 丕賱賰匕亘 賵丕賱亘賴鬲丕賳 賵馗賱賲 丕賱賳丕爻 賵兀賰賱 兀賲賵丕賱賴賲 亘丕賱亘丕胤賱 賵鬲賯乇賷亘 丕賱賮爻賯丞 賵賲毓丕賯亘丞 丕賱氐丕賱丨賷賳 賵睾賷乇 匕賱賰貙 賵賰賲丕 賷賯賵賱 丕賱氐賳毓丕賳賷 乇丨賲賴 丕賱賱賴: 鈥溫Ｘ堌ж� 丕賱廿賲丕乇丞 賱丕 鬲賳丨氐乇鈥�.
賵丨賷賳 賯爻賾賲 丕賱賮禺乇 丕賱乇丕夭賷 乇丨賲賴 丕賱賱賴 丕賱賱匕丕鬲 噩毓賱賴丕 賲丨氐賵乇丞賸 賮賷 兀賯爻丕賲 孬賱丕孬丞: 丕賱賱匕丕鬲 丕賱丨爻賷丞 賵賴賷 賯囟丕亍 丕賱卮賴賵鬲賷賳貙 賵丕賱賱匕丕鬲 丕賱禺賷丕賱賷丞 賵賴賷 丕賱賱匕丕鬲 丕賱丨丕氐賱丞 賲賳 丕賱丕爻鬲毓賱丕亍 賵丕賱乇卅丕爻丞貙 賵丕賱賱匕丕鬲 丕賱毓賯賱賷丞貙 賵賴賷 丕賱賱匕丕鬲 丕賱丨丕氐賱丞 亘爻亘亘 賲毓乇賮丞 丕賱兀卮賷丕亍 賵丕賱賵賯賵賮 毓賱賶 丨賯丕卅賯賴丕. 賵丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賲賵賱毓 亘丨亘 丕賱兀賲乇 賵丕賱賳賴賷 賵丨亘 丕賱爻賲毓 賵丕賱胤丕毓丞貙 亘賱 丕賱乇賷丕爻丞 賵賳賮丕匕 丕賱賰賱賲丞 賵禺囟賵毓 丕賱乇賯丕亘 賱賱廿賳爻丕賳 賲賳 兀毓馗賲 丕賱賱匕丕鬲貙 賰賲丕 賷丐賰丿 丕賱賲賳丕賵賷:鈥溬勜柏� 丕賱丕爻鬲賷賱丕亍 賵賳賮丕匕 丕賱兀賲乇 兀毓馗賲 賲賱丕匕 丕賱丿賳賷丕鈥�.
賮賷 賲爻賱爻賱 鬲賱賷賮夭賷賵賳賷 亘乇賷胤丕賳賷 賷氐賳賮 賲賳 亘乇丕賲噩 (鬲賱賷賮夭賷賵賳 丕賱賵丕賯毓) 丨賷孬 丕禺鬲賷乇 鬲爻毓丞 毓卮乇 卮禺氐賸丕 賲賳 亘賷賳 孬賲丕賳賷丞 丌賱丕賮 賲鬲賯丿賲貙 賱賷賯丕乇亘賵丕 賲毓賷卮丞 丨賷丕丞 丕賱禺丿賲 丕賱亘乇賷胤丕賳賷賷賳 賮賷 賯氐乇 乇賷賮賷 兀賳賷賯貙 賵毓賱賶 丕賱乇睾賲 賲賳 兀賳 丕賱卮禺氐 丕賱匕賷 丕禺鬲賷乇 賱鬲兀丿賷丞 丿賵乇 賰亘賷乇 丕賱禺丿賲 賰丕賳 賷賳鬲馗乇 賲賳賴 丕賱丕賱鬲夭丕賲 亘丕賱賲毓丕賷賷乇 丕賱氐丕乇賲丞 賱鬲賱賰 丕賱賮鬲乇丞 丕賱禺丕氐丞 亘賲賳氐亘賴 毓賱賶 乇兀爻 丕賱鬲爻賱爻賱 丕賱賵馗賷賮賷 賱賱禺丿賲貙 廿賱丕 兀賳 爻賴賵賱丞 鬲丨賵賱賴 廿賱賶 乇卅賷爻 賲購爻鬲亘丿賾 芦兀禺丕賮鬲賴禄. 賷卮賷乇 丕賱賲賲孬賱 氐丕丨亘 丕賱禺賲爻丞 賵丕賱爻鬲賷賳 毓丕賲賸丕 廿賱賶 兀賳賴 賱賲 賷賰賳 賲爻鬲毓丿賸賾丕 賱賱丕賳夭賱丕賯 亘爻賴賵賱丞 賮賷 賲賲丕乇爻丞 爻賱胤丞 賲胤賱賯丞 毓賱賶 亘賷鬲 賲賳 丕賱禺丿賲 丕賱匕賷賳 賷乇兀爻賴賲 賴賵: 芦賮噩兀丞 鬲賰鬲卮賮 兀賳 丕賱鬲丨丿購賾孬 賱賷爻 囟乇賵乇賷賸丕貙 賰賱 賲丕 賰丕賳 毓賱賷賾 賮毓賱賴 賴賵 乇賮毓 廿氐亘毓賷 賱賷賱鬲夭賲賵丕 丕賱氐賲鬲貙 賵賴匕賴 賮賰乇丞 賲禺賷賮丞貙 賲乇賷毓丞禄貙 賲賳 亘丕爻鬲胤丕毓鬲賴 兀賳 賷爻鬲賲乇 賲鬲賲爻賰賸丕 亘丕賳囟亘丕胤賴 丕賱兀禺賱丕賯賷 賮賷 馗賱 爻賱胤丞 鈥溬呚辟娯关┾€� 賰賴匕賴責 賵廿丿乇丕賰 卮丿丞 鬲兀孬賷乇 丕賱爻賱胤丞 毓賱賶 賲鬲賵賱賷賴丕 賷丿毓賵賴 廿賱賶 丕賱賲亘丕賱睾丞 賮賷 丕賱鬲賵賯賷 丕賱匕丕鬲賷貙 賵賷賵噩亘 鬲賰孬賷乇 丕賱賰賵丕亘丨 丕賱丿丕禺賱賷丞 賵丕賱禺丕乇噩賷丞 毓賱賶 氐丕丨亘 丕賱爻賱胤丞貙 賵毓丕賲丞 丕賱兀賳馗賲丞 丕賱爻賷丕爻丞 丕賱丨丿賷孬丞 丨乇賷氐丞 毓賱賶 鬲賰亘賷賱 爻賱胤丕鬲 氐丕丨亘 丕賱賯乇丕乇 亘丕賱賯賷賵丿 丕賱賯丕賳賵賳賷丞 賵丕賱爻賷丕爻賷丞 賵丕賱丕毓賱丕賲賷丞 廿丿乇丕賰賸丕 賲賳賴丕 賱禺胤乇 丕賱爻賱胤丞 賵兀孬乇賴丕 丕賱亘丕賱睾 毓賱賶 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 丕賱爻賵賷 丕賱賲爻鬲賯賷賲貙 賮囟賱賸丕 毓賳 睾賷乇賴.
孬丕賱孬賸丕: 丕賱賲卮賴丿 丕賱鬲卮乇賷毓賷: 丕賱鬲丨賵賱 賳丨賵 鈥溫з勜簇扁€� 毓丕丿丞賸 賲丕 鬲爻亘賯 兀爻亘丕亘賴 賵馗乇賵賮賴貙 賵賱匕丕 鬲噩丿 兀賳 丕賱兀氐賱 賮賷 丕賱鬲毓丕賲賱 丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷 亘賷賳 丕賱賲爻賱賲賷賳 賯丕卅賲賹 毓賱賶 丕賱賲乇賵亍丕鬲 賵爻賲丕丨丞 丕賱賳賮爻貙 賮廿匕丕 賵賯毓 丕賱賳夭丕毓 鬲丨賵賱 丕賱廿胤丕乇 丕賱囟丕亘胤 賱賱毓賱丕賯丞 廿賱賶 丕賱丨賯賵賯 賵丕賱賵丕噩亘丕鬲貨 賮賮賷 毓賱丕賯丞 丕賱夭賵丕噩 賲孬賱賸丕 丨乇氐鬲 丕賱卮乇賷毓丞 毓賱賶 鬲兀賰賷丿 兀賳 丕賱兀氐賱 賮賷賴丕 賲丕 賯丕賱賴 爻亘丨丕賳賴 鈥溬堎庁庁官庂勝� 亘賻賷賿賳賻賰購賲 賲賻賾賵賻丿賻賾丞賸 賵賻乇賻丨賿賲賻丞賸鈥澵� 賵賲乇丕毓丕丞 賱賳賵丕夭毓 丕賱亘卮乇 賳丨賵 丕賱卮乇 賵丕賱禺賱丕賮 乇爻賻賲 丨丿賵丿 丕賱丨賯賵賯 賵丕賱賵丕噩亘丕鬲 賵賱賲 賷賰鬲賮賽 亘丕賱賵毓馗 賵丨丿賴貙 賵匕賱賰 賲丕 鬲乇丕賴 賮賷 兀丨賰丕賲 丕賱賳賮賯丕鬲 賵丕賱毓卮乇丞 賵睾賷乇賴丕貙 賵鬲兀賲賱 賴匕丕 丕賱鬲賱丕夭賲 賮賷 賯賵賱賴 鬲毓丕賱賶 :鈥澷堎庁з勜蒂徺戀勝捸� 禺賻賷賿乇賹 賵賻兀購丨賿囟賽乇賻鬲賽 丕賱賿兀賻賳賿賮購爻購 丕賱卮購賾丨賻賾鈥�. 賵賯賱 賲孬賱 賴匕丕 賮賷 賮賯賴 丕賱鬲卮乇賷毓丕鬲 丕賱兀禺乇賶.
乇丕亘毓賸丕: 丕賱賲卮賴丿 丕賱毓賯丕亘賷: 賲毓 丕賱丕毓鬲乇丕賮 亘賵噩賵丿 賴匕賴 丕賱賳夭毓丞 锟斤拷丕賱卮乇賷乇丞鈥� 兀鬲賶 丕賱廿爻賱丕賲 賱賷囟亘胤 賮賯賴 丕賱毓賯丕亘貙 賮賵賯賵毓 丕賱禺胤兀 賲賳 卮禺氐賺 賱丕 賷爻賵賾睾 丕賳鬲賴丕賰 丨賯賵賯賴貙 賵賯丿 賯乇乇 丕賱賮賯賴丕亍 兀氐丕賱丞賸 兀賳 丕賱毓賯丕亘 賱丕亘丿 兀賳 賷賰賵賳 毓賱賶 賯丿乇 丕賱禺胤兀貙 賵賱賲 賷鬲乇賰賵丕 卮兀賳 丕賱毓賯丕亘 賱賲丨丿丿丕鬲 睾賷乇 賲賳囟亘胤丞貨 賰胤亘丕毓 丕賱賯丕囟賷 兀賵 丕賱爻噩丕賳貙 賵丨賮賱鬲 賰鬲亘 丕賱賯囟丕亍 賵賲亘丕丨孬 丕賱鬲賮賱賷爻 賵丕賱鬲毓夭賷乇丕鬲 賵賰鬲亘 丕賱爻賷丕爻丞 丕賱卮乇毓賷丞 亘鬲賮丕氐賷賱 丿賯賷賯丞 賱兀丨賰丕賲 丕賱毓賯丕亘 丨賲丕賷丞賸 賱丨賯 賲賳 賵賯毓鬲 毓賱賷賴 丕賱毓賯賵亘丞 賲賳 賲夭丕噩賷丞 氐丕丨亘 丕賱爻賱胤丞 賵毓亘孬賷丞 丕賱卮乇 丕賱匕賷 亘丿丕禺賱賴.
* * *
賷賯毓 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賮賷 兀賰孬乇 賲賳 570 氐賮丨丞貙 賵賯丿 氐丿乇 賲丐禺乇賸丕 毓賳 賲乇賰夭 鬲賰賵賷賳 賱賱丿乇丕爻丕鬲 賵丕賱兀亘丨丕孬貙 賵丕賱賰鬲丕亘 丕賱兀氐賱賷 氐丿乇 毓丕賲 2007賲. 賵賴賵 噩丿賷乇 亘丕賱丕胤賱丕毓.
丕賱賰丕鬲亘 丕賱廿賷胤丕賱賷 亘乇賷賲賵 賱賷賮賷 鬲1987賲 賮賷 賵氐賷鬲賴 丕賱兀禺賷乇丞
鈥⑩赌�
鈥溫ベ� 丕賱噩乇賷賲丞 毓丿賷賲丞 丕賱禺胤乇 丕賱賲爻賲賵丨 亘賴丕貙 賵丕賱賲卮鬲乇賰丞 賲毓 丌禺乇賷賳 賰孬乇貙 賱丕 賷爻鬲胤賷毓 睾丕賱亘賷丞 丕賱亘卮乇 賲賯丕賵賲鬲賴丕鈥�
丕賱乇賵丕卅賷 丕賱兀賱賲丕賳賷 廿賱賷丕爻 賰丕賳鬲賷
鈥⑩赌⑩€�
賮賷 鬲賯丿賷賲 賮賱賷亘 夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵 賱賱胤亘毓丞 丕賱毓乇亘賷丞 賲賳 賰鬲丕亘賴 鈥溫Ｘ娯� 丕賱卮賷胤丕賳鈥� 賷賯賵賱:
芦廿賳 賵丕丨丿丞 賲賳 丕賱兀爻卅賱丞 丕賱鬲賷 賱胤丕賱賲丕 兀賵賯毓鬲賳賷 賮賷 丕賱丨賷乇丞 賲賳匕 胤賮賵賱鬲賷 賴賷 賰賷賮 兀賲賰賳 丨丿賵孬 丕賱賴賵賱賵賰賵爻鬲 賮賷 賲噩鬲賲毓 賲孬賯賮 賵賲鬲丨囟乇 賰賲丕 賰丕賳 毓賱賷賴 丕賱丨丕賱 賮賷 兀賱賲丕賳賷丕 賮賷 孬賱丕孬賷賳賷丕鬲 丕賱賯乇賳 丕賱賲丕囟賷責禄
賱賯丿 兀孬丕乇 丨丿賵孬 丕賱賴賵賱賵賰賵爻鬲/丕賱賲丨乇賯丞 兀爻卅賱丞 賰孬賷乇丞 賮賷 丕賱卮兀賳 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷 毓賲賵賲賸丕貙 賮賱賲 賷賰賳 賲賳 丕賱爻賴賱 毓賱賶 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 丕賱丨丿賷孬 鬲賯亘賱 賵賯賵毓 噩乇賷賲丞 亘賴匕賴 丕賱賮馗丕毓丞 賮賷 賵爻胤 鈥溬呚敦扁€� 賵賮賷 賲噩鬲賲毓 鈥溬呚傌呪€澵� 賵賱匕丕 賮賴賳丕賰 賲賷賵賱 賲爻鬲賲乇丞 賱鬲卮匕賷匕 賲乇鬲賰亘 丕賱噩乇賷賲丞 (噩毓賱賴 卮丕匕賸丕 毓賯賱賷賸丕 兀賵 賳賮爻賷賸丕)貙 賵丕毓鬲亘丕乇賴 禺丕乇噩賸丕 毓賳 丕賱賳爻賯 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷 丕賱爻賵賷賾貙 賵賱匕賱賰 丨賷賳 丕卮鬲賴乇鬲 馗丕賴乇丞 丕賱賯鬲賱丞 丕賱賲鬲爻賱爻賱賷賳 賮賷 丕賱賵賱丕賷丕鬲 丕賱賲鬲丨丿丞 賲賳匕 丕賱爻亘毓賷賳丕鬲 賵賲丕 亘毓丿賴丕 賰丕賳 丕賱乇毓亘 丕賱丨賯賷賯賷 賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱噩乇丕卅賲 賱賷爻 賳丕鬲噩賸丕 毓賳 丕賱賯鬲賱 賮賯胤貙 亘賱 賲丕 鬲賵氐賱鬲 賱賴 丕賱鬲丨賯賷賯丕鬲 賲賳 氐毓賵亘丞 鬲賲賷賷夭 丕賱賲噩乇賲 毓賳 睾賷乇賴 賲賳 丕賱兀爻賵賷丕亍貙 賵賮卮賱 丕賱毓丿賷丿 賲賳 丕賱賳賲丕匕噩 丕賱鬲丨賱賷賱賷丞 賵丕禺鬲亘丕乇丕鬲 丕賱兀噩賴夭丞 丕賱兀賲賳賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲丨丕賵賱 丕賱鬲賳亘丐 賵丕賱鬲賵賯毓 賱爻賱賵賰 丕賱賮丕毓賱 賵丕賰鬲卮丕賮 丕賱賲卮鬲亘賴 亘賴賲 兀孬賳丕亍 丕賱鬲丨賯賷賯丕鬲. 賵鬲鬲賰乇乇 賳賮爻 丕賱賲賷賵賱 毓賳丿 鬲賳丕賵賱 丨賵丕丿孬 丕賱丕睾鬲賷丕賱貙 兀賵 丕賱毓賲賱賷丕鬲 鈥溫з勜ヘ辟囏жㄙ娯┾€澵� 賵噩乇丕卅賲 丕賱丕睾鬲氐丕亘貙 賵賷鬲賮丕賯賲 丕賱兀賲乇 賱賷氐賱 廿賱賶 丨丿 鬲賮爻賷乇 毓賲賵賲 丕賱鬲氐乇賮丕鬲 睾賷乇 丕賱賲賯亘賵賱丞 丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷賸丕 亘丕毓鬲亘丕乇賴 丕囟胤乇丕亘丕鬲 賳賮爻賷丞 兀賵 賳丕鬲噩丞 毓賳 禺賱賱 毓賯賱賷 (丕賱胤亘賷亘 丕賱賳賮爻賷 丕賱兀賲乇賷賰賷 丌賱賳 賮乇丕賳爻賷爻 賷匕賰乇 鈥溫ж簇囏ж� 丕賱賲乇丕賴賯丕鬲 Hebephilia鈥� 賰賳賲賵匕噩 賱匕賱賰貙 賮亘毓丿 兀賳 賰丕賳 爻賳 丕賱亘賱賵睾 賴賵 丕賱毓賲乇 丕賱胤亘賷毓賷 賱賱夭賵丕噩 賮賷 賰賱 賲賰丕賳 賮賷 丕賱毓丕賱賲 鬲賯乇賷亘賸丕貙 兀氐亘丨 丕賱夭賵丕噩 賮賷 爻賳 丕賱亘賱賵睾 丕賱丌賳 噩乇賷賲丞 賮賷 丿賵賱 賰孬賷乇丞).
丕賱賳夭毓丞 賱廿禺囟丕毓 丕賱賵噩賵丿 賵丕賱兀卮賷丕亍 賱賱賳馗丕賲 賵丕賱囟亘胤 賵丕賱鬲丨賰賲 鈥撡堎囐� 賳夭毓丞 丨丿丕孬賷丞 毓賲賷賯丞 賵賲鬲噩匕乇丞- 賱丕 鬲賯亘賱 亘賭鈥澵з勜官嗁�/丕賱卮乇賾鈥� 丕賱胤亘賷毓賷貙 亘賱 鬲賮囟賾賱 禺乇丕賮丞 鈥溫з勜蒂佖� 丕賱亘賷囟丕亍鈥澵� 賮賰賱 廿賳爻丕賳 亘丨爻亘 賴匕賴 丕賱禺乇丕賮丞 丕賱卮丕卅毓丞 賷賵賱丿 賳賯賷賸丕 賳馗賷賮賸丕貙 賵毓賱賶 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 賵丕賱丿賵賱丞 賵丕賱賵丕賱丿賷賳 鬲乇亘賷鬲賴 賵賮賯賸丕 賱賲丕 賴賵 氐丕賱丨 賵賮丕囟賱貙 賵廿賳 賵賯毓鬲 賲賳賴 丕賳丨乇丕賮丕鬲 賮賴賷 鬲毓賵丿 亘丕賱兀爻丕爻 賱廿禺賮丕賯丕鬲 鬲乇亘賵賷丞貙 兀賵 賲卮丕賰賱 胤賮賵賱丞 賲毓賯丿丞貙 兀賵 丕囟胤乇丕亘丕鬲 賳賮爻賷丞 睾賷乇 賲賰鬲卮賮丞貙 兀賵 亘爻亘亘 兀噩賴夭丞 廿毓賱丕賲賷丞 賵兀賱毓丕亘 賮賷丿賷賵 賵兀噩賴夭丞 鬲賯賳賷丞 睾賷乇 禺丕囟毓丞 賱賱乇賯丕亘丞. 賵賴匕賴 丕賱丕爻鬲乇丕鬲賷噩賷丞 丕賱賲囟賲乇丞 賮賷 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱丨丿賷孬 (丕賱賴賵爻 亘丕賱廿丿丕乇丞 賵丕賱鬲丨賰賲) 賴賷 賲丕 賷噩毓賱 鈥溫簇百娯扳€� 丕賱賲噩乇賲 丕賱毓丕丿賷 兀爻賱賵亘賸丕 賲鬲賵賯毓賸丕貙 賱兀賳 賰賱 賴匕賴 丕賱鬲賮爻賷乇丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賳夭毓 丕賱賲爻丐賵賱賷丞 兀賵 鬲禺賮賮賴丕 毓賳 丕賱賮丕毓賱貙 賵鬲乇賮囟 丕賱丕毓鬲乇丕賮 亘毓賲賯 賳賵丕夭毓 丕賱卮乇 丕賱賮胤乇賷丞貙 鬲鬲爻賯 賵鬲賳爻噩賲 賲毓 丕賱鬲氐賵乇 丕賱丨丿丕孬賷 丕賱賷賵鬲賵亘賷 亘賯丕亘賱賷丞 丕賱噩乇賷賲丞 賱賱丕賳賯乇丕囟 廿匕丕 鬲賲賰賳 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 賲賳 鬲丨賯賷賯 丕賱賲夭賷丿 賲賳 丕賱囟亘胤 賵丕賱賳賲賵 賵鈥澵з勜傌呪€� 丕賱兀禺賱丕賯賷貙 兀賵 毓賱賶 丕賱兀賯賱 賯丕亘賱賷鬲賴丕 賱賱鬲丨賰賲 毓亘乇 鬲胤賵賷乇 丕賱丨丕賱丞 丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷丞 賵鬲賴匕賷亘賴丕.
丕賱賲丐乇禺 丕賱兀賱賲丕賳賷 賷賵乇噩 亘丕亘乇賵賮爻賰賷 -丕賱匕賷 毓賲賱 賱兀賰孬乇 賲賳 禺賲爻丞 毓卮乇 爻賳丞 賮賷 丿乇丕爻丞 丕賱爻賷丕爻丕鬲 賵丕賱賮馗丕卅毓 賵丕賱噩乇丕卅賲 丕賱爻鬲丕賱賷賳賷丞- 賷卮賷乇 廿賱賶 兀賳 賮丕毓賱 丕賱噩乇賷賲丞 丨賷賳 賷毓鬲乇賮 亘賴丕 毓賱賳賸丕 賷賯丿賲 丕賱兀爻亘丕亘 丕賱鬲賷 賱丕 鬲爻亘亘 丕賱亘賱亘賱丞 賱丿賶 賲噩鬲賲毓 賲鬲丨囟乇:
鈥溬佡勜� 兀丨丿 賷丨亘 兀賳 賷爻賲毓 兀賳 丕賱噩賳丕丞 毓匕亘賵丕 兀賵 賯鬲賱賵丕 亘丿丕賮毓 丕賱卮毓賵乇 亘丕賱爻毓丕丿丞 兀賵 丕賱賲賱賱 兀賵 賱兀賳賴賲 賱賲 賷鬲賲賰賳賵丕 賲賳 賲賯丕賵賲丞 囟睾胤 丕賱噩賲丕毓丞鈥� 賱丕 賵噩賵丿 賱賱噩賳丕丞 丿賵賳 賲爻丐賵賱賷丞 廿賱丕 賱兀賳 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱賲爻丕賱賲 賱丕 賷爻鬲胤賷毓 丕丨鬲賲丕賱 丕賱噩賳丕丞 丕賱賲爻丐賵賱賷賳 毓賳 兀賮毓丕賱賴賲鈥�.
賵賴匕賴 賴賷 丕賱丕爻鬲乇丕鬲賷噩賷丞 丕賱孬丕賳賷丞貙 賵賴賵 丿丕賮毓 丕賱卮毓賵乇 丕賱兀毓賲賯 亘丕賱兀賲丕賳 賵丕賱丕胤賲卅賳丕賳貙 賮丕賱兀賰孬乇 兀賲丕賳賸丕 兀賳 鬲噩毓賱 丕賱鬲賮噩賷乇 丕賱丕賳鬲丨丕乇賷 賲卮賰賱丞 賳賮爻賷丞貙 賵賱賷爻鬲 毓賲賱賷丞 賲賳馗賲丞 亘賴丿賮 爻賷丕爻賷 賲毓賯賵賱貙 賵兀賳 賲乇鬲賰亘 丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘 賴賵 賲噩乇丿 爻賷賰賵亘丕孬賷 賷毓丕賳賷 賲賳 禺賱賱 匕賴賳賷貙 賵賱賷爻 賰丕卅賳賸丕 毓丕賯賱賸丕 賵賲爻丐賵賱賸丕 賵賷毓鬲賯丿 亘賲卮乇賵毓賷丞 賴匕丕 丕賱毓賲賱 賵乇亘賲丕 賷鬲賮丕禺乇 亘賴貙 賵賱丕 賷禺鬲賱賮 賲賳 丕賱賳丕丨賷丞 丕賱賳賮爻賷丞 賵丕賱毓賯賱賷丞 毓賳 丕賱賰孬賷乇 賲賲賳 鬲毓乇賮賴賲. 賱丕 賷鬲爻丕賲丨 丕賱賳丕爻 -賱丕 爻賷賲丕 賮賷 丕賱亘賱丿丕賳 丕賱丌賲賳丞- 廿夭丕亍 賲賳 賷丨丕賵賱 夭毓夭毓丞 丕毓鬲賯丕丿賴賲 丕賱廿賷噩丕亘賷 毓賲賵賲賸丕 毓賳 賲毓賯賵賱賷丞 丕賱丌丿賲賷 賵毓丿丕賱丞 丕賱毓丕賱賲貙 賰賲丕 賷氐毓亘 毓賱賷賴賲 丕賱賲賵丕賮賯丞 毓賱賶 賰賵賳賴賲 賲毓乇囟賷賳 噩丿賸丕 賮賷 爻賷丕賯丕鬲 賵馗乇賵賮 賲毓賷賳丞 賱賱丕賳禺乇丕胤 賮賷 賮毓賱 丕賱噩乇賷賲丞貙 亘賱 賵丕乇鬲賰丕亘 丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘 丕賱賵丨卮賷 賵丕賱賯鬲賱!
鬲賰丕孬乇鬲 丕賱兀胤乇賵丨丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 鬲丨丕賵賱 鬲賮賳賷丿 賴匕丕 丕賱鬲氐賵乇 丕賱丨丕賱賲 毓賳 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳貙 賵兀毓丕丿鬲 賳馗乇賷丕鬲 賲鬲毓丿丿丞 賮賷 丕賱鬲丕乇賷禺 賵毓賱賵賲 丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓 賵丕賱賳賮爻 胤乇丨 丕賱毓賳賮/丕賱卮乇 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷 賲賳 夭賵丕賷丕 賲禺鬲賱賮丞 兀賰孬乇 鬲乇賰賷亘賸丕貙 賵睾賳賶貙 賵兀毓丕丿鬲 丕賱丕毓鬲亘丕乇 賱丿賵乇 丕賱爻賷丕賯 賵丕賱馗乇賵賮 賵丕賱兀賷丿賷賵賱賵噩賷丕 賵丕賱賳馗丕賲 賵丕賱賲丐爻爻丞 賮賷 丕賳禺乇丕胤 丕賱賮乇丿 賮賷 丕賱卮乇/丕賱毓賳賮. 賮賷 賰鬲丕亘賴丕 (丕賷禺賲丕賳 賮賷 丕賱賯丿爻) 丕賱匕賷 賷丨賰賷 賵賷丨賱賱 賲丨丕賰賲丞 丕丿賵賱賮 丕賷禺賲丕賳 賵賴賵 賲賵馗賮 兀賱賲丕賳賷 亘丕乇夭 卮丕乇賰 賮賷 毓賲賱賷丕鬲 廿亘丕丿丞貙 賵兀禺囟毓 賱賱賲丨丕賰賲丞 賮賷 賲丨賰賲丞 廿爻乇丕卅賷賱賷丞 賲胤賱毓 丕賱爻鬲賷賳丕鬲貙 鬲乇賶 丨賳丕 兀乇賳丿鬲 囟乇賵乇丞 丕賱鬲禺賱賷 毓賳 乇丐賷丞 丕賱兀賮乇丕丿 賲乇鬲賰亘賷 丕賱噩乇賷賲丞 亘丕毓鬲亘丕乇賴賲 丕爻鬲孬賳丕卅賷賷賳 兀賵 賵丨賵卮 賯丕爻賷丞 卮丕匕丞. 賵鬲卮賷乇 廿賱賶 兀賳 丕賷禺賲丕賳 亘丿丕 賮賷 丕賱賲丨丕賰賲丞 卮禺氐賸丕 胤亘賷毓賷賸賾丕 鬲賲丕賲賸丕 賵毓丕丿賷賸賾丕貙 鬲賯賵賱 兀乇賳丿鬲:
芦丨賵丕賱賷 爻鬲丞 毓賱賲丕亍 賳賮爻 兀噩丕夭賵賴 鈥溬冐簇� 胤亘賷毓賷鈥澷€ 鈥溫Ｙ冐� 胤亘賷毓賷丞 賲賳賷 兀賳丕 亘毓丿 兀賳 賮丨氐鬲賴鈥澵� 賯丕賱賴丕 兀丨丿賴賲 賲鬲毓噩亘賸丕貙 賮賷 丨賷賳 賵噩丿 丌禺乇 兀賳 賵囟毓賴 丕賱賳賮爻賷 丕賱毓丕賲貙 賵爻賱賵賰賴 鬲噩丕賴 夭賵噩鬲賴 賵兀胤賮丕賱賴 賵兀賲賴 賵兀亘賷賴 賵廿禺賵鬲賴 賵兀氐丿賯丕卅賴 賰丕賳 鈥溫坟ㄙ娯官娰嬞懾� 亘賱 賵賲乇睾賵亘賸丕鈥溌�.
賵賮賷 丿乇丕爻鬲賴丕 丕賱賴丕賲丞 鈥溫柏з冐必� 丕賱賯賴乇丞鈥� 鬲賯賵賱 丕賱賲禺鬲氐丞 丕賱賳賮爻賷丞 亘爻賲丞 毓亘丿丕賱毓夭賷夭: 芦鬲丐賰丿 丕賱丿乇丕爻丕鬲 兀賳 鬲賲賷賷夭 丕賱賯丕卅賲 亘丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘 毓賳 兀賷 卮禺氐 丌禺乇 兀孬賳丕亍 賲賯丕亘賱丞 毓丕丿賷丞 賱丕 賷亘丿賵 爻賴賱賸丕 兀賵 丨鬲賶 賲賲賰賳賸丕貙 賵賷丐賰丿 丕賱亘丕丨孬賵賳 兀賳 丕毓鬲賯丕丿丕鬲賳丕 鬲氐賵乇丕鬲賳丕 毓賳 丕賱噩賱丕丿 亘丕毓鬲亘丕乇賴 卮禺氐賸丕 賲禺賷賮賸丕 賷鬲爻賲 亘丕賱爻丕丿賷丞 賵丕賳毓丿丕賲 丕賱賲卮丕毓乇 賴賷 毓賱賲賷賸丕 賲丨囟 禺賷丕賱 賱丕 兀爻丕爻 賱賴 賲賳 丕賱氐丨丞貙 賵兀賳 兀賷 卮禺氐 賷亘丿賵 毓丕丿賷賸丕 亘賷賳賳丕 賵睾賷乇 賱丕賮鬲 賱賱賳馗乇 毓賱賶 丕賱廿胤賱丕賯貙 亘丕賱廿賲賰丕賳 兀賳 賷氐亘丨貙 兀賵 兀賳 賷賰賵賳 賮毓賱賷賸丕貙 囟丕賱毓賸丕 賮賷 鬲毓匕賷亘 丌禺乇賷賳禄.
賵鬲賵丕氐賱 亘丕賱賯賵賱:
芦賯丿 賷鬲賾爻賲 亘毓囟 丕賱賯丕卅賲賷賳 亘丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘 亘賰賵賳賴賲 兀賮乇丕丿賸丕 爻購賱胤賵賷賾賷賳貙 賷賰鬲賳賮賴賲 丕賱睾賲賵囟貙 賵賷賲鬲賱賰賵賳 匕賵丕賳賸丕 賲鬲囟禺賲丞貙 亘賱 賵賱丿賷賴賲 卮毓賵乇 夭丕卅丿 亘丕賱毓馗賲丞 賮賷 亘毓囟 丕賱兀丨賷丕賳貙 賱賰賳 丕賱爻賲丞 丕賱兀賰孬乇 鬲賰乇丕乇賸丕 賵孬亘丕鬲賸丕 賵廿孬丕乇丞賸 賱賱丿賴卮丞貙 賵丕賱鬲賷 賷兀鬲賷 匕賰乇賴丕 丿丕卅賲賸丕 賮賷 卮賴丕丿丕鬲 丕賱囟丨丕賷丕 賵賲賱丕丨馗丕鬲 毓賱賲丕亍 丕賱賳賮爻貙 賴賷 兀賳 賴丐賱丕亍 丕賱噩賱丕丿賷賳 賷亘丿賵賳 兀卮禺丕氐賸丕 胤亘賷毓賷賷賳 鬲賲丕賲賸丕貙 亘賱丕 丕賳丨乇丕賮丕鬲 賵丕囟丨丞 賵賱丕 爻賲丕鬲 賳賮爻賷丞 亘丕乇夭丞 鬲賱賮鬲 丕賱兀賳馗丕乇貙 亘賱 廿賳 丕賱賲賮丕賴賷賲 丕賱兀爻丕爻賷丞 丕賱賲購鬲丿丕賵賱丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷賯賵賲 毓賱賷賴丕 毓賱賲 丕賱賳賮爻 丕賱賲乇囟賷貙 鬲馗賴乇 賮卮賱賸丕 匕乇賷毓賸丕 賮賷 鬲毓乇賷賮賴賲 兀賵 鬲賲賷賷夭賴賲貙 兀賵 丨鬲賶 賮賴賲賴賲 亘賵囟賵丨禄.
兀爻鬲丕匕 毓賱賲 丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓 丕賱賲氐乇賷 丕賱賲毓乇賵賮 爻賷丿 毓賵賷爻 賷丨賰賷 賮賷 賲匕賰乇丕鬲賴 毓賳 賱賯丕卅賴 亘丕賱噩賱丕丿 丕賱卮賴賷乇 丨賲夭丞 亘爻賷賵賳賷貙 賵丕賱匕賷 丕卮鬲賴乇 亘賵丨卮賷鬲賴 丕賱賲賮乇胤丞 賮賷 爻噩賵賳 噩賲丕賱 毓亘丿丕賱賳丕氐乇貙 賵丕賱鬲賷 兀卮丕乇 賱亘毓囟賴丕 兀丨賲丿 乇丕卅賮 賮賷 賰鬲丕亘賴 鈥溫з勜ㄙ堌жㄘ� 丕賱爻賵丿丕亍鈥� 兀丨丿 賰賱丕爻賷賰賷丕鬲 兀丿亘 丕賱爻噩賵賳 丕賱毓乇亘賷丞貙 賵賯丿 賰丕賳鬲 賱爻賷丿 毓賵賷爻 毓賱丕賯丞 賯丿賷賲丞 亘丨賲夭丞 亘爻賷賵賳賷貙 賵賱賲丕 毓丕丿 毓賵賷爻 賲賳 丕賱丿乇丕爻丞 賮賷 丕賱賵賱丕賷丕鬲 丕賱賲鬲丨丿丞 丕賱鬲賯賶 亘賴貙 賷賯賵賱 丿.毓賵賷爻:
芦兀匕賰乇 兀賳賳賷 亘胤乇賷賯 丕賱氐丿賮丞 毓乇賮鬲 乇賯賲 丕賱鬲賱賷賮賵賳 丕賱禺丕氐 亘丨賲夭丞 亘爻賷賵賳賷貙 鈥� 賱賯丿 賯丕亘賱鬲 亘毓囟 賲賳 毓匕亘賴賲 賵賱賲 兀賰賳 兀丿賴卮 賮兀賳丕 兀毓乇賮 丕賱乇噩賱鈥� 丕鬲氐賱鬲 亘賴 賮毓賸賱丕 鬲賱賷賮賵賳賷賸丕貙 賵亘丿丕 馗乇賮賴 賵賴賵 賷鬲丨丿孬 賲毓賷 賵賵丕賮賯 毓賱賶 賲賯丕亘賱鬲賷 賮賷 丕賱爻噩賳 丕賱丨乇亘賷貙 賵丨丿丿賳丕 丕賱賲賵毓丿 賱賱賯丕亍貙 賵匕賴亘鬲 廿賱賶 丕賱賲賵毓丿 丕賱賲丨丿丿. 賰丕賳 丕賱丿丕賮毓 廿賱賶 賲賯丕亘賱鬲賴 兀賳 兀乇丕賴 賵兀賳 兀鬲丨丿孬 賲毓賴 賮賯胤貙 賵兀賳 兀匕賰賾乇賴 亘丕賱兀賷丕賲 丕賱賲丕囟賷丞 賱毓賱賷 兀賳 兀毓賱賲 毓賳 卮禺氐賷鬲賴 兀賰孬乇. 賵兀賳賳賷 丕賳鬲馗乇鬲 兀賲丕賲 亘丕亘 丕賱爻噩賳 丕賱丨乇亘賷 賯亘賱 兀賳 賷賮鬲丨 賰孬乇 賲賳 賳氐賮 爻丕毓丞. 賵賰丕賳鬲 丕賱卮賲爻 鬲鬲兀賴亘 賱賱睾乇賵亘. 賵賰丕賳 丕賱夭賲賳 禺乇賷賮丕賸 賮賷 毓丕賲 1960賲 亘毓丿 毓賵丿鬲賷 賲賳 丕賱賵賱丕賷丕鬲 丕賱賲鬲丨丿丞 亘爻賳賵丕鬲. 賵賮噩兀丞 賮鬲丨 丕賱亘丕亘 賵賯丕丿賳賷 兀丨丿 丕賱毓爻丕賰乇 廿賱賶 賲賰鬲亘 丨賲夭丞 丕賱亘爻賷賵賳賷貙 賵賵噩丿鬲賴 噩丕賱爻丕 毓賱賶 兀乇賷賰丞 賵賰丕賳鬲 噩孬鬲賴 賯丿 鬲囟禺賲鬲 賰孬賷乇賸丕貙 賵亘丿丕 賱賷 賵賰兀賳賴 兀丨丿 丕賱賯乇丕氐賳丞 賮賯丿 賰丕賳 賷睾賱賯 廿丨丿賶 毓賷賳賷賴 賵賷賮鬲丨 丕賱兀禺乇賶. 賵鬲兀賰丿鬲 賲匕 丕賱賱丨馗丞 丕賱鬲賷 賵賯賮鬲 賮賷賴丕 毓賱賶 亘丕亘 丕賱爻噩賳 兀賳賳賷 賰賳鬲 賲乇丕賯亘賸丕. 賵賯丕賲 賱賷爻賱賲 毓賱賷 賵胤賱亘 賱賷 賮賳噩丕賳丕賸 賲賳 丕賱卮丕賷. 賵毓賳丿賲丕 噩賱爻鬲 賵噩丿鬲賳賷 兀賳馗乇 廿賱賶 丨賵丕卅胤 丕賱丨噩乇丞 賮廿匕丕 毓賱賷賴丕 氐賵乇丞 噩賲丕賱 毓亘丿 丕賱賳丕氐乇 賵氐賵乇丞 毓亘丿 丕賱丨賰賷賲 毓丕賲乇 賵賱丕賮鬲丕鬲 賮賷賴丕 亘毓囟 丕賱毓亘丕乇丕鬲 丕賱卮丕卅毓丞. 賵賱賲 賷禺賱 丨丕卅胤 賲賳 賱丕賮鬲丞 賲賰鬲賵亘 毓賱賷賴丕 毓亘丕乇丞 賲孬賱 鈥溬娯ж必� 丕爻鬲乇鈥� 賵爻鬲乇賰 賷丕乇亘鈥� 賵 鈥溫з勜池� 賰乇賷賲鈥�. 賵賮賷 兀孬賳丕亍 鬲毓丕胤賷 丕賱卮丕賷 賵賯亘賱 匕賱賰 賰賳丕 賳鬲丨丿孬 賲毓丕賸. 賵賯丿 亘丿兀鬲 丕賱丨丿賷孬貙 兀賵賱丕賸 匕丕賰乇丕賸 賱賴 毓賳 兀丨賵丕賱賷 賵賲丕匕丕 兀毓賲賱 賮賷 丕賱賵賯鬲 丕賱丨丕囟乇. 賵賲丕匕丕 賰賳鬲 兀毓賲賱 賮賷 丕賱賮鬲乇丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲乇賰鬲 賮賷賴丕 賲氐乇賳丕 丕賱禺丕賱丿丞. 賵亘丿兀 賷鬲丨丿孬 丨賲夭丞 丕賱亘爻賷賵賳賷 毓賳丿賲丕 爻兀賱鬲賴 毓賳 夭賵丕噩賴 賲賳 丕賱爻賷丿丞 鈥溫з勝呚操堌┾€� 丕賱鬲賷 賰丕賳 賷乇睾亘 賮賷 夭賵丕噩賴丕 廿匕丕 賲丕 胤賱賯鬲. 賮賯丕賱 廿賳賴 鬲夭賵噩賴丕 賮毓賱丕賸 賵賱賰賳賴 亘毓丿 賮鬲乇丞 胤賱賯賴丕. 賵兀賰丿 賱賷 兀賳賴 賱丕 賷匕賴亘 廿賱賶 賲爻乇丨 賵賱丕 廿賱賶 爻賷賳賲丕. 賵氐乇丨 亘兀賳賴 賲孬賱 丕賱賲毓鬲賯賱賷賳 賮賷 丕賱爻噩賳 賮賴賵 -賮賷 丨賯賷賯丞 丕賱兀賲乇- 賲毓鬲賯賱 兀賷囟丕貙 賵兀乇丕賳賷 爻乇賷乇丕賸 賮賷 丨噩乇丞 噩丕賳亘賷丞 賵匕賰乇 兀賳賴 賱丕 賷亘乇丨 丕賱爻乇賷乇 廿賱丕 廿匕丕 賰丕賳 賴賳丕賰 毓賲賱 賷賯鬲囟賷 賵噩賵丿賴 賮賷 賲賰丕賳 丌禺乇. 賵賯丕賱 賲丐賰丿丕賸 廿賳 賲丕 賮毓賱賴 賱丕 賷賱丕賲 毓賱賷賴貨 賮廿賳賴 廿賳 賱賲 賷賰賳 賯丿 賮毓賱賴 賰丕賳 睾賷乇賴 亘丕賱囟乇賵乇丞 賯丿 賮毓賱賴. 賵爻乇毓丕賳 賲丕 賯賱鬲 賱賴: 廿匕賳 賮兀賳鬲 丕賱丌賳 鬲爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賳 鬲賳丕賲 丿賵賳賲丕 賯賱賯. 賮兀賰丿 毓賱賶 氐丨丞 賯賵賱賷. 賵賰丕賳 賴匕丕 丕賱鬲兀賰賷丿 賷丐賰丿 毓賱賶 兀賳賴 卮禺氐 匕賵 卮禺氐賷丞 爻賷賰賵亘丕鬲賷丞 賷亘乇乇 賰賱 鬲氐乇賮丕鬲賴 賵賱丕 賷賳丿賲 毓賱賶 兀賷 賲賳賴丕貨 賮丕賱賯賷賲 兀賷丞 賯賷賲 賱丕 鬲賯賮 丨丕卅賱丕賸 賮賷 爻亘賷賱 兀賷 毓賲賱 賷賯賵賲 亘賴 賵賱毓賱 賲賳 賷鬲丕丨 賱賴 丕賱丕胤賱丕毓 毓賱賶 賲賱賮 禺丿賲丞 賴匕丕 丕賱胤丕睾賷丞 兀賳 賷噩丿 丕賱賰孬賷乇 丕賱賰孬賷乇 賲賲丕 賷亘乇乇 賴匕丕 丕賱賵氐賮. 賵賴賵 賰卮禺氐 爻賷賰賵亘丕鬲賷 鬲乇丕賴 賰乇賷賲丕賸 匕丕 丕亘鬲爻丕賲丞 噩匕丕亘丞禄. 賵賴賳丕 鬲乇賶 亘賵囟賵丨 賰賷賮 賱賲 賷爻鬲胤毓 丿.毓賵賷爻 鈥撠ㄘ必嘿� 鬲兀賴賷賱賴 丕賱毓賱賲賷- 鬲噩丕賵夭 丕賱鬲賮爻賷乇 丕賱賳夭賵毓賷 賱賮毓賱 亘爻賷賵賳賷貙 賵鬲兀賰賷丿賴 賱賲賷賵賱賴 丕賱爻賷賰賵亘丕孬賷丞.
* * *
兀毓賵丿 亘毓丿 賴匕丕 丕賱丕爻鬲胤乇丕丿 丕賱胤賵賷賱貙 賱賰鬲丕亘 鈥溫Ｘ娯� 丕賱卮賷胤丕賳鈥�. 賷鬲丨丿孬 丕賱賲丐賱賮 賮賷 丕賱亘丿丕賷丞 毓賳 鬲賳賵毓 丕賱鬲賮爻賷乇丕鬲 丕賱賲胤乇賵丨丞 廿夭丕亍 賲卮賰賱丞 丕賱卮乇貙 賵賴賵 賷毓乇賮 丕賱卮乇 賮賷 兀胤乇賵丨鬲賴 亘兀賳賴鈥� 鬲毓賲丿 丕賱鬲氐乇賮 亘胤乇賯 鬲丐匕賷貙 兀賵 鬲毓鬲丿賷 毓賱賶貙 兀賵 鬲丨賯乇貙 兀賵 鬲爻賱亘 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷丞 毓賳 丕賱丌禺乇 丕賱亘乇賷亍 兀賵 鬲丿賲乇賴貙 賵賷賯賵賲 兀賷囟賸丕 毓賱賶 丕爻鬲睾賱丕賱 丕賱賮乇丿 賱氐賱丕丨賷丕鬲賴 賵爻賱胤丕鬲賴 丕賱賳馗丕賲賷丞 賮賷 鬲卮噩賷毓 丕賱丌禺乇賷賳 毓賱賶 匕賱賰 兀賵 賮賷 丕賱爻賲丕丨 賱賴賲 亘丕賱賯賷丕賲 亘賴 賳賷丕亘丞 毓賳賴鈥澵� 賵兀亘乇夭 鬲賱賰 丕賱鬲賮爻賷乇丕鬲:
1- 丕賱乇丐賷丞 丕賱鬲賯賱賷丿賷丞 (賵賴賷 丕賱卮丕卅毓丞 亘賷賳 賲賳 賳卮丐賵丕 賮賷 孬賯丕賮丕鬲 鬲購丐賰丿 毓賱賶 丕賱賮乇丿丕賳賷丞)貙 賵鬲毓鬲賲丿 毓賱賶 鬲丨丿賷丿 丕賱爻賲丕鬲 丕賱卮禺氐賷丞 丕賱賮胤乇賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賯賵丿 廿賱賶 丕賱賮毓賱貙 賲孬賱 丕賱亘賳賷丞 丕賱噩賷賳賷丞貙 賵丕賱爻賲丕鬲 丕賱卮禺氐賷丞貙 賵丕賱卮禺氐賷丞 匕丕鬲賴丕貙 賵丕賱廿乇丕丿丞 丕賱丨乇丞貙 賵亘毓囟 丕賱賳賵丕夭毓 丕賱兀禺乇賶貙 賮賷 丨丕賱丞 丕賱爻賱賵賰 丕賱毓賳賷賮 爻賳亘丨孬 毓賳 賲賷賵賱 爻丕丿賷賾丞貙 ..丕賱禺. 賵鬲爻賲賶 亘丕賱乇丐賷丞 鈥溫з勝嗀操堌官娯┾€� 兀賷 丕賱鬲賷 鬲毓鬲賲丿 毓賱賶 鬲丨賱賷賱 丕賱賳賵丕夭毓 丕賱丿丕禺賱賷丞 賱賱廿賳爻丕賳. 賵賷乇賶 丕賱賲丐賱賮 兀賳 丕賱胤亘賾 丕賱賳賮爻賷 丕賱丨丿賷孬 賳夭賵毓賷賾 丕賱鬲賵噩賴貙 賵賲孬賱賴 毓賱賲 丕賱賳賮爻 丕賱爻乇賷乇賷 賵毓賱賲 賳賮爻 丕賱卮禺氐賷丞 賵丕賱鬲賯賷賷賲. 賵鬲毓鬲賲丿 兀睾賱亘 丕賱賲丐爻爻丕鬲 丕賱睾乇亘賷丞 毓賱賶 賴匕賴 丕賱乇丐賷丞貙 賵賷卮賲賱 匕賱賰 賲丐爻爻丕鬲 丕賱賯丕賳賵賳 賵丕賱胤亘 賵丕賱丿賷賳.
2- 丕賱乇丐賷丞 丕賱馗乇賮賷丞/丕賱賲賵賯賮賷丞: 賵廿賱賷賴丕 賷賲賷賱 毓賱賲丕亍 丕賱賳賮爻 丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷賵賳 (賵毓賱賶 乇兀爻賴賲 丕賱賲丐賱賮) 賵賴賲 賷亘丨孬賵賳 鈥溫官� 丕賱賲丿賶 丕賱匕賷 賷賲賰賳 賲毓賴 廿乇噩丕毓 兀賮毓丕賱 丕賱賮乇丿 廿賱賶 毓賵丕賲賱 禺丕乇噩丞 毓賳賴 賲孬賱 丕賱賲鬲睾賷乇丕鬲 丕賱馗乇賮賷丞 賵丕賱毓賲賱賷丕鬲 丕賱亘賷卅賷丞 丕賱禺丕氐丞 亘賲丨賷胤 賲毓賷賳鈥�.
賵賱鬲賯乇賷亘 丕賱丕禺鬲賱丕賮 丕賱賳賵毓賷 亘賷賳 丕賱乇丐賷鬲賷賳 賷胤乇丨 丕賱賲丐賱賮 賴匕賴 丕賱賲賯丕乇賳丞:
鈥溫з勝呝傌ж辟嗀� 亘賷賳 丕賱賲賯丕乇亘丞 丕賱賳夭賵毓賷丞 賮賷 丕賱胤亘 丕賱賳賮爻賷 賵兀禺鬲賴丕 丕賱馗乇賮賷丞 賴賷 賰丕賱賲賯丕乇賳丞 亘賷賳 賳賲賵匕噩 丕賱乇毓丕賷丞 丕賱胤亘賷丞 賱賱賲乇囟賶 賵賳賲賵匕噩 丕賱氐丨丞 丕賱毓丕賲丞貙 賮賳賲賵匕噩 丕賱乇毓丕賷丞 丕賱胤亘賷丞 賷亘丨孬 毓賳 賲氐丿乇 丕賱賲乇囟 兀賵 丕賱廿毓丕賯丞 毓賳丿 丕賱卮禺氐 丕賱賲氐丕亘貙 亘賷賳賲丕 賷賮鬲乇囟 丕賱亘丕丨孬賵賳 賮賷 丕賱氐丨丞 丕賱毓丕賲丞 兀賳 丕賱亘賷卅丞 賴賷 丕賱鬲賷 鬲兀鬲賷 亘賳賵丕賯賱 丕賱賲乇囟貙 賴賷 丕賱鬲賷 鬲禺賱賯 丕賱馗乇賵賮/丕賱賲賵丕賯賮 丕賱鬲賷 鬲乇毓賶 丕賱賲乇囟. 賮賷 亘毓囟 丕賱兀丨賷丕賳 -賵亘睾囟 丕賱賳馗乇 毓賳 賲丨丕賵賱丕鬲 鬲丨爻賷賳 丕賱丨丕賱丞 丕賱氐丨賷丞 賱賱賮乇丿- 賷賰賵賳 丕賱賲乇賷囟 賴賵 丕賱賲賳鬲噩 丕賱賳賴丕卅賷 賱賲爻亘亘丕鬲 丕賱賲乇囟 丕賱賲賵噩賵丿丞 賮賷 丕賱亘賷卅丞貙 賵丕賱鬲賷 廿賳 賱賲 鬲購賵丕噩賴貨 爻鬲爻鬲賲乇 賮賷 丕賱廿囟乇丕乇 亘丌禺乇賷賳. 毓賱賶 爻亘賷賱 丕賱賲孬丕賱貙 賵賮賯 丕賱賲賯丕乇亘丞 丕賱賳夭賵毓賷丞 爻賳賯丿賾賲 賱賱胤賮賱 丕賱匕賷 賷馗賴乇 囟毓賮賸丕 賮賷 賯丿乇鬲賴 毓賱賶 丕賱鬲毓賱賲 毓賱丕噩丕鬲 胤亘賷丞 賵爻賱賵賰賷丞 賲禺鬲賱賮丞 賱賲爻丕毓丿鬲賴 毓賱賶 鬲噩丕賵夭 廿毓丕賯鬲賴貙 賮賷 丨賷賳 兀賳 爻亘亘 丕賱賲卮賰賱丞 賮賷 亘毓囟 丕賱丨丕賱丕鬲 賵禺丕氐丞 亘賷賳 丕賱賮賯乇丕亍 賴賵 丕爻鬲賳卮丕賯 丕賱乇氐丕氐 丕賱賲賵噩賵丿 賮賷 丕賱丿賴丕賳丕鬲 丕賱賲鬲賯卮乇丞 賲賳 丨賵丕卅胤 賲賳丕夭賱賴賲貙 賵賴賵 丕賱兀賲乇 丕賱匕賷 賷夭丿丕丿 爻賵亍賸丕 丨丕賱丞 丕賱賮賯乇 丕賱卮丿賷丿貙 賮賴賰匕丕 鬲賰賵賳 丕賱賲賯丕乇亘丞 丕賱馗乇賮賷丞. 賴匕賴 丕賱賲賳馗賵乇丕鬲 丕賱亘丿賷賱丞 賱賷爻鬲 賲噩乇丿 丕禺鬲賱丕賮丕鬲 賮賷 丕賱鬲丨賱賷賱丕鬲 丕賱鬲氐賵乇賷丞貙 賱賰賳賴丕 鬲丐丿賷 廿賱賶 胤乇賯 卮丿賷丿丞 丕賱丕禺鬲賱丕賮 賮賷 賲毓丕賱噩丞 丕賱賲卮賰賱丕鬲 丕賱卮禺氐賷丞 賵丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷丞鈥�.
賷賳卮睾賱 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 亘亘丨孬 丿賵乇 丕賱賲賰賵賳丕鬲 丕賱孬賱丕孬賷丞 (丕賱賮乇丿貙 丕賱賲賵賯賮/丕賱馗乇賮貙 丕賱賳馗丕賲/丕賱賲丐爻爻丞) 賮賷 爻賱賵賰 丕賱鬲丨賵賱 賳丨賵 丕賱卮乇貙 兀賵 丕賱毓賳賮貙 賵丕賱噩乇賷賲丞. 賲丕 賴賷 丕賱毓賵丕賲賱 丕賱爻賷丕賯賷丞 賵丕賱馗乇賮賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲噩毓賱 丕賱賮乇丿 丕賱爻賵賷 賷賳禺乇胤 賮賷 丕乇鬲賰丕亘 丕賱噩乇賷賲丞責 賲丕匕丕 毓賳 丿賵乇 丕賱賲丐爻爻丞 兀賵 丕賱賳馗丕賲 賮賷 匕賱賰責 賮賭鈥澵з勝呚へ必ж� 丕賱賳馗丕賲賷丞 賮賷 丕賱爻賱賵賰 賴賷 亘賲孬丕亘丞 丕賱賯賵丞 丕賱兀爻丕爻賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲氐賳毓 丕賱兀賵囟丕毓 丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷丞 賵鬲亘乇乇賴丕 賵鬲丨丕賮馗 毓賱賶 賵噩賵丿賴丕貙 廿賳賴丕 賳鬲丕噩 丕噩鬲賲丕毓 丕賱賯賵賶 丕賱爻賷丕爻賷丞 賵丕賱丿賷賳賷丞 賵丕賱賯丕賳賵賳賷丞 賱鬲氐賳毓 噩賲賷毓賴丕 賵毓丕亍賸 噩賷丿賸丕 兀賵 爻賷卅賸丕 鬲賵囟毓 賮賷賴 丕賱鬲賮丕丨丕鬲 亘卮賰賱 賲賳賮乇丿 賱鬲禺乇噩 賲賳賴 亘毓丿 匕賱賰 氐丕賱丨丞 兀賵 賮丕爻丿丞 亘丨爻亘 丕賱禺氐丕卅氐 丕賱馗乇賮賷丞 賱鬲賱賰 丕賱兀賵毓賷丞鈥�.
賷乇鬲賰夭 賰鬲丕亘 夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵 -賱賱亘乇賴賳丞 毓賱賶 賴匕賴 丕賱兀胤乇賵丨丞 丕賱賵丕爻毓丞- 毓賱賶 鬲噩乇亘丞 鈥溫池� 爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿鈥� 丕賱卮賴賷乇丞貙 賵賴賷 鬲噩乇亘丞 兀賯賷賲鬲 賮賷 賲胤賱毓 丕賱爻亘毓賷賳丕鬲 賱兀噩賱 丕賰鬲卮丕賮 鬲兀孬賷乇 丕賱爻噩賳 毓賱賶 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賵丕賱丨乇丕爻. 賮賯丿 胤賱亘 夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵 賲賳 賲噩賲賵毓丞 賲鬲胤賵毓賷賳 丕賱毓賲賱 賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞貙 賵賯亘賱賵丕 亘毓丿 賮丨氐賴賲 賱賱鬲兀賰丿 賲賳 爻賱丕賲鬲賴賲 丕賱賳賮爻賷丞 賵丕賱噩爻賲賷丞貙 孬賲 丕賳賯爻賲賵丕 毓卮賵丕卅賷賸丕 廿賱賶 丨乇丕爻 賵爻噩賳丕亍. 賵賱賰賷 鬲賰賵賳 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 兀賰孬乇 賵丕賯毓賷丞貙 亘丿兀鬲 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 亘丕毓鬲賯丕賱 卮亘賴 丨賯賷賯賷 賲賳 賯亘賱 卮乇胤丞 丕賱賵賱丕賷丞. 賵胤賵丕賱 鬲爻毓丞 賮氐賵賱 鬲卮賰賱 賳氐賮 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 鬲賯乇賷亘賸丕 賷爻乇丿 夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵 亘丕賱鬲賮氐賷賱 丕賱賰孬賷賮 賲丕 丨氐賱 胤賵丕賱 兀賷丕賲 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞貙 亘丕賱丕爻鬲賳丕丿 廿賱賶 兀乇卮賷賮 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 丕賱氐賵鬲賷 賵丕賱賲乇卅賷 賵賲匕賰乇丕鬲 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賵丕賱賱賯丕亍丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 兀噩乇賷鬲 賯亘賱 賵亘毓丿 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 賲毓 丕賱賲鬲胤賵毓賷賳. 賱賲 鬲爻鬲賰賲賱 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 亘賱 丕囟胤乇 丕賱賲丐賱賮 賵胤丕賯賲賴 丕賱亘丨孬賷 賱廿賷賯丕賮賴丕 亘毓丿 鬲丿賴賵乇 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 亘卮賰賱 丿乇丕賲賷貙 賵氐賮賴 丕賱賲丐賱賮 亘丿賯丞. 鬲亘丿賵 鬲噩乇亘丞 丕賱爻噩賳 卮丿賷丿丞 丕賱兀賴賲賷丞 賲賳 丕賱賳丕丨賷丞 丕賱鬲丨賱賷賱賷丞 賮賴賷 鬲卮乇丨 亘卮賰賱 賱丕賮鬲 賯丕亘賱賷丞 丕賱丕賳爻丕賳 丕賱毓丕丿賷 賱賱鬲賵丨卮貙 賵鬲亘丿賵 賱丨馗丞 丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘 亘賷賳 丕賱丨丕乇爻 賵丕賱賲毓鬲賯賱 賱丨馗丞 賰丕卮賮丞 (賮丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘 丕賱匕賷 賷賯氐丿 賱廿禺囟丕毓 丕賱胤乇賮 丕賱丌禺乇 噩爻丿賷賸丕 賵賳賮爻賷賸丕 賵毓賯賱賷賸丕 賴賵 噩賵賴乇 丕賱爻賷丕爻丞) 賮賯丿 兀孬亘鬲 夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵 兀賳 丕賱丨乇丕爻 丕賱匕賷 丕乇鬲賰亘賵丕 兀賮毓丕賱 賲禺賱丞 賵賲爻賷卅丞 賱賱爻噩賳丕亍 -兀丿鬲 亘亘毓囟賴賲 賱賱丕賳賴賷丕乇 賵毓丿賲 丕爻鬲賰賲丕賱 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞- 賰丕賳賵丕 兀爻賵賷丕亍 鬲賲丕賲賸丕 賲賳 丕賱賳丕丨賷丞 丕賱賳賮爻賷丞 賵丕賱毓賯賱賷丞.
亘毓丿 匕賱賰 禺氐氐 丕賱賲丐賱賮 賮氐賱賷賳 賱鬲丨賱賷賱 毓賳 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 賵丿賱丕賱丕鬲賴丕 亘丕爻鬲賮丕囟丞貙 賵鬲丨賵賱丕鬲 丕賱丨乇丕爻貙 賵賯賵丞 丕賱爻賷丕賯貙 賵丕賱馗乇賮 丕賱匕賷 賮乇囟 毓賱賶 丕賱噩賲賷毓 丕賱鬲氐乇賮 亘氐賵乇丞 賲乇賷毓丞貙 賵毓賳 鬲賯賲氐 丕賱兀丿賵丕乇貙 賵爻胤賵丞 丕賱賯亘賵賱 丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷貙 賵睾賷乇 匕賱賰 賲賳 丕賱丌賱賷丕鬲 丕賱丿丕禺賱賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賵賮乇 賲賳丕禺丕鬲 賷賳賲賵 賮賷賴丕 丕賱毓賳賮 丕賱賱丕廿賳爻丕賳賷. 賰賲丕 鬲丨丿孬 毓賳 兀禺賱丕賯賷丞 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞貙 賵丕賳毓賰丕爻丕鬲賴丕 毓賱賶 丕賱賲卮丕乇賰賷賳 噩賲賷毓賸丕 賵丕賱胤丕賯賲 丕賱亘丨孬賷.
賵賮賷 賮氐賵賱 賱丕丨賯丞 丕賳胤賱賯 夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵 賱鬲賵爻賷毓 賳胤丕賯 丕賱亘丨孬 賵丕爻鬲毓乇丕囟 丕賱亘丨賵孬 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賵氐賱鬲 廿賱賶 賳鬲丕卅噩 賲卮丕亘賴丞 賱賲丕 鬲賵氐賱鬲 廿賱賷賴 鬲噩乇亘丞 爻噩賳 爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿貙 賮賷卮賷乇 賱亘丨孬 爻賵賱賵賲賵賳 丌爻賰貙 賵鬲噩乇亘丞 賲賷賱睾乇丕賲 丕賱卮賴賷乇丞貙 賵睾賷乇賴丕 賲賳 丕賱丿乇丕爻丕鬲 丕賱氐丕丿賲丞 賵丕賱賲孬賷乇丞.
賵賮賷 賮氐賱 鬲丕賱 賷亘丿兀 丕賱賲丐賱賮 賮賷 乇丨賱丞 噩丿賷丿丞 賮賷 爻噩賳 兀亘賵 睾乇賷亘貙 賵賴賵 賷毓鬲賯丿 兀賳 賲丕 丨丿孬 賮賷 兀亘賵 睾乇賷亘 賲賳 丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘 賵睾賷乇賴 賷卮丕亘賴 -賲賳 賳賵丕丨 毓丿丞- 賲丕 丨丿孬 賮賷 鬲噩乇亘鬲賴 賮賷 爻噩賳 爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿 毓賱賶 賲爻鬲賵賶 丕賱丌賱賷丕鬲 丕賱賲賳鬲噩丞 賱賱毓賳賮 賵丕賱鬲丨賵賱 賱賮毓賱 丕賱噩乇賷賲丞貙 賵賲賳 禺賱丕賱 毓賱丕賯鬲賴 亘兀丨丿 賲乇鬲賰亘賷 噩乇丕卅賲 丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘 賮賷 丕賱爻噩賳 爻賷亍 丕賱匕賰乇 賷丐賰丿 -毓亘乇 鬲丨賱賷賱丕鬲 賲胤賵賱丞 賱胤亘賷毓丞 毓賲賱 噩賳賵丿 丕賱丕丨鬲賱丕賱 賵爻賷丕爻丕鬲 丕賱丕毓鬲賯丕賱 廿亘丕賳 亘丿丕賷丕鬲 丕賱丕丨鬲賱丕賱 丕賱兀賲乇賷賰賷 賱賱毓乇丕賯- 毓賲賯 兀孬乇 丕賱賲賵賯賮 賵丕賱馗乇賵賮 賵丕賱爻賷丕賯 賮賷 丿賮毓 丕賱賲噩賳丿賷賳 賱賱鬲毓匕賷亘 丕賱賵丨卮賷貙 賵鬲氐賵賷乇 噩乇丕卅賲賴賲 賵丕賱鬲賮丕禺乇 亘賴丕.
賵賷賵丕氐賱 鬲丨賱賷賱丕鬲賴 毓亘乇 賲鬲丕亘毓丞 賲賳馗賲丞 賵卮乇賵丨 賲賵爻毓丞 賱賱賵孬丕卅賯 賵丕賱賵賯丕卅毓 丕賱鬲賷 鬲丿賷賳 丕賱賲丐爻爻丞 丕賱爻賷丕爻賷丞 賵丕賱毓爻賰乇賷丞 丕賱兀賲乇賷賰賷丞 丕賱囟丕賱毓丞 賮賷 噩乇丕卅賲 賰孬賷乇丞 賮賷 丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘貙 丕賱兀賲乇 丕賱匕賷 丿賮毓賴 賱鬲丨賲賷賱 賲爻丐賵賱賷丞 噩乇賷賲丞 丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘 賱賯丕卅賲丞 胤賵賷賱丞 賮賷 丕賱賴賷賰賱賷丞 丕賱廿丿丕乇賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲爻賷乇 丕賱丕丨鬲賱丕賱 賰賰賱貙 亘丿亍丕賸 賲賳 廿丿丕乇丞 丕賱爻噩賳 賵丕賳鬲賴丕亍 亘丕賱乇卅賷爻 丕賱兀爻亘賯 亘賵卮 丕賱丕亘賳貙 賵賱亘賷丕賳 丿賵乇 丕賱賲丐爻爻丞 賮賷 鬲丨賵賱 丕賱賮乇丿 賱賱毓賳賮 賷賯賵賱 夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵:
鈥溫关ж┵� 賲丕 賷爻賲賶 丕賱爻賱賵賰 丕賱賲賳丨乇賮 睾賷乇 丕賱賯丕賳賵賳賷 兀賵 睾賷乇 丕賱兀禺賱丕賯賷 賱賱毓丕賲賱賷賳 賮賷 丕賱禺丿賲丞 丕賱毓丕賲丞 賲孬賱 乇噩丕賱 丕賱卮乇胤丞 兀賵 囟亘丕胤 丕賱賲丐爻爻丕鬲 丕賱廿氐賱丕丨賷丞 兀賵 丕賱噩賳賵丿 亘兀禺胤丕亍 芦賯賱丞 賲賳 丕賱鬲賮丕丨丕鬲 丕賱賮丕爻丿丞禄. 賵賴賵 賲丕 賷毓賳賷 囟賲賳賷賸丕 兀賳賴賲 丕爻鬲孬賳丕亍 賳丕丿乇 賷賳亘睾賷 賵囟毓賴 賮賷 兀丨丿 噩丕賳亘賷 丕賱丨丕噩夭 丕賱賲賳賷毓 丕賱賮丕氐賱 亘賷賳 丕賱禺賷乇 賵丕賱卮乇貨 賮賷 丨賷賳 鬲賯亘毓 丕賱兀睾賱亘賷丞 賲賳 丕賱鬲賮丕丨丕鬲 丕賱氐丕賱丨丞 賮賷 丕賱噩丕賳亘 丕賱丌禺乇貙 賱賰賳 賲賳 丕賱匕賷 賷賯賵賲 亘賴匕丕 丕賱賮氐賱責 賮賷 丕賱睾丕賱亘 丨賲丕丞 丕賱賳馗丕賲貙 兀賵賱卅賰 丕賱匕賷賳 賷乇賷丿賵賳 鬲丨賷賷丿 丕賱賲卮賰賱丞 亘睾賷丞 鬲卮鬲賷鬲 丕賱丕賳鬲亘丕賴 賵氐乇賮 丕賱賱賵賲 亘毓賷丿賸丕 毓賳 丕賱賲鬲乇亘毓賷賳 毓賱賶 賯賲丞 賴乇賲 丕賱爻賱胤丞貙 賵丕賱匕賷賳 乇亘賲丕 賰丕賳賵丕 丕賱賲鬲爻亘亘賷賳 賮賷 氐賳丕毓丞 馗乇賵賮 毓賲賱 賲鬲乇丿賷丞 兀賵 賮賷 睾賷丕亘 丕賱乇賯丕亘丞 賵丕賱廿卮乇丕賮. 賲噩丿丿賸丕 賮廿賳 賲賳胤賯 鈥溫з勜佖ж� 丕賱賮丕爻丿丞鈥� 丕賱賯丕卅賲 毓賱賶 丕賱賲賯丕乇亘丞 丕賱賳夭賵毓賷丞 賱賱賲賵賯賮 賷鬲噩丕賴賱 丕賱賵毓丕亍 丕賱賮丕爻丿 賵丕賱囟睾賵胤 丕賱馗乇賮賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷氐賳毓賴丕貙 賵丕賱鬲賷 賲賳 卮兀賳賴丕 兀賳 鬲賮爻丿 賲丕 亘丿丕禺賱賴貙 賷乇賰賾夭 鬲丨賱賷賱 丕賱兀賳馗賲丞 毓賱賶 氐購賳賾丕毓 丕賱賵毓丕亍貙 毓賱賶 兀賵賱卅賰 丕賱匕賷賳 賷賲賱賰賵賳 丕賱爻賱胤丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲購賲賰賾賳賴賲 賲賳 鬲氐賲賷賲賴.
賴賲 芦賳禺亘丞 丕賱爻賱胤丞禄貙 氐購賳賾丕毓 丕賱賵毓丕亍貙 賵丕賱毓丕賲賱賵賳 賲賳 禺賱賮 丕賱爻鬲丕乇貙 丕賱匕賷賳 賷氐賲賲賵賳 丕賱兀賵囟丕毓 丕賱賲毓賷卮賷丞 賱賱亘賯賷丞 丕賱賲噩亘乇賷賳 毓賱賶 賯囟丕亍 兀賵賯丕鬲賴賲 賮賷 丕賱亘賷卅丕鬲 丕賱賲丐爻爻賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 氐賳毓賴丕 賴丐賱丕亍. 兀賳丕乇 毓丕賱賲 丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓 鬲卮丕乇賱夭 乇丕賷鬲 賲賷賱夭 孬賯亘 丕賱爻賱胤丞 丕賱兀爻賵丿 賴匕丕:
芦鬲賯賵賲 賳禺亘丞 丕賱爻賱胤丞 毓賱賶 孬賱賾丞 賲賲賳 鬲爻賲丨 賱賴賲 賲賳丕氐亘賴賲 亘鬲噩丕賵夭 丕賱亘賷卅丞 丕賱丕毓鬲賷丕丿賷丞 賱賱乇噩丕賱 賵丕賱賳爻丕亍 丕賱毓丕丿賷賷賳貨 賴賲 賷卮睾賱賵賳 賲賵丕賯毓 丕鬲禺丕匕 賯乇丕乇丕鬲 禺胤賷乇丞 丕賱鬲亘毓丕鬲貙 賱賰賳 卮睾賱賴賲 賱賴匕賴 丕賱賲賳丕氐亘 丕賱賲丨賵乇賷丞 賷賮賵賯 賮賷 兀賴賲賷鬲賴 丕鬲禺丕匕賴賲 賱賴匕賴 丕賱賯乇丕乇丕鬲 賲賳 毓丿賲賴貙 賮賮卮賱賴賲 賮賷 丕賱賮毓賱 賵賮賷 氐賳毓 丕賱賯乇丕乇 兀賰孬乇 禺胤賵乇丞 賮賷 丨丿 匕丕鬲賴 賲賳 賳賵毓賷丞 丕賱賯乇丕乇丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 賷鬲禺匕賵賳賴丕貙 匕賱賰 賱兀賳賴賲 賮賷 賲賵囟毓 賯賷丕丿丞 丕賱鬲賳馗賷賲丕鬲 賵丕賱賲丐爻爻丕鬲 丕賱賰亘乇賶 賱賱賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱丨丿賷孬貙 賷丨賰賲賵賳 卮乇賰丕鬲 賰亘賷乇丞貙 賷丨乇賰賵賳 丌賱丞 丕賱丿賵賱丞 賵賷胤丕賱亘賵賳 亘丕賲鬲賷丕夭丕鬲賴丕貙 賷丿賷乇賵賳 丕賱賲丐爻爻丞 丕賱毓爻賰乇賷丞貙 賵賷卮睾賱賵賳 賲賵丕賯毓 賯賷丕丿丞 丕爻鬲乇丕鬲賷噩賷丞 賱賱亘賳賷丞 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲鬲乇賰夭 賮賷賴丕 丕賱丌賳 賵爻丕卅賱 丕賱賳賮賵匕 丕賱賲丐孬乇丞 賵丕賱孬乇賵丞 賵丕賱卮賴乇丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷鬲賲鬲毓賵賳 亘賴丕禄.
孬賲 賷禺鬲賲 丕賱賲丐賱賮 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱兀禺賷乇 亘丨丿賷孬 毓賳 兀爻丕賱賷亘 賵鬲賰鬲賷賰丕鬲 賲賯丕賵賲丞 丕賱賵賯賵毓 賮賷 丕賱卮乇/丕賱毓賳賮貙 賵賷賯丿賲 丕丨鬲賮丕亍賸 亘丕賱亘胤賵賱丞貙 毓亘乇 廿亘乇丕夭 毓丿丞 賳賲丕匕噩 丕爻鬲胤丕毓鬲 丕賱鬲睾賱亘 毓賱賶 丕賱賲賵賯賮 賵丕賱爻賷丕賯 賵丕賱賲丐爻爻丞 賵丕賳鬲賮囟鬲 囟丿 丕賱噩乇賷賲丞 賵賱賲 鬲禺囟毓 賱睾賵丕賷鬲賴丕.
* * *
賲丕匕丕 毓賳 鈥溫з勜簇扁€� 兀賵 丕賱毓賳賮 丕賱爻賱胤賵賷 賮賷 丕賱鬲氐賵乇 丕賱廿爻賱丕賲賷責 賷賲賰賳賳丕 賴賳丕 兀賳 賳卮賷乇 賱毓丿丞 賲卮丕賴丿:
兀賵賱賸丕: 丕賱賲卮賴丿 丕賱賲毓乇賮賷: 丕賱卮乇賷毓丞 鬲孬亘鬲 賵噩賵丿 丕賱卮乇 賮賷 丕賱賳賮賵爻 賷賯賵賱 鬲毓丕賱賶 鈥溬堎庂嗁庂佡捸迟� 賵賻賲賻丕 爻賻賵賻賾丕賴賻丕* 賮賻兀賻賱賿賴賻賲賻賴賻丕 賮購噩購賵乇賻賴賻丕 賵賻鬲賻賯賿賵賻丕賴賻丕鈥溫� 賮丕賱鬲賯賵賶 賵丕賱賮噩賵乇 賲賰賵賳丕賳 乇卅賷爻丕賳 賮賷 兀毓賲丕賯 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳貙 賵賯丿 賵氐賮賴 丕賱賱賴 亘兀賳賴 鈥溫纲庂勝徺堎呝嬝� 噩賻賴購賵賱賸丕鈥澵� 賵賯丕賱 鬲毓丕賱賶 (廿賳賻賾 丕賱賿廿賽賳賿爻賻丕賳賻 禺購賱賽賯賻 賴賻賱購賵毓丕賸 * 廿賽匕賻丕 賲賻爻賻賾賴購 丕賱卮賻賾乇購賾 噩賻夭購賵毓丕賸 * 賵賻廿賽匕賻丕 賲賻爻賻賾賴購 丕賱賿禺賻賷賿乇購 賲賻賳購賵毓丕賸)貙 毓賱賶 兀賳 賱賵噩賵丿 賴匕丕 丕賱卮乇 丨賰賲丞 賷毓賱賲賴丕 丕賱賱賴 鬲毓丕賱賶: 鈥溬堎嗀ㄙ勝堎冑� 亘丕賱卮乇 賵丕賱禺賷乇 賮鬲賳丞鈥澵� 廿賱丕 兀賳 賴匕丕 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 丕賱馗賱賵賲 丕賱噩賴賵賱 賲賴賷兀 賱賯亘賵賱 丕賱丨賯貙 賵賱賷爻 賮賷賴 賲丕賳毓 賷賲賳毓賴 賲賳 匕賱賰貙 賮賭鈥澷呝庁� 賲賽賳賿 賲賻賵賿賱購賵丿賺 廿賽賱丕賻賾 賷購賵賱賻丿購 毓賻賱賻賶 丕賱賿賮賽胤賿乇賻丞賽鈥澵� 孬賲 賴賵 廿賳 鬲賲爻賰 亘丕賱賲丿丿 丕賱廿賱賴賷貙 賵爻丕毓丿賴 丕賱鬲賵賮賷賯 賳噩賶 賲賳 丕賱卮乇賵乇貙 賵廿賳 鬲乇賰 賳賮爻賴 賵賴賵丕賴丕 乇賮毓 毓賳賴 丕賱丨賮馗 賵丕賱毓賵賳 賵丕乇鬲賰爻 賮賷 丕賱卮乇 賵睾賵賶. 賵丕賱鬲毓賵賷賱 賮賷 鬲丨氐賷賱 丕賱賰賮丕亍丞 丕賱兀禺賱丕賯賷丞 毓賱賶 賲噩乇丿 鈥溫ベ嗀池з嗁娯� 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳鈥� 亘賳丕亍 毓賱賶 丕賱胤賷賳貙 亘賱 丕賱丕賱鬲夭丕賲 賵丕賱丕賳囟亘丕胤 丕賱兀禺賱丕賯賷 賱丕 賷賰賵賳 毓賲賷賯賸丕 廿賱丕 丨賷賳 賷鬲兀爻爻 毓賱賶 乇賯丕亘丞 廿賷賲丕賳賷丞 丿丕禺賱賷丞 賯賵賷丞貙 賵丕毓鬲賯丕丿 亘丕賱丨爻丕亘貙 賵禺賵賮 賲賳 丕賱毓賯丕亘 丕賱兀禺乇賵賷.
孬丕賳賷賸丕: 丕賱賲卮賴丿 丕賱賳賮爻賷: 兀賯乇賾鬲 丕賱卮乇賷毓丞 亘鬲兀孬賷乇 丕賱鬲賱亘賾爻 亘丕賱爻賱胤丞 毓賱賶 爻賱賵賰賷丕鬲 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳貙 賵鬲噩丿 賴匕丕 丕賱賳賵毓 賲賳 丕賱鬲賳丕賵賱 賮賷 賲亘丕丨孬 胤賱亘 丕賱廿賲丕乇丞貙 賵丕賱鬲氐丿乇 賱賱賵賱丕賷丕鬲貙 賮賯丿 爻兀賱 丕賱賳亘賷 氐賱賶 丕賱賱賴 毓賱賷賴 賵爻賱賲 丕賱賲賯丿丕丿 亘賳 丕賱兀爻賵丿 乇囟賷 丕賱賱賴 毓賳賴 亘毓丿 兀賳 賵賱賾丕賴 賵賱丕賷丞 賵賯丕賱: 鈥溬冑娰� 賵噩丿鬲 丕賱廿賲丕乇丞責鈥� 賮賯丕賱:
鈥溬娯� 乇爻賵賱 丕賱賱賴: 賲丕 馗賳賳鬲 廿賱丕 兀賳 丕賱賳丕爻 賰賱賴賲 禺賻賵賻賱賹 鈥撠Ｙ� 禺丿賲賹- 賱賷貙 賵丕賱賱賴 賱丕 兀賱賷 毓賱賶 毓賲賱 賲丕 丿賲鬲 丨賷賸丕鈥澵� 賵賮賷 乇賵丕賷丞 鈥溬冑徺嗁捸� 兀購丨賿賲賻賱購 賵賻兀購賵囟賻毓購 丨賻鬲賻賾賶 乇賻兀賻賷賿鬲購 亘賽兀賻賳賻賾 賱賽賷 毓賻賱賻賶 丕賱賿賯賻賵賿賲賽 賮賻囟賿賱賸丕鈥�.
賮卮毓賵乇 丕爻鬲毓亘丕丿 丕賱賳丕爻 賲丐孬乇 賮賷 氐賱丕丨 氐丕丨亘 丕賱爻賱胤丞 賵賳噩丕鬲賴 賮賷 丕賱丌禺乇丞貨 賯丕賱 氐賱賶 丕賱賱賴 毓賱賷賴 賵爻賱賲: 鈥溫ベ嗁冑� 爻鬲丨乇氐賵賳 毓賱賶 丕賱廿賲丕乇丞貙 賵爻鬲賰賵賳 賳丿丕賲丞 賷賵賲 丕賱賯賷丕賲丞貨 賮賳毓賲 丕賱賲乇囟毓丞貙 賵亘卅爻鬲 丕賱賮丕胤賲丞鈥澵� 賵賮賷 鬲賱賲賾爻 賴匕丕 丕賱兀孬乇 丕賱賳賮爻賷 賷賯賵賱 丕亘賳 丨噩乇 賮賷 卮乇丨賴 賱賴匕丕 丕賱丨丿賷孬: 鈥溬嗁愗官呝� 丕賱賲乇囟毓丞貨 賱賲丕 賮賷賴丕 賲賳 丨氐賵賱 丕賱賲丕賱, 賵賳賮丕匕 丕賱賰賱賲丞貙 賵鬲丨氐賷賱 丕賱賱匕丕鬲 丕賱丨爻賷丞 賵丕賱賵賴賲賷丞 丨丕賱 丨氐賵賱賴丕鈥溫� 賵鬲兀賲賱 賯賵賱賴: 鈥溬嗁佖ж� 丕賱賰賱賲丞鈥� 孬賲 鈥溫з勝勜柏ж� 丕賱賵賴賲賷丞鈥� 兀賷 兀賳 賱賳賮丕匕 丕賱賰賱賲丞 毓賱賶 丕賱丌禺乇賷賳 賱匕丕卅匕 賯丿 鬲丨賵賱 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 毓賳 爻丕亘賯 毓賴丿賴 丕賱禺賷賾乇貙 賮丕毓鬲賱丕亍 丕賱爻賱胤丞 賲夭賱賯 賲禺賵賮 鈥溬勜Ｙ嗁囏� 鬲丨乇賾賰 丕賱氐賮丕鬲 [丕賱乇丿賷卅丞] 丕賱亘丕胤賳丞貙 賵鬲睾賱亘 毓賱賶 丕賱賳賮爻 丨亘 丕賱噩丕賴鈥� 賰賲丕 賷賯賵賱 丕賱賲賳丕賵賷 乇丨賲賴 丕賱賱賴貙 賮乇亘賲丕 賵賱丿鬲 丕賱丨爻丿 賵丕賱睾賷乇丞 賵丕賮囟鬲 亘氐丕丨亘賴丕 廿賱賶 丕賱賰匕亘 賵丕賱亘賴鬲丕賳 賵馗賱賲 丕賱賳丕爻 賵兀賰賱 兀賲賵丕賱賴賲 亘丕賱亘丕胤賱 賵鬲賯乇賷亘 丕賱賮爻賯丞 賵賲毓丕賯亘丞 丕賱氐丕賱丨賷賳 賵睾賷乇 匕賱賰貙 賵賰賲丕 賷賯賵賱 丕賱氐賳毓丕賳賷 乇丨賲賴 丕賱賱賴: 鈥溫Ｘ堌ж� 丕賱廿賲丕乇丞 賱丕 鬲賳丨氐乇鈥�.
賵丨賷賳 賯爻賾賲 丕賱賮禺乇 丕賱乇丕夭賷 乇丨賲賴 丕賱賱賴 丕賱賱匕丕鬲 噩毓賱賴丕 賲丨氐賵乇丞賸 賮賷 兀賯爻丕賲 孬賱丕孬丞: 丕賱賱匕丕鬲 丕賱丨爻賷丞 賵賴賷 賯囟丕亍 丕賱卮賴賵鬲賷賳貙 賵丕賱賱匕丕鬲 丕賱禺賷丕賱賷丞 賵賴賷 丕賱賱匕丕鬲 丕賱丨丕氐賱丞 賲賳 丕賱丕爻鬲毓賱丕亍 賵丕賱乇卅丕爻丞貙 賵丕賱賱匕丕鬲 丕賱毓賯賱賷丞貙 賵賴賷 丕賱賱匕丕鬲 丕賱丨丕氐賱丞 亘爻亘亘 賲毓乇賮丞 丕賱兀卮賷丕亍 賵丕賱賵賯賵賮 毓賱賶 丨賯丕卅賯賴丕. 賵丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賲賵賱毓 亘丨亘 丕賱兀賲乇 賵丕賱賳賴賷 賵丨亘 丕賱爻賲毓 賵丕賱胤丕毓丞貙 亘賱 丕賱乇賷丕爻丞 賵賳賮丕匕 丕賱賰賱賲丞 賵禺囟賵毓 丕賱乇賯丕亘 賱賱廿賳爻丕賳 賲賳 兀毓馗賲 丕賱賱匕丕鬲貙 賰賲丕 賷丐賰丿 丕賱賲賳丕賵賷:鈥溬勜柏� 丕賱丕爻鬲賷賱丕亍 賵賳賮丕匕 丕賱兀賲乇 兀毓馗賲 賲賱丕匕 丕賱丿賳賷丕鈥�.
賮賷 賲爻賱爻賱 鬲賱賷賮夭賷賵賳賷 亘乇賷胤丕賳賷 賷氐賳賮 賲賳 亘乇丕賲噩 (鬲賱賷賮夭賷賵賳 丕賱賵丕賯毓) 丨賷孬 丕禺鬲賷乇 鬲爻毓丞 毓卮乇 卮禺氐賸丕 賲賳 亘賷賳 孬賲丕賳賷丞 丌賱丕賮 賲鬲賯丿賲貙 賱賷賯丕乇亘賵丕 賲毓賷卮丞 丨賷丕丞 丕賱禺丿賲 丕賱亘乇賷胤丕賳賷賷賳 賮賷 賯氐乇 乇賷賮賷 兀賳賷賯貙 賵毓賱賶 丕賱乇睾賲 賲賳 兀賳 丕賱卮禺氐 丕賱匕賷 丕禺鬲賷乇 賱鬲兀丿賷丞 丿賵乇 賰亘賷乇 丕賱禺丿賲 賰丕賳 賷賳鬲馗乇 賲賳賴 丕賱丕賱鬲夭丕賲 亘丕賱賲毓丕賷賷乇 丕賱氐丕乇賲丞 賱鬲賱賰 丕賱賮鬲乇丞 丕賱禺丕氐丞 亘賲賳氐亘賴 毓賱賶 乇兀爻 丕賱鬲爻賱爻賱 丕賱賵馗賷賮賷 賱賱禺丿賲貙 廿賱丕 兀賳 爻賴賵賱丞 鬲丨賵賱賴 廿賱賶 乇卅賷爻 賲購爻鬲亘丿賾 芦兀禺丕賮鬲賴禄. 賷卮賷乇 丕賱賲賲孬賱 氐丕丨亘 丕賱禺賲爻丞 賵丕賱爻鬲賷賳 毓丕賲賸丕 廿賱賶 兀賳賴 賱賲 賷賰賳 賲爻鬲毓丿賸賾丕 賱賱丕賳夭賱丕賯 亘爻賴賵賱丞 賮賷 賲賲丕乇爻丞 爻賱胤丞 賲胤賱賯丞 毓賱賶 亘賷鬲 賲賳 丕賱禺丿賲 丕賱匕賷賳 賷乇兀爻賴賲 賴賵: 芦賮噩兀丞 鬲賰鬲卮賮 兀賳 丕賱鬲丨丿購賾孬 賱賷爻 囟乇賵乇賷賸丕貙 賰賱 賲丕 賰丕賳 毓賱賷賾 賮毓賱賴 賴賵 乇賮毓 廿氐亘毓賷 賱賷賱鬲夭賲賵丕 丕賱氐賲鬲貙 賵賴匕賴 賮賰乇丞 賲禺賷賮丞貙 賲乇賷毓丞禄貙 賲賳 亘丕爻鬲胤丕毓鬲賴 兀賳 賷爻鬲賲乇 賲鬲賲爻賰賸丕 亘丕賳囟亘丕胤賴 丕賱兀禺賱丕賯賷 賮賷 馗賱 爻賱胤丞 鈥溬呚辟娯关┾€� 賰賴匕賴責 賵廿丿乇丕賰 卮丿丞 鬲兀孬賷乇 丕賱爻賱胤丞 毓賱賶 賲鬲賵賱賷賴丕 賷丿毓賵賴 廿賱賶 丕賱賲亘丕賱睾丞 賮賷 丕賱鬲賵賯賷 丕賱匕丕鬲賷貙 賵賷賵噩亘 鬲賰孬賷乇 丕賱賰賵丕亘丨 丕賱丿丕禺賱賷丞 賵丕賱禺丕乇噩賷丞 毓賱賶 氐丕丨亘 丕賱爻賱胤丞貙 賵毓丕賲丞 丕賱兀賳馗賲丞 丕賱爻賷丕爻丞 丕賱丨丿賷孬丞 丨乇賷氐丞 毓賱賶 鬲賰亘賷賱 爻賱胤丕鬲 氐丕丨亘 丕賱賯乇丕乇 亘丕賱賯賷賵丿 丕賱賯丕賳賵賳賷丞 賵丕賱爻賷丕爻賷丞 賵丕賱丕毓賱丕賲賷丞 廿丿乇丕賰賸丕 賲賳賴丕 賱禺胤乇 丕賱爻賱胤丞 賵兀孬乇賴丕 丕賱亘丕賱睾 毓賱賶 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 丕賱爻賵賷 丕賱賲爻鬲賯賷賲貙 賮囟賱賸丕 毓賳 睾賷乇賴.
孬丕賱孬賸丕: 丕賱賲卮賴丿 丕賱鬲卮乇賷毓賷: 丕賱鬲丨賵賱 賳丨賵 鈥溫з勜簇扁€� 毓丕丿丞賸 賲丕 鬲爻亘賯 兀爻亘丕亘賴 賵馗乇賵賮賴貙 賵賱匕丕 鬲噩丿 兀賳 丕賱兀氐賱 賮賷 丕賱鬲毓丕賲賱 丕賱丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷 亘賷賳 丕賱賲爻賱賲賷賳 賯丕卅賲賹 毓賱賶 丕賱賲乇賵亍丕鬲 賵爻賲丕丨丞 丕賱賳賮爻貙 賮廿匕丕 賵賯毓 丕賱賳夭丕毓 鬲丨賵賱 丕賱廿胤丕乇 丕賱囟丕亘胤 賱賱毓賱丕賯丞 廿賱賶 丕賱丨賯賵賯 賵丕賱賵丕噩亘丕鬲貨 賮賮賷 毓賱丕賯丞 丕賱夭賵丕噩 賲孬賱賸丕 丨乇氐鬲 丕賱卮乇賷毓丞 毓賱賶 鬲兀賰賷丿 兀賳 丕賱兀氐賱 賮賷賴丕 賲丕 賯丕賱賴 爻亘丨丕賳賴 鈥溬堎庁庁官庂勝� 亘賻賷賿賳賻賰購賲 賲賻賾賵賻丿賻賾丞賸 賵賻乇賻丨賿賲賻丞賸鈥澵� 賵賲乇丕毓丕丞 賱賳賵丕夭毓 丕賱亘卮乇 賳丨賵 丕賱卮乇 賵丕賱禺賱丕賮 乇爻賻賲 丨丿賵丿 丕賱丨賯賵賯 賵丕賱賵丕噩亘丕鬲 賵賱賲 賷賰鬲賮賽 亘丕賱賵毓馗 賵丨丿賴貙 賵匕賱賰 賲丕 鬲乇丕賴 賮賷 兀丨賰丕賲 丕賱賳賮賯丕鬲 賵丕賱毓卮乇丞 賵睾賷乇賴丕貙 賵鬲兀賲賱 賴匕丕 丕賱鬲賱丕夭賲 賮賷 賯賵賱賴 鬲毓丕賱賶 :鈥澷堎庁з勜蒂徺戀勝捸� 禺賻賷賿乇賹 賵賻兀購丨賿囟賽乇賻鬲賽 丕賱賿兀賻賳賿賮購爻購 丕賱卮購賾丨賻賾鈥�. 賵賯賱 賲孬賱 賴匕丕 賮賷 賮賯賴 丕賱鬲卮乇賷毓丕鬲 丕賱兀禺乇賶.
乇丕亘毓賸丕: 丕賱賲卮賴丿 丕賱毓賯丕亘賷: 賲毓 丕賱丕毓鬲乇丕賮 亘賵噩賵丿 賴匕賴 丕賱賳夭毓丞 锟斤拷丕賱卮乇賷乇丞鈥� 兀鬲賶 丕賱廿爻賱丕賲 賱賷囟亘胤 賮賯賴 丕賱毓賯丕亘貙 賮賵賯賵毓 丕賱禺胤兀 賲賳 卮禺氐賺 賱丕 賷爻賵賾睾 丕賳鬲賴丕賰 丨賯賵賯賴貙 賵賯丿 賯乇乇 丕賱賮賯賴丕亍 兀氐丕賱丞賸 兀賳 丕賱毓賯丕亘 賱丕亘丿 兀賳 賷賰賵賳 毓賱賶 賯丿乇 丕賱禺胤兀貙 賵賱賲 賷鬲乇賰賵丕 卮兀賳 丕賱毓賯丕亘 賱賲丨丿丿丕鬲 睾賷乇 賲賳囟亘胤丞貨 賰胤亘丕毓 丕賱賯丕囟賷 兀賵 丕賱爻噩丕賳貙 賵丨賮賱鬲 賰鬲亘 丕賱賯囟丕亍 賵賲亘丕丨孬 丕賱鬲賮賱賷爻 賵丕賱鬲毓夭賷乇丕鬲 賵賰鬲亘 丕賱爻賷丕爻丞 丕賱卮乇毓賷丞 亘鬲賮丕氐賷賱 丿賯賷賯丞 賱兀丨賰丕賲 丕賱毓賯丕亘 丨賲丕賷丞賸 賱丨賯 賲賳 賵賯毓鬲 毓賱賷賴 丕賱毓賯賵亘丞 賲賳 賲夭丕噩賷丞 氐丕丨亘 丕賱爻賱胤丞 賵毓亘孬賷丞 丕賱卮乇 丕賱匕賷 亘丿丕禺賱賴.
* * *
賷賯毓 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賮賷 兀賰孬乇 賲賳 570 氐賮丨丞貙 賵賯丿 氐丿乇 賲丐禺乇賸丕 毓賳 賲乇賰夭 鬲賰賵賷賳 賱賱丿乇丕爻丕鬲 賵丕賱兀亘丨丕孬貙 賵丕賱賰鬲丕亘 丕賱兀氐賱賷 氐丿乇 毓丕賲 2007賲. 賵賴賵 噩丿賷乇 亘丕賱丕胤賱丕毓.
June 1, 2019
Philip Zimbardo鈥檚 The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil was a stimulating read. A lot of psychology books tend to be a bit dry or scientifically wordy, becoming tedious and stodgy. It鈥檚 refreshing to be able to retain knowledge that can later be reflected on.
The Lucifer Effect delves into the psychology of roles we assume when forced into power struggles. It鈥檚 a facet of research that reveals the power of social situations and the social construction of reality.
Starting off with a short overview on crimes against humanity, the history of the degradation in Rwanda and Nanking, the horrors and abuse at Abu Ghraib Prison, and the atrocity of Nazi Germany.
The first half of the book is a written reenactment of his Stanford Prison Experiment organized in 1971 in which he selected a group of college students to assume the role of prisoners and another group to assume the role of guards, set up in a mock prison, they were to endure a set of prison rules for two weeks. The experiment proved interesting insight into the psychology of sadism, humiliation, and dehumanization, of prisoners surrendering their humanity and compassion to social power.
These chapters are, indeed, monotonous and are lagging in interest; however I found them to have a reasonably significant share in revealing the pattern of thought that we undergo when put in these situations.
His aspiration with this study was to differentiate between dispositional behaviors and situational, in which we overemphasize personality in explaining any behavior while concurrently underemphasizing situational influences. The imagined threat of being cast outside the 鈥渋n-group鈥� coupled with the threat of rejection. This hits home, living in a society that encourages individualism. Typically, roles are tied to specific situations; they are enacted when one is in that situation. Yet some roles are sinister, and can become who we are most of the time.
Most interesting are the chapters following the review of the SPE in which Zimbardo analyses the psychological transformation of the human mind under pressure.
The other half of the book breaks down the psychology of social dynamics in power, conformity, obedience, deindividuation, dehumanization, and the evil of inaction finishing with a very intense chapter on Abu Ghraib鈥檚 abuses of power, interrogations and tortures which is wrapped up by putting our government鈥檚 perverse, and conspiratorial system on trial as an influence for these war crimes and crimes against humanity and what can be done to prevent future abuses.
At last the book ends with a chapter on resisting situational influences and celebrating heroism which brings to our attention that, although heroes seem to be few and far between just as the 鈥渂ad apples鈥� seem to be, the banality of evil shares much with the banality of heroism. We are just as capable of doing good as we are of doing evil. Just as evil is unconsciously learned, so we can learn strategies of resistance towards evil deeds.
This was a liberating read for me as it raised my consciousness to underlying psychological evil in the human condition. As an ordinary person, I can be seduced into behaving in evil ways under the sway of powerful systematic and situational forces. Only by being made aware of my influential limitations, can I then make the ethical choice between the permeable line between good and evil as we are not slaves to the power of situational forces, and we can learn to resist and oppose them. Such knowledge can release us all from subjugation to the mighty grasp of conformity, compliance, persuasion, and other forms of social influence and coercion. After all, we are only human. Complex, yet very far from perfect.
I highly recommend this book if you鈥檙e willing to learn more about how you subconsciously tick.
鈥淓ach of us is the end product of the complex development and specialization that have grown out of millions of years of evolution, growth, adaptation, and coping. Our species has reached its special place on Earth because of our remarkable capacity for learning, for language, for reasoning, for inventing, and for imagining new and better futures. Every human being has the potential to perfect the skills, talents, and attributes we need to go beyond surviving to thrive and enhance our human condition.鈥�
The Lucifer Effect delves into the psychology of roles we assume when forced into power struggles. It鈥檚 a facet of research that reveals the power of social situations and the social construction of reality.
Starting off with a short overview on crimes against humanity, the history of the degradation in Rwanda and Nanking, the horrors and abuse at Abu Ghraib Prison, and the atrocity of Nazi Germany.
The first half of the book is a written reenactment of his Stanford Prison Experiment organized in 1971 in which he selected a group of college students to assume the role of prisoners and another group to assume the role of guards, set up in a mock prison, they were to endure a set of prison rules for two weeks. The experiment proved interesting insight into the psychology of sadism, humiliation, and dehumanization, of prisoners surrendering their humanity and compassion to social power.
These chapters are, indeed, monotonous and are lagging in interest; however I found them to have a reasonably significant share in revealing the pattern of thought that we undergo when put in these situations.
His aspiration with this study was to differentiate between dispositional behaviors and situational, in which we overemphasize personality in explaining any behavior while concurrently underemphasizing situational influences. The imagined threat of being cast outside the 鈥渋n-group鈥� coupled with the threat of rejection. This hits home, living in a society that encourages individualism. Typically, roles are tied to specific situations; they are enacted when one is in that situation. Yet some roles are sinister, and can become who we are most of the time.
Most interesting are the chapters following the review of the SPE in which Zimbardo analyses the psychological transformation of the human mind under pressure.
The other half of the book breaks down the psychology of social dynamics in power, conformity, obedience, deindividuation, dehumanization, and the evil of inaction finishing with a very intense chapter on Abu Ghraib鈥檚 abuses of power, interrogations and tortures which is wrapped up by putting our government鈥檚 perverse, and conspiratorial system on trial as an influence for these war crimes and crimes against humanity and what can be done to prevent future abuses.
At last the book ends with a chapter on resisting situational influences and celebrating heroism which brings to our attention that, although heroes seem to be few and far between just as the 鈥渂ad apples鈥� seem to be, the banality of evil shares much with the banality of heroism. We are just as capable of doing good as we are of doing evil. Just as evil is unconsciously learned, so we can learn strategies of resistance towards evil deeds.
This was a liberating read for me as it raised my consciousness to underlying psychological evil in the human condition. As an ordinary person, I can be seduced into behaving in evil ways under the sway of powerful systematic and situational forces. Only by being made aware of my influential limitations, can I then make the ethical choice between the permeable line between good and evil as we are not slaves to the power of situational forces, and we can learn to resist and oppose them. Such knowledge can release us all from subjugation to the mighty grasp of conformity, compliance, persuasion, and other forms of social influence and coercion. After all, we are only human. Complex, yet very far from perfect.
I highly recommend this book if you鈥檙e willing to learn more about how you subconsciously tick.
鈥淓ach of us is the end product of the complex development and specialization that have grown out of millions of years of evolution, growth, adaptation, and coping. Our species has reached its special place on Earth because of our remarkable capacity for learning, for language, for reasoning, for inventing, and for imagining new and better futures. Every human being has the potential to perfect the skills, talents, and attributes we need to go beyond surviving to thrive and enhance our human condition.鈥�
February 27, 2020
袗泻芯 薪械 褋褌械 褔褍胁邪谢懈 蟹邪 小褌邪薪褎芯褉写褋泻懈褟褌 蟹邪褌胁芯褉薪懈褔械褋泻懈 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌 - 屑邪褉褕 写邪 褋懈 薪邪胁邪泻褋邪褌械. 孝芯胁邪 械 械写懈薪 芯褌 薪邪泄-懈蟹胁械褋褌薪懈褌械 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌懈 胁 褋褗胁褉械屑械薪薪邪褌邪 薪邪褍泻邪, 泻褗写械褌芯 械写懈薪 锌褋懈褏芯谢芯谐 胁蟹械屑邪 薪褟泻芯谢泻芯 褋褌褍写械薪褌懈 (写芯斜褉芯胁芯谢褑懈), 褉邪蟹写械谢褟 谐懈 薪邪 褋谢褍褔邪械薪 锌褉懈薪褑懈锌 薪邪 薪邪写蟹懈褉邪褌械谢懈 懈 蟹邪褌胁芯褉薪懈褑懈 懈 谐懈 蟹邪泻谢褞褔胁邪 胁 械写薪芯 锌褉芯褋褌芯褉薪芯 屑邪蟹械, 泻褗写械褌芯 芯褌 褌邪谢邪褕懈褌 褋邪 薪邪锌褉邪胁械薪懈 "泻懈谢懈懈" 懈 械 薪邪泻邪褔懈谢 泻邪屑械褉懈, 蟹邪 写邪 谐懈 谐谢械写邪 泻邪泻胁芯 锌褉邪胁褟褌.
袦谢邪写械卸懈褌械 胁褋懈褔泻懈褌械 褋邪 懈蟹斜褉邪薪懈 锌褉械写胁邪褉懈褌械谢薪芯 写邪 褋邪 薪芯褉屑邪谢薪懈, 斜械蟹 锌褋懈褏懈褔薪懈 懈 锌芯胁械写械薪褔械褋泻懈 芯褌泻谢芯薪械薪懈褟, 胁褋懈褔泻懈褌械 褋邪 褋褌褍写械薪褌懈 胁 褍薪懈胁械褉褋懈褌械褌邪, 斜械蟹 泻褉懈屑懈薪邪谢薪懈 锌褉芯褟胁懈 懈 褌.薪. 袟邪 1 褋械写屑懈褑邪 屑邪蟹械褌芯 褋械 锌褉械胁褉褗褖邪 褋 褌褗屑薪懈褑邪 薪邪 褍卸邪褋懈褌械 褋 薪械锌褉械褋褌邪薪薪懈 芯斜懈写懈, 锌芯斜芯懈, 斜褍薪褌 薪邪 "蟹邪褌胁芯褉薪懈褑懈褌械", 懈蟹写械胁邪褌械谢褋褌胁邪 懈 褌.薪. 袧邪谢邪谐邪 褋械 写邪 锌褉械泻褉邪褌褟褌 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌邪, 薪芯 褌芯泄 芯褋褌邪胁邪 械写懈薪 芯褌 械褌邪谢芯薪懈褌械 胁 锌褋懈褏芯谢芯谐懈褟褌邪 薪邪 褔芯胁械褕泻芯褌芯 锌芯胁械写械薪懈械 胁 褋褌褉械褋芯胁懈 褍褋谢芯胁懈褟.
袩芯-泻褗褋薪芯 袛械泄胁懈写 袟懈屑斜邪褉写芯 (胁褗锌褉芯褋薪懈褟 锌褋懈褏芯谢芯谐) 褋褌邪胁邪 械写懈薪 芯褌 薪邪泄-懈蟹胁械褋褌薪懈褌械 邪泻邪写械屑懈褔薪懈 锌褋懈褏芯谢芯蟹懈 胁 褋胁械褌邪, 褋褗褋 褋褌芯褌懈褑懈 锌褍斜谢懈泻邪褑懈懈 懈 械 械泻褋锌械褉褌-褋胁懈写械褌械谢 胁 写械谢芯褌芯 褋褉械褖褍 邪屑械褉懈泻邪薪褋泻懈褌械 胁芯泄薪懈褑懈, 泻芯懈褌芯 斜褟褏邪 褋械 谐邪胁褉懈谢懈 褋褗褋 蟹邪褌胁芯褉薪懈褑懈 胁 袠褉邪泻 锌褉械写懈 薪褟泻芯谢泻芯 谐芯写懈薪懈.
袣薪懈谐邪褌邪 械 写械褌邪泄谢薪芯 芯锌懈褋邪薪懈械 薪邪 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌邪, 褋 泻芯屑械薪褌邪褉懈 薪邪 褋谢褍褔胁邪褖芯褌芯 褋械 懈 懈蟹胁芯写懈 蟹邪 褌芯胁邪 泻邪泻胁芯 褌芯 薪懈 泻邪蟹胁邪 蟹邪 褔芯胁械褕泻邪褌邪 锌褋懈褏懈泻邪.
袦谢邪写械卸懈褌械 胁褋懈褔泻懈褌械 褋邪 懈蟹斜褉邪薪懈 锌褉械写胁邪褉懈褌械谢薪芯 写邪 褋邪 薪芯褉屑邪谢薪懈, 斜械蟹 锌褋懈褏懈褔薪懈 懈 锌芯胁械写械薪褔械褋泻懈 芯褌泻谢芯薪械薪懈褟, 胁褋懈褔泻懈褌械 褋邪 褋褌褍写械薪褌懈 胁 褍薪懈胁械褉褋懈褌械褌邪, 斜械蟹 泻褉懈屑懈薪邪谢薪懈 锌褉芯褟胁懈 懈 褌.薪. 袟邪 1 褋械写屑懈褑邪 屑邪蟹械褌芯 褋械 锌褉械胁褉褗褖邪 褋 褌褗屑薪懈褑邪 薪邪 褍卸邪褋懈褌械 褋 薪械锌褉械褋褌邪薪薪懈 芯斜懈写懈, 锌芯斜芯懈, 斜褍薪褌 薪邪 "蟹邪褌胁芯褉薪懈褑懈褌械", 懈蟹写械胁邪褌械谢褋褌胁邪 懈 褌.薪. 袧邪谢邪谐邪 褋械 写邪 锌褉械泻褉邪褌褟褌 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌邪, 薪芯 褌芯泄 芯褋褌邪胁邪 械写懈薪 芯褌 械褌邪谢芯薪懈褌械 胁 锌褋懈褏芯谢芯谐懈褟褌邪 薪邪 褔芯胁械褕泻芯褌芯 锌芯胁械写械薪懈械 胁 褋褌褉械褋芯胁懈 褍褋谢芯胁懈褟.
袩芯-泻褗褋薪芯 袛械泄胁懈写 袟懈屑斜邪褉写芯 (胁褗锌褉芯褋薪懈褟 锌褋懈褏芯谢芯谐) 褋褌邪胁邪 械写懈薪 芯褌 薪邪泄-懈蟹胁械褋褌薪懈褌械 邪泻邪写械屑懈褔薪懈 锌褋懈褏芯谢芯蟹懈 胁 褋胁械褌邪, 褋褗褋 褋褌芯褌懈褑懈 锌褍斜谢懈泻邪褑懈懈 懈 械 械泻褋锌械褉褌-褋胁懈写械褌械谢 胁 写械谢芯褌芯 褋褉械褖褍 邪屑械褉懈泻邪薪褋泻懈褌械 胁芯泄薪懈褑懈, 泻芯懈褌芯 斜褟褏邪 褋械 谐邪胁褉懈谢懈 褋褗褋 蟹邪褌胁芯褉薪懈褑懈 胁 袠褉邪泻 锌褉械写懈 薪褟泻芯谢泻芯 谐芯写懈薪懈.
袣薪懈谐邪褌邪 械 写械褌邪泄谢薪芯 芯锌懈褋邪薪懈械 薪邪 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌邪, 褋 泻芯屑械薪褌邪褉懈 薪邪 褋谢褍褔胁邪褖芯褌芯 褋械 懈 懈蟹胁芯写懈 蟹邪 褌芯胁邪 泻邪泻胁芯 褌芯 薪懈 泻邪蟹胁邪 蟹邪 褔芯胁械褕泻邪褌邪 锌褋懈褏懈泻邪.
March 13, 2017
A classic on the subject, Zimbardo tackles in this book the longest description and explanation of his Stanford Prison Experiment, along with two other main themes: the Abu Ghraib abuses and, in the last chapter, heroism and altruism. Now, of course I am a little biased (at the moment I am using his study as a building block for an essay on obedience and my Social Psychology paper was on Abu Ghraib), but I loved this book. I love the subject, I love the writing, I find the entire theme endlessly fascinating and also - don't tell anyone - I really like Zimbardo. I think he is a great psychologist who happened to conduct the right experiment at the right time, and his work on heroism and altruism could truly change the way we raise our children and the way our societies respond to human rights violations and other morally unjustifiable things.
For anyone interested in the "psychology of evil", situational vs dispositional factors, oppressive systems - or for anyone who comes with a historical interest from the side of the totalitarian regimes of the 20th and 21st Century - this is truly a book for you. I would argue, one of the best works on a branch of psychology, ever.
For anyone interested in the "psychology of evil", situational vs dispositional factors, oppressive systems - or for anyone who comes with a historical interest from the side of the totalitarian regimes of the 20th and 21st Century - this is truly a book for you. I would argue, one of the best works on a branch of psychology, ever.
March 27, 2024
袝写薪芯 芯褌 薪械褖邪褌邪, 泻芯懈褌芯 褔芯胁械泻 薪邪褍褔邪胁邪 芯褌 泻薪懈谐邪褌邪 薪邪 袟懈屑斜邪褉写芯, 械 泻芯谢泻芯 芯锌邪褋薪懈 屑芯谐邪褌 写邪 斜褗写邪褌 褋谢褗薪褔械胁懈褌械 芯褔懈谢邪. 孝械 薪懈 芯褌写械谢褟褌 薪械 褋邪屑芯 芯褌 褋谢褗薪褑械褌芯, 薪芯 懈 芯褌 芯泻芯谢薪懈褌械, 懈 芯褌褔褍卸写邪胁邪褌 薪邪 褋胁芯泄 褉械写 写褉褍谐懈褌械 芯褌 薪邪褋. 袩褉械胁褉褗褖邪褌 褋械 胁 写褉械斜薪芯 薪邪谐谢械写, 薪芯 懈蟹泻谢褞褔懈褌械谢薪芯 械褎懈泻邪褋薪芯 褋褉械写褋褌胁芯 蟹邪 邪薪芯薪懈屑薪芯褋褌. 袗 泻芯谐芯 谐芯 械 谐褉懈卸邪 蟹邪 泻邪泻胁芯褌芯 懈 泻芯谐芯褌芯 懈 写邪 械 胁 褋褉械写邪 薪邪 邪薪芯薪懈屑薪芯褋褌?
袩芯褔褌懈 褌芯谢泻芯胁邪 斜械蟹芯斜懈写薪芯 泻邪褌芯 褋谢邪谐邪薪械褌芯 薪邪 褔懈褎褌 褋谢褗薪褔械胁懈 芯褔懈谢邪 蟹邪锌芯褔胁邪 懈 褋邪屑懈褟褌 小褌邪薪褎芯褉写褋泻懈 袟邪褌胁芯褉薪懈褔械褋泻懈 袝泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌 (小袟袝). 袧褟泻芯谢泻芯 褍褔械薪懈 懈 写芯斜褉芯胁芯谢褑懈 褋懈屑褍谢懈褉邪褌 蟹邪褌胁芯褉薪懈褔械褋泻懈 褍褋谢芯胁懈褟 胁 褍薪懈胁械褉褋懈褌械褌褋泻芯 屑邪蟹械 懈 褋械 褉邪蟹锌褉械写械谢褟褌 薪邪 褋谢褍褔邪械薪 锌褉懈薪褑懈锌 薪邪 蟹邪褌胁芯褉薪懈褑懈 懈 薪邪写蟹懈褉邪褌械谢懈, 褋 褑械谢 懈蟹褋谢械写胁邪薪械 薪邪 锌芯胁械写械薪懈械褌芯. 袝泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌褗褌 械 锌谢邪薪懈褉邪薪 写邪 锌褉芯写褗谢卸懈 14 写薪懈. 袙褋懈褔泻懈 褍褔邪褋褌薪懈褑懈 褋邪 锌褉械屑懈薪邪谢懈 锌褉械褑懈蟹械薪 锌芯写斜芯褉 懈 褋邪 屑谢邪写懈, 蟹写褉邪胁懈 懈 薪芯褉屑邪谢薪懈 褏芯褉邪. 袙 薪邪褔邪谢芯褌芯 斜褍褌邪褎芯褉懈褟褌邪 锌褉械芯斜谢邪写邪胁邪. 袧芯 芯褖械 薪邪 褕械褋褌懈褟 写械薪 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌褗褌 械 锌褉械泻褉邪褌械薪 锌褉械写褋褉芯褔薪芯. 袞懈胁芯褌褗褌 薪邪 薪懈褌芯 械写懈薪 褍褔邪褋褌薪懈泻 薪褟屑邪 写邪 械 褋褗褖懈褟褌, 懈 褌芯 薪械 薪械锌褉械屑械薪薪芯 蟹邪 锌芯-写芯斜褉芯 - 褋械斜械锌芯蟹薪邪薪懈械褌芯 褉褟写泻芯 薪芯褋懈 褉邪写芯褋褌. 楔械褋褌 写薪懈 褋邪 薪邪锌褗谢薪芯 写芯褋褌邪褌褗褔薪懈, 蟹邪 写邪 褋械 懈蟹褟胁褟褌 邪谐褉械褋懈褟 芯褌 褋褌褉邪薪邪 薪邪 薪邪写蟹懈褉邪褌械谢懈褌械 懈 锌褉械褔褍锌胁邪薪械 芯褌 褋褌褉邪薪邪 薪邪 蟹邪褌胁芯褉薪懈褑懈褌械 胁 薪械锌褉械写胁懈写械薪懈 屑邪褖邪斜懈.
小袟袝 薪械 薪懈 泻邪蟹胁邪 薪械褖芯 薪芯胁芯. 袙褋懈褔泻懈 褋屑械 蟹邪褌胁芯褉薪懈褑懈 薪邪 褍屑芯胁械褌械 褋懈, 薪芯 写芯泻邪褌芯 褋褉械写邪褌邪 芯泻芯谢芯 薪邪褋 褋褌懈屑褍谢懈褉邪 褉械写邪 懈 胁蟹邪懈屑芯锌芯屑芯褖褌邪, 锌芯胁械褔械褌芯 薪械褖邪 褋邪 薪邪褉械写. 袣芯谐邪褌芯 芯斜邪褔械 褔芯胁械泻 写褉褗锌薪械 写褟胁芯谢邪 蟹邪 芯锌邪褕泻邪褌邪 懈 褋械 芯蟹芯胁械 胁 谢芯褕邪 褋懈褌褍邪褑懈褟, 褋褌邪褉懈褌械 薪邪胁懈褑懈 薪械 锌芯屑邪谐邪褌. 袙褗胁 胁褗褉褌芯锌邪 薪邪 蟹邪锌谢邪褕懈褌械谢薪邪 懈 褋褌褉械褋懈褉邪褖邪 褋懈褌褍邪褑懈褟 懈蟹锌谢褍胁邪褌 芯薪械蟹懈 械泻褋褌褉械屑薪懈 褋褌芯泄薪芯褋褌懈, 泻芯懈褌芯 胁 械卸械写薪械胁懈械褌芯 褋懈 写褉械屑褟褌 泻褉芯褌泻芯 褍 胁褋械泻懈. 袗 邪泻芯 褌邪蟹懈 褋懈褌褍邪褑懈褟 薪械 械 懈蟹芯谢懈褉邪薪邪, 邪 械 锌褉邪胁懈谢芯 褋 胁械褔械 褍褌胁褗褉写械薪邪 泻芯屑斜懈薪邪褑懈褟 芯褌 芯谐褉邪薪懈褔械薪 斜褉芯泄 褉芯谢械胁懈 屑芯写械谢懈, 懈 褋 薪械褟 械 褖褉邪泻薪邪谢 蟹邪谢芯卸械薪懈褟褌 泻邪锌邪薪 薪邪 屑褉邪泻芯斜械褋薪邪 懈谢懈 锌褉芯褋褌芯 锌芯-邪胁褌芯褉懈褌邪褉薪邪 褋懈褋褌械屑邪, 蟹谢芯褌芯 懈蟹锌谢褍胁邪 锌芯褔褌懈 胁褗胁 胁褋械泻懈. 袠 械褌芯 褟 薪邪 - 褑褟谢邪褌邪 褔芯胁械褕泻邪 懈褋褌芯褉懈褟, 锌褗谢薪邪 褋 薪邪褋懈谢懈械, 谐械薪芯褑懈写 懈 褉邪蟹褉褍褏邪 - 薪邪 褏芯褉邪 懈 褑械谢懈 薪邪褉芯写懈. 袠褋褌芯褉懈褟, 泻褗写械褌芯 褔芯胁械泻 械 褋邪屑, 邪薪芯薪懈屑械薪, 锌芯写褔懈薪械薪, 斜械蟹褉邪蟹谢懈褔械薪 懈 蟹邪褌芯胁邪 锌芯-谢械褋薪芯 卸械褋褌芯泻, 蟹邪芯斜懈泻芯谢械薪 芯褌 写褉褍谐懈 邪薪芯薪懈屑薪懈 胁褉邪谐芯胁械. 小褌邪胁邪 谢械褋薪芯. 袠 泻邪褌芯 褋褉械写褋褌胁芯 蟹邪 锌褋懈褏懈褔械褋泻芯 芯褑械谢褟胁邪薪械 褑械薪薪芯褋褌懈褌械 蟹邪锌芯褔胁邪褌 写邪 褋械 薪邪锌邪褋胁邪褌 泻褗屑 芯褌褉芯胁薪邪褌邪 褋褉械写邪, 胁屑械褋褌芯 写邪 褋械 褌褗褉褋褟褌 褔芯胁械褕泻懈褌械 胁褉褗蟹泻懈 懈 锌褉芯屑褟薪邪褌邪.
袠褋褌芯褉懈褟褌邪, 褉邪蟹斜懈褉邪 褋械, 锌芯蟹薪邪胁邪 懈 锌芯谢芯卸懈褌械谢薪懈 锌褉懈屑械褉懈 懈 谐械褉芯懈. 袚械褉芯懈褌械 芯斜邪褔械 薪懈泻芯谐邪 薪械 褋邪 褋邪屑懈, 褌械 褋褌邪胁邪褌 谐械褉芯懈, 蟹邪褖芯褌芯 褍褋锌褟胁邪褌 写邪 褍胁谢械泻邪褌 写芯褋褌邪褌褗褔薪芯 写褉褍谐懈 褏芯褉邪, 蟹邪 写邪 锌芯胁谢懈褟褟褌 褍褋锌械褕薪芯 薪邪 芯斜褖械褋褌胁芯褌芯. 袚械褉芯懈蟹屑褗褌, 泻邪蟹胁邪 袟懈屑斜邪褉写芯, 械 胁懈薪邪谐懈 褋芯褑懈邪谢械薪 褎械薪芯屑械薪. 小邪屑芯 褌邪泻邪 芯谐褉邪写懈褌械, 胁写懈谐薪邪褌懈 褋 褑械谢 屑邪薪懈锌褍谢邪褑懈褟 懈 泻芯薪褌褉芯谢, 锌邪写邪褌.
袛芯斜褉芯褌芯 懈 蟹谢芯褌芯 卸懈胁械褟褌 褍 胁褋械泻懈, 薪芯 泻芯械 褖械 薪邪写写械谢械械, 蟹邪胁懈褋懈 芯褌 褋懈谢邪褌邪 薪邪 胁褗褌褉械褕薪芯褌芯 褍斜械卸写械薪懈械 懈 褑械薪薪芯褋褌懈褌械, 泻邪泻褌芯 懈 芯褌 懈薪褌械薪蟹懈褌械褌邪 薪邪 褋懈褌褍邪褑懈懈褌械 懈 锌芯褉芯写懈谢懈褌械 谐懈 褋懈褋褌械屑懈.
袠蟹胁褉邪褖械薪懈褟褌邪 胁 袗斜褍 袚褉邪懈斜, 懈 胁褗胁 胁褋褟泻芯 薪械褖邪褋褌薪芯 泻褗褌褔械 锌芯 褋胁械褌邪, 褋邪 锌谢芯写 薪邪 邪褉芯谐邪薪褌薪懈 懈 屑邪褔泻邪褖懈 褋懈褋褌械屑懈, 锌芯褉邪卸写邪褖懈 蟹谢芯胁械褖懈 褋懈褌褍邪褑懈懈, 泻褗写械褌芯 泻芯薪褎芯褉屑懈蟹屑褗褌, 懈蟹芯谢邪褑懈褟褌邪 懈 褋褌褉邪褏褗褌 褍 锌邪谢邪褔懈 懈 卸械褉褌胁懈 械 屑薪芯谐芯 褋褏芯写械薪. 袛褉褍谐懈 褉芯谢懈 蟹邪 褍褔邪褋褌薪懈褑懈褌械 胁 褍卸邪褋邪 谢懈锌褋胁邪褌. 袠 薪械 褌褉褟斜胁邪 写邪 褋械 写芯锌褍褋泻邪褌, 薪芯 胁械写薪褗卸 写芯锌褍褋薪邪褌懈 - 褌褉褟斜胁邪 写邪 斜褗写邪褌 薪邪泻邪蟹胁邪薪懈.
小褌芯褉懈 屑懈 褋械, 褔械 - 写芯褉懈 褋谢械写 褌芯谢泻芯胁邪 写械褋械褌懈谢械褌懈褟 - 袟懈屑斜邪褉写芯 胁褋械 芯褖械 褋械 斜芯褉懈 写邪 芯褋屑懈褋谢懈 泻邪泻胁邪 褌芯褔薪芯 泻褍褌懈褟 锟斤拷邪 袩邪薪写芯褉邪 械 芯褌胁芯褉懈谢 胁 芯谐褉邪薪懈褔械薪懈褟 屑邪褖邪斜 薪邪 小袟袝. 袙褌芯褉邪褌邪 褔邪褋褌 薪邪 泻薪懈谐邪褌邪, 薪邪锌褍褋泻邪褖邪 锌褉械写械谢懈褌械 薪邪 小袟袝, 械 薪邪 屑械褋褌邪 写芯褋褌邪 芯斜褗褉泻邪薪邪 懈 锌褗谢薪邪 褋 芯斜褖懈 锌褉懈泻邪蟹泻懈. 袠蟹胁褉邪褖械薪懈褟褌邪 胁 袗斜褍 袚褉邪懈斜 (泻芯懈褌芯 褋a 褋邪屑芯 褌褗薪懈褔泻懈褟褌 胁褉褗褏 薪邪 薪械芯斜褟褌械薪 屑褉褗褋械薪 邪泄褋斜械褉谐) 褋邪 褉邪蟹谐谢械写邪薪懈 胁 谢械泻芯 褋褌械褋薪械薪懈褌械 褉邪屑泻懈 薪邪 褋懈褉褍邪褑懈芯薪薪懈褟 邪薪邪谢懈蟹 懈 薪邪谢芯卸械薪懈褌械 薪邪 褍褔邪褋褌薪懈褑懈褌械 褉芯谢械胁懈 屑芯写械谢懈, 屑邪泻邪褉 写邪 褋邪 锌褉械写褋褌邪胁械薪懈 褋 锌芯褉褟写褗褔薪懈 泻芯谢懈褔械褋褌胁芯 褍卸邪褋褟胁邪褖懈 懈 褌械褏薪懈褔械褋泻懈 写械褌邪泄谢懈. 小懈褋褌械屑邪褌邪 械 芯斜胁懈薪械薪邪 锌芯懈屑械薪薪芯 - 袘褍褕, 效械泄薪懈, 袪褗屑褋褎械谢写 - 薪芯 芯斜胁懈薪械薪懈械褌芯 蟹胁褍褔懈 薪褟泻邪泻 褍屑芯褉械薪芯 懈 斜械蟹褋懈谢薪芯.
袣褉邪褟褌 薪邪 泻薪懈谐邪褌邪...斜械写薪懈 屑懈 袟懈屑斜邪褉写芯! 袩芯谐邪谢胁邪薪械 锌芯 谐谢邪胁懈褑邪褌邪 褋 薪褟泻芯谢泻芯 褍褋锌芯泻芯懈褌械谢薪懈 芯斜褖懈 褎褉邪蟹懈 (写邪 薪械 褋械 芯褌褔邪械 褋褗胁褋械屑 泻谢械褌懈褟褌 褔懈褌邪褌械谢) 薪械 械 写芯褋褌邪褌褗褔薪芯! 袧芯 斜谢邪谐芯写邪褉褟, 褔械 薪懈 写邪写械 褏褉邪薪邪 蟹邪 褉邪蟹屑懈褋褗谢 懈 蟹邪 - 泻邪泻褌芯 懈 褌懈 褋械 薪邪写褟胁邪褕 - 械褎懈泻邪褋薪邪 褋褗锌褉芯褌懈胁邪 褋褉械褖褍 蟹谢芯褌芯 懈 锌芯谢蟹芯褌胁芯褉薪芯 锌褉芯褌懈胁芯写械泄褋褌胁懈械.
***
鈥溞澬靶�-胁懈写懈屑芯褌芯 薪械褖芯, 泻芯械褌芯 蟹邪斜械谢褟蟹邪褏, 斜械褕械 泻邪泻 锌芯胁械褔械褌芯 褏芯褉邪 胁 褌芯胁邪 懈蟹褋谢械写胁邪薪械 懈蟹胁谢懈褔邪褌 褔褍胁褋褌胁芯褌芯 褋懈 蟹邪 懈写械薪褌懈褔薪芯褋褌 懈 斜谢邪谐芯锌芯谢褍褔懈械 芯褌 薪械锌芯褋褉械写褋褌胁械薪邪褌邪 褋懈 褋褉械写邪, 邪 薪械 芯褌 褋械斜械 褋懈, 懈 蟹邪褌芯胁邪 褌械 褋械 锌褉芯胁邪谢懈褏邪 - 锌褉芯褋褌芯 薪械 屑芯卸邪褏邪 写邪 褍褋褌芯褟褌 薪邪 薪邪褌懈褋泻邪: 褌械 薪褟屑邪褏邪 薪懈褖芯 胁 褋械斜械 褋懈, 泻芯械褌芯 写邪 懈蟹锌褉邪胁褟褌 褋褉械褖褍 胁褋懈褔泻芯 褌芯胁邪.鈥�
鈥溞撔笛€芯懈蟹屑褗褌 褔械褋褌芯 懈蟹懈褋泻胁邪 褋芯褑懈邪谢薪邪 锌芯写泻褉械锌邪.鈥�
Read
August 15, 2019"袙褋懈褔泻懈 褋屑械 屑芯褉褋泻懈 褋胁懈薪褔械褌邪 胁 袘芯卸懈褟褌邪 谢邪斜芯褉邪褌芯褉懈褟鈥�
效芯胁械褔械褋褌胁芯褌芯 械 锌褉芯褋褌芯 胁 锌褉芯褑械褋 薪邪 褋褗蟹写邪胁邪薪械."
鈥斕⑿敌叫笛佇� 校懈谢褟屑褋, 鈥濩amino Real鈥� (1953)
"袝褎械泻褌褗褌 袥褍褑懈褎械褉" 胁褋褗褖薪芯褋褌 械 锌芯褌褉械褋邪胁邪褖芯- 锌谢邪褕械褖 褋芯褑懈邪谢薪芯--锌褋懈褏芯谢芯谐懈褔械褋泻懈 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌, 锌褉芯胁械写械薪 锌褉械蟹 1971谐. 笑械谢褌邪 屑褍 械 写邪 懈蟹褋谢械写胁邪 褉械邪泻褑懈懈褌械 薪邪 褔芯胁械泻邪 胁 褋褗褋褌芯褟薪懈械 薪邪 芯谐褉邪薪懈褔械薪邪 褋胁芯斜芯写邪, 胁 褍褋谢芯胁懈褟褌邪 薪邪 蟹邪褌胁芯褉薪懈褔械褋泻懈 卸懈胁芯褌 懈 薪邪 胁谢懈褟薪懈械褌芯 薪邪 薪邪谢芯卸械薪邪褌邪 褋芯褑懈邪谢薪邪 褉芯谢褟 胁褗褉褏褍 锌芯胁械写械薪懈械褌芯.听 袩褗褉胁芯薪邪褔邪谢薪邪褌邪 懈写械褟 薪邪 袟懈屑斜邪褉写芯 械 斜懈谢邪 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌褗褌 写邪 锌褉芯写褗谢卸懈 14 写械薪邪, 薪芯 褌芯泄 谐芯 锌褉械泻褗褋胁邪 薪邪 锌芯谢芯胁懈薪邪褌邪, 蟹邪褖芯褌芯 谐芯谢褟屑邪 褔邪褋褌 芯褌 褍褔邪褋褌薪懈褑懈褌械 胁械褔械 褋邪 斜懈谢懈 锌芯谢褍褔懈谢懈 薪械褉胁薪懈 褋褉懈胁芯胁械.
袧邪写邪谢懈 薪褟泻芯泄 屑芯卸械 写邪 锌褉械写锌芯谢芯卸懈 胁 泻邪泻胁芯 屑芯卸械 写邪 褋械 锌褉械胁褗褉薪械, 邪泻芯 锌芯锌邪写薪械 胁 褍褋谢芯胁懈褟, 褌胁褗褉写械 褉邪蟹谢懈褔薪懈 芯褌 褌械蟹懈, 褋 泻芯懈褌芯 械 褋胁懈泻薪邪谢 懈谢懈 屑褍 褋械 写邪写械 锌褉械泻芯屑械褉薪邪 胁谢邪褋褌?! 孝芯蟹懈 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌 械 锌褉芯胁械卸写邪薪 褋褗褋 褋褌褍写械薪褌懈, 锌褉懈 泻芯懈褌芯 薪械 褋邪 蟹邪斜械谢褟蟹邪薪懈 薪懈泻邪泻胁懈 芯褌泻谢芯薪械薪懈褟 芯褌 锌芯胁械写械薪懈械褌芯 胁 褌褟褏薪邪褌邪 薪芯褉屑邪谢薪邪 褋褉械写邪, 薪懈褌芯 锌褗泻 锌褉芯褟胁邪 薪邪 褋邪写懈蟹褗屑. 袠 懈屑械薪薪芯 褌械蟹懈 斜谢邪谐芯薪褉邪胁薪懈 薪邪 锌褉褗胁 锌芯谐谢械写 褏芯褉邪 褋械 锌褉械胁褉褗褖邪褌 胁 蟹胁械褉芯胁械. 袟邪褖芯, 泻邪泻, 泻褗写械, 泻邪泻褌芯 懈 胁褋懈褔泻懈 芯褋褌邪薪邪谢懈 锌芯写褉芯斜薪芯褋褌懈 屑芯卸械 写邪 薪邪屑械褉懈褌械 胁 泻薪懈谐邪褌邪. 袙泻谢褞褔懈褌械谢薪芯 懈 褌芯胁邪 泻邪泻 褋褌邪胁邪 褌褉邪薪褋褎芯褉屑邪褑懈褟褌邪 芯褌 械写薪芯 锌褉芯褟胁谢械薪懈械 胁 写褉褍谐芯. 袙褋懈褔泻芯 褌芯胁邪 械 薪邪谐谢械写薪芯 写芯泻邪蟹邪褌械谢褋褌胁芯, 褔械 褋褗蟹薪邪薪懈械褌芯 懈 斜懈褌懈械褌芯 褋邪 胁蟹邪懈屑芯褋胁褗褉蟹邪薪懈 懈 胁蟹邪懈屑芯写械泄褋褌胁邪褖懈 褋懈, 邪 褎邪泻褌懈褌械 褋邪 锌褉芯褋褌芯 锌芯褌褉械褋邪胁邪褖懈.
袝泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌褗褌 械 锌褉械写褋褌邪胁械薪 胁 屑薪芯谐芯 写芯褋褌褗锌薪邪 褎芯褉屑邪, 薪械 泻邪褌芯 薪褟泻邪泻褗胁 褋褍褏芯胁邪褌 薪邪褍褔械薪 褌褉褍写, 邪 泻邪褌芯 懈褋褌芯褉懈褟 褋褗褋 褋褗芯褌胁械褌薪懈褌械 褎邪泻褌懈 懈 邪薪邪谢懈蟹懈.
小谢械写 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌褗褌, 袟懈屑斜邪褉写芯 锌褉邪胁懈 褋谢械写薪懈褌械 芯褋薪芯胁薪懈 懈蟹胁芯写懈:
- 褔芯胁械褕泻邪褌邪 锌褉懈褉芯写邪 薪械胁懈薪邪谐懈 械 锌芯写 泻芯薪褌褉芯谢邪 薪邪 褌芯胁邪, 泻芯械褌芯 褋屑械 锌褉懈械谢懈 写邪 薪邪褉懈褔邪屑械 褋胁芯斜芯写薪芯 胁芯谢械懈蟹褟胁谢械薪懈械
- 锌芯胁械褔械褌芯 芯褌 薪邪褋 屑芯谐邪褌 写邪 斜褗写邪褌 褌谢邪褋薪邪褌懈 泻褗屑 褌邪泻芯胁邪 锌芯胁械写械薪懈械, 泻芯械褌芯 褋褗胁褗褉褕械薪芯 锌褉芯褌懈胁芯褉械褔懈 薪邪 谢懈褔薪邪褌邪 薪懈 锌褉械写褋褌邪胁邪 蟹邪 褋邪屑懈褌械 薪邪褋
袝, 懈 邪泻芯 胁褋械 芯褖械 薪褟泻芯泄 褋懈 屑懈褋谢懈, 褔械 锌芯蟹薪邪胁邪 褋械斜械 褋懈 懈 褏芯褉邪褌邪 芯泻芯谢芯 褋械斜械 褋懈 褌芯谢泻芯胁邪 写芯斜褉械, 写邪 褋懈 锌褉懈锌芯屑薪懈 芯褖械 胁械写薪褗卸 褌芯蟹懈 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌.
March 20, 2023
賰鬲丕亘 賲禺賷賮. 賷賲賰賳 賲賳 兀賴賲 賲丕 賯乇兀鬲.
March 16, 2019
锌械褉褕邪 褔邪褋褌懈薪邪 鈥� 褌邪屑, 写械 泄写械褌褜褋褟 锌褉芯 褋褌械薪写褎芯褉写褋褜泻懈泄 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌 褨 蟹邪谐邪谢褜薪褨 胁懈褋薪芯胁泻懈 蟹 薪褜芯谐芯 鈥� 褌褟谐薪械 薪邪 褏芯褉芯褕褍 褔械褌胁褨褉泻褍. 胁芯薪芯 褋锌褉邪胁写褨 褑褨泻邪胁械 褨 褋褌褉邪褕薪械, 褏芯褔邪 屑褨褋褑褟屑懈 褌褉芯褏懈 蟹邪褌褟谐薪褍褌械 (邪谢械 褌芯 泄 蟹褉芯蟹褍屑褨谢芯: 褏芯褔械褌褜褋褟 写械褌邪谢褜薪芯 褉芯蟹锌芯胁褨褋褌懈, 褟泻 褍褋械 斜褍谢芯, 蟹胁械褉薪褍褌懈 褍胁邪谐褍 薪邪 薪褞邪薪褋懈, 锌褨写泻褉械褋谢懈褌懈 胁邪卸谢懈胁械, 褖械 褉邪蟹 锌褨写泻褉械褋谢懈褌懈 胁邪卸谢懈胁械).
写褍卸械 褑褨泻邪胁芯, 褟泻 褌褉邪薪褋褎芯褉屑褍褞褌褜褋褟 锌芯谐谢褟写懈 锌褨写写芯褋谢褨写薪懈褏: 褟泻褖芯 薪邪 褋褌芯褉. 67 蟹褨屑斜邪褉写芯 泻邪卸械 芯锌械褉邪褌芯褉芯胁褨, 褖芯 胁 锌褨写谐芯褌芯胁褑褨 写芯 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌褍 "薪褨褏褌芯 薪械 蟹邪褏芯褌褨胁 斜褍褌懈 芯褏芯褉芯薪褑械屑, 褍褋褨褏 斜褨谢褜褕械 锌褉懈胁邪斜谢褞胁邪谢邪 褉芯谢褜 褍胁'褟蟹薪械薪芯谐芯" (胁 锌褉懈薪褑懈锌褨, 褌芯 蟹芯胁褋褨屑 薪械 写懈胁薪芯, 薪褨 胁 邪屑械褉懈褑褨 褋褌邪薪芯屑 薪邪 褋械褉锌械薪褜 1971 褉芯泻褍, 薪褨 写械褋褜 褌褍褌 褨 褌械锌械褉 鈥� 褌邪泻 斜懈 屑芯胁懈褌懈, 屑芯褉邪谢褜薪邪 锌褨写谐芯褌芯胁泻邪 褋芯褑褨邪谢褜薪芯 邪泻褌懈胁薪懈褏 褋褌褍写械薪褌褨胁), 褌芯 薪邪 褋褌芯褉. 99 薪邪胁械写械薪械 蟹褨蟹薪邪薪薪褟 芯写薪芯谐芯 褍胁'褟蟹薪械薪芯谐芯 锌褉芯 褌械, 褖芯 胁卸械 胁 薪械写褨谢褞, 胁 锌械褉褕懈泄 写械薪褜 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌褍, 泄芯屑褍 蟹邪褏芯褌褨谢芯褋褟 褋褌邪褌懈 芯褏芯褉芯薪褑械屑 鈥� 褨 薪褨褏褌芯 蟹 芯褏芯褉芯薪褑褨胁, 蟹褉芯蟹褍屑褨谢芯, 斜褨谢褜褕械 薪械 胁懈褋谢芯胁谢褞胁邪胁 斜邪卸邪薪褟 褋褌邪褌懈 胁'褟蟹薪械屑. 薪邪泄斜褨谢褜褕械 胁褉邪卸邪褦 褕胁懈写泻褨褋褌褜 邪写邪锌褌邪褑褨褩 写芯 薪芯胁懈褏 褉芯谢械泄. 泻芯谢懈 泻邪褉褨薪邪 泻芯褉芯褋褌械谢褨薪邪 锌褨写 褔邪褋 泻褍褉褋褍 蟹 褨写械薪褌懈褔薪芯褋褌褨 谐芯胁芯褉懈谢邪, 褖芯 蟹邪 泻褨谢褜泻邪 谐芯写懈薪 屑芯卸薪邪 锌械褉械褌胁芯褉懈褌懈 胁懈锌邪写泻芯胁懈褏 谢褞写械泄 薪邪 写胁褨 胁芯褉芯卸褨 褋芯褑褨邪谢褜薪褨 谐褉褍锌懈, 胁 褑械 胁褨褉懈谢芯褋褟 薪邪 褟泻芯屑褍褋褜 胁泻褉邪泄 邪斜褋褌褉邪泻褌薪芯屑褍 褉褨胁薪褨 (屑芯卸械, 斜褉邪泻褍胁邪谢芯 锌械褉械泻芯薪谢懈胁懈褏 褨谢褞褋褌褉邪褑褨泄) 鈥� 邪谢械 泻芯谢懈 蟹褨屑斜邪褉写芯 芯锌懈褋褍褦, 褟泻 薪芯褉屑邪谢褜薪褨 褋褌褍写械薪褌懈, 褟泻褨 褖械 薪械写邪胁薪芯 褏芯褌褨谢懈 褋锌褉芯斜褍胁邪褌懈 褋械斜械 胁 邪屑锌谢褍邪 胁'褟蟹薪褨胁, 写芯 胁械褔芯褉邪 锌械褉褕芯谐芯 写薪褟 褋褌邪褞褌褜 胁懈褉邪蟹薪芯 褋邪写懈褋褌懈褔薪懈屑懈 薪邪谐谢褟写邪褔邪屑懈, 褋褌邪褦 褋锌褉邪胁写褨 褋褌褉邪褕薪芯.
褑褨泻邪胁芯, 褖芯 褟 褋邪屑邪 胁 锌褉芯褑械褋褨 褔懈褌邪薪薪褟 褌械卸 褌褉芯褏懈 锌芯-褨薪褕芯屑褍 锌芯褔邪谢邪 褋锌褉懈泄屑邪褌懈 褋懈褌褍邪褑褨褞, 薪械蟹胁邪卸邪褞褔懈 薪邪 褌械, 褖芯 褉邪薪褨褕械 褔褍谢邪 褨 锌褉芯 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌, 褨 锌褉芯 褌芯褌邪谢褨褌邪褉懈蟹屑, 褨 锌褉芯 褋芯褑褨邪谢褜薪褍 褨写械薪褌懈褔薪褨褋褌褜, 褌芯斜褌芯 锌褨写褏芯写懈谢邪 薪械 蟹 薪褍谢褜芯胁芯褞 斜邪蟹芯褞. 褍 锌械褉械写屑芯胁褨 蟹褨屑斜邪褉写芯 褉芯蟹锌芯胁褨写邪褦, 褟泻 斜褍胁 械泻褋锌械褉褌芯屑 薪邪 褋褍写褨 锌褉芯褌懈 薪邪谐谢褟写邪褔邪 胁'褟蟹薪懈褑褨 邪斜褍-谐褉械泄斜, 褨 屑械薪褨 蟹 褌懈屑 斜褍谢芯 薪械 写褍卸械 泻芯屑褎芯褉褌薪芯 鈥� 芯泻械泄, 胁 邪写胁芯泻邪褌褨胁 褉芯斜芯褌邪 褌邪泻邪, 邪谢械 褔芯谐芯 械泻褋锌械褉褌-锌褋懈褏芯谢芯谐 胁懈锌褉邪胁写芯胁褍褦 泻邪褌邪? 泻芯谢懈 锌芯褔邪胁褋褟 褉芯蟹写褨谢 胁谢邪褋薪械 锌褉芯 褋懈褌褍邪褑褨褞 胁 邪斜褍-谐褉械泄斜, 褟 胁卸械 褌褉芯褏懈 褉芯蟹褍屑褨谢邪, 锌褉芯 褖芯 泄写械褌褜褋褟 蟹褨屑斜邪褉写芯: 蟹薪邪褔薪芯 斜褨谢褜褕械 蟹邪 斜械蟹锌芯褋械褉械写薪褨褏 褍褔邪褋薪懈泻褨胁 胁懈薪薪褨 褌褨, 褏褌芯 褋褌胁芯褉褞褦 褋懈褌褍邪褑褨褞, 褟泻邪 褌邪泻械 褍屑芯卸谢懈胁谢褞褦, 薪邪胁褨褌褜 褟泻褖芯 褋邪屑褨 胁芯薪懈 薪褨泻芯屑褍 薪褨谐 薪械 谢邪屑邪谢懈. 胁褌褨屑, 胁褨薪 薪褨泻芯谐芯 薪械 胁懈锌褉邪胁写芯胁褍褦, 芯褋泻褨谢褜泻懈 斜械蟹锌芯褋械褉械写薪褨 褍褔邪褋薪懈泻懈 屑芯谐谢懈 斜 锌芯褋谢邪褌懈 褋懈褋褌械屑褍 写芯 斜褨褋邪, 褟泻斜懈 屑邪谢懈 写芯褋褌邪褌薪褜芯 胁薪褍褌褉褨褕薪褨褏 褋懈谢 褔懈 斜邪卸邪薪薪褟 (芯褋褌邪薪薪褨泄, 屑邪谢械薪褜泻懈泄 褉芯蟹写褨谢 褟泻褉邪蟹 锌褉芯 褌懈褏, 褏褌芯 锌芯褋谢邪胁, 褨 锌褉芯 褌械, 褟泻 褑械 屑芯卸薪邪 蟹褉芯斜懈褌懈), 鈥� 邪谢械 蟹屑褍褕褍褦 褌褉芯褕泻懈 泻褉懈褌懈褔薪褨褕械 芯褑褨薪懈褌懈 褋邪屑懈褏 褋械斜械, 写械屑芯薪褋褌褉褍褞褔懈 褋懈谢褍 褋懈褋褌械屑懈 泄 褋懈褌褍邪褑褨褩. 胁褋械-褌邪泻懈 褍屑芯胁薪懈泄 褋锌芯褋褨斜 鈥� 写褍卸械 薪械褌褉懈胁泻邪 褕褌褍泻邪.
薪邪 褑褜芯屑褍 褎芯薪褨 芯褋芯斜谢懈胁芯 褋褍屑薪邪 斜褨写邪 蟹 褔邪褋褌懈薪芯褞 锌褉芯 邪斜褍-谐褉械泄斜 褍 褌芯屑褍, 褖芯, 锌芯-锌械褉褕械, 褩褩 蟹邪薪邪写褌芯 斜邪谐邪褌芯 泄 芯写薪芯屑邪薪褨褌薪芯, 邪 锌芯-写褉褍谐械, 蟹褨屑斜邪褉写芯 蟹薪邪褏芯写懈褌褜 胁谢褍褔薪褍 屑械褌邪褎芯褉褍 褨 械泻褋锌谢褍邪褌褍褦 褩褩 ad nauseam. 褟 薪械 褉邪褏褍胁邪谢邪, 褋泻褨谢褜泻懈 褉邪蟹褨胁 胁褨薪 胁卸懈胁邪褦 "谢芯卸泻邪 写褜芯谐褌褞", 邪谢械 褌芯 斜褍谢芯 褖芯薪邪泄屑械薪褕械 写芯褏芯谢褦褉懈褋褜泻邪.
薪械蟹胁邪卸邪褞褔懈 薪邪 褌械, 褖芯 蟹褨屑斜邪褉写芯 薪邪蟹懈胁邪褦 褋械斜械 芯锌褌懈屑褨褋褌芯屑, 泻薪懈卸泻邪 蟹胁褍褔懈褌褜 写械褖芯 锌械褋懈屑褨褋褌懈褔薪芯, 薪邪胁褨褌褜 褌芯泄 芯褋褌邪薪薪褨泄 褉芯蟹写褨谢, 写械 胁褨薪 锌懈褕械, 褖芯 谢褞写懈 褌邪泻 褋邪屑芯 谢械谐泻芯 屑芯卸褍褌褜 锌械褉械褌胁芯褉懈褌懈褋褟 薪邪 谐械褉芯褩胁, 褟泻 胁芯薪懈 锌械褉械褌胁芯褉褞褞褌褜褋褟 薪邪 屑芯薪褋褌褉褨胁. 锌褉芯斜谢械屑邪 褑褨褦褩 褋胁褨褌谢芯褩 写褍屑泻懈 胁 褌芯屑褍, 褖芯 褨薪褕褨 褑褨泻邪胁褨 写芯褋谢褨写懈 锌芯泻邪蟹褍褞褌褜, 褟泻 褍 "褔懈褋褌懈褏" 褍屑芯胁邪褏 (褌懈锌褍 褉械邪谢褜薪芯谐芯 褋褌械薪写褎芯褉写褋褜泻芯谐芯 褌褞褉械屑薪芯谐芯 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌褍 褔懈 褍褟胁薪芯谐芯 "锌芯胁械谢懈褌械谢褟 屑褍褏") 谢褞写懈 胁褋械-褌邪泻懈 褋褏懈谢褟褞褌褜褋褟 写芯 蟹谢邪. 胁芯薪芯 锌褉芯褋褌芯 胁懈褏芯写懈褌褜, 邪 斜褍褌懈 写芯斜褉懈屑 写芯胁芯写懈褌褜褋褟 褋胁褨写芯屑芯, 褌邪 泄 褌褍褌 褦 蟹薪邪褔薪芯 斜褨谢褜褕褨 褕邪薪褋懈 锌芯屑械褉褌懈 褉邪薪褨褕械, 薪褨卸 褌胁褨泄 锌褉械泻褉邪褋薪懈泄 褔懈薪 锌芯屑褨褌褟褌褜. "谐械褉芯褩蟹屑, 鈥� 锌懈褕械 蟹褨屑斜邪褉写芯, 鈥� 褔邪褋褌芯 锌芯褌褉械斜褍褦 褋芯褑褨邪谢褜薪芯褩 锌褨写褌褉懈屑泻懈. 蟹邪蟹胁懈褔邪泄 屑懈 锌褉芯褋谢邪胁谢褟褦屑芯 谐械褉芯褩褔薪褨 胁褔懈薪泻懈 芯泻褉械屑懈褏 褋屑褨谢懈胁褑褨胁, 邪谢械 薪械 褋褏胁邪谢褞褦屑芯 褩褏, 褟泻褖芯 褑褨 胁褔懈薪泻懈 褋褌胁芯褉褞褞褌褜 褋械褉泄芯蟹薪褨 薪械蟹褉褍褔薪芯褋褌褨 写谢褟 褨薪褕懈褏 褨 褟泻褖芯 薪邪屑 薪械蟹褉芯蟹褍屑褨谢褨 屑芯褌懈胁懈. 薪邪褋褨薪薪褟 谐械褉芯褩褔薪芯谐芯 褋锌褉芯褌懈胁褍 薪邪泄泻褉邪褖械 褋褏芯写懈褌褜, 泻芯谢懈 胁褋褨 褔谢械薪懈 褋锌褨谢褜薪芯褌懈 谐芯褌芯胁褨 褔懈屑芯褋褜 锌芯卸械褉褌胁褍胁邪褌懈 蟹邪褉邪写懈 褋锌褨谢褜薪懈褏 褑褨薪薪芯褋褌械泄 褨 褑褨谢械泄" (265).
芯褋芯斜谢懈胁芯 褑褨薪薪褨 屑邪谢械薪褜泻褨 锌褨写泻邪蟹泻懈 鈥� 褨薪写懈泻邪褌芯褉懈 褌芯谐芯, 褖芯 屑懈 泻褍写懈褋褜 薪械 褌褍写懈 蟹邪泄褕谢懈. 薪邪锌褉懈泻谢邪写, 褔褍写芯胁邪 褋懈褌褍邪褑褨褟: 锌褉械写褋褌邪胁薪懈泻懈 "泻芯屑褨褌械褌褍 胁'褟蟹薪褨胁" 锌褉懈褏芯写褟褌褜 褍 胁褨胁褌芯褉芯泻 写芯 芯褉谐邪薪褨蟹邪褌芯褉褨胁 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌褍 卸邪谢褨褌懈褋褟 薪邪 褍屑芯胁懈 褍褌褉懈屑邪薪薪褟, 胁薪芯褋褟褔懈 褋胁芯褩 锌褉芯锌芯蟹懈褑褨褩 (胁芯薪懈 褌邪泻 褨 薪邪谐芯谢芯褕褍褞褌褜, 褖芯 褑械 薪械 褋泻邪褉谐懈, 邪 锌褉芯锌芯蟹懈褑褨褩), 褖芯写芯 锌芯泻褉邪褖械薪薪褟 褍屑芯胁 褍 胁'褟蟹薪懈褑褨. "泻械褉褌 [邪褋锌褨褉邪薪褌 蟹褨屑斜邪褉写芯] 胁胁褨褔谢懈胁芯 写褟泻褍褦 褩屑 蟹邪 胁褋褨 褑褨 锌褉芯锌芯蟹懈褑褨褩 泄 芯斜褨褑褟褦 锌械褉械写邪褌懈 褩褏 薪邪 褉芯蟹谐谢褟写 薪邪褔邪谢褜褋褌胁褍. 褑褨泻邪胁芯, 写褍屑邪褞 褟, 褔懈 锌芯屑褨褌懈谢懈 胁芯薪懈, 褖芯 胁褨薪 薪械 褉芯斜懈胁 薪褨褟泻懈褏 薪芯褌邪褌芯泻, 邪 胁芯薪懈 薪械 锌械褉械写邪谢懈 泄芯屑褍 褋胁芯谐芯 褋锌懈褋泻邪. 薪邪泄胁邪卸谢懈胁褨褕械 写谢褟 薪邪褕芯褩 褋懈褋褌械屑懈 斜褍谢芯 褋褌胁芯褉懈褌懈 褨谢褞蟹褨褞 写械屑芯泻褉邪褌褨褩 胁 邪胁褌芯褉懈褌邪褉薪褨泄 邪褌屑芯褋褎械褉褨" (156). 褨 薪械 褌械 褖芯斜 褍 屑械薪械 胁褨写 褑褜芯谐芯 邪卸 屑芯褉芯蟹 锌芯 褕泻褨褉褨, 邪谢械 褌邪泻械 褉褨写薪械 褨 蟹薪邪泄芯屑械... 薪褍, 胁懈 胁 泻褍褉褋褨.
褨 褖械: 薪械蟹胁邪卸邪褞褔懈 薪邪 斜械蟹屑械卸薪褍 泻褉邪褋懈胁褨褋褌褜 泻薪懈卸泻懈, 褉芯褋褨泄褋褜泻械 胁懈写邪薪薪褟 胁懈泻谢懈泻邪褦 褍 屑械薪械 褋褌褉邪褕薪褍 褌褍谐褍. 褍 薪懈褏 斜褍胁邪褞褌褜 锌褉芯斜谢械屑懈 薪械 褌褨谢褜泻懈 蟹 锌褍薪泻褌褍邪褑褨褦褞, 邪 泄 薪邪胁褨褌褜 褨蟹 褍蟹谐芯写卸械薪薪褟屑 褔邪褋褌懈薪 褋泻谢邪写薪芯谐芯 褉械褔械薪薪褟 (褔懈 褌芯 斜褍谢懈 芯写薪芯褉褨写薪褨 褔谢械薪懈? 薪械 锌邪屑'褟褌邪褞; 胁 泻芯卸薪芯屑褍 褉邪蟹褨, 锌械褔邪谢褜). 褨 褟 蟹薪邪泄褕谢邪 芯写薪械 屑褨褋褑械, 写械 锌械褉械泻谢邪写 锌芯褟褋薪械薪薪褟 褋芯褑褨芯谢芯谐褨褔薪芯褩 锌褉芯褑械写褍褉懈 薪械 锌褉芯褋褌芯 锌褉懈斜谢懈蟹薪懈泄, 邪 胁懈褋褋邪褌懈泄 蟹 锌邪谢褜褑褟, 邪谢械, 斜芯褞褋褟, 褌邪泻懈褏 屑褨褋褑褜 斜褍谢芯 斜褨谢褜褕械.
写褍卸械 褑褨泻邪胁芯, 褟泻 褌褉邪薪褋褎芯褉屑褍褞褌褜褋褟 锌芯谐谢褟写懈 锌褨写写芯褋谢褨写薪懈褏: 褟泻褖芯 薪邪 褋褌芯褉. 67 蟹褨屑斜邪褉写芯 泻邪卸械 芯锌械褉邪褌芯褉芯胁褨, 褖芯 胁 锌褨写谐芯褌芯胁褑褨 写芯 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌褍 "薪褨褏褌芯 薪械 蟹邪褏芯褌褨胁 斜褍褌懈 芯褏芯褉芯薪褑械屑, 褍褋褨褏 斜褨谢褜褕械 锌褉懈胁邪斜谢褞胁邪谢邪 褉芯谢褜 褍胁'褟蟹薪械薪芯谐芯" (胁 锌褉懈薪褑懈锌褨, 褌芯 蟹芯胁褋褨屑 薪械 写懈胁薪芯, 薪褨 胁 邪屑械褉懈褑褨 褋褌邪薪芯屑 薪邪 褋械褉锌械薪褜 1971 褉芯泻褍, 薪褨 写械褋褜 褌褍褌 褨 褌械锌械褉 鈥� 褌邪泻 斜懈 屑芯胁懈褌懈, 屑芯褉邪谢褜薪邪 锌褨写谐芯褌芯胁泻邪 褋芯褑褨邪谢褜薪芯 邪泻褌懈胁薪懈褏 褋褌褍写械薪褌褨胁), 褌芯 薪邪 褋褌芯褉. 99 薪邪胁械写械薪械 蟹褨蟹薪邪薪薪褟 芯写薪芯谐芯 褍胁'褟蟹薪械薪芯谐芯 锌褉芯 褌械, 褖芯 胁卸械 胁 薪械写褨谢褞, 胁 锌械褉褕懈泄 写械薪褜 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌褍, 泄芯屑褍 蟹邪褏芯褌褨谢芯褋褟 褋褌邪褌懈 芯褏芯褉芯薪褑械屑 鈥� 褨 薪褨褏褌芯 蟹 芯褏芯褉芯薪褑褨胁, 蟹褉芯蟹褍屑褨谢芯, 斜褨谢褜褕械 薪械 胁懈褋谢芯胁谢褞胁邪胁 斜邪卸邪薪褟 褋褌邪褌懈 胁'褟蟹薪械屑. 薪邪泄斜褨谢褜褕械 胁褉邪卸邪褦 褕胁懈写泻褨褋褌褜 邪写邪锌褌邪褑褨褩 写芯 薪芯胁懈褏 褉芯谢械泄. 泻芯谢懈 泻邪褉褨薪邪 泻芯褉芯褋褌械谢褨薪邪 锌褨写 褔邪褋 泻褍褉褋褍 蟹 褨写械薪褌懈褔薪芯褋褌褨 谐芯胁芯褉懈谢邪, 褖芯 蟹邪 泻褨谢褜泻邪 谐芯写懈薪 屑芯卸薪邪 锌械褉械褌胁芯褉懈褌懈 胁懈锌邪写泻芯胁懈褏 谢褞写械泄 薪邪 写胁褨 胁芯褉芯卸褨 褋芯褑褨邪谢褜薪褨 谐褉褍锌懈, 胁 褑械 胁褨褉懈谢芯褋褟 薪邪 褟泻芯屑褍褋褜 胁泻褉邪泄 邪斜褋褌褉邪泻褌薪芯屑褍 褉褨胁薪褨 (屑芯卸械, 斜褉邪泻褍胁邪谢芯 锌械褉械泻芯薪谢懈胁懈褏 褨谢褞褋褌褉邪褑褨泄) 鈥� 邪谢械 泻芯谢懈 蟹褨屑斜邪褉写芯 芯锌懈褋褍褦, 褟泻 薪芯褉屑邪谢褜薪褨 褋褌褍写械薪褌懈, 褟泻褨 褖械 薪械写邪胁薪芯 褏芯褌褨谢懈 褋锌褉芯斜褍胁邪褌懈 褋械斜械 胁 邪屑锌谢褍邪 胁'褟蟹薪褨胁, 写芯 胁械褔芯褉邪 锌械褉褕芯谐芯 写薪褟 褋褌邪褞褌褜 胁懈褉邪蟹薪芯 褋邪写懈褋褌懈褔薪懈屑懈 薪邪谐谢褟写邪褔邪屑懈, 褋褌邪褦 褋锌褉邪胁写褨 褋褌褉邪褕薪芯.
褑褨泻邪胁芯, 褖芯 褟 褋邪屑邪 胁 锌褉芯褑械褋褨 褔懈褌邪薪薪褟 褌械卸 褌褉芯褏懈 锌芯-褨薪褕芯屑褍 锌芯褔邪谢邪 褋锌褉懈泄屑邪褌懈 褋懈褌褍邪褑褨褞, 薪械蟹胁邪卸邪褞褔懈 薪邪 褌械, 褖芯 褉邪薪褨褕械 褔褍谢邪 褨 锌褉芯 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌, 褨 锌褉芯 褌芯褌邪谢褨褌邪褉懈蟹屑, 褨 锌褉芯 褋芯褑褨邪谢褜薪褍 褨写械薪褌懈褔薪褨褋褌褜, 褌芯斜褌芯 锌褨写褏芯写懈谢邪 薪械 蟹 薪褍谢褜芯胁芯褞 斜邪蟹芯褞. 褍 锌械褉械写屑芯胁褨 蟹褨屑斜邪褉写芯 褉芯蟹锌芯胁褨写邪褦, 褟泻 斜褍胁 械泻褋锌械褉褌芯屑 薪邪 褋褍写褨 锌褉芯褌懈 薪邪谐谢褟写邪褔邪 胁'褟蟹薪懈褑褨 邪斜褍-谐褉械泄斜, 褨 屑械薪褨 蟹 褌懈屑 斜褍谢芯 薪械 写褍卸械 泻芯屑褎芯褉褌薪芯 鈥� 芯泻械泄, 胁 邪写胁芯泻邪褌褨胁 褉芯斜芯褌邪 褌邪泻邪, 邪谢械 褔芯谐芯 械泻褋锌械褉褌-锌褋懈褏芯谢芯谐 胁懈锌褉邪胁写芯胁褍褦 泻邪褌邪? 泻芯谢懈 锌芯褔邪胁褋褟 褉芯蟹写褨谢 胁谢邪褋薪械 锌褉芯 褋懈褌褍邪褑褨褞 胁 邪斜褍-谐褉械泄斜, 褟 胁卸械 褌褉芯褏懈 褉芯蟹褍屑褨谢邪, 锌褉芯 褖芯 泄写械褌褜褋褟 蟹褨屑斜邪褉写芯: 蟹薪邪褔薪芯 斜褨谢褜褕械 蟹邪 斜械蟹锌芯褋械褉械写薪褨褏 褍褔邪褋薪懈泻褨胁 胁懈薪薪褨 褌褨, 褏褌芯 褋褌胁芯褉褞褦 褋懈褌褍邪褑褨褞, 褟泻邪 褌邪泻械 褍屑芯卸谢懈胁谢褞褦, 薪邪胁褨褌褜 褟泻褖芯 褋邪屑褨 胁芯薪懈 薪褨泻芯屑褍 薪褨谐 薪械 谢邪屑邪谢懈. 胁褌褨屑, 胁褨薪 薪褨泻芯谐芯 薪械 胁懈锌褉邪胁写芯胁褍褦, 芯褋泻褨谢褜泻懈 斜械蟹锌芯褋械褉械写薪褨 褍褔邪褋薪懈泻懈 屑芯谐谢懈 斜 锌芯褋谢邪褌懈 褋懈褋褌械屑褍 写芯 斜褨褋邪, 褟泻斜懈 屑邪谢懈 写芯褋褌邪褌薪褜芯 胁薪褍褌褉褨褕薪褨褏 褋懈谢 褔懈 斜邪卸邪薪薪褟 (芯褋褌邪薪薪褨泄, 屑邪谢械薪褜泻懈泄 褉芯蟹写褨谢 褟泻褉邪蟹 锌褉芯 褌懈褏, 褏褌芯 锌芯褋谢邪胁, 褨 锌褉芯 褌械, 褟泻 褑械 屑芯卸薪邪 蟹褉芯斜懈褌懈), 鈥� 邪谢械 蟹屑褍褕褍褦 褌褉芯褕泻懈 泻褉懈褌懈褔薪褨褕械 芯褑褨薪懈褌懈 褋邪屑懈褏 褋械斜械, 写械屑芯薪褋褌褉褍褞褔懈 褋懈谢褍 褋懈褋褌械屑懈 泄 褋懈褌褍邪褑褨褩. 胁褋械-褌邪泻懈 褍屑芯胁薪懈泄 褋锌芯褋褨斜 鈥� 写褍卸械 薪械褌褉懈胁泻邪 褕褌褍泻邪.
薪邪 褑褜芯屑褍 褎芯薪褨 芯褋芯斜谢懈胁芯 褋褍屑薪邪 斜褨写邪 蟹 褔邪褋褌懈薪芯褞 锌褉芯 邪斜褍-谐褉械泄斜 褍 褌芯屑褍, 褖芯, 锌芯-锌械褉褕械, 褩褩 蟹邪薪邪写褌芯 斜邪谐邪褌芯 泄 芯写薪芯屑邪薪褨褌薪芯, 邪 锌芯-写褉褍谐械, 蟹褨屑斜邪褉写芯 蟹薪邪褏芯写懈褌褜 胁谢褍褔薪褍 屑械褌邪褎芯褉褍 褨 械泻褋锌谢褍邪褌褍褦 褩褩 ad nauseam. 褟 薪械 褉邪褏褍胁邪谢邪, 褋泻褨谢褜泻懈 褉邪蟹褨胁 胁褨薪 胁卸懈胁邪褦 "谢芯卸泻邪 写褜芯谐褌褞", 邪谢械 褌芯 斜褍谢芯 褖芯薪邪泄屑械薪褕械 写芯褏芯谢褦褉懈褋褜泻邪.
薪械蟹胁邪卸邪褞褔懈 薪邪 褌械, 褖芯 蟹褨屑斜邪褉写芯 薪邪蟹懈胁邪褦 褋械斜械 芯锌褌懈屑褨褋褌芯屑, 泻薪懈卸泻邪 蟹胁褍褔懈褌褜 写械褖芯 锌械褋懈屑褨褋褌懈褔薪芯, 薪邪胁褨褌褜 褌芯泄 芯褋褌邪薪薪褨泄 褉芯蟹写褨谢, 写械 胁褨薪 锌懈褕械, 褖芯 谢褞写懈 褌邪泻 褋邪屑芯 谢械谐泻芯 屑芯卸褍褌褜 锌械褉械褌胁芯褉懈褌懈褋褟 薪邪 谐械褉芯褩胁, 褟泻 胁芯薪懈 锌械褉械褌胁芯褉褞褞褌褜褋褟 薪邪 屑芯薪褋褌褉褨胁. 锌褉芯斜谢械屑邪 褑褨褦褩 褋胁褨褌谢芯褩 写褍屑泻懈 胁 褌芯屑褍, 褖芯 褨薪褕褨 褑褨泻邪胁褨 写芯褋谢褨写懈 锌芯泻邪蟹褍褞褌褜, 褟泻 褍 "褔懈褋褌懈褏" 褍屑芯胁邪褏 (褌懈锌褍 褉械邪谢褜薪芯谐芯 褋褌械薪写褎芯褉写褋褜泻芯谐芯 褌褞褉械屑薪芯谐芯 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌褍 褔懈 褍褟胁薪芯谐芯 "锌芯胁械谢懈褌械谢褟 屑褍褏") 谢褞写懈 胁褋械-褌邪泻懈 褋褏懈谢褟褞褌褜褋褟 写芯 蟹谢邪. 胁芯薪芯 锌褉芯褋褌芯 胁懈褏芯写懈褌褜, 邪 斜褍褌懈 写芯斜褉懈屑 写芯胁芯写懈褌褜褋褟 褋胁褨写芯屑芯, 褌邪 泄 褌褍褌 褦 蟹薪邪褔薪芯 斜褨谢褜褕褨 褕邪薪褋懈 锌芯屑械褉褌懈 褉邪薪褨褕械, 薪褨卸 褌胁褨泄 锌褉械泻褉邪褋薪懈泄 褔懈薪 锌芯屑褨褌褟褌褜. "谐械褉芯褩蟹屑, 鈥� 锌懈褕械 蟹褨屑斜邪褉写芯, 鈥� 褔邪褋褌芯 锌芯褌褉械斜褍褦 褋芯褑褨邪谢褜薪芯褩 锌褨写褌褉懈屑泻懈. 蟹邪蟹胁懈褔邪泄 屑懈 锌褉芯褋谢邪胁谢褟褦屑芯 谐械褉芯褩褔薪褨 胁褔懈薪泻懈 芯泻褉械屑懈褏 褋屑褨谢懈胁褑褨胁, 邪谢械 薪械 褋褏胁邪谢褞褦屑芯 褩褏, 褟泻褖芯 褑褨 胁褔懈薪泻懈 褋褌胁芯褉褞褞褌褜 褋械褉泄芯蟹薪褨 薪械蟹褉褍褔薪芯褋褌褨 写谢褟 褨薪褕懈褏 褨 褟泻褖芯 薪邪屑 薪械蟹褉芯蟹褍屑褨谢褨 屑芯褌懈胁懈. 薪邪褋褨薪薪褟 谐械褉芯褩褔薪芯谐芯 褋锌褉芯褌懈胁褍 薪邪泄泻褉邪褖械 褋褏芯写懈褌褜, 泻芯谢懈 胁褋褨 褔谢械薪懈 褋锌褨谢褜薪芯褌懈 谐芯褌芯胁褨 褔懈屑芯褋褜 锌芯卸械褉褌胁褍胁邪褌懈 蟹邪褉邪写懈 褋锌褨谢褜薪懈褏 褑褨薪薪芯褋褌械泄 褨 褑褨谢械泄" (265).
芯褋芯斜谢懈胁芯 褑褨薪薪褨 屑邪谢械薪褜泻褨 锌褨写泻邪蟹泻懈 鈥� 褨薪写懈泻邪褌芯褉懈 褌芯谐芯, 褖芯 屑懈 泻褍写懈褋褜 薪械 褌褍写懈 蟹邪泄褕谢懈. 薪邪锌褉懈泻谢邪写, 褔褍写芯胁邪 褋懈褌褍邪褑褨褟: 锌褉械写褋褌邪胁薪懈泻懈 "泻芯屑褨褌械褌褍 胁'褟蟹薪褨胁" 锌褉懈褏芯写褟褌褜 褍 胁褨胁褌芯褉芯泻 写芯 芯褉谐邪薪褨蟹邪褌芯褉褨胁 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌褍 卸邪谢褨褌懈褋褟 薪邪 褍屑芯胁懈 褍褌褉懈屑邪薪薪褟, 胁薪芯褋褟褔懈 褋胁芯褩 锌褉芯锌芯蟹懈褑褨褩 (胁芯薪懈 褌邪泻 褨 薪邪谐芯谢芯褕褍褞褌褜, 褖芯 褑械 薪械 褋泻邪褉谐懈, 邪 锌褉芯锌芯蟹懈褑褨褩), 褖芯写芯 锌芯泻褉邪褖械薪薪褟 褍屑芯胁 褍 胁'褟蟹薪懈褑褨. "泻械褉褌 [邪褋锌褨褉邪薪褌 蟹褨屑斜邪褉写芯] 胁胁褨褔谢懈胁芯 写褟泻褍褦 褩屑 蟹邪 胁褋褨 褑褨 锌褉芯锌芯蟹懈褑褨褩 泄 芯斜褨褑褟褦 锌械褉械写邪褌懈 褩褏 薪邪 褉芯蟹谐谢褟写 薪邪褔邪谢褜褋褌胁褍. 褑褨泻邪胁芯, 写褍屑邪褞 褟, 褔懈 锌芯屑褨褌懈谢懈 胁芯薪懈, 褖芯 胁褨薪 薪械 褉芯斜懈胁 薪褨褟泻懈褏 薪芯褌邪褌芯泻, 邪 胁芯薪懈 薪械 锌械褉械写邪谢懈 泄芯屑褍 褋胁芯谐芯 褋锌懈褋泻邪. 薪邪泄胁邪卸谢懈胁褨褕械 写谢褟 薪邪褕芯褩 褋懈褋褌械屑懈 斜褍谢芯 褋褌胁芯褉懈褌懈 褨谢褞蟹褨褞 写械屑芯泻褉邪褌褨褩 胁 邪胁褌芯褉懈褌邪褉薪褨泄 邪褌屑芯褋褎械褉褨" (156). 褨 薪械 褌械 褖芯斜 褍 屑械薪械 胁褨写 褑褜芯谐芯 邪卸 屑芯褉芯蟹 锌芯 褕泻褨褉褨, 邪谢械 褌邪泻械 褉褨写薪械 褨 蟹薪邪泄芯屑械... 薪褍, 胁懈 胁 泻褍褉褋褨.
褨 褖械: 薪械蟹胁邪卸邪褞褔懈 薪邪 斜械蟹屑械卸薪褍 泻褉邪褋懈胁褨褋褌褜 泻薪懈卸泻懈, 褉芯褋褨泄褋褜泻械 胁懈写邪薪薪褟 胁懈泻谢懈泻邪褦 褍 屑械薪械 褋褌褉邪褕薪褍 褌褍谐褍. 褍 薪懈褏 斜褍胁邪褞褌褜 锌褉芯斜谢械屑懈 薪械 褌褨谢褜泻懈 蟹 锌褍薪泻褌褍邪褑褨褦褞, 邪 泄 薪邪胁褨褌褜 褨蟹 褍蟹谐芯写卸械薪薪褟屑 褔邪褋褌懈薪 褋泻谢邪写薪芯谐芯 褉械褔械薪薪褟 (褔懈 褌芯 斜褍谢懈 芯写薪芯褉褨写薪褨 褔谢械薪懈? 薪械 锌邪屑'褟褌邪褞; 胁 泻芯卸薪芯屑褍 褉邪蟹褨, 锌械褔邪谢褜). 褨 褟 蟹薪邪泄褕谢邪 芯写薪械 屑褨褋褑械, 写械 锌械褉械泻谢邪写 锌芯褟褋薪械薪薪褟 褋芯褑褨芯谢芯谐褨褔薪芯褩 锌褉芯褑械写褍褉懈 薪械 锌褉芯褋褌芯 锌褉懈斜谢懈蟹薪懈泄, 邪 胁懈褋褋邪褌懈泄 蟹 锌邪谢褜褑褟, 邪谢械, 斜芯褞褋褟, 褌邪泻懈褏 屑褨褋褑褜 斜褍谢芯 斜褨谢褜褕械.
September 19, 2015
This is a horribly difficult book to read, not because Zimbardo鈥檚 writing is bad or the subject is uninteresting, but because it exposes how easily people can be manipulated into a role 鈥� and I don鈥檛 just mean the guards, but also the prisoners. It鈥檚 important because it examines, in minute detail, the events of a now infamous experiment: the Stanford Prison Experiment. This was run, not by Stanley Milgram, as people often think, but by Philip Zimbardo, and even he became caught up in the act of it. It wasn鈥檛 even a very convincing prison, and yet it quickly made both guards and prisoners act their roles. And not even them, but people outside it who should have seen through the illusion, like the chaplain.
Both this experiment and Stanley Milgram鈥檚 experiments are kind of horrifying, because we don鈥檛 want to think it鈥檚 that easy. If you read Behind the Shock Machine, by Gina Perry (the title links to my review), she shows that it鈥檚 not that easy 鈥� Milgram鈥檚 experiments were honed to a fine point, and only the results which supported his conclusions most spectacularly were published. But still, the fact remains that you don鈥檛 have to scratch far below the surface to find something unsavoury about the way humans seem to act.
As Dar Williams says in 鈥楤uzzer鈥�: I get it now, I鈥檓 the face, I鈥檓 the cause of war; we don鈥檛 have to blame white-coated men anymore.
This book, this experiment, isn鈥檛 all there is to be said about human nature, of course. But it鈥檚 an important account of something which revolutionised our understanding of human psychology, and shone a light on things we need to examine 鈥� even if they turn out not to hold as true as we fear. Kudos to Zimbardo for his unflinching discussion of everything that went on in the experiment, and every time he failed to safeguard the interests of the participants.
Both this experiment and Stanley Milgram鈥檚 experiments are kind of horrifying, because we don鈥檛 want to think it鈥檚 that easy. If you read Behind the Shock Machine, by Gina Perry (the title links to my review), she shows that it鈥檚 not that easy 鈥� Milgram鈥檚 experiments were honed to a fine point, and only the results which supported his conclusions most spectacularly were published. But still, the fact remains that you don鈥檛 have to scratch far below the surface to find something unsavoury about the way humans seem to act.
As Dar Williams says in 鈥楤uzzer鈥�: I get it now, I鈥檓 the face, I鈥檓 the cause of war; we don鈥檛 have to blame white-coated men anymore.
This book, this experiment, isn鈥檛 all there is to be said about human nature, of course. But it鈥檚 an important account of something which revolutionised our understanding of human psychology, and shone a light on things we need to examine 鈥� even if they turn out not to hold as true as we fear. Kudos to Zimbardo for his unflinching discussion of everything that went on in the experiment, and every time he failed to safeguard the interests of the participants.
February 17, 2008
um, so i decided to stop reading this book because it's not suprising to me (in the LEAST!) that a bunch of college educated, middle-class white kids would act all brutish and prison-guardesque if they didn't have to be responsibile for any of their actions, and stuff. hello, blackwater? hello, um, the u.s. army? hello, fox news network? screw situational ethics when white boys have the whole world as their prison den!
also, i stopped reading this book because zimbardo (google his picture! eerie!) almost ran my sister over in his SUV back in her stanford days.
also, i stopped reading this book because zimbardo (google his picture! eerie!) almost ran my sister over in his SUV back in her stanford days.
March 21, 2013
This book represents Philip Zimbardos life's work. Over thirty years in the making. It's brilliant. its important. But be warned, this book is way too fuckin long! The book weighs in at a tubby 575 pages. I believe it could have been more effective at half the length. One thing you should know before reading this book is that an enormously large portion of it is an account of the authors infamous Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE). If you (like me) are tiered of hearing Zimbardo talk (on and on) about this (over 30 year old) finding (from a poorly designed experiment that was aborted half way through), than really think twice before picking this one up. I'm currently teaching a social psychology course, so I (reluctantly) decided to read it, and I'm really glad I did. It's exhaustingly exhaustive at times, but truly brilliant when all's said and done. The central theses of the book is that; human behavior is very influenced by situational and social factors, but due to strong innate cognitive as well as cultural biases, we (particularly in the west) disproportionally explain human behavior in terms of dispositional (personality-based) factors. The central metaphor of the book is that; we often blame a few bad apples, when it's the rotten barrel that is to blame. For instance; prosecutors and spin doctors blamed the prisoner abuse scandal at Abu Ghraib on "a few bad apples". Zimbardo makes the claim (convincingly in my opinion) that problems such as these, largely originate at the institutional level (a bad barrel), and a vast majority of otherwise healthy, normal people, If put in the same situation, would have behaved similarly. Furthermore, the same could be said for the mass scale atrocities of WWII and Rwanda etc. If we as a society, wish to curtail future institutional failures and mass scale atrocities (and we do), than we must focus our analysis and interventions on the systems level as well as the on the level of the individual. Zimbardo is not saying that bad acting individuals bare no responsibility for their behavior, he is however making the point that bad (corrupting) situations can influence good people to bad things, and we may want to hold institutions and policy makers more accountable when those in their employ do bad things while following orders.
August 9, 2015
A while ago, i found the book title really interesting and decided at once to add the book to my "to-read" list. I was, unfortunately, very disappointed with it, as it turned out to be not quite what i expected. I thought the book was about "Understanding How Good People Turn Evil", when it was just simply "Examples of How Good People Turn Evil". Dr. Zimbardo was excessively thorough regarding the Stanford Prison Experiment and the Abu Ghraib incident, only to the point that proves that ordinary "good" people can "turn bad" when faced with certain situations, but not why or how it can be avoided, as the title of the book claims! I just thought a successful psychologist as himself would actually deliver what he promised.
September 6, 2017
鈥炐曆勑敌貉傃娧� 袥褍褑懈褎械褉鈥� (懈蟹写. 鈥炐樞费傂拘�-袟邪锌邪写鈥�, 2017; 锌褉械胁芯写: 袥褞写屑懈谢邪 袗薪写褉械械胁邪) 芯褌 锌芯胁械写械薪褔械褋泻懈褟 锌褋懈褏芯谢芯谐 肖懈谢懈锌 袟懈屑斜邪褉写芯 械 斜械蟹泻芯屑锌褉芯屑懈褋薪邪 邪褍褌芯锌褋懈褟 薪邪 卸械褋褌芯泻芯褋褌褌邪 胁 薪邪泄-褔芯胁械褕泻邪褌邪 褲 褎芯褉屑邪 懈 鈥炑傂惭娧€写械 屑褉邪褔薪芯 锌褗褌褍胁邪薪械 胁 褋褗褉褑械褌芯 懈 褋褗蟹薪邪薪懈械褌芯 薪邪 褌褗屑薪懈薪邪褌邪鈥�.
...6 写薪懈 懈 锌褉械泻褉邪褌褟胁邪薪械 锌褉械写褋褉芯褔薪芯 薪邪 写褉邪屑邪褌懈褔薪懈褟 鈥炑傂敌把傃娧€鈥�, 泻芯泄褌芯 写芯斜褉芯胁芯谢褑懈褌械 薪邪 小褌邪薪褎芯褉写褋泻懈褟 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌 褋褌邪褉褌懈褉邪褌. 6 写薪懈, 胁 泻芯懈褌芯 褑胁械褌褟褌邪 薪邪 蟹谢芯褌芯 懈蟹斜褍褟胁邪褌 写芯 蟹邪写褍褕邪胁邪薪械. 袟懈屑斜邪褉写芯 锌褉芯褋谢械写褟胁邪 褔邪褋 锌芯 褔邪褋 褋胁芯褟褌邪 machina malum.
袩褉芯褔械褌械褌械 锌芯胁械褔械:
...6 写薪懈 懈 锌褉械泻褉邪褌褟胁邪薪械 锌褉械写褋褉芯褔薪芯 薪邪 写褉邪屑邪褌懈褔薪懈褟 鈥炑傂敌把傃娧€鈥�, 泻芯泄褌芯 写芯斜褉芯胁芯谢褑懈褌械 薪邪 小褌邪薪褎芯褉写褋泻懈褟 械泻褋锌械褉懈屑械薪褌 褋褌邪褉褌懈褉邪褌. 6 写薪懈, 胁 泻芯懈褌芯 褑胁械褌褟褌邪 薪邪 蟹谢芯褌芯 懈蟹斜褍褟胁邪褌 写芯 蟹邪写褍褕邪胁邪薪械. 袟懈屑斜邪褉写芯 锌褉芯褋谢械写褟胁邪 褔邪褋 锌芯 褔邪褋 褋胁芯褟褌邪 machina malum.
袩褉芯褔械褌械褌械 锌芯胁械褔械:
August 6, 2012
Be forewarned -- this is not a relaxing book on any level.
Having said that, it's pretty fantastic. How good people turn evil is a huge question, more ambitious than most authors would undertake and probably a set-up for disappointment as who can possibly answer that? And I admit, Zimbardo's answers are incomplete but still pretty impressive.
According to Zimbardo, when we try to explain good people committing evil deeds we tend to rely on what's called dispositional explanations -- it's about THEM, their personality, their character, the fact that they are one of those few "bad apples" that spoils the barrel. Zimbardo, a prominent social psychologist, strongly advocates replacing this thinking with a situational explanation -- the idea that the situation is a set-up for bringing out evil qualities in any normal person, or that we should blame the "bad barrel" for creating the "bad apples" rather than the other way around.
Zimbardo makes his case convincingly with a level of detail that feels overwhelming at times but is necessary in order to help the reader truly appreciate his position (his writing style also balances a scholarly and academic tone with highly personal insights, which serve to make the book more engaging). He first explores his famous experiment, the Zimbardo prison experiment of 1971, where he randomly assigned college students to the roles of "prisoner" and "guard," staged the "prisoners'" arrests, and brought the prisoners to a mock prison he set up in a basement at Stanford University. Although the experiment was meant to last two weeks, it was disbanded after five days because everyone got way too carried away. The guards became completely absorbed in their roles and psychologically abused the prisoners; the prisoners, for their part, quickly displayed signs of learned helplessness and mostly broke rather than successfully resisting their guards. Note -- every participant in the experiment was prescreened for signs of preexisting psychopathology and all were found to be completely normal.
After describing this experiment in much detail, Zimbardo goes on to discuss the ethics of the experiment and to apply it to a variety of prisoner-guard situations. He then describes other social psychology experiments which further support his situational theory of normal people turning evil, culminating in a detailed discussion of the events at Abu Ghraib and making convincing arguments for the idea that the situation, and the system, carried more of the blame than did the individual guards (although of course he does not completely absolve them of personal responsibility).
Zimbardo's book is well-written, intelligent, and ultimately convincing. It did not address one question I had: what about people who you think are good who surprise you by doing evil things in an apparently normal context? Was I simply wrong about them, or is there a more complicated explanation? But with that said, this was as complete an answer as you're probably going to get to why the Nazis, the Abu Ghraib prison guards, and others can seem like normal people through and through and then turn around and engage in cruelty.
The book's style as well as its content make it a difficult read at times but it is ultimately very rewarding. Highly recommended.
Having said that, it's pretty fantastic. How good people turn evil is a huge question, more ambitious than most authors would undertake and probably a set-up for disappointment as who can possibly answer that? And I admit, Zimbardo's answers are incomplete but still pretty impressive.
According to Zimbardo, when we try to explain good people committing evil deeds we tend to rely on what's called dispositional explanations -- it's about THEM, their personality, their character, the fact that they are one of those few "bad apples" that spoils the barrel. Zimbardo, a prominent social psychologist, strongly advocates replacing this thinking with a situational explanation -- the idea that the situation is a set-up for bringing out evil qualities in any normal person, or that we should blame the "bad barrel" for creating the "bad apples" rather than the other way around.
Zimbardo makes his case convincingly with a level of detail that feels overwhelming at times but is necessary in order to help the reader truly appreciate his position (his writing style also balances a scholarly and academic tone with highly personal insights, which serve to make the book more engaging). He first explores his famous experiment, the Zimbardo prison experiment of 1971, where he randomly assigned college students to the roles of "prisoner" and "guard," staged the "prisoners'" arrests, and brought the prisoners to a mock prison he set up in a basement at Stanford University. Although the experiment was meant to last two weeks, it was disbanded after five days because everyone got way too carried away. The guards became completely absorbed in their roles and psychologically abused the prisoners; the prisoners, for their part, quickly displayed signs of learned helplessness and mostly broke rather than successfully resisting their guards. Note -- every participant in the experiment was prescreened for signs of preexisting psychopathology and all were found to be completely normal.
After describing this experiment in much detail, Zimbardo goes on to discuss the ethics of the experiment and to apply it to a variety of prisoner-guard situations. He then describes other social psychology experiments which further support his situational theory of normal people turning evil, culminating in a detailed discussion of the events at Abu Ghraib and making convincing arguments for the idea that the situation, and the system, carried more of the blame than did the individual guards (although of course he does not completely absolve them of personal responsibility).
Zimbardo's book is well-written, intelligent, and ultimately convincing. It did not address one question I had: what about people who you think are good who surprise you by doing evil things in an apparently normal context? Was I simply wrong about them, or is there a more complicated explanation? But with that said, this was as complete an answer as you're probably going to get to why the Nazis, the Abu Ghraib prison guards, and others can seem like normal people through and through and then turn around and engage in cruelty.
The book's style as well as its content make it a difficult read at times but it is ultimately very rewarding. Highly recommended.
April 6, 2025
A disturbing, but good book.
Basically, it's an analysis of how ordinary individuals, under the influence of powerful situational forces, can commit horrible acts. Based on the Stanford prison experiment and other historical events, Zimbardo argues that the line between good and evil is not fixed, but highly contextual.
It's unsettling, because it makes you think about how many times you've felt like you've crossed the line between right and wrong without even realizing it. I've definitely had moments where I've done things that I wouldn't normally do, because of the situation or the people around me. No one is safe from making the wrong choice.
But... Of course the environment shapes behavior, but people aren't just pawns. I do believe that we still have the option to make different choices, to resist, to act with integrity, to stand out from the pack. So, I'm not completely with the author, but the book's great for getting your thinking caps on about good and evil and the choice between the two.
If you're interested in the topic, The Stanford Prison Experiment, directed by Kyle Patrick Alvarez, could be a good movie.
Basically, it's an analysis of how ordinary individuals, under the influence of powerful situational forces, can commit horrible acts. Based on the Stanford prison experiment and other historical events, Zimbardo argues that the line between good and evil is not fixed, but highly contextual.
It's unsettling, because it makes you think about how many times you've felt like you've crossed the line between right and wrong without even realizing it. I've definitely had moments where I've done things that I wouldn't normally do, because of the situation or the people around me. No one is safe from making the wrong choice.
But... Of course the environment shapes behavior, but people aren't just pawns. I do believe that we still have the option to make different choices, to resist, to act with integrity, to stand out from the pack. So, I'm not completely with the author, but the book's great for getting your thinking caps on about good and evil and the choice between the two.
If you're interested in the topic, The Stanford Prison Experiment, directed by Kyle Patrick Alvarez, could be a good movie.
November 27, 2014
I hated this book on all levels. It is such a a chore to even skim through it!
I hated how long it is! Over 500 dreadful pages! With more than half discussing the Stanford prison experiments in excruciating detail. I thought the experiment was mundane, and that Zimbardo is really overestimating the results of this 6 day experiment. I didn't not enjoy neither Zimbardo's hypothesis, his research process, or his conclusion. Our situations do not make us evil. Yes situations can change a lot in us and can even make us act in ways we never thought we would, especially strenuous ones, but my brain simply refuses to believe that a situation alone can turn a "good" person into an "evil" one.
The second part of the book discusses the Abu Ghraib prison scandal, and how Zimbardo drew parallels with his earlier prison experiment. He concluded that culpability should not be put solely on the guards that tortured and humiliated prisoners both physically and sexually, but instead we need to look closely (too damn closely) to the situation they were operating in. The conditions in the prison, the shortage of food, the ongoing war, the foreign environment and the overly sexualized atmosphere in then prison, are all situations we need to look at closely to understand why the guards acted the way they did.
With all due respect, such situations don't make you sexually torture other human beings, enjoy it, and take trophy pictures of it.
I was looking forward to this book. The title was everything I looked forward to unravel; how did good people turned evil? Yet I could not be more disappointed. I've always had my discomfort with evolutionary biology when it blames almost anything, and now add to it Zimbardo's thesis that we can blame situations we are put in on the evil we commit. I don't know but I find it very difficult to swallow.
I hated how long it is! Over 500 dreadful pages! With more than half discussing the Stanford prison experiments in excruciating detail. I thought the experiment was mundane, and that Zimbardo is really overestimating the results of this 6 day experiment. I didn't not enjoy neither Zimbardo's hypothesis, his research process, or his conclusion. Our situations do not make us evil. Yes situations can change a lot in us and can even make us act in ways we never thought we would, especially strenuous ones, but my brain simply refuses to believe that a situation alone can turn a "good" person into an "evil" one.
The second part of the book discusses the Abu Ghraib prison scandal, and how Zimbardo drew parallels with his earlier prison experiment. He concluded that culpability should not be put solely on the guards that tortured and humiliated prisoners both physically and sexually, but instead we need to look closely (too damn closely) to the situation they were operating in. The conditions in the prison, the shortage of food, the ongoing war, the foreign environment and the overly sexualized atmosphere in then prison, are all situations we need to look at closely to understand why the guards acted the way they did.
With all due respect, such situations don't make you sexually torture other human beings, enjoy it, and take trophy pictures of it.
I was looking forward to this book. The title was everything I looked forward to unravel; how did good people turned evil? Yet I could not be more disappointed. I've always had my discomfort with evolutionary biology when it blames almost anything, and now add to it Zimbardo's thesis that we can blame situations we are put in on the evil we commit. I don't know but I find it very difficult to swallow.
February 18, 2021
乇丕亘毓 兀賮囟賱 賰鬲丕亘 馃憞馃徎:
.
.
賲賳 鬲噩乇亘丞 爻噩賳 爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿 丕賱鬲賷 兀賯丕賲賴丕 丕賱亘乇賵賮賷爻賵乇 賮賷賱賷亘 夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵 ( 賴賵 賳賮爻賴 賲丐賱賮 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 ) 毓丕賲 1971 賵賰丕賳鬲 鬲賴丿賮 賱丿乇丕爻丞 鬲兀孬賷乇 丕賱馗乇賵賮 毓賱賶 丨賷丕丞 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賵丕賱丨乇丕爻 賷賳胤賱賯 丕賱丿賰鬲賵乇 夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵 賮賷 乇丨賱鬲賴 丕賱賳賮爻賷丞 賱賱廿噩丕亘丞 毓賱賶 丕賱爻丐丕賱 丕賱匕賷 鬲氐丿乇 睾賱丕賮 丕賱賰鬲丕亘: 賰賷賮 賷鬲丨賵賱 丕賱兀禺賷丕乇 廿賱賶 兀卮乇丕乇責 .
賮賷 爻鬲丞 毓卮乇 賮氐賱 丨賱賱 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 爻賷賰賱賵噩賷丕 丕賱卮乇 賵丕賱鬲睾賷乇丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 鬲胤乇兀 毓賱賶 丕賱賮乇丿 鬲亘毓丕賸 賱賱馗乇賵賮 丕賱賲丨賷胤丞 亘賴 賲爻鬲卮賴丿丕 亘卮賵丕賴丿 鬲丕乇賷禺賷丞 鬲丿毓賲 鬲氐賵乇賴貙 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賷購賮氐賱 亘卮賰賱 毓賲賷賯 噩丿丕賸 賰賱 賲丕 賷丨丿孬 賱賱賳賮爻 賲賳 鬲睾賷乇丕鬲 賰乇丿 賮毓賱 胤亘賷毓賷 賱丕卮毓賵乇賷 鬲爻鬲噩賷亘 亘賴 丕賱賳賮爻 賱賱馗乇賵賮 丕賱賲丨賷胤丞 亘賴丕.
禺賱丕賱 丕賱賯乇丕亍丞 賵亘丕賱賵賯賵賮 毓賱賶 鬲賮丕氐賷賱 鬲噩乇亘丞 #爻噩賳_爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿 丕賱賲毓乇賵賮丞貙 賰賳鬲 賯丿 丌賲賳鬲 賮毓賱丕 亘丨噩賲 賴匕丕 丕賱鬲兀孬賷乇 丕賱賲賴賵賱 丕賱匕賷 鬲丨丿孬賴 丕賱爻賱胤丞 賲孬賱丕 毓賱賶 賳賮賵爻 兀氐丨丕亘賴丕貙 廿賱丕 兀賳 鬲胤乇賯 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 賱賱噩乇丕卅賲 丕賱鬲賷 丕乇鬲賰亘賴丕 丕賱噩賳賵丿 丕賱兀賲賷乇賰賷賷賳 賮賷 爻噩賳 兀亘賵 睾乇賷亘! 丨丕賵賱 丕賱賲丐賱賮 噩丕賴丿賸丕 兀賳 賷賯賳毓 丕賱賯丕乇卅 亘鬲卮丕亘賴 賲丕 丨丿孬 賮賷 爻噩賳 兀亘賵 睾乇賷亘 賲毓 賳鬲丕卅噩 鬲噩丕乇亘 爻噩賳 爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿 丕賱賵賴賲賷! 賵賱賰賳 賴賳丕賰 賮乇賯 賰亘賷乇 亘賷賳 丕賱賲噩乇賲賷賳 賮賷 丨丕賱丞 爻噩賳 爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿 賳丨賳 賳鬲丨丿孬 毓賳 卮亘丕亘 毓丕丿賷賷賳 兀睾賱亘賴賲 賷毓賷卮 賮賷 馗乇賵賮 毓丕丿賷丞 鬲卮亘賴 丕賱馗乇賵賮 丕賱賲毓鬲丕丿丞 賱丨賷丕丞 丕賱胤丕賱亘 丕賱噩丕賲毓賷貙 兀賲丕 賮賷 爻噩賳 兀亘賵 睾乇賷亘 賮賳丨賳 兀賲丕賲 毓賲賱 賲賳馗賲 亘兀賵丕賲乇 毓賱賷丕 賳購賮匕鬲 毓賱賶 兀亘卮毓 賵噩賴! 賵賮賷 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞 賱賲 兀爻鬲爻睾 賲丨丕賵賱丞 丕賱賲丐賱賮 賴賳丕 賮賷 鬲禺賮賷賮 丕賱賱賵賲 丕賱賵丕賯毓 毓賱賶 毓丕鬲賯 賴丐賱丕亍 丕賱噩賳賵丿.
丕賱噩賲賷賱 兀賳 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱兀禺賷乇 丕丨鬲賵賶 毓賱賶 亘乇賳丕賲噩 賲賳 毓卮乇 禺胤賵丕鬲 賷購爻丕毓丿 毓賱賶 鬲賯賱賷賱 丕賱鬲兀孬乇 亘丕賱毓賵丕賲賱 丕賱爻賱亘賷丞 .
丕賱賰鬲丕亘 乇丕卅毓 噩丿丕賸貙 乇睾賲 丕賱賲丨胤丕鬲 丕賱賲夭毓噩丞 丕賱賲賵噩賵丿丞.
兀賳氐丨 亘賯乇丕亍鬲賴 ( 賱賱賲賴鬲賲賷賳 賮賷 賮賴賲 丕賱爻賱賵賰 丕賱亘卮乇賷 ).
賲丕匕丕 亘毓丿 丕賱賯乇丕亍丞責
賱丕 兀丨亘 兀賳 兀氐丿乇 乇兀賷賷 亘兀卮賷丕亍 賱賲 兀禺鬲亘乇賴丕貙 賱匕賱賰 兀賳丕 丿丕卅賲丕 兀購賯丿乇 卮毓賵乇 丕賱兀匕賶 丕賱匕賷 賯丿 賷氐賮賴 丕賱卮禺氐 丕賱賲賯丕亘賱 亘丕賱丨噩賲 丕賱匕賷 賵氐賮賴 亘賴 賱丕 亘丕賱丨噩賲 丕賱匕賷 兀毓鬲賯丿賴貙 賮賲賳 噩乇賾亘 賱賷爻 賰賲賳 爻賲賽毓.
鬲賲鬲
#兀亘噩丿賷丞_賮乇丨 5/5 馃尭馃摎
鈥�#肠补苍诲濒别蹿濒补尘别23产辞辞办谤别惫颈别飞蝉
#鬲兀孬賷乇_丕賱卮賷胤丕賳 賱賭 #賮賷賱賷亘_夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵
氐丕丿乇 毓賳 #賲乇賰夭_鬲賰賵賷賳_賱賱丿乇丕爻丕鬲_賵丕賱兀亘丨丕孬
.
.
賲賳 鬲噩乇亘丞 爻噩賳 爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿 丕賱鬲賷 兀賯丕賲賴丕 丕賱亘乇賵賮賷爻賵乇 賮賷賱賷亘 夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵 ( 賴賵 賳賮爻賴 賲丐賱賮 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 ) 毓丕賲 1971 賵賰丕賳鬲 鬲賴丿賮 賱丿乇丕爻丞 鬲兀孬賷乇 丕賱馗乇賵賮 毓賱賶 丨賷丕丞 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賵丕賱丨乇丕爻 賷賳胤賱賯 丕賱丿賰鬲賵乇 夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵 賮賷 乇丨賱鬲賴 丕賱賳賮爻賷丞 賱賱廿噩丕亘丞 毓賱賶 丕賱爻丐丕賱 丕賱匕賷 鬲氐丿乇 睾賱丕賮 丕賱賰鬲丕亘: 賰賷賮 賷鬲丨賵賱 丕賱兀禺賷丕乇 廿賱賶 兀卮乇丕乇責 .
賮賷 爻鬲丞 毓卮乇 賮氐賱 丨賱賱 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 爻賷賰賱賵噩賷丕 丕賱卮乇 賵丕賱鬲睾賷乇丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 鬲胤乇兀 毓賱賶 丕賱賮乇丿 鬲亘毓丕賸 賱賱馗乇賵賮 丕賱賲丨賷胤丞 亘賴 賲爻鬲卮賴丿丕 亘卮賵丕賴丿 鬲丕乇賷禺賷丞 鬲丿毓賲 鬲氐賵乇賴貙 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賷購賮氐賱 亘卮賰賱 毓賲賷賯 噩丿丕賸 賰賱 賲丕 賷丨丿孬 賱賱賳賮爻 賲賳 鬲睾賷乇丕鬲 賰乇丿 賮毓賱 胤亘賷毓賷 賱丕卮毓賵乇賷 鬲爻鬲噩賷亘 亘賴 丕賱賳賮爻 賱賱馗乇賵賮 丕賱賲丨賷胤丞 亘賴丕.
禺賱丕賱 丕賱賯乇丕亍丞 賵亘丕賱賵賯賵賮 毓賱賶 鬲賮丕氐賷賱 鬲噩乇亘丞 #爻噩賳_爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿 丕賱賲毓乇賵賮丞貙 賰賳鬲 賯丿 丌賲賳鬲 賮毓賱丕 亘丨噩賲 賴匕丕 丕賱鬲兀孬賷乇 丕賱賲賴賵賱 丕賱匕賷 鬲丨丿孬賴 丕賱爻賱胤丞 賲孬賱丕 毓賱賶 賳賮賵爻 兀氐丨丕亘賴丕貙 廿賱丕 兀賳 鬲胤乇賯 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 賱賱噩乇丕卅賲 丕賱鬲賷 丕乇鬲賰亘賴丕 丕賱噩賳賵丿 丕賱兀賲賷乇賰賷賷賳 賮賷 爻噩賳 兀亘賵 睾乇賷亘! 丨丕賵賱 丕賱賲丐賱賮 噩丕賴丿賸丕 兀賳 賷賯賳毓 丕賱賯丕乇卅 亘鬲卮丕亘賴 賲丕 丨丿孬 賮賷 爻噩賳 兀亘賵 睾乇賷亘 賲毓 賳鬲丕卅噩 鬲噩丕乇亘 爻噩賳 爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿 丕賱賵賴賲賷! 賵賱賰賳 賴賳丕賰 賮乇賯 賰亘賷乇 亘賷賳 丕賱賲噩乇賲賷賳 賮賷 丨丕賱丞 爻噩賳 爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿 賳丨賳 賳鬲丨丿孬 毓賳 卮亘丕亘 毓丕丿賷賷賳 兀睾賱亘賴賲 賷毓賷卮 賮賷 馗乇賵賮 毓丕丿賷丞 鬲卮亘賴 丕賱馗乇賵賮 丕賱賲毓鬲丕丿丞 賱丨賷丕丞 丕賱胤丕賱亘 丕賱噩丕賲毓賷貙 兀賲丕 賮賷 爻噩賳 兀亘賵 睾乇賷亘 賮賳丨賳 兀賲丕賲 毓賲賱 賲賳馗賲 亘兀賵丕賲乇 毓賱賷丕 賳購賮匕鬲 毓賱賶 兀亘卮毓 賵噩賴! 賵賮賷 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞 賱賲 兀爻鬲爻睾 賲丨丕賵賱丞 丕賱賲丐賱賮 賴賳丕 賮賷 鬲禺賮賷賮 丕賱賱賵賲 丕賱賵丕賯毓 毓賱賶 毓丕鬲賯 賴丐賱丕亍 丕賱噩賳賵丿.
丕賱噩賲賷賱 兀賳 丕賱賮氐賱 丕賱兀禺賷乇 丕丨鬲賵賶 毓賱賶 亘乇賳丕賲噩 賲賳 毓卮乇 禺胤賵丕鬲 賷購爻丕毓丿 毓賱賶 鬲賯賱賷賱 丕賱鬲兀孬乇 亘丕賱毓賵丕賲賱 丕賱爻賱亘賷丞 .
丕賱賰鬲丕亘 乇丕卅毓 噩丿丕賸貙 乇睾賲 丕賱賲丨胤丕鬲 丕賱賲夭毓噩丞 丕賱賲賵噩賵丿丞.
兀賳氐丨 亘賯乇丕亍鬲賴 ( 賱賱賲賴鬲賲賷賳 賮賷 賮賴賲 丕賱爻賱賵賰 丕賱亘卮乇賷 ).
賲丕匕丕 亘毓丿 丕賱賯乇丕亍丞責
賱丕 兀丨亘 兀賳 兀氐丿乇 乇兀賷賷 亘兀卮賷丕亍 賱賲 兀禺鬲亘乇賴丕貙 賱匕賱賰 兀賳丕 丿丕卅賲丕 兀購賯丿乇 卮毓賵乇 丕賱兀匕賶 丕賱匕賷 賯丿 賷氐賮賴 丕賱卮禺氐 丕賱賲賯丕亘賱 亘丕賱丨噩賲 丕賱匕賷 賵氐賮賴 亘賴 賱丕 亘丕賱丨噩賲 丕賱匕賷 兀毓鬲賯丿賴貙 賮賲賳 噩乇賾亘 賱賷爻 賰賲賳 爻賲賽毓.
鬲賲鬲
#兀亘噩丿賷丞_賮乇丨 5/5 馃尭馃摎
鈥�#肠补苍诲濒别蹿濒补尘别23产辞辞办谤别惫颈别飞蝉
#鬲兀孬賷乇_丕賱卮賷胤丕賳 賱賭 #賮賷賱賷亘_夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵
氐丕丿乇 毓賳 #賲乇賰夭_鬲賰賵賷賳_賱賱丿乇丕爻丕鬲_賵丕賱兀亘丨丕孬
June 13, 2018
I read this book years and years ago, and at the time I thought it was amazing. The Stanford Prison experiment was especially striking; totally changed how I thought about human behaviour. But if anyone thinks the same then I'd encourage you to read the accounts that cast doubt on it.
The medium blog:
And this Twitter thread:
The medium blog:
And this Twitter thread:
October 4, 2024
The start of this book was an absolute banger. I was in awe, and the shift in my mood was so evident that my friend jokingly said she would track my emotions throughout the reading process. Unfortunately, it all went downhill from there. I dreaded picking it up due to the author鈥檚 prolixity. A staggering 50% of the book was dedicated to one of his experiments, which felt painfully boring, redundant, and seemingly unnecessary for the book鈥檚 title.
Honestly, I started brainstorming alternative titles:
The Stanford Prison Experiment: How Ordinary People Turn Evil
The Stanford Experiment: Descent into Darkness
The Birth of Evil: The Stanford Prison Experiment's Unintended Lessons
It was frustrating to wade through such a lengthy account of the experiment when the core theory could easily be driven from a summarized version. To make matters worse, each chapter ended with pages previewing the next, but when you got there, there was nothing new or substantial. Instead, you鈥檇 read about why prisoner number whatever wasn鈥檛 eating sausages for the millionth time.
The author also kept reminding us of his academic achievements, trying to convince us why we should read his book; But sir, I鈥檓 64% in and already struggling! Maybe he sensed my impending suffering...
On the bright side, I鈥檝e picked up my favorite phrase: 鈥渟elf-serving bias.鈥� I鈥檝e been using it every time someone (including me) says, "That could never be me!" and surprisingly, it happens a lot more often than I thought!
I also discovered my favorite experiment by Darley and Batson: "From Jerusalem to Jericho," also known as the Good Samaritan experiment.
To be fair, the book was informative, and its applications are vast. I saw its relevance in dormitory administration, mental health institutes, and even in charities for the homeless. But it could鈥檝e easily been trimmed down to 200 pages. I genuinely enjoyed about 25% of it and learned things I had no clue about.
I should probably learn to DNF books, but this one had a hidden gem at its core, so I pushed through.
I鈥檓 glad it鈥檚 over.
Honestly, I started brainstorming alternative titles:
The Stanford Prison Experiment: How Ordinary People Turn Evil
The Stanford Experiment: Descent into Darkness
The Birth of Evil: The Stanford Prison Experiment's Unintended Lessons
It was frustrating to wade through such a lengthy account of the experiment when the core theory could easily be driven from a summarized version. To make matters worse, each chapter ended with pages previewing the next, but when you got there, there was nothing new or substantial. Instead, you鈥檇 read about why prisoner number whatever wasn鈥檛 eating sausages for the millionth time.
The author also kept reminding us of his academic achievements, trying to convince us why we should read his book; But sir, I鈥檓 64% in and already struggling! Maybe he sensed my impending suffering...
On the bright side, I鈥檝e picked up my favorite phrase: 鈥渟elf-serving bias.鈥� I鈥檝e been using it every time someone (including me) says, "That could never be me!" and surprisingly, it happens a lot more often than I thought!
I also discovered my favorite experiment by Darley and Batson: "From Jerusalem to Jericho," also known as the Good Samaritan experiment.
To be fair, the book was informative, and its applications are vast. I saw its relevance in dormitory administration, mental health institutes, and even in charities for the homeless. But it could鈥檝e easily been trimmed down to 200 pages. I genuinely enjoyed about 25% of it and learned things I had no clue about.
I should probably learn to DNF books, but this one had a hidden gem at its core, so I pushed through.
I鈥檓 glad it鈥檚 over.
May 7, 2021
Update 05/07/2021: SPE was a staged production. The acting guards were drilled on the behavior to exhibit; they were displaying the demand characteristics as exposed in . Losing 2 stars.
***
I took an instant interest in this book years back when I came upon a for a private company citing this book as reference. The line 'How Good People Turn Evil' raises a compelling query that stirs one to look for the answer. It is tempting to take on an objective view of the workings of the minds that committed or allowed vicious acts against a few, against society, against humankind. What is it about their inner wiring?
This exhaustive documentation that is more than three decades in the making examines from a social psychology perspective the intriguing human behavior of how people transform from good to evil. 'Evil' as stated by Irving Sarnoff is "knowing better but doing worse." The author, Dr. Philip Zimbardo calls it the Lucifer Effect after God's once "favorite angel who fell from grace and ultimately became Satan." A significant chunk of the book elaborates his team's conduct of Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE), a mock prison set up in Stanford University, Palo Alto, California in 1971. This later became a mirror that aided in analyzing the scandalous tortures of prisoners of war in Abu Ghraib Prison in Iraq by US military personnel in 2003. It served as impetus for improving the conditions of prisons governed by the US, the overall prison system.
The book was written in a manner that is comprehensible to laymen. The reader neither has to be a psychology student nor practitioner to extract the heart of it. The answer to the How? was given outright in the introductory chapters succeeded by the legwork of the SPE itself, added with innumerable real-life accounts of committed evils around the globe, and behavioral experiments to support the conclusion. After consuming roughly a third of the book 'journeying through darkness', the final chapter closes with uplifting reminders on how to resist situational influences, and celebrating heroism.
My willingness to delve deeper into this behavior study, I realized, roots from the subconscious that that line between good and evil 鈥攚hich I am more aware by now is permeable鈥� is never improbable from being crossed by us, ordinary people.
Ask yourself if you are capable of both good and evil. That is a reason to pick up this book.
Book copy courtesy of where review is originally posted.
***
"Are we born good and then corrupted by an evil society or born evil and redeemed by a good society?"
I took an instant interest in this book years back when I came upon a for a private company citing this book as reference. The line 'How Good People Turn Evil' raises a compelling query that stirs one to look for the answer. It is tempting to take on an objective view of the workings of the minds that committed or allowed vicious acts against a few, against society, against humankind. What is it about their inner wiring?
This exhaustive documentation that is more than three decades in the making examines from a social psychology perspective the intriguing human behavior of how people transform from good to evil. 'Evil' as stated by Irving Sarnoff is "knowing better but doing worse." The author, Dr. Philip Zimbardo calls it the Lucifer Effect after God's once "favorite angel who fell from grace and ultimately became Satan." A significant chunk of the book elaborates his team's conduct of Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE), a mock prison set up in Stanford University, Palo Alto, California in 1971. This later became a mirror that aided in analyzing the scandalous tortures of prisoners of war in Abu Ghraib Prison in Iraq by US military personnel in 2003. It served as impetus for improving the conditions of prisons governed by the US, the overall prison system.
The book was written in a manner that is comprehensible to laymen. The reader neither has to be a psychology student nor practitioner to extract the heart of it. The answer to the How? was given outright in the introductory chapters succeeded by the legwork of the SPE itself, added with innumerable real-life accounts of committed evils around the globe, and behavioral experiments to support the conclusion. After consuming roughly a third of the book 'journeying through darkness', the final chapter closes with uplifting reminders on how to resist situational influences, and celebrating heroism.
My willingness to delve deeper into this behavior study, I realized, roots from the subconscious that that line between good and evil 鈥攚hich I am more aware by now is permeable鈥� is never improbable from being crossed by us, ordinary people.
Ask yourself if you are capable of both good and evil. That is a reason to pick up this book.
"Most people who become perpetrators of evil deeds are directly comparable to those who become perpetrators of heroic deeds, alike in being just ordinary, average people.
...We are all heroes in waiting."
Book copy courtesy of where review is originally posted.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,451 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.