Modern Fantasy: The 100 Best Novels, 1946-1987: Introduces many lesser-known fantasy works Originally posted at Following on the success of Science Fiction: 100 Best Novels, An English-Language Selection, 1949-1984, it made sense that David Pringle would tackle the wide-ranging and ill-defined field of fantasy with Modern Fantasy: The 100 Best Novels, An English-Language Selection, 1946-1987. It’s actually an amazing effort, since Pringle would have had to read extensively in both genres for almost 4 decades, and I think it’s quite unusual for someone to do that for both genres. Moreover, though the borders of SF are defined differently by each person you ask, this is even more so for the fantasy genre, which can include horror, epic fantasy, hallucinatory trips, magic realism, contemporary fantasy, and things that don’t fit any convenient categories. It’s almost impossible to narrow this down to a mere 100 works, so I’m sure people would disagree with many of his choices, but that’s the fun of “Best of� lists.
David Pringle did not shy from the task, and produced a fascinating and wide-ranging list. I dare anyone to claim to have read 75% of these books, let alone all. There are so many unfamiliar books and authors that dedicated fantasy fans will immediately feel a desire to fill in all the gaps and take up the challenge. It’s another task that may take a lifetime, but I have discovered and enjoyed many lesser-known writers here that I would never have known about otherwise. There are so many writers that you might not have heard of or didn’t consider part of the genre. I can’t imagine even our most widely-read fantasy fans have read more than two-thirds of this list. And there could be no consensus on which books are the best � it’s all a matter of taste, but what incredible variety.
Each entry is two pages long � they are written succinctly and give the all-important historical and literary context for each book, along with a basic outline of the plot. Occasionally he will include some spoilers in the last few paragraphs, so be careful! But his reviews are surprisingly entertaining to read. He is also very honest is describing what type of books they are, so you can immediately eliminate books that don’t fit your taste. I really took away a better understanding of the history and development of the genre, something that informs my reviews today. It’s amazing how broadly and deeply he’s read in the genre.
For many years I used this book and Science Fiction: 100 Best Novels as guides to track down the more obscure titles in various used bookstores. I managed to get quite a few of them, but even 30 years later I’ve only read around 27 to my chagrin. I consider it a point of pride to read as many as I can before this mortal coil expires. Here is the list in chronological order � how many of them have you read already? I’ve put an asterisk next to those I’ve read.
The quality of his selections is top notch, and after flipping through these 100 entries, I must admit that my 'wish list' fattened up a few more pounds. David Pringle has done wonders writing about the classics of genre fiction, some well-known, others nearly forgotten, and here he keeps his analysis minimal, giving the reader brief synopses and brief rhetoric to what makes the novels so important in modern fantasy. However, there's one thing that gnawed on me was his willingness to drop spoilers, not minute ones, but conclusive ones that may spoil the read entirely. I don't know if he was assuming most readers of this book would have already read his selections, but it was a bit grating. For me, these type of 'best of' books are great for discovering gems, not revisiting them. Anyhow, it's all about his diverse scope of entries. Ramsey Campbell's 'The Hungry Moon' alongside Tolkein and Poul Anderson, rubbing shoulders with Michael Shea's 'Nifft the Lean' and Ken Grimwood's 'Replay', this is a near-must for bookworms, and thankfully one that rises above the stereotypical fairyland tales and sword & sandal epics. Truly shows how the genre label of 'fantasy' has an incredibly wide scope. So close to a 4-star read.
Very highly recommended! How should you go about finding out what you "should" read. Why - let David Pringle tell you, of course!
I must admit that I am a great fan of books "about" science fiction and (to a lesser degree) fantasy. I have read so many of the general ones that it does become quite predictable, what will they say as they wander through the history of the genre.
Pringle avoids all of this predictable stuff. He jumps straight to the actual "best" books themselves, and dispenses with all of that historical analysis. He does limit himself to the years 1949 to 1984, which does make the whole approach somewhat more manageable. If you like an author, or have heard of a particular book you want to check out, this is the book for you.
If you enjoy this approach, and you like fantasy, you will want to check out his book "Science Fiction: The best 100 novels".
And if you really really like David Pringle's analysis - look for The Ultimate Guide to Science Fiction. Unfortunately, that book has not yet made the cut to be listed on this website. The Guide lists 3,000 books of SF, including both novels and collections, with a rating from zero stars to 4 stars. Hmm - zero stars - what a great idea for warning poor unsuspecting readers from unreadable schlock! I'm afraid I got a bit obsessed with the Guide, etc. and bought a lot of SF & F that I will probably never find time to read.
My rating system: Since Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ only allows 1 to 5 stars (no half-stars), you have no option but to be ruthless. I reserve one star for a book that is a BOMB - or poor (equivalent to a letter grade of F, E, or at most D). Progressing upwards, 2 stars is equivalent to C (C -, C or C+), 3 stars (equals to B - or B), 4 stars (equals B+ or A -), and 5 stars (equals A or A+). As a result, I maximize my rating space for good books, and don't waste half or more of that rating space on books that are of marginal quality.
Some nice choices in here especially from the pulp era; kinda skimmed the end as they're the usual suspects. Wish there was a new edition going to present day. Some picks were just repeats, could have been better done by author
This book uses the exact same formula as the author's previous Science Fiction: The 100 Best Novels : An English-Language Selection, 1949-1984, and as with that volume Mr. Pringle has come in for some unjust criticism in my view for having an alleged "British bias". He states upfront that the selection is going to be purely his own, and that he is restricting himself entirely to English-language writers. By my count he offers 26 books by 20 English writers (one South African born, and one born in China), 3 books from 2 Canadians, and a book apiece by writers from Scotland, India, and Ireland - leaving space for 70 works by Americans. We're hardly getting short-changed, especially in a genre so powerfully influenced throughout it's history by Britons, including Tolkien, Lewis, Peake and Moorcock within the boundaries of this survey, and William Morris, Lewis Carroll, and J.K. Rowling from outside it. Surely the English contribution to the field has been enormous.
Enough nit-picking. Brian Aldiss writes a sweet, brief foreward; Pringle's 11-page introduction attempts to define the genre, to justify his selection of a starting date (in part to be in sympathy with the 1949 beginning of his SF book, and in part to start with a particularly powerful work, Peake's "Titus Groan"), and to mention a few titles and authors that have been left out, and why they have failed to make the cut. The author's methodology and biases are similar here to those he exhibits in his SF volume: choices are weighted towards literary quality, he often chooses for range rather than trying to fit any narrow "sword and sorcery" or "quest against the dark lord" type story paradigms; all to the good, I say, as it allows the appearance of such great fantasists as Aldiss, Peake, John Crowley and Salman Rushdie - none of them noted for playing in Tolkien's sandbox.
Rather than list every book included (which you can find out readily enough from a variety of places - and which I think might spoil your fun in browsing the book, so please don't!) I'll just give a rundown of the most-named writers, which should give you some idea as to whether this book might be still interesting or not:
Fritz Leiber - 4 works chosen
J.G. Ballard, Angela Carter, Michael Moorcock, Mervyn Peake - 3 works each chosen
Poul Anderson, Peter S. Beagle, John Crowley, M. John Harrison, Robert A. Heinlein, Stephen King, Brian Moore, Fletcher Pratt, Jack Vance - 2 works each chosen
I should note that Pringle considers Peake's "Gormenghast" books as individual novels, whereas he includes series by Tolkien, Donaldson and Gene Wolfe among others as single works. And as with his SF volume, short stories and collections are excluded - unless, as in the case of Vance's "Dying Earth", they can be justified as forming some kind of semi-cohesive narrative.
The fantasy genre has seen an enormous explosion in the 22 years since this book was published; you won't, obviously, see "Harry Potter" here, nor "A Song of Ice and Fire", nor Robert Jordan or Terry Goodkind. With so much new work of every shape and variety and even some new subgenres that really didn't exist - or at least hadn't been named (e.g. steampunk and urban fantasy) just a couple of decades ago, it's easy for many of the less famous works listed herein to get lost in the shuffle. Do yourself a favor, then, if you're interested in the byways and the history of the genre as it started to take hold in the popular imagination, and grab hold of Pringle's list. There aren't many more interesting, or wide-ranging guides around, even in this era of fantasy-gone-mainstream.
While Pringle's taste and mine don't align perfectly, I've used this guide as a reading list for years. Every time I open it, I see a dozen or so books I'd like to read.