What do you think?
Rate this book
賲匕賰乇丕鬲 賲賳 丕賱亘賷鬲 丕賱賲賷鬲
賴匕丕 丕賱毓賲賱 丕賱兀丿亘賷 丕賱乇丕卅毓 賴賵 賳鬲丕噩 鬲噩乇亘丞 兀賱賷賲丞 鬲禺賵囟賴丕 毓亘賯乇亘丞 兀丿亘賷丞 亘卮乇賷丞 鬲鬲賲孬賱 賮賷 丕賱賲丐賱賮 丕賱賲亘丿毓 鈥溬佡娰堌堌� 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷鈥� 丕孬乇 丕毓鬲賯丕賱丞 亘爻賷亘乇賷丕 賵 毓賳丿賲丕 賷賵丿毓 卮禺氐 賲丕 丕賱爻噩賳 賵 賱賴 賲孬賱 賴匕賴 丕賱賳賮爻 丕賱賲乇賴賮丞 丕賱乇丕卅毓丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷賲鬲賱賰賴丕 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賵 賰匕賱賰 賷賲鬲賱賰 丕賱丨丕爻丞 丕賱兀丿亘賷丞 賮賷 兀噩賱賶 氐賵乇賴丕 賵 賴賵 賲丕 賷鬲亘丿賶 賮賷 噩賲賷毓 兀毓賲丕賱賴 丕賱兀丿亘賷丞 賮賱丕 亘丿 賵 兀賳 賷賳鬲噩 賲賳 賴匕丕 毓賲賱丕 賸 兀丿亘賷丕 賸 禺丕乇賯丕 賵 賴匕丕 賲丕 賰丕賳 亘丕賱賮毓賱 賮賯丿 賳鬲噩 毓賳 賴匕丕 丕賱鬲夭丕賵噩 亘賷賳 鬲賱賰 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 丕賱丕賳爻丕賳賷丞 丕賱乇賴賷亘丞 賵 丕賯氐丿 亘賴丕 丕賱爻噩賳 賵 鬲賱賰 丕賱毓亘賯乇亘丞 丕賱賲鬲噩賱賷丞 賮賷 賮賰乇 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 兀賳 賵賱丿鬲 鬲賱賰 丕賱乇丕卅毓丞 丕賱兀丿亘賷丞 賵 賴賷 賴匕丕 丕賱毓賲賱 丕賱兀丿亘賷 丕賱毓亘賯乇賷 鈥溬呚百冐必ж� 賲賳 賲賳夭賱 丕賱兀賲賵丕鬲 匕賱賰 丕賱毓賲賱 丕賱匕賷 賷噩賲毓 亘賷賳 賮賳 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賵 丕賱爻賷乇丞 丕賱匕丕鬲賷丞 賵 賰鬲丕亘丞 丕賱賲匕賰乇丕鬲 賵 丕賱鬲丨賱賷賱 丕賱賳賮爻賷 賵 賱賰 兀賳 鬲鬲禺賷賱 毓夭賷夭賷 丕賱賯丕乇卅 毓賳丿賲丕 賷噩鬲賲毓 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賲毓 丕賱賳賲丕匕噩 丕賱賲鬲賳賵毓丞 賲賳 丕賱賲爻噩賵賳賷賳 亘噩乇丕卅賲 賲禺鬲賱賮丞 賮賰賷賮 賷賰賵賳 丕賱毓賲賱 丕賱賳丕鬲丨 毓賳 賴匕丕 ...
448 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1861
3,834 people are currently reading
69.8k people want to read
About the author
Fyodor Dostoevsky
3,092听books66k听followers
肖褢写芯褉 袦懈褏邪泄谢芯胁懈褔 袛芯褋褌芯械胁褋泻懈泄
(Russian)
Works, such as the novels Crime and Punishment (1866), The Idiot (1869), and The Brothers Karamazov (1880), of Russian writer Feodor Mikhailovich Dostoyevsky or Dostoevski combine religious mysticism with profound psychological insight.
Very influential writings of Mikhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin included Problems of Dostoyevsky's Works (1929),
Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky composed short stories, essays, and journals. His literature explores humans in the troubled political, social, and spiritual atmospheres of 19th-century and engages with a variety of philosophies and themes. People most acclaimed his Demons(1872) .
Many literary critics rate him of the greatest of world literature and consider multiple highly influential masterpieces. They consider his Notes from Underground of the first existentialist literature. He also well acts as a philosopher and theologian.
(Russian: 肖褢写芯褉 袦懈褏邪泄谢芯胁懈褔 袛芯褋褌芯械胁褋泻懈泄) (see also Fiodor Dosto茂evski)
Works, such as the novels Crime and Punishment (1866), The Idiot (1869), and The Brothers Karamazov (1880), of Russian writer Feodor Mikhailovich Dostoyevsky or Dostoevski combine religious mysticism with profound psychological insight.
Very influential writings of Mikhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin included Problems of Dostoyevsky's Works (1929),
Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky composed short stories, essays, and journals. His literature explores humans in the troubled political, social, and spiritual atmospheres of 19th-century and engages with a variety of philosophies and themes. People most acclaimed his Demons(1872) .
Many literary critics rate him of the greatest of world literature and consider multiple highly influential masterpieces. They consider his Notes from Underground of the first existentialist literature. He also well acts as a philosopher and theologian.
(Russian: 肖褢写芯褉 袦懈褏邪泄谢芯胁懈褔 袛芯褋褌芯械胁褋泻懈泄) (see also Fiodor Dosto茂evski)
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 2,712 reviews
May 20, 2024
Cancel my subscription to the resurrection鈥� Send my credentials to the house of detention鈥�
The House of the Dead is the chronicle of a prison camp, coming straight from the horse鈥檚 mouth, so to speak. The prison camp is shown as a world within the world 鈥� a hermetic community of the strictest hierarchy, living by its own severe cruel criminal laws.
And on the language side The House of the Dead is one of the lushest books by Fyodor Dostoyevsky.
I am sure that this gloomy experience of incarceration eventually allowed Fyodor Dostoyevsky to penetrate the human nature right to the bottom and to peruse all the darkest nooks and crannies of human consciousness.
Even in incarceration a strong-minded man can keep one鈥檚 soul intact.
Our prison was at the far end of the citadel behind the ramparts. Peering through the crevices in the palisade in the hope of glimpsing something, one sees nothing but a little corner of the sky, and a high earthwork covered with the long grass of the steppe. Night and day sentries walk to and fro upon it. Then one suddenly realizes that whole years will pass during which one will see, through those same crevices in the palisade, the same sentinels pacing the same earthwork, and the same little corner of the sky, not just above the prison, but far and far away.
The House of the Dead is the chronicle of a prison camp, coming straight from the horse鈥檚 mouth, so to speak. The prison camp is shown as a world within the world 鈥� a hermetic community of the strictest hierarchy, living by its own severe cruel criminal laws.
And on the language side The House of the Dead is one of the lushest books by Fyodor Dostoyevsky.
The criminals most cruelly whipped, and who were celebrated as first-rate villains, enjoyed more respect and attention than a simple deserter, a mere recruit, like the one who had just been brought in. But in neither case was any particular sympathy manifested, nor were any annoying remarks made. The unhappy man was attended to in silence, above all if he was incapable of attending to himself. The assistant-surgeon knew that they were entrusting their patients to skilful and experienced hands. The usual treatment consisted in frequent application to the poor fellow鈥檚 back of a shirt or piece of linen steeped in cold water. It was also necessary to extract from his wounds the splinters of the rods which had been broken on his back. This last operation was particularly painful to the victims, and the extraordinary stoicism with which they supported their sufferings astonished me greatly.
I am sure that this gloomy experience of incarceration eventually allowed Fyodor Dostoyevsky to penetrate the human nature right to the bottom and to peruse all the darkest nooks and crannies of human consciousness.
Even in incarceration a strong-minded man can keep one鈥檚 soul intact.
December 14, 2022
鈥淲hat are we here for? We are not alive though we are living and we are not in our graves though we are dead.鈥�
One can measure Dostoevsky only to Dostoevsky. Even when he falls short, he is still brilliant beyond comprehension.
The House of the Dead is fragmented diary of a man convicted to the Siberian prison camp in Czarists Russia after murdering his wife. Often regarded as semi-autobiografical and closely connected to Dostoevsky's prison time that deeply changed him and irreversibly influenced his writing.
The man writing the diary is quiet, distant but sharp observer of prison life. Convicts are often described in a sentence, or paragraph, still containing, in the most condensed form, the essence of their being and the tragedy of their life. Out of his more typical writing, Dostoevsky does not go further into the psychological breakdown of one character, exposing the underlying philosophies and instincts that are the driving forces of the individual, as whole life stories often narrated only in a vignette, described only as factual, without imposing his own keen observation or meaning to it. There is a sense of exhaustion in the narrator in the squalor he finds himself in. He does not have the vigor to examine life - only to document it. In the end, he is in the House of dead, immersed in apathy, where Dostoevskian qualities fade, even in Dostoevsky himself, in which, I, paradoxically, found glimpses of hope and relief. There is dejection in face of the intricacy of life embodied in the prison system, where the narrator both gives up and resists elucidation. Sometimes life becomes so heavy it is impossible to interpret in a coherent manner and all we can do is step away and quietly observe it.
鈥淩eality is infinitely diverse, compared with even the subtlest conclusions of abstract thought, and does not allow of clear-cut and sweeping distinctions. Reality resists classification.鈥�
One can feel that drowsiness the whole time reading the book, which for me, makes it the most difficult Dostoevsky, not due to the intellectual exhaustion, but the emotional.
Nevertheless the basic line of detachment, there is an underlying sense of vastness and complexities of each destiny that only brushes against the main character as he goes on in repetitive and dull camp life. The book has the atmosphere of the life of a prisoner, somewhere between dreariness and cruelty.
I will never stop being attracted to all camp and prison books. The House of the Dead is a prototype for books that endlessly fascinate me like . For me, there is an endless fascination in observing the consistency of the enduring human spirit in the face of extreme suffering, brutality and degradation, which gives motivation for tolerating one's own hardship.
鈥淢an is a creature that can get accustomed to anything, and I think that is the best definition of him.鈥�
What Dostoevsky does best is the erasure of distance between the reader and the disenfranchised, the ones that seem to be far off behind the wire and prison walls, besides the fact that in reality, we can be equally imprisoned as them, even when we are confined only by our own ideas.
鈥淰ery often among a certain highly intelligent type of people, quite paradoxical ideas will establish themselves. But they have suffered so much in their lives for these ideas, and have paid so high a price for them that it becomes very painful, indeed almost impossible, for them to part with them.鈥�
Much of the writing is about the psychological tension of imprisonment by others, in a state where the personal agency is stripped of you, where in a sense, you get used to being shiftless.
鈥淥ften a man endures for several years, submits and suffers the cruelest punishments, and then suddenly breaks out over some minute trifle, almost nothing at all.鈥�
Aggressive and murderous instincts, power and crime in one situation, guilt, weakness, punishment or injustice and suffering by the hands of sadists in another, is something that entails universal drama of human life, no matter what side of the wall we find ourselves on.
Dostoevsky gets more in his usual depth in describing the rise of tyranny in one鈥檚 psyche, the intoxication it offers, the profound drug that is hard to resist, and the indefinite power to hurt another human being and have complete power over them, most accurately manifested in the prison system of corporal punishment, which was by far a most striking chapter for me in depicting how physical violence changes the core of the psychological structure.
鈥淲hoever has experienced the power and the unrestrained ability to humiliate another human being automatically loses his own sensations. Tyranny is a habit which may be developed until at last it becomes a disease. I declare that the noblest nature can become so hardened and bestial that nothing distinguishes it from that of a wild animal. Blood and power intoxicate; they help to develop callousness and debauchery. The mind then becomes capable of the most abnormal cruelty, which it regards pleasure; the man and the citizen are swallowed up in the tyrant; and the return to human dignity, repentance, moral resurrection, becomes almost impossible.鈥�
But in the spirit of his legacy, Dostoevsky does not give up hope in the remains of good in every person, no matter the degree of corruption or abasement, which makes his writing profoundly sanguine even in the depths of dreariness.
Dostoevsky is both the titan of thought and one of us, small and disfranchised, left in the grace and mercy of his own tragic destiny and he writes not to erase anguish, but to give it the most profound depth, even only in detached observing, and to give us strength to endure it.
鈥淗ere is the world to which I am condemned, in which, despite myself, I must somehow live.鈥�
One can measure Dostoevsky only to Dostoevsky. Even when he falls short, he is still brilliant beyond comprehension.
The House of the Dead is fragmented diary of a man convicted to the Siberian prison camp in Czarists Russia after murdering his wife. Often regarded as semi-autobiografical and closely connected to Dostoevsky's prison time that deeply changed him and irreversibly influenced his writing.
The man writing the diary is quiet, distant but sharp observer of prison life. Convicts are often described in a sentence, or paragraph, still containing, in the most condensed form, the essence of their being and the tragedy of their life. Out of his more typical writing, Dostoevsky does not go further into the psychological breakdown of one character, exposing the underlying philosophies and instincts that are the driving forces of the individual, as whole life stories often narrated only in a vignette, described only as factual, without imposing his own keen observation or meaning to it. There is a sense of exhaustion in the narrator in the squalor he finds himself in. He does not have the vigor to examine life - only to document it. In the end, he is in the House of dead, immersed in apathy, where Dostoevskian qualities fade, even in Dostoevsky himself, in which, I, paradoxically, found glimpses of hope and relief. There is dejection in face of the intricacy of life embodied in the prison system, where the narrator both gives up and resists elucidation. Sometimes life becomes so heavy it is impossible to interpret in a coherent manner and all we can do is step away and quietly observe it.
鈥淩eality is infinitely diverse, compared with even the subtlest conclusions of abstract thought, and does not allow of clear-cut and sweeping distinctions. Reality resists classification.鈥�
One can feel that drowsiness the whole time reading the book, which for me, makes it the most difficult Dostoevsky, not due to the intellectual exhaustion, but the emotional.
Nevertheless the basic line of detachment, there is an underlying sense of vastness and complexities of each destiny that only brushes against the main character as he goes on in repetitive and dull camp life. The book has the atmosphere of the life of a prisoner, somewhere between dreariness and cruelty.
I will never stop being attracted to all camp and prison books. The House of the Dead is a prototype for books that endlessly fascinate me like . For me, there is an endless fascination in observing the consistency of the enduring human spirit in the face of extreme suffering, brutality and degradation, which gives motivation for tolerating one's own hardship.
鈥淢an is a creature that can get accustomed to anything, and I think that is the best definition of him.鈥�
What Dostoevsky does best is the erasure of distance between the reader and the disenfranchised, the ones that seem to be far off behind the wire and prison walls, besides the fact that in reality, we can be equally imprisoned as them, even when we are confined only by our own ideas.
鈥淰ery often among a certain highly intelligent type of people, quite paradoxical ideas will establish themselves. But they have suffered so much in their lives for these ideas, and have paid so high a price for them that it becomes very painful, indeed almost impossible, for them to part with them.鈥�
Much of the writing is about the psychological tension of imprisonment by others, in a state where the personal agency is stripped of you, where in a sense, you get used to being shiftless.
鈥淥ften a man endures for several years, submits and suffers the cruelest punishments, and then suddenly breaks out over some minute trifle, almost nothing at all.鈥�
Aggressive and murderous instincts, power and crime in one situation, guilt, weakness, punishment or injustice and suffering by the hands of sadists in another, is something that entails universal drama of human life, no matter what side of the wall we find ourselves on.
Dostoevsky gets more in his usual depth in describing the rise of tyranny in one鈥檚 psyche, the intoxication it offers, the profound drug that is hard to resist, and the indefinite power to hurt another human being and have complete power over them, most accurately manifested in the prison system of corporal punishment, which was by far a most striking chapter for me in depicting how physical violence changes the core of the psychological structure.
鈥淲hoever has experienced the power and the unrestrained ability to humiliate another human being automatically loses his own sensations. Tyranny is a habit which may be developed until at last it becomes a disease. I declare that the noblest nature can become so hardened and bestial that nothing distinguishes it from that of a wild animal. Blood and power intoxicate; they help to develop callousness and debauchery. The mind then becomes capable of the most abnormal cruelty, which it regards pleasure; the man and the citizen are swallowed up in the tyrant; and the return to human dignity, repentance, moral resurrection, becomes almost impossible.鈥�
But in the spirit of his legacy, Dostoevsky does not give up hope in the remains of good in every person, no matter the degree of corruption or abasement, which makes his writing profoundly sanguine even in the depths of dreariness.
Dostoevsky is both the titan of thought and one of us, small and disfranchised, left in the grace and mercy of his own tragic destiny and he writes not to erase anguish, but to give it the most profound depth, even only in detached observing, and to give us strength to endure it.
鈥淗ere is the world to which I am condemned, in which, despite myself, I must somehow live.鈥�
August 19, 2021
袟邪锌懈褋泻懈 懈蟹 袦褢褉褌胁芯谐芯 写芯屑邪 = Zapiski iz Myortvovo doma= Souvenirs de Ia maison des morts = The House of the Dead = Memoirs from the House of The Dead, Fyodor Dostoyevsky
The House of the Dead is a semi-autobiographical novel published in 1860鈥�2 in the journal Vremya by Russian author Fyodor Dostoevsky, which portrays the life of convicts in a Siberian prison camp.
The novel has also been published under the titles Memoirs from the House of The Dead, Notes from the Dead House (or Notes from a Dead House), and Notes from the House of the Dead.
The book is a loosely-knit collection of facts, events and philosophical discussion organised by "theme" rather than as a continuous story. Dostoevsky himself spent four years in exile in such a camp following his conviction for involvement in the Petrashevsky Circle.
This experience allowed him to describe with great authenticity the conditions of prison life and the characters of the convicts.
The narrator, Aleksandr Petrovich Goryanchikov, has been sentenced to penalty deportation to Siberia and ten years of hard labour for murdering his wife.
Life in prison is particularly hard for Aleksandr Petrovich, since he is a "gentleman" and suffers the malice of the other prisoners, nearly all of whom belong to the peasantry.
Gradually Goryanchikov overcomes his revulsion at his situation and his fellow convicts, undergoing a spiritual re-awakening that culminates with his release from the camp.
It is a work of great humanity; Dostoevsky portrays the inmates of the prison with sympathy for their plight, and also expresses admiration for their energy, ingenuity and talent.
He concludes that the existence of the prison, with its absurd practices and savage corporal punishments is a tragic fact, both for the prisoners and for Russia.
毓賳賵丕賳賴丕蹖 趩丕倬 卮丿賴 丿乇 丕蹖乇丕賳: 芦禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 賲乇丿诏丕賳禄貨 芦禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 丕賲賵丕鬲禄貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 賮卅賵丿賵乇 賲蹖禺丕卅蹖賱賵蹖趩 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖貨 鬲丕乇蹖禺 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 禺賵丕賳卮 丿乇 爻丕賱 1969賲蹖賱丕丿蹖
毓賳賵丕賳: 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 賲乇丿诏丕賳貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 賮卅賵丿賵乇 賲蹖禺丕卅蹖賱賵蹖趩 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 賲丨賲丿噩毓賮乇 賲丨噩賵亘貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 丕賲蹖乇讴亘蹖乇貙 1335貨 丿乇 432氐貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 讴鬲丕亘賴丕蹖 噩蹖亘蹖貙 趩丕倬 丿賵賲 1341貙 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 丌賲賵賳貙 1366貙 丿乇 431氐貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 丌賲賵賳貙 1391貨 丿乇 402氐貨 卮丕亘讴 978964663821貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 毓賱賲蹖 賮乇賴賳诏蹖貙 1394貨 丿乇 亘蹖爻鬲 賵 爻賴 賵 629氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9786001215995貨 賲賵囟賵毓: 丿丕爻鬲丕賳賴丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 乇賵爻蹖賴 - 爻丿賴 19賲
毓賳賵丕賳: 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 蹖 賲乇丿诏丕賳貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 賮卅賵丿賵乇 賲蹖禺丕卅蹖賱賵蹖趩 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 倬乇賵蹖夭 卮賴丿蹖貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賲噩蹖丿貙 賳卮乇 亘賴 爻禺賳貙 趩丕倬 丿賵賲 1392貨 丿乇424氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9789644530388貨
毓賳賵丕賳: 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 丕賲賵丕鬲貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 賮卅賵丿賵乇 賲蹖禺丕卅蹖賱賵蹖趩 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 賲賴乇丿丕丿 賲賴乇蹖賳貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 丿乇蹖丕貙 亘賳诏丕賴 賴丿丕蹖鬲貙 趩丕倬 丿賵賲 1341貙 丿乇328氐貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 诏賳噩蹖賳賴貙 1370貨 丿乇 320氐貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇: 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賳诏丕賴貙 1389貙 丿乇 390氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9789643515294貨
賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 亘丕乇 丕蹖賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 乇丕貙 丿乇 賲爻丕賮乇禺丕賳賴 蹖 芦禺丕賯丕賳蹖 鬲亘乇蹖夭禄貙 丿乇 爻丕賱賴丕蹖 丿賴賴 蹖 趩賴賱 賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖 禺賵丕賳丿賴 丕賲貙 丕賱亘鬲賴 亘丕乇賴丕 倬爻 丕夭 丌賳乇賵夭 賳蹖夭貙 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 禺賵丕賳丿賴 丕賲貙 鬲丕 亘賱讴賴 丕夭 丕爻乇丕乇 丿乇賵賳蹖貙 賵 乇賳噩 亘卮乇 讴賲蹖 丌诏丕賴 卮賵賲貨 芦鬲賵乇诏賳蹖賮禄貙 倬丕乇賴 丕蹖 丕夭 賯爻賲鬲賴丕蹖 芦禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 丕賲賵丕鬲 (禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 蹖 賲乇丿诏丕賳)禄 芦丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖禄 乇丕貙 亘丕 芦丿賵夭禺 丿丕賳鬲賴禄貙 亘乇丕亘乇 賳賴丕丿賴 丕賳丿貨 芦丕賲倬乇丕胤賵乇 賳蹖讴賱丕禄貙 賲賵爻爻 芦禺丕賳賴 蹖 丕賲賵丕鬲禄貙 丌賳诏丕賴 讴賴 賴賲蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 禺賵丕賳丿賳丿貙 诏乇蹖賴 讴乇丿賳丿貨 芦丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖禄貙 倬爻 丕夭 亘丕夭诏卮鬲 丕夭 夭賳丿丕賳 趩賴丕乇 爻丕賱賴貙 丿蹖诏乇 丕賲蹖丿蹖 亘賴 亘卮乇 賳丿丕卮鬲賳丿貨 丿蹖诏乇 丌賳 賲乇丿 卮丕丿 賵 賲亘丕乇夭 禺賳丿丕賳 倬蹖卮蹖賳 賳亘賵丿賳丿貨 亘賴 诏賮鬲賴 蹖 禺賵丿 丕蹖卮丕賳貙 丿乇 毓乇囟 趩賴丕乇 爻丕賱 夭賳丿賴 亘賴 诏賵乇 卮丿賴 亘賵丿賳丿貨 賲乇诏 丕噩亘丕乇蹖貙 趩賳丕賳 丕蹖卮丕賳 乇丕 賮賱噩 讴乇丿賴 亘賵丿貙 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 乇賴丕蹖蹖 賵 诏乇蹖夭 丕夭 丿乇丿 睾賲貙 诏丕賴蹖 噩夭 賲蹖禺賵丕乇蹖 賵 賯賲丕乇貙 乇丕賴蹖 賳賲蹖蹖丕賮鬲賳丿貨 賲乇丿 鬲蹖乇賴 乇賵夭蹖 卮丿賴 亘賵丿賳丿貨 夭賳丿诏蹖卮丕賳 亘蹖卮鬲乇 亘賴 蹖讴 丌鬲卮 爻賵夭蹖 賲丿賴賵卮 讴賳賳丿賴 卮亘蹖賴 亘賵丿貨 丌鬲卮蹖 讴賴 噩賵賴乇 賵噩賵丿 丕蹖卮丕賳 乇丕 亘賴 禺丕讴爻鬲乇 鬲亘丿蹖賱 讴乇丿賴 亘賵丿
趩讴蹖丿賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳: 芦丕賱讴爻丕賳丿乇 倬鬲乇賵賵蹖趩禄 蹖讴 賳噩蹖亘鈥� 夭丕丿賴 蹖 芦乇賵爻禄 亘賵丿貨 丕賵 亘乇 丕孬乇 丨爻丕丿鬲貙 賴賲爻乇 禺賵蹖卮 乇丕 讴卮鬲貙 賵 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘賴 倬賱蹖爻 賲毓乇賮蹖 讴乇丿貨 倬賱蹖爻 丕賵 乇丕 亘賴 丿賴 爻丕賱 丨亘爻 亘丕 丕毓賲丕賱 卮丕賯賴 丿乇 芦爻蹖亘乇蹖禄貙 賲丨讴賵賲 讴乇丿貙 賵 倬爻 丕夭 倬丕蹖丕賳 丌賳 賲丿鬲貙 丕賵 亘賴 丕賯丕賲鬲诏丕賴 賲丨讴賵賲蹖賳貙 賵丕賯毓 丿乇 卮賴乇 芦讴禄 賮乇爻鬲丕丿賴 卮丿貙 鬲丕 毓賲乇 禺賵丿 乇丕貙 丿乇 丌賳鈥屫� 亘賴 倬丕蹖丕賳 丌賵乇丿貨 蹖毓賳蹖 丕賵 亘賴 蹖讴 讴賵賱賵賳蹖 賲丨讴賵賲蹖賳貙 讴賴 讴賲蹖 丿賵乇鬲乇 丕夭 卮賴乇 賵丕賯毓 卮丿賴 亘賵丿貙 鬲毓賱賯 丿丕卮鬲貙 丕賲丕 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗀池� 丿乇 卮賴乇 芦讴禄 亘賴 爻乇 亘乇丿貨 丕賵 丿乇 丌賳 卮賴乇 亘丕 鬲丿乇蹖爻 夭亘丕賳 芦賮乇丕賳爻賴禄 賵...貨 賱賯賲賴鈥� 賳丕賳蹖 亘賴 丿爻鬲 賲蹖鈥屫①堌必� 丕賱亘鬲賴 鬲丿乇蹖爻 亘乇丕蹖 賲丨讴賵賲蹖賳貙 丿乇 卮賴乇賴丕蹖 芦爻蹖亘乇蹖禄 丕賲乇蹖 亘毓蹖丿 賳亘賵丿貙 夭蹖乇丕 讴爻蹖 睾蹖乇 丕夭 丌賳賴丕貙 丕夭 夭亘丕賳 芦賮乇丕賳爻賴禄貙 賵 乇卮鬲賴鈥� 賴丕蹖 鬲毓賱蹖賲 賵 鬲乇亘蹖鬲貙 丌诏丕賴蹖 賳丿丕卮鬲貨 芦禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 蹖 丕賲賵丕鬲禄貙 丕孬乇 芦丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖禄貙 亘賴 爻乇诏匕卮鬲 丿賴 爻丕賱賴 蹖 芦丕賱讴爻丕賳丿乇 倬鬲乇賵賵蹖趩禄貙 丿乇 夭賳丿丕賳 亘丕 丕毓賲丕賱 卮丕賯賴貙 丕禺鬲氐丕氐 蹖丕賮鬲賴鈥� 丕爻鬲貨 芦丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖禄 丿乇 亘禺卮蹖 丕夭 丕蹖賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳貙 賲丕噩乇丕蹖 賲丨亘賵亘蹖鬲 禺賵丿貙 丿乇 夭賳丿丕賳 芦爻蹖亘乇蹖禄 乇丕 賳蹖夭 卮乇丨 賲蹖鈥屫囐嗀� 賵 囟賲賳 賲毓乇賮蹖 夭賳丿丕賳蹖丕賳 丿蹖诏乇貙 爻乇诏匕卮鬲 睾賲鈥屫з嗂屫� 丌賳賴丕 乇丕貙 亘賴 胤乇夭蹖 亘丿蹖毓貙 丨讴丕蹖鬲 賲蹖讴賳賳丿貙 賵 倬乇丿賴 丕夭 亘乇禺蹖 丕爻乇丕乇 丿乇賵賳蹖 丕賳爻丕賳 亘乇賲蹖鈥屫ж辟嗀�
鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴賳诏丕賲 乇爻丕賳蹖 03/06/1399賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 27/05/1400賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
The House of the Dead is a semi-autobiographical novel published in 1860鈥�2 in the journal Vremya by Russian author Fyodor Dostoevsky, which portrays the life of convicts in a Siberian prison camp.
The novel has also been published under the titles Memoirs from the House of The Dead, Notes from the Dead House (or Notes from a Dead House), and Notes from the House of the Dead.
The book is a loosely-knit collection of facts, events and philosophical discussion organised by "theme" rather than as a continuous story. Dostoevsky himself spent four years in exile in such a camp following his conviction for involvement in the Petrashevsky Circle.
This experience allowed him to describe with great authenticity the conditions of prison life and the characters of the convicts.
The narrator, Aleksandr Petrovich Goryanchikov, has been sentenced to penalty deportation to Siberia and ten years of hard labour for murdering his wife.
Life in prison is particularly hard for Aleksandr Petrovich, since he is a "gentleman" and suffers the malice of the other prisoners, nearly all of whom belong to the peasantry.
Gradually Goryanchikov overcomes his revulsion at his situation and his fellow convicts, undergoing a spiritual re-awakening that culminates with his release from the camp.
It is a work of great humanity; Dostoevsky portrays the inmates of the prison with sympathy for their plight, and also expresses admiration for their energy, ingenuity and talent.
He concludes that the existence of the prison, with its absurd practices and savage corporal punishments is a tragic fact, both for the prisoners and for Russia.
毓賳賵丕賳賴丕蹖 趩丕倬 卮丿賴 丿乇 丕蹖乇丕賳: 芦禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 賲乇丿诏丕賳禄貨 芦禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 丕賲賵丕鬲禄貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 賮卅賵丿賵乇 賲蹖禺丕卅蹖賱賵蹖趩 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖貨 鬲丕乇蹖禺 賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 禺賵丕賳卮 丿乇 爻丕賱 1969賲蹖賱丕丿蹖
毓賳賵丕賳: 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 賲乇丿诏丕賳貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 賮卅賵丿賵乇 賲蹖禺丕卅蹖賱賵蹖趩 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 賲丨賲丿噩毓賮乇 賲丨噩賵亘貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 丕賲蹖乇讴亘蹖乇貙 1335貨 丿乇 432氐貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 讴鬲丕亘賴丕蹖 噩蹖亘蹖貙 趩丕倬 丿賵賲 1341貙 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 丌賲賵賳貙 1366貙 丿乇 431氐貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 丌賲賵賳貙 1391貨 丿乇 402氐貨 卮丕亘讴 978964663821貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 毓賱賲蹖 賮乇賴賳诏蹖貙 1394貨 丿乇 亘蹖爻鬲 賵 爻賴 賵 629氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9786001215995貨 賲賵囟賵毓: 丿丕爻鬲丕賳賴丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 乇賵爻蹖賴 - 爻丿賴 19賲
毓賳賵丕賳: 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 蹖 賲乇丿诏丕賳貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 賮卅賵丿賵乇 賲蹖禺丕卅蹖賱賵蹖趩 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 倬乇賵蹖夭 卮賴丿蹖貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賲噩蹖丿貙 賳卮乇 亘賴 爻禺賳貙 趩丕倬 丿賵賲 1392貨 丿乇424氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9789644530388貨
毓賳賵丕賳: 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 丕賲賵丕鬲貨 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴: 賮卅賵丿賵乇 賲蹖禺丕卅蹖賱賵蹖趩 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖貨 賲鬲乇噩賲: 賲賴乇丿丕丿 賲賴乇蹖賳貨 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 丿乇蹖丕貙 亘賳诏丕賴 賴丿丕蹖鬲貙 趩丕倬 丿賵賲 1341貙 丿乇328氐貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 诏賳噩蹖賳賴貙 1370貨 丿乇 320氐貨 趩丕倬 丿蹖诏乇: 鬲賴乇丕賳貙 賳诏丕賴貙 1389貙 丿乇 390氐貨 卮丕亘讴 9789643515294貨
賳禺爻鬲蹖賳 亘丕乇 丕蹖賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 乇丕貙 丿乇 賲爻丕賮乇禺丕賳賴 蹖 芦禺丕賯丕賳蹖 鬲亘乇蹖夭禄貙 丿乇 爻丕賱賴丕蹖 丿賴賴 蹖 趩賴賱 賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖 禺賵丕賳丿賴 丕賲貙 丕賱亘鬲賴 亘丕乇賴丕 倬爻 丕夭 丌賳乇賵夭 賳蹖夭貙 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 禺賵丕賳丿賴 丕賲貙 鬲丕 亘賱讴賴 丕夭 丕爻乇丕乇 丿乇賵賳蹖貙 賵 乇賳噩 亘卮乇 讴賲蹖 丌诏丕賴 卮賵賲貨 芦鬲賵乇诏賳蹖賮禄貙 倬丕乇賴 丕蹖 丕夭 賯爻賲鬲賴丕蹖 芦禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 丕賲賵丕鬲 (禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 蹖 賲乇丿诏丕賳)禄 芦丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖禄 乇丕貙 亘丕 芦丿賵夭禺 丿丕賳鬲賴禄貙 亘乇丕亘乇 賳賴丕丿賴 丕賳丿貨 芦丕賲倬乇丕胤賵乇 賳蹖讴賱丕禄貙 賲賵爻爻 芦禺丕賳賴 蹖 丕賲賵丕鬲禄貙 丌賳诏丕賴 讴賴 賴賲蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 禺賵丕賳丿賳丿貙 诏乇蹖賴 讴乇丿賳丿貨 芦丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖禄貙 倬爻 丕夭 亘丕夭诏卮鬲 丕夭 夭賳丿丕賳 趩賴丕乇 爻丕賱賴貙 丿蹖诏乇 丕賲蹖丿蹖 亘賴 亘卮乇 賳丿丕卮鬲賳丿貨 丿蹖诏乇 丌賳 賲乇丿 卮丕丿 賵 賲亘丕乇夭 禺賳丿丕賳 倬蹖卮蹖賳 賳亘賵丿賳丿貨 亘賴 诏賮鬲賴 蹖 禺賵丿 丕蹖卮丕賳貙 丿乇 毓乇囟 趩賴丕乇 爻丕賱 夭賳丿賴 亘賴 诏賵乇 卮丿賴 亘賵丿賳丿貨 賲乇诏 丕噩亘丕乇蹖貙 趩賳丕賳 丕蹖卮丕賳 乇丕 賮賱噩 讴乇丿賴 亘賵丿貙 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 乇賴丕蹖蹖 賵 诏乇蹖夭 丕夭 丿乇丿 睾賲貙 诏丕賴蹖 噩夭 賲蹖禺賵丕乇蹖 賵 賯賲丕乇貙 乇丕賴蹖 賳賲蹖蹖丕賮鬲賳丿貨 賲乇丿 鬲蹖乇賴 乇賵夭蹖 卮丿賴 亘賵丿賳丿貨 夭賳丿诏蹖卮丕賳 亘蹖卮鬲乇 亘賴 蹖讴 丌鬲卮 爻賵夭蹖 賲丿賴賵卮 讴賳賳丿賴 卮亘蹖賴 亘賵丿貨 丌鬲卮蹖 讴賴 噩賵賴乇 賵噩賵丿 丕蹖卮丕賳 乇丕 亘賴 禺丕讴爻鬲乇 鬲亘丿蹖賱 讴乇丿賴 亘賵丿
趩讴蹖丿賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳: 芦丕賱讴爻丕賳丿乇 倬鬲乇賵賵蹖趩禄 蹖讴 賳噩蹖亘鈥� 夭丕丿賴 蹖 芦乇賵爻禄 亘賵丿貨 丕賵 亘乇 丕孬乇 丨爻丕丿鬲貙 賴賲爻乇 禺賵蹖卮 乇丕 讴卮鬲貙 賵 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘賴 倬賱蹖爻 賲毓乇賮蹖 讴乇丿貨 倬賱蹖爻 丕賵 乇丕 亘賴 丿賴 爻丕賱 丨亘爻 亘丕 丕毓賲丕賱 卮丕賯賴 丿乇 芦爻蹖亘乇蹖禄貙 賲丨讴賵賲 讴乇丿貙 賵 倬爻 丕夭 倬丕蹖丕賳 丌賳 賲丿鬲貙 丕賵 亘賴 丕賯丕賲鬲诏丕賴 賲丨讴賵賲蹖賳貙 賵丕賯毓 丿乇 卮賴乇 芦讴禄 賮乇爻鬲丕丿賴 卮丿貙 鬲丕 毓賲乇 禺賵丿 乇丕貙 丿乇 丌賳鈥屫� 亘賴 倬丕蹖丕賳 丌賵乇丿貨 蹖毓賳蹖 丕賵 亘賴 蹖讴 讴賵賱賵賳蹖 賲丨讴賵賲蹖賳貙 讴賴 讴賲蹖 丿賵乇鬲乇 丕夭 卮賴乇 賵丕賯毓 卮丿賴 亘賵丿貙 鬲毓賱賯 丿丕卮鬲貙 丕賲丕 賲蹖鈥屫堌з嗀池� 丿乇 卮賴乇 芦讴禄 亘賴 爻乇 亘乇丿貨 丕賵 丿乇 丌賳 卮賴乇 亘丕 鬲丿乇蹖爻 夭亘丕賳 芦賮乇丕賳爻賴禄 賵...貨 賱賯賲賴鈥� 賳丕賳蹖 亘賴 丿爻鬲 賲蹖鈥屫①堌必� 丕賱亘鬲賴 鬲丿乇蹖爻 亘乇丕蹖 賲丨讴賵賲蹖賳貙 丿乇 卮賴乇賴丕蹖 芦爻蹖亘乇蹖禄 丕賲乇蹖 亘毓蹖丿 賳亘賵丿貙 夭蹖乇丕 讴爻蹖 睾蹖乇 丕夭 丌賳賴丕貙 丕夭 夭亘丕賳 芦賮乇丕賳爻賴禄貙 賵 乇卮鬲賴鈥� 賴丕蹖 鬲毓賱蹖賲 賵 鬲乇亘蹖鬲貙 丌诏丕賴蹖 賳丿丕卮鬲貨 芦禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 蹖 丕賲賵丕鬲禄貙 丕孬乇 芦丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖禄貙 亘賴 爻乇诏匕卮鬲 丿賴 爻丕賱賴 蹖 芦丕賱讴爻丕賳丿乇 倬鬲乇賵賵蹖趩禄貙 丿乇 夭賳丿丕賳 亘丕 丕毓賲丕賱 卮丕賯賴貙 丕禺鬲氐丕氐 蹖丕賮鬲賴鈥� 丕爻鬲貨 芦丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵爻讴蹖禄 丿乇 亘禺卮蹖 丕夭 丕蹖賳 丿丕爻鬲丕賳貙 賲丕噩乇丕蹖 賲丨亘賵亘蹖鬲 禺賵丿貙 丿乇 夭賳丿丕賳 芦爻蹖亘乇蹖禄 乇丕 賳蹖夭 卮乇丨 賲蹖鈥屫囐嗀� 賵 囟賲賳 賲毓乇賮蹖 夭賳丿丕賳蹖丕賳 丿蹖诏乇貙 爻乇诏匕卮鬲 睾賲鈥屫з嗂屫� 丌賳賴丕 乇丕貙 亘賴 胤乇夭蹖 亘丿蹖毓貙 丨讴丕蹖鬲 賲蹖讴賳賳丿貙 賵 倬乇丿賴 丕夭 亘乇禺蹖 丕爻乇丕乇 丿乇賵賳蹖 丕賳爻丕賳 亘乇賲蹖鈥屫ж辟嗀�
鬲丕乇蹖禺 亘賴賳诏丕賲 乇爻丕賳蹖 03/06/1399賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 27/05/1400賴噩乇蹖 禺賵乇卮蹖丿蹖貨 丕. 卮乇亘蹖丕賳蹖
February 12, 2016
賰賳鬲 兀卮毓乇 賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱兀賷丕賲 亘囟賷賯 卮丿賷丿 賮鬲賳丕賵賱鬲 賰鬲丕亘 "匕賰乇賷丕鬲 賲賳 賲賳夭賱 丕賱兀賲賵丕鬲" 賮兀毓丿鬲 賯乇丕亍鬲賴. 賰賳鬲 賯丿 賳爻賷鬲 賰孬賷乇賸丕 賲賳賴貙 賮賱賲丕 兀毓丿鬲 賯乇丕亍鬲賴 兀賷賯賳鬲 兀賳 賱賷爻 賮賷 丕賱兀丿亘 丕賱噩丿賷丿 賰賱賴 賰鬲丕亘 賵丕丨丿 賷賮賵賯賴貙 丨鬲賶 賵賱丕 賰購鬲亘 亘賵卮賰賷賳
賱賷爻鬲 丕賱賳亘乇丞 賴賷 丕賱卮賷亍 丕賱乇丕卅毓 賮賷賴貙 亘賱 賵噩賴丞 丕賱賳馗乇 丕賱鬲賷 賷卮鬲賲賱 毓賱賷賴丕貨 廿賳賴 氐丕丿賯 胤亘賷毓賷 賲爻賷丨賷貙 廿賳賴 賰鬲丕亘 賷毓賱賾賲 丕賱丿賷賳
.賮廿匕丕 乇兀賷鬲 丿賵爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賮賯賱 賱賴 兀賳賷 兀丨亘賴
丨爻賳賸丕 兀賳丕 兀睾亘胤 鬲賵賱爻鬲賵賷 賵兀丨爻丿賴貙 毓賱賶 丕賱兀賯賱 賵噩丿 賲賳 爻賷禺亘乇 丿賵爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 亘丨亘賴.
賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞貙 丿賵爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賴購賳丕 丌禺乇
賱賷爻 賰廿賳爻丕賳 亘丕賱胤亘毓貙 賮賲丕 夭丕賱 賴賵 丕賱乇賵丨 丕賱鬲賷 賱賲 兀噩丿 賮賷 廿賳爻丕賳賷鬲賴丕 亘毓丿
賵賲丕 夭丕賱 卮毓賵乇賴 亘兀賱賲 賵賲毓丕賳丕丞 賰賱 賲賳 丨賵賱賴 丨鬲賶 丕賱丨賷賵丕賳丕鬲貙 賱賲 兀乇賽 賲孬賷賱賴 賯胤!
賱賰賳 丿賵爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賴購賳丕 賲禺鬲賱賮 賰兀丿賷亘貙 乇亘賲丕 賱丕禺鬲賱丕賮 胤丕亘毓 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞貨 賮賴賷 賴購賳丕 賱丕 鬲毓丿賵 賰賵賳賴丕 賲匕賰乇丕鬲貨 賱賷爻鬲 乇賵丕賷丞 亘亘丿丕賷丞 賵毓賯丿丞 賵賳賴丕賷丞 賰丕賱乇賵丕賷丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 賯乇兀鬲賴丕 賱賴 賲賳 賯亘賱
賵賱賷爻 賴丕 賴購賳丕 卮禺氐賷丕鬲 賴匕賷丕賳賷丞 賵兀丨丿丕孬 睾乇賷亘丞 丕賱兀胤賵丕乇 賰賲丕 賮賷 丕賱爻丕亘賯
乇亘賲丕 賱兀賳 丕賱賲匕賰乇丕鬲 賲賳 氐賲賷賲 賵丕賯毓賴 丕賱賲乇賷乇貙 賱賲 賷購賰賳 賴賳丕賰 孬賲丞 賲爻丕丨丞 賰賷 賷賱賴賵 丕賱禺賷丕賱 亘丿丕禺賱賴丕!
賮賯胤 丕賱兀賱賲 賲賳 賰丕賳 賷鬲丨乇賰 亘丨乇賷丞 賵賰賽亘乇 賴丕 賴賳丕
賱丕 爻賷賲丕 賵氐賮賴 賱丨馗丕鬲 噩賱丿 丕賱亘毓囟 亘丕賱爻賷丕胤貙 賵丕賱賲乇囟 賵丕賱賲賵鬲.. 廿賱禺
氐丿賯賸丕 賱丕 兀毓賱賲 賱賲 賯丕賱 丿賵爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 兀賳 賲匕賰乇丕鬲賴 賲賳 賲賳夭賱 丕賱兀賲賵丕鬲責
兀賷賾 兀賲賵丕鬲責 賯乇兀鬲賴丕 賵兀賳賴賷鬲賴丕 丿賵賳 兀毓賱賲 廿噩丕亘丞 丕賱爻丐丕賱責
兀乇丕賴賲 賷賮賷囟賵賳 丨賲丕爻丞貙 噩賳賵賳貙 卮睾賮 丨鬲賶 賵廿賳 賰丕賳 賴匕丕 丕賱卮睾賮 賱賱丨乇賷丞 丕賱賲爻賱賵亘丞
賷毓賲賱賵賳貙 兀毓賲丕賱 (兀卮睾丕賱) 卮丕賯丞 賴匕丕 賲賳 兀噩賱 丕賱爻噩賳
孬賲 賷賵丕氐賱賵賳 丕賱毓賲賱 賱賷賱丕賸貙 賵賴匕丕 賲賳 兀噩賱 噩賲毓 賲丕賱 禺丕氐 亘賴賲
孬賲 賷賳賮賯賵賳賴貙 孬賲 賷毓賲賱賵賳貙 孬賲 賷賵丕氐賱賵賳 丕賱毓賲賱...
賷禺鬲乇毓賵賳 賵賷亘鬲賰乇賵賳 兀卮賷丕亍 賱賱鬲乇賮賷賴 賵鬲賲囟賷丞 丕賱賵賯鬲 (鬲賲孬賷賱 賲爻乇丨賷丞)貙 賵賱丕 亘兀爻 亘亘毓囟 丕賱賲卮丕噩乇丕鬲 (噩丿賾賷丞 賵睾賷乇 噩丿賾賷丞) 賱鬲賲囟賷丞 丕賱賵賯鬲
賴丐賱丕亍 賷毓賷卮賵賳 賲賳 兀噩賱 卮賷亍 賲丕 (丕賱丨乇賷丞) 賵賮賷 丕賳鬲馗丕乇賴 賷毓賲賱賵賳貙 賵賱丕 賷鬲賵賯賮賵賳 毓賳 丕賱毓賲賱..
賵丕賱賱賴 廿賳賳丕 賳丨賳 丕賱兀賲賵丕鬲貙 賳丨賳 丕賱匕賷賳 賳毓賷卮 賮賷 丕賱賱丕卮賷亍貙 賳賮毓賱 丕賱賱丕卮賷亍貙 賮賷 丕賳鬲馗丕乇 丕賱賱丕卮賷亍貙 丕賱匕賷 賱賳 賷兀鬲賷 亘丕賱胤亘毓!
賴匕丕 亘丕賱鬲兀賰賷丿 賱丕 賷毓賳賷賾 兀賳 丨賷丕鬲賴賲 賮賷 兀賮囟賱 丨丕賱貙 丕賱爻噩賳 賮賷 賰賱 丕賱兀丨賵丕賱 賷馗賱 爻噩賳賸丕!
卮毓賵乇 賱丕 賷毓賱賲賴 廿賱丕 丕賱賱賴貙 賵賲賳 賲乇賾 亘賴
賱賲 鬲購爻賱亘 丨購乇賷鬲賷賾 賲賳 賯亘賱貙 亘兀賷賾 卮賰賱 賰丕賳
賱賰賳 賲噩乇丿 鬲禺賷賱 賲氐賷乇 賰賴匕丕 賷購賮夭毓賳賷貙 賮賲丕匕丕 毓賳 賲賳 賲乇賾 亘賴責
丕爻兀賱 丕賱賱賴 兀賳 賷毓賮賷賳丕 賲賳 賲氐賷乇 賰賴匕丕
鬲購乇賶 賲賳 爻賷購禺亘乇 丿賵爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 兀賳賳賷 兀丨亘賴責
鬲賲賾鬲
August 21, 2024
鈥�Prisons do not disappear social problems, they disappear human beings.鈥�
鈥�
It has been said you can judge the character of a society by how they judge their prisoners and poor. This quote is to the great Russian author Fyodor Dostoevsky and though he may not have said those words exactly, the sentiment rings loud and clear in Notes from a Dead House. Published between 1860-1862, the novel鈥攐ften translated as The Dead House though for the purposes of this review I鈥檒l be using the translation from translator duo and 鈥攊s a chilling look at the harshness of the Siberian penal colonies where the brutalities of forced labor and punishment are so awash in a monotony of the mundane stretching on for years until even brutality registers as mundane. I mean, prison is pretty shit at its most basic, but this is a whole higher tier of not awesome that literature has ensured will be remembered amongst the many punitive atrocities committed by humans against each other. A roman 脿 clef inspired by Dostoevsky鈥檚 own four year sentence at a prison in Omsk, this unabashed and incisive account of prison was thought of as one of his greatest novels during his life and from fellow Russian author who remarked that he 鈥�didn鈥檛 know a better book in all our literature.鈥� Which is saying a lot considering ole Leo rarely had kind words for his contemporaries. The novel is by turns gripping and horrifying, yet can be repetitive and is occasionally a slog through burdensome passages鈥攃learly by design to affect the quotidian tedium of prison life鈥攁ll the while the lack of freedom seeps into the reader to shake you to your core. These experiences of penal exile shaped Dostoevsky鈥檚 worldview which burns brightly in the stories within Dead House and make this an important and insightful novel that cuts to the heart of the human condition under tormentous states, championing the people most put out upon by society and delivering a damning indictment on the cruelties of prison.
鈥�Here is the world to which I am condemned, in which, despite myself, I must somehow live.鈥�
First, I鈥檇 like to thank Luh for a great buddy read of this book which managed to make a very bleak novel quite fun. Thank you for all the discussions, many of the ideas we talked about found its way into this review in some form so I鈥檇 like to co-credit her. Oh, and a little me factoid: not only has Dostoevsky long been a favorite but was also my first tattoo:
Upon his release from the Siberian prison camps, Dostoevksy wrote to his brother saying 鈥�I have brought back from the camps so many folk figures, characters!...So many stories of vagabonds and brigands, stories of dark and bitter life. I could fill volumes.鈥� Which I guess being all 鈥渨ow I got some wild stories to tell now!鈥� is about as optimistic a take on being in prison one can have? These characters would find their way into Notes From the Dead House and inspire characters long through his career with his time spent in the labor camp, and the mock execution that preceded it, inspiring thematic ideas throughout his works. According to his biographer , it was in the penal colony that Doestovksy began to see the working-class, poor and criminals less as 鈥�barbarians awaiting the light鈥� as he had once written, but as representations of God and beauty in their 鈥�capacity to love and forgive鈥� This becomes the conclusion reached by narrator Alexander Petrovitch Goryanchikov in Dead House and we see how he, a nobleman cast into prison for the murder of his wife (which Dostoevsky doesn鈥檛 find altogether too damning I guess as he refers to him as 鈥�a man of irreproachably moral life鈥� mere sentences after telling his crime) goes from attempting to categorize his fellow inmates to seeing such categorizations as beside the point in their mass suffering and society of confinement. 鈥�Reality resists classification,鈥� he writes. Bonus points to anyone who decides this could be a fun line to pull out at your next performance review!
The novel is framed as being highlights from the notebooks of a fellow inmate found after his death, a layer of narrative remove from Dostoevksy鈥檚 experiences that allows artistic freedom. As Dostoevksy biographer writes:
While there is fiction at work. The book retains much of the actual dialogue of prison life he recorded in what is dubbed his : a journal he kept hidden for the four years intentionally leaving no indication of its authorship in case it was discovered. Having gained some notoriety at a young age with his novel and mixed reception of his short stories, the guards in the prison were wary of him writing about what he saw and talking big litera-shit about them so they and frequently beat and questioned him where he was keeping his writing. Dostoevsky would only reply 鈥�In my head,鈥� which is pretty hard.
Sketch of the mock execution face by Dostoevsky
If I may back up a moment because my ADHD took the wheel of this review structure, the situation around his imprisonment is rather key to the understanding of most of his works. As a member of the , Dostoevksy was one of several members denounced to the government and sentenced for execution. His crime was the reading and distribution of essays critical of Russian politics and religion, though he claimed he was reading them only for literary purposes. On the date of his execution, he was tied to a stake with other men, had their death sentences read but, right before being fired upon, an officer ran forward with a letter of reprieve from the Tzar sentencing them instead to forced labor in Siberia. The mock execution was part of the punishment like some really fucking twisted hidden camera prank show, something Dostoevsky would visit in declaring the knowledge of impending execution to be the cruelest of torments. As Prince Myshkin says in The Idiot:
It had its effect and several of the men would have lasting mental health issues due to the trauma, though Dostoevsky wrote to his brother that 鈥�I am being reborn in another form,鈥� though the discussions from Myshkin would later reveal how much Dostoevsky still struggled to come to terms with the philosophical and spiritual resonance of that event. You know, as one probably would if someone tried to publicly execute you as a political stunt.
鈥�During the first weeks, and naturally the early part of my imprisonment, made a deep impression on my imagination. The following years on the other hand are all mixed up together, and leave but a confused recollection. Certain epochs of this life are even effaced from my memory. I have kept one general impression of it though, always the same; painful, monotonous, stifling. What I saw in experience during the first few days of imprisonment seems to me as if it had all taken place yesterday. Such was the case.鈥�
The novel shows in great detail the horrific monotony and brutality witnessed in the camps. 鈥�Of course, prisons and the system of forced labor do not correct the criminal.鈥� Alexander Petrovitch writes, 鈥�they only punish him and ensure society against the evildoer鈥檚 further attempts on its peace and quiet.鈥� This idea is central to ideas of prison abolition as expressed by activists such as or who wrote:
The who and why is key to Dead House, as the narrative observes how these are people being forced into exile and hidden from society, put in conditions so harsh they may likely not be able to ever return (and many immediately find themselves resentenced upon release).
It does not reform a person, he argues, only solidifies their hatred for society. It disappears people but not the problems that lead to them either.
鈥�What are we here for? We are not alive though we are living and we are not in our graves though we are dead.鈥�
The passage of time in Siberia is both boring and brutal until even the brutality hardly registers. Haha It is show how the worst torment of prison, however, is not the violence or the hard labor, but the utter lack of freedom and meaning.
He also spends much time discussing 鈥�one more torment in prison life that waqs almost worst than all the others,鈥� which was the 鈥� forced communal cohabitation.鈥� Criminals of all walks of life were forced into tight confinement and were forced to create a society of themselves. Our narrator, of noble lineage like Dostoevsky, is initially outcast for his parentage but comes to be trusted as we see how time erodes any differences between inmates. But it is a harsh world with harsh neighbors where stealing is common, though I enjoyed the aspect of his one friend stealing constantly 鈥�without any embarrassment, almost unconsciously, as if out of duty, and it was impossible to be angry with him.鈥� So much of everything just becomes the mundane, and even punishment or informing to the guards barely registers with anyone. It鈥檚 just how it is.
I did greatly enjoy the aspects on how their society worked such as the smuggling or trades that were kept up despite being in prison. It was viewed almost as a resistance and a way to bring life into the camps and when people were caught, punished, and their goods taken from them, they just go right back to it. 鈥�Man is a creature that can get accustomed to anything, and I think that is the best definition of him,鈥� he writes and resilience is championed even in all the drudgery and bleakness. This is not to say it was comfortable and the experience had horrific lasting effects of the mental and physical health of all who endured it. They can survive but even the strongest 鈥�submits and suffers the cruelest punishments, and then suddenly breaks out over some minute trifle, almost nothing at all.鈥� There is a big lead up to a performance put on for the benefit of the prisoners and our narrator observes this rare moment of warmth in humanity that reverberates through the prison during this time. Though this is immediately followed by some of the harshest scenes which drives home the point that these were fellow humans, people down on their luck but just like anyone else, and they were dehumanized and suffering to nearly unspeakable degrees.
These are the people the literary community should always be putting our support behind. What is the good of art if it isn鈥檛 being used to uplift those in need? Dostoevsky wasn鈥檛 the only one with this stance, and later would write about the traumas of the gulags, 鈥檚 would condemn capital punishment and by would help spearhead prison abolitionist movements that center addressing social ills over disappearing people. Though I always think of 鈥檚 statement on why will always be necessary when the poor are oppressed:
A powerful statement. And the same can be said of Dead House.
You might have noticed this is a rather bleak and burdensome read, but there is still a light that shines in its championing of the human spirit and plea to treat everyone with dignity and respect. That Dostoevsky was writing stories of the poor and criminals was rather progressive at the time and we can really see how his experience in Siberia lead to many of his themes and strengthened his faith. Notes From the Dead House is a powerful work that feels heavy to ready, though it is because Dostoevsky excels at instilling strong emotions in the reader and making them share the struggles of his characters. A chilling read that wasn鈥檛 my favorite by him but does have lasting value鈥攊t was later adapted as an by Leo拧 Jan谩膷ek so someone with an actual attention span please check that out and let me know how it is鈥攆or its look at social issues, the human condition and as a key source of understanding for his entire oeuvre.
4/5
鈥�Every man, whoever he may be and however humiliated, still requires, even if instinctively, even if unconsciously, respect for his human dignity. The prisoner himself knows that he is a prisoner, an outcast and he knows his place before his superior; but no brands, no fetters will make him forget that he is a human being. And since he is in fact a human being, it follows that he must be treated like a human being.鈥�
鈥�
It has been said you can judge the character of a society by how they judge their prisoners and poor. This quote is to the great Russian author Fyodor Dostoevsky and though he may not have said those words exactly, the sentiment rings loud and clear in Notes from a Dead House. Published between 1860-1862, the novel鈥攐ften translated as The Dead House though for the purposes of this review I鈥檒l be using the translation from translator duo and 鈥攊s a chilling look at the harshness of the Siberian penal colonies where the brutalities of forced labor and punishment are so awash in a monotony of the mundane stretching on for years until even brutality registers as mundane. I mean, prison is pretty shit at its most basic, but this is a whole higher tier of not awesome that literature has ensured will be remembered amongst the many punitive atrocities committed by humans against each other. A roman 脿 clef inspired by Dostoevsky鈥檚 own four year sentence at a prison in Omsk, this unabashed and incisive account of prison was thought of as one of his greatest novels during his life and from fellow Russian author who remarked that he 鈥�didn鈥檛 know a better book in all our literature.鈥� Which is saying a lot considering ole Leo rarely had kind words for his contemporaries. The novel is by turns gripping and horrifying, yet can be repetitive and is occasionally a slog through burdensome passages鈥攃learly by design to affect the quotidian tedium of prison life鈥攁ll the while the lack of freedom seeps into the reader to shake you to your core. These experiences of penal exile shaped Dostoevsky鈥檚 worldview which burns brightly in the stories within Dead House and make this an important and insightful novel that cuts to the heart of the human condition under tormentous states, championing the people most put out upon by society and delivering a damning indictment on the cruelties of prison.
鈥�Here is the world to which I am condemned, in which, despite myself, I must somehow live.鈥�
First, I鈥檇 like to thank Luh for a great buddy read of this book which managed to make a very bleak novel quite fun. Thank you for all the discussions, many of the ideas we talked about found its way into this review in some form so I鈥檇 like to co-credit her. Oh, and a little me factoid: not only has Dostoevsky long been a favorite but was also my first tattoo:
Upon his release from the Siberian prison camps, Dostoevksy wrote to his brother saying 鈥�I have brought back from the camps so many folk figures, characters!...So many stories of vagabonds and brigands, stories of dark and bitter life. I could fill volumes.鈥� Which I guess being all 鈥渨ow I got some wild stories to tell now!鈥� is about as optimistic a take on being in prison one can have? These characters would find their way into Notes From the Dead House and inspire characters long through his career with his time spent in the labor camp, and the mock execution that preceded it, inspiring thematic ideas throughout his works. According to his biographer , it was in the penal colony that Doestovksy began to see the working-class, poor and criminals less as 鈥�barbarians awaiting the light鈥� as he had once written, but as representations of God and beauty in their 鈥�capacity to love and forgive鈥� This becomes the conclusion reached by narrator Alexander Petrovitch Goryanchikov in Dead House and we see how he, a nobleman cast into prison for the murder of his wife (which Dostoevsky doesn鈥檛 find altogether too damning I guess as he refers to him as 鈥�a man of irreproachably moral life鈥� mere sentences after telling his crime) goes from attempting to categorize his fellow inmates to seeing such categorizations as beside the point in their mass suffering and society of confinement. 鈥�Reality resists classification,鈥� he writes. Bonus points to anyone who decides this could be a fun line to pull out at your next performance review!
The novel is framed as being highlights from the notebooks of a fellow inmate found after his death, a layer of narrative remove from Dostoevksy鈥檚 experiences that allows artistic freedom. As Dostoevksy biographer writes:
鈥�Dead House is journalism, really, but it couldn鈥檛 be called that at the time so it鈥檚 framed as a novel. It鈥檚 part of a genre called Zapiski, which means 鈥榥otes鈥� or 鈥榮cribbles鈥�. It鈥檚 nominally about a third person, but it鈥檚 obviously heavily influenced by his experience in prison. I don鈥檛 think you could have later writers like Solzhenitsyn without this book.鈥�
While there is fiction at work. The book retains much of the actual dialogue of prison life he recorded in what is dubbed his : a journal he kept hidden for the four years intentionally leaving no indication of its authorship in case it was discovered. Having gained some notoriety at a young age with his novel and mixed reception of his short stories, the guards in the prison were wary of him writing about what he saw and talking big litera-shit about them so they and frequently beat and questioned him where he was keeping his writing. Dostoevsky would only reply 鈥�In my head,鈥� which is pretty hard.
Sketch of the mock execution face by Dostoevsky
If I may back up a moment because my ADHD took the wheel of this review structure, the situation around his imprisonment is rather key to the understanding of most of his works. As a member of the , Dostoevksy was one of several members denounced to the government and sentenced for execution. His crime was the reading and distribution of essays critical of Russian politics and religion, though he claimed he was reading them only for literary purposes. On the date of his execution, he was tied to a stake with other men, had their death sentences read but, right before being fired upon, an officer ran forward with a letter of reprieve from the Tzar sentencing them instead to forced labor in Siberia. The mock execution was part of the punishment like some really fucking twisted hidden camera prank show, something Dostoevsky would visit in declaring the knowledge of impending execution to be the cruelest of torments. As Prince Myshkin says in The Idiot:
鈥�...the strongest pain may not be in the wounds, but in knowing for certain that in an hour, then in ten minutes, then in half a minute, then now, this second 鈥� your soul will fly out of your body and you鈥檒l no longer be a man, and its鈥� for certain 鈥� the main thing is that it鈥檚 for certain.鈥�
It had its effect and several of the men would have lasting mental health issues due to the trauma, though Dostoevsky wrote to his brother that 鈥�I am being reborn in another form,鈥� though the discussions from Myshkin would later reveal how much Dostoevsky still struggled to come to terms with the philosophical and spiritual resonance of that event. You know, as one probably would if someone tried to publicly execute you as a political stunt.
鈥�During the first weeks, and naturally the early part of my imprisonment, made a deep impression on my imagination. The following years on the other hand are all mixed up together, and leave but a confused recollection. Certain epochs of this life are even effaced from my memory. I have kept one general impression of it though, always the same; painful, monotonous, stifling. What I saw in experience during the first few days of imprisonment seems to me as if it had all taken place yesterday. Such was the case.鈥�
The novel shows in great detail the horrific monotony and brutality witnessed in the camps. 鈥�Of course, prisons and the system of forced labor do not correct the criminal.鈥� Alexander Petrovitch writes, 鈥�they only punish him and ensure society against the evildoer鈥檚 further attempts on its peace and quiet.鈥� This idea is central to ideas of prison abolition as expressed by activists such as or who wrote:
鈥�Jails and prisons are designed to break human beings鈥rison abolition requires that we challenge our thinking about what constitutes punishment, for whom and why.鈥�
The who and why is key to Dead House, as the narrative observes how these are people being forced into exile and hidden from society, put in conditions so harsh they may likely not be able to ever return (and many immediately find themselves resentenced upon release).
鈥�In the criminal himself, prison and the most intense forced labor develop only hatred, a thirst for forbidden pleasures, and a terrible light-mindedness. But I am firmly convinced that the famous system of solitary confinement also achieves only a false, deceptive, external purpose. It sucks the living juice from a man, enervates his soul, weakens it, frightens it, and then presents this morally dried-up, half crazed mummy as an example of correction and repentance. Of course, a criminal who has risen against society hates it, and almost always considers himself right and society wrong.鈥�
It does not reform a person, he argues, only solidifies their hatred for society. It disappears people but not the problems that lead to them either.
鈥�What are we here for? We are not alive though we are living and we are not in our graves though we are dead.鈥�
The passage of time in Siberia is both boring and brutal until even the brutality hardly registers. Haha It is show how the worst torment of prison, however, is not the violence or the hard labor, but the utter lack of freedom and meaning.
鈥�鈥�if they wanted to crush, to annihilate a man totally, to punish him with the most terrible punishment, so that the most dreadful murderer would shudder at this punishment and be frightened of it beforehand, they would only need to give the labor a character of complete, total uselessness and meaninglessness.鈥�
He also spends much time discussing 鈥�one more torment in prison life that waqs almost worst than all the others,鈥� which was the 鈥� forced communal cohabitation.鈥� Criminals of all walks of life were forced into tight confinement and were forced to create a society of themselves. Our narrator, of noble lineage like Dostoevsky, is initially outcast for his parentage but comes to be trusted as we see how time erodes any differences between inmates. But it is a harsh world with harsh neighbors where stealing is common, though I enjoyed the aspect of his one friend stealing constantly 鈥�without any embarrassment, almost unconsciously, as if out of duty, and it was impossible to be angry with him.鈥� So much of everything just becomes the mundane, and even punishment or informing to the guards barely registers with anyone. It鈥檚 just how it is.
I did greatly enjoy the aspects on how their society worked such as the smuggling or trades that were kept up despite being in prison. It was viewed almost as a resistance and a way to bring life into the camps and when people were caught, punished, and their goods taken from them, they just go right back to it. 鈥�Man is a creature that can get accustomed to anything, and I think that is the best definition of him,鈥� he writes and resilience is championed even in all the drudgery and bleakness. This is not to say it was comfortable and the experience had horrific lasting effects of the mental and physical health of all who endured it. They can survive but even the strongest 鈥�submits and suffers the cruelest punishments, and then suddenly breaks out over some minute trifle, almost nothing at all.鈥� There is a big lead up to a performance put on for the benefit of the prisoners and our narrator observes this rare moment of warmth in humanity that reverberates through the prison during this time. Though this is immediately followed by some of the harshest scenes which drives home the point that these were fellow humans, people down on their luck but just like anyone else, and they were dehumanized and suffering to nearly unspeakable degrees.
These are the people the literary community should always be putting our support behind. What is the good of art if it isn鈥檛 being used to uplift those in need? Dostoevsky wasn鈥檛 the only one with this stance, and later would write about the traumas of the gulags, 鈥檚 would condemn capital punishment and by would help spearhead prison abolitionist movements that center addressing social ills over disappearing people. Though I always think of 鈥檚 statement on why will always be necessary when the poor are oppressed:
鈥�So long as there shall exist, by reason of law and custom, a social condemnation, which, in the face of civilisation, artificially creates hells on earth, and complicates a destiny that is divine, with human fatality; so long as the three problems of the age 鈥� the degradation of man by poverty, the ruin of woman by starvation, and the dwarfing of childhood by physical and spiritual night 鈥� are not solved; so long as, in certain regions, social asphyxia shall be possible; in other words, and from a yet more extended point of view, so long as ignorance and misery remain on earth, books like this cannot be useless.鈥�
A powerful statement. And the same can be said of Dead House.
You might have noticed this is a rather bleak and burdensome read, but there is still a light that shines in its championing of the human spirit and plea to treat everyone with dignity and respect. That Dostoevsky was writing stories of the poor and criminals was rather progressive at the time and we can really see how his experience in Siberia lead to many of his themes and strengthened his faith. Notes From the Dead House is a powerful work that feels heavy to ready, though it is because Dostoevsky excels at instilling strong emotions in the reader and making them share the struggles of his characters. A chilling read that wasn鈥檛 my favorite by him but does have lasting value鈥攊t was later adapted as an by Leo拧 Jan谩膷ek so someone with an actual attention span please check that out and let me know how it is鈥攆or its look at social issues, the human condition and as a key source of understanding for his entire oeuvre.
4/5
鈥�Every man, whoever he may be and however humiliated, still requires, even if instinctively, even if unconsciously, respect for his human dignity. The prisoner himself knows that he is a prisoner, an outcast and he knows his place before his superior; but no brands, no fetters will make him forget that he is a human being. And since he is in fact a human being, it follows that he must be treated like a human being.鈥�
October 24, 2024
Much brighter and lighter than its theme (The Diary of a Deportee in Siberia) could suggest, this autobiographical novel struck me with its gallery of extraordinary characters and its succession of anecdotes, sometimes deeply sad and uplifting, sometimes downright funny.
I expected the ferocious description of a nightmare with sadistic guards, prisoners who kill each other, famine, and disease. But, in the end, it is a story鈥攁lmost bland鈥攐f a repetitive daily life, which illustrates one of the main words (and the author's great cause for alarm): that humans can adapt to absolutely everything.
I expected the ferocious description of a nightmare with sadistic guards, prisoners who kill each other, famine, and disease. But, in the end, it is a story鈥攁lmost bland鈥攐f a repetitive daily life, which illustrates one of the main words (and the author's great cause for alarm): that humans can adapt to absolutely everything.
June 10, 2014
I have been frequenting an open-air restaurant for 7 years now. Hiding on the roof of a rickety building, in one of the small tributaries of the Jaipur's busiest road, it is aptly named Cocoon. The place is shady, unknown, and visited only by international tourists living in its cheap guest-house.
Nothing unusual seemed to happen at that place and nothing unusual did happen the last time I visited it: I drank two cups of hot lemon tea, I followed short arcs sketched by listless eagles in the evening sky, I breathed in volumes of busy city smoke; but while leaving for home, as I turned on the ignition key of my bike, I caught hold of a loud, clear, distinct feeling. It was so distinct that I did not know at first what it was trying to convey; that is to say, my natural thinking process had reverted to a background noise and I could only listen with attention to the wordless outwardly buzz around my ears and inside my chest, which seemed to be growing... keener and keener. I stood motionless for a second or two, and then, a picture of a shop flashed inside the head. I turned my head to find the same shop in the ground floor of that building. 7 years and I had never once noticed that shop! From across the street, it appeared to be a wholesaler's office, with its glass partition displaying drawing and craft notebooks, paper-thin local guides to health and fitness, bedroom life, and tourism in Rajasthan. Curious, however, I trudged towards the store, my attention fixed mostly on that outwardly buzz which I wasn鈥檛 hearing 鈥� if it can be called hearing 鈥� for the first time.
The store was large and largely empty. Two men were gossiping in the middle of the room across an unbalanced wooden table, which, helped by either one鈥檚 dangling feet, made a rhythmic thud-thud. It stopped abruptly: the thud-thud, and the the gossiping too, and they looked up surprised to find a visitor. I caught their amazed disoriented gaze, but, to avoid any verbal distractions, I looked towards a shelf on my immediate right. I was at once stunned.
Dostoyevsky, Turgenev, Pasternak, Gibran... hard copy editions of rarest of their works, thick with time and grime, casually stacked together in a single shelf. With my mouth half open, I plugged out 10 titles, not once leafing through them, not once checking the blurb, and plopped the bulk on the owner's creaking desk.
He too was excited but he concealed it, and overcharged me. I did not cross-check the MRP nor did I request for a discount; he may have charged me even more and I would have happily emptied my wallet. Such was my state! I felt unworldly. What did it matter which books I was buying, at what price and who from? Trifles! Mere trifles. What mattered was that I see through the task, witness what I was being shown, stay 鈥榗onnected鈥�. The buzzing humming feeling had now enlarged and transmuted into a quietude donning my whole being 鈥� not the other way round. I returned home after a short ride, but I was now proud for some reason and happy; the quietude only a memory, an object for analysis. For rationalizations. I dusted the books, and arranged them neatly on my desk, as if they were sacred idols I was going to worship every day.
For 6 months I did not go to them: laziness, thoughtlessness, fear. The books would change me somehow, I knew, and I wasn't too prepared to let go of whatever they may ask me to let go of. No, not unless the sentries of my rational mind were welcoming and unsuspicious.
And here now I am, reading, having read. Something indeed did happen. Something unidentifiable. But what exactly did the book do? So that my intellect does not become restless, I will give it a word to chew over and flaunt. Not the same word Leo Tolstoy used for : edifying; not the same word that settled on my mind for Dostoyevsky鈥檚 influence on an aspiring writer: uncorrupting; but: purging. The book purged me, emptied me, humbled me; cleaned me of the grime I had gathered over time.
This book is sacred.
Nothing unusual seemed to happen at that place and nothing unusual did happen the last time I visited it: I drank two cups of hot lemon tea, I followed short arcs sketched by listless eagles in the evening sky, I breathed in volumes of busy city smoke; but while leaving for home, as I turned on the ignition key of my bike, I caught hold of a loud, clear, distinct feeling. It was so distinct that I did not know at first what it was trying to convey; that is to say, my natural thinking process had reverted to a background noise and I could only listen with attention to the wordless outwardly buzz around my ears and inside my chest, which seemed to be growing... keener and keener. I stood motionless for a second or two, and then, a picture of a shop flashed inside the head. I turned my head to find the same shop in the ground floor of that building. 7 years and I had never once noticed that shop! From across the street, it appeared to be a wholesaler's office, with its glass partition displaying drawing and craft notebooks, paper-thin local guides to health and fitness, bedroom life, and tourism in Rajasthan. Curious, however, I trudged towards the store, my attention fixed mostly on that outwardly buzz which I wasn鈥檛 hearing 鈥� if it can be called hearing 鈥� for the first time.
The store was large and largely empty. Two men were gossiping in the middle of the room across an unbalanced wooden table, which, helped by either one鈥檚 dangling feet, made a rhythmic thud-thud. It stopped abruptly: the thud-thud, and the the gossiping too, and they looked up surprised to find a visitor. I caught their amazed disoriented gaze, but, to avoid any verbal distractions, I looked towards a shelf on my immediate right. I was at once stunned.
Dostoyevsky, Turgenev, Pasternak, Gibran... hard copy editions of rarest of their works, thick with time and grime, casually stacked together in a single shelf. With my mouth half open, I plugged out 10 titles, not once leafing through them, not once checking the blurb, and plopped the bulk on the owner's creaking desk.
He too was excited but he concealed it, and overcharged me. I did not cross-check the MRP nor did I request for a discount; he may have charged me even more and I would have happily emptied my wallet. Such was my state! I felt unworldly. What did it matter which books I was buying, at what price and who from? Trifles! Mere trifles. What mattered was that I see through the task, witness what I was being shown, stay 鈥榗onnected鈥�. The buzzing humming feeling had now enlarged and transmuted into a quietude donning my whole being 鈥� not the other way round. I returned home after a short ride, but I was now proud for some reason and happy; the quietude only a memory, an object for analysis. For rationalizations. I dusted the books, and arranged them neatly on my desk, as if they were sacred idols I was going to worship every day.
For 6 months I did not go to them: laziness, thoughtlessness, fear. The books would change me somehow, I knew, and I wasn't too prepared to let go of whatever they may ask me to let go of. No, not unless the sentries of my rational mind were welcoming and unsuspicious.
And here now I am, reading, having read. Something indeed did happen. Something unidentifiable. But what exactly did the book do? So that my intellect does not become restless, I will give it a word to chew over and flaunt. Not the same word Leo Tolstoy used for : edifying; not the same word that settled on my mind for Dostoyevsky鈥檚 influence on an aspiring writer: uncorrupting; but: purging. The book purged me, emptied me, humbled me; cleaned me of the grime I had gathered over time.
This book is sacred.
December 21, 2022
"Nosotros somos hombres destrozados, triturados, deshechos; no tenemos entra帽as. Por eso gritamos de noche."
No existe para m铆 mejor Dostoievski que el autobiogr谩fico. Fue, es y ser谩 "el mejor conocedor del alma humana de todos los tiempos", como dec铆a Zweig; pero para llegar a esa profundidad, le fue necesario empezar con la suya propia y 鈥淟a Casa de los Muertos鈥� es un libro en el que el Dostoievski hombre se camufla en el personaje ficticio de Alexander Petrovich para narrar sus penurias en la prisi贸n de Siberia.
La detenci贸n de Dostoievski en 1849 junto con el grupo revolucionario ut贸pico de Petrachevsky y el posterior del simulacro de su fusilamiento (algo que lo marcar铆a a fuego y que narrar铆a magistralmente a trav茅s de las palabras del Pr铆ncipe Mishkin en "El Idiota") derivaron en su posterior reclusi贸n en Siberia y no iba a ser el mismo Dostoievski el que atravesara el port贸n de salida cuatro a帽os despu茅s.
Dice en otra parte del libro: 鈥淎s铆 pues, hab铆a vivido sin libros, encerrado en m铆 mismo, plante谩ndome cuestiones, que intentaba resolver, y cuya soluci贸n me atormentaba frecuentemente鈥� Pero jam谩s podr茅 expresar todo esto鈥︹€�
Ni 茅l ni ning煤n otro hombre puede ser mismo en su vida a partir de una experiencia como esta. Incluso, Dostoievski afirma que para 茅l (un hombre culto e intelectual) era m谩s dif铆cil tener que convivir (con todo lo que esto conlleva cotidianamente) con asesinos, hombres embrutecidos, salvajes y delincuentes, que estar privado de la libertad que gozaba tiempo atr谩s.
Las distintas experiencias vividas en el presidio son contadas en forma frontal, visceral por momentos, pero nunca de a帽oranza a los viejos tiempos ni de arrepentimiento.
脡l fue un hombre que supo aceptar y afrontar las desgracias de su vida con hombr铆a y sin flaquezas, m谩s que las f铆sicas, dado que toda su vida padeci贸 de epilepsia. De hecho, tres cap铆tulos de la segunda parte transcurren en el hospital donde fue internado por esta enfermedad.
Otro de los aspectos que Dostoievski desarrolla en profundidad es el de las cadenas y hierros que ten铆an que soportar sobre el cuerpo los prisioneros, algo que cobra real dimensi贸n cuando narra la experiencia de cuando deb铆an ba帽arse todos juntos en una especie de infierno de vapor y calor intolerable.
Tambi茅n es realmente crudo el modo en que nos cuenta la forma en la que los prisioneros eran azotados en sus espaldas y esto se relacionaba directamente a la gravedad de las penas que cumpl铆an. Estos eran castigados con varazos que iban de los 500 hasta los 2000 azotes y se hac铆an en tandas, dado que era normal que el prisionero se desmayara luego de infligirles semejante un castigo tan violento en sus espaldas. Otros, directamente no lograban sobrevivir a este suplicio.
Cabe destacar tambi茅n que durante todos los d铆as estaban sometidos a trabajos forzosos sin misericordia. El castigo era la consecuencia irreversible y rec铆proca que se relacionaba al crimen cometido por el prisionero.
La primera parte culmina con dos cap铆tulos que otorgan cierto alivio a tanto sufrimiento y crudeza y que tratan dos temas comunes a cualquier ser humano, por un lado la Navidad y por el otro, la posibilidad de algunos presidiarios de formar parte de una obra de teatro, lo cual es una manera de liberar tensiones a trav茅s de un personaje en acto y es en cierto modo, una reconexi贸n con la literatura.
En l铆neas generales y m谩s all谩 de que por momentos ciertos pasajes de lecturas son terribles, es un libro al que le doy cinco estrellas, dado que lo que surge de lo narrado aqu铆, fue clave que todo admirador de Dostoievski (y los que quieran saber sobre su vida) pueda comprender (esa es la palabra) el porqu茅 de muchas de las acciones y vivencias que experimentar谩n los personajes de sus novelas partir de 1850 y tambi茅n una prueba de la fortaleza moral y la entereza humana que Dostoievski tuvo que sostener para no sucumbir en la vida.
No existe para m铆 mejor Dostoievski que el autobiogr谩fico. Fue, es y ser谩 "el mejor conocedor del alma humana de todos los tiempos", como dec铆a Zweig; pero para llegar a esa profundidad, le fue necesario empezar con la suya propia y 鈥淟a Casa de los Muertos鈥� es un libro en el que el Dostoievski hombre se camufla en el personaje ficticio de Alexander Petrovich para narrar sus penurias en la prisi贸n de Siberia.
La detenci贸n de Dostoievski en 1849 junto con el grupo revolucionario ut贸pico de Petrachevsky y el posterior del simulacro de su fusilamiento (algo que lo marcar铆a a fuego y que narrar铆a magistralmente a trav茅s de las palabras del Pr铆ncipe Mishkin en "El Idiota") derivaron en su posterior reclusi贸n en Siberia y no iba a ser el mismo Dostoievski el que atravesara el port贸n de salida cuatro a帽os despu茅s.
Dice en otra parte del libro: 鈥淎s铆 pues, hab铆a vivido sin libros, encerrado en m铆 mismo, plante谩ndome cuestiones, que intentaba resolver, y cuya soluci贸n me atormentaba frecuentemente鈥� Pero jam谩s podr茅 expresar todo esto鈥︹€�
Ni 茅l ni ning煤n otro hombre puede ser mismo en su vida a partir de una experiencia como esta. Incluso, Dostoievski afirma que para 茅l (un hombre culto e intelectual) era m谩s dif铆cil tener que convivir (con todo lo que esto conlleva cotidianamente) con asesinos, hombres embrutecidos, salvajes y delincuentes, que estar privado de la libertad que gozaba tiempo atr谩s.
Las distintas experiencias vividas en el presidio son contadas en forma frontal, visceral por momentos, pero nunca de a帽oranza a los viejos tiempos ni de arrepentimiento.
脡l fue un hombre que supo aceptar y afrontar las desgracias de su vida con hombr铆a y sin flaquezas, m谩s que las f铆sicas, dado que toda su vida padeci贸 de epilepsia. De hecho, tres cap铆tulos de la segunda parte transcurren en el hospital donde fue internado por esta enfermedad.
Otro de los aspectos que Dostoievski desarrolla en profundidad es el de las cadenas y hierros que ten铆an que soportar sobre el cuerpo los prisioneros, algo que cobra real dimensi贸n cuando narra la experiencia de cuando deb铆an ba帽arse todos juntos en una especie de infierno de vapor y calor intolerable.
Tambi茅n es realmente crudo el modo en que nos cuenta la forma en la que los prisioneros eran azotados en sus espaldas y esto se relacionaba directamente a la gravedad de las penas que cumpl铆an. Estos eran castigados con varazos que iban de los 500 hasta los 2000 azotes y se hac铆an en tandas, dado que era normal que el prisionero se desmayara luego de infligirles semejante un castigo tan violento en sus espaldas. Otros, directamente no lograban sobrevivir a este suplicio.
Cabe destacar tambi茅n que durante todos los d铆as estaban sometidos a trabajos forzosos sin misericordia. El castigo era la consecuencia irreversible y rec铆proca que se relacionaba al crimen cometido por el prisionero.
La primera parte culmina con dos cap铆tulos que otorgan cierto alivio a tanto sufrimiento y crudeza y que tratan dos temas comunes a cualquier ser humano, por un lado la Navidad y por el otro, la posibilidad de algunos presidiarios de formar parte de una obra de teatro, lo cual es una manera de liberar tensiones a trav茅s de un personaje en acto y es en cierto modo, una reconexi贸n con la literatura.
En l铆neas generales y m谩s all谩 de que por momentos ciertos pasajes de lecturas son terribles, es un libro al que le doy cinco estrellas, dado que lo que surge de lo narrado aqu铆, fue clave que todo admirador de Dostoievski (y los que quieran saber sobre su vida) pueda comprender (esa es la palabra) el porqu茅 de muchas de las acciones y vivencias que experimentar谩n los personajes de sus novelas partir de 1850 y tambi茅n una prueba de la fortaleza moral y la entereza humana que Dostoievski tuvo que sostener para no sucumbir en la vida.
January 20, 2023
賵 賲賳 丕賱賲丐賰丿 兀賳 丕賱賲噩乇賲 賱丕 鬲氐賱丨賴 爻噩賵賳 賵 賱丕 賲毓鬲賯賱丕鬲 賵 賱丕 兀卮睾丕賱 卮丕賯丞. 賮賴匕賴 丕賱毓賯賵亘丕鬲 賱丕 鬲爻鬲胤賷毓 廿賱丕 兀賳 鬲賵賯毓 亘賴 丕賱賯氐丕氐 賵 兀賳 鬲爻賰賳 乇賵毓 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 賲賳 丕賱噩乇丕卅賲 丕賱鬲賷 賷賲賰賳 兀賳 賷乇鬲賰亘賴丕. 賵 賱賷爻 賮賷 賵爻毓 丕賱廿毓鬲賯丕賱丕鬲 賵 丕賱兀卮睾丕賱 丕賱賲乇賴賯丞 廿賱丕 兀賳 鬲賮丕賯賲 賮賷 賴丐賱丕亍 丕賱乇噩丕賱 丕賱丨賯丿 丕賱毓賲賷賯. 賵 丕賱毓胤卮 廿賱賶 丕賱賱匕丕鬲 丕賱賲丨乇賲丞 賵 丕賱丕爻鬲賴鬲丕乇 丕賱賮馗賷毓. 賵 賲賳 噩賴丞 孬丕賳賷丞. 兀賳丕 毓賱賶 賷賯賷賳 賲賳 兀賳 丕賱賳馗丕賲 丕賱卮賴賷乇 賱賱爻噩賳 丕賱丕賳賮乇丕丿賷 賱丕 賷丨賯賯 爻賵賶 睾乇囟 馗丕賴乇賷 賵 禺丕丿毓. 賮賴賵 賷亘鬲夭 賲賳 丕賱賲噩乇賲 賰賱 賯賵鬲賴 賵 胤丕賯鬲賴. 賵 賷孬賷乇 丨賮賷馗丞 賳賮爻賴. 賮賷囟毓賮賴丕 賵 賷禺賷賮賴丕. 賵 兀禺賷乇丕 賷禺乇噩 賲賵賲賷丕亍 噩丕賮丞 賵 卮亘賴 賲噩賳賵賳丞 賰賲孬丕賱 毓賱賶 丕賱廿氐賱丕丨 賵 丕賱鬲賵亘丞.亘丕賱乇睾賲 賲賳 兀賳 丿賵爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賷丨丕賵賱 丕賱廿賷賴丕賲 亘兀賳賴丕 賲匕賰乇丕鬲 卮禺氐 兀禺乇 廿賱丕 兀賳賴丕 鬲賮賵丨 亘乇丕卅丨丞 賲毓丕賳丕鬲賴 賵 毓匕丕亘丕鬲賴 賵 鬲噩乇亘鬲賴 丕賱兀賱賷賲丞 賮賷 賲毓鬲賯賱 爻賷亘乇賷丕 丕賱乇賴賷亘.
賮丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賲賴賲丕 賷氐睾乇 卮兀賳賴 賵 賲賴賲丕 賷賴亘胤 賯丿乇賴 賵 賲賴賲丕 鬲賴賳 賯賷賲鬲賴. 賷丨亘 亘睾乇賷夭鬲賴 兀賳 鬲丨鬲乇賲 賰乇丕賲鬲賴 賲賳 丨賷孬 賴賵 廿賳爻丕賳. 丕賳 賰賱 爻噩賷賳 賷毓乇賮 丨賯 丕賱賲毓乇賮丞 兀賳賴 爻噩賷賳 賵 賷毓乇賮 丨賯 丕賱賲毓乇賮丞 兀賳賴 賲賳亘賵匕 賲賲賯賵鬲 賲賰乇賵賴. 賵 賷毓乇賮 丕賱賲爻丕賮丞 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賮氐賱 亘賷賳賴 賵 亘賷賳 乇丐爻丕卅賴. 賵 賱賰賳 賱丕 丕賱賯囟亘丕賳 賵 賱丕 丕賱兀睾賱丕賱 鬲賳爻賷賴 兀賳賴 廿賳爻丕賳. 賮賱丕亘丿 兀賳 賷毓丕賲賱 廿匕丕 賲毓丕賲賱丞 廿賳爻丕賳賷丞.賱丕 賷卮毓乇 亘賯賷賲丞 丕賱賰乇丕賲丞 廿賱丕 賲賳 兀購賴丿乇鬲 賰乇丕賲鬲賴 賵 匕丕賯 賵賷賱丕鬲 丕賱賲毓丕賳丕丞 賵 丕賱丨丕噩丞. 賵 賰丕賳鬲 賱賴匕賴 丕賱氐乇禺丞 兀氐丿丕亍 丌鬲鬲 孬賲丕乇賴丕 賮賷 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱乇賵爻賷 亘毓丿 匕賱賰 賵 兀丿鬲 廿賱賶 廿氐賱丕丨 丨丕賱 丕賱爻噩賵賳 亘氐賵乇賰亘賷乇丞.
兀毓鬲賯丿 丕賳賴 賲丕 賲賳 亘丕卅毓丞 賵 賲丕 賲賳 爻丕賰賳丞 賲賳 爻丕賰賳丕鬲 丕賱賲丿賷賳丞 亘兀爻乇賴丕 廿賱丕 賵 兀乇爻賱鬲 卮賷卅丕 廿賱賶 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 丕賱鬲毓爻丕亍 賲賳 兀噩賱 丕賱賲亘丕乇賰丞 亘丕賱毓賷丿. 賰丕賳 亘賷賳 賴匕賴 丕賱氐丿賯丕鬲 氐丿賯丕鬲 孬賲賷賳丞: 毓丿丿 賰亘賷乇 賲賳 兀乇睾賮丞 丕賱禺亘夭 丕賱賲氐賳賵毓 賲賳 賮丕禺乇 丕賱丿賯賷賯. 賵 賰丕賳 亘賷賳賴丕 兀賷囟丕 氐丿賯丕鬲 夭賴賷丿丞: 乇睾賷賮 賲賳 禺亘夭 兀亘賷囟 孬賲賳賴 賰賵亘賰丕賳. 兀賵 乇睾賷賮丕賳 賲賳 禺亘夭 兀爻賵丿 丿賴賳 亘丕賱賯卮丿丞. 鬲賱賰 賴丿賷丞 丕賱賮賯賷乇 賱賱賮賯賷乇 兀賳賮賯 賮賷賴丕 丕賱兀賵賱 兀禺乇 賰賵亘賰 賷賲賱賰賴. 賵 賰丕賳鬲 賴匕賴 丕賱氐丿賯丕鬲 鬲賯亘賱 亘丕賲鬲賳丕賳 賵丕丨丿. 丿賵賳 鬲賮乇賷賯 亘賷賳賴丕 賮賷 丕賱賯賷賲丞 兀賵 賮賷 丕賱賲氐丿乇. 賵 賰丕賳 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 丕賱匕賷賳 賷爻鬲賱賲賵賳 丕賱賴丿丕賷丕 賷乇賮毓賵賳 賯亘毓丕鬲賴賲 毓乇賮丕賳丕 亘丕賱噩賲賷賱. 賵 賷卮賰乇賵賳 賱兀氐丨丕亘 丕賱賴丿丕賷丕 賴丿丕賷丕賴賲 賵 賴賲 賷丨賷賵賳賴賲 賵 賷鬲賲賳賵賳 賱賴賲 毓賷丿丕 爻毓賷丿丕 孬賲 賷賳賮賯賵賳 丕賱氐丿賯丕鬲 廿賱賶 丕賱賲胤亘禺.賵 賰賲丕 賰鬲亘 毓賳 乇賵丨 丕賱賯丕賳賵賳 賮廿賳賴 賱賲 賷賳爻 丕丨爻丕賳 丕賱賲丨爻賳賷賳 賮賷 匕賱賰 丕賱夭賲賳 丕賱匕賷 毓乇賮 賲毓賳賶 丕賱鬲賰丕賮賱 毓賱賶 兀賵爻毓 賳胤丕賯 賮賷 爻丕卅乇 兀氐賯丕毓 丕賱兀乇囟.
廿賳 賴丐賱丕亍 丕賱毓噩夭丞 丕賱賲爻卅賵賱賷賳 毓賳 鬲胤亘賷賯 丕賱賯丕賳賵賳 賱丕 賷丿乇賰賵賳 兀亘丿丕 兀賳 鬲胤亘賷賯 賳氐賵氐 丕賱賯丕賳賵賳 亘睾賷乇 賮賴賲 賱乇賵丨 丕賱賯丕賳賵賳 賷丐丿賷 廿賱賶 丕賱丕囟胤乇丕亘丕鬲 乇兀爻丕. 廿賳賴賲 賷賯賵賱賵賳: 匕賱賰 賲丕 賷賳氐 毓賱賷賴 丕賱賯丕賳賵賳. 賮賲丕匕丕 鬲乇賷丿賵賳 夭賷丕丿丞 毓賱賶 匕賱賰責 丨鬲賶 賱賯丿 賷丿賴卮賴賲 丨賯丕 兀賳 鬲胤賱亘 賲賳賴賲 毓丿丕 鬲賳賮賷匕 丕賱賯丕賳賵賳 兀賳 賷賰賵賳 賱賴賲 卮賷亍 賲賳 氐丿賯 丕賱廿丨爻丕爻 賵 爻賱丕賲丞 丕賱鬲賮賰賷乇. 賵 爻賱丕賲丞 丕賱鬲賮賰賷乇 賴匕賴 賴賷 丕賱鬲賷 鬲亘丿賵 賱賴賲 夭丕卅丿丞 賱丕 賲丨賱 賱賴丕 亘賵噩賴 禺丕氐. 賮賴賷 賮賷 賳馗乇賴賲 鬲乇賮 賱丕 賱夭賵賲 賱賴. 鬲乇賮 賷孬賷乇 賲賵噩丿鬲賴賲 賵 賷賵賯馗 丨賳賯賴賲 賵 賷毓夭夭 鬲毓氐亘賴賲.賵 賰鬲亘 兀賷囟丕 毓賳 賲毓丕賳丕丞 丕賱爻噩賷賳 賮賷 毓丿 丕賱兀賷丕賲 賵 丕賳鬲馗丕乇 賷賵賲 丕賱禺賱丕氐.
兀賳鬲馗乇 氐丕亘乇丕. 賵 兀毓丿 丕賱兀賷丕賲 賷賵賲丕 賷賵賲丕. 賵 賷賮乇丨賳賷 丨鬲賶 丨賷賳 賷賰賵賳 賯丿 亘賯賷 毓賱賷賾 兀賳 兀賲賰孬 賮賷 丕賱爻噩賳 兀賱賮 賷賵賲 兀禺乇賶. 兀賳賳賷 兀爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賳 兀賯賵賱 賱賳賮爻賷 賮賷 丕賱睾丿丕丞 兀賳賴 賱賲 賷亘賯 廿賱丕 鬲爻毓賲丕卅丞 賵 鬲爻毓丞 賵 鬲爻毓賵賳 賷賵賲丕. 賱丕 兀賱賮 賷賵賲.賵 賲丕 兀賳 賷兀鬲賷 卮賷卅丕 賲賳 禺丕乇噩 丕賱爻噩賳 丨鬲賶 賷賱賵賳 丕賱丨賷丕丞 賵 賷毓賷丿 丕賱兀賲賱 賮賷 賷賵賲 賷爻鬲胤賷毓 賮賷賴 丕賱爻噩賷賳 兀賳 賷鬲賱賲爻 胤乇賷賯賴 賲乇丞 兀禺乇賶 賵爻胤 丕賱亘卮乇 賰賵丕丨丿 賲賳賴賲 賱丕 賰賲賳亘賵匕 賵 賲乇賲賷 賮賷 丕賱毓乇丕亍. 賲賴賲丕 賰丕賳 賴匕丕 丕賱卮賷亍 氐睾賷乇丕 賮爻賷購丨丿孬 丕賱兀孬乇 賳賮爻賴 丨鬲賶 賵 賱賵 賰丕賳 毓丿丿丕 賲賳 賲噩賱丞.
賰賳鬲 兀爻鬲毓乇囟 丨賷丕鬲賷 丕賱爻丕亘賯丞 賵 兀丨賱賱 兀丿賯 鬲賮丕氐賷賱賴丕. 賵 兀胤賷賱 丕賱鬲賮賰賷乇 賮賷賴丕. 賵 兀丨賰賲 毓賱賶 賳賮爻賷 亘睾賷乇 乇丨賲丞 賵 賱丕 卮賮賯丞. 賰賳鬲 兀賮賰乇 賵 兀賯乇乇 賵 兀丨賱賮 兀賱丕 兀賯丕乇賮 賮賷 丕賱賲爻鬲賯亘賱 賲丕 賯丕乇賮鬲 賮賷 丕賱賲丕囟賷 賲賳 兀禺胤丕亍. 賵 兀賳 兀鬲噩賳亘 丕賱爻賯胤丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 丨胤賲鬲賳賷. 賰賳鬲 兀賳鬲馗乇 丨乇賷鬲賷 賵 兀賳丕丿賷賴丕 賮賷 丨乇丕乇丞 賵 丨賲丕爻丞. 賰賳鬲 兀乇賷丿 兀賳 兀噩乇亘 賯賵丕賷 賲乇丞 兀禺乇賶 賮賷 賰賮丕丨 噩丿賷丿.
廿賳 匕賱賰 丕賱毓丿丿 賲賳 丕賱賲噩賱丞 賯丿 亘丿丕 賱賷 賰兀賳賴 乇爻賵賱 賯丿 賴亘胤 毓賱賷 賲賳 丕賱毓丕賱賲 丕賱兀禺乇. 丕乇鬲爻賲鬲 丨賷丕鬲賷 丕賱賲丕囟賷丞 兀賲丕賲 毓賷賳賷 亘丕乇夭丞 賵丕囟丨丞 丨賷賳匕丕賰. 賵 丨丕賵賱鬲 兀賳 兀毓乇賮 賴賱 兀賳丕 鬲禺賱賮鬲 賵 賴賱 毓丕卮賵丕 賰孬賷乇丕 亘丿賵賳賷責 鬲爻丕亍賱鬲 毓賲丕 賷卮睾賱 亘丕賱賴賲 賵 賷丨乇賰 賳賮賵爻賴賲. 鬲爻丕亍賱鬲 毓賳 丕賱賲爻丕卅賱 丕賱鬲賷 兀氐亘丨鬲 鬲毓賳賷賴賲 賵 毓賳 丕賱賲卮賰賱丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 兀氐亘丨鬲 鬲賴賲賴賲. 賰賳鬲 兀鬲賱亘孬 毓賱賶 丕賱賰賱賲丕鬲 賯賱賯丕 賵 兀賯乇兀 亘賷賳 丕賱爻胤賵乇 賵 兀丨丕賵賱 兀賳 兀賮賴賲 賲賳 丕賱毓亘丕乇丕鬲 賲毓賳丕賴丕 丕賱禺賮賷. 賵 兀賳 兀乇賶 賲丕 賮賷賴丕 賲賳 廿卮丕乇丕鬲 毓賱賶 丕賱賲丕囟賷 丕賱匕賷 兀毓乇賮賴. 賰賳鬲 兀賯鬲賮賷 兀孬丕乇 丕賱兀卮賷丕亍 丕賱鬲賷 賰丕賳鬲 鬲賴夭 丕賱廿賳賮毓丕賱 賮賷 夭賲丕賳賷 賮賲丕 賰丕賳 兀卮丿 丨夭賳賷 丨賷賳 丕囟胤乇乇鬲 兀賳 兀毓鬲乇賮 賱賳賮爻賷 亘兀賳賳賷 兀氐亘丨鬲 睾乇賷亘丕 毓賳 丕賱丨賷丕丞 丕賱噩丿賷丿丞. 賵 兀賳賳賷 丕賱兀賳 毓囟賵 賮賷 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 賲賳賮氐賱 毓賳賴 賲賳亘賵匕 賲賳賴. 賱賯丿 鬲兀禺乇鬲 賵 鬲禺賱賮鬲.賵 兀禺賷乇丕 ...
爻賯胤鬲 丕賱兀睾賱丕賱 .. 兀賳賴囟鬲賴丕 .. 賰賳鬲 兀乇賷丿 兀賳 兀賲爻賰賴丕 賮賷 賷丿賷. 賵 兀賳 兀賳馗乇 睾賱賷賴丕 賲乇丞 兀禺乇賶 .... 兀丿賴卮賳賷 兀賳賴丕 賰丕賳鬲 賲賳匕 賱丨馗丞 鬲賰亘賱 爻丕賯賷賾.
賵丿丕毓丕 .. 廿賱賶 丕賱丨乇賷丞 .. 廿賱賶 丕賱丨賷丕丞 丕賱噩丿賷丿丞 .. 廿賱賶 丕賱丕賳亘毓丕孬 賲賳 亘賷賳 丕賱兀賲賵丕鬲.
March 4, 2021
Dostoevsky did five years of hard labour in a Siberian prison for being in the wrong room at the wrong time. When he was released in 1854 he had to serve time in the Siberian army and he was still banned from publishing anything. This memoir of his time in the joint finally came out in 1861 and it was a big hit. It was the first book to reveal all the horrors of life inside. Dosto said to his brother
there will be the depiction of characters unheard of previously in literature
Maybe he had in mind the prisoner he called Sirotkin. Prison homosexuality isn鈥檛 a modern invention (I know you didn鈥檛 think it was) but Dosto couldn鈥檛 address this subject directly, so he very delicately sketches one particular prisoner, Sirotkin - how handsome he is, how he looks well in a woman鈥檚 dress, how he provides (unspecified) services to other prisoners. I wasn鈥檛 expecting that. I thought 鈥� wait, what was that again?
As with all these memoirs, there is some fictionalising, shaping, rearranging, but the point of The House of the Dead was to tell the truth. So there is no plot. It鈥檚 not a novel. Many chapters are
loose assemblages of anecdotes and essayistic fragments
(Max Nelson in the Paris Review)
Well, there is one thin framing device used for the book, it鈥檚 supposed to be the memoir of a fictional character who got ten years for murdering his wife. But that was included to avoid trouble with the official Russian censor. Contemporary readers took the book as 鈥渕ore or less a faithful account鈥� of Dosto鈥檚 own experience.
LIFE LESSONS FROM SIBERIA
1) The prisoners long for meaningful work, most of them have a trade. The way to destroy their spirits is to force them into work with no point.
2) Prison tries to crush the inmates into total conformity but only succeeds in making their rebellious inner lives more real.
3) Anything can be a prison, the mind, the body, religion, your class, your nationality, anything. Who keeps you in those mind-forged manacles? Only you.
THE ANGUISH AND SOLACE OF FYODOR DOSTOYEVSKY
Although there is no plot at all, this is the story of an intellectual whose radical politics in support of the lower classes forced him (by accident) into unsought and unwelcome intimacy with those lower classes, in the course of which he discovered an emotional and spiritual love for those he had only previously considered to be part of an abstract political theory. Before prison he had thought that the alleviation of the suffering of the peasants was the problem. As an effete literary journalist, prison reality hit Dosto like an express train. At first he hated all the other prisoners and they hated him because he was a 鈥渘obleman鈥�.
After prison he thought the peasants themselves, their intense spiritual realities and their stoicism, were the solution. He slept and ate and lived each miserable moment with them for five years, his prejudices melted away, and this was how it changed him.
Joseph Frank says in prison he finds
a new understanding of the intense humanity and particular moral quality of those he had at first regarded with loathing and dismay
THIS MAY NOT BE THE DOSTOYEVSKY BOOK FOR YOU
I must admit even given that stark horrifying nature of the world described, the narrator can be waffly, repetitious and a little annoying. You will meet a parade of extraordinary characters but you know they aren鈥檛 going to come together into any kind of drama. Just like real life, people come and go and our narrator has no idea what happened to them.
I do not think Petroff can have ended well, he was marked for a violent end; and if he is not yet dead, that only means that the opportunity has not yet presented itself.
Fortunately we know what happened to Dostoyevsky. Four years after this he wrote Crime and Punishment.
there will be the depiction of characters unheard of previously in literature
Maybe he had in mind the prisoner he called Sirotkin. Prison homosexuality isn鈥檛 a modern invention (I know you didn鈥檛 think it was) but Dosto couldn鈥檛 address this subject directly, so he very delicately sketches one particular prisoner, Sirotkin - how handsome he is, how he looks well in a woman鈥檚 dress, how he provides (unspecified) services to other prisoners. I wasn鈥檛 expecting that. I thought 鈥� wait, what was that again?
As with all these memoirs, there is some fictionalising, shaping, rearranging, but the point of The House of the Dead was to tell the truth. So there is no plot. It鈥檚 not a novel. Many chapters are
loose assemblages of anecdotes and essayistic fragments
(Max Nelson in the Paris Review)
Well, there is one thin framing device used for the book, it鈥檚 supposed to be the memoir of a fictional character who got ten years for murdering his wife. But that was included to avoid trouble with the official Russian censor. Contemporary readers took the book as 鈥渕ore or less a faithful account鈥� of Dosto鈥檚 own experience.
LIFE LESSONS FROM SIBERIA
1) The prisoners long for meaningful work, most of them have a trade. The way to destroy their spirits is to force them into work with no point.
2) Prison tries to crush the inmates into total conformity but only succeeds in making their rebellious inner lives more real.
3) Anything can be a prison, the mind, the body, religion, your class, your nationality, anything. Who keeps you in those mind-forged manacles? Only you.
THE ANGUISH AND SOLACE OF FYODOR DOSTOYEVSKY
Although there is no plot at all, this is the story of an intellectual whose radical politics in support of the lower classes forced him (by accident) into unsought and unwelcome intimacy with those lower classes, in the course of which he discovered an emotional and spiritual love for those he had only previously considered to be part of an abstract political theory. Before prison he had thought that the alleviation of the suffering of the peasants was the problem. As an effete literary journalist, prison reality hit Dosto like an express train. At first he hated all the other prisoners and they hated him because he was a 鈥渘obleman鈥�.
After prison he thought the peasants themselves, their intense spiritual realities and their stoicism, were the solution. He slept and ate and lived each miserable moment with them for five years, his prejudices melted away, and this was how it changed him.
Joseph Frank says in prison he finds
a new understanding of the intense humanity and particular moral quality of those he had at first regarded with loathing and dismay
THIS MAY NOT BE THE DOSTOYEVSKY BOOK FOR YOU
I must admit even given that stark horrifying nature of the world described, the narrator can be waffly, repetitious and a little annoying. You will meet a parade of extraordinary characters but you know they aren鈥檛 going to come together into any kind of drama. Just like real life, people come and go and our narrator has no idea what happened to them.
I do not think Petroff can have ended well, he was marked for a violent end; and if he is not yet dead, that only means that the opportunity has not yet presented itself.
Fortunately we know what happened to Dostoyevsky. Four years after this he wrote Crime and Punishment.
September 4, 2018
"During the first weeks, and naturally the early part of my imprisonment, made a deep impression on my imagination. The following years on the other hand are all mixed up together, and leave but a confused recollection. Certain epochs of this life are even effaced from my memory. I have kept one general impression of it though, always the same; painful, monotonous, stifling. What I saw in experience during the first few days of imprisonment seems to me as if it had all taken place yesterday. Such was the case"
These words arrive quite early on, and set the scene for Fyodor Dostoyevsky鈥檚 extraordinary, heartened, semi-fictional account of the internment he endured in a Siberian prison camp after being sentenced to four years of hard labour for his involvement in a revolutionary conspiracy. Dostoyevsky completed this work six years after his release, and across its two main sections you can feel him organising his memories, vividly revising them, and struggling to get them down before they fade. Under the circumstances, he did a remarkable job, after all, I am sure he would rather have written about something else, but his experiences are that important, he simply had to get it down on paper. Few books give such a vivid picture of the sort of setting from which many great works of prison literature emerge, the power of certain writing done from prison has to do with the way it alternatively staves off and gives rein to restlessness, fervour, and desperation. Dostoyevsky鈥檚 narrator insists even the most docile prisoners sometimes need an anguished, convulsive recklessly hopeful display of personality.
Most of the book鈥檚 action revolves around the convicts attempts to make room for some colour and change in their days, but this is obviously limited, card games, knife fights, thefts, drinking sprees, escape attempts, holiday celebrations, a play, anything to stop madness setting setting in. But the most dramatic such attempt in the novel is the shape of the narrative itself. Alexander Petrovich is a bit of a sloppy storyteller. He keeps filling in background information belatedly, as many of the novel鈥檚 chapters are really loose assemblages of anecdotes and essayistic fragments. In a way, 'The House of the Dead is constantly at odds with its subject matter; wherever the narrative calls for a dreary roll call of routine tasks and daily humiliations, the book darts off, digresses or swerves to the side. Which makes me ask the question, why didn't Dostoyevsky just write an out and out autobiographical account of his experience?
This felt to me like a brother version of Solzhenitsyn鈥檚 'One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich', but with less of the bleak, fully clear, almost documentary-style narrative. To be fair, the book moves around genres really well, shifting fluidly between fiction, philosophical meditation, and memoir. I was expecting something more hard-hitting, and emotionally draining from the reader's perspective, that would long live in the memory, but it fell short of this. There are however, for Dostoyevsky fans plenty of lovely philosophical musings, where the narrator ponders the nature of freedom and the importance of hope, the inequality of punishments for the same crime, the gap between appearance and reality, the nature of free will, and other heavy themes.
To me, it was like standing just outside the prison gates getting a glimpse, rather than truly feeling the blood, sweat, and tears from within. Very well written (it's Dostoyevsky after all), just not entirely what I had hoped for.
These words arrive quite early on, and set the scene for Fyodor Dostoyevsky鈥檚 extraordinary, heartened, semi-fictional account of the internment he endured in a Siberian prison camp after being sentenced to four years of hard labour for his involvement in a revolutionary conspiracy. Dostoyevsky completed this work six years after his release, and across its two main sections you can feel him organising his memories, vividly revising them, and struggling to get them down before they fade. Under the circumstances, he did a remarkable job, after all, I am sure he would rather have written about something else, but his experiences are that important, he simply had to get it down on paper. Few books give such a vivid picture of the sort of setting from which many great works of prison literature emerge, the power of certain writing done from prison has to do with the way it alternatively staves off and gives rein to restlessness, fervour, and desperation. Dostoyevsky鈥檚 narrator insists even the most docile prisoners sometimes need an anguished, convulsive recklessly hopeful display of personality.
Most of the book鈥檚 action revolves around the convicts attempts to make room for some colour and change in their days, but this is obviously limited, card games, knife fights, thefts, drinking sprees, escape attempts, holiday celebrations, a play, anything to stop madness setting setting in. But the most dramatic such attempt in the novel is the shape of the narrative itself. Alexander Petrovich is a bit of a sloppy storyteller. He keeps filling in background information belatedly, as many of the novel鈥檚 chapters are really loose assemblages of anecdotes and essayistic fragments. In a way, 'The House of the Dead is constantly at odds with its subject matter; wherever the narrative calls for a dreary roll call of routine tasks and daily humiliations, the book darts off, digresses or swerves to the side. Which makes me ask the question, why didn't Dostoyevsky just write an out and out autobiographical account of his experience?
This felt to me like a brother version of Solzhenitsyn鈥檚 'One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich', but with less of the bleak, fully clear, almost documentary-style narrative. To be fair, the book moves around genres really well, shifting fluidly between fiction, philosophical meditation, and memoir. I was expecting something more hard-hitting, and emotionally draining from the reader's perspective, that would long live in the memory, but it fell short of this. There are however, for Dostoyevsky fans plenty of lovely philosophical musings, where the narrator ponders the nature of freedom and the importance of hope, the inequality of punishments for the same crime, the gap between appearance and reality, the nature of free will, and other heavy themes.
To me, it was like standing just outside the prison gates getting a glimpse, rather than truly feeling the blood, sweat, and tears from within. Very well written (it's Dostoyevsky after all), just not entirely what I had hoped for.
May 3, 2023
De葯i nu-mi place cartea (din pricini obscure), m膬 卯ntreb de ce n-am transcris p卯n膬 acum m膬car acest pasaj pe care nu mai e nevoie s膬-l comentez:
鈥灻巒tr-o zi mi-a trecut prin minte ideea c膬 dac膬 s-ar urm膬ri strivirea complet膬 a personalit膬牛ii omului, distrugerea lui total膬, pedepsirea lui cu pedeapsa cea mai crunt膬, de care p卯n膬 艧i uciga艧ul cel mai 卯nver艧unat s膬 se cutremure, 卯ngrozindu-se numai la g卯ndul c膬 ar putea s膬 se abat膬 asupra lui, ar fi de ajuns ca acesta s膬 fie pus la o munc膬 cu des膬v卯r艧ire inutil膬 艧i absurd膬鈥�.
M膬 g卯ndesc c膬 nu e obligatoriu s膬 fii trimis 卯n Siberia pentru a 卯ndeplini o munc膬 de acest tip, inutil膬 葯i lipsit膬 de sens. Po葲i, de exemplu, s膬 te apuci de scris...
鈥灻巒tr-o zi mi-a trecut prin minte ideea c膬 dac膬 s-ar urm膬ri strivirea complet膬 a personalit膬牛ii omului, distrugerea lui total膬, pedepsirea lui cu pedeapsa cea mai crunt膬, de care p卯n膬 艧i uciga艧ul cel mai 卯nver艧unat s膬 se cutremure, 卯ngrozindu-se numai la g卯ndul c膬 ar putea s膬 se abat膬 asupra lui, ar fi de ajuns ca acesta s膬 fie pus la o munc膬 cu des膬v卯r艧ire inutil膬 艧i absurd膬鈥�.
M膬 g卯ndesc c膬 nu e obligatoriu s膬 fii trimis 卯n Siberia pentru a 卯ndeplini o munc膬 de acest tip, inutil膬 葯i lipsit膬 de sens. Po葲i, de exemplu, s膬 te apuci de scris...
May 2, 2017
"...丕賱丨乇賷丞貙 丕賱丨賷丕丞 丕賱噩丿賷丿丞貙 丕賱兀賳亘毓丕孬 賲賳 亘賷賳 丕賱丕賲賵丕鬲 .. 賷丕 賱賴丕 賲賳 賱丨馗丞 乇丕卅毓丞 "
賵亘賴匕丕 兀禺鬲鬲賲 丿賵爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賶 兀賳卮賵丿丞 丕賱毓匕丕亘 賵賱丨賳 丕賱兀賱賲 ..
賴賶 賱賷爻鬲 賰兀賶 乇賵丕賷丞 賰鬲亘賴丕 賮賷賵丿乇貙 賵賱賰賳賴丕 亘賲孬丕亘丞 鬲丨賯賷賯 毓賳 丨賷丕丞 丕賱爻噩賳.. 賮賱丕 鬲乇鬲賷亘 賱賱兀丨丿丕孬 賰賲丕 賴賵 賲鬲毓丕乇賮 賮賶 兀賶 賯氐丞貙 賮賮賶 亘毓囟 丕賱兀丨賷丕賳 賰丕賳 賷賯胤毓 丕賱爻乇丿 亘賯氐丞 兀禺乇賶 .
匕賱賰 丕賱毓賲賱 賷噩賲毓 亘賷賳 賮賳 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賵 丕賱爻賷乇丞 丕賱匕丕鬲賷丞 賵 丕賱鬲丨賱賷賱 丕賱賳賮爻賷 賰兀賮囟賱 賲丕 賷賰賵賳 ..
賮賱賲丕 賱賱廿爻賴丕亘 賮賶 丕賱丨丿賷孬 毓賳 丕賱丕爻賱賵亘 賵丕賱賵氐賮 賵丕賱爻乇丿 賵丕賱鬲丨賱賷賱 丕賱賳賮爻賶 賱卮禺氐賷丕鬲 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 廿賳 賰賳丕 賳爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賳 賳氐賮 賰賱 賴匕丕 亘賰賱賲丞 賵丕丨丿丞 責 丕賱毓亘賯乇賷丞 .
.賴匕賴 丕賱賲匕賰乇丕鬲 乇賴賷亘丞 賵賲鬲賳丕孬乇丞 亘氐賵乇丞 賲囟胤乇亘丞貙 賱丕亘丿 兀賳賴丕 賰鬲亘鬲 賮賶 爻丕毓丕鬲 噩賳賵賳
" 廿賳 丕賱賲噩乇賲賷賳 賴賲 丕賱兀卮禺丕氐 丕賱兀賰孬乇 賲賵賴亘丞貙 賵丕賱兀賰亘乇 賯賵丞 賲賳 噩賲賷毓 兀賮乇丕丿 卮毓亘賳丕 "
锟斤拷毓賱賶 賴匕賴 丕賱賮賰乇丞 賯丕賲鬲 賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 ..
廿賳 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賷氐賵乇 丨賷丕丞 丕賱爻噩賳 亘胤乇賷賯丞 賲亘賴賲丞 賳賵毓丕賸 賲丕 亘賲丕 賮賷賴丕 賲賳 丌乇丕亍 丨賵賱 丨賷丕丞 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍貙 賵毓丕丿丕鬲賴賲 丕賱睾乇賷亘丞貙 賵胤亘丕毓賴賲貙 賵賯氐氐賴賲貙 賵鬲毓丕賲賱丕鬲賴賲 賲毓 丕賱賳亘賱丕亍 .. 賮賱丕 鬲爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賱丕 鬲鬲毓丕胤賮 賲毓 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賵賱丕 鬲爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賳 鬲鬲毓丕胤賮 賲賴毓賲 !
賵賰賳鬲 毓賳丿 丕賱丕賳鬲賴丕亍 賲賳 賯乇丕亍丞 賰賱 賮氐賱 兀賯賵賱 : 兀賳賴 兀賮囟賱 賲賳 爻丕亘賯賷賴貙 賵兀噩丿 賮賷賴 賲賳 丕賱乇賵毓丞 賲丕 賷噩毓賱賳賶 兀賮鬲鬲賳 亘賴 兀賰孬乇.. 賱賰賳 亘毓丿 丕賱丕賳鬲賴丕亍 賲賳 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 兀丿乇賰鬲 兀賳賴丕 賲賳 兀毓馗賲 賲丕 賯乇兀鬲 .
兀賲丕 毓賳 賲賯丿賲丞 丕賱賲鬲乇噩賲 丕賱鬲賶 兀賵囟丨 賮賷賴丕 丕賱賰孬賷乇 賲賳 丕賱兀禺胤丕亍 賮賶 丕賱鬲乇噩賲丕鬲 丕賱兀禺乇賶 賵亘丕賱乇睾賲 賲賳 兀賳賴 賱賲 賷匕賰乇 丕爻賲 丕賱賲鬲乇噩賲 丕賱兀禺乇 賱賰賳賴 賰丕賳 賷鬲丨丿孬 毓賳 鬲乇噩賲丞 爻丕賲賶 丕賱丿乇賵亘賶 賵賲丕 亘賴丕 賲賳 兀禺胤丕亍 ..
賮賶 丕賱賳賴丕賷丞 賷噩亘 丕賱廿卮丕丿丞 亘丕賱鬲乇噩賲丞 丕賱賲賲鬲丕夭丞 .
賵亘賴匕丕 兀禺鬲鬲賲 丿賵爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賶 兀賳卮賵丿丞 丕賱毓匕丕亘 賵賱丨賳 丕賱兀賱賲 ..
賴賶 賱賷爻鬲 賰兀賶 乇賵丕賷丞 賰鬲亘賴丕 賮賷賵丿乇貙 賵賱賰賳賴丕 亘賲孬丕亘丞 鬲丨賯賷賯 毓賳 丨賷丕丞 丕賱爻噩賳.. 賮賱丕 鬲乇鬲賷亘 賱賱兀丨丿丕孬 賰賲丕 賴賵 賲鬲毓丕乇賮 賮賶 兀賶 賯氐丞貙 賮賮賶 亘毓囟 丕賱兀丨賷丕賳 賰丕賳 賷賯胤毓 丕賱爻乇丿 亘賯氐丞 兀禺乇賶 .
匕賱賰 丕賱毓賲賱 賷噩賲毓 亘賷賳 賮賳 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賵 丕賱爻賷乇丞 丕賱匕丕鬲賷丞 賵 丕賱鬲丨賱賷賱 丕賱賳賮爻賷 賰兀賮囟賱 賲丕 賷賰賵賳 ..
賮賱賲丕 賱賱廿爻賴丕亘 賮賶 丕賱丨丿賷孬 毓賳 丕賱丕爻賱賵亘 賵丕賱賵氐賮 賵丕賱爻乇丿 賵丕賱鬲丨賱賷賱 丕賱賳賮爻賶 賱卮禺氐賷丕鬲 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 廿賳 賰賳丕 賳爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賳 賳氐賮 賰賱 賴匕丕 亘賰賱賲丞 賵丕丨丿丞 責 丕賱毓亘賯乇賷丞 .
.賴匕賴 丕賱賲匕賰乇丕鬲 乇賴賷亘丞 賵賲鬲賳丕孬乇丞 亘氐賵乇丞 賲囟胤乇亘丞貙 賱丕亘丿 兀賳賴丕 賰鬲亘鬲 賮賶 爻丕毓丕鬲 噩賳賵賳
" 廿賳 丕賱賲噩乇賲賷賳 賴賲 丕賱兀卮禺丕氐 丕賱兀賰孬乇 賲賵賴亘丞貙 賵丕賱兀賰亘乇 賯賵丞 賲賳 噩賲賷毓 兀賮乇丕丿 卮毓亘賳丕 "
锟斤拷毓賱賶 賴匕賴 丕賱賮賰乇丞 賯丕賲鬲 賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 ..
廿賳 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賷氐賵乇 丨賷丕丞 丕賱爻噩賳 亘胤乇賷賯丞 賲亘賴賲丞 賳賵毓丕賸 賲丕 亘賲丕 賮賷賴丕 賲賳 丌乇丕亍 丨賵賱 丨賷丕丞 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍貙 賵毓丕丿丕鬲賴賲 丕賱睾乇賷亘丞貙 賵胤亘丕毓賴賲貙 賵賯氐氐賴賲貙 賵鬲毓丕賲賱丕鬲賴賲 賲毓 丕賱賳亘賱丕亍 .. 賮賱丕 鬲爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賱丕 鬲鬲毓丕胤賮 賲毓 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賵賱丕 鬲爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賳 鬲鬲毓丕胤賮 賲賴毓賲 !
賵賰賳鬲 毓賳丿 丕賱丕賳鬲賴丕亍 賲賳 賯乇丕亍丞 賰賱 賮氐賱 兀賯賵賱 : 兀賳賴 兀賮囟賱 賲賳 爻丕亘賯賷賴貙 賵兀噩丿 賮賷賴 賲賳 丕賱乇賵毓丞 賲丕 賷噩毓賱賳賶 兀賮鬲鬲賳 亘賴 兀賰孬乇.. 賱賰賳 亘毓丿 丕賱丕賳鬲賴丕亍 賲賳 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 兀丿乇賰鬲 兀賳賴丕 賲賳 兀毓馗賲 賲丕 賯乇兀鬲 .
兀賲丕 毓賳 賲賯丿賲丞 丕賱賲鬲乇噩賲 丕賱鬲賶 兀賵囟丨 賮賷賴丕 丕賱賰孬賷乇 賲賳 丕賱兀禺胤丕亍 賮賶 丕賱鬲乇噩賲丕鬲 丕賱兀禺乇賶 賵亘丕賱乇睾賲 賲賳 兀賳賴 賱賲 賷匕賰乇 丕爻賲 丕賱賲鬲乇噩賲 丕賱兀禺乇 賱賰賳賴 賰丕賳 賷鬲丨丿孬 毓賳 鬲乇噩賲丞 爻丕賲賶 丕賱丿乇賵亘賶 賵賲丕 亘賴丕 賲賳 兀禺胤丕亍 ..
賮賶 丕賱賳賴丕賷丞 賷噩亘 丕賱廿卮丕丿丞 亘丕賱鬲乇噩賲丞 丕賱賲賲鬲丕夭丞 .
May 22, 2024
"Here there is a world's apart, unlike everything else, with laws of its own, its own dress, its own manners and customs, and here is the house of the living dead - life as nowhere else and a people apart." And the story of this living dead is what Dostoevsky brings to us readers. Based loosely on his own prison experience, this semi-autobiographical novel chronicles the ten-year prison life of Alexander Petrovich in a Siberian prison.
The story begins with "gentleman" Alexander's arrival at the prison which overflows with the peasant community. From the beginning, he is an outsider in every possible way. Imagine, leaving one's own country, surrendering one's liberty, and coming into a prison to serve a ten-year term of penal servitude just to face the cold and unfriendly multitude of peasants; how alone one must feel. The wide gap between the gentry and the peasants in the free world is also preserved in this confined world.
Alexander's mental suffering is acute, for the surrounding is too harsh for his gentlemanly breeding and his intelligence. But he has no choice except to endure the suffering for ten long years amidst a handful of gentlemen and a multitude of peasants. He has to prepare himself mentally to acquiesce to this new life. It is by no means easy. Alexander details his first year in prison which is the hardest of all years. The loathing of the surroundings, his agony at having to live daily in stifling condition, at his distress at the unfriendliness of the fellow convicts leave him ill. It is a painful and melancholy account. With time, he reconciles with his condemned life and earns a few friendly acquaintances.
Alexander's observation of the convicted peasants helps him to acquire a good understanding of them. The prejudice he entertained against them, being a man of the gentry, slowly evaporates as he learns to appreciate their simplicity and good-naturedness. His study of their characters brings to the chronicle a true account of the thoughts and conduct of the peasant class.
The chronicle also details to some extent the nature of corporal punishment and the general conduct of the prison officers. Corporal punishment was cruel and inhumane and it was painful knowledge that at some point in our history such punishment was thought of as just. Being something of a reign of its own, certain commanding officers tended to be tyrants. But generally, according to Alexander's account, the officers were considerate of the convicts.
The ten years Alexander spent in prison helped him reflect on the true meaning of life and the important values of life. His perception of life and liberty alters, and he leaves the life of the "living dead" a wise man eager to begin his new life. "Freedom, new life, resurrection from the dead...What a glorious moment!"
Reading this melancholy account of Alexander Petrovich made me realize that we too are globally undergoing a similar situation due to the pandemic. We don't live in a "house of dead" of course, but our free movement is restricted. Liberty is curtailed to some extent. Perhaps, it is time for us to reflect on the important things of our lives as Alexander did and to bask in the glory the new resurrected life will bring when the freedom is fully restored to us.
The story begins with "gentleman" Alexander's arrival at the prison which overflows with the peasant community. From the beginning, he is an outsider in every possible way. Imagine, leaving one's own country, surrendering one's liberty, and coming into a prison to serve a ten-year term of penal servitude just to face the cold and unfriendly multitude of peasants; how alone one must feel. The wide gap between the gentry and the peasants in the free world is also preserved in this confined world.
Alexander's mental suffering is acute, for the surrounding is too harsh for his gentlemanly breeding and his intelligence. But he has no choice except to endure the suffering for ten long years amidst a handful of gentlemen and a multitude of peasants. He has to prepare himself mentally to acquiesce to this new life. It is by no means easy. Alexander details his first year in prison which is the hardest of all years. The loathing of the surroundings, his agony at having to live daily in stifling condition, at his distress at the unfriendliness of the fellow convicts leave him ill. It is a painful and melancholy account. With time, he reconciles with his condemned life and earns a few friendly acquaintances.
Alexander's observation of the convicted peasants helps him to acquire a good understanding of them. The prejudice he entertained against them, being a man of the gentry, slowly evaporates as he learns to appreciate their simplicity and good-naturedness. His study of their characters brings to the chronicle a true account of the thoughts and conduct of the peasant class.
The chronicle also details to some extent the nature of corporal punishment and the general conduct of the prison officers. Corporal punishment was cruel and inhumane and it was painful knowledge that at some point in our history such punishment was thought of as just. Being something of a reign of its own, certain commanding officers tended to be tyrants. But generally, according to Alexander's account, the officers were considerate of the convicts.
The ten years Alexander spent in prison helped him reflect on the true meaning of life and the important values of life. His perception of life and liberty alters, and he leaves the life of the "living dead" a wise man eager to begin his new life. "Freedom, new life, resurrection from the dead...What a glorious moment!"
Reading this melancholy account of Alexander Petrovich made me realize that we too are globally undergoing a similar situation due to the pandemic. We don't live in a "house of dead" of course, but our free movement is restricted. Liberty is curtailed to some extent. Perhaps, it is time for us to reflect on the important things of our lives as Alexander did and to bask in the glory the new resurrected life will bring when the freedom is fully restored to us.
August 13, 2012
毓賲賷賯 ... 賵 氐丕丿賲 ... 賵 賱匕賷匕 !
賰賲丕 賷賱賷賯 亘兀丨丿 兀賵爻毓 賰鬲亘 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 卮賴乇丞賸
廿賳賾賴 丿丕賳鬲賷 丌禺乇 賷賳丨丿乇 廿賱賶 丕賱噩丨賷賲 賱賷卮乇丨 丕賱兀賴賵丕賱 .... 賵 賷賳匕乇 亘丕賱賯賷丕賲丞
賵賱賰賳賾賴 噩丨賷賲 賲卮丕賴丿 賲毓丕卮 , 丨賷孬 丕賱賲賳賮賷賾賵賳 亘噩乇丕卅賲賴賲 賮賷 爻賷亘賷乇賷丕
賴賳丕賰 丨賷孬 賷噩鬲賲毓 兀賰孬乇 丕賱兀卮禺丕氐 丕爻鬲孬賳丕卅賷賾丞 賵 鬲胤乇賾賮丕 賮賷 丕賱睾乇丕亘丞 賵 丕賱噩乇兀丞 賷賲丕乇爻 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賴賵丕賷鬲賴 丕賱賯丿賷賲丞 賮賷 賳夭毓 丕賱丨噩亘 毓賳 丕賱賳賮爻 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷賾丞 賵 丕賱睾賵氐 賮賷賴丕 毓賲賷賯丕賸 , 賱賷賰鬲亘 丨乇賵賮丕賸 賱丕 鬲禺賱賵 賲賳 丕賱丿賴卮丞 毓賲賾丕 丕爻鬲噩賱丕賴 賲賳 鬲賱賰 丕賱賳賮賵爻
丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷賰鬲亘賴丕 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 毓賱賶 賱爻丕賳 乇噩賱 睾乇賷亘 賵噩丿賴 賮賷 廿丨丿賶 丕賱亘賱丿丕鬲 , 賰禺丿毓丞 賷毓乇賮 兀賳賾賴丕 賱賳 鬲賳胤賱賷 毓賱賶 兀丨丿 , 鬲亘丿賵 賲丨賲賾賱丞 亘丕賳賮毓丕賱丕鬲 賵 賴賵丕噩爻 氐丕丨亘賽賴丕 丕賱丨賷賾丞 賮賷 鬲丨乇亘鬲賴 丕賱兀賰孬乇 禺胤乇丕賸 賵 丕爻鬲孬賳丕卅賷賾丞 賮賷 丨賷丕鬲賴 賱賲賾丕 爻購噩賳 兀乇亘毓 爻賳賷賳 , 賴匕賴 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 丕賱鬲賷 爻賷匕賰乇 亘毓丿 匕賱賰 亘爻賳賷賳 兀賳賾賴 賷丨賲丿 丕賱賱賴 毓賱賶 兀賳 賲乇賾 亘賴丕 , 賱兀賳賾賴丕 賰卮賮鬲 賱賴 賲賳 兀爻乇丕乇 丕賱賳賮爻 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷賾丞 賵 賲賳 丨賰丕賷丕鬲 丕賱丨賷丕丞 賵 毓賲賯賽賴丕 丕賱賰孬賷乇 賲賲賾丕 賰丕賳 爻賷禺賮賶 毓賱賷賴 賵 賴賵 賮賷 毓賱賷丕亍 胤丕賵賱丞 丕賱賰鬲丕亘丞 賵 賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱賳亘賱丕亍 .
賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱賳亘賱丕亍 賴匕丕 丕賱匕賷 噩乇賾 毓賱賷賴 丕賳鬲爻丕亘購賴 廿賱賷賴 丕賱賰孬賷乇 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱爻噩賳 , 廿匕 賲賳 丕賱賲爻鬲睾乇亘 賵 睾賷乇 丕賱賲鬲禺賷賾賱 兀賳 鬲賰賵賳 賰賳亘賷賱 氐丿賷賯丕賸 賱賱卮毓亘 丕賱賰丕丿丨 , 賴匕丕 賲丕 賯乇兀賴 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賮賷 丿賴卮丞 兀賯乇亘 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 廿賱賷賴 - 丕賱匕賷 丕禺鬲丕乇 禺丿賲鬲賴 - 賱賲賾丕 賯丕賱 賱賴 : 兀賱爻鬲購 賲賳賰賲 !責
賴匕賴 丕賱睾乇亘丞 丕賱賲囟丕毓賮丞 毓賳 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賮賵賯 睾乇亘丞 丕賱爻噩賳 , 賵 丕賱鬲賷 丨乇爻鬲 丨賷賾夭 丕賱賲爻丕賮丞 賲毓賴賲 - 賲丕 賷匕賰賾乇 亘乇賵丕賷丞 丕賱賯賵賯毓丞 - , 賲賰賾賳鬲 丿賷爻鬲賵賮爻賰賷 賲賳 丕賱鬲賮乇賾睾 賱賲賱丕丨馗鬲賴賲 賵 賲賱丕丨賯鬲賴賲 亘丕賱鬲賮賰賷乇 賵 丕賱鬲丨賱賷賱 賵 亘卮賰賱 兀毓賲賯 , 賵 賱匕賱賰 賷亘丿賵 賲賳氐賮丕賸 廿賱賶 丨丿賾 亘毓賷丿 毓賳 兀賯氐賶 丨丕賱丕鬲 丕賱鬲毓丕胤賮 賵 丕賱丕賳賮毓丕賱 丕賱賵噩丿丕賳賷 賲毓 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 毓亘乇 丕賱爻胤賵乇 , 禺丕氐賾丞 囟賲賳 賲卮丕賴丿賴賲 賮賷 丕賱賲爻鬲卮賮賶 兀賵 賵氐賮 丨丕賱鬲賴賲 賮賷 鬲乇賯賾亘 賵 丕賳鬲馗丕乇 丕賱毓賯賵亘丕鬲 丕賱噩爻丿賷賾丞 , 賴匕丕 丕賱禺賵賮 賲賳 丕賱毓賯丕亘 賲賳 丕賱爻賵胤 丕賱匕賷 賰丕賳 賷丿賮毓 丕賱賰孬賷乇賷賳 賲賳賴賲 賱賮毓賱 兀賷賾 噩乇賷賲丞 兀賵 兀賷賾 卮賷亍 賱鬲兀禺賷乇 賱丨馗丞 賳夭賵賱 丕賱毓賯賵亘丞 丨鬲賶 賱賵 賰丕賳鬲 爻鬲鬲囟丕毓賮 !
丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賷氐賮 亘匕乇丞 丕賱胤賷亘丞 賵 丕賱禺賷乇 賮賷 賰孬賷乇 賲賳 賴丐賱丕亍 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 , 賲賲賾丕 賷賯賵賱 廿賳賾賰 賯丿 賱丕 鬲噩丿賴 賱丿賶 賰孬賷乇 賲賳 丕賱賲孬賯賾賮賷賳 , 賵賱丕 賷睾賮賱 兀賳 賷氐賮 賲賳 賴賲 睾賷乇 賯丕丿乇賷賳 廿賱賾丕 毓賱賶 丕賱卮乇賾 賵 丕賱賲賰乇 賵 丕賱賵卮丕賷丞 賵 賷氐賮 兀丨丿賴賲 - 丕賱匕賷 禺購丿毓 亘賴 賮賷 丕賱賷賵賲 丕賱丕賵賾賱- 亘鬲賯乇賷毓 賵 鬲卮賳賷毓 卮丿賷丿 , 賰匕賱賰 賷乇賰賾夭 毓賱賶 丕賱賲賴丕乇丕鬲 丕賱丕爻鬲孬賳丕卅賷賾丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷賯丿乇賵賳 毓賱賷賴丕 , 賵 賷賯賵賱 賮賷 賰賱賲丞 賱丕賮鬲丞 賰賷賮 兀賳賾 賴匕丕 丕賱賲賰丕賳 賷囟賲賾 賲噩鬲賲毓丕賸 賲賳 丕賱卮禺氐賷賾丕鬲 丕賱兀賰孬乇 廿亘丿丕毓丕賸 賵 賯丿乇丞賸 毓賱賶 丕賱廿賳噩丕夭 ... 賰賲丕 爻鬲卮毓乇 亘賯丿乇 賰亘賷乇 賲賳 丕賱鬲毓丕囟賮 賲毓賴賲 賵 賴賵 賷乇賵賷 賱丨馗丕鬲 丕賱賯賴乇 丕賱囟毓賮 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷 丕賱鬲賷 賰丕賳鬲 鬲毓鬲乇賷賴賲 ,賲孬賱 丕賱乇丨賱丞 丕賱氐毓亘丞 噩丿賾丕 賱賱丨氐賵賱 毓賱賶 丕賲乇兀丞 亘兀噩乇 亘丕賴馗 賰賱賾 毓丿賾丞 爻賳賷賳 , 賵 賲孬賱 兀賲丕賳賷賾 丕賱亘毓囟 賵 兀丨賱丕賲賴賲 丨賵賱 丕賱丨賷丕丞 丕賱賯丕丿賲丞 亘毓丿 兀賳 賷賳鬲賴賷 丕賱爻噩賳 亘毓丿 毓卮乇 兀賵 毓卮乇賷賳 毓丕賲丕賸 , 賵 賲毓丕乇賰 丕賱卮鬲丕卅賲 丕賱鬲賷 賰丕賳 賱丕 賷禺賱賵 賲賳賴丕 賳賴丕乇 , 賵 賳夭丕毓丕鬲賴賲 丨賵賱 丕賱氐睾丕卅乇 , 賵 廿卮丕丿鬲賴賲 賵 亘乇賷賯 丕賱丨乇賷丞 丕賱匕賷 賱賲毓 賮賷 毓賷賵賳賴賲 賱丿賶 禺亘乇 賴乇亘 兀丨丿 丕賱夭賲賱丕亍 , 賵 賱丿賶 乇賲賷賴賲 賱賱賳爻乇 丕賱丨亘賷爻 賲毓賴賲 禺丕乇噩 兀爻賵丕乇 丕賱爻噩賳 , 丕賱賳爻乇 丕賱匕賷 賱賲 賷賮鬲 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 兀賳 賷丨賱賾賱 卮禺氐賷賾鬲賴 兀賷囟丕賸 , 賰賲丕 爻亘賯 兀賳 丨賱賾賱 卮禺氐賷賾丞 賰賱丕亘 丕賱爻噩賳 賵 丕賱丕禺鬲賱丕賮丕鬲 丕賱賳賮爻賷賾丞 亘賷賳賴丕 .
賵 賱賱鬲匕賰賷乇 賮賴匕丕 丕賱賲賳賮賶 丕賱爻賷亘賷乇賷 賰丕賳鬲 丕賱兀卮睾丕賱 丕賱卮丕賯賾丞 賮賷賴 賲賮乇賵囟丞賸 毓賱賶 噩賲賷毓 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 , 賴匕賴 丕賱兀卮睾丕賱 丕賱鬲賷 賷賮賵鬲 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 兀賳 賷匕賰乇 鬲噩乇亘鬲賴 賲毓賴丕 , 賵 兀賳 賷丨賱賾賱賴丕 兀賷囟丕賸 , 賵 賰丕賳 賲賳 丕賱噩賲賷賱 丨賷賳 賯丕賱 廿賳賾 兀賰亘乇 毓匕丕亘 鬲囟毓賴 毓賱賶 爻噩賷賳 丨賷賳 鬲賰賱賾賮賴 亘毓賲賱 賱丕 賷乇賶 賮賷賴 廿賳噩丕夭丕賸 , 毓賲賱丕賸 毓亘孬賷賾丕 鬲賮賴賲賴 兀賳賾 丕賱睾乇囟 賮賷賴 兀賳 賷毓賲賱 賮賯胤 賵 鬲噩亘乇賴 毓賱賶 匕賱賰 , 賰兀賳 賷賳賯賱 丨噩丕乇丞 賲賳 丕賱賷賲賷賳 廿賱賶 丕賱卮賲丕賱 孬賲賾 鬲噩毓賱賴 賷毓賷丿賴丕 賲賳 丕賱卮賲丕賱 廿賱賶 丕賱賷賲賷賳 , 亘賷賳賲丕 賷亘丿賵 丕賱爻噩賷賳 賲賳爻噩賲丕賸 賲毓 丕賱毓賲賱 丨賷賳 賷乇賶 廿賳噩丕夭賴 賮賷賴 賰兀賳 賷亘賳賷 爻賵乇丕賸 賲孬賱丕賸 ...
孬賲賾丞 毓賳賶 賰亘賷乇 賮賷 鬲丨賱賷賱 丕賱卮禺氐賷賾丕鬲 亘毓賲賯 賵 鬲賮氐賷賱 , 賵 賮賷 鬲賲賷賷夭 丕禺鬲賱丕賮丕鬲賴丕 賵 賲賳胤賯賴丕 賵 賴賵丕噩爻賴丕 , 賵 賮賷 丨賰丕賷丕鬲賴 丕賱丿賯賷賯丞 賵 丕賱賲賲鬲毓丞 毓賳 鬲氐乇賾賮丕鬲賴賲 丿丕禺賱 丕賱爻噩賳 , 賵 毓賳 丨丿賷孬賴賲 毓賳 噩乇丕卅賲賴賲 丕賱匕賷 賷賱丕丨馗 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賲賳丿賴卮丕賸 兀賳賾賴 賱賲 賷氐丕丿賮 賲乇賾丞 賵丕丨丿丞 賲賳 賷鬲丨丿賾孬 毓賳 噩乇賷賲鬲賴 亘賳賵毓 賲賳 丕賱賳丿賲 ... 兀亘丿丕賸 ! , 乇睾賲 兀賳賾 賰孬賷乇丕賸 賲賳 賴匕賴 丕賱噩乇丕卅賲 鬲亘賱睾 丨丿賾丕賸 賲賳 丕賱賮馗丕毓丞 鬲爻鬲睾乇亘 賰賷賮 賷毓賷卮 賮丕毓賱賴丕 亘賷賳 丕賱亘卮乇 ... 賵賱賰賳 賷丕 賱賱爻禺乇賷丞 賮賴賵 賷毓賷卮 賴賳丕 兀賲丕賲賰 賵 兀賳鬲 鬲賱丨馗 賲乇丨賴 兀賵 "賹賯賱亘賴 丕賱胤賷賾亘" 兀賵 賰乇賲賴 ... 兀賵 丨鬲賶 卮賴丕賲鬲賴 .
賰丕賳 賮賷 丕賱爻噩賳 賲鬲賲乇賾丿賵賳 爻賷丕爻賷賾賵賳 , 賵 賰丕賳 賮賷賴 賲孬賯賾賮賵賳 , 賵 賰丕賳 賮賷賴 賯鬲賱丞 賵 爻賮賾丕丨賵賳 , 賵 賰丕賳 賮賷賴 賲禺乇賾亘賵賳 , 賵 賰丕賳 賮賷賴 賲鬲賲乇賾丿賵賳 丿賷賳賷賾丕賸 , 賵 賰丕賳 賮賷賴 賲爻賱賲賵賳 孬賱丕孬丞 賲賳 丿丕睾爻鬲丕賳 賱丕 賷賮賵鬲 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮賰爻賷 丕賳 賷氐賮 賲丨亘賾鬲賴 賱賴賲 賵 兀賲丕賳鬲賴賲 賵 "丕亘鬲爻丕賲鬲賴賲 丕賱賲爻賱賲丞" 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賮鬲賳賴 賵 鬲禺丿賾乇賴 , 賵 賰丕賳 賮賷 丕賱爻噩賳 賷賴賵丿賷賾 賷氐賮賴 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 亘廿爻賴丕亘 賱賷賰賵賳 賳賲賵匕噩 丕賱賷賴賵丿賷賾 亘賰賱賾 鬲賳丕賯囟丕鬲賴 賵 氐賵乇賴 丕賱賳賲胤賷丞 賵賱賰賳賾賴 賲噩爻賾丿 兀賲丕賲賴 ... 賰丕賳 賮賷賴 賰賱賾 賴匕丕 丕賱睾賳賶 賵 丕賱鬲賳賵賾毓 丕賱匕賷 賷賳賯賱賴 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 亘亘乇丕毓丞 .
賰賲丕 賯丿 鬲卮賰賾賱 賵賯賮丕鬲 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 亘賷賳 丕賱賮氐賵賱 賱賱鬲丨賱賷賱 賵 丕賱鬲賮氐賷賱 賵 賱匕賰乇 丌乇丕卅賴 丨賵賱 賯囟丕賷丕 丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷丞 賵 丿賷賳賷賾丞 賵 賳賮爻賷賾丞 賲乇鬲亘胤丞 亘丕賱爻噩賳 兀賴賲賾 賲丕 賷囟賲賾賴 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賮丕卅丿丞賸 .
賱丕 賷賳亘睾賷 丕賳 賳賳爻賶 兀賳賾 賵氐賮 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮賰爻賷 賱賵囟毓 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賵 卮禺氐賷賾丕鬲賴賲 賵 鬲賯乇賷亘賴賲 賱賱賯乇賾丕亍 賰亘卮乇 , 賲毓 賵氐賮賴 丕賱賯丕爻賷 賱賱毓賯賵亘丕鬲 賵 賱賵囟毓 丕賱賲卮賮賶 , 賱賲 賷丨囟乇 賮賷 丕賳鬲卮丕乇 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賮賷 賰賱賾 兀賳丨丕亍 乇賵爻賷丕 賵 丨爻亘 -亘毓丿賲丕 丕毓鬲乇囟鬲 丕賱乇賯丕亘丞 毓賱賶 亘毓囟 丕賱賰賱賲丕鬲 丕賱亘匕賷卅丞 賮賯胤- 丨鬲賶 賰丕賳 丕賱賯賷氐乇 賳賮爻賴 賷賯乇兀 氐賮丨丕鬲賴 賵 賷亘賰賷 , 賰賲丕 賷乇賵賷 禺丿賲賴 , 賵 廿賳賾賲丕 賰丕賳 賱賴 鬲兀孬賷乇 兀賵爻毓 兀丿賾賶 廿賱賶 鬲睾賷賷乇 賯丕賳賵賳 丕賱毓賯賵亘丕鬲 賵 賲賳毓 丕賱毓賯賵亘丕鬲 丕賱噩爻丿賷賾丞 賮賷 丕賱爻噩賵賳 亘毓丿 賳卮乇賴 亘爻賳賷賳 賲毓丿賵丿丞 賮賯胤 .
賵 賷亘賯賶 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 兀丨丿 亘氐賲丕鬲 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 丕賱鬲賷 賱丕 賷噩亘 丕賱賲乇賵乇 亘賴 丿賵賳 丕賱賵賯賵賮 毓賳丿賴丕 , 賵 兀丨丿 兀賵丕卅賱 丕賱賰鬲亘 丕賱鬲賷 丕賯鬲丨賲鬲 毓丕賱賲 丕賱爻噩賳 丕賱乇賴賷亘
賰賲丕 賷賱賷賯 亘兀丨丿 兀賵爻毓 賰鬲亘 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 卮賴乇丞賸
廿賳賾賴 丿丕賳鬲賷 丌禺乇 賷賳丨丿乇 廿賱賶 丕賱噩丨賷賲 賱賷卮乇丨 丕賱兀賴賵丕賱 .... 賵 賷賳匕乇 亘丕賱賯賷丕賲丞
賵賱賰賳賾賴 噩丨賷賲 賲卮丕賴丿 賲毓丕卮 , 丨賷孬 丕賱賲賳賮賷賾賵賳 亘噩乇丕卅賲賴賲 賮賷 爻賷亘賷乇賷丕
賴賳丕賰 丨賷孬 賷噩鬲賲毓 兀賰孬乇 丕賱兀卮禺丕氐 丕爻鬲孬賳丕卅賷賾丞 賵 鬲胤乇賾賮丕 賮賷 丕賱睾乇丕亘丞 賵 丕賱噩乇兀丞 賷賲丕乇爻 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賴賵丕賷鬲賴 丕賱賯丿賷賲丞 賮賷 賳夭毓 丕賱丨噩亘 毓賳 丕賱賳賮爻 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷賾丞 賵 丕賱睾賵氐 賮賷賴丕 毓賲賷賯丕賸 , 賱賷賰鬲亘 丨乇賵賮丕賸 賱丕 鬲禺賱賵 賲賳 丕賱丿賴卮丞 毓賲賾丕 丕爻鬲噩賱丕賴 賲賳 鬲賱賰 丕賱賳賮賵爻
丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷賰鬲亘賴丕 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 毓賱賶 賱爻丕賳 乇噩賱 睾乇賷亘 賵噩丿賴 賮賷 廿丨丿賶 丕賱亘賱丿丕鬲 , 賰禺丿毓丞 賷毓乇賮 兀賳賾賴丕 賱賳 鬲賳胤賱賷 毓賱賶 兀丨丿 , 鬲亘丿賵 賲丨賲賾賱丞 亘丕賳賮毓丕賱丕鬲 賵 賴賵丕噩爻 氐丕丨亘賽賴丕 丕賱丨賷賾丞 賮賷 鬲丨乇亘鬲賴 丕賱兀賰孬乇 禺胤乇丕賸 賵 丕爻鬲孬賳丕卅賷賾丞 賮賷 丨賷丕鬲賴 賱賲賾丕 爻購噩賳 兀乇亘毓 爻賳賷賳 , 賴匕賴 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 丕賱鬲賷 爻賷匕賰乇 亘毓丿 匕賱賰 亘爻賳賷賳 兀賳賾賴 賷丨賲丿 丕賱賱賴 毓賱賶 兀賳 賲乇賾 亘賴丕 , 賱兀賳賾賴丕 賰卮賮鬲 賱賴 賲賳 兀爻乇丕乇 丕賱賳賮爻 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷賾丞 賵 賲賳 丨賰丕賷丕鬲 丕賱丨賷丕丞 賵 毓賲賯賽賴丕 丕賱賰孬賷乇 賲賲賾丕 賰丕賳 爻賷禺賮賶 毓賱賷賴 賵 賴賵 賮賷 毓賱賷丕亍 胤丕賵賱丞 丕賱賰鬲丕亘丞 賵 賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱賳亘賱丕亍 .
賲噩鬲賲毓 丕賱賳亘賱丕亍 賴匕丕 丕賱匕賷 噩乇賾 毓賱賷賴 丕賳鬲爻丕亘購賴 廿賱賷賴 丕賱賰孬賷乇 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱爻噩賳 , 廿匕 賲賳 丕賱賲爻鬲睾乇亘 賵 睾賷乇 丕賱賲鬲禺賷賾賱 兀賳 鬲賰賵賳 賰賳亘賷賱 氐丿賷賯丕賸 賱賱卮毓亘 丕賱賰丕丿丨 , 賴匕丕 賲丕 賯乇兀賴 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賮賷 丿賴卮丞 兀賯乇亘 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 廿賱賷賴 - 丕賱匕賷 丕禺鬲丕乇 禺丿賲鬲賴 - 賱賲賾丕 賯丕賱 賱賴 : 兀賱爻鬲購 賲賳賰賲 !責
賴匕賴 丕賱睾乇亘丞 丕賱賲囟丕毓賮丞 毓賳 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賮賵賯 睾乇亘丞 丕賱爻噩賳 , 賵 丕賱鬲賷 丨乇爻鬲 丨賷賾夭 丕賱賲爻丕賮丞 賲毓賴賲 - 賲丕 賷匕賰賾乇 亘乇賵丕賷丞 丕賱賯賵賯毓丞 - , 賲賰賾賳鬲 丿賷爻鬲賵賮爻賰賷 賲賳 丕賱鬲賮乇賾睾 賱賲賱丕丨馗鬲賴賲 賵 賲賱丕丨賯鬲賴賲 亘丕賱鬲賮賰賷乇 賵 丕賱鬲丨賱賷賱 賵 亘卮賰賱 兀毓賲賯 , 賵 賱匕賱賰 賷亘丿賵 賲賳氐賮丕賸 廿賱賶 丨丿賾 亘毓賷丿 毓賳 兀賯氐賶 丨丕賱丕鬲 丕賱鬲毓丕胤賮 賵 丕賱丕賳賮毓丕賱 丕賱賵噩丿丕賳賷 賲毓 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 毓亘乇 丕賱爻胤賵乇 , 禺丕氐賾丞 囟賲賳 賲卮丕賴丿賴賲 賮賷 丕賱賲爻鬲卮賮賶 兀賵 賵氐賮 丨丕賱鬲賴賲 賮賷 鬲乇賯賾亘 賵 丕賳鬲馗丕乇 丕賱毓賯賵亘丕鬲 丕賱噩爻丿賷賾丞 , 賴匕丕 丕賱禺賵賮 賲賳 丕賱毓賯丕亘 賲賳 丕賱爻賵胤 丕賱匕賷 賰丕賳 賷丿賮毓 丕賱賰孬賷乇賷賳 賲賳賴賲 賱賮毓賱 兀賷賾 噩乇賷賲丞 兀賵 兀賷賾 卮賷亍 賱鬲兀禺賷乇 賱丨馗丞 賳夭賵賱 丕賱毓賯賵亘丞 丨鬲賶 賱賵 賰丕賳鬲 爻鬲鬲囟丕毓賮 !
丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賷氐賮 亘匕乇丞 丕賱胤賷亘丞 賵 丕賱禺賷乇 賮賷 賰孬賷乇 賲賳 賴丐賱丕亍 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 , 賲賲賾丕 賷賯賵賱 廿賳賾賰 賯丿 賱丕 鬲噩丿賴 賱丿賶 賰孬賷乇 賲賳 丕賱賲孬賯賾賮賷賳 , 賵賱丕 賷睾賮賱 兀賳 賷氐賮 賲賳 賴賲 睾賷乇 賯丕丿乇賷賳 廿賱賾丕 毓賱賶 丕賱卮乇賾 賵 丕賱賲賰乇 賵 丕賱賵卮丕賷丞 賵 賷氐賮 兀丨丿賴賲 - 丕賱匕賷 禺購丿毓 亘賴 賮賷 丕賱賷賵賲 丕賱丕賵賾賱- 亘鬲賯乇賷毓 賵 鬲卮賳賷毓 卮丿賷丿 , 賰匕賱賰 賷乇賰賾夭 毓賱賶 丕賱賲賴丕乇丕鬲 丕賱丕爻鬲孬賳丕卅賷賾丞 丕賱鬲賷 賷賯丿乇賵賳 毓賱賷賴丕 , 賵 賷賯賵賱 賮賷 賰賱賲丞 賱丕賮鬲丞 賰賷賮 兀賳賾 賴匕丕 丕賱賲賰丕賳 賷囟賲賾 賲噩鬲賲毓丕賸 賲賳 丕賱卮禺氐賷賾丕鬲 丕賱兀賰孬乇 廿亘丿丕毓丕賸 賵 賯丿乇丞賸 毓賱賶 丕賱廿賳噩丕夭 ... 賰賲丕 爻鬲卮毓乇 亘賯丿乇 賰亘賷乇 賲賳 丕賱鬲毓丕囟賮 賲毓賴賲 賵 賴賵 賷乇賵賷 賱丨馗丕鬲 丕賱賯賴乇 丕賱囟毓賮 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷 丕賱鬲賷 賰丕賳鬲 鬲毓鬲乇賷賴賲 ,賲孬賱 丕賱乇丨賱丞 丕賱氐毓亘丞 噩丿賾丕 賱賱丨氐賵賱 毓賱賶 丕賲乇兀丞 亘兀噩乇 亘丕賴馗 賰賱賾 毓丿賾丞 爻賳賷賳 , 賵 賲孬賱 兀賲丕賳賷賾 丕賱亘毓囟 賵 兀丨賱丕賲賴賲 丨賵賱 丕賱丨賷丕丞 丕賱賯丕丿賲丞 亘毓丿 兀賳 賷賳鬲賴賷 丕賱爻噩賳 亘毓丿 毓卮乇 兀賵 毓卮乇賷賳 毓丕賲丕賸 , 賵 賲毓丕乇賰 丕賱卮鬲丕卅賲 丕賱鬲賷 賰丕賳 賱丕 賷禺賱賵 賲賳賴丕 賳賴丕乇 , 賵 賳夭丕毓丕鬲賴賲 丨賵賱 丕賱氐睾丕卅乇 , 賵 廿卮丕丿鬲賴賲 賵 亘乇賷賯 丕賱丨乇賷丞 丕賱匕賷 賱賲毓 賮賷 毓賷賵賳賴賲 賱丿賶 禺亘乇 賴乇亘 兀丨丿 丕賱夭賲賱丕亍 , 賵 賱丿賶 乇賲賷賴賲 賱賱賳爻乇 丕賱丨亘賷爻 賲毓賴賲 禺丕乇噩 兀爻賵丕乇 丕賱爻噩賳 , 丕賱賳爻乇 丕賱匕賷 賱賲 賷賮鬲 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 兀賳 賷丨賱賾賱 卮禺氐賷賾鬲賴 兀賷囟丕賸 , 賰賲丕 爻亘賯 兀賳 丨賱賾賱 卮禺氐賷賾丞 賰賱丕亘 丕賱爻噩賳 賵 丕賱丕禺鬲賱丕賮丕鬲 丕賱賳賮爻賷賾丞 亘賷賳賴丕 .
賵 賱賱鬲匕賰賷乇 賮賴匕丕 丕賱賲賳賮賶 丕賱爻賷亘賷乇賷 賰丕賳鬲 丕賱兀卮睾丕賱 丕賱卮丕賯賾丞 賮賷賴 賲賮乇賵囟丞賸 毓賱賶 噩賲賷毓 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 , 賴匕賴 丕賱兀卮睾丕賱 丕賱鬲賷 賷賮賵鬲 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 兀賳 賷匕賰乇 鬲噩乇亘鬲賴 賲毓賴丕 , 賵 兀賳 賷丨賱賾賱賴丕 兀賷囟丕賸 , 賵 賰丕賳 賲賳 丕賱噩賲賷賱 丨賷賳 賯丕賱 廿賳賾 兀賰亘乇 毓匕丕亘 鬲囟毓賴 毓賱賶 爻噩賷賳 丨賷賳 鬲賰賱賾賮賴 亘毓賲賱 賱丕 賷乇賶 賮賷賴 廿賳噩丕夭丕賸 , 毓賲賱丕賸 毓亘孬賷賾丕 鬲賮賴賲賴 兀賳賾 丕賱睾乇囟 賮賷賴 兀賳 賷毓賲賱 賮賯胤 賵 鬲噩亘乇賴 毓賱賶 匕賱賰 , 賰兀賳 賷賳賯賱 丨噩丕乇丞 賲賳 丕賱賷賲賷賳 廿賱賶 丕賱卮賲丕賱 孬賲賾 鬲噩毓賱賴 賷毓賷丿賴丕 賲賳 丕賱卮賲丕賱 廿賱賶 丕賱賷賲賷賳 , 亘賷賳賲丕 賷亘丿賵 丕賱爻噩賷賳 賲賳爻噩賲丕賸 賲毓 丕賱毓賲賱 丨賷賳 賷乇賶 廿賳噩丕夭賴 賮賷賴 賰兀賳 賷亘賳賷 爻賵乇丕賸 賲孬賱丕賸 ...
孬賲賾丞 毓賳賶 賰亘賷乇 賮賷 鬲丨賱賷賱 丕賱卮禺氐賷賾丕鬲 亘毓賲賯 賵 鬲賮氐賷賱 , 賵 賮賷 鬲賲賷賷夭 丕禺鬲賱丕賮丕鬲賴丕 賵 賲賳胤賯賴丕 賵 賴賵丕噩爻賴丕 , 賵 賮賷 丨賰丕賷丕鬲賴 丕賱丿賯賷賯丞 賵 丕賱賲賲鬲毓丞 毓賳 鬲氐乇賾賮丕鬲賴賲 丿丕禺賱 丕賱爻噩賳 , 賵 毓賳 丨丿賷孬賴賲 毓賳 噩乇丕卅賲賴賲 丕賱匕賷 賷賱丕丨馗 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賲賳丿賴卮丕賸 兀賳賾賴 賱賲 賷氐丕丿賮 賲乇賾丞 賵丕丨丿丞 賲賳 賷鬲丨丿賾孬 毓賳 噩乇賷賲鬲賴 亘賳賵毓 賲賳 丕賱賳丿賲 ... 兀亘丿丕賸 ! , 乇睾賲 兀賳賾 賰孬賷乇丕賸 賲賳 賴匕賴 丕賱噩乇丕卅賲 鬲亘賱睾 丨丿賾丕賸 賲賳 丕賱賮馗丕毓丞 鬲爻鬲睾乇亘 賰賷賮 賷毓賷卮 賮丕毓賱賴丕 亘賷賳 丕賱亘卮乇 ... 賵賱賰賳 賷丕 賱賱爻禺乇賷丞 賮賴賵 賷毓賷卮 賴賳丕 兀賲丕賲賰 賵 兀賳鬲 鬲賱丨馗 賲乇丨賴 兀賵 "賹賯賱亘賴 丕賱胤賷賾亘" 兀賵 賰乇賲賴 ... 兀賵 丨鬲賶 卮賴丕賲鬲賴 .
賰丕賳 賮賷 丕賱爻噩賳 賲鬲賲乇賾丿賵賳 爻賷丕爻賷賾賵賳 , 賵 賰丕賳 賮賷賴 賲孬賯賾賮賵賳 , 賵 賰丕賳 賮賷賴 賯鬲賱丞 賵 爻賮賾丕丨賵賳 , 賵 賰丕賳 賮賷賴 賲禺乇賾亘賵賳 , 賵 賰丕賳 賮賷賴 賲鬲賲乇賾丿賵賳 丿賷賳賷賾丕賸 , 賵 賰丕賳 賮賷賴 賲爻賱賲賵賳 孬賱丕孬丞 賲賳 丿丕睾爻鬲丕賳 賱丕 賷賮賵鬲 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮賰爻賷 丕賳 賷氐賮 賲丨亘賾鬲賴 賱賴賲 賵 兀賲丕賳鬲賴賲 賵 "丕亘鬲爻丕賲鬲賴賲 丕賱賲爻賱賲丞" 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賮鬲賳賴 賵 鬲禺丿賾乇賴 , 賵 賰丕賳 賮賷 丕賱爻噩賳 賷賴賵丿賷賾 賷氐賮賴 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 亘廿爻賴丕亘 賱賷賰賵賳 賳賲賵匕噩 丕賱賷賴賵丿賷賾 亘賰賱賾 鬲賳丕賯囟丕鬲賴 賵 氐賵乇賴 丕賱賳賲胤賷丞 賵賱賰賳賾賴 賲噩爻賾丿 兀賲丕賲賴 ... 賰丕賳 賮賷賴 賰賱賾 賴匕丕 丕賱睾賳賶 賵 丕賱鬲賳賵賾毓 丕賱匕賷 賷賳賯賱賴 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 亘亘乇丕毓丞 .
賰賲丕 賯丿 鬲卮賰賾賱 賵賯賮丕鬲 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 亘賷賳 丕賱賮氐賵賱 賱賱鬲丨賱賷賱 賵 丕賱鬲賮氐賷賱 賵 賱匕賰乇 丌乇丕卅賴 丨賵賱 賯囟丕賷丕 丕噩鬲賲丕毓賷丞 賵 丿賷賳賷賾丞 賵 賳賮爻賷賾丞 賲乇鬲亘胤丞 亘丕賱爻噩賳 兀賴賲賾 賲丕 賷囟賲賾賴 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賮丕卅丿丞賸 .
賱丕 賷賳亘睾賷 丕賳 賳賳爻賶 兀賳賾 賵氐賮 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮賰爻賷 賱賵囟毓 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賵 卮禺氐賷賾丕鬲賴賲 賵 鬲賯乇賷亘賴賲 賱賱賯乇賾丕亍 賰亘卮乇 , 賲毓 賵氐賮賴 丕賱賯丕爻賷 賱賱毓賯賵亘丕鬲 賵 賱賵囟毓 丕賱賲卮賮賶 , 賱賲 賷丨囟乇 賮賷 丕賳鬲卮丕乇 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賮賷 賰賱賾 兀賳丨丕亍 乇賵爻賷丕 賵 丨爻亘 -亘毓丿賲丕 丕毓鬲乇囟鬲 丕賱乇賯丕亘丞 毓賱賶 亘毓囟 丕賱賰賱賲丕鬲 丕賱亘匕賷卅丞 賮賯胤- 丨鬲賶 賰丕賳 丕賱賯賷氐乇 賳賮爻賴 賷賯乇兀 氐賮丨丕鬲賴 賵 賷亘賰賷 , 賰賲丕 賷乇賵賷 禺丿賲賴 , 賵 廿賳賾賲丕 賰丕賳 賱賴 鬲兀孬賷乇 兀賵爻毓 兀丿賾賶 廿賱賶 鬲睾賷賷乇 賯丕賳賵賳 丕賱毓賯賵亘丕鬲 賵 賲賳毓 丕賱毓賯賵亘丕鬲 丕賱噩爻丿賷賾丞 賮賷 丕賱爻噩賵賳 亘毓丿 賳卮乇賴 亘爻賳賷賳 賲毓丿賵丿丞 賮賯胤 .
賵 賷亘賯賶 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 兀丨丿 亘氐賲丕鬲 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 丕賱鬲賷 賱丕 賷噩亘 丕賱賲乇賵乇 亘賴 丿賵賳 丕賱賵賯賵賮 毓賳丿賴丕 , 賵 兀丨丿 兀賵丕卅賱 丕賱賰鬲亘 丕賱鬲賷 丕賯鬲丨賲鬲 毓丕賱賲 丕賱爻噩賳 丕賱乇賴賷亘
June 27, 2018
"...丕賱丨乇賷丞貙 丕賱丨賷丕丞 丕賱噩丿賷丿丞貙 丕賱兀賳亘毓丕孬 賲賳 亘賷賳 丕賱丕賲賵丕鬲 .. 賷丕 賱賴丕 賲賳 賱丨馗丞 乇丕卅毓丞 "
亘賴匕丕 禺鬲賲 賮賷賵丿賵乇 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘貙 賰丕賱丕賳亘毓丕孬 賲賳 亘賷賳 丕賱丕賲賵丕鬲. 丨賷丕鬲 丕賱爻噩賳 丕賱賲乇賷乇丞 賷氐賮賴丕 賴賳丕 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賲毓 丕賱鬲睾賱睾賱 賮賷 丕賱賳賮爻 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 丨賷孬 賷丨丕賵賱 丕賳 賷鬲睾賱睾賱 賮賷 賳賮爻賷丕鬲 賴丐賱丕亍 丕賱乇賮丕賯 賮賷 丕賱爻噩賳.
爻噩賳丕亍 賲禺鬲賱賮賵賳 賮賷 賰賱 卮賷亍貙 賳亘賱丕亍貙 丨乇賮賷賵賳貙 賮賱丕丨賵賳貙 賲賳 卮毓賵亘 丕禺乇賶 賵丿賷丕賳丕鬲 丕禺乇賶賵丨鬲賶 毓爻賰乇賷賵賳.
賲賳 丕乇賵毓 賰鬲亘 丕丿亘 丕賱爻噩賵賳 丕賱匕賷 賯乇丕鬲賴丕. 賵賱丕 賷丕鬲賷 毓賱賶 匕賰乇 丕賱爻噩丕賳賷賳 丕賱丕 賮賷賲丕 賳丿乇 賮賴賳丕 賷丨丕賵賱 丕賳 賷馗賴乇 賰賷賮 賷鬲毓丕賲賱 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賲毓 賵丕賯毓賴賲 賵丕賱鬲賰賷賮 賲毓 賴匕賴 丕賱丨賷丕丞. 丨賷孬 賷丨丕賵賱 丕賱爻噩賷賳 丕賳 賷賳賴賷 丕賱毓賲賱 丕賱賲胤賱賵亘 賲賳賴 亘賰賱 丕鬲賯丕賳 賵爻乇毓丞. 賲毓 丕賳賴 賷毓賱賲 丕賳 丕賱丕卮睾丕賱 丕賱卮丕賯丞 賱丕 鬲賳鬲賴賷 賵賴賳丕賰 毓賲賱 丕禺乇 賮賷 丕賳鬲馗丕乇賴.
賰賷賮 賷賮乇丨 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 毓賱賶 丕賷 卮賷亍 賲毓 鬲賮丕賴鬲賴. 鬲氐賵賷乇賴 賱賱賲爻乇丨賷丞 賵丕賱丕賳賮毓賱丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 丕亘丿丕賴丕 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 毓賱賶 賴匕丕 丕賱毓賲賱 乇丕卅毓丞 賮毓賱丕. 鬲卮毓乇 丕賳賴賲 丕胤賮丕賱 賵禺賷丕賱丕鬲賴賲 鬲爻乇丨 賮賷賲丕 爻賷丨氐賱 亘毓丿 丕賱賳噩丕丨 賮賷 鬲賯丿賷賲 丕賱毓賲賱 丕賱賲爻乇丨賷 賲毓 丕賳賴賲 賷毓賱賲賵賳 丕賳 賲賳 爻賷卮丕賴丿賴賲 賴賲 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賵亘毓囟 丕賱爻噩丕賳賷賳.
鬲氐乇賮丕鬲 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賮賷 丕賱賲爻鬲卮賮賷丕鬲貙 賱賱賴乇賵亘 賲賳 丕賱噩賱丿 亘丕賱爻賷丕胤 賵賲丨丕賵賱丞 丕賱丕胤亘丕亍 賲爻丕毓丿鬲賴賲 亘丕賱賲賵丕賮賯丞 毓賱賶 亘賯丕亍賴賲 丕胤賵賱 賮鬲乇丞 賲賲賰賳丞.
丕賱丨賷賵丕賳丕鬲 賮賷 丕賱爻噩賳 賵胤亘丕卅毓 丕賱亘卮乇 丕賱賲禺鬲賱賮丞 賮賷 丕賱鬲毓丕賲賱 賲毓 賴匕丕 丕賱丨賷賵丕賳 丕賱匕賷 丿丕亍鬲 亘賴 丕賱馗乇賵賮 丕賱賶 丕賱爻噩賳 賲賳 丨賷孬 賱丕 鬲丿乇賷.
乇丕卅毓丞 賮毓賱丕
亘賴匕丕 禺鬲賲 賮賷賵丿賵乇 丿賷爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘貙 賰丕賱丕賳亘毓丕孬 賲賳 亘賷賳 丕賱丕賲賵丕鬲. 丨賷丕鬲 丕賱爻噩賳 丕賱賲乇賷乇丞 賷氐賮賴丕 賴賳丕 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賰鬲丕亘 賲毓 丕賱鬲睾賱睾賱 賮賷 丕賱賳賮爻 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 丨賷孬 賷丨丕賵賱 丕賳 賷鬲睾賱睾賱 賮賷 賳賮爻賷丕鬲 賴丐賱丕亍 丕賱乇賮丕賯 賮賷 丕賱爻噩賳.
爻噩賳丕亍 賲禺鬲賱賮賵賳 賮賷 賰賱 卮賷亍貙 賳亘賱丕亍貙 丨乇賮賷賵賳貙 賮賱丕丨賵賳貙 賲賳 卮毓賵亘 丕禺乇賶 賵丿賷丕賳丕鬲 丕禺乇賶賵丨鬲賶 毓爻賰乇賷賵賳.
賲賳 丕乇賵毓 賰鬲亘 丕丿亘 丕賱爻噩賵賳 丕賱匕賷 賯乇丕鬲賴丕. 賵賱丕 賷丕鬲賷 毓賱賶 匕賰乇 丕賱爻噩丕賳賷賳 丕賱丕 賮賷賲丕 賳丿乇 賮賴賳丕 賷丨丕賵賱 丕賳 賷馗賴乇 賰賷賮 賷鬲毓丕賲賱 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賲毓 賵丕賯毓賴賲 賵丕賱鬲賰賷賮 賲毓 賴匕賴 丕賱丨賷丕丞. 丨賷孬 賷丨丕賵賱 丕賱爻噩賷賳 丕賳 賷賳賴賷 丕賱毓賲賱 丕賱賲胤賱賵亘 賲賳賴 亘賰賱 丕鬲賯丕賳 賵爻乇毓丞. 賲毓 丕賳賴 賷毓賱賲 丕賳 丕賱丕卮睾丕賱 丕賱卮丕賯丞 賱丕 鬲賳鬲賴賷 賵賴賳丕賰 毓賲賱 丕禺乇 賮賷 丕賳鬲馗丕乇賴.
賰賷賮 賷賮乇丨 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 毓賱賶 丕賷 卮賷亍 賲毓 鬲賮丕賴鬲賴. 鬲氐賵賷乇賴 賱賱賲爻乇丨賷丞 賵丕賱丕賳賮毓賱丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 丕亘丿丕賴丕 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 毓賱賶 賴匕丕 丕賱毓賲賱 乇丕卅毓丞 賮毓賱丕. 鬲卮毓乇 丕賳賴賲 丕胤賮丕賱 賵禺賷丕賱丕鬲賴賲 鬲爻乇丨 賮賷賲丕 爻賷丨氐賱 亘毓丿 丕賱賳噩丕丨 賮賷 鬲賯丿賷賲 丕賱毓賲賱 丕賱賲爻乇丨賷 賲毓 丕賳賴賲 賷毓賱賲賵賳 丕賳 賲賳 爻賷卮丕賴丿賴賲 賴賲 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賵亘毓囟 丕賱爻噩丕賳賷賳.
鬲氐乇賮丕鬲 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賮賷 丕賱賲爻鬲卮賮賷丕鬲貙 賱賱賴乇賵亘 賲賳 丕賱噩賱丿 亘丕賱爻賷丕胤 賵賲丨丕賵賱丞 丕賱丕胤亘丕亍 賲爻丕毓丿鬲賴賲 亘丕賱賲賵丕賮賯丞 毓賱賶 亘賯丕亍賴賲 丕胤賵賱 賮鬲乇丞 賲賲賰賳丞.
丕賱丨賷賵丕賳丕鬲 賮賷 丕賱爻噩賳 賵胤亘丕卅毓 丕賱亘卮乇 丕賱賲禺鬲賱賮丞 賮賷 丕賱鬲毓丕賲賱 賲毓 賴匕丕 丕賱丨賷賵丕賳 丕賱匕賷 丿丕亍鬲 亘賴 丕賱馗乇賵賮 丕賱賶 丕賱爻噩賳 賲賳 丨賷孬 賱丕 鬲丿乇賷.
乇丕卅毓丞 賮毓賱丕
October 16, 2021
禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴鈥屰� 賲乇丿诏丕賳貙 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 蹖讴 夭賳丿丕賳蹖 賲丨讴賵賲 亘賴 趩賳丿蹖賳 爻丕賱 丨亘爻 丕爻鬲 讴賴 夭賳丿丕賳 乇丕 亘賴 禺丕賳賴鈥屰� 賲乇丿诏丕賳 鬲卮亘蹖賴 讴乇丿賴 賵 丕夭 乇賵夭诏丕乇 爻禺鬲蹖 讴賴 丿乇 丌賳 丿賵乇丕賳 诏匕乇丕賳丿賴貙 賲蹖
賳賵蹖爻丿. 禺蹖賱蹖 讴鬲丕亘 丿乇丿賳丕讴蹖 亘賵丿...
賳賵蹖爻丿. 禺蹖賱蹖 讴鬲丕亘 丿乇丿賳丕讴蹖 亘賵丿...
November 28, 2015
"What I have said of servitude, I again say of imprisonment, we are all prisoners. What is our life but a prison? We are all imprisoned in an island. The world itself to some men is a prison, our narrow seas as so many ditches, and when they have compassed the globe of the earth, they would fain go see what is done in the moon."
- Robert Burton, Anatomy of Melancholy: S2.3.4
Not top-half Dostoevsky, but a must read still. This book (and Dostoevsky's four years in Siberia) are an obvious rough draft to his later GREAT novels (Crime & Punishment, The Brothers Karamazov, etc). Even without the early draft qualities of this novel, 'Notes from a Dead House' is a critical novel. This novel IS the godfather of all prison memoir/novels. Orange might be the new black, but the Big D was there first. Actually, it is probably worth a few minutes exploring the similarities between OITNB and 'Notes from a Dead House'. Both explore how prison impacts those who are sent there, the way people survive, the things that drive people mad inside, the things that are core about being human within an environment meant to limit the very essence of humanness, how punishment is relative, etc, and ad nauseam.
I think the brilliance of prison writing is the way it can be used as a microcosm of life. We are all trapped by something. Nihil enim refert, rerum sis servus an hominum (鈥淚t matters little whether we are enslaved by men or things.鈥�). We are all controlled by something, tortured by someone, addicted to vice, sin, or our own fears. Exploring the idea of prison and prisoners can open us up to not just the difficulties we all face, but the way(s) we can survive life's fetters, our body's constraints, the darkness of this mortal coil. Dostoevsky give us hints. Dreams, hope, faith, purpose and relationships all allowed him to survive his four years in Siberia. Those same characteristics increase the odds that not only will we survive our incarceration on this Earth, but we might even grow fond of it and find beauty and love in the process.
- Robert Burton, Anatomy of Melancholy: S2.3.4
Not top-half Dostoevsky, but a must read still. This book (and Dostoevsky's four years in Siberia) are an obvious rough draft to his later GREAT novels (Crime & Punishment, The Brothers Karamazov, etc). Even without the early draft qualities of this novel, 'Notes from a Dead House' is a critical novel. This novel IS the godfather of all prison memoir/novels. Orange might be the new black, but the Big D was there first. Actually, it is probably worth a few minutes exploring the similarities between OITNB and 'Notes from a Dead House'. Both explore how prison impacts those who are sent there, the way people survive, the things that drive people mad inside, the things that are core about being human within an environment meant to limit the very essence of humanness, how punishment is relative, etc, and ad nauseam.
I think the brilliance of prison writing is the way it can be used as a microcosm of life. We are all trapped by something. Nihil enim refert, rerum sis servus an hominum (鈥淚t matters little whether we are enslaved by men or things.鈥�). We are all controlled by something, tortured by someone, addicted to vice, sin, or our own fears. Exploring the idea of prison and prisoners can open us up to not just the difficulties we all face, but the way(s) we can survive life's fetters, our body's constraints, the darkness of this mortal coil. Dostoevsky give us hints. Dreams, hope, faith, purpose and relationships all allowed him to survive his four years in Siberia. Those same characteristics increase the odds that not only will we survive our incarceration on this Earth, but we might even grow fond of it and find beauty and love in the process.
May 11, 2017
"賰賳鬲 兀卮毓乇 賮賷 賴匕賴 丕賱兀賷丕賲 亘囟賷賯 卮丿賷丿 賮鬲賳丕賵賱鬲 賰鬲丕亘 "匕賰乇賷丕鬲 賲賳 賲賳夭賱 丕賱兀賲賵丕鬲" 賮兀毓丿鬲 賯乇丕亍鬲賴. 賰賳鬲 賯丿 賳爻賷鬲 賰孬賷乇賸丕 賲賳賴貙 賮賱賲丕 兀毓丿鬲 賯乇丕亍鬲賴 兀賷賯賳鬲 兀賳 賱賷爻 賮賷 丕賱兀丿亘 丕賱噩丿賷丿 賰賱賴 賰鬲丕亘 賵丕丨丿 賷賮賵賯賴貙 丨鬲賶 賵賱丕 賰購鬲亘 亘賵卮賰賷賳
賱賷爻鬲 丕賱賳亘乇丞 賴賷 丕賱卮賷亍 丕賱乇丕卅毓 賮賷賴貙 亘賱 賵噩賴丞 丕賱賳馗乇 丕賱鬲賷 賷卮鬲賲賱 毓賱賷賴丕貨 廿賳賴 氐丕丿賯 胤亘賷毓賷 賲爻賷丨賷貙 廿賳賴 賰鬲丕亘 賷毓賱賾賲 丕賱丿賷賳
賮廿匕丕 乇兀賷鬲 丿賵爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賮賯賱 賱賴 兀賳賷 兀丨亘賴"
賴賰匕丕 賰鬲亘 鬲賵賱爻鬲賵賶 廿賱賶 爻鬲乇丕禺賵賮
賵賴賰匕丕 賯乇兀鬲購 賮賷 賲賯丿賲丞 丕賱賰鬲丕亘
賱丕 兀禺賮賶 丨賷賳賴丕 兀賳賳賶 卮毓乇鬲購 亘丿賴卮丞 卮丿賷丿丞
廿匕 賰賷賮 賷賰賵賳 賰鬲丕亘 賷鬲丨丿孬 毓賳 丕賱賲賵鬲貙 賰鬲丕亘 賷氐賳賮 賰兀丿亘 爻噩賵賳貙 賰鬲丕亘 賰卅賷亘 爻賵丿丕賵賶貙 賰賷賮 賷賰賵賳 乇丕丨丞賸 賵賲賱噩兀賸 丨賷賳 丕賱卮毓賵乇 亘丕賱囟賷賯責!!
亘丿兀鬲購 丕賱賯乇丕亍丞 毓賱賶 丨匕乇貙 賵丕賱丌賳 賱賶 兀賳 兀毓鬲乇賮 兀賳 鬲賵賱爻鬲賵賶 賰丕賳 賲丨賯賸丕
貙貙貙貙貙
賰丕賳鬲 賲卮賰賱鬲賶 賲毓 兀丿亘 丕賱爻噩賵賳 賴賵 賵氐賮 丕賱丨賷丕丞 丕賱賲乇賷乇丞 賵丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘 丕賱賲卮賷賳貙 亘賲丕 賮賷賴 廿乇賴丕賯 賱賱賯丕乇卅 卮丿賷丿
賵賯丿 賰丕賳 賷賴賲賳賶 兀賰孬乇 兀賳 兀賱賲爻 鬲兀孬賷乇 匕賱賰 毓賱賶 卮禺氐賷丞 丕賱爻噩賷賳
禺丕氐丞 亘毓丿 丕賱禺乇賵噩 賲賳 丕賱爻噩賳貙 賵賯丿 兀鬲丕丨鬲 賱賶 賯乇丕亍丕鬲賶 廿丿乇丕賰 亘毓囟 賴匕賴 丕賱鬲兀孬賷乇丕鬲 賰賲丕 賮賶 乇賵丕賷丞 丕賱賯賵賯毓丞 賵乇賵丕賷丞 1984
毓賱賶 兀賳 賮賶 賴丕鬲賷賳貙 賰丕賳 丕賱爻噩賷賳 賲馗賱賵賲丕貙 賲毓賴 賴賵 丕賱丨賯
賮賰賷賮 亘丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 丕賱匕賷賳 丕乇鬲賰亘賵丕 噩乇丕卅賲 鬲爻鬲丨賯 賲毓賴丕 丕賱毓賯賵亘丞責
賰賷賮 賷噩丿賶 丕賱爻噩賳 賲毓賴丕責
賴賱 賷賴匕亘 丕賱賳賮爻 賵賷毓賷丿賴丕 廿賱賶 乇卮丿賴丕貙 兀賲 鬲鬲丨胤賲 毓賱賶 賯囟亘丕賳 丕賱爻噩賳貙 睾賷乇 賯丕丿乇丞 毓賱賶 丕賱鬲丨賱賷賯 兀亘毓丿 賲賳 丕賱爻賷丕噩 丕賱賲丨賷胤責
廿噩丕亘丞 賰賱 鬲賱賰 丕賱兀爻卅賱丞 賵兀賰孬乇 賮賶 賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞
賵廿賳 賰丕賳鬲 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賱賲 鬲鬲丨丿孬 亘卮賰賱 賲亘丕卮乇 毓賳 丨賷丕丞 丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 亘毓丿 丕賱廿賮乇丕噩貙 廿賱丕 兀賳賴丕 賰丕賳鬲 賰丕賮賷丞
賱鬲毓乇賮 廿賱賶 兀賶 賲丿賶 氐丕乇 丕賱爻噩賷賳 卮禺氐賸丕 丌禺乇
賰賳鬲購 賯丿 鬲毓乇囟鬲 賮賶 丨賷丕鬲賷 賱賮鬲乇丞 賲賳 丕賱丨亘爻貙 賰丕賳鬲 兀賯賱 賲賳 卮賴乇賷賳 賮賯胤貙 賵賰丕賳 賵囟毓賶 賮賷賴丕 賷毓鬲亘乇 廿賲亘乇丕胤賵乇賷賸丕 亘丕賱賳爻亘丞 賱賴匕賴 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞
賵乇睾賲 匕賱賰 賮賯丿 毓賵賾賱鬲 丕賱賰孬賷乇 毓賱賶 禺乇賵噩賶 賲賳 賲丨亘爻賷貙 兀賳鬲馗乇 賱賷賱丞 鬲賱賵 兀禺乇賶
賰丕賳鬲 鬲噩乇亘丞 氐睾賷乇丞 賱賰賳賶 兀丿乇賰鬲 賰賲 兀賳 爻賱亘 丕賱丨乇賷丞 賲賳 丕賱賲乇亍 賴賵 兀賯爻賶 賲賳 丕賱廿毓丿丕賲 亘丕賱賳爻亘丞 廿賱賷賴 賵禺丕氐丞 廿賳 賰丕賳 亘乇賷卅丕
丌賲賱 兀賳 賷兀鬲賶 賷賵賲 賱丕 賳乇賶 賮賷賴 爻噩賵賳賸丕
賵賷賰賵賳 丕賱毓丕賱賲 賲鬲丨囟乇賸丕 亘丨賷孬 鬲賰賵賳 丕賱毓賯賵亘丕鬲 毓賱賶 賯丿乇 賴匕丕 丕賱鬲丨囟乇
賱賯丿 睾賱亘鬲 丌乇丕卅賶 丕賱卮禺氐賷丞 毓賱賶 丕賱賲乇丕噩毓丞貙 賮兀毓鬲匕乇 毓賳 匕賱賰
賵賯丿 賰丕賳鬲 賯乇丕亍丞 爻鬲馗賱 賮賶 丕賱匕丕賰乇丞 兀賲丿賸丕 胤賵賷賱賸丕
鬲賲鬲
20\7\2016
...
February 13, 2022
亘賴 賳丕賲 丕賵
蹖丕丿丿丕卮鬲賴丕蹖蹖 丕夭 禺丕賳賴 賲乇丿诏丕賳 蹖丕 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 賲乇丿诏丕賳 蹖丕 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 丕賲賵丕鬲 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 乇賲丕賳賴丕蹖 賮蹖賵丿賵乇 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 讴賴 丌賳 乇丕 丿乇 丿賵乇丕賳 賲蹖丕賳蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏蹖 禺賵丿 賳賵卮鬲賴 丕爻鬲. 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 倬爻 丕夭 趩賴丕乇 爻丕賱 诏匕乇丕賳丿賳 丿賵乇丕賳 鬲亘毓蹖丿 丿乇 丕乇丿賵诏丕賴鈥屬囏й� 丕噩亘丕乇蹖 讴丕乇 爻蹖亘乇蹖 賳賵卮鬲賴 丕爻鬲 賵 丕蹖賳 乇賲丕賳 亘賴 賳賵毓蹖 亘蹖丕賳诏乇 賲卮丕賴丿丕鬲 禺賵丿 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 丕夭 丕蹖賳 丕乇丿賵诏丕賴鈥屫池� 禺蹖賱蹖 丕夭 賲賳鬲賯丿丕賳 丕蹖賳 丕孬乇 乇丕 亘賴鬲乇蹖賳 乇賲丕賳 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 賲蹖鈥屫з嗁嗀� 賵 鬲丕孬蹖乇诏匕丕乇蹖 乇賲丕賳 丿乇 夭賲丕賳 丕賳鬲卮丕乇卮 亘賴 丨丿蹖 亘賵丿賴 讴賴 鬲夭丕乇 賳蹖讴賱丕蹖 丕賵賱 倬爻 丕夭 禺賵丕賳丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 賲鬲丕孬乇 卮丿賴 賵 诏乇蹖賴 讴乇丿賴 丕爻鬲.
亘賴 賳馗乇 賲賳 賴賲 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 亘賴鬲乇蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘賴丕蹖 丕蹖賳 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 亘夭乇诏 乇賵爻 丕爻鬲. 蹖丕丿丿丕卮鬲賴丕蹖蹖 丕夭 禺丕賳賴 賲乇丿诏丕賳 亘賴 賳賵毓蹖 禺卮鬲 丕賵賱 爻丕禺鬲賲丕賳 賵 賳馗丕賲 賮讴乇蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 丕爻鬲. 賵 倬爻 丕夭 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丕賵 乇賲丕賳賴丕蹖 亘夭乇诏卮 乇丕 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 噩賳丕蹖丕鬲 賵 賲讴丕賮丕鬲賴丕蹖 丕蹖賳 噩賳丕蹖丕鬲 賲蹖鈥屬嗁堐屫池� 賵 乇賳噩 亘卮乇 乇丕 亘賴 亘賴鬲乇蹖賳 (亘丿鬲乇蹖賳責!) 卮讴賱 丿乇 倬蹖卮鈥屫辟堐屫� 賯乇丕乇 賲蹖鈥屫囏�
丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 丿賵 鬲乇噩賲賴 禺賵亘 丿丕乇丿 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 賲乇丨賵賲 丿讴鬲乇 賲丨賲丿噩毓賮乇 賲丨噩賵亘 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 倬蹖卮 丕夭 丕賳賯賱丕亘 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丕賱丕賳 鬲賵爻胤 賳卮乇丌賲賵賳 賵 丕賳鬲卮丕乇丕鬲 毓賱賲蹖 賵 賮乇賴賳诏蹖 賲賳鬲卮乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賵 丿蹖诏乇蹖 鬲乇噩賲賴 禺丕賳賲 爻毓蹖丿賴 乇丕賲夭 讴賴 鬲賵爻胤 賳卮乇 賳賵 賲賳鬲卮乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�.
蹖丕丿丿丕卮鬲賴丕蹖蹖 丕夭 禺丕賳賴 賲乇丿诏丕賳 蹖丕 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 賲乇丿诏丕賳 蹖丕 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 丕賲賵丕鬲 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 乇賲丕賳賴丕蹖 賮蹖賵丿賵乇 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 讴賴 丌賳 乇丕 丿乇 丿賵乇丕賳 賲蹖丕賳蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏蹖 禺賵丿 賳賵卮鬲賴 丕爻鬲. 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 乇丕 倬爻 丕夭 趩賴丕乇 爻丕賱 诏匕乇丕賳丿賳 丿賵乇丕賳 鬲亘毓蹖丿 丿乇 丕乇丿賵诏丕賴鈥屬囏й� 丕噩亘丕乇蹖 讴丕乇 爻蹖亘乇蹖 賳賵卮鬲賴 丕爻鬲 賵 丕蹖賳 乇賲丕賳 亘賴 賳賵毓蹖 亘蹖丕賳诏乇 賲卮丕賴丿丕鬲 禺賵丿 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 丕夭 丕蹖賳 丕乇丿賵诏丕賴鈥屫池� 禺蹖賱蹖 丕夭 賲賳鬲賯丿丕賳 丕蹖賳 丕孬乇 乇丕 亘賴鬲乇蹖賳 乇賲丕賳 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 賲蹖鈥屫з嗁嗀� 賵 鬲丕孬蹖乇诏匕丕乇蹖 乇賲丕賳 丿乇 夭賲丕賳 丕賳鬲卮丕乇卮 亘賴 丨丿蹖 亘賵丿賴 讴賴 鬲夭丕乇 賳蹖讴賱丕蹖 丕賵賱 倬爻 丕夭 禺賵丕賳丿賳 讴鬲丕亘 賲鬲丕孬乇 卮丿賴 賵 诏乇蹖賴 讴乇丿賴 丕爻鬲.
亘賴 賳馗乇 賲賳 賴賲 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 亘賴鬲乇蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘賴丕蹖 丕蹖賳 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 亘夭乇诏 乇賵爻 丕爻鬲. 蹖丕丿丿丕卮鬲賴丕蹖蹖 丕夭 禺丕賳賴 賲乇丿诏丕賳 亘賴 賳賵毓蹖 禺卮鬲 丕賵賱 爻丕禺鬲賲丕賳 賵 賳馗丕賲 賮讴乇蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賮爻讴蹖 丕爻鬲. 賵 倬爻 丕夭 丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丕賵 乇賲丕賳賴丕蹖 亘夭乇诏卮 乇丕 丿乇 賲賵乇丿 噩賳丕蹖丕鬲 賵 賲讴丕賮丕鬲賴丕蹖 丕蹖賳 噩賳丕蹖丕鬲 賲蹖鈥屬嗁堐屫池� 賵 乇賳噩 亘卮乇 乇丕 亘賴 亘賴鬲乇蹖賳 (亘丿鬲乇蹖賳責!) 卮讴賱 丿乇 倬蹖卮鈥屫辟堐屫� 賯乇丕乇 賲蹖鈥屫囏�
丕蹖賳 讴鬲丕亘 丿賵 鬲乇噩賲賴 禺賵亘 丿丕乇丿 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 賲乇丨賵賲 丿讴鬲乇 賲丨賲丿噩毓賮乇 賲丨噩賵亘 讴賴 亘乇丕蹖 倬蹖卮 丕夭 丕賳賯賱丕亘 丕爻鬲 讴賴 丕賱丕賳 鬲賵爻胤 賳卮乇丌賲賵賳 賵 丕賳鬲卮丕乇丕鬲 毓賱賲蹖 賵 賮乇賴賳诏蹖 賲賳鬲卮乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堌� 賵 丿蹖诏乇蹖 鬲乇噩賲賴 禺丕賳賲 爻毓蹖丿賴 乇丕賲夭 讴賴 鬲賵爻胤 賳卮乇 賳賵 賲賳鬲卮乇 賲蹖鈥屫促堌�.
April 11, 2020
丿乇 讴鬲丕亘 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 賲乇丿诏丕賳 貙 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵賮爻讴蹖 亘夭乇诏 丕夭 乇賳噩 亘乇丕蹖 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 賲蹖 诏賵蹖丿 貙 乇賳噩蹖 讴賴 亘賴 禺丕胤乇 噩乇賲 賳讴乇丿賴 賵 賴賲 亘賴 禺丕胤乇 丿乇 賲丨蹖胤 賳丕賲賳丕爻亘 亘賵丿賳 賲鬲丨賲賱 賲蹖 卮賵丿 .
卮丕蹖丿 賴賲 亘鬲賵丕賳 诏賮鬲 丕爻鬲丕丿 丿乇 丕蹖賳 丕孬乇 賴賲 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺賵丿 乇丕 丕夭 夭亘丕賳 丿蹖诏乇 夭賳丿丕賳蹖丕賳 賲蹖 诏賵蹖丿 賵 賴賲 亘丕 乇賵丕賳卮賳丕爻蹖 賳爻亘鬲丕 丿賯蹖賯蹖 貙 卮賳丕禺鬲蹖 丕夭 乇賵丨蹖賴 鬲亘賴 讴丕乇丕賳 賯乇賳 賳賵夭丿賴賲 乇賵爻蹖賴 賳卮丕賳 賲蹖 丿賴丿 . 賲噩乇賲蹖賳蹖 讴賴 亘賴 噩乇賲 賴丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮 丿乇 丌賳 夭賳丿丕賳 賴爻鬲賳丿 賵賱蹖 賴賲賴 亘丕 賴賲 丿乇 賳丿丕卮鬲賳 丕丨爻丕爻 倬卮蹖賲丕賳蹖 賲卮鬲乇讴 賴爻鬲賳丿 .
丕賵 丿乇 丨丕賱丕鬲 趩賳丿 鬲賳 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賲噩乇賲蹖賳 賴賲 丿賯蹖賯 賲蹖 卮賵丿 貙 賲孬賱丕 诏丕夭蹖賳 讴爻蹖 丕蹖爻鬲 讴賴 賴賲賵丕乇賴 丿乇 爻乇鬲丕爻乇 讴鬲丕亘 丕夭 丕賵 賲蹖 鬲乇爻丿 賵 賴乇 噩丕 诏丕夭蹖賳 賵丕乇丿 賲蹖 卮賵丿 丕丨爻丕爻 鬲乇爻 乇丕 丿乇 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賲蹖 鬲賵丕賳 蹖丕賮鬲 .
蹖丕 丌讴蹖賲蹖趩 貙 丕賮爻乇 爻丕亘賯 讴賴 亘丕 賴賲丕賳 禺氐賵氐蹖丕鬲 丕賮爻乇蹖 禺賵丿 蹖毓賳蹖 賳馗賲 賵 丕賳馗亘丕胤 賵 賯丕賳賵賳 賵賲賯乇乇丕鬲 亘賴 賲丨蹖胤 賵丨卮蹖 夭賳丿丕賳 丌賲丿賴 蹖丕 倬鬲乇賵賮 毓噩蹖亘 讴賴 賴賲蹖卮賴 亘賴 丿賳亘丕賱 趩蹖夭蹖 丕蹖爻鬲 賵 賲毓賱賵賲 賳蹖爻鬲 讴賴 亘賴 丌賳 賲蹖 乇爻丿 蹖丕 賳賴 .
丕賵 賴賲蹖賳 胤賵乇 丕夭 鬲囟丕丿 胤亘賯丕鬲蹖 丿乇 噩丕賲毓賴 夭賳丿丕賳蹖丕賳 賲蹖 诏賵蹖丿 貙 丕夭 丕蹖賳 讴賴 賳噩蹖亘 夭丕丿賴 賴丕蹖 賱賴爻鬲丕賳蹖 賮賯胤 亘丕 诏乇賵賴 禺賵丿 賲毓丕卮乇鬲 賲蹖 讴乇丿賳丿 蹖丕 賲孬賱丕 賳噩蹖亘 夭丕丿賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丕賵 賴賲賵丕乇賴 丕夭 胤乇賮 胤亘賯賴 賮乇賵 丿爻鬲 鬲丨賯蹖乇 賲蹖 卮賵丿 賵 丌賳賴丕 丕賵 乇丕 丕夭 禺賵丿 賳賲蹖 丿丕賳賳丿 .
丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵賮爻讴蹖 丿乇 賲蹖丕賳 丕蹖賳 噩丕賲毓賴 鬲亘賴 讴丕乇 賵 禺胤乇賳丕讴 丿賳亘丕賱 丕賳爻丕賳蹖鬲 賲蹖 诏乇丿丿 賵 丌賳乇丕 賴賲 倬蹖丿丕 賲蹖 讴賳丿 貨 亘賴 賴賲蹖賳 诏賵賳賴 鬲毓乇蹖賮 亘爻蹖丕乇 賳丕亘蹖 賴賲 丕夭 丕賳爻丕賳 丕乇丕卅賴 賲蹖 讴賳丿 :
丕賳爻丕賳 毓亘丕乇鬲爻鬲 丕夭 賲賵噩賵丿蹖 讴賴 亘賴 賴賲賴 趩蹖夭 毓丕丿鬲 賲蹖 讴賳丿.鈥�
卮丕蹖丿 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 賲乇丿诏丕賳 乇丕 丕夭 噩賴丕鬲蹖 亘鬲賵丕賳 亘丕 讴鬲丕亘 蹖讴 乇賵夭 丕蹖賵丕賳 丿賳蹖爻賵賵蹖趩 丕孬乇 丕賱讴爻丕賳丿乇 爻賵賱跇賳蹖鬲爻蹖賳 賲賯丕蹖爻賴 讴乇丿 . 亘賴 賳馗乇 賲賳 乇賳噩蹖 讴賴 丿乇 讴鬲丕亘 爻賵賱跇賳蹖鬲爻蹖賳 亘賴 鬲氐賵蹖乇 讴卮蹖丿賴 卮丿賴 貙 卮讴賳噩賴 賴丕蹖 賲丨蹖胤 丕乇丿賵诏丕賴 貙 賳賵毓 睾匕丕 貙 讴蹖賮蹖鬲 讴丕乇 貙 乇賮鬲丕乇 賳诏賴亘丕賳丕賳 賴賲诏蹖 賵 賴賲诏蹖 丿賴賴丕 賲乇鬲亘賴 丕夭 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 賲乇丿诏丕賳 爻禺鬲 鬲乇 賵 賲禺賵賮 鬲乇 賴爻鬲賳丿 . 卮丕蹖丿 亘丕 賲賯丕蹖爻賴 丕蹖賳 丿賵 夭賳丿丕賳 蹖讴蹖 丿乇 夭賲丕賳 鬲夭丕乇 丌賱讴爻丕賳丿乇 丕賵賱 賵 丿蹖诏乇蹖 丿乇 夭賲丕賳 丕爻鬲丕賱蹖賳 貙 丕賳丿讴蹖 亘鬲賵丕賳 亘賴 鬲賮丕賵鬲 蹖讴 乇跇蹖賲 丿蹖讴鬲丕鬲賵乇蹖 賲毓賲賵賱蹖 亘丕 蹖讴 丿蹖讴鬲丕鬲賵乇蹖 丿丕乇丕蹖 丕蹖丿卅賵賱賵跇蹖 倬蹖 亘乇丿 .
卮丕蹖丿 賴賲 亘鬲賵丕賳 诏賮鬲 丕爻鬲丕丿 丿乇 丕蹖賳 丕孬乇 賴賲 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺賵丿 乇丕 丕夭 夭亘丕賳 丿蹖诏乇 夭賳丿丕賳蹖丕賳 賲蹖 诏賵蹖丿 賵 賴賲 亘丕 乇賵丕賳卮賳丕爻蹖 賳爻亘鬲丕 丿賯蹖賯蹖 貙 卮賳丕禺鬲蹖 丕夭 乇賵丨蹖賴 鬲亘賴 讴丕乇丕賳 賯乇賳 賳賵夭丿賴賲 乇賵爻蹖賴 賳卮丕賳 賲蹖 丿賴丿 . 賲噩乇賲蹖賳蹖 讴賴 亘賴 噩乇賲 賴丕蹖 賲禺鬲賱賮 丿乇 丌賳 夭賳丿丕賳 賴爻鬲賳丿 賵賱蹖 賴賲賴 亘丕 賴賲 丿乇 賳丿丕卮鬲賳 丕丨爻丕爻 倬卮蹖賲丕賳蹖 賲卮鬲乇讴 賴爻鬲賳丿 .
丕賵 丿乇 丨丕賱丕鬲 趩賳丿 鬲賳 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賲噩乇賲蹖賳 賴賲 丿賯蹖賯 賲蹖 卮賵丿 貙 賲孬賱丕 诏丕夭蹖賳 讴爻蹖 丕蹖爻鬲 讴賴 賴賲賵丕乇賴 丿乇 爻乇鬲丕爻乇 讴鬲丕亘 丕夭 丕賵 賲蹖 鬲乇爻丿 賵 賴乇 噩丕 诏丕夭蹖賳 賵丕乇丿 賲蹖 卮賵丿 丕丨爻丕爻 鬲乇爻 乇丕 丿乇 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 賲蹖 鬲賵丕賳 蹖丕賮鬲 .
蹖丕 丌讴蹖賲蹖趩 貙 丕賮爻乇 爻丕亘賯 讴賴 亘丕 賴賲丕賳 禺氐賵氐蹖丕鬲 丕賮爻乇蹖 禺賵丿 蹖毓賳蹖 賳馗賲 賵 丕賳馗亘丕胤 賵 賯丕賳賵賳 賵賲賯乇乇丕鬲 亘賴 賲丨蹖胤 賵丨卮蹖 夭賳丿丕賳 丌賲丿賴 蹖丕 倬鬲乇賵賮 毓噩蹖亘 讴賴 賴賲蹖卮賴 亘賴 丿賳亘丕賱 趩蹖夭蹖 丕蹖爻鬲 賵 賲毓賱賵賲 賳蹖爻鬲 讴賴 亘賴 丌賳 賲蹖 乇爻丿 蹖丕 賳賴 .
丕賵 賴賲蹖賳 胤賵乇 丕夭 鬲囟丕丿 胤亘賯丕鬲蹖 丿乇 噩丕賲毓賴 夭賳丿丕賳蹖丕賳 賲蹖 诏賵蹖丿 貙 丕夭 丕蹖賳 讴賴 賳噩蹖亘 夭丕丿賴 賴丕蹖 賱賴爻鬲丕賳蹖 賮賯胤 亘丕 诏乇賵賴 禺賵丿 賲毓丕卮乇鬲 賲蹖 讴乇丿賳丿 蹖丕 賲孬賱丕 賳噩蹖亘 夭丕丿賴 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丕賵 賴賲賵丕乇賴 丕夭 胤乇賮 胤亘賯賴 賮乇賵 丿爻鬲 鬲丨賯蹖乇 賲蹖 卮賵丿 賵 丌賳賴丕 丕賵 乇丕 丕夭 禺賵丿 賳賲蹖 丿丕賳賳丿 .
丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵賮爻讴蹖 丿乇 賲蹖丕賳 丕蹖賳 噩丕賲毓賴 鬲亘賴 讴丕乇 賵 禺胤乇賳丕讴 丿賳亘丕賱 丕賳爻丕賳蹖鬲 賲蹖 诏乇丿丿 賵 丌賳乇丕 賴賲 倬蹖丿丕 賲蹖 讴賳丿 貨 亘賴 賴賲蹖賳 诏賵賳賴 鬲毓乇蹖賮 亘爻蹖丕乇 賳丕亘蹖 賴賲 丕夭 丕賳爻丕賳 丕乇丕卅賴 賲蹖 讴賳丿 :
丕賳爻丕賳 毓亘丕乇鬲爻鬲 丕夭 賲賵噩賵丿蹖 讴賴 亘賴 賴賲賴 趩蹖夭 毓丕丿鬲 賲蹖 讴賳丿.鈥�
卮丕蹖丿 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 賲乇丿诏丕賳 乇丕 丕夭 噩賴丕鬲蹖 亘鬲賵丕賳 亘丕 讴鬲丕亘 蹖讴 乇賵夭 丕蹖賵丕賳 丿賳蹖爻賵賵蹖趩 丕孬乇 丕賱讴爻丕賳丿乇 爻賵賱跇賳蹖鬲爻蹖賳 賲賯丕蹖爻賴 讴乇丿 . 亘賴 賳馗乇 賲賳 乇賳噩蹖 讴賴 丿乇 讴鬲丕亘 爻賵賱跇賳蹖鬲爻蹖賳 亘賴 鬲氐賵蹖乇 讴卮蹖丿賴 卮丿賴 貙 卮讴賳噩賴 賴丕蹖 賲丨蹖胤 丕乇丿賵诏丕賴 貙 賳賵毓 睾匕丕 貙 讴蹖賮蹖鬲 讴丕乇 貙 乇賮鬲丕乇 賳诏賴亘丕賳丕賳 賴賲诏蹖 賵 賴賲诏蹖 丿賴賴丕 賲乇鬲亘賴 丕夭 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 賲乇丿诏丕賳 爻禺鬲 鬲乇 賵 賲禺賵賮 鬲乇 賴爻鬲賳丿 . 卮丕蹖丿 亘丕 賲賯丕蹖爻賴 丕蹖賳 丿賵 夭賳丿丕賳 蹖讴蹖 丿乇 夭賲丕賳 鬲夭丕乇 丌賱讴爻丕賳丿乇 丕賵賱 賵 丿蹖诏乇蹖 丿乇 夭賲丕賳 丕爻鬲丕賱蹖賳 貙 丕賳丿讴蹖 亘鬲賵丕賳 亘賴 鬲賮丕賵鬲 蹖讴 乇跇蹖賲 丿蹖讴鬲丕鬲賵乇蹖 賲毓賲賵賱蹖 亘丕 蹖讴 丿蹖讴鬲丕鬲賵乇蹖 丿丕乇丕蹖 丕蹖丿卅賵賱賵跇蹖 倬蹖 亘乇丿 .
December 3, 2014
廿賳 丕賱亘夭丞 丕賱毓爻賰乇賷丞 賴賷 丕賱鬲賷 鬲氐賳毓 賯賷賲丞 兀賲孬丕賱 賴匕丕 丕賱乇噩賱
丨賯賸丕 賷丕 乇賮丕賯!貙 賱賲丕匕丕 賳亘賯賶 賴賳丕責 賲丕匕丕 賳賮毓賱 賴賳丕責 廿賳賳丕 賳丨賷丕 亘賱丕 丨賷丕丞貙 廿賳賳丕 兀賲賵丕鬲 亘睾賷乇 賲賵鬲賽
丨賯賸丕 賷丕 乇賮丕賯!貙 賱賲丕匕丕 賳亘賯賶 賴賳丕責 賲丕匕丕 賳賮毓賱 賴賳丕責 廿賳賳丕 賳丨賷丕 亘賱丕 丨賷丕丞貙 廿賳賳丕 兀賲賵丕鬲 亘睾賷乇 賲賵鬲賽
November 4, 2012
Prison Life in Siberia. It is a phrase synonymous with misery and suffering. Below zero temperatures. Hard labor. Isolation. Physical punishment. It is everything that reminds me of how fortunate I am to be reading Dostoyevsky鈥檚 semi-autobiographical work instead of actually living it. It paints an image of prison life that is a hundred times more primitive than many of the lazy country club prisons of today鈥檚 western world. Just how bad was it in 19th century Siberia? My curiosity found this novel irresistible. I just had to find out what this lifestyle was in a bygone time in a country that has had a very troubled and complicated past. I was ready to enter the House of the Dead.
In 1849, Fyodor Dostoyevsky was accused of reading and distributing several banned works of literature and subsequently sentenced to prison by the Russian government to four years hard labor in Siberia followed by mandatory military service. During this time the writer experienced unendurable hardship. His experience of this period inspired him to write a work of fiction that brought this previously unknown world to light. After his release from prison he penned a work that would become the first work that would describe in vivid detail the horrors of his four excruciatingly long years in the awful Siberian prison.
Dostoyevsky portrays a very realistic and expressive account of his earliest impressions of entering prison life. He introduces the fictional narrator of Alexander Petrovitch, who classifies himself as a 鈥済entleman of the noble class鈥� of Russians much like Dostoyevsky himself. The author touches upon many different aspects of life in the prison. He describes the work schedule, the food, the living conditions, the punishment, the sick hospital all with distinct detail.
A very large focus of Fyodor鈥檚 narrative is his examination of the Russian character. It is unclear if any of the other prisoners described are based on actual convicts that Dostoyevsky knew during his incarceration. However, he provides a very interesting account of the attitudes and behaviors of several characters who have adapted to life of punishment and isolation.
Overall, Dostoyevsky has written one of his most personal and realistic works that is definitely worth reading. It is among some of his shorter works and gets passed up for his four elephants, Crime and Punishment, Brothers Karamazov, The Idiot, and Demons. However, this work should not be ignored. It has excellent writing and is recommended for anyone interested in this unusual and primitive world.
In 1849, Fyodor Dostoyevsky was accused of reading and distributing several banned works of literature and subsequently sentenced to prison by the Russian government to four years hard labor in Siberia followed by mandatory military service. During this time the writer experienced unendurable hardship. His experience of this period inspired him to write a work of fiction that brought this previously unknown world to light. After his release from prison he penned a work that would become the first work that would describe in vivid detail the horrors of his four excruciatingly long years in the awful Siberian prison.
Dostoyevsky portrays a very realistic and expressive account of his earliest impressions of entering prison life. He introduces the fictional narrator of Alexander Petrovitch, who classifies himself as a 鈥済entleman of the noble class鈥� of Russians much like Dostoyevsky himself. The author touches upon many different aspects of life in the prison. He describes the work schedule, the food, the living conditions, the punishment, the sick hospital all with distinct detail.
A very large focus of Fyodor鈥檚 narrative is his examination of the Russian character. It is unclear if any of the other prisoners described are based on actual convicts that Dostoyevsky knew during his incarceration. However, he provides a very interesting account of the attitudes and behaviors of several characters who have adapted to life of punishment and isolation.
Overall, Dostoyevsky has written one of his most personal and realistic works that is definitely worth reading. It is among some of his shorter works and gets passed up for his four elephants, Crime and Punishment, Brothers Karamazov, The Idiot, and Demons. However, this work should not be ignored. It has excellent writing and is recommended for anyone interested in this unusual and primitive world.
December 13, 2020
螖畏渭慰蟽喂蔚蠉胃畏魏蔚 蟿慰 1861, 蟿慰 House of the Dead 蔚委谓伪喂 苇谓伪
畏渭喂-伪蠀蟿慰尾喂慰纬蟻伪蠁喂魏蠈 苇蟻纬慰 蟺慰蠀 尾伪蟽委味蔚蟿伪喂 蟽蟿畏谓 蔚尉慰蟻委伪
蟿慰蠀 螡蟿慰蟽蟿慰纬喂苇蠁蟽魏喂 蟽蟿畏 危喂尾畏蟻委伪 蠈蟺慰蠀 蟿喂渭蠅蟻萎胃畏魏蔚 渭蔚 芦蟽魏位畏蟻萎 蔚蟻纬伪蟽委伪禄 伪蠁慰蠉 伪蟻蠂喂魏维 魏伪蟿伪未喂魏维蟽蟿畏魏蔚 谓伪 蟿喂渭蠅蟻畏胃蔚委 渭蔚 胃维谓伪蟿慰 伪蟺蠈 慰渭维未伪 蔚魏蟿蔚位蔚蟽蟿喂魏萎蟼 伪蠀蟿慰魏蟻伪蟿慰蟻喂魏萎蟼 蟺蠀蟻慰未蠈蟿畏蟽畏蟼 纬喂伪 蟿畏 蟽蠀渭渭蔚蟿慰蠂萎 蟿慰蠀 蟽蟿慰谓 魏蠉魏位慰 蟿慰蠀 螤蔚蟿蟻伪蟽苇蠁蟽魏喂,
渭喂伪 位慰纬慰蟿蔚蠂谓喂魏萎 慰渭维未伪 蟺慰蠀 蠀喂慰胃苇蟿畏蟽蔚 喂未苇蔚蟼 蟽蔚 伪谓蟿委胃蔚蟽畏 渭蔚 蟿喂蟼 蟿蟽伪蟻喂魏苇蟼 伪蠀蟿慰魏蟻伪蟿慰蟻委蔚蟼 魏伪喂 蟿喂蟼 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏苇蟼 未慰蠀位蔚委伪蟼 蟽蔚 渭蔚纬维位慰 渭苇蟻慰蟼 蟿畏蟼 巍蠅蟽委伪蟼.
螣 螡蟿慰蟽蟿慰纬喂苇蠁蟽魏喂 蟺苇蟻伪蟽蔚 蟿苇蟽蟽蔚蟻伪 蠂蟻蠈谓喂伪 蟽蟿畏谓 蔚尉慰蟻委伪 渭蔚蟿维 蟿畏谓 魏慰喂谓慰蟺慰委畏蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 蟺慰喂谓萎蟼 蟿慰蠀 魏伪喂 蟽蟿畏 蟽蠀谓苇蠂蔚喂伪 伪谓伪纬魏维蟽蟿畏魏蔚 谓伪 蟽蟿蟻伪蠁蔚委 蟽蟿慰 蟽蟿蟻伪蟿蠈 渭苇蠂蟻喂 谓伪 伪谓伪魏慰蠀蠁喂蟽蟿蔚委 魏伪喂 谓伪 蔚蟺伪谓苇位胃蔚喂, 位蠈纬蠅 魏伪魏萎蟼 蠀纬蔚委伪蟼 (蟺喂蟽蟿蔚蠉蔚蟿伪喂 蠈蟿喂 萎蟿伪谓 畏 蔚蟺喂位畏蠄委伪 蟺慰蠀 蟿慰谓 尾伪蟽维谓喂味蔚).
危蟿喂蟼 伪谓伪渭谓萎蟽蔚喂蟼 伪蟺慰 蟿慰 蟽蟺委蟿喂 蟿蠅谓 蟺蔚胃伪渭苇谓蠅谓, 蟿蠅谓 魏伪蟿蔚蟻纬喂蟿蠋谓, 蟿蠅谓 未慰位慰蠁蠈谓蠅谓, 蟿蠅谓 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏蠋谓 魏蟻伪蟿慰蠀渭苇谓蠅谓, 蟿蠅谓 蟽魏位畏蟻慰蟺蠀蟻畏谓喂魏蠋谓 喂蟽慰尾喂蟿蠋谓, 蟿蠅谓 伪蟺位蠋谓 渭慰蠀味委魏蠅谓 魏伪喂 纬蔚谓喂魏蠋蟼 蠈位蠅谓 蟿蠅谓 尾委慰蠄蠀蠂慰位慰纬喂魏蠋谓 蔚喂未蠋谓 蟿畏蟼 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺喂谓畏蟼 蟻维蟿蟽伪蟼, 伪蠀蟿蠈 蟿慰 尾伪胃蠉蟿伪蟿伪 蔚渭蟺谓蔚蠀蟽渭苇谓慰 伪蟺慰 蔚纬魏蔚蠁伪位喂魏维 蠂伪慰蟿喂魏苇蟼 魏伪喂 蔚谓 尾蟻伪蟽渭蠋 蠄蠀蠂萎蟼 蔚蟺喂蟻蟻慰苇蟼 渭蠀胃喂蟽蟿蠈蟻畏渭伪 蔚尉蔚蟻蔚蠀谓维 蠀蟺苇蟻慰蠂伪 魏伪喂 蟿喂蟼 蟽魏苇蠄蔚喂蟼 蟿蠅谓 蠂伪蟻伪魏蟿萎蟻蠅谓 蟿慰蠀 蔚谓蠋 蔚蟻蔚蠀谓维 蟿伪 尾维胃畏 蟿畏蟼 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺喂谓畏蟼 蠄蠀蠂萎蟼.
螤蔚蟻喂纬蟻维蠁慰谓蟿伪蟼 渭蔚 伪蟺蔚蟻喂蠈蟻喂蟽蟿畏 位蔚蟺蟿慰渭苇蟻蔚喂伪 蟿畏 蟽蠅渭伪蟿喂魏萎 魏伪喂 蠄蠀蠂喂魏萎 蟿伪位伪喂蟺蠅蟻委伪 蟿蠅谓 魏伪蟿伪未委魏蠅谓, 慰 蠂伪蟻伪魏蟿萎蟻伪蟼 蟿慰蠀 螡蟿慰蟽蟿慰纬喂苇蠁蟽魏喂 未蔚谓 蠂维谓蔚喂 蟺慰蟿苇 蟿畏谓 蟺委蟽蟿畏 蟿慰蠀 蟽蟿喂蟼 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺喂谓蔚蟼 喂未喂蠈蟿畏蟿蔚蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 魏伪位慰蟽蠉谓畏 蟿慰蠀 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰蠀.
螆谓伪 蟽蟿慰喂蠂蔚喂蠅渭苇谓慰 魏伪喂 伪尉喂慰胃伪蠉渭伪蟽蟿慰 苇蟻纬慰 纬蔚渭维蟿慰 胃伪蠉渭伪 魏伪喂 蟺伪蟻伪委蟿畏蟽畏 蟽蟿喂蟼 蟽蟿苇蟺蔚蟼 蟿畏蟼 危喂尾畏蟻委伪蟼
螒魏慰位慰蠀胃蠋谓蟿伪蟼 蟿畏谓 喂蟽蟿慰蟻委伪 蟿慰蠀 螒位苇尉伪谓未蟻慰蠀 螤苇蟿蟻慰尾喂蟿蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏蟼 蔚尉慰蟻委伪蟼 蟿慰蠀 蟽蟿畏 危喂尾畏蟻委伪 蠅蟼 苇谓伪蟼 伪蟻喂蟽蟿慰魏蟻伪蟿喂魏维 蔚蟺喂蟿畏未蔚蠀渭苇谓伪 芦蔚蠀纬蔚谓萎蟼禄. 螤慰蟿苇 未蔚谓 蟺萎蟻蔚 蟿慰 蠂蟻委蟽渭伪 蟿蠅谓 蟽蠀谓蟿蟻蠈蠁蠅谓 蠅蟼 魏伪蟿维未喂魏慰蟼 蟺慰蠀 蔚谓蟿维蟽蟽蔚蟿伪喂 蟽蔚 渭喂伪 味慰蠉纬魏位伪 伪蟺慰蟿蔚位慰蠉渭蔚谓畏 伪蟺慰 维纬蟻喂伪 胃畏蟻委伪 渭苇蠂蟻喂 维魏伪魏伪 魏伪喂 蟺伪谓蟿蔚位蠋蟼 蔚纬魏位喂渭伪蟿喂蟽渭苇谓伪 慰喂魏蠈蟽喂蟿伪 蟽伪蟻魏慰蠁维纬伪 渭蔚
伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺喂谓畏 渭慰蟻蠁萎.
螆味畏蟽蔚 蟽蟿伪 魏维蟿蔚蟻纬伪 蟿蠅谓 伪谓蠉蟺伪蟻魏蟿蠅谓 蟺蟻慰蟼 蟿畏谓 魏慰喂谓蠅谓委伪, 蟿蠅谓 谓蔚魏蟻蠋谓 蟺慰蠀 蟺维位蔚蠀伪谓 谓伪 尉蔚胃维蠄慰蠀谓 蟿慰蠀蟼 伪蟺蔚位蟺喂蟽渭苇谓慰蠀蟼 渭伪 味蠅谓蟿伪谓慰蠉蟼 魏伪喂 蠂伪渭苇谓慰蠀蟼 蟽蟿畏谓 蠁胃慰蟻维 蔚伪蠀蟿慰蠉蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼 伪蟺慰 蟿慰谓 委未喂慰 蟿慰蠀蟼 蟿慰谓 蟿维蠁慰 蟺慰蠀 蔚委蠂蔚 维蠁胃伪蟻蟿蔚蟼 蠄蠀蠂苇蟼 渭苇蟽伪 蟽蔚 蟿慰蠉尾位喂谓伪 蠁苇蟻蔚蟿蟻伪.
韦蠅谓 蔚蟻纬伪味蠈渭蔚谓蠅谓 蟽魏位畏蟻维 伪谓维渭蔚蟽伪 蟽蔚 味蠋谓蟿蔚蟼 魏伪喂 蟿蔚胃谓蔚蠋蟿蔚蟼 蠀蟺蠈 维胃位喂蔚蟼 蟽蠀谓胃萎魏蔚蟼, 纬喂伪 未苇魏伪 蠂蟻蠈谓喂伪, 蠈蟿伪谓 蟺伪蟻伪未蠈胃畏魏蔚 蟽蟿喂蟼 伪蟻蠂苇蟼 伪蠁慰蠉 未慰位慰蠁蠈谓畏蟽蔚 蟿畏 纬蠀谓伪委魏伪 蟿慰蠀.
螌蟺慰蠀 蟺畏纬伪委谓慰蠀谓 慰喂 蠄蠀蠂苇蟼 蟿蠅谓 味蠅谓蟿伪谓蠋谓 蟺慰蠀 苇蠂慰蠀谓 蟺蔚胃维谓蔚喂.
螣 危喂尾畏蟻喂伪谓蠈蟼 魏蠈位蟺慰蟼 蟺蟻喂谓 蔚蟺喂谓慰畏胃蔚委 蟿慰 蠈谓慰渭伪.
螆谓伪 蟿伪尉委未喂 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺喂谓蠅谓 蟺谓蔚蠀渭维蟿蠅谓 蟺慰蠀 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺伪胃慰蠉谓 谓伪 蔚蟺喂尾喂蠋蟽慰蠀谓 蠈蠂喂 蔚蠉魏慰位伪, 伪蟺蠈 蠈位伪 蠈蟽伪 伪蟺伪喂蟿慰蠉谓蟿伪喂 纬喂伪 蟿畏 味蠅萎.
芦螤伪谓蟿慰蠉 谓蔚魏蟻慰委 魏伪喂 蟺蟿蠋渭伪蟿伪. 螌位蔚蟼 蟿喂蟼 蠋蟻蔚蟼 魏伪喂 蠈位蔚蟼 蟿喂蟼 渭苇蟻蔚蟼. 螔蟻苇蠁畏 魏伪喂 未喂伪位蠀渭苇谓伪 纬蔚蟻蠈谓蟿喂伪, 苇蠁畏尾慰喂 魏伪喂 伪谓苇纬纬喂蠂蟿蔚蟼 胃蠀纬伪蟿苇蟻蔚蟼 蟺苇蠁蟿慰蠀谓 尉苇蟺谓慰慰喂 蟽伪谓 谓伪 魏伪蟿蟻伪魏蠀位慰蠉谓 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰谓 慰蠀蟻伪谓蠈. 韦慰蠀蟼 蟽畏魏蠋谓慰蠀谓 维蟻慰谓 维蟻慰谓 魏伪喂 蟿慰蠀蟼 蟿蟻伪尾慰蠉谓 蟽蟿伪 谓蔚魏蟻慰蟿慰渭蔚委伪, 蟿慰蠀蟼 尾维味慰蠀谓 蟽蟿伪 维胃位喂伪 蟽蠀蟻蟿维蟻喂伪 蟿慰蠀 蠄蠀魏蟿喂魏慰蠉 谓蔚魏蟻慰胃伪位维渭慰蠀, 纬喂伪 谓伪 蟿慰蠀蟼 蠁蠀蟿苇蠄慰蠀谓 蟿畏谓 维位位畏 渭苇蟻伪 蟽蟿畏 谓蔚魏蟻慰蠉蟺慰位畏 蟿畏蟼 蔚谓慰蟻委伪蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼. 螠蔚位位慰谓蟿喂魏蠈蟼 谓蔚魏蟻蠈蟼 慰 魏伪胃苇谓伪蟼 渭伪蟼, 魏蠀魏位慰蠁慰蟻蔚委 伪谓维渭蔚蟽伪 蟽蔚 蟿蠅蟻喂谓慰蠉蟼 魏伪喂 伪尾慰萎胃畏蟿慰蠀蟼 谓蔚魏蟻慰蠉蟼禄.
螞伪蟿蟻蔚蠉蠅 蟿慰谓 螡蟿蠈蟽蟿慰, 苇蠂蠅 未喂伪尾维蟽蔚喂 蟿伪 蟺蔚蟻喂蟽蟽蠈蟿蔚蟻伪 苇蟻纬伪 蟿慰蠀, 慰蟺蠈蟿蔚 蔚蟺喂蟿蟻苇蟺蔚蟿伪喂 蟽蔚 伪蠀蟿蠈谓 蟿慰谓 尾蔚蟿蔚蟻维谓慰 蟿畏蟼 巍蠅蟽喂魏萎蟼 位慰纬慰蟿蔚蠂谓喂魏萎蟼 魏位畏蟻慰谓慰渭喂维蟼 蟽蟿畏谓 蟺伪纬魏蠈蟽渭喂伪 纬蟻伪渭渭伪蟿蔚委伪 谓伪 纬委谓蠅 位委纬慰 蟺伪蟻伪蟺维谓蠅 蔚蟺喂魏蟻喂蟿喂魏萎. 螒蟺慰渭伪魏蟻蠉谓蔚蟿伪喂 蟽畏渭伪谓蟿喂魏维 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰蠀蟼 蟿蠉蟺慰蠀蟼 未慰渭蠋谓 蟺位慰魏蠋谓 蟺慰蠀 蠂蟻畏蟽喂渭慰蟺慰喂蔚委 蟽蔚 维位位伪 渭蠀胃喂蟽蟿慰蟻萎渭伪蟿伪.
螣 位蠈纬慰蟼 纬喂伪 伪蠀蟿蠈 苇蠂蔚喂 谓蠈畏渭伪 - 尾伪蟽委蟽蟿畏魏蔚 蟽蟿畏 未喂魏萎 蟿慰蠀 蔚渭蟺蔚喂蟻委伪 蟽蟿畏 危喂尾畏蟻委伪, 魏伪喂 蟺喂胃伪谓蠈蟿伪蟿伪 萎蟿伪谓 魏维蟺蠅蟼 魏伪胃伪蟻蟿喂魏蠈蟼 蔚蠅蟼 魏伪胃伪喂蟻蔚蟿喂魏蠈蟼 纬喂伪 谓伪 蟿慰谓 魏伪蟿伪纬蟻维蠄蔚喂. 螘委谓伪喂 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰谓 伪谓 胃苇位蔚蟿蔚 谓伪 渭维胃蔚蟿蔚 蟺蔚蟻喂蟽蟽蠈蟿蔚蟻伪 纬喂伪 蟿畏 味蠅萎 蟽蟿畏 蠁蠀位伪魏萎, 伪位位维 未蔚谓 蔚委谓伪喂 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿喂魏维 苇谓伪 苇蟻纬慰 渭蠀胃喂蟽蟿慰蟻喂慰纬蟻伪蠁委伪蟼 渭蔚 蟿畏谓 蟿蠀蟺喂魏维 蠀蟺苇蟻慰蠂畏 未慰渭萎 蟿畏蟼 蟺位慰魏萎蟼 伪蟺慰 蟿畏谓 蟺苇谓伪 蟿慰蠀 位伪蟿蟻蔚渭苇谓慰蠀 蟽蠀纬纬蟻伪蠁苇伪.
危蔚 蟺慰位位维 蟽畏渭蔚委伪 纬委谓蔚蟿伪喂 渭慰谓蠈蟿慰谓慰蟼 魏伪喂 蔚蟺伪谓伪位伪渭尾维谓蔚喂 萎 蟿慰谓委味蔚喂 喂未喂伪喂蟿苇蟻蠅蟼 蠄蠀蠂慰纬蟻伪蠁萎渭伪蟿伪 蟺伪蟻蠈渭慰喂伪 渭蔚蟿伪尉蠉 蟿慰蠀蟼 魏伪喂 伪谓蠋蠁蔚位慰蠀蟼 未喂伪尉喂蠁喂蟽渭慰蠉蟼, 蟽蟿喂蠂慰渭蠀胃委蔚蟼 魏伪喂 蠁蠀蟽喂慰纬谓蠅渭喂魏苇蟼 蟺蔚蟻喂纬蟻伪蠁苇蟼 蟿蠅谓 苇纬魏位蔚喂蟽蟿蠅谓 魏伪喂 魏伪蟿蔚蟽蟿畏渭苇谓蠅谓 -蟺蟻慰蟼 蔚蟺伪谓苇谓蟿伪尉畏- 蟽蟿畏谓 蠂喂慰谓喂蟽渭苇谓畏 魏蠈位伪蟽畏 蟿蠅谓 魏伪蟿伪谓伪纬魏伪蟽蟿喂魏蠋谓 苇蟻纬蠅谓 魏伪喂 畏渭蔚蟻蠋谓 蟿畏蟼 危喂尾畏蟻委伪蟼.
螠蔚 魏慰蠉蟻伪蟽蔚蟼 位委纬慰 伪纬伪蟺畏渭苇谓蔚 伪位位维 蟽鈥櫸蔽澄毕€维蠅 伪魏蠈渭伪 蟺喂慰 蟺慰位蠉.
螌蟽慰 渭蔚 蟺位畏纬蠋谓蔚喂 蟿蠈蟽慰 渭蔚 蟺慰蟻蠋谓蔚喂. 3.5 猸愶笍
馃挋
螝伪位萎 伪谓维纬谓蠅蟽畏.
螤慰位位慰蠉蟼 伪蟽蟺伪蟽渭慰蠉蟼.
畏渭喂-伪蠀蟿慰尾喂慰纬蟻伪蠁喂魏蠈 苇蟻纬慰 蟺慰蠀 尾伪蟽委味蔚蟿伪喂 蟽蟿畏谓 蔚尉慰蟻委伪
蟿慰蠀 螡蟿慰蟽蟿慰纬喂苇蠁蟽魏喂 蟽蟿畏 危喂尾畏蟻委伪 蠈蟺慰蠀 蟿喂渭蠅蟻萎胃畏魏蔚 渭蔚 芦蟽魏位畏蟻萎 蔚蟻纬伪蟽委伪禄 伪蠁慰蠉 伪蟻蠂喂魏维 魏伪蟿伪未喂魏维蟽蟿畏魏蔚 谓伪 蟿喂渭蠅蟻畏胃蔚委 渭蔚 胃维谓伪蟿慰 伪蟺蠈 慰渭维未伪 蔚魏蟿蔚位蔚蟽蟿喂魏萎蟼 伪蠀蟿慰魏蟻伪蟿慰蟻喂魏萎蟼 蟺蠀蟻慰未蠈蟿畏蟽畏蟼 纬喂伪 蟿畏 蟽蠀渭渭蔚蟿慰蠂萎 蟿慰蠀 蟽蟿慰谓 魏蠉魏位慰 蟿慰蠀 螤蔚蟿蟻伪蟽苇蠁蟽魏喂,
渭喂伪 位慰纬慰蟿蔚蠂谓喂魏萎 慰渭维未伪 蟺慰蠀 蠀喂慰胃苇蟿畏蟽蔚 喂未苇蔚蟼 蟽蔚 伪谓蟿委胃蔚蟽畏 渭蔚 蟿喂蟼 蟿蟽伪蟻喂魏苇蟼 伪蠀蟿慰魏蟻伪蟿慰蟻委蔚蟼 魏伪喂 蟿喂蟼 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏苇蟼 未慰蠀位蔚委伪蟼 蟽蔚 渭蔚纬维位慰 渭苇蟻慰蟼 蟿畏蟼 巍蠅蟽委伪蟼.
螣 螡蟿慰蟽蟿慰纬喂苇蠁蟽魏喂 蟺苇蟻伪蟽蔚 蟿苇蟽蟽蔚蟻伪 蠂蟻蠈谓喂伪 蟽蟿畏谓 蔚尉慰蟻委伪 渭蔚蟿维 蟿畏谓 魏慰喂谓慰蟺慰委畏蟽畏 蟿畏蟼 蟺慰喂谓萎蟼 蟿慰蠀 魏伪喂 蟽蟿畏 蟽蠀谓苇蠂蔚喂伪 伪谓伪纬魏维蟽蟿畏魏蔚 谓伪 蟽蟿蟻伪蠁蔚委 蟽蟿慰 蟽蟿蟻伪蟿蠈 渭苇蠂蟻喂 谓伪 伪谓伪魏慰蠀蠁喂蟽蟿蔚委 魏伪喂 谓伪 蔚蟺伪谓苇位胃蔚喂, 位蠈纬蠅 魏伪魏萎蟼 蠀纬蔚委伪蟼 (蟺喂蟽蟿蔚蠉蔚蟿伪喂 蠈蟿喂 萎蟿伪谓 畏 蔚蟺喂位畏蠄委伪 蟺慰蠀 蟿慰谓 尾伪蟽维谓喂味蔚).
危蟿喂蟼 伪谓伪渭谓萎蟽蔚喂蟼 伪蟺慰 蟿慰 蟽蟺委蟿喂 蟿蠅谓 蟺蔚胃伪渭苇谓蠅谓, 蟿蠅谓 魏伪蟿蔚蟻纬喂蟿蠋谓, 蟿蠅谓 未慰位慰蠁蠈谓蠅谓, 蟿蠅谓 蟺慰位喂蟿喂魏蠋谓 魏蟻伪蟿慰蠀渭苇谓蠅谓, 蟿蠅谓 蟽魏位畏蟻慰蟺蠀蟻畏谓喂魏蠋谓 喂蟽慰尾喂蟿蠋谓, 蟿蠅谓 伪蟺位蠋谓 渭慰蠀味委魏蠅谓 魏伪喂 纬蔚谓喂魏蠋蟼 蠈位蠅谓 蟿蠅谓 尾委慰蠄蠀蠂慰位慰纬喂魏蠋谓 蔚喂未蠋谓 蟿畏蟼 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺喂谓畏蟼 蟻维蟿蟽伪蟼, 伪蠀蟿蠈 蟿慰 尾伪胃蠉蟿伪蟿伪 蔚渭蟺谓蔚蠀蟽渭苇谓慰 伪蟺慰 蔚纬魏蔚蠁伪位喂魏维 蠂伪慰蟿喂魏苇蟼 魏伪喂 蔚谓 尾蟻伪蟽渭蠋 蠄蠀蠂萎蟼 蔚蟺喂蟻蟻慰苇蟼 渭蠀胃喂蟽蟿蠈蟻畏渭伪 蔚尉蔚蟻蔚蠀谓维 蠀蟺苇蟻慰蠂伪 魏伪喂 蟿喂蟼 蟽魏苇蠄蔚喂蟼 蟿蠅谓 蠂伪蟻伪魏蟿萎蟻蠅谓 蟿慰蠀 蔚谓蠋 蔚蟻蔚蠀谓维 蟿伪 尾维胃畏 蟿畏蟼 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺喂谓畏蟼 蠄蠀蠂萎蟼.
螤蔚蟻喂纬蟻维蠁慰谓蟿伪蟼 渭蔚 伪蟺蔚蟻喂蠈蟻喂蟽蟿畏 位蔚蟺蟿慰渭苇蟻蔚喂伪 蟿畏 蟽蠅渭伪蟿喂魏萎 魏伪喂 蠄蠀蠂喂魏萎 蟿伪位伪喂蟺蠅蟻委伪 蟿蠅谓 魏伪蟿伪未委魏蠅谓, 慰 蠂伪蟻伪魏蟿萎蟻伪蟼 蟿慰蠀 螡蟿慰蟽蟿慰纬喂苇蠁蟽魏喂 未蔚谓 蠂维谓蔚喂 蟺慰蟿苇 蟿畏谓 蟺委蟽蟿畏 蟿慰蠀 蟽蟿喂蟼 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺喂谓蔚蟼 喂未喂蠈蟿畏蟿蔚蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏谓 魏伪位慰蟽蠉谓畏 蟿慰蠀 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺慰蠀.
螆谓伪 蟽蟿慰喂蠂蔚喂蠅渭苇谓慰 魏伪喂 伪尉喂慰胃伪蠉渭伪蟽蟿慰 苇蟻纬慰 纬蔚渭维蟿慰 胃伪蠉渭伪 魏伪喂 蟺伪蟻伪委蟿畏蟽畏 蟽蟿喂蟼 蟽蟿苇蟺蔚蟼 蟿畏蟼 危喂尾畏蟻委伪蟼
螒魏慰位慰蠀胃蠋谓蟿伪蟼 蟿畏谓 喂蟽蟿慰蟻委伪 蟿慰蠀 螒位苇尉伪谓未蟻慰蠀 螤苇蟿蟻慰尾喂蟿蟼 魏伪喂 蟿畏蟼 蔚尉慰蟻委伪蟼 蟿慰蠀 蟽蟿畏 危喂尾畏蟻委伪 蠅蟼 苇谓伪蟼 伪蟻喂蟽蟿慰魏蟻伪蟿喂魏维 蔚蟺喂蟿畏未蔚蠀渭苇谓伪 芦蔚蠀纬蔚谓萎蟼禄. 螤慰蟿苇 未蔚谓 蟺萎蟻蔚 蟿慰 蠂蟻委蟽渭伪 蟿蠅谓 蟽蠀谓蟿蟻蠈蠁蠅谓 蠅蟼 魏伪蟿维未喂魏慰蟼 蟺慰蠀 蔚谓蟿维蟽蟽蔚蟿伪喂 蟽蔚 渭喂伪 味慰蠉纬魏位伪 伪蟺慰蟿蔚位慰蠉渭蔚谓畏 伪蟺慰 维纬蟻喂伪 胃畏蟻委伪 渭苇蠂蟻喂 维魏伪魏伪 魏伪喂 蟺伪谓蟿蔚位蠋蟼 蔚纬魏位喂渭伪蟿喂蟽渭苇谓伪 慰喂魏蠈蟽喂蟿伪 蟽伪蟻魏慰蠁维纬伪 渭蔚
伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺喂谓畏 渭慰蟻蠁萎.
螆味畏蟽蔚 蟽蟿伪 魏维蟿蔚蟻纬伪 蟿蠅谓 伪谓蠉蟺伪蟻魏蟿蠅谓 蟺蟻慰蟼 蟿畏谓 魏慰喂谓蠅谓委伪, 蟿蠅谓 谓蔚魏蟻蠋谓 蟺慰蠀 蟺维位蔚蠀伪谓 谓伪 尉蔚胃维蠄慰蠀谓 蟿慰蠀蟼 伪蟺蔚位蟺喂蟽渭苇谓慰蠀蟼 渭伪 味蠅谓蟿伪谓慰蠉蟼 魏伪喂 蠂伪渭苇谓慰蠀蟼 蟽蟿畏谓 蠁胃慰蟻维 蔚伪蠀蟿慰蠉蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼 伪蟺慰 蟿慰谓 委未喂慰 蟿慰蠀蟼 蟿慰谓 蟿维蠁慰 蟺慰蠀 蔚委蠂蔚 维蠁胃伪蟻蟿蔚蟼 蠄蠀蠂苇蟼 渭苇蟽伪 蟽蔚 蟿慰蠉尾位喂谓伪 蠁苇蟻蔚蟿蟻伪.
韦蠅谓 蔚蟻纬伪味蠈渭蔚谓蠅谓 蟽魏位畏蟻维 伪谓维渭蔚蟽伪 蟽蔚 味蠋谓蟿蔚蟼 魏伪喂 蟿蔚胃谓蔚蠋蟿蔚蟼 蠀蟺蠈 维胃位喂蔚蟼 蟽蠀谓胃萎魏蔚蟼, 纬喂伪 未苇魏伪 蠂蟻蠈谓喂伪, 蠈蟿伪谓 蟺伪蟻伪未蠈胃畏魏蔚 蟽蟿喂蟼 伪蟻蠂苇蟼 伪蠁慰蠉 未慰位慰蠁蠈谓畏蟽蔚 蟿畏 纬蠀谓伪委魏伪 蟿慰蠀.
螌蟺慰蠀 蟺畏纬伪委谓慰蠀谓 慰喂 蠄蠀蠂苇蟼 蟿蠅谓 味蠅谓蟿伪谓蠋谓 蟺慰蠀 苇蠂慰蠀谓 蟺蔚胃维谓蔚喂.
螣 危喂尾畏蟻喂伪谓蠈蟼 魏蠈位蟺慰蟼 蟺蟻喂谓 蔚蟺喂谓慰畏胃蔚委 蟿慰 蠈谓慰渭伪.
螆谓伪 蟿伪尉委未喂 伪谓胃蟻蠋蟺喂谓蠅谓 蟺谓蔚蠀渭维蟿蠅谓 蟺慰蠀 蟺蟻慰蟽蟺伪胃慰蠉谓 谓伪 蔚蟺喂尾喂蠋蟽慰蠀谓 蠈蠂喂 蔚蠉魏慰位伪, 伪蟺蠈 蠈位伪 蠈蟽伪 伪蟺伪喂蟿慰蠉谓蟿伪喂 纬喂伪 蟿畏 味蠅萎.
芦螤伪谓蟿慰蠉 谓蔚魏蟻慰委 魏伪喂 蟺蟿蠋渭伪蟿伪. 螌位蔚蟼 蟿喂蟼 蠋蟻蔚蟼 魏伪喂 蠈位蔚蟼 蟿喂蟼 渭苇蟻蔚蟼. 螔蟻苇蠁畏 魏伪喂 未喂伪位蠀渭苇谓伪 纬蔚蟻蠈谓蟿喂伪, 苇蠁畏尾慰喂 魏伪喂 伪谓苇纬纬喂蠂蟿蔚蟼 胃蠀纬伪蟿苇蟻蔚蟼 蟺苇蠁蟿慰蠀谓 尉苇蟺谓慰慰喂 蟽伪谓 谓伪 魏伪蟿蟻伪魏蠀位慰蠉谓 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰谓 慰蠀蟻伪谓蠈. 韦慰蠀蟼 蟽畏魏蠋谓慰蠀谓 维蟻慰谓 维蟻慰谓 魏伪喂 蟿慰蠀蟼 蟿蟻伪尾慰蠉谓 蟽蟿伪 谓蔚魏蟻慰蟿慰渭蔚委伪, 蟿慰蠀蟼 尾维味慰蠀谓 蟽蟿伪 维胃位喂伪 蟽蠀蟻蟿维蟻喂伪 蟿慰蠀 蠄蠀魏蟿喂魏慰蠉 谓蔚魏蟻慰胃伪位维渭慰蠀, 纬喂伪 谓伪 蟿慰蠀蟼 蠁蠀蟿苇蠄慰蠀谓 蟿畏谓 维位位畏 渭苇蟻伪 蟽蟿畏 谓蔚魏蟻慰蠉蟺慰位畏 蟿畏蟼 蔚谓慰蟻委伪蟼 蟿慰蠀蟼. 螠蔚位位慰谓蟿喂魏蠈蟼 谓蔚魏蟻蠈蟼 慰 魏伪胃苇谓伪蟼 渭伪蟼, 魏蠀魏位慰蠁慰蟻蔚委 伪谓维渭蔚蟽伪 蟽蔚 蟿蠅蟻喂谓慰蠉蟼 魏伪喂 伪尾慰萎胃畏蟿慰蠀蟼 谓蔚魏蟻慰蠉蟼禄.
螞伪蟿蟻蔚蠉蠅 蟿慰谓 螡蟿蠈蟽蟿慰, 苇蠂蠅 未喂伪尾维蟽蔚喂 蟿伪 蟺蔚蟻喂蟽蟽蠈蟿蔚蟻伪 苇蟻纬伪 蟿慰蠀, 慰蟺蠈蟿蔚 蔚蟺喂蟿蟻苇蟺蔚蟿伪喂 蟽蔚 伪蠀蟿蠈谓 蟿慰谓 尾蔚蟿蔚蟻维谓慰 蟿畏蟼 巍蠅蟽喂魏萎蟼 位慰纬慰蟿蔚蠂谓喂魏萎蟼 魏位畏蟻慰谓慰渭喂维蟼 蟽蟿畏谓 蟺伪纬魏蠈蟽渭喂伪 纬蟻伪渭渭伪蟿蔚委伪 谓伪 纬委谓蠅 位委纬慰 蟺伪蟻伪蟺维谓蠅 蔚蟺喂魏蟻喂蟿喂魏萎. 螒蟺慰渭伪魏蟻蠉谓蔚蟿伪喂 蟽畏渭伪谓蟿喂魏维 伪蟺蠈 蟿慰蠀蟼 蟿蠉蟺慰蠀蟼 未慰渭蠋谓 蟺位慰魏蠋谓 蟺慰蠀 蠂蟻畏蟽喂渭慰蟺慰喂蔚委 蟽蔚 维位位伪 渭蠀胃喂蟽蟿慰蟻萎渭伪蟿伪.
螣 位蠈纬慰蟼 纬喂伪 伪蠀蟿蠈 苇蠂蔚喂 谓蠈畏渭伪 - 尾伪蟽委蟽蟿畏魏蔚 蟽蟿畏 未喂魏萎 蟿慰蠀 蔚渭蟺蔚喂蟻委伪 蟽蟿畏 危喂尾畏蟻委伪, 魏伪喂 蟺喂胃伪谓蠈蟿伪蟿伪 萎蟿伪谓 魏维蟺蠅蟼 魏伪胃伪蟻蟿喂魏蠈蟼 蔚蠅蟼 魏伪胃伪喂蟻蔚蟿喂魏蠈蟼 纬喂伪 谓伪 蟿慰谓 魏伪蟿伪纬蟻维蠄蔚喂. 螘委谓伪喂 蔚谓未喂伪蠁苇蟻慰谓 伪谓 胃苇位蔚蟿蔚 谓伪 渭维胃蔚蟿蔚 蟺蔚蟻喂蟽蟽蠈蟿蔚蟻伪 纬喂伪 蟿畏 味蠅萎 蟽蟿畏 蠁蠀位伪魏萎, 伪位位维 未蔚谓 蔚委谓伪喂 蟺蟻伪纬渭伪蟿喂魏维 苇谓伪 苇蟻纬慰 渭蠀胃喂蟽蟿慰蟻喂慰纬蟻伪蠁委伪蟼 渭蔚 蟿畏谓 蟿蠀蟺喂魏维 蠀蟺苇蟻慰蠂畏 未慰渭萎 蟿畏蟼 蟺位慰魏萎蟼 伪蟺慰 蟿畏谓 蟺苇谓伪 蟿慰蠀 位伪蟿蟻蔚渭苇谓慰蠀 蟽蠀纬纬蟻伪蠁苇伪.
危蔚 蟺慰位位维 蟽畏渭蔚委伪 纬委谓蔚蟿伪喂 渭慰谓蠈蟿慰谓慰蟼 魏伪喂 蔚蟺伪谓伪位伪渭尾维谓蔚喂 萎 蟿慰谓委味蔚喂 喂未喂伪喂蟿苇蟻蠅蟼 蠄蠀蠂慰纬蟻伪蠁萎渭伪蟿伪 蟺伪蟻蠈渭慰喂伪 渭蔚蟿伪尉蠉 蟿慰蠀蟼 魏伪喂 伪谓蠋蠁蔚位慰蠀蟼 未喂伪尉喂蠁喂蟽渭慰蠉蟼, 蟽蟿喂蠂慰渭蠀胃委蔚蟼 魏伪喂 蠁蠀蟽喂慰纬谓蠅渭喂魏苇蟼 蟺蔚蟻喂纬蟻伪蠁苇蟼 蟿蠅谓 苇纬魏位蔚喂蟽蟿蠅谓 魏伪喂 魏伪蟿蔚蟽蟿畏渭苇谓蠅谓 -蟺蟻慰蟼 蔚蟺伪谓苇谓蟿伪尉畏- 蟽蟿畏谓 蠂喂慰谓喂蟽渭苇谓畏 魏蠈位伪蟽畏 蟿蠅谓 魏伪蟿伪谓伪纬魏伪蟽蟿喂魏蠋谓 苇蟻纬蠅谓 魏伪喂 畏渭蔚蟻蠋谓 蟿畏蟼 危喂尾畏蟻委伪蟼.
螠蔚 魏慰蠉蟻伪蟽蔚蟼 位委纬慰 伪纬伪蟺畏渭苇谓蔚 伪位位维 蟽鈥櫸蔽澄毕€维蠅 伪魏蠈渭伪 蟺喂慰 蟺慰位蠉.
螌蟽慰 渭蔚 蟺位畏纬蠋谓蔚喂 蟿蠈蟽慰 渭蔚 蟺慰蟻蠋谓蔚喂. 3.5 猸愶笍
馃挋
螝伪位萎 伪谓维纬谓蠅蟽畏.
螤慰位位慰蠉蟼 伪蟽蟺伪蟽渭慰蠉蟼.
July 16, 2017
Me ha sorprendido principalmente por no ser tan traum谩tico como esperaba. Y no es que no cuente cosas espantosas de c贸mo eran las prisiones y los trabajos forzados en Siberia, pero es que Dosto tambi茅n es capaz de hablar de los presidiarios con cari帽o y reflejar momentos incre铆blemente entra帽ables.
A煤n as铆 se me ha hecho largo y denso, una lectura para tomarse con mucha calma.
A煤n as铆 se me ha hecho largo y denso, una lectura para tomarse con mucha calma.
July 2, 2021
禺胤乇 亘亘丕賱賷 匕丕鬲 賷賵賲 兀賳賴 廿匕丕 兀乇賷丿 廿賴賱丕賰 廿賳爻丕賳貙 賵賲毓丕賯亘鬲賴 亘賮馗丕毓丞貙 賵爻丨賯賴 爻丨賯賸丕 卮丿賷丿賸丕 丨丿 兀賳 賷乇鬲噩賮 兀賲丕賲 賴匕丕 丕賱毓賯丕亘貙 賵賷乇鬲丕毓 賲賳賴 爻賱賮賸丕 丨鬲賶 兀毓鬲賶 丕賱賯鬲賱丞貨 賷賰賮賷 兀賳 鬲囟賮賷 毓賱賶 毓賲賱賴 氐賮丞 毓丿賲 丕賱噩丿賵賶 鬲賲丕賲賸丕貙 賱丕貙 亘賱 丕賱毓亘孬賷丞
丨賯賸丕 賷丕 乇賮丕賯貙 賱賲丕匕丕 賳亘賯賶 賴賳丕責貙 賲丕匕丕 賳賮毓賱 賴賳丕責
廿賳賳丕 賳丨賷丕 亘賱丕 丨賷丕丞貙 兀賲賵丕鬲 亘賱丕 賲賵鬲.
丿賵爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賷丨丿孬賰賲.. 賲賳匕 兀賰孬乇 賲賳 賯乇賳 賵賳氐賮 賲賳 丕賱夭賲丕賳
July 23, 2019
乇賵丕賷丞 "匕賰乇賷丕鬲 賲賳 賲賳夭賱 丕賱兀賲賵丕鬲" 賱賭 鈦р€�#丿賵爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷鈥仼 鬲卮亘賴 噩賵賱丞 匕賴賳賷丞 賮賷 賲賳胤賯 丕賱爻噩賳貙 賵賲賳胤賯 丕賱賯丕賳賵賳貙 賵賲賳胤賯 丕賱噩乇賷賲丞.. 鬲卮毓乇賰 兀賳賰 鬲卮乇賾丨 丕賱爻賷賰賵賱賵噩賷丞 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 鬲丨鬲 丕賱賲賽噩賴乇.
August 31, 2014
丕賱賲匕賴亘 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷 賮賷 丕賱兀丿亘 鬲賷丕乇 賲鬲賰丕賲賱貙 賱賴 丨丿賵丿 賵兀亘毓丕丿 賵丕囟丨丞貙 毓賱賶 丕賱乇睾賲 賲賳 兀賳 賰賱賲丞 "廿賳爻丕賳賷丞" 亘丕鬲鬲 鬲購爻鬲毓賲賱 賮賷 兀丨丕賷賷賳 賰孬賷乇丞 亘卮賰賱賺 兀賯乇亘 廿賱賶 丕賱廿亘鬲匕丕賱.
丕賱賲匕賴亘 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷 賮賷 丕賱兀丿亘 賴賵 氐乇禺丞 丕丨鬲噩丕噩 毓賱賶 賰賱 囟乇亘 賲賳 囟乇賵亘 丕賱鬲賮賰賷乇 兀賵 丕賱爻賱賵賰 賷丐丿賷 亘丕賱鬲囟丨賷丞 亘丕賱廿賳爻丕賳.
賵亘賴匕丕 丕賱賲賮賴賵賲貙 賳爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賳 鬲毓鬲亘乇 丿賵爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷貙 亘毓賲賱賴 賴匕丕 丕賱匕賷 賷鬲兀乇噩丨 亘賷賳 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賵丕賱賲匕賰乇丕鬲 丕賱卮禺氐賷丞貙 兀丨丿 乇賵丕丿 賴匕丕 丕賱賲匕賴亘. 賮賴賵 賷丨賰賷 毓賳 丕賱毓丕賱賲 丕賱賲馗賱賲 賱丨賷丕丞 丕賱爻噩賵賳 亘氐賵乇丞 賲禺鬲賱賮丞 賵賲丿賴卮丞 賵賲丐賱賲丞 賮賷 丕賱賵賯鬲 賳賮爻賴貙 賱鬲丐賰丿 兀賳 丕賱賵丨卮 丕賱賰丕賲賳 丿丕禺賱 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賷馗賴乇 毓賳丿賲丕 鬲鬲丕丨 賱賴 丕賱賮乇氐丞 貙 賱賷賲丕乇爻 丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘 賵丕賳鬲賴丕賰 丕賱賰乇丕賲丞 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷丞 賵丕賱亘卮丕毓丞 亘賰丕賮丞 兀卮賰丕賱賴丕 賵氐賵乇賴丕.
丕爻鬲丨囟乇鬲 賵兀賳丕 兀賯乇兀 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 丕賱丿乇丕爻丞 丕賱賳賮爻丕賳賷丞 丕賱卮賴賷乇丞 丕賱鬲賷 毓購乇賮鬲 亘丕爻賲 "鬲噩乇亘丞 爻噩賳 爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿" 賵丕賱鬲賷 兀噩乇丕賴丕 賮乇賷賯 賲賳 丕賱亘丕丨孬賷賳 賷賯賵丿賴 賮賷賱賷亘 夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵 賲賳 噩丕賲毓丞 爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿 賮賷 毓丕賲 佟侃侑佟 賱賮賴賲 賳馗丕賲 丕賱爻噩賵賳 賵丕賱氐乇丕毓丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賳賲賵 亘賷賳 賯囟亘丕賳賴貙 丨賷孬 賯丕賲 亘兀丿丕亍 丿賵乇 丕賱丨乇丕爻 賵丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賲鬲胤賵毓賵賳 賵匕賱賰 賮賷 亘賳丕亍 賷丨丕賰賷 丕賱爻噩賳 鬲賲丕賲丕賸. 廿賱丕 兀賳 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 爻乇毓丕賳 賲丕 鬲噩丕賵夭鬲 丨丿賵丿 丕賱爻賷胤乇丞 賵鬲賲 廿賷賯丕賮賴丕 亘丕賰乇丕賸 毓賳丿賲丕 鬲丨賵賱 丕賱爻噩丕賳賵賳 廿賱賶 爻噩丕賳賷賳 丨賯賷賯賷賷賳 賵亘丿兀賵丕 亘丕乇鬲賰丕亘 賲賲丕乇爻丕鬲 爻丕丿賷丞 賵賱丕 廿賳爻丕賳賷丞 囟丿 丕賱賲爻丕噩賷賳 鬲爻亘亘鬲 賱亘毓囟賴賲 亘丕囟胤乇丕亘丕鬲 賳賮爻賷丞!
亘廿賲賰丕賳賰賲 丕賱鬲毓乇賮 毓賱賶 鬲賮丕氐賷賱 賴匕賴 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賮賷賱賲
毓賵丿丞 丿賵爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賲噩丿丿丕貙 兀爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賳 兀賯賵賱 亘兀賳 乇賵丕賷鬲賴 賴匕賴 廿丨丿賶 兀噩賲賱 乇賵丕賷丕鬲 兀丿亘 丕賱爻噩賵賳 賵賲賳 兀賰孬乇賴丕 丕禺鬲乇丕賯丕 賱賱賳賮爻 賵賲爻丕爻丕 亘卮睾丕賮 丕賱賯賱亘貙 賵賯丿乇丞 毓賱賶 鬲賵氐賷賮 賵丕爻鬲亘胤丕賳 丕賱賳賮爻 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 毓賳丿賲丕 鬲鬲毓乇囟 賱鬲噩乇亘丞 丕賱丕賳丨亘丕爻 丿丕禺賱 賯囟亘丕賳 丕賱爻噩賳 賵丕爻鬲賱丕亘 丕賱丨乇賷丞貙 賵丿禺賵賱賴丕 賲乇睾賲丞 賮賷 毓夭賱丞 賵賵丨丿丞 廿噩亘丕乇賷丞 鬲鬲毓乇囟 賮賷賴丕 廿賱賶 賲賵丕噩賴丞 丿丕卅賲丞 賲毓 丕賱賳賮爻 賲毓 賰賱 賲丕 賷鬲噩丕匕亘賴丕 賲賳 賲丿 賵噩匕乇 賵兀賲賱 賵賷兀爻 賵乇噩丕亍 賵賯賳賵胤!
丕賱賲匕賴亘 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷 賮賷 丕賱兀丿亘 賴賵 氐乇禺丞 丕丨鬲噩丕噩 毓賱賶 賰賱 囟乇亘 賲賳 囟乇賵亘 丕賱鬲賮賰賷乇 兀賵 丕賱爻賱賵賰 賷丐丿賷 亘丕賱鬲囟丨賷丞 亘丕賱廿賳爻丕賳.
賵亘賴匕丕 丕賱賲賮賴賵賲貙 賳爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賳 鬲毓鬲亘乇 丿賵爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷貙 亘毓賲賱賴 賴匕丕 丕賱匕賷 賷鬲兀乇噩丨 亘賷賳 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 賵丕賱賲匕賰乇丕鬲 丕賱卮禺氐賷丞貙 兀丨丿 乇賵丕丿 賴匕丕 丕賱賲匕賴亘. 賮賴賵 賷丨賰賷 毓賳 丕賱毓丕賱賲 丕賱賲馗賱賲 賱丨賷丕丞 丕賱爻噩賵賳 亘氐賵乇丞 賲禺鬲賱賮丞 賵賲丿賴卮丞 賵賲丐賱賲丞 賮賷 丕賱賵賯鬲 賳賮爻賴貙 賱鬲丐賰丿 兀賳 丕賱賵丨卮 丕賱賰丕賲賳 丿丕禺賱 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賷馗賴乇 毓賳丿賲丕 鬲鬲丕丨 賱賴 丕賱賮乇氐丞 貙 賱賷賲丕乇爻 丕賱鬲毓匕賷亘 賵丕賳鬲賴丕賰 丕賱賰乇丕賲丞 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷丞 賵丕賱亘卮丕毓丞 亘賰丕賮丞 兀卮賰丕賱賴丕 賵氐賵乇賴丕.
丕爻鬲丨囟乇鬲 賵兀賳丕 兀賯乇兀 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 丕賱丿乇丕爻丞 丕賱賳賮爻丕賳賷丞 丕賱卮賴賷乇丞 丕賱鬲賷 毓購乇賮鬲 亘丕爻賲 "鬲噩乇亘丞 爻噩賳 爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿" 賵丕賱鬲賷 兀噩乇丕賴丕 賮乇賷賯 賲賳 丕賱亘丕丨孬賷賳 賷賯賵丿賴 賮賷賱賷亘 夭賷賲亘丕乇丿賵 賲賳 噩丕賲毓丞 爻鬲丕賳賮賵乇丿 賮賷 毓丕賲 佟侃侑佟 賱賮賴賲 賳馗丕賲 丕賱爻噩賵賳 賵丕賱氐乇丕毓丕鬲 丕賱鬲賷 鬲賳賲賵 亘賷賳 賯囟亘丕賳賴貙 丨賷孬 賯丕賲 亘兀丿丕亍 丿賵乇 丕賱丨乇丕爻 賵丕賱爻噩賳丕亍 賲鬲胤賵毓賵賳 賵匕賱賰 賮賷 亘賳丕亍 賷丨丕賰賷 丕賱爻噩賳 鬲賲丕賲丕賸. 廿賱丕 兀賳 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 爻乇毓丕賳 賲丕 鬲噩丕賵夭鬲 丨丿賵丿 丕賱爻賷胤乇丞 賵鬲賲 廿賷賯丕賮賴丕 亘丕賰乇丕賸 毓賳丿賲丕 鬲丨賵賱 丕賱爻噩丕賳賵賳 廿賱賶 爻噩丕賳賷賳 丨賯賷賯賷賷賳 賵亘丿兀賵丕 亘丕乇鬲賰丕亘 賲賲丕乇爻丕鬲 爻丕丿賷丞 賵賱丕 廿賳爻丕賳賷丞 囟丿 丕賱賲爻丕噩賷賳 鬲爻亘亘鬲 賱亘毓囟賴賲 亘丕囟胤乇丕亘丕鬲 賳賮爻賷丞!
亘廿賲賰丕賳賰賲 丕賱鬲毓乇賮 毓賱賶 鬲賮丕氐賷賱 賴匕賴 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞 賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賮賷賱賲
毓賵丿丞 丿賵爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賲噩丿丿丕貙 兀爻鬲胤賷毓 兀賳 兀賯賵賱 亘兀賳 乇賵丕賷鬲賴 賴匕賴 廿丨丿賶 兀噩賲賱 乇賵丕賷丕鬲 兀丿亘 丕賱爻噩賵賳 賵賲賳 兀賰孬乇賴丕 丕禺鬲乇丕賯丕 賱賱賳賮爻 賵賲爻丕爻丕 亘卮睾丕賮 丕賱賯賱亘貙 賵賯丿乇丞 毓賱賶 鬲賵氐賷賮 賵丕爻鬲亘胤丕賳 丕賱賳賮爻 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 毓賳丿賲丕 鬲鬲毓乇囟 賱鬲噩乇亘丞 丕賱丕賳丨亘丕爻 丿丕禺賱 賯囟亘丕賳 丕賱爻噩賳 賵丕爻鬲賱丕亘 丕賱丨乇賷丞貙 賵丿禺賵賱賴丕 賲乇睾賲丞 賮賷 毓夭賱丞 賵賵丨丿丞 廿噩亘丕乇賷丞 鬲鬲毓乇囟 賮賷賴丕 廿賱賶 賲賵丕噩賴丞 丿丕卅賲丞 賲毓 丕賱賳賮爻 賲毓 賰賱 賲丕 賷鬲噩丕匕亘賴丕 賲賳 賲丿 賵噩匕乇 賵兀賲賱 賵賷兀爻 賵乇噩丕亍 賵賯賳賵胤!
September 15, 2018
賳賯丿蹖 亘丿賵賳 毓賳賵丕賳 亘賳丿蹖
賮蹖賱爻賵賮丕賳 賯丕乇賴 丕蹖 賲毓鬲賯丿賳丿 讴賴 倬乇丕讴爻蹖爻 (蹖丕 賴賲丕賳 賲賲丕乇爻鬲)貙 賲賴賲鬲乇蹖賳 毓丕賲賱 鬲毓丕賱蹖 亘禺卮 丕賳爻丕賳 丕爻鬲. 丕蹖賳 賯賵賱蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 倬蹖卮 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賮蹖賱爻賵賮丕賳 蹖賵賳丕賳 賵 倬蹖卮 丕夭 丌賳丕賳 丨讴賲丕蹖 卮乇賯蹖 賳蹖夭 亘爻蹖丕乇 亘賴 丌賳 鬲丕讴蹖丿 丿丕卮鬲賴 丕賳丿. 卮丕蹖丿 丕蹖賳 賳讴鬲賴 丿乇 丕亘鬲丿丕 亘爻蹖丕乇 倬蹖卮 倬丕 丕賮鬲丕丿賴 亘賴 賳馗乇 亘蹖丕蹖丿. 賵賱蹖 丕诏乇 亘亘蹖賳蹖丿 趩賴 賳馗乇蹖賴 賴丕蹖 毓噩蹖亘蹖 丕夭 丿賱 賴賲蹖賳 賳讴鬲賴 倬蹖卮 倬丕 丕賮鬲丕丿賴 亘蹖乇賵賳 讴卮蹖丿賴 卮丿賴 鬲毓噩亘 賲蹖 讴賳蹖丿: 丕诏乇 爻乇賵卮 丿乇 芦亘爻胤 鬲噩乇亘賴 賳亘賵蹖禄 丕丿毓丕 賲蹖 讴賳丿 讴賴 倬蹖丕賲亘乇 亘賴 鬲丿乇蹖噩 倬蹖丕賲亘乇鬲乇 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲貨 丕诏乇 诏丕丿丕賲乇 賲毓鬲賯丿 丕爻鬲 賳亘賵睾 鬲乇亘蹖鬲 賲蹖卮賵丿 賵 丕诏乇 賴丕蹖丿诏乇 賲蹖诏賮鬲 卮丕毓乇 乇丕賴 夭亘丕賳 亘賴 丨賯蹖賯鬲 乇丕 亘賴 鬲丿乇蹖噩 乇賵卮賳鬲乇 賲蹖 蹖丕亘丿 賵... 賴賲賴 亘丕 丕蹖賳 賳讴鬲賴 爻丕丿賴 賯丕亘賱 賴囟賲 丕爻鬲 讴賴 倬乇丕讴爻蹖爻 蹖丕 鬲賲乇蹖賳 蹖丕 賲賲丕乇爻鬲 蹖丕 亘賴 賯賵賱 丿蹖賴蹖賲蹖 芦賵乇夭賴禄貙 乇賵丨 乇丕 賲爻鬲毓丿 倬匕蹖乇卮 趩蹖夭蹖 賲蹖讴賳丿 讴賴 亘賴 鬲賲丕賲賴 賲禺賱賵賯 禺賵丿 丕賵 賳蹖爻鬲貙 賵賱蹖 丕诏乇 丕賵 賳亘賵丿貙 丿乇 丿賳蹖丕锟斤拷 賲丕 亘丕夭鬲丕亘 賳丿丕卮鬲. 丕诏乇 賳蹖賵鬲賳 賳亘賵丿貙 丕诏乇 賲賵賱賵蹖 賳亘賵丿貙 丕诏乇 倬蹖丕賲亘乇丕賳 賳亘賵丿賳丿貙 丕诏乇 卮丕毓乇丕賳 賵 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 亘夭乇诏 賳亘賵丿賳丿 讴賴 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖蹖 乇丕 丿乇蹖丕賮鬲 賵 亘賴 噩賴丕賳 賲丕 亘丕夭 亘鬲丕亘丕賳賳丿貙 噩賴丕賳 賲丕 趩賴 亘賵丿責
丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵賮爻讴蹖 賴賲 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 賴賲蹖賳 乇爻賵賱丕賳 丕爻鬲貙 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 丌蹖賳賴 丿丕乇丕賳. 讴爻蹖 讴賴 丕诏乇 賳亘賵丿貙 亘乇丕丿乇丕賳 讴丕乇丕賲丕夭乇賵賮貙 丕亘賱賴貙 噩賳丕蹖鬲 賵 賲讴丕賮丕鬲 賵 丕賱亘鬲賴 噩賳 夭丿诏丕賳蹖 丿乇 丿賳蹖丕蹖 賲丕 賵噩賵丿 賳丿丕卮鬲. 賵賱蹖 賵賯鬲蹖 倬蹖丕賲亘乇 倬蹖丕賲亘乇鬲乇 賲蹖卮賵丿貙 賲诏乇 賲蹖卮賵丿 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 鬲乇 賳卮賵丿責 賲孬賱 乇賵夭 亘乇丕蹖 賲賳 乇賵卮賳 卮丿賴 讴賴 亘蹖賳 丌孬丕乇 丕賵賱蹖賴 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵賮爻讴蹖 亘丕 丌孬丕乇 賲鬲丕禺乇 丕賵 鬲賮丕賵鬲 賮丕丨卮蹖 賵噩賵丿 丿丕乇丿. 乇賲丕賳賴丕蹖 賳蹖賲賴 丕賵賱 毓賲乇 丨乇賮賴 丕蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵賮爻讴蹖貙 丕夭 亘蹖趩丕乇诏丕賳 (1846) 鬲丕 賴賲蹖賳 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 丕賲賵丕鬲 (1862) 亘丕 賳賵毓蹖 賵爻賵丕爻 賵 賮丕氐賱賴 賴賲乇丕賴 丕爻鬲. 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵賮爻讴蹖 卮禺氐蹖鬲 賴丕蹖 禺賵丿 乇丕 賳蹖賲賴 讴丕乇賴 乇賴丕 賲蹖讴賳丿 賵 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 乇丕 賴賲趩賵賳 蹖讴 乇賵夭賳丕賲賴 賳诏丕乇 芦诏夭丕乇卮禄 賲蹖讴賳丿. 賵賱蹖 賳蹖賲賴 丿賵賲 毓賲乇 丨乇賮賴 丕蹖 丕賵貙 丕夭 蹖丕丿丿丕卮鬲 賴丕蹖 夭蹖乇夭賲蹖賳蹖 (1864) 鬲丕 亘乇丕丿乇丕賳 讴丕乇丕賲丕夭賵賮 (1880) 賳丕诏賴丕賳 诏賵蹖蹖 鬲氐賲蹖賲 賲蹖诏蹖乇丿 亘噩丕蹖 诏夭丕乇卮貙 亘賴 乇賵丕蹖鬲 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕賳爻丕賳賴丕 亘倬乇丿丕夭丿. 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 乇丕賵蹖貙 亘噩丕蹖 丿丕賳丕蹖 讴賱 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 賳丕馗乇 賲丕噩乇丕 賯乇丕乇 丿賴丿 賵 诏賵蹖蹖 丕賳诏丕乇 胤乇丨 诏爻鬲乇丿賴 丕蹖 丕夭 讴賱 丕賳丿蹖卮賴 禺賵丿 丿乇 丌孬丕乇 賲禺鬲賱賮卮 賳卮丕賳 丿賴丿: 丕蹖賳讴賴 丕賳爻丕賳 賲丨賯 乇賳噩 賳蹖爻鬲貙 賵賱蹖 乇賳噩 (賳賴 毓賯賱貙 賳賴 賱匕鬲 賵 賳賴 賲亘丕乇夭賴) 丕賵 乇丕 賲蹖乇賴丕賳丿
禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 丕賲賵丕鬲貙 賴賲丕賳胤賵乇 讴賴 丕夭 鬲賵囟蹖丨 亘丕賱丕 賲毓賱賵賲 丕爻鬲貙 乇賵蹖 賲乇夭 丕爻鬲. 賮乇賲 賳蹖賲賴 丿賵賲 賵 賲丨鬲賵丕蹖 賳蹖賲賴 丕賵賱 乇丕 丿丕乇丿. 乇丕賵蹖 賳丕馗乇蹖 卮禺氐蹖 丕爻鬲 (蹖讴 夭賳丿丕賳蹖 讴賴 丕夭 丿蹖诏乇 夭賳丿丕賳蹖丕賳 芦賮丕氐賱賴禄 丿丕乇丿) 賵 亘丕 鬲噩乇亘賴 賴丕蹖 卮禺氐蹖 禺賵丿 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵賮爻讴蹖 (丿賵乇丕賳 丨亘爻 丿乇 爻蹖亘乇蹖) 賴賲 亘賴 禺賵亘蹖 丌賲蹖禺鬲賴 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲. 丕蹖丿賴 賴丕蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 亘爻蹖丕乇 亘丿蹖毓 賵 賯丕亘賱 鬲丕賲賱賳丿. 賲孬賱丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 趩乇丕 夭賳丿丕賳蹖 賴丕 亘丕 賴賲 丿毓賵丕 賲蹖讴賳賳丿貙 趩乇丕 丕夭 賴賲 丿夭丿蹖 賲蹖讴賳賳丿貙 賲孬賱丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 賮乇賯 賴賲亘爻鬲诏蹖 夭賳丿丕賳蹖賴丕 亘丕 丕賮乇丕丿 丌夭丕丿 丿乇 趩蹖爻鬲貙 賮乇賯 讴丕乇 禺賵丿丕賳诏蹖禺鬲賴 賵 讴丕乇 丕噩亘丕乇蹖 丿乇 趩蹖爻鬲貙 蹖丕 趩乇丕 亘丕蹖丿 賯丕鬲賱蹖賳 賲禺鬲賱賮 (賯丕鬲賱 讴賵丿讴貙 夭賳貙 賲鬲噩丕賵夭貙 丿夭丿 賵...) 亘丿賵賳 鬲賵噩賴 亘賴 賲丕賴蹖鬲 賲賯鬲賵賱 蹖讴爻丕賳 賲噩丕夭丕鬲 卮賵賳丿貙 賵 蹖丕 賲賮丕賴蹖賲蹖 賲孬賱 丕賳鬲賯丕賲貙 丕鬲賴丕賲貙 賲噩乇賲貙 賳丕賲 賮乇賵卮蹖貙 賳丕賲 诏匕丕乇蹖貙 禺賵丿讴卮蹖 賵 丿蹖诏乇讴卮蹖 賵 亘爻蹖丕乇蹖 賳讴丕鬲 賯丕亘賱 鬲賵噩賴 丿蹖诏乇 讴賴 賴賲賴 丿乇 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 丕賲賵丕鬲 胤乇丨 賲蹖卮賵賳丿. 丕氐賱丕 鬲丕 亘賴 丨丕賱 倬乇爻蹖丿賴 丕蹖丿 趩乇丕 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 芦丕賲賵丕鬲禄責
賴賲賴 丕蹖賳 賲爻丕卅賱 讴鬲丕亘 丨丕囟乇 乇丕 噩匕丕亘 賲蹖讴賳丿貙 丕賲丕 賯賱賲 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵賮爻讴蹖 賵 胤乇丨 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丌賳 噩匕丕亘蹖鬲蹖 乇丕 讴賴 丕賳鬲馗丕乇 丿丕乇蹖丿 亘乇丌賵乇丿賴 賳賲蹖讴賳丿. 亘乇 禺賱丕賮 丕亘賱賴 賵 噩賳丕蹖鬲 賵 賲讴丕賮丕鬲貙 胤乇丨 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 丕孬乇 亘丕乇 噩匕丕亘蹖鬲 乇丕 亘賴 丿賵卮 賳賲蹖讴卮丿. 亘乇 禺賱丕賮 噩賳 夭丿诏丕賳 賵 亘乇丕乇丿丕賳 讴丕乇丕賲丕夭賵賮 賴賲 丿蹖丕賱賵诏賴丕 丿乇禺卮卮 賴丕蹖 噩亘乇丕賳 讴賳賳丿賴 丕蹖 賳丿丕乇丿. 亘乇 禺賱丕賮 賴乇 趩賴丕乇 丕孬乇 賲匕讴賵乇貙 卮禺氐蹖鬲 倬乇丿丕夭蹖賴丕 蹖丕 氐蹖賯賱 禺賵乇丿賴 賵 丿乇诏蹖乇讴賳賳丿賴 賳蹖爻鬲 蹖丕 亘賴 丕賳丿丕夭賴 讴丕賮蹖 亘賴 乇賵蹖 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 诏卮賵丿賴 賳賲蹖卮賵丿. 亘丕蹖丿 倬匕蹖乇賮鬲 讴賴 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵賮爻讴蹖 賴賲 亘賴 鬲丿乇蹖噩 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 鬲乇 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲 賵 丌孬丕乇 賲鬲丕禺乇 丕賵 亘賴 賵囟賵丨 丕夭 丌孬丕乇 丕賵賱蹖賴 丕卮 毓賲蹖賯鬲乇 賵 噩匕丕亘鬲乇賳丿
噩丿丕 丕夭 丕蹖賳貙 鬲乇噩賲賴 讴鬲丕亘 亘爻蹖丕乇 囟毓蹖賮 亘賵丿. 鬲乇噩賲賴 賲賴乇丿丕丿 賲賴乇蹖賳 乇丕 賳禺賵丕賳蹖丿- 鬲乇噩賲賴 丕蹖 讴賴 亘噩丕蹖 賲噩乇賲 丕夭 賲賯氐乇貙 亘噩丕蹖 賳诏賴亘丕賳 丕夭 賲爻鬲丨賮馗 賵 亘噩丕蹖 賴乇 丨乇賮 乇亘胤蹖 丕夭 賲毓 匕賱讴 丕爻鬲賮丕丿賴 賲蹖讴賳丿! 賴賲趩賳蹖賳 賳爻禺賴 讴鬲丕亘 氐賵鬲蹖 丌賵丕蹖 亘賵賮 賴賲 亘爻蹖丕乇 賳丕丕賲蹖丿讴賳賳丿賴 賵 丨賵氐賱賴-爻乇亘乇 亘賵丿. 亘丕卮丿 讴賴 鬲噩乇亘賴 卮賲丕 丕夭 鬲乇噩賲賴 丿蹖诏乇 丕蹖賳 丕孬乇 鬲噩乇亘賴 亘賴鬲乇蹖 丕夭 賲賳 亘丕卮丿! 乇
賮蹖賱爻賵賮丕賳 賯丕乇賴 丕蹖 賲毓鬲賯丿賳丿 讴賴 倬乇丕讴爻蹖爻 (蹖丕 賴賲丕賳 賲賲丕乇爻鬲)貙 賲賴賲鬲乇蹖賳 毓丕賲賱 鬲毓丕賱蹖 亘禺卮 丕賳爻丕賳 丕爻鬲. 丕蹖賳 賯賵賱蹖 丕爻鬲 讴賴 倬蹖卮 丕夭 丕蹖賳 賮蹖賱爻賵賮丕賳 蹖賵賳丕賳 賵 倬蹖卮 丕夭 丌賳丕賳 丨讴賲丕蹖 卮乇賯蹖 賳蹖夭 亘爻蹖丕乇 亘賴 丌賳 鬲丕讴蹖丿 丿丕卮鬲賴 丕賳丿. 卮丕蹖丿 丕蹖賳 賳讴鬲賴 丿乇 丕亘鬲丿丕 亘爻蹖丕乇 倬蹖卮 倬丕 丕賮鬲丕丿賴 亘賴 賳馗乇 亘蹖丕蹖丿. 賵賱蹖 丕诏乇 亘亘蹖賳蹖丿 趩賴 賳馗乇蹖賴 賴丕蹖 毓噩蹖亘蹖 丕夭 丿賱 賴賲蹖賳 賳讴鬲賴 倬蹖卮 倬丕 丕賮鬲丕丿賴 亘蹖乇賵賳 讴卮蹖丿賴 卮丿賴 鬲毓噩亘 賲蹖 讴賳蹖丿: 丕诏乇 爻乇賵卮 丿乇 芦亘爻胤 鬲噩乇亘賴 賳亘賵蹖禄 丕丿毓丕 賲蹖 讴賳丿 讴賴 倬蹖丕賲亘乇 亘賴 鬲丿乇蹖噩 倬蹖丕賲亘乇鬲乇 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲貨 丕诏乇 诏丕丿丕賲乇 賲毓鬲賯丿 丕爻鬲 賳亘賵睾 鬲乇亘蹖鬲 賲蹖卮賵丿 賵 丕诏乇 賴丕蹖丿诏乇 賲蹖诏賮鬲 卮丕毓乇 乇丕賴 夭亘丕賳 亘賴 丨賯蹖賯鬲 乇丕 亘賴 鬲丿乇蹖噩 乇賵卮賳鬲乇 賲蹖 蹖丕亘丿 賵... 賴賲賴 亘丕 丕蹖賳 賳讴鬲賴 爻丕丿賴 賯丕亘賱 賴囟賲 丕爻鬲 讴賴 倬乇丕讴爻蹖爻 蹖丕 鬲賲乇蹖賳 蹖丕 賲賲丕乇爻鬲 蹖丕 亘賴 賯賵賱 丿蹖賴蹖賲蹖 芦賵乇夭賴禄貙 乇賵丨 乇丕 賲爻鬲毓丿 倬匕蹖乇卮 趩蹖夭蹖 賲蹖讴賳丿 讴賴 亘賴 鬲賲丕賲賴 賲禺賱賵賯 禺賵丿 丕賵 賳蹖爻鬲貙 賵賱蹖 丕诏乇 丕賵 賳亘賵丿貙 丿乇 丿賳蹖丕锟斤拷 賲丕 亘丕夭鬲丕亘 賳丿丕卮鬲. 丕诏乇 賳蹖賵鬲賳 賳亘賵丿貙 丕诏乇 賲賵賱賵蹖 賳亘賵丿貙 丕诏乇 倬蹖丕賲亘乇丕賳 賳亘賵丿賳丿貙 丕诏乇 卮丕毓乇丕賳 賵 賳賵蹖爻賳丿诏丕賳 亘夭乇诏 賳亘賵丿賳丿 讴賴 趩蹖夭賴丕蹖蹖 乇丕 丿乇蹖丕賮鬲 賵 亘賴 噩賴丕賳 賲丕 亘丕夭 亘鬲丕亘丕賳賳丿貙 噩賴丕賳 賲丕 趩賴 亘賵丿責
丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵賮爻讴蹖 賴賲 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 賴賲蹖賳 乇爻賵賱丕賳 丕爻鬲貙 蹖讴蹖 丕夭 丌蹖賳賴 丿丕乇丕賳. 讴爻蹖 讴賴 丕诏乇 賳亘賵丿貙 亘乇丕丿乇丕賳 讴丕乇丕賲丕夭乇賵賮貙 丕亘賱賴貙 噩賳丕蹖鬲 賵 賲讴丕賮丕鬲 賵 丕賱亘鬲賴 噩賳 夭丿诏丕賳蹖 丿乇 丿賳蹖丕蹖 賲丕 賵噩賵丿 賳丿丕卮鬲. 賵賱蹖 賵賯鬲蹖 倬蹖丕賲亘乇 倬蹖丕賲亘乇鬲乇 賲蹖卮賵丿貙 賲诏乇 賲蹖卮賵丿 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 丕蹖 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 鬲乇 賳卮賵丿責 賲孬賱 乇賵夭 亘乇丕蹖 賲賳 乇賵卮賳 卮丿賴 讴賴 亘蹖賳 丌孬丕乇 丕賵賱蹖賴 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵賮爻讴蹖 亘丕 丌孬丕乇 賲鬲丕禺乇 丕賵 鬲賮丕賵鬲 賮丕丨卮蹖 賵噩賵丿 丿丕乇丿. 乇賲丕賳賴丕蹖 賳蹖賲賴 丕賵賱 毓賲乇 丨乇賮賴 丕蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵賮爻讴蹖貙 丕夭 亘蹖趩丕乇诏丕賳 (1846) 鬲丕 賴賲蹖賳 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 丕賲賵丕鬲 (1862) 亘丕 賳賵毓蹖 賵爻賵丕爻 賵 賮丕氐賱賴 賴賲乇丕賴 丕爻鬲. 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵賮爻讴蹖 卮禺氐蹖鬲 賴丕蹖 禺賵丿 乇丕 賳蹖賲賴 讴丕乇賴 乇賴丕 賲蹖讴賳丿 賵 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 乇丕 賴賲趩賵賳 蹖讴 乇賵夭賳丕賲賴 賳诏丕乇 芦诏夭丕乇卮禄 賲蹖讴賳丿. 賵賱蹖 賳蹖賲賴 丿賵賲 毓賲乇 丨乇賮賴 丕蹖 丕賵貙 丕夭 蹖丕丿丿丕卮鬲 賴丕蹖 夭蹖乇夭賲蹖賳蹖 (1864) 鬲丕 亘乇丕丿乇丕賳 讴丕乇丕賲丕夭賵賮 (1880) 賳丕诏賴丕賳 诏賵蹖蹖 鬲氐賲蹖賲 賲蹖诏蹖乇丿 亘噩丕蹖 诏夭丕乇卮貙 亘賴 乇賵丕蹖鬲 夭賳丿诏蹖 丕賳爻丕賳賴丕 亘倬乇丿丕夭丿. 禺賵丿 乇丕 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 乇丕賵蹖貙 亘噩丕蹖 丿丕賳丕蹖 讴賱 亘賴 毓賳賵丕賳 賳丕馗乇 賲丕噩乇丕 賯乇丕乇 丿賴丿 賵 诏賵蹖蹖 丕賳诏丕乇 胤乇丨 诏爻鬲乇丿賴 丕蹖 丕夭 讴賱 丕賳丿蹖卮賴 禺賵丿 丿乇 丌孬丕乇 賲禺鬲賱賮卮 賳卮丕賳 丿賴丿: 丕蹖賳讴賴 丕賳爻丕賳 賲丨賯 乇賳噩 賳蹖爻鬲貙 賵賱蹖 乇賳噩 (賳賴 毓賯賱貙 賳賴 賱匕鬲 賵 賳賴 賲亘丕乇夭賴) 丕賵 乇丕 賲蹖乇賴丕賳丿
禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 丕賲賵丕鬲貙 賴賲丕賳胤賵乇 讴賴 丕夭 鬲賵囟蹖丨 亘丕賱丕 賲毓賱賵賲 丕爻鬲貙 乇賵蹖 賲乇夭 丕爻鬲. 賮乇賲 賳蹖賲賴 丿賵賲 賵 賲丨鬲賵丕蹖 賳蹖賲賴 丕賵賱 乇丕 丿丕乇丿. 乇丕賵蹖 賳丕馗乇蹖 卮禺氐蹖 丕爻鬲 (蹖讴 夭賳丿丕賳蹖 讴賴 丕夭 丿蹖诏乇 夭賳丿丕賳蹖丕賳 芦賮丕氐賱賴禄 丿丕乇丿) 賵 亘丕 鬲噩乇亘賴 賴丕蹖 卮禺氐蹖 禺賵丿 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵賮爻讴蹖 (丿賵乇丕賳 丨亘爻 丿乇 爻蹖亘乇蹖) 賴賲 亘賴 禺賵亘蹖 丌賲蹖禺鬲賴 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲. 丕蹖丿賴 賴丕蹖 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 亘爻蹖丕乇 亘丿蹖毓 賵 賯丕亘賱 鬲丕賲賱賳丿. 賲孬賱丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 趩乇丕 夭賳丿丕賳蹖 賴丕 亘丕 賴賲 丿毓賵丕 賲蹖讴賳賳丿貙 趩乇丕 丕夭 賴賲 丿夭丿蹖 賲蹖讴賳賳丿貙 賲孬賱丕 丕蹖賳讴賴 賮乇賯 賴賲亘爻鬲诏蹖 夭賳丿丕賳蹖賴丕 亘丕 丕賮乇丕丿 丌夭丕丿 丿乇 趩蹖爻鬲貙 賮乇賯 讴丕乇 禺賵丿丕賳诏蹖禺鬲賴 賵 讴丕乇 丕噩亘丕乇蹖 丿乇 趩蹖爻鬲貙 蹖丕 趩乇丕 亘丕蹖丿 賯丕鬲賱蹖賳 賲禺鬲賱賮 (賯丕鬲賱 讴賵丿讴貙 夭賳貙 賲鬲噩丕賵夭貙 丿夭丿 賵...) 亘丿賵賳 鬲賵噩賴 亘賴 賲丕賴蹖鬲 賲賯鬲賵賱 蹖讴爻丕賳 賲噩丕夭丕鬲 卮賵賳丿貙 賵 蹖丕 賲賮丕賴蹖賲蹖 賲孬賱 丕賳鬲賯丕賲貙 丕鬲賴丕賲貙 賲噩乇賲貙 賳丕賲 賮乇賵卮蹖貙 賳丕賲 诏匕丕乇蹖貙 禺賵丿讴卮蹖 賵 丿蹖诏乇讴卮蹖 賵 亘爻蹖丕乇蹖 賳讴丕鬲 賯丕亘賱 鬲賵噩賴 丿蹖诏乇 讴賴 賴賲賴 丿乇 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 丕賲賵丕鬲 胤乇丨 賲蹖卮賵賳丿. 丕氐賱丕 鬲丕 亘賴 丨丕賱 倬乇爻蹖丿賴 丕蹖丿 趩乇丕 禺丕胤乇丕鬲 禺丕賳賴 芦丕賲賵丕鬲禄責
賴賲賴 丕蹖賳 賲爻丕卅賱 讴鬲丕亘 丨丕囟乇 乇丕 噩匕丕亘 賲蹖讴賳丿貙 丕賲丕 賯賱賲 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵賮爻讴蹖 賵 胤乇丨 丿丕爻鬲丕賳 丌賳 噩匕丕亘蹖鬲蹖 乇丕 讴賴 丕賳鬲馗丕乇 丿丕乇蹖丿 亘乇丌賵乇丿賴 賳賲蹖讴賳丿. 亘乇 禺賱丕賮 丕亘賱賴 賵 噩賳丕蹖鬲 賵 賲讴丕賮丕鬲貙 胤乇丨 丿丕爻鬲丕賳蹖 丕孬乇 亘丕乇 噩匕丕亘蹖鬲 乇丕 亘賴 丿賵卮 賳賲蹖讴卮丿. 亘乇 禺賱丕賮 噩賳 夭丿诏丕賳 賵 亘乇丕乇丿丕賳 讴丕乇丕賲丕夭賵賮 賴賲 丿蹖丕賱賵诏賴丕 丿乇禺卮卮 賴丕蹖 噩亘乇丕賳 讴賳賳丿賴 丕蹖 賳丿丕乇丿. 亘乇 禺賱丕賮 賴乇 趩賴丕乇 丕孬乇 賲匕讴賵乇貙 卮禺氐蹖鬲 倬乇丿丕夭蹖賴丕 蹖丕 氐蹖賯賱 禺賵乇丿賴 賵 丿乇诏蹖乇讴賳賳丿賴 賳蹖爻鬲 蹖丕 亘賴 丕賳丿丕夭賴 讴丕賮蹖 亘賴 乇賵蹖 禺賵丕賳賳丿賴 诏卮賵丿賴 賳賲蹖卮賵丿. 亘丕蹖丿 倬匕蹖乇賮鬲 讴賴 丿丕爻鬲丕蹖賵賮爻讴蹖 賴賲 亘賴 鬲丿乇蹖噩 賳賵蹖爻賳丿賴 鬲乇 卮丿賴 丕爻鬲 賵 丌孬丕乇 賲鬲丕禺乇 丕賵 亘賴 賵囟賵丨 丕夭 丌孬丕乇 丕賵賱蹖賴 丕卮 毓賲蹖賯鬲乇 賵 噩匕丕亘鬲乇賳丿
噩丿丕 丕夭 丕蹖賳貙 鬲乇噩賲賴 讴鬲丕亘 亘爻蹖丕乇 囟毓蹖賮 亘賵丿. 鬲乇噩賲賴 賲賴乇丿丕丿 賲賴乇蹖賳 乇丕 賳禺賵丕賳蹖丿- 鬲乇噩賲賴 丕蹖 讴賴 亘噩丕蹖 賲噩乇賲 丕夭 賲賯氐乇貙 亘噩丕蹖 賳诏賴亘丕賳 丕夭 賲爻鬲丨賮馗 賵 亘噩丕蹖 賴乇 丨乇賮 乇亘胤蹖 丕夭 賲毓 匕賱讴 丕爻鬲賮丕丿賴 賲蹖讴賳丿! 賴賲趩賳蹖賳 賳爻禺賴 讴鬲丕亘 氐賵鬲蹖 丌賵丕蹖 亘賵賮 賴賲 亘爻蹖丕乇 賳丕丕賲蹖丿讴賳賳丿賴 賵 丨賵氐賱賴-爻乇亘乇 亘賵丿. 亘丕卮丿 讴賴 鬲噩乇亘賴 卮賲丕 丕夭 鬲乇噩賲賴 丿蹖诏乇 丕蹖賳 丕孬乇 鬲噩乇亘賴 亘賴鬲乇蹖 丕夭 賲賳 亘丕卮丿! 乇
November 7, 2015
賱胤丕賱賲丕 賰丕賳 丕賱兀丿賷亘 丕賱兀毓馗賲 賴賵 丕賱賯丕丿乇 毓賱賶 丕賱鬲毓亘賷乇 毓賳 賳賮爻賴 賯亘賱 兀賷 卮卅貙 賲賳 賷賯丿乇 毓賱賶 鬲乇噩賲丞 丿賵丕禺賱 賳賮爻賴 賵鬲賯丿賷賲賴丕 亘氐賵乇丞 賲丨亘亘丞貙 賮丕賱睾丕賱亘 兀賳賴 賷鬲賲賰賳 賲賳 賯賱亘賰 賰賱 丕賱鬲賲賰賳貙 賵鬲乇賶 賮賷賴 毓馗賲丞 兀丿亘賷丞 賲噩爻丿丞貙 賵賮賷 賴匕丕 丕賱賲囟賲丕乇 賱丕 賷鬲賮賵賯 兀丨丿 毓賱賶 丕賱毓馗賷賲 丿爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷貙 賵丕賱匕賷 賱賷爻 賲賳 丕賱賲噩丨賮 毓賱賶 丕賱丕胤賱丕賯 兀賳 賷毓鬲亘乇賴 丕賱賰孬賷乇賷賳 兀毓馗賲 乇賵丕卅賷 賮賷 鬲丕乇賷禺 賮賳 丕賱乇賵丕賷丞 丕賱胤賵賷賱. 賵賱胤丕賱賲丕 賳噩丨 賴匕丕 丕賱毓賲賱丕賯 賮賷 丕賱鬲毓亘賷乇 毓賳 賳賮爻賴 賵丕賱丨丕賱丕鬲 丕賱毓丿賷丿丞 丕賱鬲賷 賯丿賲賴丕 賱賳丕 賰鬲噩丕乇亘 廿賳爻丕賳賷丞 賲爻噩賱丞 貙 賮賱丕 賳賳爻賶 賰鬲丕亘鬲賴 賱乇丕卅毓鬲賴(丕賱賲賯丕賲乇) 賵賰丕賳 丨賷賳賴丕 賲丿賲賳 賯賲丕乇貙 賵賳噩丨 賮賷 丕賱鬲毓亘賷乇 毓賳 丨丕賱鬲賴 亘氐賵乇丞 賲毓噩夭丞 鬲噩毓賱 乇賵丕賷鬲賴 鬲賱賰 賲賳 兀噩賲賱 賲丕 賰購鬲亘 毓賳 賴匕丕 丕賱賵亘丕亍貙 賵賱丕 賳賳爻賶 兀毓馗賲 賰鬲丕亘丕鬲賴 毓賱賶 丕賱丕胤賱丕賯 (丕賱兀禺賵丞 賰乇丕賲丕夭賵賮) 賵丕賱鬲賷 賯賷賱 毓賳賴丕 賮賷賲丕 賯賷賱 兀賳賴丕 賲賯鬲亘爻丞 毓賳 丨賷丕鬲賴 丕賱卮禺氐賷丞 賳賮爻賴丕 賮賷賲丕 賷鬲毓賱賯 亘賵氐賮 丕賱賵丕賱丿貙 賵賴丕賳丨賳 賴賳丕 兀賲丕賲 丨丕賱丞 賱丕 賷賯丕乇賳賴丕 丨丕賱丞貙 賵賴賵 鬲爻噩賷賱 丨賷 賱爻噩賷賳 兀孬賳丕亍 賮鬲乇丞 爻噩賳賴貙 賵丕賱爻噩賷賳 賴賵 丿爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賳賮爻賴 賱賷賯丿賲 賱賳丕 鬲噩乇亘丞 廿賳爻丕賳賷丞 賮乇賷丿丞 賵乇賮賷毓丞 丕賱胤乇丕夭.
丕賱賯乇丕亍丞 賱丿爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 毓賲賱 賲毓賯丿 賮毓賱丕貙 賮兀賳鬲 兀賲丕賲 毓賯賱賷丞 禺丕賱丿丞 亘賰賱 賲毓賳賶 丕賱賰賱賲丞貙 毓賯賱賷丞 鬲鬲噩丕賵夭 卮賰賱賷丕鬲 丕禺鬲賱丕賮 丕賱夭賲丕賳 賵丕賱賲賰丕賳貙 賱鬲賰賵賳 賰鬲丕亘丕鬲賴 賲賳 鬲賱賰 丕賱賳賵毓賷丞 丕賱氐丕賱丨丞 賱賱丕爻鬲禺丿丕賲 賮賷 兀賷 賵賯鬲 賵兀賷 賲噩鬲賲毓 貙 毓賯賱賷丞 鬲乇賴賯賰 賵 鬲噩匕亘賰 賱毓丕賱賲賴丕 丕賱爻丨乇賷 丕賱禺丕氐 賱鬲禺賵囟 睾賲丕乇 鬲噩乇亘丞 丕賱賯乇丕亍丞 賱賴丕 賰兀賳賰 賮賷 賲睾丕賲乇丞 丨賯賷賯賷丞貙 鬲爻鬲賰卮賮 禺賱丕賱賴丕 噩賵丕賳亘 噩丿賷丿丞 毓賱賷賰 賮賷 賮賴賲 丕賱毓賯賱 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷 亘賰賱 鬲毓賯賷丿丕鬲賴 賵丕賱丨賷丕丞 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳賷丞 亘賰賱 賲乇丕丨賱賴丕.
賲賳 爻賵亍 丨馗賷 兀賳賷 賯乇兀鬲 賴匕丕 丕賱毓賲賱 賵兀賳丕 賮賷 丕賱噩賷卮貙 賱兀賳賷 丕賳丿賲噩鬲 賮賷賴 賵毓噩夭鬲 毓賳 鬲乇賰賴 賵兀賳丕 兀毓乇賮 賰賲 丕賱賲禺丕賵賮 丕賱鬲賷 爻賷賮噩乇賴丕 亘丿丕禺賱賷貙 賮賴賷 匕賰乇賷丕鬲 爻噩賷賳貙 賵賵賱賰賳 乇睾賲 毓賳賰 鬲賮賰乇 賮賷賴丕 兀賳賴丕 匕賰乇賷丕鬲 賱賰賱 卮禺氐 丕購囟胤乇廿賱賶 丕賱廿賱鬲夭丕賲 亘卮卅 賲丕 兀賵 亘賲賰丕賳 賲丕 賵毓噩夭 毓賳 鬲乇賰賴.
亘亘爻丕胤丞 : 丕賱毓賲賱 毓亘丕乇丞 毓賳 匕賰乇賷丕鬲 爻噩賷賳 賵 亘賯賱賷賱 賲賳 丕賱鬲噩丕賵夭 賳賯丿乇 丕賱賯賵賱 毓賱賶 兀賳 賴匕丕 丕賱毓賲賱 賲賳 兀賮囟賱 賲丕 賰購鬲亘 賮賷 兀丿亘 丕賱爻噩賵賳 毓賱賶 丕賱廿胤賱丕賯貙 賮賰丕鬲亘賴 丕爻鬲胤丕毓 兀賳 賷乇賾賵囟 禺賱丕賷丕 賲禺賴 丕賱噩亘丕乇丞 賱賷賳鬲噩 賱賳丕 爻胤賵乇 賲賳 賳賵乇貙 爻胤賵乇 鬲氐賱丨 賱賱鬲毓亘賷乇 毓賳 賰賱 亘卮乇賷 賵賯毓 賮賷 囟賷賯丞貙 賵丕爻鬲胤丕毓 兀賳 賷鬲乇噩賲 丨乇賵賮 賰賱賲丕鬲賴 廿賱賶 賲乇丕賷丕 賵丕囟丨丞 賰賱 丕賱賵囟賵丨 賱鬲賰卮賮 賱賳丕 毓賳 毓卮乇丕鬲 丕賱卮禺氐賷丕鬲 丕賱亘卮乇賷丞 賵賷賯丿賲賴丕 賱賳丕 亘亘賷丕賳 賱丕 賲孬賷賱 賱賴 .
賲賳 禺賱丕賱 鬲賯丿賷賲賴 賱鬲噩乇亘鬲賴 丕賱乇賵丕卅賷賴 丕爻鬲胤丕毓 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 兀賳 賷賯丿賲 鬲丨賱賷賱 賮乇賷丿 賱賱廿賳爻丕賳 賵丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 亘亘乇丕毓丞 賷購丨爻丿 毓賱賷賴丕 貙 賮賴賵 賷乇賶 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 毓賱賶 丨賯賷賯鬲賴 亘賱丕 兀賷 丕鬲賴丕賲 賲噩丨賮 賱賴 賵賱丕 兀賷 賰乇丕賴賷丞 貙 賮丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 賷亘賯賶 廿賳爻丕賳 賵賲賳 賵噩賴丞 賳馗乇賴 賮賴賵 廿賳爻丕賳 賯丕丿乇 毓賱賶 兀賳 賷鬲毓賵丿 賰賱 卮卅貙 賵兀賳 賴匕丕 兀賮囟賱 鬲毓乇賷賮 賷賲賰賳 兀賳 賷毓乇賮 亘賴 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳,
賵毓賳丿 丕賱丨丿賷孬 毓賱賶 丕賱毓賱丕賯丞 亘賷賳 丕賱賲噩乇賲 賵丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 賷亘丿毓 丿爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 賮賷 鬲賵氐賷賮賴 賮賷賵噩夭 賯丕卅賱賸丕: 廿賳 丕賱賲噩乇賲 丕賱匕賷 鬲賲乇丿 毓賱賶 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 賷賰乇賴 丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 賵賷毓丿 賳賮爻賴 丿丕卅賲賸丕 毓賱賶 丨賯 貙 賮丕賱賲噩鬲賲毓 賴賵 丕賱賲禺胤卅 賮賷 賳馗乇賴 貙 兀賲丕 賴賵 賮賱賷爻 亘賲禺胤卅貙 孬賲 廿賳賴 毓賵賯亘 賱匕賱賰 賷乇賶 兀賳賴 兀氐亘丨 亘乇賷卅賸丕貙 丿毓賰 賲賳 丕禺鬲賱丕賮 丌乇丕亍 丕賱賳丕爻 亘毓囟賴賲 賲毓 亘毓囟 賮賷 卮兀賳 丕賱噩乇賷賲丞貙 廿賳 賴賳丕賰 噩乇丕卅賲 賷毓鬲乇賮 賰賱 廿賳爻丕賳 賮賷 賰賱 賲賰丕賳 賵夭賲丕賳 賵鬲毓鬲乇賮 噩賲賷毓 丕賱賯賵丕賳賷賳 賵丕賱兀賳馗賲丞 賵丕賱卮乇丕卅毓 亘兀賳賴丕 噩乇丕卅賲 賱丕 噩丿丕賱 賮賷賴丕 賵亘兀賳賴丕 爻鬲馗賱 鬲毓丿 噩乇丕卅賲 賲丕 馗賱 丕賱廿賳爻丕賳 廿賳爻丕賳丕.
賵毓賳丿賲丕 賷鬲胤乇賯 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 廿賱賶 鬲賵氐賷賮賴 丕賱毓丕賲 賱丨丕賱丕鬲 丕賱爻噩賷賳 賵賰賷賮賷丞 鬲丨胤賷賲 廿乇丕丿鬲賴 賮廿賳賴 賷乇賶 亘兀賳 廿匕丕 兀購乇賷丿 鬲丨胤賷賲 廿賳爻丕賳 賲丕 鬲丨胤賷賲丕 賵賲毓丕賯亘鬲賴 賲毓丕賯亘丞 賯丕爻賷丞 乇賴賷亘賴 賵爻丨賯賴 爻丨賯賸丕 賷乇鬲毓卮 廿夭丕亍賴 兀卮丿 丕賱爻賮丕賰賷賳 毓鬲賵賸丕 賵兀賰孬乇賴賲 囟乇丕賵丞 貙 廿禺丕賮鬲賴 賲賳 賴匕賴 丕賱毓賯賵亘丞 禺賵賮賸丕 乇賴賷亘賸丕 賯亘賱 廿賳夭丕賱賴丕 賮賷賴貙 兀賳 賷購賮乇囟 毓賱賷賴 丕賱賯賷丕賲 亘毓賲賱 賱賷爻 賱賴 兀賷 賮丕卅丿丞 丕賱亘鬲賴貙 賰丨賮乇 丨賮乇丞 賲丕 賵乇丿賲賴丕 賲乇丞 兀禺乇賶 賵賲丕 廿賱賶 匕賱賰 賲賳 鬲賱賰 丕賱賳賵毓賷丞 賲賳 丕賱兀毓賲丕賱.
丕賱賲賴賲 : 賳丨賳 兀賲丕賲 毓賲賱 賮乇賷丿 賵毓賲賷賯 賰賱 丕賱毓賲賯貙 毓賲賱 鬲囟丕賮乇鬲 賮賷賴 賰賱 賲賯賵賲丕鬲 丕賱毓賲賱 丕賱賳丕噩丨貙 賲賳 鬲噩乇亘丞 丨賷丕鬲賷丞 兀賱賷賲丞 賱鬲賵氐賷賮 賲丿賴卮 賲賳 賯賽亘賱 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 賱鬲賱賰 丕賱鬲噩乇亘丞貙 賱氐丿賯 亘賱賷睾 賷氐賱 賲亘丕卮乇丞 廿賱賶 賯賱亘賰貙 賱卮乇丨 賰丕賮 賵賵丕賮 賱賱卮禺氐賷丕鬲 亘亘乇丕毓丞 賲卮賴賵乇丞 毓賳賴貙 賱鬲賮丕氐賷賱 賲賲鬲毓丞 鬲囟毓賰 賮賷 賯賱亘 丕賱毓丕賱賲 丕賱乇賵丕卅賷 賱賱賰丕鬲亘貙賱廿賱賲丕賲 賰丕賲賱 亘鬲賮丕氐賷賱 亘毓賷賳賴丕 鬲囟賮賷 亘乇賷賯 丌禺乇 賱賱毓賲賱 (賰廿賱賲丕賲 丕賱賰丕鬲亘 亘亘毓囟 鬲賮丕氐賷賱 丕賱丿賷賳 丕賱廿爻賱丕賲賷 賱兀賳賴 賯丕亘賱賴 賲爻丕噩賷賳 賲爻賱賲賷賳 賵賲丿賶 廿毓噩丕亘賴 亘亘毓囟賴賲 賵卮丨乇賴 賱胤乇賷賯丞 丨賷丕鬲賴賲 賯囟丕亍 兀賵賯丕鬲 毓賷丿賴賲 )貙 賰賱 匕賱賰 賲毓 鬲乇噩賲丞 噩賷丿丞 賱賱睾丕賷丞貙 賵賮賷 丕賱賳賴丕賷丞 鬲賰賵賳 兀賲丕賲 乇賵丕賷丞 賮匕丞 鬲賱賷賯 亘丕爻賲 丿爻鬲賵賷賮爻賰賷 丕賱禺丕賱丿.
亘賲噩乇丿 丕賳鬲賴丕卅賰 賲賳 丕賱毓賲賱 爻鬲鬲賮噩乇 亘丿丕禺賱賰 賲卮丕毓乇 丕賱禺賵賮 丕賱賲乇毓亘貙 賮丕賱毓賲賱 賲鬲禺賲 亘賲卮丕毓乇 廿賳爻丕賳賷丞 氐丕丿賯丞 賵賲賱卅 亘亘卮乇 鬲賯丕亘賱賴賲 賮賷 丨賷丕鬲賰 賵鬲毓乇賮 亘賵噩賵丿賴賲貙 丕賱毓賲賱 賷囟毓賰 賮賷 賲賵丕噩賴丞 賲亘丕卮乇丞 賲毓 賲毓鬲乇賰 丕賱丨賷丕丞.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 2,712 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.