What do you think?
Rate this book
賲丕蹖丕
丿丕爻鬲丕賳 爻賴 乇賵夭 夭賳丿诏蹖 蹖讴 夭蹖爻鬲 卮賳丕爻 鬲賳賴丕蹖 賳乇賵跇蹖貙 蹖讴 乇賲丕賳 賳賵蹖爻 丕賳诏賱蹖爻蹖貙 賵 蹖讴 夭賵噩 噩賵丕賳 丕爻倬丕賳蹖丕蹖蹖 丿乇 噩夭蹖乇賴 亘賴卮鬲 賲丕賳賳丿 鬲丕賵卅賵賳蹖. 诏匕乇丕賳丿賳 卮亘 賴丕蹖 胤賵賱丕賳蹖 亘丕 亘乇蹖噩貙 賯氐賴 诏賮鬲賳 賵 鬲賮讴乇.
亘乇禺賵乇丿蹖 讴賴 賳賴 賮賯胤 亘賴 夭賳丿诏蹖 卮禺氐蹖鬲 賴丕蹖 讴鬲丕亘貙 亘賱讴賴 亘賴 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲丕 賳蹖夭 賲毓賳丕 賲蹖 亘禺卮丿.
蹖賵爻鬲蹖賳 诏賵乇丿乇 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 乇賲丕賳 倬乇賮乇賵卮 丿賳蹖丕蹖 爻賵賮蹖 丕爻鬲.
亘乇禺賵乇丿蹖 讴賴 賳賴 賮賯胤 亘賴 夭賳丿诏蹖 卮禺氐蹖鬲 賴丕蹖 讴鬲丕亘貙 亘賱讴賴 亘賴 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲丕 賳蹖夭 賲毓賳丕 賲蹖 亘禺卮丿.
蹖賵爻鬲蹖賳 诏賵乇丿乇 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 乇賲丕賳 倬乇賮乇賵卮 丿賳蹖丕蹖 爻賵賮蹖 丕爻鬲.
406 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1999
246 people are currently reading
4530 people want to read
About the author
Jostein Gaarder
74听books7,461听followersJostein Gaarder is a Norwegian intellectual and author of several novels, short stories, and children's books. Gaarder often writes from the perspective of children, exploring their sense of wonder about the world. He often uses meta-fiction in his works, writing stories within stories.
Gaarder was born into a pedagogical family. His best known work is the novel Sophie's World, subtitled "A Novel about the History of Philosophy." This popular work has been translated into fifty-three languages; there are over thirty million copies in print, with three million copies sold in Germany alone.
In 1997, he established the Sophie Prize together with his wife Siri Dannevig. This prize is an international environment and development prize (USD 100,000 = 77,000 鈧�), awarded annually. It is named after the novel.
Gaarder was born into a pedagogical family. His best known work is the novel Sophie's World, subtitled "A Novel about the History of Philosophy." This popular work has been translated into fifty-three languages; there are over thirty million copies in print, with three million copies sold in Germany alone.
In 1997, he established the Sophie Prize together with his wife Siri Dannevig. This prize is an international environment and development prize (USD 100,000 = 77,000 鈧�), awarded annually. It is named after the novel.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 296 reviews
February 24, 2022
乇賵囟鬲購 賳賮爻賷 毓賱賶 賮賰乇丞 兀賳賷 賲噩乇丿 噩夭亍 囟卅賷賱 賲賳 賲睾丕賲乇丞 丕賱丨囟丕乇丞 丕賱毓馗賲賶...賲噩乇丿 賰爻乇丞 毓丕亘乇丞 鈥徺呝� 卮賷亍 兀毓馗賲 賲賳賷 賵兀賯賵賶
賴賳丕賰 卮丕睾賱丕賳 兀爻丕爻賷丕賳 賱噩賵爻鬲丕賷賳 睾丕乇丿乇:
"丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 賵丕賱鬲胤賵乇"
賮亘賷賳賲丕 賳噩丿 亘毓囟 丕賱兀噩賵亘丞 賱丿賶 毓賱賲丕亍 丕賱兀丨賷丕亍 丕賱鬲胤賵乇賷 賵
賲賮爻乇賷 賳馗乇賷丞 鈥徹з勜з嗁佖ж� 丕賱賰亘賷乇
鬲馗賱 兀爻卅賱丞 丕賱賮賷賱爻賵賮 賲賳賴賲乇丞
賱丕 鬲鬲賵賯賮 毓賳丿 丨丿賵丿
賵賲亘丿兀 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱兀賵賱 賴賵 兀賳 鬲胤乇丨 丕賱兀爻卅賱丞
賵賯丿乇 賲丕 賰丕賳 丕賱爻丐丕賱 毓賲賷賯丕 鈥�
賯丿乇 賲丕 賷爻鬲丨賯 卮丿賷丿 丕賱丕丨鬲乇丕賲
鈥�
----------
亘賱賲毓丞 亘乇賯 亘丕賴乇丞貙 兀乇鬲賳賷 鬲賱賰 丕賱賵丕賯毓丞 兀賳賷 兀賳丕 兀賷囟賸丕 賰丕卅賳 丨賷 賲賳 賱丨賲 賵丿賲貙 賲噩乇丿 丨賷賵丕賳 丌禺乇 賱賴 賯爻胤賴 鈥徺呝� 丕賱夭賲賳 毓賱賶 賴匕賴 丕賱兀乇囟貙 賱賰賳賴 賷賵賲賸丕 賲丕 爻賷賰賮 毓賳 丕賱賵噩賵丿鈥�
賰賰賱 兀毓賲丕賱 睾丕乇丿乇 丿賴卮丞 丕賱賵噩賵丿 賵賲丨丕賵賱丞 丕賱亘丨孬 毓賳 賲睾夭丕賴 賴賷 卮丕睾賱賴 鈥徹з勜簇ж嘿�
賵丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 賴賳丕 鬲毓胤賷賴 鬲賱賰 丕賱賯丿乇丞 丕賱賲匕賴賱丞 賰賲毓賱賲 賵毓丕卮賯 賱賴丕
賰賷 賷賯賱亘 毓丕賱賲賰 乇兀爻丕 毓賱賶 毓賯亘
賵賷孬賷乇 賮賷賰 賲丕 賷孬賷乇賴 賲賳 兀爻卅賱丞 賵噩賵丿賷丞 爻鬲馗賱 鬲丐乇賯賳丕 丕亘丿 丕賱丿賴乇
賰賱 賲乇丞 亘毓亘賯乇賷丞 鈥撠地必� 兀賴賷賲 亘賴丕 鬲賲丕賲丕- 賷囟賮乇 丨賰丕賷鬲賴 亘賮丕賳鬲丕夭賷丕 睾賷乇 賲鬲賵賯毓丞鈥�
亘丿亍丕 賲賳 丕賱丨賵丕乇 亘賷賳 丕賱亘胤賱 賵亘賷賳 丕賱爻丨賱賷丞-兀噩賲賱 賵兀賲鬲毓 氐賮丨丕鬲 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賮賷 鈥徹必Ｙ娰�
孬賲 丕賱噩賵賰乇- 匕賱賰 丕賱丨丕囟乇 兀亘丿丕 賮賷 賰賱 賲丕 賷賰鬲亘鈥�
賴匕丕 丕賱賯夭賲 丕賱毓噩賷亘 丕賱匕賷 賲賱賴 丕賱亘毓囟 賲賲賳 賯乇兀 賱噩丕乇丿乇 兀賰孬乇 賲賳 毓賲賱
賵賱賰賳賳賷 亘鬲 兀丨亘賴 賵兀鬲賵賯毓賴
賵兀毓乇賮 兀賳賴 賰賱 賲乇丞 爻賷噩賱亘 賱賷 賯丿乇丕 賲賳 丕賱丿賴卮丞 賱賳 兀爻丕賴
孬賲 丕賱鬲卮丕亘賴 丕賱毓噩賷亘 亘賷賳 丌賳丕 丕賱乇丕賯氐丞 丕賱廿爻亘丕賳賷丞
賵賱賵丨丕鬲 "賲丕禺丕" 丕賱卮賴賷乇丞 鈥徺勝勜关ㄙ傌辟� (睾賵賷丕)鈥�
賵兀賳鬲 鬲馗賳 賵丕賱賰丕鬲亘 賷亘丨孬 毓賳 丕賱兀噩賵亘丞 丕賱氐丕卅亘丞
毓賳 亘丿丕賷丞 賳卮兀丞 丕賱賰賵賳
賵毓賳 丕賱賳馗乇賷丕鬲 丕賱毓賱賲賷丞兀賳賰 兀賲丕賲 乇賵丕賷丞賵丕賯毓賷丞 毓賯賱丕賳賷丞 噩丕賲丿丞
賵賱賰賳賰 賮賷 丕賱丨賯賷賯丞 爻鬲噩丿 賳賮爻賰 兀賲丕賲 馗賵丕賴乇 禺丕乇賯丞 賵賲禺賱賵賯丕鬲 睾乇賷亘丞鈥�
兀賯夭丕賲 賵噩賳賷丕鬲 賵 兀賵乇丕賯 賰賵鬲卮賷賳丞 賲鬲丨乇賰丞
賰賱 卮賷亍 賲賲賰賳
賮賷 賯乇丕亍鬲賰 丕賱兀賵賱賶 爻賷禺丿毓賰 賵亘卮丿丞
丨鬲賶 鬲噩丿 賳賮爻賰 兀賲丕賲 丕賱賱丕賲毓賯賵賱 賵噩賴丕 賱賵噩賴
賵丕賱睾乇賷亘 兀賳賰 鬲氐丿賯賴 賵鬲丨亘賴 鈥�
賵賲孬賱賷 鬲鬲賵賯毓 丕賱賲夭賷丿 賲賳 丕賱噩賳賵賳 丕賱鬲丕賲 丕賱賲賰鬲賵亘 亘賲賳鬲賴賶 丕賱毓賯賱
----------
賱賵 鬲毓賱賯 丕賱兀賲乇 亘丕賱丕丨鬲賲丕賱丕鬲.. 賱卮丕乇賮 賴匕丕 丕賱賵噩賵丿 毓賱賶 丕賱丕爻鬲丨丕賱丞...
鬲亘丨孬 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賮賷 丕賱兀賲賵乇 丕賱賰賵賳賷丞 丕賱賰亘乇賶
禺賱賯 丕賱賰賵賳..鈥�
鬲胤賵乇 丕賱丨賷丕丞 毓賱賶 丕賱賰乇丞 丕賱兀乇囟賷丞..鈥�
丕賳亘孬丕賯 丕賱噩賳爻 丕賱亘卮乇賷..鈥�
胤亘賷毓丞 丕賱賵毓賷..鈥�
賵丕賱睾丕賷丞 賲賳 丕賱賵噩賵丿 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷
鬲丿賵乇 丕賱兀丨丿丕孬 賲丕 亘賷賳 噩夭賷乇丞 賮賷噩賷 賵兀爻亘丕賳賷丕 鈥�
亘胤賱賳丕 賴賵 毓丕賱賲 丕賱兀丨賷丕亍 丕賱鬲胤賵乇賷 丕賱賳乇賵賷噩賷 賮乇丕賳賰 兀賳丿乇爻賵賳
賵賵噩賵丿 賮乇丕賳賰 卮丿賷丿 丕賱兀賴賲賷丞
賮亘賷賳賲丕 賷毓鬲乇賷賴 賰亘卮乇賷 匕賱賰 丕賱賯賱賯 丕賱賵噩賵丿賷 丕賱毓丕賲
賷噩丿 賮賷 毓賱賲賴 亘毓囟 丕賱廿噩丕亘丕鬲
賵賱賰賳賴丕 兀亘丿丕 賱丕 鬲卮賮賷 睾賱賷賱賴
賵亘丕賯賷 卮禺賵氐 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賲賳 毓賵丕賱賲 賵兀噩賳丕爻 賲禺鬲賱賮丞
賮賴賳丕賰 乇賵丕卅賷 廿賳賰賱賷夭賷 鈥�
賵乇丕賯氐丕賳 廿爻亘丕賳賷丕賳.. 賵賴賰匕丕 鈥�
鬲鬲丿丕禺賱 賵鬲鬲卮丕亘賰 賯氐氐 丕賱卮禺氐賷丕鬲 鈥�
賵賷禺鬲賱胤 賮賷賴丕 丕賱禺賷丕賱 亘丕賱丨賯賷賯丞
賲丕賷丕 賴賷 廿賱賴丞 丕賱乇亘賷毓 毓賳丿 丕賱乇賵賲丕賳 鈥�
賵賮賷 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱賴賳丿賵爻賷丞 鬲毓賳賷: 丕賱賵賴賲
賵丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 鬲爻鬲禺丿賲 乇賲夭賴丕 亘丿乇噩丞 毓丕賱賷丞 賲賳 丕賱噩乇兀丞 賵丕賱禺賷丕賱
賵賱賷爻 毓賱賷 兀賳 兀丨乇賯 丕賱兀丨丿丕孬 鈥�
賵賱賰賳賰 爻鬲毓乇賮 爻乇 丕爻鬲禺丿丕賲 噩丕乇丿乇 賱賱丕爻賲 丕賱賮乇賷丿
----------
鬲丨鬲 賯亘丞 賲丕囟賺 睾丕賲囟 賱丕 兀夭丕賱 兀爻賲毓 氐賵鬲賰
鬲丐賰丿 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賮賷 丕賱賳賴丕賷丞 毓賱賶 囟乇賵乇丞 丕賱丨亘
賵毓賱賶 兀賳賳丕 賱丕 夭賱賳丕 氐睾丕乇 氐睾丕乇鈥�
賳丨賷丕 毓賱賶 賴丕賲卮 丕賱賰賵賳
賵賱賰賳 丕賱亘乇賷賯 丕賱匕賷 鬲卮毓 亘賴 兀爻卅賱鬲賳丕 鈥�
賷爻鬲胤賷毓 丕賱賵氐賵賱 廿賱賶 兀亘毓丿 賲噩乇丞
May 29, 2023
賲賲賱 噩丿丕. 亘毓丿 丕賳賴丕亍 孬賱孬 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賯乇乇鬲 毓丿賲 鬲囟賷賷毓 丕賱賵賯鬲 兀賰孬乇 賲賳 匕賱賰. 賰丕賳 兀噩丿乇 亘賴 兀賳 賷噩毓賱賴 賰鬲丕亘丕 毓賱賲賷丕 亘丿賱丕 賲賳 乇賵丕賷丞 乇賰賷賰丞 丕賱賲爻鬲賵賶 賵 爻禺賷賮丞 賴賰匕丕.
February 22, 2017
兀賵賱丕 賱賲賳 賰丕賳 賲孬賱賷 賵馗賳 兀賳賴 爻賷賯乇兀 乇賵丕賷丞 丕爻賲賴丕 賲丕賷丕 賮賱丕 鬲鬲賮丕噩兀 賱兀賳 賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 廿賳 氐丨 鬲爻賲賷鬲賴丕 乇賵丕賷丞 賴賷 賱丕 鬲賲鬲 賱賱賲賵囟賵毓 亘氐賱丞
賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賷乇賵賷 賯氐丞 丕賱禺賱賯 賵賳卮賵亍 丕賱賰賵賳 賵丕賱賲噩乇丕鬲 賵鬲胤賵乇 丕賱噩賳爻 丕賱亘卮乇賷 賵 丕賱兀乇囟 賵鬲丨賵賱丕鬲賴丕 ...
賲毓 毓賲賱賷丕鬲 賯氐賮 賵賯賳氐 鬲鬲乇賰 兀孬丕乇賴丕 賴賳丕 賵賴賳丕賰 賳丕卮乇丞 兀賮賰丕乇 賳馗乇賷丞 丕賱鬲胤賵乇 丕賱毓賱賲丕賳賷丞 丕賱乇丕賮囟丞 賱兀賮賰丕乇 丕賱兀丿賷丕賳 賲噩鬲賲毓丞 丨賵賱 賲爻兀賱丞 丕賱禺賱賯 賵賵噩賵丿 丕賱禺丕賱賯
賲爻鬲禺丿賲丕 丕賱兀爻賱賵亘 丕賱兀丿亘賷 賵丕賱賺賮賱爻賮丞 ... 賮鬲丕乇丞 丨賵丕乇 亘賷賳 丕賱毓丕賯賱 賵丕賱匕賷 賴賵 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 賵亘賷賳 丕賱毓賵丕賱賲 丕賱兀禺乇賶 丨賷孬 鬲鬲丨賵賱 廿賱賶 賰丕卅賳丕鬲 賳丕胤賯丞
賵鬲丕乇丞 兀禺乇賶 丨賵丕乇 丿丕禺賱 乇兀爻賴 賵丕賱賴丿賮 丕賱賳賴丕卅賷 賱兀賷 丨賵丕乇 亘賷賳 丕孬賳賷賳 兀賵 賮賷 乇兀爻 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 賴賵 丕孬亘丕鬲 賳馗乇賷丞 丕賱鬲胤賵乇丕賱丿丕乇賵賷賳賷丞
丕賱賳噩賲鬲賷賳 賱賱兀爻賱賵亘 丕賱兀丿亘賷 賮賯胤 賲毓 乇賮囟 鬲丕賲 賱賱賲囟賲賵賳
賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賷乇賵賷 賯氐丞 丕賱禺賱賯 賵賳卮賵亍 丕賱賰賵賳 賵丕賱賲噩乇丕鬲 賵鬲胤賵乇 丕賱噩賳爻 丕賱亘卮乇賷 賵 丕賱兀乇囟 賵鬲丨賵賱丕鬲賴丕 ...
賲毓 毓賲賱賷丕鬲 賯氐賮 賵賯賳氐 鬲鬲乇賰 兀孬丕乇賴丕 賴賳丕 賵賴賳丕賰 賳丕卮乇丞 兀賮賰丕乇 賳馗乇賷丞 丕賱鬲胤賵乇 丕賱毓賱賲丕賳賷丞 丕賱乇丕賮囟丞 賱兀賮賰丕乇 丕賱兀丿賷丕賳 賲噩鬲賲毓丞 丨賵賱 賲爻兀賱丞 丕賱禺賱賯 賵賵噩賵丿 丕賱禺丕賱賯
賲爻鬲禺丿賲丕 丕賱兀爻賱賵亘 丕賱兀丿亘賷 賵丕賱賺賮賱爻賮丞 ... 賮鬲丕乇丞 丨賵丕乇 亘賷賳 丕賱毓丕賯賱 賵丕賱匕賷 賴賵 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 賵亘賷賳 丕賱毓賵丕賱賲 丕賱兀禺乇賶 丨賷孬 鬲鬲丨賵賱 廿賱賶 賰丕卅賳丕鬲 賳丕胤賯丞
賵鬲丕乇丞 兀禺乇賶 丨賵丕乇 丿丕禺賱 乇兀爻賴 賵丕賱賴丿賮 丕賱賳賴丕卅賷 賱兀賷 丨賵丕乇 亘賷賳 丕孬賳賷賳 兀賵 賮賷 乇兀爻 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 賴賵 丕孬亘丕鬲 賳馗乇賷丞 丕賱鬲胤賵乇丕賱丿丕乇賵賷賳賷丞
丕賱賳噩賲鬲賷賳 賱賱兀爻賱賵亘 丕賱兀丿亘賷 賮賯胤 賲毓 乇賮囟 鬲丕賲 賱賱賲囟賲賵賳
July 28, 2011
This is the second novel I've read by Gaarder. As an admirer of philosophy, it's not as informative as Sophie's World, but they both manifest Gaarder as a wise writer. This story speaks of love, loss, and meaning. It touches on philosophy and evolution. I like Gaarder's strong non-religious philosophical faith in God which makes an atheist's stance looks ridiculous. As he says, in terms of probability, nothingness would've been far more likely, and I agree. I also like the idea presented in the story of purposeful evolution. It was quite interesting. Castle in the Pyrenees will be my next station with Gaarder. 4 stars for Maya if it didn't have many long tedious details at some points.
June 25, 2015
賲賳 賲丿賵賳鬲賷: 孬賲丕賳賵賳 賰鬲丕亘丕 亘丨孬丕 毓賳 賲禺乇噩
***
鬲賳亘賷賴: 賱丕 賷賵噩丿 丨乇賯 賱賱乇賵丕賷丞 賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱賲乇丕噩毓丞
乇賵丕賷丞 賲丕賷丕 毓亘丕乇丞 毓賳 鬲兀賲賱丕鬲 賮賷 丕賱賲毓噩夭丞 丕賱鬲賷 丕爻賲賴丕 ( 賵噩賵丿賳丕 ) .. 兀賵 賰賲丕 鬲賯賵賱 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 ( 賱賵 鬲毓賱賯 丕賱兀賲乇 亘丕賱丕丨鬲賲丕賱丕鬲, 賱卮丕乇賮 賴匕丕 丕賱賵噩賵丿 毓賱賶 丕賱丕爻鬲丨丕賱丞 ) ..
鬲亘丿兀 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 亘賵氐賵賱 賮乇丕賳賰 兀賳丿乇爻賵賳, 毓丕賱賲 丕賱兀丨賷丕亍 丕賱鬲胤賵乇賷, 賱賱噩夭賷乇丞 丕賱賮賷噩賷丞 鬲丕賮賵賳賷 賱賱丕爻鬲乇禺丕亍 賯丕丿賲丕賸 賲賳 丕爻鬲乇丕賱賷丕 亘毓丿 兀賳 兀賳賴賶 乇丨賱丞 亘丨孬 毓賱賲賷. 賮賷 丕賱兀賷丕賲 丕賱賯賱賷賱丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷賯囟賷賴丕 賮乇丕賳賰 賮賷 鬲丕賮賵賳賷 賷賱鬲賯賷 亘亘毓囟 丕賱兀卮禺丕氐 丕賱賲孬賷乇賷賳 賱賱丕賴鬲賲丕賲 賵鬲丿賵乇 亘賷賳賴 賵亘賷賳賴賲 亘毓囟 丕賱丨賵丕乇丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 賱丕 丕爻鬲胤賷毓 丕賳 兀氐賮 賲丿賶 乇賵毓鬲賴丕
賲丕 賴賵 噩丿賷乇 亘丕賱丕賴鬲賲丕賲 亘禺氐賵氐 賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賴賵 兀賳 賴匕賴 丕賱鬲兀賲賱丕鬲 鬲兀禺匕 胤丕亘毓丕賸 毓賱賲賷丕貨 廿賳賴丕 賲賳 丕賱兀毓賲丕賱 丕賱賳丕丿乇丞 噩丿丕 丕賱鬲賷 鬲毓噩賳 丕賱賯賱賯 丕賱賵噩賵丿賷 賵賳馗乇賷丕鬲 丕賱賳卮賵亍 賵丕賱鬲胤賵乇 亘卮賷亍 賲賳 丕賱鬲兀賲賱丕鬲 丕賱氐賵賮賷賴 賮賷 丕賱賵毓賷 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷 賲毓 賳馗乇賷丞 丕賱丕賳賮噩丕乇 丕賱毓馗賷賲 賱賷賳鬲噩 賱賳丕 賴匕丕 丕賱賯丕賱亘 丕賱乇賵丕卅賷 丕賱亘賴賷
毓乇賮 丕賱噩賲賴賵乇丕賱毓乇亘賷 賷賵爻鬲丕賷賳 睾丕乇丿乇 賲賳 禺賱丕賱 乇賵丕賷丕鬲賴 毓丕賱賲 氐賵賮賷 賵爻乇 丕賱氐亘乇 賵賮鬲丕丞 丕賱亘乇鬲賯丕賱, 兀賲丕 乇賵丕賷丞 賲丕賷丕 賯丿 鬲賰賵賳 賴賷 丕賱兀賯賱 卮賴乇丞 賲賳 亘賷賳賴賲 賵賴匕丕 賱賴 賲亘乇乇賴. 賷賵爻鬲丕賷賳 睾丕乇丿乇 賯亘賱 丕賳 賷賰賵賳 乇賵丕卅賷丕賸 賴賵 兀爻鬲丕匕 賮賱爻賮丞, 賱匕賱賰 丿丕卅賲丕 賲丕 鬲噩丿 賮賷 乇賵丕賷丕鬲賴 賲丨丕賵賱丕鬲 乇丕卅毓丞 賵噩亘丕乇丞 賱鬲亘爻賷胤 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞. 賱賰賳 賮賷 乇賵丕賷丞 賲丕賷丕, 賵毓賱賶 毓賰爻 亘丕賯賷 乇賵丕賷丕鬲賴, 賱賷爻 賴賳丕賰 鬲亘爻賷胤 賱胤乇丨 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 丕賱賮賱爻賮賷, 亘丕賱廿囟丕賯賴 賱匕賱賰 賷噩亘 兀賳 賷賰賵賳 賱丿賶 丕賱賯乇丕亍 禺賱賮賷賴 毓賳 賳馗乇賷丞 丕賱鬲胤賵乇. 丕賱賲丨鬲賵賶 丕賱賮賱爻賮賷 賮賷 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賱賷爻 賲毓賯丿丕賸 賱賰賳賴 賱丕 賷賲乇 亘賲乇丕丨賱 賲鬲毓丿丿丞 賲賳 丕賱鬲亘爻賷胤 賮賷 賲孬賱 乇賵丕賷丞 毓丕賱賲 氐賵賮賷
賱賵 賱賲 賷賰賳 賱丿賷賰 禺賱賮賷丞 毓賳 賳馗乇賷丞 丕賱鬲胤賵乇, 兀賵 賱賲 鬲賰賳 賲賯鬲賳毓丕賸 亘氐丨鬲賴丕, 賮賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賱賳 鬲賯丿賲 賱賰 卮賷卅丕賸 毓賱賶 丕賱廿胤賱丕賯. 兀爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賳 丕鬲噩丕賵夭 賵丕賯賵賱 丕賳 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賴賷 乇賵丕賷丞 毓賳 賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱鬲胤賵乇
丨爻賳丕賸, 賱賲丕匕丕 賰丕賳 鬲賯賷賷賲賷 賱賱乇賵丕賷丞 孬賱丕孬 賳噩賲丕鬲 賮賯胤責
賯亘賱 賰賱 卮賷亍 丿毓賵賳賷 兀丐賰丿 賱賰賲 兀賳 亘毓囟 丕賱噩購賲賱 賵亘毓囟 丕賱丨賵丕乇丕鬲 賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賵氐賱鬲 賱賲乇丨賱丞 (丕賱爻賱胤賳賴) 賱賰賳 賵亘乇睾賲 匕賱賰 賮乇鬲賲 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 亘胤卅, 賵賮賷 亘毓囟 丕賱兀丨賷丕賳 賷賰賵賳 賲賲賱丕賸. 賮賷 亘丿丕賷丞 賰賱 賮氐賱 賰賳鬲 兀毓乇賮 丕賳賷 賱丕 亘丿 兀賳 兀賲乇 亘爻鬲 兀賵 爻亘毓 氐賮丨丕鬲 賲賳 丕賱賵氐賮 丕賱亘丕匕禺 賱賰賱 卮賷亍 賮賷 丕賱毓丕賱賲 賯亘賱 兀賳 賷亘丿兀 丕賱丨賵丕乇 丕賱賲孬賷乇 .. 賵賱賴匕丕 胤丕乇鬲 丕賱賳噩賲丞 丕賱兀賵賱賶
丕賱賳噩賲丞 丕賱孬丕賳賷丞 禺爻乇賴丕 賷賵爻鬲丕賷賳 睾丕乇丿 賱兀賳賴 賷賰乇乇 丕爻鬲禺丿丕賲 賳賮爻 丕賱賵爻丕卅賱 丕賱兀丿亘賷丞 亘卮賰賱 賱丕 賷氐丿賯貨 賲丕 賴匕丕 丕賱賴賵爻 亘丕賱乇爻丕卅賱 賵兀賵乇丕賯 丕賱賱毓亘 (丕賱賰賵鬲卮賷賳賴) 賵亘兀爻賱賵亘 賯氐丞 丿丕禺賱 賯氐丞責責責 ... 亘丿兀鬲 兀卮賰 丕賳賴 賷賳鬲賲賷 賱丿賷丕賳賴 鬲賯丿爻 賴匕賴 丕賱兀卮賷丕亍. 乇睾賲 兀賳賴丕 兀丿賵丕鬲 乇丕卅毓丞 賵禺丿賲鬲 丕賱毓賲賱 廿賱丕 兀賳賳賷 亘氐乇丕丨丞 夭賴賯鬲 賲賳賴丕貨 賴匕丕 乇丕亘毓 毓賲賱 兀賯乇兀賴 賱賷賵爻鬲丕賷賳 睾丕乇丿乇 賵賳賮爻 丕賱兀丿賵丕鬲 鬲鬲賰乇乇
丕賱爻亘亘 丕賱兀禺乇 賱禺爻丕乇丞 丕賱賳噩賲丞 丕賱孬丕賳賷丞 賴賵 兀賳 噩賴丿 睾丕乇丿乇 丕賳氐亘 亘卮賰賱 乇卅賷爻賷 鬲噩丕賴 丕賱丨賵丕乇丕鬲 賱丿乇噩丞 兀賳 丕賱丨亘賰丞 賰丕賳鬲 亘丕賱賳爻亘丞 賱賷, 賵賴匕丕 賲噩乇丿 丕賳胤亘丕毓 卮禺氐賷, 乇賰賷賰丞
毓賱賶 賰賱 丨丕賱, 兀賳丕 賯乇兀鬲 丕賱鬲乇噩賲丞 丕賱毓乇亘賷丞 賱賱乇賵丕賷丞 丕賱氐丕丿乇丞 賲賳 丿丕乇 丕賱賰賱賲丞 亘鬲乇噩賲丞 賷丕爻賷賳 丕賱丨丕噩 氐丕賱丨, 賵賴賷 鬲乇噩賲丞 賲賲鬲丕夭丞, 賵賴匕丕 賰丕賳 卮賷亍 睾賷乇 賲鬲賵賯毓 丕賱亘鬲丞 賲賳 丿丕乇 賳卮乇 賷亘丿賵 兀賳賴丕 賱賲 鬲賰賳 鬲賲賱賰 丨賯賵賯 鬲乇噩賲丞 丕賱毓賲賱. 丕賱賲胤亘 丕賱賵丨賷丿 丕賱匕賷 賵丕噩賴賴 丕賱賲鬲乇噩賲 賴賵 丕賳賴 賰丕賳鬲 賴賳丕賰 亘毓囟 丕賱爻胤賵乇 丕賱卮毓乇賷丞, 賵賴賵 賲賲丕 賰丕賳 賷氐毓亘 鬲乇噩賲鬲賴 賱賰賳 鬲賲鬲 鬲乇噩賲鬲賴丕 亘卮賰賱 賱丕 亘兀爻 亘賴 毓賱賶 賰賱 丨丕賱.
***
鬲賳亘賷賴: 賱丕 賷賵噩丿 丨乇賯 賱賱乇賵丕賷丞 賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱賲乇丕噩毓丞
乇賵丕賷丞 賲丕賷丕 毓亘丕乇丞 毓賳 鬲兀賲賱丕鬲 賮賷 丕賱賲毓噩夭丞 丕賱鬲賷 丕爻賲賴丕 ( 賵噩賵丿賳丕 ) .. 兀賵 賰賲丕 鬲賯賵賱 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 ( 賱賵 鬲毓賱賯 丕賱兀賲乇 亘丕賱丕丨鬲賲丕賱丕鬲, 賱卮丕乇賮 賴匕丕 丕賱賵噩賵丿 毓賱賶 丕賱丕爻鬲丨丕賱丞 ) ..
鬲亘丿兀 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 亘賵氐賵賱 賮乇丕賳賰 兀賳丿乇爻賵賳, 毓丕賱賲 丕賱兀丨賷丕亍 丕賱鬲胤賵乇賷, 賱賱噩夭賷乇丞 丕賱賮賷噩賷丞 鬲丕賮賵賳賷 賱賱丕爻鬲乇禺丕亍 賯丕丿賲丕賸 賲賳 丕爻鬲乇丕賱賷丕 亘毓丿 兀賳 兀賳賴賶 乇丨賱丞 亘丨孬 毓賱賲賷. 賮賷 丕賱兀賷丕賲 丕賱賯賱賷賱丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷賯囟賷賴丕 賮乇丕賳賰 賮賷 鬲丕賮賵賳賷 賷賱鬲賯賷 亘亘毓囟 丕賱兀卮禺丕氐 丕賱賲孬賷乇賷賳 賱賱丕賴鬲賲丕賲 賵鬲丿賵乇 亘賷賳賴 賵亘賷賳賴賲 亘毓囟 丕賱丨賵丕乇丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 賱丕 丕爻鬲胤賷毓 丕賳 兀氐賮 賲丿賶 乇賵毓鬲賴丕
賲丕 賴賵 噩丿賷乇 亘丕賱丕賴鬲賲丕賲 亘禺氐賵氐 賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賴賵 兀賳 賴匕賴 丕賱鬲兀賲賱丕鬲 鬲兀禺匕 胤丕亘毓丕賸 毓賱賲賷丕貨 廿賳賴丕 賲賳 丕賱兀毓賲丕賱 丕賱賳丕丿乇丞 噩丿丕 丕賱鬲賷 鬲毓噩賳 丕賱賯賱賯 丕賱賵噩賵丿賷 賵賳馗乇賷丕鬲 丕賱賳卮賵亍 賵丕賱鬲胤賵乇 亘卮賷亍 賲賳 丕賱鬲兀賲賱丕鬲 丕賱氐賵賮賷賴 賮賷 丕賱賵毓賷 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷 賲毓 賳馗乇賷丞 丕賱丕賳賮噩丕乇 丕賱毓馗賷賲 賱賷賳鬲噩 賱賳丕 賴匕丕 丕賱賯丕賱亘 丕賱乇賵丕卅賷 丕賱亘賴賷
毓乇賮 丕賱噩賲賴賵乇丕賱毓乇亘賷 賷賵爻鬲丕賷賳 睾丕乇丿乇 賲賳 禺賱丕賱 乇賵丕賷丕鬲賴 毓丕賱賲 氐賵賮賷 賵爻乇 丕賱氐亘乇 賵賮鬲丕丞 丕賱亘乇鬲賯丕賱, 兀賲丕 乇賵丕賷丞 賲丕賷丕 賯丿 鬲賰賵賳 賴賷 丕賱兀賯賱 卮賴乇丞 賲賳 亘賷賳賴賲 賵賴匕丕 賱賴 賲亘乇乇賴. 賷賵爻鬲丕賷賳 睾丕乇丿乇 賯亘賱 丕賳 賷賰賵賳 乇賵丕卅賷丕賸 賴賵 兀爻鬲丕匕 賮賱爻賮丞, 賱匕賱賰 丿丕卅賲丕 賲丕 鬲噩丿 賮賷 乇賵丕賷丕鬲賴 賲丨丕賵賱丕鬲 乇丕卅毓丞 賵噩亘丕乇丞 賱鬲亘爻賷胤 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞. 賱賰賳 賮賷 乇賵丕賷丞 賲丕賷丕, 賵毓賱賶 毓賰爻 亘丕賯賷 乇賵丕賷丕鬲賴, 賱賷爻 賴賳丕賰 鬲亘爻賷胤 賱胤乇丨 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 丕賱賮賱爻賮賷, 亘丕賱廿囟丕賯賴 賱匕賱賰 賷噩亘 兀賳 賷賰賵賳 賱丿賶 丕賱賯乇丕亍 禺賱賮賷賴 毓賳 賳馗乇賷丞 丕賱鬲胤賵乇. 丕賱賲丨鬲賵賶 丕賱賮賱爻賮賷 賮賷 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賱賷爻 賲毓賯丿丕賸 賱賰賳賴 賱丕 賷賲乇 亘賲乇丕丨賱 賲鬲毓丿丿丞 賲賳 丕賱鬲亘爻賷胤 賮賷 賲孬賱 乇賵丕賷丞 毓丕賱賲 氐賵賮賷
賱賵 賱賲 賷賰賳 賱丿賷賰 禺賱賮賷丞 毓賳 賳馗乇賷丞 丕賱鬲胤賵乇, 兀賵 賱賲 鬲賰賳 賲賯鬲賳毓丕賸 亘氐丨鬲賴丕, 賮賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賱賳 鬲賯丿賲 賱賰 卮賷卅丕賸 毓賱賶 丕賱廿胤賱丕賯. 兀爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賳 丕鬲噩丕賵夭 賵丕賯賵賱 丕賳 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賴賷 乇賵丕賷丞 毓賳 賮賱爻賮丞 丕賱鬲胤賵乇
丨爻賳丕賸, 賱賲丕匕丕 賰丕賳 鬲賯賷賷賲賷 賱賱乇賵丕賷丞 孬賱丕孬 賳噩賲丕鬲 賮賯胤責
賯亘賱 賰賱 卮賷亍 丿毓賵賳賷 兀丐賰丿 賱賰賲 兀賳 亘毓囟 丕賱噩購賲賱 賵亘毓囟 丕賱丨賵丕乇丕鬲 賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賵氐賱鬲 賱賲乇丨賱丞 (丕賱爻賱胤賳賴) 賱賰賳 賵亘乇睾賲 匕賱賰 賮乇鬲賲 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 亘胤卅, 賵賮賷 亘毓囟 丕賱兀丨賷丕賳 賷賰賵賳 賲賲賱丕賸. 賮賷 亘丿丕賷丞 賰賱 賮氐賱 賰賳鬲 兀毓乇賮 丕賳賷 賱丕 亘丿 兀賳 兀賲乇 亘爻鬲 兀賵 爻亘毓 氐賮丨丕鬲 賲賳 丕賱賵氐賮 丕賱亘丕匕禺 賱賰賱 卮賷亍 賮賷 丕賱毓丕賱賲 賯亘賱 兀賳 賷亘丿兀 丕賱丨賵丕乇 丕賱賲孬賷乇 .. 賵賱賴匕丕 胤丕乇鬲 丕賱賳噩賲丞 丕賱兀賵賱賶
丕賱賳噩賲丞 丕賱孬丕賳賷丞 禺爻乇賴丕 賷賵爻鬲丕賷賳 睾丕乇丿 賱兀賳賴 賷賰乇乇 丕爻鬲禺丿丕賲 賳賮爻 丕賱賵爻丕卅賱 丕賱兀丿亘賷丞 亘卮賰賱 賱丕 賷氐丿賯貨 賲丕 賴匕丕 丕賱賴賵爻 亘丕賱乇爻丕卅賱 賵兀賵乇丕賯 丕賱賱毓亘 (丕賱賰賵鬲卮賷賳賴) 賵亘兀爻賱賵亘 賯氐丞 丿丕禺賱 賯氐丞責責責 ... 亘丿兀鬲 兀卮賰 丕賳賴 賷賳鬲賲賷 賱丿賷丕賳賴 鬲賯丿爻 賴匕賴 丕賱兀卮賷丕亍. 乇睾賲 兀賳賴丕 兀丿賵丕鬲 乇丕卅毓丞 賵禺丿賲鬲 丕賱毓賲賱 廿賱丕 兀賳賳賷 亘氐乇丕丨丞 夭賴賯鬲 賲賳賴丕貨 賴匕丕 乇丕亘毓 毓賲賱 兀賯乇兀賴 賱賷賵爻鬲丕賷賳 睾丕乇丿乇 賵賳賮爻 丕賱兀丿賵丕鬲 鬲鬲賰乇乇
丕賱爻亘亘 丕賱兀禺乇 賱禺爻丕乇丞 丕賱賳噩賲丞 丕賱孬丕賳賷丞 賴賵 兀賳 噩賴丿 睾丕乇丿乇 丕賳氐亘 亘卮賰賱 乇卅賷爻賷 鬲噩丕賴 丕賱丨賵丕乇丕鬲 賱丿乇噩丞 兀賳 丕賱丨亘賰丞 賰丕賳鬲 亘丕賱賳爻亘丞 賱賷, 賵賴匕丕 賲噩乇丿 丕賳胤亘丕毓 卮禺氐賷, 乇賰賷賰丞
毓賱賶 賰賱 丨丕賱, 兀賳丕 賯乇兀鬲 丕賱鬲乇噩賲丞 丕賱毓乇亘賷丞 賱賱乇賵丕賷丞 丕賱氐丕丿乇丞 賲賳 丿丕乇 丕賱賰賱賲丞 亘鬲乇噩賲丞 賷丕爻賷賳 丕賱丨丕噩 氐丕賱丨, 賵賴賷 鬲乇噩賲丞 賲賲鬲丕夭丞, 賵賴匕丕 賰丕賳 卮賷亍 睾賷乇 賲鬲賵賯毓 丕賱亘鬲丞 賲賳 丿丕乇 賳卮乇 賷亘丿賵 兀賳賴丕 賱賲 鬲賰賳 鬲賲賱賰 丨賯賵賯 鬲乇噩賲丞 丕賱毓賲賱. 丕賱賲胤亘 丕賱賵丨賷丿 丕賱匕賷 賵丕噩賴賴 丕賱賲鬲乇噩賲 賴賵 丕賳賴 賰丕賳鬲 賴賳丕賰 亘毓囟 丕賱爻胤賵乇 丕賱卮毓乇賷丞, 賵賴賵 賲賲丕 賰丕賳 賷氐毓亘 鬲乇噩賲鬲賴 賱賰賳 鬲賲鬲 鬲乇噩賲鬲賴丕 亘卮賰賱 賱丕 亘兀爻 亘賴 毓賱賶 賰賱 丨丕賱.
January 31, 2016
唳囙Ο唳监唳膏唳む唳� 唳椸唳班唳∴唳� 唳忇 唳ㄠ唳唳� 唳膏唳ム 唳唳班Ε唳� 唳Π唳苦唳 唳膏唳唳� 唳溹唰� 唳︵唳唰囙イ 唳唳班Ε唳� 唳唳む唳� 唳唳椸唳� 唳Π唰囙Π 唳椸唳侧唳 唳膏唳� 唳唳椸唳оΔ唳� 唳曕唳班唳� 唳侧唳唳侧 唳椸唳涏 唳椸 -_- 唳嗋Ξ唳距Π 唳呧Σ唰嵿Κ 唳曕唳涏 唳∴唳班唳唳� 唳唳むΠ唰� 唳忇唳熰 唳嗋唰� 唰оЕ唳熰 唳︵唳多 唳唳� 唳忇Π 唳唳むΠ唰� 唳ㄠΠ唳撪Ο唳监 唳忇唳熰 啷� 唳ㄠΠ唳撪Ο唳监唳� 唳唳班Δ唳� 唳忇 唳嗋唰嵿Π唳灌唳� 唳曕唳班Θ 唳ㄠΠ唰嵿Ω 唳唳ム唳� 唳唳むΠ唰囙 唳膏唳唳Ζ唰嵿Η 唳涏唳侧イ 唳忇唳� 唳Θ唰� 唳灌唰嵿唰� 唳椸唳班唳∴唳� 唳膏唳灌唳唳� 唳曕唳班Θ唰囙 唳椸唳侧 唳栢唳� 唳忇唳熰 唳栢唳班唳� 唳灌Ο唳� 唳ㄠ 啷� 唰оЕ唳熰 唳︵唳多唳� 唳Δ 唰唳� 唳侧唳栢唰囙Π 唳侧唳膏唳� 唳嗋唰� 唳唳︵唳� 唳膏唳ム 唳嗋Ξ唳� 唳︵唳栢 唳曕Π唳む 唳氞唳� 啷� 唳膏Ξ唳膏唳 唳忇唳熰唳� 唳侧唳膏唳熰唳� 唰Е% 唳侧唳栢 唳唳� 啷� 唳溹唳唳むΖ唰囙Π 唳唳むΠ唰� 唳椸唳班唳∴唳� 唳膏唳灌唳� 唳呧Θ唰嵿Ο唳むΞ啷�
唳膏唳唳� 唳溹唰� 唳呧Ε唳 唳︵唳 唳呧Π唰囙唰嵿 唳椸唳班唳� 唳涏唳� 唳多唳о唳� 唳︵Π唰嵿Χ唳ㄠ唳� 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳唳唳� 唳忇唳� 唳膏唳ム 唳囙Ν唰嬥Σ唳苦唳多唳ㄠ唳班 唳唳唰嬥Σ唳溹 唳嗋Π 唳︵Π唰嵿Χ唳� 啷� 唳忇Π 唳氞唳唰� 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳嗋Π 唳曕 唳灌Δ唰� 唳唳班???
唳忇唳熰 唳膏唳唰囙唰嵿 唳膏Μ 唳膏Ξ唳 唳唳班Χ唰嵿Θ 唳曕Π唰� 唳唳氞唳涏 唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳曕 ? 唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳曕唳ム 唳ム唳曕 唳忇Ω唰囙唳�? 唳嗋Π唰囙唳熰 唳膏唳唰囙唰嵿 唳膏唳� 唳呧Ξ唳苦唳唳膏唳� 唳唳班Χ唰嵿Θ唰囙Π 唳夃Δ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳︵唳唳� 唳氞唳粪唳熰 唳曕Π唳涏 啷� 唳忇 唰ㄠ唳距Π 唳唳椸Σ唳Θ唰嵿Ζ唳� 唳Ζ唳� 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳ㄠ 唳灌Ο唳� 唳む唳灌Σ唰� 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳Σ唰� 唳嗋Ω唳侧 唳曕唳涏唳� 唳ㄠ唳� 啷�
唳忇 唳溹唳唳椸唳 唳忇唳熰 唳ㄠ唳溹唳� 唳氞唳ㄠ唳む 唳о唳班 唳Σ唳� 鈥� 唳唳侧唳膏唳 唳曕唳傕Μ唳� 唳囙Ν唰嬥Σ唳苦唳多Θ 唰ㄠ唳距 唳唳唳ム唳� 唳Δ 唰�+唰� 唳膏Μ 唳膏Ξ唳 唰 唳嗋Ω唳啷� 唳膏Ξ唳膏唳 唳多唳о 唳ㄠ唳唳氞唳� 唳唳班 唳溹唳ㄠ唳膏唳� 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π 唳曕唳涏 唳о唳佮Ο唳监唳熰 唳曕Π唰� 唳班唳栢唳涏 啷� 唳む唳� 唳呧Θ唰囙 唳膏Ξ唳唳� 唰�+唰� 唳氞唳� 唳ㄠ 唳忇Ω唰� 唰� 唳曕唳傕Μ唳� 唰� 唳氞Σ唰� 唳嗋Ω唳涏 啷� 唳灌Ο唳监Δ 唳曕唳� 唳忇唳︵唳� 唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳ㄠ唳唳氞唳班唳� 唳忇 唳灌唳佮Ο唳监唳侧 唳唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳唳侧Δ唰� 唳唳班Μ 啷� 唳む唳� 唳嗋唰� 唳嗋Κ唳距Δ唳� 唳唳唳距Π 唳曕唳涏 唳唳班 唳唳� 啷�
唳唳熰 唳Α唳监唳� 唳嗋唰� 唰ㄠ唳� 唳溹唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳ム唳 唳班唳栢Δ唰� 唳灌Μ唰� 唰� 唳唳熰 唳曕唳� 唳囙Ν唰嬥Σ唳苦唳多唳ㄠ唳班 唳唳唰嬥Σ唳溹唳膏唳� 唳侧唳栢唳� 唳ㄠ 唰�) 唳侧唳栢 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰囙Π 唳曕唳班Θ唰� 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳班 唳唳多唳唳� 唳曕Π唰囙Θ 唳ㄠ 唳Π唳� 唳︵Π唰嵿Χ唳ㄠ唳� 唳曕唳班Θ唰� 唳曕Π唰� 啷� 唳忇 唰ㄠ唳� 唳溹唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳ㄠ 唳ㄠ唳む 唳唳班Σ唰� 唳唳熰 唳Α唳监 唳膏唳� 唳灌Ο唳监 唳唳 啷�
唳唳班Ε唳唳� 唳Σ唳� 唳曕 唳曕 唳唳唳� 唳忇Π 唳唳むΠ唰� 鈥� 唳曕唳涏唳熰 唳唳侧Μ唳距Ω唳� , 唳曕唳涏唳熰 唳嗋Μ唰囙 唳曕唳涏唳熰 唳∴唳班唳囙Θ唰囙Π 唳囙Ν唳侧唳夃Χ唳� 唳忇Μ唳� 唳Π唳距Μ唳班唳� 唳Δ唳� 唳︵Π唰嵿Χ唳� 啷� 唳唳唰囙Π 唳唳班Ε唳� 唳呧Σ唰嵿Κ唳熰唳曕 唳多唳� 唳熰唳曕 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳唳澿唳距Θ唰囙Π 唳曕唳涏唳熰 唳唳多唳粪Δ 唳椸唳曕 唳膏唳灌唳唳� 唳膏唳ム 唳唳唳距Θ唳� 唳唳班唰嵿Δ唳苦唳� 啷むΞ唳距Ο唳监 唳忇 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳忇 唳呧Θ唰佮Ν唰佮Δ唳� 唳忇Θ唰� 唳︵唳啷� 唳呧Θ唰囙唳熰 唳溹唳Θ唰囙Π 唳唰� 唳Ε 唳灌唳佮唰� 唳嗋Ω唳距Π 唳Π 唳灌唳距Δ 唳曕唳� 唳膏唳� 唳膏唳唳む 唳Θ唰� 唳Π唰� 唳唳唳� 唳Π 唳 唳嗋Θ唳ㄠ唳︵唳� 唳灌Ο唳� 唳膏唳� 唳嗋Θ唳ㄠ唳︵唳� 唳呧Θ唰佮Ν唰佮Δ唳苦イ 唳唳熰 唳氞唳栢 唳嗋唳椸唳� 唳︵唳唰� 唳︵唳栢唳唰� 唳︵唳 唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳犩唳� 唳曕Δ唳熰 唳溹唳Θ 唳嗋Π 唳唳む唳唳� 唳唳澿 唳ム唳曕 啷�
唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳嗋Ω唳� 唳唳む唳� 唳忇唳唳班唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳栢唳� 唳曕Ξ唳� 唳夃Κ唳侧Μ唰嵿Η唳� 唳曕Π唳� 唳曕Π 唳唳む唳 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π 唳犩唳� 唳曕Δ唳熰 唳曕唳涏啷むイ 唳忇Δ唳熰唳曕 唳Α唳监 唳曕唳班 唳Θ唰� 唳灌Δ唰� 唳唳班 唳忇唳熰 唳唳澿 唳膏唳唳� 唳溹唳む唳� 唳Δ 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳曕唳� 唳︵Π唰嵿Χ唳ㄠ唳� 唳 啷むΖ唳班唳多Θ唰囙Π 唳 唳犩唳曕 唳嗋唰� 唳むΜ唰� 唳灌唳唳� 唳嗋Ξ唳距Π 唳曕唳涏 唳Θ唰� 唳灌Ο唳监唳涏 唳忇唳熰 唳Δ唳熰 唳ㄠ 唳︵Π唰嵿Χ唳ㄠ唳� 唳Δ唳熰 唳ㄠ 唳囙Ν唰嬥Σ唳苦唳多Θ 唳む唳班唰囙Ο唳监唳� 唳唳多 唳唳侧Μ唳距Ω唳距Π 唳 ,唳忇唳栢唳ㄠ 唳忇唳︵唳曕 唳唳Θ 唳唳班唳唳む唳� 唳嗋Θ唳ㄠ唳� 唳嗋唰� 唳む唳Θ唳� 唳灌唳班唳ㄠ唳� 唳む唳唳� 唳曕Ψ唰嵿 唳� 唳嗋唰囙イ 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳唳熰 唳 唳︵Π唰嵿Χ唳� / 唳囙Ν唰嬥Σ唳苦唳多Θ 唳涏唳唳唰� 唳唳侧Μ唳距Ω唳� 唳熰唳囙Κ 唳灌Ο唳监 唳唳 唳膏唳熰 唳忇唰囙Μ唳距Π唰� 唳多唳� 唳︵唳曕 唳ㄠ 唳椸唳侧 唳唳澿Δ唰� 唳唳班唳� 唳曕唳� 唳曕唳班Θ 唳ㄠ唳� 啷� 唳唳熰唳� 唳多唳班唳熰 唳曕唳涏唳熰 唳о唳� 唳椸Δ唳苦Π(唳呧Θ唰囙唰囙Π 唳曕唳涏 唳忇唳熰 唳Ο唳监唳 唳о唳� 唳椸Δ唳苦Π 唳� 唳侧唳椸Δ唰� 唳唳班) 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳忇唳唳� 唳 唳唳唰� 唳⑧唳曕Δ唰� 唳唳班Μ唰� 唳忇Μ唳� 唳忇唳唳� 唳 唳唳熰唳� 唳多唳� 唳� 唳唳む 唳唳班Μ唰� 唳膏唳� 唳唳澿Μ唰� 唳忇 唳 唳嗋Ω唳侧 唳曕 唳溹唳ㄠ唳�!!!! 唳嗋Π唰囙唳熰 唳溹唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳班 唳囙Ν唰嬥Σ唳苦唳多Θ唰囙Π 唳Α唳监唳多唳ㄠ唳� 唳忇唰囙Μ唳距Π唰� 唳多唳班唳む 唳嗋唰囙Θ 唳む唳︵唳班唰� 唳忇 唳 唳呧Θ唰囙 唳椸唳侧 唳唳班Χ唰嵿Θ 唳曕Π唳距Π 唳膏唳唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳︵唳 啷�
唳唳熰唳曕 唳唳熰唳唳熰 唰ㄠ唳� 唳呧唳多 唳唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳唳侧 唳唳 唳唳班Ε唳� 唳呧唳多 唳嗋唰� 唳Π唳苦Μ唰囙Χ 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π 唳膏唰囙Δ唳ㄠΔ唳� 唳嗋Π 唳囙Ν唳侧唳夃Χ唳ㄠ唳� 唳Δ 唳溹唳苦Σ 唳唳粪Ο唳�- 鈥溹唳Π唳� 唳膏唳� 唳ㄠ唳栢唳佮Δ 唳多唳侧唳唳班唳� 唳唳� 唳膏唳粪唳熰唳� 唳唳涏Θ唰� 唳唳侧唳唳� 唳唳侧唳唳� 唳唳� 唳栢Π唳� 唳灌Ο唳监唳涏鈥� 啷� 唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳 唳嗋 唳忇唳栢唳ㄠ 唳嗋唳� 唳む唳� 唳唳涏Θ唰� 唳嗋唰� 唳唳侧唳唳� 唳唳班唳� 唳膏唳椸唳班唳� 啷� 唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳Ζ唳� 唳曕唳� 唳唳 唳曕Ο唳监唳� 唳侧唰嵿Ψ 唳唳� 唳唳涏Θ唰� 唳氞Σ唰� 唳唳む唳� 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π 唳曕唳涏 唳溹Σ唰囙Π 唳曕唳� 唳唳班唳ㄠ唳� 唳∴唳傕唳距Ο唳� 唳唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳ㄠ唳唳� 唳唳班唳ㄠΘ唰嵿Δ唳曕Π 唳唳班唰囙Ψ唰嵿唳� 唳忇 唳曕Ε唳距Ο唳� 唳唳侧Δ唰� 唳班唳唳� 唳侧唳椸Δ 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳膏唳� 唳氞唳粪唳熰唳熰唳� 唳嗋唳曕 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π唳曕 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π 唳溹唳唳椸 唳Ω唳苦Ο唳监 唳班唳栢唳涏 啷� 唳囙Ν唰嬥Σ唳苦唳多Θ唰囙Π 唳Δ 唳唳むΠ唰嵿唳苦Δ 唳唳粪Ο唳� 唳唳� 唳︵唳唰� 唳Ζ唳� 唳嗋Π唰囙唳熰 唳唳涏Θ唰� 唳氞Σ唰� 唳唳� 唳む唳� 唳唳� 唳唳唳� 唳忇Π 唳む唳唳� 唳嗋Δ唳膏Μ唳距唳苦Π 唳Δ 唳唳熰唳唳熰唳� 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π 唳曕唳涏 唳呧Π唰嵿Ε唳灌唳� 唳侧唳椸Δ 啷� 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳膏唳� 唳呧Π唰嵿Ε唳灌唳� 唳曕Π唰嵿Ξ 唳唰嵿 唳曕 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳唳唳� 唳ㄠ 唳忇唳熰 唳ㄠ唳冟Ω唳權唳� 唳椸唳班 唳嗋Π 唳侧唰嵿Ψ唳距Η唳苦 唳唳班唳ㄠ唳� 唳膏唳氞Θ唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳︵唳唰囙唰� 啷�
唳囙Ο唳监唳膏唳む唳ㄠ唳� 唳侧唳栢唳� 唳оΠ唳� 唳呧Θ唰囙唳熰 唳唳班Χ唰嵿Θ唰囙Π 唳Π 唳唳班Χ唰嵿Θ 唳曕Π唰� 唳唳撪Ο唳监 唳嗋Π 唳膏唳� 唳夃Δ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳む唳� 唳曕唳� 唳氞Π唳苦Δ唰嵿Π唰� 唳唳むΠ 唳︵唳唰� 唳唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳嗋Θ唳距イ 唳む唳Θ唳� 唳嗋Π唰囙唳熰 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳唳班Χ唰嵿Θ 唳� 唳嗋唰� 鈥溹Ο唳︵ 唳曕唳� 唳膏唳班Ψ唰嵿唳� 唳ム唳曕 唳ム唳曕唳� 唳む唳灌Σ唰� 唳む唳ㄠ 唳曕 ? 唳嗋Π 唳Ζ唳� 唳む唳ㄠ 唳ㄠ唳� 唳ム唳曕唳� 唳む唳灌Σ唰� 唳忇 唳溹唳む唳� 唳曕鈥� ?
唳嗋Ξ唳� 唳膏唳班Ψ唰嵿唳距唰� 唳︵唳栢 唳む唳栢唳∴ 唳忇 唳∴唳溹唳囙Θ唳距Π 唳灌唳膏唳 唳 唳曕唳ㄠ 唳唳班Δ唳苦唳� 唳溹唳ㄠ唳� 唳忇Ξ唳� 唳唳 唳曕Π唰囙唰囙Θ 唳唳熰 唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳膏唳溹 唳唳澿Δ唰� 唳ㄠ 唳唳班 啷� 唳唳熰唳曕 唳唳澿Δ唰� 唳唳ㄠ唳粪唰� 唳む唳︵唳� 唳膏Π唰嵿Μ唰嬥唰嵿 唳膏唳唳 唳唳む 唳灌Μ唰�
啷�
唰ㄠΟ唳� 唳呧唳多 唳嗋唰� 唳唳侧Μ唳距Ω唳距Π 唳椸Σ唰嵿Κ 啷� 唳︵Π唰嵿Χ唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳曕 唳唳膏唳熰唳班 唳曕唳ㄠΜ唳� 唳ム唳班唳侧唳班唳� 唳︵唳曕 唳熰唳ㄠ 唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳唳撪Ο唳监唳� 唳膏Λ唳侧Δ唳距唳距 唳忇 唳呧唳多唳� 唳唳唳ㄠイ
唳唳� 唳ㄠ 唳侧唳椸唳� 唳︵唳� 鈥� 唳嗋Ξ唳� 唳囙Ν唰嬥Σ唳苦唳多唳ㄠ唳班 唳唳唰嬥Σ唳溹唳膏唳� 唳ㄠ , 唳囙Ν唰嬥Σ唳苦唳多Θ唰囙Π 唳溹唳苦Σ唳む唳� 唳嗋Ξ唳距Π 唳唳ム唳 唳⑧唳曕 唳ㄠ 唳忇 唳曕唳班Θ唰囙 唳唳膏唳熰唳� 唳椸Π唳∴Θ 唳曕 唳唳� 唳唳� 唳Σ唳距唳� 唳嗋Ξ唳距Π 唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳灌Ο唳� 唳ㄠ 啷� 唳嗋Ξ唳距Π 唳唳膏唳熰唳� 唳椸Π唳∴Θ唰囙Π 唳膏唳ム 唳唳む唳� 唳Π 唳唳む 唳 唳 唳曕Π唳距唳距 唳栢唳� 唳忇唳熰 唳唳� 唳侧唳椸 唳ㄠ 啷� 唳嗋Μ唳距Π 唳唳班 唳膏唳唳� 唳溹唳� 唳唳班Ε唳 唳Π唰囙唰� 唳む唳︵唳� 唳曕唳涏 唳栢唳� 唳忇唳熰 唳溹唳む唳� 唳ㄠ唳� 唳侧唳椸Δ唰� 唳唳班 啷� 唳曕唳班Θ 唳膏唳唳� 唳溹唳� 唳涏唳� 唳曕唳� 唳侧唳栢唰囙Π 唳忇 唳溹Θ唳唳� 唳膏唳оΘ唳距Π 唳唳粪Ο唳� 唳唳熰 唳膏Μ 唳膏Ξ唳 唳唳撪Ο唳监 唳唳 唳ㄠ 啷�
唳嗋Π唰囙唳熰 唳︵唳� 唳栢唳� 唳膏Ξ唰嵿Ν唳Δ 唳む唳� 唳班唳膏唳� 唳唳熰 唳Α唳监唳� 唳忇 唳唳熰 唳оΠ唳� 唳夃唳苦Δ 啷むΘ唳唳� 唳溹唳曕唳� 唳忇Π 唳曕唳灌唳ㄠ 唳忇唳栢唳ㄠ 唳曕 唳曕唳傕Μ唳� 唳唳唳曕唳熰唳� 唳曕 唳оΠ唳� 唳Θ唰� 唳灌Ο唳� 唳曕唳苦Θ 唳灌Ο唳监 唳唳啷�
唳呧Θ唰佮Μ唳距Ζ 唳唳班Ω唳傕唰� 唳Ζ唳� 唳Σ唳む 唳灌Ο唳� 唳む唳灌Σ唰� 唳Σ唳む 唳灌Μ唰� 唳呧Θ唰囙唳︵唳� 唳呧Θ唰佮Μ唳距Ζ 唳ㄠ 唳Α唳监唳� 唳呧Ν唰嵿Ο唳距Ω唰囙Π 唳曕唳班Θ唰� 唳栢唳� 唳忇唳熰 唳唳� 唳侧唳椸 唳ㄠ啷� 唳嗋Μ唳距Π 唳膏唳唳� 唳溹唳む唳� 唳 唳班唳� 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳呧Θ唰佮Μ唳距Ζ 唳灌Ο唳监唳涏唳� 唳む唳� 唳涏唳熰唳唳佮唳� 唳� 唳ㄠ唳囙イ 唳Ζ唳苦 唳嗋Μ唰嵿Μ唰佮Π 唳Δ唰� 唳呧Θ唰佮Μ唳距Ζ 唳犩唳曕 唳嗋唰囙イ
唳む唳班Κ唳� 唳� 唳嗋Ξ唳� 唳忇 唳 唳膏Μ唳距唳曕 唳Α唳监Δ唰� 唳Σ唳� 唳曕唳班Θ 唳侧唳栢 唳灌唳膏唳 唳囙Ο唳监唳膏唳む唳ㄠ唰� 唳溹唳ㄠ唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳忇唳熰唳� 唳忇 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳 啷�
唳嗋Π 唳唳班 唳 唳溹唳∴唰� 唳嗋唰� 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳曕唳涏 唳夃唰嵿Δ唳� 唳多唳о 唳夃唰嵿Δ唳� 唳椸唳侧唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳灌Σ唰囙 唳忇 唳 唳Α唳监 唳唳啷� 唳多唳� 唳曕Π唳� 唳唳班唳 唳曕唳涏 唳夃唰嵿Δ唳� 唳︵唳唰� -
唰� 唳侧唳膏唳�, 唳侧Ω唰嵿 唳栢唳溹唳� 唳唳多唳唳多 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π 唳膏Μ唳距Π 唳唳澿 唳唳膏唳� 唳灌Μ唳距Π 唳忇 唳呧Ω唰佮Ω唰嵿Ε 唳嗋唳距唳栢 唳曕唳� 唳曕Π唰囙イ
唰� 唳溹唳む唰� 唳樴唳班 唳嗋唰� 唳忇唳熰 唳嗋唳距唳栢啷� 唳Ω唰嵿Δ唰� 唳Δ 唳Α唳� 唳忇Μ唳� 唳多唰嵿Δ唳苦Χ唳距Σ唰€ 唳む唳� 唳唳曕唳む唳� 唳呧Ν唳距Μ 唳むΔ 唳む唳曕唳粪唳｀Η唳距Π啷�
唰� 唳椸唳熰 唳唳距Μ唳苦Χ唰嵿Μ 唳� 唳唳ㄠ唳粪 唳忇唳唳む唳� 唳唳班唳ㄠ 唳唳� 唳膏Π唰嵿Μ唳溹Θ唰€唳� 唳氞唳むΘ唳� 唳嗋唰囙イ唳膏唳むΠ唳距 唳忇 唳椸唳班唰囙Π 唳唳膏Ο唰嬥唰嵿Ο 唳Π唳苦Μ唰囙Χ 唳班唰嵿Ψ唳� 唳曕Π唳� 唳膏唳班唳� 唳唳多唳唳� 唳︵唳唳苦Δ唰嵿Μ 唳ㄠΟ唳� 唳忇唳� 唳唳距唳距唳む唳� 唳︵唳唳苦Δ唰嵿Μ啷�
唰� 唳忇唳熰 唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳膏唳粪唳熰 唳む 唳侧唳椸 唳唳 唳曕Ο唳监唳� 唳唳侧唳唳� 唳唳班イ 唳嗋Π 唳唳班 唳唳む 唳膏Ξ唳 唳侧唳椸 唳唳む唳� 唳曕Ο唳监唳� 唳膏唳曕唳ㄠ唳∴イ
唳膏唳唳� 唳溹唰� 唳呧Ε唳 唳︵唳 唳呧Π唰囙唰嵿 唳椸唳班唳� 唳涏唳� 唳多唳о唳� 唳︵Π唰嵿Χ唳ㄠ唳� 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳唳唳� 唳忇唳� 唳膏唳ム 唳囙Ν唰嬥Σ唳苦唳多唳ㄠ唳班 唳唳唰嬥Σ唳溹 唳嗋Π 唳︵Π唰嵿Χ唳� 啷� 唳忇Π 唳氞唳唰� 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳嗋Π 唳曕 唳灌Δ唰� 唳唳班???
唳忇唳熰 唳膏唳唰囙唰嵿 唳膏Μ 唳膏Ξ唳 唳唳班Χ唰嵿Θ 唳曕Π唰� 唳唳氞唳涏 唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳曕 ? 唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳曕唳ム 唳ム唳曕 唳忇Ω唰囙唳�? 唳嗋Π唰囙唳熰 唳膏唳唰囙唰嵿 唳膏唳� 唳呧Ξ唳苦唳唳膏唳� 唳唳班Χ唰嵿Θ唰囙Π 唳夃Δ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳︵唳唳� 唳氞唳粪唳熰 唳曕Π唳涏 啷� 唳忇 唰ㄠ唳距Π 唳唳椸Σ唳Θ唰嵿Ζ唳� 唳Ζ唳� 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳ㄠ 唳灌Ο唳� 唳む唳灌Σ唰� 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳Σ唰� 唳嗋Ω唳侧 唳曕唳涏唳� 唳ㄠ唳� 啷�
唳忇 唳溹唳唳椸唳 唳忇唳熰 唳ㄠ唳溹唳� 唳氞唳ㄠ唳む 唳о唳班 唳Σ唳� 鈥� 唳唳侧唳膏唳 唳曕唳傕Μ唳� 唳囙Ν唰嬥Σ唳苦唳多Θ 唰ㄠ唳距 唳唳唳ム唳� 唳Δ 唰�+唰� 唳膏Μ 唳膏Ξ唳 唰 唳嗋Ω唳啷� 唳膏Ξ唳膏唳 唳多唳о 唳ㄠ唳唳氞唳� 唳唳班 唳溹唳ㄠ唳膏唳� 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π 唳曕唳涏 唳о唳佮Ο唳监唳熰 唳曕Π唰� 唳班唳栢唳涏 啷� 唳む唳� 唳呧Θ唰囙 唳膏Ξ唳唳� 唰�+唰� 唳氞唳� 唳ㄠ 唳忇Ω唰� 唰� 唳曕唳傕Μ唳� 唰� 唳氞Σ唰� 唳嗋Ω唳涏 啷� 唳灌Ο唳监Δ 唳曕唳� 唳忇唳︵唳� 唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳ㄠ唳唳氞唳班唳� 唳忇 唳灌唳佮Ο唳监唳侧 唳唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳唳侧Δ唰� 唳唳班Μ 啷� 唳む唳� 唳嗋唰� 唳嗋Κ唳距Δ唳� 唳唳唳距Π 唳曕唳涏 唳唳班 唳唳� 啷�
唳唳熰 唳Α唳监唳� 唳嗋唰� 唰ㄠ唳� 唳溹唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳ム唳 唳班唳栢Δ唰� 唳灌Μ唰� 唰� 唳唳熰 唳曕唳� 唳囙Ν唰嬥Σ唳苦唳多唳ㄠ唳班 唳唳唰嬥Σ唳溹唳膏唳� 唳侧唳栢唳� 唳ㄠ 唰�) 唳侧唳栢 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰囙Π 唳曕唳班Θ唰� 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳班 唳唳多唳唳� 唳曕Π唰囙Θ 唳ㄠ 唳Π唳� 唳︵Π唰嵿Χ唳ㄠ唳� 唳曕唳班Θ唰� 唳曕Π唰� 啷� 唳忇 唰ㄠ唳� 唳溹唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳ㄠ 唳ㄠ唳む 唳唳班Σ唰� 唳唳熰 唳Α唳监 唳膏唳� 唳灌Ο唳监 唳唳 啷�
唳唳班Ε唳唳� 唳Σ唳� 唳曕 唳曕 唳唳唳� 唳忇Π 唳唳むΠ唰� 鈥� 唳曕唳涏唳熰 唳唳侧Μ唳距Ω唳� , 唳曕唳涏唳熰 唳嗋Μ唰囙 唳曕唳涏唳熰 唳∴唳班唳囙Θ唰囙Π 唳囙Ν唳侧唳夃Χ唳� 唳忇Μ唳� 唳Π唳距Μ唳班唳� 唳Δ唳� 唳︵Π唰嵿Χ唳� 啷� 唳唳唰囙Π 唳唳班Ε唳� 唳呧Σ唰嵿Κ唳熰唳曕 唳多唳� 唳熰唳曕 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳唳澿唳距Θ唰囙Π 唳曕唳涏唳熰 唳唳多唳粪Δ 唳椸唳曕 唳膏唳灌唳唳� 唳膏唳ム 唳唳唳距Θ唳� 唳唳班唰嵿Δ唳苦唳� 啷むΞ唳距Ο唳监 唳忇 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳忇 唳呧Θ唰佮Ν唰佮Δ唳� 唳忇Θ唰� 唳︵唳啷� 唳呧Θ唰囙唳熰 唳溹唳Θ唰囙Π 唳唰� 唳Ε 唳灌唳佮唰� 唳嗋Ω唳距Π 唳Π 唳灌唳距Δ 唳曕唳� 唳膏唳� 唳膏唳唳む 唳Θ唰� 唳Π唰� 唳唳唳� 唳Π 唳 唳嗋Θ唳ㄠ唳︵唳� 唳灌Ο唳� 唳膏唳� 唳嗋Θ唳ㄠ唳︵唳� 唳呧Θ唰佮Ν唰佮Δ唳苦イ 唳唳熰 唳氞唳栢 唳嗋唳椸唳� 唳︵唳唰� 唳︵唳栢唳唰� 唳︵唳 唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳犩唳� 唳曕Δ唳熰 唳溹唳Θ 唳嗋Π 唳唳む唳唳� 唳唳澿 唳ム唳曕 啷�
唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳嗋Ω唳� 唳唳む唳� 唳忇唳唳班唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳栢唳� 唳曕Ξ唳� 唳夃Κ唳侧Μ唰嵿Η唳� 唳曕Π唳� 唳曕Π 唳唳む唳 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π 唳犩唳� 唳曕Δ唳熰 唳曕唳涏啷むイ 唳忇Δ唳熰唳曕 唳Α唳监 唳曕唳班 唳Θ唰� 唳灌Δ唰� 唳唳班 唳忇唳熰 唳唳澿 唳膏唳唳� 唳溹唳む唳� 唳Δ 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳曕唳� 唳︵Π唰嵿Χ唳ㄠ唳� 唳 啷むΖ唳班唳多Θ唰囙Π 唳 唳犩唳曕 唳嗋唰� 唳むΜ唰� 唳灌唳唳� 唳嗋Ξ唳距Π 唳曕唳涏 唳Θ唰� 唳灌Ο唳监唳涏 唳忇唳熰 唳Δ唳熰 唳ㄠ 唳︵Π唰嵿Χ唳ㄠ唳� 唳Δ唳熰 唳ㄠ 唳囙Ν唰嬥Σ唳苦唳多Θ 唳む唳班唰囙Ο唳监唳� 唳唳多 唳唳侧Μ唳距Ω唳距Π 唳 ,唳忇唳栢唳ㄠ 唳忇唳︵唳曕 唳唳Θ 唳唳班唳唳む唳� 唳嗋Θ唳ㄠ唳� 唳嗋唰� 唳む唳Θ唳� 唳灌唳班唳ㄠ唳� 唳む唳唳� 唳曕Ψ唰嵿 唳� 唳嗋唰囙イ 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳唳熰 唳 唳︵Π唰嵿Χ唳� / 唳囙Ν唰嬥Σ唳苦唳多Θ 唳涏唳唳唰� 唳唳侧Μ唳距Ω唳� 唳熰唳囙Κ 唳灌Ο唳监 唳唳 唳膏唳熰 唳忇唰囙Μ唳距Π唰� 唳多唳� 唳︵唳曕 唳ㄠ 唳椸唳侧 唳唳澿Δ唰� 唳唳班唳� 唳曕唳� 唳曕唳班Θ 唳ㄠ唳� 啷� 唳唳熰唳� 唳多唳班唳熰 唳曕唳涏唳熰 唳о唳� 唳椸Δ唳苦Π(唳呧Θ唰囙唰囙Π 唳曕唳涏 唳忇唳熰 唳Ο唳监唳 唳о唳� 唳椸Δ唳苦Π 唳� 唳侧唳椸Δ唰� 唳唳班) 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳忇唳唳� 唳 唳唳唰� 唳⑧唳曕Δ唰� 唳唳班Μ唰� 唳忇Μ唳� 唳忇唳唳� 唳 唳唳熰唳� 唳多唳� 唳� 唳唳む 唳唳班Μ唰� 唳膏唳� 唳唳澿Μ唰� 唳忇 唳 唳嗋Ω唳侧 唳曕 唳溹唳ㄠ唳�!!!! 唳嗋Π唰囙唳熰 唳溹唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳班 唳囙Ν唰嬥Σ唳苦唳多Θ唰囙Π 唳Α唳监唳多唳ㄠ唳� 唳忇唰囙Μ唳距Π唰� 唳多唳班唳む 唳嗋唰囙Θ 唳む唳︵唳班唰� 唳忇 唳 唳呧Θ唰囙 唳椸唳侧 唳唳班Χ唰嵿Θ 唳曕Π唳距Π 唳膏唳唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳︵唳 啷�
唳唳熰唳曕 唳唳熰唳唳熰 唰ㄠ唳� 唳呧唳多 唳唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳唳侧 唳唳 唳唳班Ε唳� 唳呧唳多 唳嗋唰� 唳Π唳苦Μ唰囙Χ 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π 唳膏唰囙Δ唳ㄠΔ唳� 唳嗋Π 唳囙Ν唳侧唳夃Χ唳ㄠ唳� 唳Δ 唳溹唳苦Σ 唳唳粪Ο唳�- 鈥溹唳Π唳� 唳膏唳� 唳ㄠ唳栢唳佮Δ 唳多唳侧唳唳班唳� 唳唳� 唳膏唳粪唳熰唳� 唳唳涏Θ唰� 唳唳侧唳唳� 唳唳侧唳唳� 唳唳� 唳栢Π唳� 唳灌Ο唳监唳涏鈥� 啷� 唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳 唳嗋 唳忇唳栢唳ㄠ 唳嗋唳� 唳む唳� 唳唳涏Θ唰� 唳嗋唰� 唳唳侧唳唳� 唳唳班唳� 唳膏唳椸唳班唳� 啷� 唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳Ζ唳� 唳曕唳� 唳唳 唳曕Ο唳监唳� 唳侧唰嵿Ψ 唳唳� 唳唳涏Θ唰� 唳氞Σ唰� 唳唳む唳� 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π 唳曕唳涏 唳溹Σ唰囙Π 唳曕唳� 唳唳班唳ㄠ唳� 唳∴唳傕唳距Ο唳� 唳唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳ㄠ唳唳� 唳唳班唳ㄠΘ唰嵿Δ唳曕Π 唳唳班唰囙Ψ唰嵿唳� 唳忇 唳曕Ε唳距Ο唳� 唳唳侧Δ唰� 唳班唳唳� 唳侧唳椸Δ 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳膏唳� 唳氞唳粪唳熰唳熰唳� 唳嗋唳曕 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π唳曕 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π 唳溹唳唳椸 唳Ω唳苦Ο唳监 唳班唳栢唳涏 啷� 唳囙Ν唰嬥Σ唳苦唳多Θ唰囙Π 唳Δ 唳唳むΠ唰嵿唳苦Δ 唳唳粪Ο唳� 唳唳� 唳︵唳唰� 唳Ζ唳� 唳嗋Π唰囙唳熰 唳唳涏Θ唰� 唳氞Σ唰� 唳唳� 唳む唳� 唳唳� 唳唳唳� 唳忇Π 唳む唳唳� 唳嗋Δ唳膏Μ唳距唳苦Π 唳Δ 唳唳熰唳唳熰唳� 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π 唳曕唳涏 唳呧Π唰嵿Ε唳灌唳� 唳侧唳椸Δ 啷� 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳膏唳� 唳呧Π唰嵿Ε唳灌唳� 唳曕Π唰嵿Ξ 唳唰嵿 唳曕 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳唳唳� 唳ㄠ 唳忇唳熰 唳ㄠ唳冟Ω唳權唳� 唳椸唳班 唳嗋Π 唳侧唰嵿Ψ唳距Η唳苦 唳唳班唳ㄠ唳� 唳膏唳氞Θ唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳︵唳唰囙唰� 啷�
唳囙Ο唳监唳膏唳む唳ㄠ唳� 唳侧唳栢唳� 唳оΠ唳� 唳呧Θ唰囙唳熰 唳唳班Χ唰嵿Θ唰囙Π 唳Π 唳唳班Χ唰嵿Θ 唳曕Π唰� 唳唳撪Ο唳监 唳嗋Π 唳膏唳� 唳夃Δ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳む唳� 唳曕唳� 唳氞Π唳苦Δ唰嵿Π唰� 唳唳むΠ 唳︵唳唰� 唳唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳嗋Θ唳距イ 唳む唳Θ唳� 唳嗋Π唰囙唳熰 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳唳班Χ唰嵿Θ 唳� 唳嗋唰� 鈥溹Ο唳︵ 唳曕唳� 唳膏唳班Ψ唰嵿唳� 唳ム唳曕 唳ム唳曕唳� 唳む唳灌Σ唰� 唳む唳ㄠ 唳曕 ? 唳嗋Π 唳Ζ唳� 唳む唳ㄠ 唳ㄠ唳� 唳ム唳曕唳� 唳む唳灌Σ唰� 唳忇 唳溹唳む唳� 唳曕鈥� ?
唳嗋Ξ唳� 唳膏唳班Ψ唰嵿唳距唰� 唳︵唳栢 唳む唳栢唳∴ 唳忇 唳∴唳溹唳囙Θ唳距Π 唳灌唳膏唳 唳 唳曕唳ㄠ 唳唳班Δ唳苦唳� 唳溹唳ㄠ唳� 唳忇Ξ唳� 唳唳 唳曕Π唰囙唰囙Θ 唳唳熰 唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳膏唳溹 唳唳澿Δ唰� 唳ㄠ 唳唳班 啷� 唳唳熰唳曕 唳唳澿Δ唰� 唳唳ㄠ唳粪唰� 唳む唳︵唳� 唳膏Π唰嵿Μ唰嬥唰嵿 唳膏唳唳 唳唳む 唳灌Μ唰�
啷�
唰ㄠΟ唳� 唳呧唳多 唳嗋唰� 唳唳侧Μ唳距Ω唳距Π 唳椸Σ唰嵿Κ 啷� 唳︵Π唰嵿Χ唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳曕 唳唳膏唳熰唳班 唳曕唳ㄠΜ唳� 唳ム唳班唳侧唳班唳� 唳︵唳曕 唳熰唳ㄠ 唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳唳撪Ο唳监唳� 唳膏Λ唳侧Δ唳距唳距 唳忇 唳呧唳多唳� 唳唳唳ㄠイ
唳唳� 唳ㄠ 唳侧唳椸唳� 唳︵唳� 鈥� 唳嗋Ξ唳� 唳囙Ν唰嬥Σ唳苦唳多唳ㄠ唳班 唳唳唰嬥Σ唳溹唳膏唳� 唳ㄠ , 唳囙Ν唰嬥Σ唳苦唳多Θ唰囙Π 唳溹唳苦Σ唳む唳� 唳嗋Ξ唳距Π 唳唳ム唳 唳⑧唳曕 唳ㄠ 唳忇 唳曕唳班Θ唰囙 唳唳膏唳熰唳� 唳椸Π唳∴Θ 唳曕 唳唳� 唳唳� 唳Σ唳距唳� 唳嗋Ξ唳距Π 唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳灌Ο唳� 唳ㄠ 啷� 唳嗋Ξ唳距Π 唳唳膏唳熰唳� 唳椸Π唳∴Θ唰囙Π 唳膏唳ム 唳唳む唳� 唳Π 唳唳む 唳 唳 唳曕Π唳距唳距 唳栢唳� 唳忇唳熰 唳唳� 唳侧唳椸 唳ㄠ 啷� 唳嗋Μ唳距Π 唳唳班 唳膏唳唳� 唳溹唳� 唳唳班Ε唳 唳Π唰囙唰� 唳む唳︵唳� 唳曕唳涏 唳栢唳� 唳忇唳熰 唳溹唳む唳� 唳ㄠ唳� 唳侧唳椸Δ唰� 唳唳班 啷� 唳曕唳班Θ 唳膏唳唳� 唳溹唳� 唳涏唳� 唳曕唳� 唳侧唳栢唰囙Π 唳忇 唳溹Θ唳唳� 唳膏唳оΘ唳距Π 唳唳粪Ο唳� 唳唳熰 唳膏Μ 唳膏Ξ唳 唳唳撪Ο唳监 唳唳 唳ㄠ 啷�
唳嗋Π唰囙唳熰 唳︵唳� 唳栢唳� 唳膏Ξ唰嵿Ν唳Δ 唳む唳� 唳班唳膏唳� 唳唳熰 唳Α唳监唳� 唳忇 唳唳熰 唳оΠ唳� 唳夃唳苦Δ 啷むΘ唳唳� 唳溹唳曕唳� 唳忇Π 唳曕唳灌唳ㄠ 唳忇唳栢唳ㄠ 唳曕 唳曕唳傕Μ唳� 唳唳唳曕唳熰唳� 唳曕 唳оΠ唳� 唳Θ唰� 唳灌Ο唳� 唳曕唳苦Θ 唳灌Ο唳监 唳唳啷�
唳呧Θ唰佮Μ唳距Ζ 唳唳班Ω唳傕唰� 唳Ζ唳� 唳Σ唳む 唳灌Ο唳� 唳む唳灌Σ唰� 唳Σ唳む 唳灌Μ唰� 唳呧Θ唰囙唳︵唳� 唳呧Θ唰佮Μ唳距Ζ 唳ㄠ 唳Α唳监唳� 唳呧Ν唰嵿Ο唳距Ω唰囙Π 唳曕唳班Θ唰� 唳栢唳� 唳忇唳熰 唳唳� 唳侧唳椸 唳ㄠ啷� 唳嗋Μ唳距Π 唳膏唳唳� 唳溹唳む唳� 唳 唳班唳� 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳呧Θ唰佮Μ唳距Ζ 唳灌Ο唳监唳涏唳� 唳む唳� 唳涏唳熰唳唳佮唳� 唳� 唳ㄠ唳囙イ 唳Ζ唳苦 唳嗋Μ唰嵿Μ唰佮Π 唳Δ唰� 唳呧Θ唰佮Μ唳距Ζ 唳犩唳曕 唳嗋唰囙イ
唳む唳班Κ唳� 唳� 唳嗋Ξ唳� 唳忇 唳 唳膏Μ唳距唳曕 唳Α唳监Δ唰� 唳Σ唳� 唳曕唳班Θ 唳侧唳栢 唳灌唳膏唳 唳囙Ο唳监唳膏唳む唳ㄠ唰� 唳溹唳ㄠ唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳忇唳熰唳� 唳忇 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳 啷�
唳嗋Π 唳唳班 唳 唳溹唳∴唰� 唳嗋唰� 唳呧Ω唳距Η唳距Π唳� 唳曕唳涏 唳夃唰嵿Δ唳� 唳多唳о 唳夃唰嵿Δ唳� 唳椸唳侧唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳灌Σ唰囙 唳忇 唳 唳Α唳监 唳唳啷� 唳多唳� 唳曕Π唳� 唳唳班唳 唳曕唳涏 唳夃唰嵿Δ唳� 唳︵唳唰� -
唰� 唳侧唳膏唳�, 唳侧Ω唰嵿 唳栢唳溹唳� 唳唳多唳唳多 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π 唳膏Μ唳距Π 唳唳澿 唳唳膏唳� 唳灌Μ唳距Π 唳忇 唳呧Ω唰佮Ω唰嵿Ε 唳嗋唳距唳栢 唳曕唳� 唳曕Π唰囙イ
唰� 唳溹唳む唰� 唳樴唳班 唳嗋唰� 唳忇唳熰 唳嗋唳距唳栢啷� 唳Ω唰嵿Δ唰� 唳Δ 唳Α唳� 唳忇Μ唳� 唳多唰嵿Δ唳苦Χ唳距Σ唰€ 唳む唳� 唳唳曕唳む唳� 唳呧Ν唳距Μ 唳むΔ 唳む唳曕唳粪唳｀Η唳距Π啷�
唰� 唳椸唳熰 唳唳距Μ唳苦Χ唰嵿Μ 唳� 唳唳ㄠ唳粪 唳忇唳唳む唳� 唳唳班唳ㄠ 唳唳� 唳膏Π唰嵿Μ唳溹Θ唰€唳� 唳氞唳むΘ唳� 唳嗋唰囙イ唳膏唳むΠ唳距 唳忇 唳椸唳班唰囙Π 唳唳膏Ο唰嬥唰嵿Ο 唳Π唳苦Μ唰囙Χ 唳班唰嵿Ψ唳� 唳曕Π唳� 唳膏唳班唳� 唳唳多唳唳� 唳︵唳唳苦Δ唰嵿Μ 唳ㄠΟ唳� 唳忇唳� 唳唳距唳距唳む唳� 唳︵唳唳苦Δ唰嵿Μ啷�
唰� 唳忇唳熰 唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳膏唳粪唳熰 唳む 唳侧唳椸 唳唳 唳曕Ο唳监唳� 唳唳侧唳唳� 唳唳班イ 唳嗋Π 唳唳班 唳唳む 唳膏Ξ唳 唳侧唳椸 唳唳む唳� 唳曕Ο唳监唳� 唳膏唳曕唳ㄠ唳∴イ
Read
February 12, 2024Who or what is Maya?
Maya was created by the almighty Brahman, the highest universal principle, the ultimate reality in the Universe.
In the major schools of Hindu philosophy, It is the immaterial final cause of all that exists, and Maya is Its creation and it's identical to him (doesn't this ring a bell around the Holy Trinity?).
The ancient scholar, Adi Shankaracharya stated that Maya is the inexpressible discourse of Brahman and Sri Ramakrishna Paramahansa believed that everything including Maya is a face of God.
In Hindu philosophy, the World is an illusion, a piece of Brahman's supreme consciousness, it is just the projection of a false reality created by Maya, a temporary phenomenon that sustains the illusion of our confused existence in a fabricated reality we recognize as True.
In spiritual language, Maya means our recognised "unreality", distinct from the Reality represented by Brahman in Its eternal and absolute aspect of pure consciousness, and Its creation is a mere projection of that consciousness which we accept as reality. It exists as long as there is an independent conscientious observer of the experience, meaning all of us.
The word "maya" also means trickery, fraud or deceit; It refers to all the different forms of illusion that distract and deceive the senses, which have only a limited capacity to perceive and discern truth, but we take those deceptions for granted and trust the appearances of things more than the truth underlying them.
This illusion is a product, either of a random will or the deliberation of a conscious one. Only by cultivating all qualities of goodness can our soul rise to transcendence and be free of the clutches of Maya to escape the "Ilusion" and then be allowed to contemplate True Reality. In other words, this reality we live and recognize does not provide real happiness, which is just an elusive dream. On the basis of this misconception which ties together the hearts of the male and female, one becomes attracted to his body, home, property, children, relatives and wealth. In this way, one increases life鈥檚 illusions and thinks in terms of "I and mine". (Bhagavat Purana 5.5.8)
Plato's famous allegory of the cave was written around 380 BCE and it is believed that he got his inspiration from the Maya concept which is much older.
The overwhelming majority of existing "scriptures" affirm, or defend, that Creation is the game of Divine Consciousness. It manifests itself in infinite different ways and Its essence permeates everything that constitutes the reality that we recognize with the goal, in the End, to absorve everything in Itself, for no apparent and specific reason, because Gods does not do anything with any particular objective or desire that we can understand. Yoga Vashista said: The world is nothing but a mere vibration of consciousness in space. It appears to exist just as a goblin appears to exist in the eyes of the ignorant. All this is just Maya: for here there is no contradiction between infinite consciousness and the apparent existence of the universe. It's like the wonderful dream of a person who is awake.
Maya (the book) is an entangle of physics, philosophy, ecology and cosmology in a convoluted story full of illusions, allusions and delusions; A mix of materialism and spirituality in a declaration of love that unfolds to question the meaning of life, the purpose of the universe and everything in it, including our own connection with the Cosmos.
There exists a World. In terms of probability this borders on the impossible. It would have been far more likely if, by chance, there was nothing at all. Then, at least, no one would have begun asking why there was nothing.
Maya's narrative structure is marked by various shifts in time and perspective to the point of awkwardness. Much of the novel is written in the form of a letter, but other parts are given in a constant-changing "present" as we jump from one character's point of view to a different character's perspective.
Later, we understand that what was depicted in the "letter" was partway false; for example, the main character carries on a long philosophical conversation with a gecko named Gordon (from the Gin) playing both parts of the dialogue, an event which turns out to have been entirely imagined by another character as part of a novel he's writing. There is a couple who continuously exchange out loud some sort of enigmatic philosophical riddles, mainly using the metaphor of a pack of cards combined with theological cosmology and a vague sense of provocation. There's some sort of time travel and spontaneous generation and a mystery around a doppelganger in Goya's paintings.
And a debate, in the background of the story, between Holism, the theory that says that parts of a Whole are in intimate interconnection in such a way that they cannot exist or be understood independently of the Whole, and Reductionism which seeks to isolate the individual components in separateness from the Whole to better understand it. Holism recognizes the importance of considering various factors simultaneously, while Reductionism focuses on isolating single specific elements. It is the case of not seeing the Forest because of the trees or not seeing the Tree because of the forest. To me this is the core of the problem with this book: the trees and the forest are very confusing to the intellectually limited reader that I am. I don't know why but it made me think of Sir Ken Robinson's statement in a Ted Talks lecture:
If a man makes a statement in a forest and no woman is there to hear him, is he still wrong?
As with Gaarder's previous works, Maya asks us Big Questions. The central philosophical question of this book is, "Does life have meaning?". He starts with a strictly scientific viewpoint that states we humans are merely carriers of genes and that there is no greater purpose to life; Then this slowly shifts towards a more esoteric speculation, in which it is suggested that conscious life sprang into existence as a means to produce a consciousness so that the Universe could aknowledge and experience itself, something that James Lovelock explores far better in his "Novacene", and that we are all part of Gaia (Lovelock again), which is a single Organism and a single Soul that encompasses everything that exists, where our alleged free individualism is just an illusion that we, sophisticated primates, fabricated out of our lust in the presumption of our superiority.
Gaarder was a philosophy teacher who became a full-time writer. He effectively provokes thought on his themes. I ponder frequently on many issues he raised.
It is a pity that he isn鈥檛 a better writer; If only his fictional technique were good enough to do justice to his superb concepts he could produce exceptional literary work. As it is, this book is more interesting than captivating, and although the conceptual and philosophical premises on which it's based will interest the novices inclined to ponder the major subjects of Life, the actual story tends to an unfocus and confuse proselytism to convert the already believers.
I found Maya difficult to follow, understand and appreciate. I can only acknowledge this as a book by Josteein Garder because it has his name on the cover. How can this be the same writer that gave us "Sophias World" and "The Orange Girl"?
I see this as a weak fiction work, with its unrealistic characters, and the sloppily constructed plot, but for those who are interested in philosophical questions and Life enigmas, it still is a J. Gaarder book, therefore worth reading.
Maya was created by the almighty Brahman, the highest universal principle, the ultimate reality in the Universe.
In the major schools of Hindu philosophy, It is the immaterial final cause of all that exists, and Maya is Its creation and it's identical to him (doesn't this ring a bell around the Holy Trinity?).
The ancient scholar, Adi Shankaracharya stated that Maya is the inexpressible discourse of Brahman and Sri Ramakrishna Paramahansa believed that everything including Maya is a face of God.
In Hindu philosophy, the World is an illusion, a piece of Brahman's supreme consciousness, it is just the projection of a false reality created by Maya, a temporary phenomenon that sustains the illusion of our confused existence in a fabricated reality we recognize as True.
In spiritual language, Maya means our recognised "unreality", distinct from the Reality represented by Brahman in Its eternal and absolute aspect of pure consciousness, and Its creation is a mere projection of that consciousness which we accept as reality. It exists as long as there is an independent conscientious observer of the experience, meaning all of us.
The word "maya" also means trickery, fraud or deceit; It refers to all the different forms of illusion that distract and deceive the senses, which have only a limited capacity to perceive and discern truth, but we take those deceptions for granted and trust the appearances of things more than the truth underlying them.
This illusion is a product, either of a random will or the deliberation of a conscious one. Only by cultivating all qualities of goodness can our soul rise to transcendence and be free of the clutches of Maya to escape the "Ilusion" and then be allowed to contemplate True Reality. In other words, this reality we live and recognize does not provide real happiness, which is just an elusive dream. On the basis of this misconception which ties together the hearts of the male and female, one becomes attracted to his body, home, property, children, relatives and wealth. In this way, one increases life鈥檚 illusions and thinks in terms of "I and mine". (Bhagavat Purana 5.5.8)
Plato's famous allegory of the cave was written around 380 BCE and it is believed that he got his inspiration from the Maya concept which is much older.
The overwhelming majority of existing "scriptures" affirm, or defend, that Creation is the game of Divine Consciousness. It manifests itself in infinite different ways and Its essence permeates everything that constitutes the reality that we recognize with the goal, in the End, to absorve everything in Itself, for no apparent and specific reason, because Gods does not do anything with any particular objective or desire that we can understand. Yoga Vashista said: The world is nothing but a mere vibration of consciousness in space. It appears to exist just as a goblin appears to exist in the eyes of the ignorant. All this is just Maya: for here there is no contradiction between infinite consciousness and the apparent existence of the universe. It's like the wonderful dream of a person who is awake.
Maya (the book) is an entangle of physics, philosophy, ecology and cosmology in a convoluted story full of illusions, allusions and delusions; A mix of materialism and spirituality in a declaration of love that unfolds to question the meaning of life, the purpose of the universe and everything in it, including our own connection with the Cosmos.
There exists a World. In terms of probability this borders on the impossible. It would have been far more likely if, by chance, there was nothing at all. Then, at least, no one would have begun asking why there was nothing.
Maya's narrative structure is marked by various shifts in time and perspective to the point of awkwardness. Much of the novel is written in the form of a letter, but other parts are given in a constant-changing "present" as we jump from one character's point of view to a different character's perspective.
Later, we understand that what was depicted in the "letter" was partway false; for example, the main character carries on a long philosophical conversation with a gecko named Gordon (from the Gin) playing both parts of the dialogue, an event which turns out to have been entirely imagined by another character as part of a novel he's writing. There is a couple who continuously exchange out loud some sort of enigmatic philosophical riddles, mainly using the metaphor of a pack of cards combined with theological cosmology and a vague sense of provocation. There's some sort of time travel and spontaneous generation and a mystery around a doppelganger in Goya's paintings.
And a debate, in the background of the story, between Holism, the theory that says that parts of a Whole are in intimate interconnection in such a way that they cannot exist or be understood independently of the Whole, and Reductionism which seeks to isolate the individual components in separateness from the Whole to better understand it. Holism recognizes the importance of considering various factors simultaneously, while Reductionism focuses on isolating single specific elements. It is the case of not seeing the Forest because of the trees or not seeing the Tree because of the forest. To me this is the core of the problem with this book: the trees and the forest are very confusing to the intellectually limited reader that I am. I don't know why but it made me think of Sir Ken Robinson's statement in a Ted Talks lecture:
If a man makes a statement in a forest and no woman is there to hear him, is he still wrong?
As with Gaarder's previous works, Maya asks us Big Questions. The central philosophical question of this book is, "Does life have meaning?". He starts with a strictly scientific viewpoint that states we humans are merely carriers of genes and that there is no greater purpose to life; Then this slowly shifts towards a more esoteric speculation, in which it is suggested that conscious life sprang into existence as a means to produce a consciousness so that the Universe could aknowledge and experience itself, something that James Lovelock explores far better in his "Novacene", and that we are all part of Gaia (Lovelock again), which is a single Organism and a single Soul that encompasses everything that exists, where our alleged free individualism is just an illusion that we, sophisticated primates, fabricated out of our lust in the presumption of our superiority.
Gaarder was a philosophy teacher who became a full-time writer. He effectively provokes thought on his themes. I ponder frequently on many issues he raised.
It is a pity that he isn鈥檛 a better writer; If only his fictional technique were good enough to do justice to his superb concepts he could produce exceptional literary work. As it is, this book is more interesting than captivating, and although the conceptual and philosophical premises on which it's based will interest the novices inclined to ponder the major subjects of Life, the actual story tends to an unfocus and confuse proselytism to convert the already believers.
I found Maya difficult to follow, understand and appreciate. I can only acknowledge this as a book by Josteein Garder because it has his name on the cover. How can this be the same writer that gave us "Sophias World" and "The Orange Girl"?
I see this as a weak fiction work, with its unrealistic characters, and the sloppily constructed plot, but for those who are interested in philosophical questions and Life enigmas, it still is a J. Gaarder book, therefore worth reading.
April 8, 2017
亘丕賱丕禺乇賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 诏賵乇丿乇 乇賵 賴賲 禺賵賳丿賲貙 卮丕蹖丿 丨丿賵丿 趩賴丕乇 爻丕賱 倬蹖卮 亘賵丿 讴賴 乇丕夭 賮丕賱 賵乇賯 乇賵 禺賵賳丿賲 賵 亘毓丿 乇賮鬲賲 鬲賲丕賲 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕蹖 蹖賵爻鬲蹖賳 诏賵乇丿乇 乇賵 禺乇蹖丿賲 蹖毓賳蹖 丌賳 賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 倬蹖丿丕 讴乇丿賲 乇賵 :) 丿賳蹖丕蹖 爻賵賮蹖 賵 丿禺鬲乇 倬乇鬲賯丕賱 賵 乇丕夭 賮丕賱 賵乇賯 卮丕賴讴丕乇 亘賵丿賳 賵賱蹖 賯氐乇蹖 丿乇 倬蹖乇賳賴 賵 夭賳丿诏蹖 讴賵鬲丕賴 丕爻鬲 鬲讴乇丕乇 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 乇賵 賳卮賵賳 賲蹖丿丕丿 丕賳賯丿乇 讴賴 丕夭 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賳丕丕賲蹖丿 卮丿賲 賵亘丕 禺賵丿賲 诏賮鬲賲 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 丿趩丕乇 鬲讴乇丕乇 卮丿賴 賵 丿丕乇賴 賴賲賵賳 丨乇賮丕 賯亘賱蹖 乇賵 鬲賵 讴鬲丕亘丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮 賲蹖夭賳賴 賵 賵丕賯毓丕 趩乇丕 鬲丕 丨乇賮 鬲丕夭賴 丕蹖 賳蹖爻鬲 賵乇賯 賴丕 賵 丿乇禺鬲 賴丕 乇賵賴丿乇 賲蹖丿賳責
亘賴 禺丕胤乇 賴賲蹖賳 禺賵賳丿賳 賲丕蹖丕 丨爻丕亘蹖 亘賴 鬲毓賵蹖賯 丕賮鬲丕丿 賵 賲鬲賳 鬲賯乇蹖亘丕 爻賳诏蹖賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賴賲 賲夭蹖丿 亘乇 毓賱鬲 亘賵丿貙 亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 賲賳 跇賳鬲蹖讴 禺賵賳丿賲 賵 蹖賴 夭蹖爻鬲 卮賳丕爻賲 賵 賳爻亘鬲 亘賴
賲賮丕賴蹖賲 讴蹖賴丕賳 卮賳丕爻蹖 賴賲 亘蹖 丕胤賱丕毓 賳蹖爻鬲賲 丕賲丕 禺賵賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘乇丕賲 丌爻賵賳 賳亘賵丿.
诏賵乇丿乇 鬲賵 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘丕夭 賴賲 亘賴 賮丕賱 賵乇賯 丕卮丕乇賴 賲蹖讴賳賴 賴賲賵賳 禺丕賱 賴丕 賵 丕賱亘鬲賴 跇賵讴乇
丕賲丕 丕蹖賳噩丕 诏賵乇丿乇 丨乇賮 賴丕蹖 禺賵亘 夭蹖丕丿 賵 丕賱亘鬲賴 噩丿蹖丿蹖 賴賲 賲蹖夭賳賴 讴賴 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘乇丕賲 噩匕丕亘 讴乇丿 賳馗乇蹖賴 賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丿乇 丕乇鬲亘丕胤 亘丕 鬲讴丕賲賱 丕賳爻丕賳 賲蹖夭賳賴 丕賳賯丿乇 噩丕賱亘貙 毓賱賲蹖 賵 卮蹖乇蹖賳 诏賮鬲賴 賲蹖卮賴 讴賴 讴丕賲賱 亘賴 丿賱 丌丿賲 賲蹖卮蹖賳賴
賵 丕賱亘鬲賴 丕蹖賳噩丕 诏賵乇丿乇 亘丕 丕蹖賲丕賳 乇丕爻禺 鬲乇蹖 亘賴 禺丿丕 賲蹖倬乇丿丕夭賴 賵 丕夭 賴賲賴 亘賴鬲乇 丕蹖賳賴 讴賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 倬丕蹖丕賳 鬲賱禺蹖 賴賲 賳丿丕乇賴
趩蹖夭蹖 讴賴 丌夭丕乇 丿賴賳丿賴 亘賵丿 诏丕賴蹖 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘貙 亘禺卮 賴丕蹖蹖 亘賵丿 讴賴 賵丕賯毓丕 丕丨爻丕爻 賲蹖讴乇丿賲 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賮賯胤 丿丕乇賴 賲胤丕賱亘 毓賱賲蹖 亘蹖丕賳 賲蹖讴賳賴 賵 丕蹖賳 鬲賯乇蹖亘丕 睾蹖乇 賲賲讴賳賴 讴賴 鬲賵 蹖賴 噩賲毓 丕夭 丌丿賲丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮 賴賲賴 丕賳賯丿乇 丿蹖丿 讴蹖賴丕賳 卮賳丕爻蹖 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮賳 賵 賴賲賴 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 鬲讴丕賲賱 丿蹖丿 乇賵卮賳蹖 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮賳貙 賱丕丕賯賱 鬲賵 丕胤乇丕賮 賲賳 讴賴 賴賲 趩蹖賳 趩蹖夭蹖 賲丨丕賱賴 :)) 卮丕蹖丿 禺丕乇噩蹖丕 丕胤賱丕毓丕鬲卮賵賳 亘蹖卮鬲乇賴
賯爻賲鬲 倬爻 诏賮鬲丕乇 噩丕賳 丕爻倬賵讴 賴賲 讴賴 丌禺乇卮 丕賵賲丿賴 趩賳丿丕賳 亘乇丕賲 噩匕丕亘 賳亘賵丿 丕賱亘鬲賴 讴賴 賯爻賲鬲 賴丕蹖 賲賴賲 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 (讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 噩賱賵诏蹖乇蹖 丕夭 丕爻倬賵蹖賱 卮丿賳 鬲賵囟蹖丨 亘蹖卮鬲乇蹖 賳賲蹖丿賲 ) 鬲賵 丕蹖賳 亘禺卮賴 賵賱蹖 丕夭 丨丕賱鬲 卮蹖乇蹖賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 賳賵蹖爻蹖 禺丕乇噩 賲蹖卮賴 賵 丕蹖賳 亘賳馗乇賲 丕氐賱丕 噩匕丕亘 賳亘賵丿 胤賵乇蹖 讴賴 賳蹖賲賴 卮亘 賵賯鬲蹖 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賯爻賲鬲 乇爻蹖丿賲 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 乇賴丕 讴乇丿賲 鬲丕 亘丕賯蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 乇賵 亘毓丿丕 亘禺賵賳賲貙 讴丕乇蹖 讴賴 賲毓賲賵賱丕 賳蹖賲賴 卮亘 賴丕 賴乇诏夭 賳賲蹖鬲賵賳賲 亘丕 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕 亘讴賳賲.
禺賱丕氐賴 丕诏賴 丕蹖賳 亘禺卮 丌禺乇 亘賴鬲乇 賳賵卮鬲賴 賲蹖卮丿 賵 賴賲蹖賳胤賵乇 賲胤丕賱亘 丕夭 賴賲 诏爻蹖禺鬲賴 亘賴 禺賵乇丿 丌丿賲 丿丕丿賴 賳賲蹖卮丿 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賱蹖丕賯鬲 趩賴丕乇 蹖丕 倬賳噩 爻鬲丕乇賴 乇賵 賴賲 丿丕卮鬲貙 丕賱亘鬲賴 讴賴 賳馗乇 卮禺氐蹖 賲賳賴 丕蹖賳 賵 賴蹖趩 丕乇夭卮 丿蹖诏賴 丕蹖 賳丿丕乇賴.
丕诏賴 亘禺賵丕賲 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕蹖 诏賵乇丿乇 乇賵 丕夭 賳馗乇 毓賱丕賯賴 賲賳丿蹖 禺賵丿賲 鬲賯爻蹖賲 讴賳賲 賲蹖卮賴 亘賴 丕蹖賳 鬲乇鬲蹖亘:
1) 丿賳蹖丕蹖 爻賵賮蹖
2) 丿禺鬲乇 倬乇鬲賯丕賱 賵 乇丕夭 賮丕賱 賵乇賯
3) 賲丕蹖丕
賯氐乇蹖 丿乇 倬蹖乇賳賴 賵 夭賳丿诏蹖 讴賵鬲丕賴 丕爻鬲 乇賵 賵丕賯毓丕 丿賵爻鬲 賳丿丕卮鬲賲.
亘賴 禺丕胤乇 賴賲蹖賳 禺賵賳丿賳 賲丕蹖丕 丨爻丕亘蹖 亘賴 鬲毓賵蹖賯 丕賮鬲丕丿 賵 賲鬲賳 鬲賯乇蹖亘丕 爻賳诏蹖賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賴賲 賲夭蹖丿 亘乇 毓賱鬲 亘賵丿貙 亘丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 賲賳 跇賳鬲蹖讴 禺賵賳丿賲 賵 蹖賴 夭蹖爻鬲 卮賳丕爻賲 賵 賳爻亘鬲 亘賴
賲賮丕賴蹖賲 讴蹖賴丕賳 卮賳丕爻蹖 賴賲 亘蹖 丕胤賱丕毓 賳蹖爻鬲賲 丕賲丕 禺賵賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘乇丕賲 丌爻賵賳 賳亘賵丿.
诏賵乇丿乇 鬲賵 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘丕夭 賴賲 亘賴 賮丕賱 賵乇賯 丕卮丕乇賴 賲蹖讴賳賴 賴賲賵賳 禺丕賱 賴丕 賵 丕賱亘鬲賴 跇賵讴乇
丕賲丕 丕蹖賳噩丕 诏賵乇丿乇 丨乇賮 賴丕蹖 禺賵亘 夭蹖丕丿 賵 丕賱亘鬲賴 噩丿蹖丿蹖 賴賲 賲蹖夭賳賴 讴賴 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 亘乇丕賲 噩匕丕亘 讴乇丿 賳馗乇蹖賴 賴丕蹖蹖 讴賴 丿乇 丕乇鬲亘丕胤 亘丕 鬲讴丕賲賱 丕賳爻丕賳 賲蹖夭賳賴 丕賳賯丿乇 噩丕賱亘貙 毓賱賲蹖 賵 卮蹖乇蹖賳 诏賮鬲賴 賲蹖卮賴 讴賴 讴丕賲賱 亘賴 丿賱 丌丿賲 賲蹖卮蹖賳賴
賵 丕賱亘鬲賴 丕蹖賳噩丕 诏賵乇丿乇 亘丕 丕蹖賲丕賳 乇丕爻禺 鬲乇蹖 亘賴 禺丿丕 賲蹖倬乇丿丕夭賴 賵 丕夭 賴賲賴 亘賴鬲乇 丕蹖賳賴 讴賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 倬丕蹖丕賳 鬲賱禺蹖 賴賲 賳丿丕乇賴
趩蹖夭蹖 讴賴 丌夭丕乇 丿賴賳丿賴 亘賵丿 诏丕賴蹖 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘貙 亘禺卮 賴丕蹖蹖 亘賵丿 讴賴 賵丕賯毓丕 丕丨爻丕爻 賲蹖讴乇丿賲 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賮賯胤 丿丕乇賴 賲胤丕賱亘 毓賱賲蹖 亘蹖丕賳 賲蹖讴賳賴 賵 丕蹖賳 鬲賯乇蹖亘丕 睾蹖乇 賲賲讴賳賴 讴賴 鬲賵 蹖賴 噩賲毓 丕夭 丌丿賲丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮 賴賲賴 丕賳賯丿乇 丿蹖丿 讴蹖賴丕賳 卮賳丕爻蹖 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮賳 賵 賴賲賴 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 鬲讴丕賲賱 丿蹖丿 乇賵卮賳蹖 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮賳貙 賱丕丕賯賱 鬲賵 丕胤乇丕賮 賲賳 讴賴 賴賲 趩蹖賳 趩蹖夭蹖 賲丨丕賱賴 :)) 卮丕蹖丿 禺丕乇噩蹖丕 丕胤賱丕毓丕鬲卮賵賳 亘蹖卮鬲乇賴
賯爻賲鬲 倬爻 诏賮鬲丕乇 噩丕賳 丕爻倬賵讴 賴賲 讴賴 丌禺乇卮 丕賵賲丿賴 趩賳丿丕賳 亘乇丕賲 噩匕丕亘 賳亘賵丿 丕賱亘鬲賴 讴賴 賯爻賲鬲 賴丕蹖 賲賴賲 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 (讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 噩賱賵诏蹖乇蹖 丕夭 丕爻倬賵蹖賱 卮丿賳 鬲賵囟蹖丨 亘蹖卮鬲乇蹖 賳賲蹖丿賲 ) 鬲賵 丕蹖賳 亘禺卮賴 賵賱蹖 丕夭 丨丕賱鬲 卮蹖乇蹖賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 賳賵蹖爻蹖 禺丕乇噩 賲蹖卮賴 賵 丕蹖賳 亘賳馗乇賲 丕氐賱丕 噩匕丕亘 賳亘賵丿 胤賵乇蹖 讴賴 賳蹖賲賴 卮亘 賵賯鬲蹖 亘賴 丕蹖賳 賯爻賲鬲 乇爻蹖丿賲 讴鬲丕亘 乇賵 乇賴丕 讴乇丿賲 鬲丕 亘丕賯蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 乇賵 亘毓丿丕 亘禺賵賳賲貙 讴丕乇蹖 讴賴 賲毓賲賵賱丕 賳蹖賲賴 卮亘 賴丕 賴乇诏夭 賳賲蹖鬲賵賳賲 亘丕 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕 亘讴賳賲.
禺賱丕氐賴 丕诏賴 丕蹖賳 亘禺卮 丌禺乇 亘賴鬲乇 賳賵卮鬲賴 賲蹖卮丿 賵 賴賲蹖賳胤賵乇 賲胤丕賱亘 丕夭 賴賲 诏爻蹖禺鬲賴 亘賴 禺賵乇丿 丌丿賲 丿丕丿賴 賳賲蹖卮丿 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 賱蹖丕賯鬲 趩賴丕乇 蹖丕 倬賳噩 爻鬲丕乇賴 乇賵 賴賲 丿丕卮鬲貙 丕賱亘鬲賴 讴賴 賳馗乇 卮禺氐蹖 賲賳賴 丕蹖賳 賵 賴蹖趩 丕乇夭卮 丿蹖诏賴 丕蹖 賳丿丕乇賴.
丕诏賴 亘禺賵丕賲 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕蹖 诏賵乇丿乇 乇賵 丕夭 賳馗乇 毓賱丕賯賴 賲賳丿蹖 禺賵丿賲 鬲賯爻蹖賲 讴賳賲 賲蹖卮賴 亘賴 丕蹖賳 鬲乇鬲蹖亘:
1) 丿賳蹖丕蹖 爻賵賮蹖
2) 丿禺鬲乇 倬乇鬲賯丕賱 賵 乇丕夭 賮丕賱 賵乇賯
3) 賲丕蹖丕
賯氐乇蹖 丿乇 倬蹖乇賳賴 賵 夭賳丿诏蹖 讴賵鬲丕賴 丕爻鬲 乇賵 賵丕賯毓丕 丿賵爻鬲 賳丿丕卮鬲賲.
November 6, 2014
Jostein Gaarder prepares a cake called "Maya" by mixing Indian Advaita Philosophy with Darwin's theory of Evolution and baking it in an oven at a temperature of intellectual stimulation. After garnishing with a little bit of mystery, he tops it with some romance. The cake is served in a shape of a very very long letter.
Unfortunately, the resultant is so unpalatable that even if you could enjoy the flavour, you don't really like the overall treat. Especially when the chef had earlier given you "Sophie's World", one of the best dishes you had ever had.
Loved these lines the best:
Unfortunately, the resultant is so unpalatable that even if you could enjoy the flavour, you don't really like the overall treat. Especially when the chef had earlier given you "Sophie's World", one of the best dishes you had ever had.
Loved these lines the best:
We bear and are borne by a soul we do not know.
When the riddle raises itself on two legs without being solved, it is our turn.
When the dream pinches its own arm without waking, it is us.
For we are the riddle no one guesses.
We are the fairy tale trapped in its own image.
We are that moves on and on without arriving at understanding鈥�..
November 6, 2012
An incredibly poetic interpretation of what it means for us, as a species, to be alive in this very moment; a very complex, sometimes surreal, tale summarizing what evolution has given us with, and how we have arrived at this point in the history of the planet, while at the same time showing us the circles that complete our lives as human beings.
July 22, 2020
Fiji es un pa铆s insular en medio del oc茅ano Pac铆fico cuyas tres principales islas son: Viti Levu, Vanua Levu y Taveuni. Esta 煤ltima es famosa porque es atravesada por el meridiano de 180潞, llamado tambi茅n como l铆nea internacional de cambio de fecha. En este lugar, cada vez que pasa el sol se cuenta un d铆a en el calendario. Dicho de otra forma: all谩 es donde "comienza un nuevo d铆a". Esta isla va a ser el lugar donde se van a desarrollar la mayor cantidad de los acontecimientos de esta novela de Gaarder, y el hecho de que sea ese lugar tan "especial" me pareci贸 que era un dato 颈苍煤迟颈濒 que ten铆a que dar justo al inicio de esta rese帽a de una novela no acta para bi贸logos evolutivos al borde del colapso o que viven en medio de una pandemia.
De entrada debo decir que este libro me llam贸 la atenci贸n desde que lo conoc铆 por dos motivos: Los extractos del libro que est谩n dentro de Jaque mate (Siruela, 2006) son la mejor antesala al libro completo. Cuando lo encontr茅 en una librer铆a y supe que hablaba sobre Evoluci贸n de los vertebrados, Big Bang y que en el medio de todo hab铆a una intriga, supe que ten铆a que leer el libro.
驴Puede alguno de los mortales que vive entre nosotros, ser id茅ntico a una de las pinturas m谩s famosas de Goya, a sabiendas de que es f铆sicamente imposible pues el cuadro lleva pintado 200 a帽os? Esta es, justamente la premisa que intentar responder Maya. Para hacerlo, Gaarder va a construir una novela surrealista en la que est谩n involucrados personajes que tranquilamente podr铆an ser los protagonistas de una novela escrita por Agatha Christie.
Conforme se va desarrollando la historia, la intriga crece y se van tejiendo los hilos que conectan a cada uno de los personajes dentro de ella. Para esto, Gaarder se va a apoyar como lo sabe hacer en sus novelas, en el conocimiento filos贸fico 鈥攖anto occidental como oriental鈥� y, en esta ocasi贸n en principios de biolog铆a evolutiva y la teor铆a del Big Bang. Un elemento que explota durante todo el desarrollo de la novela y que de muestra o un buen conocimiento sobre el tema o bien, una muy buena investigaci贸n como preparaci贸n de la novela.
El principal misterio que encarna la novela y que no pienso revelar de manera explicita ac谩, gira entorno a dos personajes espa帽oles: Ana y Jos茅, que frecuentemente en medio de sus conversaciones sueltan de manera medio espor谩dica una suerte de aforismos sobre diversos temas: el origen del cosmos, el origen de la vida, el origen del humano, su fin, etc. Estos aforismos, que m谩s tarde llegaremos a conocer como El manifiesto van a dar pie para que se exploren otros temas que est谩n en todo el centro de la novela: La conciencia de la materia sobre su propia existencia, la teor铆a de la evoluci贸n y la cabida de la causalidad dentro de su corpus; solo por se帽alar algunas de tantas que hacen que leer la novela tome su tiempo y asimilar cada uno de los paradigmas propuestos tarde otro poco m谩s.
Otros dos temas que toca el libro y que han despertado mi inter茅s personal son: la presencia del paradigma de reducci贸n al absurdo dentro de la Ciencia, en el sentido de que quiz谩s haya asuntos que escapen a nuestro entendimiento y a los instrumentos y m茅todos empleados en la actualidad; de manera tal que, quiz谩s dentro de un siglo o un milenio se r铆an de nosotros. Y la concepci贸n dentro de la obra de actos futuros como motivos de sucesos pasados, algo as铆 como el our贸boros: aquella serpiente que ella misma se muerde la cola. Y que usa el autor para intentar encontrar alguna fuga a la Evoluci贸n org谩nica. Un poco sin sentido si tenemos en cuenta que el fijismo no tiene cabida dentro de la teor铆a, pero que igual lleva a pasajes bastante interesantes y ricos en prosa.
Algo que no debe escapar es el hecho de que el libro es una larga carta que le escribe un hombre a su ex mujer luego de un viaje a la ya citada isla. Digo que no debe escapar pues es un elemento que puede olvidarse f谩cilmente, pero que Gaarder recalca cada tanto al volver a la narraci贸n en segunda persona. Esta forma de narrar va a llevar a explorar y detallar de mejor forma sucesos particulares de la estancia del protagonista en la isla. Esto va a dar cabida para que se explore la Angustia c贸smica que dice sufrir y que le lleva a fijar su atenci贸n en la pareja de espa帽oles que comparten con 茅l estancia en la isla.
Esto tambi茅n da cabida a uno de los episodios m谩s subrrealistas del libro, pues durante sus noches en la isla, Frank (el protagonista de la novela) va a tener ciertos di谩logos con Gordon, un geco que se encuentra dentro de su habitaci贸n que lo va a llevar, mediante sus conversaciones tanto a la m铆nima expresi贸n como individuo dentro de un enorme cosmos en el cual no es para nada importante y al punto m谩s alto como un sucesor "natural" dentro de la larga l铆nea de tetr谩podos que han pisado la Tierra durante toda su historia. Gordon lo va a reducir y enaltecer de una forma tan incre铆ble y en cierto punto, tan contrastante que es asombroso que un solo personaje pueda explotar ambas facetas del ser.
Como algunos conceptos filos贸ficos son centrales para el desarrollo de la historia, es frecuente que aparezcan cada tanto locuciones en lat铆n, algo que para un p煤blico no muy familiarizado con estas, puede resultar en un completo desentendimiento del porqu茅 se usan en cierto pasaje. Algo que me pas贸 un par de ocasiones y que me llev贸 a buscar la locuci贸n para intentar darle sentido al pasaje en cuesti贸n.
Toda la intriga que se va a帽adiendo conforme pasan las p谩ginas se soluciona muy prontamente y casi de manera imperceptible al final de la historia, lo que lo obliga a uno a volver m谩s atr谩s para saber si hay alg煤n detalle que escap贸 a la lectura. Algo flojo el desenlace si se compara con los dos primeros tercios del libros, sumado al hecho de que, muy al final del asunto, el autor decide entramar m谩s los hilos que conectan a los personajes, algo que me dej贸 un poco perdido y que deja la sensaci贸n de que el libro no va sobre lo que uno cree que va todo el libro, sino sobre otra cosa completamente diferente. O quiz谩s fui yo el que no entend铆 el libro.
El manifiesto esta suerte de aforismos que est谩n latentes en toda la novela y que al principio despiertan inter茅s y que ayudan mucho a que se desarrolle una de las subtramas de la novela, llega a un punto donde se vuelven repetitivos hasta el cansancio, no aportan nada m谩s a la historia y en el 煤nico relicto de pensamiento filos贸fico tan desbordado en la primera mitad del libro.
La edici贸n de Siruela bien cuidada, de un papel de alta calidad, fuente m谩s que perfecta para el formato del libro es el detalle de fina coqueter铆a justo que tiene esta novela que nos lleva al origen mismo del cosmos, a islas paradis铆acas del Pac铆fico y a uno de los museos m谩s importantes del mundo durante el desarrollo de la trama para rescatar. Un detalle que no debe escapar y que quiero dejar de manifiesto, porque ellos lo han hecho siempre muy bien con los libros de Gaarder, y espero que lo sigan haciendo as铆 por muchos a帽os m谩s. 隆Larga vida a Ediciones Siruela!
Como colof贸n y como muestra de esa Angustia c贸smica de la que sufre nuestro protagonista, les dejo esta frase, y espero que los deje dormir:
De entrada debo decir que este libro me llam贸 la atenci贸n desde que lo conoc铆 por dos motivos: Los extractos del libro que est谩n dentro de Jaque mate (Siruela, 2006) son la mejor antesala al libro completo. Cuando lo encontr茅 en una librer铆a y supe que hablaba sobre Evoluci贸n de los vertebrados, Big Bang y que en el medio de todo hab铆a una intriga, supe que ten铆a que leer el libro.
驴Puede alguno de los mortales que vive entre nosotros, ser id茅ntico a una de las pinturas m谩s famosas de Goya, a sabiendas de que es f铆sicamente imposible pues el cuadro lleva pintado 200 a帽os? Esta es, justamente la premisa que intentar responder Maya. Para hacerlo, Gaarder va a construir una novela surrealista en la que est谩n involucrados personajes que tranquilamente podr铆an ser los protagonistas de una novela escrita por Agatha Christie.
Conforme se va desarrollando la historia, la intriga crece y se van tejiendo los hilos que conectan a cada uno de los personajes dentro de ella. Para esto, Gaarder se va a apoyar como lo sabe hacer en sus novelas, en el conocimiento filos贸fico 鈥攖anto occidental como oriental鈥� y, en esta ocasi贸n en principios de biolog铆a evolutiva y la teor铆a del Big Bang. Un elemento que explota durante todo el desarrollo de la novela y que de muestra o un buen conocimiento sobre el tema o bien, una muy buena investigaci贸n como preparaci贸n de la novela.
El principal misterio que encarna la novela y que no pienso revelar de manera explicita ac谩, gira entorno a dos personajes espa帽oles: Ana y Jos茅, que frecuentemente en medio de sus conversaciones sueltan de manera medio espor谩dica una suerte de aforismos sobre diversos temas: el origen del cosmos, el origen de la vida, el origen del humano, su fin, etc. Estos aforismos, que m谩s tarde llegaremos a conocer como El manifiesto van a dar pie para que se exploren otros temas que est谩n en todo el centro de la novela: La conciencia de la materia sobre su propia existencia, la teor铆a de la evoluci贸n y la cabida de la causalidad dentro de su corpus; solo por se帽alar algunas de tantas que hacen que leer la novela tome su tiempo y asimilar cada uno de los paradigmas propuestos tarde otro poco m谩s.
Otros dos temas que toca el libro y que han despertado mi inter茅s personal son: la presencia del paradigma de reducci贸n al absurdo dentro de la Ciencia, en el sentido de que quiz谩s haya asuntos que escapen a nuestro entendimiento y a los instrumentos y m茅todos empleados en la actualidad; de manera tal que, quiz谩s dentro de un siglo o un milenio se r铆an de nosotros. Y la concepci贸n dentro de la obra de actos futuros como motivos de sucesos pasados, algo as铆 como el our贸boros: aquella serpiente que ella misma se muerde la cola. Y que usa el autor para intentar encontrar alguna fuga a la Evoluci贸n org谩nica. Un poco sin sentido si tenemos en cuenta que el fijismo no tiene cabida dentro de la teor铆a, pero que igual lleva a pasajes bastante interesantes y ricos en prosa.
Algo que no debe escapar es el hecho de que el libro es una larga carta que le escribe un hombre a su ex mujer luego de un viaje a la ya citada isla. Digo que no debe escapar pues es un elemento que puede olvidarse f谩cilmente, pero que Gaarder recalca cada tanto al volver a la narraci贸n en segunda persona. Esta forma de narrar va a llevar a explorar y detallar de mejor forma sucesos particulares de la estancia del protagonista en la isla. Esto va a dar cabida para que se explore la Angustia c贸smica que dice sufrir y que le lleva a fijar su atenci贸n en la pareja de espa帽oles que comparten con 茅l estancia en la isla.
Esto tambi茅n da cabida a uno de los episodios m谩s subrrealistas del libro, pues durante sus noches en la isla, Frank (el protagonista de la novela) va a tener ciertos di谩logos con Gordon, un geco que se encuentra dentro de su habitaci贸n que lo va a llevar, mediante sus conversaciones tanto a la m铆nima expresi贸n como individuo dentro de un enorme cosmos en el cual no es para nada importante y al punto m谩s alto como un sucesor "natural" dentro de la larga l铆nea de tetr谩podos que han pisado la Tierra durante toda su historia. Gordon lo va a reducir y enaltecer de una forma tan incre铆ble y en cierto punto, tan contrastante que es asombroso que un solo personaje pueda explotar ambas facetas del ser.
Como algunos conceptos filos贸ficos son centrales para el desarrollo de la historia, es frecuente que aparezcan cada tanto locuciones en lat铆n, algo que para un p煤blico no muy familiarizado con estas, puede resultar en un completo desentendimiento del porqu茅 se usan en cierto pasaje. Algo que me pas贸 un par de ocasiones y que me llev贸 a buscar la locuci贸n para intentar darle sentido al pasaje en cuesti贸n.
Toda la intriga que se va a帽adiendo conforme pasan las p谩ginas se soluciona muy prontamente y casi de manera imperceptible al final de la historia, lo que lo obliga a uno a volver m谩s atr谩s para saber si hay alg煤n detalle que escap贸 a la lectura. Algo flojo el desenlace si se compara con los dos primeros tercios del libros, sumado al hecho de que, muy al final del asunto, el autor decide entramar m谩s los hilos que conectan a los personajes, algo que me dej贸 un poco perdido y que deja la sensaci贸n de que el libro no va sobre lo que uno cree que va todo el libro, sino sobre otra cosa completamente diferente. O quiz谩s fui yo el que no entend铆 el libro.
El manifiesto esta suerte de aforismos que est谩n latentes en toda la novela y que al principio despiertan inter茅s y que ayudan mucho a que se desarrolle una de las subtramas de la novela, llega a un punto donde se vuelven repetitivos hasta el cansancio, no aportan nada m谩s a la historia y en el 煤nico relicto de pensamiento filos贸fico tan desbordado en la primera mitad del libro.
La edici贸n de Siruela bien cuidada, de un papel de alta calidad, fuente m谩s que perfecta para el formato del libro es el detalle de fina coqueter铆a justo que tiene esta novela que nos lleva al origen mismo del cosmos, a islas paradis铆acas del Pac铆fico y a uno de los museos m谩s importantes del mundo durante el desarrollo de la trama para rescatar. Un detalle que no debe escapar y que quiero dejar de manifiesto, porque ellos lo han hecho siempre muy bien con los libros de Gaarder, y espero que lo sigan haciendo as铆 por muchos a帽os m谩s. 隆Larga vida a Ediciones Siruela!
Como colof贸n y como muestra de esa Angustia c贸smica de la que sufre nuestro protagonista, les dejo esta frase, y espero que los deje dormir:
Se tarda miles de millones de a帽os en crear un ser humano. Y solo se tarda segundos en morir.
August 18, 2018
賲丕蹖丕 讴鬲丕亘蹖 406 氐賮丨賴 丕蹖 讴賴 丨丿賵丿 丿賵賴賮鬲賴 胤賵賱 讴卮蹖丿 鬲丕 鬲賳賴丕 50 氐賮丨賴 丕夭 丕賵賳 乇賵 亘禺賵賳賲. 丕賵丕蹖賱 讴鬲丕亘 賴蹖趩 噩匕丕亘蹖鬲蹖 賳丿丕卮鬲 賵 鬲賳賴丕 乇賵夭蹖 丿賵 爻賴 氐賮丨賴 賲蹖鬲賵賳爻鬲賲 倬蹖卮 亘乇賲 丕賲丕 鬲賯乇蹖亘丕 丕夭 氐賮丨賴 50 亘賴 亘毓丿 噩匕亘 卮丿賲 賵 蹖賴 賳賮爻 禺賵賳丿賲卮 賵 賱匕鬲 亘乇丿賲.
丕夭賲鬲賳 讴鬲丕亘:
丿賳蹖丕蹖蹖 賵噩賵丿 丿丕乇丿. 丕丨鬲賲丕賱丕 乇賵夭蹖 丕蹖賳 丿賳蹖丕 賲乇夭 賳丕賲賲讴賳 乇丕 賱賲爻 禺賵丕賴丿 讴乇丿. 丕诏乇 賴蹖趩 趩蹖夭 亘賴 胤賵乇 丕鬲賮丕賯蹖 亘賴 賵噩賵丿 賳賲蹖 丌賲丿貙 噩賴丕賳 賯丕亘賱 丕毓鬲賲丕丿鬲乇 亘賵丿. 丿乇 丕蹖賳 氐賵乇鬲貙 賴蹖趩 讴爻 賴乇诏夭 丕夭 禺賵丿 賳賲蹖 倬乇爻蹖丿 讴賴 趩乇丕 趩蹖夭蹖 賵噩賵丿 賳丿丕乇丿. 氐64
丕诏乇 禺丿丕蹖蹖 賵噩賵丿 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮丿貙 鬲賳賴丕 丿乇 賲丨賵 讴乇丿賳 乇丿倬丕蹖 禺賵丿 夭蹖乇讴 賳蹖爻鬲貙 亘賱讴賴 倬蹖卮 丕夭 賴乇趩蹖夭貙 丕爻鬲丕丿 賲禺賮蹖 讴乇丿賳 禺賵蹖卮 丕爻鬲. 賵丕賯毓蹖鬲 丕蹖賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 噩賴丕賳 賴爻鬲蹖 趩蹖夭 讴賲 丕乇夭卮 賵 讴賵趩讴蹖 賳蹖爻鬲. 丿乇 倬賴賳賴 蹖 丌爻賲丕賳貙 賴賲賴 趩蹖夭 賮卮乇丿賴 賵 倬蹖趩蹖丿賴 丕爻鬲 賵 爻鬲丕乇賴 賴丕 丕賴賱 卮丕蹖毓賴 倬乇丕讴賳蹖 賵 睾蹖亘鬲 賳蹖爻鬲賳丿. 氐104
鬲賳賴丕 蹖讴 丿賳蹖丕 賵噩賵丿 丿丕乇丿 賵 賳讴鬲賴 蹖 賲賴賲 丕蹖賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丌賳 丿賳蹖丕 禺賵丿 鬲賵 賴爻鬲蹖. 氐193
賮丕氐賱賴 蹖 趩賳丿丕賳蹖 賲蹖丕賳 禺賳丿賴 賵 诏乇蹖賴 賳蹖爻鬲貙 趩賵賳 禺賵卮亘禺鬲蹖 賲孬賱 卮蹖卮賴 鬲乇丿 賵 卮讴賳賳丿賴 丕爻鬲. 氐278
倬.賳: *賲蹖賱蹖丕乇丿賴丕 爻丕賱 亘乇丕蹖 禺賱賯 蹖讴 丕賳爻丕賳 賱丕夭賲 丕爻鬲 賵 鬲賳賴丕 趩賳丿 孬丕賳蹖賴 亘乇丕蹖 賲乇丿賳.*
丕夭賲鬲賳 讴鬲丕亘:
丿賳蹖丕蹖蹖 賵噩賵丿 丿丕乇丿. 丕丨鬲賲丕賱丕 乇賵夭蹖 丕蹖賳 丿賳蹖丕 賲乇夭 賳丕賲賲讴賳 乇丕 賱賲爻 禺賵丕賴丿 讴乇丿. 丕诏乇 賴蹖趩 趩蹖夭 亘賴 胤賵乇 丕鬲賮丕賯蹖 亘賴 賵噩賵丿 賳賲蹖 丌賲丿貙 噩賴丕賳 賯丕亘賱 丕毓鬲賲丕丿鬲乇 亘賵丿. 丿乇 丕蹖賳 氐賵乇鬲貙 賴蹖趩 讴爻 賴乇诏夭 丕夭 禺賵丿 賳賲蹖 倬乇爻蹖丿 讴賴 趩乇丕 趩蹖夭蹖 賵噩賵丿 賳丿丕乇丿. 氐64
丕诏乇 禺丿丕蹖蹖 賵噩賵丿 丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮丿貙 鬲賳賴丕 丿乇 賲丨賵 讴乇丿賳 乇丿倬丕蹖 禺賵丿 夭蹖乇讴 賳蹖爻鬲貙 亘賱讴賴 倬蹖卮 丕夭 賴乇趩蹖夭貙 丕爻鬲丕丿 賲禺賮蹖 讴乇丿賳 禺賵蹖卮 丕爻鬲. 賵丕賯毓蹖鬲 丕蹖賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 噩賴丕賳 賴爻鬲蹖 趩蹖夭 讴賲 丕乇夭卮 賵 讴賵趩讴蹖 賳蹖爻鬲. 丿乇 倬賴賳賴 蹖 丌爻賲丕賳貙 賴賲賴 趩蹖夭 賮卮乇丿賴 賵 倬蹖趩蹖丿賴 丕爻鬲 賵 爻鬲丕乇賴 賴丕 丕賴賱 卮丕蹖毓賴 倬乇丕讴賳蹖 賵 睾蹖亘鬲 賳蹖爻鬲賳丿. 氐104
鬲賳賴丕 蹖讴 丿賳蹖丕 賵噩賵丿 丿丕乇丿 賵 賳讴鬲賴 蹖 賲賴賲 丕蹖賳 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丌賳 丿賳蹖丕 禺賵丿 鬲賵 賴爻鬲蹖. 氐193
賮丕氐賱賴 蹖 趩賳丿丕賳蹖 賲蹖丕賳 禺賳丿賴 賵 诏乇蹖賴 賳蹖爻鬲貙 趩賵賳 禺賵卮亘禺鬲蹖 賲孬賱 卮蹖卮賴 鬲乇丿 賵 卮讴賳賳丿賴 丕爻鬲. 氐278
倬.賳: *賲蹖賱蹖丕乇丿賴丕 爻丕賱 亘乇丕蹖 禺賱賯 蹖讴 丕賳爻丕賳 賱丕夭賲 丕爻鬲 賵 鬲賳賴丕 趩賳丿 孬丕賳蹖賴 亘乇丕蹖 賲乇丿賳.*
September 4, 2016
Five stars! No doubt.
Banyak yang akan saya bahas nanti di sini. Sementara karena update-nya pakai hp, segini dulu.
Jujur, ini lebih berat ketimbang Dunia Sophie kalau menurut saya. Dunia Sophie, meskipun kontennya jauh lebih berat (karena seperti mendapat kursus filsafat, namun dituturkan kepada anak kecil yang belum dewasa, sementara, tokoh dalam Maya, mature semua).
Ada Joker yang muncul lagi di Sini... dan saya teringat pada Tyrion Lannister. Maafkan aku =))
Banyak yang akan saya bahas nanti di sini. Sementara karena update-nya pakai hp, segini dulu.
Jujur, ini lebih berat ketimbang Dunia Sophie kalau menurut saya. Dunia Sophie, meskipun kontennya jauh lebih berat (karena seperti mendapat kursus filsafat, namun dituturkan kepada anak kecil yang belum dewasa, sementara, tokoh dalam Maya, mature semua).
Ada Joker yang muncul lagi di Sini... dan saya teringat pada Tyrion Lannister. Maafkan aku =))
April 25, 2019
乇賲丕賳 貙 乇賲丕賳蹖爻鬲 賮賱爻賮蹖. 讴賴 丕賱亘鬲賴 亘丕 丌賳 賮賱爻賮賴 丕蹖 讴賴 卮賲丕 賮讴乇 賲蹖讴賳蹖丿 賮乇賯 丿丕乇丿. 亘乇禺賱丕賮 丿賳蹖丕蹖 爻賵賮蹖 讴賴 丌賲賵夭卮 鬲丕乇蹖禺 賮賱爻賮賴 蹖 賲丨囟 丕爻鬲 貙 賲丕蹖丕 亘賴 亘蹖丕賳 丿睾丿睾賴 賴丕 賵 爻賵丕賱 賴丕蹖 賮賱爻賮蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賲蹖倬乇丿丕夭丿. 丿乇 賲丕蹖丕 亘賴 丿賳亘丕賱 噩賵丕亘 賳亘丕卮蹖丿. 賲丕蹖丕 卮乇賵毓蹖 亘乇丕蹖 賲胤丕賱毓賴 丕蹖 诏爻鬲乇丿賴 丕爻鬲. 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 亘賴 丿賳亘丕賱 禺賱賯 蹖讴 丕孬乇 丕丿亘蹖 賳蹖爻鬲. 诏乇趩賴 丨賯 丕丿亘蹖丕鬲 賮賱爻賮蹖 禺賵丿 乇丕 禺賵亘 丕丿丕 讴乇丿賴 丕賲丕 賳亘丕蹖丿 丿乇 丕蹖賳 乇賲丕賳 貙 亘賴 丿賳亘丕賱 鬲賵氐蹖賮丕鬲 夭蹖亘丕蹖 丕丿亘蹖 亘丕卮蹖賲. 亘賱讴賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 倬乇 讴卮卮 賵 噩匕丕亘蹖 丕爻鬲 亘乇 賮賱爻賮賴 蹖 噩賴丕賳 賵 賴爻鬲蹖. 亘賴 賳馗乇 賲賳 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 賴丿賮 賴丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 丕夭 賳賵卮鬲賳 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘貙 丌卮賳丕 讴乇丿賳 賲丕 亘丕 丕氐賱 禺賵蹖卮貙 賳夭丿蹖讴 讴乇丿賳 賲丕 亘賴 禺賵蹖卮鬲賳貙 亘丕夭讴乇丿賳 匕賴賳 賲丕 亘賴 乇賵蹖 賲爻丕卅賱 賵乇丕蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 乇賵夭賲乇賴 賵 毓丕丿蹖貙 賵 睾蹖乇賴 丕爻鬲. 禺賵丕賳丿賳 丕蹖賳 賯亘蹖賱 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕 亘乇 賴乇 丕賳爻丕賳蹖 賵丕噩亘 丕爻鬲. 夭蹖乇丕 賮賯胤 卮丕賲賱 夭蹖亘丕蹖蹖 丕丿亘蹖 賳蹖爻鬲 亘賱讴賴 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賴丿賮 亘賴 賮讴乇 賮乇賵 亘乇丿賳 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 乇丕 賳蹖夭 丿乇 爻乇 丿丕乇丿. 賮賱爻賮賴 丕蹖 亘乇 賳噩賵賲 貙 夭蹖爻鬲 卮賳丕爻蹖 貙 夭賲蹖賳 卮賳丕爻蹖 貙 噩丕賳賵乇 卮賳丕爻蹖 賵....
亘賴 诏賵賳賴 丕蹖 讴賴 丕賳诏丕乇 禺賵丕爻鬲賴 鬲賲丕賲 丕賮乇丕丿 亘卮乇 貙 丿乇 賴乇 丨賵夭賴 丕蹖 乇丕 亘賴 亘丕夭蹖 賮賱爻賮蹖 禺賵丿 賵丕乇丿 讴賳丿.
亘賴 诏賵賳賴 丕蹖 讴賴 丕賳诏丕乇 禺賵丕爻鬲賴 鬲賲丕賲 丕賮乇丕丿 亘卮乇 貙 丿乇 賴乇 丨賵夭賴 丕蹖 乇丕 亘賴 亘丕夭蹖 賮賱爻賮蹖 禺賵丿 賵丕乇丿 讴賳丿.
October 28, 2012
I'm a fan of Jostein Gaarder. That being said, that's one of the worst books that ever got to my hands.
I just couldn't get through ten pages! I never really got to the end and my ex who is also a big fan didn't either. I remember some frogs and a boring beginning.
I just couldn't get through ten pages! I never really got to the end and my ex who is also a big fan didn't either. I remember some frogs and a boring beginning.
April 5, 2010
#2010-28#
Kita melahirkan dan dilahirkan oleh sebuah jiwa yang tak kita kenal. Ketika teka-teki itu berdiri pada kedua kakinya tanpa dapat terpecahkan, itulah giliran kita. Ketika impian mencubit lengannya sendiri tanpa terbangun, itulah kita. Karena kita adalah teka-teki yang tak terterka oleh siapa pun. Kita adalah dongeng yang terperangkap dalam bayangannya sendiri. Kita adalah apa yang terus berjalan tanpa pernah tiba pada pengertian...
Manusia, si makhluk unik yang berpikir, yang dikutuk untuk terus berpikir sepanjang hidupnya. Masih mengusung tema tentang penciptaan dunia, dengan setting yang dateline, Taveuni, Fiji.
Bumi ini berputar? Ya, dan carilah jawabannya kenapa ada satu garis dmana kau meletakkan kakimu satu di hari ini, dan satu di hari kemarin. Memberi pertanyaan lanjutan apakah bumi ini hanya berputar dan menua atau putaran yang hanya perulangan saja? Kenapa di Taveuni sini? Kenapa tidak di Timur Tengah, atau Eropa, atau Indonesia kita berganti tanggal setiap harinya?
Nyatalah, bahwa manusia memang ditakdirkan untuk berpikir dan bertanya sepanjang hidupnya. Manusia ditakdirkan untuk menjadi kritis.
Karena siapa kita kritis kah? Karena diberi akal budi. Bukan karena kita keturunan amfibi yang gemar bertanya, seperti seekor tokek cerewet yang nongkrong di atas botol gin Frank Andersen, dan memberikan pertanyaan-pertanyaan tentang dunia, tentang dirinya yang merasa dari generasi yang lebih tua. Siapa yang melarang untuk bertanya?
Separuh kisah, setengah dongeng, mana yang nyata, mana yang maya, mana yang mimpi? Satu-satunya yang menghilang ketika kita mati adalah imajinasi kita sendiri yang merasa terpisah dari seluruh dunia鈥攂egitu kita mempercayai bahwa mimpi bukanlah bagian dari kita sendiri. (h.197)
Dateline, Taveuni, Maja, Flamenco, Spanyol, Salamanca. Manusia, yang selalu mencari jawaban atas pertanyaan-pertanyaan yang berkecamuk dalam pikirannya. Tak tahulah bahwa hidupnya dipermainkan oleh nasib dan takdir. Apakah itu membawanya ke kekecewaan atau kebahagiaan. Siapa yang tahu bahwa kesedihan mungkin akan membawamu ke kebahagiaan, atau sebaliknya. Takdir telah menikmati kekejamannya dengan membuatmu melihat segalanya bermula, hanya untuk menyadari bahwa engkau tidak mampu berbuat apa-apa. (h.259). Segala sesuatu bisa begitu cepat direnggut walaupun sudah dalam genggaman kita. Lengah sedikit yang berakibat fatal. Dan manusia terus bertanya, kenapa? Dan terkadang pertanyaan membawa pada kehancuran. Itulah suratan takdir? Itulah takdir kita yang tidak kita ketahui bahwa kita berada dalam takdir itu sendiri?
Kini, para peri itu berada dalam dongeng, tetapi mereka tidak menyadarinya. Apakah dongeng benar-benar akan menjadi dongeng jika ia tidak bisa melihat dirinya sendiri? Apakah kehidupan sehari-hari akan menjadi keajaiban jika ia terus menerus berkeliling untuk menjelaskan dirinya sendiri? (h.309)
Sulit untuk tidak bertanya, namun tanyalah pada diri sendiri. Siapa kamu? Mungkin jawabnya seperti pada Dunia Sophie, mungkin akan ditemui kesendirian seperti Misteri Solitaire. Siapa yang tahu ini adalah jalan hidup atau dongeng. Terkadang harus melangkah ke dalam mimpi untuk membuat keseimbangan diri. Terkadang harus keluar lagi kembali di kehidupan sehari-hari.
Manusia berpikir, dan bertanya.
Karena itu, pikir-pikirlah dulu kalau bertanya.
Kita melahirkan dan dilahirkan oleh sebuah jiwa yang tak kita kenal. Ketika teka-teki itu berdiri pada kedua kakinya tanpa dapat terpecahkan, itulah giliran kita. Ketika impian mencubit lengannya sendiri tanpa terbangun, itulah kita. Karena kita adalah teka-teki yang tak terterka oleh siapa pun. Kita adalah dongeng yang terperangkap dalam bayangannya sendiri. Kita adalah apa yang terus berjalan tanpa pernah tiba pada pengertian...
Manusia, si makhluk unik yang berpikir, yang dikutuk untuk terus berpikir sepanjang hidupnya. Masih mengusung tema tentang penciptaan dunia, dengan setting yang dateline, Taveuni, Fiji.
Bumi ini berputar? Ya, dan carilah jawabannya kenapa ada satu garis dmana kau meletakkan kakimu satu di hari ini, dan satu di hari kemarin. Memberi pertanyaan lanjutan apakah bumi ini hanya berputar dan menua atau putaran yang hanya perulangan saja? Kenapa di Taveuni sini? Kenapa tidak di Timur Tengah, atau Eropa, atau Indonesia kita berganti tanggal setiap harinya?
Nyatalah, bahwa manusia memang ditakdirkan untuk berpikir dan bertanya sepanjang hidupnya. Manusia ditakdirkan untuk menjadi kritis.
Karena siapa kita kritis kah? Karena diberi akal budi. Bukan karena kita keturunan amfibi yang gemar bertanya, seperti seekor tokek cerewet yang nongkrong di atas botol gin Frank Andersen, dan memberikan pertanyaan-pertanyaan tentang dunia, tentang dirinya yang merasa dari generasi yang lebih tua. Siapa yang melarang untuk bertanya?
Separuh kisah, setengah dongeng, mana yang nyata, mana yang maya, mana yang mimpi? Satu-satunya yang menghilang ketika kita mati adalah imajinasi kita sendiri yang merasa terpisah dari seluruh dunia鈥攂egitu kita mempercayai bahwa mimpi bukanlah bagian dari kita sendiri. (h.197)
Dateline, Taveuni, Maja, Flamenco, Spanyol, Salamanca. Manusia, yang selalu mencari jawaban atas pertanyaan-pertanyaan yang berkecamuk dalam pikirannya. Tak tahulah bahwa hidupnya dipermainkan oleh nasib dan takdir. Apakah itu membawanya ke kekecewaan atau kebahagiaan. Siapa yang tahu bahwa kesedihan mungkin akan membawamu ke kebahagiaan, atau sebaliknya. Takdir telah menikmati kekejamannya dengan membuatmu melihat segalanya bermula, hanya untuk menyadari bahwa engkau tidak mampu berbuat apa-apa. (h.259). Segala sesuatu bisa begitu cepat direnggut walaupun sudah dalam genggaman kita. Lengah sedikit yang berakibat fatal. Dan manusia terus bertanya, kenapa? Dan terkadang pertanyaan membawa pada kehancuran. Itulah suratan takdir? Itulah takdir kita yang tidak kita ketahui bahwa kita berada dalam takdir itu sendiri?
Kini, para peri itu berada dalam dongeng, tetapi mereka tidak menyadarinya. Apakah dongeng benar-benar akan menjadi dongeng jika ia tidak bisa melihat dirinya sendiri? Apakah kehidupan sehari-hari akan menjadi keajaiban jika ia terus menerus berkeliling untuk menjelaskan dirinya sendiri? (h.309)
Sulit untuk tidak bertanya, namun tanyalah pada diri sendiri. Siapa kamu? Mungkin jawabnya seperti pada Dunia Sophie, mungkin akan ditemui kesendirian seperti Misteri Solitaire. Siapa yang tahu ini adalah jalan hidup atau dongeng. Terkadang harus melangkah ke dalam mimpi untuk membuat keseimbangan diri. Terkadang harus keluar lagi kembali di kehidupan sehari-hari.
Manusia berpikir, dan bertanya.
Karena itu, pikir-pikirlah dulu kalau bertanya.
July 7, 2008
I had high hopes with this one. After all, Gaarder was the man who penned one of the modern classics that is Sophie鈥檚 World.
And he didn鈥檛 disappoint me. Maya is definitely a worthy successor to the likes of Sophie鈥檚 World and Vita Brevis. Staying true to his calling, he takes us in a tour-de-force of hard philosophical questions that were difficult to imagine, - let alone deliberate, by anyone alone. This, - I think, is where his greatest influence is supposed to be : in his provocations where one is forced to take a long, hard look at oneself and ponder why is he living at all. Such incitements are necessary because by default, man always strive to fulfil, but not question, his needs.
Focusing more to the question of evolution and biology, Maya nevertheless feel a little bit constrained by the love-story plot. This did not become obvious, however, until the last 40 pages or so. A savoring reader thus will not have any problems in immersing into Gaarder鈥檚 typical mental discourses happening all over this book.
What more interesting is his try to take on mystery / thriller genre, - however slight. Granted, in the end the mystery was only used as a device to build the momentum towards climax; but it鈥檚 still intriguing for me that he adopt such an adventurous plan. Not that it didn鈥檛 work. On the contrary, the execution was of such excellence that I was fooled into thinking that this is truly an enigmatic book in the same league as Eco. Now that I had time to think about the issue, maybe it shouldn鈥檛 be surprising at all. I mean, a man who can construct a very exciting verbal scene full of anguish between his human character and a gecko; will surely be able to keep us in his grip in one or two alternate methods.
The epilogue, then, explains all. Only then it became apparent that this is a first and foremost, a love story. A very beautiful and profound love story, for that matter. Yet, I can not help but think that this is also this book鈥檚 weak point. Had Gaarder been more flexible; maybe letting go to the momentum and taking on the metaphysical thriller theme to the end will pay more. It almost feels like a hangover for me : riding so high in the buildup, but then take a sharp ( although admittedly sweet ) drop in the end. It then dictates a necessary evaluation of the question : Should a literary work鈥檚 end justify the means ?
Finally, this book again exhibits Gaarder鈥檚 ability as a storyteller. Bearing that small complain in mind, I鈥檇 still gladly recommend this one. If you don鈥檛 read this book with a critic鈥檚 spectacle, then it鈥檚 truly enjoyable to let yourself go, even swept by some of the finest dialogues I鈥檝e ever read in modern fiction..!!
And he didn鈥檛 disappoint me. Maya is definitely a worthy successor to the likes of Sophie鈥檚 World and Vita Brevis. Staying true to his calling, he takes us in a tour-de-force of hard philosophical questions that were difficult to imagine, - let alone deliberate, by anyone alone. This, - I think, is where his greatest influence is supposed to be : in his provocations where one is forced to take a long, hard look at oneself and ponder why is he living at all. Such incitements are necessary because by default, man always strive to fulfil, but not question, his needs.
Focusing more to the question of evolution and biology, Maya nevertheless feel a little bit constrained by the love-story plot. This did not become obvious, however, until the last 40 pages or so. A savoring reader thus will not have any problems in immersing into Gaarder鈥檚 typical mental discourses happening all over this book.
What more interesting is his try to take on mystery / thriller genre, - however slight. Granted, in the end the mystery was only used as a device to build the momentum towards climax; but it鈥檚 still intriguing for me that he adopt such an adventurous plan. Not that it didn鈥檛 work. On the contrary, the execution was of such excellence that I was fooled into thinking that this is truly an enigmatic book in the same league as Eco. Now that I had time to think about the issue, maybe it shouldn鈥檛 be surprising at all. I mean, a man who can construct a very exciting verbal scene full of anguish between his human character and a gecko; will surely be able to keep us in his grip in one or two alternate methods.
The epilogue, then, explains all. Only then it became apparent that this is a first and foremost, a love story. A very beautiful and profound love story, for that matter. Yet, I can not help but think that this is also this book鈥檚 weak point. Had Gaarder been more flexible; maybe letting go to the momentum and taking on the metaphysical thriller theme to the end will pay more. It almost feels like a hangover for me : riding so high in the buildup, but then take a sharp ( although admittedly sweet ) drop in the end. It then dictates a necessary evaluation of the question : Should a literary work鈥檚 end justify the means ?
Finally, this book again exhibits Gaarder鈥檚 ability as a storyteller. Bearing that small complain in mind, I鈥檇 still gladly recommend this one. If you don鈥檛 read this book with a critic鈥檚 spectacle, then it鈥檚 truly enjoyable to let yourself go, even swept by some of the finest dialogues I鈥檝e ever read in modern fiction..!!
June 26, 2013
Adoro os livros de Jostein Gaarder porque abordam, quest玫es e/ou temas para as quais o ser humano ainda n茫o encontrou respostas.
Os temas abordados neste magn铆fico livro situam-se nas quest玫es de f贸rum existencialista, abarcando o mist茅rio do cosmos, o mist茅rio da vida e o mist茅rio da morte.
Centrando sobre o mist茅rio da morte, 茅 sabido que a nossa sociedade e cultura, evita falar sobre a morte. Sendo ela - "a morte" - um grande "tabu" nos dias de hoje. Por esta raz茫o, as pessoas numa situa莽茫o de perda de um conhecido/amigo n茫o sabem como se comportar. O que 茅 perfeitamente normal, tendo em conta que 茅 um "tabu" e por isso evita-se falar-se sobre o mesmo. As pessoas nessas circunst芒ncias acabam por manifestar a sua solidariedade atrav茅s de, frases feitas, como por exemplo: "Os bons n茫o pertencem a este mundo". As pessoas que recorrem a este tipo de frases feitas, penso eu que n茫o reflectem muito sobre os significados das mesmas. Pois se reflectissem, depreenderiam que dizer isso ao conhecido/amigo no momento de pesar, 茅 extremamente descabido e agressivo. Ora vejamos, se "os bons n茫o pertencem a este mundo", posso concluir que ser mau prolongaria-me a vida, certo? As pessoas de uma forma geral, limitam-se simplesmente a repetir as mesmas frases como se se tratassem de um "ROBOT HUMANIZADO".
Como lidar com este "tabu"? Digo-vos que o caminho para lidar com o "tabu" associado 脿 morte, 茅 o de preparar as pessoas para a morte de uma forma construtiva, ou seja, a morte 茅 irm茫 g茅mea da vida, uma n茫o existe sem a outra. N茫o 茅 por a ignorarmos, que vamos sair ilesos ou conseguir escapar 脿 morte, ningu茅m o conseguiu, pelo menos que eu tenha conhecimento disso. E voc锚s conhecem algu茅m que se tenha tornado imortal?
Depois de ter-vos exposto a ideia principal que retive deste livro, deixo-vos uns excertos do manifesto inserido neste livro, com o prop贸sito de vos agu莽ar a curiosidade e levar-vos a ler "Maya - O Romance da Cria莽茫o" de Jostein Gaarder:
"Leva-se milhares de milh玫es de anos a criar um ser humano. E s贸 uns segundos a morrer."
"Ao morrer, assim como a cena est谩 fixada no rolo da pel铆cula, e os cen谩rios ru铆ram e arderam, somos fantasmas na lembran莽a que os nossos descendentes t锚m de n贸s. Ent茫o somos fantasmas, querido, somos mito. Mas ainda estamos juntos, ainda somos um passado comum, um passado remoto eis o que somos. Sob um rel贸gio de passado m铆tico escuto a tua voz."
"Os elfos est茫o agora no conto, mas s茫o aquilo para o qual n茫o h谩 palavras. Seria o conto um verdadeiro conto se fosse capaz de se ver a si mesmo? Causaria impacte a vida di谩ria se estivesse constantemente a explicar-se a si pr贸pria."
Os temas abordados neste magn铆fico livro situam-se nas quest玫es de f贸rum existencialista, abarcando o mist茅rio do cosmos, o mist茅rio da vida e o mist茅rio da morte.
Centrando sobre o mist茅rio da morte, 茅 sabido que a nossa sociedade e cultura, evita falar sobre a morte. Sendo ela - "a morte" - um grande "tabu" nos dias de hoje. Por esta raz茫o, as pessoas numa situa莽茫o de perda de um conhecido/amigo n茫o sabem como se comportar. O que 茅 perfeitamente normal, tendo em conta que 茅 um "tabu" e por isso evita-se falar-se sobre o mesmo. As pessoas nessas circunst芒ncias acabam por manifestar a sua solidariedade atrav茅s de, frases feitas, como por exemplo: "Os bons n茫o pertencem a este mundo". As pessoas que recorrem a este tipo de frases feitas, penso eu que n茫o reflectem muito sobre os significados das mesmas. Pois se reflectissem, depreenderiam que dizer isso ao conhecido/amigo no momento de pesar, 茅 extremamente descabido e agressivo. Ora vejamos, se "os bons n茫o pertencem a este mundo", posso concluir que ser mau prolongaria-me a vida, certo? As pessoas de uma forma geral, limitam-se simplesmente a repetir as mesmas frases como se se tratassem de um "ROBOT HUMANIZADO".
Como lidar com este "tabu"? Digo-vos que o caminho para lidar com o "tabu" associado 脿 morte, 茅 o de preparar as pessoas para a morte de uma forma construtiva, ou seja, a morte 茅 irm茫 g茅mea da vida, uma n茫o existe sem a outra. N茫o 茅 por a ignorarmos, que vamos sair ilesos ou conseguir escapar 脿 morte, ningu茅m o conseguiu, pelo menos que eu tenha conhecimento disso. E voc锚s conhecem algu茅m que se tenha tornado imortal?
Depois de ter-vos exposto a ideia principal que retive deste livro, deixo-vos uns excertos do manifesto inserido neste livro, com o prop贸sito de vos agu莽ar a curiosidade e levar-vos a ler "Maya - O Romance da Cria莽茫o" de Jostein Gaarder:
"Leva-se milhares de milh玫es de anos a criar um ser humano. E s贸 uns segundos a morrer."
"Ao morrer, assim como a cena est谩 fixada no rolo da pel铆cula, e os cen谩rios ru铆ram e arderam, somos fantasmas na lembran莽a que os nossos descendentes t锚m de n贸s. Ent茫o somos fantasmas, querido, somos mito. Mas ainda estamos juntos, ainda somos um passado comum, um passado remoto eis o que somos. Sob um rel贸gio de passado m铆tico escuto a tua voz."
"Os elfos est茫o agora no conto, mas s茫o aquilo para o qual n茫o h谩 palavras. Seria o conto um verdadeiro conto se fosse capaz de se ver a si mesmo? Causaria impacte a vida di谩ria se estivesse constantemente a explicar-se a si pr贸pria."
March 6, 2017
兀賵賱丕賸 - 賱賷爻鬲 乇賵丕賷丞.. 亘丕賱賲毓賳賶 丕賱鬲賯賱賷丿賷貙 賮賷賴丕 卮賷亍 賲禺鬲賱賮貙 賵睾乇賷亘貙 兀毓噩亘賳賷貙 賴匕丕 丕賱鬲丿丕禺賱貙 亘賷賳 丕賱賵丕賯毓貙 丕賱禺賷丕賱貙 丕賱賮賱爻賮丞貙 賵丨鬲賶 丕賱丨賱賲
孬丕賳賷丕- 鬲亘丿賵 賱賷貨 丕賱噩夭亍 丕賱孬丕賳賷 賲賳 爻乇 丕賱氐亘乇..賮賷賴丕 鬲卮丕亘賴賭貙 賰亘賷乇..兀賵 亘丕賱兀丿賯: 丕賯鬲亘丕爻
兀賲丕 亘毓丿
賷亘賯賶 睾丕乇丿乇 鬲丕卅賴賭貨 亘賷賳 丕賱廿賷賲丕賳 亘禺丕賱賯 毓馗賷賲 賵賲亘丿毓... 賵賳馗乇賷丞 丕賱鬲胤賵乇
賮賷 乇賵丕賷鬲賴賭.. 毓賳丿賲丕 兀亘丿毓 丕賱亘丨丕乇 兀卮禺丕氐 賵乇賯 丕賱賱毓亘貙 賱賲 賷兀鬲賵丕 亘胤乇賷賯丞 丕賱鬲胤賵乇!!責責..賵 廿賳賲丕 馗賴乇賵丕 鬲亘丕毓丕貙 亘卮賰賱賴賲 丕賱賰丕賲賱 丕賱鬲丕賲 !!責責責
賴賰匕丕 鬲禺賷賱 丕賱兀賲乇貨 賲毓 亘丨丕乇 賵丨賷丿!!!!..賱賰賳 毓賳丿賲丕 賳鬲丨丿孬 毓賳 丕賱禺賱賯貙 賷賰賵賳 賱丕夭賲 賱夭賵賲丕 丕賱鬲胤賵乇貙 賲賳 丕賱丨爻丕亍 丕賱毓囟賵賷貙 賵丨賷丿 丕賱禺賱賷丞貙 丕賱夭亘丕亘丞 { 賵賴賷 睾賷乇 丕賱匕亘丕亘丞}貙 丕賱賮賯丕乇賷丕鬲 貙 賵鬲鬲賲丞 丕賱爻賱爻賱丞.....廿賱禺
賱丕兀噩丿 兀賷 乇丕賷胤貙 亘賷賳賷 賵亘锟斤拷賳 兀亘賵 亘乇賷氐貙 賱丕 賱賲 賷賰賳 兀丨丿 兀噩丿丕丿賷
*_*
孬丕賳賷丕- 鬲亘丿賵 賱賷貨 丕賱噩夭亍 丕賱孬丕賳賷 賲賳 爻乇 丕賱氐亘乇..賮賷賴丕 鬲卮丕亘賴賭貙 賰亘賷乇..兀賵 亘丕賱兀丿賯: 丕賯鬲亘丕爻
兀賲丕 亘毓丿
賷亘賯賶 睾丕乇丿乇 鬲丕卅賴賭貨 亘賷賳 丕賱廿賷賲丕賳 亘禺丕賱賯 毓馗賷賲 賵賲亘丿毓... 賵賳馗乇賷丞 丕賱鬲胤賵乇
賮賷 乇賵丕賷鬲賴賭.. 毓賳丿賲丕 兀亘丿毓 丕賱亘丨丕乇 兀卮禺丕氐 賵乇賯 丕賱賱毓亘貙 賱賲 賷兀鬲賵丕 亘胤乇賷賯丞 丕賱鬲胤賵乇!!責責..賵 廿賳賲丕 馗賴乇賵丕 鬲亘丕毓丕貙 亘卮賰賱賴賲 丕賱賰丕賲賱 丕賱鬲丕賲 !!責責責
賴賰匕丕 鬲禺賷賱 丕賱兀賲乇貨 賲毓 亘丨丕乇 賵丨賷丿!!!!..賱賰賳 毓賳丿賲丕 賳鬲丨丿孬 毓賳 丕賱禺賱賯貙 賷賰賵賳 賱丕夭賲 賱夭賵賲丕 丕賱鬲胤賵乇貙 賲賳 丕賱丨爻丕亍 丕賱毓囟賵賷貙 賵丨賷丿 丕賱禺賱賷丞貙 丕賱夭亘丕亘丞 { 賵賴賷 睾賷乇 丕賱匕亘丕亘丞}貙 丕賱賮賯丕乇賷丕鬲 貙 賵鬲鬲賲丞 丕賱爻賱爻賱丞.....廿賱禺
賱丕兀噩丿 兀賷 乇丕賷胤貙 亘賷賳賷 賵亘锟斤拷賳 兀亘賵 亘乇賷氐貙 賱丕 賱賲 賷賰賳 兀丨丿 兀噩丿丕丿賷
*_*
March 23, 2010
like every book by jostein gaarder (one of my all-time favorite authors), "maya" was beautiful and nostalgic. it lectures about life and death in a way that seems poetic enough to deal with and absorb positively. but i found myself, after having read so many jostein gaarder books, that this one did not flow with the ease and rhythmic passion the others have. it felt rather long and droning. i did not enjoy the endless conversations between frank and gordon the gecko, nor the exchanges between frank and jos茅, or frank and john. in fact, john, the plotting matchmaking widower, who features prominently only at the beginning and at the end of the book, felt more relatable to me than frank, whom we follow through the entire book. he was too defeated, and i hated how defeated i felt myself when i read about him, except maybe when he went into his interesting, although extensive, lectures about the big bang and the evolution of the species.
i think my favorite character was laura, the avid reader of "lonely planet", because i don't know quite how to feel about her; she's ambiguous to me, whereas all the other characters either unnerved me or mildly interested me.
the part i enjoyed the most was when, after hearing so many dispersed quotes from the manifesto that reminded me so much of another gaarder book, the connection was finally revealed with "the solitaire mystery", my absolute favorite book by jostein gaarder, and that alignment of the two stories made me immensely happy, although it wasn't a long-lasting feeling. but the manifesto itself felt too much like a copycat of the tiny book from "the solitaire mystery", which revealed to hans thomas things about the past, present and future.
there were some very poetic instances throughout the book, and i've found myself writing down some quotes which i found solemnly beautiful. the ending was nice, albeit rather predictable, and it gave me a sensation of fulfillment, just not as strong and reverberating as previous jostein gaarder books. maybe my expectations were too high, i needed this book to surpass my love for "the solitaire mystery" or "sophy's world", but it didn't quite get there.
but i've found i quite like the name maya now, for all it's implications and meanings.
i think my favorite character was laura, the avid reader of "lonely planet", because i don't know quite how to feel about her; she's ambiguous to me, whereas all the other characters either unnerved me or mildly interested me.
the part i enjoyed the most was when, after hearing so many dispersed quotes from the manifesto that reminded me so much of another gaarder book, the connection was finally revealed with "the solitaire mystery", my absolute favorite book by jostein gaarder, and that alignment of the two stories made me immensely happy, although it wasn't a long-lasting feeling. but the manifesto itself felt too much like a copycat of the tiny book from "the solitaire mystery", which revealed to hans thomas things about the past, present and future.
there were some very poetic instances throughout the book, and i've found myself writing down some quotes which i found solemnly beautiful. the ending was nice, albeit rather predictable, and it gave me a sensation of fulfillment, just not as strong and reverberating as previous jostein gaarder books. maybe my expectations were too high, i needed this book to surpass my love for "the solitaire mystery" or "sophy's world", but it didn't quite get there.
but i've found i quite like the name maya now, for all it's implications and meanings.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
April 19, 2011
This is the second Gaarder book I have read, the first being Sophie's World. Other reviews mentioned reading the Solitaire Man was helpful to them, and I wish that I had read it because it would have given the story more meaning.
I enjoy philosophy books, and I loved Sophie's World. I found the evolution speeches by the main character, Frank, very interesting. That's the kind of thing I couldn't read in a textbook, but putting it in a story makes much more sense to me. That being said, there is a large portion of the book where Frank is talking to a gecko who he imagines talks back to him. As a device to write more scientific information it is very creative, but as a plot point I thought it was used too much. I think some of those conversations could have been cut down.
I was also confused about one of the major plot points. It seems there is a mystery, and that was the best part of the book. But the final part of the book is a post script written by a character, John who is a novelist, and the post script ruined the mystery for me and seemed like an easy way out for Gaarder. (That's all I can say without spoilers).
So, I rated this book 3 stars. It doesn't get stars for the storyline, the beginning was slow and the big mystery seemed ruined for me at the end, but it does get stars for Gaarder's articulate descriptions of philosophical biology and the scientific existentialism I think we've all felt at one point or another when we look up at the stars and realize how far away they are and how old they are, and how ephemeral we are in comparison.
I enjoy philosophy books, and I loved Sophie's World. I found the evolution speeches by the main character, Frank, very interesting. That's the kind of thing I couldn't read in a textbook, but putting it in a story makes much more sense to me. That being said, there is a large portion of the book where Frank is talking to a gecko who he imagines talks back to him. As a device to write more scientific information it is very creative, but as a plot point I thought it was used too much. I think some of those conversations could have been cut down.
I was also confused about one of the major plot points. It seems there is a mystery, and that was the best part of the book. But the final part of the book is a post script written by a character, John who is a novelist, and the post script ruined the mystery for me and seemed like an easy way out for Gaarder. (That's all I can say without spoilers).
So, I rated this book 3 stars. It doesn't get stars for the storyline, the beginning was slow and the big mystery seemed ruined for me at the end, but it does get stars for Gaarder's articulate descriptions of philosophical biology and the scientific existentialism I think we've all felt at one point or another when we look up at the stars and realize how far away they are and how old they are, and how ephemeral we are in comparison.
August 18, 2014
噩賵爻鬲丕賷賳 噩丕乇丿乇 賵乇賵丕賷鬲賴 丕賱卮賷賯丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賳丕賯卮 兀賮賰丕乇 丨賵賱 鬲胤賵乇 丕賱丨賷丕丞 毓賱賶 丕賱兀乇囟 貙丕氐賱 丕賱噩賳爻 丕賱亘卮乇賷 賵賳馗乇賷丞 鬲胤賵乇賴 貙 胤亘賷毓賷丞 丕賱丕丿乇丕賰 賵丕賱賵毓賷 毓賳丿 丕賱亘卮乇貙 賵 丕賱睾丕賷丞 賲賳 丕賱賵噩賵丿 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷 賵丕丨鬲賲丕賱賷丞 賰賵賳 賴匕賴 丕賱賲乇丨賱丞 賲丐賯鬲丞 賵爻亘亘 賱賵噩賵丿 丨賷丕丞 賵賰丕卅賳丕鬲 兀賰孬乇 鬲胤賵乇丕 賲賳丕 !
賷賯賵賱 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 噩賵爻鬲丕賷賳 噩丕乇丿乇 毓賱賶 賱爻丕賳 丕賱乇丕賵賷 噩賵賳 爻亘賵賰 賵丕氐賮丕 賲丕 賰鬲亘 : " 賷鬲囟賲賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賯氐丞 賵丕賯毓賷丞 亘賯丿乇 賲丕 賴賷 毓賲賱 賲賳 兀毓賲丕賱 丕賱禺賷丕賱. 睾賷乇 兀賳賷 賱丕 兀丿乇賷 兀賷 丕賱賯氐鬲賷賳 兀卮丿 睾乇丕亘丞 賲賳 丕賱兀禺乇賶. 廿賳賴賲丕 賲孬賱 丕賱丿噩丕噩丞 賵 丕賱亘賷囟丞. 賮賱賵賱丕 丕賱賯氐丞 丕賱兀氐賱賷丞 賱賲丕 兀賲賰賳 賱賱賲亘鬲賰乇丞 兀賳 鬲賵噩丿貙 賵賱賵賱丕 丕賱賯氐丞 丕賱賲亘鬲賰乇丞 賱賲丕 兀賲賰賳 丕賱鬲賮賰賷乇 賮賷 丕賱賯氐丞 丕賱丨賯賷賯賷丞 丕氐賱丕. 孬賲 廿賳賴 賲賳 丕賱賲爻鬲丨賷賱 兀賳 賳丨丿丿 兀賷賳 鬲亘丿兀 丕賱賯氐鬲丕賳 賵兀賷賳 鬲賳鬲賴賷丕賳. 賱賷爻鬲 丕賱亘丿丕賷丞 賵丨丿賴丕 賴賷 丕賱鬲賷 鬲丨丿丿 丕賱賳賴丕賷丞貙 丕賱賳賴丕賷丞 亘丿賵乇賴丕 鬲丨丿丿 丕賱亘丿丕賷丞. " 賵賴匕丕 賮毓賱丕 賵氐賮 丿賯賷賯 賱賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 丨賷孬 鬲鬲卮丕亘賰 丕賱賯氐氐 亘丿亍丕 賲賳 賯氐丞 賮乇丕賳賰 毓丕賱賲 丕賱兀丨賷丕亍 丕賱鬲胤賵乇賷 賵夭賵噩鬲賴 賮賷乇丕 貙 賵丕賳鬲賴丕亍 亘賯氐丞 丌賳丕 賵禺賵爻賷賴 丕賱夭賵噩 丕賱丕爻亘丕賳賷 丕賱卮賴賷乇 ..
乇賵丕賷丞 匕丕鬲 丕爻賱賵亘 賲賳賮乇丿 賵賲禺鬲賱賮 賵賲鬲賲賷夭丞 毓賳 丕賱睾賷乇 ..
賷賯賵賱 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 噩賵爻鬲丕賷賳 噩丕乇丿乇 毓賱賶 賱爻丕賳 丕賱乇丕賵賷 噩賵賳 爻亘賵賰 賵丕氐賮丕 賲丕 賰鬲亘 : " 賷鬲囟賲賳 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賯氐丞 賵丕賯毓賷丞 亘賯丿乇 賲丕 賴賷 毓賲賱 賲賳 兀毓賲丕賱 丕賱禺賷丕賱. 睾賷乇 兀賳賷 賱丕 兀丿乇賷 兀賷 丕賱賯氐鬲賷賳 兀卮丿 睾乇丕亘丞 賲賳 丕賱兀禺乇賶. 廿賳賴賲丕 賲孬賱 丕賱丿噩丕噩丞 賵 丕賱亘賷囟丞. 賮賱賵賱丕 丕賱賯氐丞 丕賱兀氐賱賷丞 賱賲丕 兀賲賰賳 賱賱賲亘鬲賰乇丞 兀賳 鬲賵噩丿貙 賵賱賵賱丕 丕賱賯氐丞 丕賱賲亘鬲賰乇丞 賱賲丕 兀賲賰賳 丕賱鬲賮賰賷乇 賮賷 丕賱賯氐丞 丕賱丨賯賷賯賷丞 丕氐賱丕. 孬賲 廿賳賴 賲賳 丕賱賲爻鬲丨賷賱 兀賳 賳丨丿丿 兀賷賳 鬲亘丿兀 丕賱賯氐鬲丕賳 賵兀賷賳 鬲賳鬲賴賷丕賳. 賱賷爻鬲 丕賱亘丿丕賷丞 賵丨丿賴丕 賴賷 丕賱鬲賷 鬲丨丿丿 丕賱賳賴丕賷丞貙 丕賱賳賴丕賷丞 亘丿賵乇賴丕 鬲丨丿丿 丕賱亘丿丕賷丞. " 賵賴匕丕 賮毓賱丕 賵氐賮 丿賯賷賯 賱賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 丨賷孬 鬲鬲卮丕亘賰 丕賱賯氐氐 亘丿亍丕 賲賳 賯氐丞 賮乇丕賳賰 毓丕賱賲 丕賱兀丨賷丕亍 丕賱鬲胤賵乇賷 賵夭賵噩鬲賴 賮賷乇丕 貙 賵丕賳鬲賴丕亍 亘賯氐丞 丌賳丕 賵禺賵爻賷賴 丕賱夭賵噩 丕賱丕爻亘丕賳賷 丕賱卮賴賷乇 ..
乇賵丕賷丞 匕丕鬲 丕爻賱賵亘 賲賳賮乇丿 賵賲禺鬲賱賮 賵賲鬲賲賷夭丞 毓賳 丕賱睾賷乇 ..
May 26, 2013
What begins as a slow, plodding rumination on not-much-at-all (i.e. repetitive lessons on evolutionary biology and the ramblings of characters you don't yet care about) turns into an intriguing, slow-boiling mystery about life: both backwards and forwards. I found myself riveted once the initial banality dissolved, eagerly speeding through the rest of the book, and by the time I finished the novel even the first 100 pages took on a new, fascinating appeal. It's a bold move for a writer to start with confounding prose that will only make sense in retrospect, but the payoff for any vigilant reader is well-worth the price of admission. I just wish the characters themselves were as finely wrought as the fascinating coincidences.
Read
December 17, 2014賰鬲丕亘 丨賵賱 賲爻卅賱賴 賱丕賷賳丨賱 鬲賰丕賲賱 丕爻鬲.賲爻卅賱賴 丕賷 賰賴 丕夭 賵賯鬲賷 亘賴 诏賵卮賲 禺賵乇丿 亘乇丕賷 爻丕賱賷丕賳 匕賴賳賲 乇丕 丿乇诏賷乇 禺賵丿卮 賰乇丿.賳賵賷爻賳丿賴 亘丕 噩賲賱丕鬲 爻賳噩賷丿賴 賲爻卅賱賴 乇丕 賲賷卮賰丕賮丿.诏丕賴賷 丨乇賮 賴丕 夭賷丕丿賷 倬賷趩賷丿賴 賲賷 卮賵丿 賵賱賷 賱丨賳 賰鬲丕亘 爻丕丿賴 賵 禺賵丿賲丕賳賷爻鬲.鬲丕 丕賷賳噩丕 賰賴 賰鬲丕亘 乇丕 禺賵丕賳丿賴 丕賲 賮賰乇 賳賲賷賰乇丿賲 賰爻賷 丿賷丿诏丕賴 賲匕賴亘賷 丌賮乇賷賳卮 丕賳爻丕賳 賵 賳馗乇賷賴 鬲賰丕賲賱 乇丕 丕賷賳賯丿乇 賲丕賴乇丕賳賴 亘丕 賴賲 鬲胤亘賷賯 亘丿賴丿.
March 26, 2025
At some point, I couldnt stop reading. It really made me think about my life and existance. A little bit hard to understand at the beggining, but then all the loose parts start making sense. I recommend it!
December 13, 2018
Ini gw yang lagi lemot apa emang bukunya yang aneh? Banyak point yang tidak didapat dari buku ini dan jujur gak ngerti ceritanya lol. Apalagi endingnya ini bkin wtf.
Mungkin harus baca kembali tapi kok rasanya males duh -__-
Mungkin harus baca kembali tapi kok rasanya males duh -__-
Currently reading
December 15, 2008趩賳丿 乇賵夭 倬蹖卮 乇賮鬲賲 卮賴乇 讴鬲丕亘 賳蹖丕賵乇丕賳 賵 丿蹖丿賲 鬲乇噩賲賴 卮丿賴...蹖讴 讴鬲丕亘 噩丿蹖丿 丕夭 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賲賵乇丿 毓賱丕賯賴 丕賲...亘賴鬲乇蹖賳 趩蹖夭賴 讴賴 亘丕 禺賵丿鬲 亘亘乇蹖卮 賲爻丕賮乇鬲 賵 鬲賵 丕賵睾丕鬲 賮乇丕睾鬲鬲 亘禺賵賳蹖卮...
October 18, 2014
亘賴 丕蹖賳 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 禺蹖賱蹖 毓賱丕賯賴 丿丕乇賲 卮丕蹖丿 毓賱鬲 丕蹖賳讴賴 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 亘賴 丕賳丿丕夭賴 蹖 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕蹖 丿蹖诏乇卮 噩匕亘賲 賳讴乇丿 鬲讴乇丕乇蹖 亘賵丿賳 賯爻賲鬲 賴丕蹖蹖 丕夭 丕賵賳 丿乇 讴鬲丕亘 賴丕蹖 丿蹖诏乇卮 亘賵丿 賵賱蹖 亘丕夭 賴賲 賳讴丕鬲 夭蹖丕丿蹖 丿丕卮鬲 讴賴 賲蹖 卮丿 爻丕毓鬲 賴丕 乇賵卮 賮讴乇 讴乇丿
November 22, 2016
Gw baca buku apa sih??
April 29, 2023
鈥楨verything is connected,鈥� Jos茅 said.
Where to begin when discussing a Jostein Gaarder novel? Do we start with the principal characters as suits our expectations for a work of fiction? Or do we begin the big philosophical concepts that Gaarder鈥檚 novels almost always seem to focus on? Or is this a false choice given that humans are, as one character here suggests, 鈥榟yperindividualistic master-mammals鈥� blessed or cursed with a capacity for thinking big thoughts?
The apparent ambiguity comes when a group of visitors from different nations 鈥� Australia, Spain, England, Norway, Italy, the US 鈥� find themselves thrown together on a Fijian island anticipating the approaching new millennium. (Pedant that I am, that changeover point actually arrived at the end of 2000, not the beginning, but no matter.)
Near the 180掳 date-line, where you can have one foot planted in what will be yesterday and the other in what would be tomorrow, one of the narrators at a resort muses 鈥榃asn鈥檛 it a bit strange that almost all the guests at the Maravu went round talking about the same thing?鈥� And this indeed is the central enigma that the reader also tries to fathom, continually foiled by a jester-suited figure.
Our focus centres on the two narrators. One is John Spooke, a widowed English author from Croydon; nested within his account is a lengthy epistle from Norwegian evolutionary biologist Frank Andersen to his wife Vera, a palaeo-anthropologist, from whom he鈥檚 estranged following the accident which killed their young daughter Sonja. And appended to these narratives is a so-called Manifesto consisting of obscure aphorisms associated with a childless Spanish couple, Ana and Jos茅. They all have personal stories to tell, stories which form the web of the novel.
But embedded within this weave are all kinds of literary lollipops 鈥� themes, ideas, coincidences, mysteries, clues, science, art, stories, life, death. Many represent the staples that Gaarder revisits in quite a few of the novels of his which I鈥檝e read: cards, card games like Solitaire, the enigmatic Joker; Time and the possibility of the past impacting the future and vice versa, or indeed paralleling it; evolution, biodiversity, humanity鈥檚 effect on the planet; and of course relationships and love whether sexual, familial or platonic. As this novel鈥檚 dedication 鈥� to Gaarder鈥檚 wife Siri 鈥� hints, love between and for both spouse and offspring is an abiding motif.
To be sure, Maya is an uneven novel. There are longueurs in the first half set on the Fijian island of Taveuni as the reader is fed a plethora of details about biology, evolution and the universe; we witness a surreal conversation between the Norwegian and a 鈥榩entadactyl tetrapod鈥�, a gecko he calls Gordon and who seems to be a kind of Jiminy Cricket conscience figure. And then there are many references to maya, the Brahman concept of illusion 鈥� or maybe it鈥檚 the Spanish maja, a lower class female but one with attitude, such as a flamenco dancer? What have Goya鈥檚 famous pictures, La maja vestida and La maja desnuda, to do with this conundrum? At.one point the Englishman declares, 鈥榃e are merely fleeting spirits in transition,鈥� and indicating one individual he adds, 鈥楢nd this spirit鈥檚 name is Maya!鈥�
We may perhaps feel we are being taken for fools. But when the novel鈥檚 action moves to Spain, to Madrid, Salamanca and Seville, we start to see a way through the obfuscation Gaarder has deliberately created, as themes and motifs begin to coalesce and the reader鈥檚 fog of confusion begins to dissipate. It鈥檚 then that we finally understand some of the allusions in the 52 entries in the Manifesto, such as this, the final one:
It takes billions of years to create a human being. And it takes only a few seconds to die.
Best known as the author of Sophie鈥檚 World (1991), Gaarder followed its success up with The Christmas Mystery (1992), which I found a little less convincing. For a pre-Millennium book Maya was quite positive in its outlook but by the time of The World according to Anna (2013), with its intimations of a worsened climate crisis and a calamitous loss of biodiversity, his tone was considerably darker. I somehow suspect that subsequent novels have remained pessimistic but don鈥檛 doubt that they鈥檙e all trying to say profound things about existence, perhaps along the lines of 鈥� as Jos茅 says 鈥� 鈥淓verything is connected.鈥�
Displaying 1 - 30 of 296 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.