Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Chernobyl: The History of a Nuclear Catastrophe

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Chernobyl, please sign up.

Answered Questions (2)

Aris So I now have an opinion on both books. I have read mid way through both but will only finish "Midnight in Chernobyl". Here is how they compare in my …m´Ç°ù±ðSo I now have an opinion on both books. I have read mid way through both but will only finish "Midnight in Chernobyl". Here is how they compare in my opinion: I think that this one is for researchers and the other one for regular readers like me. The reason I originally selected this one was its author's credentials and other work. Unfortunately however, it is rather academic, with very flat characters, and virtually very few elements of a captivating narrative. It includes myriads of details thrown in a relatively unstructured way and provides with no intuition whatsoever as to the physics underpinning the accident. I had to push myself to read half of it and eventually gave up. "Midnight in Chernobyl" has the constructs, mild dramatic elements and depth of characters that kept me wanting more. It also attempts to explain the physics behind the accident and does a relatively good job. With just a little help from Wikipedia you will get it, the whole thing. In conclusion, both are good but IMO, they target different audiences. Because most of us are not academics or historians, it is no coincidence that Midnight has a better ranking both here and on Amazon. (less)

About Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ Q&A

Ask and answer questions about books!

You can pose questions to the Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.

See Featured Authors Answering Questions