Thomas Erikson is a behaviourist and the bestselling author of the Surrounded by- series about human behaviours.
The series, has been translated to close to 60 languages and has sold over 8 million copies.
His mission is to make people鈥檚 lives easier by making them more aware of themselves and help people to a better understanding of what it takes to achieve the best possible communication.
He is a highly sought-after public speaker with 120 keynotes yearly on topics such as human behaviours, self-awareness, , narcissism, and leadership.
He lives by the simple but useful quote: You can鈥檛 change somebody else, but you can change yourself.
Thomas was writing for twenty years before finally getting published. Being an author was his dream in life, so he never gave up. Instead he tested new ideas, tweaked his writing style, learned new skills, asked professionals, worked from 03.00 in the morning for years.
No one really believed in his writing ambitions, so he had to believe in himself.
Nowadays Thomas is Sweden鈥檚 most translated author still active. Only Selma Lagerl枚f and Astid Lindgren has been translated into more languages. He has until today published twelve books 鈥� half fiction and half non-fiction 鈥� and he will continue to write as long as he breathes.
He lives on the countryside in Sweden with his wife Christina, Sweden鈥檚 biggest romance author, he runs a family business that provides online courses and master classes on all the topics he writes about in his books.
Fun fact: Thomas is a true anglophile. He is a passionate gardener, loves topiary: if he could wear tweed the full year he would. And he is s collector of old Land Rovers. Some of them works, most of them don鈥檛.
This author is clearly a business man. His repetitive ramblings suggest he has an axe to grind rather than any real awareness or understanding of mental ill-health, personality disorders or psychopathy. There are much better books on the market which explore similar issues. I'd start with Jon Ronson's 'The Psychopath Test' or M. E. Thomas' 'Confessions of a Sociopath'.
5 pages in and as someone who studies mental health I am CRINGING. Phrases like 鈥榥ormal people鈥� and the general tone in which people who are demonised who were born this way is abhorrent. There is a factual way to get all of this across. The author seems jaded, and I can see many who have been jaded by someone with anti social/narcissistic TRAITS, would love this book. People throw the term psychopath and sociopath around so loosely- when in actuality they compromise 1% of the population in clinical terms. Someone with anti-social TRAITS is not a psychopath. Staying in a toxic relationship with someone with poor mental health- does not make them a psychopath. The tone in which this is written should have been re-evaluated, it fuels stigma even more when you are a mental health professional and you use language like this.
A gift from my friend and an international best seller is the only reason that I completed this book. In my opinion perhaps the only relatable psychological relationship is the author last name. The thing about self-help book is that it is often backed up by pseudo science that is written in a manner cater to lay person that is unaware of the concepts presented in the book. Thomas Erikson's surrounded by psychopath is another classic example of such reading. It started with running examples of what psychopath is, by claiming real experience to draw a more convincing outlook of his knowledge. Sadly how real such experiences are will never be known. The contents within the book are also contraidict in relating of the pseudo ideas, at the introduction he described psychopath to be known as a classification that is beyond the DISC spectrum, however at later chapters decided that some traits are similar to DISC spectrum.
The semantic usage of the words is also problematic and often unnecessary, for instance manipulation in p84. Thomas conflate the concept of manipulation with influence and persuasion, such loosely use of words can easily be interpreted wrongly and also dangerous and create unnecessary miscommunication. Taking such conflation at face value would also means that we are constantly manipulating others, which Thomas term it as only natural. He then go on to prescribe an additional adjective to manipulation as being positive or negative, which is redundant and unhelpful, especially intuitively nobody relates manipulation with a positive connotation to it. The attempts by Thomas to conflate concept and then re-catergorised them, may serves as a means to simplify certain concept but is often unnecessary and unhelpful to differentiate between concept. The portions that really makes me tick are 1) the examples given, which are often if not all are unable to verify its authenticity and tend to claim as real life examples. This gives reader an impression that psychopath are really everywhere and real, which is not necessarily true.
2) Passing statement that are either dismissive or contrary - for instance, helping others will subject ourselve to be exploited - p93; making remarks that psychologists are unable to come to a conclusive answer if psychopathic is curable but ironically will claim research data to support his position.
The author also classified psychopathic traits into the different colours, except for the blue because they are too meticulous (again another passing remark with no basis). However, this attempt really undermine the psychopathic traits that the author has been trying to establish in the earlier chapters. Mainly the fact that he could classified them so easily into the different colours of psychopathic traits ironically contradict his earlier statement inferring that the classifying psychopath is impossible. In addition, the way he attempted to differentiate psychopath with normal people is just that they are not remorse with their doing, however psychopathic traits tend to be measure in degree rather than a clear binary distinction between psychopath and people who are normal. It then goes on to suggest how a psychopath manipulate the different colours, which is strange because the earlier part of the book the author was very concerned about the psychopath who wanted to take advantage of the personalities traits of the different colour but now wrote a manual on how to do it. Although I suspect that some may argue that the knowledge provided by the author serve as a means to know how to prevent being manipulated, but It is one thing to learn to defend and another to learn to offend. I don't need to teach someone how to shoot a gun to prepare them to protect from gun violence.
That being said, the book is not entirely without some nuggets of content to take away, for example he mentioned in the book that "Fear isn't the problem. The problem is how you choose to handle it." However, this sprinkle of "wisdom" does little to the overall quality of the book content.
In summary, the general take away of this book is how much emphasis Thomas made on the authenticity of the 4 colours "DISC", however, the scientific references to this concept is not only missing but overly inflated. Thomas make numerous passing remarks of researches or papers to suggest his concept but hardly provide any authentic sources. Furthermore, his overly conflate and simplify concept is definitely unhelpful to the general reader, he represents himself as some sort of an authoritative figure or an expert in the field of behaviour psychology but is backed by his own pseudoscientific understanding of human behaviour. His intention in this book has been clear, to crept unwarranted skepticism to his readers, and in this time and age where the general public are mostly literate but lacks critical thinking is definitely a dangerous concoction to the progress of civilisation. If anything is worth mentioning, perhaps the most representation of a manipulative individual is none other than the author himself, not so much as to say he is a psychopath but clearly an overrated writer that devise content to meet the general population that doesn't subscribe to critical analysis.
Internationally bestselling author Thomas Erikson returns with another fascinating book which shows readers how to identify and avoid the psychopaths around them. Charming, charismatic, and delightful or manipulative, self-serving, and cunning? Psychopaths are both and that's exactly what makes them dangerous. Bestselling author of the international phenomenon Surrounded by Idiots, Thomas Erikson reveals how to identify the psychopaths in your life and combat their efforts to control and manipulate.
Using the same simple four-colour system of behaviour classification that made Surrounded by Idiots so popular, Surrounded by Psychopaths teaches readers how to deal with psychopaths in their lives by becoming aware of their own behaviour and their weaknesses. Vivid example stories illustrate ways that psychopaths can take advantage of various behaviour types, helping readers identify their own weaknesses and be proactive about protecting themselves. Erikson outlines some of the most common forms of manipulation used by psychopaths--and others--to influence those around them. Since manipulation can often be a feature of ordinary, non-psychopathic relationships, the book also includes practical methods and techniques to help readers confront controlling people and rehabilitate negative relationships into mutually respectful ones.
By understanding your behaviour as well as the tendencies and strategies of psychopaths, Surrounded by Psychopaths will teach you to protect yourself from manipulative influence in your workplace, social life, and family. It is an accessible, witty and riveting read and as a lover of true crime, and therefore interested by the inner workings of the mind of those who manipulate others, this really had me enthralled throughout. A layperson will easily comprehend the vast knowledge and information Erikson provides and the chatty, conversational writing style means you devour it quickly. I'd recommend this as an indispensable book for those in a relationship, cohabiting or acquainted with one of these types as Erikson gives tips as to how you can put a stop to the behaviour and exploitation, but I'd also recommend it highly to those interested in psychology, those who have a criminology background and true crime enthusiasts. Many thanks to Vermilion for an ARC.
Human behaviour fascinates me and I saw this book and thought this might be interesting to get a better understanding not for psychopaths but for human behaviour in general. I couldn't finish the book and I feel dissatisfied here.
It was interesting at times but I felt it was all a kind of sales pitch to me as a reader. I do find that I question myself more what other peoples motives might be. Being an international bestseller doesn't always make the book a good read.
Mirriam Webster defines psychopath as follows a mentally unstable person
especially : a person having an egocentric and antisocial personality marked by a lack of remorse for one's actions, an absence of empathy for others, and often criminal tendencies.
Now I do not call my self an expert but on several occassions where I have read articles/books and reports it is a word not to use carelessly. In this case for me he used this word in connection which really got my goat.
Adolf Hitler was a psyhopath. Gets and annoys me every single time. If you are asking there are several sources that don't agree with this and I think they have a better idea of what they are talking about then this author. But I am getting off topic here.
For me the author didn't check his facts which is a major factor of the book.
The book is alright to read. I guess but I expected more and to be honest I wouldn't recommend it.
I enjoyed this much more than . Eventhough the book is targeted towards understanding how psychopaths (a term I never liked to use and label people with because it's very biased and I prefer to identify those as manipulative) could manipulate the four colors and advice on how to react. Despite the biasness emphasized throughout the book, I enjoyed picking up a few points and takeaways on how to categorize, understand and react to manipulative behavior in a conflict . A lot of these behaviors are common and I am also guilty to have practiced it myself (guilty as charged for the silent treatment). It reminds me a lot of my past experiences with people who I have walked away from (sadly not early enough in the relationship) and in a way, I congratulated myself once more for leaving after reading this book. I think this is a good book for readers who felt that they are being manipulated but with fear to admit it. It does help to boost a certain level of confidence to plan their next step regardless of what it may result in. I also personally think that it shouldn't be read as a standalone, and if the reader wants to, the reader should at least know their DISC profile.
Sitt lugnt i b氓ten, det 盲r inte psykopater du beh枚ver g氓 runt och oroa dig f枚r - det 盲r Eriksons argumentationsteknik. Erikson p氓minner v盲ldigt mycket om Jordan Peterson i sitt skrivande 盲ven om jag faktiskt skulle s盲ga att Peterson 盲r v盲rre. Jag skulle kunna k枚pa att Erikson skrivit n氓gon slags ess盲 枚ver psykopatin som f枚reteelse. Det vill s盲ga att det 盲r tydligt att det 盲r f枚rfattarens egna 氓sikter. Eller att han hade skrivit vetenskapligt. Denna bok precis som f枚reg氓ngaren inneh氓ller dock en salig blandning av h枚rs盲gen och tveksamma k盲llh盲nvisningar allt f枚r att den oinsatta skall luras att tro att Eriksons egna 氓sikter skulle ha n氓gon slags legitimitet. En sak som verkligen skr盲mmer mig 盲r 盲ven bevekelsegrunderna f枚r att han skriver boken. I slutet utm氓lar han en av sina f枚re detta partners som om inte fullst盲ndig psykopat s氓 med psykopat-tendenser. I say beware of men with "crazy exes", speciellt om de sen k盲nner behovet av att skriva en bok i syfte att legitimera kvinnornas beteenden som patologiska.
This book provides a helpful mental model to understand your own behavior better and how others might use your weak spots to manipulate you.
As someone who鈥檚 worked closely with a psychopath, I found the explanation of manipulation tactics at the end to be especially useful knowledge. I just wish I would have had the book a few years ago to guide me through that situation.
This isn鈥檛 meant to be science. It鈥檚 meant to be a practical guide to help people understand human behavior a little better. It鈥檚 also about learning how to identify and cut ties with someone who is toxic or psychopathic.
I wonder if a lot of the people giving this book a one star are psychopaths attempting to keep this information out of the hands of the average empath. Because when an empath can more easily spot manipulative behavior and then pushes through the fear to draw healthy boundaries, psychopaths lose their victims! 馃槢馃檭
Read it with the right mindset鈥攊t鈥檚 storytelling to help you understand a useful framework to analyze human behavior so you can be more effective at identifying psychopaths and draw boundaries to avoid being their victim. It鈥檚 not a textbook and yes it鈥檚 repetitive at times because repetition helps people remember things better. And also yes, the author is a businessman because this book is about how to help people identify psychopaths mainly in the workplace. Let it be what it is. 馃帀
Interesting approach to practical psychology, maybe too simplified, but I have no education to really judge that. Anyway, it can probably save serious troubles for more than one person. Still, it is written clearly looking from Scandinavian point of view. While fully understandable in Europe, might be not so clear and applicable for example for Latin or Asian people, despite that author recons that it is fully universal. Nevertheless, at least two techniques of defense against manipulators are probably worth trying: 1. Always take time to think longer when you get any request for any favor from anybody. Always. 2. If some actions of anybody bother you try to communicate it to them in exactly those 4 points in such order: a) When you do this and this b) I feel this and this c) If instead of this and this action you made/did this and this d) I would feel this and this If technique 2. doesn't help in the long run, you might be facing a psychopath.
艩奴davota knyga, neveltui Obuolys i拧leido. Bet nors nebuvo gramatini懦 klaid懦 ir typos. Viskas paremta paprastu DISA ar kokiu ten metodu, pagal kur寞 啪mon臈s skirstomi 寞 keturias spalvas. Tada ie拧koma j懦 silpn懦j懦 pusi懦 ir kaip jas gal臈t懦 i拧naudoti psichopatas. Ir tok寞 paprast膮 拧奴d膮 mal臈 beveik 300 psl. Jokios gilesn臈s analiz臈s apie psichopatij膮.
Menestyskonsultti ja entinen dekkaristi iski kultasuoneen teoksellaan Idiootit ymp盲rill盲mme, ja t盲ss盲 jatko-osassa William Moulton Marstonin 1920-luvulla kehitt盲m盲盲n DISC-j盲rjestelm盲盲n on ymp盲tty v盲rikoodit: vihre盲, sininen, punainen ja keltainen, eli introvertit ja ekstrovertit pannaan nelilaatikkoon, jotta niit盲 psykopaattisia piirteit盲 voi alkaa tutkailemaan niin perheess盲 kuin ty枚paikallakin.
L盲hdeluettelo on suppea, eik盲 tekij盲ll盲 ole mink盲盲n sortin psykologian tai psykoterapian koulutusta. V盲reist盲 sitten t盲m盲n kirjan mukaan tiet盲盲, millaisia v盲rityyppej盲 voi psykopaatteina olla: 鈥漵ininen, viile盲 perfektionisti鈥�; 鈥漦eltaiset manipuloinnin mestarit ovatkin psykopaatteja鈥�, ja listaa jatketaan, miten psykopaatti manipuloi vihre盲盲 tyyppi盲. Positiivinen vahvistaminen eri muodoissaan otetaan aika usein esille.
Suurin ongelma on, ett盲 aikoinaan Jungin kehittelem盲 jako introverttiin, ekstroverttiin ja persoonallisuustyyppien yhdistelmiin ajattelu, tunteminen, aistiminen ja havainnointi on aika kyseenalainen ja ongelmallinen, ja niist盲 on johdettu jos jonkinmoista mallia luokitella ihmisten k盲ytt盲ytymist盲 ja m盲盲ritell盲 persoonallisuustyyppej盲.
Joharin ikkunakin (Joseph Luft ja Harrington Ingham) saadaan mahdutettua mukaan eli nelikentt盲: ylh盲盲ll盲 vasemmalla virallinen min盲, oikealla sokea min盲, alhaalla vasemmalla salainen min盲 ja oikealla tuntematon min盲. Virallinen min盲 siis kostuu siit盲, mit盲 yksil枚 tiet盲盲 itsest盲盲n ja mit盲 h盲n muille paljastaa. Sokeaa min盲盲 ei itse tiedet盲, mutta muut sen p盲盲ttelev盲t. Salainen min盲 onkin muilta piilossa ja oman julkisivun suojissa. Tuntematonta min盲盲 ei yksil枚 sen paremmin kuin muutkaan eiv盲t tied盲, mutta sielt盲 se kumpuaa tiukoissa paikoissa tai kun toimitaan vaiston varassa.
Menn盲盲n aika lailla keitti枚psykologian puolelle, mutta jonkin verran itsetarkkailua voi harrastaa varsinkin kirjan loppupuolella, kun tulee vinkkej盲 psykopaattien tunnistamiseen ja niiden v盲lttelyyn. Rikkin盲inen 盲lpp盲ri -taktiikkaa kannattaa kirjan mukaan k盲ytt盲盲 p盲盲llep盲sm盲rin taltuttamiseen: 鈥漃alaan asiaan, kun olen pohtinut asiaa tarpeeksi.鈥� 脛l盲 siis polta p盲reit盲si, vaan ota itsellesi aikaa, vaikka se narsisti tai psykopaatti k盲ytt盲盲 yht盲 tavallisimmista manipulointikeinoista eli aikapaineen luomista ajaakseen tahtonsa l盲pi.
Hyv盲uskoisen ja sinisilm盲isen h盲rm盲l盲isenkin on hyv盲 tunnistaa niit盲 tavallisimpia manipulointikeinoja, joita my枚s psykopaatit usein k盲ytt盲v盲t: tahdittomuus, syyllist盲minen, ep盲suorat loukkaukset, vihjailevat kommentit, v盲heksynt盲, valehtelu, raivoaminen, uhriutuminen, imartelu ja monet muut.
Psykopaatit ymp盲rill盲ni oli todella kiinnostava ja osittain valaisevakin kirja, mutta olisin toivonut v盲hemm盲n sen vakuuttelua, ett盲 "psykopaatteja on ymp盲rill盲si enemm盲n kuin uskotkaan!!!" ja enemm盲n ihan vain arkiel盲m盲n manipuloimista. Eri "v盲rien" tahalliset ja tahattomat tavat manipuloida ymp盲rist枚盲盲n - ja miten manipulointi vaikuttaa kuhunkin v盲riin - oli ehdottomasti kirjan parasta antia, sensaatiohakuinen psykopaatti-sanan viljely ei niink盲盲n.
Ehk盲 olisi pit盲nyt lukea ensin Idiootit ymp盲rill盲ni tiet盲盲kseen enemm盲n ihmisten luokittelusta nelj盲盲n eri v盲rikategoriaan, mutta onnekseni olen maailman selkein (sininen) tapaus, joten t盲m盲 puute ei paljoa vaivannut.
Koin kirjan hy枚dyllisen盲 ja kiinnostavana, mutta en edelleenk盲盲n koe itse盲ni hirve盲n uhatuksi psykopaattien suunnalta, vaikka heit盲 onkin (enemm盲n kuin uskotkaan) 2-4%(!!!!).
Picked up this book because I heard so many good things about 'Surrounded by Idiots' but was too lazy to read that book. I was hoping this book to be really enlightening and all, but it turned out to be rather gossipy and filled with insipid and rather slippery slope-y anecdotes which made it really hard for me to take whatever was written too seriously. The language is fairly colloquial so it was pretty easy to just charge through the segments that were painful to read and what pushed me to finishing this book was the modicum of somewhat wise words about how to recognise manipulation and the possible strategies to react to them, that was strategically chopped up and sprinkled over the length of the book. I guess clickbait is a form of manipulation as well.
It's definitely a straightforward book about Psychopaths. Although it seems like it's very rare that we run into them, according to the book it's more common than we think.
Surrounded by Psychopaths has some great examples of how people manipulate each other and how we are fooled into being manipulated by others. It also categorizes people in four different colors which are red, yellow, green, and blue.
The last 25% of the book focuses on learning the different manipulation strategies people usually use and how you can deflect those strategies. Or even use them I suppose.
The author intends to convey ideas related to the book's central theme of avoiding exploitation by others, but I'm not convinced that they possess a deep understanding of the subject matter. The book seems to lack substantial content worth your time, as the author continually introduces stories to align with the book's theme, yet often fills pages with unnecessary information. Instead of clarifying the topic, they tend to extend it with more extraneous material, leading to a repetitive pattern.馃檮
The author appears to recognize when readers become disinterested due to excessive, off-topic explanations, and attempts to regain attention by introducing new headings. It feels like a cycle where you initially read brief, relevant insights related to the headings, followed by more unrelated information that is thrust into this 250-page book. The author even goes as far as self-proclaiming expertise in behavioral matters, which might be questionable.
In my personal opinion, this book is a waste of time and could be condensed into a much shorter 50-100 page format, with a more fitting title, as the current one hardly seems relevant to the subject matter. The book doesn't live up to the grandeur of the term "Psychopaths," which encompasses a broader range of meanings and personalities. It's frustrating that the author constantly urges you to keep reading and believe in the content.鈾撅笍
It took me an extended period to finish this book, during which I managed to complete two other books due to a lack of motivation. I ended up skimming through almost three-quarters of this book, finding very little of value within.
Also Wasting my time on reviewing his book TOO Is entirely unnecessary. Certainly there are many more bluffs which has to be addressed too!