What do you think?
Rate this book
丌丿賲蹖 賴賲丕賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗀�
Do you ever feel overwhelmed and powerless after watching the news? Does it make you feel sad about the world, without much hope for its future? Take a breath 鈥� the world is not as bad as the headlines would have you believe. In You Are What You Read , campaigner and researcher Jodie Jackson helps us understand how our current twenty-four-hour news cycle is produced, who decides what stories are selected, why the news is mostly negative and what effect this has on us as individuals and as a society. Combining the latest research from psychology, sociology and the media, she builds a powerful case for including solutions into our news narrative as an antidote to the negativity bias. You Are What You Read is not just a book, it is a manifesto for a it is not a call for us to ignore the negative but rather a call to not ignore the positive. It asks us to change the way we consume the news and shows us how, through our choices, we have the power to improve our media diet, our mental health and just possibly the world.
299 pages, Paperback
First published September 3, 2019
116 people are currently reading
2706 people want to read
About the author
Jodie Jackson
13听books40听followersJodie Jackson is an expert on the psychological impact of the news on our mental health and the health of our society. Her widely cited research has led to regular speaking engagements at media and mental health conferences around the world. Jodie Jackson is a partner at The Constructive Journalism Project and she holds a master鈥檚 degree in applied positive psychology.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 78 reviews
August 2, 2024
禺蹖賱蹖 禺蹖賱蹖 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 丿賵爻鬲 丿丕卮鬲賲. 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 胤乇夭 丿乇爻鬲 禺賵丕賳丿賳 乇賵 亘賴 賲丕 蹖丕丿 賲蹖丿賴 賳讴丕鬲 賵 爻賵丕賱丕鬲蹖 讴賴 賴賳诏丕賲 禺賵丕賳丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮 丕夭 噩賲賱賴 : 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕蹖 乇賲丕賳貙 賳丕 丿丕爻鬲丕賳貙 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 賵 噩爻鬲丕乇 乇賵 亘乇丕蹖 賲丕 鬲賵囟蹖丨 賲蹖丿賴 賵 賴賲 賮丕蹖丿賴 禺賵丕賳丿賳 賴乇 讴丿賵賲 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賲賵囟賵毓丕鬲 乇賵 賴賲 亘乇丕蹖 賲丕 鬲賵囟蹖丨 賲蹖丿賴. 丕蹖賳 讴賴 賴賳诏丕賲 禺賵賳丿賳 趩賴 爻賵丕賱 賴丕蹖蹖 乇賵 趩胤賵乇蹖 賲蹖鬲賵賳蹖賲 丕夭 賲鬲賳 亘倬乇爻蹖賲 讴賴 乇賵蹖讴乇丿 賴丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮 丕賵賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 賵 夭賵丕蹖丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮 丕賵賳 乇賵 賵丕讴丕賵蹖 讴賳蹖賲 蹖賴 噩賵乇丕蹖蹖 賵 亘鬲賵賳蹖賲 讴丕賲賱 賲賵 乇賵 丕夭 賲丕爻鬲 亘讴卮蹖賲 亘蹖乇賵賳 禺賱丕氐賴.
賮乇蹖丿乇蹖卮 賳蹖趩賴貙 夭賲丕賳蹖 賳賵卮鬲賴 亘賵丿: 芦丕夭 爻賻乇爻賻乇蹖鈥屫堌з嗀з� 亘蹖夭丕乇賲.禄
賵 讴鬲丕亘 賴賲 乇賵蹖 丕蹖賳 賲賵囟賵毓 禺蹖賱蹖 鬲丕讴蹖丿 丿丕乇賴 亘乇丕蹖 爻乇诏乇賲蹖 讴鬲丕亘 賳禺賵賳蹖賲 亘乇丕蹖 丕蹖賳讴賴 蹖丕丿亘诏蹖乇蹖賲 讴鬲丕亘 亘禺賵賳蹖賲.
賮乇蹖丿乇蹖卮 賳蹖趩賴貙 夭賲丕賳蹖 賳賵卮鬲賴 亘賵丿: 芦丕夭 爻賻乇爻賻乇蹖鈥屫堌з嗀з� 亘蹖夭丕乇賲.禄
賵 讴鬲丕亘 賴賲 乇賵蹖 丕蹖賳 賲賵囟賵毓 禺蹖賱蹖 鬲丕讴蹖丿 丿丕乇賴 亘乇丕蹖 爻乇诏乇賲蹖 讴鬲丕亘 賳禺賵賳蹖賲 亘乇丕蹖 丕蹖賳讴賴 蹖丕丿亘诏蹖乇蹖賲 讴鬲丕亘 亘禺賵賳蹖賲.
September 28, 2022
乇丕賴賳賲丕蹖蹖 亘乇丕蹖 禺賵亘 禺賵丕賳丿賳.
讴鬲丕亘 趩賳丿 賮氐賱 丿丕乇丿 讴賴 亘賴 鬲乇鬲蹖亘 亘賴 賴丿賮賲丕賳 丕夭 禺賵丕賳丿賳貙 趩胤賵乇 禺賵丕賳丿賳貙 噩爻鬲丕乇 趩蹖爻鬲 賵 趩賴 賵蹖跇诏蹖鈥屬囏й屰� 丿丕乇丿 賵 趩乇丕 亘丕蹖丿 噩爻鬲丕乇 禺賵丕賳丿貙 丕丿亘蹖丕鬲 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 趩蹖爻鬲 賵 趩賴 賵蹖跇诏蹖鈥屬囏й屰� 丿丕乇丿 賵 趩乇丕 亘丕蹖丿 禺賵丕賳丿 讴賴 賴賲乇丕賴 丕爻鬲 亘丕 賲孬丕賱鈥屬囏й屰� 丕夭 賲鬲賵賳 賲賴賲.
賮氐賱鈥� 亘毓丿蹖 亘賴 賲賯丕蹖爻賴鈥屰� 賲鬲賵賳鈥屬囏й� 趩丕倬蹖 賵 丿蹖噩蹖鬲丕賱蹖 賲蹖鈥屬矩必ж藏�. 賵 丿乇 丌禺乇 丿賵 囟賲蹖賲賴 丿丕乇丿 讴賴 丌孬丕乇 賲賴賲 丕丿亘蹖丕鬲 乇丕 賴賲乇丕賴 亘丕 鬲賵囟蹖丨蹖 讴賵鬲丕賴 亘賴 賲禺丕胤亘 賲毓乇賮蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�.
鬲噩乇亘賴鈥屰� 賲賳 丕夭 禺賵丕賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賱匕鬲亘禺卮 亘賵丿.
讴鬲丕亘 趩賳丿 賮氐賱 丿丕乇丿 讴賴 亘賴 鬲乇鬲蹖亘 亘賴 賴丿賮賲丕賳 丕夭 禺賵丕賳丿賳貙 趩胤賵乇 禺賵丕賳丿賳貙 噩爻鬲丕乇 趩蹖爻鬲 賵 趩賴 賵蹖跇诏蹖鈥屬囏й屰� 丿丕乇丿 賵 趩乇丕 亘丕蹖丿 噩爻鬲丕乇 禺賵丕賳丿貙 丕丿亘蹖丕鬲 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 趩蹖爻鬲 賵 趩賴 賵蹖跇诏蹖鈥屬囏й屰� 丿丕乇丿 賵 趩乇丕 亘丕蹖丿 禺賵丕賳丿 讴賴 賴賲乇丕賴 丕爻鬲 亘丕 賲孬丕賱鈥屬囏й屰� 丕夭 賲鬲賵賳 賲賴賲.
賮氐賱鈥� 亘毓丿蹖 亘賴 賲賯丕蹖爻賴鈥屰� 賲鬲賵賳鈥屬囏й� 趩丕倬蹖 賵 丿蹖噩蹖鬲丕賱蹖 賲蹖鈥屬矩必ж藏�. 賵 丿乇 丌禺乇 丿賵 囟賲蹖賲賴 丿丕乇丿 讴賴 丌孬丕乇 賲賴賲 丕丿亘蹖丕鬲 乇丕 賴賲乇丕賴 亘丕 鬲賵囟蹖丨蹖 讴賵鬲丕賴 亘賴 賲禺丕胤亘 賲毓乇賮蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�.
鬲噩乇亘賴鈥屰� 賲賳 丕夭 禺賵丕賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賱匕鬲亘禺卮 亘賵丿.
April 16, 2023
賲丕 賲鬲賵賳 乇丕 丿乇 倬乇鬲賵 丌賳趩賴 夭蹖爻鬲賴鈥屫й屬� 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗃屬�. 丕夭 賳馗乇 賲賳貙 乇賵蹖 丿蹖诏乇 爻讴賴 丕蹖賳 丕爻鬲: 賲丕 丿乇 倬乇鬲賵 賲鬲賵賳蹖 讴賴 禺賵丕賳丿賴鈥屫й屬� 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗃屬�. 賲鬲賵賳蹖 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 賲丕 丕賴賲蹖鬲 丿丕乇賳丿 亘丿賱 亘賴 丌賳 趩蹖夭蹖 賲蹖鈥屫促堎嗀� 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屫堌з� "賲鬲賵賳 夭賳丿诏蹖" 賳丕賲蹖丿卮丕賳貨 賲鬲賵賳蹖 讴賴 夭賳丿诏蹖鈥屬呚з� 乇丕 睾賳蹖鈥屫� 賵 倬蹖趩蹖丿賴鈥屫� 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀�.
丕诏乇 禺賵亘 亘禺賵乇蹖貙 爻丕賱賲鈥屫� 禺賵丕賴蹖 亘賵丿. 丕诏乇 禺賵亘 賵乇夭卮 讴賳蹖貙 賯賵蹖鈥屫� 禺賵丕賴蹖 卮丿. 丕賲丕 丕诏乇 禺賵亘 亘禺賵丕賳蹖 趩賴 禺賵丕賴蹖 卮丿責
亘丕賴賵卮鈥屫必� 卮丕蹖丿.
賲胤賱毓鈥屫必� 賯胤毓丕賸.
賵賱蹖 讴鬲丕亘 丨丕囟乇 丿乇亘丕乇賴鈥屰� 丕蹖賳 趩蹖夭賴丕 賳蹖爻鬲. 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賲蹖鈥屭堐屫� 亘丕 禺賵亘 禺賵丕賳丿賳貙 夭賳丿賴鈥屫� 禺賵丕賴蹖 亘賵丿.
丕诏乇 禺賵亘 亘禺賵乇蹖貙 爻丕賱賲鈥屫� 禺賵丕賴蹖 亘賵丿. 丕诏乇 禺賵亘 賵乇夭卮 讴賳蹖貙 賯賵蹖鈥屫� 禺賵丕賴蹖 卮丿. 丕賲丕 丕诏乇 禺賵亘 亘禺賵丕賳蹖 趩賴 禺賵丕賴蹖 卮丿責
亘丕賴賵卮鈥屫必� 卮丕蹖丿.
賲胤賱毓鈥屫必� 賯胤毓丕賸.
賵賱蹖 讴鬲丕亘 丨丕囟乇 丿乇亘丕乇賴鈥屰� 丕蹖賳 趩蹖夭賴丕 賳蹖爻鬲. 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賲蹖鈥屭堐屫� 亘丕 禺賵亘 禺賵丕賳丿賳貙 夭賳丿賴鈥屫� 禺賵丕賴蹖 亘賵丿.
June 11, 2019
When did you last see a good news story? We seem to have a diet of really bad news that never stops. Even when the presenter is talking about the latest disaster there is a ticker tape of sub-stories that expand to fill the vacuum of the entire day. It is just draining listening to or reading the stories that flood out of our media. I stopped watching a while ago now, and even though I buy the weekend papers, I tend to read the supplements rather than the main section. Thankfully though, there could be another way and campaigner and researcher Jodie Jackson wants to show us it.
First, though, you have to understand that psychology of why the media outlets produce the material that they do, Jackson goes into the details behind the headlines, why bad news rather than good news sells and the cumulative effect that this has on our mental well being. She addresses points on fake news, and churnalism, where journalists take a very liberal view of the truth in the speed to get the articles written for the ever hungry news machine.
She says that we don鈥檛 need to stop seeing bad news, being informed about significant world events is necessary, however, we need to limit our intake of it. What Jackson is advocating though is looking for alternative sources for your news, places that have taken time to do the proper research about a topic, can write with a balanced view and are seeking to inform rather than just go for the sensational headline. Seeking solution focused news sources that concentrate on innovation, initiative peacebuilding and positive responses to social issues need to make up a significant proportion of our media diet.
There are various methods and suggestions in the book that are very sensible. Stop reading the dirge from the media outlets that want sensational headlines and find those that have a more considered and balanced approach. Avoid the tabloids they are preaching to a base level of readers as well as trying to dictate the political agenda in a lot of cases. Read from different perspectives on the same story. Don鈥檛 forget though, we as the consumers of this actually hold the power, if we stop buying and watching the worst news channels then they will change as they will lose customers and then income. Jackson writes with a positive clarity about a subject that most people find unpalatable these days, but more than that there are things that you can do to change your media intake and make you a better-informed person.
First, though, you have to understand that psychology of why the media outlets produce the material that they do, Jackson goes into the details behind the headlines, why bad news rather than good news sells and the cumulative effect that this has on our mental well being. She addresses points on fake news, and churnalism, where journalists take a very liberal view of the truth in the speed to get the articles written for the ever hungry news machine.
She says that we don鈥檛 need to stop seeing bad news, being informed about significant world events is necessary, however, we need to limit our intake of it. What Jackson is advocating though is looking for alternative sources for your news, places that have taken time to do the proper research about a topic, can write with a balanced view and are seeking to inform rather than just go for the sensational headline. Seeking solution focused news sources that concentrate on innovation, initiative peacebuilding and positive responses to social issues need to make up a significant proportion of our media diet.
There are various methods and suggestions in the book that are very sensible. Stop reading the dirge from the media outlets that want sensational headlines and find those that have a more considered and balanced approach. Avoid the tabloids they are preaching to a base level of readers as well as trying to dictate the political agenda in a lot of cases. Read from different perspectives on the same story. Don鈥檛 forget though, we as the consumers of this actually hold the power, if we stop buying and watching the worst news channels then they will change as they will lose customers and then income. Jackson writes with a positive clarity about a subject that most people find unpalatable these days, but more than that there are things that you can do to change your media intake and make you a better-informed person.
July 23, 2023
賯亘賱 丕夭 賴乇趩蹖夭蹖 亘丕蹖丿 亘诏賲 賲賳 爻胤 亘賴 爻胤乇 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 賲夭賴 賲夭賴 讴乇丿賲 賵 亘毓丿 亘賱毓蹖丿賲 貙丨鬲蹖 诏丕賴蹖 亘毓囟蹖 爻胤賵乇卮 乇賵 趩賳丿亘丕乇 禺賵賳丿賲 讴賴 禺蹖丕賱賲 乇丕丨鬲 亘丕卮賴 鬲賵蹖 毓賲賯 噩丕賳賲 賳賮賵匕 讴乇丿賴 .
賯亘賱丕 讴鬲丕亘 亘丕 丕蹖賳 賲囟賲賵賳 讴賴 (趩胤賵乇 讴鬲丕亘 禺賵亘 亘禺賵賳蹖賲 )貙 禺賵賳丿賴 亘賵丿賲 賵賱蹖 丕蹖賳 讴噩丕 賵 丌賳 讴噩丕 .丕氐賱丕 睾賳丕蹖 丕丿亘蹖 賵 丿爻鬲賴 亘賳丿蹖 賲胤丕賱亘 賯丕亘賱 賯蹖丕爻 賳亘賵丿.爻胤丨 讴鬲丕亘 賲孬賱 亘蹖卮鬲乇 丕孬丕乇 賳卮乇 亘蹖丿诏賱 亘丕賱丕 亘賵丿 貙 賳孬乇 丿乇 毓蹖賳 倬蹖趩蹖丿诏蹖 乇賵丕賳 賴賲 亘賵丿 賵 賲賳 賵丕賯毓丕 卮蹖賮鬲賴 賲賵囟賵毓卮 卮丿賲 .
賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 丿乇 丕亘鬲丿丕 鬲賵囟蹖丨 賲蹖丿賴 讴賴 賲丕 亘賴 卮讴賱 賴賲賵賳 趩蹖夭蹖 丿乇 賲蹖丕蹖蹖賲 讴賴 賲蹖禺賵賳蹖賲 賵 趩賯丿乇 卮蹖乇蹖賳 賴賲 鬲賵囟蹖丨 賲蹖丿賴 讴賴 趩胤賵乇 亘丕蹖丿 亘禺賵賳蹖賲 .
丿乇 亘禺卮 賴丕蹖 亘毓丿蹖 亘賴 丕賳賵丕毓 爻亘讴 賴丕蹖 丕丿亘蹖 賲蹖倬乇丿丕夭賴 賵 丕蹖賳讴賴 賴乇讴丿賵賲 丕夭 丕蹖賳賴丕 趩蹖 亘賴 賲丕 賲蹖丿賴 賲孬賱丕 噩爻鬲丕乇 趩蹖 賲蹖丿賴責卮毓乇 趩蹖 賲蹖丿賴責丿丕爻鬲丕賳 趩蹖 賲蹖丿賴 責賵 丕賱亘鬲賴 丕蹖賳讴賴 趩胤賵乇 賴乇讴丿賵賲 亘丕蹖丿 禺賵賳丿賴 亘卮賴 丕蹖賳賲 亘诏賲 讴賴 亘丕賯蹖 爻亘讴 賴丕 乇賵 賴賲 亘乇乇爻蹖 賲蹖讴賳賴 .
乇丕爻鬲卮 賳賲蹖鬲賵賳賲 亘诏賲 亘賴 賴賲賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 賲蹖讴賳賲 趩賵賳 賲賲讴賳賴 亘丕 鬲乇噩賲賴 蹖丕 噩賲賱賴 賴丕蹖 胤賵賱丕賳蹖卮 賳鬲賵賳賴 丕乇鬲亘丕胤 亘诏蹖乇賴 丕賲丕 亘賴 賴乇讴爻蹖 讴賴 禺賵賳丿賳 禺賵乇丕讴 乇賵丨卮賴 亘賴 賴乇讴爻蹖 讴賴 乇丕噩毓 亘賴 賮毓賱 賲胤丕賱毓賴 賮讴乇 賲蹖讴賳賴 賵 賲蹖禺賵丕丿 賮賱爻賮賴 禺賵賳丿賳卮 乇賵 亘丿賵賳賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘賴 卮丿鬲 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 賲蹖讴賳賲
賯亘賱丕 讴鬲丕亘 亘丕 丕蹖賳 賲囟賲賵賳 讴賴 (趩胤賵乇 讴鬲丕亘 禺賵亘 亘禺賵賳蹖賲 )貙 禺賵賳丿賴 亘賵丿賲 賵賱蹖 丕蹖賳 讴噩丕 賵 丌賳 讴噩丕 .丕氐賱丕 睾賳丕蹖 丕丿亘蹖 賵 丿爻鬲賴 亘賳丿蹖 賲胤丕賱亘 賯丕亘賱 賯蹖丕爻 賳亘賵丿.爻胤丨 讴鬲丕亘 賲孬賱 亘蹖卮鬲乇 丕孬丕乇 賳卮乇 亘蹖丿诏賱 亘丕賱丕 亘賵丿 貙 賳孬乇 丿乇 毓蹖賳 倬蹖趩蹖丿诏蹖 乇賵丕賳 賴賲 亘賵丿 賵 賲賳 賵丕賯毓丕 卮蹖賮鬲賴 賲賵囟賵毓卮 卮丿賲 .
賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 丿乇 丕亘鬲丿丕 鬲賵囟蹖丨 賲蹖丿賴 讴賴 賲丕 亘賴 卮讴賱 賴賲賵賳 趩蹖夭蹖 丿乇 賲蹖丕蹖蹖賲 讴賴 賲蹖禺賵賳蹖賲 賵 趩賯丿乇 卮蹖乇蹖賳 賴賲 鬲賵囟蹖丨 賲蹖丿賴 讴賴 趩胤賵乇 亘丕蹖丿 亘禺賵賳蹖賲 .
丿乇 亘禺卮 賴丕蹖 亘毓丿蹖 亘賴 丕賳賵丕毓 爻亘讴 賴丕蹖 丕丿亘蹖 賲蹖倬乇丿丕夭賴 賵 丕蹖賳讴賴 賴乇讴丿賵賲 丕夭 丕蹖賳賴丕 趩蹖 亘賴 賲丕 賲蹖丿賴 賲孬賱丕 噩爻鬲丕乇 趩蹖 賲蹖丿賴責卮毓乇 趩蹖 賲蹖丿賴責丿丕爻鬲丕賳 趩蹖 賲蹖丿賴 責賵 丕賱亘鬲賴 丕蹖賳讴賴 趩胤賵乇 賴乇讴丿賵賲 亘丕蹖丿 禺賵賳丿賴 亘卮賴 丕蹖賳賲 亘诏賲 讴賴 亘丕賯蹖 爻亘讴 賴丕 乇賵 賴賲 亘乇乇爻蹖 賲蹖讴賳賴 .
乇丕爻鬲卮 賳賲蹖鬲賵賳賲 亘诏賲 亘賴 賴賲賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 賲蹖讴賳賲 趩賵賳 賲賲讴賳賴 亘丕 鬲乇噩賲賴 蹖丕 噩賲賱賴 賴丕蹖 胤賵賱丕賳蹖卮 賳鬲賵賳賴 丕乇鬲亘丕胤 亘诏蹖乇賴 丕賲丕 亘賴 賴乇讴爻蹖 讴賴 禺賵賳丿賳 禺賵乇丕讴 乇賵丨卮賴 亘賴 賴乇讴爻蹖 讴賴 乇丕噩毓 亘賴 賮毓賱 賲胤丕賱毓賴 賮讴乇 賲蹖讴賳賴 賵 賲蹖禺賵丕丿 賮賱爻賮賴 禺賵賳丿賳卮 乇賵 亘丿賵賳賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘賴 卮丿鬲 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 賲蹖讴賳賲
July 10, 2024
卮丕蹖丿 亘乇丕蹖 讴爻蹖 讴賴 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴鈥屰� 丨乇賮賴鈥屫й� 賲丨爻賵亘 賲蹖鈥屫促� 賵 丌卮賳丕蹖蹖 夭蹖丕丿蹖 亘丕 丕丿亘蹖丕鬲 丿丕乇賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 趩蹖夭 趩賳丿丕賳蹖 亘乇丕蹖 丕乇丕卅賴 賳丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮賴貨 丕賲丕 賲賳 丕夭 禺賵賳丿賳卮 賴賲 賱匕鬲 亘乇丿賲 賵 賴賲 蹖丕丿 诏乇賮鬲賲.
亘乇蹖丿賴鈥屬囏й屰� 讴賴 丕夭 丌孬丕乇 賲禺鬲賱賮 鬲賵蹖 讴鬲丕亘 亘乇乇爻蹖 卮丿賴 亘賵丿賳 毓賱丕賵賴 亘乇 丕蹖賳鈥屭┵� 亘賴 噩匕丕亘蹖鬲 讴鬲丕亘 丕囟丕賮賴 讴乇丿賳貙 丿乇 亘賴鬲乇 乇爻賵賳丿賳 賲賳馗賵乇 賴賲 賲賮蹖丿 亘賵丿賳.
賮賯胤 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 亘禺卮 倬丕蹖丕賳蹖 乇丕噩毓 亘賴 賲鬲賵賳 丿蹖噩蹖鬲丕賱貙 丕诏乇趩賴 讴賴 鬲丕 丨丿 夭蹖丕丿蹖 賲賵丕賮賯 亘賵丿賲 亘丕 賳馗乇丕鬲卮賵賳貙 丕賲丕 賮讴乇 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 賲賯丿丕乇蹖 讴賲鈥屬勜焚佦� 卮丿賴 亘賵丿 亘賴 賲鬲賵賳 丿蹖噩蹖鬲丕賱. 賲孬賱丕 亘乇丕蹖 禺賵丿 賲賳 丕蹖亘賵讴 亘賴 禺丕胤乇 丿乇 丿爻鬲乇爻 亘賵丿賳 賴賲蹖卮诏蹖貙 丿乇 賲賵丕賯毓蹖 讴賴 鬲賵 賲賵丿 禺賵賳丿賳 賴爻鬲賲 禺蹖賱蹖 亘賴 丿乇丿亘禺賵乇賴 賵 丕蹖賳 丕賲鬲蹖丕夭 賲賴賲蹖 賳爻亘鬲 亘賴 讴鬲丕亘 趩丕倬蹖 賲丨爻賵亘 賲蹖鈥屫促�.
亘乇蹖丿賴鈥屬囏й屰� 讴賴 丕夭 丌孬丕乇 賲禺鬲賱賮 鬲賵蹖 讴鬲丕亘 亘乇乇爻蹖 卮丿賴 亘賵丿賳 毓賱丕賵賴 亘乇 丕蹖賳鈥屭┵� 亘賴 噩匕丕亘蹖鬲 讴鬲丕亘 丕囟丕賮賴 讴乇丿賳貙 丿乇 亘賴鬲乇 乇爻賵賳丿賳 賲賳馗賵乇 賴賲 賲賮蹖丿 亘賵丿賳.
賮賯胤 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 亘禺卮 倬丕蹖丕賳蹖 乇丕噩毓 亘賴 賲鬲賵賳 丿蹖噩蹖鬲丕賱貙 丕诏乇趩賴 讴賴 鬲丕 丨丿 夭蹖丕丿蹖 賲賵丕賮賯 亘賵丿賲 亘丕 賳馗乇丕鬲卮賵賳貙 丕賲丕 賮讴乇 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 賲賯丿丕乇蹖 讴賲鈥屬勜焚佦� 卮丿賴 亘賵丿 亘賴 賲鬲賵賳 丿蹖噩蹖鬲丕賱. 賲孬賱丕 亘乇丕蹖 禺賵丿 賲賳 丕蹖亘賵讴 亘賴 禺丕胤乇 丿乇 丿爻鬲乇爻 亘賵丿賳 賴賲蹖卮诏蹖貙 丿乇 賲賵丕賯毓蹖 讴賴 鬲賵 賲賵丿 禺賵賳丿賳 賴爻鬲賲 禺蹖賱蹖 亘賴 丿乇丿亘禺賵乇賴 賵 丕蹖賳 丕賲鬲蹖丕夭 賲賴賲蹖 賳爻亘鬲 亘賴 讴鬲丕亘 趩丕倬蹖 賲丨爻賵亘 賲蹖鈥屫促�.
May 3, 2019
Fine points, lots of filler
If you are reading this, you may already be in the choir. In that case, you can safely move to the resource list at the end. If you have time to kill, some core concepts wrapped around anecdotes, quotes, and tropes.
But, yeah, as a recovering news junkie, I agree with the crux of the book,, and have been on a quest to be educated, engaged, and informed in a manner that is actionable (whatever that means).
If you are reading this, you may already be in the choir. In that case, you can safely move to the resource list at the end. If you have time to kill, some core concepts wrapped around anecdotes, quotes, and tropes.
But, yeah, as a recovering news junkie, I agree with the crux of the book,, and have been on a quest to be educated, engaged, and informed in a manner that is actionable (whatever that means).
January 26, 2025
鈥淚f you don鈥檛 read the newspaper, you鈥檙e uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you鈥檙e misinformed.
Mark Twain
鈥淭he top four UK news organisations in terms of readership 鈥� the Daily Mail, the Sun, the Mirror and the Telegraph, with a combined readership of 110.6 million readers a month 鈥� had an obvious pro-Leave bias. Their persuasive position was not based on objectively reporting facts but on manipulating them for their own political agenda.鈥�
It seems that the more obvious and blatant your lies, corruption and criminality the more likely you are to not only get away with it, but also benefit greatly as seen with the likes of Boris Johnson and pretty much the majority of the Tory cabinet.
鈥淭he media鈥檚 fear of being boring has made them overcompensate with excessive promotion of conflict and violence at an accelerated pace.鈥�
This is also why we have such a growing prevalence of learned helplessness. Jackson is good on the deeply toxic culture of fear mongering, drama generating negativity bias, which benefits only corporate interests and their political cronies. Unfortunately the increasing lack of truth, transparency and responsibility, leads only to greater suspicion and distrust by the general public and ultimately creates and profits from anger, division and distrust on all sides.
鈥淭he sensationalisation of violence and conflict in an attempt to push up ratings and reach a larger audience may serve the interest of the networks but it is contrary to the interests of their viewers. Because of this commercially driven negativity bias, we are being denied the opportunity to access agenda free information, one of the United Nation鈥檚 鈥榤ost basic freedoms鈥�.鈥�
鈥淚t is the public that are serving the needs of the news organisations, rather than the other way around.鈥�
At one point when trying to prove a point about how myths and fallacies can permeate popular culture by telling us that Gandhi was assassinated at 87, but he was actually killed at 78. It puts a clown鈥檚 nose on her point. Also Jackson claims that life has improved for most Americans,
鈥淎mericans today have a comparative advantage with higher incomes, lower infant mortality, higher life expectancy and more college degrees than their predecessors.鈥�
So this Pinker-esque nonsense is dangerously misleading, first of all Americans are fatter, sicker, lazier, greedier, angrier and more depressed than they have ever been in history. Infant mortality may have decreased but compare it with other wealthy nations and you鈥檒l get a shock. Many also have higher life expectancy, but these are not necessarily better or quality filled years and often they are merely being kept alive by incredibly expensive drugs.
Compare maternity leave and basic welfare with other major nations, they also have the highest incarceration rates in the world, appalling levels of gun control, mass shootings, police intimidation, violence and killing, institutionalised racism, the most expensive health care with only mediocre results and opioid epidemics.
Many may have higher incomes, but those dollars buy a lot less than previous generations and real wages for the vast majority of Americans have either stagnated or decreased since the 1970s and they now struggle with low-paid, precarious work and the only thing those extra college degrees guarantee is a lot more debt which takes even longer to pay off. Add to this the fact that America has never been so feared, distrusted or despised by so many people around the world.
In spite of that rant I enjoyed this, Jackson makes a lot of good points and there was a lot of positive, inspirational and generally interesting stuff in here, which should help many to make a better effort to pursue better quality journalism and more considered writing from their chosen news outlets. Good luck finding those. I鈥檓 still looking鈥�
December 25, 2019
Interesting!
May 24, 2024
禺蹖賱蹖 亘乇丕賲 禺爻鬲賴 讴賳賳丿賴鈥� 亘賵丿. 乇丕噩毓 亘賴 趩蹖夭鈥屬囏й屰� 丨乇賮 賲蹖鈥屫藏� 讴賴 鬲丕 丨丿賵丿 夭蹖丕丿蹖 亘丿蹖賴蹖 賲丨爻賵亘 賲蹖鈥屫簇� 賵 亘蹖丕賳 賵 丿蹖丿诏丕賴卮 賴賲 丕夭 賳馗乇賲 趩蹖夭 趩賳丿丕賳 禺丕氐蹖 賳丿丕卮鬲. 丕賲丕 亘丕蹖丿 丕蹖賳 乇賵 丿乇 賳馗乇 诏乇賮鬲 讴賴 丌蹖丕 亘乇丕蹖 蹖讴 賮乇丿 讴鬲丕亘禺賵丕賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘丕蹖丿 丨乇賮鈥屬囏й� 毓噩蹖亘 賵 睾乇蹖亘蹖 亘夭賳賴責 丕诏賴 丕蹖賳 賳讴鬲賴 乇賵 -賲賳氐賮丕賳賴- 丿乇 賳馗乇 亘诏蹖乇賲貙 亘丕蹖丿 亘诏賲 讴賴 亘蹖丕賳卮 鬲丕 噩丕蹖蹖 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屫簇� 噩丕賱亘 亘賵丿貨 丿乇爻鬲 賲孬賱 蹖讴 丿賮鬲乇趩賴鈥屰� 乇丕賴賳賲丕.
亘賴 胤賵乇 禺賱丕氐賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賲蹖丕丿 賵 丕夭 賳丨賵賴鈥屰� 賲胤丕賱毓賴鈥屫й� 讴賴 丕夭 賳馗乇卮 亘賴鬲乇蹖賳 讴蹖賮蹖鬲 乇賵 丿丕乇賴 氐丨亘鬲 賲蹖讴賳賴 賵 乇丕噩毓 亘賴 禺賵賳丿賳 賲鬲賳鈥屬囏й� 丕丿亘蹖 诏賵卮夭丿 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 讴賴 亘丕蹖丿 亘賴 趩賴 賲賵丕乇丿蹖 鬲賵噩賴 丿丕卮鬲. 丿乇 丕蹖賳 亘蹖賳 蹖讴 爻乇蹖 賲鬲賳 賵 卮毓乇 讴賵鬲丕賴 賴賲 賲蹖丕乇賴 賵 乇賵蹖 丕賵賳鈥屬囏� 鬲賵囟蹖丨丕鬲卮 乇賵 亘蹖丕賳 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�.
亘乇丕蹖 賲賳 禺蹖賱蹖 倬蹖卮 丕賵賲丿 讴賴 丕丨爻丕爻 讴賳賲 丿丕乇賴 夭蹖丕丿賴鈥屭堐屰� 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�. 鬲賯乇蹖亘丕 賮賯胤 丕夭 亘乇蹖丿賴鈥屬囏й屰� 讴賴 丕夭卮 孬亘鬲 讴乇丿賲 禺爻鬲賴 賳賲蹖鈥屫簇�.
亘賴 胤賵乇 禺賱丕氐賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賲蹖丕丿 賵 丕夭 賳丨賵賴鈥屰� 賲胤丕賱毓賴鈥屫й� 讴賴 丕夭 賳馗乇卮 亘賴鬲乇蹖賳 讴蹖賮蹖鬲 乇賵 丿丕乇賴 氐丨亘鬲 賲蹖讴賳賴 賵 乇丕噩毓 亘賴 禺賵賳丿賳 賲鬲賳鈥屬囏й� 丕丿亘蹖 诏賵卮夭丿 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁� 讴賴 亘丕蹖丿 亘賴 趩賴 賲賵丕乇丿蹖 鬲賵噩賴 丿丕卮鬲. 丿乇 丕蹖賳 亘蹖賳 蹖讴 爻乇蹖 賲鬲賳 賵 卮毓乇 讴賵鬲丕賴 賴賲 賲蹖丕乇賴 賵 乇賵蹖 丕賵賳鈥屬囏� 鬲賵囟蹖丨丕鬲卮 乇賵 亘蹖丕賳 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�.
亘乇丕蹖 賲賳 禺蹖賱蹖 倬蹖卮 丕賵賲丿 讴賴 丕丨爻丕爻 讴賳賲 丿丕乇賴 夭蹖丕丿賴鈥屭堐屰� 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁�. 鬲賯乇蹖亘丕 賮賯胤 丕夭 亘乇蹖丿賴鈥屬囏й屰� 讴賴 丕夭卮 孬亘鬲 讴乇丿賲 禺爻鬲賴 賳賲蹖鈥屫簇�.
June 22, 2020
"If information is to the mind what food is to the body, then it is time we become aware of the impact of our informational diet on our mental health".
I loved that the idea of the importance of our "media diet" was backed up by loads of academic research. The author is passionate about the subject, she has practical suggestions.
While sometimes there was a feeling of 'page-fillers' to write up a longer book, it is much better to read it rather than aimlessly browse one's social media feed.
"Our more recent tendency to over-consume poor-quality journalism has left us oversupplied and under-informed."
I loved that the idea of the importance of our "media diet" was backed up by loads of academic research. The author is passionate about the subject, she has practical suggestions.
While sometimes there was a feeling of 'page-fillers' to write up a longer book, it is much better to read it rather than aimlessly browse one's social media feed.
"Our more recent tendency to over-consume poor-quality journalism has left us oversupplied and under-informed."
September 19, 2019
The fast pace and negative bias of the news leaves many - me included - feeling hopeless. For a while I shut down all news outlets from my life, but this felt wrong. There was surely another way to stay informed. Jodie Jackson makes a case for solution based news as a way to empower readers to take action. She does not suggests that it should replace investigative journalism, but rather complement it. She thinks that journalism can expose problems, and also highlight solutions.
Together with Hans Rosling book, Factfulness, Jackson鈥檚 book provides a much needed breath of fresh air and inspiration for my (seemingly eternal) pessimism.
Together with Hans Rosling book, Factfulness, Jackson鈥檚 book provides a much needed breath of fresh air and inspiration for my (seemingly eternal) pessimism.
May 18, 2020
While interesting and thought-provoking, I found the book lacked organization.
At worst, there's a lot of padding.
At best, it feels like each chapter was written as a stand-alone article, and then everything was stitched together as a book. There's a lot of repetition, to the point where I had to stop several times wondering whether I'd somehow already read what I was reading.
It's a shame. The author did interesting research and has a lot to teach, I feel like the ideas presented here need to spread. I just find that the book doesn't do a very good job at it. Maybe I was just not in the target audience.
At worst, there's a lot of padding.
At best, it feels like each chapter was written as a stand-alone article, and then everything was stitched together as a book. There's a lot of repetition, to the point where I had to stop several times wondering whether I'd somehow already read what I was reading.
It's a shame. The author did interesting research and has a lot to teach, I feel like the ideas presented here need to spread. I just find that the book doesn't do a very good job at it. Maybe I was just not in the target audience.
May 2, 2025
讴鬲丕亘卮 賳诏丕賴賲 乇賵 亘賴 禺賵賳丿賳 毓賵囟 讴乇丿 . 賲丿賱 禺賵賳丿賲賲 毓賵囟 卮丿 賵 讴賲蹖 毓賲蹖賯 鬲乇 賲蹖鬲賵賳賲 亘禺賵賳賲.
September 6, 2019
Jodie Jackson鈥檚 You Are What You Read will cause a stir. Jackson鈥檚 book takes an unusual but well-reasoned position. She earned a degree in Positive Psychology and has built a reputation for researching the psychological impact negative news coverage has on the viewing public. The central thrust of her argument is that the media lacks a balanced approach to news coverage all too often slanted towards the dark and dire rather than incorporating solutions and the forward march of human progress into our informational diet. Naysayers may claim no such prejudice exists; networks and other outlets are simply covering the reality of our age. You Are What You Read aims, in part, our errors in appraising the current situation.
URL:
She begins the book with a section laying out her motivation and purpose for writing the book, a sort of initial 鈥渁rgument鈥� for everything that follows. It is a shrewd move charting her personal journey to writing this book as it brings added passion to the work rather than grounding it in dry research. Jackson does draw from the work of others to help make her point on a number of the book鈥檚 contentions, but You Are What You Read isn鈥檛 reliant on such references to state its case for readers.
Jackson gains reams of credibility by never viewing this issue through conspiratorial lenses alone. . There鈥檚 no inclination in her point of view towards casting the bias she sees as part of a conscious plot aimed towards shaping our attitudes and opinions, though she doesn鈥檛 discredit such possibilities. Her tacit acknowledgment of personal and even unconscious bias reporters bring to their work is an inescapable recognition of our own human nature. The book opens with an exploration about how perception transforms our understanding about events and their effect on us and the world.
AMAZON:
Her cool command of language continues sustaining reader interest through later sections 鈥淢isread or Misled鈥� and 鈥淏ad News Sells鈥� examining the accelerating slide media outlets have made in the direction of 鈥渋nformtainment鈥� rather than disseminating hard and objective content. I do not think Jackson disagrees with anyone who comes into this discussion believing or finishes this book understanding how the commercial and profit driven model of mass media casts a long shadow over our understanding of the world and one another. Ever in pursuit of advertising dollars, networks like CNN and Fox News pander to our growing alarm, division, fascination with abomination, and even our thoughts of 鈥渂etter him/her/them than me鈥�.
鈥淭oo Much of a Good Thing鈥� tackles how even the best-intentioned media outlets and individual reporters can cause more harm than good overexposing the public to negative news. She believes the often altruistic motivations driving people to pursue journalism run head long into the reality these attempts provoking empathy can produce fear, feelings of insignificance, paranoia, and depression. 鈥淭he News Solution鈥� puts forth her vision for how news organization and media hubs can better report the news in a responsible and conscientious manner. The remainder of the book goes into how our personal attitudes shape our connections and the need for a balance between news focused on solutions and problems. The skewing towards negativity is a central theme she revisits often in this book and leaves no angle of attack untaken.
Jodie Jackson鈥檚 You Are What You Read provides readers with an alternate take on how they perceive and why. She makes her arguments from a position of strength and backs up her assertions with solid reasoning and a lucid roadmap for changing the media landscape. This will be a compelling read for anyone studying modern media and its impact on our world.
URL:
She begins the book with a section laying out her motivation and purpose for writing the book, a sort of initial 鈥渁rgument鈥� for everything that follows. It is a shrewd move charting her personal journey to writing this book as it brings added passion to the work rather than grounding it in dry research. Jackson does draw from the work of others to help make her point on a number of the book鈥檚 contentions, but You Are What You Read isn鈥檛 reliant on such references to state its case for readers.
Jackson gains reams of credibility by never viewing this issue through conspiratorial lenses alone. . There鈥檚 no inclination in her point of view towards casting the bias she sees as part of a conscious plot aimed towards shaping our attitudes and opinions, though she doesn鈥檛 discredit such possibilities. Her tacit acknowledgment of personal and even unconscious bias reporters bring to their work is an inescapable recognition of our own human nature. The book opens with an exploration about how perception transforms our understanding about events and their effect on us and the world.
AMAZON:
Her cool command of language continues sustaining reader interest through later sections 鈥淢isread or Misled鈥� and 鈥淏ad News Sells鈥� examining the accelerating slide media outlets have made in the direction of 鈥渋nformtainment鈥� rather than disseminating hard and objective content. I do not think Jackson disagrees with anyone who comes into this discussion believing or finishes this book understanding how the commercial and profit driven model of mass media casts a long shadow over our understanding of the world and one another. Ever in pursuit of advertising dollars, networks like CNN and Fox News pander to our growing alarm, division, fascination with abomination, and even our thoughts of 鈥渂etter him/her/them than me鈥�.
鈥淭oo Much of a Good Thing鈥� tackles how even the best-intentioned media outlets and individual reporters can cause more harm than good overexposing the public to negative news. She believes the often altruistic motivations driving people to pursue journalism run head long into the reality these attempts provoking empathy can produce fear, feelings of insignificance, paranoia, and depression. 鈥淭he News Solution鈥� puts forth her vision for how news organization and media hubs can better report the news in a responsible and conscientious manner. The remainder of the book goes into how our personal attitudes shape our connections and the need for a balance between news focused on solutions and problems. The skewing towards negativity is a central theme she revisits often in this book and leaves no angle of attack untaken.
Jodie Jackson鈥檚 You Are What You Read provides readers with an alternate take on how they perceive and why. She makes her arguments from a position of strength and backs up her assertions with solid reasoning and a lucid roadmap for changing the media landscape. This will be a compelling read for anyone studying modern media and its impact on our world.
December 31, 2021
I have very little confidence in the news. I will say that I am a fan of media, journalists, reading, reporting, knowledge. But tabloids, hourly headlines and breaking news - ergh. I am angry at the lack of serious and sustained coverage of the climate crisis, frustrated at the bias and repetitive nature of UK media coverage and both the lack of accountability for the government and the royal family and the sway they both hold over mainstream media. The methods used to know-it-all in order to stay 鈥榬elevant鈥� and grab readers aren鈥檛 always as extreme and damaging as the Milly Dowler phone hacking scandal, but are often similarly invasive and inhumane. I hate the way we forget the issues of last week, and feel like because we know something, that means we鈥檝e done something. And yet鈥� I can鈥檛 resist the urge to check, sometimes multiple times a day. For the most part, I don鈥檛 read intentionally, I am picky towards the headlines that grab me, I don鈥檛 read articles thoroughly, or even fully. And then when I realise this isn鈥檛 adding value to my life or the world, I challenge myself to avoid the news for as many days/weeks as I can. Which is a hilariously not helpful solution.
I was hoping this book could inspire me to change my media habits. Give me some ideas for how I can be more mindful, informed, balanced and healthy. And I think it has. The one point that kind of blew my mind was this鈥�
If you are looking for entertainment, watch an entertaining television programme or read a magazine. We should try not to blur the purpose of the news with the purpose of entertainment.
I suppose because the news is delivered to me on the TV and radio alongside entertainment, and because I do get some sort of dopamine hit reading it online, I have honestly come to think of the news as a form of entertainment 鈥� often upsetting, aggravating, unfulfilling entertainment sure - but I don鈥檛 feel smarter or more motivated to act after exposing myself to the news presently so I don鈥檛 think of it as a way to educate myself, or help to make decisions. I do search up studies and read long-form research when I have a question on a particular issue, but not on a regular basis.
A dangerous consequence of our softened shock shield is that we are becoming less outraged by, more accepting of and indifferent to wrongdoing. Rather than responding to an issue that needs our attention with action, we are instead immobilised by apathy. In other words, we are becoming more cynical.
I completely agree with this statement and it鈥檚 something I鈥檝e noticed in my personal experience. You can only be appalled and called to action by scandals so many times. Another good point this book makes is that many of us get our news from social media. The problem with this is that the algorithms give us content based on what we鈥檝e previously clicked and liked, leading to 鈥榚cho chambers鈥� or 鈥榝ilter bubbles'. This is not exclusive to social media, many news sites now curate our home pages in order to keep us there. Personalised news feeds are 鈥渘arrowing our perception of the world and depriving us of the opportunity to learn, be challenged and think differently.鈥�
I would argue we are also less willing to disagree. We have this need to be right, to be heard, to convince. So many of us have this perception that we hold the 鈥渋n鈥� opinion, and anyone disagreeing is not only wrong but needs to be avoided and maybe even shamed. Open discussion and considering another鈥檚 perspective, without the need to end up on the same page is a skill many seem to have lost. Especially with text online and social media, you don鈥檛 have the social cues, intentions and complexities you would feel in a face-to-face interaction, and others feel less human. Even if you feel someone is harming you with their perspective (the two big divisive issues that come to mind for me are people hesitant/against taking the covid-19 vaccine, or those who don鈥檛 understand or accept the rise in diverse gender identities and trans-rights issues, especially those involving children) two wrongs don鈥檛 make a right. All issues are complex, because people are diverse and complex. When we try and simplify an issue or only view it from our own perspective and experience, we lose something, often relationships. What sort of world do we want to live in? We will always have disagreements with people, I want to live in a more considerate, accepting and curious world. I want people to listen to my thoughts, so I should listen to theirs.
Martin Luther King Jr. himself was angered into action, though it was how he expressed that anger 鈥� with courage, patience and compassion 鈥� that brought about social progress by mobilising people in a constructive way. As he said in 1968, 鈥業t is not enough to be angry. The supreme task is to organise people and unite people so that their anger becomes a transforming force.鈥� When anger is unchanneled and perhaps combined with other psychological ingredients such as intolerance, hatred, revenge and excitement, it can be classified as rage. Rage, in the face of challenge, would bring about a different expression that may in fact hinder social progress.
On the flipside, sometimes it鈥檚 good to be passionate and stubborn. I liked how this book discusses not being prejudiced against so called 鈥榖ad鈥� emotions like anger, sadness, fear and dissatisfaction. These are all natural and healthy feelings, and used in the right way can actually be very good, and productive. Solutions focused news doesn鈥檛 ignore problems. It fights problems. It鈥檚 about how we feel and what we鈥檙e doing. Do we feel hopeful about the world and the people in it? Are we taking action to stay consistent with our values, are we reassessing? The news shows us what鈥檚 possible for humanity. If it鈥檚 filled with violence and corruption day in, day out and no balance or light shone on ways to help, what toll does that take on our mental health and faith in humanity? There was also an interesting point about how Fox News in the US increased its viewership and made a bunch more money with less investment, less journalists and less research, by giving people newsreaders with personalities they could identify with and 鈥渢rust鈥�. If we chase profit, we risk losing integrity.
We could perhaps benefit from tuning into the news less frequently and reading it in more depth when we do鈥� take[ing] a longer-term view on issues to include depth, analysis and reflection rather than simply breaking news.
Although it seems I have taken quite a lot away from this book, it's more of a "like it" than a "love it" for me. It feels long for the points it鈥檚 making and at times too informal and unorganised for my liking. I did like how the author shares previous attempts to bring solutions-focused news into the mainstream and why it didn鈥檛 succeed or how it could be done better. There were a few statements I disagreed with. One was that runners in recent years don鈥檛 have greater physical qualities than in the past, they simply have more mental energy because you have to see it to be it and if the media reports people running faster miles/marathons, more people will. This just seemed an unnecessary and untrue statement because there is access to better tech, sports science, training regimes, diets, etc now than there ever has been, though obviously mental strength is a big aspect too. Also I found the comparison of personalised news feeds to schools was weird, and I didn鈥檛 agree with using an extreme example to simply dismiss the idea of student-focusing (rather than results-focusing) schools more.
There is some great stuff in this book. It finishes with these, the 鈥渟ix effective ways we can change our media diet in a way that will help us become more informed, engaged and empowered鈥�:
1. Become a conscious consumer
2. Read/watch good-quality journalism
3. Burst your filter bubble
4. Be prepared to pay for content
5. Read beyond the news
6. Read solutions-focused news
We all imagine that we create our own beliefs and opinions about what we read in the news. In reality, many of these beliefs and opinions are created for us, depending on where we have learning about the issue being reported. We all have a paper we enjoy reading, a programme we enjoy watching 鈥� but more to the point, who has the time to cross-reference each news story to gain different perspectives and analyse all the information to be able to draw our own conclusion? In our fast-paced daily lives, this kind of news consumption fits in well: we like to 鈥榢now鈥� what is going on in the world so we are not caught off guard for being ignorant, and one source is more than enough at any given time for most people to feel they have a sense of what is going on. [鈥 I want to highlight how much of the information we retain has been fed to us rather than researched and concluded ourselves.
I was hoping this book could inspire me to change my media habits. Give me some ideas for how I can be more mindful, informed, balanced and healthy. And I think it has. The one point that kind of blew my mind was this鈥�
If you are looking for entertainment, watch an entertaining television programme or read a magazine. We should try not to blur the purpose of the news with the purpose of entertainment.
I suppose because the news is delivered to me on the TV and radio alongside entertainment, and because I do get some sort of dopamine hit reading it online, I have honestly come to think of the news as a form of entertainment 鈥� often upsetting, aggravating, unfulfilling entertainment sure - but I don鈥檛 feel smarter or more motivated to act after exposing myself to the news presently so I don鈥檛 think of it as a way to educate myself, or help to make decisions. I do search up studies and read long-form research when I have a question on a particular issue, but not on a regular basis.
A dangerous consequence of our softened shock shield is that we are becoming less outraged by, more accepting of and indifferent to wrongdoing. Rather than responding to an issue that needs our attention with action, we are instead immobilised by apathy. In other words, we are becoming more cynical.
I completely agree with this statement and it鈥檚 something I鈥檝e noticed in my personal experience. You can only be appalled and called to action by scandals so many times. Another good point this book makes is that many of us get our news from social media. The problem with this is that the algorithms give us content based on what we鈥檝e previously clicked and liked, leading to 鈥榚cho chambers鈥� or 鈥榝ilter bubbles'. This is not exclusive to social media, many news sites now curate our home pages in order to keep us there. Personalised news feeds are 鈥渘arrowing our perception of the world and depriving us of the opportunity to learn, be challenged and think differently.鈥�
I would argue we are also less willing to disagree. We have this need to be right, to be heard, to convince. So many of us have this perception that we hold the 鈥渋n鈥� opinion, and anyone disagreeing is not only wrong but needs to be avoided and maybe even shamed. Open discussion and considering another鈥檚 perspective, without the need to end up on the same page is a skill many seem to have lost. Especially with text online and social media, you don鈥檛 have the social cues, intentions and complexities you would feel in a face-to-face interaction, and others feel less human. Even if you feel someone is harming you with their perspective (the two big divisive issues that come to mind for me are people hesitant/against taking the covid-19 vaccine, or those who don鈥檛 understand or accept the rise in diverse gender identities and trans-rights issues, especially those involving children) two wrongs don鈥檛 make a right. All issues are complex, because people are diverse and complex. When we try and simplify an issue or only view it from our own perspective and experience, we lose something, often relationships. What sort of world do we want to live in? We will always have disagreements with people, I want to live in a more considerate, accepting and curious world. I want people to listen to my thoughts, so I should listen to theirs.
Martin Luther King Jr. himself was angered into action, though it was how he expressed that anger 鈥� with courage, patience and compassion 鈥� that brought about social progress by mobilising people in a constructive way. As he said in 1968, 鈥業t is not enough to be angry. The supreme task is to organise people and unite people so that their anger becomes a transforming force.鈥� When anger is unchanneled and perhaps combined with other psychological ingredients such as intolerance, hatred, revenge and excitement, it can be classified as rage. Rage, in the face of challenge, would bring about a different expression that may in fact hinder social progress.
On the flipside, sometimes it鈥檚 good to be passionate and stubborn. I liked how this book discusses not being prejudiced against so called 鈥榖ad鈥� emotions like anger, sadness, fear and dissatisfaction. These are all natural and healthy feelings, and used in the right way can actually be very good, and productive. Solutions focused news doesn鈥檛 ignore problems. It fights problems. It鈥檚 about how we feel and what we鈥檙e doing. Do we feel hopeful about the world and the people in it? Are we taking action to stay consistent with our values, are we reassessing? The news shows us what鈥檚 possible for humanity. If it鈥檚 filled with violence and corruption day in, day out and no balance or light shone on ways to help, what toll does that take on our mental health and faith in humanity? There was also an interesting point about how Fox News in the US increased its viewership and made a bunch more money with less investment, less journalists and less research, by giving people newsreaders with personalities they could identify with and 鈥渢rust鈥�. If we chase profit, we risk losing integrity.
We could perhaps benefit from tuning into the news less frequently and reading it in more depth when we do鈥� take[ing] a longer-term view on issues to include depth, analysis and reflection rather than simply breaking news.
Although it seems I have taken quite a lot away from this book, it's more of a "like it" than a "love it" for me. It feels long for the points it鈥檚 making and at times too informal and unorganised for my liking. I did like how the author shares previous attempts to bring solutions-focused news into the mainstream and why it didn鈥檛 succeed or how it could be done better. There were a few statements I disagreed with. One was that runners in recent years don鈥檛 have greater physical qualities than in the past, they simply have more mental energy because you have to see it to be it and if the media reports people running faster miles/marathons, more people will. This just seemed an unnecessary and untrue statement because there is access to better tech, sports science, training regimes, diets, etc now than there ever has been, though obviously mental strength is a big aspect too. Also I found the comparison of personalised news feeds to schools was weird, and I didn鈥檛 agree with using an extreme example to simply dismiss the idea of student-focusing (rather than results-focusing) schools more.
There is some great stuff in this book. It finishes with these, the 鈥渟ix effective ways we can change our media diet in a way that will help us become more informed, engaged and empowered鈥�:
1. Become a conscious consumer
2. Read/watch good-quality journalism
3. Burst your filter bubble
4. Be prepared to pay for content
5. Read beyond the news
6. Read solutions-focused news
We all imagine that we create our own beliefs and opinions about what we read in the news. In reality, many of these beliefs and opinions are created for us, depending on where we have learning about the issue being reported. We all have a paper we enjoy reading, a programme we enjoy watching 鈥� but more to the point, who has the time to cross-reference each news story to gain different perspectives and analyse all the information to be able to draw our own conclusion? In our fast-paced daily lives, this kind of news consumption fits in well: we like to 鈥榢now鈥� what is going on in the world so we are not caught off guard for being ignorant, and one source is more than enough at any given time for most people to feel they have a sense of what is going on. [鈥 I want to highlight how much of the information we retain has been fed to us rather than researched and concluded ourselves.
May 30, 2019
I absolutely understand why some people, including the author choose to step away from the negativity that drives the media. It has become almost like a shark feeding frenzy with the audience baying for blood. The more traumatic, brutal and soul-destroying the news is the better.
The news of today isn't the news of yesterday. We used to have media outlets with journalists who strived to give the world, their audience, the facts and the truth, albeit as they perceived it through their frame of reference. Nowadays you get opinion based journalism, sensationalist tabloid pieces and a slowly declining number of outlets and individuals who report the facts.
On top of that our media outlets are controlled by conglomerates and moguls who have bought up the majority of them, so it has become a kind of monopoly. There is a good reason the peasants rose up to demand Rupert Murdoch not be allowed to buy yet another media outlet that reaches millions of people.
Monopolies change the way we receive information and more importantly they control the information we are being fed. They decide what to feed the masses, which means they can sway opinions and votes. Not exactly unimportant in our day and age when tempers are frayed and the extreme right is on the rise.
I think the saddest aspect of all of the above, aside from journalists not being journalists anymore, is that the majority of people don't realise they are being manipulated to think, vote and perceive information a certain way. That's not the same as being ignorant or uninformed. If you have no clue that someone is trying to dictate or influence your opinions, then you will be none the wiser.
It's a fact that the Russians have influenced political outcomes in multiple countries, and still are. They have buildings filled with people who plant false information and stories to influence the public - troll farms. Fact. It's also a fact that big media outlets no longer produce non-biased news.
We live in a world where the public is hungry for every detail of someone's life. Reality shows and Z-celebrities make money the more extreme, aggressive and dramatic they are. The other side of that coin is the fact that the public wants it to be delivered to them.
Jackson advocates for the audience to adapt a more balanced media diet. I concur with the general idea, however I do believe it is quite hard to do so. It's not easy for everyone to discern between fact and opinion, and whilst I agree that more positivity is needed to balance the negativity, I think it's becoming harder to find sources to deliver that.
Although the theoretical idea is one I believe will allow many to have a more productive life and be less stressed, I also believe it's important not to retreat into a false bubble of hope. I do believe it's important to educate people and to fight this war of negativity head on. You can't change something if you don't know it's already swallowed you whole and influenced you, which means helping others to understand what is happening is even more important.
This is an engaging and thought-provoking piece of non-fiction. In fact perhaps the world would be a better place if we had more voices like Jackson, who are trying to be heard through the cacophony of falsities. It is indeed a movement.
*I received a courtesy copy*
The news of today isn't the news of yesterday. We used to have media outlets with journalists who strived to give the world, their audience, the facts and the truth, albeit as they perceived it through their frame of reference. Nowadays you get opinion based journalism, sensationalist tabloid pieces and a slowly declining number of outlets and individuals who report the facts.
On top of that our media outlets are controlled by conglomerates and moguls who have bought up the majority of them, so it has become a kind of monopoly. There is a good reason the peasants rose up to demand Rupert Murdoch not be allowed to buy yet another media outlet that reaches millions of people.
Monopolies change the way we receive information and more importantly they control the information we are being fed. They decide what to feed the masses, which means they can sway opinions and votes. Not exactly unimportant in our day and age when tempers are frayed and the extreme right is on the rise.
I think the saddest aspect of all of the above, aside from journalists not being journalists anymore, is that the majority of people don't realise they are being manipulated to think, vote and perceive information a certain way. That's not the same as being ignorant or uninformed. If you have no clue that someone is trying to dictate or influence your opinions, then you will be none the wiser.
It's a fact that the Russians have influenced political outcomes in multiple countries, and still are. They have buildings filled with people who plant false information and stories to influence the public - troll farms. Fact. It's also a fact that big media outlets no longer produce non-biased news.
We live in a world where the public is hungry for every detail of someone's life. Reality shows and Z-celebrities make money the more extreme, aggressive and dramatic they are. The other side of that coin is the fact that the public wants it to be delivered to them.
Jackson advocates for the audience to adapt a more balanced media diet. I concur with the general idea, however I do believe it is quite hard to do so. It's not easy for everyone to discern between fact and opinion, and whilst I agree that more positivity is needed to balance the negativity, I think it's becoming harder to find sources to deliver that.
Although the theoretical idea is one I believe will allow many to have a more productive life and be less stressed, I also believe it's important not to retreat into a false bubble of hope. I do believe it's important to educate people and to fight this war of negativity head on. You can't change something if you don't know it's already swallowed you whole and influenced you, which means helping others to understand what is happening is even more important.
This is an engaging and thought-provoking piece of non-fiction. In fact perhaps the world would be a better place if we had more voices like Jackson, who are trying to be heard through the cacophony of falsities. It is indeed a movement.
*I received a courtesy copy*
June 5, 2019
Jodie Jackson鈥檚 You Are What You Read: Why Changing Your Media Diet Can Change the World is what all good non-fiction should be 鈥� exciting, challenging and perceptive.
That said, we are Jackson鈥檚 readership. The people who鈥檝e stopped reading newspapers, watching the news, even watching terrestrial television because we鈥檙e irritated with the way in which information is handed to us, the way in which the press manipulates what we see, we read, we hear. We just get our news in a different way now. And we鈥檙e not the only ones.
The premise of this book is that the news we consume is predominantly negative and it inevitably impacts on our lives, the way we think, the way we act, the way we treat others.
鈥榃e are familiar with the saying 鈥淵ou are what you eat鈥�; a simple but effective summary that has made us increasingly aware of the impact that food has on our physical health,鈥� the author comments early on in the book. 鈥樷€� Well food is to the body what news is to the mind. 鈥� [T]he news affects our mood, our beliefs, our understanding of the world, our relationship to other people and our politics, but its impact remains largely unquestioned by the consumers who are affected by its content.鈥�
In You Are What You Read, Jackson hands us the tools with which to protect ourselves against this insidious news cycle and shows us how to rethink the way in which we consume our news, thereby challenging the predominantly doom and gloom information that is 鈥榝ed鈥� to us. It鈥檚 not about ignoring the bad things that happen but rather about not ignoring the positives, about allowing ourselves balance and the choice to make informed decisions about what is happening in our world and what we choose to do about it.
This is a thought-provoking read, the author providing us with enough intelligent prompts to look at how we interact with news without it appearing preachy or heavy handed. Certainly, we鈥檒l be buying multiple copies of this book; we think it鈥檚 that important....
For full review:
Thanks to the publisher for sending a review copy. This review was published originally as part of a book tour. All opinions are our own. All rights reserved.
That said, we are Jackson鈥檚 readership. The people who鈥檝e stopped reading newspapers, watching the news, even watching terrestrial television because we鈥檙e irritated with the way in which information is handed to us, the way in which the press manipulates what we see, we read, we hear. We just get our news in a different way now. And we鈥檙e not the only ones.
The premise of this book is that the news we consume is predominantly negative and it inevitably impacts on our lives, the way we think, the way we act, the way we treat others.
鈥榃e are familiar with the saying 鈥淵ou are what you eat鈥�; a simple but effective summary that has made us increasingly aware of the impact that food has on our physical health,鈥� the author comments early on in the book. 鈥樷€� Well food is to the body what news is to the mind. 鈥� [T]he news affects our mood, our beliefs, our understanding of the world, our relationship to other people and our politics, but its impact remains largely unquestioned by the consumers who are affected by its content.鈥�
In You Are What You Read, Jackson hands us the tools with which to protect ourselves against this insidious news cycle and shows us how to rethink the way in which we consume our news, thereby challenging the predominantly doom and gloom information that is 鈥榝ed鈥� to us. It鈥檚 not about ignoring the bad things that happen but rather about not ignoring the positives, about allowing ourselves balance and the choice to make informed decisions about what is happening in our world and what we choose to do about it.
This is a thought-provoking read, the author providing us with enough intelligent prompts to look at how we interact with news without it appearing preachy or heavy handed. Certainly, we鈥檒l be buying multiple copies of this book; we think it鈥檚 that important....
For full review:
Thanks to the publisher for sending a review copy. This review was published originally as part of a book tour. All opinions are our own. All rights reserved.
April 22, 2020
You Are What You Read
by
Jodie Jackson
3 Stars
I鈥檓 torn between 3 and 4 stars on this book: 4 stars because I think it鈥檚 an important topic and I believe the author鈥檚 position on it is spot-on, but 3 stars because (as other reviewers have pointed out) it just feels like there鈥檚 too much filler in the book. The topic could have been covered well in a long essay. Even a short book (as this is) feels like the author was trying to meet a teacher鈥檚 requirement for a minimum number of pages; much of it seems forced and unnecessary.
by
Jodie Jackson
3 Stars
I鈥檓 torn between 3 and 4 stars on this book: 4 stars because I think it鈥檚 an important topic and I believe the author鈥檚 position on it is spot-on, but 3 stars because (as other reviewers have pointed out) it just feels like there鈥檚 too much filler in the book. The topic could have been covered well in a long essay. Even a short book (as this is) feels like the author was trying to meet a teacher鈥檚 requirement for a minimum number of pages; much of it seems forced and unnecessary.
February 1, 2021
Est谩 cortito, ligero y trata de manera muy concisa el efecto que tiene el consumo repetitivo de noticias "negativas" sobre nuestra salud mental. La autora propone tener mucho ojo con las fuentes que frecuentamos, ser consumidores conscientes, salir de nuestra burbuja de redes sociales e incluso considerar pagar por medios de calidad. Creo que es un de esos libros que voy a releer o voy a guardar de referencia.
June 2, 2019
A short but extremely well written and well researched book on the benefits of solutions-focussed news. Makes its case well and, suitably, goes further than just telling us there鈥檚 a problem.
February 6, 2025
丌丿賲蹖 賴賲丕賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗀�.(乇丕賴賳賲丕蹖 毓賲賱蹖 禺賵亘 禺賵丕賳丿賳)
乇丕亘乇鬲 丿蹖鈥屰屫з嗃�
賮丕乇爻蹖賽 毓賱蹖 馗賮乇 賯賴乇賲丕賳蹖鈥屬嗂権ж�
賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 蹖 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 丿乇 賳爻禺賴 蹖 丕賳鬲卮丕乇丕鬲 亘蹖丿诏賱鈥屫й� 讴賴 丿爻鬲 賲賳賴貙 亘丕 賴賲蹖賳 噩賱丿貙 賴賲蹖賳 毓賳賵丕賳 賵 賴賲蹖賳 賲鬲乇噩賲貙 丌賯丕蹖 乇丕亘乇鬲 丿蹖鈥屰屫з嗃� 賴爻鬲賳丿. 賵 丕蹖賳 噩丕 賮讴乇 讴賳賲 亘賴 丕卮鬲亘丕賴 禺丕賳賲 Jodi Jackson 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 讴鬲丕亘 賲毓乇賮蹖 卮丿賳丿.
/book/show/55836295-you-are-what-you-read
丕蹖賳胤賵乇 賳蹖爻鬲 讴賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘賴 卮賲丕 丕胤賱丕毓丕鬲 氐賮乇 鬲丕 氐丿 丕蹖賳讴賴 趩蹖 亘禺賵賳賲 賵 趩噩賵乇蹖 亘禺賵賳賲 賵 趩噩賵乇蹖 禺賵亘 亘禺賵賳賲 乇賵 亘丿賴. 賵賱蹖 亘丕 禺賵賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 卮賲丕 賯乇丕乇賴 蹖賴 丕蹖丿賴鈥屫й� 倬蹖丿丕 讴賳蹖 乇丕噩毓 亘賴 丕蹖賳讴賴 賳丨賵賴 禺賵丕賳卮 賵 亘乇禺賵乇丿 亘丕 賲鬲賵賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 趩賴 鬲賮丕賵鬲蹖 亘丕 噩爻鬲丕乇 丿丕乇賴. 蹖丕 卮毓乇 賳賵 乇賵 趩噩賵乇蹖 亘丕蹖丿 賳诏丕賴 讴乇丿.
亘乇丕蹖 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴鈥屬囏й� 丨乇賮賴鈥屫й� 卮丕蹖丿 丨乇賮 夭蹖丕丿蹖 亘乇丕 诏賮鬲賳 賳丿丕卮鬲賴鈥屫ㄘж促�. 賵賱蹖 亘乇丕蹖 賲賳蹖 讴賴 丨賵氐賱賴 蹖 卮乇賵毓 蹖賴 讴鬲丕亘 禺蹖賱蹖 鬲禺氐氐蹖 丿乇 賴賲蹖賳 賲賵乇丿 賳丿丕卮鬲賲 賵 亘蹖卮鬲乇 賲蹖禺賵丕爻鬲賲 蹖賴 丕蹖丿賴 讴賱蹖 倬蹖丿丕 讴賳賲 讴鬲丕亘 禺蹖賱蹖 賲賳丕爻亘貙 亘賴 噩丕 賵 亘賴 賲賵賯毓蹖 亘賵丿.
賲賳 丌丿賲 "卮毓乇 禺賵丕賳"丕蹖 賳蹖爻鬲賲 賲鬲丕爻賮丕賳賴 賵賱蹖 禺亘 賴賲蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 讴賲讴賲 讴乇丿 蹖讴賲 亘丕 卮毓乇 丌卮鬲蹖 讴賳賲. 賵 亘賴 鬲丕孬蹖乇 賯丕賱亘 賵 鬲讴乇丕乇賴丕 乇賵蹖 賲毓賳丕 賵 賲賮賴賵賲 賵賲賳馗賵乇 卮丕毓乇 丿賯鬲 讴賳賲.
讴鬲丕亘 丕夭 爻賴 亘禺卮 鬲卮讴蹖賱 卮丿賴.
亘禺卮 蹖讴 : 乇賵蹖讴乇丿賴丕 賲蹖诏賴 丕氐賱丕 亘丕 趩賴 乇賵蹖讴乇丿蹖 亘丕蹖丿 亘禺賵賳蹖責 匕賴賳 倬乇爻卮诏乇 賵 亘丕夭責 讴丕賲賱丕 亘丿賵賳 鬲毓氐亘責 賲卮丕賴丿賴 诏乇 蹖丕 賲賳賯鬲丿責 賲賵賯毓 禺賵賳丿賳貙 丨蹖賳 禺賵賳丿賳貙 亘賴 趩蹖 亘丕蹖丿 鬲賵噩賴 讴賳蹖責 鬲睾蹖蹖乇 賱丨賳 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 亘賴 趩賴 賲毓賳丕蹖蹖 賲蹖鬲賵賳賴 亘丕卮賴 賵 丕夭丕蹖賳 丿爻鬲 賲賮丕賴蹖賲.
亘禺卮 丿賵 : 讴丕乇亘爻鬲 賴丕 亘賴 丿賵 賯爻賲鬲 禺賵丕賳丿賳 賲鬲賵賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 賵 睾蹖乇 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 鬲賯爻蹖賲 賲蹖卮賴 賵 丕夭 賳丨賵賴 禺賵丕賳卮 賲鬲賵賳 睾蹖乇丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 賵 丕賴賲蹖鬲 賲鬲賵賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 賲蹖诏賴.
亘禺卮 爻賴 : 讴丕乇讴乇丿賴丕 丕夭 賱匕鬲 賴丕蹖 賲鬲賳丕賯囟 禺賵丕賳丿賳 賲蹖诏賴. 丕蹖賳讴賴 禺賵丕賳丿賳 讴噩丕蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 噩丕 丿丕乇賴 賵 亘丕蹖丿 讴噩丕卮 噩丕 亘诏蹖乇賴 賵 趩乇丕.
亘禺卮 倬蹖賵爻鬲 賴丕 丿賵 賯爻賲鬲 丿丕乇賴 讴賴 蹖讴蹖 賲賯丕蹖爻賴 賲鬲賵賳 趩丕倬蹖 賵 丿蹖噩蹖鬲丕賱 (讴賴 亘賴 賳馗乇賲 亘禺卮 噩丕賱亘蹖 賳亘賵丿. 賳爻亘鬲 亘賴 亘賯蹖賴 蹖 亘禺卮 賴丕 讴賲鬲乇 丿賱趩爻亘 亘賵丿 賵 丕賳诏丕乇 夭賵乇讴蹖 賵 爻胤丨蹖 亘賵丿)
賵 倬蹖賵爻鬲 丿蹖诏乇蹖 賲乇亘賵胤 亘賴 趩賴 亘禺賵丕賳蹖賲 賵 趩乇丕. 讴賴 賲蹖鬲賵賳賴 賮賴乇爻鬲 噩丕蹖诏夭蹖賳 亘賴鬲乇蹖 賳爻亘鬲 亘賴 賱蹖爻鬲 "120 讴鬲丕亘蹖 讴賴 賯亘賱 丕夭 賲乇诏 亘丕蹖丿 禺賵賳丿" 亘丕卮賴 趩賵賳 賲蹖丕丿 賲蹖诏賴 趩蹖賵 趩乇丕 亘丕蹖丿 亘禺賵賳蹖 賵 亘賴 趩賴 丿乇丿鬲 賲蹖禺賵乇賴. 讴賴 賲爻賱賲丕 賲賲讴賳賴 賳馗乇 賴賲賴 賳亘丕卮賴 賵賱蹖 禺賵丿卮 亘丨孬 噩丕賱亘蹖 乇賵 亘丕夭 賲蹖讴賳賴.
賲賳 丕夭 禺賵丕賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賱匕鬲 亘乇丿賲 賵 蹖丕丿 诏乇賮鬲賲 賵 亘丕夭 賴賲 亘賴 丌賳 亘乇禺賵丕賴賲 诏卮鬲 賵 丿蹖诏賴 賲诏賴 丌丿賲 趩蹖 賲蹖禺賵丕丿 丕夭 蹖賴 讴鬲丕亘責
賲賴賲 鬲乇 丕夭 賴賲賴 丕蹖賳讴賴 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 丿乇 夭賲丕賳 丿乇爻鬲蹖 禺賵賳丿賲. 亘丕毓孬 讴賲蹖 乇卮丿賲 卮丿 賵賱蹖 丕夭 丿乇讴賲 禺丕乇噩 賳亘賵丿 賵 丕夭 爻胤丨賲賲 倬丕蹖蹖賳 鬲乇 賳亘賵丿.
丿乇 胤蹖 禺賵丕賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘丕 賲鬲賵賳 賵 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕蹖 丕乇夭卮賲賳丿 賵 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴鈥屬囏й� 禺賱丕賯 賵 噩丕賱亘蹖 賴賲 丌卮賳丕 卮丿賲 讴賴 卮丕蹖丿 賯亘賱鈥屫� 讴賲鬲乇 丕夭卮賵賳 卮賳蹖丿賴 蹖丕 禺賵賳丿賴 亘賵丿賲.
讴鬲丕亘 丕夭 噩丕賴丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮 賵 禺蹖賱蹖 夭蹖丕丿蹖 賳賯賱 賯賵賱 賲蹖丕乇賴貙 趩賴 丿乇 乇丕爻鬲丕蹖 賲胤丕賱毓賴 蹖 賲鬲賳 賵 丌賲賵夭卮 賳丨賵賴 蹖 丕賳噩丕賲 丕蹖賳讴丕乇 賵 趩賴 賳賯賱 賯賵賱 賴丕蹖蹖 丕夭 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕蹖蹖 亘丕 賴賲蹖賳 賲賵囟賵毓 鈥溭嗂堎嗁� 亘禺賵丕賳蹖賲鈥� 丿乇 乇丕爻鬲丕蹖 乇丿 蹖丕 鬲丕蹖蹖丿 丨乇賮 禺賵丿卮 賵 亘賴 賳馗乇賲 丕蹖賳 丕夭 讴丕乇丕蹖 噩丕賱亘蹖賴 讴賴 賲蹖讴賳賴.
賲鬲賳蹖 乇賵 賲蹖丕乇賴 賵 亘丕 賯爻賲鬲蹖 丕夭卮 賲賵丕賮賯鬲 賲蹖讴賳賴 賵賱蹖 賲蹖诏賴 賲孬賱丕 丕诏乇 賮賱丕賳 噩丕卮 乇賵 丕蹖賳噩賵乇蹖 賲蹖 诏賮鬲 讴丕賲賱 鬲乇 賲蹖鈥屫ㄙ堌� 賵 丕蹖賳 亘乇丕蹖 賲賳賽 丌賲丕鬲賵乇蹖 讴賴 丕賵賱賽 乇丕賴賽 蹖丕丿诏乇賮鬲賳賽 賳丨賵賴 蹖 丿乇爻鬲 賲胤丕賱毓賴 蹖 丕賳鬲賯丕丿蹖鈥屫з呚� 賳讴丕鬲 噩丕賱亘蹖 丿丕卮鬲.
乇丕亘乇鬲 丿蹖鈥屰屫з嗃�
賮丕乇爻蹖賽 毓賱蹖 馗賮乇 賯賴乇賲丕賳蹖鈥屬嗂権ж�
賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 蹖 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 丿乇 賳爻禺賴 蹖 丕賳鬲卮丕乇丕鬲 亘蹖丿诏賱鈥屫й� 讴賴 丿爻鬲 賲賳賴貙 亘丕 賴賲蹖賳 噩賱丿貙 賴賲蹖賳 毓賳賵丕賳 賵 賴賲蹖賳 賲鬲乇噩賲貙 丌賯丕蹖 乇丕亘乇鬲 丿蹖鈥屰屫з嗃� 賴爻鬲賳丿. 賵 丕蹖賳 噩丕 賮讴乇 讴賳賲 亘賴 丕卮鬲亘丕賴 禺丕賳賲 Jodi Jackson 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 讴鬲丕亘 賲毓乇賮蹖 卮丿賳丿.
/book/show/55836295-you-are-what-you-read
丕蹖賳胤賵乇 賳蹖爻鬲 讴賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘賴 卮賲丕 丕胤賱丕毓丕鬲 氐賮乇 鬲丕 氐丿 丕蹖賳讴賴 趩蹖 亘禺賵賳賲 賵 趩噩賵乇蹖 亘禺賵賳賲 賵 趩噩賵乇蹖 禺賵亘 亘禺賵賳賲 乇賵 亘丿賴. 賵賱蹖 亘丕 禺賵賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 卮賲丕 賯乇丕乇賴 蹖賴 丕蹖丿賴鈥屫й� 倬蹖丿丕 讴賳蹖 乇丕噩毓 亘賴 丕蹖賳讴賴 賳丨賵賴 禺賵丕賳卮 賵 亘乇禺賵乇丿 亘丕 賲鬲賵賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 趩賴 鬲賮丕賵鬲蹖 亘丕 噩爻鬲丕乇 丿丕乇賴. 蹖丕 卮毓乇 賳賵 乇賵 趩噩賵乇蹖 亘丕蹖丿 賳诏丕賴 讴乇丿.
亘乇丕蹖 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴鈥屬囏й� 丨乇賮賴鈥屫й� 卮丕蹖丿 丨乇賮 夭蹖丕丿蹖 亘乇丕 诏賮鬲賳 賳丿丕卮鬲賴鈥屫ㄘж促�. 賵賱蹖 亘乇丕蹖 賲賳蹖 讴賴 丨賵氐賱賴 蹖 卮乇賵毓 蹖賴 讴鬲丕亘 禺蹖賱蹖 鬲禺氐氐蹖 丿乇 賴賲蹖賳 賲賵乇丿 賳丿丕卮鬲賲 賵 亘蹖卮鬲乇 賲蹖禺賵丕爻鬲賲 蹖賴 丕蹖丿賴 讴賱蹖 倬蹖丿丕 讴賳賲 讴鬲丕亘 禺蹖賱蹖 賲賳丕爻亘貙 亘賴 噩丕 賵 亘賴 賲賵賯毓蹖 亘賵丿.
賲賳 丌丿賲 "卮毓乇 禺賵丕賳"丕蹖 賳蹖爻鬲賲 賲鬲丕爻賮丕賳賴 賵賱蹖 禺亘 賴賲蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 讴賲讴賲 讴乇丿 蹖讴賲 亘丕 卮毓乇 丌卮鬲蹖 讴賳賲. 賵 亘賴 鬲丕孬蹖乇 賯丕賱亘 賵 鬲讴乇丕乇賴丕 乇賵蹖 賲毓賳丕 賵 賲賮賴賵賲 賵賲賳馗賵乇 卮丕毓乇 丿賯鬲 讴賳賲.
丌賳趩賴 丕丿亘蹖丕鬲 亘賴 賲丕 毓乇囟賴 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 丿賯蹖賯丕 賲鬲囟丕丿 趩蹖夭蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 賲亘丕丨孬賴 亘賴 丿爻鬲 賲蹖鈥屫囏�. 丌孬丕乇 丕丿亘蹖 丨讴賲 氐丕丿乇 賳賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 丕丿毓丕蹖 趩蹖夭蹖 乇丕 賳丿丕乇賳丿 賵 丕诏乇 卮禺氐蹖鬲鈥屬囏� 蹖丕 乇丕賵蹖丕賳 丕丿亘蹖 丕賳賵丕毓 丿毓丕賵蹖 賵 丕丨讴丕賲蹖 乇丕 讴賴 禺丕氐 賲亘丕丨孬丕鬲 乇爻賲蹖 丕爻鬲 胤乇丨 賲蹖讴賳賳丿貙 丕蹖賳 讴丕乇 乇丕 賳賴 亘賴 丕爻賲 賲賵賱賮 蹖丕 丕孬乇貙 亘賱讴賴 丕夭 噩丕賳亘 禺賵丿卮丕賳 丿乇 賳賯卮 卮禺氐蹖鬲貙 丿乇 賱丨馗丕鬲蹖 禺丕氐 丿乇 噩賴丕賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖鈥屫й� 讴賴 丿乇 丌賳 亘賴 爻乇 賲蹖鈥屫ㄘ辟嗀� 丕賳噩丕賲 賲蹖鈥屫囐嗀�.
讴鬲丕亘 丕夭 爻賴 亘禺卮 鬲卮讴蹖賱 卮丿賴.
亘禺卮 蹖讴 : 乇賵蹖讴乇丿賴丕 賲蹖诏賴 丕氐賱丕 亘丕 趩賴 乇賵蹖讴乇丿蹖 亘丕蹖丿 亘禺賵賳蹖責 匕賴賳 倬乇爻卮诏乇 賵 亘丕夭責 讴丕賲賱丕 亘丿賵賳 鬲毓氐亘責 賲卮丕賴丿賴 诏乇 蹖丕 賲賳賯鬲丿責 賲賵賯毓 禺賵賳丿賳貙 丨蹖賳 禺賵賳丿賳貙 亘賴 趩蹖 亘丕蹖丿 鬲賵噩賴 讴賳蹖責 鬲睾蹖蹖乇 賱丨賳 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 亘賴 趩賴 賲毓賳丕蹖蹖 賲蹖鬲賵賳賴 亘丕卮賴 賵 丕夭丕蹖賳 丿爻鬲 賲賮丕賴蹖賲.
亘禺卮 丿賵 : 讴丕乇亘爻鬲 賴丕 亘賴 丿賵 賯爻賲鬲 禺賵丕賳丿賳 賲鬲賵賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 賵 睾蹖乇 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 鬲賯爻蹖賲 賲蹖卮賴 賵 丕夭 賳丨賵賴 禺賵丕賳卮 賲鬲賵賳 睾蹖乇丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 賵 丕賴賲蹖鬲 賲鬲賵賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 賲蹖诏賴.
亘禺卮 爻賴 : 讴丕乇讴乇丿賴丕 丕夭 賱匕鬲 賴丕蹖 賲鬲賳丕賯囟 禺賵丕賳丿賳 賲蹖诏賴. 丕蹖賳讴賴 禺賵丕賳丿賳 讴噩丕蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 噩丕 丿丕乇賴 賵 亘丕蹖丿 讴噩丕卮 噩丕 亘诏蹖乇賴 賵 趩乇丕.
亘禺卮 倬蹖賵爻鬲 賴丕 丿賵 賯爻賲鬲 丿丕乇賴 讴賴 蹖讴蹖 賲賯丕蹖爻賴 賲鬲賵賳 趩丕倬蹖 賵 丿蹖噩蹖鬲丕賱 (讴賴 亘賴 賳馗乇賲 亘禺卮 噩丕賱亘蹖 賳亘賵丿. 賳爻亘鬲 亘賴 亘賯蹖賴 蹖 亘禺卮 賴丕 讴賲鬲乇 丿賱趩爻亘 亘賵丿 賵 丕賳诏丕乇 夭賵乇讴蹖 賵 爻胤丨蹖 亘賵丿)
賵 倬蹖賵爻鬲 丿蹖诏乇蹖 賲乇亘賵胤 亘賴 趩賴 亘禺賵丕賳蹖賲 賵 趩乇丕. 讴賴 賲蹖鬲賵賳賴 賮賴乇爻鬲 噩丕蹖诏夭蹖賳 亘賴鬲乇蹖 賳爻亘鬲 亘賴 賱蹖爻鬲 "120 讴鬲丕亘蹖 讴賴 賯亘賱 丕夭 賲乇诏 亘丕蹖丿 禺賵賳丿" 亘丕卮賴 趩賵賳 賲蹖丕丿 賲蹖诏賴 趩蹖賵 趩乇丕 亘丕蹖丿 亘禺賵賳蹖 賵 亘賴 趩賴 丿乇丿鬲 賲蹖禺賵乇賴. 讴賴 賲爻賱賲丕 賲賲讴賳賴 賳馗乇 賴賲賴 賳亘丕卮賴 賵賱蹖 禺賵丿卮 亘丨孬 噩丕賱亘蹖 乇賵 亘丕夭 賲蹖讴賳賴.
賲賳 丕夭 禺賵丕賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賱匕鬲 亘乇丿賲 賵 蹖丕丿 诏乇賮鬲賲 賵 亘丕夭 賴賲 亘賴 丌賳 亘乇禺賵丕賴賲 诏卮鬲 賵 丿蹖诏賴 賲诏賴 丌丿賲 趩蹖 賲蹖禺賵丕丿 丕夭 蹖賴 讴鬲丕亘責
賲賴賲 鬲乇 丕夭 賴賲賴 丕蹖賳讴賴 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 丿乇 夭賲丕賳 丿乇爻鬲蹖 禺賵賳丿賲. 亘丕毓孬 讴賲蹖 乇卮丿賲 卮丿 賵賱蹖 丕夭 丿乇讴賲 禺丕乇噩 賳亘賵丿 賵 丕夭 爻胤丨賲賲 倬丕蹖蹖賳 鬲乇 賳亘賵丿.
丿乇 胤蹖 禺賵丕賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘丕 賲鬲賵賳 賵 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕蹖 丕乇夭卮賲賳丿 賵 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴鈥屬囏й� 禺賱丕賯 賵 噩丕賱亘蹖 賴賲 丌卮賳丕 卮丿賲 讴賴 卮丕蹖丿 賯亘賱鈥屫� 讴賲鬲乇 丕夭卮賵賳 卮賳蹖丿賴 蹖丕 禺賵賳丿賴 亘賵丿賲.
讴鬲丕亘 丕夭 噩丕賴丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮 賵 禺蹖賱蹖 夭蹖丕丿蹖 賳賯賱 賯賵賱 賲蹖丕乇賴貙 趩賴 丿乇 乇丕爻鬲丕蹖 賲胤丕賱毓賴 蹖 賲鬲賳 賵 丌賲賵夭卮 賳丨賵賴 蹖 丕賳噩丕賲 丕蹖賳讴丕乇 賵 趩賴 賳賯賱 賯賵賱 賴丕蹖蹖 丕夭 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕蹖蹖 亘丕 賴賲蹖賳 賲賵囟賵毓 鈥溭嗂堎嗁� 亘禺賵丕賳蹖賲鈥� 丿乇 乇丕爻鬲丕蹖 乇丿 蹖丕 鬲丕蹖蹖丿 丨乇賮 禺賵丿卮 賵 亘賴 賳馗乇賲 丕蹖賳 丕夭 讴丕乇丕蹖 噩丕賱亘蹖賴 讴賴 賲蹖讴賳賴.
賲鬲賳蹖 乇賵 賲蹖丕乇賴 賵 亘丕 賯爻賲鬲蹖 丕夭卮 賲賵丕賮賯鬲 賲蹖讴賳賴 賵賱蹖 賲蹖诏賴 賲孬賱丕 丕诏乇 賮賱丕賳 噩丕卮 乇賵 丕蹖賳噩賵乇蹖 賲蹖 诏賮鬲 讴丕賲賱 鬲乇 賲蹖鈥屫ㄙ堌� 賵 丕蹖賳 亘乇丕蹖 賲賳賽 丌賲丕鬲賵乇蹖 讴賴 丕賵賱賽 乇丕賴賽 蹖丕丿诏乇賮鬲賳賽 賳丨賵賴 蹖 丿乇爻鬲 賲胤丕賱毓賴 蹖 丕賳鬲賯丕丿蹖鈥屫з呚� 賳讴丕鬲 噩丕賱亘蹖 丿丕卮鬲.
禺賵丕賳丿賳 氐亘賵乇丕賳賴 賵 爻賳噩蹖丿賴 蹖 讴鬲丕亘鈥屬囏й� 禺賵亘 賵 亘乇噩爻鬲賴貙 賲夭賲夭賴 讴乇丿賳 夭亘丕賳 賵 丕蹖丿賴鈥屬囏й� 丌賳賴丕貙 乇丕賴蹖 丕爻鬲 亘乇丕蹖 丕賮夭丕蹖卮 卮賳丕禺鬲 賲丕貙 毓賲賯 亘禺卮蹖丿賳 亘賴 丿乇讴 賵 丿乇蹖丕賮鬲賲丕賳貙 鬲賯賵蹖鬲 匕賴賳賲丕賳 賵 丿乇毓蹖賳 丨丕賱 鬲賵噩賴 亘賴 賳蹖丕夭賴丕蹖 毓丕胤賮蹖鈥屬呚з�
亘賴 诏賮鬲賴 爻丕賲賵卅賱 噩丕賳爻賵賳貙 賳賯丕丿 亘夭乇诏 賯乇賳 郾鄹賲貙 鬲賳賴丕 亘丕蹖丿 趩蹖夭蹖 乇丕 亘禺賵丕賳蹖賲 讴賴 賲噩匕賵亘賲丕賳 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 趩賵賳 賵賯鬲蹖 趩蹖夭蹖 乇丕 賳賴 丿丕賵胤賱亘丕賳賴 讴賴 丕夭 爻乇 丕噩亘丕乇 亘禺賵丕賳蹖賲貙 丿乇 毓賲賱 賳賴 亘賴 丌賳 鬲賵噩賴 賲蹖讴賳蹖賲 賵 賳賴 丿乇诏蹖乇卮 賲蹖鈥屫促堐屬�.丿乇 賳鬲蹖噩賴 丕夭 丌賳 賱匕鬲 賳賲蹖亘乇蹖賲 賵 丕夭 蹖丕丿卮 禺賵丕賴蹖賲 亘乇丿.
丌賱賳 噩蹖讴賵亘夭 丿乇讴鬲丕亘 鈥溬勜柏ж� 禺賵丕賳丿賳 丿乇 毓氐乇 丨賵丕爻鈥屬矩必屸€� 賴賲蹖賳 丿蹖丿诏丕賴 噩丕賳爻賵賳 乇丕 亘丕夭鬲丕亘 賲蹖丿賴丿 賵 賲蹖诏賵蹖丿: 亘丕蹖丿 丕夭 乇賵蹖 賴賵爻 亘禺賵丕賳蹖賲貙 蹖毓賳蹖 鬲賳賴丕 趩蹖夭蹖 乇丕 亘禺賵丕賳蹖賲 讴賴 亘賴 賳馗乇賲丕賳 噩丕賱亘 賲蹖 丌蹖丿貙 趩蹖夭蹖 讴賴 讴賳噩讴丕賵蹖 賵 丕卮鬲蹖丕賯鈥屬呚з� 乇丕 亘乇 賲蹖 丕賳诏蹖夭丿.
亘丕 丕蹖賳 丨丕賱 诏丕賴蹖 丌賳 鬲讴丕賱蹖賮 禺賵丕賳卮 丕噩亘丕乇蹖 賲丕乇丕 亘丕 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕蹖蹖 丌卮賳丕 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀� 讴賴 丌賳賴丕 乇丕 賱匕鬲鈥屫ㄘ� 賲蹖 蹖丕亘蹖賲 賵 卮丕蹖丿 亘禺賵丕賴蹖賲 亘蹖卮鬲乇 丿乇 賲賵乇丿卮丕賳 亘丿丕賳蹖賲.
September 11, 2019
As media organisations globally are starting to embrace constructive journalism, Jodie fulfills a crucial role by engaging and empowering not just those who make the news, but all of us. If 鈥榊ou Are What You Read鈥� is about consuming stories that are good for you, then this very book is a great place to start.
August 2, 2023
讴丕賲賳鬲 丿賵 賴賮鬲賴 亘毓丿 丕夭 禺賵賳丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 丕囟丕賮賴 卮丿:
讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 鬲賵蹖 #胤丕賯趩賴 禺賵賳丿賲 賵 賮氐賱鈥屬囏й� 丌禺乇 讴鬲丕亘 讴賴 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 禺賵丕賳丿賳 讴鬲丕亘鈥屬囏й� 丿蹖噩蹖鬲丕賱 亘賵丿 亘丕毓孬 卮丿 蹖賴 噩賵乇丕蹖蹖 鬲氐賲蹖賲 亘诏蹖乇賲 丨鬲蹖鈥屫з勝呝傌堌� 丕蹖賳 丌禺乇蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘蹖 亘丕卮賴 讴賴 丕賵賳噩丕 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁�. 亘乇丕蹖 賴賲蹖賳 賴賲 毓賱蹖 乇睾賲 毓賱丕賯賴 賵 賳蹖丕夭 賵 丕丨鬲乇丕賲賲 賴賲 胤丕賯趩賴 賵 賴賲 賮蹖丿蹖亘賵 賵 賴賲 亘賯蹖賴 丕倬鈥屬囏й� 讴鬲丕亘鈥� 鬲賵蹖 诏賵卮蹖 乇賵 丨匕賮 讴乇丿賲.
趩賳丿 乇賵夭 亘毓丿 禺賵賳丿賲 讴賴 胤丕賯趩賴 賮蹖賱鬲乇 卮丿.
讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 鬲賵蹖 #胤丕賯趩賴 禺賵賳丿賲 賵 賮氐賱鈥屬囏й� 丌禺乇 讴鬲丕亘 讴賴 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 禺賵丕賳丿賳 讴鬲丕亘鈥屬囏й� 丿蹖噩蹖鬲丕賱 亘賵丿 亘丕毓孬 卮丿 蹖賴 噩賵乇丕蹖蹖 鬲氐賲蹖賲 亘诏蹖乇賲 丨鬲蹖鈥屫з勝呝傌堌� 丕蹖賳 丌禺乇蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘蹖 亘丕卮賴 讴賴 丕賵賳噩丕 賲蹖鈥屫堎嗁�. 亘乇丕蹖 賴賲蹖賳 賴賲 毓賱蹖 乇睾賲 毓賱丕賯賴 賵 賳蹖丕夭 賵 丕丨鬲乇丕賲賲 賴賲 胤丕賯趩賴 賵 賴賲 賮蹖丿蹖亘賵 賵 賴賲 亘賯蹖賴 丕倬鈥屬囏й� 讴鬲丕亘鈥� 鬲賵蹖 诏賵卮蹖 乇賵 丨匕賮 讴乇丿賲.
趩賳丿 乇賵夭 亘毓丿 禺賵賳丿賲 讴賴 胤丕賯趩賴 賮蹖賱鬲乇 卮丿.
March 5, 2019
This book is a demonstration of the need to review how you interact with media. It provides the bolster for the idea that critical thinking is important not just it鈥檚 application but also n it鈥檚 benefits.
How you both challenge and explore the media avalanche of news can both be of benefit to understanding and emotional wellbeing.
I would recommend supporting the ideas and framework this book champions. If you feel the need to know more by accepting less then this should be a appropriate way point towards a more fulfilling relationship with news output.
How you both challenge and explore the media avalanche of news can both be of benefit to understanding and emotional wellbeing.
I would recommend supporting the ideas and framework this book champions. If you feel the need to know more by accepting less then this should be a appropriate way point towards a more fulfilling relationship with news output.
June 17, 2019
Good overview of Solutions Focused Journalism
This is a solid addition to any positive psychology enthusiast鈥檚 library.
It鈥檚 a quick yet insightful introduction to how your reading diet can affect the way you think, feel, and act.
Feed your brain well and boost your mood in positive tangible ways.
Definitely worth checking out.
This is a solid addition to any positive psychology enthusiast鈥檚 library.
It鈥檚 a quick yet insightful introduction to how your reading diet can affect the way you think, feel, and act.
Feed your brain well and boost your mood in positive tangible ways.
Definitely worth checking out.
October 9, 2019
I warmly recommend this book. After feeling thoroughly down from the doom and gloom of the daily news picture, this book was a true saviour! Not only do I now have a plethora of sources on constructive journalism, I have a better understanding of how and why the news diet is the way it is, the psychological effects, and what can be done to change it.
July 4, 2019
Jodie Jackson鈥檚 book is more than just a dream - it鈥檚 a balanced, realistic love letter to constructive journalism. It addresses not just the industry of fast food style news journalism but how it effects our mental health. Optimistic and vital reading.
September 27, 2019
It talks about some basic principles for a reader. Good effort and genuine passion, but it can be easily done in an article not worth a book. As for the suggestion to the journalism, it's unrealistic and impractical.
July 8, 2019
Very interesting read on the toxic outcomes of the majority of today's media (fast paced, sensational, quantity over quality, the conglomerates annex ads, etc.)
Displaying 1 - 30 of 78 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.