What do you think?
Rate this book
One Day
It鈥檚 1988 and Dexter Mayhew and Emma Morley have only just met. But after only one day together, they cannot stop thinking about one another. Over twenty years, snapshots of that relationship are revealed on the same day鈥擩uly 15th鈥攐f each year. Dex and Em face squabbles and fights, hopes and missed opportunities, laughter and tears. And as the true meaning of this one crucial day is revealed, they must come to grips with the nature of love and life itself.
From the Trade Paperback edition.
From the Trade Paperback edition.
Audio CD
First published June 11, 2009
16022 people are currently reading
260007 people want to read
About the author
David Nicholls
40听books5,215听followersDavid Nicholls is a British author, screenwriter, and actor. A student of Toynbee Comprehensive school and Barton Peveril Sixth Form College, he Graduated from the University of Bristol having studied English Literature and Drama.
After graduation, he won a scholarship to study at the American Musical and Dramatic Academy in New York, before returning to London in 1991 and finally earning an Equity card. He worked sporadically as an actor for the next eight years, eventually earning a three year stint at the Royal National Theatre, followed by a job at BBC Radio Drama as a script reader/researcher. This led to script-editing jobs at London Weekend Television and Tiger Aspect Productions.
During this period, he began to write, developing an adaptation of Sam Shepard鈥檚 stage-play Simpatico with the director Matthew Warchus, an old friend from University. He also wrote his first original script, a situation comedy about frustrated waiters, Waiting, which was later optioned by the BBC.
Simpatico was turned into a feature film in 1999, and this allowed David to start writing full-time. He has been twice nominated for BAFTA awards and his first novel, Starter for Ten was featured on the first Richard and Judy Book Club.
After graduation, he won a scholarship to study at the American Musical and Dramatic Academy in New York, before returning to London in 1991 and finally earning an Equity card. He worked sporadically as an actor for the next eight years, eventually earning a three year stint at the Royal National Theatre, followed by a job at BBC Radio Drama as a script reader/researcher. This led to script-editing jobs at London Weekend Television and Tiger Aspect Productions.
During this period, he began to write, developing an adaptation of Sam Shepard鈥檚 stage-play Simpatico with the director Matthew Warchus, an old friend from University. He also wrote his first original script, a situation comedy about frustrated waiters, Waiting, which was later optioned by the BBC.
Simpatico was turned into a feature film in 1999, and this allowed David to start writing full-time. He has been twice nominated for BAFTA awards and his first novel, Starter for Ten was featured on the first Richard and Judy Book Club.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 28,345 reviews
November 7, 2012
Rarely am I left speechless, I usually have plenty to say, but as I reflected on this novel, I realized there would be no surefire way to describe this book. It is a complete conundrum. Readers will either love or hate this book, I don鈥檛 think it there is much of a middle road with this one. It will speak to those with similar personal experiences.
I enjoyed the format. It gives the reader snapshots of Dex and Em鈥檚 life, like flipping through a stack of polaroids, just a flash of what was going on at a particular time. Picking the same day established a sequence and highlighted that life and circumstances can change so quickly at times, or not change at all as was in Em鈥檚 case when two days start exactly the same. I think this was an intelligent way to approach a story that spans 20 years. We don鈥檛 really need a full depiction of every single event in their lives to have a sense of what they are going through.
Characterization was excellent. Dex and Em quickly became real in my mind, as if I was peeking into the lives of a couple of friends, or reading their journal pages. I too quickly began to know what Emma would or would not like just as Dex did. The characters were genuine. Some reviews say that they were stereotypical鈥ut I find that some people latch onto stereotypes, it helps them define themselves. I feel this is what Emma was doing in her youth with her political stances and thus why they are not as important as she grows older. So are they really stereotypical characters? Or are they just portraying their ideal personas as so many people do?
I find that comparisons to When Harry met Sally fall short. I understand the reasons for the comparisons in that they are both about friends that seem to circle back every few years and make sarcastic quips to one another. But I feel like it ends there. To me, this is more of a modernized Wuthering Heights.
The author鈥檚 ability to write from a woman鈥檚 POV is refreshing. I am hesitant when I read something written by a man, trying to sound like a woman. I generally feel like it鈥檚 not authentic,like there is something off. Not with this book. Em thought the way I would think, said things that I would say.
In the end, this novel deeply affected me. I have not read something that has touched me this much in some time. It spoke to me completely as I was tortured by my own Dex in my youth and early adulthood. The emotions are portrayed as they should be; the frustration, the yearning are, from my perspective, completely legitimate. I found myself feeling like I was reading bits and pieces of my own story. I had knots in my stomach through most of the book and after finishing this at 1 am this morning, I could do nothing but stare at the ceiling and walls, absorbing what I had read, tearing it apart mentally, and extracting lessons from it to be applied in life. That, for me, is the mark of a wonderful novel, reading that reaches into your soul and touches your heart, writing that moves you to feel.
I enjoyed the format. It gives the reader snapshots of Dex and Em鈥檚 life, like flipping through a stack of polaroids, just a flash of what was going on at a particular time. Picking the same day established a sequence and highlighted that life and circumstances can change so quickly at times, or not change at all as was in Em鈥檚 case when two days start exactly the same. I think this was an intelligent way to approach a story that spans 20 years. We don鈥檛 really need a full depiction of every single event in their lives to have a sense of what they are going through.
Characterization was excellent. Dex and Em quickly became real in my mind, as if I was peeking into the lives of a couple of friends, or reading their journal pages. I too quickly began to know what Emma would or would not like just as Dex did. The characters were genuine. Some reviews say that they were stereotypical鈥ut I find that some people latch onto stereotypes, it helps them define themselves. I feel this is what Emma was doing in her youth with her political stances and thus why they are not as important as she grows older. So are they really stereotypical characters? Or are they just portraying their ideal personas as so many people do?
I find that comparisons to When Harry met Sally fall short. I understand the reasons for the comparisons in that they are both about friends that seem to circle back every few years and make sarcastic quips to one another. But I feel like it ends there. To me, this is more of a modernized Wuthering Heights.
The author鈥檚 ability to write from a woman鈥檚 POV is refreshing. I am hesitant when I read something written by a man, trying to sound like a woman. I generally feel like it鈥檚 not authentic,like there is something off. Not with this book. Em thought the way I would think, said things that I would say.
In the end, this novel deeply affected me. I have not read something that has touched me this much in some time. It spoke to me completely as I was tortured by my own Dex in my youth and early adulthood. The emotions are portrayed as they should be; the frustration, the yearning are, from my perspective, completely legitimate. I found myself feeling like I was reading bits and pieces of my own story. I had knots in my stomach through most of the book and after finishing this at 1 am this morning, I could do nothing but stare at the ceiling and walls, absorbing what I had read, tearing it apart mentally, and extracting lessons from it to be applied in life. That, for me, is the mark of a wonderful novel, reading that reaches into your soul and touches your heart, writing that moves you to feel.
December 19, 2010
Why do these two like each other, exactly?
August 30, 2010
Frankly, after reading a spoiler about the ending, I simply have no will to continue on, there is just no pay-off after enduring this depressing tale sprinkled with occasional one-liners. Granted, I am never opposed to taking a good dose of drama, but melodrama I detest.
This story is about a man and a woman who one day come together as lovers, then break up, but stay connected. Their relationship is followed through the next 20 years by presenting just one day - July 15th - out of their lives.
This is indeed a great premise (and technique), but I wish they were used on different characters and situations. Both Dexter and Emma are not likable enough for me to care to see how their relationship unfolds. I dislike watching Dexter waste his life on partying and hooking up and Emma - on pining over him for years. There is nothing remotely romantic, deep, or compelling about it IMO.
I agree with one of the reviewers here who said that the author didn't quite know his target audience. is neither a literary fiction (which can spin the star-crossed lovers theme in a meaningful way - see ), nor a light-hearted chick lit (some reviewers mistakenly compare this novel to the movie "When Harry Met Sally"). It is somewhere in the middle, which is, IMO, a decently written relationship melodrama, perfect examples of which are and tear-jerkers by , , and the likes. But alas, this is not my favored genre.
This story is about a man and a woman who one day come together as lovers, then break up, but stay connected. Their relationship is followed through the next 20 years by presenting just one day - July 15th - out of their lives.
This is indeed a great premise (and technique), but I wish they were used on different characters and situations. Both Dexter and Emma are not likable enough for me to care to see how their relationship unfolds. I dislike watching Dexter waste his life on partying and hooking up and Emma - on pining over him for years. There is nothing remotely romantic, deep, or compelling about it IMO.
I agree with one of the reviewers here who said that the author didn't quite know his target audience. is neither a literary fiction (which can spin the star-crossed lovers theme in a meaningful way - see ), nor a light-hearted chick lit (some reviewers mistakenly compare this novel to the movie "When Harry Met Sally"). It is somewhere in the middle, which is, IMO, a decently written relationship melodrama, perfect examples of which are and tear-jerkers by , , and the likes. But alas, this is not my favored genre.
October 23, 2011
THIS REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS!!!
(I just copied this from my blog...and, didn't realize until it was pointed out to me (below) that I didn't copy the whole thing sorry!)
Please be warned this blog post contains SPOILERS for the following books: One Day, Message in a Bottle, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, The Lord of the Rings, The Way We Were, A Walk to Remember, Atonement, Bridges of Madison County, The Time Travelers Wife, The English Patient
This is the first book that is so beautiful that I want to quote it and keep it with me, and, yet I hate it...I mean seriously hate it! I am sorry I read it, if I hadn't bought it on the Nook I'd burn it. I don't want to read anymore books by this author just incase he tricks me again! I want to...I am crying...shame on David Nicholls...*insert cuss-words here* And, no I WILL NOT be watching the movie...seriously! Yes, I hated the ending that much, not since Atonement have I felt this emotionally cheated.
Emma Morley dies and no, I, in no way, saw that coming. Why didn't I see that coming because this book One Day by David Nicholls (a name that will be seared in my brain so I don't slip up and buy one of his books again) was not advertised as a book in the same vain as Message in a Bottle . See, the thing is I hate when books have needless death and dying. I hate books that intentionally kill off characters you love (think the Weasley twin in HP7 ) to make you cry, not to propel the plot along. And, in this book, after reading about 360 pages of a wonderfully tormented friendship on the verge of something more I was relating to the characters, to the places (I mean Emma has a flat in Earl's Court, really, Earl's Court) and I was relating to the hurt and desire of wanting your best friend...hmm...I was relating soooo much, that when Emma died I felt like a friend died and my breathing became erratic and my world darkened. Frankly, if I'd known this was going to happen, I wouldn't have read the book as I do not read such books. And, that's just it...I feel that Mr. Nicholls had Emma die towards the end (because yes, there's still like 30ish pages after her death...I don't know why...I suppose so you can short out your Nook crying while reading) because that was the ending no one expected. This is what I feel Nicholas Sparks, who is on my banned book list did with Message in a Bottle and what I feel Ian McEwan did in Atonement (what a shame the ending of that was!) and what I feel The Time Travelers Wife was, I mean that book doesn't even adhere to the science of time-travel or the science it creates in the story (if you can...um...er...'meet' yourself, you can also 'save' yourself...I mean he even knew what was over there in the forest...gah!). I'm not into gimmicks and I am not into tricks while reading. I don't have to guess the ending and I don't have to see it coming, but I do have to feel, at the end, that the book and its characters led to the conclusion.
I have, for many years, read books that use to death or separation to propel the plot. I was a little sad that Boromir died in Lord of the Rings , I was a little sad when Jaimie died in A Walk to Remember , and, I cried like someone died at the end of Bridges of Madison County (you know the part where all she has to do is get out of the truck and leave her whole life behind to be with the one she loves and she's there grabbing at the handle and you know she isn't going to do it, but you want her to, you really want her to), I don't mind that The English Patient dies, I don't mind that Hubbell and Katie never get together in The Way We Were . I understand weakness and I understand death when it is used in a proper way to drive home the major themes and symbols of a book or movie. Nicholls used Emma's death to do neither.
I read a review on GoodReads (I read many reviews looking for closure and answers) that talked about how David Nicholls wrote a book that didn't really address any audience and therefore made a certain type of audience incredibly upset. This is true, maybe he didn't understand his audience. I know I'm all for learning about relationship mistakes in a work of fiction, I just don't need characters to die to do that. I also know that there are people who love this book, just like there are people who can't get enough of Nicholas Sparks.
I have had enough of both.
(I just copied this from my blog...and, didn't realize until it was pointed out to me (below) that I didn't copy the whole thing sorry!)
Please be warned this blog post contains SPOILERS for the following books: One Day, Message in a Bottle, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, The Lord of the Rings, The Way We Were, A Walk to Remember, Atonement, Bridges of Madison County, The Time Travelers Wife, The English Patient
This is the first book that is so beautiful that I want to quote it and keep it with me, and, yet I hate it...I mean seriously hate it! I am sorry I read it, if I hadn't bought it on the Nook I'd burn it. I don't want to read anymore books by this author just incase he tricks me again! I want to...I am crying...shame on David Nicholls...*insert cuss-words here* And, no I WILL NOT be watching the movie...seriously! Yes, I hated the ending that much, not since Atonement have I felt this emotionally cheated.
Emma Morley dies and no, I, in no way, saw that coming. Why didn't I see that coming because this book One Day by David Nicholls (a name that will be seared in my brain so I don't slip up and buy one of his books again) was not advertised as a book in the same vain as Message in a Bottle . See, the thing is I hate when books have needless death and dying. I hate books that intentionally kill off characters you love (think the Weasley twin in HP7 ) to make you cry, not to propel the plot along. And, in this book, after reading about 360 pages of a wonderfully tormented friendship on the verge of something more I was relating to the characters, to the places (I mean Emma has a flat in Earl's Court, really, Earl's Court) and I was relating to the hurt and desire of wanting your best friend...hmm...I was relating soooo much, that when Emma died I felt like a friend died and my breathing became erratic and my world darkened. Frankly, if I'd known this was going to happen, I wouldn't have read the book as I do not read such books. And, that's just it...I feel that Mr. Nicholls had Emma die towards the end (because yes, there's still like 30ish pages after her death...I don't know why...I suppose so you can short out your Nook crying while reading) because that was the ending no one expected. This is what I feel Nicholas Sparks, who is on my banned book list did with Message in a Bottle and what I feel Ian McEwan did in Atonement (what a shame the ending of that was!) and what I feel The Time Travelers Wife was, I mean that book doesn't even adhere to the science of time-travel or the science it creates in the story (if you can...um...er...'meet' yourself, you can also 'save' yourself...I mean he even knew what was over there in the forest...gah!). I'm not into gimmicks and I am not into tricks while reading. I don't have to guess the ending and I don't have to see it coming, but I do have to feel, at the end, that the book and its characters led to the conclusion.
I have, for many years, read books that use to death or separation to propel the plot. I was a little sad that Boromir died in Lord of the Rings , I was a little sad when Jaimie died in A Walk to Remember , and, I cried like someone died at the end of Bridges of Madison County (you know the part where all she has to do is get out of the truck and leave her whole life behind to be with the one she loves and she's there grabbing at the handle and you know she isn't going to do it, but you want her to, you really want her to), I don't mind that The English Patient dies, I don't mind that Hubbell and Katie never get together in The Way We Were . I understand weakness and I understand death when it is used in a proper way to drive home the major themes and symbols of a book or movie. Nicholls used Emma's death to do neither.
I read a review on GoodReads (I read many reviews looking for closure and answers) that talked about how David Nicholls wrote a book that didn't really address any audience and therefore made a certain type of audience incredibly upset. This is true, maybe he didn't understand his audience. I know I'm all for learning about relationship mistakes in a work of fiction, I just don't need characters to die to do that. I also know that there are people who love this book, just like there are people who can't get enough of Nicholas Sparks.
I have had enough of both.
January 4, 2011
Is love really all that difficult? Yes, yes it is. David Nicholls crafts a beautiful love story about two people who are so different that they really only have one thing in common: they are both mad for each other. The frustrating thing is though, that however much these two people love each other, they maintain a "friends only" status throughout most of the book. What starts out as a possible love affair after just graduating college, Emma and Dexter's chemistry and attraction falls through the cracks as the years pass. Distance, missed opportunities, and even a letter that never gets sent, are all obstacles that ultimately determine their romantic fate and and life that they may have led together when they were young. Each character experiences struggles, dysfunctional relationships, setbacks, and successes and eventually it is clear that life is passing them by because their true soul mate is not truly in their life.
"One Day" offers laughs, tears, and insight and encourages to not limit yourself and if you truly want something, don't hold back. If you're in love, go for it. Missed opportunities are hard to overcome. Don't let the years go by in vain.
Thanks David Nicholls for such a glorious, heartbreaking read.
"One Day" offers laughs, tears, and insight and encourages to not limit yourself and if you truly want something, don't hold back. If you're in love, go for it. Missed opportunities are hard to overcome. Don't let the years go by in vain.
Thanks David Nicholls for such a glorious, heartbreaking read.
September 3, 2011
Every moment with this book felt like a waste of my time. I've seen it all before: the ugly duckling pining after the rich asshole who could be transformed into a better man if he only realized that the right woman was right there in front of him. This plot is so well trod that I feel like there are hundreds of better examples of it that I could have been reading. And here is the thing, I love these kinds of stories as the size of my romance shelf can attest. But I hated these characters so much that I couldn't root for them.
And as to the ending, can I just say that I didn't like it the first time it happened in , and I still didn't like it when Nicholls ripped it off.
And as to the ending, can I just say that I didn't like it the first time it happened in , and I still didn't like it when Nicholls ripped it off.
February 3, 2023
DELL'ALTEZZA, MA SOPRATTUTTO DELLA BASSEZZA
Non sono un fan di Hornby.
Neppure di Coe, ma per lui ho pi霉 interesse.
Per貌, non abbastanza interesse da arrivare in fondo a questo libro nonostante la sua raccomandazione.
Mi avevano detto che le prime 70/100 pagine non erano all鈥檃ltezza delle seguenti (ma nessuno mi aveva avvertito della bassezza): sono arrivato a 124, un quarto del libro, e direi che basta, non 猫 necessario bere tutta la botte per sapere se il vino 猫 buono.
So gi脿 dove vuole andare a parare: Nicholls vuole farmi piangere a tutti i costi.
脠 la sua vendetta per 鈥楲ove Story鈥� che mi lasci貌 impassibile.
Nicholls 猫 uno sceneggiatore, di TV e cinema: la sua professione principale determina la sua scrittura, secondo me, in modo vistoso e insopportabile.
脠 tutto un dare indicazioni: indicazioni per il futuro regista (ch茅 tanto tutti i suoi libri finiscono sullo schermo, 猫 evidente l鈥檌ntento - qui per esempio, c鈥櫭� Anne 鈥楽morfietta鈥� Hathaway all鈥檕pera nella parte di Emma), indicazioni per gli attori, per il casting鈥�
E anche indicazioni per il lettore, che invece, nel mio caso, vorrebbe essere libero di interpretare a sua scelta 鈥� ma non pu貌, perch茅 猫 tutto smaccato e sottolineato.
Il mestiere col quale Nicholls si guadagna da vivere viene fuori anche nella mediocrit脿 della scrittura.
Vogliamo poi parlare della sciattezza della traduzione e dell鈥檈dizione?!
[Peccato, perch茅 uno dei due traduttori 猫 Marco Rossari, di cui ho letto un paio di libri interessanti e divertenti].
Passerotta e passerotto in鈥漁ne Day-Un giorno鈥� di Lone Scherfig, 2011.
Gi脿 a p.2 leggo che Emma prov貌 per lui un brivido rassicurante di repulsione.
Ho provato a lungo a immaginare come Anne Hathaway ci mostrer脿 un brivido rassicurante di repulsione nei confronti di Dexter (Jim Sturgess) e probabilmente 猫 l鈥檜nica cosa di questo romanzo che mi rester脿 da scoprire (perch茅, il film io certo non lo vedr貌).
Ecco un鈥檃ltra chicca per la Hathaway: a un certo punto dovr脿 scivolare gi霉 dallo sgabello come se stesse per tuffarsi nelle acque del Polo Nord. Cara Anne, ti aspetta una dura prova. Ma so che con le solite smorfiette riuscirai a portare il compito a casa, come ha fatto Meg Ryan per anni.
Poi ci sono le lettere che i due si scambiano, dove Nicholls d脿 il meglio di s茅 (nel senso, ovviamente, del peggio di s茅): parole tutte in maiuscolo, acronimi che dovrebbero far sorridere, sottolineature, giovanilismi vari, un mix tremendo che spingerebbe a saltare queste zone della narrazione, se non fosse che il racconto procede proprio attraverso queste lettere.
Miciotto e miciotta.
Evito l鈥檈lenco di tutte le mie sottolineature alla scelta di metafore o alle descrizioni o alle battute di dialogo che Nicholls adotta e che secondo me non sono degne di Harmony (che non ho mai letto, e forse per questo, rispetto di pi霉).
Aggiungo che i personaggi sono insopportabili: alla faccia dell鈥檕riginalit脿, proprio come in 鈥楲ove Story鈥�, lui 猫 ricco e lei no.
Dexter 猫 un avventuriero, un 鈥榩ioniere鈥� perch茅 esce con un paio di jeans bermuda senza mutande, impavido e spudorato. Non ha mai visto un film di Fellini anche se vive e insegna a Roma. Emma gli dice 鈥iventare una intellettuale coscienziosa. Dexter non era sicuro di capire quel termine, ma all鈥檌nterno della parola 鈥榗oscienziosa鈥� aveva individuato 鈥渃osce鈥� e questo pavlovianamente bast貌 a provocargli una mezza erezione.
O anche: Dexter non amava farsi passare per un vanesio, ma a volte avrebbe voluto che ci fosse qualcuno nei paraggi a importunarlo con la macchina fotografica.
Mi pare non ci sia bisogno di commenti.
Piccioncina e piccioncino.
Ma se non bastasse, pi霉 avanti si legge perfino che nei rari momenti d鈥檌nsicurezza, Dexter si era preoccupato che la sua scarsa intelligenza potesse penalizzarlo nella vita, ma il suo era un lavoro dove contavano soprattutto la fiducia in se stessi, l鈥檈nergia, magari anche un po鈥� di arroganza, tutte qualit脿 che erano alla sua portata.
S矛, bisognava essere intelligenti, ma non come Emma. Bastava essere maneggioni, furbi, arrivisti.
Lei, Emma, 猫 anche peggio di lui: non solo perch茅 猫 innamorata di un tomo simile, ma anche perch茅 猫 gi脿 vecchia a 20 anni, bacchettona, rigida, si lamenta sempre, probabilmente 猫 gi脿 malata di qualcosa, e non riesce neppure a godersi il fatto di essere una bellissima ragazza.
Tenerella e tenerello.
E poi, ci sarebbe da aggiungere che la deliziosa trovata di dividere il romanzo per capitoli che si svolgono tutti nello stesso giorno, il 15 luglio, uno a distanza di un anno dall鈥檃ltro, per me risulta una scelta perdente e frustrante, un po' come... beh, lasciamo perdere.
Tra l鈥檃ltro, ho gi脿 visto un paio di film con questa struttura e non mi sono piaciuti per niente.
Mi accorgo che mischio libri e film come se fossero della stessa natura.
Il fatto 猫 che questo romanzo 猫 sostanzialmente una sceneggiatura rilegata.
PS
Questo libro 猫 nella mia lista scambiabili: spero che trovi subito qualcuno interessato, non vedo l鈥檕ra di liberarmene.
E il 29 settembre ci sono riuscito, me ne sono liberato! Evviva!
Lupacchiotta e lupacchiotto.
Non sono un fan di Hornby.
Neppure di Coe, ma per lui ho pi霉 interesse.
Per貌, non abbastanza interesse da arrivare in fondo a questo libro nonostante la sua raccomandazione.
Mi avevano detto che le prime 70/100 pagine non erano all鈥檃ltezza delle seguenti (ma nessuno mi aveva avvertito della bassezza): sono arrivato a 124, un quarto del libro, e direi che basta, non 猫 necessario bere tutta la botte per sapere se il vino 猫 buono.
So gi脿 dove vuole andare a parare: Nicholls vuole farmi piangere a tutti i costi.
脠 la sua vendetta per 鈥楲ove Story鈥� che mi lasci貌 impassibile.
Nicholls 猫 uno sceneggiatore, di TV e cinema: la sua professione principale determina la sua scrittura, secondo me, in modo vistoso e insopportabile.
脠 tutto un dare indicazioni: indicazioni per il futuro regista (ch茅 tanto tutti i suoi libri finiscono sullo schermo, 猫 evidente l鈥檌ntento - qui per esempio, c鈥櫭� Anne 鈥楽morfietta鈥� Hathaway all鈥檕pera nella parte di Emma), indicazioni per gli attori, per il casting鈥�
E anche indicazioni per il lettore, che invece, nel mio caso, vorrebbe essere libero di interpretare a sua scelta 鈥� ma non pu貌, perch茅 猫 tutto smaccato e sottolineato.
Il mestiere col quale Nicholls si guadagna da vivere viene fuori anche nella mediocrit脿 della scrittura.
Vogliamo poi parlare della sciattezza della traduzione e dell鈥檈dizione?!
[Peccato, perch茅 uno dei due traduttori 猫 Marco Rossari, di cui ho letto un paio di libri interessanti e divertenti].
Passerotta e passerotto in鈥漁ne Day-Un giorno鈥� di Lone Scherfig, 2011.
Gi脿 a p.2 leggo che Emma prov貌 per lui un brivido rassicurante di repulsione.
Ho provato a lungo a immaginare come Anne Hathaway ci mostrer脿 un brivido rassicurante di repulsione nei confronti di Dexter (Jim Sturgess) e probabilmente 猫 l鈥檜nica cosa di questo romanzo che mi rester脿 da scoprire (perch茅, il film io certo non lo vedr貌).
Ecco un鈥檃ltra chicca per la Hathaway: a un certo punto dovr脿 scivolare gi霉 dallo sgabello come se stesse per tuffarsi nelle acque del Polo Nord. Cara Anne, ti aspetta una dura prova. Ma so che con le solite smorfiette riuscirai a portare il compito a casa, come ha fatto Meg Ryan per anni.
Poi ci sono le lettere che i due si scambiano, dove Nicholls d脿 il meglio di s茅 (nel senso, ovviamente, del peggio di s茅): parole tutte in maiuscolo, acronimi che dovrebbero far sorridere, sottolineature, giovanilismi vari, un mix tremendo che spingerebbe a saltare queste zone della narrazione, se non fosse che il racconto procede proprio attraverso queste lettere.
Miciotto e miciotta.
Evito l鈥檈lenco di tutte le mie sottolineature alla scelta di metafore o alle descrizioni o alle battute di dialogo che Nicholls adotta e che secondo me non sono degne di Harmony (che non ho mai letto, e forse per questo, rispetto di pi霉).
Aggiungo che i personaggi sono insopportabili: alla faccia dell鈥檕riginalit脿, proprio come in 鈥楲ove Story鈥�, lui 猫 ricco e lei no.
Dexter 猫 un avventuriero, un 鈥榩ioniere鈥� perch茅 esce con un paio di jeans bermuda senza mutande, impavido e spudorato. Non ha mai visto un film di Fellini anche se vive e insegna a Roma. Emma gli dice 鈥iventare una intellettuale coscienziosa. Dexter non era sicuro di capire quel termine, ma all鈥檌nterno della parola 鈥榗oscienziosa鈥� aveva individuato 鈥渃osce鈥� e questo pavlovianamente bast貌 a provocargli una mezza erezione.
O anche: Dexter non amava farsi passare per un vanesio, ma a volte avrebbe voluto che ci fosse qualcuno nei paraggi a importunarlo con la macchina fotografica.
Mi pare non ci sia bisogno di commenti.
Piccioncina e piccioncino.
Ma se non bastasse, pi霉 avanti si legge perfino che nei rari momenti d鈥檌nsicurezza, Dexter si era preoccupato che la sua scarsa intelligenza potesse penalizzarlo nella vita, ma il suo era un lavoro dove contavano soprattutto la fiducia in se stessi, l鈥檈nergia, magari anche un po鈥� di arroganza, tutte qualit脿 che erano alla sua portata.
S矛, bisognava essere intelligenti, ma non come Emma. Bastava essere maneggioni, furbi, arrivisti.
Lei, Emma, 猫 anche peggio di lui: non solo perch茅 猫 innamorata di un tomo simile, ma anche perch茅 猫 gi脿 vecchia a 20 anni, bacchettona, rigida, si lamenta sempre, probabilmente 猫 gi脿 malata di qualcosa, e non riesce neppure a godersi il fatto di essere una bellissima ragazza.
Tenerella e tenerello.
E poi, ci sarebbe da aggiungere che la deliziosa trovata di dividere il romanzo per capitoli che si svolgono tutti nello stesso giorno, il 15 luglio, uno a distanza di un anno dall鈥檃ltro, per me risulta una scelta perdente e frustrante, un po' come... beh, lasciamo perdere.
Tra l鈥檃ltro, ho gi脿 visto un paio di film con questa struttura e non mi sono piaciuti per niente.
Mi accorgo che mischio libri e film come se fossero della stessa natura.
Il fatto 猫 che questo romanzo 猫 sostanzialmente una sceneggiatura rilegata.
PS
Questo libro 猫 nella mia lista scambiabili: spero che trovi subito qualcuno interessato, non vedo l鈥檕ra di liberarmene.
E il 29 settembre ci sono riuscito, me ne sono liberato! Evviva!
Lupacchiotta e lupacchiotto.
July 2, 2021
鉂わ笍鉂わ笍鉂わ笍
June 30, 2010
Let's talk about death. Not death which is inevitably part of life, but death in fiction, where it is not inevitable at all. Death in fiction is a deliberate, well-thought out decision: the writer is God, and he or she is choosing, for whatever reason, to Strike This Character Down.
There are good fictional deaths, and ones which feel cheap. This book lost me for good because it contains a death that felt exactly like the hand of God reaching down: Oh, thought the writer-god, I don't really know how to end this but I know that an element of tragedy will make this novel seem super deep. Die, character, die! This did not seem like a senseless death of that type that in real life is imbued with honest tragedy. It felt like an author scrambling for a final act, and not being brave enough to let his characters simply face the rest of their lives together. To die might be a very great adventure, as Peter Pan says, but Peter Pan is an eternal child. Isn't this book supposed to be about growing up? Isn't the greatest adventure simply living?
But let's stay with youthful mistakes for a minute. You see, the thing is: I wrote this novel. I don't say this out of jealousy鈥斺€淚t should be me with this bestseller, me with a movie deal and praising me on his blog!鈥� No. Not that I wouldn't like all of those things one day鈥擨 totally would鈥攂ut the novel I wrote, which shares a freakish number of similar elements with this one, sucked. I mean, it really stank. This novel, it must also be noted, is much, much better than mine was: the prose is an improvement over mine at the time (I was 20 or 21), and I'm pretty damn sure that this book is more realistic, and more consistently funny and emotionally engaging, than my juvenile effort. However, there are definite and bizarre similarities: both books are about a friendship between a man and a woman over a long stretch of time, beginning in the 鈥�80s; both are about struggling to strike a balance between financial solvency and artistic integrity; both star a character named Em (really, it's eerie); and both feature a tragic bicycle accident. It's the tragic bicycle accident that really gets me. I saw the one in One Day coming from miles away, and approached it with increasing incredulity. Because I had done the tragic bicycle accident, in the shitty novel I wrote when I was 20, and it was dumb then and it is dumb now. It's the hand of the author coming down and going, 鈥淟ook! Look! I AM GOING TO MAKE YOU CRY GODDAMMIT.鈥�
Since none of you has read my novel (thank god), this comparison lacks something. So allow me to make another one. This involves yet another embarrassing confession: I really, really like the movie City of Angels. Yes, the one with Nicolas Cage and Meg Ryan: completely honestly, I do. I also love the movie it was based on, Wings of Desire. I remember at some point discussing our mutual appreciation for these two films with my mother. Which did we prefer? I know I hesitated, because as much as I love Wings of Desire, I also think it drags at certain points鈥攖hat long, lengthy speech in the bar at the end! What's that about? City of Angels, though...
Here my mom stepped in, definitive. She liked Wings of Desire better, because of the crucial difference in the movies' endings. See, in Wings of Desire, the angel falls, finds the woman he loves, there is a pretentious speech in a bar, and then they just...go on living. That's the ending: they must face the consequences of living. In City of Angels, on the other hand, the angel falls, finds the woman he loves, and then the very next morning...she dies. IN A FREAKIN' TRAGIC BICYCLE ACCIDENT. Seriously, what gives? Are we all just a bunch of scarred Nico fans inside? Is this a public safety announcement of some kind? 鈥淜ids! Wear a helmet鈥攐r your death may facilitate the important, if sadly belated, epiphanies of your loved ones!鈥�
No, but quite honestly, I think my mom was right that the bolder, braver ending can sometimes be the one that's not about GRAND TRAGEDY, but that's simply about the everyday struggle and joy of living. How is that not an equally valid story to tell? The fact that David Nicholls seemed to do everything in his power to ultimately avoid telling it really frustrated me. This novel definitely has its charm: it's snarky and English; its central device is clever; its depiction of feeling lost and aimless in your twenties seemed spot-on. But鈥攊n part because of its clever format鈥攖oo many of this story's important moments happened off-stage, and the鈥攐ne is led to believe鈥攃entral event of its two protagonists finally, finally falling in love is downplayed horribly so that鈥攄un dun dun鈥攖he tragic bicycle accident can occur several chapters later. I felt cheated and manipulated, frankly, having slogged through 300 pages of the male lead behaving like an utter ass while not a lot of other stuff happened鈥攁ll that, for this? And sure, one could argue that that sense of disappointment is realistic to life. But I would counter that it doesn't make for very good fiction.
Neither does the fact that this book has more endings padding out its already hefty page count than . You'd already lost me with the tragic bicycle accident, dude, can we just wrap this up already? Your internet profile was enthralling, but on a one-to-one level it just isn't working. Let's split the check and go our separate ways. Maybe in ten years' time I'll look back on this and laugh; in twenty I'll have forgotten your name.
There are good fictional deaths, and ones which feel cheap. This book lost me for good because it contains a death that felt exactly like the hand of God reaching down: Oh, thought the writer-god, I don't really know how to end this but I know that an element of tragedy will make this novel seem super deep. Die, character, die! This did not seem like a senseless death of that type that in real life is imbued with honest tragedy. It felt like an author scrambling for a final act, and not being brave enough to let his characters simply face the rest of their lives together. To die might be a very great adventure, as Peter Pan says, but Peter Pan is an eternal child. Isn't this book supposed to be about growing up? Isn't the greatest adventure simply living?
But let's stay with youthful mistakes for a minute. You see, the thing is: I wrote this novel. I don't say this out of jealousy鈥斺€淚t should be me with this bestseller, me with a movie deal and praising me on his blog!鈥� No. Not that I wouldn't like all of those things one day鈥擨 totally would鈥攂ut the novel I wrote, which shares a freakish number of similar elements with this one, sucked. I mean, it really stank. This novel, it must also be noted, is much, much better than mine was: the prose is an improvement over mine at the time (I was 20 or 21), and I'm pretty damn sure that this book is more realistic, and more consistently funny and emotionally engaging, than my juvenile effort. However, there are definite and bizarre similarities: both books are about a friendship between a man and a woman over a long stretch of time, beginning in the 鈥�80s; both are about struggling to strike a balance between financial solvency and artistic integrity; both star a character named Em (really, it's eerie); and both feature a tragic bicycle accident. It's the tragic bicycle accident that really gets me. I saw the one in One Day coming from miles away, and approached it with increasing incredulity. Because I had done the tragic bicycle accident, in the shitty novel I wrote when I was 20, and it was dumb then and it is dumb now. It's the hand of the author coming down and going, 鈥淟ook! Look! I AM GOING TO MAKE YOU CRY GODDAMMIT.鈥�
Since none of you has read my novel (thank god), this comparison lacks something. So allow me to make another one. This involves yet another embarrassing confession: I really, really like the movie City of Angels. Yes, the one with Nicolas Cage and Meg Ryan: completely honestly, I do. I also love the movie it was based on, Wings of Desire. I remember at some point discussing our mutual appreciation for these two films with my mother. Which did we prefer? I know I hesitated, because as much as I love Wings of Desire, I also think it drags at certain points鈥攖hat long, lengthy speech in the bar at the end! What's that about? City of Angels, though...
Here my mom stepped in, definitive. She liked Wings of Desire better, because of the crucial difference in the movies' endings. See, in Wings of Desire, the angel falls, finds the woman he loves, there is a pretentious speech in a bar, and then they just...go on living. That's the ending: they must face the consequences of living. In City of Angels, on the other hand, the angel falls, finds the woman he loves, and then the very next morning...she dies. IN A FREAKIN' TRAGIC BICYCLE ACCIDENT. Seriously, what gives? Are we all just a bunch of scarred Nico fans inside? Is this a public safety announcement of some kind? 鈥淜ids! Wear a helmet鈥攐r your death may facilitate the important, if sadly belated, epiphanies of your loved ones!鈥�
No, but quite honestly, I think my mom was right that the bolder, braver ending can sometimes be the one that's not about GRAND TRAGEDY, but that's simply about the everyday struggle and joy of living. How is that not an equally valid story to tell? The fact that David Nicholls seemed to do everything in his power to ultimately avoid telling it really frustrated me. This novel definitely has its charm: it's snarky and English; its central device is clever; its depiction of feeling lost and aimless in your twenties seemed spot-on. But鈥攊n part because of its clever format鈥攖oo many of this story's important moments happened off-stage, and the鈥攐ne is led to believe鈥攃entral event of its two protagonists finally, finally falling in love is downplayed horribly so that鈥攄un dun dun鈥攖he tragic bicycle accident can occur several chapters later. I felt cheated and manipulated, frankly, having slogged through 300 pages of the male lead behaving like an utter ass while not a lot of other stuff happened鈥攁ll that, for this? And sure, one could argue that that sense of disappointment is realistic to life. But I would counter that it doesn't make for very good fiction.
Neither does the fact that this book has more endings padding out its already hefty page count than . You'd already lost me with the tragic bicycle accident, dude, can we just wrap this up already? Your internet profile was enthralling, but on a one-to-one level it just isn't working. Let's split the check and go our separate ways. Maybe in ten years' time I'll look back on this and laugh; in twenty I'll have forgotten your name.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
December 12, 2021
National Book Awards Winner. Essentially a romantic comedy, but one with superb characterisations of the main protagonists. On the 15th July 1988, Emma and Dexter meet on the night of their graduation in Edinburgh鈥� the book then goes on to tell the state of their lives each and every 15 July for the next 20 years.
A charming life-affirming read that justly deserves the high critical acclaim it gained on publication. 8 out of 12.
2011 read
A charming life-affirming read that justly deserves the high critical acclaim it gained on publication. 8 out of 12.
2011 read
October 9, 2022
芦Se solo quella volta avessi preso il telefono e avessi detto 鈥渉ey. So che hai da fare, che sei andato avanti e che ci siamo persi, ma ora non vorrei nient鈥檃ltro che essere con te. Non avrei bisogno di nient鈥檃ltro se non della tua silenziosa compagnia. E niente.. se hai voglia, se non hai nulla da fare... ecco si, io sono qui. Ciao鈥� chiss脿 dove sarei ora.禄
Ecco. Questo 猫 IL libro delle occasioni perse, delle chiamate fatte solo nella propria testa sotto la doccia, delle lettere mai spedite e del coraggio fifone di lasciar parlare il cuore.
Non 猫 un libro dinamico o d鈥檃vventura. Non 猫 ricco d鈥檃zione, ma di esperienze che profumano di quotidianit脿, in cui immedesimarsi 猫 pressoch茅 automatico. Non lo definirei nemmeno un libro romantico. La realt脿 di una relazione di amicizia fatta di amore e di odio, di incomprensioni e di nostalgia 猫 disarmante. Tutt3 abbiamo vissuto almeno una relazione di questo tipo.
La prima met脿 猫 caratterizzata da una scrittura vivace, frenetica e scorrevole. Come quando si hanno 20 anni e tutto scorre e nulla merita troppa attenzione, cos矛 anche la scrittura si adegua a questo ritmo.
Man mano che invecchiano, i problemi e la vita si fanno pi霉 incalzanti e cos矛 anche il testo diventa pi霉 riflessivo e lento.
Un libro in cui due vite scorrono, ma alla fine non succede niente. Nessuna battaglia e nessun mistero da scoprire. Una fotografia di normalit脿 che un po' fa paura e un po' sa di casa.
Ecco. Questo 猫 IL libro delle occasioni perse, delle chiamate fatte solo nella propria testa sotto la doccia, delle lettere mai spedite e del coraggio fifone di lasciar parlare il cuore.
Non 猫 un libro dinamico o d鈥檃vventura. Non 猫 ricco d鈥檃zione, ma di esperienze che profumano di quotidianit脿, in cui immedesimarsi 猫 pressoch茅 automatico. Non lo definirei nemmeno un libro romantico. La realt脿 di una relazione di amicizia fatta di amore e di odio, di incomprensioni e di nostalgia 猫 disarmante. Tutt3 abbiamo vissuto almeno una relazione di questo tipo.
La prima met脿 猫 caratterizzata da una scrittura vivace, frenetica e scorrevole. Come quando si hanno 20 anni e tutto scorre e nulla merita troppa attenzione, cos矛 anche la scrittura si adegua a questo ritmo.
Man mano che invecchiano, i problemi e la vita si fanno pi霉 incalzanti e cos矛 anche il testo diventa pi霉 riflessivo e lento.
Un libro in cui due vite scorrono, ma alla fine non succede niente. Nessuna battaglia e nessun mistero da scoprire. Una fotografia di normalit脿 che un po' fa paura e un po' sa di casa.
March 20, 2025
You can't tell me this book doesn't have some of the best dialogue. I'm reading this again because I love this book deeply. I love the banter between the characters, the writing, and the entire story. Em and Dex. Dex and Em. The passionate duo. Friends for over 20 years, in a will they/won't they dance.
The year is 1988. Emma Morley and Dexter Mayhew meet at an end-of-the-year graduation party. There is something unearthly about Emma. She looks thoughtful, too bright, slightly nerdy under the glasses, and charming. She's a reader and a devoted feminist/activist.
On the other hand, Dexter is a pretty boy and a golden retriever. He's the life of the party, a man about the town with his charm and good looks. When they bump into each other, the draw becomes real. Thus begins a lifelong friendship.
One night together--not a fully one-night stand, something pulls them toward each other. Over the next decade, they meet yearly on St. Swithns Day (July 15th). They experience it all. Life. Death. Jobs. Loses. Wins. Gains. Love. And Heartache. I love how much Dex believes in Em:
Author David Nicholls has impressive character development. We see Emma as this existential, passionate, intelligent thinker. Not only does she draw Dex in, but she also pulls the reader. She's interesting, with jagged edges. Someone that would keep you on your toes. A great friend.
While Dex is kind and generous, he has much to give to the relationship. He props up Emma, reminding her of her worth, but can also just as easily break her. He needs her, and she needs him in a way that feeds their relationship.
It doesn't happen often, but sometimes, even the insufferable characters evolve, and you root for them. This was the case with 'One Day.' The story was relatable--reminding me that perhaps I've been here before. I've had a friend like this. I've gone through turmoil and warmth in relationships, holding on to something viable, even through the toxicity. Honest and real.
I'm truly attached to this story. The writing is crisp and vivid, the banter engaging:
I would recommend this book repeatedly, even if it is riddled with heartache.
I read 'One Day" a while back. I gave it four stars because the ending was soul-crushing. Rereading it, I'm back to give a 5-star review.
There is something beautiful about the way Nicholls doesn鈥檛 leave you hanging in the devastation of the story. We can linger and rest in a space of love and admiration between Em and Dex. Watching the Netflix show (beautifully done) was absolutely devastating, but the book gave me peace because it circles back to the best moments between the two characters.
5/5 stars.
Check out my other reviews of Nicholas' books:
You Are Here
The year is 1988. Emma Morley and Dexter Mayhew meet at an end-of-the-year graduation party. There is something unearthly about Emma. She looks thoughtful, too bright, slightly nerdy under the glasses, and charming. She's a reader and a devoted feminist/activist.
On the other hand, Dexter is a pretty boy and a golden retriever. He's the life of the party, a man about the town with his charm and good looks. When they bump into each other, the draw becomes real. Thus begins a lifelong friendship.
One night together--not a fully one-night stand, something pulls them toward each other. Over the next decade, they meet yearly on St. Swithns Day (July 15th). They experience it all. Life. Death. Jobs. Loses. Wins. Gains. Love. And Heartache. I love how much Dex believes in Em:
You feel a little bit lost right now about what to do with your life, a bit rudderless and oarless and aimless, but that鈥檚 okay鈥� That鈥檚 alright because we鈥檙e all meant to be like that at twenty-four./i>
Author David Nicholls has impressive character development. We see Emma as this existential, passionate, intelligent thinker. Not only does she draw Dex in, but she also pulls the reader. She's interesting, with jagged edges. Someone that would keep you on your toes. A great friend.
Live each day as if it's your last, that was the conventional advice, but really, who had the energy for that? What if it rained or you felt a bit glandy? It just wasn't practical. Better by far to simply try and be good and courageous and bold and to make a difference. Not change the world exactly, but the bit around you. Go out there with your passion and your electric typewriter and work hard at...something. Change lives through art, maybe. Cherish your friends, stay true to your principles, live passionately and fully and well. Experience new things. Love and be loved, if you ever get the chance
While Dex is kind and generous, he has much to give to the relationship. He props up Emma, reminding her of her worth, but can also just as easily break her. He needs her, and she needs him in a way that feeds their relationship.
You know what I can't understand? You have all these people telling you all the time how great you are, smart and funny and talented and all that, I mean endlessly, I've been telling you for years. So why don't you believe it? Why do you think people say that stuff, Em? Do you think it's a conspiracy, people secretly ganging up to be nice about you?
It doesn't happen often, but sometimes, even the insufferable characters evolve, and you root for them. This was the case with 'One Day.' The story was relatable--reminding me that perhaps I've been here before. I've had a friend like this. I've gone through turmoil and warmth in relationships, holding on to something viable, even through the toxicity. Honest and real.
I'm truly attached to this story. The writing is crisp and vivid, the banter engaging:
Travelling', she sighed.'So predictable.'
'What's wrong with traveling?'
'Avoiding reality more like.'
'I think reality is over-rated,' he said in the hope that this might come across as dark and charismatic
I would recommend this book repeatedly, even if it is riddled with heartache.
I read 'One Day" a while back. I gave it four stars because the ending was soul-crushing. Rereading it, I'm back to give a 5-star review.
There is something beautiful about the way Nicholls doesn鈥檛 leave you hanging in the devastation of the story. We can linger and rest in a space of love and admiration between Em and Dex. Watching the Netflix show (beautifully done) was absolutely devastating, but the book gave me peace because it circles back to the best moments between the two characters.
5/5 stars.
Check out my other reviews of Nicholas' books:
You Are Here
September 29, 2011
Opening Line: "I suppose the important thing is to make some sort of difference."
So I鈥檓 going to try to write a somewhat sensible review here that doesn鈥檛 come across as all gushy fan-girl. I will say (hopefully only once) that I adored this book but you should know that I'm a bit of a sucker for a tragedy too. ONE DAY was brilliant in every way; making me laugh and cry while filling me with nostalgia and longing. And because I鈥檓 the same age as Dexter and Emma the time frame here was also totally relatable (see nostalgia) with little details I had forgotten about from the past two decades.
Equal parts heartbreaking and hilarious yet also suspenseful as each chapter takes place a year to the day after the last one so you have to figure out what鈥檚 happened in that time between. And of course you want the H/h to get together so you鈥檙e waiting with bated breathe for them to finally 鈥渟ee鈥� each other too. In the end this also made me want to seize the day like it鈥檚 my last, phone up all my long lost friends and lovers and look at old photographs. Hmmm and I haven鈥檛 even gotten into the genius of the writing yet (how do you put that into words?)
I knew that writing a review here was going to be difficult (when you love a book this much there doesn鈥檛 seem to be enough correct words to do it justice) and I promised myself to just keep this short and to the point so here goes... This is one of the most hilarious, perceptive, witty, moving and heartbreaking books I have ever read.
Told in 5 parts in alternating POV鈥檚 and over a span of twenty years Dexter Mayhew and Emma Morley meet in 1988. Em has just graduated from university and hooked up with that boy she鈥檚 seen around for ages. He is Dexter, beautiful, pretentious and in his mind destined for greatness. As the sun rises they drink wine and talk about their futures. They have their whole lives stretching out ahead of them in an endless number of days and isn鈥檛 it going to be wonderful they can achieve anything they want to.
Starting as lovers Dexter and Emma continue as friends and the book joins them on July 15th of each year (St Swithin鈥檚 day) through their 20鈥檚 and 30鈥檚 and into their 40鈥檚. As anyone in their 40鈥檚 knows, life happens and it doesn鈥檛 always go as planned, missed opportunities and the like.
鈥淲hen I was younger everything seemed possible. Now nothing does.鈥�
Through phone calls and letters, in different countries and towns, through assorted relationships, jobs and life鈥檚 little surprises and ruts we join Em and Dex each year in a unique snapshot of their life. They don鈥檛 always get along but they do think about each other everyday in some way and in case you haven鈥檛 figured it out this is ultimately a love story.
I can鈥檛 say much more about this without giving it all away. But when I read the last word I wanted to start it again and nothing I鈥檝e tried to read since compares. Cheers.
鈥淟ive each day as if it鈥檚 your last, that was the conventional advice, but really, who had the energy for that?鈥�
So I鈥檓 going to try to write a somewhat sensible review here that doesn鈥檛 come across as all gushy fan-girl. I will say (hopefully only once) that I adored this book but you should know that I'm a bit of a sucker for a tragedy too. ONE DAY was brilliant in every way; making me laugh and cry while filling me with nostalgia and longing. And because I鈥檓 the same age as Dexter and Emma the time frame here was also totally relatable (see nostalgia) with little details I had forgotten about from the past two decades.
Equal parts heartbreaking and hilarious yet also suspenseful as each chapter takes place a year to the day after the last one so you have to figure out what鈥檚 happened in that time between. And of course you want the H/h to get together so you鈥檙e waiting with bated breathe for them to finally 鈥渟ee鈥� each other too. In the end this also made me want to seize the day like it鈥檚 my last, phone up all my long lost friends and lovers and look at old photographs. Hmmm and I haven鈥檛 even gotten into the genius of the writing yet (how do you put that into words?)
I knew that writing a review here was going to be difficult (when you love a book this much there doesn鈥檛 seem to be enough correct words to do it justice) and I promised myself to just keep this short and to the point so here goes... This is one of the most hilarious, perceptive, witty, moving and heartbreaking books I have ever read.
Told in 5 parts in alternating POV鈥檚 and over a span of twenty years Dexter Mayhew and Emma Morley meet in 1988. Em has just graduated from university and hooked up with that boy she鈥檚 seen around for ages. He is Dexter, beautiful, pretentious and in his mind destined for greatness. As the sun rises they drink wine and talk about their futures. They have their whole lives stretching out ahead of them in an endless number of days and isn鈥檛 it going to be wonderful they can achieve anything they want to.
Starting as lovers Dexter and Emma continue as friends and the book joins them on July 15th of each year (St Swithin鈥檚 day) through their 20鈥檚 and 30鈥檚 and into their 40鈥檚. As anyone in their 40鈥檚 knows, life happens and it doesn鈥檛 always go as planned, missed opportunities and the like.
鈥淲hen I was younger everything seemed possible. Now nothing does.鈥�
Through phone calls and letters, in different countries and towns, through assorted relationships, jobs and life鈥檚 little surprises and ruts we join Em and Dex each year in a unique snapshot of their life. They don鈥檛 always get along but they do think about each other everyday in some way and in case you haven鈥檛 figured it out this is ultimately a love story.
I can鈥檛 say much more about this without giving it all away. But when I read the last word I wanted to start it again and nothing I鈥檝e tried to read since compares. Cheers.
鈥淟ive each day as if it鈥檚 your last, that was the conventional advice, but really, who had the energy for that?鈥�
July 25, 2011
This book is completely overhyped. It is so dull. It's not exactly boring, but it's certainly not exciting. In my opinion, dull is the perfect adjective to describe 'One Day'. I was expecting something mindblowingly heart-wrenching from all of the praise I've seen for this book, but it was quite a disappointment. The book was well written and the premise was fantastic but it just didn't work for me - the whole thing just felt so drawn out and I didn't feel much for either Emma or Dexter - especially Dexter. The whole 'twist' just felt quite ridiculous. After ploughing through most of the book and to be given that ending didn't make me sad, just quite infuriated. I thought that the imperfect ending was the right way for the book to go, but not in this way. The book did show a realistic evolution of a relationship throughout twenty years, but this 'observation' of the couples lives unfortunately didn't really do anything for me.
August 12, 2011
Romances that bring friends together should show some reason why the two people like each other. Right? That seems to be the tactic that works for other stories.
As complete opposites, you鈥檇 think Dexter and Emma were turned on by these differing facts. But, the characters actually seem annoyed by most of what makes them dissimilar. In short, there is nothing to explain why they would actually care about each other. And, there鈥檚 no reason for me to care about them either, for that matter.
Dexter is a sleazy pig of a jerk, who is also an alcoholic and a druggy. Emma is bad-tempered and critical鈥� she snaps and complains about people, yet she secretly seems to admire Dexter for the things she can鈥檛 stand about him: spontaneity and bravery. I鈥檓 supposed to be watching their friendship slowly turn into something more, but the trouble is that I cannot even understand why they鈥檙e friends to begin with. They are merely a one-night stand gone completely wrong.
It seems the only reason they hang around each other is to keep the sexual tension alive, which is really the only thing that they have 鈥� attraction. If the years that pass are supposed to show how the two grow closer together, why don鈥檛 either show much evolution in their characters? The only time either one has an insightful thought about themselves or their relationship is when they are drunk. How insightful can those thoughts really be if the two supposed friends bicker and criticize one another more than anything?
To make matters worse, the end does not give anything to satisfy my unanswered questions and confusion about the relationship of Dexter and Emma. Sadly, I wished the story had ended 200 pages in, or less, which meant I was less than half way before I wanted to tear the rest of the pages out of this never-ending unromantic story.
-EZ Read Staffer Amelia
watch the video discussion:
As complete opposites, you鈥檇 think Dexter and Emma were turned on by these differing facts. But, the characters actually seem annoyed by most of what makes them dissimilar. In short, there is nothing to explain why they would actually care about each other. And, there鈥檚 no reason for me to care about them either, for that matter.
Dexter is a sleazy pig of a jerk, who is also an alcoholic and a druggy. Emma is bad-tempered and critical鈥� she snaps and complains about people, yet she secretly seems to admire Dexter for the things she can鈥檛 stand about him: spontaneity and bravery. I鈥檓 supposed to be watching their friendship slowly turn into something more, but the trouble is that I cannot even understand why they鈥檙e friends to begin with. They are merely a one-night stand gone completely wrong.
It seems the only reason they hang around each other is to keep the sexual tension alive, which is really the only thing that they have 鈥� attraction. If the years that pass are supposed to show how the two grow closer together, why don鈥檛 either show much evolution in their characters? The only time either one has an insightful thought about themselves or their relationship is when they are drunk. How insightful can those thoughts really be if the two supposed friends bicker and criticize one another more than anything?
To make matters worse, the end does not give anything to satisfy my unanswered questions and confusion about the relationship of Dexter and Emma. Sadly, I wished the story had ended 200 pages in, or less, which meant I was less than half way before I wanted to tear the rest of the pages out of this never-ending unromantic story.
-EZ Read Staffer Amelia
watch the video discussion:
August 14, 2010
A hilarious and realistic love story. Excellent characterizations, Nicholls captures life's ups and downs so well and tells Emma and Dexter's stories through snapshots on one day over the course of twenty years.
If you are a HEA junky like me, you might want to be aware that this is not a traditional happy ending at all, but in a way it is even better because the story continues beyond the HEA, it is real, honest and bittersweet.
I don't necessarily think this is a story everyone will enjoy, it is not really a romance, it is a truthful love story with all that it implies. Dark and gritty at times as well.
If you are a HEA junky like me, you might want to be aware that this is not a traditional happy ending at all, but in a way it is even better because the story continues beyond the HEA, it is real, honest and bittersweet.
I don't necessarily think this is a story everyone will enjoy, it is not really a romance, it is a truthful love story with all that it implies. Dark and gritty at times as well.
March 3, 2017
Well well well... 3,7/5 stars for me...
If I get to tell you my feelings about this book in one single word, it would be "FINALLY!"
To be honest, having watched the movie, this book did not surprise me at all and all I can say about this one is how true to life and down-to-earth it is. The characters are alright, however, I personally "slightly" hate the leading male character Dexter who is, needlessly to say, arrogant, cocky and (ahem!) a pain in da ARSE! There I said it!
Seriously this takes me WAY too long to finish as you can probably see, and there are several times when I have to fight against my will not to leave this one in the DNF section ( how cruel and guilty I shall feel for having done such a thing to a book! )
Overall, I would recommend this to people who would love to spare quite some of their times for such a novel, and WARNING: Do not watch the movie before you read it, totally ruins the hype!! You've been warned mate :P
If I get to tell you my feelings about this book in one single word, it would be "FINALLY!"
To be honest, having watched the movie, this book did not surprise me at all and all I can say about this one is how true to life and down-to-earth it is. The characters are alright, however, I personally "slightly" hate the leading male character Dexter who is, needlessly to say, arrogant, cocky and (ahem!) a pain in da ARSE! There I said it!
Seriously this takes me WAY too long to finish as you can probably see, and there are several times when I have to fight against my will not to leave this one in the DNF section ( how cruel and guilty I shall feel for having done such a thing to a book! )
Overall, I would recommend this to people who would love to spare quite some of their times for such a novel, and WARNING: Do not watch the movie before you read it, totally ruins the hype!! You've been warned mate :P
June 16, 2024
Catching up鈥�
I couldn鈥檛 believe I had not posted this review to 欧宝娱乐. I had read this years ago, and had even re-visited it around the time I had watched the movie. And, then when I was writing my review for 鈥淵ou are Here鈥� his latest book, I was shocked to discover I hadn鈥檛 posted it. So, here it is now.
Dexter. Emma. Am I already crying? Stop. I have a review to write here.
This is the story of 2 people who meet on the night of their graduation from college. They have planned out lives. The attraction is wild. But they must separate on to those lives they plan to live. But they made a mark on each other. They must see each other again. And, again. Year after year after year. For the next 20 years.
And, this is what we experience as readers. The next 20 years. Funny. Sad. Witty. Authentic. Compassionate. We grow. We stay the same. But we always come back together for one day. Until鈥�
Can someone please pass the Kleenex?
I couldn鈥檛 believe I had not posted this review to 欧宝娱乐. I had read this years ago, and had even re-visited it around the time I had watched the movie. And, then when I was writing my review for 鈥淵ou are Here鈥� his latest book, I was shocked to discover I hadn鈥檛 posted it. So, here it is now.
Dexter. Emma. Am I already crying? Stop. I have a review to write here.
This is the story of 2 people who meet on the night of their graduation from college. They have planned out lives. The attraction is wild. But they must separate on to those lives they plan to live. But they made a mark on each other. They must see each other again. And, again. Year after year after year. For the next 20 years.
And, this is what we experience as readers. The next 20 years. Funny. Sad. Witty. Authentic. Compassionate. We grow. We stay the same. But we always come back together for one day. Until鈥�
Can someone please pass the Kleenex?
August 31, 2011
Every now and then you read a book that sticks with you. It may have a serious tone, or in the case of , no particular tone at all. I鈥檓 exceedingly glad that I withheld from reading reviews of this novel until after I was three fourths of the way through, as I鈥檓 not sure my experience with these characters, these words, would have been the same. It was bad enough to have been bombarded with blurb after blurb hailing this book as a comedy, others as a romance. I鈥檓 of the opinion that it is neither. is what life reads like.
*Spoilers Ahead*
I鈥檓 sure you all know the premise, if not, watch the movie trailer, it will spell it out quite clearly. Guy (Dexter) and girl (Emma) meet, have a brief hookup, and settle into a loaded friendship until finally, after nearly fifteen years of angst, they become lovers. It鈥檚 rather touching really, but what enchanted me most wasn鈥檛 the eventual coming together of these two disastrous fools, but rather the hot messes that these two characters are as individuals. What misfortunes they suffer! And what success! Thus is the beauty of this book.
Neither Dexter nor Emma are particularly likeable, but they love each other. Why, I do not know. Frankly, it was only when Dexter was in Emma鈥檚 presence that I could even moderately stand him, but again, I thought that was rather brilliant characterization on the author鈥檚 part. Haven鈥檛 we all met a shithead, or two, and thought to ourselves 鈥淚 can鈥檛 stand this mofo, I bet he doesn鈥檛 have a single friend to his name鈥�? Nicholls shows us, that not only do such shitheads have friends, they have a mother and father, and even a brilliant woman who loves them. They might even have good, shine worthy moments whilst in those individuals presence. Who鈥檇 have thunk it?
And Emma, what can I say about Emma? For most of the book she is a walking, talking catastrophe. Pinning after a man who isn鈥檛 worthy of her, lost and directionless. Filled with dreams and utterly clueless as to how to make them a reality. But she endeared herself to me with her fiery passion, intellect (except in matters of the heart), indecision and lack of self confidence. Why? Because I鈥檝e been her. I think we all have. Most of us suffer through a quarter life crisis, otherwise, the coin never would have been phrased. And I鈥檓 certain most of us struggle with when to settle for our lot, and content ourselves with our fortune and when to press on and reach for our dreams, hopes and wants.
In seeing the disasters that are Emma and Dex, I was reminded that the beauty in life is best shown by living it. Adversity only magnifies accomplishment. And while we all surely have a fate, our choices very much determine the course of a life. was a touching book, filled with relevant detail and rather lovely, readable writing. I鈥檒l certainly read it again.
*Spoilers Ahead*
I鈥檓 sure you all know the premise, if not, watch the movie trailer, it will spell it out quite clearly. Guy (Dexter) and girl (Emma) meet, have a brief hookup, and settle into a loaded friendship until finally, after nearly fifteen years of angst, they become lovers. It鈥檚 rather touching really, but what enchanted me most wasn鈥檛 the eventual coming together of these two disastrous fools, but rather the hot messes that these two characters are as individuals. What misfortunes they suffer! And what success! Thus is the beauty of this book.
Neither Dexter nor Emma are particularly likeable, but they love each other. Why, I do not know. Frankly, it was only when Dexter was in Emma鈥檚 presence that I could even moderately stand him, but again, I thought that was rather brilliant characterization on the author鈥檚 part. Haven鈥檛 we all met a shithead, or two, and thought to ourselves 鈥淚 can鈥檛 stand this mofo, I bet he doesn鈥檛 have a single friend to his name鈥�? Nicholls shows us, that not only do such shitheads have friends, they have a mother and father, and even a brilliant woman who loves them. They might even have good, shine worthy moments whilst in those individuals presence. Who鈥檇 have thunk it?
And Emma, what can I say about Emma? For most of the book she is a walking, talking catastrophe. Pinning after a man who isn鈥檛 worthy of her, lost and directionless. Filled with dreams and utterly clueless as to how to make them a reality. But she endeared herself to me with her fiery passion, intellect (except in matters of the heart), indecision and lack of self confidence. Why? Because I鈥檝e been her. I think we all have. Most of us suffer through a quarter life crisis, otherwise, the coin never would have been phrased. And I鈥檓 certain most of us struggle with when to settle for our lot, and content ourselves with our fortune and when to press on and reach for our dreams, hopes and wants.
In seeing the disasters that are Emma and Dex, I was reminded that the beauty in life is best shown by living it. Adversity only magnifies accomplishment. And while we all surely have a fate, our choices very much determine the course of a life. was a touching book, filled with relevant detail and rather lovely, readable writing. I鈥檒l certainly read it again.
August 6, 2011
And I give up.
Twenty pages in and I was already regretting my choice of picking this book up. Now, after one hundred whole pages of this trash, I can't take it anymore.
How do I begin to explain this atrocity? One Day recounts the story of Emma and Dexter in a never-before-seen format - each chapter is the just the one day - July 15th - of each year of their lives. This could have had so much potential but the execution is just...agonizingly painful.
Now, Emma is a whiny, bitchy, insecure hipster who would much rather wear glasses than contacts, loves to feel sorry for herself WHEN THERE'S NO NEED TO and does NOTHING to fix her mess of a life, reads Dostovyesky and the like, shoves her taste for GOOD LITERATURE down Dexter's throat and, basically, cannot be happy unless she's fighting for a CAUSE.
Dexter, on the other hand, is a whiny, douchey, insecure nymphomaniac who is loaded with cash and no idea what to do with it, likes being made to constantly feel that he's AWESOME, has no clue about what he wants in life - all he wants is job which he can "brag about in a bar" and doesn't involve hard work - and, basically, cannot be happy unless he has a woman in his bed with him.
The biggest mystery in the pages I read, is HOW in the world these two fell for each other! The first time we meet them, they are strangers who just hooked up after running into each other at a party. Already Dex is thinking of leaving as soon as Em falls asleep, while she, on the other hand, is wondering to herself is he's THE ONE. A year after that, Dex is out travelling the world and sleeping with random women, while Em is working in D-grade plays wondering where her life is heading (No idea why she cant get herself a real job even though, as we are constantly reminded, she has a DOUBLE DEGREE). They are still in touch and have "feelings for each other" (when did that happen?)
A year after that, Dex is in Greece and STILL sleeping with random women, while Em has moved on from her dreams of becoming a playwright and now works in a greasy, run-down Mexican restaurant (why and how did she get here?) in the middle of nowhere - still no sign of a REAL JOB. A year after that, Dex is in India and trying to become a professional photographer while Em is STILL WORKING AT THAT DAMN RESTAURANT even though she hates it there (why she just doesn't pack up her bags and leave, is never made clear). A YEAR AFTER THAT, Dex is in the same town as Em, working as a TV presenter (apparently "he realized photography was not for him, and besides, "I'm a TV presenter" sounded more impressive"), flaunting women in front of the love-lorn Em, who, by the way? Mexican Restaurant.
You see? It's utterly maddening! Since each chapter is a year apart, lots of the "in between" details are missed out which is why it feels like there is absolutely no connection between the chapters. Though, the author tries hard to bridge the gap. Too hard.
Sample this example - In one chapter, we are introduced to Ian, Em's new coworker, who asks her out but she declines as she is not interested and the chapter ends abruptly after that. In the beginning of the next chapter, the author reminds us - Hey! The two chapters are connected! It's the continuation of the same story! My story IS progressing but I'm not going to explain any of it to you. No, really! I'll prove it to you by not at all understating it and hitting you on the head with it! Look, look! -- "The other staff scoffed. 'Why is it always me?' moaned Ian. 'Because you do it so beautifully,' said his best friend Emma"
Subtle, Mr.Nicholls, very subtle.
Moaning and groaning, I forced myself to read on - much like how Harry forces Dumbledore to drink the potion in the Cave - and after, about a hundred pages, when they are at a nudist beach by accident and Dex is trying to convince Em to take her clothes off while she's saying no (this goes on for a bit), I read this -
She leant forward, put her hand on his wrist. 'I think we should tell each other something that the other person doesn鈥榯 know.'
'What, like a secret?'
'Exactly, a secret, something surprising, one a night every night for the rest of the holiday.'
'Okay. You first.'
'No, you first.'
'Why me first?'
'You've got more to choose from.'
And it was true, he had an almost bottomless supply of secrets. He could tell her that he鈥榙 watched her getting dressed that night, or that he鈥榙 left the bathroom door open on purpose when he showered. He could tell her that he鈥榙 smoked heroin with Naomi, or that just before Christmas he鈥榙 had fast, unhappy sex with Emma鈥榮 flatmate Tilly Killick; a foot massage that had spun horribly out of control while Emma was at Woolworths buying fairy lights for the tree. But perhaps it would be better to go for something that didn鈥榯 reveal him as shallow or seedy, duplicitous or conceited.
He thought for some time.
'Okay, here goes.' He cleared his throat. 'A couple of weeks ago at this club, I got off with this guy.'
And THAT, ladies and gentlemen, is when I stopped reading, because my brain exploded.
Twenty pages in and I was already regretting my choice of picking this book up. Now, after one hundred whole pages of this trash, I can't take it anymore.
How do I begin to explain this atrocity? One Day recounts the story of Emma and Dexter in a never-before-seen format - each chapter is the just the one day - July 15th - of each year of their lives. This could have had so much potential but the execution is just...agonizingly painful.
Now, Emma is a whiny, bitchy, insecure hipster who would much rather wear glasses than contacts, loves to feel sorry for herself WHEN THERE'S NO NEED TO and does NOTHING to fix her mess of a life, reads Dostovyesky and the like, shoves her taste for GOOD LITERATURE down Dexter's throat and, basically, cannot be happy unless she's fighting for a CAUSE.
Dexter, on the other hand, is a whiny, douchey, insecure nymphomaniac who is loaded with cash and no idea what to do with it, likes being made to constantly feel that he's AWESOME, has no clue about what he wants in life - all he wants is job which he can "brag about in a bar" and doesn't involve hard work - and, basically, cannot be happy unless he has a woman in his bed with him.
The biggest mystery in the pages I read, is HOW in the world these two fell for each other! The first time we meet them, they are strangers who just hooked up after running into each other at a party. Already Dex is thinking of leaving as soon as Em falls asleep, while she, on the other hand, is wondering to herself is he's THE ONE. A year after that, Dex is out travelling the world and sleeping with random women, while Em is working in D-grade plays wondering where her life is heading (No idea why she cant get herself a real job even though, as we are constantly reminded, she has a DOUBLE DEGREE). They are still in touch and have "feelings for each other" (when did that happen?)
A year after that, Dex is in Greece and STILL sleeping with random women, while Em has moved on from her dreams of becoming a playwright and now works in a greasy, run-down Mexican restaurant (why and how did she get here?) in the middle of nowhere - still no sign of a REAL JOB. A year after that, Dex is in India and trying to become a professional photographer while Em is STILL WORKING AT THAT DAMN RESTAURANT even though she hates it there (why she just doesn't pack up her bags and leave, is never made clear). A YEAR AFTER THAT, Dex is in the same town as Em, working as a TV presenter (apparently "he realized photography was not for him, and besides, "I'm a TV presenter" sounded more impressive"), flaunting women in front of the love-lorn Em, who, by the way? Mexican Restaurant.
You see? It's utterly maddening! Since each chapter is a year apart, lots of the "in between" details are missed out which is why it feels like there is absolutely no connection between the chapters. Though, the author tries hard to bridge the gap. Too hard.
Sample this example - In one chapter, we are introduced to Ian, Em's new coworker, who asks her out but she declines as she is not interested and the chapter ends abruptly after that. In the beginning of the next chapter, the author reminds us - Hey! The two chapters are connected! It's the continuation of the same story! My story IS progressing but I'm not going to explain any of it to you. No, really! I'll prove it to you by not at all understating it and hitting you on the head with it! Look, look! -- "The other staff scoffed. 'Why is it always me?' moaned Ian. 'Because you do it so beautifully,' said his best friend Emma"
Subtle, Mr.Nicholls, very subtle.
Moaning and groaning, I forced myself to read on - much like how Harry forces Dumbledore to drink the potion in the Cave - and after, about a hundred pages, when they are at a nudist beach by accident and Dex is trying to convince Em to take her clothes off while she's saying no (this goes on for a bit), I read this -
She leant forward, put her hand on his wrist. 'I think we should tell each other something that the other person doesn鈥榯 know.'
'What, like a secret?'
'Exactly, a secret, something surprising, one a night every night for the rest of the holiday.'
'Okay. You first.'
'No, you first.'
'Why me first?'
'You've got more to choose from.'
And it was true, he had an almost bottomless supply of secrets. He could tell her that he鈥榙 watched her getting dressed that night, or that he鈥榙 left the bathroom door open on purpose when he showered. He could tell her that he鈥榙 smoked heroin with Naomi, or that just before Christmas he鈥榙 had fast, unhappy sex with Emma鈥榮 flatmate Tilly Killick; a foot massage that had spun horribly out of control while Emma was at Woolworths buying fairy lights for the tree. But perhaps it would be better to go for something that didn鈥榯 reveal him as shallow or seedy, duplicitous or conceited.
He thought for some time.
'Okay, here goes.' He cleared his throat. 'A couple of weeks ago at this club, I got off with this guy.'
And THAT, ladies and gentlemen, is when I stopped reading, because my brain exploded.
February 26, 2024
Well, this is another limbo book for me. I didn鈥檛 enjoy it much, but I also didn鈥檛 hate it. I finally decided to round up my 3.5 stars to 4! However, I can honestly say I adored the adaptation on Netflix. I've already typed up a review and made my two Valentine鈥檚 Day recommendations for watching, laughing, and crying (I also added my other recommendation "Anyone but You").
If you want to check out my thoughts, here鈥檚 the link below:
If you want to check out my thoughts, here鈥檚 the link below:
August 17, 2020
Em and Dex, Dex and Em. Two people that we catch up with every year on exactly the same day. This is the second time i've read this book and I鈥檓 sobbing, totally and utterly sobbing. If a book can do that to you twice then it鈥檚 a really good book and this is why its now a favourite of all time.
I can't imagine watching the film for this but maybe, one day
I can't imagine watching the film for this but maybe, one day
August 4, 2011
Yuck! What self-indulgent muck! I decided to read this book after having read extremely positive reviews in the British press, and upon finding out that a movie based on the book will be released imminently.
About 100 pages in, I was already hating it, and now, finally finishing it, I am convinced those raving reviews must have been written by people who hardly ever read books.
The book is cheesy and corny, predictable as a storm on a cloudy day, with characters who unfortunately display very little deep or profound development as the book progresses. It's chick-lit written by a man.
I feel that the author's use of a certain trite plot device, which may have been intended to shock and awe the reader, only made me feel really angry about having laboured to get so far into the book. I don't want to spoil the plot for those who still intend to read the book, but I am compelled to advise you to brace yourself for a cop-out.
Probably for the first time in my life, I am honestly hoping that the movie will out-perform the book.
About 100 pages in, I was already hating it, and now, finally finishing it, I am convinced those raving reviews must have been written by people who hardly ever read books.
The book is cheesy and corny, predictable as a storm on a cloudy day, with characters who unfortunately display very little deep or profound development as the book progresses. It's chick-lit written by a man.
I feel that the author's use of a certain trite plot device, which may have been intended to shock and awe the reader, only made me feel really angry about having laboured to get so far into the book. I don't want to spoil the plot for those who still intend to read the book, but I am compelled to advise you to brace yourself for a cop-out.
Probably for the first time in my life, I am honestly hoping that the movie will out-perform the book.
July 3, 2010
There will be spoilers...
I am no longer speaking to this book it has seriously pissed me off. It is imperialist unamerican and majorly depressing. I have done you a favor Mr Nicholls and decided not to kill myself lest it reflect poorly on your book, but you made me want to repeatedly. And yes I understand you are british and that there is something fundamentally wrong with british people that makes you uncomfortable with anyone have a remotely good day in a novel, but seriously. Honestly David I am a bit worried about you and I think it maybe a good idea for you to go see a therapist you seem intensely depressed to me and you don't want to go ending up like B.S. Johnson now do you?
Right so now that I am done ranting about cultural differences on to ranting about the book. This book basically has the plot of an american romantic comedy. Nicholls even knows this and periodically remarks on it (comparing the main characters to Harry and Sally for example). Unlike an American story it's well depressing and not a little bit, all the time. I know it is hard to imagine but this is a book about two people who are basically depressed constantly, okay I lie once Emma is happy and maybe twice Dexter is happy in a course of 20 years, and it is never super happy, just eh okay happy. They are constantly in relationships they hate with people that hate them or generally terrible at whatever they are attempting to do at that moment. Seriously this is why I am getting up in the morning so that I can be miserable once again?
This book seems to me to have two options for trajectories:
The American: They get together and everyone lives happily ever after.
The british: they stay friends but they never seem to slow down long enough to get together.
The second option feels like the direction the book is going for a full 3 hundred pages. Dexter even at one point says something along these lines to Emma. And to be completely honest I was okay with that. I understand the idea that some people just can't slow down enough to make a relationship work. I understand that regardless of how much Emma and Dexter love each other, which is evident in the book, that sometimes things just don't manage to fall into place. This doesn't mean that they don't love each other enough or that there is something wrong with them, it simply means that circumstances are simply unable to create a world in which people like Emma and Dexter end up together. Perhaps they care to much, perhaps in the end we all settle. With passion comes disease and argument, and a relationship of love can never be quite as perfect as a relationship of compromise. Of Dexter marrying someone else and agreeing to become a just good enough husband, of Emma settling for a man who loves her whom she can't manage to change quite enough to love him back. This is where I thought the book was going to go. Perhaps the book still ends up here in a terribly horrendous way but first...
The book goes american on us. They manage to get together, and just in time, whew almost missed that whole biological clock thing, and yes circumstances could be better. I mean that idiot Dexter has a kid that truly belongs to someone else and he has been a loser and a drunk for the better part of 40 years, but at least it finally happens. And Emma fixes him. Yay for an american happy ending.
But wait on their two year anniversary "Emma Morley dies" and I am not kidding that is the amount of play it gets in the book. She thinks she is going to be late meeting dexter to look at a house and she dies. This is where the book and I began our grudge map. I did not wait 350 pages for something good to finally happen so that people could suddenly get killed off. And Dexter becomes a bad person again, but he gets over it and is friends with his ex wife again and dating the manager of his shop, um can you say incest? Serious at least date someone who your wife wasn't making jokes about you cheating on her with.
So seriously David I am worried about you if these are your introjects of the world, please email me I will help you find a good therapist.
I am no longer speaking to this book it has seriously pissed me off. It is imperialist unamerican and majorly depressing. I have done you a favor Mr Nicholls and decided not to kill myself lest it reflect poorly on your book, but you made me want to repeatedly. And yes I understand you are british and that there is something fundamentally wrong with british people that makes you uncomfortable with anyone have a remotely good day in a novel, but seriously. Honestly David I am a bit worried about you and I think it maybe a good idea for you to go see a therapist you seem intensely depressed to me and you don't want to go ending up like B.S. Johnson now do you?
Right so now that I am done ranting about cultural differences on to ranting about the book. This book basically has the plot of an american romantic comedy. Nicholls even knows this and periodically remarks on it (comparing the main characters to Harry and Sally for example). Unlike an American story it's well depressing and not a little bit, all the time. I know it is hard to imagine but this is a book about two people who are basically depressed constantly, okay I lie once Emma is happy and maybe twice Dexter is happy in a course of 20 years, and it is never super happy, just eh okay happy. They are constantly in relationships they hate with people that hate them or generally terrible at whatever they are attempting to do at that moment. Seriously this is why I am getting up in the morning so that I can be miserable once again?
This book seems to me to have two options for trajectories:
The American: They get together and everyone lives happily ever after.
The british: they stay friends but they never seem to slow down long enough to get together.
The second option feels like the direction the book is going for a full 3 hundred pages. Dexter even at one point says something along these lines to Emma. And to be completely honest I was okay with that. I understand the idea that some people just can't slow down enough to make a relationship work. I understand that regardless of how much Emma and Dexter love each other, which is evident in the book, that sometimes things just don't manage to fall into place. This doesn't mean that they don't love each other enough or that there is something wrong with them, it simply means that circumstances are simply unable to create a world in which people like Emma and Dexter end up together. Perhaps they care to much, perhaps in the end we all settle. With passion comes disease and argument, and a relationship of love can never be quite as perfect as a relationship of compromise. Of Dexter marrying someone else and agreeing to become a just good enough husband, of Emma settling for a man who loves her whom she can't manage to change quite enough to love him back. This is where I thought the book was going to go. Perhaps the book still ends up here in a terribly horrendous way but first...
The book goes american on us. They manage to get together, and just in time, whew almost missed that whole biological clock thing, and yes circumstances could be better. I mean that idiot Dexter has a kid that truly belongs to someone else and he has been a loser and a drunk for the better part of 40 years, but at least it finally happens. And Emma fixes him. Yay for an american happy ending.
But wait on their two year anniversary "Emma Morley dies" and I am not kidding that is the amount of play it gets in the book. She thinks she is going to be late meeting dexter to look at a house and she dies. This is where the book and I began our grudge map. I did not wait 350 pages for something good to finally happen so that people could suddenly get killed off. And Dexter becomes a bad person again, but he gets over it and is friends with his ex wife again and dating the manager of his shop, um can you say incest? Serious at least date someone who your wife wasn't making jokes about you cheating on her with.
So seriously David I am worried about you if these are your introjects of the world, please email me I will help you find a good therapist.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
August 14, 2011
I finished this book 3 days ago and I'm just now coming out of the stupor that I've been wandering around in since. One Day isn't a book with many gray areas...readers will absolutely love the story or they will hate it. I happen to be one of the former...so much so that I have spent all of my free time in the last 3 days hunting down pictures, articles, interviews, etc, related to the book and the movie adapted from it (opens nationwide August 19th). Since the author of One Day, David Nicholls, also wrote the script for the movie, I have no doubt that this is going to be that rare exception where the movie will be as good or better than the book. The actors they have cast to play the lead protagonists are a perfect fit. In fact, Anne Hathaway loved the book so much, she flew to London to convince the director why she was perfect to play the part of Emma.
The story centers on the lives of two people, Emma Morley & Dexter Mayhew, who meet the night of their college graduation on July 15, 1988. The one-night-stand they attempt to engage in doesn't pan out; instead, they opt for being friends. Little do they know, this "off-the-cuff" friendship they've settled for will cultivate and grow - encompassing Dex, Em and all of the book's readers. Thus, July 15, 1988 marks the day that changes their lives forever. For each year thereafter, the story stops on that same day to check in with Dex and Em.
One Day is a character study like no other. I don't think I've ever read a book where I have known the H/h as intimately as I do Dex and Em. Their hopes and fears, successes and failures - as well as the steadfast bond between them - is all absorbed by the reader. Whether you enjoyed the book or not, I'd wager very few could deny the amazing chemistry between Dex & Em, as well as how thoroughly exposed & vulnerable their feelings become as the years go by. You will laugh a little at them and cry a lot with them. In fact, there comes a point in the story where the laughter will cease but not the tears...definitely not the tears. Even for those of us that normally don't cry at the drop of a pin...you might surprise yourself here. Forewarned is forearmed...have the box of tissue handy!
I am not going to elaborate on the storyline because it isn't one to tell; rather, it is a story readers should experience for themselves. Although it is a fictionalized account, there are situations in One Day that might hit home as being very personal to you. Friendship and love... does one lead to the other or should heading in that direction be avoided? Can they exist synonymously...running deep and true and eternal? Is there one specific day that changed your life forever?
The only genre I read is romance and IMO One Day is a 10-star contribution. However, if you require your romance to be all wrapped up in shiny paper with a big bow on top (like I usually do), I would recommend that you do not read this book. But for those of you who are willing to step outside of the box, you will get an extraordinary, emotionally-gripping, "laughter despite the tears" powerhouse of a novel in return. The cover of the book says it all!
The story centers on the lives of two people, Emma Morley & Dexter Mayhew, who meet the night of their college graduation on July 15, 1988. The one-night-stand they attempt to engage in doesn't pan out; instead, they opt for being friends. Little do they know, this "off-the-cuff" friendship they've settled for will cultivate and grow - encompassing Dex, Em and all of the book's readers. Thus, July 15, 1988 marks the day that changes their lives forever. For each year thereafter, the story stops on that same day to check in with Dex and Em.
One Day is a character study like no other. I don't think I've ever read a book where I have known the H/h as intimately as I do Dex and Em. Their hopes and fears, successes and failures - as well as the steadfast bond between them - is all absorbed by the reader. Whether you enjoyed the book or not, I'd wager very few could deny the amazing chemistry between Dex & Em, as well as how thoroughly exposed & vulnerable their feelings become as the years go by. You will laugh a little at them and cry a lot with them. In fact, there comes a point in the story where the laughter will cease but not the tears...definitely not the tears. Even for those of us that normally don't cry at the drop of a pin...you might surprise yourself here. Forewarned is forearmed...have the box of tissue handy!
I am not going to elaborate on the storyline because it isn't one to tell; rather, it is a story readers should experience for themselves. Although it is a fictionalized account, there are situations in One Day that might hit home as being very personal to you. Friendship and love... does one lead to the other or should heading in that direction be avoided? Can they exist synonymously...running deep and true and eternal? Is there one specific day that changed your life forever?
The only genre I read is romance and IMO One Day is a 10-star contribution. However, if you require your romance to be all wrapped up in shiny paper with a big bow on top (like I usually do), I would recommend that you do not read this book. But for those of you who are willing to step outside of the box, you will get an extraordinary, emotionally-gripping, "laughter despite the tears" powerhouse of a novel in return. The cover of the book says it all!
March 22, 2020
Just a little bit disappointed because I enjoyed so very much and I expected this one to be good as well. It was okay but it never really pulled me in. I had considerable difficulty with how unlikeable both main characters were and I was totally unable to understand why they should like let alone love each other. On the other hand the story was good and the idea of writing about one particular day each year gave the book great structure. The ending was unexpected and confronting but then there was probably no other way the author could have gone. Overall there was nothing really wrong with this book - I was just expecting a whole lot more.
March 25, 2017
Read a book with a number in the title.
This is by far the easiest 5 stars I've given out this year.
(forget the fact that it is only the second 5 stars I've given out this year.)
(also forget the fact that I'm writing this review the day before I finish which will most likely be its biggest contender)
And btw, fuck this book.
Maybe it's just bad timing for whatever, but I think you should head of to China or India or wherever and find yourself, and I'll get on quite happily with things here. I don't want to come with you, I don't want weekly postcards, I don't even want your phone number. I don't want to get married and have your babies either, or even have another fling. We had one really really nice night together, that's all. I'll always remember it. And if we bump into each other sometime in the future at a party or something, then that's fine too. We'll just have a friendly chat. We won't be embarrassed 'cause you've had your hand down my top and there'll be no awkwardness and we'll be, whatever 'cool' about it, alright? Me and you. We'll just be....friends. Agreed?
This is going to be one of those personal reviews. Just so you're warned. If you don't like it, look away now. Spoiler tagging for those not interested.
August 16, 2023
3.5词3鈽�
鈥淗e wanted to live life in such a way that if a photograph were taken at random, it would be a cool photograph. Things should look right. Fun; there should be a lot of fun and no more sadness than absolutely necessary.鈥�
Oooo I got so mad reading this 鈥� and listening to the excellent narrator. The anger was more frustration at the stretching out of a good story with good characters and a good premise. Good but not great, which was disappointing because as I read, I kept thinking of how it could have been tightened up.
The two main characters meet as they鈥檙e graduating from university and have a sort of one-night stand and go their own ways. Dexter Mayhew is a handsome Mr Popularity from a wealthy family, while Emma Morley is a bookish, spectacle-wearing, self-made independent girl.
Superficial is the word for Dexter.
鈥淐ertain cool-sounding jobs - heart surgeon, architect - were permanently closed to him now and journalism seemed about to go the same way. He wasn't much of a writer, knew little about politics, spoke bad restaurant-French, lacked all training and qualifications, possessed only a passport and a vivid image of himself smoking beneath a ceiling fan in tropical countries, a battered Nikon and a bottle of whisky by his bedside.
. . .
t this stage in his life, his main criterion for choosing a career was that it should sound good in a bar, shouted into a girl's ear, and there was no denying that 鈥業'm a professional photographer鈥� was a fine sentence, almost up there with 鈥業 report from war zones鈥� or 鈥榓ctually, I make documentaries.鈥�鈥�
Emma gets roped into joining a local theatre cooperative. There is quite a lot about her theatre work and the people. I found all of this very slow-going. I wasn鈥檛 interested in that part at all. The author is a playwright and screen writer, which may be why he sent Emma that way.
鈥淓mma had no ambitions as an actress or any great love of theatre, except as a medium to convey words and ideas. And Sledgehammer was to be a new kind of progressive theatre co-op, with shared intentions, a shared zeal, a written manifesto and a commitment to changing young lives through art. Maybe there'd be some romance too, Emma thought, or at the very least some sex. She packed her rucksack, said goodbye to her sceptical mum and dad, and set out in the mini-bus as if heading out on some great cause, a sort of theatrical Spanish Civil War, funded by the Arts Council.
But three months later, what had happened to the warmth, the camaraderie, the sense of social value, of high ideals coupled with fun? They were meant to be a co-operative.鈥�
At least she鈥檚 having a go at a life. Dex, on the other hand, has followed through with his wish for a bottle of whisky always handy.
The book moves from year to year on St Swithin鈥檚 Day. Sometimes they鈥檙e together, sometimes not. They meet up from time to time to catch up, and we see their changes as Dex becomes a famous TV host and Emma works in a Mexican restaurant and thinks about writing books.
For all of his shallowness and many lovers, we can see that Dex has more to him when he talks to Emma. He relies on her for advice, sympathy, or just conversaton when he鈥檚 lonely. The will-they-won鈥檛-they tension runs through the whole thing. She knows he sheds his women, and she can鈥檛 quite let go entirely.
I enjoyed their frustrating relationship and some, but not all, of the various lives they led. There was too much of everything. I grew tired of Dex鈥檚 drunken womanising and Emma鈥檚 choices of partners. The ending is a surprise.
I can see why it was made into a film, and I鈥檇 probably enjoy it. It鈥檚 just not what I鈥檇 hoped as a book.
I listened to the audio part of the time, which was fine but not memorable and not conducive to skimming when I felt bogged down.
鈥淗e wanted to live life in such a way that if a photograph were taken at random, it would be a cool photograph. Things should look right. Fun; there should be a lot of fun and no more sadness than absolutely necessary.鈥�
Oooo I got so mad reading this 鈥� and listening to the excellent narrator. The anger was more frustration at the stretching out of a good story with good characters and a good premise. Good but not great, which was disappointing because as I read, I kept thinking of how it could have been tightened up.
The two main characters meet as they鈥檙e graduating from university and have a sort of one-night stand and go their own ways. Dexter Mayhew is a handsome Mr Popularity from a wealthy family, while Emma Morley is a bookish, spectacle-wearing, self-made independent girl.
Superficial is the word for Dexter.
鈥淐ertain cool-sounding jobs - heart surgeon, architect - were permanently closed to him now and journalism seemed about to go the same way. He wasn't much of a writer, knew little about politics, spoke bad restaurant-French, lacked all training and qualifications, possessed only a passport and a vivid image of himself smoking beneath a ceiling fan in tropical countries, a battered Nikon and a bottle of whisky by his bedside.
. . .
t this stage in his life, his main criterion for choosing a career was that it should sound good in a bar, shouted into a girl's ear, and there was no denying that 鈥業'm a professional photographer鈥� was a fine sentence, almost up there with 鈥業 report from war zones鈥� or 鈥榓ctually, I make documentaries.鈥�鈥�
Emma gets roped into joining a local theatre cooperative. There is quite a lot about her theatre work and the people. I found all of this very slow-going. I wasn鈥檛 interested in that part at all. The author is a playwright and screen writer, which may be why he sent Emma that way.
鈥淓mma had no ambitions as an actress or any great love of theatre, except as a medium to convey words and ideas. And Sledgehammer was to be a new kind of progressive theatre co-op, with shared intentions, a shared zeal, a written manifesto and a commitment to changing young lives through art. Maybe there'd be some romance too, Emma thought, or at the very least some sex. She packed her rucksack, said goodbye to her sceptical mum and dad, and set out in the mini-bus as if heading out on some great cause, a sort of theatrical Spanish Civil War, funded by the Arts Council.
But three months later, what had happened to the warmth, the camaraderie, the sense of social value, of high ideals coupled with fun? They were meant to be a co-operative.鈥�
At least she鈥檚 having a go at a life. Dex, on the other hand, has followed through with his wish for a bottle of whisky always handy.
The book moves from year to year on St Swithin鈥檚 Day. Sometimes they鈥檙e together, sometimes not. They meet up from time to time to catch up, and we see their changes as Dex becomes a famous TV host and Emma works in a Mexican restaurant and thinks about writing books.
For all of his shallowness and many lovers, we can see that Dex has more to him when he talks to Emma. He relies on her for advice, sympathy, or just conversaton when he鈥檚 lonely. The will-they-won鈥檛-they tension runs through the whole thing. She knows he sheds his women, and she can鈥檛 quite let go entirely.
I enjoyed their frustrating relationship and some, but not all, of the various lives they led. There was too much of everything. I grew tired of Dex鈥檚 drunken womanising and Emma鈥檚 choices of partners. The ending is a surprise.
I can see why it was made into a film, and I鈥檇 probably enjoy it. It鈥檚 just not what I鈥檇 hoped as a book.
I listened to the audio part of the time, which was fine but not memorable and not conducive to skimming when I felt bogged down.
January 23, 2024
dexter is a self-centered prick and i like emma less for pining after him her whole life. oh, and that ending was absolute bullshit.
January 25, 2018
One Day, David Nicholls
Each chapter covers the lives of two protagonists on 15 July, St. Swithin's Day, for twenty years.
毓賳賵丕賳 賮蹖賱賲: 蹖讴 乇賵夭貨 讴丕乇诏乇丿丕賳: 賱賵賳 丕爻趩乇賮蹖賳诏貨 鬲賴蹖賴鈥� 讴賳賳丿賴: 賳蹖賳丕 跇丕讴賵亘爻賳貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 丿蹖賵蹖丿 賳蹖讴賵賱夭貨 亘丕夭蹖诏乇丕賳: 噩蹖賲 丕爻鬲乇噩爻貨 丌賳 賴丕鬲丕賵蹖貨 賲賵爻蹖賯蹖: 乇蹖趩賱 倬賵乇鬲賲賳貨 鬲丿賵蹖賳: 亘丕乇賳蹖 倬蹖賱蹖賳诏貨 鬲丕乇蹖禺鈥屬囏й� 丕賳鬲卮丕乇: 19 丌诏賵爻爻鬲 2011貨 賲丿鬲 夭賲丕賳: 108 丿賯蹖賯賴貨 讴卮賵乇: 丕賳诏賱爻鬲丕賳貨 夭亘丕賳: 丕賳诏賱蹖爻蹖貨 賴夭蹖賳賴 賮蹖賱賲 15000000 丿賱丕乇
倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1988 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 趩賳丿 丿丕賳卮噩賵 倬爻 丕夭 賮丕乇睾鈥� 丕賱鬲丨氐蹖賱蹖 亘賴 賱賳丿賳 亘乇诏卮鬲賴鈥� 丕賳丿 賵 倬爻 丕夭 禺丿丕丨丕賮馗蹖 丕夭 賴賲丿蹖诏乇 丿賵 鬲賳 丕夭 丿丕賳卮噩賵賴丕: ( 丕賲丕 賵 丿讴爻 ) 亘丕 賴賲 亘賴 禺丕賳賴鈥� 蹖 芦丕賲丕禄 賲蹖鈥屫辟堎嗀�. 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1989 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 芦丕賲丕禄 亘賴 蹖讴 禺丕賳賴鈥� 蹖 噩丿蹖丿 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌�. 賵 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏蹖 乇丕 卮乇賵毓 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�. 賵 芦丿讴爻禄 亘乇丕蹖 鬲丿乇蹖爻 亘賴 賴賳丿 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌�. 倬丕賳夭賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1990 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 芦丕賲丕禄 丿乇 蹖讴 乇爻鬲賵乇丕賳 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 诏丕乇爻賵賳 讴丕乇 賵 亘丕 賴賲讴丕乇 噩丿蹖丿卮 丕蹖丕賳 丌卮賳丕 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 賵 ... 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1991 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 亘乇丕蹖 丿蹖丿賳 芦丕賲丕禄 亘賴 乇爻鬲賵乇丕賳蹖 讴賴 芦丕賲丕禄 丿乇 丌賳噩丕 讴丕乇 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌� 鬲丕 丕賵 乇丕 亘亘蹖賳丿. 賵 亘賴 芦丕賲丕禄 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 賲爻丕賮乇鬲 賲蹖鈥屫囏�. 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1992 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 賵 芦丕賲丕禄 亘賴 賲爻丕賮乇鬲 賲蹖鈥屫辟堎嗀� 賵 ...貨 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1993 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 賲噩乇蹖 蹖讴 亘乇賳丕賲賴 鬲賱賵蹖夭蹖賵賳蹖 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賵 亘賴 卮賴乇鬲 賲蹖鈥屫必池�. 賵賱蹖 丕夭 芦丕賲丕禄 丿賵乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1994 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 亘賴 丿蹖丿丕乇 賲丕丿乇卮 讴賴 賲亘鬲賱丕 亘賴 亘蹖賲丕乇蹖 爻乇胤丕賳 卮丿賴 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌�. 賵 趩賳丿鬲丕 丕夭 亘乇賳丕賲賴鈥� 賴丕蹖 囟亘胤 卮丿賴鈥� 蹖 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘賴 賲丕丿乇卮 賳卮丕賳 賲蹖鈥屫囏�. 賵賱蹖 倬丿乇卮 丕賵 乇丕 丕夭 禺丕賳賴 亘蹖乇賵賳 賲蹖鈥屫з嗀ж藏�. 賵 芦丕賲丕禄 賴賲 亘乇丕蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘賴 禺丕賳賴鈥� 蹖 丕蹖丕賳 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌�. 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1995 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 賲丕丿乇 丿讴爻 賲蹖鈥屬呟屫必� 賵 倬丿乇卮 亘賴 丕爻鬲賵丿蹖賵 賲蹖鈥屫③屫� 賵 丿賵爻鬲 丿禺鬲乇 丿讴爻 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫ㄛ屬嗀�. 賵 芦丕賲丕禄 賲毓賱賲 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 賵 ... 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1996 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 芦丕賲丕禄 亘丕 丕蹖丕賳 賳丕賲夭丿 賲蹖鈥屫促堎嗀� . 賵 丿讴爻 芦丕賲丕禄 乇丕 亘賴 乇爻鬲賵乇丕賳蹖 亘丕 讴賱丕爻 丿毓賵鬲 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�. 賵 ...貨 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1997 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 賴蹖趩 丕鬲賮丕賯蹖 賳賲蹖鈥屫з佖�. 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1998 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 卮賴乇鬲卮 乇丕 丕夭 丿爻鬲 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 賵 賲噩乇蹖 蹖讴 亘乇賳丕賲賴 賲毓乇賮蹖 亘丕夭蹖鈥屬囏й� 讴丕賲倬蹖賵鬲乇蹖 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賵 丕夭 讴丕乇 鬲賱賵蹖夭蹖賵賳 讴賳丕乇賴 诏蹖乇蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�. 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1999 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 亘禺丕胤乇 鬲賳賴丕蹖蹖 丕卮 鬲氐賲蹖賲 亘乇丕蹖 丕夭丿賵丕噩 賲蹖鈥屭屫必� 賵 亘丕 爻蹖賱賵蹖 賳丕賲夭丿 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 賵 ...貨 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2000 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 賵 賴賲爻乇卮 亘賴 毓乇賵爻蹖 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 賴賲讴賱丕爻蹖賴丕蹖 丿丕賳卮诏丕賴蹖 丕卮 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌�. 賵 丿乇 丌賳噩丕 芦丕賲丕禄 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫ㄛ屬嗀� . 賵 ...貨貨 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2001 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 亘丕 丿賵爻鬲卮 蹖讴 卮乇讴鬲 亘爻鬲賴 亘賳丿蹖 爻亘夭蹖噩丕鬲 鬲丕爻蹖爻 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀�. 爻蹖賱賵蹖 亘趩賴 丿丕乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 賵 爻蹖賱賵蹖 亘賴 丿讴爻 禺蹖丕賳鬲 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�.貨 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2002 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 丕夭 爻蹖賱賵蹖 噩丿丕 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賵 丕賮爻乇丿诏蹖 賲蹖诏蹖乇丿. 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2003 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 亘乇丕蹖 丿蹖丿賳 芦丕賲丕禄 亘賴 倬丕乇蹖爻 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌�. 賵 ...貨 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2004 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 亘丕 芦丕賲丕禄 丕夭丿賵丕噩 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�. 賵 ... 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2005 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 芦丕賲丕禄 賳賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗀� 亘趩賴 丿丕乇 卮賵丿. 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2006 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 芦丕賲丕禄 賴賳诏丕賲 亘乇诏卮鬲賳 丕夭 丕爻鬲禺乇 賵 乇賮鬲賳 倬蹖卮 丿讴爻 亘丕 讴丕賲蹖賵賳 鬲氐丕丿賮 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賵 賲蹖鈥屬呟屫必�. 賵 丿讴爻 丕賮爻乇丿诏蹖 丨丕丿 賲蹖鈥屭屫必�. 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2007 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 丕夭 丕賮爻乇丿賴 賵 爻乇诏乇丿丕賳 丕爻鬲. 賵 ...貨 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2008 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 賴蹖趩 丕鬲賮丕賯蹖 賳賲蹖鈥屫з佖�. 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2009 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 丿乇 讴丕賮蹖 卮丕倬 禺賵丿 丕蹖丕賳 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫ㄛ屬嗀�. 讴賴 丕夭丿賵丕噩 讴乇丿賴 賵 禺丕賳賵丕丿賴 丿丕乇 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲. 丿讴爻 賳丕诏賴丕賳 丕夭 禺賵丕亘 亘蹖丿丕乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賵 賲蹖鈥屫ㄛ屬嗀� 卮丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1989 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丕爻鬲. 賵 ...貨 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2011 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 亘丕 丿禺鬲乇卮 亘賴 噩丕蹖蹖 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌� 讴賴 卮丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1989 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 亘丕 丕賲丕 乇賮鬲賴 亘賵丿. 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
Each chapter covers the lives of two protagonists on 15 July, St. Swithin's Day, for twenty years.
毓賳賵丕賳 賮蹖賱賲: 蹖讴 乇賵夭貨 讴丕乇诏乇丿丕賳: 賱賵賳 丕爻趩乇賮蹖賳诏貨 鬲賴蹖賴鈥� 讴賳賳丿賴: 賳蹖賳丕 跇丕讴賵亘爻賳貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 丿蹖賵蹖丿 賳蹖讴賵賱夭貨 亘丕夭蹖诏乇丕賳: 噩蹖賲 丕爻鬲乇噩爻貨 丌賳 賴丕鬲丕賵蹖貨 賲賵爻蹖賯蹖: 乇蹖趩賱 倬賵乇鬲賲賳貨 鬲丿賵蹖賳: 亘丕乇賳蹖 倬蹖賱蹖賳诏貨 鬲丕乇蹖禺鈥屬囏й� 丕賳鬲卮丕乇: 19 丌诏賵爻爻鬲 2011貨 賲丿鬲 夭賲丕賳: 108 丿賯蹖賯賴貨 讴卮賵乇: 丕賳诏賱爻鬲丕賳貨 夭亘丕賳: 丕賳诏賱蹖爻蹖貨 賴夭蹖賳賴 賮蹖賱賲 15000000 丿賱丕乇
倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1988 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 趩賳丿 丿丕賳卮噩賵 倬爻 丕夭 賮丕乇睾鈥� 丕賱鬲丨氐蹖賱蹖 亘賴 賱賳丿賳 亘乇诏卮鬲賴鈥� 丕賳丿 賵 倬爻 丕夭 禺丿丕丨丕賮馗蹖 丕夭 賴賲丿蹖诏乇 丿賵 鬲賳 丕夭 丿丕賳卮噩賵賴丕: ( 丕賲丕 賵 丿讴爻 ) 亘丕 賴賲 亘賴 禺丕賳賴鈥� 蹖 芦丕賲丕禄 賲蹖鈥屫辟堎嗀�. 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1989 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 芦丕賲丕禄 亘賴 蹖讴 禺丕賳賴鈥� 蹖 噩丿蹖丿 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌�. 賵 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏蹖 乇丕 卮乇賵毓 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�. 賵 芦丿讴爻禄 亘乇丕蹖 鬲丿乇蹖爻 亘賴 賴賳丿 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌�. 倬丕賳夭賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1990 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 芦丕賲丕禄 丿乇 蹖讴 乇爻鬲賵乇丕賳 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 诏丕乇爻賵賳 讴丕乇 賵 亘丕 賴賲讴丕乇 噩丿蹖丿卮 丕蹖丕賳 丌卮賳丕 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 賵 ... 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1991 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 亘乇丕蹖 丿蹖丿賳 芦丕賲丕禄 亘賴 乇爻鬲賵乇丕賳蹖 讴賴 芦丕賲丕禄 丿乇 丌賳噩丕 讴丕乇 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌� 鬲丕 丕賵 乇丕 亘亘蹖賳丿. 賵 亘賴 芦丕賲丕禄 倬蹖卮賳賴丕丿 賲爻丕賮乇鬲 賲蹖鈥屫囏�. 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1992 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 賵 芦丕賲丕禄 亘賴 賲爻丕賮乇鬲 賲蹖鈥屫辟堎嗀� 賵 ...貨 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1993 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 賲噩乇蹖 蹖讴 亘乇賳丕賲賴 鬲賱賵蹖夭蹖賵賳蹖 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賵 亘賴 卮賴乇鬲 賲蹖鈥屫必池�. 賵賱蹖 丕夭 芦丕賲丕禄 丿賵乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1994 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 亘賴 丿蹖丿丕乇 賲丕丿乇卮 讴賴 賲亘鬲賱丕 亘賴 亘蹖賲丕乇蹖 爻乇胤丕賳 卮丿賴 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌�. 賵 趩賳丿鬲丕 丕夭 亘乇賳丕賲賴鈥� 賴丕蹖 囟亘胤 卮丿賴鈥� 蹖 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘賴 賲丕丿乇卮 賳卮丕賳 賲蹖鈥屫囏�. 賵賱蹖 倬丿乇卮 丕賵 乇丕 丕夭 禺丕賳賴 亘蹖乇賵賳 賲蹖鈥屫з嗀ж藏�. 賵 芦丕賲丕禄 賴賲 亘乇丕蹖 夭賳丿诏蹖 亘賴 禺丕賳賴鈥� 蹖 丕蹖丕賳 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌�. 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1995 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 賲丕丿乇 丿讴爻 賲蹖鈥屬呟屫必� 賵 倬丿乇卮 亘賴 丕爻鬲賵丿蹖賵 賲蹖鈥屫③屫� 賵 丿賵爻鬲 丿禺鬲乇 丿讴爻 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫ㄛ屬嗀�. 賵 芦丕賲丕禄 賲毓賱賲 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 賵 ... 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1996 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 芦丕賲丕禄 亘丕 丕蹖丕賳 賳丕賲夭丿 賲蹖鈥屫促堎嗀� . 賵 丿讴爻 芦丕賲丕禄 乇丕 亘賴 乇爻鬲賵乇丕賳蹖 亘丕 讴賱丕爻 丿毓賵鬲 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�. 賵 ...貨 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1997 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 賴蹖趩 丕鬲賮丕賯蹖 賳賲蹖鈥屫з佖�. 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1998 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 卮賴乇鬲卮 乇丕 丕夭 丿爻鬲 賲蹖鈥屫囏� 賵 賲噩乇蹖 蹖讴 亘乇賳丕賲賴 賲毓乇賮蹖 亘丕夭蹖鈥屬囏й� 讴丕賲倬蹖賵鬲乇蹖 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賵 丕夭 讴丕乇 鬲賱賵蹖夭蹖賵賳 讴賳丕乇賴 诏蹖乇蹖 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�. 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1999 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 亘禺丕胤乇 鬲賳賴丕蹖蹖 丕卮 鬲氐賲蹖賲 亘乇丕蹖 丕夭丿賵丕噩 賲蹖鈥屭屫必� 賵 亘丕 爻蹖賱賵蹖 賳丕賲夭丿 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 賵 ...貨 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2000 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 賵 賴賲爻乇卮 亘賴 毓乇賵爻蹖 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 賴賲讴賱丕爻蹖賴丕蹖 丿丕賳卮诏丕賴蹖 丕卮 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌�. 賵 丿乇 丌賳噩丕 芦丕賲丕禄 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫ㄛ屬嗀� . 賵 ...貨貨 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2001 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 亘丕 丿賵爻鬲卮 蹖讴 卮乇讴鬲 亘爻鬲賴 亘賳丿蹖 爻亘夭蹖噩丕鬲 鬲丕爻蹖爻 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗁嗀�. 爻蹖賱賵蹖 亘趩賴 丿丕乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�. 賵 爻蹖賱賵蹖 亘賴 丿讴爻 禺蹖丕賳鬲 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�.貨 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2002 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 丕夭 爻蹖賱賵蹖 噩丿丕 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賵 丕賮爻乇丿诏蹖 賲蹖诏蹖乇丿. 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2003 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 亘乇丕蹖 丿蹖丿賳 芦丕賲丕禄 亘賴 倬丕乇蹖爻 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌�. 賵 ...貨 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2004 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 亘丕 芦丕賲丕禄 丕夭丿賵丕噩 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀�. 賵 ... 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2005 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 芦丕賲丕禄 賳賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗀� 亘趩賴 丿丕乇 卮賵丿. 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2006 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 芦丕賲丕禄 賴賳诏丕賲 亘乇诏卮鬲賳 丕夭 丕爻鬲禺乇 賵 乇賮鬲賳 倬蹖卮 丿讴爻 亘丕 讴丕賲蹖賵賳 鬲氐丕丿賮 賲蹖鈥屭┵嗀� 賵 賲蹖鈥屬呟屫必�. 賵 丿讴爻 丕賮爻乇丿诏蹖 丨丕丿 賲蹖鈥屭屫必�. 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2007 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 丕夭 丕賮爻乇丿賴 賵 爻乇诏乇丿丕賳 丕爻鬲. 賵 ...貨 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2008 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 賴蹖趩 丕鬲賮丕賯蹖 賳賲蹖鈥屫з佖�. 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2009 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 丿乇 讴丕賮蹖 卮丕倬 禺賵丿 丕蹖丕賳 乇丕 賲蹖鈥屫ㄛ屬嗀�. 讴賴 丕夭丿賵丕噩 讴乇丿賴 賵 禺丕賳賵丕丿賴 丿丕乇 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲. 丿讴爻 賳丕诏賴丕賳 丕夭 禺賵丕亘 亘蹖丿丕乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賵 賲蹖鈥屫ㄛ屬嗀� 卮丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1989 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丕爻鬲. 賵 ...貨 倬丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 2011 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 丿讴爻 亘丕 丿禺鬲乇卮 亘賴 噩丕蹖蹖 賲蹖鈥屫辟堌� 讴賴 卮丕賳夭丿賴賲 跇賵卅蹖賴 爻丕賱 1989 賲蹖賱丕丿蹖 亘丕 丕賲丕 乇賮鬲賴 亘賵丿. 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
Displaying 1 - 30 of 28,345 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.