Ronald Thompson knows he is not guilty of the murder for which he is about to be executed. There are only two days left to unmask the real villain - a terrifying psychopath who has killed before and has unfinished business with his victim's family.
The #1 New York Times bestselling author Mary Higgins Clark has written thirty-eight suspense novels, four collections of short stories, a his颅torical novel, a memoir, and two children鈥檚 books. With bestselling author Alafair Burke she wrote the Under Suspicion series. With her daughter Carol Higgins Clark, she has coauthored five more suspense novels. Her sister-in-law is the also author Mary Jane Clark.
Clark鈥檚 books have sold more than 100 million copies in the United States alone. Her books are beloved around the world and made her an international bestseller many times over.
Story about a maniac who kidnaps a pretty journalist (Sharon Martin) and a young boy (Neil Peterson, son of the man Sharon is dating) and hides them in an old, isolated room underneath Grand Central Station. Also, a young man is facing the electric chair for a crime he may not have committed. Are these two cases connected?
I thoroughly enjoyed this book! It was a fast-paced and exciting read with many characters points-of-view and tense situations. I had a hard time putting this book down. Another very entertaining read by Mary Higgins Clark.
End of the year re-reading, as I try to catch up on current book-ish tasks. What a nice surprise, I enjoyed this a much this time as when I originally read it, way back when.
A Stranger is Watching is a very simple story, but the killer here is not given God like status. He needs to work hard so as to avoid being brought in by the New York police. Eventually bad luck, plus some hard work on behalf of those people on the angels' side, literally catch up with him.
I think that the author will never kill a main character, unless the latter has died in the past, viewed via flashbacks. It's kind of understandable, it makes sense. The blow of death is softened, because the death happened to someone who isn't as known by the readers as the living characters in the present.
Formulaic though the structure of the book is, it's a winning formula. Mary Higgins Clark must have exhausted every permutation throughout her career before her readers said enough was enough. Before, i.e, fatigue set in. The author experienced a lofty position, and I'm glad that she is not as forgotten as say, Harold Robbins.
I myself want more, even if it is of the same. I need the simple sustenance, and I am certain that I will not ditch most of her books. That is a boon. To purchase an ebook and not finishing it is so wasteful. I like Clark's books, so far. I like to follow the coincidences, the poetic justice, the alibis, the plotting, the piety, the good vs evil, the battle of wits, the race against time. This book has got all of that and some more.
This book is a thriller book. It is an early book in this author's long, illustrious career. In this one Steve's wife was murdered years ago and Steve is a proponent of the death penalty. His present love interest is against it. That dreadful night is coming back to haunt both of them and Steve's son.
Like I said this was early on in this author's career and you can tell. The writing was not exactly polished up to her usual standard fare. Some character's ran into each other and it seems like at times we were jumping from one scene to another without the logical steps of progression. That being said I was enjoying the premise of the novel. I also liked the idea of two people on different sides of an argument being able to have a relationship. The thriller aspect that makes my blood pump was not really there until the finale. The finale was fantastic and that would easily get a five star rating. I could not read fast enough as I wondered if the heroes would be able to stop the evil acts in time. For the majority of this book I was going to give this a three star rating. The finale bumped it up for me.
This was not the best offering from this author in her long career. It was still a nice read and I enjoyed my time with it even with its minor flaws. If the author wrote this later on in her career I believe it would have easily been a better book. It had what I am looking for in a thriller genre novel. The battle between good and evil and a countdown of the clock to stop the evil acts from the villain.
The problem with a Mary Higgins Clark book is the reason why she is so popular--once you start, you cannot stop reading it--everything else gets put on hold. This book is no exception.
When I first read this, I started and then forgot to stop. What it lacks in some qualities it makes up for with the fact that there is no right place to take a break and put it down. I started it one school night and had to stay up until three to finish it. Don't tell my parents.
沤ymioji Mary Higgins Ckark ir 寞sp奴dinga serija jos detektyv懦. Ji - tikrai viena 啪inomiausi懦 啪anro autori懦 pasaulyje, kurios knygos vis dar ver膷iamos 寞 daugyb臋 kalb懦, senieji k奴riniai perleid啪iami ir mylimi galyb臈s skaiytoj懦. Kadangi knygos ra拧ytos seniau, joje nerasi i拧mani懦j懦 technologij懦, skaitant da啪nai nusikeli 寞 laikus, kur fakso aparatas stovi kiekvienam ofise, o kalbasi 啪mon臈s laidiniais telefonais. Tai nostalgi拧ki detektyvai, kuriuose n臈ra nei kruvin懦 啪udyni懦, nei makabri拧k懦 scen懦.
艩iame irgi tas pats - pagrobimo byla ir joki懦 拧lyk拧tybi懦. U啪 Ninos nu啪udym膮 netrukus mirties bausme bus nubaustas nekaltas jaunuolis. 沤urnalsit臈 艩enon stengiasi u啪kirsti tam keli膮, o Ninos vyras kaip tik - kovoj膮 u啪 teisingum膮, kuriuo tiki. Nepaisant nuomoni懦 i拧siskyrimo, jiedu yra pora. Tikrasis nusikalt臈lis pagrobia 艩enon ir Stivo s奴n懦, o vyras daro visk膮, kad juos susigf膮啪int懦.
Gan臈tinai nusp臈jamas reikalas, kur寞 skaitant tikrai yra vietos panuobod啪iaut. Ypa膷, kai galvoje jau guli 拧imtai kietesni懦 istorij懦, su kuriuomis pastar膮j膮 gali lyginti. Knyga plona, skyriai trumpi, perskaitysit labai greit, bet tikrai nesp臈sit 寞sijaust tiek, kad r奴p臈t懦 veik臈jai. Knygoje buvo kalbama apie mirties bausm臋, jos 寞tstaymus Amerikoje - tas buvo 寞domu ir net gaila, kad 拧i膮 tem膮 autor臈 paliet臈 tik prab臈g拧miui. Tikrai yra geresni懦 MHC knyg懦.
Mary Higgins Clark pretty much never disappoints. I was actually surprised to find that this was originally published in 1977. It was only when I found myself asking why the characters were using payphones rather than cell phones that I looked up the publication date.
A good, fast-paced mystery. I picked it up off my shelves of books I pick up at thrift stores for $0.25-$0.50 while trying to decide what to read next, knowing it would only take me a day or two to finish. It was an engrossing story that kept me on the edge of my seat.
A masterpiece of literature it isn't, but a damn good read it is.
Mon premier Mary Higgins Clark et s没rement aussi mon premier policier. Je me souviens ne pas avoir r茅ussi 脿 le l芒cher tant que j'avais pas lu le dernier mot. Une grande 茅crivaine 脿 suspense!
The State of Connecticut is two days away from executing Ronald Thompson for the murder of Nina Peterson. (Although true when the book was written in 1977, the execution of minors at the time of the crime was struck down by the Supreme Court in 2005 and the state of Connecticut has banned executions in 2012). For Nina鈥檚 husband Steve, justice is about to be served. However, when his girlfriend Sharon and young son Niel are kidnapped for ransom, evidence emerges that points to Thompson鈥檚 innocence while a serial killer is about to strike again. The plot, although simplistic, is somewhat disjointed and illogical at times. For example, we are told Niel identified the kidnapper as his mother鈥檚 murderer; yet we are also told the kid could not see the murderer because of the lighting. Also, if you are going to plant a bomb, why tip off the authorities when he had easier means of killing Sharon and Niel? For that matter, why go back to the spot where your own bomb is seconds away from detonation? Overall, I give this one a 3/5. It is average and would not stand out in a stack of 500 books.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
First, I鈥檓 setting the read date for 2021 because I clearly missed my goal for this year and ended up forgetting to log books as well.
Second, this was the first book I managed to finish in French, I believe because of the simplistic writing style and the high level of suspense. By the end, I started reading much faster in anticipation.
And third, of course the old homeless woman had to die. Since the story couldn鈥檛 be perfect and someone 鈥渘eeded鈥� to die, evidently the most 鈥渋nsignificant鈥� character was chosen, which more than annoys me. I think it鈥檚 best when a story ends realistically (at times with a death) but it鈥檚 frustrating when the author chooses a homeless person assuming it will have the least impact on the reader. Anyways, I probably looked into that too much, but it was the end of the book so it stuck with me the most.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
A Stranger is Watching I have to admit that this is the first book I have ever read a book by this famous author. I love mysteries so I don't know how I have missed such a classic writer. I am only reading it because it was left in a holiday apartment I am renting. I could not put this book down. It is fast paced, you feel empathy for all the characters as Clark, brings them all to life with their tales from the past and heart wrenching stories. I could visualise Grand Central Station, from the graphic details. Clark is now on my radar and I look forward to reading more of her books.
Okay, so I needed a book to read....still can't get my hands on the book club book.........so I raided Zach's bookshelves. He likes Mary Higgins Clark and buys them at the .25 cent library sales. He said his teacher read this to them in 10th grade. I had never read any Mary Higgins Clark, as popular as she is. I was hooked! Very well-written and fun suspense story. And yes, I was able to fall asleep. I was worried about that since all of my reading time is usually at night.....as a result I often avoid scary books!
Mary Higgins Clark鈥檚 A Stranger Is Watching is a great book to read and to study if you are a writer. Higgins Clark knows how to build tension, how to bring threads and characters together, and how to keep the reader turning pages. I mean down to the wire! There are no spare words or chapters in A Stranger Is Watching.
Six-year-old Neil Peterson witnesses his mother Nina being murdered. Young Ronald Thompson says he didn鈥檛 killed Nina, but he鈥檚 going to the electric chair in a few days. Journalist Sharon Martin doesn鈥檛 believe in capital punishment. Steve, Nina鈥檚 widower, does. Higgins Clark adds a bit of romance to her characters as Steve and Sharon try to understand their relationship. But when a psychopath with unfinished business enters the mix, he sends everybody scrambling to get at the real truth, to save the innocent, and stop the terror. But can they do it with a literal clock counting down to the end?
I鈥檇 rather not tell you who鈥檚 doing what. Find out for yourself. You鈥檒l enjoy this suspense story!
Combl茅 une lacune: lecture de ce roman c茅l猫brissime de Mary Higgings-Clark, publi茅 il y a cinquante ans. Et pas d茅莽u: thriller vif, rythm茅, haletant. Superbe. Dans un New-York du pass茅, sans Iphone, encombr茅 de grosses voitures, avec sa vieille gare centrale au coeur de l'action, soutenue jusqu'脿 la derni猫re ligne.
I only listened to the audio version of this because I recognized the cover of A Stranger is Watching from my mother's bookshelf during a 2-for-1 audible sale.
I am not a fan, that's for sure, but it was mildly interesting, and I did enjoy the characterization of the victims, even if Mary Higgins Clark created a killer that made absolutely no sense, and gave us the worst FBI agents ever assembled.
It is a murder novel. Murders happen, but who cares?! Who cares?
I'd have been happy if they all died, but I am writing this post COVID while a genocide is happening in real time in Palestine. So I don't know and can't.
I chose to read the book "A Stranger Is Watching" by Mary Higgins Clark. This book follows the story of a man named Steve as well as his son Neil and Steve's girlfriend Sharon. One day when Sharon is watching Neil alone, a mysterious man only calling himself "Foxy" kidnaps them both. From then on, the story follows individual characters ranging from Steve to Sharon and even Foxy himself as Steve tries to save his girlfriend and his son. We are given several viewpoints of the situation through the eyes of multiple characters, so it is interesting to see how they act and react to certain scenarios. This is a suspense thriller that keeps you on the edge of your seat waiting to see what happens next.
What I think is most interesting about this book is the way it gives more than one viewpoint to the situation. You get to see just what is going on inside the head of the kidnapper as well as the lives of those he's changed. There is more than just the kidnapping as well. There is also a sort of murder mystery at hand that, at the beginning of the book may seem to already be solved, but it begins to change as you uncover just what was actually happening all along. The book for the most part succeeds in being suspenseful, however the ending is very abrupt compared to the rest of the book and only serves it's job to end the book. Luckily the book has intriguing characters that keep the book going even in the slower portions. Some of these characters you really begin to sympathize with. Especially Sharon and Neil, who undergo torturous conditions under a very psychotic villain. This is a good book for anyone who likes suspense or who likes murder mystery's.
Suspenseful book to say the least! My first Mary Higgins Clark book and I loved it! Halfway through I realized I wasn鈥檛 putting the book down until it was finished. Of course at this point the book is a tad outdated, but I really liked that it put me in a different time that didn鈥檛 have access to cell phones. Something that would be so easy a fix now couldn鈥檛 have been at that time. My only reasons for not giving a five: 1. I wish there was more character building between Neil, Sharon and Steve. I feel as though it hopped right into the action without having us 鈥榝all in love with the characters鈥�. It didn鈥檛 take enough time to learn their personalities before hopping into the story at hand. 2. I felt as though Arty were such a minor role before they figured out he was the 鈥榖ad guy鈥�, that it wasn鈥檛 much of a wow factor for me. I wish more stories and character development focused on him before revealing his intentions. Therefore, I feel I would have given the book a five if only it were longer and a bit more drawn out.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
Un livre dont les pages tournent toutes seules, bien que l'茅preuve du temps donnent quelques rides au sc茅nario. Quoiqu'il en soit, mon premier Higgins Clark exige de se faire d茅vorer d'un coup, l'intrigue passe 脿 travers le sablier du temps, et le temps est partie prenante du roman. Chaque heure est compt茅e, chaque minute , chaque seconde, jusqu'脿 la toute derni猫re. Malheureusement, 脿 la toute fin, l'auteur tourne les coins tr猫s ronds, tr猫s, tr猫s ronds faisant en sorte que la notion de la dur茅e cr茅e quelques aberrations temporelles. Une minute, 莽a reste une minute et non dix. D猫s lors, on cesse d'y croire, mais il ne reste alors que quelques pages. Comme une bonne s茅rie qu'on 茅coute en rafale durant un week-end pluvieux et qu'on oublie 12 mois plus tard. Entertaining!
A Stranger is Watching by Mary Higgins Clark 3 out of 10 stars Time to read 2:37
PLOT: A Stranger is Watching is a tepid book about a serial killer (who's not at all scary), named Foxy (WTH?). He kills several women, including Nina Peterson, the wife and mother of a small boy. Neil, the boy, inadvertently sees the killing of his mother, and sends 19 year old, Ronald Thompson to prison for a crime he didn't commit. After the conviction, Steve Peterson, Neil's father begins to heal, and goes on talk shows espousing his pro views on capital punishment. He meets Sharon Martin, an activist against executions, and they strike up a relationship. (It is the lamest, saddest attempt at a romantic encounter I've ever read). There's no romance between the couple, Sharon seems indifferent to Steve, even when Clark tries to make her need him. There's eventually a kidnapping, a bomb, and an epic failure in place of a suspenseful crescendo.
REVIEW: Mary Higgins Clark is pure pulp fiction "books about imaginary characters and events, produced in large quantities and intended to be read by many people but not considered to be of very good quality", that describes Clark to a tee. Her writing is good enough for light reading, better than some, worse than others, she does paint a picture of places, people and things.
But the real problem I have with Clark is her two dimensional characters. If you read her books back to back, you begin to see the same characters appear again and again. That can happen to anyone, even Stephen King said he had problems with this, but a decent author should at least try to avoid it. Clark seems to deliberately use her previous character studies, and then she just changes the small details, like names and appearance.
Clark is actually better at creating atmospherics, and I wish she'd focused on that more in her career. Her best book (IMHO) is , and it's because the farm, and surrounding area becomes a character, the most interesting one, and carries the book forward. The characters are slaves to it, it feeds on them in a way, becoming a monster in it's own right. That doesn't happen here, although Clark tries with the dank room the kidnapped couple are held in.
I think Clark's main problem is not understanding the true evil of men. She has no comprehension of what constitutes a real fiendish degenerate, who at his core lies a cacophony of disturbed voices and vile fantasies, that can lead to his striking out at the vulnerable just to ease his sick tensions. And so she fails to scare us, because her descriptions of these men becomes farcical, instead of realistic. They become instead like a paper doll, flat, two dimensional, and with no ability to hurt or frighten us. I mean for God's sake, she named her serial killer "Foxy"!
This leads me to my next problem with all of Clark's books, the women are always victims. They never try to help themselves, they expect a man to come to their rescue. It's pitiful and disgusting, and I expect more from female writers. I know, these books are written, and take place in the 1970's-1980's, but there were strong women then. In this book, Clark tries to pass Sharon Martin off as a hard nosed writer, who travels to dangerous places, chasing stories. But it's just window dressing, and when the chips are down, Sharon actually says to herself, "What was he going to do to me?" She never considers fighting back, she never asks herself, "What am I going to do to him?" She doesn't try to save herself (her attempts are lackluster and pathetic), she simply puts her fate in everyone else's hands. I don't believe both things are true. Either Sharon is a badass, traveling to war zones to get her stories, or she's a sniveling simp. You can't have it both ways.
I've heard lots of Clark's books have been made into tv movies, and I think she would have been more successful writing screenplays. Her stories seem to be made for the small screen, but always fall flat in book form. I'll probably read more of these to fall asleep, that's what they seem to be written for.
For full review, including a review of the book covers: