What do you think?
Rate this book
乇噩賱 賱賰賱 丕賱毓氐賵乇
The classic play about Sir Thomas More, the Lord chancellor who refused to compromise and was executed by Henry VIII.
328 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1960
232 people are currently reading
9,017 people want to read
About the author
Robert Bolt
67听books46听followersFrom IMDB.com:
Son of a small shopkeeper, he attended Manchester Grammar School. He later said that he made poor uses of his opportunities there. He went to work in an insurance office, but later entered Manchester University, taking a degree in History. A post-graduate year at Exeter University led to a schoolmaster's position, first at a village school in Devon, then for seven years at Millfield. During this time he wrote a dozen radio plays, which were broadcast. Encouraged by the London success of his stage play "Flowering Cherry" he left teaching for full-time writing. 1960 saw two of his plays ("The Tiger And The Horse" and "A Man For All Seasons") running concurrently in the West End.
Son of a small shopkeeper, he attended Manchester Grammar School. He later said that he made poor uses of his opportunities there. He went to work in an insurance office, but later entered Manchester University, taking a degree in History. A post-graduate year at Exeter University led to a schoolmaster's position, first at a village school in Devon, then for seven years at Millfield. During this time he wrote a dozen radio plays, which were broadcast. Encouraged by the London success of his stage play "Flowering Cherry" he left teaching for full-time writing. 1960 saw two of his plays ("The Tiger And The Horse" and "A Man For All Seasons") running concurrently in the West End.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 674 reviews
August 4, 2020
A Man for All Seasons: a Play in Two Acts, Robert Bolt
A Man for All Seasons is a play by Robert Bolt based on the life of Sir Thomas More.
The plot is based on the historical events leading up to the execution of Sir Thomas More, the 16th-century Chancellor of England, who refused to endorse King Henry VIII's wish to divorce his wife Catherine of Aragon, who did not bear him a son, so that he could marry Anne Boleyn, the sister of his former mistress.
鬲丕乇蹖禺 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 禺賵丕賳卮: 乇賵夭 亘蹖爻鬲 賵 趩賴丕乇賲 賲丕賴 跇賵卅賳 爻丕賱 2009 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖
毓賳賵丕賳: 賲乇丿蹖 亘乇丕蹖 鬲賲丕賲 賮氐賵賱貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 乇丕亘乇鬲 亘丕賱鬲貨 賲鬲乇噩賲 賮乇夭丕賳賴 胤丕賴乇蹖貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賳卮乇 賯胤乇賴貙 1385貙 丿乇 200氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9789643416256貨 趩丕倬 丿賵賲 1392貨 趩丕倬 爻賵賲 賵 趩賴丕乇賲 1393貨 趩丕倬 倬鬲噩賲 1395貨 賲賵囟賵毓 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 賴丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 亘乇蹖鬲丕賳蹖丕 - 爻丿賴 20賲
丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丿乇亘丕乇賴 蹖 丕蹖爻鬲丕丿诏蹖 芦爻乇 鬲賵賲丕爻 賲賵乇禄 丿乇 亘乇丕亘乇 倬丕丿卮丕賴 芦賴賳乇蹖 賴卮鬲賲禄 丕爻鬲貙 讴賴 賲蹖禺賵丕賴丿 亘乇 禺賱丕賮 賯丕賳賵賳 讴賱蹖爻丕貙 賴賲爻乇 禺賵丿 乇丕 胤賱丕賯 丿賴丿貙 賵 丿賵亘丕乇賴 丕夭丿賵丕噩 讴賳丿.貨 乇賵丿乇乇賵蹖蹖 倬丕丿卮丕賴 蹖讴鈥屫嗀� 亘丕 讴賱蹖爻丕 賵 賯賵丕賳蹖賳卮貙 賳蹖丕夭 亘賴 蹖讴 賯乇亘丕賳蹖 丿丕乇丿貙 賵 賯乇亘丕賳蹖 讴爻蹖 賳蹖爻鬲 噩夭 賲卮丕賵乇 倬丕丿卮丕賴貙 芦爻乇 鬲賵賲丕爻 賲賵乇禄貙 讴賴 倬爻 丕夭 丿乇诏匕卮鬲 芦讴丕乇丿蹖賳丕賱禄貙 亘賴 賲賯丕賲 芦氐丿乇丕毓馗賲蹖禄 乇爻蹖丿賴貙 賵 倬丕丿卮丕賴 丕氐乇丕乇 丿丕乇丿貙 亘丕 鬲賵噩賴 亘賴 氐丿丕賯鬲 賵 丕毓鬲亘丕乇蹖 讴賴 芦爻乇 鬲丕賲爻 賲賵乇禄 賲蹖丕賳 賲乇丿賲 丿丕乇丿貙 賵蹖 丕夭丿賵丕噩卮 乇丕 鬲丕蹖蹖丿 讴賳丿貙 鬲丕 賳蹖丕夭蹖 亘賴 鬲丕蹖蹖丿 芦倬丕倬禄 賳丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮丿貙 丕賲丕 芦爻乇 鬲賵賲丕爻禄 讴賴 亘賴 丕禺賱丕賯 賵 丕氐賵賱卮 倬丕蹖亘賳丿 丕爻鬲貙 賳賲蹖鬲賵丕賳丿 鬲賳 亘賴 丌賳 禺賵丕爻鬲賴 亘丿賴丿貙 賵 賴賲賴 賲卮讴賱丕鬲 乇丕 亘賴 噩丕賳 賲蹖禺乇丿貙 鬲丕 丕氐賵賱卮 乇丕 夭蹖乇 倬丕 賳诏匕丕乇丿...貨
鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴賳诏丕賲 乇爻丕賳蹖 13/05/1399賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
A Man for All Seasons is a play by Robert Bolt based on the life of Sir Thomas More.
The plot is based on the historical events leading up to the execution of Sir Thomas More, the 16th-century Chancellor of England, who refused to endorse King Henry VIII's wish to divorce his wife Catherine of Aragon, who did not bear him a son, so that he could marry Anne Boleyn, the sister of his former mistress.
鬲丕乇蹖禺 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 禺賵丕賳卮: 乇賵夭 亘蹖爻鬲 賵 趩賴丕乇賲 賲丕賴 跇賵卅賳 爻丕賱 2009 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖
毓賳賵丕賳: 賲乇丿蹖 亘乇丕蹖 鬲賲丕賲 賮氐賵賱貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 乇丕亘乇鬲 亘丕賱鬲貨 賲鬲乇噩賲 賮乇夭丕賳賴 胤丕賴乇蹖貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賳卮乇 賯胤乇賴貙 1385貙 丿乇 200氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9789643416256貨 趩丕倬 丿賵賲 1392貨 趩丕倬 爻賵賲 賵 趩賴丕乇賲 1393貨 趩丕倬 倬鬲噩賲 1395貨 賲賵囟賵毓 賳賲丕蹖卮賳丕賲賴 賴丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 亘乇蹖鬲丕賳蹖丕 - 爻丿賴 20賲
丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丿乇亘丕乇賴 蹖 丕蹖爻鬲丕丿诏蹖 芦爻乇 鬲賵賲丕爻 賲賵乇禄 丿乇 亘乇丕亘乇 倬丕丿卮丕賴 芦賴賳乇蹖 賴卮鬲賲禄 丕爻鬲貙 讴賴 賲蹖禺賵丕賴丿 亘乇 禺賱丕賮 賯丕賳賵賳 讴賱蹖爻丕貙 賴賲爻乇 禺賵丿 乇丕 胤賱丕賯 丿賴丿貙 賵 丿賵亘丕乇賴 丕夭丿賵丕噩 讴賳丿.貨 乇賵丿乇乇賵蹖蹖 倬丕丿卮丕賴 蹖讴鈥屫嗀� 亘丕 讴賱蹖爻丕 賵 賯賵丕賳蹖賳卮貙 賳蹖丕夭 亘賴 蹖讴 賯乇亘丕賳蹖 丿丕乇丿貙 賵 賯乇亘丕賳蹖 讴爻蹖 賳蹖爻鬲 噩夭 賲卮丕賵乇 倬丕丿卮丕賴貙 芦爻乇 鬲賵賲丕爻 賲賵乇禄貙 讴賴 倬爻 丕夭 丿乇诏匕卮鬲 芦讴丕乇丿蹖賳丕賱禄貙 亘賴 賲賯丕賲 芦氐丿乇丕毓馗賲蹖禄 乇爻蹖丿賴貙 賵 倬丕丿卮丕賴 丕氐乇丕乇 丿丕乇丿貙 亘丕 鬲賵噩賴 亘賴 氐丿丕賯鬲 賵 丕毓鬲亘丕乇蹖 讴賴 芦爻乇 鬲丕賲爻 賲賵乇禄 賲蹖丕賳 賲乇丿賲 丿丕乇丿貙 賵蹖 丕夭丿賵丕噩卮 乇丕 鬲丕蹖蹖丿 讴賳丿貙 鬲丕 賳蹖丕夭蹖 亘賴 鬲丕蹖蹖丿 芦倬丕倬禄 賳丿丕卮鬲賴 亘丕卮丿貙 丕賲丕 芦爻乇 鬲賵賲丕爻禄 讴賴 亘賴 丕禺賱丕賯 賵 丕氐賵賱卮 倬丕蹖亘賳丿 丕爻鬲貙 賳賲蹖鬲賵丕賳丿 鬲賳 亘賴 丌賳 禺賵丕爻鬲賴 亘丿賴丿貙 賵 賴賲賴 賲卮讴賱丕鬲 乇丕 亘賴 噩丕賳 賲蹖禺乇丿貙 鬲丕 丕氐賵賱卮 乇丕 夭蹖乇 倬丕 賳诏匕丕乇丿...貨
鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴賳诏丕賲 乇爻丕賳蹖 13/05/1399賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
October 8, 2023
Note, Oct. 8, 2023: I've just corrected a typo in this review --thanks for catching that one, Bionic Jean!
Written in 1960, and first performed in 1961, the historical play A Man for All Seasons focuses on the crisis of conscience posed for Sir Thomas More in the years ca. 1526 until his execution in 1535, as an English public official and internationally known public intellectual and lay theologian, by King Henry VIII's determination to annul his first marriage and subsequent break with the Roman Catholic Church. But although they form the historical backdrop to the action, the specific issues of Papal authority, Christian unity, indissolubility of marriage, and even the claims of Christian faith vs. amoral expediency are not, for the playwright, the central concern here. For Bolt, who was himself an agnostic, the even more basic and central question, which he explores explicitly in his roughly 11-page Preface, is: do we have any essential core part of ourselves that we stand on uncompromisingly, that isn't up for negotiation if surrendering it gets us out of trouble and buys us an easy life? (In other words, we can say the play is about moral integrity itself.) He thinks we should, if we want to be truly human; but he's painfully aware that the great majority of people don't. More, in the final analysis, was patently someone who did, who, even though he didn't court martyrdom and indeed was willing to go to some lengths to sidestep the issue, did ultimately have a line in the sand that he wasn't willing to cross. That's what attracted Bolt to his story, and why he presents it as a thought-provoking exemplar for his fellow humans to ponder.
This play has been at least twice presented/adapted as a movie, once in 1966 with Paul Scofield as More and again in 1988 starring Charlton Heston. I've seen the Heston version; while I haven't seen the earlier one, I've read things about it that indicate that it brings in a lot more characters and material than the 1988 production. Part of my reason for wanting to read the original play was to get an idea of which movie more faithfully followed it. My suspicions are now confirmed that the Heston version is the more faithful one. It differs in some minor particulars (and in one place the positioning of some lines detailing what happened to certain characters at the very end rather than earlier in Act Two, as Bolt's version has them, strikes me as better.) Also, film technology benefits from easier transitions of scenes than is possible in a stage play, especially one with just two acts (Bolt's text has to devote a fair amount of attention to directing the lighting arrangements, movements of props, etc., to set different scenes). Like all plays, this one comes across more powerfully in performance. But even if you've seen a production, it repays a reading.
My reading, for instance, confirmed for me that the character who slips into various minor roles, (as a boatman, for example, or More's steward) and at various points addresses the audience to comment on the action, originates in Bolt's text, not as an invention by the 1988 scriptwriters. His role has affinities to that of the stage manager in Thornton Wilder's play Our Town; but Bolt's Preface indicates that the primary earlier playwright who influenced this play was Bertold Brecht. Not being at all familiar with Brecht's work or dramatic theories, that discussion went over my head; but the Preface is still valuable reading that you don't get from the film. Among other things, it's valuable for explaining the role of this latter character, who's identified in the text as "the Common Man." As Bolt explains, this doesn't mean average "man on the street," but rather a representative of what's "common" to all of us of the species "Man(kind)" --namely, our baser tendency or temptation to deny our inner core of moral integrity in exchange for the purely animal wants of safety and comfort. (Though as a secularist he doesn't like the idea, Bolt ponders briefly whether "It may be that a clear sense of the self can only crystallize round something transcendental....")
If I have a criticism of the play at all, it's of one glaring historical inaccuracy (which the written original shares with the 1988 film). Although Bolt's handling of historical details appears to be mostly sound, and he clearly did some research for this project, he consistently refers to Henry as seeking a "divorce" from Queen Catherine. (Had you said that to Henry, he probably would have had you beheaded.) Like his Catholic opponents, he theoretically deplored divorce; what he wanted instead was an annullment, an authoritative declaration that no valid marriage had taken place with Catherine in the first place, which is legally quite different. But aside from that quibble, either in written or enacted form, this is a powerful, intensely dramatic story skillfully presented, an undeniable crown jewel of the 20th-century British theater. It continues to speak to us in the 21st century --perhaps with heightened intensity, as many of us contemplate the slide of the contemporary Western world towards political totalitarianism and religious persecution with a foreboding that most people in the mid-20th-century cocoon of "American exceptionalism" and certainty that "it can't happen here" wouldn't have been able to imagine.
Written in 1960, and first performed in 1961, the historical play A Man for All Seasons focuses on the crisis of conscience posed for Sir Thomas More in the years ca. 1526 until his execution in 1535, as an English public official and internationally known public intellectual and lay theologian, by King Henry VIII's determination to annul his first marriage and subsequent break with the Roman Catholic Church. But although they form the historical backdrop to the action, the specific issues of Papal authority, Christian unity, indissolubility of marriage, and even the claims of Christian faith vs. amoral expediency are not, for the playwright, the central concern here. For Bolt, who was himself an agnostic, the even more basic and central question, which he explores explicitly in his roughly 11-page Preface, is: do we have any essential core part of ourselves that we stand on uncompromisingly, that isn't up for negotiation if surrendering it gets us out of trouble and buys us an easy life? (In other words, we can say the play is about moral integrity itself.) He thinks we should, if we want to be truly human; but he's painfully aware that the great majority of people don't. More, in the final analysis, was patently someone who did, who, even though he didn't court martyrdom and indeed was willing to go to some lengths to sidestep the issue, did ultimately have a line in the sand that he wasn't willing to cross. That's what attracted Bolt to his story, and why he presents it as a thought-provoking exemplar for his fellow humans to ponder.
This play has been at least twice presented/adapted as a movie, once in 1966 with Paul Scofield as More and again in 1988 starring Charlton Heston. I've seen the Heston version; while I haven't seen the earlier one, I've read things about it that indicate that it brings in a lot more characters and material than the 1988 production. Part of my reason for wanting to read the original play was to get an idea of which movie more faithfully followed it. My suspicions are now confirmed that the Heston version is the more faithful one. It differs in some minor particulars (and in one place the positioning of some lines detailing what happened to certain characters at the very end rather than earlier in Act Two, as Bolt's version has them, strikes me as better.) Also, film technology benefits from easier transitions of scenes than is possible in a stage play, especially one with just two acts (Bolt's text has to devote a fair amount of attention to directing the lighting arrangements, movements of props, etc., to set different scenes). Like all plays, this one comes across more powerfully in performance. But even if you've seen a production, it repays a reading.
My reading, for instance, confirmed for me that the character who slips into various minor roles, (as a boatman, for example, or More's steward) and at various points addresses the audience to comment on the action, originates in Bolt's text, not as an invention by the 1988 scriptwriters. His role has affinities to that of the stage manager in Thornton Wilder's play Our Town; but Bolt's Preface indicates that the primary earlier playwright who influenced this play was Bertold Brecht. Not being at all familiar with Brecht's work or dramatic theories, that discussion went over my head; but the Preface is still valuable reading that you don't get from the film. Among other things, it's valuable for explaining the role of this latter character, who's identified in the text as "the Common Man." As Bolt explains, this doesn't mean average "man on the street," but rather a representative of what's "common" to all of us of the species "Man(kind)" --namely, our baser tendency or temptation to deny our inner core of moral integrity in exchange for the purely animal wants of safety and comfort. (Though as a secularist he doesn't like the idea, Bolt ponders briefly whether "It may be that a clear sense of the self can only crystallize round something transcendental....")
If I have a criticism of the play at all, it's of one glaring historical inaccuracy (which the written original shares with the 1988 film). Although Bolt's handling of historical details appears to be mostly sound, and he clearly did some research for this project, he consistently refers to Henry as seeking a "divorce" from Queen Catherine. (Had you said that to Henry, he probably would have had you beheaded.) Like his Catholic opponents, he theoretically deplored divorce; what he wanted instead was an annullment, an authoritative declaration that no valid marriage had taken place with Catherine in the first place, which is legally quite different. But aside from that quibble, either in written or enacted form, this is a powerful, intensely dramatic story skillfully presented, an undeniable crown jewel of the 20th-century British theater. It continues to speak to us in the 21st century --perhaps with heightened intensity, as many of us contemplate the slide of the contemporary Western world towards political totalitarianism and religious persecution with a foreboding that most people in the mid-20th-century cocoon of "American exceptionalism" and certainty that "it can't happen here" wouldn't have been able to imagine.
January 23, 2022
丕鬲夭丕賳 丕賱丨賰賲 賵 胤賴丕乇丞 丕賱賷丿
賵囟賵丨 丕賱乇丐賷丞 賵 丕賱卮噩丕毓丞 亘賱丕 丨丿賵丿
氐乇丕毓 丕賱賲亘丕丿卅 囟丿 丕賱卮賴賵丕鬲
毓賱賷 賷丿 鬲賵賲丕爻 賲賵乇 丕賱乇噩賱 丕賱匕賷 鬲賲 廿毓賱丕賳賴 賯丿賷爻丕賸 亘毓丿 賵賮丕鬲賴 亘丕乇亘毓賲丕卅丞 毓丕賲
爻賱胤 亘賵賱鬲 丕賱囟賵亍 賮賷 賲爻乇丨賷鬲賴 丕賱卮賴賷乇丞 毓賱賷 丕禺乇 毓丕賲賷賳 賮賯胤 賲賳 丨賷丕丞 鬲賵賲丕爻 賲賵乇 賱賷爻鬲毓乇囟 丕夭賲鬲賴 賵 賲賵丕噩賴鬲賴 丕賱睾賷乇 賲爻亘賵賯丞 賱賱賲賱賰 賴賳乇賷 丕賱孬丕賲賳 毓賳丿賲丕 丕乇丕丿 丕賱禺賱丕氐 賲賳 爻賱胤丞 丕賱賰賳賷爻丞 賱兀爻亘丕亘 賲賱賮賯丞貨 賮丕氐乇 爻賷乇 鬲賵賲丕爻 毓賱賷 賮囟丨 賲禺胤胤賴 丕賱禺賮賷
賵 賴賵 丕賱禺賱丕氐 賲賳 夭賵噩鬲賴 賰丕孬乇賷賳 賱賱夭賵丕噩 賲賳 丕禺乇賷 鬲賳噩亘 賱賴 賵乇賷孬丕 賱毓乇卮賴
囟丨賷 鬲賵賲丕爻 亘丕賲賵丕賱賴貨 賵馗賷賮鬲賴 丕賱爻賷丕丿賷丞貨 賲乇賰夭賴貨 亘賱 亘丨賷丕鬲賴 賰賱賴丕 賱丕噩賱 丕毓賱丕亍 賲亘丕丿卅賴 丕賱丿賷賳賷丞
乇睾賲 丕賳 賲賵乇 賱賲 賷氐賱 賱賲賰丕賳鬲賴 亘丕賱賵乇丕孬丞貨 亘賱 氐毓丿 賲賳 兀氐賵賱 賲鬲賵丕囟毓丞 賱賲丨丕賲賷 亘丕乇毓 賱毓囟賵 亘丕賱亘乇賱賲丕賳貨 賱賷氐亘丨 亘毓丿賴丕 丕賱乇噩賱 丕賱孬丕賳賷 賮賷 丕賱賲賲賱賰丞 賮賷 爻賳 賲亘賰乇丞
賵 氐賲賲 亘賵賱鬲 毓賱賷 廿馗賴丕乇 胤賴丕乇丞 鬲賵賲丕爻 賲賵乇 亘丕亘乇丕夭 丿賳丕亍丞 鬲賵賲丕爻 賰乇賵賲賵賷賱 亘禺亘孬賴 賵 鬲兀賲乇賴 賵 賲丿丕賴賳鬲賴 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賳丕賯囟鬲 鬲賲丕賲丕 賲毓 乇賵丨 賲賵乇 賵 丕丿鬲 亘賴 賮賷 丕賱賳賴丕賷丞 賱賱丕毓丿丕賲貨 亘卮賲賵禺 賵 賰乇丕賲丞 丕賱丕亘胤丕賱 賱丕禺乇 賱丨馗賴貨 賱賷氐亘丨 乇噩賱丕 賱賰賱 丕賱毓氐賵乇
賵囟賵丨 丕賱乇丐賷丞 賵 丕賱卮噩丕毓丞 亘賱丕 丨丿賵丿
氐乇丕毓 丕賱賲亘丕丿卅 囟丿 丕賱卮賴賵丕鬲
毓賱賷 賷丿 鬲賵賲丕爻 賲賵乇 丕賱乇噩賱 丕賱匕賷 鬲賲 廿毓賱丕賳賴 賯丿賷爻丕賸 亘毓丿 賵賮丕鬲賴 亘丕乇亘毓賲丕卅丞 毓丕賲
爻賱胤 亘賵賱鬲 丕賱囟賵亍 賮賷 賲爻乇丨賷鬲賴 丕賱卮賴賷乇丞 毓賱賷 丕禺乇 毓丕賲賷賳 賮賯胤 賲賳 丨賷丕丞 鬲賵賲丕爻 賲賵乇 賱賷爻鬲毓乇囟 丕夭賲鬲賴 賵 賲賵丕噩賴鬲賴 丕賱睾賷乇 賲爻亘賵賯丞 賱賱賲賱賰 賴賳乇賷 丕賱孬丕賲賳 毓賳丿賲丕 丕乇丕丿 丕賱禺賱丕氐 賲賳 爻賱胤丞 丕賱賰賳賷爻丞 賱兀爻亘丕亘 賲賱賮賯丞貨 賮丕氐乇 爻賷乇 鬲賵賲丕爻 毓賱賷 賮囟丨 賲禺胤胤賴 丕賱禺賮賷
賵 賴賵 丕賱禺賱丕氐 賲賳 夭賵噩鬲賴 賰丕孬乇賷賳 賱賱夭賵丕噩 賲賳 丕禺乇賷 鬲賳噩亘 賱賴 賵乇賷孬丕 賱毓乇卮賴
囟丨賷 鬲賵賲丕爻 亘丕賲賵丕賱賴貨 賵馗賷賮鬲賴 丕賱爻賷丕丿賷丞貨 賲乇賰夭賴貨 亘賱 亘丨賷丕鬲賴 賰賱賴丕 賱丕噩賱 丕毓賱丕亍 賲亘丕丿卅賴 丕賱丿賷賳賷丞
乇睾賲 丕賳 賲賵乇 賱賲 賷氐賱 賱賲賰丕賳鬲賴 亘丕賱賵乇丕孬丞貨 亘賱 氐毓丿 賲賳 兀氐賵賱 賲鬲賵丕囟毓丞 賱賲丨丕賲賷 亘丕乇毓 賱毓囟賵 亘丕賱亘乇賱賲丕賳貨 賱賷氐亘丨 亘毓丿賴丕 丕賱乇噩賱 丕賱孬丕賳賷 賮賷 丕賱賲賲賱賰丞 賮賷 爻賳 賲亘賰乇丞
賵 氐賲賲 亘賵賱鬲 毓賱賷 廿馗賴丕乇 胤賴丕乇丞 鬲賵賲丕爻 賲賵乇 亘丕亘乇丕夭 丿賳丕亍丞 鬲賵賲丕爻 賰乇賵賲賵賷賱 亘禺亘孬賴 賵 鬲兀賲乇賴 賵 賲丿丕賴賳鬲賴 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賳丕賯囟鬲 鬲賲丕賲丕 賲毓 乇賵丨 賲賵乇 賵 丕丿鬲 亘賴 賮賷 丕賱賳賴丕賷丞 賱賱丕毓丿丕賲貨 亘卮賲賵禺 賵 賰乇丕賲丞 丕賱丕亘胤丕賱 賱丕禺乇 賱丨馗賴貨 賱賷氐亘丨 乇噩賱丕 賱賰賱 丕賱毓氐賵乇
November 7, 2022
This was one of my favorite movies growing up. The rapid-fire repartee left me longing for subtitles or 鈥榩ause鈥� and 鈥榬ewind鈥� buttons before I even knew what they were; that鈥檚 how much I hungered to know exactly what was said. Repeated viewings ensured eventual clarity; living in the Catholic city of St. Louis one was sure to catch this on late night reruns several times a year.
The book is a quick read. I polished it off in two long sittings but will read it again. I gobbled it this time, partially because it was so good, but also because I want to share it with my Dad when I go home this weekend.
The book varies somewhat from the movie, as there are some theatrical effects which the movie does away with and grandiose things the movie adds not found in the play. However, the important aspects鈥攖he penetrating dialogue, Sir Thomas More鈥檚 amazing mind and perceptive wit captured so elegantly through Bolt鈥檚 writing鈥攁re all there. Finally! Having just read , St. Thomas More鈥檚 last words, I recognized shades throughout. Need to reread to see if it is there as well.
ENJOY!
Updated: November 7, 2022 for grammatical errors
The book is a quick read. I polished it off in two long sittings but will read it again. I gobbled it this time, partially because it was so good, but also because I want to share it with my Dad when I go home this weekend.
The book varies somewhat from the movie, as there are some theatrical effects which the movie does away with and grandiose things the movie adds not found in the play. However, the important aspects鈥攖he penetrating dialogue, Sir Thomas More鈥檚 amazing mind and perceptive wit captured so elegantly through Bolt鈥檚 writing鈥攁re all there. Finally! Having just read , St. Thomas More鈥檚 last words, I recognized shades throughout. Need to reread to see if it is there as well.
ENJOY!
Updated: November 7, 2022 for grammatical errors
August 29, 2022
唳Χ唰嵿唳苦Ξ唳� 唳唳多唳唳� 唳膏唳ム 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π 唳唳班唳氞唳唳� 唳 唳嗋Ζ唳班唳多唳� 唳唳班唳ム唰嵿Ο唳椸唳侧 唳班Ο唳监唳涏, 唳膏 唳む唳侧唳曕唳 唳唳班Ε唳唳� 唳ム唳曕Μ唰� 唳班唳粪唳熰唳� 唳� 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰囙Π 唳唳ム唰€唳曕Π唳｀イ 唳囙Ο唳监唳班唳唳� 唳唳多唳� 唳唳� 唳︵唳多 唳唳熰唳唳熰 唳Η唰嵿Ο唳唳椸唳� 唳忇 唳ㄠ唳む 唳唳班Δ唳苦Ψ唰嵿唳� 唳唳唰� 唳唳啷� 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π 唳夃Κ唳唳距Ζ唰囙Χ唰€唳 唳呧唰嵿唳侧唰佮Σ唰嬥Δ唰� 唳班唳粪唳熰唳� 唳� 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰€唳 唳唳班Δ唳苦Ψ唰嵿唳距Θ唰囙Π 唳唳ム唰€唳曕Π唳｀唳� 唳唳唳唳班唳� 唳唳熰唳� 唳溹Θ唳唳班唳 唳ㄠΟ唳� 唳Σ唰� 唳忇Μ唳� 唳忇Π 唳膏唳ム 唳唰� 唳班唳溹Θ唰堗Δ唳苦 唳唳班Κ唰嵿Ο唳距唳氞唳� 唳唳椸Ω唰傕Δ唰嵿Π 唳ム唳曕唳 唳� 唳呧唰嵿唳侧唳� 唳︵唳多唰佮Σ唰嬥Δ唰� 唳嗋唳� 唳唳班Γ唳唳� 唳灌Ο唳� 唳︵唳多唰佮Σ唰嬥Δ唰� 唳唳班唳侧唳� 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰囙Π 唳唳む唳む唳む, 唳Σ唰�, 唳忇Ω唳� 唳︵唳多 唳溹Θ唳溹唳Θ 唳む唳氞唳涏唳む唳む唳氞唳� 唳膏Μ 唳唳ㄠΩ唳苦 唳唳о唳 唳呧唳距Π唳｀ 唳灌唳佮唳� 唳栢唳; 唳灌唳膏唳唳� 唳� 唳唳唳唳 唳膏Μ 唳唳粪Ο唳监唳� 唳椸唳侧唳о唳佮Η唳距Ο唳� 唳︵唳� 唳灌唳班唳唰� 唳� 唳呧唰嵿唳侧唰佮Σ唰嬥Π 唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳班Μ唳距Π 唳ㄠ唳ㄠ唳� 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰€唳 唳膏唳樴唳む 唳溹Α唳监唳唰� 唳Α唳监啷�
唳班唳粪唳熰唳班唳 唳多唳膏Θ 唳唳Μ唳膏唳ム, 唳嗋唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳班Ο唳监唳�, 唳� 唳唳唰嵿Δ唳苦唳� 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰€唳 唳唳多唳唳�-唳忇唰佮Σ唰� 唳 唳膏Ξ唰嵿Κ唰傕Π唰嵿Γ 唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳忇Μ唳� 唳膏唳唳о唳� 唰┼唳� 唳唳粪Ο唳� 唳膏唳熰 唳� 唳呧唰嵿唳侧唳� 唳唳ㄠ唳粪唳班 唳栢唳� 唳忇唳熰 唳唳澿唳� 唳氞唳粪唳熰 唳曕Π唰囙Θ 唳ㄠ; 唳忇唳班 唳忇 唳呧唰嵿唳距Θ唳む唳唳班唳� 唳溹唳Θ唳︵Π唰嵿Χ唳ㄠ唳苦唰� 唳唳班唳｀Κ唳ㄠ 唳嗋唳曕Α唳监 唳оΠ唰� 唳班唳栢唳� 唳Σ唰囙 唳唳班Δ唰� 唳多唳о唳唳む唳� 唳灌唳ㄠ唳︵唳︵唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο唳� 唳唳膏Ο唰嬥唰嵿Ο 唳忇唳熰 唳︵唳� 唳唳ㄠ唳唳� 唳ㄠ唳傕Π唳� 唳忇唰囙Θ唰嵿Α唳� 唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳忇唳熰 唳︵Σ 唳班唳粪唳熰唳班唳� 唳多唳膏Θ 唳曕唳粪Ξ唳む唳� 唳︵唳唳苦Δ唰嵿Μ唰� 唳嗋Ω唰�, 唳唳曕唳膏唳む唳ㄠ 唳оΠ唰嵿Ψ唳｀唳� 唳多唳曕唳� 唳曕唳� 唳ㄠ唳班 唳唳氞唳� 唳氞唳囙Δ唰� 唳椸唳侧 唳む唳佮唰� 唳氞唳班唳� 唳膏唳曕唳粪唳� 唳膏唳曕唳粪唳� 唳唳椸唳∴ 唳曕Π唳唳� 唳嗋唰€唳Θ-唳氞唳粪唳熰唳 唳唳ム 唳曕唳熰 唳Π唳む 唳灌Ο唳�, 唳多唳班唳侧唳曕唳む 唳︵Χ唳曕唳� 唳Π 唳︵Χ唳� 唳оΠ唰� 唳灌唳ㄠ唳︵ 唳む唳唳侧Ζ唰囙Π 唳︵Ξ唳� 唳唳∴唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳� 唳氞唳曕Π唰€ 唳ム唳曕 唳唰嵿唳苦Δ 唳曕Π唰� 唳唳︵唳� 唳膏唳傕唳侧唳班 唳曕唳粪Ξ唳む唳 唳嗋Ω唰�, 唳嗋Π 唳唳權Σ唳距Ζ唰囙Χ唰� 唳膏Θ唰嵿Δ唳距Θ 唳︵Δ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳ㄠ唳む 唳氞唳囙Σ唰� 唳膏唳唳溹唳曕Ν唳距Μ唰� 唳灌唳拷锟斤拷 唳灌Δ唰� 唳灌Ο唳� (唳曕唳班Γ, 唳囙Ω唳侧唳 唳膏Θ唰嵿Δ唳距Θ 唳︵Δ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳ㄠ唳唳� 唳唳о唳� 唳ㄠ唳囙イ 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唳曕 唳曕唳ㄠ唳︵唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳嗋唳ㄠ唰佮Σ唰� 唳班唳苦Δ 唳灌Ο唳� 唳Σ唰� 唳︵Δ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳膏Θ唰嵿Δ唳距Θ唰囙Π 唳膏Ξ唰嵿Κ唳む唳む唳� 唳唳班Δ唳苦Π唳曕唳粪唳 唳曕唳� 唳嗋唳ㄠ唳� 唳曕唳犩唳唳� 唳忇唳距Θ唰� 唳ㄠ唳�; 唳︵Δ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳唳む-唳唳む唳� 唳唳む唳唳� 唳Π 唳栢唳� 唳膏唳溹唳� 唳︵Δ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳膏Θ唰嵿Δ唳距Θ唳︵唳� 唳膏Ξ唰嵿Κ唳む唳む 唳ム唳曕 唳唰嵿唳苦Δ 唳曕Π唳� 唳唳)啷� 唳唳權Σ唳距Ζ唰囙Χ唰� 唳膏Μ 唳唳侧唳唰� 唰Е 唳侧唳栢唳� 唳撪Κ唳班 唳呧Θ唳距Ε 唳多唳多 唳班Ο唳监唳涏啷� 唳Π唳苦Μ唳距Π唰囙Π 唳嗋Ζ唳� 唳膏唳灌唳班唳� 唳涏唳∴唳� 唳唳∴唰� 唳撪唳� 唳忇Ζ唰囙Π 唳唳ㄠΜ唳苦唳む唳� 唳溹唳炧唳� 唳Σ唳む 唳椸唳侧 唳多唳ㄠ唳唳� 唳曕唳犩唳啷� 唳唳權Σ唳距Ζ唰囙Χ唰囙Π 唳曕唳多唳� 唳曕唳多唳班唳︵唳� 唳唳澿 唳曕唳� 唳灌Δ唰嵿Ο唳�, 唳оΠ唰嵿Ψ唳�, 唳∴唳曕唳む唳� 唳灌唳� 唳曕唳班Ξ唳多 唳娻Π唰嵿Η唳唳栢, 唳忇Μ唳� 唳曕唳� 唳む唳︵唳� 唳唳むΠ唰� 唳呧Θ唰佮Χ唰嬥唳ㄠ唳� 唳呧Ν唳距Μ 唳侧唰嵿Ψ唰嵿Ο唳｀唳-唳忇 唳唳班Χ唰嵿Θ唳椸唳侧唳� 唳夃Δ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳呧Θ唰囙唳熰唳� 唳侧唳曕唳唰� 唳嗋唰� 唳忇唳距Θ唰囙イ
唳曕Ε唳� 唳灌Σ唰�, 唳Χ唰嵿唳苦Ξ唰� 唳班唳粪唳熰唳� 唳� 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰囙Π 唳忇 唳唳ム唰€唳曕Π唳� 唳曕 唳曕Π唰� 唳膏Ξ唰嵿Ν唳� 唳灌Σ唰�? 唳嗋唳曕唳� 唳嗋Η唰佮Θ唳苦 唳Χ唰嵿唳苦Ξ唳� 唳膏Ν唰嵿Ο唳む唳� 唳膏Μ唳氞唳唰� 唳椸唳班唳む唳Κ唰傕Π唰嵿Γ 唳︵Σ唳苦Σ 唳Σ唳� 唳灌Ο唳� 唳唳唳椸Θ唳� 唳曕唳班唳熰 唳氞唳曕唳む唳Δ唰嵿Π唳熰唳曕啷� 唳膏Π唳曕唳� 唳唳班Η唳距Θ, 唳班唳溹/唳唳︵Χ唳距Π唳� 唳 唳嗋唳ㄠ唳� 唳娻Π唰嵿Η唰� 唳ㄠΘ, 唳呧Κ唳班唳� 唳曕Π唳侧 唳む唳佮Ζ唰囙Π唳� 唳 唳多唳膏唳む 唳唳む 唳灌Μ唰�, 唳忇 唳唳唳唳班唳� 唰Е唰� 唳唳� 唳嗋唰� 唳侧唳栢 唳� 唳︵Σ唳苦Σ唰� 唳ㄠ唳多唳氞唳� 唳曕Π唳� 唳灌Ο唳监イ 唳忇 唳唳唳椸Θ唳� 唳曕唳班唳熰唳� 唳灌唳� 唳оΠ唰囙 唳膏唳ム唳唳� 唳灌Ο唳� 唳嗋唳ㄠ唳� 唳忇唳熰 唳椸唳班唳む唳Κ唰傕Π唰嵿Γ 唳唳о唳� 唳 唳嗋 唳唳ム唳唳� 唳唳班Δ唰嵿Ο唰囙唳熰 唳︵唳多唳� 唳嗋唳ㄠ 唳曕唳犩唳唳� 唳唳班Η唳距Θ 唳唳む唳む: 唳忇Π 唳椸唳侧Ν唳班 唳ㄠ唳� 唳灌唳囙Μ唳苦Ο唳监唳� 唳曕Π唳唳� (Habeas Corpus)啷� 唳侧唳唳熰唳� 唳忇 唳多Μ唰嵿Ζ唳︵唳Ο唳监唳� 唳嗋唰嵿Ψ唳班唳� 唳呧Π唰嵿Ε "(唳呧Ν唳苦Ο唰佮唰嵿Δ 唳唳唰嵿Δ唳�) 唳膏Χ唳班唳班 唳嗋Κ唳ㄠ唳� 唳灌唳唳溹Δ唰� 唳嗋唰�"啷� 唳唳班唳氞唳� 唳 唳Η唰嵿Ο唳唳椸唳� 唳Δ唰� 唳ㄠ唳Δ唳�/ 唳班唳粪唳熰唳班Κ唰嵿Π唳о唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳嗋 唳氞唳囙Σ唰囙 唳嗋Κ唳ㄠ唳曕 唳溹唳侧 唳嗋唳曕 唳班唳栢Δ唰� 唳唳班唳� 唳ㄠ (唳唳权Σ唳距Ζ唰囙Χ唰赌唳班, 唳呧唰嵿唳灌唳膏唳� 唳曕Π唳唳� 唳ㄠ, 唳唳侧唳�!), 唳嗋Κ唳ㄠ唳曕 唳嗋唰� 唳嗋Ζ唳距Σ唳む 唳膏Χ唳班唳班 唳灌唳溹唳� 唳曕Π唳む 唳む唳ㄠ 唳唳о唳イ 唳嗋Ζ唳距Σ唳� 唳ㄠ唳班唳о唳班Γ 唳曕Π唳唳� 唳嗋Κ唳ㄠ 唳︵唳粪 唳ㄠ 唳曕 唳ㄠ唳班唳︵唳�, 唳ㄠ唳Δ唳� 唳ㄠΟ唳监イ 唳呧Κ唳班唳� 唳唳班Ξ唳距Γ唳苦Δ 唳ㄠ 唳灌Μ唳距Π 唳嗋唰� 唳嗋Κ唳ㄠ 唳 唳ㄠ唳班唳︵唳� 唳む 唳ㄠ唳多唳氞唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳忇 唳灌唳囙Μ唳苦Ο唳监唳� 唳曕Π唳唳膏イ 唳灌唳囙Μ唳苦Ο唳监唳� 唳曕Π唳唳� 唳嗋唰� 唳Σ唰囙 唳ㄠ唳Δ唳苦唰� 唳樴唳班Κ唳ム 唳唳ム 唳栢唳熰唳唰� 唳呧Δ唳苦Π唳苦唰嵿Δ 唳曕Ψ唰嵿 唳曕Π唰� 唰┼Ж 唳曕 唰Ж 唳о唳班唳� 唳嗋唳� 唳唳班Γ唳唳� 唳曕Π唳む 唳灌Ο唳�, 唳む唳佮Π 唳唳� 唳膏唳Κ唰嵿Θ 唳唳熰-唳膏唳� 唳膏Π唳距Ω唳班 唳嗋Κ唳ㄠ唳� 唳︵Π唳溹唳 唳熰唳曕 唳唳班 唳唳ㄠ 唳唳班Χ唰嵿Θ唰� 唳嗋Κ唳ㄠ唳曕 唳夃唳苦Ο唳监 唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳唳撪Ο唳监-唳膏唳熰 唳曕唳涏唳熰 唳溹唳苦Σ 唳� 唳唳侧Ξ唰嵿Μ唳苦Δ 唳灌Ο唳� 唳忇 唳灌唳囙Μ唳苦Ο唳监唳� 唳曕Π唳唳膏唳� 唳Π唳距Δ唰囙啷�
唰Е唰� 唳唳班唳班 唳唳多 唳嗋唰� 唳唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳唳撪Ο唳监 唳忇 唳ㄠ唳む唳椸唳侧唳む 唳班唳粪唳熰唳班Ο唳ㄠ唳む唳班唰� 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰€唳 唳唳多唳唳� 唳ム唳曕 唳嗋Σ唳距Ζ唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳班唳栢Μ唳距Π 唳唳班唳ムΞ唳苦 唳忇唳熰 唳唳班Ο唳监唳� 唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳︵唳栢Δ唰� 唳唳� 唳膏唳溹唳囙イ 唳むΜ唰�, 唳班唳� 唳唳Θ 唳忇 唳班唳む 唳む唳班 唳灌Ο唳� 唳ㄠ, 唳溹Θ唳椸Γ唰囙Π 唳呧Η唳苦唳距Π 唳嗋Ζ唳距Ο唳监唳� 唳ㄠ唳唳む唳む 唳唳班Ω唰嵿Δ唳距Μ唳苦Δ 唳忇 唳膏Μ 唳嗋唳� 唳曕唳ㄠ唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳о唳� 唳む唳Θ唳� 唳曕Σ唳 唳侧唳栢唳唳む唳班 唳唳膏唳むΜ唳距Ο唳监唳� 唳灌Ο唳监 唳唳 唳ㄠ啷� 唳忇Π 唳膏唳ム 唳溹Α唳监唳唰� 唳嗋唰� 唳唰� 唳唳ㄠ唳粪唳� 唳班唰嵿Δ, 唳樴唳�, 唳� 唳膏唳椸唳班唳唳� 唳呧Ζ唰嵿Ν唰佮Δ 唳膏Μ 唳囙Δ唳苦唳距Ω啷� 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ 唳� 唳班唳粪唳熰唳班唳� 唳唳ム唰€唳曕Π唳｀唳� 唳嗋Η唰佮Θ唳苦 唳 唳班唳唳� 唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳︵唳栢 唳嗋, 唳膏唳熰唳� 唳唳む唳む 唳椸Α唳监 唳灌Ο唳监 唳椸唳唰囙唳苦Σ唰� 唳粪唳� 唳多Δ唳曕唳� 唳囙唳侧唳唳ㄠ唳∴, 唳班唳溹 唳呧Ψ唰嵿唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳多唳膏Θ唳距Ξ唳侧啷� 唳班Μ唳距Π唰嵿 唳唳侧唳� 唳む唳佮Π 唳唳栢唳唳� 唳ㄠ唳熰 '唳� 唳唳唳� 唳Π 唳呧Σ 唳膏唳溹Θ唳�' 唳侧唳栢唳涏唳� 唳忇 唳囙Δ唳苦唳距Ω唰囙Π 唳唳班唳曕唳粪唳唰囙啷� 唳愢Δ唳苦唳距Ω唳苦 唳樴唳ㄠ唳Σ唰€唳� 唳撪Κ唳� 唳� 唳ㄠ唳熰 唳ㄠ唳班唳唳�, 唳む唳� 唳忇Π 唳愢Δ唳苦唳距Ω唳苦 唳唳班唳曕唳粪唳唳熰 唳嗋唰� 唳溹唳ㄠ 唳ㄠ唳撪Ο唳监 唳溹Π唰佮Π唰€啷�
唳熰唳夃Α唳� 唳唳多唳� 唳班唳溹 唳呧Ψ唰嵿唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳忇 唳呧Π唰嵿Ε唰� 唳膏Ν唰嵿Ο唳む唳� 唳囙Δ唳苦唳距Ω唰囙Π 唳椸Δ唳苦Κ唳� 唳呧Θ唰囙唳栢唳ㄠ 唳Π唳苦Μ唳班唳むΘ 唳曕Π唰� 唳︵唳唰囙唳苦Σ唰囙Θ, 唳呧Ε唳� 唳む唳佮Π 唳班唳溹 唳灌Μ唳距Π唳� 唳曕Ε唳� 唳涏唳侧唳ㄠ啷� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳涏唳侧唳� 唳む唳佮Π 唳唳む 唳班唳溹 唳膏Κ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳︵唳唳む唳 唳唳む唳班Ω唳ㄠ唳む唳�; 唳唳班Ε唳� 唳唳む唳� 唳嗋Π唰嵿Ε唳距Π唳曕 唳熰Κ唳曕 唳膏唳傕唳距Ω唳ㄠ 唳Ω唳距Π 唳曕唳� 唳夃Κ唳距Ο唳� 唳む唳佮Π 唳涏唳侧唳ㄠ啷� 唳嗋Π唰嵿Ε唳距Π唰囙Π 唳唳� 唰� 唳唳� 唳Ο唳监唳�, 唳唳む 唳膏Κ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳む唳� 唳膏唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳曕唳唳ムΣ唳苦 唳膏唳唳班唳溹唳唳� 唳呧Η唳苦Κ唳む 唳膏Ξ唰嵿Π唳距 唳︵唳唳む唳 唳唳班唳︵唳ㄠ唳ㄠ唳� 唳� 唳膏Ξ唰嵿Π唳距唰嵿唰€ 唳唳班Ε唳� 唳囙Ω唳距Μ唰囙Σ-唳忇Π 唳膏唳ム 唳唳權Σ唳� 唳膏唳ㄠ唳唳� 唳むΠ唳苦唳距Ο唳� 唳氞唳曕唳む 唳曕Π唰囙Θ, 唳嗋Π唰嵿Ε唳距Π 唳唳侧唳� 唳灌Σ唰囙 唳唳班唳︵唳ㄠ唳ㄠ唳�-唳囙Ω唳距Μ唰囙Σ唰囙Π 唳曕Θ唰嵿Ο唳� 唳曕唳唳ム唳班唳ㄠ唳� 唳膏唳ム 唳む唳� 唳唳唰� 唳︵唳唳ㄠイ 唳唳侧Δ 唳囙唳侧唳�-唳膏唳唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳曕唳唳ムΣ唳苦 唳膏唳唳班唳溹唳唳� 唳灌唳� 唳嗋Π唳� 唳多唰嵿Δ唳苦Χ唳距Σ唰€ 唳曕Π唰� 唳む唳侧唳� 唳忇唳︵唳� 唳侧唰嵿Ψ唰嵿Ο 唳涏唳侧イ 唰оЙ唰︵Ё 唳膏唳侧 唰оЙ 唳唳� 唳Ο唳监唳膏 唳嗋Π唰嵿Ε唳距Π 唳曕唳唳ム唳班唳ㄠ唰� 唳唳唰� 唳曕Π唰� 唳囙唳侧唳�-唳膏唳唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳曕唳唳ムΣ唳苦 唳膏唳唳班唳溹唳唳� 唳Μ唳苦Ψ唰嵿Ο唰� 唳膏Ξ唰嵿Π唳距 唳灌Μ唳距Π 唳Ε唰� 唳唳班唳唳班 唳忇唳苦Ο唳监 唳唳�, 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳唳о唳唳�! 唳唳唰囙Π 唳唳む唳� 唰ㄠЕ 唳膏Κ唰嵿Δ唳距 唳Π唰囙 唳班唳椸 唳唳椸 唳嗋Π唰嵿Ε唳距Π 唳оΠ唳距Η唳距Ξ 唳む唳唳� 唳曕Π唰囙Θ啷� 唳膏唳唳唳唳曕Ν唳距Μ唰囙 唳膏唳傕唳距Ω唳ㄠ唳� 唳︵唳唳苦Δ唰嵿Μ 唳忇Μ唳距Π 唳忇Ω唰� 唳Α唳监 唳嗋Π唰嵿Ε唳距Π唰囙Π 唳涏唳� 唳唳� 唳呧Ψ唰嵿唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳撪Κ唳�, 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳膏唳唳唳ㄠ唳多Π唳� 唳︵唳 唳曕Π唰� 唳Ω唰� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦唰� 唳む唳む 唳Ω唳む 唳灌Σ唰� 唳曕唳唳ム唳班唳ㄠ唰� 唳唳唰� 唳曕Π唰囙 唳Ω唳む 唳灌Μ唰囙イ 唳膏唳唳唳ㄠ唳多Ζ唰囙Π 唳� 唳多Π唰嵿Δ 唳ㄠ 唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳呧Π唰嵿Ε 唳︵唳佮Α唳监唳 唳ㄠ唳溹唳︵唳� 唳膏Μ唳氞唳唰� 唳Α唳� 唳唳む唳班唰� 唳呧Κ唳唳� 唳曕Π唳�, 唳 唳曕唳班唳Δ 唳班唳溹Θ唰堗Δ唳苦 唳嗋Δ唰嵿Θ唳灌Δ唰嵿Ο唳距イ 唳溹唳� 唳膏唳唳班唳溹唳唳� 唳膏唳Κ唰嵿Θ唰� 唳唳唳� 唳膏Κ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳む唳佮Π 唳唳оΜ唳� 唳溹唳粪唳犩唳-唳唳む唳班Μ唳о唳曕 唳︵唳唳む唳 唳唳む唳班唳� 唳膏唳ム 唳唳唰� 唳︵唳唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳む唳∴唳溹唳∴ 唳多唳班 唳曕Π唰� 唳︵唳�, 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳忇Μ唳距Π 唳唳� 唳膏唳о 唳Ω唰囙Θ 唳曕唳唳ムΣ唳苦唳︵唳� 唳唳侧唳� 唳椸唳︵ 唳膏唳Ο唳监 唳唳イ 唳曕唳唳ムΣ唳苦 唳Δ唰� 唳唳� 唳曕唳ㄠ 唳唳唳曕 唳唳唰� 唳曕Π唳む 唳唳班唳ㄠ, 唳曕唳班Γ, 唳唳囙Μ唰囙Σ唰� 唳忇Ω唰囙唰�, 鈥淭hous shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy brother鈥檚 wife: it is thy brother鈥檚 nakedness鈥� (唳侧唳唳熰唳曕唳� 唰оМ唳� 唰оК)啷�
唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰€唳 唳唳班Δ唳苦Ψ唰嵿唳距Θ唳椸唳侧 唳Ζ唳苦 唳唳ㄠ唳ㄠ 唳灌Ο唳� 唳椸Γ唳唳ㄠ唳粪唳� 唳夃Κ唳距Ω唳ㄠ 唳忇Μ唳� 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰€唳 唳班唳む唳ㄠ唳む 唳溹唳班 唳曕Π唳唳� 唳ㄠ唳唳む唳む, 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰€唳 唳唳班Δ唳苦Ψ唰嵿唳距Θ唰囙Π 唳膏Μ唳氞唳唰� 唳Α唳� 唳曕唳� 唳嗋Ω唳侧 唳ㄠ唳Δ唳苦唰� 唳む唳粪唳� 唳曕Π唳�, 唳ㄠ唳Δ唳苦Π 唳灌唳む唳� 唳むΠ唳唳班 唳灌Ο唳监 唳撪唳距イ 唳溹Θ唳椸Γ唳曕 唳ㄠ唳唳ㄠ唳む唳班Γ唰� 唳班唳栢Μ唳距Π 唳唳侧唳 唳多唳膏唰囙Π 唳膏Μ唳氞唳唰� 唳曕唳粪Ξ唳む唳оΠ 唳灌唳む唳唳距Π唳熰 唳唳侧Δ 唳忇 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰€唳 唳唳班Δ唳苦Ψ唰嵿唳距Θ, 唳呧Ω唰嵿Δ唰嵿Π唳距唳距Π唰� 唳膏Ο唳む唳ㄠ 唳膏唰嵿唳苦Δ 唳椸唳侧唳唳班唳� 唳 唳唳侧唳�-唳膏唳ㄠ唳唳灌唳ㄠ 唳ㄠΟ唳监イ 唳唳唳曕 唳唳唰� 唳曕Π唳距Π 唳曕唳唳ムΣ唳苦 唳ㄠ唳粪唳о唳溹唳炧 唳膏Π唰嵿Μ唳膏唳о唳班Γ唰囙Π 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳溹唳班 唳ム唳曕Σ唰囙 唳多唳� 唳Π唰嵿Ο唳ㄠ唳� 唳膏唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳曕唳涏 唳班唳溹Θ唰堗Δ唳苦 唳灌唳︵唳唳距Π 唳唳ㄠ唳Ο唳监 唳班唳溹唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳ㄠ唳唳唳� 唳多唳ム唳� 唳曕Π唰囙Θ 唳Π唰嵿Δ唰嵿Ο唰囙Π 唳唳曕 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳班唳� 唳侧唳曕唳� 唳呧Λ唳苦Ω唰囙Π 唳Α唳监Μ唳距Μ唰� 唳唳�; 唳唳ㄠ唳唳侧唳 唳む 唳嗋Π 唳曕唳夃 唳曕唳夃唰� 唳侧唳炧唳� 唳曕Π唳距Ο唳� 唳ㄠ啷� 唳唳唰囙Π 唳Π 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳�-唳曕唳唳ム唳班唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳� 唳曕Ο唳监唳� 唳唳� 唳唳侧唳� 唳氞Σ唳涏唳侧, 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳� 唳曕Ο唳� 唳唳班 唳曕唳� 唳唳む唳� 唳膏Θ唰嵿Δ唳距Θ唰囙Π 唳︵唳栢 唳ㄠ 唳唳撪Ο唳监唳 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳唳� 唳唳氞Σ唳苦Δ 唳灌Ο唳监 唳Α唳监唳�, 唳忇唳距Α唳监唳� 唳曕唳唳ム唳班唳� 唳曕唳班Ξ唳� 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唳曕Π唰嵿Ξ唰� 唳Θ唰嬥Ο唰嬥唰€ 唳灌Ο唳监 唳Α唳监唳 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳曕唳涏 唳む唳佮唰� 唳嗋Π 唳嗋唰囙Π 唳Δ唰� 唳呧Δ唰� 唳忇唳熰 唳嗋唳班唳粪Γ唰€唳 唳犩唳曕唳苦Σ唰嬥Θ唳距イ 唳む唳ㄠ 唳呧唳唳� 唳唳侧唳� 唳ㄠ唳唳ㄠ 唳嗋Π唰囙 唳ㄠ唳班唳� 唳唳班Δ唳� 唳呧Θ唰佮Π唳曕唳� 唳灌Ο唳监 唳Α唳监唳�, 唳唳ㄠ 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦唰� 唳唳む唳班Ω唳ㄠ唳む唳� 唳夃Κ唳灌唳� 唳︵唳む 唳唳班Μ唰囙Θ 唳Σ唰� 唳ㄠ唳多唳氞唳� 唳曕Π唰囙Θ啷�
唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳忇Μ唳距Π 唳む唳佮Π 唳膏唳む唳班 唳曕唳唳ム唳班唳ㄠ唰� 唳む唳侧唳� 唳︵唳唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳唳Ω唰嵿Δ 唳灌Ο唳监 唳Α唳监唳�, 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳忇Μ唳距Π唳� 唳唳� 唳膏Κ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳曕唳侧唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳佮唰� 唳Ω唰囙Θ; 唳唳唳� 唳呧Θ唰佮Ξ唰嬥Ζ唳� 唳涏唳∴唳� 唳曕唳唳ムΣ唳苦-唳唳唳灌Μ唳苦唰嵿唰囙Ζ 唳唳� 唳ㄠΟ唳监イ 唳曕唳唳ム唳班唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳ㄠΚ唰� 唳唰嵿唳� 唳氞唳班唳侧Ω 唳む唳� 唳班唳唳� 唳膏唳唳班唳溹唳唳� (唳灌Σ唳� 唳班唳唳� 唳忇Ξ唰嵿Κ唳距Ο唳监唳�) 唳ㄠ唳唳ㄠ唳む唳班Γ 唳ㄠ唳唰囙唰囙Θ, 唳唳唳� 唳嗋Μ唳距Ω唳膏唳ムΣ 唳唳唳熰唳曕唳� 唳氞唳班唳侧Ω唰囙Π 唳犩唳� 唳ㄠ唳曕唳� 唳∴唳距Ο唳监イ 唳氞唳班唳侧Ω唰囙Π 唳栢唳侧唳� 唳唳唳� 唳唳む唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳︵唳侧 唳曕唳侧唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳Χ唳距唳唰囙Π 唳唳唳� 唳嗋Π唳距Ξ唰囙Π 唳氞唳曕Π唰€唳熰 唳嗋Π 唳ム唳曕唳ㄠ啷� 唳呧Ω唰嵿Δ唳苦Δ唰嵿Μ唰囙Π 唳忇Ξ唳� 唳膏唳曕唰� 唳Α唳监 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦唰� '唳ㄠ' 唳Σ唰� 唳︵唳唳� 唳涏唳∴唳� 唳唳唳� 唳嗋Π 唳曕唳� 唳夃Κ唳距Ο唳� 唳涏唳侧唳ㄠ啷� 唳唳栢 唳呧Μ唳多唳� 唳む唳ㄠ 唳Σ唰囙Θ, 唳唳班Μ唳距Π 唳班唳溹唳� 唳囙唰嵿唰囙Ξ唳む 唳ㄠ唳唳� 唳唳侧唳熰唳ㄠ 唳唳唳� 唳曕唳� 唳ㄠΟ唳�, 唳嗋唰� 唳 唳灌Ο唳监唳涏 唳灌Ο唳监唳涏, 唳忇唳� 唳ム唳曕 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳班唳� 唳唳о唳� 唳Δ唰嬥 唳膏Μ 唳氞Σ唳啷� 唳唳唳� 唳忇唳熰 唳Μ唳苦Δ唰嵿Π 唳Θ唰嵿Η唳�, 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳� 唳呧Θ唰囙 唳涏 唳曕唳熰 唳呧Κ唰� 唳︵Χ 唳唳� 唳む唳班唳� 唳灌唳膏唳� 唳ㄠ唳曕唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳むΜ唰囙 唳曕唳� 唳膏唳ム 唳曕唳� 唳唳唰� 唳灌Μ唰� 唳む 唳犩唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳︵唳ㄠイ 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳唳唳灌Μ唳苦唰嵿唰囙Ζ 唳む唳� 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳班唳� 唳氞唳栢 唳呧Μ唰堗Η啷�
唳唳唳灌Μ唳苦唰嵿唰囙Ζ唰囙Π 唳唳唳唳班 唳Δ唳唳班唳ム唰嵿Ο 唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳膏唳ム 唳唳唳� 唳︵唳班Δ唰嵿Μ 唳唳∴唳む唳� 唳ム唳曕啷� 唳曕唳侧唳唳ㄠ唳熰唰� 唳侧唳唳� 唳唳班 唳唳侧 唳︵唳唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳忇Μ唳距Π 唳︵唳班唳� 唳忇 唳Θ唰嵿Ζ唳� 唳嗋唳熰唳ㄠイ 唳む唳ㄠ 唳忇Μ唳距Π 唳唳囙Μ唰囙Σ 唳︵唳栢唳唰� 唳溹Θ唳椸Γ唰囙Π 唳膏唳Θ唰� 唳灌唳佮 唳︵唳唰� 唳Σ唰囙Θ, 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳� 唳膏唳Ψ唰嵿 唳曕Π唰囙 唳む唳佮Π 唳唳む 唳侧唳栢 唳︵唳唰囙唰囙Θ 唳唳囙Ο唳监唳� 唳膏唳む唳班唳曕 唳唳唰� 唳曕Π唳� 唳氞Σ唰� 唳ㄠ, 唳むΜ唰佮 唳膏Ξ唰嵿Κ唳む唳む唳� 唳侧唳 唳む唳佮Π 唳唳む 唳忇Μ唳� 唳唳� 唳唳椸Ω唳距唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳む唳佮唰� 唳唳唳� 唳膏唳ム 唳唳唰� 唳︵唳唰� 唳Ο唳监唳ㄠ 唳忇 唳唳唳氞唳班 唳侧唳唳� 唳曕Π唰囙唰囙Θ啷� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳撪Κ唳� 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳� 唳 唳曕唳粪唳唳� 唳膏 唳む 唳膏唳Ψ唰嵿唳� 唳唳澿 唳唳氞唳涏, 唳曕唳班Γ 唳む唳佮Π 唳曕唳� 唳唳む唳班Ω唳ㄠ唳む唳� 唳灌唰嵿唰囙Θ唳距イ 唳む唳ㄠ 唳忇唳� 唳忇 唳唳� 唳ム唳曕 唳唳班唳唰� 唳嗋Ω唳む 唳氞唳囙唰囙Θ, 唳呧Ε唳� 唳唳� 唳む唳佮Π 唳唳唳灌Μ唳苦唰嵿唰囙Ζ唰� 唳Δ 唳︵唳氞唳涏唳� 唳ㄠ啷� 唳唳唳� 唳膏唳ム 唳唳唳灌唳� 唳ム唳曕 唳呧Μ唳膏唳ム唳 唳唳班Δ唳� 唳唳灌唳班唳む 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳唳� 唳︵唳唳椸唳�-唳氞Δ唰佮Π唰嵿唰佮Γ 唳灌唳班 唳唳∴唰� 唳唳氞唳涏啷� 唳忇Ξ唳� 唳Ο唳监唳ㄠ 唳唳唳氞唳班 唳Ζ唳� 唳︵唳唰� 唳氞Σ唰囙唰囙Θ 唳 唳唳�, 唳む唳佮唰� 唳曕 唳嗋Π 唳唳� 唳Σ唰� 唳唳ㄠ 唳氞Σ唰�? 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳忇Μ唳距Π 唳ㄠ唳溹唳曕唳� 唳囙唳侧唳唳ㄠ唳∴唳� 唳曕唳唳ムΣ唳苦 唳膏Ξ唳距唰囙Π 唳唳ム 唳Σ唰� 唳樴唳粪Γ唳� 唳曕Π唳侧唳�, 唳む唳佮Π 唳唳班Ω唰嵿Δ唳距Μ唳苦Δ 唳ㄠΔ唰佮Θ 唳膏Ξ唳距 唳曕唳犩唳唳む 唳唳唳� 唳 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰€唳 唳唳班Δ唳苦Ψ唰嵿唳距Θ唰囙Π 唳曕唳� 唳唳唳曕 唳嗋Π 唳班唳侧唳ㄠ啷� 唳氞唳班唳� 唳忇Μ唳� 唳膏唳熰唳�-唳忇Π 唳唳ム唰€唳曕Π唳｀唳� 唳班唳膏唳む 唳栢唳佮Α唳监唳� 唳曕唳� 唳多唳班 唳灌Ο唳监 唳椸唳侧鈥�
唳唳唰� 唳唳� 唳曕唳熰唳唰� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳ㄠ唳溹唳曕唳� 唳曕唳唳ムΣ唳苦 唳氞唳班唳氞唳� 唳膏Π唰嵿Μ唰囙Ω唳班唳 唳樴唳粪Γ唳� 唳曕Π唳距Π 唳� 唳班唳溹Θ唰堗Δ唳苦 唳氞唳侧唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳︵Π唳唳班唳� 唳忇唳溹Θ 唳唳熰唳� 唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳曕Π唰囙Θ 唳ㄠ, 唳む唳佮Π 唳ㄠ唳� 唳膏唳唳� 唳ムΞ唳距Ω 唳唳�, 唳ㄠ唳熰唳唳距Π 唳班Μ唳距Π唰嵿 唳唳侧唳� 唳唳佮唰� 唳唳唳� 唳呧Λ 唳呧Σ 唳膏唳溹Θ唳� 唳Σ唰囙唰囙Θ啷� 唳ムΞ唳距Ω 唳唳� 唳涏唳侧唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳侧Π唰嵿Α 唳灌唳� 唳氞唳唳ㄠ唳膏唳侧Π; 唳� 唳Ζ唳熰 唳唳曕唳むΠ唳距唰嵿Ο唰� 唳忇唳ㄠ 唳嗋唰�, 唳忇Μ唳� 唳忇Π 唳呧Μ唳膏唳ム唳� 唳唳曕唳むΠ唳距唰嵿Ο唰囙Π 唳唳班Η唳距Θ唳Θ唰嵿Δ唰嵿Π唰€唳班 唳撪Κ唳班啷� 唳唳班唳� 唳曕唳涏 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳︵唳 唳涏唳� 唳む唳ㄠ 唳唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳唳班Ω唰嵿Δ唳距Μ唳苦Δ '唳撪Ε 唳呧Λ 唳膏唳唳班唳唳膏'-唳む 唳膏唳唳曕唳粪Π 唳曕Π唰囙Θ啷� 唳忇 唳多Κ唳� 唳ㄠ唳唳� 唳呧Π唰嵿Ε 唳唳� 唳唳ㄠ 唳ㄠ唳唰囙唰囙Θ 唳班唳溹 唳呧Ψ唰嵿唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦 唳囙唳侧唳唳ㄠ唳∴唳� 唳氞唳班唳氞唳� 唳膏Π唰嵿Μ唳距Η唳苦Θ唳距Ο唳监, 唳忇Μ唳� 唳む唳ㄠ 唳唳ㄠ 唳唳班Χ唰嵿Θ唰� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳唳班Δ唳� 唳呧Θ唰佮唳� 唳ム唳曕Μ唰囙Θ啷� 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳班唳� 唳唳о唳ㄠ 唳呧唰佮 唳唳多唳唳� 唳班唳栢 唳唳� 唳多Δ 唳呧Δ唰嵿Ο唳距唳距Π 唳忇Μ唳� 唳溹唳侧Μ唳距Ω唰囙Π 唳Π唳� 唳む唳佮Π 唳呧Μ唳膏唳ム唳� 唳ム唳曕 唳ㄠΑ唳监唳� 唳ㄠ啷� 唳唳ㄠΩ唳苦唳唳 唳忇Μ唳� 唳ㄠ唳む唳曕Ν唳距Μ唰� 唳灌唳班 唳椸唳唰� 唳曕唳粪唳 唳唳� 唳灌Ο唳监 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳多唳粪Δ唳� 唳唳班唰� 唳唳む唳唳︵Γ唰嵿Α 唳︵唳ㄠイ 唰оЙ唰┼Й-唳忇Π 唰� 唳溹唳侧唳� 唳侧Θ唰嵿Α唳ㄠ唳� 唳熰唳撪Ο唳监唳� 唳灌唳侧 唳� 唳唳む唳唳︵Γ唰嵿Α 唳曕唳班唳唳� 唳曕Π唳� 唳灌Ο唳监イ 唳熰唳撪Ο唳监唳� 唳灌唳� 唳膏唳ム唳Θ唳距唳� 唳唳ㄠ唳ㄠ唳� 唳灌Ο唳监唳涏唳侧 唳唳栢唳唳� 唳忇Μ唳� 唳夃唳氞 唳Ζ唰� 唳嗋Ω唰€唳� 唳唳唰嵿Δ唳苦Ζ唰囙Π 唳唳む唳唳︵Θ唰嵿Α 唳曕唳班唳唳� 唳曕Π唳唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο啷�
唳膏Μ 唳椸Σ唰嵿Κ唰囙Π唳� 唳む 唳忇唳溹Θ 唳ㄠ唳唳� 唳嗋Π 唳忇唳溹Θ 唳唳侧唳� 唳ム唳曕啷� 唳唳侧唳熰唳� 唳� 唳ㄠ唳熰唰囙Π 唳ㄠ唳唳� 唳呧Μ唳多唳 唳ムΞ唳距Ω 唳唳班イ 唳嗋Ζ唳班唳多Μ唳距Θ 唳唳� 唳ㄠ唳む唳� 唳唳班Χ唰嵿Θ唰� 唳忇唳唳班 唳唳ム 唳ㄠΔ 唳曕Π唰囙Θ 唳ㄠ啷� 唳唳班Μ唳距Π 唳灌唳唳� 唳︵唳唳� 唳灌Ο唳监唳涏, 唳Π唳苦Μ唳距Π 唳ム唳曕 唳︵唳班唳樴Ζ唳苦Θ 唳嗋Σ唳距Ζ唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳班唳栢 唳唳粪Γ 唳涏唳� 唳忇Μ唳� 唳ㄠ唳傕Π唳� 唳忇唳熰 唳溹唳侧 唳嗋唳曕 唳班唳栢 唳灌Ο唳监唳涏, 唳栢唳唳� 唳︵唳唳� 唳灌Ο唳� 唳ㄠ, 唳むΜ唰佮 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳膏唳ム 唳嗋Κ唰嬥Ψ唰� 唳唳� 唳ㄠ 唳唳班イ 唳唳侧唳熰唳� 唳ㄠ唳熰唰� 唳︵唳栢 唳唳 唳唳班唳� 唳唳班唰囙Ω唰嵿唰嵿Ο唳距Θ唰嵿 唳多唳唳ㄠ唳о唳唳唰€唳班 唳忇Ω唰� 唳む唳佮唰� 唳唳︵唳о 唳︵唳氞唳涏唳�, 唳撪Κ唳班 唳撪Κ唳班 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳唳班Δ唳� 唳嗋Θ唰佮唳む唳� 唳忇Θ唰� 唳Θ唰� 唳Θ唰� 唳む唳佮唰� 唳呧Ω唰嵿Μ唰€唳曕唳� 唳曕Π唳侧唳� 唳む 唳侧唳唳犩 唳氞唳曕 唳唳, 唳む唳ㄠ 唳膏唳熰 唳曕唳� 唳曕Π唳涏唳� 唳ㄠ啷� 唳唳� 唳溹Μ唳距Μ唰� 唳Σ唰囙Θ, 唳 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳班唳� 唳嗋Θ唰佮唳む唳� 唳唳む 唳呧Ξ唳� 唳涏Σ唳距唳侧唳� 唳唳班Ο唳监唳溹Θ 唳灌Ο唳�, 唳む唳ㄠ 唳膏 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳班唳� 唳唳溹唳班 唳ㄠΘ, 唳む唳佮Π 唳曕唳唳ムΣ唳苦 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳班唳� 唳班唳氞 唳呧Θ唰囙 唳唳多 唳膏唳曕唳粪唳イ 唳唳班唳� 唳氞Π唳苦Δ唰嵿Π唰囙Π 唳忇 唳︵唳⑧唳む唳� 唳︵唳曕 唳囙唳苦Δ 唳曕Π唰囙 唳唳侧唳� 唳む唳佮Π 唳ㄠ唳熰唰� 唳唳班唰� 唳唳唳� 唳Π 唳呧Σ 唳膏唳溹Θ唳� 唳Σ唰囙唰囙Θ; 唳班唳�, 唳澿Α唳�, 唳唳粪唳熰, 唳灌唳�-唳唳班唰冟Δ唳� 唳唳Θ 唳班唳 唳ㄠ唳�, 唳椸唳熰 唳唳班唳� 唳溹唳∴唰� 唳唳� 唳忇 唳曕Ε唳距Π唳� 唳唳ㄠ唳粪イ 唳ㄠ唳熰唰囙Π 唳唳唳曕唳む唳� 唳唳侧唳� 唳膏唳Ψ唰嵿 唳溹唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳︵唳唰囙唰囙Θ 唳栢唳班唳粪唳� 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰� 唳む唳佮Π 唳唳熰唳� 唳唳多唳唳� 唳ㄠ唳�, 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳� 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唳熰 唳班唰嵿Ψ唳� 唳曕Π唳む 唳椸唳唰� 唳唳班唳� 唳灌唳班唳ㄠ 唳ムΞ唳距Ω 唳唳班唳� 唳唳班Δ唳� 唳む唳佮Π 唳班Ο唳监唳涏 唳呧唰佮Γ唰嵿 唳多唳班Ζ唰嵿Η唳距Μ唰嬥Η, 唳 唳曕唳班Γ唰� 唳� 唳ㄠ唳熰唳熰 唳嗋Ζ唰� 唳侧唳栢啷� 唳唳班唳� 唳嗋Ζ唳班唳多 唳呧Θ唰佮Κ唰嵿Π唳距Γ唳苦Δ 唳灌Ο唳监 唳唳犩唳� 唳唳� 唳ㄠ唳溹唳� 唳Δ唰囙Π 唳唳班Δ唳� 唳呧Μ唳苦唳� 唳ム唳曕唳�-唳唳班唳距Π唳距Θ唰嵿Δ唳班 唳膏 唳嗋唳唳�-唳� 唳溹唳ㄠ唳唰囙唰囙Θ 唳唳侧唳熰イ
唳ムΞ唳距Ω 唳唳� 唳溹唳Ζ唰嵿Ζ唳多唳む唳� 唳唳粪Γ 唳溹Θ唳唳班唳 唳涏唳侧唳� 唳む唳佮Π 唳唳ㄠΜ唳む唳唳︵ 唳︵唳粪唳熰唳唰嵿唳苦Π 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο啷� 唳� 唳唳粪Ο唳监 唳む唳ㄠ 唳唳� 唳曕Ο唳监唳曕唳苦 唳 唳侧唳栢唳涏唳侧唳�, 唳唳椸唳侧唳� 唳唳澿 唳嗋 唳膏Μ唳氞唳唰� 唳唳栢唳唳� '唳囙唳熰唳唳唳�' 唳唳熰啷� 唳� 唳唳む 唳む唳ㄠ 唳忇唳熰 唳嗋Ζ唳班唳� 唳膏Ξ唳距唰囙Π 唳曕Σ唰嵿Κ唳苦Δ 唳涏Μ唳� 唳忇唳曕唳涏唳侧唳�, 唳唳栢唳ㄠ 唳唳唰嵿Δ唳苦Ξ唳距Σ唳苦唳距Θ唳距Η唰€唳� 唳曕唳� 唳Ω唰嵿Δ唰� 唳ㄠ唳囙イ 唳膏Ξ唳距唰囙Π 唳膏Μ唳距 唳膏Ξ唰嵿Κ唳︵唳� 唳唳椸唳唳椸 唳曕Π唰� 唳︵唳ㄠΘ唰嵿Ζ唳苦Θ 唳唳班Ο唳监唳溹Θ唰€唳 唳曕唳溹唰佮Σ唰� 唳膏唳班啷� 唳唳唰嵿Δ唳苦Π 唳唳侧唳曕唳ㄠ唳 唳唳灌唳む 唳曕唳涏唳� 唳ㄠ唳� 唳� 唳膏Ξ唳距唰�, 唳む唳� 唳忇唳距Θ唰� 唳曕唳粪Ξ唳む唳� 唳︵唳� 唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳栢唳唰嬥唰囙Ο唳监唳� 唳ㄠ唳囙イ 唳唳班唳� 唳� 唳唳熰唳� 唰� 唳唳� 唳嗋唰� 唰оЙ唰оЗ 唳膏唳侧 唳唳曕唳唳距Ν唰囙Σ唰嵿Σ唳� 唳囙Δ唳距Σ唳苦Δ唰� 唳Ω唰� 唳侧唳栢唳涏唳侧唳� 唳唳班唳� 唳犩唳� 唳夃Σ唰嵿唰嬥Π唳ム 唳 '唳︵唳 唳唳班唳ㄠ唳�', 唳唳栢唳ㄠ 唳曕唳粪Ξ唳む唳� 唳唳侧イ '唳唳班唳ㄠ唳�'-唳� 唳唳曕唳唳距Ν唰囙Σ唰嵿Σ唳� 唳︵唳栢唳唰囙唳苦Σ唰囙Θ 唳嗋Ζ唳班唳� 唳班唳溹Κ唰佮Δ唰嵿Π唳曕 唳曕唳粪Ξ唳む唳� 唳氞唳∴唳距Θ唰嵿Δ唰� 唳夃唳む 唳灌Σ唰� 唳灌唳む 唳Δ 唳班唰嵿Δ 唳唳栢唳�, 唳唳栢Δ唰� 唳灌Μ唰�, 唳Θ唰嵿Η唰佮唰� 唳唳唰� 唳唳粪Δ唰� 唳灌Σ唰� 唳唳粪Δ唰� 唳灌Μ唰�, 唳唳班Δ唳� 唳唳灌唳班唳む 唳Ο唳监唳� 唳唳侧唳熰 唳唳侧Μ唳距Π 唳灌Σ唰� 唳唳侧唳熰 唳唳侧Δ唰� 唳灌Μ唰�, 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳曕唳粪Ξ唳む唳 唳唳唳� 唳Π 唳溹Θ唳椸Γ唰囙Π 唳夃Θ唰嵿Θ唳む唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳曕唳� 唳曕Π唳む 唳灌Μ唰� (I have to be cruel only to be kind)啷� 唳Χ唰嵿唳苦Ξ 唳むΕ唳� 唳嗋Ξ唰囙Π唳苦唳距唰� 唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳唳曕唳唳距Ν唰囙Σ唰嵿Σ唳苦Ο唳监唳� 唳Σ唰囙 唳溹唳ㄠ, 唳唳多唳粪Δ, 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳曕唳膏唳炧唳溹唳� 唳唳� 唳Σ唰囙 唳︵唳�, "America has no permanent friends or enemies, only interests鈥�, 唳むΜ唰� 唳唳班唳� 唳膏唳Κ唰嵿Θ唰囙Π 唳唳唰嵿Δ唳苦Ξ唳距Σ唳苦唳距Θ唳�-唳唳灌唳� 唳膏Ξ唳距 唳椸唳� 唳曕Π唳唳� 唳氞唳粪唳熰 唳唳佮Π唳� 唳曕Π唰囙唰囙Θ, 唳膏唳� 唳侧唳ㄠ唳�-唳膏唳熰唳侧唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳灌唳む 唳Ε唰囙唰嵿 唳班唰嵿Δ 唳唳栢Δ唰� 唳︵唳唳о 唳曕Π唰囙Θ 唳ㄠ 唳曕唳ㄠ唳�, 唳唳唰嵿Ο唳距 唳膏Μ唳膏Ξ唳 唳む唳佮Ζ唰囙Π 唳唳班Ω唰嵿Δ唰佮Δ唳� 唳涏唳侧, 唳唳曕唳唳侧唳侧唳� 唳Δ唰嬥 唳む唳佮Π唳距 唳Σ唰囙唰囙Θ, "I have to be cruel only t鈥︹€澿イ 唳唳班Κ唳ㄠ唳ム 唳曕 唳唳曕唳唳距Ν唰囙Σ唰嵿Σ唳苦Κ唳ㄠ唳ム-唳 唳Ε唰囙 唳嗋Κ唳ㄠ 唳灌唳佮唰佮Θ, 唳呧唰佮唳距Δ 唳嗋Κ唳ㄠ唳� 唳撪 唳忇唳熰-唳囙イ
唳唳侧唳� 唳唳侧唳� 唳唳ㄠ唳唰囙唰囙Θ 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳︵Π唳唳班唳� 唳嗋Π唰囙 唳椸唳班唳む唳Κ唰傕Π唰嵿Γ 唳膏Ζ唳膏唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π '唳氞唳� 唳唳ㄠ唳膏唳熰唳�' 唳ムΞ唳距Ω 唳曕唳班Ξ唳撪Ο唳监唳侧唰囙イ 唳唳侧唳� 唳︵唳栢唳唰囙唰囙Θ 唳曕唳唳 唳о唳班唳� 唳曕唳班Ξ唳撪Ο唳监唳� 唳曕唳班Ξ唳多唳� 唳唳班唳� 唳唳班Δ唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳Θ 唳唳粪唳唰� 唳椸唳涏唳�, 唳曕Ε唳距Π 唳唳唳佮唰� 唳唳侧 唳曕唳唳 唳膏唳溹唳ㄠ 唳唳氞唳班 唳唳班唰� 唳呧Κ唰嵿Π唳膏唳む唳� 唳曕Π唰囙唰囙Θ 唳唳班Μ唳距Π啷� 唳曕唳涏唳熰 唳о唳班Σ唳唰� 唳多唳班 唳灌唳唳� 唳� 唳ㄠ唳熰 唳唳班唳膏Θ唰囙Π 唳唳氞唳班唳� 唳� 唳︵唳多唳 唳忇Ω唰� 唳灌唰庎Κ唳苦Γ唰嵿Α唰囙Π 唳椸Δ唳� 唳唳∴唳苦Ο唳监 唳︵唳啷� 唳膏唳溹唳ㄠ 唳唳氞唳班唳� 唳︵唳多唳� 唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳Σ唰囙 唳曕唳班Ξ唳撪Ο唳监唳侧唳� 唳唳澿 唳唳膏唳むΜ唰囙Π 唳呧Θ唰囙 唳氞Π唳苦Δ唰嵿Π唰囙Π 唳唳班Δ唳苦Λ唳侧Θ 唳膏唳Ψ唰嵿 唳︵唳栢Δ唰� 唳唳�, 唳灌Ο唳监Δ唰� 唳膏唳熰 唳︵唳栢唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳侧唳熰唳� 唳夃Ζ唰嵿Ζ唰囙Χ唰嵿Ο 唳涏唳侧イ 唳ㄠ唳熰唰� 唳唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳︵唳多唳唳� 唳唳澿 唳涏唳� 唳忇唳熰 唳氞Π唳苦Δ唰嵿Π 唳曕唳粪Γ唳苦唰囙Π 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳夃唳曕 唳︵唳唰� 唳唳啷� 唳� 唳氞Π唳苦Δ唰嵿Π唳熰唳� 唳ㄠ唳� '唳曕Ξ唳� 唳唳唳�'啷� 唳嗋Ξ唳溹Θ唳む唳� 唳唳班Δ唳苦Θ唳苦Η唳� 唳� 唳曕Ξ唳� 唳唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳Ο唳监唳ㄠ唳� 唳ㄠ唳熰 唳多唳班 唳灌Ο唳�, 唳忇Π唳Π 唳椸唳熰 唳ㄠ唳熰唰� 唳む唳� 唳唳多唳� 唳曕唳� 唳唳唳曕 唳ム唳曕唳ㄠ啷� 唳ㄠ唳熰唰囙Π 唳多唳粪 唳曕Ξ唳� 唳唳唳� 唳о唳� 唳唳侧唳熰 唳溹Σ唰嵿Σ唳距Ζ 唳灌Ο唳监 唳ムΞ唳距Ω 唳唳班唳� 唳唳む唳唳︵Θ唰嵿Α 唳曕唳班唳唳� 唳曕Π唰囙イ 唳忇唳苦 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π 唳嗋Ξ唳溹Θ唳む唳� 唳唳� 唳氞Π唳苦Δ唰嵿Π啷� 唳多唳膏Θ唳Θ唰嵿Δ唰嵿Π唰囙Π 唳膏唳︵唳о唳ㄠ唳む 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π 唳曕唳� 唳唳唳曕 唳ム唳曕唳ㄠ, 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳嗋Ξ唳班唳� 唳多唳膏唰囙Π 唳唳むΘ唳唳曕唳� 唳溹Σ唰嵿Σ唳距Ζ 唳灌Ο唳监 唳多唳膏唰囙Π 唳多Δ唰嵿Π唰佮Π 唳唳ム 唳曕唳熰 唳ㄠ唳囙イ
唳撪, 唳ムΞ唳距Ω 唳唳班唰� 唳膏Π唳苦Ο唳监 唳︵唳む 唳 唳ムΞ唳距Ω 唳曕唳班Ξ唳撪Ο唳监唳� 唳呧Δ唰� 唳粪Α唳监Ο唳ㄠ唳む唳� 唳曕Π唳侧唳�, 唳む唳佮Π 唳曕 唳灌Ο唳监唳涏唳侧 唳多唳粪Δ唳�? 唳嗋Π 唳膏唳� 唳呧唳唳� 唳唳侧唳�? 唳唳佮唰� 唳唳唰� 唳曕Π唳唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳唳唰囙 唳Η唰嵿Ο唳 唳︵唳栢唳唰� 唳ㄠΔ唰佮Θ 唳班唳粪唳熰唳班Μ唰嵿Ο唳Ω唰嵿Ε唳� 唳溹唳班 唳曕Π唰囙Θ? 唳栢唳唳距Σ唰€ 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳曕Ο唳监唳� 唳唳� 唳Π唳� 唳忇唳︵唳� 唳︵唳溹Θ唰囙Π唳� 唳多唳班唳氞唳涏唳� 唳曕Π唰囙Θ啷� 唳呧唳唳� 唳唳侧唳�-唳忇Π 唳Π 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳嗋Π唳� 唰唳� 唳唳唰� 唳曕Π唰囙唳苦Σ唰囙Θ, 唳忇唳︵唳� 唰� 唳溹Θ唰囙Π 唳唳班唳｀Ζ唳｀唳� 唳︵唳ㄠイ 唳灌唳唳�, 唳犩唳� 唳оΠ唰囙唰囙Θ, 唳忇 唳︵'唳唳班 唳多唳班唳氞唳涏唳�!
唳班唳粪唳熰唳班唳 唳多唳膏Θ 唳唳Μ唳膏唳ム, 唳嗋唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳班Ο唳监唳�, 唳� 唳唳唰嵿Δ唳苦唳� 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰€唳 唳唳多唳唳�-唳忇唰佮Σ唰� 唳 唳膏Ξ唰嵿Κ唰傕Π唰嵿Γ 唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳忇Μ唳� 唳膏唳唳о唳� 唰┼唳� 唳唳粪Ο唳� 唳膏唳熰 唳� 唳呧唰嵿唳侧唳� 唳唳ㄠ唳粪唳班 唳栢唳� 唳忇唳熰 唳唳澿唳� 唳氞唳粪唳熰 唳曕Π唰囙Θ 唳ㄠ; 唳忇唳班 唳忇 唳呧唰嵿唳距Θ唳む唳唳班唳� 唳溹唳Θ唳︵Π唰嵿Χ唳ㄠ唳苦唰� 唳唳班唳｀Κ唳ㄠ 唳嗋唳曕Α唳监 唳оΠ唰� 唳班唳栢唳� 唳Σ唰囙 唳唳班Δ唰� 唳多唳о唳唳む唳� 唳灌唳ㄠ唳︵唳︵唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο唳� 唳唳膏Ο唰嬥唰嵿Ο 唳忇唳熰 唳︵唳� 唳唳ㄠ唳唳� 唳ㄠ唳傕Π唳� 唳忇唰囙Θ唰嵿Α唳� 唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳忇唳熰 唳︵Σ 唳班唳粪唳熰唳班唳� 唳多唳膏Θ 唳曕唳粪Ξ唳む唳� 唳︵唳唳苦Δ唰嵿Μ唰� 唳嗋Ω唰�, 唳唳曕唳膏唳む唳ㄠ 唳оΠ唰嵿Ψ唳｀唳� 唳多唳曕唳� 唳曕唳� 唳ㄠ唳班 唳唳氞唳� 唳氞唳囙Δ唰� 唳椸唳侧 唳む唳佮唰� 唳氞唳班唳� 唳膏唳曕唳粪唳� 唳膏唳曕唳粪唳� 唳唳椸唳∴ 唳曕Π唳唳� 唳嗋唰€唳Θ-唳氞唳粪唳熰唳 唳唳ム 唳曕唳熰 唳Π唳む 唳灌Ο唳�, 唳多唳班唳侧唳曕唳む 唳︵Χ唳曕唳� 唳Π 唳︵Χ唳� 唳оΠ唰� 唳灌唳ㄠ唳︵ 唳む唳唳侧Ζ唰囙Π 唳︵Ξ唳� 唳唳∴唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳� 唳氞唳曕Π唰€ 唳ム唳曕 唳唰嵿唳苦Δ 唳曕Π唰� 唳唳︵唳� 唳膏唳傕唳侧唳班 唳曕唳粪Ξ唳む唳 唳嗋Ω唰�, 唳嗋Π 唳唳權Σ唳距Ζ唰囙Χ唰� 唳膏Θ唰嵿Δ唳距Θ 唳︵Δ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳ㄠ唳む 唳氞唳囙Σ唰� 唳膏唳唳溹唳曕Ν唳距Μ唰� 唳灌唳拷锟斤拷 唳灌Δ唰� 唳灌Ο唳� (唳曕唳班Γ, 唳囙Ω唳侧唳 唳膏Θ唰嵿Δ唳距Θ 唳︵Δ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳ㄠ唳唳� 唳唳о唳� 唳ㄠ唳囙イ 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唳曕 唳曕唳ㄠ唳︵唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳嗋唳ㄠ唰佮Σ唰� 唳班唳苦Δ 唳灌Ο唳� 唳Σ唰� 唳︵Δ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳膏Θ唰嵿Δ唳距Θ唰囙Π 唳膏Ξ唰嵿Κ唳む唳む唳� 唳唳班Δ唳苦Π唳曕唳粪唳 唳曕唳� 唳嗋唳ㄠ唳� 唳曕唳犩唳唳� 唳忇唳距Θ唰� 唳ㄠ唳�; 唳︵Δ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳唳む-唳唳む唳� 唳唳む唳唳� 唳Π 唳栢唳� 唳膏唳溹唳� 唳︵Δ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳膏Θ唰嵿Δ唳距Θ唳︵唳� 唳膏Ξ唰嵿Κ唳む唳む 唳ム唳曕 唳唰嵿唳苦Δ 唳曕Π唳� 唳唳)啷� 唳唳權Σ唳距Ζ唰囙Χ唰� 唳膏Μ 唳唳侧唳唰� 唰Е 唳侧唳栢唳� 唳撪Κ唳班 唳呧Θ唳距Ε 唳多唳多 唳班Ο唳监唳涏啷� 唳Π唳苦Μ唳距Π唰囙Π 唳嗋Ζ唳� 唳膏唳灌唳班唳� 唳涏唳∴唳� 唳唳∴唰� 唳撪唳� 唳忇Ζ唰囙Π 唳唳ㄠΜ唳苦唳む唳� 唳溹唳炧唳� 唳Σ唳む 唳椸唳侧 唳多唳ㄠ唳唳� 唳曕唳犩唳啷� 唳唳權Σ唳距Ζ唰囙Χ唰囙Π 唳曕唳多唳� 唳曕唳多唳班唳︵唳� 唳唳澿 唳曕唳� 唳灌Δ唰嵿Ο唳�, 唳оΠ唰嵿Ψ唳�, 唳∴唳曕唳む唳� 唳灌唳� 唳曕唳班Ξ唳多 唳娻Π唰嵿Η唳唳栢, 唳忇Μ唳� 唳曕唳� 唳む唳︵唳� 唳唳むΠ唰� 唳呧Θ唰佮Χ唰嬥唳ㄠ唳� 唳呧Ν唳距Μ 唳侧唰嵿Ψ唰嵿Ο唳｀唳-唳忇 唳唳班Χ唰嵿Θ唳椸唳侧唳� 唳夃Δ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳呧Θ唰囙唳熰唳� 唳侧唳曕唳唰� 唳嗋唰� 唳忇唳距Θ唰囙イ
唳曕Ε唳� 唳灌Σ唰�, 唳Χ唰嵿唳苦Ξ唰� 唳班唳粪唳熰唳� 唳� 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰囙Π 唳忇 唳唳ム唰€唳曕Π唳� 唳曕 唳曕Π唰� 唳膏Ξ唰嵿Ν唳� 唳灌Σ唰�? 唳嗋唳曕唳� 唳嗋Η唰佮Θ唳苦 唳Χ唰嵿唳苦Ξ唳� 唳膏Ν唰嵿Ο唳む唳� 唳膏Μ唳氞唳唰� 唳椸唳班唳む唳Κ唰傕Π唰嵿Γ 唳︵Σ唳苦Σ 唳Σ唳� 唳灌Ο唳� 唳唳唳椸Θ唳� 唳曕唳班唳熰 唳氞唳曕唳む唳Δ唰嵿Π唳熰唳曕啷� 唳膏Π唳曕唳� 唳唳班Η唳距Θ, 唳班唳溹/唳唳︵Χ唳距Π唳� 唳 唳嗋唳ㄠ唳� 唳娻Π唰嵿Η唰� 唳ㄠΘ, 唳呧Κ唳班唳� 唳曕Π唳侧 唳む唳佮Ζ唰囙Π唳� 唳 唳多唳膏唳む 唳唳む 唳灌Μ唰�, 唳忇 唳唳唳唳班唳� 唰Е唰� 唳唳� 唳嗋唰� 唳侧唳栢 唳� 唳︵Σ唳苦Σ唰� 唳ㄠ唳多唳氞唳� 唳曕Π唳� 唳灌Ο唳监イ 唳忇 唳唳唳椸Θ唳� 唳曕唳班唳熰唳� 唳灌唳� 唳оΠ唰囙 唳膏唳ム唳唳� 唳灌Ο唳� 唳嗋唳ㄠ唳� 唳忇唳熰 唳椸唳班唳む唳Κ唰傕Π唰嵿Γ 唳唳о唳� 唳 唳嗋 唳唳ム唳唳� 唳唳班Δ唰嵿Ο唰囙唳熰 唳︵唳多唳� 唳嗋唳ㄠ 唳曕唳犩唳唳� 唳唳班Η唳距Θ 唳唳む唳む: 唳忇Π 唳椸唳侧Ν唳班 唳ㄠ唳� 唳灌唳囙Μ唳苦Ο唳监唳� 唳曕Π唳唳� (Habeas Corpus)啷� 唳侧唳唳熰唳� 唳忇 唳多Μ唰嵿Ζ唳︵唳Ο唳监唳� 唳嗋唰嵿Ψ唳班唳� 唳呧Π唰嵿Ε "(唳呧Ν唳苦Ο唰佮唰嵿Δ 唳唳唰嵿Δ唳�) 唳膏Χ唳班唳班 唳嗋Κ唳ㄠ唳� 唳灌唳唳溹Δ唰� 唳嗋唰�"啷� 唳唳班唳氞唳� 唳 唳Η唰嵿Ο唳唳椸唳� 唳Δ唰� 唳ㄠ唳Δ唳�/ 唳班唳粪唳熰唳班Κ唰嵿Π唳о唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳嗋 唳氞唳囙Σ唰囙 唳嗋Κ唳ㄠ唳曕 唳溹唳侧 唳嗋唳曕 唳班唳栢Δ唰� 唳唳班唳� 唳ㄠ (唳唳权Σ唳距Ζ唰囙Χ唰赌唳班, 唳呧唰嵿唳灌唳膏唳� 唳曕Π唳唳� 唳ㄠ, 唳唳侧唳�!), 唳嗋Κ唳ㄠ唳曕 唳嗋唰� 唳嗋Ζ唳距Σ唳む 唳膏Χ唳班唳班 唳灌唳溹唳� 唳曕Π唳む 唳む唳ㄠ 唳唳о唳イ 唳嗋Ζ唳距Σ唳� 唳ㄠ唳班唳о唳班Γ 唳曕Π唳唳� 唳嗋Κ唳ㄠ 唳︵唳粪 唳ㄠ 唳曕 唳ㄠ唳班唳︵唳�, 唳ㄠ唳Δ唳� 唳ㄠΟ唳监イ 唳呧Κ唳班唳� 唳唳班Ξ唳距Γ唳苦Δ 唳ㄠ 唳灌Μ唳距Π 唳嗋唰� 唳嗋Κ唳ㄠ 唳 唳ㄠ唳班唳︵唳� 唳む 唳ㄠ唳多唳氞唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳忇 唳灌唳囙Μ唳苦Ο唳监唳� 唳曕Π唳唳膏イ 唳灌唳囙Μ唳苦Ο唳监唳� 唳曕Π唳唳� 唳嗋唰� 唳Σ唰囙 唳ㄠ唳Δ唳苦唰� 唳樴唳班Κ唳ム 唳唳ム 唳栢唳熰唳唰� 唳呧Δ唳苦Π唳苦唰嵿Δ 唳曕Ψ唰嵿 唳曕Π唰� 唰┼Ж 唳曕 唰Ж 唳о唳班唳� 唳嗋唳� 唳唳班Γ唳唳� 唳曕Π唳む 唳灌Ο唳�, 唳む唳佮Π 唳唳� 唳膏唳Κ唰嵿Θ 唳唳熰-唳膏唳� 唳膏Π唳距Ω唳班 唳嗋Κ唳ㄠ唳� 唳︵Π唳溹唳 唳熰唳曕 唳唳班 唳唳ㄠ 唳唳班Χ唰嵿Θ唰� 唳嗋Κ唳ㄠ唳曕 唳夃唳苦Ο唳监 唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳唳撪Ο唳监-唳膏唳熰 唳曕唳涏唳熰 唳溹唳苦Σ 唳� 唳唳侧Ξ唰嵿Μ唳苦Δ 唳灌Ο唳� 唳忇 唳灌唳囙Μ唳苦Ο唳监唳� 唳曕Π唳唳膏唳� 唳Π唳距Δ唰囙啷�
唰Е唰� 唳唳班唳班 唳唳多 唳嗋唰� 唳唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳唳撪Ο唳监 唳忇 唳ㄠ唳む唳椸唳侧唳む 唳班唳粪唳熰唳班Ο唳ㄠ唳む唳班唰� 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰€唳 唳唳多唳唳� 唳ム唳曕 唳嗋Σ唳距Ζ唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳班唳栢Μ唳距Π 唳唳班唳ムΞ唳苦 唳忇唳熰 唳唳班Ο唳监唳� 唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳︵唳栢Δ唰� 唳唳� 唳膏唳溹唳囙イ 唳むΜ唰�, 唳班唳� 唳唳Θ 唳忇 唳班唳む 唳む唳班 唳灌Ο唳� 唳ㄠ, 唳溹Θ唳椸Γ唰囙Π 唳呧Η唳苦唳距Π 唳嗋Ζ唳距Ο唳监唳� 唳ㄠ唳唳む唳む 唳唳班Ω唰嵿Δ唳距Μ唳苦Δ 唳忇 唳膏Μ 唳嗋唳� 唳曕唳ㄠ唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳о唳� 唳む唳Θ唳� 唳曕Σ唳 唳侧唳栢唳唳む唳班 唳唳膏唳むΜ唳距Ο唳监唳� 唳灌Ο唳监 唳唳 唳ㄠ啷� 唳忇Π 唳膏唳ム 唳溹Α唳监唳唰� 唳嗋唰� 唳唰� 唳唳ㄠ唳粪唳� 唳班唰嵿Δ, 唳樴唳�, 唳� 唳膏唳椸唳班唳唳� 唳呧Ζ唰嵿Ν唰佮Δ 唳膏Μ 唳囙Δ唳苦唳距Ω啷� 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ 唳� 唳班唳粪唳熰唳班唳� 唳唳ム唰€唳曕Π唳｀唳� 唳嗋Η唰佮Θ唳苦 唳 唳班唳唳� 唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳︵唳栢 唳嗋, 唳膏唳熰唳� 唳唳む唳む 唳椸Α唳监 唳灌Ο唳监 唳椸唳唰囙唳苦Σ唰� 唳粪唳� 唳多Δ唳曕唳� 唳囙唳侧唳唳ㄠ唳∴, 唳班唳溹 唳呧Ψ唰嵿唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳多唳膏Θ唳距Ξ唳侧啷� 唳班Μ唳距Π唰嵿 唳唳侧唳� 唳む唳佮Π 唳唳栢唳唳� 唳ㄠ唳熰 '唳� 唳唳唳� 唳Π 唳呧Σ 唳膏唳溹Θ唳�' 唳侧唳栢唳涏唳� 唳忇 唳囙Δ唳苦唳距Ω唰囙Π 唳唳班唳曕唳粪唳唰囙啷� 唳愢Δ唳苦唳距Ω唳苦 唳樴唳ㄠ唳Σ唰€唳� 唳撪Κ唳� 唳� 唳ㄠ唳熰 唳ㄠ唳班唳唳�, 唳む唳� 唳忇Π 唳愢Δ唳苦唳距Ω唳苦 唳唳班唳曕唳粪唳唳熰 唳嗋唰� 唳溹唳ㄠ 唳ㄠ唳撪Ο唳监 唳溹Π唰佮Π唰€啷�
唳熰唳夃Α唳� 唳唳多唳� 唳班唳溹 唳呧Ψ唰嵿唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳忇 唳呧Π唰嵿Ε唰� 唳膏Ν唰嵿Ο唳む唳� 唳囙Δ唳苦唳距Ω唰囙Π 唳椸Δ唳苦Κ唳� 唳呧Θ唰囙唳栢唳ㄠ 唳Π唳苦Μ唳班唳むΘ 唳曕Π唰� 唳︵唳唰囙唳苦Σ唰囙Θ, 唳呧Ε唳� 唳む唳佮Π 唳班唳溹 唳灌Μ唳距Π唳� 唳曕Ε唳� 唳涏唳侧唳ㄠ啷� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳涏唳侧唳� 唳む唳佮Π 唳唳む 唳班唳溹 唳膏Κ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳︵唳唳む唳 唳唳む唳班Ω唳ㄠ唳む唳�; 唳唳班Ε唳� 唳唳む唳� 唳嗋Π唰嵿Ε唳距Π唳曕 唳熰Κ唳曕 唳膏唳傕唳距Ω唳ㄠ 唳Ω唳距Π 唳曕唳� 唳夃Κ唳距Ο唳� 唳む唳佮Π 唳涏唳侧唳ㄠ啷� 唳嗋Π唰嵿Ε唳距Π唰囙Π 唳唳� 唰� 唳唳� 唳Ο唳监唳�, 唳唳む 唳膏Κ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳む唳� 唳膏唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳曕唳唳ムΣ唳苦 唳膏唳唳班唳溹唳唳� 唳呧Η唳苦Κ唳む 唳膏Ξ唰嵿Π唳距 唳︵唳唳む唳 唳唳班唳︵唳ㄠ唳ㄠ唳� 唳� 唳膏Ξ唰嵿Π唳距唰嵿唰€ 唳唳班Ε唳� 唳囙Ω唳距Μ唰囙Σ-唳忇Π 唳膏唳ム 唳唳權Σ唳� 唳膏唳ㄠ唳唳� 唳むΠ唳苦唳距Ο唳� 唳氞唳曕唳む 唳曕Π唰囙Θ, 唳嗋Π唰嵿Ε唳距Π 唳唳侧唳� 唳灌Σ唰囙 唳唳班唳︵唳ㄠ唳ㄠ唳�-唳囙Ω唳距Μ唰囙Σ唰囙Π 唳曕Θ唰嵿Ο唳� 唳曕唳唳ム唳班唳ㄠ唳� 唳膏唳ム 唳む唳� 唳唳唰� 唳︵唳唳ㄠイ 唳唳侧Δ 唳囙唳侧唳�-唳膏唳唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳曕唳唳ムΣ唳苦 唳膏唳唳班唳溹唳唳� 唳灌唳� 唳嗋Π唳� 唳多唰嵿Δ唳苦Χ唳距Σ唰€ 唳曕Π唰� 唳む唳侧唳� 唳忇唳︵唳� 唳侧唰嵿Ψ唰嵿Ο 唳涏唳侧イ 唰оЙ唰︵Ё 唳膏唳侧 唰оЙ 唳唳� 唳Ο唳监唳膏 唳嗋Π唰嵿Ε唳距Π 唳曕唳唳ム唳班唳ㄠ唰� 唳唳唰� 唳曕Π唰� 唳囙唳侧唳�-唳膏唳唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳曕唳唳ムΣ唳苦 唳膏唳唳班唳溹唳唳� 唳Μ唳苦Ψ唰嵿Ο唰� 唳膏Ξ唰嵿Π唳距 唳灌Μ唳距Π 唳Ε唰� 唳唳班唳唳班 唳忇唳苦Ο唳监 唳唳�, 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳唳о唳唳�! 唳唳唰囙Π 唳唳む唳� 唰ㄠЕ 唳膏Κ唰嵿Δ唳距 唳Π唰囙 唳班唳椸 唳唳椸 唳嗋Π唰嵿Ε唳距Π 唳оΠ唳距Η唳距Ξ 唳む唳唳� 唳曕Π唰囙Θ啷� 唳膏唳唳唳唳曕Ν唳距Μ唰囙 唳膏唳傕唳距Ω唳ㄠ唳� 唳︵唳唳苦Δ唰嵿Μ 唳忇Μ唳距Π 唳忇Ω唰� 唳Α唳监 唳嗋Π唰嵿Ε唳距Π唰囙Π 唳涏唳� 唳唳� 唳呧Ψ唰嵿唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳撪Κ唳�, 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳膏唳唳唳ㄠ唳多Π唳� 唳︵唳 唳曕Π唰� 唳Ω唰� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦唰� 唳む唳む 唳Ω唳む 唳灌Σ唰� 唳曕唳唳ム唳班唳ㄠ唰� 唳唳唰� 唳曕Π唰囙 唳Ω唳む 唳灌Μ唰囙イ 唳膏唳唳唳ㄠ唳多Ζ唰囙Π 唳� 唳多Π唰嵿Δ 唳ㄠ 唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳呧Π唰嵿Ε 唳︵唳佮Α唳监唳 唳ㄠ唳溹唳︵唳� 唳膏Μ唳氞唳唰� 唳Α唳� 唳唳む唳班唰� 唳呧Κ唳唳� 唳曕Π唳�, 唳 唳曕唳班唳Δ 唳班唳溹Θ唰堗Δ唳苦 唳嗋Δ唰嵿Θ唳灌Δ唰嵿Ο唳距イ 唳溹唳� 唳膏唳唳班唳溹唳唳� 唳膏唳Κ唰嵿Θ唰� 唳唳唳� 唳膏Κ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳む唳佮Π 唳唳оΜ唳� 唳溹唳粪唳犩唳-唳唳む唳班Μ唳о唳曕 唳︵唳唳む唳 唳唳む唳班唳� 唳膏唳ム 唳唳唰� 唳︵唳唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳む唳∴唳溹唳∴ 唳多唳班 唳曕Π唰� 唳︵唳�, 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳忇Μ唳距Π 唳唳� 唳膏唳о 唳Ω唰囙Θ 唳曕唳唳ムΣ唳苦唳︵唳� 唳唳侧唳� 唳椸唳︵ 唳膏唳Ο唳监 唳唳イ 唳曕唳唳ムΣ唳苦 唳Δ唰� 唳唳� 唳曕唳ㄠ 唳唳唳曕 唳唳唰� 唳曕Π唳む 唳唳班唳ㄠ, 唳曕唳班Γ, 唳唳囙Μ唰囙Σ唰� 唳忇Ω唰囙唰�, 鈥淭hous shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy brother鈥檚 wife: it is thy brother鈥檚 nakedness鈥� (唳侧唳唳熰唳曕唳� 唰оМ唳� 唰оК)啷�
唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰€唳 唳唳班Δ唳苦Ψ唰嵿唳距Θ唳椸唳侧 唳Ζ唳苦 唳唳ㄠ唳ㄠ 唳灌Ο唳� 唳椸Γ唳唳ㄠ唳粪唳� 唳夃Κ唳距Ω唳ㄠ 唳忇Μ唳� 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰€唳 唳班唳む唳ㄠ唳む 唳溹唳班 唳曕Π唳唳� 唳ㄠ唳唳む唳む, 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰€唳 唳唳班Δ唳苦Ψ唰嵿唳距Θ唰囙Π 唳膏Μ唳氞唳唰� 唳Α唳� 唳曕唳� 唳嗋Ω唳侧 唳ㄠ唳Δ唳苦唰� 唳む唳粪唳� 唳曕Π唳�, 唳ㄠ唳Δ唳苦Π 唳灌唳む唳� 唳むΠ唳唳班 唳灌Ο唳监 唳撪唳距イ 唳溹Θ唳椸Γ唳曕 唳ㄠ唳唳ㄠ唳む唳班Γ唰� 唳班唳栢Μ唳距Π 唳唳侧唳 唳多唳膏唰囙Π 唳膏Μ唳氞唳唰� 唳曕唳粪Ξ唳む唳оΠ 唳灌唳む唳唳距Π唳熰 唳唳侧Δ 唳忇 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰€唳 唳唳班Δ唳苦Ψ唰嵿唳距Θ, 唳呧Ω唰嵿Δ唰嵿Π唳距唳距Π唰� 唳膏Ο唳む唳ㄠ 唳膏唰嵿唳苦Δ 唳椸唳侧唳唳班唳� 唳 唳唳侧唳�-唳膏唳ㄠ唳唳灌唳ㄠ 唳ㄠΟ唳监イ 唳唳唳曕 唳唳唰� 唳曕Π唳距Π 唳曕唳唳ムΣ唳苦 唳ㄠ唳粪唳о唳溹唳炧 唳膏Π唰嵿Μ唳膏唳о唳班Γ唰囙Π 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳溹唳班 唳ム唳曕Σ唰囙 唳多唳� 唳Π唰嵿Ο唳ㄠ唳� 唳膏唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳曕唳涏 唳班唳溹Θ唰堗Δ唳苦 唳灌唳︵唳唳距Π 唳唳ㄠ唳Ο唳监 唳班唳溹唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳ㄠ唳唳唳� 唳多唳ム唳� 唳曕Π唰囙Θ 唳Π唰嵿Δ唰嵿Ο唰囙Π 唳唳曕 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳班唳� 唳侧唳曕唳� 唳呧Λ唳苦Ω唰囙Π 唳Α唳监Μ唳距Μ唰� 唳唳�; 唳唳ㄠ唳唳侧唳 唳む 唳嗋Π 唳曕唳夃 唳曕唳夃唰� 唳侧唳炧唳� 唳曕Π唳距Ο唳� 唳ㄠ啷� 唳唳唰囙Π 唳Π 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳�-唳曕唳唳ム唳班唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳� 唳曕Ο唳监唳� 唳唳� 唳唳侧唳� 唳氞Σ唳涏唳侧, 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳� 唳曕Ο唳� 唳唳班 唳曕唳� 唳唳む唳� 唳膏Θ唰嵿Δ唳距Θ唰囙Π 唳︵唳栢 唳ㄠ 唳唳撪Ο唳监唳 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳唳� 唳唳氞Σ唳苦Δ 唳灌Ο唳监 唳Α唳监唳�, 唳忇唳距Α唳监唳� 唳曕唳唳ム唳班唳� 唳曕唳班Ξ唳� 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唳曕Π唰嵿Ξ唰� 唳Θ唰嬥Ο唰嬥唰€ 唳灌Ο唳监 唳Α唳监唳 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳曕唳涏 唳む唳佮唰� 唳嗋Π 唳嗋唰囙Π 唳Δ唰� 唳呧Δ唰� 唳忇唳熰 唳嗋唳班唳粪Γ唰€唳 唳犩唳曕唳苦Σ唰嬥Θ唳距イ 唳む唳ㄠ 唳呧唳唳� 唳唳侧唳� 唳ㄠ唳唳ㄠ 唳嗋Π唰囙 唳ㄠ唳班唳� 唳唳班Δ唳� 唳呧Θ唰佮Π唳曕唳� 唳灌Ο唳监 唳Α唳监唳�, 唳唳ㄠ 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦唰� 唳唳む唳班Ω唳ㄠ唳む唳� 唳夃Κ唳灌唳� 唳︵唳む 唳唳班Μ唰囙Θ 唳Σ唰� 唳ㄠ唳多唳氞唳� 唳曕Π唰囙Θ啷�
唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳忇Μ唳距Π 唳む唳佮Π 唳膏唳む唳班 唳曕唳唳ム唳班唳ㄠ唰� 唳む唳侧唳� 唳︵唳唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳唳Ω唰嵿Δ 唳灌Ο唳监 唳Α唳监唳�, 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳忇Μ唳距Π唳� 唳唳� 唳膏Κ唰嵿Δ唳� 唳曕唳侧唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳佮唰� 唳Ω唰囙Θ; 唳唳唳� 唳呧Θ唰佮Ξ唰嬥Ζ唳� 唳涏唳∴唳� 唳曕唳唳ムΣ唳苦-唳唳唳灌Μ唳苦唰嵿唰囙Ζ 唳唳� 唳ㄠΟ唳监イ 唳曕唳唳ム唳班唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳ㄠΚ唰� 唳唰嵿唳� 唳氞唳班唳侧Ω 唳む唳� 唳班唳唳� 唳膏唳唳班唳溹唳唳� (唳灌Σ唳� 唳班唳唳� 唳忇Ξ唰嵿Κ唳距Ο唳监唳�) 唳ㄠ唳唳ㄠ唳む唳班Γ 唳ㄠ唳唰囙唰囙Θ, 唳唳唳� 唳嗋Μ唳距Ω唳膏唳ムΣ 唳唳唳熰唳曕唳� 唳氞唳班唳侧Ω唰囙Π 唳犩唳� 唳ㄠ唳曕唳� 唳∴唳距Ο唳监イ 唳氞唳班唳侧Ω唰囙Π 唳栢唳侧唳� 唳唳唳� 唳唳む唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳︵唳侧 唳曕唳侧唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳Χ唳距唳唰囙Π 唳唳唳� 唳嗋Π唳距Ξ唰囙Π 唳氞唳曕Π唰€唳熰 唳嗋Π 唳ム唳曕唳ㄠ啷� 唳呧Ω唰嵿Δ唳苦Δ唰嵿Μ唰囙Π 唳忇Ξ唳� 唳膏唳曕唰� 唳Α唳监 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦唰� '唳ㄠ' 唳Σ唰� 唳︵唳唳� 唳涏唳∴唳� 唳唳唳� 唳嗋Π 唳曕唳� 唳夃Κ唳距Ο唳� 唳涏唳侧唳ㄠ啷� 唳唳栢 唳呧Μ唳多唳� 唳む唳ㄠ 唳Σ唰囙Θ, 唳唳班Μ唳距Π 唳班唳溹唳� 唳囙唰嵿唰囙Ξ唳む 唳ㄠ唳唳� 唳唳侧唳熰唳ㄠ 唳唳唳� 唳曕唳� 唳ㄠΟ唳�, 唳嗋唰� 唳 唳灌Ο唳监唳涏 唳灌Ο唳监唳涏, 唳忇唳� 唳ム唳曕 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳班唳� 唳唳о唳� 唳Δ唰嬥 唳膏Μ 唳氞Σ唳啷� 唳唳唳� 唳忇唳熰 唳Μ唳苦Δ唰嵿Π 唳Θ唰嵿Η唳�, 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳� 唳呧Θ唰囙 唳涏 唳曕唳熰 唳呧Κ唰� 唳︵Χ 唳唳� 唳む唳班唳� 唳灌唳膏唳� 唳ㄠ唳曕唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳むΜ唰囙 唳曕唳� 唳膏唳ム 唳曕唳� 唳唳唰� 唳灌Μ唰� 唳む 唳犩唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳︵唳ㄠイ 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳唳唳灌Μ唳苦唰嵿唰囙Ζ 唳む唳� 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳班唳� 唳氞唳栢 唳呧Μ唰堗Η啷�
唳唳唳灌Μ唳苦唰嵿唰囙Ζ唰囙Π 唳唳唳唳班 唳Δ唳唳班唳ム唰嵿Ο 唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳膏唳ム 唳唳唳� 唳︵唳班Δ唰嵿Μ 唳唳∴唳む唳� 唳ム唳曕啷� 唳曕唳侧唳唳ㄠ唳熰唰� 唳侧唳唳� 唳唳班 唳唳侧 唳︵唳唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳忇Μ唳距Π 唳︵唳班唳� 唳忇 唳Θ唰嵿Ζ唳� 唳嗋唳熰唳ㄠイ 唳む唳ㄠ 唳忇Μ唳距Π 唳唳囙Μ唰囙Σ 唳︵唳栢唳唰� 唳溹Θ唳椸Γ唰囙Π 唳膏唳Θ唰� 唳灌唳佮 唳︵唳唰� 唳Σ唰囙Θ, 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳� 唳膏唳Ψ唰嵿 唳曕Π唰囙 唳む唳佮Π 唳唳む 唳侧唳栢 唳︵唳唰囙唰囙Θ 唳唳囙Ο唳监唳� 唳膏唳む唳班唳曕 唳唳唰� 唳曕Π唳� 唳氞Σ唰� 唳ㄠ, 唳むΜ唰佮 唳膏Ξ唰嵿Κ唳む唳む唳� 唳侧唳 唳む唳佮Π 唳唳む 唳忇Μ唳� 唳唳� 唳唳椸Ω唳距唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳む唳佮唰� 唳唳唳� 唳膏唳ム 唳唳唰� 唳︵唳唰� 唳Ο唳监唳ㄠ 唳忇 唳唳唳氞唳班 唳侧唳唳� 唳曕Π唰囙唰囙Θ啷� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳撪Κ唳� 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳� 唳 唳曕唳粪唳唳� 唳膏 唳む 唳膏唳Ψ唰嵿唳� 唳唳澿 唳唳氞唳涏, 唳曕唳班Γ 唳む唳佮Π 唳曕唳� 唳唳む唳班Ω唳ㄠ唳む唳� 唳灌唰嵿唰囙Θ唳距イ 唳む唳ㄠ 唳忇唳� 唳忇 唳唳� 唳ム唳曕 唳唳班唳唰� 唳嗋Ω唳む 唳氞唳囙唰囙Θ, 唳呧Ε唳� 唳唳� 唳む唳佮Π 唳唳唳灌Μ唳苦唰嵿唰囙Ζ唰� 唳Δ 唳︵唳氞唳涏唳� 唳ㄠ啷� 唳唳唳� 唳膏唳ム 唳唳唳灌唳� 唳ム唳曕 唳呧Μ唳膏唳ム唳 唳唳班Δ唳� 唳唳灌唳班唳む 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳唳� 唳︵唳唳椸唳�-唳氞Δ唰佮Π唰嵿唰佮Γ 唳灌唳班 唳唳∴唰� 唳唳氞唳涏啷� 唳忇Ξ唳� 唳Ο唳监唳ㄠ 唳唳唳氞唳班 唳Ζ唳� 唳︵唳唰� 唳氞Σ唰囙唰囙Θ 唳 唳唳�, 唳む唳佮唰� 唳曕 唳嗋Π 唳唳� 唳Σ唰� 唳唳ㄠ 唳氞Σ唰�? 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳忇Μ唳距Π 唳ㄠ唳溹唳曕唳� 唳囙唳侧唳唳ㄠ唳∴唳� 唳曕唳唳ムΣ唳苦 唳膏Ξ唳距唰囙Π 唳唳ム 唳Σ唰� 唳樴唳粪Γ唳� 唳曕Π唳侧唳�, 唳む唳佮Π 唳唳班Ω唰嵿Δ唳距Μ唳苦Δ 唳ㄠΔ唰佮Θ 唳膏Ξ唳距 唳曕唳犩唳唳む 唳唳唳� 唳 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰€唳 唳唳班Δ唳苦Ψ唰嵿唳距Θ唰囙Π 唳曕唳� 唳唳唳曕 唳嗋Π 唳班唳侧唳ㄠ啷� 唳氞唳班唳� 唳忇Μ唳� 唳膏唳熰唳�-唳忇Π 唳唳ム唰€唳曕Π唳｀唳� 唳班唳膏唳む 唳栢唳佮Α唳监唳� 唳曕唳� 唳多唳班 唳灌Ο唳监 唳椸唳侧鈥�
唳唳唰� 唳唳� 唳曕唳熰唳唰� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳ㄠ唳溹唳曕唳� 唳曕唳唳ムΣ唳苦 唳氞唳班唳氞唳� 唳膏Π唰嵿Μ唰囙Ω唳班唳 唳樴唳粪Γ唳� 唳曕Π唳距Π 唳� 唳班唳溹Θ唰堗Δ唳苦 唳氞唳侧唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳︵Π唳唳班唳� 唳忇唳溹Θ 唳唳熰唳� 唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳曕Π唰囙Θ 唳ㄠ, 唳む唳佮Π 唳ㄠ唳� 唳膏唳唳� 唳ムΞ唳距Ω 唳唳�, 唳ㄠ唳熰唳唳距Π 唳班Μ唳距Π唰嵿 唳唳侧唳� 唳唳佮唰� 唳唳唳� 唳呧Λ 唳呧Σ 唳膏唳溹Θ唳� 唳Σ唰囙唰囙Θ啷� 唳ムΞ唳距Ω 唳唳� 唳涏唳侧唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳侧Π唰嵿Α 唳灌唳� 唳氞唳唳ㄠ唳膏唳侧Π; 唳� 唳Ζ唳熰 唳唳曕唳むΠ唳距唰嵿Ο唰� 唳忇唳ㄠ 唳嗋唰�, 唳忇Μ唳� 唳忇Π 唳呧Μ唳膏唳ム唳� 唳唳曕唳むΠ唳距唰嵿Ο唰囙Π 唳唳班Η唳距Θ唳Θ唰嵿Δ唰嵿Π唰€唳班 唳撪Κ唳班啷� 唳唳班唳� 唳曕唳涏 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳︵唳 唳涏唳� 唳む唳ㄠ 唳唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳唳班Ω唰嵿Δ唳距Μ唳苦Δ '唳撪Ε 唳呧Λ 唳膏唳唳班唳唳膏'-唳む 唳膏唳唳曕唳粪Π 唳曕Π唰囙Θ啷� 唳忇 唳多Κ唳� 唳ㄠ唳唳� 唳呧Π唰嵿Ε 唳唳� 唳唳ㄠ 唳ㄠ唳唰囙唰囙Θ 唳班唳溹 唳呧Ψ唰嵿唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦 唳囙唳侧唳唳ㄠ唳∴唳� 唳氞唳班唳氞唳� 唳膏Π唰嵿Μ唳距Η唳苦Θ唳距Ο唳监, 唳忇Μ唳� 唳む唳ㄠ 唳唳ㄠ 唳唳班Χ唰嵿Θ唰� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳唳班Δ唳� 唳呧Θ唰佮唳� 唳ム唳曕Μ唰囙Θ啷� 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳班唳� 唳唳о唳ㄠ 唳呧唰佮 唳唳多唳唳� 唳班唳栢 唳唳� 唳多Δ 唳呧Δ唰嵿Ο唳距唳距Π 唳忇Μ唳� 唳溹唳侧Μ唳距Ω唰囙Π 唳Π唳� 唳む唳佮Π 唳呧Μ唳膏唳ム唳� 唳ム唳曕 唳ㄠΑ唳监唳� 唳ㄠ啷� 唳唳ㄠΩ唳苦唳唳 唳忇Μ唳� 唳ㄠ唳む唳曕Ν唳距Μ唰� 唳灌唳班 唳椸唳唰� 唳曕唳粪唳 唳唳� 唳灌Ο唳监 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳多唳粪Δ唳� 唳唳班唰� 唳唳む唳唳︵Γ唰嵿Α 唳︵唳ㄠイ 唰оЙ唰┼Й-唳忇Π 唰� 唳溹唳侧唳� 唳侧Θ唰嵿Α唳ㄠ唳� 唳熰唳撪Ο唳监唳� 唳灌唳侧 唳� 唳唳む唳唳︵Γ唰嵿Α 唳曕唳班唳唳� 唳曕Π唳� 唳灌Ο唳监イ 唳熰唳撪Ο唳监唳� 唳灌唳� 唳膏唳ム唳Θ唳距唳� 唳唳ㄠ唳ㄠ唳� 唳灌Ο唳监唳涏唳侧 唳唳栢唳唳� 唳忇Μ唳� 唳夃唳氞 唳Ζ唰� 唳嗋Ω唰€唳� 唳唳唰嵿Δ唳苦Ζ唰囙Π 唳唳む唳唳︵Θ唰嵿Α 唳曕唳班唳唳� 唳曕Π唳唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο啷�
唳膏Μ 唳椸Σ唰嵿Κ唰囙Π唳� 唳む 唳忇唳溹Θ 唳ㄠ唳唳� 唳嗋Π 唳忇唳溹Θ 唳唳侧唳� 唳ム唳曕啷� 唳唳侧唳熰唳� 唳� 唳ㄠ唳熰唰囙Π 唳ㄠ唳唳� 唳呧Μ唳多唳 唳ムΞ唳距Ω 唳唳班イ 唳嗋Ζ唳班唳多Μ唳距Θ 唳唳� 唳ㄠ唳む唳� 唳唳班Χ唰嵿Θ唰� 唳忇唳唳班 唳唳ム 唳ㄠΔ 唳曕Π唰囙Θ 唳ㄠ啷� 唳唳班Μ唳距Π 唳灌唳唳� 唳︵唳唳� 唳灌Ο唳监唳涏, 唳Π唳苦Μ唳距Π 唳ム唳曕 唳︵唳班唳樴Ζ唳苦Θ 唳嗋Σ唳距Ζ唳� 唳曕Π唰� 唳班唳栢 唳唳粪Γ 唳涏唳� 唳忇Μ唳� 唳ㄠ唳傕Π唳� 唳忇唳熰 唳溹唳侧 唳嗋唳曕 唳班唳栢 唳灌Ο唳监唳涏, 唳栢唳唳� 唳︵唳唳� 唳灌Ο唳� 唳ㄠ, 唳むΜ唰佮 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳膏唳ム 唳嗋Κ唰嬥Ψ唰� 唳唳� 唳ㄠ 唳唳班イ 唳唳侧唳熰唳� 唳ㄠ唳熰唰� 唳︵唳栢 唳唳 唳唳班唳� 唳唳班唰囙Ω唰嵿唰嵿Ο唳距Θ唰嵿 唳多唳唳ㄠ唳о唳唳唰€唳班 唳忇Ω唰� 唳む唳佮唰� 唳唳︵唳о 唳︵唳氞唳涏唳�, 唳撪Κ唳班 唳撪Κ唳班 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳唳班Δ唳� 唳嗋Θ唰佮唳む唳� 唳忇Θ唰� 唳Θ唰� 唳Θ唰� 唳む唳佮唰� 唳呧Ω唰嵿Μ唰€唳曕唳� 唳曕Π唳侧唳� 唳む 唳侧唳唳犩 唳氞唳曕 唳唳, 唳む唳ㄠ 唳膏唳熰 唳曕唳� 唳曕Π唳涏唳� 唳ㄠ啷� 唳唳� 唳溹Μ唳距Μ唰� 唳Σ唰囙Θ, 唳 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳班唳� 唳嗋Θ唰佮唳む唳� 唳唳む 唳呧Ξ唳� 唳涏Σ唳距唳侧唳� 唳唳班Ο唳监唳溹Θ 唳灌Ο唳�, 唳む唳ㄠ 唳膏 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳班唳� 唳唳溹唳班 唳ㄠΘ, 唳む唳佮Π 唳曕唳唳ムΣ唳苦 唳堗Χ唰嵿Μ唳班唳� 唳班唳氞 唳呧Θ唰囙 唳唳多 唳膏唳曕唳粪唳イ 唳唳班唳� 唳氞Π唳苦Δ唰嵿Π唰囙Π 唳忇 唳︵唳⑧唳む唳� 唳︵唳曕 唳囙唳苦Δ 唳曕Π唰囙 唳唳侧唳� 唳む唳佮Π 唳ㄠ唳熰唰� 唳唳班唰� 唳唳唳� 唳Π 唳呧Σ 唳膏唳溹Θ唳� 唳Σ唰囙唰囙Θ; 唳班唳�, 唳澿Α唳�, 唳唳粪唳熰, 唳灌唳�-唳唳班唰冟Δ唳� 唳唳Θ 唳班唳 唳ㄠ唳�, 唳椸唳熰 唳唳班唳� 唳溹唳∴唰� 唳唳� 唳忇 唳曕Ε唳距Π唳� 唳唳ㄠ唳粪イ 唳ㄠ唳熰唰囙Π 唳唳唳曕唳む唳� 唳唳侧唳� 唳膏唳Ψ唰嵿 唳溹唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳︵唳唰囙唰囙Θ 唳栢唳班唳粪唳� 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唰� 唳む唳佮Π 唳唳熰唳� 唳唳多唳唳� 唳ㄠ唳�, 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳� 唳оΠ唰嵿Ξ唳熰 唳班唰嵿Ψ唳� 唳曕Π唳む 唳椸唳唰� 唳唳班唳� 唳灌唳班唳ㄠ 唳ムΞ唳距Ω 唳唳班唳� 唳唳班Δ唳� 唳む唳佮Π 唳班Ο唳监唳涏 唳呧唰佮Γ唰嵿 唳多唳班Ζ唰嵿Η唳距Μ唰嬥Η, 唳 唳曕唳班Γ唰� 唳� 唳ㄠ唳熰唳熰 唳嗋Ζ唰� 唳侧唳栢啷� 唳唳班唳� 唳嗋Ζ唳班唳多 唳呧Θ唰佮Κ唰嵿Π唳距Γ唳苦Δ 唳灌Ο唳监 唳唳犩唳� 唳唳� 唳ㄠ唳溹唳� 唳Δ唰囙Π 唳唳班Δ唳� 唳呧Μ唳苦唳� 唳ム唳曕唳�-唳唳班唳距Π唳距Θ唰嵿Δ唳班 唳膏 唳嗋唳唳�-唳� 唳溹唳ㄠ唳唰囙唰囙Θ 唳唳侧唳熰イ
唳ムΞ唳距Ω 唳唳� 唳溹唳Ζ唰嵿Ζ唳多唳む唳� 唳唳粪Γ 唳溹Θ唳唳班唳 唳涏唳侧唳� 唳む唳佮Π 唳唳ㄠΜ唳む唳唳︵ 唳︵唳粪唳熰唳唰嵿唳苦Π 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο啷� 唳� 唳唳粪Ο唳监 唳む唳ㄠ 唳唳� 唳曕Ο唳监唳曕唳苦 唳 唳侧唳栢唳涏唳侧唳�, 唳唳椸唳侧唳� 唳唳澿 唳嗋 唳膏Μ唳氞唳唰� 唳唳栢唳唳� '唳囙唳熰唳唳唳�' 唳唳熰啷� 唳� 唳唳む 唳む唳ㄠ 唳忇唳熰 唳嗋Ζ唳班唳� 唳膏Ξ唳距唰囙Π 唳曕Σ唰嵿Κ唳苦Δ 唳涏Μ唳� 唳忇唳曕唳涏唳侧唳�, 唳唳栢唳ㄠ 唳唳唰嵿Δ唳苦Ξ唳距Σ唳苦唳距Θ唳距Η唰€唳� 唳曕唳� 唳Ω唰嵿Δ唰� 唳ㄠ唳囙イ 唳膏Ξ唳距唰囙Π 唳膏Μ唳距 唳膏Ξ唰嵿Κ唳︵唳� 唳唳椸唳唳椸 唳曕Π唰� 唳︵唳ㄠΘ唰嵿Ζ唳苦Θ 唳唳班Ο唳监唳溹Θ唰€唳 唳曕唳溹唰佮Σ唰� 唳膏唳班啷� 唳唳唰嵿Δ唳苦Π 唳唳侧唳曕唳ㄠ唳 唳唳灌唳む 唳曕唳涏唳� 唳ㄠ唳� 唳� 唳膏Ξ唳距唰�, 唳む唳� 唳忇唳距Θ唰� 唳曕唳粪Ξ唳む唳� 唳︵唳� 唳ㄠ唳唰� 唳栢唳唰嬥唰囙Ο唳监唳� 唳ㄠ唳囙イ 唳唳班唳� 唳� 唳唳熰唳� 唰� 唳唳� 唳嗋唰� 唰оЙ唰оЗ 唳膏唳侧 唳唳曕唳唳距Ν唰囙Σ唰嵿Σ唳� 唳囙Δ唳距Σ唳苦Δ唰� 唳Ω唰� 唳侧唳栢唳涏唳侧唳� 唳唳班唳� 唳犩唳� 唳夃Σ唰嵿唰嬥Π唳ム 唳 '唳︵唳 唳唳班唳ㄠ唳�', 唳唳栢唳ㄠ 唳曕唳粪Ξ唳む唳� 唳唳侧イ '唳唳班唳ㄠ唳�'-唳� 唳唳曕唳唳距Ν唰囙Σ唰嵿Σ唳� 唳︵唳栢唳唰囙唳苦Σ唰囙Θ 唳嗋Ζ唳班唳� 唳班唳溹Κ唰佮Δ唰嵿Π唳曕 唳曕唳粪Ξ唳む唳� 唳氞唳∴唳距Θ唰嵿Δ唰� 唳夃唳む 唳灌Σ唰� 唳灌唳む 唳Δ 唳班唰嵿Δ 唳唳栢唳�, 唳唳栢Δ唰� 唳灌Μ唰�, 唳Θ唰嵿Η唰佮唰� 唳唳唰� 唳唳粪Δ唰� 唳灌Σ唰� 唳唳粪Δ唰� 唳灌Μ唰�, 唳唳班Δ唳� 唳唳灌唳班唳む 唳Ο唳监唳� 唳唳侧唳熰 唳唳侧Μ唳距Π 唳灌Σ唰� 唳唳侧唳熰 唳唳侧Δ唰� 唳灌Μ唰�, 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳曕唳粪Ξ唳む唳 唳唳唳� 唳Π 唳溹Θ唳椸Γ唰囙Π 唳夃Θ唰嵿Θ唳む唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳曕唳� 唳曕Π唳む 唳灌Μ唰� (I have to be cruel only to be kind)啷� 唳Χ唰嵿唳苦Ξ 唳むΕ唳� 唳嗋Ξ唰囙Π唳苦唳距唰� 唳嗋Ξ唳班 唳唳曕唳唳距Ν唰囙Σ唰嵿Σ唳苦Ο唳监唳� 唳Σ唰囙 唳溹唳ㄠ, 唳唳多唳粪Δ, 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳曕唳膏唳炧唳溹唳� 唳唳� 唳Σ唰囙 唳︵唳�, "America has no permanent friends or enemies, only interests鈥�, 唳むΜ唰� 唳唳班唳� 唳膏唳Κ唰嵿Θ唰囙Π 唳唳唰嵿Δ唳苦Ξ唳距Σ唳苦唳距Θ唳�-唳唳灌唳� 唳膏Ξ唳距 唳椸唳� 唳曕Π唳唳� 唳氞唳粪唳熰 唳唳佮Π唳� 唳曕Π唰囙唰囙Θ, 唳膏唳� 唳侧唳ㄠ唳�-唳膏唳熰唳侧唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳灌唳む 唳Ε唰囙唰嵿 唳班唰嵿Δ 唳唳栢Δ唰� 唳︵唳唳о 唳曕Π唰囙Θ 唳ㄠ 唳曕唳ㄠ唳�, 唳唳唰嵿Ο唳距 唳膏Μ唳膏Ξ唳 唳む唳佮Ζ唰囙Π 唳唳班Ω唰嵿Δ唰佮Δ唳� 唳涏唳侧, 唳唳曕唳唳侧唳侧唳� 唳Δ唰嬥 唳む唳佮Π唳距 唳Σ唰囙唰囙Θ, "I have to be cruel only t鈥︹€澿イ 唳唳班Κ唳ㄠ唳ム 唳曕 唳唳曕唳唳距Ν唰囙Σ唰嵿Σ唳苦Κ唳ㄠ唳ム-唳 唳Ε唰囙 唳嗋Κ唳ㄠ 唳灌唳佮唰佮Θ, 唳呧唰佮唳距Δ 唳嗋Κ唳ㄠ唳� 唳撪 唳忇唳熰-唳囙イ
唳唳侧唳� 唳唳侧唳� 唳唳ㄠ唳唰囙唰囙Θ 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳︵Π唳唳班唳� 唳嗋Π唰囙 唳椸唳班唳む唳Κ唰傕Π唰嵿Γ 唳膏Ζ唳膏唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π '唳氞唳� 唳唳ㄠ唳膏唳熰唳�' 唳ムΞ唳距Ω 唳曕唳班Ξ唳撪Ο唳监唳侧唰囙イ 唳唳侧唳� 唳︵唳栢唳唰囙唰囙Θ 唳曕唳唳 唳о唳班唳� 唳曕唳班Ξ唳撪Ο唳监唳� 唳曕唳班Ξ唳多唳� 唳唳班唳� 唳唳班Δ唳� 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳苦Π 唳Θ 唳唳粪唳唰� 唳椸唳涏唳�, 唳曕Ε唳距Π 唳唳唳佮唰� 唳唳侧 唳曕唳唳 唳膏唳溹唳ㄠ 唳唳氞唳班 唳唳班唰� 唳呧Κ唰嵿Π唳膏唳む唳� 唳曕Π唰囙唰囙Θ 唳唳班Μ唳距Π啷� 唳曕唳涏唳熰 唳о唳班Σ唳唰� 唳多唳班 唳灌唳唳� 唳� 唳ㄠ唳熰 唳唳班唳膏Θ唰囙Π 唳唳氞唳班唳� 唳� 唳︵唳多唳 唳忇Ω唰� 唳灌唰庎Κ唳苦Γ唰嵿Α唰囙Π 唳椸Δ唳� 唳唳∴唳苦Ο唳监 唳︵唳啷� 唳膏唳溹唳ㄠ 唳唳氞唳班唳� 唳︵唳多唳� 唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳Σ唰囙 唳曕唳班Ξ唳撪Ο唳监唳侧唳� 唳唳澿 唳唳膏唳むΜ唰囙Π 唳呧Θ唰囙 唳氞Π唳苦Δ唰嵿Π唰囙Π 唳唳班Δ唳苦Λ唳侧Θ 唳膏唳Ψ唰嵿 唳︵唳栢Δ唰� 唳唳�, 唳灌Ο唳监Δ唰� 唳膏唳熰 唳︵唳栢唳ㄠ唳� 唳唳侧唳熰唳� 唳夃Ζ唰嵿Ζ唰囙Χ唰嵿Ο 唳涏唳侧イ 唳ㄠ唳熰唰� 唳唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳︵唳多唳唳� 唳唳澿 唳涏唳� 唳忇唳熰 唳氞Π唳苦Δ唰嵿Π 唳曕唳粪Γ唳苦唰囙Π 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳夃唳曕 唳︵唳唰� 唳唳啷� 唳� 唳氞Π唳苦Δ唰嵿Π唳熰唳� 唳ㄠ唳� '唳曕Ξ唳� 唳唳唳�'啷� 唳嗋Ξ唳溹Θ唳む唳� 唳唳班Δ唳苦Θ唳苦Η唳� 唳� 唳曕Ξ唳� 唳唳唳ㄠ唳� 唳Ο唳监唳ㄠ唳� 唳ㄠ唳熰 唳多唳班 唳灌Ο唳�, 唳忇Π唳Π 唳椸唳熰 唳ㄠ唳熰唰� 唳む唳� 唳唳多唳� 唳曕唳� 唳唳唳曕 唳ム唳曕唳ㄠ啷� 唳ㄠ唳熰唰囙Π 唳多唳粪 唳曕Ξ唳� 唳唳唳� 唳о唳� 唳唳侧唳熰 唳溹Σ唰嵿Σ唳距Ζ 唳灌Ο唳监 唳ムΞ唳距Ω 唳唳班唳� 唳唳む唳唳︵Θ唰嵿Α 唳曕唳班唳唳� 唳曕Π唰囙イ 唳忇唳苦 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π 唳嗋Ξ唳溹Θ唳む唳� 唳唳� 唳氞Π唳苦Δ唰嵿Π啷� 唳多唳膏Θ唳Θ唰嵿Δ唰嵿Π唰囙Π 唳膏唳︵唳о唳ㄠ唳む 唳嗋Ξ唳距Ζ唰囙Π 唳曕唳� 唳唳唳曕 唳ム唳曕唳ㄠ, 唳曕唳ㄠ唳む 唳嗋Ξ唳班唳� 唳多唳膏唰囙Π 唳唳むΘ唳唳曕唳� 唳溹Σ唰嵿Σ唳距Ζ 唳灌Ο唳监 唳多唳膏唰囙Π 唳多Δ唰嵿Π唰佮Π 唳唳ム 唳曕唳熰 唳ㄠ唳囙イ
唳撪, 唳ムΞ唳距Ω 唳唳班唰� 唳膏Π唳苦Ο唳监 唳︵唳む 唳 唳ムΞ唳距Ω 唳曕唳班Ξ唳撪Ο唳监唳� 唳呧Δ唰� 唳粪Α唳监Ο唳ㄠ唳む唳� 唳曕Π唳侧唳�, 唳む唳佮Π 唳曕 唳灌Ο唳监唳涏唳侧 唳多唳粪Δ唳�? 唳嗋Π 唳膏唳� 唳呧唳唳� 唳唳侧唳�? 唳唳佮唰� 唳唳唰� 唳曕Π唳唳� 唳溹Θ唰嵿Ο 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳唳唰囙 唳Η唰嵿Ο唳 唳︵唳栢唳唰� 唳ㄠΔ唰佮Θ 唳班唳粪唳熰唳班Μ唰嵿Ο唳Ω唰嵿Ε唳� 唳溹唳班 唳曕Π唰囙Θ? 唳栢唳唳距Σ唰€ 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳曕Ο唳监唳� 唳唳� 唳Π唳� 唳忇唳︵唳� 唳︵唳溹Θ唰囙Π唳� 唳多唳班唳氞唳涏唳� 唳曕Π唰囙Θ啷� 唳呧唳唳� 唳唳侧唳�-唳忇Π 唳Π 唳灌唳ㄠΠ唳� 唳嗋Π唳� 唰唳� 唳唳唰� 唳曕Π唰囙唳苦Σ唰囙Θ, 唳忇唳︵唳� 唰� 唳溹Θ唰囙Π 唳唳班唳｀Ζ唳｀唳� 唳︵唳ㄠイ 唳灌唳唳�, 唳犩唳� 唳оΠ唰囙唰囙Θ, 唳忇 唳︵'唳唳班 唳多唳班唳氞唳涏唳�!
May 15, 2024
This is two gems in one: The play itself is unforgettable, and Bolt's introduction is equally so. As Bolt explains, why did he, a rationalist who is Christian only in the broadest cultural sense of the term, take as his hero a Catholic saint? The answer is More's simultaneous enthusiasm for life in the here and now with his immovable commitment to an idea and to ideals for which it would be no question in his mind to sacrifice the life that he loved so dearly. Bolt thinks that the key lies in More's idea of his self and ponders whether any society without a transcendent basis for the idea of selfhood can generate the kind of commitment that More had. I have my own ideas on selfhood and its importance even if there ends up being no transcendent foundation for individual identity, and I think that even if it turns out to be true that what we call the self is only a temporary assemblage of synaptic connections, the sense of self is a vital element that needs to be individually recognized and explored and delimited before any search for transcendence can be realized. At any rate, I applaud this book, one of my very favorites for decades, and Bolt's introduction. As J.R.R. Tolkien once suggested in his own introductory comments to Smith of Wootton Major, introductions should be read *after* the first reading of the main text; so read the play first, then read the introduction. Then read the play again, and be sure not to miss the Academy Award-winning 1996 movie adaptation, in which Paul Scofield reprised his role in the West End production of the play. Truly a play for all seasons!
September 6, 2013
A Man For All Seasons is a play concerned with morality, politics and the common man. It is a play that though written decades ago, holds great wisdom for the individual of today and in its own particular way utilises a known historical event to address particular issues.
The core argument of this play is whether morality and law or religion and law must be separated. Whether it should or should not be is a separate debate to this review, however Robert Bolt's argument appears to be that a man or woman must stick to their beliefs. That to do otherwise and to compromise lacks moral integrity.
The suggestion through the play is that morals can be seen as just a gesture. And any gesture is of course not important when contrasted against any form of legality. However, the protagonist of the play, Thomas More, takes the stand that morals are above the law, not mere gestures, for they define a man. And a man's self is all he has in the end according to More. To that end morality comes over man made laws because to More morality essentially stems from God.
The history of this play was defined in the preface by the author. Many will know the popular version of the story, of how Henry the VIII decided to first marry his brother's widow Catherine, getting the Pope to change laws based on Biblical ideals, and then to divorce her in favour of one Anne Boleyn. All of which led to the known history of Henry VIII's wives of course. That aside, the means by which he divorced Catherine is what forms the real conflict of the play. For Henry VIII decided that the Pope was nothing but a Bishop of Rome rather than God's representative as was thought at the time. As such this lead to Henry VIII deciding that all bishops (including the Pope) were under the ruler-ship of a King and then he appointed the Archbishop of Canterbury which led to the formation of the Anglican Church - the Church of England. The rest as they say is history.
Thomas More as a character in this play, stands in opposition to these acts by the king. He presents the view that the Magna Carter protects the Church from the throne as well as indicating that God and his representatives are above the throne. Everything boils down, therefore, to More refusing to swear an oath despite his children telling him that surely words mean nothing if not meant in the heart. And yet More, dramatically refuses to swear this oath for to swear a false oath before God would be a grave compromise.
It is fascinating how political this play is, considering that so much pageantry surrounds politics . It is also fascinating that the main narrator for the play is called the Common Man and plays a variety of roles, occasionally breaking the fourth wall to speak to the audience. The most interesting aspect of this character is that he does nothing to prevent the disaster that occurs in the play, hinting that Bolt is aiming to show his audience that when the common individual does nothing to prevent it, tragedy will triumph.
A Man For All Seasons is the story of a man who essentially does not bow to others putting pressure on his beliefs in regards to politics, religion and one state Marriage (a marriage that Henry VIII argued semantically, was invalid). Whether we are meant to be that man for all seasons is a question for the reader or observer to consider. The key issue of importance appears to be that one should recognise what they can do to prevent disaster from striking.
Feel free to debate any of these issues in the comments section. As long as all comments are civilised I'm certain they will prompt interesting discussion.
Read
February 27, 2020I'm currently listening to Hilary Mantel's and will have to re-read this play as well.
I know I loved it on first read many, many years ago, but I may re-evaluate.
I know I loved it on first read many, many years ago, but I may re-evaluate.
March 22, 2007
I'm not going to lie. After reading this book, I'm a little bit in love with Sir Thomas More.
You can't help it after reading Robert Bolt's play, though. He's so witty and charming and kind and gentle, yet so passionately certain of what is right and wrong and what things are worth dying for. King Henry VIII is such a great character in this play, such an overly-jovial spoiled baby, that More looks even more noble by comparison. (In my head I picture him looking a little bit like Clark Kent. I don't know why.)
Bolt's preface to the play, talking about how he came to choose this particular subject matter when he's not even really a Christian, is almost as interesting and compelling as the play itself; he describes how he came to More with an outsider's eye and without really being able to believe in what More believed, he was still struck by the firmness of More's commitment to stand by the oath he swore, even knowing that it meant death at the hands of the King who was once his best friend.
This play has one of the best courtroom scenes in all of modern drama, rivaling anything in "Twelve Angry Men."
You can't help it after reading Robert Bolt's play, though. He's so witty and charming and kind and gentle, yet so passionately certain of what is right and wrong and what things are worth dying for. King Henry VIII is such a great character in this play, such an overly-jovial spoiled baby, that More looks even more noble by comparison. (In my head I picture him looking a little bit like Clark Kent. I don't know why.)
Bolt's preface to the play, talking about how he came to choose this particular subject matter when he's not even really a Christian, is almost as interesting and compelling as the play itself; he describes how he came to More with an outsider's eye and without really being able to believe in what More believed, he was still struck by the firmness of More's commitment to stand by the oath he swore, even knowing that it meant death at the hands of the King who was once his best friend.
This play has one of the best courtroom scenes in all of modern drama, rivaling anything in "Twelve Angry Men."
July 28, 2023
Unless I'm misremembering (a quick Google search is not helping me here), the late Justice Antonin Scalia quoted this play in his speeches. This immediately bumped it from one of those classics I 'heard about and should read someday...' to a high priority on my to-read list. But I went in basically clueless about the content.
I think it would take a talented cast to make this play interesting for modern audiences to watch. (I might rescind that statement once I get my hands on the movie.) Reading it however? Fascinating.
There are lots of really great themes in this play. While the central drama is one man's refusal to go against the dictates of his conscience, there are also some really interesting thoughts about the purpose of the law, the meaning of silence, and the pressure of society.
Definitely one I will need to come back to once I've done some more reading on Thomas More.
I think it would take a talented cast to make this play interesting for modern audiences to watch. (I might rescind that statement once I get my hands on the movie.) Reading it however? Fascinating.
There are lots of really great themes in this play. While the central drama is one man's refusal to go against the dictates of his conscience, there are also some really interesting thoughts about the purpose of the law, the meaning of silence, and the pressure of society.
Definitely one I will need to come back to once I've done some more reading on Thomas More.
December 8, 2014
This country's planted thick with laws from coast to coast-man's laws, not God's-and if you cut them down-and you're just the man to do it-d'you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake.
Several years ago I did something stupid, not sure what. It is near certain that I knew at the time. My wife yelled at me. I deserved that, I'm sure of that in hindsight. I sat and read this in one go. It isn't historically accurate but it is compelling.
Several years ago I did something stupid, not sure what. It is near certain that I knew at the time. My wife yelled at me. I deserved that, I'm sure of that in hindsight. I sat and read this in one go. It isn't historically accurate but it is compelling.
November 12, 2021
A Man For All Seasons This review is dedicated to prisoners of conscience and those who swim against the tide by putting their own consciences first This play revolves around Sir Thomas More who out of his own religious and political conviction refuses to endorse the divorce of Henry VIII to Catherine of Aragon .As a result he is condemned to die but refuses to renege right up to his executioner is a universal work which embodies the principals of freedom and conscience; the self-assurance to do what one knows to be right regardless of swimming against the . tide. In the age of political correctness it is as important to stand firm on ones own convictions and sense of right and wrong no matter what the consequences More refuses to bow down to the maxim that `every man has his price' and is an early political dissident -the forerunner of so many true prisoners of conscience throughout .More can be seen as the Danton , the Pastor Niemoller , the Lech Walesa the Vaclav Havel or one of the countless persecuted dissidents in dictatorships existing today such as Zimbabwe , Iran, North Korea and Red China I 'But it is far more than just a political work -it is full of human emotion and explores human theme it is wonderful to see how More' s wife and daughter stand by him to the end And the biting humor of the narrator presented as The Common Man adds a special quality to the play much like Shakespeare's Fallcroft A Man For All Seasons is definitely a literary masterpiece
March 3, 2018
For those who are history buffs this is a play about Sir Thomas More and his refusing to submit to pressures of Cromwell to recognize the union of Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn against the Roman Catholic Church. The play was intense and shows a man, More, who actually loved his sovereign but loved God more. The fact that More never spoke out against Henry and the charges against him were manufactured and the laws misused would eventually turn More into a Saint and Martyr. I read the director's/actor's script of the play and every countenance of the characters or discourses were minutely detailed so the reader had a good concept of how the actual play should be performed. I would recommend this play as one that is well written, clearly defined characters and highly dramatic.
May 19, 2020
爻乇 鬲丕賲爻 毓夭蹖夭
爻賱丕賲. 禺賵丕爻鬲賲 亘诏賵蹖賲 丿乇 丕夭丕蹖 賵賱夭 讴賴 賴蹖趩貙 丕诏乇 丿賵爻鬲蹖鈥屬呚з� 乇丕 亘賴 讴賱 噩賴丕賳 賴賲 亘賮乇賵卮賲 丕乇夭丕賳 丿丕丿賴鈥屫з�. 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 鬲賵貙 賴乇亘丕乇貙 賲乇丕 卮賵乇蹖丿賴鈥屫ж坟� 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賲丿賴賵卮 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�. 賴乇亘丕乇 讴賴 鬲賵 乇丕 丿乇 丌賳 爻賱賵賱 賳賲賵乇 賵 鬲丕乇蹖讴 賲蹖鈥屫ㄛ屬嗁� 賯賱亘鈥屬� 賮卮乇丿賴 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 賵賯鬲蹖 丕夭 賮乇胤 丿乇丿 亘蹖鈥屫ж勜з傐� 丿乇 丿丕丿诏丕賴 鬲賯丕囟丕蹖 氐賳丿賱蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗃� 鬲丕 亘賳卮蹖賳蹖貙 賲賳 賳蹖夭 亘賴 夭丕賳賵 賲蹖鈥屫з佖�. 爻乇 鬲丕賲爻貙 賲賳 夭賳丿诏蹖 乇丕 丕夭 鬲賵 賲卮賯 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁呚� 丕乇丕丿赖鈥屫з� 乇丕 丿乇 鬲賱丕卮 亘乇丕蹖 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘賴 丕乇丕丿賴鈥屰� 鬲賵 禺乇噩 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁呚� 丕爻鬲賵丕乇蹖 賵 讴賲丕賱鈥屫堌з囒� 乇丕 亘乇丕蹖 丨賮馗 賵噩丿丕賳 丕夭 鬲賵 蹖丕丿 賲蹖鈥屭屫辟�. 鬲賵 亘賴 賲賳 诏賮鬲蹖 賮乇卮鬲诏丕賳 亘乇丕蹖 卮讴賵賴 賵 噩賱丕賱貙 丨蹖賵丕賳丕鬲 亘乇丕蹖 毓氐賲鬲 賵 诏蹖丕賴丕賳 亘乇丕蹖 爻丕丿诏蹖 禺賱賯 卮丿賴鈥屫з嗀� 丕賲丕 賲賳貙 丕賳爻丕賳貙 亘乇丕蹖 丕蹖賳 禺賱賯 卮丿賴鈥屫з� 讴賴 毓丕賯賱丕賳賴 賵 亘乇丕爻丕爻 丕賳丿蹖卮賴鈥屫з� 丿乇 禺丿賲鬲 丌賮乇蹖丿诏丕乇賲 亘丕卮賲. 賵 丕蹖賳 丿蹖丿诏丕賴 賲賳貙 鬲賳賴丕 賲乇亘賵胤 亘賴 禺賵丿賲 丕爻鬲貙 賵 賯乇丕乇 賳蹖爻鬲 丿賳蹖丕 乇丕 鬲讴丕賳蹖 丿賴賲貙 賵 賴乇趩蹖夭蹖 讴賴 亘賴 丌賳 丕爻鬲賵丕乇賲 賵 鬲讴蹖賴 亘賴 丕賵 丿丕丿賴鈥屫з� 賳賴 丕夭 丌爻賲丕賳貙 讴賴 丕夭 丿乇賵賳 禺賵丿賲 卮乇蹖丕賳 丿丕乇丿. 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 鬲賵 亘丕夭禺賱賯 賯氐賴鈥屰� 毓蹖爻蹖鈥屫池� 丿乇 噩賴丕賳 丕賲乇賵夭 賴爻鬲蹖.
爻賱丕賲. 禺賵丕爻鬲賲 亘诏賵蹖賲 丿乇 丕夭丕蹖 賵賱夭 讴賴 賴蹖趩貙 丕诏乇 丿賵爻鬲蹖鈥屬呚з� 乇丕 亘賴 讴賱 噩賴丕賳 賴賲 亘賮乇賵卮賲 丕乇夭丕賳 丿丕丿賴鈥屫з�. 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 鬲賵貙 賴乇亘丕乇貙 賲乇丕 卮賵乇蹖丿賴鈥屫ж坟� 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賲丿賴賵卮 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�. 賴乇亘丕乇 讴賴 鬲賵 乇丕 丿乇 丌賳 爻賱賵賱 賳賲賵乇 賵 鬲丕乇蹖讴 賲蹖鈥屫ㄛ屬嗁� 賯賱亘鈥屬� 賮卮乇丿賴 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 賵賯鬲蹖 丕夭 賮乇胤 丿乇丿 亘蹖鈥屫ж勜з傐� 丿乇 丿丕丿诏丕賴 鬲賯丕囟丕蹖 氐賳丿賱蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗃� 鬲丕 亘賳卮蹖賳蹖貙 賲賳 賳蹖夭 亘賴 夭丕賳賵 賲蹖鈥屫з佖�. 爻乇 鬲丕賲爻貙 賲賳 夭賳丿诏蹖 乇丕 丕夭 鬲賵 賲卮賯 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁呚� 丕乇丕丿赖鈥屫з� 乇丕 丿乇 鬲賱丕卮 亘乇丕蹖 乇爻蹖丿賳 亘賴 丕乇丕丿賴鈥屰� 鬲賵 禺乇噩 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁呚� 丕爻鬲賵丕乇蹖 賵 讴賲丕賱鈥屫堌з囒� 乇丕 亘乇丕蹖 丨賮馗 賵噩丿丕賳 丕夭 鬲賵 蹖丕丿 賲蹖鈥屭屫辟�. 鬲賵 亘賴 賲賳 诏賮鬲蹖 賮乇卮鬲诏丕賳 亘乇丕蹖 卮讴賵賴 賵 噩賱丕賱貙 丨蹖賵丕賳丕鬲 亘乇丕蹖 毓氐賲鬲 賵 诏蹖丕賴丕賳 亘乇丕蹖 爻丕丿诏蹖 禺賱賯 卮丿賴鈥屫з嗀� 丕賲丕 賲賳貙 丕賳爻丕賳貙 亘乇丕蹖 丕蹖賳 禺賱賯 卮丿賴鈥屫з� 讴賴 毓丕賯賱丕賳賴 賵 亘乇丕爻丕爻 丕賳丿蹖卮賴鈥屫з� 丿乇 禺丿賲鬲 丌賮乇蹖丿诏丕乇賲 亘丕卮賲. 賵 丕蹖賳 丿蹖丿诏丕賴 賲賳貙 鬲賳賴丕 賲乇亘賵胤 亘賴 禺賵丿賲 丕爻鬲貙 賵 賯乇丕乇 賳蹖爻鬲 丿賳蹖丕 乇丕 鬲讴丕賳蹖 丿賴賲貙 賵 賴乇趩蹖夭蹖 讴賴 亘賴 丌賳 丕爻鬲賵丕乇賲 賵 鬲讴蹖賴 亘賴 丕賵 丿丕丿賴鈥屫з� 賳賴 丕夭 丌爻賲丕賳貙 讴賴 丕夭 丿乇賵賳 禺賵丿賲 卮乇蹖丕賳 丿丕乇丿. 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 鬲賵 亘丕夭禺賱賯 賯氐賴鈥屰� 毓蹖爻蹖鈥屫池� 丿乇 噩賴丕賳 丕賲乇賵夭 賴爻鬲蹖.
October 24, 2021
This play balances a character of constancy, principle and conscience against a whole mob of shitheads who enjoy none of these qualities. Interesting to me is the mixture of respect and resentment that this character of conscience creates in those characters who live according to convenience and expediency. This play is probably a nice description of just about every martyrdom in every land across all the ages. And it shows why there are so few martyrs. It鈥檚 really really easy to bend your inner rules.
This is a two act play without scene breaks, which is an interesting formulation. Bolt鈥檚 use of a single character to thread together the contiguous scenes recalled to me .
This is a two act play without scene breaks, which is an interesting formulation. Bolt鈥檚 use of a single character to thread together the contiguous scenes recalled to me .
January 3, 2012
this is a very famous play and i'm not really sure why. thomas more makes an inspiring main character but neither he nor anybody else ever changes and there's not a single surprise or twist in the whole play. just a straight line to martyrdom from page one. it's like one long speech about standing up for principles. it's a well-written speech, but still.
November 22, 2024
4.5 stars! It's very moving, and I especially love the part of the Common Man. The irony of him giving insight throughout the play is wonderfully done. St. Thomas More's tact, humility, and wit is very endearing. I love this play!
October 11, 2024
鈥淲hen a man takes an oath, Meg, he's holding his own self in his own hands. Like water [he cups his hands], and if he opens his fingers then, he needn't hope to find himself again. Some men aren't capable of this, but I'd be loathe to think your father one of them.鈥�
LOVED. This play has forever burrowed itself into the deepest recesses of my brain, and I need to at least keep a log of my main thoughts so I can return to this when I inevitably reflect on this play again in the future.
Storywise, my edition provides a fairly succinct synopsis:
鈥淚n this tense play of conscience, Thomas More, Lord Chancellor of England, enters into political and moral conflict with King Henry VIII when he refuses to support the King鈥檚 move to divorce his wife, Catherine of Aragon. More鈥檚 decision to endorse the divine right of the Pope over and above that of the King leads to his unwilling martyrdom and tragic downfall.鈥�
A Man for All Seasons asks deep, philosophical questions that have stuck with me over the years 听鈥� through the play we explore themes of integrity, the idea of the self and selfhood, the conflict between personal belief and public duty, and the high cost of moral conviction.
I love Thomas More鈥檚 character because you can take away dual interpretations of him. Is More an inspiring figure of moral conviction, or is he a warning against the dangers of moral absolutism?
More鈥檚 refusal to compromise his conscience, even when his life is at stake, raises profound questions: Is it right to prioritize one鈥檚 individual conscience over societal or political demands? What happens when rigid morality clashes with complex real-world situations? Is it always right to prioritize personal integrity over loved ones鈥� well-being?
As an inspiring figure, More is a symbol of integrity and moral courage. He鈥檚 an idealist whose unwavering commitment to his conscience serves as profound personal inspiration. His steadfastness in the face of societal, political, and personal pressure suggests that living by your principles, even when it costs you everything, is the highest form of moral duty. Robert Bolt seems to present More as a figure who values his "self" over external pressures, symbolizing the individual standing firm against the encroachments of authority. I and many other readers find in More an aspirational figure, a reminder that moral integrity can triumph over corruption and compromise, even if the consequences are severe. He reminds me of Socrates (who also faced death for his adherence to his beliefs), and both stand as pillars of devotion and examples of the sacrifices necessary to preserve one鈥檚 ethical identity in a world full of moral ambiguity.
叠鲍罢鈥�.
As a warning against moral absolutism, More is a tragic figure whose rigidity led to needless suffering. More's refusal to bend鈥攅ven in the face of death鈥攔eflects a kind of moral pride that disregards the emotional toll on his family. In the play, More's wife Alice and his daughter Margaret (Meg) both plead with him to save his life by taking the oath, even if it means lying for the sake of survival. Their pleas highlight the human cost of More's moral rigidity. One could interpret More鈥檚 integrity as important, but acknowledge that an unbending adherence to principles鈥攚ithout room for compromise鈥攃an be impractical and even harmful. The grief and suffering More鈥檚 death causes his loved ones could be seen as a warning against moral absolutism.
Bolt perhaps may have intended this tension. In his preface to the play, Bolt notes that More was chosen as the central figure not because of his saintliness, but because of his internal sense of self鈥攈is ability to "hold his own self in his hands." More as a character transcends simple religious martyrdom 鈥斕鼴olt admired him for his sense of 鈥渟elfhood鈥� aka his ability to remain true to his internal convictions rather than external pressures. I feel like for Bolt, More鈥檚 greatness lay not in his specific religious beliefs but in his ability to live and die according to the values he held most dear. However, Bolt also leaves room for the audience to question the wisdom of More's choices. Was his death really necessary? Could he have found a way to preserve his integrity while sparing his family鈥檚 pain?
To me, More's martyrdom feels both like an act of extraordinary moral courage and, at times, stubbornness. The play does not offer easy answers but invites deep reflection on whether holding fast to one鈥檚 principles, regardless of the cost, is noble or impractical in a world of compromise.
Is More a beacon of moral clarity, or is his story a critique of rigid adherence to absolute principles? Bolt, through the complexity of his portrayal, allows room for both interpretations, leaving it to us in the audience to reflect on the delicate balance between principle and practicality, integrity and flexibility.
This is also the play I instantly think about when I think of the theme of selfhood, which lies at the heart of More鈥檚 moral struggle. As Bolt notes in his introduction, More鈥檚 steadfastness stems from his clear sense of self. For him, identity is defined by adherence to his conscience, something that cannot be compromised without losing himself in the process. It always makes me reflect on what qualities of mine are essential to myself 鈥� which qualities in us cannot be stripped away, because they are essential to the core of who we are?
Ultimately, A Man for All Seasons offers a timeless reflection on the tension between public duty and private conviction, the fragility and essentialism of selfhood, and the cost of living by one鈥檚 ideals.
March 28, 2018
I didn't expect to like this book/play as much as I did.
Story goes, our English teacher brings in the book and has us read the super long, boring prologue. Literally, the most boring thing in the entire book. Other than that, the book/play of fly.
Set during King Henry VIII's rein, poor Sir Thomas More struggles to keep his family safe while struggling to resolve an issue against his moral conscience. It's all great. No spoilers, since it is history.
Story goes, our English teacher brings in the book and has us read the super long, boring prologue. Literally, the most boring thing in the entire book. Other than that, the book/play of fly.
Set during King Henry VIII's rein, poor Sir Thomas More struggles to keep his family safe while struggling to resolve an issue against his moral conscience. It's all great. No spoilers, since it is history.
February 1, 2019
A reread this play after some 35 years...it's still as powerful as it was 3 decades ago. I'll be attending its Broadway revival in a few weeks...this was Bolt's masterpiece.
January 9, 2023
鉁� 2.5 stars
~
[read for high school 鈥榝reshmen year鈥� great books class]
~
[read for high school 鈥榝reshmen year鈥� great books class]
April 29, 2025
A Man for All Seasons by Robert Bolton
Magnificent, stupendous- 10 out of 10
The film may be better known than the play and I however had the chance to enjoy the excellent screen version first.
The movie had the script written by Robert Bolt and went on to win no less than six Academy Awards and had Orson Wells in the cast.
This morning I have finished the play on which the acclaimed film was based and what a marvelous work it is!!
It can serve as a lesson for anybody interested in learning about meaning, rectitude, bravery, power of conviction and much more.
The hero is a very complex and strong man, determined to stand up for his beliefs, even if that means antagonizing the king.
Thomas More is not really a rebel, on the contrary he respects the authority of the king and that makes the play even more thrilling.
If he would be a nut case or a chevalier bent on fighting and dueling emphatically, refusing to accept the new order for the fun of it, it would have been a comedy or perhaps a tragedy with limited impact.
But Thomas More, even when accused is very careful to state that he accepts the new order of things and even the future queen.
The trouble is started by the infamous king Henry VIII, after his first wife fails to deliver a heir and he wants to change the established rules.
It is true that not having a male descendant was a problem of national security in those days and any ruler would have been annoyed with the situation.
But Henry went too far, one might say- when he decided that he would have a new wife no matter what the rest of the world says.
This meant a conflict with the Catholic Church that disapproves to this day of divorce and banned it outright in the past.
In fact I think it is disallowed even today without a proper dispensation, based on reasonable and well grounded motives.
In the conflict with the Catholic Church, Thomas More sides with the pope, in the belief that the latter does represent God on Earth.
Since Thomas More is a very faithful man, he sees the options before him as clear cut, although he would not upset the king, if he could.
- Even if the monarch deserves obeisance and loyalty, there is a higher authority that commands even greater respect
So when asked to disavow his faith and recognize a new church, which would become The Church of England or The Anglican Church, More refuses.
This makes me have some qualms here, even if I am aware of the Magnificence of this Man for All Seasons.
Yes, it is wonderful and awesome to have such strong, unflinching beliefs that would not change even in front of Death.
But on the other hand, a little flexibility could have saved not just his own person, but spared his family immense suffering.
The strange coincidence is that while I write these notes, there is an episode from The History of Christianity on The History Channel- where else?- and that makes me think of a possible vanity of the great man...
The episode on TV refers to Protestantism and the many shades and confessions it gave birth to all over the world.
We can imagine what comedians would make out of this stand for the Old Church as opposed to choosing a new denomination.
But putting this issue aside, we need to get back to admiring a wonderful hero who would not lose his religion even when faced with execution.
I am not sure if I should assume that a potential reader would not about this centuries old history and not think in terms of spoiler alerts.
Because the stupendous play ends with a dramatic, horrifying bang鈥he significance of which the audience knows all too well.
I had the great chance to listen to a BBC production with fantastic interpretations from the likes of Brian Cox and Martin Freeman.
Magnificent, stupendous- 10 out of 10
The film may be better known than the play and I however had the chance to enjoy the excellent screen version first.
The movie had the script written by Robert Bolt and went on to win no less than six Academy Awards and had Orson Wells in the cast.
This morning I have finished the play on which the acclaimed film was based and what a marvelous work it is!!
It can serve as a lesson for anybody interested in learning about meaning, rectitude, bravery, power of conviction and much more.
The hero is a very complex and strong man, determined to stand up for his beliefs, even if that means antagonizing the king.
Thomas More is not really a rebel, on the contrary he respects the authority of the king and that makes the play even more thrilling.
If he would be a nut case or a chevalier bent on fighting and dueling emphatically, refusing to accept the new order for the fun of it, it would have been a comedy or perhaps a tragedy with limited impact.
But Thomas More, even when accused is very careful to state that he accepts the new order of things and even the future queen.
The trouble is started by the infamous king Henry VIII, after his first wife fails to deliver a heir and he wants to change the established rules.
It is true that not having a male descendant was a problem of national security in those days and any ruler would have been annoyed with the situation.
But Henry went too far, one might say- when he decided that he would have a new wife no matter what the rest of the world says.
This meant a conflict with the Catholic Church that disapproves to this day of divorce and banned it outright in the past.
In fact I think it is disallowed even today without a proper dispensation, based on reasonable and well grounded motives.
In the conflict with the Catholic Church, Thomas More sides with the pope, in the belief that the latter does represent God on Earth.
Since Thomas More is a very faithful man, he sees the options before him as clear cut, although he would not upset the king, if he could.
- Even if the monarch deserves obeisance and loyalty, there is a higher authority that commands even greater respect
So when asked to disavow his faith and recognize a new church, which would become The Church of England or The Anglican Church, More refuses.
This makes me have some qualms here, even if I am aware of the Magnificence of this Man for All Seasons.
Yes, it is wonderful and awesome to have such strong, unflinching beliefs that would not change even in front of Death.
But on the other hand, a little flexibility could have saved not just his own person, but spared his family immense suffering.
The strange coincidence is that while I write these notes, there is an episode from The History of Christianity on The History Channel- where else?- and that makes me think of a possible vanity of the great man...
The episode on TV refers to Protestantism and the many shades and confessions it gave birth to all over the world.
We can imagine what comedians would make out of this stand for the Old Church as opposed to choosing a new denomination.
But putting this issue aside, we need to get back to admiring a wonderful hero who would not lose his religion even when faced with execution.
I am not sure if I should assume that a potential reader would not about this centuries old history and not think in terms of spoiler alerts.
Because the stupendous play ends with a dramatic, horrifying bang鈥he significance of which the audience knows all too well.
I had the great chance to listen to a BBC production with fantastic interpretations from the likes of Brian Cox and Martin Freeman.
July 24, 2021
Yesterday I was listening to this podcast where the host asked listeners to make a list of things they would die for. Of course, the list, any list, would begin with loved ones, some possessions such as lands and money... and then we would arrive at the untangible. Values. Freedom, any kind of freedom. Truth.
In this tragic historical drama, Bolt depicts what it was like to die for what is believed to be Moral Truth.
A Man for All Seasons is a brilliant portrait of Sir Thomas More in his last years as Lord Chancellor of England during the reign of Henry VIII and his famous Act of Supremacy.
Although the story contains no surprises, Bolt succeeds at writing a compelling play that has readers wonder was it really all worth it? In a time where, as Rich put it 鈥渆very man has his price鈥�, should he have given his life for what he held to be right?
Equally brilliant -if not more brilliant- is Bolt's prefatory text, in which he explains his passion for the 16th century Chancellor and his sacred principles.
In this tragic historical drama, Bolt depicts what it was like to die for what is believed to be Moral Truth.
A Man for All Seasons is a brilliant portrait of Sir Thomas More in his last years as Lord Chancellor of England during the reign of Henry VIII and his famous Act of Supremacy.
Although the story contains no surprises, Bolt succeeds at writing a compelling play that has readers wonder was it really all worth it? In a time where, as Rich put it 鈥渆very man has his price鈥�, should he have given his life for what he held to be right?
Equally brilliant -if not more brilliant- is Bolt's prefatory text, in which he explains his passion for the 16th century Chancellor and his sacred principles.
January 12, 2008
As says in her review, I too fell for Sir Thomas More while reading the script and have a lasting fondness for Paul Scofield after seeing his portrayal of More in the 1966 movie. Though I am not Catholic and am not a believer in organized religion and am saddened beyond reason when I think of anyone killing over such an issue, for More to be so clever while being so staunch in his convictions and to stand for his principles -- to argue in fact that it is the principle of standing on his principles that should be respected by the King and the court -- made my anguished teenage heart cry even harder for the justice that I thought should be available in the world.
The exchange regarding the maxim "Silence gives consent" has always stuck with me and shames me when I think of times I've held my tongue for the sake of courtesy or decorum.
The exchange regarding the maxim "Silence gives consent" has always stuck with me and shames me when I think of times I've held my tongue for the sake of courtesy or decorum.
October 17, 2014
丕诏乇 賲丕 丿乇 讴卮賵乇蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 賲蹖 讴乇丿蹖賲 讴賴 鬲賯賵丕 賲賮蹖丿 賮丕蹖丿賴 亘賵丿貙 毓賯賱 爻賱蹖賲 賵丕丿丕乇賲丕賳 賲蹖 讴乇丿 讴賴 禺賵亘 亘丕卮蹖賲貙 賵 丨乇氐 賵 丌夭 賲丕 乇丕 賯丿蹖爻 噩賱賵賴 賲蹖 丿丕丿. 丌賳賵賯鬲 乇賵夭诏丕乇賲丕賳 趩賵賳 丨蹖賵丕賳丕鬲 蹖丕 賮乇卮鬲诏丕賳蹖 亘賵丿 讴賴 丿乇 禺胤賴 丕蹖 禺乇賲貙 賮丕乇睾 丕夭 賴乇 诏賵賳賴 芦賯賴乇賲丕賳禄 亘賴 爻乇 賲蹖 亘乇賳丿. 丕賲丕 丕讴賳賵賳 讴賴 賲蹖 亘蹖賳蹖賲 丨乇氐 賵 睾囟亘 賵 丨爻丿 賵 睾乇賵乇 賵 亘胤丕賱鬲 賵 卮賴賵鬲 賵 丨賲丕賯鬲 亘乇 賮乇賵鬲賳蹖 賵 倬丕讴丿丕賲賳蹖 賵 噩乇兀鬲 賵 毓丿丕賱鬲 賵 賮賴賲 睾賱亘賴 丿丕乇丿 賵 亘蹖卮鬲乇 賲賮蹖丿 賮丕蹖丿賴 丕爻鬲 賵 賲丕 賴賲 亘賴乇丨丕賱 亘丕蹖丿 丕賳鬲禺丕亘 讴賳蹖賲 讴賴 丕爻丕爻丕賸 丕賳爻丕賳 亘丕卮蹖賲 蹖丕 賳賴貙 倬爻 賳丕趩丕乇 亘丕蹖丿 讴賲蹖 倬丕蹖丿丕乇 亘賲丕賳蹖賲貙 丨鬲蹖 丕诏乇 賱丕夭賲 亘丕卮丿 禺胤乇 芦賯賴乇賲丕賳禄 卮丿賳 乇丕 賳蹖夭 亘倬匕蹖乇蹖賲.禄
December 5, 2012
After reading Mantel's 'Wolf Hall' and 'Bring up the Bodies' I felt almost obligated to get another perspective on Thomas More. From a fictional perspective, I felt 'A Man for All Seasons' was the place to go. A beautiful play that examines what it is like to be a man of immovable consience in a corrupt society. Now I've got to go figure out if a fundamentalist angel is still an angel.
October 21, 2024
I read this in preparation for a production I'm involved in - not as an actor, but once I got through the first few pages I couldn't put it down.
The plot is fairly well known; Henry VIII wants a divorce, breaks from Rome, and with revolutions, people die. St Thomas More being one of them. This interplay between the world and the Heavens can be seen working through More's mind, and he remains true to his word, and is able to use the law to his advantage by remaining silent. In his sham trial at the end, he realises there is no reason to stay quiet anymore and speaks his mind - his realisation that his death is God's will.
The author keeps the suspense throughout and even though we know the conclusion, we can still see the inner thoughts of St Thomas More playing out as he keeps to his convictions and his faith to the very end.
The slimy Cromwell has the perfect lines to indicate his position, and as we are remind in the play, he meets the same end as St Thomas More, his loyalty to the world and the King having led him to the chopping block.
There are moments of relief and humour in the play, releasing the tension, and More's almost breezy understanding of the situation and his resignation towards God shows him as a model of how we can live our lives in tumultuous political times.
"More: Then it's a poor argument to call it 'neat', Meg. When a man takes an oath, Meg, he's holding his on self in his own hands. Like water (cups hands) and if he opens his fingers then - he needn't hope to find himself again. Some men aren't capable of this, but I'd be loathe to think your father one of them." p.83
"More: The law is not a 'light' for you or any man to see by; the law is not an instrument of any kind. (To the Foreman.) The law is a causeway upon which so long as he keeps to it a citizen may walk safely."p.92
"More: Have patience, Margaret, and trouble not thyself. Death comes for us all; even at our birth (he holds her head and looks down at it for a moment in recollection) - even at our birth, death does but stand aside a little. It is the law of nature, and the will of God." p.98
St Thomas More - Pray for us.
The plot is fairly well known; Henry VIII wants a divorce, breaks from Rome, and with revolutions, people die. St Thomas More being one of them. This interplay between the world and the Heavens can be seen working through More's mind, and he remains true to his word, and is able to use the law to his advantage by remaining silent. In his sham trial at the end, he realises there is no reason to stay quiet anymore and speaks his mind - his realisation that his death is God's will.
The author keeps the suspense throughout and even though we know the conclusion, we can still see the inner thoughts of St Thomas More playing out as he keeps to his convictions and his faith to the very end.
The slimy Cromwell has the perfect lines to indicate his position, and as we are remind in the play, he meets the same end as St Thomas More, his loyalty to the world and the King having led him to the chopping block.
There are moments of relief and humour in the play, releasing the tension, and More's almost breezy understanding of the situation and his resignation towards God shows him as a model of how we can live our lives in tumultuous political times.
"More: Then it's a poor argument to call it 'neat', Meg. When a man takes an oath, Meg, he's holding his on self in his own hands. Like water (cups hands) and if he opens his fingers then - he needn't hope to find himself again. Some men aren't capable of this, but I'd be loathe to think your father one of them." p.83
"More: The law is not a 'light' for you or any man to see by; the law is not an instrument of any kind. (To the Foreman.) The law is a causeway upon which so long as he keeps to it a citizen may walk safely."p.92
"More: Have patience, Margaret, and trouble not thyself. Death comes for us all; even at our birth (he holds her head and looks down at it for a moment in recollection) - even at our birth, death does but stand aside a little. It is the law of nature, and the will of God." p.98
St Thomas More - Pray for us.
August 4, 2024
How dare More be a main character.
Read
March 25, 2024What an odd thing to write a play about. Rather Shakespearean ending. I enjoyed it.
February 6, 2021
"If we lived in a State where virtue was profitable, common sense would make us good, and greed would make us saintly. And we'd live like animals or angels in the happy land that needs no heroes." ~Sir Thomas More
I haven't read a play since I was in high school, during my drama club days when I actually participated in a play. While I am not the greatest fan of period pieces, the lessons of corruption - morality - politics and the common man remains evident through the evolution of time, place, and opportunity.
Is there a blurred line or expectation of compromise between bowing down to the pressures of choosing the populist wrong in exchange for what is right and just? The conversations in this book are quite relevant throughout history, even in our day and time.
Henry VIII defied the law of the church by pushing for permission to marry the widow of his deceased brother. He has now become heir to the thrown but doesn't have a wife. Henry knows what the scripture says in Leviticus 18:16 "Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy brother's wife." Yet he pushes the church anyway to grant his wish to marry Catherine, his brother's widow. The problem comes when Catherine is unable to bear him a male heir and he wants the marriage annulled so he can marry another woman who will bear him a son.
The pressure is on Lord Chancellor, Sir Thomas More who is committed to the covenant of the church and morally he cannot agree to changing the rules back just to suit King Henry's desires. Thus, he is thrown into jail. During the only visit More was allowed to have, his family (his wife Alice, his daughter Margaret, and his son-in-law William Roper) comes to see him in prison. They plea with him to compromise his belief about the annulment, but he sticks with his commitment and sorrowfully asks them to leave and move out of town.
Thomas Cromwell and The Duke of Norfolk who were supposed to be More's friends maliciously craft grounds to have More put on trial for treason. It was interesting to me that when Cromwell addressed the jury, trying to demonize More in order to support his argument for his conviction, he said this, "There's nothing like darkness for sharpening the ear, and we listen." He further made this comment in his commentary, "So silence can, according to circumstances, speak. Consider, now, the circumstances of the prisoner's silence."
Immediately they had Sir Thomas More beheaded. Even though More knew his demise, he stuck to his conscious and commitment. This is a good, short read that draws you in to the drama.
I haven't read a play since I was in high school, during my drama club days when I actually participated in a play. While I am not the greatest fan of period pieces, the lessons of corruption - morality - politics and the common man remains evident through the evolution of time, place, and opportunity.
Is there a blurred line or expectation of compromise between bowing down to the pressures of choosing the populist wrong in exchange for what is right and just? The conversations in this book are quite relevant throughout history, even in our day and time.
Henry VIII defied the law of the church by pushing for permission to marry the widow of his deceased brother. He has now become heir to the thrown but doesn't have a wife. Henry knows what the scripture says in Leviticus 18:16 "Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy brother's wife." Yet he pushes the church anyway to grant his wish to marry Catherine, his brother's widow. The problem comes when Catherine is unable to bear him a male heir and he wants the marriage annulled so he can marry another woman who will bear him a son.
The pressure is on Lord Chancellor, Sir Thomas More who is committed to the covenant of the church and morally he cannot agree to changing the rules back just to suit King Henry's desires. Thus, he is thrown into jail. During the only visit More was allowed to have, his family (his wife Alice, his daughter Margaret, and his son-in-law William Roper) comes to see him in prison. They plea with him to compromise his belief about the annulment, but he sticks with his commitment and sorrowfully asks them to leave and move out of town.
Thomas Cromwell and The Duke of Norfolk who were supposed to be More's friends maliciously craft grounds to have More put on trial for treason. It was interesting to me that when Cromwell addressed the jury, trying to demonize More in order to support his argument for his conviction, he said this, "There's nothing like darkness for sharpening the ear, and we listen." He further made this comment in his commentary, "So silence can, according to circumstances, speak. Consider, now, the circumstances of the prisoner's silence."
Immediately they had Sir Thomas More beheaded. Even though More knew his demise, he stuck to his conscious and commitment. This is a good, short read that draws you in to the drama.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 674 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.